[Senate Hearing 107-973] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] S. Hrg. 107-973 THE DETENTION AND TREATMENT OF HAITIAN ASYLUM SEEKERS ======================================================================= HEARING before the SUBCOMMITTEE ON IMMIGRATION of the COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION __________ OCTOBER 1, 2002 __________ Serial No. J-107-107 __________ Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary 88-613 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2003 ____________________________________________________________________________ For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpr.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; (202) 512�091800 Fax: (202) 512�092250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402�090001 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont, Chairman EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah JOSEPH R. BIDEN, Jr., Delaware STROM THURMOND, South Carolina HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JON KYL, Arizona CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York MIKE DeWINE, Ohio RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama MARIA CANTWELL, Washington SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JOHN EDWARDS, North Carolina MITCH McCONNELL, Kentucky Bruce A. Cohen, Majority Chief Counsel and Staff Director Sharon Prost, Minority Chief Counsel Makan Delrahim, Minority Staff Director ------ Subcommittee on Immigration EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts, Chairman DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa MARIA CANTWELL, Washington JON KYL, Arizona JOHN EDWARDS, North Carolina MIKE DeWINE, Ohio Melody Barnes, Majority Chief Counsel Stuart Anderson, Minority Chief Counsel C O N T E N T S ---------- STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Brownback, Hon. Sam, a U.S. Senator from the State of Kansas..... 2 Conyers, Hon. John, Jr., a Representative in Congress from the State of Michigan [ex officio]................................. 7 prepared statement........................................... 27 Kennedy, Hon. Edward M., a U.S. Senator from the State of Massachusetts.................................................. 1 WITNESSES Johnson, Stephen C., Policy Analyst for Latin America, Heritage Foundation, Washington, D.C.................................... 12 Little, Cheryl, Executive Director, Florida Immigrant Advocacy Center, Miami, Florida......................................... 10 Ocean, Marie Jocely, Haitian asylee and former detainee, Miami, Florida........................................................ 8 Parks, Dina Paul, Executive Director, National Coalition for Haitian Rights, New York, New York............................. 13 Wenski, Thomas G., Auxiliary Bishop of Miami, Florida, and Chairman, U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' Committee on Migration, Miami, Florida...................................... 5 SUBMISSIONS FOR THE RECORD American Civil Liberties Union, Lida Rodriguez-Taseff, President, Miami-Dade County Chapter, Miami, Florida, statement........... 22 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Oganizations, Washington, D.C., statement...................... 24 Carey-Shuler, Barbara M., County Commissioner, Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners, Miami, Florida, statement....... 25 Department of Justice, Daniel J. Bryant, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legislative Affairs, Washington, D.C........ 30 Glover, Danny, Miami, Florida, statement......................... 33 Graham, Hon. Bob., a U.S. Senator from the State of Florida, statement...................................................... 35 Johnson, Stephen C., Policy Analyst for Latin America, Heritage Foundation, Washington, D.C., prepared statement............... 38 Kennedy, Hon. Edward M., a U.S. Senator from the State of Massachusetts, and Hon. Sam Brownback, a U.S. Senator from the State of Kansas, joint letter.................................. 45 Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, Anwen Hughes, Staff Attorney, Washington, D.C., statement.................................... 47 Little, Cheryl, Executive Director, Florida Immigrant Advocacy Center, Miami, Florida, prepared statement..................... 59 Miami-Dade County Community Relations Board, Adora Obi Nweze, Chair, Community Relations Board, position statement........... 73 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Brad Brown, President, Miami-Dade Branch of the NAACP, Miami, Florida........................................................ 74 Nelson, Hon. Bill, a U.S. Senator from the State of Florida, statement...................................................... 82 Ocean, Marie Jocelyn, Haitian asylee and former INS detainee, prepared statement............................................. 83 O'Laughlin, Sister Jeanne, OP, President, Barry University, Broward County, Florida, statement............................. 86 Parks, Dina Paul, Executive Director, National Coalition for Haitian Rights, New York, New York, prepared statement......... 87 Ros-Lehtinen, Hon. Ileana, a Representative in Congress from the State of Florida, statement.................................... 99 Russo, Monica, President, SEIU 1199 Florida, AFL-CIO, International Executive Board, Service Employees Interational Union, Florida, statement...................................... 101 United Caribbean African Alliance, Inc., Bernier Lauredan, M.D., Chairman, Washington, D.C., statement.......................... 103 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Guenet Guebre- Christos, Regional Representative, Washington, D.C., statement. 105 United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division........................................ 112 Wenski, Thomas G., Auxiliary Bishop of Miami, Florida, and Chairman, U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' Committee on Migration, Miami, Florida, prepared statement.................. 118 Women's Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Wendy A. Young, Director of Government Relations, New York, New York, statement...................................................... 127 THE DETENTION AND TREATMENT OF HAITIAN ASYLUM SEEKERS ---------- TUESDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2002 U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on Immigration, Committee on the Judiciary, Washington, D.C. The Subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:46 p.m., in room SD-226, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Edward M. Kennedy, Chairman of the Subcommittee, presiding. Present: Senators Kennedy, Brownback, and Representative Conyers [ex officio.] OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. EDWARD M. KENNEDY, A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS Chairman Kennedy. Thank you for your patience. We look forward to our hearing today. Senator Brownback and I had our consultation with the State Department on the number of immigrants and we are disappointed with the administration's decisions in terms of the total numbers, but we are going to work with them to try and see if we can't persuade the administration to respond to the great human tragedy that is being experienced by refugees all over the world and for many who meet the criteria which both the United States and the international community have defined as being the criteria under which they would be welcomed here into the United States. I want to welcome some special guests who are longstanding advocates for Haitian rights. We have representatives here from Massachusetts, Florida, New York, and Connecticut. I thank all of you for your leadership and commitment and your support for the fair treatment of Haitian refugees. Many of us are troubled by the detention policy of the Department of Justice. On December 3, 2001, a refugee boat carrying 187 Haitians ran aground off the coast of Florida. The Coast Guard rescued 167 persons and they were detained and placed in removal proceedings by the Department of Justice. The INS Deputy Commissioner instructed the INS field officers to implement a new parole policy in cases of all Haitians arriving by boat in Florida after December 2001. The instructions stated that no Haitian should be paroled from detention without approval from Washington. One of the express purposes of this new policy is the deterrence of future Haitian arrivals by sea. Last week, in a letter from the Justice Department, they confirmed their change in policy and explained their reasons for the change, that detention was needed to ``prevent against a potential mass migration to the United States.'' A major concern is that such a policy violates well- established international refugee standards which are the basis of U.S. law. As an advisory opinion of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees states, ``[t]he detention of asylum seekers...to deter future arrivals does not fall within any of the exceptional grounds for detention and is contrary to the principle underlying the international refugee protection regime.'' Another major concern is whether this detention policy is discriminatory. It appears to be a policy based on the national origin of the detainee, with no regard for the person's individual record or circumstances. The policy applies only to Haitian