[Senate Hearing 107-] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] S. Hrg. 107- 951 THE ANNUAL NATIONAL EXPORT STRATEGY REPORT OF THE TRADE PROMOTION COORDINATING COMMITTEE ======================================================================= HEARING before the COMMITTEE ON BANKING,HOUSING,AND URBAN AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON REVIEWING THE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TPCC ON ITS NATIONAL EXPORT STRATEGY AND ITS PLANS FOR THE COMING YEAR __________ MAY 14, 2002 __________ Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 88-412 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2003 ____________________________________________________________________________ For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpr.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; (202) 512�091800 Fax: (202) 512�092250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402�090001 COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland, Chairman CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut PHIL GRAMM, Texas TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama JACK REED, Rhode Island ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado EVAN BAYH, Indiana MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming ZELL MILLER, Georgia CHUCK HAGEL, Nebraska THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware RICK SANTORUM, Pennsylvania DEBBIE STABENOW, Michigan JIM BUNNING, Kentucky JON S. CORZINE, New Jersey MIKE CRAPO, Idaho DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada Steven B. Harris, Staff Director and Chief Counsel Wayne A. Abernathy, Republican Staff Director Martin J. Gruenberg, Senior Counsel Amy F. Dunathan, Republican Senior Professional Staff Michael James Barton, Republican Professional Staff Joseph R. Kolinski, Chief Clerk and Computer Systems Administrator George E. Whittle, Editor (ii) ? C O N T E N T S ---------- TUESDAY, MAY 14, 2002 Page Opening statement of Chairman Sarbanes........................... 1 Opening statements, comments, or prepared statements of: Senator Carper............................................... 2 Senator Akaka................................................ 3 Senator Hagel................................................ 6 WITNESSES Donald L. Evans, Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce.......... 4 Prepared statement........................................... 23 Eduardo Aguirre, Vice Chairman and First Vice President, Export- Import Bank of the United States...................................... 7 Prepared statement........................................... 26 Hector V. Barreto, Administrator, Small Business Administration.. 9 Prepared statement........................................... 29 Thelma J. Askey, Director, U.S. Trade and Development Agency..... 10 Prepared statement........................................... 31 Ross Connelly, Executive Vice President, Overseas Private Investment Corporation.................................................... 12 Prepared statement........................................... 33 Additional Material Supplied for the Record The 2002 National Export Strategy Report submitted by the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee............................... 36 (iii) THE ANNUAL NATIONAL EXPORT STRATEGY REPORT OF THE TRADE PROMOTION COORDINATING COMMITTEE ---------- TUESDAY, MAY 14, 2002 U.S. Senate, Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Washington, DC. The Committee met at 10:35 a.m. in room SD-538 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building, Senator Paul S. Sarbanes (Chairman of the Committee) presiding. OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN PAUL S. SARBANES Chairman Sarbanes. The hearing will come to order. We may be interrupted by a vote shortly. But you are never absolutely sure when those votes are going to take place, so we might as well get started, and if the vote comes, we will have to suspend and resume afterwards. I am very pleased to welcome before the Committee this morning this panel of distinguished representatives of the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee: Secretary of Commerce Donald Evans, who serves as the Chairman of the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee; Eduardo Aguirre, Vice Chairman and First Vice President of the Export-Import Bank, in which capacity he serves as Vice Chairman of the TPCC; Hector Barreto, Administrator of the Small Business Administration; Thelma Askey, Director of the Trade and Development Agency; and Ross Connelly, Executive Vice President of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation. Peter Watson, the President, is in Africa, as I understand. Mr. Connelly. Correct. Chairman Sarbanes. Before we address today's subject, I want to take just a moment to acknowledge someone who was on this panel when the Banking Committee held its last hearing, but is not, regrettably, with us today, and that is John Robson. I had the highest regard and respect for John. I thought he was a very effective Chairman of the Export-Import Bank. He brought great stature, depth of public sector experience, and just plain good judgment to the position. As Chairman of the Export-Import Bank, he also served as Vice Chairman of the TPCC, in which I know he took a very strong interest. Not only the Export-Import Bank and the TPCC, but also, indeed, the Nation, will greatly miss his leadership and his dedicated service. I very much wanted to put that on the record this morning. The purpose of today's hearing is to review the Annual Report of the TPCC on its National Export Strategy and its plans for the coming year. The Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee was established in statute by the Export Enhancement Act of 1992. I should note that before that, actually, we had a trade promotion coordinating committee as an initiative of the first Bush Administration. In fact, the legislation was passed during the Bush Administration. I make that point only to emphasize that this has been a bipartisan effort from its inception. It has commanded strong support on both sides of the aisle and it was also, I think, a reflection of close Executive-Congressional cooperation at the time, and I think that has continued to be reflected as we have worked on this over the last decade. The purpose of the TPCC, as stated in the statute, is to provide a unifying framework to coordinate the export promotion and export financing activities of the U.S. Government, and to develop a Government-wide strategic plan for carrying out Federal export promotion and export financing programs. The statute designates the Secretary of Commerce as the Chairman and designated as members all the Federal agencies involved in export promotion. The effectiveness of the TPCC depends greatly on the leadership it receives from the Chairman and other key members, and let me say that it has been my perception that Secretary Evans and Under Secretary Grant Aldonas have recognized the TPCC from the time they took office as an opportunity to bring a greater sense of strategy and focus to U.S. export promotion efforts, and we very much appreciate that perception on their part and their efforts to energize the TPCC as a priority. And they appear, at least, to have gotten active cooperation and leadership from the other agencies represented on the panel--well, certainly, the ones represented on the panel and, hopefully, others not here represented. As I mentioned, last October, the Banking Committee held a hearing on the preliminary report of the TPCC, in expectation of the Annual Report submitted today. At that time, Secretary Evans indicated that the Committee planned to undertake a benchmarking exercise to learn more about what customers of the agencies want from U.S. export promotion programs, and to examine the best practices of the governments of our major competitor countries to determine how they promote exports. I understood that then they would review U.S. export promotion programs in light of this exercise and develop recommendations for making improvements. As I understand it, that exercise has been completed, or at least a good part of it has, and Secretary Evans and the other members of the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee are here this morning to present their findings and recommendations. So, we very much look forward to your testimony. With that, I yield to Senator Carper. STATEMENT OF SENATOR THOMAS R. CARPER Senator Carper. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And to each of our witnesses, good morning, and welcome. There are three old Governors, who sit right here, side by side--former Governor Evan Bayh, former Governor Zell Miller, and former Governor Tom Carper. And even though we serve in the Senate---- Chairman Sarbanes. It is a powerful bloc. [Laughter.] Secretary Evans. Indeed. [Laughter.] Senator Carper. A lot of frustration over here on this part of the panel. [Laughter.] Not really. One of the things that each of us used to do as Governors is lead trade delegations to countries all over the world. And during the time that I was privileged to be Governor of Delaware, I remember going to places like Japan, Vietnam, Taiwan, Canada, Mexico, Chile, and some other places. I was a shut-in compared to some of the Governors. They really got around the globe to promote their States and trade with other countries. One of the things we focused on within the National Governors Association was the belief that if governors led trade delegations to other parts of the world, if we went over a little better briefed, and our staffs went over a little better briefed, we might not only do maybe some good for our States, but also we might do some more good for the country. I think your predecessor, Mr. Secretary, was good to work with us, and I think the State Department was good to work with the National Governors Association and with the governors. I think that in your testimony here today, Secretary Evans, you indicate that the Department of Commerce plans to dedicate some more resources to training State partners in trade promotion coordinating activities. I applaud that. I know if Senator Bayh and Senator Miller were here today, they would as well. But we help our States and we help our country to the extent that we can continue to work as partners in training and in export promotion. I simply wanted to make that point to remind you that it is important, and to let you know that these old Governors, and I think I speak for my two colleagues as well, appreciate and applaud what you are doing here. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Chairman Sarbanes. Thank you, Senator Carper. Senator Akaka. COMMENTS OF SENATOR DANIEL K. AKAKA Senator Akaka. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I want to join you in welcoming the witnesses. I also thank them for appearing here today. I look forward to your discussion of the Annual National Export Strategy Report of the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee. The work of the TPCC in coordinating and developing Federal activities to increase exports is extremely important to our Nation, and really, the world as well. Increased exports have a positive impact on the economy through the potential creation of jobs, increasing wages, and acceleration of economic growth. Representing a State where small businesses are such a vital part of the economy, I am particularly interested in the efforts being made to provide assistance to small businesses that export their products or have the potential to do so. Mr. Chairman, I look forward to today's discussion on a strategy for U.S. export promotion and export financing programs. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Chairman Sarbanes. Thank you, Senator Akaka. The light has gone off. The vote has begun. Mr. Secretary, I think probably that we should suspend and go and vote and we will come back, and then we will take your testimony. Secretary Evans. Very well. Chairman Sarbanes. So the Committee will stand in recess for a few minutes. [Recess.] Chairman Sarbanes. The Committee is prepared to resume. Mr. Secretary, I have no colleagues here who want to make opening statements, so why don't we go right to you. STATEMENT OF DONALD L. EVANS SECRETARY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Secretary Evans. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I am delighted to be back in front of your Committee. This is one of the subjects we talked about in our very first meetings. I know how important it is to you. I appreciate your focus on it. I also want to associate myself with the remarks you made with respect to John Robson. He was truly an extraordinary public servant. He served this country with great dignity and integrity and he will be missed. His presence was very much felt on this Committee for the period of time that he was on it. And so, again, thank you for those kind words that you offered. Mr. Chairman, and other Members who are not here, as Chairman of the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee, I am extremely pleased to be here today with my colleagues to preview the President's first National Export Strategy. I ask that you include my written testimony in the record. Chairman Sarbanes. It will be included in the record. Secretary Evans. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I intend to focus my oral remarks on three basic points. One, the tool the President needs to pry open markets for American goods, services, investments, and ideas. Two, the means by which we can ensure that the President's export promotion objectives are met. And three, the continuing role I expect the TPCC to play in implementing the President's strategy. President Bush and I both start from the proposition that American farmers, workers, and business already compete in a global economy. The only real question is whether we will give the President the tools that he needs to shape that global economy to our advantage or leave others to write the rules of the road. The President and, by extension, the United States, has been shunted aside in the battle to open new markets because the President lacks the tools he needs to defend our interests at the negotiating table --Trade Promotion Authority. With TPA, the President could conclude trade agreements that might contribute as much as $1.9 trillion to worldwide economic growth. Without TPA, those new markets will go to our trading partners, along with the investments in jobs that those markets will create. The question before the Senate is whether U.S. farmers, workers, and entrepreneurs will get a chance to compete for a slice of the expanding global economic pie or find their goods and services increasingly locked out of markets around the world. The President needs TPA, or Trade Promotion Authority, now. While Trade Promotion Authority is a necessary condition for defending America's trade interests, it is not sufficient. That is where our export promotion strategy and the TPCC comes in. I can summarize our approach in three words that lie at the very heart of the President's management agenda--follow- through, results, and accountability. First, I say follow-through. I mean ensuring that the benefits of our trade agreements accrue to American exporters, rather than our trading partners. Too often, the United States has left its trade gains on the bargaining table. We aim to reverse that trend. We have already begun to implement that strategy. The most significant market opening initiative in recent years has been China's accession to the World Trade Organization. That is why I recently led a trade mission to Bejing and Shanghai. It is also why I will send a high-level Commerce official to China each month to ensure that China implements its WTO obligations, so that our small- and medium-sized companies can reap the gains from China's compliance. We have adopted the same approach with our free trade agreement partners. I will lead a trade mission for small- and medium-sized U.S. businesses to one of our NAFTA trading partners, Mexico, this summer. I