[Title 40 CFR ]
[Code of Federal Regulations (annual edition) - July 1, 2019 Edition]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[[Page i]]
Title 40
Protection of Environment
________________________
Part 63 (Sec. Sec. 63.1440 to 63.6175)
Revised as of July 1, 2019
Containing a codification of documents of general
applicability and future effect
As of July 1, 2019
Published by the Office of the Federal Register
National Archives and Records Administration as a
Special Edition of the Federal Register
[[Page ii]]
U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL EDITION NOTICE
Legal Status and Use of Seals and Logos
The seal of the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA) authenticates the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) as
the official codification of Federal regulations established
under the Federal Register Act. Under the provisions of 44
U.S.C. 1507, the contents of the CFR, a special edition of the
Federal Register, shall be judicially noticed. The CFR is
prima facie evidence of the original documents published in
the Federal Register (44 U.S.C. 1510).
It is prohibited to use NARA's official seal and the stylized Code
of Federal Regulations logo on any republication of this
material without the express, written permission of the
Archivist of the United States or the Archivist's designee.
Any person using NARA's official seals and logos in a manner
inconsistent with the provisions of 36 CFR part 1200 is
subject to the penalties specified in 18 U.S.C. 506, 701, and
1017.
Use of ISBN Prefix
This is the Official U.S. Government edition of this publication
and is herein identified to certify its authenticity. Use of
the 0-16 ISBN prefix is for U.S. Government Publishing Office
Official Editions only. The Superintendent of Documents of the
U.S. Government Publishing Office requests that any reprinted
edition clearly be labeled as a copy of the authentic work
with a new ISBN.
U . S . G O V E R N M E N T P U B L I S H I N G O F F I C E
------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Superintendent of Documents Washington, DC
20402-0001
http://bookstore.gpo.gov
Phone: toll-free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800
[[Page iii]]
Table of Contents
Page
Explanation................................................. v
Title 40:
Chapter I--Environmental Protection Agency
(Continued) 3
Finding Aids:
Table of CFR Titles and Chapters........................ 1161
Alphabetical List of Agencies Appearing in the CFR...... 1181
List of CFR Sections Affected........................... 1191
[[Page iv]]
----------------------------
Cite this Code: CFR
To cite the regulations in
this volume use title,
part and section number.
Thus, 40 CFR 63.1440
refers to title 40, part
63, section 1440.
----------------------------
[[Page v]]
EXPLANATION
The Code of Federal Regulations is a codification of the general and
permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the Executive
departments and agencies of the Federal Government. The Code is divided
into 50 titles which represent broad areas subject to Federal
regulation. Each title is divided into chapters which usually bear the
name of the issuing agency. Each chapter is further subdivided into
parts covering specific regulatory areas.
Each volume of the Code is revised at least once each calendar year
and issued on a quarterly basis approximately as follows:
Title 1 through Title 16.................................as of January 1
Title 17 through Title 27..................................as of April 1
Title 28 through Title 41...................................as of July 1
Title 42 through Title 50................................as of October 1
The appropriate revision date is printed on the cover of each
volume.
LEGAL STATUS
The contents of the Federal Register are required to be judicially
noticed (44 U.S.C. 1507). The Code of Federal Regulations is prima facie
evidence of the text of the original documents (44 U.S.C. 1510).
HOW TO USE THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
The Code of Federal Regulations is kept up to date by the individual
issues of the Federal Register. These two publications must be used
together to determine the latest version of any given rule.
To determine whether a Code volume has been amended since its
revision date (in this case, July 1, 2019), consult the ``List of CFR
Sections Affected (LSA),'' which is issued monthly, and the ``Cumulative
List of Parts Affected,'' which appears in the Reader Aids section of
the daily Federal Register. These two lists will identify the Federal
Register page number of the latest amendment of any given rule.
EFFECTIVE AND EXPIRATION DATES
Each volume of the Code contains amendments published in the Federal
Register since the last revision of that volume of the Code. Source
citations for the regulations are referred to by volume number and page
number of the Federal Register and date of publication. Publication
dates and effective dates are usually not the same and care must be
exercised by the user in determining the actual effective date. In
instances where the effective date is beyond the cut-off date for the
Code a note has been inserted to reflect the future effective date. In
those instances where a regulation published in the Federal Register
states a date certain for expiration, an appropriate note will be
inserted following the text.
OMB CONTROL NUMBERS
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-511) requires
Federal agencies to display an OMB control number with their information
collection request.
[[Page vi]]
Many agencies have begun publishing numerous OMB control numbers as
amendments to existing regulations in the CFR. These OMB numbers are
placed as close as possible to the applicable recordkeeping or reporting
requirements.
PAST PROVISIONS OF THE CODE
Provisions of the Code that are no longer in force and effect as of
the revision date stated on the cover of each volume are not carried.
Code users may find the text of provisions in effect on any given date
in the past by using the appropriate List of CFR Sections Affected
(LSA). For the convenience of the reader, a ``List of CFR Sections
Affected'' is published at the end of each CFR volume. For changes to
the Code prior to the LSA listings at the end of the volume, consult
previous annual editions of the LSA. For changes to the Code prior to
2001, consult the List of CFR Sections Affected compilations, published
for 1949-1963, 1964-1972, 1973-1985, and 1986-2000.
``[RESERVED]'' TERMINOLOGY
The term ``[Reserved]'' is used as a place holder within the Code of
Federal Regulations. An agency may add regulatory information at a
``[Reserved]'' location at any time. Occasionally ``[Reserved]'' is used
editorially to indicate that a portion of the CFR was left vacant and
not accidentally dropped due to a printing or computer error.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
What is incorporation by reference? Incorporation by reference was
established by statute and allows Federal agencies to meet the
requirement to publish regulations in the Federal Register by referring
to materials already published elsewhere. For an incorporation to be
valid, the Director of the Federal Register must approve it. The legal
effect of incorporation by reference is that the material is treated as
if it were published in full in the Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 552(a)).
This material, like any other properly issued regulation, has the force
of law.
What is a proper incorporation by reference? The Director of the
Federal Register will approve an incorporation by reference only when
the requirements of 1 CFR part 51 are met. Some of the elements on which
approval is based are:
(a) The incorporation will substantially reduce the volume of
material published in the Federal Register.
(b) The matter incorporated is in fact available to the extent
necessary to afford fairness and uniformity in the administrative
process.
(c) The incorporating document is drafted and submitted for
publication in accordance with 1 CFR part 51.
What if the material incorporated by reference cannot be found? If
you have any problem locating or obtaining a copy of material listed as
an approved incorporation by reference, please contact the agency that
issued the regulation containing that incorporation. If, after
contacting the agency, you find the material is not available, please
notify the Director of the Federal Register, National Archives and
Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001,
or call 202-741-6010.
CFR INDEXES AND TABULAR GUIDES
A subject index to the Code of Federal Regulations is contained in a
separate volume, revised annually as of January 1, entitled CFR Index
and Finding Aids. This volume contains the Parallel Table of Authorities
and Rules. A list of CFR titles, chapters, subchapters, and parts and an
alphabetical list of agencies publishing in the CFR are also included in
this volume.
[[Page vii]]
An index to the text of ``Title 3--The President'' is carried within
that volume.
The Federal Register Index is issued monthly in cumulative form.
This index is based on a consolidation of the ``Contents'' entries in
the daily Federal Register.
A List of CFR Sections Affected (LSA) is published monthly, keyed to
the revision dates of the 50 CFR titles.
REPUBLICATION OF MATERIAL
There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing
in the Code of Federal Regulations.
INQUIRIES
For a legal interpretation or explanation of any regulation in this
volume, contact the issuing agency. The issuing agency's name appears at
the top of odd-numbered pages.
For inquiries concerning CFR reference assistance, call 202-741-6000
or write to the Director, Office of the Federal Register, National
Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD
20740-6001 or e-mail [email protected].
SALES
The Government Publishing Office (GPO) processes all sales and
distribution of the CFR. For payment by credit card, call toll-free,
866-512-1800, or DC area, 202-512-1800, M-F 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. e.s.t. or
fax your order to 202-512-2104, 24 hours a day. For payment by check,
write to: US Government Publishing Office - New Orders, P.O. Box 979050,
St. Louis, MO 63197-9000.
ELECTRONIC SERVICES
The full text of the Code of Federal Regulations, the LSA (List of
CFR Sections Affected), The United States Government Manual, the Federal
Register, Public Laws, Public Papers of the Presidents of the United
States, Compilation of Presidential Documents and the Privacy Act
Compilation are available in electronic format via www.govinfo.gov. For
more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S.
Government Publishing Office. Phone 202-512-1800, or 866-512-1800 (toll-
free). E-mail, [email protected].
The Office of the Federal Register also offers a free service on the
National Archives and Records Administration's (NARA) World Wide Web
site for public law numbers, Federal Register finding aids, and related
information. Connect to NARA's web site at www.archives.gov/federal-
register.
The e-CFR is a regularly updated, unofficial editorial compilation
of CFR material and Federal Register amendments, produced by the Office
of the Federal Register and the Government Publishing Office. It is
available at www.ecfr.gov.
Oliver A. Potts,
Director,
Office of the Federal Register.
July 1, 2019.
[[Page ix]]
THIS TITLE
Title 40--Protection of Environment is composed of thirty-seven
volumes. The parts in these volumes are arranged in the following order:
Parts 1-49, parts 50-51, part 52 (52.01-52.1018), part 52 (52.1019-
52.2019), part 52 (52.2020-end of part 52), parts 53-59, part 60 (60.1-
60.499), part 60 (60.500-end of part 60, sections), part 60
(Appendices), parts 61-62, part 63 (63.1-63.599), part 63 (63.600-
63.1199), part 63 (63.1200-63.1439), part 63 (63.1440-63.6175), part 63
(63.6580-63.8830), part 63 (63.8980-end of part 63), parts 64-71, parts
72-79, part 80, part 81, parts 82-86, parts 87-95, parts 96-99, parts
100-135, parts 136-149, parts 150-189, parts 190-259, parts 260-265,
parts 266-299, parts 300-399, parts 400-424, parts 425-699, parts 700-
722, parts 723-789, parts 790-999, parts 1000-1059, and part 1060 to
end. The contents of these volumes represent all current regulations
codified under this title of the CFR as of July 1, 2019.
Chapter I--Environmental Protection Agency appears in all thirty-
seven volumes. OMB control numbers for title 40 appear in Sec. 9.1 of
this chapter.
Chapters IV-VIII--Regulations issued by the Environmental Protection
Agency and Department of Justice, Council on Environmental Quality,
Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, Environmental Protection
Agency and Department of Defense; Uniform National Discharge Standards
for Vessels of the Armed Forces, and the Gulf Coast Ecosystem
Restoration Council appear in volume thirty seven.
For this volume, Ann Worley was Chief Editor. The Code of Federal
Regulations publication program is under the direction of John Hyrum
Martinez, assisted by Stephen J. Frattini.
[[Page 1]]
TITLE 40--PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT
(This book contains part 63, Sec. Sec. 63.1440 to 63.6175)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Part
chapter i--Environmental Protection Agency (Continued)...... 63
[[Page 3]]
CHAPTER I--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to chapter I appear at 65 FR
47324, 47325, Aug. 2, 2000.
SUBCHAPTER C--AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED)
Part Page
63 National emission standards for hazardous
air pollutants for source categories
(Continued)............................. 5
[[Page 5]]
SUBCHAPTER C_AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED)
PART 63_NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES (CONTINUED)--Table of Contents
Subpart QQQ_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Primary Copper Smelting
What This Subpart Covers
Sec.
63.1440 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.1441 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.1442 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.1443 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Emission Limitations and Work Practice Standards
63.1444 What emissions limitations and work practice standards must I
meet for my copper concentrate dryers, smelting furnaces, slag
cleaning vessels, and copper converter departments?
63.1445 What work practice standards must I meet for my fugitive dust
sources?
63.1446 What alternative emission limitation may I meet for my combined
gas streams?
Operation and Maintenance Requirements
63.1447 What are my operation and maintenance requirements?
General Compliance Requirements
63.1448 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
Initial Compliance Requirements
63.1449 By what date must I conduct performance tests or other initial
compliance demonstrations?
63.1450 What test methods and other procedures must I use to demonstrate
initial compliance with the emission limitations?
63.1451 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations, work practice standards, and operation and
maintenance requirements that apply to me?
Continuous Compliance Requirements
63.1452 What are my monitoring requirements?
63.1453 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations, work practice standards, and operations and
maintenance requirements that apply to me?
Notifications, Reports and Records
63.1454 What notifications must I submit and when?
63.1455 What reports must I submit and when?
63.1456 What records must I keep and how long must I keep my records?
Other Requirements and Information
63.1457 What part of the General Provisions apply to me?
63.1458 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.1459 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart QQQ of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart QQQ.
Figure 1 to Subpart QQQ of Part 63--Data Summary Sheet for Determination
of Average Opacity.
Subpart RRR_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Secondary Aluminum Production
General
63.1500 Applicability.
63.1501 Dates.
63.1502 [Reserved]
63.1503 Definitions.
63.1504 [Reserved]
Emission Standards and Operating Requirements
63.1505 Emission standards for affected sources and emission nits.
63.1506 Operating requirements.
63.1507-63.1509 [Reserved]
Monitoring and Compliance Provisions
63.1510 Monitoring requirements.
63.1511 Performance test/compliance demonstration general requirements.
63.1512 Performance test/compliance demonstration requirements and
procedures.
63.1513 Equations for determining compliance.
63.1514 Change of furnace classification.
Notifications, Reports, And Records
63.1515 Notifications.
63.1516 Reports.
63.1517 Records.
Other
63.1518 Applicability of general provisions.
63.1519 Implementation and enforcement.
[[Page 6]]
63.1520 [Reserved]
Table 1 to Subpart RRR of Part 63--Emission Standards for New and
Existing Affected Sources
Table 2 to Subpart RRR of Part 63--Summary of Operating Requirements for
New and Existing Affected Sources and Emission Units
Table 3 to Subpart RRR of Part 63--Summary of Monitoring Requirements
for New and Existing Affected Sources and Emission Units
Appendix A to Subpart RRR of Part 63--General Provisions Applicability
to Subpart RRR
Subpart SSS [Reserved]
Subpart TTT_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Primary Lead Smelting
63.1541 Applicability.
63.1542 Definitions.
63.1543 Standards for process and process fugitive sources.
63.1544 Standards for fugitive dust sources.
63.1545 Compliance dates.
63.1546 Performance testing.
63.1547 Monitoring requirements.
63.1548 Notification requirements.
63.1549 Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
63.1550 Delegation of authority.
63.1551 Affirmative defense for exceedance of emission limit during
malfunction.
Table 1 to Subpart TTT of Part 63--General Provisions Applicability to
Subpart TTT
Subpart UUU_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming
Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units
What This Subpart Covers
63.1560 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.1561 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.1562 What parts of my plant are covered by this subpart?
63.1563 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming Units, Sulfur Recovery
Units, and Bypass Lines
63.1564 What are my requirements for metal HAP emissions from catalytic
cracking units?
63.1565 What are my requirements for organic HAP emissions from
catalytic cracking units?
63.1566 What are my requirements for organic HAP emissions from
catalytic reforming units?
63.1567 What are my requirements for inorganic HAP emissions from
catalytic reforming units?
63.1568 What are my requirements for HAP emissions from sulfur recovery
units?
63.1569 What are my requirements for HAP emissions from bypass lines?
General Compliance Requirements
63.1570 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
63.1571 How and when must I conduct a performance test or other initial
compliance demonstration?
63.1572 What are my monitoring installation, operation, and maintenance
requirements?
63.1573 What are my monitoring alternatives?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.1574 What notifications must I submit and when?
63.1575 What reports must I submit and when?
63.1576 What records must I keep, in what form, and for how long?
Other Requirements and Information
63.1577 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
63.1578 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.1579 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Metal HAP Emission Limits for
Catalytic Cracking Units
Table 2 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Operating Limits for Metal HAP
Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
Table 3 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Monitoring Systems for
Metal HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
Table 4 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
for Metal HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
Table 5 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Initial Compliance With Metal HAP
Emission Limits for Catalytic Cracking Units
Table 6 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With Metal HAP
Emission Limits for Catalytic Cracking Units
Table 7 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With Operating
Limits for Metal HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
[[Page 7]]
Table 8 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Organic HAP Emission Limits for
Catalytic Cracking Units
Table 9 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Operating Limits for Organic HAP
Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
Table 10 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Monitoring Systems for
Organic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
Table 11 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
for Organic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units Not
Subject to New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) for Carbon
Monoxide (CO)
Table 12 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Initial Compliance With Organic HAP
Emission Limits for Catalytic Cracking Units
Table 13 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With Organic
HAP Emission Limits for Catalytic Cracking Units
Table 14 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With Operating
Limits for Organic HAP Emissions from Catalytic Cracking Units
Table 15 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Organic HAP Emission Limits for
Catalytic Reforming Units
Table 16 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Operating Limits for Organic HAP
Emissions From Catalytic Reforming Units
Table 17 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Monitoring Systems for
Organic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Reforming Units
Table 18 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
for Organic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Reforming Units
Table 19 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Initial Compliance With Organic HAP
Emission Limits for Catalytic Reforming Units
Table 20 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With Organic
HAP Emission Limits for Catalytic Reforming Units
Table 21 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With Operating
Limits for Organic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Reforming
Units
Table 22 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Inorganic HAP Emission Limits for
Catalytic Reforming Units
Table 23 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Operating Limits for Inorganic HAP
Emission Limitations for Catalytic Reforming Units
Table 24 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Monitoring Systems for
Inorganic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Reforming Units
Table 25 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
for Inorganic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Reforming Units
Table 26 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Initial Compliance with Inorganic
HAP Emission Limits for Catalytic Reforming Units
Table 27 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With Inorganic
HAP Emission Limits for Catalytic Reforming Units
Table 28 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With Operating
Limits for Inorganic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Reforming
Units
Table 29 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--HAP Emission Limits for Sulfur
Recovery Units
Table 30 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Operating Limits for HAP Emissions
From Sulfur Recovery Units
Table 31 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Monitoring Systems for
HAP Emissions From Sulfur Recovery Units
Table 32 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
for HAP Emissions From Sulfur Recovery Units Not Subject to
the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Sulfur Oxides
Table 33 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Initial Compliance with HAP Emission
Limits for Sulfur Recovery Units
Table 34 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With HAP
Emission Limits for Sulfur Recovery Units
Table 35 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With Operating
Limits for HAP Emissions from Sulfur Recovery Units
Table 36 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Work Practice Standards for HAP
Emissions From Bypass Lines
Table 37 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
for Bypass Lines
Table 38 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Initial Compliance With Work
Practice Standards for HAP Emissions From Bypass Lines
Table 39 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With Work
Practice Standards for HAP Emissions from Bypass Lines
Table 40 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Installation,
Operation, and Maintenance of Continuous Opacity Monitoring
Systems and Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems
Table 41 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Installation,
Operation, and Maintenance of Continuous Parameter Monitoring
Systems
Table 42 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Additional Information for Initial
Notification of Compliance Status
Table 43 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Reports
[[Page 8]]
Table 44 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Applicability of NESHAP General
Provisions to Subpart UUU
Appendix A to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Determination of Metal
Concentration on Catalyst Particles (Instrumental Analyzer
Procedure)
Subpart VVV_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Publicly Owned Treatment Works
Applicability
63.1580 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.1581 Does the subpart distinguish between different types of POTW
treatment plants?
Requirements for Group 1 POTW Treatment Plants
63.1582 [Reserved]
63.1583 What are the emission points and control requirements for a
Group 1 POTW treatment plant?
63.1584 [Reserved]
63.1585 How does a Group 1 POTW treatment plant demonstrate compliance?
Requirements for Group 1 and Group 2 POTW Treatment Plants
63.1586 What are the emission points and control requirements for a
Group 1 or Group 2 POTW?
63.1587 When do I have to comply?
63.1588 How do Group 1 and Group 2 POTW treatment plants demonstrate
compliance?
63.1589 What records must I keep?
63.1590 What reports must I submit?
63.1591 What are my notification requirements?
63.1592 Which General Provisions apply to my POTW treatment plant?
63.1593 [Reserved]
63.1594 Who enforces this subpart?
63.1595 List of definitions.
Table 1 to Subpart VVV of Part 63--Applicability of 40 CFR Part 63
General Provisions to Subpart VVV
Table 2 to Subpart VVV of Part 63--Compliance Dates and Requirements
Subpart WWW [Reserved]
Subpart XXX_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Ferroalloys Production: Ferromanganese and Silicomanganese
63.1620 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.1621 What are my compliance dates?
63.1622 What definitions apply to this subpart?
63.1623 What are the emissions standards for new, reconstructed and
existing facilities?
63.1624 What are the operational and work practice standards for new,
reconstructed, and existing facilities?
63.1625 What are the performance test and compliance requirements for
new, reconstructed, and existing facilities?
63.1626 What monitoring requirements must I meet?
63.1627 What notification requirements must I meet?
63.1628 What recordkeeping and reporting requirements must I meet?
63.1629 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.1630-63.1649 [Reserved]
63.1650 Applicability and compliance dates.
63.1651 Definitions.
63.1652 Emission standards.
63.1653 Opacity standards.
63.1654 Operational and work practice standards.
63.1655 Maintenance requirements.
63.1656 Performance testing, test methods, and compliance
demonstrations.
63.1657 Monitoring requirements.
63.1658 Notification requirements.
63.1659 Reporting requirements.
63.1660 Recordkeeping requirements.
63.1661 Implementation and enforcement.
63.1662-63.1679 [Reserved]
Table 1 to Subpart XXX of Part 63--General Provisions Applicability to
Subpart XXX
Subpart AAAA_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
What This Subpart Covers
63.1930 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.1935 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.1940 What is the affected source of this subpart?
63.1945 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
63.1947 When do I have to comply with this subpart if I own or operate a
bioreactor?
63.1950 When am I no longer required to comply with this subpart?
63.1952 When am I no longer required to comply with the requirements of
this subpart if I own or operate a bioreactor?
Standards
63.1955 What requirements must I meet?
General and Continuing Compliance Requirements
63.1960 How is compliance determined?
63.1965 What is a deviation?
63.1975 How do I calculate the 3-hour block average used to demonstrate
compliance?
[[Page 9]]
Notifications, Reports and Records
63.1980 What records and reports must I keep and submit?
Other Requirements and Information
63.1985 Who enforces this subpart?
63.1990 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart AAAA of Part 63--Applicability of NESHAP General
Provisions to Subpart AAAA
Subpart BBBB [Reserved]
Subpart CCCC_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Manufacturing of Nutritional Yeast
What This Subpart Covers
63.2130 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.2131 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.2132 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.2133 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Emission Limitations
63.2140 What emission limitations must I meet?
General Compliance Requirements
63.2150 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements
63.2160 By what date must I conduct an initial compliance demonstration?
63.2161 What performance tests and other procedures must I use if I
monitor brew ethanol?
63.2162 When must I conduct subsequent performance tests if I monitor
brew ethanol?
63.2163 If I monitor fermenter exhaust, what are my monitoring
installation, operation, and maintenance requirements?
63.2164 If I monitor brew ethanol, what are my monitoring installation,
operation, and maintenance requirements?
63.2165 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations if I monitor fermenter exhaust?
Continuous Compliance Requirements
63.2170 How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate continuous
compliance?
63.2171 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Notification, Reports, and Records
63.2180 What notifications must I submit and when?
63.2181 What reports must I submit and when?
63.2182 What records must I keep?
63.2183 In what form and how long must I keep my records?
Other Requirements and Information
63.2190 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
63.2191 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.2192 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart CCCC of Part 63--Emission Limitations
Table 2 to Subpart CCCC of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
If You Monitor Brew Ethanol
Table 3 to Subpart CCCC of Part 63--Initial Compliance With Emission
Limitations
Table 4 to Subpart CCCC of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With Emission
Limitations
Table 5 to Subpart CCCC of Part 63--Requirements for Reports
Table 6 to Subpart CCCC of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart CCCC
Table 7 to Subpart CCCC of Part 63--Emission Limitation Applicability
Timeline
Table 8 to Subpart CCCC of Part 63--Monitoring System Requirements
Timeline
Subpart DDDD_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Plywood and Composite Wood Products
What This Subpart Covers
63.2230 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.2231 Does this subpart apply to me?
63.2232 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.2233 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Compliance Options, Operating Requirements, and Work Practice
Requirements
63.2240 What are the compliance options and operating requirements and
how must I meet them?
63.2241 What are the work practice requirements and how must I meet
them?
General Compliance Requirements
63.2250 What are the general requirements?
63.2251 What are the requirements for the routine control device
maintenance exemption?
63.2252 What are the requirements for process units that have no control
or work practice requirements?
[[Page 10]]
Initial Compliance Requirements
63.2260 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the compliance
options, operating requirements, and work practice
requirements?
63.2261 By what date must I conduct performance tests or other initial
compliance demonstrations?
63.2262 How do I conduct performance tests and establish operating
requirements?
63.2263 Initial compliance demonstration for a dry rotary dryer.
63.2264 Initial compliance demonstration for a hardwood veneer dryer.
63.2265 Initial compliance demonstration for a softwood veneer dryer.
63.2266 Initial compliance demonstration for a veneer redryer.
63.2267 Initial compliance demonstration for a reconstituted wood
product press or board cooler.
63.2268 Initial compliance demonstration for a wet control device.
63.2269 What are my monitoring installation, operation, and maintenance
requirements?
Continuous Compliance Requirements
63.2270 How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate continuous
compliance?
63.2271 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the compliance
options, operating requirements, and work practice
requirements?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.2280 What notifications must I submit and when?
63.2281 What reports must I submit and when?
63.2282 What records must I keep?
63.2283 In what form and how long must I keep my records?
Other Requirements and Information
63.2290 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
63.2291 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.2292 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1A to Subpart DDDD of Part 63--Production-Based Compliance Options
Table 1B to Subpart DDDD of Part 63--Add-On Control Systems Compliance
Options
Table 2 to Subpart DDDD of Part 63--Operating Requirements
Table 3 to Subpart DDDD of Part 63--Work Practice Requirements
Table 4 to Subpart DDDD of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
Table 5 to Subpart DDDD of Part 63--Performance Testing and Initial
Compliance Demonstrations for the Compliance Options and
Operating Requirements
Table 6 to Subpart DDDD of Part 63--Initial Compliance Demonstrations
for Work Practice Requirements
Table 7 to Subpart DDDD of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With the
Compliance Options and Operating Requirements
Table 8 to Subpart DDDD of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With the Work
Practice Requirements
Table 9 to Subpart DDDD of Part 63--Requirements for Reports
Table 10 to Subpart DDDD of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart DDDD
Appendix A to Subpart DDDD of Part 63--Alternative Procedure To
Determine Capture Efficiency From Enclosures Around Hot
Presses in the Plywood and Composite Wood Products Industry
Using Sulfur Hexafluoride Tracer Gas
Subpart EEEE_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Organic Liquids Distribution (Non-Gasoline)
What This Subpart Covers
63.2330 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.2334 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.2338 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.2342 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
63.2343 What are my requirements for emission sources not requiring
control?
Emission Limitations, Operating Limits, and Work Practice Standards
63.2346 What emission limitations, operating limits, and work practice
standards must I meet?
General Compliance Requirements
63.2350 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements
63.2354 What performance tests, design evaluations, and performance
evaluations must I conduct?
63.2358 By what date must I conduct performance tests or other initial
compliance demonstrations?
63.2362 When must I conduct subsequent performance tests?
63.2366 What are my monitoring installation, operation, and maintenance
requirements?
63.2370 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations, operating limits, and work practice standards?
[[Page 11]]
Continuous Compliance Requirements
63.2374 When do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate continuous
compliance and how do I use the collected data?
63.2378 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations, operating limits, and work practice standards?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.2382 What notifications must I submit and when and what information
should be submitted?
63.2386 What reports must I submit and when and what information is to
be submitted in each?
63.2390 What records must I keep?
63.2394 In what form and how long must I keep my records?
Other Requirements and Information
63.2396 What compliance options do I have if part of my plant is subject
to both this subpart and another subpart?
63.2398 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
63.2402 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.2406 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart EEEE of Part 63--Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants
Table 2 to Subpart EEEE of Part 63--Emission Limits
Table 3 to Subpart EEEE of Part 63--Operating Limits--High Throughput
Transfer Racks
Table 4 to Subpart EEEE of Part 63--Work Practice Standards
Table 5 to Subpart EEEE of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
and Design Evaluations
Table 6 to Subpart EEEE of Part 63--Initial Compliance with Emission
Limits
Table 7 to Subpart EEEE of Part 63--Initial Compliance with Work
Practice Standards
Table 8 to Subpart EEEE of Part 63--Continuous Compliance with Emission
Limits
Table 9 to Subpart EEEE of Part 63--Continuous Compliance with Operating
Limits--High Throughput Transfer Racks
Table 10 to Subpart EEEE of Part 63--Continuous Compliance with Work
Practice Standards
Table 11 to Subpart EEEE of Part 63--Requirements for Reports
Table 12 to Subpart EEEE of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart EEEE
Subpart FFFF_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing
What This Subpart Covers
63.2430 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.2435 Am I subject to the requirements in this subpart?
63.2440 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
Compliance Dates
63.2445 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Emission Limits, Work Practice Standards, and Compliance Requirements
63.2450 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
63.2455 What requirements must I meet for continuous process vents?
63.2460 What requirements must I meet for batch process vents?
63.2465 What requirements must I meet for process vents that emit
hydrogen halide and halogen HAP or HAP metals?