asylum seekers. Similarly situated asylum seekers of other nationalities are routinely released. Most of the Haitians in question have demonstrated a credible fear of persecution, have family or community contacts willing to sponsor them, do not pose a flight risk, and would not pose a danger to the community. These factors would normally have resulted in grants or parole from detention and are the same factors currently used to parole other nationals from detention. Yet, the Haitians have been singled out for more restrictive treatment. Such a policy appears to violate U.S. law, which according to a 1995 Supreme Court decision, must be based on individualized parole determinations without regard to race or national origin. Prolonged detention has also interfered with the ability of Haitians to present their asylum claims. Few of the Haitians can afford to retain private counsel, and few legal service providers have the staff and resources to represent all of the detainees. As a result, many Haitians have been forced to appear in immigration courts unrepresented. In some cases, they have relied on INS officers to assist them in completing their asylum applications, a clear conflict of interest. Despite these problems, requests from local legal service organizations for adequate time and access to Haitian detainees has at times been denied. As of last week, only 16 of the 167 detainees from the December 2001 boat have been granted asylum, despite a majority having initially passed the credible fear interview. Fifty of the detainees have been deported and another 54 are awaiting removal. Given the current escalation of violence in Haiti, the life and death implications of improper detention practices and inadequate access to representation are very troubling. The committee invited the Justice Department to testify today. Unfortunately, the Department did not send a representative to participate in this hearing to defend or explain the policy they initiated, implemented, and stand behind. I regret the Department's absence and I look forward to the testimony of our witnesses. Senator Brownback? STATEMENT OF HON. SAM BROWNBACK, A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF KANSAS Senator Brownback. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you for calling the hearing. I too am disappointed in the numbers that are coming out, the refugee resettlement numbers in the United States, and we are going to continue to work together to try to get those numbers up and to get a larger number of refugees into the United States. We need to; it is the right thing for us to do. There are a number of people sitting in very difficult, extraordinarily hostile circumstances in refugee camps around the world and we really need to help these people out. I know we have had difficulties after last September 11. Those are well-known and documented, but it doesn't remove our need to be able to help people that are in the most dire of circumstances. I think it ennobles us as a country, and it also speaks volumes to the rest of the world, when we open our country up to help those in the worst of circumstances. So I am hopeful that we can continue to put some pressure forward to get that refugee population number up. I am eager to hear the testimony by the witnesses here today. It needn't be repeated, but it is always worth repeating that our Nation has a long and noble tradition of being a country or refuge. We are the world's leader in the protection of refugees and asylum seekers, and I am pleased that we are and I want us to continue to be that. No other nation has made the political, financial, or spiritual commitment that this Nation has made to sheltering the persecuted from harm. It is the Book of Jeremiah for guidance that we can read. This is what the Lord says: ``Do what is just and right. Rescue from the hand of the oppressor the one who has been robbed. Do no wrong or violence to the alien.'' Then you can even look in the Book of Matthew: ``For I was hungry and he gave me something to eat. I was thirsty and he gave me something to drink. I was a stranger and you invited me in.'' Our Nation's commitment extends to all refugees, irrespective of their race, nationality, religion, political opinion, or social group. Our obligation is to rescue from the hand of the oppressor, to treat the stranger with kindness and respect, no matter where that person comes from. I appreciate that with respect to Haiti, there are political and administrative considerations that guide the administration's detention policies and have done so with prior administrations. However, the detention of Haitian asylum seekers is neither a new topic nor an unfamiliar controversy. To the contrary, it appears to be a chronic concern that crosses administrations. Mr. Chairman, I look forward to the testimony of our witnesses and welcome their insights. I appreciate the passion and compassion that they will bring to the issue. I hope that with their help, we can bring the NGO community and the administration together to work out a meaningful and lasting solution to the problems that will be detailed before us today, and that there will not be a prejudice based upon one certain group or another or other considerations. We need to consider and treat everybody as equal and the same in regard to refugee policy and asylum seekers seeking asylum or refuge in the United States. Mr. Chairman, as the administration is not here to testify today, I would like to submit for the record a document that represents the administration's position. The correspondence is from the Assistant Attorney General, Daniel Bryant. It is dated September 25 and it is chronicling the development of the current policy toward Haitian asylum seekers. With that, Mr. Chairman, I look forward to the testimony we are going to hear today, and I do hope we can start to move forward toward some resolution of this chronic problem. Chairman Kennedy. Thank you very much. We will include in the record. I would like to have our panel come up. Bishop Thomas Wenski is the Auxiliary Bishop of Miami, Florida, and Chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' Committee on Migration. He is also Director of Catholic Charities for the Archdiocese of Miami. For more than 20 years, Bishop Wenski has been an eloquent and powerful voice for refugees fleeing persecution. Bishop Wenski speaks Creole and is especially well-known both in the United States and Haiti as a defender of the rights of Haitians, and I am honored to welcome him and look forward to his testimony. I would also like to welcome Marie Ocean, who is a Haitian asylee and a former INS detainee at the Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center. Marie Ocean fled her native Haiti after he father and brother were already assassinated by political opponents and she feared for her life. She is one of the original December 2001 boat refugees. Ms. Ocean, I would like to thank you very much for being here. I know it took a lot of courage to share your story with us. I also want to thank Gepsie Metellus, who will be translating for you. Cheryl Little is the Executive Director of the Florida Immigrant Advocacy Center in Miami. Ms. Little co-founded the Florida Immigrant Advocacy Center that provides free legal help to immigrants of all nationalities. FIAC serves the most vulnerable immigrants, including asylum seekers, the homeless, and victims of domestic violence. Ms. Little is a nationally recognized, tireless advocate deeply committed to safeguarding the rights of asylum seekers and refugees. I look forward to her testimony. I would like to welcome Stephen Johnson, a former State Department officer who has worked in the Bureau of Inter- American Affairs and Public Affairs. He is a currently the Latin American policy analyst at the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies at the Heritage Foundation. During his time at the State Department, Mr. Johnson was a writer and researcher, serving as the Director of the Central American Staff Working Group, and later as the Chief of the Editorial Division in the Public Affairs Bureau. We welcome him and thank him for testifying. I look forward to your views. Dina Paul Parks is the Executive Director of the National Coalition for Haitian Rights, in New York City. She helps to develop policy and recommendations on immigration, human rights, and Haitian American community development. NCHR was established in 1982 in response to the waves of refugees fleeing the oppressive Duvalier regime. For over 20 years, the NCHR has promoted human rights and democracy in Haiti, while advocating for fair treatment and policies for Haitian refugees. I am pleased that she will be testifying today. We will hear from Bishop Wenski. STATEMENT OF THOMAS G. WENSKI, AUXILIARY BISHOP OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AND CHAIRMAN, UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS' COMMITTEE ON MIGRATION, MIAMI, FLORIDA Bishop Wenski. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for inviting me to testify today. First, I would like to thank you and your subcommittee for holding this hearing today. I thank you for your longstanding commitment to immigrants and refugees in this Nation. I would also like to thank Senator Brownback for his support of fair access for asylum seekers seeking protection in the United States. Senator Brownback also took time out of his busy schedule to visit with the United States Catholic Conference of Bishops' Committee on Migration several weeks ago. At that time, Senator Brownback spoke of his concern at the treatment accorded Korean asylum seekers in China. I think today's proceedings might point out some unfortunate parallels between the way China treats North Korean asylum seekers and our own policy toward asylum seekers from Haiti. Before being ordained a bishop, I worked as a parish priest among the Haitian population in South Florida for almost 20 years. During that time, my pastoral duties included visiting Haitians detained at the INS Krome processing center. The present policy, which holds a group of 160 Haitian nationals in indefinite detention since December of last year, recalls the ill-fated detention policies of the early 1980's when thousands of Haitians were held in detention at Krome and in other places for more than a year, until the Federal courts forced the INS to release them. At that time, USCCB's Migration and Refugees Services assisted the Government in helping these detainees reunite with family members in the United States, seek legal advice and counsel, and to comply with periodic reporting to INS while their applications for asylum were being processed. In my work with Haitians in South Florida, I have found them to be hard-working, honest, and God-fearing members of our communities. They have been a positive influence in South Florida and elsewhere. In recent years, Haitian Americans have distinguished themselves in all areas of our community's life, and indeed today several are elected public officials. In other words, whatever fears there might have been that led to the early policies of the 1980's have not been realized. They were unfounded. So one must ask why do we return now to a policy that is unfair and unjust? The present policy is unfair because it singles out Haitians for disparate treatment. Other groups of asylum seekers similarly situated who arrive on the shores of South Florida are not subjected to indefinite detention. Except for a few cases, nearly all Haitians arriving by sea to Miami have been detained, while more than 90 percent of other nationalities arriving the same way during the same period have been released while their claims are adjudicated. The present policy is unjust, for the indefinite detention of asylum seekers erodes refugee rights provided for under international law. In my written statement I submitted to the committee, the appropriate references to international laws are cited. As we have done since the mid-1970's, the United States Bishops call for an end to a policy that unfairly and unjustly discriminates against Haitian asylum seekers. Once again, we call for a reexamination of current interdiction policies. Haitians stopped on the high seas or in airports must not be denied the opportunity to request asylum and to be heard fairly. Once again, we call for the reversal of the current policy of indefinite detention of Haitian asylum seekers. Those already found to have met credible fear criteria should be immediately released and afforded a reasonable time to secure counsel and to petition for asylum. Once again, we offer our assistance to INS in helping to resettle asylum seekers from Haiti while their cases go forward. In the early 1980's when we collaborated with INS in facilitating the release of Haitians, we helped them to report their whereabouts to INS and to appear at their hearings. They did not abscond, they did not pose a flight risk. USCCB's MRS has long collaborated with INS and ORR in helping Haitian and Cuban entrants process through Krome for over 20 years. This offers a way that builds upon the successes of the past, that serves the interests of justice, and provides a cost-effective alternative to indefinite detention. I remember how 1 day in the early 1980's officials from INS in Miami contacted me at my church. They requested that I accompany them to the home of a woman in Fort Lauderdale. Her son was detained in Krome for several months after arriving from Haiti after a harrowing voyage in a rickety boat. Fearing for his life if forcibly deported to Haiti and despairing of ever leaving the monotony of a then seriously overcrowded facility, he committed suicide in Krome. The INS officials asked me to interpret for them as they presented their condolences to his mother. Today, whether in Krome where the men are held or the TGK correctional facilities, the county jail where the women are held, the present revival of the old and cruel policy of indefinite detention has recreated those same conditions that breed fear and despair, and portend further tragedy. Mr. Chairman, this is not worthy of the United States of America. [The prepared statement of Bishop Wenski appears as a submission for the record.] Chairman Kennedy. Thank you very much, Bishop. We are joined by Congressman Conyers, who has been a great leader nationally on this issue. Certainly, if he had a word to say, we would welcome it, and we would invite him, as well, if he had the time, to listen to the rest of our witnesses as someone who cares very deeply about this issue. We always welcome our colleagues from the other side, and more particularly welcome a friend. STATEMENT OF HON. JOHN CONYERS, JR., A REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS FROM THE STATE OF MICHIGAN Representative Conyers. Mr. Chairman, I am honored, first of all, to sit with you anywhere, but in the U.S. Senate it is even better, and at a committee that you are chairing is even better yet. So please know that I am happy to be with you. I would be happy wherever I was sitting, especially with the witnesses that you have on this panel. Cheryl Little and Marie Ocean and, our friend, Ms. Parks have all done incredible work on this subject. It is a labor of love, and I am very privileged to join with you, Bishop Wenski, in merely discussing this subject for a couple of minutes. I am going to put my statement in the record, and so what I would like to do now is just lift up the main problem here, which is that Haitian arrivals into this country, particularly through Florida, seeking asylum are treated differently from everybody else that comes to the United States--everybody. There is a policy of, number one, turning them away right on the spot, no questions asked. They turn the boats around. You may say, do they need food or nourishment, or are they sick, or is their little raft capable of going back? They turn it around. That is it, no questions asked. That is in violation, of course, of our immigration laws, but it more seriously contravenes any spirit of the treatment that human beings should be afforded anywhere in the world, much less coming to the shores of the United States. The other point is about Krome itself, which is a nightmare. I was talking to the acting superintendent there. Here are some of the problems encountered during this visit. [The information referred to appears as a submission for the record.] Representative Conyers. The discriminatory process of the Immigration and Naturalization Service has to end, and I sure hope that they are scheduled to come before you today or sometime soon. I would sure like to hear their statements under oath about some of the things that are going on there. The separation of mothers from their children is disgraceful. Then the final point that occurs to me is the way the lawyers representing Haitian asylum seekers are treated in the INS courts. It is shabby, it is disrespectful, and it is not in keeping with any sense of fairness that we try to operate our system of laws with. So I am delighted and congratulate you, Mr. Chairman, for holding these hearings and I am very pleased to see all of these witnesses with us. Thank you. [The prepared statement of Mr. Conyers appears as a submission for the record.] Chairman Kennedy. Thank you very much. We might join and ask the American Bar Association to do a study about how the attorneys are treated and give a report back to us. Representative Conyers. I would like to join you in such a request. Chairman Kennedy. We might join with Senator Brownback and others and see if it might make some sense. Marie Ocean, we thank you for being here. We thank you for coming and we know it is not easy to talk about the struggles in one's life as you have had, and so we are very grateful to you for telling us your story. By telling us your story, we will try and make sure it doesn't happen to other people. STATEMENT OF MARIE JOCELYN OCEAN, HAITIAN ASYLEE AND FORMER DETAINEE, MIAMI, FLORIDA Ms. Ocean. [speaking through an interpreter.] Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Good afternoon, Mr. Chair. My name is Marie Jocelyn Ocean. I am from Haiti and I am here because of my difficulties, my problems, with Lavalas. I suffered quite a few shocks, I suffered several shocks as a result of Lavalas. They killed a brother of mine. They beat up one of my brother's children. Fifteen days after my brother's funeral, my father was killed. Subsequent to that, another brother of mine was beaten and abused and suffered a stab wound right above his eyebrow. They came after me subsequently, but I ran. Because they did not find me, they beat up on my 9-year-old girl. This year, she is 10 years old. And these are the reasons that I fled the country by boat--I along with the many other women who are still detained for the same reasons. I am not alone to have suffered this problem. My problem is also the problem of the other women who are still detained. We were detained by the Immigration and Nationalization Service on December 3. I was taken to jail, I along with the other women detainees. I was held in a motel that served like a jail along with other women and we were not treated well at all. We were in a room. Essentially, it had no windows and we were not able to see the outside at all. We could not breathe. The only opportunity to enjoy the outdoors was on our trips to the court. And there was also a 7-year-old youngster also locked up with us. A 7-year-old should not be detained in such circumstances. I was summoned by an official at the jail, supposedly because I was going to court, and I found myself being transferred to another facility, a jail, TGK. Upon my arrival at TGK, I was strip-searched. I along with the other women were equally strip-searched, and this process of being strip- searched was absolutely humiliating and we were handcuffed and escorted into the jail. At the jail, one of the experiences was the evening check- ups when the guards would come around to check the cells and to make sure that all the detainees were in place. The locking of the doors, the banging on the jail doors, and the flashlights was absolutely traumatizing. The flashlights interrupting our sleep that way was traumatizing and that made us even more fearful, and that contributed to taking us back to the experience we had in Haiti. And certainly we were taken before a judge, but not being able to speak English, not understanding the process, the procedures, we were helpless. Among the other women detainees, I was the only fortunate one to have been benefited from the legal assistance of a FIAC attorney, and this attorney accompanied me and represented me before the immigration judge at TGK. On May 31, 2002, I went before the judge and I was granted asylum in the United States. I was very happy to receive asylum, but I was still troubled. I was troubled for the other women detainees because we were in the same boat together, so to speak, because when we were all captured we did not know where we would end up. They were moved from one detention facility to another, and I think that these women should not have been detained in that manner. And all of the other nationals who subsequently requested asylum were released, while the Haitians were kept and were denied every time. All of us have the same blood flowing through our veins and we are all God's children; we are children of the same God. We thought that coming before Americans, coming before America with the problems we endured, with the troubles we had to experience, and that if we came with our troubles before America, America would consider this treatment we experienced, as well as the torture we experienced. Unfortunately, this was not the outcome that we anticipated or expected. We were treated worse than common criminals because the facility in which these women are detained is a jail facility for criminals. They will have been there 10 months now. They should not have been there for such a long time because they are not criminals. They did not kill anyone. I acknowledge that we arrived illegally, but we are not to be blamed because conditions in our country forced us to flee. According to the laws of this country, while it is true that we arrived illegally and we could have been detained to be punished for breaking those laws, we should not been punished or detained for such a long time. We were absolutely humiliated. We were devaluated as human beings. Certainly, the authorities do not view it that way, but we detainees certainly feel and experience it that way because when an adult cries, certainly there are problems, and he cries because he has problems. Since my arrival in the United States, since my and the other detainees' arrivals, we have not experienced the same difficulties as in Haiti, because the conditions under which I fled Haiti are certainly different from the conditions I live in today. I am no longer afraid for my life. I appear before you today to testify and to appeal to you to help these women detainees because we are all one and the same, because we must hang in there together, put our heads together so that they too can be freed. Thank you very much for the opportunity to appear before you to testify on my behalf as well as on behalf of the other women detainees. [The prepared statement of Ms. Ocean appears as a submission for the record.] Chairman Kennedy. Thank you for that extraordinary story of incredible pain, anguish and misery. No one should have to undergo that kind of treatment here in the United States. It is an absolutely despicable kind of treatment, and we certainly find it as shocking an injustice as you do and we will see what we can do to try to bring that kind of treatment to a halt. It is very powerful testimony and we appreciate very much your willingness to share it with us. Ms. Little? STATEMENT OF CHERYL LITTLE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, FLORIDA IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER, MIAMI, FLORIDA Ms. Little. On behalf of the Florida Immigrant Advocacy Center, I want to thank you, Mr. Chairman, and Senator Brownback for inviting me to testify today. And it is always good to see Congressman Conyers. I saw him, recently in Miami when he was visiting the detention centers there and meeting with many of the Haitians. I want to thank each of you for your leadership in defending immigrants' basic rights. My testimony today is supported by the Women's Commission for Refugee Women and Children. In December 2001, following the December 3 arrival of 167 Haitians who fled Haiti by boat, the Acting Deputy INS Commissioner adopted a secret policy directed solely at Haitians which resulted in the detention of virtually all Haitian asylum seekers in South Florida, regardless of how they arrived in the United States and whether they had demonstrated a credible fear of persecution, which all but two did. While adopting the Haitian policy, the INS continued to routinely release those asylum seekers of other nationalities who had passed their INS credible fear interviews. The INS policy expressly applied to Haitian asylum seekers arriving both by plane and by boat. The effect of the December policy was dramatic and immediate. The released rate for Haitians who had passed their credible fear interviews dropped from 96 percent in November 2001 to 6 percent between December 14, 2001, and March 18, 2002. Even Haitians who had been granted asylum and could no longer be legally detained by INS were not immediately released. As a result of the Haitian policy, the INS refused to release over 240 Haitian asylum seekers, while it continued to release asylum seekers of all other nationalities in the Miami District at an extremely high rate. The Haitian policy represents a radical departure from INS' prior policy, which did not make distinctions based on nationality or race and which expressly permitted the release of asylum seekers of all nationalities who pass their credible fear interviews in the Miami District. For months after the Haitian policy was adopted, INS officials denied the existence of the policy to advocates and community leaders. Only in March 2002 did INS officials finally acknowledge that they had indeed adopted a policy of detaining Haitians. According to Acting INS Commissioner Becraft, the INS adopted the policy because of concerns that there was going to be a mass migration of people arriving by boat from Haiti rivaling that of the Cuban Mariel exodus and the significant number of refugees held at Guantanamo in 1994. Yet the overall number of Haitian interdictions in 2001 simply do not indicate a mass migration, nor do Coast Guard interdiction statistics for 2002. Indeed, only 1,956 Haitians were interdicted at sea by the Coast Guard in 2001. This number is significantly smaller than the 1980 Mariel boatlift, during which 125,000 Cubans arrived in the United States, as well as in 1994, when over 25,000 Haitians and over 37,000 Cubans were detained there. On March 15, 2002, a class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of all the detained Haitians in the Southern District of Florida who arrived on or after December 3 and had passed their credible fear interviews. The district court summarily dismissed the case without an evidentiary hearing, saying it was up to politicians, not the courts, to determine the Haitians' fate. An appeal to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals is pending. After the lawsuit was filed, INS changed its detention policy to permit the release of certain Haitian asylum seekers who arrived at the Miami Airport or other ports of entry. However, the vast majority of Haitians who arrived by boat on December 3 continue to languish in INS detention and suffer irreparable harm as a result. Unlike released asylum seekers of other nationalities, they are forced to prepare for their asylum cases in an expedited, Haitian-only docket and have limited access to counsel. Few agencies are able to provide free legal help to the Haitians and most are unrepresented. Without attorneys, the Haitians are far less likely to win asylum than those with attorneys. A study conducted by Georgetown University in 2000 indicated that asylum seekers in