will be joined on that trip by many of my TPCC colleagues here with me today because, as I have told my colleagues, we would be better prepared to do business. Second, when I focus on results, it is because that is what the President and I both expect. When we met with you last October, Mr. Chairman, we described our intention to ensure our export promotion programs were best in class, when compared against our Government counterparts abroad and within private industry. Today, after 7 months of research and a true team effort, my colleagues and I are confident that we have laid the groundwork for achieving just that goal. That said, after 30 years of experience in the private sector, I can tell you that if you cannot measure your progress, you won't make any progress. That is why I will insist that our first step in implementing the recommendations set out in the TPCC's Report will be to define the results we want to achieve and develop the means to measure our progress toward those goals. The guideposts I intend to use to measure our progress include the growth of U.S. exporters, particularly small- and medium-sized exporters, and the level of exports that take place as a result of our efforts. And three, whether we have met our customers' expectations. That will ensure that our export promotion programs remain grounded in what our customers want, which is the surest way to guarantee results. Third, and finally, I intend to emphasize accountability. My colleagues and I have assumed personal responsibility for making this work. We expect to be held to that standard. The President expects nothing less, nor should you. The role that the TPCC will play in implementing our export strategy is straightforward. I intend to adopt what my friends in business would call a total quality approach to export promotion, with the TPCC serving as the auditor of our progress toward that goal. The TPCC agencies will meet at least once a month at the cabinet level or subcabinet level to take stock. The TPCC will produce quarterly reports so that we can check our progress throughout the year, rather than waiting for the Annual Report. In the process, I expect the TPCC process to ensure that the agencies involved are coordinating our efforts, to name only a few of the recommendations contained in this Report. Working together to discover projects sooner and bringing the prospect of U.S. financing early on in order to help U.S. companies take full advantage of these opportunities. Also presenting a single face to the exporter, tailing agency programs to meet the exporters' needs by functioning as one- stop shops. We want our people in the field to function like account managers, helping firms navigate the full array of Government export promotion programs. Also combining the marketing efforts of SBA, Ex-Im Bank, and the Commercial Service to make sure lenders know how these programs can help their small business clients. In addition, enhancing our use of the Internet as a communication tool, particularly our primary portal-- export.gov--so that exporters can find the Government's best information on trade leads in one place in real time. And reaching out to our State and local partners, elected officials, and private sector representatives, as a means for reaching small- and medium-sized companies as multipliers of our services. In closing, let me reiterate my appreciation to you, Senator, and all the Members of this Committee for your interest in and oversight of the export promotion process. What the TPCC really offers us is an avenue through which we can apply many of the principles of private sector management to Government programs, yielding what I promise will be both effective and results-oriented. I welcome your thoughts and those of your colleagues on the recommendations we are presenting today, and would be pleased to answer any questions you may have. Chairman Sarbanes. Thank you very much, Mr. Secretary. We have been joined by Senator Hagel. Chuck, did you have any opening statement? COMMENT OF SENATOR CHUCK HAGEL Senator Hagel. No. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Chairman Sarbanes. Well, we will move right along, then, and we will now hear from the Vice Chairman of the Export- Import Bank, Mr. Aguirre. STATEMENT OF EDUARDO AGUIRRE VICE CHAIRMAN AND FIRST VICE PRESIDENT EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES Mr. Aguirre. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Before I begin my remarks, I would like to once again thank you for your comments and for the comments of so many others regarding the passing of our late Chairman Robson. Clearly, Ex- Im Bank is still in mourning and will be for some time. We miss him. But our extended family, and certainly the Robson family, very much appreciate all the sympathy that we have been receiving over the past month and a half. Chairman Sarbanes. I note that there is a very nice tribute to John Robson in the opening of the TPCC Report. I commend you for that. Mr. Aguirre. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today, particularly in my role as Vice Chairman of the TPCC, and to present the National Export Strategy. We are very pleased to share our collective strategy on how to increase U.S. exporter competitiveness through collaborative Government support. And with your indulgence, and in the interest of brevity, a more extensive testimony is being provided for the record. Chairman Sarbanes. It will be included in the record. Mr. Aguirre. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. My testimony focuses on Ex-Im Bank and the export finance arena. The Export-Import Bank of the United States is in step with the Administration's commitment to free and fair trade. Ex-Im Bank supports American jobs by assisting U.S. exporters to compete fairly and successfully in the world marketplace. U.S. businesses rely on Ex-Im Bank to facilitate the financing of exports that would otherwise not take place. We attempt to level the playing field for U.S. businesses by offsetting market imperfections and trade-distorting subsidies that disadvantage U.S. exporters. Last year alone, Ex-Im Bank supported $12.5 billion worth of U.S. exports. Of all Bank transactions, 90 percent were in direct support of small businesses, representing $1.7 billion or 18 percent of the exports supported. In fact, 383 new small businesses utilized the Bank for the first time last year to support their exports. As all of you know, Ex-Im Bank does not compete with the private sector financing. The Bank works closely with other U.S. Government agencies to capture possible efficiencies and to protect the interest of the taxpayer. Let me briefly review some of the prior TPCC initiatives involving Ex-Im Bank and what Ex-Im Bank is currently doing to address them. The Bank maintains eight regional offices across the country. For the past 2 years, the Bank has delivered direct marketing material jointly with the Department of Commerce and some of their divisions. We are doing more educational seminars outside of Washington and have reformatted them into efficient one-day mini-courses. We actively participate in trade association shows, where thousands of exporters and buyers are gathered in a very cost- effective outreach tactic. Just 2 weeks ago, the Bank hosted 1,500 participants, who came to learn about the Bank and to network, at our annual conference. Participants included exporters, bankers, brokers, foreign buyers, and the United States and foreign government officials. Now onto the current TPCC recommendations. The recommendations of the National Export Strategy were developed in close coordination amongst the TPCC agencies and with significant input from the U.S. export community. From this dialogue, the TPCC developed the recommendations. Highlights of the recommendations that pertain to the Ex-Im Bank include five key areas: Number one, technology. Employ technology to maximize customer service, creating processing efficiencies, and leveraging scarce human resources through automation. We also have several upgrading programs in place, and we aim to provide faster turn-around time and more up-to-date management information. Number two, tied aid. Develop a multipronged approach to address the trade-distorting effect of commercially driven tied aid. Number three, Ex-Im Bank and SBA coordination. We aim to better integrate Ex-Im Bank's and SBA's Working Capital Guarantee Programs. In fact, last week, Administrator Hector Barreto of the SBA and I signed an agreement to coordinate marketing efforts and to work together to identify additional opportunities to integrate these programs. Number four, market windows. Commission a study to assess the impact of market window activity on U.S. exporter competitiveness. And last, number five, the service sector. Examine the unique financing needs of the services sector and develop programs and procedures that address those needs. In conclusion, since last October, when the TPCC agencies collectively last testified before this Committee, we have been working very hard to identify innovative ways to serve Ex-Im Bank's customers--the Nation's exporters. I look forward to working with you and the other TPCC agencies in implementing these critical steps to improve U.S. exporter competitiveness. Mr. Chairman, Senator Hagel, and Senator Akaka during my 34-year banking career, I have always tried to make decisions on what is right for the customer. In the private sector, it was a matter of survival, aligning your organization around your customers' needs and expanding your services through strategic alliances. Those were, and still are, one of the best ways for companies to expand market share. In the public sector, the principles of the TPCC are fundamentally issues of efficiency and providing our exporters with a unified and simplified Government response. Our exporters need the best their Government can offer. The best will only come through our collective and coordinated actions. While the TPCC has made progress in the past few years, we recognize that we have more to do in several areas. The TPCC is committed to this effort. We appreciate your leadership on these issues and I look forward to addressing your questions. Thank you. Chairman Sarbanes. Thank you very much. Next, we will hear from Hector Barreto the Administrator of the Small Business Administration. STATEMENT OF HECTOR V. BARRETO ADMINISTRATOR SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Mr. Barreto. Thank you, Chairman Sarbanes, and distinguished Members. Thank you for inviting me to testify on the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee's National Export Strategy, and the role that the U.S. Small Business Administration plays in the Federal Government's export promotion strategy. I would first like to recognize the outstanding leadership of Secretary Evans, Under Secretary Aldonas, and the TPCC staff for their dedication to this effort. The SBA has been working closely with the Department of Commerce, Ex-Im Bank, OPIC, and other TPCC agencies in developing recommendations for the National Export Strategy that incorporate small business issues in order to grow them to be the most competitive in the world. Small businesses create two-thirds of new U.S. jobs, are responsible for much of our economy's innovation and generate over half of our private gross domestic product. But while 97 percent of U.S. exporters are small businesses, fewer than 1 percent of our small businesses export. The TPCC conducted a formal survey of 3,000 U.S. small- and medium-sized businesses to determine what was needed for them to be more competitive in the global marketplace. The survey found that small companies face more hurdles exporting than large companies. Specifically, small businesses need good information and expertise in a way that does not require large resources of time. Small businesses also need capital. And the SBA is a resource for these needs. The National Export Strategy presented today by the TPCC recommends: ``A Government that provides better customer service through joint promotion, training, trade finance, and information delivery.'' In order to meet the need to create a one-stop-shop approach, we have enhanced our working relationships with our partners in the following ways: SBA and the Ex-Im Bank have entered into a Memorandum of Cooperation. The first phase of this initiative will be to leverage marketing resources across SBA and Ex-Im Bank to raise awareness among lenders and exporters. SBA and the Department of Commerce are working more closely to coordinate marketing and outreach efforts to the U.S. small business community in the delivery of both technical and financial assistance programs. The SBA's and Commerce's national network of service providers will collaborate and will work in partnership to provide significantly improved counseling, training, and financial assistance, while also forming a more efficient and transparent delivery system for these services. We are already making great strides in cross- training. For example, in recent months, SBA has participated in Commerce's annual regional meetings of Senior Commercial Officers and have begun the process of training them on SBA's International Trade Loan Programs. Another example of our efforts in leveraging our partnership to further promote export opportunities for U.S. small businesses will be the Small Business Initiative between SBA and OPIC that will focus on cross-training and outreach to provide the necessary tools and products needed to invest internationally. We look forward to formalizing this opportunity in the very near future. After reviewing our existing International Trade loan programs and the recommendations from the National Export Strategy, SBA increased the Export Express loan guaranty to a new maximum of $250,000. The SBA Export Express loan guaranty program can be used to finance small businesses' export development costs such as participation in a foreign trade show or translation of product catalogues, as well as finance actual export orders. SBA is also a partner in many of the President's E- government initiatives to make information available on-line 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. We are currently working together with Commerce to strengthen our links with export.gov and looking at enhancing SBA's International Trade website to allow the customer to access information at the time and the place of his or her convenience. SBA currently provides information to small businesses through the Export Trade Assistance Partnership, or E-TAP. E- TAP is a training program offered at each of the 19 U.S. Export Assistance Centers and some Small Business Development Centers, which combined with individual business counseling, offers effective and customized assistance to new-to-export companies looking to enter the global marketplace. We are looking at ways of increasing the number of E-TAP programs being offered by encouraging our resource partners to implement the program. SBA is fully committed to the National Export Strategy. We believe that the recommendations in this Report will help to streamline and improve Federal export assistance programs and benefit U.S. small businesses so that they will continue to be the most competitive companies in the world. I look forward to SBA's ongoing contribution to the TPCC and our commitment to evaluate and harmonize our programs. I would be happy to answer any questions you may have, and thank you very much for the opportunity. Chairman Sarbanes. Thank you very much. And in introducing you, I wanted also to thank you for the SBA's quick response to the tornado that struck Southern Maryland. Your people were on the scene and we very much appreciate that. Mr. Barreto. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Chairman Sarbanes. It has been very helpful. Next, we will hear from Thelma Askey, Director of the U.S. Trade and Development Agency. STATEMENT OF THELMA J. ASKEY DIRECTOR U.S. TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Ms. Askey. Thank you, Chairman Sarbanes, Senator Hagel, and Senator Akaka, for providing this opportunity for TDA and the other members of the TPCC to come before you today. As has already been said, the last time we were before you was October 2 of last year, shortly after the attacks of September 11. Now, 6 months later, I think it is even more clear that trade promotion efforts such as those we are discussing here today, are vital to the United States--and global--economic and political security. In particular, our ability to foster development in and trade with the Front Line States, with countries in South and South-East Asia, and with struggling markets in Africa, will go a very long way toward promoting international stability. To begin with, let me first express my appreciation to Secretary Evans, Under Secretary Aldonas, and their staffs for the tremendous amount of work that they have put into the TPCC process in the past 7 months. They are to be commended for their proactive efforts to discern the needs of the exporting community and to develop specific strategies to respond to those needs. The Report contains a number of specific proposals pertaining to TDA, and I will outline them in a moment, but since TDA does not regularly appear before this Committee, I would like to quickly take a moment to reiterate TDA's mission and activities. As directed by statute, TDA promotes American private sector participation in developing and middle-income countries, with special emphasis on economic sectors that represent significant U.S. export potential. TDA is a small, nimble agency that partners with U.S. companies and assists them in building mutually beneficial relationships with overseas project sponsors and Government officials. The result is increased U.S. exports and jobs, as well as the completion of high-quality, successful projects and other solutions that address priority developmental needs in host countries. TDA's operations put it at the forefront of U.S. foreign and trade policy, where it works in concert with a wide array of other U.S. Government agencies, such as the Departments of State, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture, Energy, and Transportation, the U.S. Trade Representative, Export-Import Bank, of course, and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation. Turning to the TPCC Report, there are a number of recommendations that involve U.S. TDA. Since my colleagues have already identified many of them, I will simply highlight a few key recommendations. First of all, we will continue to focus on developing coordinated strategies in crisis regions. For example, TDA has been working closely with OPIC in developing potential projects in Afghanistan, particularly in the telecom sector. In fact, TDA is already providing funding for an advisor to the communications ministry, to assist them with evaluating proposals for the telecommunications sector. We also have been working closely with Commerce and the FAA in developing a technical assistance program for the aviation sector in Afghanistan that will support U.S. commercial interests. In addition, as proposed by Treasury and other TPCC agencies, TDA will explore opportunities to fund front-end engineering and design studies, which are commonly referred to as FEED studies. Other countries sometimes fund such studies as part of aggressive efforts to win large development projects, and TDA will initiate a pilot program to support U.S. companies who are confronted with this type of competition. TDA also looks forward to continuing its efforts in the area of biotechnology. We continue to work with USDA, USTR, and the Department of State to support public-private partnerships that help promote sound regulatory environments overseas for American biotech products. These efforts are crucial for ensuring that our trading partners continue to allow the import of American pharmaceutical and agricultural products. Additionally, TDA will continue to develop strategies for supporting efforts in the service sector, such as in insurance, banking/finance, tourism and e-commerce. For example, TDA has been supporting feasibility studies and technical assistance for projects around the world involving e-commerce. Most recently, 2 weeks ago, TDA signed a grant with Sinopec, China's leading petroleum and petrochemical company, for a feasibility study to help develop an e-trade platform, putting all of the company's procurement activities online. And of course, that is particularly beneficial to U.S. exporters. In sum, TDA will continue to work closely with the TPCC and its member agencies in making sure that U.S. policy objectives are supported by concrete results, and that U.S. companies have the support they need to operate around the world. This obviously is of benefit to the U.S. economy, as it supports exports and creates U.S. jobs. But equally important, the dissemination of U.S. goods, technology, services, and business practices around the world represents a cost-effective, market- based means of effectuating the President's strategy of supporting economic growth and development in developing countries. Again, I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today and look forward to answering any questions you may have. Chairman Sarbanes. Thank you very much. Our concluding panelist is Ross Connelly, the Executive Vice President of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation. STATEMENT OF ROSS CONNELLY EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION Mr. Connelly. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and Members of the Committee. I am pleased and honored to be here today on behalf of Dr. Peter Watson, OPIC's President and CEO. Dr. Watson regrets that he could not be here today in person due to previously scheduled travel to Africa. Mr. Chairman, I have some brief verbal remarks I would like to make and ask that my written statement be submitted for the record. Chairman Sarbanes. Mr. Connelly, your full statement will be included in the record. Mr. Connelly. Thank you. At the onset, Mr. Chairman, I want you and the Committee to know that OPIC is committed to working with our sister agencies to meet the objectives of the TPCC Report. I am very pleased to be sitting here with my colleagues from the Trade Promotion Agencies, many with whom we have developed good and productive working relationships. I want to briefly speak to the most encouraging fact of this entire TPCC exercise, that not only have the agencies reached consensus on these recommendations, but also many of us are already implementing them. As you know, Mr. Chairman, I spent 25 years in the private sector. Policy-setting and goals are very important. But at the end of the day, as Secretary Evans said, success in the private sector is measured by tangible results. In that regard, I am pleased to report on specific actions that we have taken in support of the TPCC objectives. The TPCC Report calls for greater cooperation among the agencies in early project development, as well as better coordination in crisis regions. This has been a major objective of mine in the last 10 months at OPIC, and I am pleased to report that with our colleagues at the Ex-Im Bank and TDA, we are making this a reality. In the company of my friend, Eduardo Aguirre, our three agencies conducted an investment assessment mission to Pakistan this past February that has helped us develop a significant volume of U.S. investment opportunities in that country. More recently, as you have heard, OPIC and TDA have been working closely to develop opportunities in Afghanistan that we believe should lead to fruition shortly. There are other areas where we have played a more pro active role--sub-Saharan Africa being an example. But I would like to state for the record that, based on my own experience, early identification and development of market opportunities is a role OPIC can perform quite effectively for the benefit of U.S. businesses and taxpayers in the context of OPIC's overall development mission. The TPCC call for better customer service for U.S. businesses, mirrors our own effort to date. Through an internal reorganization, OPIC is working to empower its individual line departments who work directly with U.S. businesses to take ownership of a project as it works its way through the agency approval process, to utilize new internal structures to resolve disputes quickly, and to streamline the application process so that we can provide a more efficient, less costly service. As a small agency, OPIC is looking for ways to leverage its resources with other agencies. And in this regard, as Administrator Barreto has indicated, OPIC soon hopes to conclude an agreement with the Small Business Administration that will provide a vehicle to seamlessly connect interested U.S. companies currently doing business with the SBA with the tools and the products that OPIC provides, in order to help U.S. firms expand internationally. Through these efforts and through the implementation of the recommendations of the TPCC Report, we will have better coordination, improved customer service, and more aggressive outreach and advocacy for U.S. business, particularly U.S. small business. We at OPIC are confident that the TPCC recommendations have placed us on the right path. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I would be pleased to answer any questions. Chairman Sarbanes. Thank you very much. First of all, I want to commend you and the Committee. I think both the survey you did of exporters and the review you did of what other countries do provide us a very important data base. I am particularly interested in the Committee following up on the resources that our competitors devote to export promotion. And if you can get the material, what their budget breakdown is, what goes into it, a summary of the activities that they are doing. I think it is very important that we fully understand and appreciate what we are up against, what our exporters are up against and, in effect, what you all are up against. It may influence people here to make somewhat different judgments about the kind of commitment that we should make to the export strategy. So, I think that is a very important initiative and I hope you will build on it in future reports. I want to focus for a moment on the two charts at the end of the Report, which show where the money goes for export promotion. Now, I guess the first question that I am interested in, and I know that budget issues are difficult and sensitive for interagency committees to deal with. But did the TPCC play a role in formulating the export promotion budget recommendations that are contained in the President's budget, or did each agency simply come forward with their proposal and got it included one way or another, so that there was no coordination on the budget proposal? Secretary Evans. Mr. Chairman, I think as far as these charts are concerned, which refers to the 2003 budget, it was clear that each agency and department acted on their own, independent of one another. We are making the effort to talk about this issue as we go into the 2004 budget cycle, particularly as it relates to an important area like training. That is one of our focused initiatives, to train individuals across Government as to all the various programs that are available to our exporters in this country, making sure that the right hand knows what the left hand is doing, what each agency is doing. And so, we are having discussions about that. I cannot tell you that it is formal yet. But I do recognize the importance of talking about a coordinated effort. So, Mr. Chairman, as was mentioned in my comments, I think that we have come a long way since the October meeting. We have a long way to go, though. We are going to meet every month and talk about priority issues that this Coordinating Committee must deal with. I think one of those priority issues are the resources that we have available to us, like our budgets, and make sure that there is not duplication, make sure there is not overlap, make sure that there is discussion as to the kind of dollars that each agency is using as it relates to the Coordinating Committee and are there some savings there some place? I do not know the answer to the question, but we are having, and will have, those discussions as it relates to the 2004 budget. Chairman Sarbanes. Well, we changed the date for the Report from September to March in 1999, in an effort to try to get the TPCC into the budget cycle, so that there was a coordinated Administration strategy on export promotion, which kind of reflected the judgment of the interagency committee. I am encouraged to hear that, to some extent, you are thinking in those terms for the 2004 budget. I think as you look at what other countries are doing, it would be helpful if we got some sense of how they allocate their assistance, to. I notice 50 percent of the promotion is done by the Department of Agriculture. Secretary Evans. Right. Chairman Sarbanes. Now, without more analysis, I do not know whether that is the right figure, too much, too little. It is hard to judge. But it would be interesting to know what other countries do and how this relates. I am struck by the fact that in the Report, because I have a feeling that probably the overall amount we are providing is not adequate. Actually, I know you all are bound by the OMB, but I might try to find some indirect way to put that question because you indicate that Canada last year spent 13 times more on export promotion than the United States did per dollar of GDP. And that France and the United Kingdom outspent and outstaffed the United States in absolute terms. In other words, they had a bigger budget than we have. Is that correct? Secretary Evans. They have a larger budget than we have, yes. I do not know the exact numbers, but, yes. Chairman Sarbanes. Those are pretty challenging figures when you look at them. What kind of issues besides the budget issue do you anticipate focusing on as you move toward the future? Secretary Evans. Well, I guess there are two or three, Mr. Chairman. One is education. I think one of the real challenges we face in this country is educating small- and medium-size companies, really educating America, as to the importance of trade in our growing and changing economy. I think that it is clear that our global economy is becoming integrated at a much faster pace than certainly any of us would have thought 5 years ago, and certainly much faster than any of us would have thought some 10 years ago when you passed the Export Enhancement Act. We are rapidly moving into a very integrated, global economy. And it is important that we provide the tools to not only educate our companies as to how that economy will function, but also have the tools and the support and the resources to facilitate our small- and medium-size enterprises participating in that. So, I think I would say, education is a large focus of ours. I mentioned training in my earlier comments, training across agencies. And in that, Mr. Chairman, I would say a serious, coordinated effort. Not an effort where we talk to each other once every 4 or 5 months and then send you a report once a year, but let's get results. Let's talk. Let's make sure we are meeting monthly and make sure that we are receiving results on a monthly basis. This is not something that I want to hear about a year from now. I want to hear about it on an ongoing kind of basis. I would say a focus is to just--and we have great cooperation. We absolutely are talking to each other. I have heard nothing but a spirit of cooperation throughout all agencies and all departments. I want to make sure that we sustain that, make sure that we are focused on not only continuing that, but also achieving results. What are the action items that we need to be dealing with month to month to month, and let's check them off. Another area that came up in the meeting last October was this coordination--and came up again by the good Senator this morning--coordination between Federal and State and how important it is to coordinate our efforts. We have made good progress on that. We have some 12 States right now where we share office space, so people are right next to each other talking to each other. We have programs underway where we are providing support to promote trade State by State. That is an education tool. We are going to focus on working very closely with the States because they are the ones that are the closest to the small- and medium-size businesses. I think those are probably several of the highlights. I think one last one we would mention, Mr. Chairman, is the importance of, after the training, you really do have people in the Government that can take people through a project from start to finish and can stay with them, and not only help them identify the market, identify the opportunity, but also once it is identified, work with them on helping them find and source financing. Once financing is found and sourced, then making sure that they understand the rules and regs and standards of the country that they are moving into, and how to deal with customs in this country that they are going into. And then stay with them for any kind of regulatory or any kind of related issue that they may deal with in another country. That is the challenge. These are new countries and different rules and different regs. You want to have kind of a start to finish. Somebody that can stay with them. So those are four or five, I think, of the very important issues that we are focused on. Chairman Sarbanes. Very good. Senator Akaka. Senator Akaka. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Secretary, I am here because I want to talk about tourism. Secretary Evans. Good. Senator Akaka. I would like to go back and quote Mr. Doggett, the former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tourism Industries, who said, ``International travel to the United States is an export just like the sale of agricultural products, automobiles, or consumer goods, and that strength plays over into our GDP.'' So it is very much a part of the export of services that you promote. One of the recommendations in the Report is that the Department of Commerce's Office of Travel and Tourism in Trade Development should develop public- private partnerships. You mentioned in your statement that you are even doing that at the office here. My question to you is, how will these partnerships be developed and how will the Department coordinate promotion efforts with State agencies? Secretary Evans. Well, Senator, a couple thoughts on that. One is we certainly put a lot of emphasis on tourism and travel in the last 15 months, but even more so since September 11, because if there was any industry that was seriously impacted by September 11, it was the travel and tourism industry. And we recognized that early. I met with the private sector probably no longer than a couple of weeks after September 11. I cannot remember the exact date. But I asked them to come to Washington and sit down and visit with us and talk about ways we can work together in partnership to promote tourism. Out of that came an ad campaign that we encouraged and I think has been helpful to the industry. Out of that meeting came the idea of revitalizing the Tourism Policy Council, which gives us a regular opportunity to sit down with the private sector to talk about joint efforts, joint ideas, joint promotional kind of campaigns. I cannot point to anything specific right now, other than the ad campaign that took place this last--I think the ad campaign probably was right after the first of the year, if my memory serves me right. There were some TV spots that were not only run here in America, but also in Europe and in Japan. It is certainly something that I talk about everywhere I go, and I will continue to do that. But the focus for us to look for opportunities of public- private partnerships will be through our Tourism Development Desk, as well as our Tourism Policy Council, which keeps us, and myself, frankly, in regular communication with the private sector. Senator Akaka. Do we have any efforts that place agency representatives in particular countries to work with that country on tourism at this time? Secretary Evans. We have, of course, Commercial Service offices all over the world and we will, through those offices and through our embassies, quite frankly, but through those offices, through our foreign commercial service offices around the world, we encourage those to promote tourism and travel any way that they can. Again, I think it is a part of the overall training initiative, we should make sure that the people that are around the world have the tools that they should have to promote American products and goods and services. One of those is export of tourism and travel. Senator Akaka. I just want to say, Mr. Secretary, that we appreciate what you are doing for the Commerce Department. Thank you very much. I want to move to---- Ms. Askey. Senator Akaka. Senator Akaka. Director Askey, I appreciate the way you describe your agency as being small and nimble. You are also working on partnerships, especially with other countries and our U.S. companies to promote exports. You mentioned in your statement that the Trade and Development Agency will continue to develop strategies for supporting efforts in the service sector, including tourism. What strategies are being developed by the TDA to support tourism? Ms. Askey. Thank you. I had wanted to add to the Secretary's comments on that because we happen to have a concrete example. This month, we are hosting a conference for exporters of tourism packages, et cetera, opportunities in Istanbul. And we worked very closely with the Department of Commerce's Foreign Commercial Service officers in the region. We particularly reinvigorated our effort in the post- September 11 period, both because it is important for those front-line States and some of the other countries in the region, to look to tourism as kind of the first steps or early steps in development. Of course, it is very important for U.S. exporters to be active participants in that. And the conferences that we set up are very project-specific type conferences. Along with the Foreign Commercial Service and with Ex-Im Bank and OPIC, we have worked hard to try to develop specific opportunities that we can highlight for U.S. participants and foreign country participants that will be coming together for this tourism conference. And it is one of the ways that we both let our trading partners around the world know about U.S. service exports in this particular sector, but also U.S. providers in this sector, what opportunities there are, what development opportunities there are in this region, and throughout the world. We very much look at tourism as an important service sector and as one where U.S. providers are very competitive. Chairman Sarbanes. Thank you. Mr. Aguirre. Mr. Aguirre. Senator, if I could just add a couple of comments about tourism. As you know, Ex-Im Bank is very involved in aircraft financing, export aircraft financing. Obviously, a lot of that is going to the Pacific Basin. I would suspect that many of the 560 or so aircraft that are currently in our portfolio are landing in Hawaii, just as we speak. So, in a round-about way, I think we are financing some exports which are clearly bringing tourism to our shores. Senator Akaka. Thank you. Mr. Secretary. Secretary Evans. I would add one other quick thought, Senator. I was in Tokyo about 3 weeks ago and signed a tourism promotion agreement with the Minister of Land and Transportation Ogi. We were very pleased to be able to sign that as another indication of our cooperation with Japan to promote tourism. She further said that she would be happy to save me the journey all the way to Tokyo next time and would meet me in Hawaii. So maybe that is another way to promote tourism to Hawaii. Senator Akaka. Thank you very much, yes. Secretary Evans. Thank you. Mr. Barreto. Senator Akaka, I also wanted to contribute that the SBA has been very involved since September 11 with our disaster loans. Obviously, whenever there is a disaster, we are always at the forefront. We were recently in LaPlata, Maryland. Right after September 11, we received a lot of calls into the SBA, and some of those were from Hawaii, especially from the travel and tourism industry. One of the things that the SBA has done, as well as continuing to coordinate with the Secretary's roundtable on travel and tourism, is that we have also reached out across the country, outside of the disaster area, to do economic injury disaster loans. Those are the loans that the SBA does directly. They are 4 percent loans over as much as a 30-year time horizon. We took the unprecedented move of changing our regulations to be able to allow us to do those types of loans all across the country. It has been very successful. We have done a lot of outreach. And I know that one of the areas that has been the most effective is the travel and tourism industry, and we will continue to reach out to that very important segment of our economy. Senator Akaka. Thank you, Mr. Barreto. Mr. Chairman, thank you. My time has expired. Chairman Sarbanes. Thank you. I think Senator Akaka is on to a very important point here. There are a number of Members in the Congress who are very interested in promoting travel and tourism. Senator Reid in Nevada actually heads up a Congressional Caucus in that regard. Obviously, it is very important to Hawaii. I know other countries have these major tourism promotion outlets here, like France and the United Kingdom. Up in New York, they have that. Does the United States have anything that is comparable overseas, trying to promote the residents of those countries to come here? Secretary Evans. I do not know what it would be, Mr. Chairman. Something may be escaping me, but I do not know that we have anything on that level. Chairman Sarbanes. I think we have left it primarily to the private sector to do, I guess. Secretary Evans. Right. Chairman Sarbanes. But it might be worth looking at. I have a few more questions, then we will let the panel go. We had a hearing about a week ago on the Treasury Department's Report on the International Economic and Exchange Rate Policy, which you probably read about. I know the Secretary of the Treasury pronounces or not, as the case may be, on dollar policy and its exchange rates. I do not want to get anyone in trouble here, but let me ask you this question, since you survey our exporters. How much are you hearing from them that the exchange rate of the dollar, what many of them would argue is the over-valued exchange rate of the dollar, is impacting their ability to compete internationally with respect to exports? When you did your surveys and everything, or in the course of doing your normal business, how much of this do you run into? Secretary Evans. Mr. Chairman, we did have a question on that. Actually, I think our survey says it was not ranked very highly. We hear comments about it, of course, but I haven't seen the ranking specifically. So if you would like to see that study, I am sure we could provide you with that. Chairman Sarbanes. Was that the one you just did with the small and medium people who are not very much into the export business, or did that cover all of the export community? Secretary Evans. I am sure it was just the one we did with the small- and medium-size companies. Chairman Sarbanes. Because the NAM came before us. Secretary Evans. Right. Chairman Sarbanes. The president of the NAM stated, and I am now quoting him: ``Exports of U.S.-manufactured goods have plunged $140 billion in the last 18 months at an annual rate, the largest such fall in U.S. history. The export losses, principally due to the over-valued dollar, are a key factor explaining why the manufacturing sector has fared so much more poorly than the rest of the economy in this recession.'' And the American Farm Bureau was also at the table asserting that their ability to export had been significantly hampered by what they asserted was the over-valuation of the dollar. So have any of the others run into that assertion? Mr. Aguirre. Mr. Chairman, I cross the threshold with trepidation here because I certainly believe Secretary O'Neill is responsible for foreign monetary policy and for U.S. export financing. We are not going to cross into each other's territory. But I think there are so many factors involved in an export. The dollar and the strength of the dollar is a very important factor. What we heard most about, quite frankly, in the TPCC Report had to do with being user-friendly and having the right technology that gives the right management information systems to the exporters so that we could work with them and provide better accessibility to financing. Quite clearly, the dollar was brought up, but I do not think it ranked that high. And it might have been just the timing of the survey why that factor did not bubble up that high. Chairman Sarbanes. Anyone else want to comment? Mr. Connelly. Mr. Chairman, I would just point out that in our experience, the issue is not so much the level of the exchange rate, but the volatility of the exchange rate. And I think that is the concern that our clients express more than anything else. Chairman Sarbanes. I have one closing question. I would like to ask each of you what is the single impediment that you encounter, that if it could be cleared away, would be most helpful to you in doing your work? And if you wish, you may take on the OMB. [Laughter.] After all, you are here and we have you here. You are supposed to give us very straightforward responses. Why don't I just go right down the list. Secretary Evans. I am not sure. I think that I would put a more positive spin on it. I have been really encouraged by what has been a committee that has not been particularly active coming together with a very strong focus on wanting to make a difference in providing the kind of information to our small- and medium-sized businesses that they need to export their products and services. And until I see what are our results, what are we accomplishing, I am not sure I am ready to talk about what our real impediments are yet. I think we might be in a better position to do that in 6 months or so. I would be glad to come back up and talk about it. But I think we are still building what will be a very effective, forceful effort in promoting trade. I do not see any real impediments yet. It is certainly not dollars, as far as I am concerned, at this stage of the game. Chairman Sarbanes. Mr. Aguirre. Mr. Aguirre. Senator, as you know, I am fresh to the Government from the private sector, so my comments are tainted by the perception that I had until recently. Chairman Sarbanes. Well, they might be enhanced, rather than tainted. [Laughter.] Mr. Aguirre. It could be. [Laughter.] I think that the issue is actually being addressed right here at TPCC. The exporting community does not appreciate the many resources that our Government puts in front of them. And I think they perceive dealing with the various agencies as a task and not an opportunity. In TPCC, what we are trying to do is do better coordination, better communication, and in some cases, eliminate duplication, as I think we are trying to do with the various agencies. So the obstacle, if there is one, is a perception obstacle. Clearly, there are a lot of things that we need to do to make ourselves more user-friendly. But if we can persuade the exporters that, in fact, there are so many resources here that we can provide for them, I think we will help the country. Chairman Sarbanes. I thought you might say for Congress to give me an Export-Import Bank authorization. [Laughter.] Mr. Aguirre. That would be more an extra focus. [Laughter.] Chairman Sarbanes. We are working on that. We are going to conference on it, as you know, so let's see what we can produce. Mr. Aguirre. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Chairman Sarbanes. Mr. Barreto. Mr. Barreto. Mr. Chairman, I would also concur with my colleague. I am also, as many of the members here, coming from the private sector. When you are in the private sector and you are thinking about taking advantage of Government programs, and we talk to small businesses every day and they tell us, no, it is going to take too long. I can take a yes, I can take a no, but the maybes kill me and I would rather not even try. So, we have a major challenge to kind of go out and reintroduce ourselves to our clients. I oftentimes say, they do not really know what they do not know. There are a lot of great programs and services. And me, coming from the private sector as well, I did not even realize how much was out there until I got back here. We have to change the perception so that the people that we are supposed to be benefiting really think of us as their partner. They really think of us as an advocate, somebody that they can count on to respond to them. I think that we have some very good tools available to us. And I also agree with Vice Chairman Aguirre that the collaboration that we are going to have is going to help us leverage the existing resources that we have. One of the benefits that the SBA has is a pretty large network. We have offices and resource partners in every State in the union and many of the major cities, multiple offices. So, we need to leverage what we have. And working together, I think we will get that word out and start helping more small businesses. Thank you. Chairman Sarbanes. Director Askey. Ms. Askey. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Since we are in the business of partnering with U.S. firms abroad, and we have two parts to our activity. One is direct support of projects and the other is more of a technical assistance training activity. With respect to U.S. businesses and firms that we are working with overseas, I think the impediment is two-fold. One is subsidized competition by our trading partners. That is generally why we are there, to give some additionality to the process. So subsidized competition by our foreign trading partners is key. Also the staying power of small- and medium-sized business in difficult markets. Exporting is not an easy task over time. And so, getting companies to focus on their sustainability in the export market is a task. On the technical assistance side and the more policy- oriented things we do, it is generally trying to persuade the governments to have a stake in the outcome of the technical assistance. For example, on our biotechnology initiative with China, the important thing is getting the Chinese government to participate in the process of developing the technical assistance and understanding the United States technical expertise to be brought to bear. We are not just giving them money and saying, work on your biotechnology regime. So on the technical assistance side, it is basically getting a mesh between the foreign government policy goals and U.S. policy goals. But when it comes to U.S. exporters, I think it is subsidized competition that they face and sustainability in export markets. Chairman Sarbanes. Good. Mr. Connelly. Mr. Connelly. Well, I need to preface my remarks by saying we have an excellent relationship with the OMB. [Laughter.] I think I would summarize the challenge from my standpoint in that it is not a budgetary challenge. Chairman Sarbanes. I am sure everyone else would echo that comment. Mr. Connelly. Yes. [Laughter.] But we do have the need to innovate, to modernize our products and services, and to meet the challenges of a world that is becoming more complex and highly globalized. We have in the agency, what I have learned--I have just been out of the private sector for 9 or 10 months. We have excellent people, tremendously dedicated professionals, and they can do the job. We have to find a way to recognize how the world has changed, to organize to meet those challenges and to introduce products and services that deliver the best service to our clients in a way that passes muster, as it must, within the entire interagency process. Chairman Sarbanes. Thank you all very much. It has been a very helpful panel, and we look forward to the implementation of the recommendations in the Report, and also, to the various new initiatives that you talked about for the next report. The hearing stands adjourned. Secretary Evans. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Barreto. Thank you. Mr. Aguirre. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. [Whereupon, at 12:15 p.m., the hearing was adjourned.] [Prepared statements and additional material supplied for the record follow:] PREPARED STATEMENT OF DONALD L. EVANS Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce May 14, 2002 Thank you, Mr. Chairman. My colleagues and I are extremely pleased to have the opportunity to present to you this Administration's first National Export Strategy. The Report is the culmination of the best efforts of all of the agencies here with me today, as well as the Departments of State and the Treasury, USAID, and USTR. It has truly been a team undertaking, and we are confident that the steps we have laid out are grounded in what our customers want, need, and expect from their Government export promotion programs. We think these steps will make a difference in the way we serve our clients-- especially small businesses. This is very much the approach the President wants all of us in the Administration to take. The President, through his Government-wide Management Agenda, has made clear that he believes that Americans deserve a Government that is ``best in class'' in service and effectiveness and that is results-oriented. In the broader context of our trade agenda, this commitment to results translates into two things. First, it means aggressively opening new markets for our exporters. Second, it means having the best tools available to our exporters to realize sales in those markets once they are open. The first prong of the trade agenda--opening new markets--is, quite frankly, on hold, waiting for the Senate to give the President Trade Promotion Authority. The President believes this bill is overdue. Simply put, we are losing real trade opportunities without it. We know the trade agreements that TPA will let us conclude over the next 5 years could contribute as much as $1.9 trillion to world economic growth. The question for the Senate is, what slice of this growing pie of opportunities will belong to U.S. companies? We believe the longer the delay on Trade Promotion Authority, the more it costs American farmers, business owners, and workers. We are pleased that the legislation appears to be moving to a vote as a carefully crafted, bipartisan balance. Amendments that would upset that careful balance would be strongly opposed by the Administration. Senator Sarbanes, we appreciate the opportunity to articulate here the second aspect of the President's strategy--expanding the base of exporters and providing the promotional support they need to ``fill in'' behind the agreements we negotiate. From the perspective of a small U.S. company wanting to export, new trade agreements are only half the battle. Agreements are meaningless to a company if it does not have the information, expertise, and financing it needs to get started exporting and to do the deals. All of you are aware that trade has never been more important to the United States and world economy. It now accounts for about a quarter of both the United States and world GDP and is growing at over twice the rate of any other sector. The goal of the 60 recommendations in this Report is to make sure all export-ready U.S. companies can participate in this growth. Small companies now account for just under 30 percent of the value of U.S. exports; yet our survey found that 30 percent of U.S. small companies that do not currently export would like to. Moreover, of those that export, two-thirds only export to one market. By improving customer service and providing new export opportunities, we want to tap the unrealized export potential of both large and small U.S. companies. These recommendations give our exporters a new strategic partner, and provide them with the tools they need to be globally competitive. We want to help those companies exporting to only one market broaden their horizons and make sure that capable small businesses can take full advantage of new market openings. The recommendations in this Report were the result of 7 months of research and interagency deliberations. As we explained last October, we took a management approach, starting first with our customers. The driving force behind all of these recommendations was to respond to customer needs. We talked to about 100 exporters in focus groups and one-on-one meetings, about half of which were smaller companies. We undertook a survey of more than 3,000 small and mid-sized U.S. firms. We asked them what works and what doesn't work. We asked them to tell us how to improve Government services and to tell us about other Government, State, and local agencies that do a great job of meeting their needs. We talked to both exporters and nonexporters to get at the question of why many small businesses choose not to export. From our survey and interviews with clients, we came away with a number of observations:Our clients are pleased with our products and services, but want them to be even more streamlined and timely. Time is critical to companies of any size. Even the smallest customers have very high expectations about how quickly they get what they need. Our clients think Government agencies have an important role to play in both trade and investment promotion. This is particularly true because other governments are more strategic in helping their companies get the best shot at possible opportunities and providing high-level focus and coordination of small business programs. U.S. companies want more than export assistance. They want an account manager to take them from their first transaction, to their first investment, through the life of a project. They want Government personnel trained and skilled enough to take them through the maze of Government programs, and they want the Government to help generate new opportunities. U.S. companies want more coordinated Government service. They want us to operate as if we were one company--not a collection of individual agencies. They expect seamless programs with a common set of standards and requirements and want coordinated client management among the agencies. U.S. companies look to the Government first for information on market opportunities and financing. The companies that do not export would export if they had more information about foreign market trends and trade leads. In addition, we took an in-depth look at the programs offered by our major competitors: We were particularly impressed by the high level of support our trading partners give to small- and middle-sized firms. Here in the United States, we know that these firms are a tremendous engine of job growth. And when these firms are successful in international markets, they can achieve even higher growth rates and pay better wages here at home. Our competitors also understand the dynamism and power of small business. We found that a number of our trading partners have coordinated, Cabinet-level task forces dedicated to getting small companies into overseas markets. Korea, for example, is moving away from support for large conglomerates or chaebols, and has a Presidential Commission that integrates programs and budgets that help small business exporters. France, Canada, Spain, and the UK also have coordinated, high-level programs to help small business exporters. Our competitors take a more active approach in generating opportunities for their exporters. Many governments cultivate relationships with procurement officials in emerging markets and ``cherry pick'' the best projects for their exporters--presenting them with shopping lists of the most lucrative projects. Other governments take a more holistic view toward export promotion, combining their export and investment promotion programs. Rather than focus strictly on export sales, they focus on their firms' international competitiveness. And we found especially in Europe, the Swedes, the French, and the British have elaborate e-business strategies that have become the organizing principle for their trade promotion programs. By next year, the British will have all of their export promotion services online. All of the trade promotion agencies will be linked with each other and with all of their known exporters. The National Export Strategy Our strategy, simply put, is to make sure our exporters have the best tools to take advantage of the commercial opportunities we negotiate. It boils down to three important points: A more active U.S. Government partner with U.S. exporters when it comes to major project competitions. Better customer service through joint promotion, training, trade finance, and information delivery. A Government that is working harder, through State and local partnerships and trade education to make sure that potential exporters know about the services we provide. Strategic Approach to Project Development One of the themes that came up repeatedly in our discussions was that companies want Government to take a more coordinated and more strategic approach to helping them compete internationally. This applies to a wide range of issues including major project development, a coordinated commercial response in crisis regions and advocacy support throughout the life of the project. Our competitors often have the upper hand in major project competitions well before the project is publically tendered. Other governments indicate that they can finance a particular project early on and then coordinate their response between the agencies responsible for on-the-ground market intelligence, technical assistance and financing. Ex-Im Bank, Commerce and a number of TPCC agencies are going to meet this challenge by working together to discover projects sooner, show an early likelihood of U.S. financing and help U.S. exporters take advantage of these opportunities. In key pilot countries, we will now have a coordinated, team approach to bringing buyers and sellers together. Exporters also told us they want to see the U.S. Government take a more active role in countering and discouraging market distorting uses of tied and untied aid. As a result, we have expanded the tools available to exporters to address tied aid, including a more aggressive response to Japan's use of tied and untied aid (Japan is the largest provider of both), a pilot program that would enable the Trade Development Agency to fund engineering studies that often set the standards and specifications for future projects, exploring the design of a pilot project that would provide mixed credits for specific developmentally sound projects, and use of the war chest to address instances where non-Japanese trading partners use tied aid to capture market share in emerging markets. Better Customer Service In the area of client service, we found that U.S. firms that export have an increasingly sophisticated understanding of what they need to be successful overseas. They are aware of competing Government programs and have very high expectations about the quality of service that they get. Not surprisingly, the more experienced exporters want better coordination among the Government agencies; in short, they want the agencies to operate as if they were part of the same U.S. Government ``company.'' To respond to this concern, we are going to do a better job of promoting each others' programs. We are planning on training our Commercial Service officers so they can act as ``account managers'' that can help our companies with an overseas strategy, and not just an export sale. That means a much greater emphasis on training across agencies than ever before, with the goal of creating agency staff that can function as ``one-stop-shops,'' or account managers, that can help a firm navigate the full array of Government export promotion programs. Trade Finance Our survey told us that trade finance is still a major obstacle to getting small businesses into world markets. It also indicated that too many U.S. companies turned down sales because they had problems getting financial support, or limited their exports to those opportunities they could fund on their own. Too few small exporters are taking advantage of SBA and Ex-Im Bank working capital programs. While many companies know about these programs, they are