63.2470 What requirements must I meet for storage tanks?
63.2475 What requirements must I meet for transfer racks?
63.2480 What requirements must I meet for equipment leaks?
63.2485 What requirements must I meet for wastewater streams and liquid
streams in open systems within an MCPU?
63.2490 What requirements must I meet for heat exchange systems?
Alternative Means of Compliance
63.2495 How do I comply with the pollution prevention standard?
63.2500 How do I comply with emissions averaging?
63.2505 How do I comply with the alternative standard?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.2515 What notifications must I submit and when?
63.2520 What reports must I submit and when?
63.2525 What records must I keep?
Other Requirements and Information
63.2535 What compliance options do I have if part of my plant is subject
to both this subpart and another subpart?
63.2540 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
63.2545 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
[[Page 12]]
63.2550 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63--Emission Limits and Work Practice
Standards for Continuous Process Vents
Table 2 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63--Emission Limits and Work Practice
Standards for Batch Process Vents
Table 3 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63--Emission Limits for Hydrogen Halide
and Halogen HAP Emissions or HAP Metals Emissions From Process
Vents
Table 4 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63--Emission Limits for Storage Tanks
Table 5 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63--Emission Limits and Work Practice
Standards for Transfer Racks
Table 6 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63--Requirements for Equipment Leaks
Table 7 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63--Requirements for Wastewater Streams
and Liquid Streams in Open Systems Within an MCPU
Table 8 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63--Partially Soluble Hazardous Air
Pollutants
Table 9 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63--Soluble Hazardous Air Pollutants
Table 10 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63--Requirements for Heat Exchange
Systems
Table 11 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63--Requirements for Reports
Table 12 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
(Subpart A) to Subpart FFFF
Subpart GGGG_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production
What This Subpart Covers
63.2830 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.2831 Where can I find definitions of key words used in this subpart?
63.2832 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.2833 Is my source categorized as existing or new?
63.2834 When do I have to comply with the standards in this subpart?
Standards
63.2840 What emission requirements must I meet?
Compliance Requirements
63.2850 How do I comply with the hazardous air pollutant emission
standards?
63.2851 What is a plan for demonstrating compliance?
63.2852 What is a startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan?
63.2853 How do I determine the actual solvent loss?
63.2854 How do I determine the weighted average volume fraction of HAP
in the actual solvent loss?
63.2855 How do I determine the quantity of oilseed processed?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.2860 What notifications must I submit and when?
63.2861 What reports must I submit and when?
63.2862 What records must I keep?
63.2863 In what form and how long must I keep my records?
Other Requirements and Information
63.2870 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
63.2871 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.2872 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Subpart HHHH_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Wet-Formed Fiberglass Mat Production
What This Subpart Covers
63.2980 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.2981 Does this subpart apply to me?
63.2982 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
Emission Limitations
63.2983 What emission limits must I meet?
63.2984 What operating limits must I meet?
63.2985 When do I have to comply with these standards?
63.2986 How do I comply with the standards?
Operation, Maintenance, and Monitoring Plan
63.2987 What must my operation, maintenance, and monitoring (OMM) plan
include?
63.2988 [Reserved]
63.2989 How do I change my (OMM) plan?
63.2990 Can I conduct short-term experimental production runs that cause
parameters to deviate from operating limits?
Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements
63.2991 When must I conduct performance tests?
63.2992 How do I conduct a performance test?
63.2993 What test methods must I use in conducting performance tests?
63.2994 How do I verify the performance of monitoring equipment?
63.2995 What equations must I use to determine compliance?
[[Page 13]]
Monitoring Requirements
63.2996 What must I monitor?
63.2997 What are the requirements for monitoring devices?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.2998 What records must I maintain?
63.2999 In what form and for how long must I maintain records?
63.3000 What notifications and reports must I submit?
Other Requirements and Information
63.3001 What sections of the general provisions apply to me?
63.3002 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.3003 [Reserved]
63.3004 What definitions apply to this subpart?
63.3005-63.3079 [Reserved]
Table 1 to Subpart HHHH of Part 63--Minimum Requirements for Monitoring
and Recordkeeping
Table 2 to Subpart HHHH of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
(40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A) to Subpart HHHH
Appendix A to Subpart HHHH of Part 63--Method for Determining Free-
Formaldehyde in Urea-Formaldehyde Resins by Sodium Sulfite
(Iced & Cooled)
Appendix B to Subpart HHHH of Part 63--Method for the Determination of
Loss-on-Ignition
Subpart IIII_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
What This Subpart Covers
63.3080 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.3081 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.3082 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.3083 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Emission Limitations
63.3090 What emission limits must I meet for a new or reconstructed
affected source?
63.3091 What emission limits must I meet for an existing affected
source?
63.3092 How must I control emissions from my electrodeposition primer
system if I want to comply with the combined primer-surfacer,
topcoat, final repair, glass bonding primer, and glass bonding
adhesive emission limit?
63.3093 What operating limits must I meet?
63.3094 What work practice standards must I meet?
General Compliance Requirements
63.3100 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
63.3101 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.3110 What notifications must I submit?
63.3120 What reports must I submit?
63.3130 What records must I keep?
63.3131 In what form and for how long must I keep my records?
Compliance Requirements for Adhesive, Sealer, and Deadener
63.3150 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.3151 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.3152 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Combined Electrodeposition Primer,
Primer-Surfacer, Topcoat, Final Repair, Glass Bonding Primer, and Glass
Bonding Adhesive Emission Limitations
63.3160 By what date must I conduct performance tests and other initial
compliance demonstrations?
63.3161 How do I demonstrate initial compliance?
63.3162 [Reserved]
63.3163 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.3164 What are the general requirements for performance tests?
63.3165 How do I determine the emission capture system efficiency?
63.3166 How do I determine the add-on control device emission
destruction or removal efficiency?
63.3167 How do I establish the add-on control device operating limits
during the performance test?
63.3168 What are the requirements for continuous parameter monitoring
system installation, operation, and maintenance?
63.3169 What are the requirements for a capture system or add-on control
device which is not taken into account when demonstrating
compliance with the applicable emission limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Combined Primer-Surfacer, Topcoat, Final
Repair, Glass Bonding Primer, and Glass Bonding Adhesive Emission
Limitations and the Separate Electrodeposition Primer Emission
Limitations
63.3170 By what date must I conduct performance tests and other initial
compliance demonstrations?
[[Page 14]]
63.3171 How do I demonstrate initial compliance?
63.3172 [Reserved]
63.3173 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.3174 What are the requirements for a capture system or add-on control
device which is not taken into account when demonstrating
compliance with the applicable emission limitations?
Other Requirements and Information
63.3175 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.3176 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Tables to Subpart IIII of Part 63
Table 1 to Subpart IIII of Part 63--Operating Limits for Capture Systems
and Add-On Control Devices
Table 2 to Subpart IIII of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart IIII of Part 63
Table 3 to Subpart IIII of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Solvents and Solvent Blends
Table 4 to Subpart IIII of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Petroleum Solvent Groups
Appendix A to Subpart IIII of Part 63--Determination of Capture
Efficiency of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Spray Booth
Emissions From Solvent-borne Coatings Using Panel Testing
Subpart JJJJ_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Paper and Other Web Coating
What This Subpart Covers
63.3280 What is in this subpart?
63.3290 Does this subpart apply to me?
63.3300 Which of my emission sources are affected by this subpart?
63.3310 What definitions are used in this subpart?
Emission Standards and Compliance Dates
63.3320 What emission standards must I meet?
63.3321 What operating limits must I meet?
63.3330 When must I comply?
General Requirements for Compliance With the Emission Standards and for
Monitoring and Performance Tests
63.3340 What general requirements must I meet to comply with the
standards?
63.3350 If I use a control device to comply with the emission standards
what monitoring must I do?
63.3360 What performance tests must I conduct?
Requirements for Showing Compliance
63.3370 How do I demonstrate compliance with the emission standards?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.3400 What notifications and reports must I submit?
63.3410 What records must I keep?
Delegation of Authority
63.3420 What authorities may be delegated to the States?
Table 1 to Subpart JJJJ of Part 63--Operating Limits if Using Add-On
Control Devices and Capture System
Table 2 to Subpart JJJJ of Part 63--Applicability of 40 CFR Part 63
General Provisions to Subpart JJJJ
Subpart KKKK_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Surface Coating of Metal Cans
What This Subpart Covers
63.3480 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.3481 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.3482 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.3483 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Emission Limitations
63.3490 What emission limits must I meet?
63.3491 What are my options for meeting the emission limits?
63.3492 What operating limits must I meet?
63.3493 What work practice standards must I meet?
General Compliance Requirements
63.3500 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
63.3501 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.3510 What notifications must I submit?
63.3511 What reports must I submit?
63.3512 What records must I keep?
63.3513 In what form and for how long must I keep my records?
Compliance Requirements for the Compliant Material Option
63.3520 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.3521 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.3522 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
[[Page 15]]
Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate Without Add-On Controls
Option
63.3530 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.3531 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.3532 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate With Add-On Controls
Option
63.3540 By what date must I conduct performance tests and other initial
compliance demonstrations?
63.3541 How do I demonstrate initial compliance?
63.3542 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.3543 What are the general requirements for performance tests?
63.3544 How do I determine the emission capture system efficiency?
63.3545 How do I determine the add-on control device emission
destruction or removal efficiency?
63.3546 How do I establish the emission capture system and add-on
control device operating limits during the performance test?
63.3547 What are the requirements for continuous parameter monitoring
system installation, operation, and maintenance?
Compliance Requirements for the Control Efficiency/Outlet Concentration
Option
63.3550 By what date must I conduct performance tests and other initial
compliance demonstrations?
63.3551 How do I demonstrate initial compliance?
63.3552 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.3553 What are the general requirements for performance tests?
63.3554 How do I determine the emission capture system efficiency?
63.3555 How do I determine the outlet THC emissions and add-on control
device emission destruction or removal efficiency?
63.3556 How do I establish the emission capture system and add-on
control device operating limits during the performance test?
63.3557 What are the requirements for continuous parameter monitoring
system installation, operation, and maintenance?
Other Requirements and Information
63.3560 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.3561 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63--Emission Limits for New or
Reconstructed Affected Sources
Table 2 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63--Emission Limits for Existing
Affected Sources
Table 3 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63--Emission Limits for Affected Sources
Using the Control Efficiency/Outlet Concentration Compliance
Option
Table 4 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63--Operating Limits if Using the
Emission Rate with Add-on Controls Option or the Control
Efficiency/Outlet Concentration Compliance Option
Table 5 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart KKKK
Table 6 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Solvents and Solvent Blends
Table 7 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Petroleum Solvent Groups
Subpart MMMM_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products
What This Subpart Covers
63.3880 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.3881 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.3882 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.3883 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Emission Limitations
63.3890 What emission limits must I meet?
63.3891 What are my options for meeting the emission limits?
63.3892 What operating limits must I meet?
63.3893 What work practice standards must I meet?
General Compliance Requirements
63.3900 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
63.3901 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.3910 What notifications must I submit?
63.3920 What reports must I submit?
63.3930 What records must I keep?
63.3931 In what form and for how long must I keep my records?
Compliance Requirements for the Compliant Material Option
63.3940 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.3941 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
[[Page 16]]
63.3942 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate Without Add-On Controls
Option
63.3950 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.3951 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.3952 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate With Add-On Controls
Option
63.3960 By what date must I conduct performance tests and other initial
compliance demonstrations?
63.3961 How do I demonstrate initial compliance?
63.3962 [Reserved]
63.3963 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.3964 What are the general requirements for performance tests?
63.3965 How do I determine the emission capture system efficiency?
63.3966 How do I determine the add-on control device emission
destruction or removal efficiency?
63.3967 How do I establish the emission capture system and add-on
control device operating limits during the performance test?
63.3968 What are the requirements for continuous parameter monitoring
system installation, operation, and maintenance?
Other Requirements and Information
63.3980 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.3981 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart MMMM of Part 63--Operating Limits if Using the
Emission Rate with Add-on Controls Option
Table 2 to Subpart MMMM of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart MMMM of Part 63
Table 3 to Subpart MMMM of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Solvents and Solvent Blends
Table 4 to Subpart MMMM of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Petroleum Solvent Groups
Appendix A to Subpart MMMM of Part 63--Alternative Capture Efficiency
and Destruction Efficiency Measurement and Capture Efficiency
Monitoring Procedures for Magnet Wire Coating Operations
Subpart NNNN_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Surface Coating of Large Appliances
What This Subpart Covers
63.4080 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.4081 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.4082 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.4083 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Emission Limitations
63.4090 What emission limits must I meet?
63.4091 What are my options for meeting the emission limits?
63.4092 What operating limits must I meet?
63.4093 What work practice standards must I meet?
General Compliance Requirements
63.4100 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
63.4101 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.4110 What notifications must I submit?
63.4120 What reports must I submit?
63.4121 What are my electronic reporting requirements?
63.4130 What records must I keep?
63.4131 In what form and for how long must I keep my records?
Compliance Requirements for the Compliant Material Option
63.4140 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.4141 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.4142 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate Without Add-On Controls
Option
63.4150 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.4151 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.4152 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate With Add-On Controls
Option
63.4160 By what date must I conduct initial performance tests and other
initial compliance demonstrations?
63.4161 How do I demonstrate initial compliance?
[[Page 17]]
63.4162 [Reserved]
63.4163 How do I conduct periodic performance tests and demonstrate
continuous compliance with the emission limitations?
63.4164 What are the general requirements for performance tests?
63.4165 How do I determine the emission capture system efficiency?
63.4166 How do I determine the add-on control device emission
destruction or removal efficiency?
63.4167 How do I establish the emission capture system and add-on
control device operating limits during performance tests?
63.4168 What are the requirements for continuous parameter monitoring
system installation, operation, and maintenance?
Other Requirements and Information
63.4180 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.4181 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart NNNN of Part 63--Operating Limits if Using the
Emission Rate with Add-on Controls Option
Table 2 to Subpart NNNN of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart NNNN
Table 3 to Subpart NNNN of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Solvents and Solvent Blends
Table 4 to Subpart NNNN of Part 63--Default Organic Mass Fraction for
Petroleum Solvent Groups
Table 5 to Subpart NNNN of Part 63--List of Hazardous Air Pollutants
That Must Be Counted Toward Total Organic HAP Content if
Present at 0.1 Percent or More by Mass
Subpart OOOO_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles
What This Subpart Covers
63.4280 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.4281 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.4282 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.4283 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Emission Limitations
63.4290 What emission limits must I meet?
63.4291 What are my options for meeting the emission limits?
63.4292 What operating limits must I meet?
63.4293 What work practice standards must I meet?
General Compliance Requirements
63.4300 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
63.4301 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.4310 What notifications must I submit?
63.4311 What reports must I submit?
63.4312 What records must I keep?
63.4313 In what form and for how long must I keep my records?
Compliance Requirements for the Compliant Material Option
63.4320 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.4321 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.4322 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate Without Add-On Controls
Option
63.4330 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.4331 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.4332 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate With Add-On Controls
Option
63.4340 By what date must I conduct initial performance tests and other
initial compliance demonstrations?
63.4341 How do I demonstrate initial compliance?
63.4342 How do I conduct periodic performance tests and demonstrate
continuous compliance with the emission limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Organic HAP Overall Control Efficiency
and Oxidizer Outlet Organic HAP Concentration Options
63.4350 By what date must I conduct performance tests and other initial
compliance demonstrations?
63.4351 How do I demonstrate initial compliance?
63.4352 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Performance Testing and Monitoring Requirements
63.4360 What are the general requirements for performance tests?
63.4361 How do I determine the emission capture system efficiency?
[[Page 18]]
63.4362 How do I determine the add-on control device emission
destruction or removal efficiency?
63.4363 How do I establish the add-on control device operating limits
during the performance test?
63.4364 What are the requirements for CPMS installation, operation, and
maintenance?
Other Requirements and Information
63.4370 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.4371 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart OOOO of Part 63--Emission Limits for New or
Reconstructed and Existing Affected Sources in the Printing,
Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles Source
Category
Table 2 to Subpart OOOO of Part 63--Operating Limits if Using Add-On
Control Devices and Capture System
Table 3 to Subpart OOOO of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart OOOO
Table 4 to Subpart OOOO of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Solvents and Solvent Blends
Table 5 to Subpart OOOO of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Petroleum Solvent Groups
Table 6 to Subpart OOOO of Part 63--List of Hazardous Air Pollutants
That Must Be Counted Toward Total Organic HAP Content if
Present at 0.1 Percent or More by Mass
Subpart PPPP_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Surface Coating of Plastic Parts and Products
What This Subpart Covers
63.4480 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.4481 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.4482 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.4483 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Emission Limitations
63.4490 What emission limits must I meet?
63.4491 What are my options for meeting the emission limits?
63.4492 What operating limits must I meet?
63.4493 What work practice standards must I meet?
General Compliance Requirements
63.4500 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
63.4501 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.4510 What notifications must I submit?
63.4520 What reports must I submit?
63.4530 What records must I keep?
63.4531 In what form and for how long must I keep my records?
Compliance Requirements for the Compliant Material Option
63.4540 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.4541 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.4542 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate Without Add-On Controls
Option
63.4550 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.4551 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.4552 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate With Add-On Controls
Option
63.4560 By what date must I conduct performance tests and other initial
compliance demonstrations?
63.4561 How do I demonstrate initial compliance?
63.4562 [Reserved]
63.4563 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.4564 What are the general requirements for performance tests?
63.4565 How do I determine the emission capture system efficiency?
63.4566 How do I determine the add-on control device emission
destruction or removal efficiency?
63.4567 How do I establish the emission capture system and add-on
control device operating limits during the performance test?
63.4568 What are the requirements for continuous parameter monitoring
system installation, operation, and maintenance?
Other Requirements and Information
63.4580 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.4581 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart PPPP of Part 63--Operating Limits if Using the
Emission Rate with Add-on Controls Option
Table 2 to Subpart PPPP of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart PPPP of Part 63
[[Page 19]]
Table 3 to Subpart PPPP of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Solvents and Solvent Blends
Table 4 to Subpart PPPP of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Petroleum Solvent Groups
Appendix A to Subpart PPPP of Part 63--Determination of Weight Volatile
Matter Content and Weight Solids Content of Reactive Adhesives
Subpart QQQQ_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Surface Coating of Wood Building Products
What This Subpart Covers
63.4680 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.4681 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.4682 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.4683 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Emission Limitations
63.4690 What emission limits must I meet?
63.4691 What are my options for meeting the emission limits?
63.4692 What operating limits must I meet?
63.4693 What work practice standards must I meet?
General Compliance Requirements
63.4700 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
63.4701 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.4710 What notifications must I submit?
63.4720 What reports must I submit?
63.4730 What records must I keep?
63.4731 In what form and for how long must I keep my records?
Compliance Requirements for the Compliant Material Option
63.4740 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.4741 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.4742 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate Without Add-On Controls
Option
63.4750 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.4751 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.4752 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate With Add-On Controls
Option
63.4760 By what date must I conduct performance tests and other initial
compliance demonstrations?
63.4761 How do I demonstrate initial compliance?
63.4762 [Reserved]
63.4763 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.4764 What are the general requirements for performance tests?
63.4765 How do I determine the emission capture system efficiency?
63.4766 How do I determine the add-on control device emission
destruction or removal efficiency?
63.4767 How do I establish the emission capture system and add-on
control device operating limits during the performance test?
63.4768 What are the requirements for continuous parameter monitoring
system installation, operation, and maintenance?
Other Requirements and Information
63.4780 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.4781 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart QQQQ of Part 63--Emission Limits for New or
Reconstructed Affected Sources
Table 2 to Subpart QQQQ of Part 63--Emission Limits for Existing
Affected Sources
Table 3 to Subpart QQQQ of Part 63--Operating Limits if Using the
Emission Rate with Add-on Controls Option
Table 4 to Subpart QQQQ of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart QQQQ of Part 63
Table 5 to Subpart QQQQ of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Solvents and Solvent Blends
Table 6 to Subpart QQQQ of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Petroleum Solvent Groups
Subpart RRRR_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Surface Coating of Metal Furniture
What This Subpart Covers
63.4880 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.4881 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.4882 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.4883 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Emission Limitations
63.4890 What Emission Limits Must I Meet?
[[Page 20]]
63.4891 What are my options for demonstrating compliance with the
emission limits?
63.4892 What operating limits must I meet?
63.4893 What work practice standards must I meet?
General Compliance Requirements
63.4900 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
63.4901 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.4910 What notifications must I submit?
63.4920 What reports must I submit?
63.4921 What are my electronic reporting requirements?
63.4930 What records must I keep?
63.4931 In what form and for how long must I keep my records?
Compliance Requirements for the Compliant Material Option
63.4940 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.4941 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.4942 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate Without Add-On Controls
Option
63.4950 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance
demonstration?
63.4951 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations?
63.4952 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations?
Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate With Add-On Controls
Option
63.4960 By what date must I conduct initial performance tests and other
initial compliance demonstrations?
63.4961 How do I demonstrate initial compliance?
63.4962 How do I conduct periodic performance tests and demonstrate
continuous compliance with the emission limitations?
63.4963 What are the general requirements for performance tests?
63.4964 How do I determine the emission capture system efficiency?
63.4965 How do I determine the add-on control device emission
destruction or removal efficiency?
63.4966 How do I establish the emission capture system and add-on
control device operating limits during performance tests?
63.4967 What are the requirements for continuous parameter monitoring
system installation, operation, and maintenance?
Other Requirements and Information
63.4980 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.4981 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart RRRR of Part 63--Operating Limits if Using the
Emission Rate with Add-on Controls Option
Table 2 to Subpart RRRR of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart RRRR
Table 3 to Subpart RRRR of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Solvents and Solvent Blends
Table 4 to Subpart RRRR of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction
for Petroleum Solvent Groups
Table 5 to Subpart RRRR of Part 63--List of Hazardous Air Pollutants
That Must Be Counted Toward Total Organic HAP Content if
Present at 0.1 Percent or More by Mass
Subpart SSSS_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Surface Coating of Metal Coil
What This Subpart Covers
63.5080 What is in this subpart?
63.5090 Does this subpart apply to me?
63.5100 Which of my emissions sources are affected by this subpart?
63.5110 What special definitions are used in this subpart?
Emission Standards and Compliance Dates
63.5120 What emission standards must I meet?
63.5121 What operating limits must I meet?
63.5130 When must I comply?
General Requirements for Compliance with the Emission Standards and for
Monitoring and Performance Tests
63.5140 What general requirements must I meet to comply with the
standards?
63.5150 If I use a control device to comply with the emission standards,
what monitoring must I do?
63.5160 What performance tests must I complete?
Requirements for Showing Compliance
63.5170 How do I demonstrate compliance with the standards?
Reporting and Recordkeeping
63.5180 What reports must I submit?
63.5190 What records must I maintain?
[[Page 21]]
Delegation of Authority
63.5200 What authorities may be delegated to the States?
63.5201-63.5209 [Reserved]
Table 1 to Subpart SSSS of Part 63--Operating Limits if Using Add-on
Control Devices and Capture System
Table 2 to Subpart SSSS of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart SSSS
Subpart TTTT_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Leather Finishing Operations
What This Subpart Covers
63.5280 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.5285 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.5290 What parts of my facility does this subpart cover?
63.5295 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Standards
63.5305 What emission standards must I meet?
Compliance Requirements
63.5320 How does my affected major source comply with the HAP emission
standards?
63.5325 What is a plan for demonstrating compliance and when must I have
one in place?
63.5330 How do I determine the compliance ratio?
63.5335 How do I determine the actual HAP loss?
63.5340 How do I determine the allowable HAP loss?
63.5345 How do I distinguish between the two upholstery product process
operations?
63.5350 How do I distinguish between the water-resistant/specialty and
nonwater-resistant leather product process operations?
63.5355 How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate continuous
compliance?
63.5360 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
standards?
Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements
63.5375 When must I conduct a performance test or initial compliance
demonstration?
63.5380 How do I conduct performance tests?
63.5385 How do I measure the quantity of finish applied to the leather?
63.5390 How do I measure the HAP content of a finish?
63.5395 How do I measure the density of a finish?
63.5400 How do I measure the quantity of leather processed?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.5415 What notifications must I submit and when?
63.5420 What reports must I submit and when?
63.5425 When must I start recordkeeping to determine my compliance
ratio?
63.5430 What records must I keep?
63.5435 In what form and how long must I keep my records?
Other Requirements and Information
63.5450 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
63.5455 Who administers this subpart?
63.5460 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Figure 1 to Subpart TTTT of Part 63--Example Logs for Recording Leather
Finish Use and HAP Content
Table 1 to Subpart TTTT of Part 63--Leather Finishing HAP Emission
Limits for Determining the Allowable HAP Loss
Table 2 to Subpart TTTT of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart TTTT
Subpart UUUU_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Cellulose Products Manufacturing
What This Subpart Covers
63.5480 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.5485 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.5490 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.5495 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Emission Limits, Operating Limits, and Work Practice Standards
63.5505 What emission limits, operating limits, and work practice
standards must I meet?
General Compliance Requirements
63.5515 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements
63.5530 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limits
and work practice standards?
63.5535 What performance tests and other procedures must I use?
63.5540 By what date must I conduct a performance test or other initial
compliance demonstration?
[[Page 22]]
63.5545 What are my monitoring installation, operation, and maintenance
requirements?
Continuous Compliance Requirements
63.5555 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limits, operating limits, and work practice standards?
63.5560 How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate continuous
compliance?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.5575 What notifications must I submit and when?
63.5580 What reports must I submit and when?
63.5585 What records must I keep?
63.5590 In what form and how long must I keep my records?
Other Requirements and Information
63.5595 What compliance options do I have if part of my affected source
is subject to both this subpart and another subpart?
63.5600 What other requirements apply to me?
63.5605 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.5610 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart UUUU of Part 63--Emission Limits and Work Practice
Standards
Table 2 to Subpart UUUU of Part 63--Operating Limits
Table 3 to Subpart UUUU of Part 63--Initial Compliance With Emission
Limits and Work Practice Standards
Table 4 to Subpart UUUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
Table 5 to Subpart UUUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance with Emission
Limits and Work Practice Standards
Table 6 to Subpart UUUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance with Operating
Limits
Table 7 to Subpart UUUU of Part 63--Requirements for Notifications
Table 8 to Subpart UUUU of Part 63--Requirements for Reports
Table 9 to Subpart UUUU of Part 63--Requirements for Recordkeeping
Table 10 to Subpart UUUU of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart UUUU
Subpart VVVV_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Boat Manufacturing
What the Subpart Covers
63.5680 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.5683 Does this subpart apply to me?
63.5686 How do I demonstrate that my facility is not a major source?
63.5689 What parts of my facility are covered by this subpart?
63.5692 How do I know if my boat manufacturing facility is a new source
or an existing source?
63.5695 When must I comply with this subpart?
Standards for Open Molding Resin and Gel Coat Operations
63.5698 What emission limit must I meet for open molding resin and gel
coat operations?
63.5701 What are my options for complying with the open molding emission
limit?
63.5704 What are the general requirements for complying with the open
molding emission limit?
63.5707 What is an implementation plan for open molding operations and
when do I need to prepare one?
63.5710 How do I demonstrate compliance using emissions averaging?
63.5713 How do I demonstrate compliance using compliant materials?
63.5714 How do I demonstrate compliance if I use filled resins?
Demonstrating Compliance for Open Molding Operations Controlled by Add-
on Control Devices
63.5715 What operating limits must I meet?
63.5716 When must I conduct a performance test?
63.5719 How do I conduct a performance test?
63.5722 How do I use the performance test data to demonstrate initial
compliance?
63.5725 What are the requirements for monitoring and demonstrating
continuous compliance?
Standards for Closed Molding Resin Operations
63.5728 What standards must I meet for closed molding resin operations?
Standards for Resin and Gel Coat Mixing Operations
63.5731 What standards must I meet for resin and gel coat mixing
operations?
Standards for Resin and Gel Coat Application Equipment Cleaning
Operations
63.5734 What standards must I meet for resin and gel coat application
equipment cleaning operations?
63.5737 How do I demonstrate compliance with the resin and gel coat
application equipment cleaning standards?
[[Page 23]]
Standards for Carpet and Fabric Adhesive Operations
63.5740 What emission limit must I meet for carpet and fabric adhesive
operations?
Standards for Aluminum Recreational Boat Surface Coating Operations
63.5743 What standards must I meet for aluminum recreational boat
surface coating operations?
63.5746 How do I demonstrate compliance with the emission limits for
aluminum wipedown solvents and aluminum coatings?
63.5749 How do I calculate the organic HAP content of aluminum wipedown
solvents?
63.5752 How do I calculate the organic HAP content of aluminum
recreational boat surface coatings?
63.5753 How do I calculate the combined organic HAP content of aluminum
wipedown solvents and aluminum recreational boat surface
coatings?
63.5755 How do I demonstrate compliance with the aluminum recreational
boat surface coating spray gun cleaning work practice
standards?
Methods for Determining Hazardous Air Pollutant Content
63.5758 How do I determine the organic HAP content of materials?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.5761 What notifications must I submit and when?