detention are more than twice as likely as those who aren't detained to be without legal representation, and persons with attorneys are four to six times more likely to be granted asylum. Most of the Haitians speak no English and are forced to complete asylum applications in English. Their cases are expedited and those attorneys who have agreed to represent them face multiple barriers in gaining access to their clients. INS itself admitted that it lacks adequate visitation space to meet the needs of attorneys assisting the Haitians. The conditions in the facilities in which Haitians have been detained further compromise their ability to seek asylum. These facilities have been terribly overcrowded, unsanitary, and traumatizing for many. Families have been separated into different detention centers, sometimes thousands of miles apart. From December 2001 through August 2002, the Haitian women were held in a maximum-security county jail and subject to frequent strip-searches, lock-downs, and hourly interruptions of sleep during the night. In June of this year, a Haitian asylum seeker at Krome attempted suicide. In conclusion, FIAC is gravely concerned about the safety of those Haitians already deported and about the likely deportation of 107 of the Haitian asylum seekers who remain in INS custody after 10 months in the United States. Virtually all of the Haitians on board the December 3 boat are from Raboteau, a section of Gonaives which has been the epicenter of recent political violence and unrest in Haiti. Our responsibility to protect persons among us who have fled political persecution should not depend on politics. Haitian asylum seekers come to the United States seeking refuge from persecution. They expect to be treated fairly and equally by the world's leading democracy and defender of human rights. While we certainly understand the need after September 11 to protect our borders, to indefinitely detain Haitian asylum seekers in the Miami District who have committed no crime and treat them differently than any other group is a perplexing waste of precious resources and a waste of U.S. taxpayers' money. To flee from persecution is not a crime; it is a basic human right. It is the Government's responsibility now to treat the Haitian asylum seekers as they treat asylum seekers from other countries. Haitians deserve no less. [The prepared statement of Ms. Little appears as a submission for the record.] Chairman Kennedy. We will include all the statements in the record. Mr. Johnson? STATEMENT OF STEPHEN C. JOHNSON, POLICY ANALYST FOR LATIN AMERICA, HERITAGE FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON, D.C. Mr. Johnson. Mr. Chairman and distinguished members of the subcommittee, I feel honored today by your invitation to allow me to speak to you on the political and economic conditions in Haiti. I do not study immigration or refugee policy, and therefore cannot provide expertise on the immediate issue that you are considering, but welcome the opportunity to address some of the conditions that encourage Haitians to leave their home. I am also keenly aware that many of you have experience on this issue that far pre-dates my own. One could conclude that Haiti has had a history of political turbulence since independence almost 200 years ago, and that has left little space for the development of durable institutions and the idea that government is supposed to serve the people as opposed to the people serving it. Such rule has periodically triggered waves of immigrants and migrants that impact Haiti's close neighbors, the Dominican Republic particularly, which shares the same island, Cuba, the Bahamas, and the United States. These migrations continue today and are likely to continue into the near future as long as Haitians and their leaders fail to agree on a social contract and develop a society that honors the dignity of each individual, the concept of cooperation, and free choice. Haiti is not alone in its problems. In the 1980's, Central Americans fled wars and civil conflicts impacting the United States. Today, families are leaving Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, and Argentina to flee violence or economic disaster. My view is that asylum decisions can only be made fairly when heavy migratory pressures are alleviated, and migration numbers can only be reduced by helping to resolve the problems that trigger flight to begin with in the country of origin. Haiti is a country that has an abundance of democratic thinkers and a wealth of people with entrepreneurial skills who understand the virtues of consensus and compromise. The problem seems to be that the playing field has always been arranged by those who wish to act with an iron fist. Their preoccupation with control has produced a legacy of impunity, corruption, and criminality that belies the inherent goodness of the Haitian people. Political leaders have traditionally fought each other using partisan mobs. Papa Doc Duvalier created an entire army of them called the Tontons Macoutes. Supporters of President Jean Bertrand Aristide's Lavalas Party now carry out attacks in a similar manner against political opponents and journalists using rocks, guns, and machetes, whether he wants them to or not. Human Rights Watch and the U.S. State Department report that the judicial system and police, into which the United States poured nearly $100 million after President Aristide was restored to power in 1994, are essentially dysfunctional. Of the 6,000 police trained when the new Haitian National Police was organized, only about 3,000 remain, and many of them are sympathizers of the Lavalas Party. Haiti has a population of about 7.8 million people. By way of comparison, El Salvador has 6 million people and a civilian police force of 19,000, and that is barely adequate to deal with common crime and drug trafficking. On economic terms, Haiti's gross domestic product fell, on average, 2.5 percent during the last 10 years. That is 2.5 percent every year. Gross domestic product per capita is about $370, according to the Heritage Foundation's Index of Economic Freedom. Eighty percent of the water is contaminated. Half of the adult population is illiterate, 60 percent are out of work. Aside from the millions who eke out a living in subsistence agriculture on environmentally degraded land, only about 30,000 have jobs in industry. As you can see, thousands, if not millions more, are needed. A commitment to good governance would solve a number of Haiti's problems and unlock direct assistance from international donors. But without progress on governance, such aid would be wasted. To help current efforts gain traction, Haiti must look to some kind of international oversight to help establish a safe environment for fair elections to help develop good citizenship and government from the grass roots up and to check authoritarian impulses of any leader who would unfairly interpret his wishes as being those of the people. This is not something that is going to be solved overnight. It is not going to be solved in a matter of weeks, months, years. Most likely, it will be solved in a matter of decades, and U.S. policymakers and lawmakers, I think, need to be prepared for that long challenge. Haiti does deserve our help. We should help Haiti resolve its problems. We need to look at the long term and be realistic about what it will take, but we must also think about the fact that, along with Haiti, there are other countries experiencing conflict in Latin America that present U.S. lawmakers and policymakers with an extremely daunting task, and I respect your initiative and your willingness to take this on. [The prepared statement of Mr. Johnson appears as a submission for the record.] Chairman Kennedy. Thank you very much. Dina Paul Parks? STATEMENT OF DINA PAUL PARKS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL COALITION FOR HAITIAN RIGHTS, NEW YORK, NEW YORK Ms. Parks. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you for the opportunity to be here, and I am particularly honored to address the committee under your leadership, which has been so instrumental in establishing and fighting to uphold this Nation's refugee protection laws. I would also like to acknowledge Senator Brownback for his demonstrated commitment to the plight of the most vulnerable immigrants and refugees, and the Haitian asylum seekers who are the subject of this hearing today, I think, would certainly belong in that category. You have heard from several of our guests here about the basic and most salient facts of this latest INS policy. As you have learned by now, it is the just the latest in a very long history of double-standard treatment for Haitians by the U.S. Government. Unfortunately, the corollary element to this dynamic is the very long, painful tradition of political violence and repression of human rights in Haiti, and it is that that over the next few minutes I will focus on. The latest bout of political violence and gridlock harkens back to the flawed elections of May 2000. Since then, the government and opposition have been locked in a political stalemate in which neither side recognizes the legitimacy of the other, and both sides have also rebuffed serious negotiations, despite the intervention of the OAS in over 20 trips to settle the dispute. Additionally, in June of 2001 President Aristide instituted what was called a zero-tolerance policy. This basically