unaware of how they work and are confused by the fact that there are two, apparently competing programs. We are going to address this by combining the marketing efforts of SBA, Ex-Im Bank, and the Commercial Service to make sure lenders know how these programs can help their clients. We also want to integrate the programs to the extent we can--while still preserving the benefits of each. In the future, we will promote one Government trade finance service to our customers, that can then be customized with SBA and Ex- Im Bank features, as appropriate, depending upon the resources of the Bank and the needs of the client. Information This came up again and again in our discussions with customers and was ranked in our survey as the most important service Government provides and businesses need. We learned that more than half of the exporters we surveyed use a Government source to gather information on potential trade opportunities, and that they want a single site where they can get trade leads and information about specific markets. At the same time, they are unaware of the full range of Government assistance that is currently available. In response, we are enhancing export.gov-- our one-stop web portal--so that exporters can find all of the Government's best information on trade leads and markets in one place, in real time. We will use our BuyUSA product--which links buyers and sellers directly--to link foreign affiliates of U.S. multinationals abroad with U.S. suppliers, who are often small- and medium-sized exporters looking for project opportunities. Outreach, Education, and Partnering We can develop the best programs in the world, but if no one knows about them, we will not get very far. We need to do a better job of letting companies know what is available and make it easier for them to participate. Although our study found that awareness is better today than it was 5 years ago, we can certainly do a better job of connecting with business people who want to take advantage of new trade opportunities. We propose working more closely with State and local trade groups, as well as elected officials, to expand awareness and increase outreach. We will also be leveraging technology to offer simpler Internet solutions for companies looking for help. We will distribute packages of our export promotion services to the States to prevent duplication and leverage State resources. We will encourage joint strategy sessions on outreach and trade events. We will dedicate more resources to training our State partners in TPCC programs. We will develop joint TPCC agency marketing materials for our State and local partners. We will do a better job of leveraging the information provided by elected officials, who are often the first point of contact for companies seeking Government assistance. And we plan to expand education for new-to-export firms and develop a strategy to use trading companies as multipliers of our services. To sum up, we are placing a much greater focus on what our customers need; we are taking a comprehensive approach to making our companies competitive in the world market; we are actively developing opportunities for our companies; we are building programmatic bridges across the agencies; and we are using training and joint promotional efforts to improve coordination and our effectiveness across the agencies. Senator, while in many ways I believe we have gone farther than ever before with the TPCC, this is really just the starting point of our work. Some of these recommendations can be implemented immediately; but some will take more time and require a formal benchmarking effort-- such as training, information, and the speed with which we deliver our services. We also expect to use this Report as a tool to fit our resources and programs to key markets where we are negotiating bilateral and regional agreements. In the meantime, I want to make sure we are held accountable for what we have said we are going to do. Whether it is the number of new project opportunities we generate from these recommendations, or the number of small business working capital loans we undertake, I think it is important Congress knows that we expect to measure our progress. We will report how far we have come next year. Again, Senator, I appreciate your great interest in the importance of strengthening our trade promotion programs. I intend to continue to use the TPCC not only to coordinate our future efforts, but also to generate new initiatives that will help keep America the most competitive exporting Nation in the world. ---------- PREPARED STATEMENT OF EDUARDO AGUIRRE Vice Chairman and First Vice President Export-Import Bank of the United States May 14, 2002 Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. As Vice Chairman of the Export-Import Bank, I also serve as Vice Chairman of the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee (TPCC), the body designated by Congress to coordinate interagency efforts on trade promotion. Working in partnership with business and labor, we support exports in order to create and sustain jobs here in the United States. That means the Bank must be in tune with the Administration's trade and foreign policy objectives, as well as the needs of U.S. companies to compete abroad. I appreciate the efforts of all the agencies represented here today, in addition to others both inside and outside the Government, who contributed time and energy in pursuit of our common goal--to make U.S. trade promotion efforts second to none by being effective, coordinated, and user-friendly. In keeping with the Administraton's firm commitment to free and fair trade, the Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im Bank) of the United States assists U.S. exporters in competing fairly and successfully in the world marketplace. Participation in foreign trade is a critical component of the Nation's economy. In 2001, exports represented about 10 percent of the Nation's GDP and supported approximately 12 million jobs (Department of Commerce, U.S. Trade Facts), including one-in-five manufacturing jobs. Moreover, medium- and small-sized companies represented 97 percent of U.S. exporters. These companies are an important source of U.S. employment. Moreover, as jobs in the export sector on average pay wages that are 13 to 18 percent higher than the national average of nonexport jobs (Department of Commerce, U.S. Trade Facts). Market imperfections and trade distorting subsidies frustrate U.S. exporters' ability to compete and win business in new markets. The Ex- Im mission is to meet both of these challenges head-on. When foreign governments subsidize the financing of products and services sold by their companies, we step in to level the playing field. These unfair practices distort free trade, and we are committed to providing the U.S. exporters a competitive environment where the market drives the process; in other words, the best product at the best price wins the sale, and not Government-subsidized financing. Eventually, the hope and the efforts are to eliminate any Government trade distorting subsidies. Capital always moves to its best risk-adjusted rate of return. Especially in dynamic emerging markets, capital tends to be jittery even during the best of times. When these markets begin to slow or experience difficulty, capital flight is swift and can be crippling. Sometimes, especially in the short-term, this phenomenon is counter to the Bank's broader, long-term financing strategy. These sharp market movements most affect small companies. South Korea's economic turmoil during the Asian Financial Crisis was a good example of this phenomenon. When the private market collapsed in 1997-1998, Ex-Im Bank stepped up to the plate and supported almost $2 billion dollars in exports during that critical period. The Bank did not lose taxpayer dollars, and, in fact, Ex-Im Bank played a role in keeping trade relations and businesses open for U.S. exports. Now that the economy has stabilized in South Korea, the private sector has reentered the market, and the Bank has appropriately scaled back its support. What was Ex-Im Bank's role? The Bank stepped into the breach and covered appropriate short-term risk. We to some degree insulated against potential financial contagion from that crisis. In carrying out its mission in 2001, Ex-Im Bank supported approximately 4 percent of all U.S. exports to emerging markets and 6 percent of all U.S. capital goods exports to emerging markets. One of Ex-Im Bank's missions in this changed world is to take the lead in the U.S. commercial effort to penetrate the risky emerging markets. The Bank also steps up in times of crisis--as Ex-Im Bank did during the 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis, and as the Bank did this past fall through supporting the airline industry in the wake of the September 11 attacks. In this case, Ex-Im Bank has decided not to exercise its requirement that airlines have third-party war risk insurance coverage, in coordination with the U.S. Government and other nations, to keep the airlines of the world flying, until such time as the airline industry is able to secure a solution that will reinstate liability insurance. The process was successful, and international commerce continued without any hitches, as aircraft were not grounded. In so doing, not only did the Bank increase U.S. exports, but also fostered stability and economic growth at home and abroad. Last year alone, Ex-Im Bank supported $12.5 billion worth of U.S. exports. Of all Bank transactions, 90 percent were in direct support of small businesses, representing $1.65 billion or 18 percent of the U.S. exports by dollar volume supported. In fact, 383 new small businesses utilized the Bank for the first time last year to support their exports. Ex-Im Bank is proud of its record and intends to continue these efforts. At the same time, the Export-Import Bank has several other mandates, as stated in our charter: Ex-Im Bank Acts Ex-Im Bank promotes private sector financing. Where there is not a private sector alternative and there is a creditworthy transaction, the Ex-Im Bank steps up and ensures that U.S. exporters can compete and are not at a disadvantage. In short, Ex-Im Bank's role is to provide official financing support that levels the playing field for U.S. exporters until agreements can be reached to eliminate market- distorting practices. Ex-Im Bank does not perform this vital job in a vacuum. The Bank works closely with other U.S. Government agencies to capture possible efficiencies and to protect the interests of the taxpayer. The TPCC plays a critical role, as illustrated by the recommendations in the National Export Strategy Report. Allow me to briefly review some of the prior TPCC initiatives involving Ex-Im Bank and our sister trade agencies and what the Ex-Im Bank is already doing to address some of these key needs. The Bank maintains eight regional offices across the country. Six of these offices are located with the U.S. Export Assistance Centers (USEAC's) with the Department of Commerce (DOC) and the Small Business Administration (SBA). Co-location allows our respective staffs to co-market, pursue, and share trade leads and market information. The Bank has placed offices in strategic locations (Miami, FL, Washington, DC, New York, NY, Chicago, IL, Houston, TX, and three in California). The States in which these offices are located are home to approximately 65 percent of the exporters in the United States. Where we are not co-located, Ex-Im Bank employees cross-train with DOC and SBA employees in the remaining USEAC's to ensure that DOC and SBA professionals are kept up-to-date on new initiatives at the Bank. For the past 2 years, the Ex-Im Bank has delivered joint direct mail with the Department of Commerce's Foreign Commercial Service and the Census Bureau's Foreign Trade Statistics Division. This year Ex-Im Bank will deliver close to 50,000 pieces of direct mail. Not only is this partnered approach cost-effective, (it reduces the Bank's costs by two-thirds) it gives the recipient a comprehensive view of the menu of services offered by our respective institutions. Ex-Im Bank's direct mail initiative has been a huge success. Educational seminars have long been a primary approach of many of the trade agencies. So what is new? First, the Ex-Im Bank is doing more seminars. Second, the Bank has taken them outside of Washington and delivers one-day mini-courses. Third, Ex-Im Bank almost always either partners with the Department of Commerce, a City/State Partner, or one of Ex-Im Bank's sister trade agencies. For example, this spring OPIC participated in a well-received exporter seminar in Indianapolis, and 3 weeks ago Ex-Im Bank's business development team co-presented with the Department of Commerce in Lubbock, Texas. This year Ex-Im Bank executed over 50 of these type seminars, all with some form of sister agency involvement. Trade Associations: Attending trade association shows where hundreds, sometimes thousands, of exporters and buyers are amassed is a very cost-effective outreach tactic for Ex-Im Bank. Partnering with DOC and the Census Bureau makes Ex-Im Bank's approach even more effective. The Bank will continue this successful enterprise with DOC and the Census Bureau and expand upon it. Ex-Im's Annual Conference: Just 2 weeks ago, the Bank had 1,500 participants in Washington, DC, to learn about the Bank and network. Participants included exporters, bankers, brokers, foreign buyers, U.S. Government officials, and foreign government officials. National Export Report Turning to the National Export Report, these recommendations were developed in close coordination among TPCC agencies and with significant input from the U.S. export community. The TPCC listened to the concerns of our customers--the U.S. exporters. The TPCC listened to those that distribute and market our services, trade finance lenders. From this dialogue, the TPCC developed the recommendations continued in the Report. The highlights of the recommendations that pertain to the trade finance arena include: (1) Maximize customer service orientation by employing technology to create processing efficiencies and to leverage scarce human resources through automation. Many of you on this Committee are aware of Ex-Im Bank's automation plans. The TPCC recognized we could never substantially expand our support, especially for small business exporters unless and until we developed automated tools that made our processes faster. We have several upgraded programs currently in place that will assist us with providing faster turn around time and more up to date information and statistics. Earlier I mentioned the Ex-Im Bank's direct mail initiatives. The Bank's direct mail, which also includes periodic email contact, is all initiated and managed from customer management tools. Inquiries from direct mail are sent electronically to the Bank's eight field offices for prompt follow-up. When Ex-Im Bank started direct mail 2 years ago, the Bank used existing database software and low-cost customer management software. Ex-Im Bank is a victim of its own success. The Bank has now outgrown its own database and software system. The database the Bank uses was designed for 50,000 records; Ex-Im now has over 300,000 records. We knew we were doing right when private sector financial institutions started showing up at Ex-Im's doorstep asking us how the Bank markets its financing products; for example, in November 2001 GMAC sent representatives from their organization to identify how we conduct our direct mail and how we target trade shows. It is not often that the private sector asks the Government how to market. (2) Develop a multipronged approach to address the trade-distorting effect of commercially-driven tied aid, the means by which other countries provide partial grants and/or concessional loans either alone or combined with export credits and linked to procurement from the donor country, and to add tools to the U.S. cache by combining the resources and the expertise of one or more TPCC agencies to address the problem. Work with Treasury negotiators to use the Tied Aid Credit Fund (TACF) resources to advance the