63.5764 What reports must I submit and when?
63.5767 What records must I keep?
63.5770 In what form and for how long must I keep my records?
Other Information You Need To Know
63.5773 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
63.5776 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
Definitions
63.5779 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart VVVV of Part 63--Compliance Dates for New and
Existing Boat Manufacturing Facilities
Table 2 to Subpart VVVV of Part 63--Alternative HAP Content Requirements
for Open Molding Resin and Gel Coat Operations
Table 3 to Subpart VVVV of Part 63--MACT Model Point Value Formulas for
Open Molding Operations
Table 4 to Subpart VVVV of Part 63--Operating Limits If Using an Add-on
Control Device for Open Molding Operations
Table 5 to Subpart VVVV of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Contents of
Solvents and Solvent Blends
Table 6 to Subpart VVVV of Part 63--Default Organic HAP Contents of
Petroleum Solvent Groups
Table 7 to Subpart VVVV of Part 63--Applicability and Timing of
Notifications
Table 8 to Subpart VVVV of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
(40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A) to Subpart VVVV
Subpart WWWW_National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Reinforced Plastic Composites Production
What This Subpart Covers
63.5780 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.5785 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.5787 What if I also manufacture fiberglass boats or boat parts?
63.5790 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.5795 How do I know if my reinforced plastic composites production
facility is a new affected source or an existing affected
source?
Calculating Organic HAP Emissions Factors for Open Molding and
Centrifugal Casting
63.5796 What are the organic HAP emissions factor equations in Table 1
to this subpart and how are they used in this subpart?
63.5797 How do I determine the organic HAP content of my resins and gel
coats?
63.5798 What if I want to use, or I manufacture, an application
technology (new or existing) whose organic HAP emissions
characteristics are not represented by the equations in Table
1 to this subpart?
63.5799 How do I calculate my facility's organic HAP emissions on a tpy
basis for purposes of determining which paragraphs of Sec.
63.5805 apply?
Compliance Dates and Standards
63.5800 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
63.5805 What standards must I meet to comply with this subpart?
Options for Meeting Standards
63.5810 What are my options for meeting the standards for open molding
and centrifugal casting operations at new and existing
sources?
63.5820 What are my options for meeting the standards for continuous
lamination/casting operations?
[[Page 24]]
63.5830 What are my options for meeting the standards for pultrusion
operations subject to the 60 weight percent organic HAP
emissions reductions requirement?
General Compliance Requirements
63.5835 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements
63.5840 By what date must I conduct a performance test or other initial
compliance demonstration?
63.5845 When must I conduct subsequent performance tests?
63.5850 How do I conduct performance tests, performance evaluations, and
design evaluations?
63.5855 What are my monitor installation and operation requirements?
63.5860 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the standards?
Emissions Factor, Percent Reduction, and Capture Efficiency Calculation
Procedures for Continuous Lamination/Casting Operations
63.5865 What data must I generate to demonstrate compliance with the
standards for continuous lamination/casting operations?
63.5870 How do I calculate annual uncontrolled and controlled organic
HAP emissions from my wet-out area(s) and from my oven(s) for
continuous lamination/casting operations?
63.5875 How do I determine the capture efficiency of the enclosure on my
wet-out area and the capture efficiency of my oven(s) for
continuous lamination/casting operations?
63.5880 How do I determine how much neat resin plus is applied to the
line and how much neat gel coat plus is applied to the line
for continuous lamination/casting operations?
63.5885 How do I calculate percent reduction to demonstrate compliance
for continuous lamination/casting operations?
63.5890 How do I calculate an organic HAP emissions factor to
demonstrate compliance for continuous lamination/casting
operations?
Continuous Compliance Requirements
63.5895 How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate continuous
compliance?
63.5900 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the standards?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.5905 What notifications must I submit and when?
63.5910 What reports must I submit and when?
63.5915 What records must I keep?
63.5920 In what form and how long must I keep my records?
Other Requirements and Information
63.5925 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
63.5930 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.5935 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Equations To Calculate Organic HAP
Emissions Factors for Specific Open Molding and Centrifugal
Casting Process Streams
Table 2 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Compliance Dates for New and
Existing Reinforced Plastic Composites Facilities
Table 3 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Organic HAP Emissions Limits for
Existing Open Molding Sources, New Open Molding Sources
Emitting Less Than 100 TPY of HAP, and New and Existing
Centrifugal Casting and Continuous Lamination/Casting Sources
That Emit Less Than 100 TPY of HAP
Table 4 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Work Practice Standards
Table 5 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Alternative Organic HAP Emissions
Limits for Open Molding, Centrifugal Casting, and SMC
Manufacturing Operations Where the Standards Are Based on a 95
Percent Reduction Requirement
Table 6 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Basic Requirements for Performance
Tests, Performance Evaluations, and Design Evaluations for New
and Existing Sources Using Add-On Control Devices
Table 7 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Options Allowing Use of the Same
Resin Across Different Operations That Use the Same Resin Type
Table 8 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Initial Compliance With Organic HAP
Emissions Limits
Table 9 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Initial Compliance With Work
Practice Standards.
Table 10 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Data Requirements for New and
Existing Continuous Lamination Lines and Continuous Casting
Lines Complying With a Percent Reduction Limit on a Per Line
Basis
Table 11 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Data Requirements for New and
Existing Continuous Lamination and Continuous Casting Lines
Complying With a Percent Reduction Limit or a Lbs/Ton Limit on
an Averaging Basis
[[Page 25]]
Table 12 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Data Requirements for New and
Existing Continuous Lamination Lines and Continuous Casting
Lines Complying With a Lbs/Ton Organic HAP Emissions Limit on
a Per Line Basis
Table 13 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Applicability and Timing of
Notifications
Table 14 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Requirements for Reports
Table 15 to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
(Subpart A) to Subpart WWWW of Part 63
Appendix A to Subpart WWWW of Part 63--Test Method for Determining Vapor
Suppressant Effectiveness
Subpart XXXX_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Rubber Tire Manufacturing
What This Subpart Covers
63.5980 What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.5981 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.5982 What parts of my facility does this subpart cover?
63.5983 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Emission Limits for Tire Production Affected Sources
63.5984 What emission limits must I meet for tire production affected
sources?
63.5985 What are my alternatives for meeting the emission limits for
tire production affected sources?
Emission Limits for Tire Cord Production Affected Sources
63.5986 What emission limits must I meet for tire cord production
affected sources?
63.5987 What are my alternatives for meeting the emission limits for
tire cord production affected sources?
Emission Limitations for Puncture Sealant Application Affected Sources
63.5988 What emission limitations must I meet for puncture sealant
application affected sources?
63.5989 What are my alternatives for meeting the emission limitations
for puncture sealant application affected sources?
General Compliance Requirements
63.5990 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
General Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements
63.5991 By what date must I conduct an initial compliance demonstration
or performance test?
63.5992 When must I conduct subsequent performance tests?
63.5993 What performance tests and other procedures must I use?
Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements for Tire Production Affected
Sources
63.5994 How do I conduct tests and procedures for tire production
affected sources?
63.5995 What are my monitoring installation, operation, and maintenance
requirements?
63.5996 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limits
for tire production affected sources?
Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements for Tire Cord Production
Affected Sources
63.5997 How do I conduct tests and procedures for tire cord production
affected sources?
63.5998 What are my monitoring installation, operation, and maintenance
requirements?
63.5999 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limits
for tire cord production affected sources?
Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements for Puncture Sealant
Application Affected Sources
63.6000 How do I conduct tests and procedures for puncture sealant
application affected sources?
63.6001 What are my monitoring installation, operation, and maintenance
requirements?
63.6002 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limits
for puncture sealant application affected sources?
Continuous Compliance Requirements for Tire Production Affected Sources
63.6003 How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate continuous
compliance with the emission limits for tire production
affected sources?
63.6004 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limits for tire production affected sources?
Continuous Compliance Requirements for Tire Cord Production Affected
Sources
63.6005 How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate continuous
compliance with the emission limits for tire cord production
affected sources?
63.6006 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limits for tire cord production affected sources?
[[Page 26]]
Continuous Compliance Requirements for Puncture Sealant Application
Affected Sources
63.6007 How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate continuous
compliance with the emission limitations for puncture sealant
application affected sources?
63.6008 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations for puncture sealant application affected sources?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.6009 What notifications must I submit and when?
63.6010 What reports must I submit and when?
63.6011 What records must I keep?
63.6012 In what form and how long must I keep my records?
Other Requirements and Information
63.6013 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
63.6014 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.6015 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Emission Limits for Tire Production
Affected Sources
Table 2 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Emission Limits for Tire Cord
Production Affected Sources
Table 3 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Emission Limits for Puncture Sealant
Application Affected Sources
Table 4 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Operating Limits for Puncture
Sealant Application Control Devices
Table 5 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
Table 6 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Initial Compliance with the Emission
Limits for Tire Production Affected Sources
Table 7 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Initial Compliance with the Emission
Limits for Tire Cord Production Affected Sources
Table 8 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Initial Compliance with the Emission
Limits for Puncture Sealant Application Affected Sources
Table 9 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Minimum Data for Continuous
Compliance with the Emission Limits for Tire Production
Affected Sources
Table 10 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Continuous Compliance with the
Emission Limits for Tire Production Affected Sources
Table 11 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Minimum Data for Continuous
Compliance with the Emission Limits for Tire Cord Production
Affected Sources
Table 12 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Continuous Compliance with the
Emission Limits for Tire Cord Production Affected Sources
Table 13 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Minimum Data for Continuous
Compliance with the Emission Limitations for Puncture Sealant
Application Affected Sources
Table 14 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Continuous Compliance with the
Emission Limitations for Puncture Sealant Application Affected
Sources
Table 15 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Requirements for Reports
Table 16 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Selected Hazardous Air Pollutants
Table 17 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to This Subpart XXXX
Subpart YYYY_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Stationary Combustion Turbines
What This Subpart Covers
63.6080 What is the purpose of subpart YYYY?
63.6085 Am I subject to this subpart?
63.6090 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
63.6092 Are duct burners and waste heat recovery units covered by
subpart YYYY?
63.6095 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
Emission and Operating Limitations
63.6100 What emission and operating limitations must I meet?
General Compliance Requirements
63.6105 What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?
Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements
63.6110 By what date must I conduct the initial performance tests or
other initial compliance demonstrations?
63.6115 When must I conduct subsequent performance tests?
63.6120 What performance tests and other procedures must I use?
63.6125 What are my monitor installation, operation, and maintenance
requirements?
63.6130 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission and
operating limitations?
Continuous Compliance Requirements
63.6135 How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate continuous
compliance?
[[Page 27]]
63.6140 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission and
operating limitations?
Notifications, Reports, and Records
63.6145 What notifications must I submit and when?
63.6150 What reports must I submit and when?
63.6155 What records must I keep?
63.6160 In what form and how long must I keep my records?
Other Requirements and Information
63.6165 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
63.6170 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.6175 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Table 1 to Subpart YYYY of Part 63--Emission Limitations
Table 2 to Subpart YYYY of Part 63--Operating Limitations
Table 3 to Subpart YYYY of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
and Initial Compliance Demonstrations
Table 4 to Subpart YYYY of Part 63--Initial Compliance with Emission
Limitations
Table 5 to Subpart YYYY of Part 63--Continuous Compliance with Operating
Limitations
Table 6 to Subpart YYYY of Part 63--Requirements for Reports
Table 7 to Subpart YYYY of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
to Subpart YYYY
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Source: 57 FR 61992, Dec. 29, 1992, unless otherwise noted.
Subpart QQQ_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Primary Copper Smelting
Source: 67 FR 40491, June 12, 2002, unless otherwise noted.
What This Subpart Covers
Sec. 63.1440 What is the purpose of this subpart?
This subpart establishes national emission standards for hazardous
air pollutants (NESHAP) for primary copper smelters. This subpart also
establishes requirements to demonstrate initial and continuous
compliance with all applicable emission limitations, work practice
standards, and operation and maintenance requirements in this subpart.
Sec. 63.1441 Am I subject to this subpart?
You are subject to this subpart if you own or operate a primary
copper smelter that is (or is part of) a major source of hazardous air
pollutant (HAP) emissions on the first compliance date that applies to
you, and your primary copper smelter uses batch copper converters as
defined in Sec. 63.1459. Your primary copper smelter is a major source
of HAP if it emits or has the potential to emit any single HAP at the
rate of 10 tons or more per year or any combination of HAP at a rate of
25 tons or more per year.
Sec. 63.1442 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
(a) This subpart applies to each new and existing affected source at
your primary copper smelter. The affected sources are each copper
concentrate dryer, each smelting furnace, each slag cleaning vessel,
each copper converter department, and the entire group of fugitive
emission sources, as defined in Sec. 63.1459.
(b) An affected source at your primary copper smelter is existing if
you commenced construction or reconstruction of the affected source
before April 20, 1998.
(c) An affected source at your primary copper smelter is new if you
commenced construction or reconstruction of the affected source on or
after April 20, 1998. An affected source is reconstructed if it meets
the definition of ``reconstruction'' in Sec. 63.2.
Sec. 63.1443 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
(a) If you have an existing affected source, you must comply with
each emission limitation, work practice standard, and operation and
maintenance requirement in this subpart that applies to you no later
than June 13, 2005.
(b) If you have a new affected source and its initial startup date
is on or before June 12, 2002, you must comply with each emission
limitation, work practice standard, and operation and
[[Page 28]]
maintenance requirement in this subpart that applies to you by June 12,
2002.
(c) If you have a new affected source and its initial startup date
is after June 12, 2002, you must comply with each emission limitation,
work practice standard, and operation and maintenance requirement in
this subpart that applies to you upon initial startup.
(d) If your primary copper smelter is an area source that becomes a
major source of HAP, the compliance dates listed in paragraphs (d)(1)
and (2) of this section apply to you.
(1) Any portion of the existing primary copper smelter that is a new
affected source or a new reconstructed source must be in compliance with
this subpart upon startup.
(2) All other parts of the primary copper smelter must be in
compliance with this subpart no later than 3 years after it becomes a
major source.
(e) You must meet the notification and schedule requirements in
Sec. 63.1454. Several of these notifications must be submitted before
the compliance date for your affected source.
Emission Limitations and Work Practice Standards
Sec. 63.1444 What emissions limitations and work practice standards
must I meet for my copper concentrate dryers, smelting furnaces,
slag cleaning vessels, and copper converter departments?
(a) Copper concentrate dryers. For each copper concentrate dryer,
you must comply with the emission limitation in paragraph (a)(1) or (2)
of this section that applies to you.
(1) For each existing copper concentrate dryer, you must not cause
to be discharged to the atmosphere from the dryer vent any gases that
contain total particulate matter in excess of 50 milligrams per dry
standard cubic meter (mg/dscm) as measured using the test methods
specified in Sec. 63.1450(a).
(2) For each new copper concentrate dryer, you must not cause to be
discharged to the atmosphere from the dryer vent any gases that contain
total particulate matter in excess of 23 mg/dscm as measured using the
test methods specified in Sec. 63.1450(a).
(b) Smelting furnaces. For each smelting furnace, you must comply
with the emission limitations and work practice standards in paragraphs
(b)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) For each smelting furnace, you must not cause to be discharged
to the atmosphere any process off-gas that contains nonsulfuric acid
particulate matter in excess of 6.2 mg/dscm as measured using the test
methods specified in Sec. 63.1450(b). Process off-gas from a smelting
furnace is generated when copper ore concentrates and fluxes are being
smelted to form molten copper matte and slag layers.
(2) For each smelting furnace, you must control the process fugitive
emissions released when tapping copper matte or slag from the smelting
furnace according to paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(i) At all times when copper matte or slag is tapped from the
smelting furnace, you must operate a capture system that collects the
gases and fumes released from the tapping port in use. The design and
placement of this capture system must be such that the tapping port
opening, launder, and receiving vessel (e.g., ladle, slag pot) are
positioned within the confines or influence of the capture system's
ventilation draft during those times when the copper matte or slag is
flowing from the tapping port opening.
(ii) You must not cause to be discharged to the atmosphere from the
capture system used to comply with paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section
any gases that contain total particulate matter in excess of 23 mg/dscm
as measured using the test methods specified in Sec. 63.1450(a).
(c) Slag cleaning vessels. For each slag cleaning vessel, you must
comply with the emission limitations and work practice standards in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this section that apply to you.
(1) For each slag cleaning vessel, except as provided for in
paragraph (c)(2) of this section, you must not cause to be discharged to
the atmosphere any process off-gas that contains nonsulfuric acid
particulate matter in excess of 6.2 mg/dscm as measured using the test
methods specified in Sec. 63.1450(b).
[[Page 29]]
(2) As an alternative to complying with the emission limit for
nonsulfuric acid particulate matter in paragraph (c)(1) of this section,
for each existing slag cleaning vessel you may choose to comply with the
emission limit for total particulate matter specified in this paragraph
(c)(2). You must not cause to be discharged to the atmosphere any
process off-gas that contains total particulate matter in excess of 46
mg/dscm as measured using the test methods specified in Sec.
63.1450(a).
(3) For each slag cleaning vessel, you must control process fugitive
emissions released when tapping copper matte or slag from the slag
cleaning vessel according to paragraphs (c)(3)(i) and (ii) of this
section.
(i) At all times when copper matte or slag is tapped from the slag
cleaning vessel, you must operate a capture system that collects the
gases and fumes released from the tapping port in use. The design and
placement of this capture system must be such that the tapping port
opening, launder, and receiving vessel (e.g., ladle, slag pot) are
positioned within the confines or influence of the capture system's
ventilation draft during those times when the copper matte or slag is
flowing from the tapping port opening.
(ii) You must not cause to be discharged to the atmosphere from the
capture system used to comply with paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this section
any gases that contain total particulate matter in excess of 23 mg/dscm
as measured using the test methods specified in Sec. 63.1450(a).
(d) Existing copper converter departments. For each existing copper
converter department, you must comply with the emission limitations and
work practice standards in paragraphs (d)(1) through (6) of this section
that apply to you.
(1) You must operate a capture system that collects the process off
gas vented from each batch copper converter. At all times when one or
more batch copper converters are blowing, you must operate the capture
system according to the written operation and maintenance plan that has
been prepared according to the requirements in Sec. 63.1447(b).
(2) If your copper converter department uses Pierce-Smith
converters, the capture system design must include use of a primary hood
that covers the entire mouth of the converter vessel when the copper
converter is positioned for blowing. Additional hoods (e.g., secondary
hoods) or other capture devices must be included in the capture system
design as needed to achieve the opacity limit in paragraph (d)(4) of
this section. The capture system design may use multiple intake and duct
segments through which the ventilation rates are controlled
independently of each other, and individual duct segments may be
connected to separate control devices.
(3) If your copper converter department uses Hoboken converters, the
capture system must collect all process off-gas vented during blowing
through the side-flue intake on each converter vessel.
(4) You must operate the capture system such that any visible
emissions exiting the roof monitors or roof exhaust fans on the building
housing the copper converter department meet the opacity limit as
specified in paragraphs (d)(4)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(i) The opacity of any visible emissions exiting the roof monitors
or roof exhaust fans on the building housing the copper converter
department must not exceed 4 percent as determined by a performance test
conducted according to Sec. 63.1450(c).
(ii) The opacity limit in paragraph (d)(4)(i) of this section
applies only at those times when a performance test is conducted
according to Sec. 63.1450(c). The requirements for compliance with
opacity and visible emission standards specified in Sec. 63.6(h) do not
apply to this opacity limit.
(5) You must not cause to be discharged to the atmosphere from any
Pierce-Smith converter primary hood capture system or Hoboken converter
side-flue intake capture system any process off-gas that contains
nonsulfuric acid particulate matter in excess of 6.2 mg/dscm as measured
using the test methods specified in Sec. 63.1450(b).
(6) You must not cause to be discharged to the atmosphere from any
secondary capture system any gases that contain total particulate matter
[[Page 30]]
in excess of 23 mg/dscm as measured using the test methods specified in
Sec. 63.1450(a).
(e) New copper converter departments. For each new copper converter
department for which construction commenced on or after April 20, 1998,
the use of batch copper converters is prohibited.
(f) Baghouses. For each baghouse applied to meet any total
particulate matter emission limit in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this
section, you must operate the baghouse such that the bag leak detection
system does not alarm for more than 5 percent of the total operating
time in any semiannual reporting period.
(g) Venturi wet scrubbers. For each venturi wet scrubber applied to
meet any total particulate matter emission limit in paragraphs (a)
through (d) of this section, you must maintain the hourly average
pressure drop and scrubber water flow rate at or above the minimum
levels established during the initial or subsequent performance test.
(h) Other control devices. For each control device other than a
baghouse or venturi wet scrubber applied to meet any total particulate
matter emission limit in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, you
must operate the control device as specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and
(2) of this section.
(1) You must select one or more operating parameters, as appropriate
for the control device design, that can be used as representative and
reliable indicators of the control device operation.
(2) You must maintain the hourly average value for each of the
selected parameters at or above the minimum level or at or below the
maximum level, as appropriate for the selected parameter, established
during the initial or subsequent performance test.
Sec. 63.1445 What work practice standards must I meet
for my fugitive dust sources?
(a) You must control particulate matter emissions from fugitive dust
sources at your primary copper smelter by operating according to a
written fugitive dust control plan that has been approved by the
designated authority. For the purpose of complying with this paragraph
(a) you may use an existing fugitive dust control plan provided that the
plan complies with the requirements of this section. A fugitive dust
control plan is considered to be approved if the plan has been
incorporated in your applicable State implementation plan, and the
document addresses the fugitive dust sources specified in paragraph (b)
of this section and includes the information specified in paragraph (c)
of this section.
(b) Your fugitive dust control plan must address each of the
fugitive dust emission sources listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (6)
of this section that are located at your primary copper smelter.
(1) On-site roadways used by trucks or other motor vehicles (e.g.,
front-end loaders) when transporting bulk quantities of fugitive dust
materials. Paved roads and parking areas that are not used by these
vehicles do not need to be included in the plan (e.g., employee and
visitor parking lots).
(2) Unloading of fugitive dust materials from trucks or railcars.
(3) Outdoor piles used for storage of fugitive dust materials.
(4) Bedding areas used for blending copper concentrate and other
feed constituents.
(5) Each transfer point in conveying systems used to transport
fugitive dust materials. These points include, but are not limited to,
transfer of material from one conveyor belt to another and transfer of
material to a hopper or bin.
(6) Other site-specific sources of fugitive dust emissions that the
Administrator or delegated permitting authority designate to be included
in your fugitive dust control plan.
(c) Your fugitive dust control plan must describe the control
measures you use to control fugitive dust emissions from each source
addressed in the plan, as applicable and appropriate for your site
conditions. Examples of control measures include, but are not limited
to, locating the source inside a building or other enclosure, installing
and operating a local hood capture system over the source and venting
the captured gas stream to a control device, placing material stockpiles
below grade, installing wind screens or wind
[[Page 31]]
fences around the source, spraying water on the source as weather
conditions require, applying appropriate dust suppression agents on the
source, or combinations of these control measures.
(d) The requirement for you to operate according to a written
fugitive dust control plan must be incorporated in your operating permit
that is issued by the designated permitting authority under part 70 of
this chapter. A copy of your fugitive dust control plan must be sent to
the designated permitting authority on or before the compliance date for
your primary copper smelter, as specified in Sec. 63.1443.
Sec. 63.1446 What alternative emission limitation may I meet
for my combined gas streams?
(a) For situations where you combine gas streams from two or more
affected sources for discharge to the atmosphere through a single vent,
you may choose to meet the requirements in paragraph (b) of this section
as an alternative to complying with the individual total particulate
matter emission limits specified in Sec. 63.1444 that apply to you.
This alternative emission limit for a combined gas stream may be used
for any combination of the affected source gas steams specified in
paragraphs (a)(1) through (5) of this section.
(1) Gas stream discharged from a copper concentrate dryer vent that
would otherwise be subject to Sec. 63.1444(a)(1) or (2);
(2) Gas stream discharged from a smelting furnace capture system
that would otherwise be subject to Sec. 63.1444(b)(2)(ii);
(3) Process off-gas stream discharged from a slag cleaning vessel
that would otherwise be subject to Sec. 63.1444(c)(2);
(4) Gas stream discharged from a slag cleaning vessel capture system
that would otherwise be subject to Sec. 63.1444(c)(3)(ii); and
(5) Gas stream discharged from a batch copper converter secondary
capture system that would otherwise be subject to Sec. 63.1444(d)(5).
(b) You must meet the requirements specified in paragraphs (b)(1)
and (2) of this section for the combined gas stream discharged through a
single vent.
(1) For each combined gas stream discharged through a single vent,
you must not cause to be discharged to the atmosphere any gases that
contain total particulate matter in excess of the emission limit
calculated using the procedure in paragraph (b)(2) of this section and
measured using the test methods specified in Sec. 63.1450(a).
(2) You must calculate the alternative total particulate matter
emission limit for your combined gas stream using Equation 1 of this
section. The volumetric flow rate value for each of the individual
affected source gas streams that you use for Equation 1 (i.e., the flow
rate of the gas stream discharged from the affected source but before
this gas stream is combined with the other gas streams) is to be the
average of the volumetric flow rates measured using the test method
specified in Sec. 63.1450(a)(1)(ii):
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR12JN02.025
Where
EAlt = Alternative total particulate matter emission limit
for the combined gas stream discharged to atmosphere through a
single vent (mg/dscm);
Ed = Total particulate matter emission limit applicable to
copper concentrate dryer as specified in Sec. 63.1444(a)(1)
or (2) (mg/dscm);
Qd = Copper concentrate dryer exhaust gas stream volumetric
flow rate before being combined with other gas streams (dscm);
Esv = Total particulate matter emission limit for smelting
furnace capture system as specified in Sec. 63.1444(b)(2)(ii)
(mg/dscm);
Qsv = Smelting furnace capture system exhaust gas stream
volumetric flow rate before being combined with other gas
streams (dscm);
[[Page 32]]
Escvp = Total particulate matter emission limit for slag
cleaning vessel process off-gas as specified in Sec.
63.1444(c)(2) (mg/dscm);
Qscvp = Slag cleaning vessel process off-gas volumetric flow
rate before being combined with other gas streams (dscm);
Escvf = Total particulate matter emission limit for slag
cleaning vessel capture system as specified in Sec.
63.1444(c)(3)(ii) (mg/dscm);
Qscvf = Slag cleaning vessel capture system exhaust gas
stream volumetric flow rate before being combined with other
gas streams (dscm);
Ecc = Total particulate emission limit for the batch copper
converter secondary capture system as specified in Sec.
63.1544(d)(5) (mg/dscm); and
Qcc = Batch copper converter capture system exhaust gas
stream volumetric flow rate before being combined with other
gas streams (dscm).
(c) For each baghouse applied to meet any total particulate matter
emission limit in paragraph (b) of this section, you must operate the
baghouse such that the bag leak detection system does not alarm for more
than 5 percent of the total operating time in any semiannual reporting
period.
(d) For each venturi wet scrubber applied to meet any total
particulate matter emission limit in paragraph (b) of this section, you
must maintain the hourly average pressure drop and scrubber water flow
rate at or above the minimum levels established during the initial or
subsequent performance test.
(e) For each control device other than a baghouse or venturi wet
scrubber applied to meet any total particulate matter emission limit in
paragraph (b) of this section, you must operate the control device as
specified in paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) You must select one or more operating parameters, as appropriate
for the control device design, that can be used as representative and
reliable indicators of the control device operation.
(2) You must maintain the hourly average value for each of the
selected parameters at or above the minimum level or at or below the
maximum level, as appropriate for the selected parameter, established
during the initial or subsequent performance test.
Operation and Maintenance Requirements
Sec. 63.1447 What are my operation and maintenance requirements?
(a) As required by Sec. 63.6(e)(1)(i), you must always operate and
maintain your affected source, including air pollution control and
monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution
control practices for minimizing emissions at least to the levels
required by this subpart.
(b) You must prepare and operate at all times according to a written
operation and maintenance plan for each capture system and control
device subject to standards in Sec. 63.1444 or Sec. 63.1446. The plan
must address the requirements in paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this
section as applicable to the capture system or control device.
(1) Preventative maintenance. You must perform preventative
maintenance for each capture system and control device according to
written procedures specified in your operation and maintenance plan. The
procedures must include a preventative maintenance schedule that is
consistent with the manufacturer's instructions for routine and long-
term maintenance.
(2) Capture system inspections. You must conduct monthly inspections
of the equipment components of the capture system that can affect the
performance of the system to collect the gases and fumes emitted from
the affected source (e.g., hoods, exposed ductwork, dampers, fans)
according to written procedures specified in your operation and
maintenance plan. The inspection procedure must include the requirements
in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section as applicable to
the capture system or control device.
(i) Observations of the physical appearance of the equipment to
confirm the physical integrity of the equipment (e.g., verify by visual
inspection no holes in ductwork or hoods, no flow constrictions caused
by dents, or accumulated dust in ductwork).
(ii) Inspection, and if necessary testing, of equipment components
to confirm that the component is operating as intended (e.g., verify by
appropriate measures that flow or pressure sensors,
[[Page 33]]
damper plates, automated damper switches and motors are operating
according to manufacture or engineering design specifications).
(iii) In the event that a defective or damaged component is detected
during an inspection, you must initiate corrective action according to
written procedures specified in your operation and maintenance plan to
correct the defect or deficiency as soon as practicable.
(3) Copper converter department capture system operating limits. You
must establish, according to the requirements in paragraph (b)(3)(i)
through (iii) of this section, operating limits for the capture system
that are representative and reliable indicators of the performance of
capture system when it is used to collect the process off-gas vented
from batch copper converters during blowing.
(i) Select operating limit parameters appropriate for the capture
system design that are representative and reliable indicators of the
performance of the capture system when it is used to collect the process
off-gas vented from batch copper converters during blowing. At a
minimum, you must use appropriate operating limit parameters that
indicate the level of the ventilation draft and the damper position
settings for the capture system when operating to collect the process
off-gas from the batch copper converters during blowing. Appropriate
operating limit parameters for ventilation draft include, but are not
limited to, volumetric flow rate through each separately ducted hood,
total volumetric flow rate at the inlet to control device to which the
capture system is vented, fan motor amperage, or static pressure. Any
parameter for damper position setting may be used that indicates the
duct damper position relative to the fully open setting.