legitimizes the lynching of delinquents or those accused as such and has been used as a pretext for these groups to threaten or harass anyone perceived as a menace to Lavalas. This was taken to the extreme on December 17, 2001, the day of the attack on the national palace, branded as an alleged coup attempt by the Aristide government. Less than 2 hours after this attack, around of Port-au-Prince and in various locations around the country, bands of armed Lavalas supporters, known commonly as popular organizations, occasionally accompanied by elected Lavalas officials, attacked and burned down the homes and offices of opposition party members and supporters, attacked journalists, and began to force the censure of the reporting of these incidents by the independent Haitian media. Beginning in November and throughout December, journalists and human rights defenders were threatened and attacked on a daily basis. One journalist sympathetic to the opposition named Brignol Lindor was lynched and assassinated on December 2 by a crowd who claimed to be getting revenge for an anonymous attack on a Lavalas supporter a few days earlier. Shortly afterward, approximately 30 journalists, particularly those from radio stations who did not auto-censure their broadcasts after the attacks, fled Haiti. In addition, in early 2002 a small number of high-profile judges and social and political activists have continued to flee Haiti as pressure, harassment, and attacks against person, family, and property have continued. A report on the investigation of the December 17 attack by the Inter-American Commission for Human Rights of the OAS issued on July 1 of this year concluded that the attack was not a coup attempt and that the violent mobs had to have had fore- knowledge of what was expected of them in order to retaliate in such a manner. However, as more recent incidents have shown, these armed gangs are loyal to members of various factions of the Lavalas government and not exclusively to one central figure. They are disparate and operate chaotically, vying for power, and some are beginning to lose their privileges. This is seen as a betrayal by the gangs, resulting in increasing verbal and other backlash against the Lavalas movement, which, although fomented this violence, has to some degree lost control of it as it has taken on a life of its own. The U.S. Department of State, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and NCHR have considered Aristide's human rights record in this second term as poor for a democracy. The biggest problems identified include impunity for those claiming to act on behalf or in support of the government, a politicized police force, the lack of independence of the judiciary, and the harassment and persecution of members of the opposition, those journalists who do not self-censure, human rights defenders, and other outspoken critics of the government, its policies, and the armed popular organizations. To run down a few of the recent developments and violations in the past few months, in July a journalist, Israel Jacky Cantave, and his cousin disappeared on the way home from work. They were found beaten and injured several days later by neighbors of the building where they were being held. July through September: student protests against the government for attacking the foundation of the Independent Haitian University and retaliation against those student protestors. The government unilaterally and without warning decided to dismiss the vice chancellor of the university and suspend all student and faculty elections and appoint its own directors. August 2: the jailbreak of Amiot ``Cubain'' Metayer out of a prison in Raboteau, Gonaives, which is a word that you have heard before and we will hear again. Cubain is a former Aristide ally who was arrested for his role in the December 17, 2001, attacks on the opposition. The jailbreak also freed close to 160 other prisoners and these armed gangs continue to roam the streets in Raboteau. September: a week-long gang war in the Cite Soleil slum over a cache of arms resulted in at least 20 dead and 100 wounded. September 19: Haitian National Police shut down the concert of a popular band for playing a song deemed critical of Aristide. ``Revolution'' lists some of the country's ills and says ``Mr. President, I am talking to you...'' Although government officials declared it had not ordered the shut-down, no action has been taken to offer an apology to the band or its organizers, or to sanction the police officers responsible. September 20: The disappearance of a popular pro-Aristide community leader and two associates after being arrested by the police over a traffic dispute with government officials sparked tire-burning and violent protests in the streets of Carrefour Feuilles for several days. Heavily armed gang members demanded the release of Felix Bien-Aime, and heavily armed members of the police retaliated by firing tear gas and bullets into the popular neighborhood. At least one journalist reported being assaulted by the police, while other casualties included one death and several injuries. A week later, there had been several attempts to burn down the police station. September 26: Three popular independent radio stations-- Radio Kiskeya, Radio Caraibes, and Radio Ibo--shut down after receiving serious and credible threats by armed men. Just days later, President Aristide is cited to have said that if the Haitian press continued to repeat what the international press is saying, it is a clear continuation of the damage of the 1991 coup. This type of statement is just what has incited people to act within the guidelines of the zero-tolerance policy. In spite of these recent and ongoing developments, there are a lot of differences between what is happening in Haiti now and what has been behind the mass exodus of the 1970's and 1980's, and it is very important to outline those differences. First, refugees from the 1980's and during the coup d'etat of the early 1990's show that the numbers of refugees identified and interdicted are beyond comparison. From some 24,000 throughout the 1980's to 60,000 in just 3 years in the early 1990's, these figures have dropped to a scant 1,400 since October 2001. During this period, according to its own website, the U.S. Coast Guard reports only one or zero interdictions in the months of October, January, February, June, and August, meaning that even in the months before the INS policy on Haitian refugees was known as such, the Coast Guard picked up no boat people in January or February of 2002, despite the intense turbulence the country experienced in December 2001 following the attack on the national palace and the reprisal attacks on members of the opposition. Again, I would like to remind the committee that these are the Coast Guard's own numbers and they do not support the notion of a mass exodus. The interdictions from 1984 to 1989, and then from 1991 to 1995, far exceed these statistics. However, the reasons for the lack of a larger wave of refugees are not merely to be found in the statistics. With regard to Haiti, there are great distinctions to be made between the political and human rights situations under the Duvaliers, for example, the de facto Cedras regime that overthrew Aristide, and the current administration. Under the previous regimes, the forces of government and repression were strictly regimented and part of a clear, organized, and well-known hierarchy. Under the Duvaliers, they were the military and the macouts, used to balance out each other's power. Under Cedras, the military's power is complemented by both the military group FRAPH and an elaborate system of rural ``chefs de section'' and ``attaches.'' However, under the current administration no such organization or consolidated, centralized power exists. In fact, many human rights organizations, activists, and political observers diagnose chaos and disorder instead. Haiti's 7-year- old police force is politicized and corrupt, with staffing far below the original 5,000 recruits, primarily due to attrition. The country's many armed gangs, the popular organizations, are primarily loyal to the Aristide government, but not necessarily to Aristide himself. They are loyal to other popular or local leaders within Lavalas, such as Senator Dany Toussaint, a former military officer, and Senator Medard Joseph of Gonaives, whose loyal gangs include the Cannibal Army, responsible for August's spectacular jailbreak. Chairman Kennedy. This is a fascinating story because it tells with great authenticity what was happening in the country by relating it to the flow of immigrants. It is very, very powerful because generally the dialogue lacks that kind of sophistication and understanding of these forces. I think it is enormously compelling. We will put it all in the record and I think it is going to be helpful to us as we are trying to get some justice for the Haitian detainees. I think it is going to be very helpful to us in making that case. I would like you maybe just to summarize and I will put it all in the record. You have done a lot of background and study of this. It is an incredible work product. I am very impressed with all of it, but if you could summarize, I want to get some questions in. Ms. Parks. Absolutely. I will summarize by just saying a few words, if I could, about the contributions of Haitian Americans to this country. Despite