U.S. position in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to establish disciplines on the use of untied aid. The goal here is to ensure that untied aid financing is truly untied, and not defacto tied to procurement from donor country suppliers. Thus, the Bank would utilize the TACF to provide a negative incentive that would bring other untied aid donor ECA's to negotiate greater discipline in their use of those funds. For example, as cited in the new TPCC Report, the OECD recently notified Japan that a power project they wanted to support in China was not eligible for Tied Aid because it was deemed commercially viable. Within 10 days, Japan converted its support from Tied to Untied Aid, thereby raising the question: Did the Japanese really change the financing arrangement, or just change what policy they state it falls under? Begin a pilot program where the Trade Development Agency would selectively finance FEED (front-end engineering and design) studies until there are multilateral rules that prevent governments from using these studies to promote exports. Ex-Im Bank, Treasury, USAID, TDA, and the Commerce Department will work collaboratively to design creative financing arrangements for developmentally sound projects for which commercial financing is not available, achieving Administration trade and aid goals. Use the Tied Aid Credit Fund to defend U.S. exporters from patterns of use of tied aid that effectively (whether intentionally or not) represent a threat to long-run U.S. market share or access to emerging markets. (3) In response to concerns raised by the small business community, better integrate Ex-Im Bank's and SBA's Working Capital Guarantee Programs, where appropriate. Toward this end, last week Administrator Barreto of the SBA and I signed an agreement where the two agencies would begin to coordinate marketing efforts. We have also directed our respective staff to work together to identify additional opportunities to integrate these programs. (4) Commission a study to assess the impact of market window activity on U.S. exporter competitiveness, which is also a topic of interest in the Bank's reauthorization bill. (5) Examine the unique financing needs of the services sector and develop programs and procedures that address those needs. Since October, when the TPCC agencies collectively last testified before this Committee, we have been working hard to identify innovative ways to serve Ex-Im Bank's customers--the Nation's exporters. And now, I look forward to working with you and the other TPCC agencies in implementing these critical steps to improve U.S. exporter competitiveness. Mr. Chairman, throughout my 34 years in banking, I have always tried to make decisions on what is right for the customer. In the private sector, it was a matter of survival--aligning your organization around your customers needs, expanding your services through strategic alliances--these were and still are one of the best ways for companies to expand market share. In the public sector, the principles of the TPCC are fundamentally issues of efficiency and providing our exporters the best unified and simplified Government support possible. Especially in these tough times, our exporters need the best their Government can offer. The best will only be realized collective and coordinated actions. While the TPCC has made progress in the past few years, we recognize we have more to do in several areas. The TPCC is committed to this effort. Thank you for your leadership on these issues, and I am now prepared to answer any questions you may have. Thank you. ---------- PREPARED STATEMENT OF HECTOR V. BARRETO Administrator, Small Business Administration May 14, 2002 Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member, and distinguished Members, thank you for inviting me to testify on the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee's (TPCC) National Export Strategy and the role that the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) plays in the Federal Government's export promotion strategy. I would first like to recognize the outstanding leadership of Secretary Evans. The SBA has been working closely with the Department of Commerce, Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), and other TPCC agencies in developing recommendations for the National Export Strategy that incorporate small business issues in order to grow them to be the most competitive in the world. Small businesses create two-thirds of new U.S. jobs, are responsible for much of our economy's innovation and generate over half of our private gross domestic product. But while most--66 percent--of U.S. exporters have fewer than 20 employees, fewer than 1 percent of our small businesses export. Proportionately far more small businesses export in other countries, where governments dedicate far more resources to export promotion, but more importantly take a more strategic and holistic approach. Most of our trading partners offer more comprehensive support for small companies--providing assistance from beginning to end of the export process, and combining their trade and investment services. The TPCC conducted a formal survey of 3,000 U.S. small- and medium- sized businesses to determine what was needed for them to be more competitive in the global marketplace. The survey found that small companies face more hurdles exporting than large companies. Specifically, small businesses need good information and expertise in a way that does not require large resources of time. Small businesses also need capital. SBA is a resource for these needs. The National Export Strategy presented by the TPCC recommends ``a Government that provides better customer service through joint promotion, training, trade finance, and information delivery.'' In order to meet the need to create a ``one-stop-shop'' approach, we have enhanced our working relationships with our partners in the following ways: SBA and the Ex-Im Bank have entered into a ``Small Business Initiative'' Memorandum of Cooperation. The first phase of this initiative will be to leverage marketing resources across SBA and Ex-Im Bank to raise awareness among lenders and exporters. Another part of the initiative is to make our financing products more compatible, flexible and streamlined, so that one application form can be used for either agency's loans. SBA and Commerce are working more closely to coordinate marketing and outreach efforts to the U.S. small business community in the delivery of both technical and financial assistance programs. The SBA's and Commerce's national network of service providers will collaborate and work in partnership to provide significantly improved counseling, training and financial assistance activities while also forming a more efficient and transparent delivery system for these services. We are already making great strides in cross-training. For example, in recent months, the SBA has participated in Commerce's annual regional meetings of Senior Commercial Officers and have begun the process of training them on SBA's International Trade Loan Programs. Another example of our efforts in leveraging our partnerships to further promote export opportunities for U.S. small business will be the Small Business Initiative between SBA and OPIC that will focus on cross-training and outreach to provide the necessary tools and products needed to invest internationally. We look forward to formalizing this opportunity in the very near future. After reviewing our existing International Trade loan programs and the recommendations from the National Export Strategy, SBA increased the Export Express loan guaranty to a new maximum of $250,000. The SBA Export Express loan guaranty program can be used to finance small businesses' export development costs such as participation in a foreign trade show or translation of product catalogs, as well as finance actual export orders. The Export Working Capital Program (EWCP) is another of SBA's International Trade loan programs. It allows SBA to guaranty up to $1 million of a lender's working capital loan to eligible small businesses for export purposes. A small business that has prospered with SBA's EWCP assistance is M.A.S. Exports Ltd. of Savannah, Georgia. M.A.S. Exports is a supplier of auto parts and lubricants. Clifford King, President and Owner, decided 3 years ago to use an SBA export loan to help finance additional business to his offshore customers primarily in the Caribbean and Latin America. King's company, through a $250,000 revolving line of credit for export shipments under the SBA's EWCP, reached annual sales of $970,000 in 2001. SBA is also a partner in many of the President's E-Gov initiatives to make information available online 24/7. We are currently working together with Commerce to strengthen our links with export.gov and also looking at enhancing SBA's International Trade website to allow the customer to access information at the time and place of his/her convenience. SBA currently provides information to small businesses through our Export Trade Assistance Partnership (E-TAP). E-TAP is a training program offered at each of the 19 U.S. Export Assistance Centers (USEAC's) and some Small Business Development Centers (SBDC's), which combined with ongoing individual business counseling, offers effective and customized assistance to new-to-export companies looking to enter the global marketplace. We are looking at ways of increasing the number of E-TAP programs being offered by encouraging our resource partners to implement the program. SBA is fully committed to this National Export Strategy. We believe that the recommendations in this Report will help to streamline and improve Federal export assistance programs and benefit U.S. small businesses so that they will continue to be the most competitive companies in the world. I look forward to SBA's ongoing contribution to the TPCC and our commitment to evaluate and better coordinate our programs. I would be happy to answer any questions you may have. Thank you. ---------- PREPARED STATEMENT OF THELMA J. ASKEY Director, U.S. Trade and Development Agency May 14, 2002 Thank you, Chairman Sarbanes, Senator Gramm, and Members of the Committee for providing this opportunity for TDA and the other members of the TPCC to come before you today. The last time we were before you was on October 2 of last year, shortly after the attacks of September 11. Now, 6 months later, I think it is even more clear that trade promotion efforts, such as those we are discussing here today, are vital to United States--and global-- economic and political security. In particular, our ability to foster development in and trade with the Front Line States, with countries in South and South-East Asia, and with struggling markets in Africa, will go a long way toward promoting international stability. To begin, let me first express my appreciation to Secretary Evans, Under Secretary Aldonas, and their staffs for the tremendous amount of work that they have put into the TPCC process in the past 7 months. They are to be commended for their proactive efforts to discern the needs of the exporting community and to develop specific strategies to respond to those needs. TDA has been an active participant in those efforts and we look forward to continuing this role as we face the future challenges and implement the many ideas contained in the Report. The Report contains a number of specific proposals pertaining to TDA, and I will outline them in a moment, but since TDA does not regularly appear before this Committee, I would like to quickly take a moment to reiterate TDA's mission and activities. As directed by statute, TDA promotes American private sector participation in developing and middle-income countries, with special emphasis on economic sectors that represent significant U.S. export potential. TDA is a small, nimble agency that partners with U.S. companies and assists them in building mutually beneficial relationships with overseas projects sponsors and Government officials. The result is increased U.S. exports and jobs, as well as the completion of high- quality, successful projects, and other solutions that address priority developmental needs in host countries. Thus, the TDA's goals are two-fold: Helping American businesses export their products, and thereby creating jobs, while simultaneously promoting commercially viable economic growth in developing and middle- income countries. TDA's dual trade and development mission allows it to serve as an essential catalyst for priority development around the globe through support of key infrastructure projects and capacity building initiatives. TDA's operations put it at the forefront of U.S. foreign and trade policy, where it works in concert with a wide array of other U.S. Government agencies, such as the Departments of State, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture, Energy, and Transportation, the U.S. Trade Representative, the Export-Import Bank of the United States, and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation. Thus, the TDA works together closely with the other TPCC agencies on a regular basis, in the normal course of its business. TDA's role is to ensure that there are early successful demonstrations that U.S. policies result in viable and in mutually beneficial economic growth. This demonstration of U.S. support has the direct effect of increasing exports of U.S. goods, services, technology, and expertise. TDA accomplishes its mission using a number of early project planning tools, including the funding of various forms of technical assistance, feasibility studies, detailed design and engineering, orientation visits, specialized training grants, and conferences. TDA utilizes its tools creatively, tailoring its flexible resources to fit the particular needs of specific opportunities. The agency thereby achieves two results--assisting U.S. businesses as they compete for infrastructure and other development projects in highly competitive, emerging markets, and offering tailored solutions to foreign governments in need of effective commercial-sector development assistance. Turning to the TPCC Report, there are a number of recommendations that involve TDA. Since my colleagues have already identified many of them, I will simply highlight a few key recommendations. First of all, we will continue to focus on developing coordinated strategies in crisis regions. For example, the TDA has been working closely with OPIC in developing potential projects in Afghanistan, particularly in the telecom sector. In fact, the TDA is already providing funding for an advisor to the communications ministry, to assist them with evaluating proposals for the sector. This work is also being coordinated with the State Department's Office of International Communications and Information Policy and with USAID. We also have been working closely with Commerce and the FAA in developing a technical assistance program for the aviation sector in Afghanistan that will support U.S. commercial interests. Similarly, we have worked with Ex-Im Bank in identifying projects in Uzbekistan that can be supported by TDA at the feasibility study stage and later by Ex-Im Bank guarantees. We will continue to work with other TPCC agencies to develop coordinated strategies in Afghanistan and other crisis areas. In addition, as recommended by the exporting community, TDA will explore opportunities to fund front-end engineering and design studies, which are commonly referred to as FEED studies. Other countries sometimes fund such studies as part of their aggressive efforts to win large development projects, and TDA will initiate a pilot program to support U.S. companies who are confronted with this type of competition. TDA will continue working with other TPCC agencies on designing a pilot project to support capital projects in traditionally commercially nonviable sectors, such as the environment, renewable energy, health care, and water. TDA is active in all of these sectors, and will coordinate with the other TPCC agencies to further expand opportunities for U.S. businesses. TDA also looks forward to continuing its efforts in the area of biotechnology. We continue