(ii) For each operating limit parameter selected in paragraph
(b)(3)(i) of this section, designate the value or setting for the
parameter at which the capture system operates during batch copper
converter blowing. If your blister copper production operations allow
for more than one batch copper converter to be operating simultaneously
in the blowing mode, designate the value or setting for the parameter at
which the capture system operates during each possible batch copper
converter blowing configuration that you may operate at your smelter
(i.e., the operating limits with one converter blowing, with two
converters blowing, with three converters blowing, as applicable to your
smelter).
(iii) Include documentation in the plan to support your selection of
the operating limits established for the capture system. This
documentation must include a description of the capture system design, a
description of the capture system operation during blister copper
production, a description of each selected operating limit parameter, a
rationale for why you chose the parameter, a description of the method
used to monitor the parameter according to the requirements in Sec.
63.1452(a), and the data used to set the value or setting for the
parameter for each of your batch copper converter configurations.
(4) Baghouse leak detection corrective actions. In the event a bag
leak detection system alarm is triggered, you must initiate corrective
action according to written procedures specified in your operation and
maintenance plan to determine the cause of the alarm within 1 hour of
the alarm, initiate corrective action to correct the cause of the
problem within 24 hours of the alarm, and complete the corrective action
as soon as practicable. Corrective actions may include, but are not
limited to, the activities listed in paragraphs (b)(3)(i) through (vi)
of this section.
(i) Inspecting the baghouse for air leaks, torn or broken bags or
filter media, or any other condition that may cause an increase in
emissions.
(ii) Sealing off defective bags or filter media.
(iii) Replacing defective bags or filter media or otherwise
repairing the control device.
(iv) Sealing off a defective baghouse compartment.
(v) Cleaning the bag leak detection system probe, or otherwise
repair the bag leak detection system.
(vi) Shutting down the process producing the particulate emissions.
[[Page 34]]
General Compliance Requirements
Sec. 63.1448 What are my general requirements for complying
with this subpart?
(a) You must be in compliance with the emission limitations, work
practice standards, and operation and maintenance requirements in this
subpart at all times, except during periods of startup, shutdown, and
malfunction as defined in Sec. 63.2.
(b) During the period between the compliance date specified for your
affected source in Sec. 63.1443, and the date upon which continuous
monitoring systems have been installed and certified and any applicable
operating limits have been set, you must maintain a log detailing the
operation and maintenance of the process and emissions control
equipment.
(c) You must develop a written startup, shutdown, and malfunction
plan according to the provisions in Sec. 63.6(e)(3).
[57 FR 61992, Dec. 29, 1992, as amended at 71 FR 20461, Apr. 20, 2006]
Initial Compliance Requirements
Sec. 63.1449 By what dates must I conduct performance tests
or other initial compliance demonstrations?
(a) As required in Sec. 63.7(a)(2), you must conduct a performance
test within 180 calendar days of the compliance date that is specified
in Sec. 63.1443 for your affected source to demonstrate initial
compliance with each emission and opacity limit in Sec. Sec. 63.1443
and 63.1446 that applies to you.
(b) For each work practice standard and operation and maintenance
requirement that applies to you where initial compliance is not
demonstrated using a performance test or opacity observation, you must
demonstrate initial compliance within 30 calendar days after the
compliance date that is specified for your affected source in Sec.
63.1443.
Sec. 63.1450 What test methods and other procedures must I use
to demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limitations?
(a) Total particulate matter emission limits. You must conduct each
performance test to determine compliance with the total particulate
matter emission limits in Sec. 63.1444 or Sec. 63.1446 that apply to
you according to the requirements for representative test conditions
specified in Sec. 63.7(e)(1) and using the test methods and procedures
in paragraphs (a)(1) through (5) of this section.
(1) Determine the concentration of total particulate matter
according to the test methods in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter
as specified in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section.
(i) Method 1 to select sampling port locations and the number of
traverse points. Sampling ports must be located at the outlet of the
control device and prior to any releases to the atmosphere.
(ii) Method 2, 2F, or 2G to determine the volumetric flow rate of
the stack gas.
(iii) Method 3, 3A, or 3B to determine the dry molecular weight of
the stack gas.
(iv) Method 4 to determine the moisture content of the stack gas.
(v) Method 5, 5D, or 17, as applicable, to determine the
concentration of total particulate matter. You can also use ASTM D4536-
96 incorporated by reference in Sec. 63.14 as an alternative to the
sampling equipment and operating procedures in Method 5 or 17 when
testing a positive pressure baghouse, but you must use the sample
traverse location and number of sampling points described in Method 5D.
(2) As an alternative to using the applicable method specified in
paragraph (a)(1)(v) of this section, you may determine total particulate
matter emissions from the control device using Method 29 in appendix A
of part 60 of this chapter provided that you follow the procedures and
precautions prescribed in Method 29. If the control device is a positive
pressure baghouse, you must also follow the measurement procedure
specified in sections 4.1 through 4.3 of Method 5D.
(3) You must conduct three separate test runs for each performance
test. Each test run must have a minimum sampling time of 60 minutes and
a minimum sampling volume of 0.85 dscm.
[[Page 35]]
For the purpose of determining compliance with the applicable total
particulate matter emission limit, the arithmetic mean of the results
for the three separate test runs is used.
(4) For a venturi wet scrubber applied to emissions from an affected
source and subject to operating limits in Sec. 63.1444(g) or Sec.
63.1446(d) for pressure drop and scrubber water flow rate, you must
establish site-specific operating limits according to the procedures in
paragraph (a)(4)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(i) Using the continuous parameter monitoring system (CPMS) required
in Sec. 63.1452, measure and record the pressure drop and scrubber
water flow rate during each run of the particulate matter performance
test.
(ii) Compute and record the hourly average pressure drop and
scrubber water flow rate for each individual test run. Your operating
limits are the lowest average pressure drop and scrubber water flow rate
value in any of the three runs that meet the applicable emission limit.
(5) For a control device other than a baghouse or venturi wet
scrubber applied to emissions from an affected source and subject to
site-specific operating limit(s) in Sec. 63.1444(h) or Sec. 63.1446(e)
for appropriate, site-specific operating parameters that are
representative and reliable indicators of the control device
performance, you must establish a site-specific operating limit(s)
according to the procedures in paragraph (a)(5)(i) through (iv) of this
section.
(i) Select one or more operating parameters, as appropriate for the
control device design, that can be used as representative and reliable
indicators of the control device operation.
(ii) Using the CPMS required in Sec. 63.1452, measure and record
the selected operating parameters for the control device during each run
of the total particulate matter performance test.
(iii) Compute and record the hourly average value for each of the
selected operating parameters for each individual test run. Your
operating limits are the lowest value or the highest value, as
appropriate for the selected operating parameter, measured in any of the
three runs that meet the applicable emission limit.
(iv) You must prepare written documentation to support your
selection of the operating parameters used for the control device. This
documentation must include a description of each selected parameter, a
rationale for why you chose the parameter, a description of the method
used to monitor the parameter, and the data recorded during the
performance test and used to set the operating limit(s).
(b) Nonsulfuric acid particulate matter emission limits. You must
conduct each performance test to determine compliance with the
nonsulfuric acid particulate matter emission limits in Sec. 63.1444
that apply to you according to the requirements for representative test
conditions specified in Sec. 63.7(e)(1) and using the test methods and
procedures in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) Determine the concentration of nonsulfuric acid particulate
matter according to the test methods in appendix A to part 60 of this
chapter as specified in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (v) of this
section.
(i) Method 1 to select sampling port locations and the number of
traverse points. Sampling ports must be located at the outlet of the
control device and prior to any releases to the atmosphere.
(ii) Method 2, 2F, or 2G to determine the volumetric flow rate of
the stack gas.
(iii) Method 3, 3A, or 3B to determine the dry molecular weight of
the stack gas.
(iv) Method 4 to determine the moisture content of the stack gas.
(v) Method 5B to determine the nonsulfuric acid particulate matter
emissions.
(2) You must conduct three separate test runs for each performance
test. Each test run must have a minimum sampling time of 240 minutes and
a minimum sampling volume of 3.4 dscm. For the purpose of determining
compliance with the nonsulfuric acid particulate matter emission limit,
the arithmetic mean of the results for the three separate test runs is
used.
[[Page 36]]
(c) Copper converter department capture system opacity limit. You
must conduct each performance test to determine compliance with the
opacity limit in Sec. 63.1444 using the test methods and procedures in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (9) of this section.
(1) You must conduct the performance test during the period when the
primary copper smelter is operating under conditions representative of
the smelter's normal blister copper production rate. You may not conduct
a performance test during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction.
Before conducting the performance test, you must prepare a written test
plan specifying the copper production conditions to be maintained
throughout the opacity observation period and including a copy of the
written documentation you have prepared according to paragraph (a)(3) of
this section to support the established operating limits for the copper
converter department capture system. You must submit a copy of the test
plan for review and approval by the Administrator or delegated
authority. During the observation period, you must collect appropriate
process information and copper converter department capture system
operating information to prepare documentation sufficient to verify that
all opacity observations were made during the copper production and
capture system operating conditions specified in the approved test plan.
(2) You must notify the Administrator or delegated authority before
conducting the opacity observations to allow the Administrator or
delegated authority the opportunity to have authorized representatives
attend the test. Written notification of the location and scheduled date
for conducting the opacity observations must be received by the
Administrator on or before 30 calendar days before this scheduled date.
(3) You must gather the data needed for determining compliance with
the opacity limit using qualified visible emission observers and process
monitors as described in paragraphs (c)(3)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(i) Opacity observations must be performed by a sufficient number of
qualified visible emission observers to obtain two complete concurrent
sets of opacity readings for the required observation period. Each
visible emission observer must be certified as a qualified observer by
the procedure specified in section 3 of Method 9 in appendix A of part
60 of this chapter. The entire set of readings during the required
observation period does not need to be made by the same two observers.
More than two observers may be used to allow for substitutions and
provide for observer rest breaks. The owner or operator must obtain
proof of current visible emission reading certification for each
observer.
(ii) A person (or persons) familiar with the copper production
operations conducted at the smelter must serve as the indoor process
monitor. The indoor process monitor is stationed at a location inside
the building housing the batch copper converters such that he or she can
visually observe and record operations that occur in the batch copper
converter aisle during the times that the visible emission observers are
making opacity readings. More than one indoor process monitor may be
used to allow for substitutions and provide for rest breaks.
(4) You must make all opacity observations using Method 9 in
appendix A to part 60 of this chapter and following the procedures
described in paragraphs (c)(4)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(i) Each visible emission observer must make his or her readings at
a position from the outside of the building that houses the copper
converter department such that the observer's line-of-sight is
approximately perpendicular to the longer axis of the converter
building, and the observer has an unobstructed view of the building roof
monitor sections or roof exhaust fan outlets that are positioned over
each of the batch copper converters inside the building. Opacity
readings can only be made during those times when the observer's
position meets the sun orientation and other conditions specified in
section 2.1 of Method 9.
(ii) At 15-second intervals, each visible emission observer views
the building roof monitor sections or roof exhaust fan outlets that are
positioned over each of the batch copper converters inside the building
and reads
[[Page 37]]
the opacity of the visible plumes. If no plume is visible, the observer
records zero as the opacity value for the 15-second interval. In
situations when it is possible for an observer to distinguish two or
more visible emission plumes from the building roof monitor sections or
roof exhaust fan outlets, the observer must identify, to the extent
feasible, the plume having the highest opacity and record his or her
opacity reading for that plume as the opacity value for the 15-second
interval.
(5) You must make opacity observations for a period of sufficient
duration to obtain a minimum of 120 1-minute intervals during which at
least one copper converter is blowing and no interferences have occurred
from other copper production events, as specified in paragraph (c)(7) of
this section, which generate visible emissions inside the building that
potentially can interfere with the visible emissions from the converter
capture systems as seen by the outside observers. To obtain the required
number of 1-minute intervals, the observation period may be divided into
two or more segments performed on the same day or on different days if
conditions prevent the required number of opacity readings from being
obtained during one continuous time period. Examples of these conditions
include, but are not limited to, changes in the sun's orientation
relative to visible emission observers' positions such that the Method 9
conditions are no longer met or an unexpected thunder storm. If the
total observation period is divided into two or more segments, all
opacity observations must be made during the same set of copper
production conditions described in your approved test plan as required
by paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(6) You must gather indoor process information during all times that
the visible emission observers are making opacity readings outside the
building housing the copper converter department. The indoor process
monitor must continually observe the operations occurring in the copper
converter department and prepare a written record of his or her
observations using the procedure specified in paragraphs (c)(6)(i)
through (iv) of this section.
(i) At the beginning of each observation period or segment, the
clock time setting on the watch or clock to be used by the indoor
process monitor must be synchronized with the clock time settings for
the timepieces to be used by the outdoor opacity observers.
(ii) During each period or segment when opacity readings are being
made by the visible emission observers, the indoor process monitor must
continuously observe the operations occurring in the copper converter
department and record his or her observations in a log book, on data
sheets, or other type of permanent written format.
(iii) When a batch copper converter is blowing, a record must be
prepared for the converter that includes, but is not limited to, the
clock times for when blowing begins and when blowing ends and the
converter blowing rate. This information may be recorded by the indoor
process monitor or by a separate, automated computer data system.
(iv) The process monitor must record each event other than converter
blowing that occurs in or nearby the converter aisle that he or she
observes to generate visible emissions inside the building. The recorded
entry for each event must include, but is not limited to, a description
of the event and the clock times when the event begins and when the
event ends.
(7) You must prepare a summary of the data for the entire
observation period using the information recorded during the observation
period by the outdoor visible emission observers and the indoor process
monitor and the procedure specified in paragraphs (c)(7)(i) through (iv)
of this section.
(i) Using the field data sheets, identify the 1-minute clock times
for which a total of eight opacity readings were made and recorded by
both observers at 15-second intervals according to the test procedures
(i.e., a total of four opacity values have been recorded for the 1-
minute interval by each of the two observers). Calculate the average of
the eight 15-second interval readings recorded on the field data sheets
by the two observers during the clock time minute interval (add the four
consecutive 15-second interval opacity readings made by Observer A
during the specified clock time minute, plus the four
[[Page 38]]
consecutive 15-second interval opacity readings made by Observer B
during the same clock time minute, and divide the resulting total by
eight). Record the clock time and the opacity average for the 1-minute
interval on a data summary sheet. Figure 1 of this subpart shows an
example of the format for the data summary sheet you may use, but are
not required to use.
(ii) Using the data summary sheets prepared according to paragraph
(c)(7)(i) of this section and the process information recorded according
to paragraph (c)(6)(iii) of this section, identify those 1-minute
intervals for which at least one of the batch copper converters was
blowing.
(iii) Using the data summary sheets prepared according to paragraph
(c)(7)(ii) of this section and the process information recorded
according to paragraph (c)(6)(iv) of this section, identify the 1-minute
intervals during which at least one copper converter was blowing but
none of the interference events listed in paragraphs (c)(7)(iii)(A)
through (F) of this section occurred. Other ancillary activities not
listed but conducted in or adjacent to the converter aisle during the
opacity observations are not considered to be interference events (e.g.,
converter aisle cleaning, placement of smoking ladles or skulls on the
converter aisle floor).
(A) Charging of copper matte, reverts, or other materials to a batch
copper converter;
(B) Skimming slag or other molten materials from a batch copper
converter;
(C) Pouring of blister copper or other molten materials from a batch
copper converter;
(D) Return of slag or other molten materials to the flash smelting
furnace or slag cleaning vessel;
(E) Roll-out or roll-in of the batch copper converter; or
(F) Smoke and fumes generated inside the converter building by
operation of the smelting furnace, the slag cleaning vessel (if used),
anode refining and casting processes that drift into the copper
converter department.
(iv) Using the data summary sheets prepared according to paragraph
(c)(7)(iii) of this section, up to five 1-minute intervals following an
interference event may be eliminated from data used for the compliance
determination calculation specified in paragraph (c)(8) of this section
by applying a time delay factor. The time delay factor must be a
constant number of minutes not to exceed 5 minutes that is added to the
clock time recorded when cessation of the interference event occurs. The
same time delay factor must be used for all interference events (i.e., a
constant time delay factor for the smelter of 1 minute, 2 minutes, 3
minutes, 4 minutes, or 5 minutes). The number of minutes to be used for
the time delay factor is determined based on the site-specific equipment
and converter building configuration. An explanation of the rationale
for selecting the value used for the time delay factor must be prepared
and included in the test report.
(8) You must use the data summary prepared in paragraph (c)(7) of
this section to calculate the average opacity value for a minimum of 120
1-minute intervals during which at least one copper converter was
blowing with no interference events as determined according to
paragraphs (c)(7)(iii) and (iv) of this section. Average opacity is
calculated using Equation 1 of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR12JN02.026
Where
VEave = Average opacity to be used for compliance
determination (percent);
n = Total number of 1-minute intervals during which at least one copper
converter was blowing with no interference events as
determined according to paragraphs (c)(7)(iii) and (iv) of
this section (at least 120 1-minute intervals);
i = 1-minute interval ``i'' during which at least one copper converter
was blowing with no interference events as determined
according to paragraphs (c)(7)(iii) and (iv) of this section;
and
VEi = Average opacity value calculated for the eight opacity
readings recorded during 1-minute interval ``i'' (percent).
(9) You must certify that the copper converter department capture
system operated during the performance test at the operating limits
established in your capture system operation and
[[Page 39]]
maintenance plan using the procedure specified in paragraphs (c)(9)(i)
through (iv) of this section.
(i) Concurrent with all opacity observations, measure and record
values for each of the operating limit parameters in your capture system
operation and maintenance plan according to the monitoring requirements
specified in Sec. 63.1452(a).
(ii) For any dampers that are manually set and remain in the same
position at all times the capture system is operating, the damper
position must be visually checked and recorded at the beginning and end
of each opacity observation period segment.
(iii) Review the recorded monitoring data. Identify and explain any
times during batch copper converter blowing when the capture system
operated outside the applicable operating limits.
(iv) Certify in your performance test report that during all
observation period segments, the copper converter department capture
system was operating at the values or settings established in your
capture system operation and maintenance plan.
Sec. 63.1451 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with
the emission limitations, work practice standards, and operation
and maintenance requirements that apply to me?
(a) Total particulate matter emission limits. For each copper
concentrate dryer, smelting furnace, slag cleaning vessel, and copper
converter department subject to a total particulate matter emission
limits in Sec. 63.1444 or Sec. 63.1446 that applies to you, you have
demonstrated initial compliance if you meet both of the conditions in
paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) The average concentration of total particulate matter from a
control device applied to emissions from the affected source, measured
according to the performance test procedures in Sec. 63.1450(a), did
not exceed the applicable emission limit.
(2) You have submitted a notification of compliance status according
to the requirements in Sec. 63.1454(e).
(b) Nonsulfuric acid particulate matter emissions limits. For each
smelting furnace, slag cleaning vessel, and copper converter departments
subject to the nonsulfuric acid particulate matter emissions limit in
Sec. 63.1444 as applies to you, you have demonstrated initial
compliance if you meet both of the conditions in paragraphs (b)(1) and
(2) of this section.
(1) The average concentration of nonsulfuric acid particulate matter
in the process off-gas discharged from the affected source, measured
according to the performance test procedures in Sec. 63.1450(b), did
not exceed 6.2 mg/dscm.
(2) You have submitted a notification of compliance status according
to the requirements in Sec. 63.1454(e).
(c) For each existing copper converter department subject to the
opacity limit in Sec. 63.1444, you have demonstrated initial compliance
if you meet both of the conditions in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this
section.
(1) The opacity of visible emissions exiting the roof monitors or
roof exhaust fans on the building housing the copper converter
department measured according to the performance test procedures in
Sec. 63.1450(c), did not exceed 4 percent opacity.
(2) You have submitted a notification of compliance status according
to the requirements in Sec. 63.1454(e).
(d) Copper converter department capture systems. You have
demonstrated initial compliance of the copper converter department
capture system if you meet all of the conditions in paragraphs (d)(1)
through (4) of this section.
(1) Prepared the capture system operation and maintenance plan
according to the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section;
(2) Conducted an initial performance test according to the
procedures of Sec. 63.1450(c) demonstrating the opacity of any visible
emissions exiting the roof monitors or roof exhaust fans on the building
housing the copper converter department does not exceed 4 percent
opacity;
(3) Included in your notification of compliance status a copy of
your written capture system operation and maintenance plan and have
certified in your notification of compliance status that you will
operate the copper converter department capture system at all times
during blowing at the values or settings established for the operating
limits in that plan; and
[[Page 40]]
(4) Submitted a notification of compliance status according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1454(e).
(e) Baghouses. For each baghouse subject to operating limits in
Sec. 63.1444(f) or Sec. 63.1446(c), you have demonstrated initial
compliance if you meet all of the conditions in paragraphs (e)(1)
through (3) of this section.
(1) You have included in your written operation and maintenance plan
required under Sec. 63.1447(b) detailed descriptions of the procedures
you use for inspection, maintenance, bag leak detection, and corrective
action for the baghouse.
(2) You have certified in your notification of compliance status
that you will operate the baghouse according to your written operation
and maintenance plan.
(3) You have submitted the notification of compliance status
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.1454(e).
(f) Venturi wet scrubbers. For each venturi wet scrubber subject to
operating limits in Sec. 63.1444(g) or Sec. 63.1446(d), you have
demonstrated initial compliance if you meet all of the conditions in
paragraphs (f)(1) through (3) of this section.
(1) Established site-specific operating limits for pressure drop and
scrubber water flow rate and have a record of the pressure drop and
scrubber water flow rate measured during the performance test you
conduct to demonstrate initial compliance with paragraph (a) of this
section.
(2) Certified in your notification of compliance status that you
will operate the venturi wet scrubber within the established operating
limits for pressure drop and scrubber water flow rate.
(3) Submitted a notification of compliance status according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1454(e).
(g) Other control devices. For each control device other than a
baghouse or venturi wet scrubber subject to operating limits in Sec.
63.1444(h) or Sec. 63.1446(e), you have demonstrated initial compliance
if you meet all of the conditions in paragraphs (g)(1) through (4) of
this section.
(1) Selected one or more operating parameters, as appropriate for
the control device design, that can be used as representative and
reliable indicators of the control device operation.
(2) Established site-specific operating limits for each of the
selected operating parameters based on values measured during the
performance test you conduct to demonstrate initial compliance with
paragraph (a) of this section and have prepared written documentation
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.1450(a)(5)(iv).
(3) Included in your notification of compliance status a copy of the
written documentation you have prepared to demonstrate compliance with
paragraph (g)(2) of this section and have certified in your notification
of compliance status that you will operate the control device within the
established operating limits.
(4) Submitted a notification of compliance status according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1454(e).
(h) Fugitive dust sources. For all fugitive dust sources subject to
work practice standards in Sec. 63.1445, you have demonstrated initial
compliance if you meet all of the conditions in paragraphs (i)(1)
through (3) of this section.
(1) Prepared a written fugitive dust control plan according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1454 and it has been approved by the designated
authority.
(2) Certified in your notification of compliance status that you
will control emissions from the fugitive dust sources according to the
procedures in the approved plan.
(3) Submitted the notification of compliance status according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1454(e).
(i) Operation and maintenance requirements. You have demonstrated
initial compliance with the operation and maintenance requirements that
apply to you if you meet all of the conditions in paragraphs (i)(1)
through (3) of this section.
(1) Prepared an operation and maintenance plan according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1454(b).
(2) Certified in your notification of compliance status that you
will operate each capture system and control device according to the
procedures in the plan.
(3) Submitted the notification of compliance status according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1454(e).
[[Page 41]]
Continuous Compliance Requirements
Sec. 63.1452 What are my monitoring requirements?
(a) Copper converter department capture systems. For each operating
limit established under your capture system operation and maintenance
plan, you must install, operate, and maintain an appropriate monitoring
device according the requirements in paragraphs (a)(1) though (6) of
this section to measure and record the operating limit value or setting
at all times the copper converter department capture system is operating
during batch copper converter blowing. Dampers that are manually set and
remain in the same position at all times the capture system is operating
are exempted from the requirements of this paragraph (a).
(1) Install the monitoring device, associated sensor(s), and
recording equipment according to the manufacturers' specifications.
Locate the sensor(s) used for monitoring in or as close to a position
that provides a representative measurement of the parameter being
monitored.
(2) If a flow measurement device is used to monitor the operating
limit parameter, you must meet the requirements in paragraph (a)(2)(i)
through (iv) of this section.
(i) Locate the flow sensor and other necessary equipment such as
straightening vanes in a position that provides a representative flow.
(ii) Use a flow sensor with a minimum tolerance of 2 percent of the
flow rate.
(iii) Reduce swirling flow or abnormal velocity distributions due to
upstream and downstream disturbances.
(iv) Conduct a flow sensor calibration check at least semiannually.
(3) If a pressure measurement device is used to monitor the
operating limit parameter, you must meet the requirements in paragraph
(a)(3)(i) through (v) of this section.
(i) Locate the pressure sensor(s) in or as close to a position that
provides a representative measurement of the pressure.
(ii) Minimize or eliminate pulsating pressure, vibration, and
internal and external corrosion.
(iii) Use a gauge with a minimum tolerance of 0.5 inch of water or a
transducer with a minimum tolerance of 1 percent of the pressure range.
(iv) Check pressure tap pluggage daily.
(v) Using a manometer, check gauge calibration quarterly and
transducer calibration monthly.
(4) Conduct calibration and validation checks any time the sensor
exceeds the manufacturer's specifications or you install a new sensor.
(5) At least monthly, inspect all components for integrity, all
electrical connections for continuity, and all mechanical connections
for leakage.
(6) Record the results of each inspection, calibration, and
validation check.
(b) Baghouses. For each baghouse subject to the operating limit in
Sec. 63.1444(f) or Sec. 63.1446(c) for the bag leak detection system
alarm, you must at all times monitor the relative change in particulate
matter loadings using a bag leak detection system according to the
requirements in paragraph (b)(1) of this section and conduct regular
inspections according to the requirements in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section.
(1) You must install, operate, and maintain each bag leak detection
system according to the requirements in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through
(vii) of this section.
(i) The system must be certified by the manufacturer to be capable
of detecting emissions of particulate matter at concentrations of 10
milligrams per actual cubic meter (0.0044 grains per actual cubic foot)
or less.
(ii) The system must provide output of relative changes in
particulate matter loadings.
(iii) The system must be equipped with an alarm that will sound when
an increase in relative particulate loadings is detected over a preset
level. The alarm must be located such that it can be heard by the
appropriate plant personnel.
(iv) Each system that works based on the triboelectric effect must
be installed, operated, and maintained in a manner consistent with the
guidance document, ``Fabric Filter Bag Leak Detection Guidance,'' EPA-
454/R-98-015, September 1997. You may obtain a copy
[[Page 42]]
of this guidance document by contacting the National Technical
Information Service (NTIS) at 800-553-6847. You may install, operate,
and maintain other types of bag leak detection systems in a manner
consistent with the manufacturer's written specifications and
recommendations.
(v) To make the initial adjustment of the system, establish the
baseline output by adjusting the sensitivity (range) and the averaging
period of the device. Then, establish the alarm set points and the alarm
delay time.
(vi) Following the initial adjustment, do not adjust the sensitivity
or range, averaging period, alarm set points, or alarm delay time,
except as detailed in your operation and maintenance plan. Do not
increase the sensitivity by more than 100 percent or decrease the
sensitivity by more than 50 percent over a 365-day period unless a
responsible official certifies, in writing, that the baghouse has been
inspected and found to be in good operating condition.
(vii) Where multiple detectors are required, the system's
instrumentation and alarm may be shared among detectors.
(2) You must conduct baghouse inspections at their specified
frequencies according to the requirements in paragraphs (b)(2)(i)
through (viii) of this section.
(i) Monitor the pressure drop across each baghouse cell each day to
ensure pressure drop is within the normal operating range identified in
the manual.
(ii) Confirm that dust is being removed from hoppers through weekly
visual inspections or other means of ensuring the proper functioning of
removal mechanisms.
(iii) Check the compressed air supply for pulse-jet baghouses each
day.
(iv) Monitor cleaning cycles to ensure proper operation using an
appropriate methodology.
(v) Check bag cleaning mechanisms for proper functioning through
monthly visual inspection or equivalent means.
(vi) Make monthly visual checks of bag tension on reverse air and
shaker-type baghouses to ensure that bags are not kinked (kneed or bent)
or laying on their sides. You do not have to make this check for shaker-
type baghouses using self-tensioning (spring-loaded) devices.
(vii) Confirm the physical integrity of the baghouse through
quarterly visual inspections of the baghouse interior for air leaks.
(viii) Inspect fans for wear, material buildup, and corrosion
through quarterly visual inspections, vibration detectors, or equivalent
means.
(c) Venturi wet scrubbers. For each venturi wet scrubber subject to
the operating limits for pressure drop and scrubber water flow rate in
Sec. 63.1444(g) or Sec. 63.1446(d), you must at all times monitor the
hourly average pressure drop and water flow rate using a CPMS. You must
install, operate, and maintain each CPMS according to the requirements
in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) For the pressure drop CPMS, you must meet the requirements in
paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (vi) of this section.
(i) Locate the pressure sensor(s) in or as close to a position that
provides a representative measurement of the pressure and that minimizes
or eliminates pulsating pressure, vibration, and internal and external
corrosion.
(ii) Use a gauge with a minimum measurement sensitivity of 0.5 inch
of water or a transducer with a minimum measurement sensitivity of 1
percent of the pressure range.