the treatment that sometimes we receive in this country, our community has produced individuals such as Pierre- Richard Prosper, the U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Issues; Dr. Rose-Marie Toussaint, the first African American woman to head a liver transplant service in the world; Mr. Dumas Simeus, Chairman and CEO of Simeus Food International, the largest black-owned business in Texas and one of the top in the country; Mario Elie, the power guard that helped the Houston Rockets to back-to-back NBA championships in the mid- 1990's. We are doctors, taxi drivers, lawyers, home health aides, journalists, entertainers. And we are elected officials--Marie Ceflau in Massachusetts, Philip Brutus in Florida, Jose Listan, mayor of North Miami. We are even executives, like our own Board Chair, Eddy Bayardelle, First Vice President for Global Philanthropy at Merrill Lynch. We are a people who love our country, but when forced to leave it, we make an extraordinary impact where we land and the community is enriched for it. There is simply no reason that year after year, decade after decade, we always, always, always are treated like second-class citizens. Again, I thank you for the opportunity to address this committee, and I am confident that you and your colleagues will exercise due diligence in addressing our concerns that these Haitian asylum seekers be treated in a fair and humane manner, consistent with U.S. and international law. Thank you. [The prepared statement of Ms. Parks appears as a submission for the record.] Chairman Kennedy. Thank you very much for an excellent history. I was just asking my staff to both listen to you and read your testimony and remember the various fact. We certainly saw in July 2001, the student protests against the government and the suspension of student election; in August, the jailbreaks of an Aristide ally and 160 other prisoners; the September gang wars, 20 dead, 100 wounded; the resignation of two ministers. Then, in December, the boat leaves. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand what is happening at this time. And then to try and force people to go through these hoops is mind-boggling. I think it is fair to go on through these points that you raise and ask whether these were motivating factors or not. I am sure there are other considerations, but it certainly describes a horrific situation. I think putting those numbers from the past about the ebb and flow of the numbers, too, is important for us to understand. That is incredibly important. So I am grateful to you for this. I was interested in the legality of the detention policy. What was your sense about the legality of these detention policies? Would you comment on that? Ms. Little. Yes. We filed a lawsuit on the basis that the detention policy is illegal. Chairman Kennedy. We will include the lawsuit in the file, not the record. Ms. Little. We believe that the policy is illegal for a number of reasons. First of all, the parole provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act call for facially neutral parole decisions to be made. In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court in Jean v. Nelson held that parole decisions must be made without regard to race or national origin, and that decision still stands. Also, U.S. law is based on the 1951 Refugee Convention, and fundamental to that Convention is the principle of refoulement, or non-return, the idea that asylum seekers are not to be persecuted for irregular entry. Certainly, the Haitians that we are speaking of are being punished and penalized by virtue of their indefinite detention because they attempted to come here and pursue asylum claims. We also believe that international law is being violated as a result of this policy. I believe, Senator Kennedy, you referenced the UNHCR advisory opinion. The UNHCR recently said that to detain asylum seekers in order to deter them is a violation of international law. They also said that to detain certain nationalities while releasing other nationalities is a violation of international norms of refugee law. So for a whole lot of reasons, including equal protection provisions of the U.S. Constitution, we believe that this policy is illegal. Senator Brownback. Mr. Chairman, I am going to have to go on, unfortunately, to another meeting, but thank you for holding this hearing. I appreciate the statements of the people on the panel. If you don't mind me making a brief statement here, I think it is very clear what the situation is. This isn't new information. The bishop, I think, articulated it probably best when he said ``this time, and again and again.'' I really hope that maybe we can move past this mistreatment of one group and let's start to get this policy right. I appreciate the articulate statements that each of you put forward. Marie, thank you very much for coming here, in particular, with the difficulty that your family has been through. Hopefully, maybe we can join in a letter or some advocacy together so that we can try to press to get this policy changed so that everybody is treated the same, because this is well-known and well-documented, and it is time to move past it. So I would certainly give my help to do that. Chairman Kennedy. Well, I want to thank Senator Brownback because he certainly will be a very powerful ally in helping us deal with this. I want to thank you very much, Sam, for being here today and for all your support. Finally, a few points. Ms. Little, tell us about the problems that your organization has in getting legal representation. How difficult is it to find pro bono attorneys? Ms. Little. Well, to their credit, the Executive Office of Immigration Review--Steve Lang, who heads their pro bono department, put out a press release trying to get pro bono lawyers to take on some of these cases, but unfortunately it was not successful. As a result, most of these Haitians have no attorneys. Because their cases are being expedited, access to them is paramount. Yet, we have faced numerous problems in trying to help the Haitians. Let me just give you an example of what I mean when I say expedited. Additional immigration judges were detailed from the Miami courtrooms to Krome in order to hear these cases. Some of these cases are scheduled for only an hour, others for half an hour-- that is with translation--versus typically 3 hours in other cases. Judges are holding up to five merits hearings a day with the Haitian cases. Some judges have told us that they simply cannot grant continuances beyond 4 weeks. With other nationalities, that is not a problem. In one week, we had over 165 requests for assistance from the Haitians. Yet, at a time when we need more access than ever, access has been more restricted. For example, at the Krome detention center, we used to have access to our clients virtually any time during the weekends. Not long ago, INS officials told us that we could only visit our clients there between 7 and 11 a.m. This is a serious problem not only for us, but for private attorneys wanting to take on some of these cases. Also, we typically wait for hours at Krome to see our clients because head counts can take hours. After the counts finish, oftentimes we're told they don't have enough escorts to bring the Haitians meet with us. And there is not enough confidential visitation space for attorneys to meet with their clients. At the Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center, where Ms. Ocean was detained for several months, we typically wait up to an hour for an escort. There are constantly changing requirements for attorneys to get permission to go to the TGK unit where the women are being held. We have no access at all to the hotel where Ms. Ocean was originally detained. In fact, the only time I have been there was when Congressman Conyers was in Miami and he visited the facility and brought some of us along. The problems for us are exacerbated by the fact that our clients are in four different facilities. The men are at Krome. The women have been moved from TGK to the Broward County Work Release Center. Women with children are at a local motel, and we also have clients at a facility in Berks County, Pennsylvania. I don't think it is surprising that a number of our Haitian clients are extremely depressed and demoralized. As a result, they are having great difficulty articulating their claims. Many of their asylum applications, which have to be completed in English, consist of one or two sentences. The Haitians have no idea how to go about dealing with the asylum process, which is very complicated even for immigration attorneys. Chairman Kennedy. Bishop Wenski, let me ask you about what is your own experience in providing pastoral guidance to these refugees. What amount are economic refugees and what amount are those that fear asylum? Let's take the ones that you have been working with, I imagine, in different locations. We are interested obviously in the ones that you might have provided counselor services to. Bishop Wenski. I think it is kind of a trick question because usually in this country when the economy goes bad, we hang the politicians. So the economic and political factors are very much interconnected, and I don't know that we can distill somebody that is purely economic and somebody that is purely political without having a mixture of both groups. Chairman Kennedy. Well, I am not sure I agree with you. I