to work with USDA, USTR and the Department of State to support public-private partnerships that help promote sound regulatory environments overseas for American biotech products. These efforts are crucial for ensuring that our trading partners continue to allow the import of American pharmaceutical and agricultural products. Additionally, TDA will continue to develop strategies for supporting efforts in the service sector, such as in insurance, banking/finance, tourism and e-commerce. For example, TDA has been supporting feasibility studies and technical assistance for projects around the world involving e-commerce. Two weeks ago, the TDA signed a grant with Sinopec, China's leading petroleum and petrochemical company, for a feasibility study to help develop an e-trade platform, putting all of the company's procurement activities online. The study would show Sinopec how to manage and finance its e-procurement investments, as well as how to prepare its management for the organizational requirements demanded by the new system's implementation. Not only will this lead to a potential of $23 million in direct U.S. exports associated with setting up the system, but will also make their procurement process more efficient and transparent, further increasing the likelihood that U.S. companies will be successful in doing business with Sinopec in the future. The TPCC Report identifies exporters' desire that the trade agencies provide better access to information and to streamline data collection, such as with the application process. TDA is currently revamping its computer system, moving to a web-based system that will both allow our staff to work with data more efficiently and provide better access for U.S. companies to TDA information and activities. We are scheduled to have this system operational later this year. In sum, the TDA will continue to work closely with the TPCC and its member agencies in making sure that U.S. policy objectives are supported by concrete results, and that U.S. companies have the support they need as they operate around the world. This obviously is of benefit to the U.S. economy, as it supports exports and creates U.S. jobs. But equally importantly, the dissemination of U.S. goods, technology, services and business practices around the world represents a cost-effective, market-based means of effectuating the President's strategy of supporting economic growth and development in developing countries. Again, I appreciate the opportunity to again appear before you and look forward to answering any questions you may have. ---------- PREPARED STATEMENT OF ROSS CONNELLY Executive Vice President Overseas Private Investment Corporation May 14, 2002 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, I am pleased and honored to be here today on behalf of Dr. Peter Watson, OPIC's President and CEO. Dr. Watson regrets he could not be here in person due to previously scheduled travel to Africa as part of OPIC's special initiative to spur development and promote investment in sub-Saharan Africa. I want to thank you, Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, for the consistent leadership and support you have provided OPIC and its sister agencies in the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee (TPCC). Given our commitment to the development of a unified and successful U.S. trade program, I have every confidence that the TPCC Report, and our ongoing efforts to execute its recommendations, will have the desired effect: To enable U.S. companies to better compete for access to existing and emerging markets, to the benefit of American investors and exporters. Toward that end, I want to reinforce the Report's recognition of the invaluable contributions of late Export-Import Bank Chairman John E. Robson to our cooperative endeavor. John's dedication to excellence should serve as both a foundation and a beacon to the efforts of the TPCC agencies. I also wish to express OPIC's appreciation for the leadership of Secretary of Commerce Don Evans, whose efforts and vision have been key in marshaling the collective resources of our agencies for TPCC's worthy mandate. Mr. Chairman, in his introductory letter to the TPCC Report, President Bush makes clear the central goal of his unified U.S. trade policy: Providing American companies the information, expertise, and financing they need to take full advantage of the opportunities which exist in international markets. The President expects that the TPCC agencies and departments will achieve this goal by providing customer service that is responsive, streamlined, and results-oriented. While the Report contains many specific recommendations, they are all in service of a single objective: Providing the investors and exporters ``with the tools they need to compete.'' OPIC is committed to working with our sister agencies to meet this worthy objective. Over the agency's 31-year history, OPIC has promoted sustainable development and supported $138 billion worth of investment in 3,000 projects from Algeria to Zimbabwe. These same projects have generated $64 billion in U.S. exports and created nearly 250,000 U.S. jobs. The activities of these projects are as diverse as the countries that host them. Over its history, OPIC has built up reserves of over $4 billion, and as you know, accomplishes its mission at no net cost to American taxpayers. In reiterating OPIC's commitment to the goals contained in the TPCC Report, I want to share with you today specific steps OPIC has taken to implement the recommendations of the Report, and to outline OPIC's future course of action to that end. Taken as a whole, these actions represent demonstrable progress toward better coordination between OPIC and its sister agencies; improved customer service; and more aggressive outreach to the American business community. In all these efforts, OPIC has striven in particular to improve small- and medium-sized businesses' access to international markets. Improved coordination among TPCC agencies is a priority of the Report, with the expectation that this would enable the agencies to identify investment opportunities more quickly. As the Report points out, OPIC has already been working in tandem with our colleagues from the Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im) and the Trade and Development Agency (TDA) on joint initiatives. These include efforts in Indonesia, and more recently in Pakistan and Afghanistan. New OPIC Small Business Emphasis As another example of improved coordination and cooperation, I am also pleased to report that one of OPIC's key priorities under the Presidency of Peter Watson is to establish an innovative framework agreement between OPIC and the Small Business Administration (SBA). This important cooperative relationship will provide a new dimension for American small businesses currently working with the SBA by providing a vehicle to seamlessly connect interested companies with the tools and products needed to invest internationally. The effect of the OPIC/SBA Small Business Initiative will be to leverage, through cross-training and outreach, the relative strengths of the two TPCC agencies, in order to provide U.S. small businesses with the expertise and financial wherewithal necessary to make investments in international markets. We hope to formalize this arrangement in the near future. In the same spirit as our SBA cooperation, OPIC will also seek a new relationship with the U.S. Commercial Service that will establish a training program by which Commercial Service officers will be able to explain OPIC products and services to investors already familiar with international operations through existing relationships with the Commercial Service. Establishing improved customer service is another goal of the TPCC Report and an OPIC priority. OPIC's management and staff are committed to increasing responsiveness to and streamlining business processes. Minimizing the red tape and providing responsive service to those who have an interest in the agency's products is one of the critical links in meeting OPIC's development. Towards this end, OPIC will: Be Responsive to the Needs of Clients. Through customer surveys and hosting annual client conferences, OPIC will explore new ways to improve communications with its clients and stakeholders, both in formal and informal contexts. Streamline Application Processes. One of the most effective ways that OPIC can improve its ability to leverage investment is by eliminating bureaucratic procedures. By streamlining its paperwork requirements and adopting electronic processes, OPIC will be better able to serve American businesses--both large and small--that cannot afford a long and expensive application process that is not geared to the faster pace of decisionmaking that is required today. Measure Results. OPIC will develop and implement measurements that assess results and outputs, as opposed to inputs, thereby offering a more effective way to gauge our progress in serving the taxpayer. OPIC is committed to servicing our customers as effectively and efficiently as possible. Indeed, the work of the TPCC will complement the ongoing efforts that OPIC itself has embarked upon in assessing its programs, refocusing our efforts toward mobilizing capital where but for OPIC there would be no private investment, and in streamlining our operations. Refocus on Developmental Mission Our objective since coming to OPIC has been to align our products and services in a manner that supports OPIC's statutorily-mandated mission, while also recognizing a robust and growing private market that has developed since OPIC's founding. As such, we have concentrated on, among other areas: Refocusing OPIC on its core, developmental mission; rededicating our commitment to small business; and ensuring that OPIC's products are complementary, not competitive, with the private sector. Each of these reforms will also contribute importantly to meeting the goals of the TPCC Report. We are working actively to strengthen OPIC's consciousness of its historical developmental mission. We look to assess the investments that OPIC ultimately supports by more than simple dollar flows; that is, to critically examine and benchmark the added value of a particular investment to the host country, or as we say, to assess the additionality the project represents. Our goal is to ensure that OPIC's participation ``adds value'' by measuring the extent to which there is a market failure, the degree to which OPIC can leverage its resources for a broader economic impact, and the extent to which the project in question contributes to the overall economic development of the host country. Our ability to refocus on the developmental nature of our projects is made possible in part by the growth and success of private market financing and insurance mechanisms. This growth allows OPIC, with its unique strengths as a Government agency, to complement the private markets by working in countries in which the private sector would otherwise not participate. Indeed, OPIC's role is to do things that the private market will not, such as offering more tolerance for higher risk countries or projects, longer tenure, or larger per project capacity, which will help fulfill our development mandate, but to do so by accepting only prudent financial risk, as OPIC has consistently practiced over its history. The TPCC Report also calls for member agencies to formalize cooperation in pilot investment countries, such as Mexico, South Africa, Brazil, and Turkey. I am pleased to report that OPIC has been active in each of those countries, and looks forward to working with our sister agencies as part of a unified trade program. The TPCC Report notes that U.S. exporters wanted a coordinated response to the crisis regions that would enable them to take advantage of emerging commercial opportunities. Among TPCC agencies, OPIC is uniquely positioned to provide such coordination. Special Foreign Policy Initiatives Since the events of September 11, OPIC has announced a series of initiatives in support of the frontline states in the international war against terrorism, the cumulative effect of which is to demonstrate to potential U.S. investors the opportunities that exist in countries rebuilding from strife. Last October, OPIC announced an initiative for Pakistan, which included the extension of a $300 million special line of credit for U.S. companies interested in investing in Pakistan. As part of the Bush Administration's commitment to the economic reconstruction of post-Taliban Afghanistan, OPIC announced in January that it would establish an initial $50 million line of credit to support U.S. investment in that country. OPIC has also encouraged U.S. investment in the neighboring states of Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. We have made significant progress in each of these areas, and expect that within a reasonable period of time, we can fulfill the commitments we have made. Before closing, I want to note that the TPCC Report pays special attention to the needs of U.S. small- and medium-sized enterprises (SME's). Despite its small staff, OPIC has done remarkably well in reaching out to small- and medium-sized businesses that constitute a growing percentage of project participants. Of the 37 new insurance and finance projects that OPIC supported in fiscal year 2001, approximately 57 percent (21 projects) involved American small businesses. In addition, thousands of SME's participate as suppliers to OPIC-supported projects. By comparison, 40 percent of all projects that OPIC supported in fiscal year 2000 involved U.S. small businesses. Data on the specific U.S. companies that will provide goods and services to OPIC-assisted projects for the 7 fiscal years 1994 through 2000 show the specific U.S. suppliers for $11.4 billion in expected procurement for OPIC-assisted projects. These U.S. companies are located in 46 States. It is estimated that approximately 62 percent of these identified suppliers to OPIC-backed projects are U.S. small businesses. OPIC's focus is increasingly on those countries where the needs are greatest and on the U.S. small and medium businesses that otherwise would hesitate to expand overseas without OPIC financing or insurance. Fortuitously, these are the same markets where our Nation's trade assistance programs as implemented by fellow members of the TPCC can also have significant impact. It is the developing country markets that will continue to grow the fastest and it is those same markets where our exports are in demand. Small businesses often do not meet the profile that private sector financial institutions and insurers are looking for in their overseas clients. This is where the development goals of the U.S. Government, the needs of small business, and OPIC's programs intersect. With OPIC's assistance, the proven dynamism of U.S. small businesses can be mobilized to produce viable projects in the developing world. Conclusion In conclusion, the measures outlined above speak to OPIC's strong commitment to a leadership role in providing American companies the kind of unified trade program President Bush expects of the TPCC agencies. They represent significant progress toward better coordination between OPIC and its sister agencies; improved customer service; and more aggressive outreach to the American business community, all with a specific eye toward assisting small- and medium- sized businesses' efforts to access international markets. I would be remiss in closing without noting that recommendations in the Report were based on a survey of U.S. exporters, which identified their expectations and needs. It is vital for we the member agencies always to keep in mind the investor's understanding of the global marketplace, its vagaries and opportunities, in formulating our unified trade program. In that context, we at OPIC have much more to accomplish before we have made our full contribution to this process, but we are confident that our attention to investors' needs has placed us on the right path. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will be pleased to respond to your questions. ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()