(iii) Check the pressure tap for pluggage daily.
(iv) Using a manometer, check gauge calibration quarterly and
transducer calibration monthly.
(v) Conduct calibration checks any time the sensor exceeds the
manufacturer's specified maximum operating pressure range, or install a
new pressure sensor.
(vi) At least monthly, inspect all components for integrity, all
electrical connections for continuity, and all mechanical connections
for leakage.
(2) For the scrubber water flow rate CPMS, you must meet the
requirements in paragraphs (c)(2)(i) through (iv) of this section.
(i) Locate the flow sensor and other necessary equipment in a
position that provides a representative flow and that
[[Page 43]]
reduces swirling flow or abnormal velocity distributions due to upstream
and downstream disturbances.
(ii) Use a flow sensor with a minimum measurement sensitivity of 2
percent of the flow rate.
(iii) Conduct a flow sensor calibration check at least semiannually
according to the manufacturer's instructions.
(iv) At least monthly, inspect all components for integrity, all
electrical connections for continuity, and all mechanical connections
for leakage.
(d) Other control devices. For each control device other than a
baghouse or venturi wet scrubber subject to the operating limits for
appropriate parameters in Sec. 63.1444(h) or Sec. 63.1446(e), you must
at all times monitor each of your selected parameters using an
appropriate CPMS. You must install, operate, and maintain each CPMS
according to the equipment manufacturer's specifications and the
requirements in paragraphs (d)(1) though (5) of this section.
(1) Locate the sensor(s) used for monitoring in or as close to a
position that provides a representative measurement of the parameter
being monitored.
(2) Determine the hourly average of all recorded readings.
(3) Conduct calibration and validation checks any time the sensor
exceeds the manufacturer's specifications or you install a new sensor.
(4) At least monthly, inspect all components for integrity, all
electrical connections for continuity, and all mechanical connections
for leakage.
(5) Record the results of each inspection, calibration, and
validation check.
(e) Except for monitoring malfunctions, associated repairs, and
required quality assurance or control activities (including as
applicable, calibration checks and required zero and span adjustments),
you must monitor continuously (or collect data at all required
intervals) at all times an affected source is operating.
(f) You may not use data recorded during monitoring malfunctions,
associated repairs, and required quality assurance or control activities
in data averages and calculations used to report emission or operating
levels or to fulfill a minimum data availability requirement, if
applicable. You must use all the data collected during all other periods
in assessing compliance.
(g) A monitoring malfunction is any sudden, infrequent, not
reasonably preventable failure of the monitor to provide valid data.
Monitoring failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or
careless operation are not malfunctions.
[67 FR 40491, June 12, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 40673, July 14, 2005]
Sec. 63.1453 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with
the emission limitations, work practice standards, and operation
and maintenance requirements that apply to me?
(a) Particulate matter emission limits. For each affected source
subject to a particulate matter emission limit Sec. 63.1444 or Sec.
63.1446 as applies to you, you must demonstrate continuous compliance
according to the requirements in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this
section.
(1) For each copper concentrate dryer, smelting furnace, slag
cleaning vessel, and copper converter department subject to a total
particulate matter emission limit in Sec. 63.1444 or Sec. 63.1446 as
applies to you, you must demonstrate continuous compliance by meeting
the conditions in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(i) Maintain the average concentration of total particulate matter
in the gases discharged from the affected source at or below the
applicable emission limit.
(ii) Conduct subsequent performance tests following your initial
performance test no less frequently than once per year according to the
performance test procedures in Sec. 63.1450(a).
(2) For each smelting furnace, slag cleaning vessel, and copper
converter department subject to the nonsulfuric acid particulate matter
emission limit in Sec. 63.1444 as applies to you, you must demonstrate
continuous compliance by meeting the conditions in paragraphs (a)(2)(i)
and (ii) of this section.
(i) Maintain the average concentration of nonsulfuric acid
particulate matter in the process off-gas discharged from the affected
source at or below 6.2 mg/dscm.
[[Page 44]]
(ii) Conduct subsequent performance tests following your initial
performance test no less frequently than once per year according to the
performance test procedures in Sec. 63.1450(b).
(b) Copper converter department capture systems. You must
demonstrate continuous compliance of the copper converter department
capture system by meeting the requirements in paragraphs (b)(1) through
(4) of this section.
(1) Operate the copper converter department capture system at all
times during blowing at or above the lowest values or settings
established for the operating limits and demonstrated to achieve the
opacity limit according to the applicable requirements of this subpart;
(2) Inspect and maintain the copper converter department capture
system according to the applicable requirements in Sec. 63.1447 and
recording all information needed to document conformance with these
requirements;
(3) Monitor the copper converter department capture system according
to the requirements in Sec. 63.1452(a) and collecting, reducing, and
recording the monitoring data for each of the operating limit parameters
according to the applicable requirements of this subpart; and
(4) Conduct subsequent performance tests according to the
requirements of Sec. 63.1450(c) following your initial performance test
no less frequently than once per year to demonstrate that the opacity of
any visible emissions exiting the roof monitors or roof exhaust fans on
the building housing the copper converter department does not exceed 4
percent opacity.
(c) Baghouses. For each baghouse subject to the operating limit for
the bag leak detection system alarm in Sec. 63.1444(f) or Sec.
63.1446(c), you must demonstrate continuous compliance by meeting the
requirements in paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this section.
(1) Maintain the baghouse such that the bag leak detection system
alarm does not sound for more than 5 percent of the operating time
during any semiannual reporting period. To determine the percent of time
the alarm sounded use the procedures in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (v)
of this section.
(i) Alarms that occur due solely to a malfunction of the bag leak
detection system are not included in the calculation.
(ii) Alarms that occur during startup, shutdown, or malfunction are
not included in the calculation if the condition is described in the
startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, and you operated the source
during such periods in accordance with Sec. 63.6(e)(1).
(iii) Count 1 hour of alarm time for each alarm when you initiated
procedures to determine the cause of the alarm within 1 hour.
(iv) Count the actual amount of time you took to initiate procedures
to determine the cause of the alarm if you did not initiate procedures
to determine the cause of the alarm within 1 hour of the alarm.
(v) Calculate the percentage of time the alarm on the bag leak
detection system sounds as the ratio of the sum of alarm times to the
total operating time multiplied by 100.
(2) Maintain records of the times the bag leak detection system
alarm sounded, and for each valid alarm, the time you initiated
corrective action, the corrective action(s) taken, and the date on which
corrective action was completed.
(3) Inspect and maintain each baghouse according to the requirements
in Sec. 63.1451(b)(2) and recording all information needed to document
conformance with these requirements. If you increase or decrease the
sensitivity of the bag leak detection system beyond the limits specified
in Sec. 63.1451(b)(1)(vi), you must include a copy of the required
written certification by a responsible official in the next semiannual
compliance report.
(d) Venturi wet scrubbers. For each venturi wet scrubber subject to
the operating limits for pressure drop and scrubber water flow rate in
Sec. 63.1444(g) or Sec. 63.1446(d), you must demonstrate continuous
compliance by meeting the requirements of paragraphs (d)(1) through (3)
of this section.
(1) Maintain the hourly average pressure drop and scrubber water
flow rate at levels no lower than those established during the initial
or subsequent performance test;
[[Page 45]]
(2) Inspect and maintain each venturi wet scrubber CPMS according to
Sec. 63.1452(c) and recording all information needed to document
conformance with these requirements; and
(3) Collect and reduce monitoring data for pressure drop and
scrubber water flow rate according to Sec. 63.1452(e) and recording all
information needed to document conformance with these requirements.
(e) Other control devices. For each control device other than a
baghouse or venturi wet scrubber subject to the operating limits for
site-specific operating parameters in Sec. 63.1444(h) or Sec.
63.1446(e), you must demonstrate continuous compliance by meeting the
requirements of paragraphs (e)(1) through (3) of this section:
(1) Maintain the hourly average rate at levels no lower than those
established during the initial or subsequent performance test;
(2) Inspect and maintain each CPMS operated according to Sec.
63.1452(d) and record all information needed to document conformance
with these requirements; and
(3) Collect and reduce monitoring data for selected parameters
according to Sec. 63.1452(e) and recording all information needed to
document conformance with these requirements.
(f) Fugitive dust sources. For each fugitive dust source subject to
work practice standards in Sec. 63.1445, you must demonstrate
continuous compliance by implementing all of fugitive control measures
specified for the source in your written fugitive dust control plan.
[67 FR 40491, June 12, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 40674, July 14, 2005;
71 FR 20461, Apr. 20, 2006]
Notifications, Reports and Records
Sec. 63.1454 What notifications must I submit and when?
(a) You must submit all of the notifications in Sec. Sec.
63.6(h)(4) and (h)(5), 63.7(b) and (c), 63.8(f)(4), and 63.9(b) through
(h) that apply to you by the specified dates.
(b) As specified in Sec. 63.9(b)(2), if you start your affected
source before June 12, 2002, you must submit your initial notification
not later than October 10, 2002.
(c) As specified in Sec. 63.9(b)(3), if you start your new affected
source on or after June 12, 2002, you must submit your initial
notification not later than 120 calendar days after you become subject
to this subpart.
(d) If you are required to conduct a performance test, you must
submit a notification of intent to conduct a performance test at least
60 calendar days before the performance test is scheduled to begin as
required in Sec. 63.7(b)(1).
(e) If you are required to conduct a performance test, opacity
observation, or other initial compliance demonstration, you must submit
a notification of compliance status according to Sec. 63.9(h)(2)(ii) by
the date specified in paragraph (e)(1) or (2) of this section as applies
to you.
(1) For each initial compliance demonstration that does not include
a performance test, you must submit the notification of compliance
status before the close of business on the 30th calendar day following
the completion of the initial compliance demonstration.
(2) For each initial compliance demonstration that includes a
performance test, you must submit the notification of compliance status,
including the performance test results, before the close of business on
the 60th calendar day following the completion of the performance test
according to Sec. 63.10(d)(2).
Sec. 63.1455 What reports must I submit and when?
(a) You must submit each report in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this
section that applies to you.
(1) You must submit a compliance report semiannually according to
the requirements in paragraph (b) of this section and containing the
information in paragraph (c) of this section.
(2) You must submit an immediate startup, shutdown, and malfunction
report if you had a startup, shutdown, or malfunction during the
reporting period that is not consistent with your startup, shutdown, and
malfunction plan. You must report the actions taken for the event by fax
or telephone within 2 working days after starting
[[Page 46]]
actions inconsistent with the plan. You must submit the information in
Sec. 63.10(d)(5)(ii) of this part by letter within 7 working days after
the end of the event unless you have made alternative arrangements with
the permitting authority.
(b) Unless the Administrator has approved a different schedule under
Sec. 63.10(a), you must submit each compliance report required in
paragraph (a) of this section according to the applicable requirements
in paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this section.
(1) The first compliance report must cover the period beginning on
the compliance date that is specified for your affected source in Sec.
63.1443 and ending on June 30 or December 31, whichever date comes first
after the compliance date that is specified for your source in Sec.
63.1443.
(2) The first compliance report must be postmarked or delivered no
later than July 31 or January 31, whichever date comes first after your
first compliance report is due.
(3) Each subsequent compliance report must cover the semiannual
reporting period from January 1 through June 30 or the semiannual
reporting period from July 1 through December 31.
(4) Each subsequent compliance report must be postmarked or
delivered no later than July 31 or January 31, whichever date comes
first after the end of the semiannual reporting period.
(5) For each affected source that is subject to permitting
regulations pursuant to 40 CFR part 70 or 40 CFR part 71, and if the
permitting authority has established dates for submitting semiannual
reports pursuant to 40 CFR 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) or 40 CFR
71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) of this chapter, you may submit the first and
subsequent compliance reports according to the dates the permitting
authority has established instead of according to the dates in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section.
(c) Each compliance report must contain the information in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this section and, as applicable,
paragraphs (c)(4) through (8) of this section.
(1) Company name and address.
(2) Statement by a responsible official, as defined in 40 CFR 63.2,
with that official's name, title, and signature, certifying the accuracy
and completeness of the content of the report.
(3) Date of report and beginning and ending dates of the reporting
period.
(4) If you had a startup, shutdown or malfunction during the
reporting period and you took actions consistent with your startup,
shutdown, and malfunction plan, the compliance report must include the
information in Sec. 63.10(d)(5)(i).
(5) If there are no deviations from any emission limitations
(emission limit, operating limit, opacity limit) that applies to you and
there are no deviations from the requirements for work practice
standards in this subpart, a statement that there were no deviations
from the emission limitations, work practice standards, or operation and
maintenance requirements during the reporting period.
(6) If there were no periods during which an operating parameter
monitoring system was out-of-control as specified in Sec. 63.8(c)(7), a
statement that there were no periods during which the monitoring system
was out-of-control during the reporting period.
(7) For each deviation from an emission limitation (emission limit,
operating limit, opacity limit) and for each deviation from the
requirements for work practice standards that occurs at an affected
source where you are not using a continuous monitoring system to comply
with the emission limitations or work practice standards in this
subpart, the compliance report must contain the information in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section and the information in
paragraphs (b)(7)(i) and (ii) of this section. This includes periods of
startup, shutdown, and malfunction.
(i) The total operating time of each affected source during the
reporting period.
(ii) Information on the number, duration, and cause of deviations
(including unknown cause, if applicable), as applicable, and the
corrective action taken.
(8) For each deviation from an emission limitation (emission limit,
operating limit, opacity limit, and visible
[[Page 47]]
emission limit) occurring at an affected source where you are using an
operating parameter monitoring system to comply with the emission
limitation in this subpart, you must include the information in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section and the information in
paragraphs (c)(8)(i) through (xi) of this section. This includes periods
of startup, shutdown, and malfunction.
(i) The date and time that each malfunction started and stopped.
(ii) The date and time that each monitoring system was inoperative,
except for zero (low-level) and high-level checks.
(iii) The date, time and duration that each monitoring system was
out-of-control, including the information in Sec. 63.8(c)(8).
(iv) The date and time that each deviation started and stopped, and
whether each deviation occurred during a period of startup, shutdown, or
malfunction or during another period.
(v) A summary of the total duration of the deviation during the
reporting period and the total duration as a percent of the total source
operating time during that reporting period.
(vi) A breakdown of the total duration of the deviations during the
reporting period into those that are due to startup, shutdown, control
equipment problems, process problems, other known causes, and other
unknown causes.
(vii) A summary of the total duration of monitoring system downtime
during the reporting period and the total duration of monitoring system
downtime as a percent of the total source operating time during that
reporting period.
(viii) A brief description of the process units.
(ix) A brief description of the monitoring system.
(x) The date of the latest monitoring system certification or audit.
(xi) A description of any changes in continuous monitoring systems,
processes, or controls since the last reporting period.
(d) If you have obtained a Title V operating permit pursuant to 40
CFR part 70 or 40 CFR part 71 must report all deviations as defined in
this subpart in the semiannual monitoring report required by 40 CFR
70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) or 40 CFR 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A). If you submit a
compliance report pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section along with,
or as part of, the semiannual monitoring report required by 40 CFR
70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) or 40 CFR 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A), and the compliance
report includes all required information concerning deviations from any
emission limitation(including any operating limit), or work practice
requirement in this subpart, submission of the compliance report is
deemed to satisfy any obligation to report the same deviations in the
semiannual monitoring report. However, submission of a compliance report
does not otherwise affect any obligation you may have to report
deviations from permit requirements to the permit authority.
Sec. 63.1456 What records must I keep and how long must I keep my records?
(a) You must keep the records listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through
(7) of this section.
(1) A copy of each notification and report that you submitted to
comply with this subpart, including all documentation supporting any
initial notification or notification of compliance status that you
submitted, according to the requirements in Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(xiv).
(2) The records in Sec. 63.6(e)(3)(iii) through (v) related to
startup, shutdown, and malfunction.
(3) Records of performance tests and performance evaluations as
required in Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(viii).
(4) For each monitoring system, you must keep the records specified
in paragraphs (a)(4)(i) through (iv) of this section.
(i) Records described in Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(vi) through (xi).
(ii) Monitoring data recorded by the monitoring system during a
performance evaluation as required in Sec. 63.6(h)(7)(i) and (ii).
(iii) Previous (i.e., superseded) versions of the performance
evaluation plan as required in Sec. 63.8(d)(3).
(iv) Records of the date and time that each deviation started and
stopped, and whether the deviation occurred during
[[Page 48]]
a period of startup, shutdown, or malfunction or during another period.
(5) For each performance test you conduct to demonstrate compliance
with an opacity limit according to Sec. 63.1450(c), you must keep the
records specified in paragraphs (a)(5)(i) through (ix) of this section.
(i) Dates and time intervals of all opacity observation period
segments;
(ii) Description of overall smelter operating conditions during each
observation period. Identify, if any, the smelter copper production
process equipment that was out-of-service during the performance test
and explain why this equipment was not in operation;
(iii) Name, affiliation, and copy of current visible emission
reading certification for each visible emission observer participating
in the performance test;
(iv) Name, title, and affiliation for each indoor process monitor
participating in the performance test;
(v) Copies of all visible emission observer opacity field data
sheets;
(vi) Copies of all indoor process monitor operating log sheets;
(vii) Copies of all data summary sheets used for data reduction;
(viii) Copy of calculation sheets of the average opacity value used
to demonstrate compliance with the opacity limit; and
(ix) Documentation according to the requirements in Sec.
63.1450(c)(9)(iv) to support your selection of the site-specific capture
system operating limits used for each batch copper converter capture
system when blowing.
(6) For each baghouse subject to the operating limit in Sec.
63.1444(f) or Sec. 63.1446(c), you must keep the records specified in
paragraphs (a)(6)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(i) Records of alarms for each bag leak detection system.
(ii) Description of the corrective actions taken following each bag
leak detection alarm.
(7) For each control device other than a baghouse or venturi wet
scrubber subject to site-specific operating limits in Sec. 63.1444(g)
or Sec. 63.1446(f), you must keep documentation according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1450(a)(5)(iv) to support your selection of the
site-specific operating limits for the control device.
(b) Your records must be in a form suitable and readily available
for expeditious review, according to Sec. 63.10(b)(1).
(c) As specified in Sec. 63.10(b)(1), you must keep each record for
5 years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance,
corrective action, report, or record.
(d) You must keep each record on site for at least 2 years after the
date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,
report, or record, according to Sec. 63.10(b)(1). You can keep the
records off site for the remaining 3 years.
Other Requirements and Information
Sec. 63.1457 What part of the general provisions apply to me?
Table 2 to this subpart shows which parts of the general provisions
in Sec. Sec. 63.1 through 63.15 apply to you.
Sec. 63.1458 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
(a) This subpart can be implemented and enforced by us, the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), or a delegated
authority such as your State, local, or tribal agency. If the U.S. EPA
Administrator has delegated authority to your State, local, or tribal
agency, then that agency has the authority to implement and enforce this
subpart. You should contact your U.S. EPA Regional Office to find out if
this subpart is delegated to your State, local, or tribal agency.
(b) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority of this
subpart to a State, local, or tribal agency under 40 CFR part 63,
subpart E, the authorities listed in paragraph (c) of this section are
retained by the U.S. EPA Administrator and are not transferred to the
State, local, or tribal agency.
(c) The authorities that will not be delegated to State, local, or
tribal agencies are as listed in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this
section.
(1) Approval of alternatives to the emission limitations and work
practice standards in Sec. Sec. 63.1444 through 63.1446 under Sec.
63.6(g).
[[Page 49]]
(2) Approval of major alternatives to test methods under Sec.
63.7(f) and as defined in Sec. 63.90.
(3) Approval of major alternatives to monitoring under Sec. 63.8(f)
and as defined in Sec. 63.90.
(4) Approval of major alternatives to recordkeeping and reporting
under Sec. 63.10(f) and as defined in Sec. 63.90.
Sec. 63.1459 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Terms used in this subpart are defined in the Clean Air Act, in
Sec. 63.2, and in this section as follows:
Bag leak detection system means a system that is capable of
continuously monitoring relative particulate matter (dust) loadings in
the exhaust of a baghouse in order to detect bag leaks and other upset
conditions. A bag leak detection system includes, but is not limited to,
an instrument that operates on triboelectric, light scattering,
transmittance or other effect to continuously monitor relative
particulate matter loadings.
Baghouse means a control device that collects particulate matter by
filtering the gas stream through bags. A baghouse is also referred to as
a ``fabric filter.''
Batch copper converter means a Pierce-Smith converter or Hoboken
converter in which copper matte is oxidized to form blister copper by a
process that is performed in discrete batches using a sequence of
charging, blowing, skimming, and pouring.
Blowing means the operating mode for a batch copper converter during
which air or oxygen-enriched air is injected into the molten converter
bath.
Capture system means the collection of components used to capture
gases and fumes released from one or more emission points, and to convey
the captured gases and fumes to a control device. A capture system may
include, but is not limited to, the following components as applicable
to a given capture system design: duct intake devices, hoods,
enclosures, ductwork, dampers, manifolds, plenums, and fans.
Charging means the operating mode for a batch copper converter
during which molten or solid material is added into the vessel.
Control device means the air pollution control equipment used to
collect particulate matter emissions. Examples of such equipment
include, but are not limited to, a baghouse, an electrostatic
precipitator, and a wet scrubber.
Copper concentrate dryer means a vessel in which copper concentrates
are heated in the presence of air to reduce the moisture content of the
material. Supplemental copper-bearing feed materials and fluxes may be
added or mixed with the copper concentrates fed to a copper concentrate
dryer.
Copper converter department means the area at a primary copper
smelter in which the copper converters are located.
Copper matte means a material predominately composed of copper and
iron sulfides produced by smelting copper ore concentrates.
Deviation means any instance in which an affected source subject to
this subpart or an owner or operator of such a source fails to meet any
of the following:
(1) Any requirement or obligation established by this subpart
including, but not limited to, any emission limitation (including any
operating limit) or work practice standard;
(2) Any term or condition that is adopted to implement an applicable
requirement in this subpart and that is included in the operating permit
for any affected source required to obtain such a permit; or
(3) Any emission limitation (including any operating limit) or work
practice standard in this subpart during startup, shutdown, or
malfunction, regardless whether or not such failure is permitted by this
subpart.
Emission limitation means any emission limit, opacity limit,
operating limit, or visible emission limit.
Fugitive dust material means copper concentrate, dross, reverts,
slag, speiss, or other solid copper-bearing materials.
Fugitive dust source means a stationary source of particulate matter
emissions resulting from the handling, storage, transfer, or other
management of fugitive dust materials where the source is not associated
with a specific process, process vent, or stack. Examples of a fugitive
dust source include,
[[Page 50]]
but are not limited to, on-site roadways used by trucks transporting
copper concentrate, unloading of materials from trucks or railcars,
outdoor material storage piles, and transfer of material to hoppers and
bins.
Holding means the operating mode for a batch copper converter during
which the molten bath is maintained in the vessel but no blowing is
performed nor is material added into or removed from the vessel.
Opacity means the degree to which emissions reduce the transmission
of light.
Particulate matter means any finely divided solid or liquid
material, other than uncombined water, as measured by the specific
reference method.
Pouring means the operating mode for a batch copper converter during
which molten copper is removed from the vessel.
Primary copper smelter means any installation or any intermediate
process engaged in the production of copper from copper sulfide ore
concentrates through the use of pyrometallurgical techniques.
Responsible official means responsible official as defined in 40 CFR
70.2.
Skimming means the batch copper converter operating mode during
which molten slag is removed from the vessel.
Slag cleaning vessel means a vessel that receives molten copper-
bearing material and the predominant use of the vessel is to separate
this material into molten copper matte and slag layers.
Smelting furnace means a furnace, reactor, or other type of vessel
in which copper ore concentrate and fluxes are melted to form a molten
mass of material containing copper matte and slag. Other copper-bearing
materials may also be charged to the smelting furnace.
Work practice standard means any design, equipment, work practice,
or operational standard, or combination thereof, that is promulgated
pursuant to section 112(h) of the Clean Air Act.
Sec. Table 1 to Subpart QQQ of Part 63--Applicability of General
Provisions to Subpart QQQ
As required in Sec. 63.1457, you must comply with the requirements
of the NESHAP General Provisions (40 CFR part 63, subpart A) shown in
the following table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citation Subject Applies to subpart QQQ Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 63.1.......................... Applicability.......... Yes....................
Sec. 63.2.......................... Definitions............ Yes....................
Sec. 63.3.......................... Units and Abbreviations Yes....................
Sec. 63.4.......................... Prohibited Activities.. Yes....................
Sec. 63.5.......................... Construction and Yes....................
Reconstruction.
Sec. 63.6(a)-(g)................... Compliance with Yes....................
Standards and
Maintenance
requirements.
Sec. 63.6(h)....................... Determining compliance No..................... Subpart QQQ specifies
with Opacity and VE the requirements and
standards. test protocol used to
determine compliance
with the opacity
limits.
Sec. 63.6(i)-(j)................... Extension of Compliance Yes....................
and Presidential
Compliance Exemption.
Sec. 63.7(a)(1)-(2)................ Applicability and No..................... Subpart QQQ specifies
Performance Test Dates. performance test
applicability and
dates.
Sec. 63.7(a)(3), (b)-(h)........... Performance Testing Yes....................
Requirements.
Sec. 63.8 except for (a)(4),(c)(4), Monitoring Requirements Yes....................
and (f)(6).
Sec. 63.8(a)(4).................... Additional Monitoring No..................... Subpart QQ does not
Requirements for require flares.
Control devices in
Sec. 63.11.
Sec. 63.8(c)(4).................... Continuous Monitoring No..................... Subpart QQQ specifies
System Requirements. requirements for
operation of CMS.
Sec. 63.8(f)(6).................... RATA Alternative....... No..................... Subpart QQQ does not
require continuous
emission monitoring
systems.
Sec. 63.9.......................... Notification Yes....................
Requirements.
[[Page 51]]
Sec. 63.9(g)(5).................... DATA reduction......... No..................... Subpart QQQ specifies
data reduction
requirements
Sec. 63.10 except for (b)(2)(xiii) Recordkeeping and Yes....................
and (c)(7)-(8). reporting Requirements.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(xiii)............. CMS Records for RATA No..................... Subpart QQQ does not
Alternative. require continuous
emission monitoring
systems.
Sec. 63.10(c)(7)-(8)............... Records of Excess No..................... Subpart QQQ specifies
Emissions and record keeping
Parameter Monitoring requirements
Accedences for CMS.
Sec. 63.11......................... Control Device No..................... Subpart QQQ does not
Requirements. require flares
Sec. 63.12......................... State Authority and Yes....................
Delegations.
Sec. Sec. 63.13-63.15............. Addresses, Yes....................
Incorporation by
Reference,
Availability of
Information.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Figure 1 to Subpart QQQ of Part 63--Data Summary Sheet for
Determination of Average Opacity
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Visible opacity for 1-
emissions minute
Average interference interval
Number of Converter aisle opacity for 1- observed blowing
Clock time converters activity minute during 1- without
blowing interval minute visible
(percent) interval? emission
(yes or no) interferences
(percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart RRR_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Secondary Aluminum Production
Source: 65 FR 15710, Mar. 23, 2000, unless otherwise noted.
General
Sec. 63.1500 Applicability.
(a) The requirements of this subpart apply to the owner or operator
of each secondary aluminum production facility as defined in Sec.
63.1503.
(b) The requirements of this subpart apply to the following affected
sources, located at a secondary aluminum production facility that is a
major source
[[Page 52]]
of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) as defined in Sec. 63.2:
(1) Each new and existing aluminum scrap shredder;
(2) Each new and existing thermal chip dryer;
(3) Each new and existing scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating
kiln;
(4) Each new and existing group 2 furnace;
(5) Each new and existing sweat furnace;
(6) Each new and existing dross-only furnace;
(7) Each new and existing rotary dross cooler; and
(8) Each new and existing secondary aluminum processing unit.
(c) The requirements of this subpart pertaining to dioxin and furan
(D/F) emissions and associated operating, monitoring, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements apply to the following affected sources,
located at a secondary aluminum production facility that is an area
source of HAPs as defined in Sec. 63.2:
(1) Each new and existing thermal chip dryer;
(2) Each new and existing scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating
kiln;
(3) Each new and existing sweat furnace;
(4) Each new and existing secondary aluminum processing unit,
containing one or more group 1 furnace emission units processing other
than clean charge.
(d) The requirements of this subpart do not apply to facilities and
equipment used for research and development that are not used to produce
a saleable product.
(e) If you are an owner or operator of an area source subject to
this subpart, you are exempt from the obligation to obtain a permit
under 40 CFR part 70 or 71, provided you are not required to obtain a
permit under 40 CFR 70.3(a) or 71.3(a) for a reason other than your
status as an area source under this subpart. Notwithstanding the
previous sentence, you must continue to comply with the provisions of
this subpart applicable to area sources.
(f) An aluminum die casting facility, aluminum foundry, or aluminum
extrusion facility shall be considered to be an area source if it does
not emit, or have the potential to emit considering controls, 10 tons
per year or more of any single listed HAP or 25 tons per year of any
combination of listed HAP from all emission sources which are located in
a contiguous area and under common control, without regard to whether or
not such sources are regulated under this subpart or any other subpart.
In the case of an aluminum die casting facility, aluminum foundry, or
aluminum extrusion facility which is an area source and is subject to
regulation under this subpart only because it operates a thermal chip
dryer, no furnace operated by such a facility shall be deemed to be
subject to the requirements of this subpart if it melts only clean
charge, internal scrap, or customer returns.
[65 FR 15710, Mar. 23, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 79814, Dec. 30, 2002;
70 FR 75346, Dec. 19, 2005]
Sec. 63.1501 Dates.