think we heard today from Ms. Ocean and that is an extremely powerful case that you will hear for asylum, epecially all that has happened to that family. It didn't have anything to do with economics. Given what we have heard in terms of the political anarchy that has existed, I am not sure I accept that. Bishop Wenski. Well, I would agree with you on the issue of political anarchy. Chairman Kennedy. That is what we are talking about. The point is you are a counselor, to people like Marie, and they are parishioners. People are talking to you in ways that they wouldn't talk to us. I was asking about whether these are real- life stories or whether this is what we will hear from opponents, saying anyone can get six witnesses to go up there and say anything. I listened in the Armed Services Committee about the danger of the Iraqis of dropping weapons of mass destruction, and one my colleagues said, well, Senator Kennedy, you can get six generals to say anything. Well, they just happened to be some of the most important generals that have led American forces. So we are trying to find out what the facts are here, and this is a serious problem and these are serious cases. This isn't the first time I have heard them, but I was giving you an opportunity to say---- Bishop Wenski. Well, in fact, I would say that Marie's case is certainly based on fact. But even INS would say her case is based on fact because almost all of her companions in detention have been found to have a credible fear of persecution. So there is no one that is questioning the credibility of their basis for asylum, which is based on political reasons. The political classes of Haiti have failed their people and that is one of the sad realities that we have here. There is great Haitian proverb that describes it well [Creole saying.] You know, what does the flea care about if the dog is hungry? Basically, we have a failure of the political classes that the people had much hope in much expectation of. And, of course, they are paying for this in increasing misery and violence, and therefore are leaving their country looking for new hope. Chairman Kennedy. I am going to include in the record a number of statements, one from my colleague, Senator Graham, and a number of other leaders in the community, leaders in various organizations. We will include those in the record. [The prepared statement of Senator Graham appears as a submission for the record.] Chairman Kennedy. I want to thank all of our panelists very, very much for coming. It might be said, we have known this for some time. We are going to try and keep after this until we get something done, at least I am, and so we will work with others that feel the same way. I believe that we can and we commit that we will. We thank our colleagues. The subcommittee stands in recess. [Whereupon, at 4 p.m., the subcommittee was adjourned.] [Submissions for the record follow.] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.001 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.002 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.003 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.004 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.005 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.006 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.007 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.008 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.009 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.010 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.011 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.012 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.013 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.014 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.015 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.016 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.031 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.032 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.033 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.034 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.035 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.036 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.037 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.038 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.039 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.040 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.041 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.042 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.043 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.044 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.045 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.046 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.047 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.048 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.049 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.050 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.051 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.017 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.018 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.019 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.020 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.021 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.022 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.023 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.024 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.025 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.026 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.027 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.028 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.029 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.030 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.052 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.053 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.054 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.055 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.056 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.057 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.058 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.059 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.060 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.061 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.062 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.063 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.064 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.065 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.066 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.067 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.068 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.069 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.070 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.071 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.072 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.073 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.074 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.075 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.076 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.077 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.078 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.079 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.080 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.081 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.082 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.083 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.084 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.085 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.086 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.087 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.088 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.089 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.090 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.091 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.092 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.093 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.094 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.095 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.096 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.097 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.098 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.099 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.100 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.101 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.102 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.103 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.104 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.105 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.106 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.107 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.108 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.109 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.110 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.111 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.112 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T8613.113