(a) An affected source constructed before February 11, 1999, must
comply with the requirements of this subpart by March 24, 2003, except
as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c).
(b) The owner or operator of an affected source constructed before
February 14, 2012, must comply with the following requirements of this
subpart by March 16, 2016: Sec. 63.1505(k) introductory text, (k)(1)
through (k)(5), other than the emission standards for HF in (k)(2);
Sec. 63.1506 (a)(1), (c)(1), (g)(5), (k)(3), (m)(4), (m)(7), (n)(1);
Sec. 63.1510 (b)(5), (b)(9), (d)(2), (d)(3),(f)(1)(ii), (i)(4), (j)(4),
(n)(1), (o)(1), (o)(1)(ii), (s)(2)(iv), (t) introductory text,
(t)(2)(i), (t)(2)(ii), (t)(4), (t)(5); Sec. 63.1511(a) introductory
text, (b) introductory text, (b)(1), (b)(3), (b)(6), (c)(9), (g)(5);
Sec. 63.1512(e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), (h)(2), (j), (j)(1)(i), (j)(2)(i),
(o) introductory text, (o)(1), (o)(3), (p)(2); Sec. 63.1513 (b)(1),
(e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), (f); Sec. 63.1516 (b) introductory text,
(b)(2)(vii), (b)(3)(i); Sec. 63.1517(b)(1)(iii), (b)(4)(ii), (b)(14),
(b)(19).
(c) The owner or operator of an affected source constructed before
February 14, 2012, must comply with the following requirements of this
subpart by September 18, 2017: Sec. 63.1505(i)(4) and (k)(2) emission
standards for HF; Sec. 63.1512(e)(4) through (7) requirements for
testing existing uncontrolled group
[[Page 53]]
1 furnaces (that is, group 1 furnaces without add-on air pollution
control devices); and Sec. 63.1514 requirements for change of furnace
classification.
(d) An affected source that commenced construction or reconstruction
after February 11, 1999 but before February 14, 2012 must comply with
the requirements of this subpart by March 24, 2000 or upon startup,
whichever is later, except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), (e), and
(f) of this section.
(e) The owner or operator of an affected source that commences
construction or reconstruction after February 14, 2012, must comply with
all the requirements of this subpart by September 18, 2015 or upon
startup, whichever is later.
(f) The owner or operator of any affected source which is
constructed or reconstructed after February 11, 1999, but before
February 14, 2012 at any existing aluminum die casting facility,
aluminum foundry, or aluminum extrusion facility which otherwise meets
the applicability criteria set forth in Sec. 63.1500 must comply with
the requirements of this subpart by March 24, 2003 or upon startup,
whichever is later, except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this
section. The owner or operator of any affected source which is
constructed or reconstructed after February 14, 2012, at any existing
aluminum die casting facility, aluminum foundry, or aluminum extrusion
facility which otherwise meets the applicability criteria set forth in
Sec. 63.1500 must comply with the requirements by September 18, 2015 or
upon startup, whichever is later.
[80 FR 56738, Sept. 18, 2015]
Sec. 63.1502 [Reserved]
Sec. 63.1503 Definitions.
Terms used in this subpart are defined in the Clean Air Act as
amended (CAA), in Sec. 63.2, or in this section as follows:
ACGIH Guidelines means chapters 3 and 5 of Industrial Ventilation: A
Manual of Recommended Practice 23rd edition or appropriate chapters of
Industrial Ventilation: A Manual of Recommended Practice for Design 27th
edition (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14).
Add-on air pollution control device means equipment installed on a
process vent that reduces the quantity of a pollutant that is emitted to
the air.
Afterburner means an air pollution control device that uses
controlled flame combustion to convert combustible materials to
noncombustible gases; also known as an incinerator or a thermal
oxidizer.
Aluminum scrap means fragments of aluminum stock removed during
manufacturing (i.e., machining), manufactured aluminum articles or parts
rejected or discarded and useful only as material for reprocessing, and
waste and discarded material made of aluminum.
Aluminum scrap shredder means a high speed or low speed unit that
crushes, grinds, granulates, shears or breaks aluminum scrap into a more
uniform size prior to processing or charging to a scrap dryer/
delacquering kiln/decoating kiln, or furnace. A bale breaker is not an
aluminum scrap shredder. Shearing and cutting operations performed at
rolling mills and aluminum finishing operations (such as slitters) are
not aluminum scrap shredders.
Bag leak detection system means an instrument that is capable of
monitoring particulate matter loadings in the exhaust of a fabric filter
(i.e., baghouse) in order to detect bag failures. A bag leak detection
system includes, but is not limited to, an instrument that operates on
triboelectric, light scattering, light transmittance, or other effect to
monitor relative particulate matter loadings.
Bale breaker means a device used to break apart a bale of aluminum
scrap for further processing. Bale breakers are not used to crush,
grind, granulate, shear or break aluminum scrap into more uniform size
pieces.
Capture and collection system means the system, including duct
systems and fans, and, in some cases, hoods, used to collect a
contaminant at or near its source, and for affected sources equipped
with an air pollution control device, transport the contaminated air to
the air cleaning device.
Chips means small, uniformly-sized, unpainted pieces of aluminum
scrap,
[[Page 54]]
typically below 1\1/4\ inches in any dimension, primarily generated by
turning, milling, boring, and machining of aluminum parts.
Clean charge means furnace charge materials, including molten
aluminum; T-bar; sow; ingot; billet; pig; alloying elements; aluminum
scrap known by the owner or operator to be entirely free of paints,
coatings, and lubricants; uncoated/unpainted aluminum chips that have
been thermally dried or treated by a centrifugal cleaner; aluminum scrap
dried at 343 [deg]C (650 [deg]F) or higher; aluminum scrap delacquered/
decoated at 482 [deg]C (900 [deg]F) or higher; and runaround scrap.
Anodized aluminum that contains dyes or sealants containing organic
compounds is not clean charge.
Cover flux means salt added to the surface of molten aluminum in a
group 1 or group 2 furnace, without surface agitation of the molten
aluminum, for the purpose of preventing oxidation. Any flux added to a
rotary furnace is not a cover flux.
Customer returns means any aluminum product which is returned by a
customer to the aluminum company that originally manufactured the
product prior to resale of the product or further distribution in
commerce, and which contains no paint or other solid coatings (i.e.,
lacquers).
D/F means dioxins and furans.
Dioxins and furans means tetra-, penta-, hexa-, and octachlorinated
dibenzo dioxins and furans.
Dross means the slags and skimmings from aluminum melting and
refining operations consisting of fluxing agent(s), impurities, and/or
oxidized and non-oxidized aluminum, from scrap aluminum charged into the
furnace.
Dross-only furnace means a furnace, typically of rotary barrel
design, dedicated to the reclamation of aluminum from dross formed
during melting, holding, fluxing, or alloying operations carried out in
other process units. Dross and salt flux are the sole feedstocks to this
type of furnace.
Emission unit means a group 1 furnace or in-line fluxer at a
secondary aluminum production facility.
Fabric filter means an add-on air pollution control device used to
capture particulate matter by filtering gas streams through filter
media; also known as a baghouse.
Feed/charge means, for a furnace or other process unit that operates
in batch mode, the total weight of material (including molten aluminum,
T-bar, sow, ingot, etc.) and alloying agents that enter the furnace
during an operating cycle. For a furnace or other process unit that
operates continuously, feed/charge means the weight of material
(including molten aluminum, T-bar, sow, ingot, etc.) and alloying agents
that enter the process unit within a specified time period (e.g., a time
period equal to the performance test period). The feed/charge for a
dross only furnace includes the total weight of dross and solid flux.
Fluxing means refining of molten aluminum to improve product
quality, achieve product specifications, or reduce material loss,
including the addition of solvents to remove impurities (solvent flux);
and the injection of gases such as chlorine, or chlorine mixtures, to
remove magnesium (demagging) or hydrogen bubbles (degassing). Fluxing
may be performed in the furnace or outside the furnace by an in-line
fluxer.
Furnace hearth means the combustion zone of a furnace in which the
molten metal is contained.
Group 1 furnace means a furnace of any design that melts, holds, or
processes aluminum that contains paint, lubricants, coatings, or other
foreign materials with or without reactive fluxing, or processes clean
charge with reactive fluxing.
Group 2 furnace means a furnace of any design that melts, holds, or
processes only clean charge and that performs no fluxing or performs
fluxing using only nonreactive, non-HAP-containing/non-HAP-generating
gases or agents. Unheated pots, to which no flux is added and that are
used to transport metal, are not furnaces.
HCl means hydrogen chloride.
HF means hydrogen fluoride.
In-line fluxer means a device exterior to a furnace, located in a
transfer line from a furnace, used to refine (flux) molten aluminum;
also known as a flux box, degassing box, or demagging box.
[[Page 55]]
Internal scrap means all aluminum scrap regardless of the level of
contamination which originates from castings or extrusions produced by
an aluminum die casting facility, aluminum foundry, or aluminum
extrusion facility, and which remains at all times within the control of
the company that produced the castings or extrusions.
Lime means calcium oxide or other alkaline reagent.
Lime-injection means the continuous addition of lime upstream of a
fabric filter.
Melting/holding furnace means a group 1 furnace that processes only
clean charge, performs melting, holding, and fluxing functions, and does
not transfer molten aluminum to or from another furnace except for
purposes of alloy changes, off-specification product drains, or
maintenance activities.
Operating cycle means for a batch process, the period beginning when
the feed material is first charged to the operation and ending when all
feed material charged to the operation has been processed. For a batch
melting or holding furnace process, operating cycle means the period
including the charging and melting of scrap aluminum and the fluxing,
refining, alloying, and tapping of molten aluminum (the period from tap-
to-tap).
PM means, for the purposes of this subpart, emissions of particulate
matter that serve as a measure of total particulate emissions and as a
surrogate for metal HAPs contained in the particulates, including but
not limited to, antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt,
lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, and selenium.
Pollution prevention means source reduction as defined under the
Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (e.g., equipment or technology
modifications, process or procedure modifications, reformulation or
redesign of products, substitution of raw materials, and improvements in
housekeeping, maintenance, training, or inventory control), and other
practices that reduce or eliminate the creation of pollutants through
increased efficiency in the use of raw materials, energy, water, or
other resources, or protection of natural resources by conservation.
Reactive fluxing means the use of any gas, liquid, or solid flux
(other than cover flux) that results in a HAP emission. Argon and
nitrogen are not reactive and do not produce HAP.
Reconstruction means the replacement of components of an affected
source or emission unit such that the fixed capital cost of the new
components exceeds 50 percent of the fixed capital cost that would be
required to construct a comparable new affected source, and it is
technologically and economically feasible for the reconstructed source
to meet relevant standard(s) established in this subpart. Replacement of
the refractory in a furnace is routine maintenance and is not a
reconstruction. The repair and replacement of in-line fluxer components
(e.g., rotors/shafts, burner tubes, refractory, warped steel) is
considered to be routine maintenance and is not considered a
reconstruction. In-line fluxers are typically removed to a maintenance/
repair area and are replaced with repaired units. The replacement of an
existing in-line fluxer with a repaired unit is not considered a
reconstruction.
Residence time means, for an afterburner, the duration of time
required for gases to pass through the afterburner combustion zone.
Residence time is calculated by dividing the afterburner combustion zone
volume in cubic feet by the volumetric flow rate of the gas stream in
actual cubic feet per second. The combustion zone volume includes the
reaction chamber of the afterburner in which the waste gas stream is
exposed to the direct combustion flame and the complete refractory lined
portion of the furnace stack up to the measurement thermocouple.
Rotary dross cooler means a water-cooled rotary barrel device that
accelerates cooling of dross.
Round top furnace means a cylindrically-shaped reverberatory furnace
that has a top that is removed for charging and other furnace
operations.
Runaround scrap means scrap materials generated on-site by aluminum
casting, extruding, rolling, scalping, forging, forming/stamping,
cutting, and trimming operations and that do not contain paint or solid
coatings. Uncoated/unpainted aluminum chips generated by turning,
boring, milling,
[[Page 56]]
and similar machining operations may be clean charge if they have been
thermally dried or treated by a centrifugal cleaner, but are not
considered to be runaround scrap.
Scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln means a unit used
primarily to remove various organic contaminants such as oil, paint,
lacquer, ink, plastic, and/or rubber from aluminum scrap (including used
beverage containers) prior to melting, or that separates aluminum foil
from paper and plastic in scrap.
Secondary aluminum processing unit (SAPU). An existing SAPU means
all existing group 1 furnaces and all existing in-line fluxers within a
secondary aluminum production facility. Each existing group 1 furnace or
existing in-line fluxer is considered an emission unit within a
secondary aluminum processing unit. A new SAPU means any combination of
individual group 1 furnaces and in-line fluxers within a secondary
aluminum processing facility which either were constructed or
reconstructed after February 11, 1999, or have been permanently
redesignated as new emission units pursuant to Sec. 63.1505(k)(6). Each
of the group 1 furnaces or in-line fluxers within a new SAPU is
considered an emission unit within that secondary aluminum processing
unit. A secondary aluminum production facility may have more than one
new SAPU.
Secondary aluminum production facility means any establishment using
clean charge, aluminum scrap, or dross from aluminum production, as the
raw material and performing one or more of the following processes:
scrap shredding, scrap drying/delacquering/decoating, thermal chip
drying, furnace operations (i.e., melting, holding, sweating, refining,
fluxing, or alloying), recovery of aluminum from dross, in-line fluxing,
or dross cooling. A secondary aluminum production facility may be
independent or part of a primary aluminum production facility. For
purposes of this subpart, aluminum die casting facilities, aluminum
foundries, and aluminum extrusion facilities are not considered to be
secondary aluminum production facilities if the only materials they melt
are clean charge, customer returns, or internal scrap, and if they do
not operate sweat furnaces, thermal chip dryers, or scrap dryers/
delacquering kilns/decoating kilns. The determination of whether a
facility is a secondary aluminum production facility is only for
purposes of this subpart and any regulatory requirements which are
derived from the applicability of this subpart, and is separate from any
determination which may be made under other environmental laws and
regulations, including whether the same facility is a ``secondary metal
production facility'' as that term is used in 42 U.S.C. Sec. 7479(1)
and 40 CFR 52.21(b)(1)(i)(A) (``prevention of significant deterioration
of air quality'').
Shutdown means the period of operation for thermal chip dryers,
scrap dryers/delacquering kilns, decoating kilns, dross-only furnaces,
group 1 furnaces, in-line fluxers, sweat furnaces and group 2 furnaces
that begins when the introduction of feed/charge is intentionally
halted, the source of heat to the emissions unit is turned off, and
product has been removed from the emission unit to the greatest extent
practicable (e.g., by tapping a furnace). Shutdown ends when the
emission unit is near ambient temperature.
Sidewell means an open well adjacent to the hearth of a furnace with
connecting arches between the hearth and the open well through which
molten aluminum is circulated between the hearth, where heat is applied
by burners, and the open well, which is used for charging scrap and
solid flux or salt to the furnace, injecting fluxing agents, and
skimming dross.
Startup means the period of operation for thermal chip dryers, scrap
dryers/delacquering kilns, decoating kilns, dross-only furnaces, group 1
furnaces, in-line fluxers, sweat furnaces and group 2 furnaces that
begins with equipment warming from a shutdown, that is, the equipment is
at or near ambient temperature. Startup ends at the point that flux or
feed/charge is introduced.
Sweat furnace means a furnace used exclusively to reclaim aluminum
from scrap that contains substantial quantities of iron by using heat to
separate the low-melting point aluminum from
[[Page 57]]
the scrap while the higher melting-point iron remains in solid form.
Tap means the end of an operating cycle of any individual furnace
when processed molten aluminum is poured from that furnace.
TEQ means the international method of expressing toxicity
equivalents for dioxins and furans as defined in ``Interim Procedures
for Estimating Risks Associated with Exposures to Mixtures of
Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and -Dibenzofurans (CDDs and CDFs) and
1989 Update'' (EPA-625/3-89-016), available from the National Technical
Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia
22161, NTIS no. PB 90-145756.
THC means, for the purposes of this subpart, total hydrocarbon
emissions that also serve as a surrogate for the emissions of organic
HAP compounds.
Thermal chip dryer means a device that uses heat to evaporate oil or
oil/water mixtures from unpainted/uncoated aluminum chips. Pre-heating
boxes or other dryers which are used solely to remove water from
aluminum scrap are not considered to be thermal chip dryers for purposes
of this subpart.
Three-day, 24-hour rolling average means daily calculations of the
average 24-hour emission rate (lbs/ton of feed/charge), over the 3 most
recent consecutive 24-hour periods, for a secondary aluminum processing
unit.
Total reactive chlorine flux injection rate means the sum of the
total weight of chlorine in the gaseous or liquid reactive flux and the
total weight of chlorine in the solid reactive chloride flux, divided by
the total weight of feed/charge, as determined by the procedure in Sec.
63.1512(o).
Total reactive fluorine flux injection rate means the sum of the
total weight of fluorine in the gaseous or liquid reactive flux added to
an uncontrolled group 1 furnace, and the total weight of fluorine in the
solid reactive flux added to an uncontrolled group 1 furnace, divided by
the total weight of feed/charge, as determined by the procedure in Sec.
63.1512(o).
[65 FR 15710, Mar. 23, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 79814, Dec. 30, 2002;
69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004; 69 FR 53984, Sept. 3, 2004; 70 FR 57517, Oct.
3, 2005; 80 FR 56738, Sept. 18, 2015]
Sec. 63.1504 [Reserved]
Emission Standards and Operating Requirements
Sec. 63.1505 Emission standards for affected sources and emission units.
(a) Summary. The owner or operator of a new or existing affected
source must comply at all times with each applicable limit in this
section, including periods of startup and shutdown. Table 1 to this
subpart summarizes the emission standards for each type of source.
(b) Aluminum scrap shredder. On and after the compliance date
established by Sec. 63.1501, the owner or operator of an aluminum scrap
shredder at a secondary aluminum production facility that is a major
source must not discharge or cause to be discharged to the atmosphere:
(1) Emissions in excess of 0.023 grams (g) of PM per dry standard
cubic meter (dscm) (0.010 grain (gr) of PM per dry standard cubic foot
(dscf)); and
(2) Visible emissions (VE) in excess of 10 percent opacity from any
PM add-on air pollution control device if a continuous opacity monitor
(COM) or visible emissions monitoring is chosen as the monitoring
option.
(c) Thermal chip dryer. On and after the compliance date established
by Sec. 63.1501, the owner or operator of a thermal chip dryer must not
discharge or cause to be discharged to the atmosphere emissions in
excess of:
(1) 0.40 kilogram (kg) of THC, as propane, per megagram (Mg) (0.80
lb of THC, as propane, per ton) of feed/charge from a thermal chip dryer
at a secondary aluminum production facility that is a major source; and
(2) 2.50 micrograms ([micro]g) of D/F TEQ per Mg (3.5 x
10-5 gr per ton) of feed/charge from a thermal chip dryer at
a secondary aluminum production facility that is a major or area source.
(d) Scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln. On and after the
compliance date established by Sec. 63.1501:
(1) The owner or operator of a scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/
decoating kiln must not discharge or cause to be discharged to the
atmosphere emissions in excess of:
(i) 0.03 kg of THC, as propane, per Mg (0.06 lb of THC, as propane,
per ton) of
[[Page 58]]
feed/charge from a scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln at a
secondary aluminum production facility that is a major source;
(ii) 0.04 kg of PM per Mg (0.08 lb per ton) of feed/charge from a
scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln at a secondary aluminum
production facility that is a major source;
(iii) 0.25 [micro]g of D/F TEQ per Mg (3.5 x 10-6 gr of
D/F TEQ per ton) of feed/charge from a scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/
decoating kiln at a secondary aluminum production facility that is a
major or area source; and
(iv) 0.40 kg of HCl per Mg (0.80 lb per ton) of feed/charge from a
scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln at a secondary aluminum
production facility that is a major source.
(2) The owner or operator of a scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/
decoating kiln at a secondary aluminum production facility that is a
major source must not discharge or cause to be discharged to the
atmosphere visible emissions in excess of 10 percent opacity from any PM
add-on air pollution control device if a COM is chosen as the monitoring
option.
(e) Scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln: alternative
limits. The owner or operator of a scrap dryer/ delacquering kiln/
decoating kiln may choose to comply with the emission limits in this
paragraph (e) as an alternative to the limits in paragraph (d) of this
section if the scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln is equipped
with an afterburner having a design residence time of at least 1 second
and the afterburner is operated at a temperature of at least 760 [deg]C
(1400 [deg]F) at all times. On and after the compliance date established
by Sec. 63.1501:
(1) The owner or operator of a scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/
decoating kiln must not discharge or cause to be discharged to the
atmosphere emissions in excess of:
(i) 0.10 kg of THC, as propane, per Mg (0.20 lb of THC, as propane,
per ton) of feed/charge from a scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating
kiln at a secondary aluminum production facility that is a major source;
(ii) 0.15 kg of PM per Mg (0.30 lb per ton) of feed/charge from a
scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln at a secondary aluminum
production facility that is a major source;
(iii) 5.0 [micro]g of D/F TEQ per Mg (7.0 x 10-5 gr of D/
F TEQ per ton) of feed/charge from a scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/
decoating kiln at a secondary aluminum production facility that is a
major or area source; and
(iv) 0.75 kg of HCl per Mg (1.50 lb per ton) of feed/charge from a
scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln at a secondary aluminum
production facility that is a major source.
(2) The owner or operator of a scrap dryer/ delacquering kiln/
decoating kiln at a secondary aluminum production facility that is a
major source must not discharge or cause to be discharged to the
atmosphere visible emissions in excess of 10 percent opacity from any PM
add-on air pollution control device if a COM is chosen as the monitoring
option.
(f) Sweat furnace. The owner or operator of a sweat furnace shall
comply with the emission standard of paragraph (f)(2) of this section.
(1) The owner or operator is not required to conduct a performance
test to demonstrate compliance with the emission standard of paragraph
(f)(2) of this section, provided that, on and after the compliance date
of this rule, the owner or operator operates and maintains an
afterburner with a design residence time of 0.8 seconds or greater and
an operating temperature of 1600 [deg]F or greater.
(2) On and after the compliance date established by Sec. 63.1501,
the owner or operator of a sweat furnace at a secondary aluminum
production facility that is a major or area source must not discharge or
cause to be discharged to the atmosphere emissions in excess of 0.80
nanogram (ng) of D/F TEQ per dscm (3.5 x 10-10 gr per dscf)
at 11 percent oxygen (O\2\).
(g) Dross-only furnace. On and after the compliance date established
by Sec. 63.1501, the owner or operator of a dross-only furnace at a
secondary aluminum production facility that is a major source must not
discharge or cause to be discharged to the atmosphere:
(1) Emissions in excess of 0.15 kg of PM per Mg (0.30 lb of PM per
ton) of feed/charge.
[[Page 59]]
(2) Visible emissions in excess of 10 percent opacity from any PM
add-on air pollution control device if a COM is chosen as the monitoring
option.
(h) Rotary dross cooler. On and after the compliance date
established by Sec. 63.1501, the owner or operator of a rotary dross
cooler at a secondary aluminum production facility that is a major
source must not discharge or cause to be discharged to the atmosphere:
(1) Emissions in excess of 0.09 g of PM per dscm (0.04 gr per dscf).
(2) Visible emissions in excess of 10 percent opacity from any PM
add-on air pollution control device if a COM is chosen as the monitoring
option.
(i) Group 1 furnace. The owner or operator of a group 1 furnace must
use the limits in this paragraph to determine the emission standards for
a SAPU.
(1) 0.20 kg of PM per Mg (0.40 lb of PM per ton) of feed/charge from
a group 1 furnace, that is not a melting/holding furnace processing only
clean charge, at a secondary aluminum production facility that is a
major source;
(2) 0.40 kg of PM per Mg (0.80 lb of PM per ton) of feed/charge from
a group 1 melting/holding furnace processing only clean charge at a
secondary aluminum production facility that is a major source;
(3) 15 [micro]g of D/F TEQ per Mg (2.1 x 10-4 gr of D/F
TEQ per ton) of feed/charge from a group 1 furnace at a secondary
aluminum production facility that is a major or area source. This limit
does not apply if the furnace processes only clean charge; and
(4) 0.20 kg of HF per Mg (0.40 lb of HF per ton) of feed/charge from
an uncontrolled group 1 furnace and 0.20 kg of HCl per Mg (0.40 lb of
HCl per ton) of feed/charge or, if the furnace is equipped with an add-
on air pollution control device, 10 percent of the uncontrolled HCl
emissions, by weight, for a group 1 furnace at a secondary aluminum
production facility that is a major source.
(5) The owner or operator of a group 1 furnace at a secondary
aluminum production facility that is a major source must not discharge
or cause to be discharged to the atmosphere visible emissions in excess
of 10 percent opacity from any PM add-on air pollution control device if
a COM is chosen as the monitoring option.
(6) The owner or operator may determine the emission standards for a
SAPU by applying the group 1 furnace limits on the basis of the aluminum
production weight in each group 1 furnace, rather than on the basis of
feed/charge.
(7) The owner or operator of a sidewell group 1 furnace that
conducts reactive fluxing (except for cover flux) in the hearth, or that
conducts reactive fluxing in the sidewell at times when the level of
molten metal falls below the top of the passage between the sidewell and
the hearth, must comply with the emission limits of paragraphs (i)(1)
through (4) of this section on the basis of the combined emissions from
the sidewell and the hearth.
(j) In-line fluxer. Except as provided in paragraph (j)(3) of this
section for an in-line fluxer using no reactive flux material, the owner
or operator of an in-line fluxer must use the limits in this paragraph
to determine the emission standards for a SAPU.
(1) 0.02 kg of HCl per Mg (0.04 lb of HCl per ton) of feed/charge;
(2) 0.005 kg of PM per Mg (0.01 lb of PM per ton) of feed/charge.
(3) The emission limits in paragraphs (j)(1) and (j)(2) of this
section do not apply to an in-line fluxer that uses no reactive flux
materials.
(4) The owner or operator of an in-line fluxer at a secondary
aluminum production facility that is a major source must not discharge
or cause to be discharged to the atmosphere visible emissions in excess
of 10 percent opacity from any PM add-on air pollution control device
used to control emissions from the in-line fluxer, if a COM is chosen as
the monitoring option.
(5) The owner or operator may determine the emission standards for a
SAPU by applying the in-line fluxer limits on the basis of the aluminum
production weight in each in-line fluxer, rather than on the basis of
feed/charge.
(k) Secondary aluminum processing unit. The owner or operator must
comply with the emission limits calculated using the equations for PM,
HCl and HF in paragraphs (k)(1) and (2) of this
[[Page 60]]
section for each secondary aluminum processing unit at a secondary
aluminum production facility that is a major source. The owner or
operator must comply with the emission limit calculated using the
equation for D/F in paragraph (k)(3) of this section for each secondary
aluminum processing unit at a secondary aluminum production facility
that is a major or area source.
(1) The owner or operator must not discharge or allow to be
discharged to the atmosphere any 3-day, 24-hour rolling average
emissions of PM in excess of:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18SE15.007
Where:
LtiPM = The PM emission limit for individual emission unit i
in paragraph (i)(1) and (2) of this section for a group 1
furnace or in paragraph (j)(2) of this section for an in-line
fluxer;
Tti = The mass of feed/charge for 24 hours for individual
emission unit i; and
LcPM = The daily PM emission limit for the secondary aluminum
processing unit which is used to calculate the 3-day, 24-hour
PM emission limit applicable to the SAPU.
Note: In-line fluxers using no reactive flux materials cannot be
included in this calculation since they are not subject to the PM limit.
(2) The owner or operator must not discharge or allow to be
discharged to the atmosphere any 3-day, 24-hour rolling average
emissions of HCl or HF in excess of:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18SE15.008
Where:
LtiHCl/HF = The HCl emission limit for individual emission
unit i in paragraph (i)(4) of this section for a group 1
furnace or in paragraph (j)(1) of this section for an in-line
fluxer; or the HF emission limit for individual emission unit
i in paragraph (i)(4) of this section for an uncontrolled
group 1 furnace; and
LcHCl/HF = The daily HCl or HF emission limit for the
secondary aluminum processing unit which is used to calculate
the 3-day, 24-hour HCl or HF emission limit applicable to the
SAPU.
Note: Only uncontrolled group 1 furnaces are included in this HF
limit calculation. In-line fluxers using no reactive flux materials
cannot be included in this calculation since they are not subject to the
HCl or HF limit.
(3) The owner or operator must not discharge or allow to be
discharged to the atmosphere any 3-day, 24-hour rolling average
emissions of D/F in excess of:
[[Page 61]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18SE15.009
Where:
LtiD/F = The D/F emission limit for individual emission unit
i in paragraph (i)(3) of this section for a group 1 furnace;
and
LcD/F = The daily D/F emission limit for the secondary
aluminum processing unit which is used to calculate the 3-day,
24-hour D/F emission limit applicable to the SAPU.
Note: Clean charge furnaces cannot be included in this calculation
since they are not subject to the D/F limit.
(4) The owner or operator of a SAPU at a secondary aluminum
production facility that is a major source may demonstrate compliance
with the emission limits of paragraphs (k)(1) through (3) of this
section by demonstrating that each emission unit within the SAPU is in
compliance with the applicable emission limits of paragraphs (i) and (j)
of this section.
(5) The owner or operator of a SAPU at a secondary aluminum
production facility that is an area source may demonstrate compliance
with the emission limits of paragraph (k)(3) of this section by
demonstrating that each emission unit within the SAPU is in compliance
with the emission limit of paragraph (i)(3) of this section.
(6) With the prior approval of the permitting authority for major
sources, or the Administrator for area sources, an owner or operator may
redesignate any existing group 1 furnace or in-line fluxer at a
secondary aluminum production facility as a new emission unit. Any
emission unit so redesignated may thereafter be included in a new SAPU
at that facility. Any such redesignation will be solely for the purpose
of this NESHAP and will be irreversible.
[65 FR 15710, Mar. 23, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 59792, Sept. 24, 2002;
67 FR 79816, Dec. 30, 2002; 70 FR 57517, Oct. 3, 2005; 80 FR 56739,
Sept. 18, 2015]
Sec. 63.1506 Operating requirements.
(a) Summary. (1) The owner or operator must operate all new and
existing affected sources and control equipment according to the
requirements in this section. The affected sources, and their associated
control equipment, listed in Sec. 63.1500(c)(1) through (4) of this
subpart that are located at a secondary aluminum production facility
that is an area source are subject to the operating requirements of
paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (f), (g), (h), (m), (n), and (p) of this
section.
(2) The owner or operator of an existing sweat furnace that meets
the specifications of Sec. 63.1505(f)(1) must operate the sweat furnace
and control equipment according to the requirements of this section on
and after the compliance date of this standard.
(3) The owner or operator of a new sweat furnace that meets the
specifications of Sec. 63.1505(f)(1) must operate the sweat furnace and
control equipment according to the requirements of this section by March
23, 2000 or upon startup, whichever is later.
(4) Operating requirements are summarized in Table 2 to this
subpart.
(5) At all times, the owner or operator must operate and maintain
any affected source, including associated air pollution control
equipment and monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with safety
and good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions.
Determination of whether such operation and maintenance procedures are
being used will be based on information available to the Administrator
which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, review of
operation and maintenance procedures, review of operation and
maintenance records, and inspection of the source.
[[Page 62]]
(b) Labeling. The owner or operator must provide and maintain easily
visible labels posted at each group 1 furnace, group 2 furnace, in-line
fluxer and scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln that identifies
the applicable emission limits and means of compliance, including:
(1) The type of affected source or emission unit (e.g., scrap dryer/
delacquering kiln/decoating kiln, group 1 furnace, group 2 furnace, in-
line fluxer).
(2) The applicable operational standard(s) and control method(s)
(work practice or control device). This includes, but is not limited to,
the type of charge to be used for a furnace (e.g., clean scrap only, all
scrap, etc.), flux materials and addition practices, and the applicable
operating parameter ranges and requirements as incorporated in the OM&M
plan.
(3) The afterburner operating temperature and design residence time
for a scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln.
(c) Capture/collection systems. For each affected source or emission
unit equipped with an add-on air pollution control device, the owner or
operator must:
(1) Design and install a system for the capture and collection of
emissions to meet the engineering standards for minimum exhaust rates or
facial inlet velocities as contained in the ACGIH Guidelines
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14);
(2) Vent captured emissions through a closed system, except that
dilution air may be added to emission streams for the purpose of
controlling temperature at the inlet to a fabric filter; and
(3) Operate each capture/collection system according to the
procedures and requirements in the OM&M plan.
(4) In lieu of paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the owner or
operator of a sweat furnace may design, install and operate each sweat
furnace in accordance with paragraphs (c)(4)(i) through (iii) of this
section.
(i) As demonstrated by an annual negative air flow test conducted in
accordance with Sec. 63.1510(d)(3), air flow must be into the sweat
furnace or towards the plane of the sweat furnace opening.
(ii) The owner or operator must maintain and operate the sweat
furnace in a manner consistent with the good practices requirements for
minimizing emissions, including unmeasured emissions, in paragraph
(a)(5) of this section. Procedures that will minimize unmeasured
emissions may include, but are not limited to the following:
(A) Increasing the exhaust rate from the furnace with draft fans, so
as to capture emissions that might otherwise escape from the sweat
furnace opening;
(B) Minimizing the time the sweat furnace doors are open;
(C) Keeping building doors and other openings closed to the greatest
extent possible to minimize drafts that would divert emissions from
being drawn into the sweat furnace;
(D) Maintaining burners on low-fire or pilot operation while the
doors are open;
(E) Conducting periodic inspections and maintenance of sweat furnace
components to ensure their proper operation and performance including
but not limited to, door assemblies, seals, combustion chamber
refractory material, afterburner and stack refractory, blowers, fans,
dampers, burner tubes, door raise cables, pilot light assemblies,
baffles, sweat furnace and afterburner shells and other internal
structures.
(iii) The owner or operator must document in their operation,
maintenance, and monitoring (OM&M) plan the procedures to be used to
minimize emissions, including unmeasured emissions, in addition to the
procedures to ensure the proper operation and maintenance of the sweat
furnace.
(d) Feed/charge weight. The owner or operator of each affected
source or emission unit subject to an emission limit in kg/Mg (lb/ton)
or [micro]g/Mg (gr/ton) of feed/charge must:
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (d)(3) of this section, install
and operate a device that measures and records or otherwise determine
the weight of feed/charge (or throughput) for each operating cycle or
time period used in the performance test; and
(2) Operate each weight measurement system or other weight
determination
[[Page 63]]
procedure in accordance with the OM&M plan.
(3) The owner or operator may chose to measure and record aluminum
production weight from an affected source or emission unit rather than
feed/charge weight to an affected source or emission unit, provided
that:
(i) The aluminum production weight, rather than feed/charge weight
is measured and recorded for all emission units within a SAPU; and
(ii) All calculations to demonstrate compliance with the emission
limits for SAPUs are based on aluminum production weight rather than
feed/charge weight.
(e) Aluminum scrap shredder. The owner or operator of a scrap
shredder with emissions controlled by a fabric filter must operate a bag
leak detection system, or a continuous opacity monitor, or conduct
visible emissions observations.
(1) If a bag leak detection system is used to meet the monitoring
requirements in Sec. 63.1510, the owner or operator must:
(i) Initiate corrective action within 1-hour of a bag leak detection
system alarm and complete the corrective action procedures in accordance
with the OM&M plan.
(ii) Operate each fabric filter system such that the bag leak
detection system alarm does not sound more than 5 percent of the
operating time during a 6-month block reporting period. In calculating
this operating time fraction, if inspection of the fabric filter
demonstrates that no corrective action is required, no alarm time is
counted. If corrective action is required, each alarm shall be counted
as a minimum of 1 hour. If the owner or operator takes longer than 1
hour to initiate corrective action, the alarm time shall be counted as
the actual amount of time taken by the owner or operator to initiate
corrective action.
(2) If a continuous opacity monitoring system is used to meet the
monitoring requirements in Sec. 63.1510, the owner or operator must
initiate corrective action within 1-hour of any 6-minute average reading
of 5 percent or more opacity and complete the corrective action
procedures in accordance with the OM&M plan.
(3) If visible emission observations are used to meet the monitoring
requirements in Sec. 63.1510, the owner or operator must initiate
corrective action within 1-hour of any observation of visible emissions
during a daily visible emissions test and complete the corrective action
procedures in accordance with the OM&M plan.
(f) Thermal chip dryer. The owner or operator of a thermal chip
dryer with emissions controlled by an afterburner must:
(1) Maintain the 3-hour block average operating temperature of each
afterburner at or above the average temperature established during the
performance test.
(2) Operate each afterburner in accordance with the OM&M plan.
(3) Operate each thermal chip dryer using only unpainted aluminum
chips as the feedstock.
(g) Scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln. The owner or
operator of a scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln with
emissions controlled by an afterburner and a lime-injected fabric filter
must:
(1) For each afterburner,
(i) Maintain the 3-hour block average operating temperature of each
afterburner at or above the average temperature established during the
performance test.
(ii) Operate each afterburner in accordance with the OM&M plan.
(2) If a bag leak detection system is used to meet the fabric filter
monitoring requirements in Sec. 63.1510,
(i) Initiate corrective action within 1-hour of a bag leak detection
system alarm and complete any necessary corrective action procedures in
accordance with the OM&M plan.
(ii) Operate each fabric filter system such that the bag leak
detection system alarm does not sound more than 5 percent of the
operating time during a 6-month block reporting period. In calculating
this operating time fraction, if inspection of the fabric filter
demonstrates that no corrective action is required, no alarm time is
counted. If corrective action is required, each alarm shall be counted
as a minimum of 1 hour. If the owner or operator takes longer than 1
hour to initiate corrective action, the alarm time shall
[[Page 64]]
be counted as the actual amount of time taken by the owner or operator
to initiate corrective action.
(3) If a continuous opacity monitoring system is used to meet the
monitoring requirements in Sec. 63.1510, initiate corrective action
within 1-hour of any 6-minute average reading of 5 percent or more
opacity and complete the corrective action procedures in accordance with
the OM&M plan.
(4) Maintain the 3-hour block average inlet temperature for each
fabric filter at or below the average temperature established during the
performance test, plus 14 [deg]C (plus 25 [deg]F).
(5) For a continuous injection device, maintain free-flowing lime in
the hopper to the feed device at all times and maintain the lime feeder
setting at or above the level established during the performance test.
(h) Sweat furnace. The owner or operator of a sweat furnace with
emissions controlled by an afterburner must:
(1) Maintain the 3-hour block average operating temperature of each
afterburner at or above:
(i) The average temperature established during the performance test;
or
(ii) 1600 [deg]F if a performance test was not conducted, and the
afterburner meets the specifications of Sec. 63.1505(f)(1).
(2) Operate each afterburner in accordance with the OM&M plan.
(i) Dross-only furnace. The owner or operator of a dross-only
furnace with emissions controlled by a fabric filter must:
(1) If a bag leak detection system is used to meet the monitoring
requirements in Sec. 63.1510,
(i) Initiate corrective action within 1-hour of a bag leak detection
system alarm and complete the corrective action procedures in accordance
with the OM&M plan.
(ii) Operate each fabric filter system such that the bag leak
detection system alarm does not sound more than 5 percent of the
operating time during a 6-month block reporting period. In calculating
this operating time fraction, if inspection of the fabric filter
demonstrates that no corrective action is required, no alarm time is
counted. If corrective action is required, each alarm shall be counted
as a minimum of 1 hour. If the owner or operator takes longer than 1
hour to initiate corrective action, the alarm time shall be counted as
the actual amount of time taken by the owner or operator to initiate
corrective action.
(2) If a continuous opacity monitoring system is used to meet the
monitoring requirements in Sec. 63.1510, initiate corrective action
within 1-hour of any 6-minute average reading of 5 percent or more
opacity and complete the corrective action procedures in accordance with
the OM&M plan.
(3) Operate each furnace using dross and salt flux as the sole
feedstock.
(j) Rotary dross cooler. The owner or operator of a rotary dross
cooler with emissions controlled by a fabric filter must:
(1) If a bag leak detection system is used to meet the monitoring
requirements in Sec. 63.1510,
(i) Initiate corrective action within 1-hour of a bag leak detection
system alarm and complete the corrective action procedures in accordance
with the OM&M plan.
(ii) Operate each fabric filter system such that the bag leak
detection system alarm does not sound more than 5 percent of the
operating time during a 6-month block reporting period. In calculating
this operating time fraction, if inspection of the fabric filter
demonstrates that no corrective action is required, no alarm time is
counted. If corrective action is required, each alarm shall be counted
as a minimum of 1 hour. If the owner or operator takes longer than 1
hour to initiate corrective action, the alarm time shall be counted as
the actual amount of time taken by the owner or operator to initiate
corrective action.
(2) If a continuous opacity monitoring system is used to meet the
monitoring requirements in Sec. 63.1510, initiate corrective action
within 1 hour of any 6-minute average reading of 5 percent or more
opacity and complete the corrective action procedures in accordance with
the OM&M plan.
(k) In-line fluxer. The owner or operator of an in-line fluxer with
emissions controlled by a lime-injected fabric filter must:
[[Page 65]]
(1) If a bag leak detection system is used to meet the monitoring
requirements in Sec. 63.1510,
(i) Initiate corrective action within 1-hour of a bag leak detection
system alarm and complete the corrective action procedures in accordance
with the OM&M plan.
(ii) Operate each fabric filter system such that the bag leak
detection system alarm does not sound more than 5 percent of the
operating time during a 6-month block reporting period. In calculating
this operating time fraction, if inspection of the fabric filter
demonstrates that no corrective action is required, no alarm time is
counted. If corrective action is required, each alarm shall be counted
as a minimum of 1 hour. If the owner or operator takes longer than 1
hour to initiate corrective action, the alarm time shall be counted as
the actual amount of time taken by the owner or operator to initiate
corrective action.
(2) If a continuous opacity monitoring system is used to meet the
monitoring requirements in Sec. 63.1510, initiate corrective action
within 1 hour of any 6-minute average reading of 5 percent or more
opacity and complete the corrective action procedures in accordance with
the OM&M plan.
(3) For a continuous injection system, maintain free-flowing lime in
the hopper to the feed device at all times and maintain the lime feeder
setting at or above the level established during the performance test.
(4) Maintain the total reactive chlorine flux injection rate for
each operating cycle or time period used in the performance test at or
below the average rate established during the performance test.
(l) In-line fluxer using no reactive flux material. The owner or
operator of a new or existing in-line fluxer using no reactive flux
materials must operate each in-line fluxer using no reactive flux
materials.
(m) Group 1 furnace with add-on air pollution control devices. The
owner or operator of a group 1 furnace with emissions controlled by a
lime-injected fabric filter must:
(1) If a bag leak detection system is used to meet the monitoring
requirements in Sec. 63.1510, the owner or operator must:
(i) Initiate corrective action within 1 hour of a bag leak detection
system alarm.
(ii) Complete the corrective action procedures in accordance with
the OM&M plan.
(iii) Operate each fabric filter system such that the bag leak
detection system alarm does not sound more than 5 percent of the
operating time during a 6-month block reporting period. In calculating
this operating time fraction, if inspection of the fabric filter
demonstrates that no corrective action is required, no alarm time is
counted. If corrective action is required, each alarm shall be counted
as a minimum of 1 hour. If the owner or operator takes longer than 1
hour to initiate corrective action, the alarm time shall be counted as
the actual amount of time taken by the owner or operator to initiate
corrective action.
(2) If a continuous opacity monitoring system is used to meet the
monitoring requirements in Sec. 63.1510, the owner or operator must:
(i) Initiate corrective action within 1 hour of any 6-minute average
reading of 5 percent or more opacity; and
(ii) Complete the corrective action procedures in accordance with
the OM&M plan.
(3) Maintain the 3-hour block average inlet temperature for each
fabric filter at or below the average temperature established during the
performance test, plus 14 [deg]C (plus 25 [deg]F).
(4) For a continuous lime injection system, maintain free-flowing
lime in the hopper to the feed device at all times and maintain the lime
feeder setting at or above the level established during the performance
test.
(5) Maintain the total reactive chlorine flux injection rate for
each operating cycle or time period used in the performance test at or
below the average rate established during the performance test.
(6) Operate each sidewell furnace such that:
(i) The level of molten metal remains above the top of the passage
between the sidewell and hearth during reactive flux injection, unless
emissions from
[[Page 66]]
both the sidewell and the hearth are included in demonstrating
compliance with all applicable emission limits.
(ii) Reactive flux is added only in the sidewell, unless emissions
from both the sidewell and the hearth are included in demonstrating
compliance with all applicable emission limits.
(7) The operation of capture/collection systems and control devices
associated with natural gas-fired, propane-fired or electrically heated
group 1 furnaces that will be idled for at least 24 hours after the
furnace cycle has been completed may be temporarily stopped. Operation
of these capture/collection systems and control devices must be
restarted before feed/charge, flux or alloying materials are added to
the furnace.
(n) Group 1 furnace without add-on air pollution control devices.
The owner or operator of a group 1 furnace (including a group 1 furnace
that is part of a secondary aluminum processing unit) without add-on air
pollution control devices must:
(1) Maintain the total reactive chlorine flux injection rate and
fluorine flux injection rate for each operating cycle or time period
used in the performance test, at or below the average rate established
during the performance test.
(2) Operate each furnace in accordance with the work practice/
pollution prevention measures documented in the OM&M plan and within the
parameter values or ranges established in the OM&M plan.
(3) Operate each group 1 melting/holding furnace subject to the
emission standards in Sec. 63.1505(i)(2) using only clean charge as the
feedstock.
(o) Group 2 furnace. The owner or operator of a new or existing
group 2 furnace must:
(1) Operate each furnace using only clean charge as the feedstock.
(2) Operate each furnace using no reactive flux.
(p) Corrective action. When a process parameter or add-on air
pollution control device operating parameter deviates from the value or
range established during the performance test and incorporated in the
OM&M plan, the owner or operator must initiate corrective action.
Corrective action must restore operation of the affected source or
emission unit (including the process or control device) to its normal or
usual mode of operation as expeditiously as practicable in accordance
with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions.
Corrective actions taken must include follow-up actions necessary to
return the process or control device parameter level(s) to the value or
range of values established during the performance test and steps to
prevent the likely recurrence of the cause of a deviation.
[65 FR 15710, Mar. 23, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 59792, Sept. 24, 2002;
67 FR 79816, Dec. 30, 2002; 69 FR 53984, Sept. 3, 2004; 80 FR 56740,
Sept. 18, 2015]
Sec. Sec. 63.1507-63.1509 [Reserved]
Monitoring and Compliance Requirements
Sec. 63.1510 Monitoring requirements.
(a) Summary. The owner or operator of a new or existing affected
source or emission unit must monitor all control equipment and processes
according to the requirements in this section. Monitoring requirements
for each type of affected source and emission unit are summarized in
Table 3 to this subpart. Area sources are subject to monitoring
requirements for those affected sources listed in Sec. 63.1500(c)(1)
through (4) of this subpart, and associated control equipment as
required by paragraphs (b) through (k), (n) through (q), and (s) through
(w) of this section, including but not limited to:
(1) The OM&M plan required in paragraph (b) of this section
pertaining to each affected source listed in Sec. 63.1500(c)(1) through
(4) of this subpart,
(2) The labeling requirements described in paragraph (c) of this
section pertaining to group 1 furnaces processing other than clean
charge, and scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kilns,
(3) The requirements for capture and collection described in
paragraph (d) of this section for each controlled affected source (i.e.,
affected sources with an add-on air pollution control device), listed in
Sec. 63.1500(c)(1) through (4) of this subpart,
[[Page 67]]
(4) The feed/charge weight monitoring requirements described in
paragraph (e) of this section applicable to group 1 furnaces processing
other than clean charge, scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kilns
and thermal chip dryers,
(5) The bag leak detection system requirements described in
paragraph (f) of this section applicable to all bag leak detection
systems installed on fabric filters and lime injected fabric filters
used to control each affected source listed in Sec. 63.1500(c)(1)-(4)
of this subpart,
(6) The requirements for afterburners described in paragraph (g) of
this section applicable to sweat furnaces, thermal chip dryers, and
scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kilns,
(7) The requirements for monitoring fabric filter inlet temperature
described in paragraph (h) of this section for all lime injected fabric
filters used to control group 1 furnaces processing other than clean
charge, sweat furnaces and scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating
kilns,
(8) The requirements for monitoring lime injection described in
paragraph (i) of this section applicable to all lime injected fabric
filters used to control emissions from group 1 furnaces processing other
than clean charge, thermal chip dryers, sweat furnaces and scrap dryer/
delacquering kiln/decoating kilns,
(9) The requirements for monitoring total reactive flux injection
described in paragraph (j) of this section for all group 1 furnaces
processing other than clean charge,
(10) The requirements described in paragraph (k) of this section for
thermal chip dryers,
(11) The requirements described in paragraph (n) of this section for
controlled group 1 sidewell furnaces processing other than clean charge,
(12) The requirements described in paragraph (o) of this section for
uncontrolled group 1 sidewell furnaces processing other than clean
charge,
(13) The requirements described in paragraph (p) of this section for
scrap inspection programs for uncontrolled group 1 furnaces,
(14) The requirements described in paragraph (q) of this section for
monitoring scrap contamination level for uncontrolled group 1 furnaces,
(15) The requirements described in paragraph (s) of this section for
secondary aluminum processing units, limited to compliance with limits
for emissions of D/F from group 1 furnaces processing other than clean
charge,
(16) The requirements described in paragraph (t) of this section for
secondary aluminum processing units limited to compliance with limits
for emissions of D/F from group 1 furnaces processing other than clean
charge,
(17) The requirements described in paragraph (u) of this section for
secondary aluminum processing units limited to compliance with limits
for emissions of D/F from group 1 furnaces processing other than clean
charge,
(18) The requirements described in paragraph (v) of this section for
alternative lime addition monitoring methods applicable to lime-injected
fabric filters used to control emissions from group 1 furnaces
processing other than clean charge, thermal chip dryers, sweat furnaces
and scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kilns, and
(19) The requirements described in paragraph (w) of this section for
approval of alternate methods for monitoring group 1 furnaces processing
other than clean charge, thermal chip dryers, scrap dryer/delacquering
kiln/decoating kilns and sweat furnaces and associated control devices
for the control of D/F emissions.
(b) Operation, maintenance, and monitoring (OM&M) plan. The owner or
operator must prepare and implement for each new or existing affected
source and emission unit, a written OM&M plan. The owner or operator of
an existing affected source must submit the OM&M plan to the permitting
authority for major sources, or the Administrator for area sources no
later than the compliance date established by Sec. 63.1501. The owner
or operator of any new affected source must submit the OM&M plan to the
permitting authority for major sources, or the Administrator for area
sources within 90 days after a successful initial performance test under
Sec. 63.1511(b), or within 90 days after the compliance date
established by Sec. 63.1501 if no initial performance
[[Page 68]]
test is required. The plan must be accompanied by a written
certification by the owner or operator that the OM&M plan satisfies all
requirements of this section and is otherwise consistent with the
requirements of this subpart. The owner or operator must comply with all
of the provisions of the OM&M plan as submitted to the permitting
authority for major sources, or the Administrator for area sources,
unless and until the plan is revised in accordance with the following
procedures. If the permitting authority for major sources, or the
Administrator for area sources determines at any time after receipt of
the OM&M plan that any revisions of the plan are necessary to satisfy
the requirements of this section or this subpart, the owner or operator
must promptly make all necessary revisions and resubmit the revised
plan. If the owner or operator determines that any other revisions of
the OM&M plan are necessary, such revisions will not become effective
until the owner or operator submits a description of the changes and a
revised plan incorporating them to the permitting authority for major
sources, or the Administrator for area sources. Each plan must contain
the following information:
(1) Process and control device parameters to be monitored to
determine compliance, along with established operating levels or ranges,
as applicable, for each process and control device.
(2) A monitoring schedule for each affected source and emission
unit.
(3) Procedures for the proper operation and maintenance of each
process unit and add-on control device used to meet the applicable
emission limits or standards in Sec. 63.1505.
(4) Procedures for the proper operation and maintenance of
monitoring devices or systems used to determine compliance, including:
(i) Calibration and certification of accuracy of each monitoring
device, at least once every 6 months, according to the manufacturer's
instructions; and
(ii) Procedures for the quality control and quality assurance of
continuous emission or opacity monitoring systems as required by the
general provisions in subpart A of this part.
(5) Procedures for monitoring process and control device parameters,
including lime injection rates, procedures for annual inspections of
afterburners, and if applicable, the procedure to be used for
determining charge/feed (or throughput) weight if a measurement device
is not used.
(6) Corrective actions to be taken when process or operating
parameters or add-on control device parameters deviate from the value or
range established in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, including:
(i) Procedures to determine and record the cause of any deviation or
excursion, and the time the deviation or excursion began and ended; and
(ii) Procedures for recording the corrective action taken, the time
corrective action was initiated, and the time/date corrective action was
completed.
(7) A maintenance schedule for each process and control device that
is consistent with the manufacturer's instructions and recommendations
for routine and long-term maintenance.
(8) Documentation of the work practice and pollution prevention
measures used to achieve compliance with the applicable emission limits
and a site-specific monitoring plan as required in paragraph (o) of this
section for each group 1 furnace not equipped with an add-on air
pollution control device.
(9) Procedures to be followed when changing furnace classifications
under the provisions of Sec. 63.1514.
(c) Labeling. The owner or operator must inspect the labels for each
group 1 furnace, group 2 furnace, in-line fluxer and scrap dryer/
delacquering kiln/decoating kiln at least once per calendar month to
confirm that posted labels as required by the operational standard in
Sec. 63.1506(b) are intact and legible.
(d) Capture/collection system. The owner or operator must:
(1) Install, operate, and maintain a capture/collection system for
each affected source and emission unit equipped with an add-on air
pollution control device; and
(2) Inspect each capture/collection and closed vent system at least
once each calendar year to ensure that each system is operating in
accordance with the operating requirements in
[[Page 69]]
Sec. 63.1506(c) and record the results of each inspection. This
inspection shall include a volumetric flow rate measurement taken at a
location in the ductwork downstream of the hoods that is representative
of the actual volumetric flow rate without interference due to leaks,
ambient air added for cooling or ducts from other hoods. The flow rate
measurement must be performed in accordance with paragraphs (d)(2)(i),
(ii), or (iii) of this section. As an alternative to the flow rate
measurement specified in this paragraph, the inspection may satisfy the
requirements of this paragraph, including the operating requirements in
Sec. 63.1506(c), by including permanent total enclosure verification in
accordance with paragraph (d)(2)(i) or (iv) of this section. Inspections
that fail to successfully demonstrate that the requirements of Sec.
63.1506(c) are met, must be followed by repair or adjustment to the
system operating conditions and a follow up inspection within 45 days to
demonstrate that Sec. 63.1506(c) requirements are fully met.
(i) Conduct annual flow rate measurements using EPA Methods 1 and 2
in appendix A to 40 CFR part 60, or conduct annual verification of a
permanent total enclosure using EPA Method 204; or you may follow one of
the three alternate procedures described in paragraphs (ii), (iii), or
(iv) of this section to maintain system operations in accordance with an
operating limit established during the performance test. The operating
limit is determined as the average reading of a parametric monitoring
instrument (Magnehelic[supreg], manometer, anemometer, or other
parametric monitoring instrument) and technique as described in
paragraphs (d)(2)(ii), (iii), and (iv) of this section. A deviation, as
defined in paragraphs (ii), (iii), and (iv) of this section, from the
parametric monitoring operating limit requires the owner or operator to
make repairs or adjustments to restore normal operation within 45 days.
(ii) As an alternative to annual flow rate measurements using EPA
Methods 1 and 2, measurement with EPA Methods 1 and 2 can be performed
once every 5 years, provided that:
(A) A flow rate indicator consisting of a pitot tube and
differential pressure gauge (Magnehelic[supreg], manometer or other
differential pressure gauge) is installed with the pitot tube tip
located at a representative point of the duct proximate to the location
of the Methods 1 and 2 measurement site; and
(B) The flow rate indicator is installed and operated in accordance
with the manufacturer's specifications; and
(C) The differential pressure is recorded during the Method 2
performance test series; and
(D) Daily differential pressure readings are made by taking three
measurements with at least 5 minutes between each measurement and
averaging the three measurements; and readings are recorded daily and
maintained at or above 90 percent of the average pressure differential
indicated by the flow rate indicator during the most recent Method 2
performance test series; and
(E) An inspection of the pitot tube and associated lines for damage,
plugging, leakage and operational integrity is conducted at least once
per year; or
(iii) As an alternative to annual flow rate measurements using EPA
Methods 1 and 2, measurement with EPA Methods 1 and 2 can be performed
once every 5 years, provided that:
(A) Daily measurements of the capture and collection system's fan
revolutions per minute (RPM) or fan motor amperage (amps) are made by
taking three measurements with at least 5 minutes between each
measurement, and averaging the three measurements; and readings are
recorded daily and maintained at or above 90 percent of the average RPM
or amps measured during the most recent Method 2 performance test
series; or
(B) A static pressure measurement device is installed in the duct
immediately downstream of the hood exit, and daily pressure readings are
made by taking three measurements with at least 5 minutes between each
measurement, and averaging the three measurements; and readings are
recorded daily and maintained at 90 percent or better of the average
vacuum recorded during the most recent Method 2 performance test series;
or
(C) A hotwire anemometer, ultrasonic flow meter, cross-duct pressure
[[Page 70]]
differential sensor, venturi pressure differential monitoring or orifice
plate equipped with an associated thermocouple and automated data
logging software and associated hardware is installed; and daily
readings are made by taking three measurements with at least 5 minutes
between each measurement, and averaging the three measurements; and
readings are recorded daily and maintained at 90 percent or greater of
the average readings during the most recent Method 2 performance test
series; or
(D) For booth-type hoods, hotwire anemometer measurements of hood
face velocity are performed simultaneously with EPA Method 1 and 2
measurements, and the annual hood face velocity measurements confirm
that the enclosure draft is maintained at 90 percent or greater of the
average readings during the most recent Method 2 performance test
series. Daily readings are made by taking three measurements with at
least 5 minutes between each measurement, and averaging the three
measurements; and readings are recorded daily and maintained at 90
percent or greater of the average readings during the most recent Method
1 and 2 performance test series.
(iv) As an alternative to the annual verification of a permanent
total enclosure using EPA Method 204, verification can be performed once
every 5 years, provided that:
(A) Negative pressure in the enclosure is directly monitored by a
pressure indicator installed at a representative location;
(B) Pressure readings are recorded daily or the system is
interlocked to halt material feed should the system not operate under
negative pressure;
(C) An inspection of the pressure indicator for damage and
operational integrity is conducted at least once per calendar year.
(3) For sweat furnaces, in lieu of paragraph (d)(2) of this section,
the owner or operator of a sweat furnace may inspect each sweat furnace
at least once each calendar year to ensure that they are being operated
in accordance with the negative air flow requirements in Sec.
63.1506(c)(4). The owner or operator of a sweat furnace must demonstrate
negative air flow into the sweat furnace in accordance with paragraphs
(d)(3)(i) through (iii) of this section.
(i) Perform an annual visual smoke test to demonstrate airflow into
the sweat furnace or towards the plane of the sweat furnace opening;
(ii) Perform the smoke test using a smoke source, such as a smoke
tube, smoke stick, smoke cartridge, smoke candle or other smoke source
that produces a persistent and neutral buoyancy aerosol; and
(iii) Perform the visual smoke test at a safe distance from and near
the center of the sweat furnace opening.
(e) Feed/charge weight. The owner or operator of an affected source
or emission unit subject to an emission limit in kg/Mg (lb/ton) or
[micro]g/Mg (gr/ton) of feed/charge must install, calibrate, operate,
and maintain a device to measure and record the total weight of feed/
charge to, or the aluminum production from, the affected source or
emission unit over the same operating cycle or time period used in the
performance test. Feed/charge or aluminum production within SAPUs must
be measured and recorded on an emission unit-by-emission unit basis. As
an alternative to a measurement device, the owner or operator may use a
procedure acceptable to the permitting authority for major sources, or
the Administrator for area sources to determine the total weight of
feed/charge or aluminum production to the affected source or emission
unit.
(1) The accuracy of the weight measurement device or procedure must
be 1 percent of the weight being measured. The
owner or operator may apply to the permitting agency for approval to use
a device of alternative accuracy if the required accuracy cannot be
achieved as a result of equipment layout or charging practices. A device
of alternative accuracy will not be approved unless the owner or
operator provides assurance through data and information that the
affected source will meet the relevant emission standard.
(2) The owner or operator must verify the calibration of the weight
measurement device in accordance with the
[[Page 71]]
schedule specified by the manufacturer, or if no calibration schedule is
specified, at least once every 6 months.
(f) Fabric filters and lime-injected fabric filters. The owner or
operator of an affected source or emission unit using a fabric filter or
lime-injected fabric filter to comply with the requirements of this
subpart must install, calibrate, maintain, and continuously operate a
bag leak detection system as required in paragraph (f)(1) of this
section or a continuous opacity monitoring system as required in
paragraph (f)(2) of this section. The owner or operator of an aluminum
scrap shredder must install and operate a bag leak detection system as
required in paragraph (f)(1) of this section, install and operate a
continuous opacity monitoring system as required in paragraph (f)(2) of
this section, or conduct visible emission observations as required in
paragraph (f)(3) of this section.
(1) These requirements apply to the owner or operator of a new or
existing affected source or existing emission unit using a bag leak
detection system.
(i) The owner or operator must install and operate a bag leak
detection system for each exhaust stack of a fabric filter.
(ii) Each bag leak detection system must be installed, calibrated,
operated, and maintained according to the manufacturer's operating
instructions.
(iii) The bag leak detection system must be certified by the
manufacturer to be capable of detecting PM emissions at concentrations
of 10 milligrams per actual cubic meter (0.0044 grains per actual cubic
foot) or less.
(iv) The bag leak detection system sensor must provide output of
relative or absolute PM loadings.
(v) The bag leak detection system must be equipped with a device to
continuously record the output signal from the sensor.
(vi) The bag leak detection system must be equipped with an alarm
system that will sound automatically when an increase in relative PM
emissions over a preset level is detected. The alarm must be located
where it is easily heard by plant operating personnel.
(vii) For positive pressure fabric filter systems, a bag leak
detection system must be installed in each baghouse compartment or cell.
For negative pressure or induced air fabric filters, the bag leak
detector must be installed downstream of the fabric filter.
(viii) Where multiple detectors are required, the system's
instrumentation and alarm may be shared among detectors.
(ix) The baseline output must be established by adjusting the range
and the averaging period of the device and establishing the alarm set
points and the alarm delay time.
(x) Following initial adjustment of the system, the owner or
operator must not adjust the sensitivity or range, averaging period,
alarm set points, or alarm delay time except as detailed in the OM&M
plan. In no case may the sensitivity be increased by more than 100
percent or decreased more than 50 percent over a 365-day period unless
such adjustment follows a complete fabric filter inspection which
demonstrates that the fabric filter is in good operating condition.
(2) These requirements apply to the owner or operator of a new or
existing affected source or an existing emission unit using a continuous
opacity monitoring system.
(i) The owner or operator must install, calibrate, maintain, and
operate a continuous opacity monitoring system to measure and record the
opacity of emissions exiting each exhaust stack.
(ii) Each continuous opacity monitoring system must meet the design
and installation requirements of Performance Specification 1 in appendix
B to 40 CFR part 60.
(3) These requirements apply to the owner or operator of a new or
existing aluminum scrap shredder who conducts visible emission
observations. The owner or operator must:
(i) Perform a visible emissions test for each aluminum scrap
shredder using a certified observer at least once a day according to the
requirements of Method 9 in appendix A to 40 CFR part 60. Each Method 9
test must consist of five 6-minute observations in a 30-minute period;
and
(ii) Record the results of each test.
[[Page 72]]
(4) As an alternative to the requirements of paragraph (f)(3) of
this section, the owner or operator of a new or existing aluminum scrap
shredder may measure the opacity of the emissions discharged through a
stack or stacks using ASTM Method D7520-13 (incorporated by reference,
see Sec. 63.14) subject to the requirements of paragraphs Sec.
63.1510(f)(4)(i) through (iv) of this section. Each test must consist of
five 6-minute observations in a 30-minute period.
(i) During the digital camera opacity technique (DCOT) certification
procedure outlined in Section 9.2 of ASTM D7520-13, the owner or
operator or the DCOT vendor must present the plumes in front of various
backgrounds of color and contrast representing conditions anticipated
during field use such as blue sky, trees, and mixed backgrounds (clouds
and/or a sparse tree stand).
(ii) The owner or operator must also have standard operating
procedures in place including daily or other frequency quality checks to
ensure that equipment is within manufacturing specifications as outlined
in Section 8.1 of ASTM D7520-13.
(iii) The owner or operator must follow the recordkeeping procedures
outlined in Sec. 63.10(b)(1) for DCOT certification, compliance report,
data sheets and all raw unaltered JPEGs used for opacity and
certification determination.
(iv) The owner or operator or the DCOT vendor must have a minimum of
four (4) independent technology users apply the software to determine
the visible opacity of the 300 certification plumes. For each set of 25
plumes, the user may not exceed 15 percent opacity on any one reading
and the average error must not exceed 7.5 percent opacity.
(g) Afterburner. These requirements apply to the owner or operator
of an affected source using an afterburner to comply with the
requirements of this subpart.
(1) The owner or operator must install, calibrate, maintain, and
operate a device to continuously monitor and record the operating
temperature of the afterburner consistent with the requirements for
continuous monitoring systems in subpart A of this part.
(2) The temperature monitoring device must meet each of these
performance and equipment specifications:
(i) The temperature monitoring device must be installed at the exit
of the combustion zone of each afterburner.
(ii) The monitoring system must record the temperature in 15-minute
block averages and determine and record the average temperature for each
3-hour block period.
(iii) The recorder response range must include zero and 1.5 times
the average temperature established according to the requirements in
Sec. 63.1512(m).
(iv) The reference method must be a National Institute of Standards
and Technology calibrated reference thermocouple-potentiometer system or
alternate reference, subject to approval by the Administrator.
(3) The owner or operator must conduct an inspection of each
afterburner at least once a year and record the results. At a minimum,
an inspection must include:
(i) Inspection of all burners, pilot assemblies, and pilot sensing
devices for proper operation and clean pilot sensor;
(ii) Inspection for proper adjustment of combustion air;
(iii) Inspection of internal structures (e.g., baffles) to ensure
structural integrity;
(iv) Inspection of dampers, fans, and blowers for proper operation;
(v) Inspection for proper sealing;
(vi) Inspection of motors for proper operation;
(vii) Inspection of combustion chamber refractory lining and clean
and replace lining as necessary;
(viii) Inspection of afterburner shell for corrosion and/or hot
spots;
(ix) Documentation, for the burn cycle that follows the inspection,
that the afterburner is operating properly and any necessary adjustments
have been made; and
(x) Verification that the equipment is maintained in good operating
condition.
(xi) Following an equipment inspection, all necessary repairs must
be completed in accordance with the requirements of the OM&M plan.
[[Page 73]]
(h) Fabric filter inlet temperature. These requirements apply to the
owner or operator of a scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln or a
group 1 furnace using a lime-injected fabric filter to comply with the
requirements of this subpart.
(1) The owner or operator must install, calibrate, maintain, and
operate a device to continuously monitor and record the temperature of
the fabric filter inlet gases consistent with the requirements for
continuous monitoring systems in subpart A of this part.
(2) The temperature monitoring device must meet each of these
performance and equipment specifications:
(i) The monitoring system must record the temperature in 15-minute
block averages and calculate and record the average temperature for each
3-hour block period.
(ii) The recorder response range must include zero and 1.5 times the
average temperature established according to the requirements in Sec.
63.1512(n).
(iii) The reference method must be a National Institute of Standards
and Technology calibrated reference thermocouple-potentiometer system or
alternate reference, subject to approval by the Administrator.
(i) Lime injection. These requirements apply to the owner or
operator of an affected source or emission unit using a lime-injected
fabric filter to comply with the requirements of this subpart.
(1) The owner or operator of a continuous lime injection system must
verify that lime is always free-flowing by either:
(i) Inspecting each feed hopper or silo at least once each 8-hour
period and recording the results of each inspection. If lime is found
not to be free-flowing during any of the 8-hour periods, the owner or
operator must increase the frequency of inspections to at least once
every 4-hour period for the next 3 days. The owner or operator may
return to inspections at least once every 8 hour period if corrective
action results in no further blockages of lime during the 3-day period;
or
(ii) Subject to the approval of the permitting agency, installing,
operating and maintaining a load cell, carrier gas/lime flow indicator,
carrier gas pressure drop measurement system or other system to confirm
that lime is free-flowing. If lime is found not to be free-flowing, the
owner or operator must promptly initiate and complete corrective action,
or
(iii) Subject to the approval of the permitting agency, installing,
operating and maintaining a device to monitor the concentration of HCl
at the outlet of the fabric filter. If an increase in the concentration
of HCl indicates that the lime is not free-flowing, the owner or
operator must promptly initiate and complete corrective action.
(2) The owner or operator of a continuous lime injection system must
record the lime feeder setting once each day of operation.
(3) An owner or operator who intermittently adds lime to a lime-
injected fabric filter must obtain approval from the permitting
authority for major sources, or the Administrator for area sources for a
lime addition monitoring procedure. The permitting authority for major
sources, or the Administrator for area sources will not approve a
monitoring procedure unless data and information are submitted
establishing that the procedure is adequate to ensure that relevant
emission standards will be met on a continuous basis.
(4) At least once per month, verify that the lime injection rate in
pounds per hour (lb/hr) is no less than 90 percent of the lime injection
rate used to demonstrate compliance during your most recent performance
test. If the monthly check of the lime injection rate is below the 90
percent, the owner or operator must repair or adjust the lime injection
system to restore normal operation within 45 days. The owner or operator
may request from the permitting authority for major sources, or the
Administrator for area sources, an extension of up to an additional 45
days to demonstrate that the lime injection rate is no less than 90
percent of the lime injection rate used to demonstrate compliance during
the most recent performance test. In the event that a lime feeder is
repaired or replaced, the feeder must be calibrated, and the feed rate
must be restored to the lb/hr feed rate operating limit established
during the most recent performance test within 45 days. The
[[Page 74]]
owner or operator may request from the permitting authority for major
sources, or the Administrator for area sources, an extension of up to an
additional 45 days to complete the repair or replacement and
establishing a new setting. The repair or replacement, and the
establishment of the new feeder setting(s) must be documented in
accordance with the recordkeeping requirements of Sec. 63.1517.
(j) Total reactive flux injection rate. These requirements apply to
the owner or operator of a group 1 furnace (with or without add-on air
pollution control devices) or in-line fluxer. The owner or operator
must:
(1) Install, calibrate, operate, and maintain a device to
continuously measure and record the weight of gaseous or liquid reactive
flux injected to each affected source or emission unit.
(i) The monitoring system must record the weight for each 15-minute
block period, during which reactive fluxing occurs, over the same
operating cycle or time period used in the performance test.
(ii) The accuracy of the weight measurement device must be 1 percent of the weight of the reactive component of the
flux being measured. The owner or operator may apply to the permitting
authority for major sources, or the Administrator for area sources for
permission to use a weight measurement device of alternative accuracy in
cases where the reactive flux flow rates are so low as to make the use
of a weight measurement device of 1 percent
impracticable. A device of alternative accuracy will not be approved
unless the owner or operator provides assurance through data and
information that the affected source will meet the relevant emission
standards.
(iii) The owner or operator must verify the calibration of the
weight measurement device in accordance with the schedule specified by
the manufacturer, or if no calibration schedule is specified, at least
once every 6 months.
(2) Calculate and record the gaseous or liquid reactive flux
injection rate (kg/Mg or lb/ton) for each operating cycle or time period
used in the performance test using the procedure in Sec. 63.1512(o).
(3) Record, for each 15-minute block period during each operating
cycle or time period used in the performance test during which reactive
fluxing occurs, the time, weight, and type of flux for each addition of:
(i) Gaseous or liquid reactive flux other than chlorine; and
(ii) Solid reactive flux.
(4) Calculate and record the total reactive flux injection rate for
each operating cycle or time period used in the performance test using
the procedure in Sec. 63.1512(o). For solid flux that is added
intermittently, record the amount added for each operating cycle or time
period used in the performance test using the procedures in Sec.
63.1512(o).
(5) The owner or operator of a group 1 furnace or in-line fluxer
performing reactive fluxing may apply to the Administrator for approval
of an alternative method for monitoring and recording the total reactive
flux addition rate based on monitoring the weight or quantity of
reactive flux per ton of feed/charge for each operating cycle or time
period used in the performance test. An alternative monitoring method
will not be approved unless the owner or operator provides assurance
through data and information that the affected source will meet the
relevant emission standards on a continuous basis.
(k) Thermal chip dryer. These requirements apply to the owner or
operator of a thermal chip dryer with emissions controlled by an
afterburner. The owner or operator must:
(1) Record the type of materials charged to the unit for each
operating cycle or time period used in the performance test.
(2) Submit a certification of compliance with the applicable
operational standard for charge materials in Sec. 63.1506(f)(3) for
each 6-month reporting period. Each certification must contain the
information in Sec. 63.1516(b)(2)(i).
(l) Dross-only furnace. These requirements apply to the owner or
operator of a dross-only furnace. The owner or operator must:
(1) Record the materials charged to each unit for each operating
cycle or time period used in the performance test.
[[Page 75]]
(2) Submit a certification of compliance with the applicable
operational standard for charge materials in Sec. 63.1506(i)(3) for
each 6-month reporting period. Each certification must contain the
information in Sec. 63.1516(b)(2)(ii).
(m) In-line fluxers using no reactive flux. The owner or operator of
an in-line fluxer that uses no reactive flux materials must submit a
certification of compliance with the operational standard for no
reactive flux materials in Sec. 63.1506(l) for each 6-month reporting
period. Each certification must contain the information in Sec.
63.1516(b)(2)(vi).
(n) Sidewell group 1 furnace with add-on air pollution control
devices. These requirements apply to the owner or operator of a sidewell
group 1 furnace using add-on air pollution control devices. The owner or
operator must:
(1) Record in an operating log for each tap of a sidewell furnace
whether the level of molten metal was above the top of the passage
between the sidewell and hearth during reactive flux injection, unless
the furnace hearth was also equipped with an add-on control device. If
visual inspection of the molten metal level is not possible, the molten
metal level must be determined using physical measurement methods.
(2) Submit a certification of compliance with the operational
standards in Sec. 63.1506(m)(6) for each 6-month reporting period. Each
certification must contain the information in Sec. 63.1516(b)(2)(iii).
(o) Group 1 furnace without add-on air pollution control devices.
These requirements apply to the owner or operator of a group 1 furnace
that is not equipped with an add-on air pollution control device.
(1) The owner or operator must develop, in consultation with the
permitting authority for major sources, or the Administrator for area
sources, a written site-specific monitoring plan. The site-specific
monitoring plan must be submitted to the permitting authority for major
sources, or the Administrator for area sources as part of the OM&M plan.
The site-specific monitoring plan must contain sufficient procedures to
ensure continuing compliance with all applicable emission limits and
must demonstrate, based on documented test results, the relationship
between emissions of PM, HCl, and D/F (and HF for uncontrolled group 1
furnaces), and the proposed monitoring parameters for each pollutant.
Test data must establish the highest level of PM, HCl, and D/F (and HF
for uncontrolled group 1 furnaces) that will be emitted from the furnace
in accordance with Sec. 63.1511(b)(1). If the permitting authority for
major sources, or the Administrator for area sources determines that any
revisions of the site-specific monitoring plan are necessary to meet the
requirements of this section or this subpart, the owner or operator must
promptly make all necessary revisions and resubmit the revised plan.
(i) The owner or operator of an existing affected source must submit
the site-specific monitoring plan to the permitting authority for major
sources, or the Administrator for area sources for review at least 6
months prior to the compliance date.
(ii) The permitting authority for major sources, or the
Administrator for area sources will review and approve or disapprove a
proposed plan, or request changes to a plan, based on whether the plan
contains sufficient provisions to ensure continuing compliance with
applicable emission limits and demonstrates, based on documented test
results, the relationship between emissions of PM, HCl, and D/F (and HF
for uncontrolled group 1 furnaces) and the proposed monitoring
parameters for each pollutant. Test data must establish the highest
level of PM, HCl, and D/F (and HF for uncontrolled group 1 furnaces)
that will be emitted from the furnace. Subject to approval of the OM&M
plan, the highest levels may be determined by conducting performance
tests and monitoring operating parameters in accordance with Sec.
63.1511(b)(1).
(2) Each site-specific monitoring plan must document each work
practice, equipment/design practice, pollution prevention practice, or
other measure used to meet the applicable emission standards.
(3) Each site-specific monitoring plan must include provisions for
unit labeling as required in paragraph (c) of this
[[Page 76]]
section, feed/charge weight measurement (or production weight
measurement) as required in paragraph (e) of this section and flux
weight measurement as required in paragraph (j) of this section.
(4) Each site-specific monitoring plan for a melting/holding furnace
subject to the clean charge emission standard in Sec. 63.1505(i)(3)
must include these requirements:
(i) The owner or operator must record the type of feed/ charge
(e.g., ingot, thermally dried chips, dried scrap, etc.) for each
operating cycle or time period used in the performance test; and
(ii) The owner or operator must submit a certification of compliance
with the applicable operational standard for clean charge materials in
Sec. 63.1506(n)(3) for each 6-month reporting period. Each
certification must contain the information in Sec. 63.1516(b)(2)(iv).
(5) If a continuous emission monitoring system is included in a
site-specific monitoring plan, the plan must include provisions for the
installation, operation, and maintenance of the system to provide
quality-assured measurements in accordance with all applicable
requirements of the general provisions in subpart A of this part.
(6) If a continuous opacity monitoring system is included in a site-
specific monitoring plan, the plan must include provisions for the
installation, operation, and maintenance of the system to provide
quality-assured measurements in accordance with all applicable
requirements of this subpart.
(7) If a site-specific monitoring plan includes a scrap inspection
program for monitoring the scrap contaminant level of furnace feed/
charge materials, the plan must include provisions for the demonstration
and implementation of the program in accordance with all applicable
requirements in paragraph (p) of this section.
(8) If a site-specific monitoring plan includes a calculation method
for monitoring the scrap contaminant level of furnace feed/charge
materials, the plan must include provisions for the demonstration and
implementation of the program in accordance with all applicable
requirements in paragraph (q) of this section.
(p) Scrap inspection program for group 1 furnace without add-on air
pollution control devices. A scrap inspection program must include:
(1) A proven method for collecting representative samples and
measuring the oil and coatings content of scrap samples;
(2) A scrap inspector training program;
(3) An established correlation between visual inspection and
physical measurement of oil and coatings content of scrap samples;
(4) Periodic physical measurements of oil and coatings content of
randomly-selected scrap samples and comparison with visual inspection
results;
(5) A system for assuring that only acceptable scrap is charged to
an affected group 1 furnace; and
(6) Recordkeeping requirements to document conformance with plan
requirements.
(q) Monitoring of scrap contamination level by calculation method
for group 1 furnace without add-on air pollution control devices. The
owner or operator of a group 1 furnace dedicated to processing a
distinct type of furnace feed/charge composed of scrap with a uniform
composition (such as rejected product from a manufacturing process for
which the coating-to-scrap ratio can be documented) may include a
program in the site-specific monitoring plan for determining,
monitoring, and certifying the scrap contaminant level using a
calculation method rather than a scrap inspection program. A scrap
contaminant monitoring program using a calculation method must include:
(1) Procedures for the characterization and documentation of the
contaminant level of the scrap prior to the performance test.
(2) Limitations on the furnace feed/charge to scrap of the same
composition as that used in the performance test. If the performance
test was conducted with a mixture of scrap and clean charge, limitations
on the proportion of scrap in the furnace feed/charge to no greater than
the proportion used during the performance test.
(3) Operating, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements
to ensure that no scrap with a contaminant level higher than that used
in the
[[Page 77]]
performance test is charged to the furnace.
(r) Group 2 furnace. These requirements apply to the owner or
operator of a new or existing group 2 furnace. The owner or operator
must:
(1) Record a description of the materials charged to each furnace,
including any nonreactive, non-HAP-containing/non-HAP-generating fluxing
materials or agents.
(2) Submit a certification of compliance with the applicable
operational standard for charge materials in Sec. 63.1506(o) for each
6-month reporting period. Each certification must contain the
information in Sec. 63.1516(b)(2)(v).
(s) Site-specific requirements for secondary aluminum processing
units. (1) An owner or operator of a secondary aluminum processing unit
at a facility must include, within the OM&M plan prepared in accordance
with Sec. 63.1510(b), the following information:
(i) The identification of each emission unit in the secondary
aluminum processing unit;
(ii) The specific control technology or pollution prevention measure
to be used for each emission unit in the secondary aluminum processing
unit and the date of its installation or application;
(iii) The emission limit calculated for each secondary aluminum
processing unit and performance test results with supporting
calculations demonstrating initial compliance with each applicable
emission limit;
(iv) Information and data demonstrating compliance for each emission
unit with all applicable design, equipment, work practice or operational
standards of this subpart; and
(v) The monitoring requirements applicable to each emission unit in
a secondary aluminum processing unit and the monitoring procedures for
daily calculation of the 3-day, 24-hour rolling average using the
procedure in Sec. 63.1510(t).
(2) The SAPU compliance procedures within the OM&M plan may not
contain any of the following provisions:
(i) Any averaging among emissions of differing pollutants;
(ii) The inclusion of any affected sources other than emission units
in a secondary aluminum processing unit;
(iii) The inclusion of any emission unit while it is shutdown; or
(iv) The inclusion of any periods of startup or shutdown in emission
calculations.
(3) To revise the SAPU compliance provisions within the OM&M plan
prior to the end of the permit term, the owner or operator must submit a
request to the permitting authority for major sources, or the
Administrator for area sources containing the information required by
paragraph (s)(1) of this section and obtain approval of the permitting
authority for major sources, or the Administrator for area sources prior
to implementing any revisions.
(t) Secondary aluminum processing unit. Except as provided in
paragraph (u) of this section, the owner or operator must calculate and
record the 3-day, 24-hour rolling average emissions of PM, HCl, and D/F
(and HF for uncontrolled group 1 furnaces) for each secondary aluminum
processing unit on a daily basis. To calculate the 3-day, 24-hour
rolling average, the owner or operator must:
(1) Calculate and record the total weight of material charged to
each emission unit in the secondary aluminum processing unit for each
24-hour day of operation using the feed/charge weight information
required in paragraph (e) of this section. If the owner or operator
chooses to comply on the basis of weight of aluminum produced by the
emission unit, rather than weight of material charged to the emission
unit, all performance test emissions results and all calculations must
be conducted on the aluminum production weight basis.
(2) Multiply the total feed/charge weight to the emission unit, or
the weight of aluminum produced by the emission unit, for each emission
unit for the 24-hour period by the emission rate (in lb/ton of feed/
charge) for that emission unit (as determined during the performance
test) to provide emissions for each emission unit for the 24-hour
period, in pounds.
(i) Where no performance test has been conducted, for a particular
emission unit, because the owner of operator has, with the approval of
the permitting authority for major sources, or
[[Page 78]]
the Administrator for area sources, chosen to determine the emission
rate of an emission unit by testing a representative unit, in accordance
with Sec. 63.1511(f), the owner or operator shall use the emission rate
determined from the representative unit in the SAPU emission rate
calculation required in Sec. 63.1510(t)(4).
(ii) Except as provided in paragraph (t)(2)(iii) of this section, if
the owner or operator has not conducted performance tests for HCl (and
HF for an uncontrolled group 1 furnace) or for HCl for an in-line
fluxer, in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 63.1512(d)(3),
(e)(3), or (h)(2), the calculation required in Sec. 63.1510(t)(4) to
determine SAPU-wide HCl and HF emissions shall be made under the
assumption that all chlorine contained in reactive flux added to the
emission unit is emitted as HCl and all fluorine contained in reactive
flux added to the emission unit is emitted as HF.
(iii) Prior to the date by which the initial performance test for HF
emissions from uncontrolled group 1 furnaces is conducted, or is
required to be conducted, the calculation required in Sec. 63.1505(k)
to determine the SAPU-wide HF emission limit and the calculation
required in Sec. 63.1510(t)(4) to determine the SAPU-wide HF emission
rate must exclude HF emissions from untested uncontrolled group 1
furnaces and feed/charge processed in untested uncontrolled group 1
furnaces.
(3) Divide the total emissions for each SAPU for the 24-hour period
by the total material charged to the SAPU, or the weight of aluminum
produced by the SAPU over the 24-hour period to provide the daily
emission rate for the SAPU.
(4) Compute the 24-hour daily emission rate using Equation 4:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18SE15.010
Where:
Eday = The daily PM, HCl, and D/F (and HF for uncontrolled
group 1 furnaces) emission rate for the secondary aluminum
processing unit for the 24-hour period;
Ti = The total amount of feed, or aluminum produced, for
emission unit i for the 24-hour period (tons or Mg);
ERi = The measured emission rate for emission unit i as
determined in the performance test (lb/ton or [micro]g/Mg of
feed/charge); and
n = The number of emission units in the secondary aluminum processing
unit.
(5) Calculate and record the 3-day, 24-hour rolling average for each
pollutant each day by summing the daily emission rates for each
pollutant over the 3 most recent consecutive days and dividing by 3. The
SAPU is in compliance with an applicable emission limit if the 3-day,
24-hour rolling average for each pollutant is no greater than the
applicable SAPU emission limit determined in accordance with Sec.
63.1505(k)(1)-(3).
(u) Secondary aluminum processing unit compliance by individual
emission unit demonstration. As an alternative to the procedures of
paragraph (t) of this section, an owner or operator may demonstrate,
through performance tests, that each individual emission unit within the
secondary aluminum production unit is in compliance with the applicable
emission limits for the emission unit.
(v) Alternative monitoring method for lime addition. The owner or
operator of a lime-coated fabric filter that employs intermittent or
noncontinuous lime addition may apply to the Administrator for approval
of an alternative method for monitoring the lime addition schedule and
rate based on monitoring the weight of lime added per ton of feed/charge
for each operating cycle or time period used in the performance test. An
alternative monitoring method will not
[[Page 79]]
be approved unless the owner or operator provides assurance through data
and information that the affected source will meet the relevant emission
standards on a continuous basis.
(w) Alternative monitoring methods. If an owner or operator wishes
to use an alternative monitoring method to demonstrate compliance with
any emission standard in this subpart, other than those alternative
monitoring methods which may be authorized pursuant to Sec.
63.1510(j)(5) and Sec. 63.1510(v), the owner or operator may submit an
application to the Administrator. Any such application will be processed
according to the criteria and procedures set forth in paragraphs (w)(1)
through (6) of this section.
(1) The Administrator will not approve averaging periods other than
those specified in this section.
(2) The owner or operator must continue to use the original
monitoring requirement until necessary data are submitted and approval
is received to use another monitoring procedure.
(3) The owner or operator shall submit the application for approval
of alternate monitoring methods no later than the notification of the
performance test. The application must contain the information specified
in paragraphs (w)(3) (i) through (iii) of this section:
(i) Data or information justifying the request, such as the
technical or economic infeasibility, or the impracticality of using the
required approach;
(ii) A description of the proposed alternative monitoring
requirements, including the operating parameters to be monitored, the
monitoring approach and technique, and how the limit is to be
calculated; and
(iii) Data and information documenting that the alternative
monitoring requirement(s) would provide equivalent or better assurance
of compliance with the relevant emission standard(s).
(4) The Administrator will not approve an alternate monitoring
application unless it would provide equivalent or better assurance of
compliance with the relevant emission standard(s). Before disapproving
any alternate monitoring application, the Administrator will provide:
(i) Notice of the information and findings upon which the intended
disapproval is based; and
(ii) Notice of opportunity for the owner or operator to present
additional supporting information before final action is taken on the
application. This notice will specify how much additional time is
allowed for the owner or operator to provide additional supporting
information.
(5) The owner or operator is responsible for submitting any
supporting information in a timely manner to enable the Administrator to
consider the application prior to the performance test. Neither
submittal of an application nor the Administrator's failure to approve
or disapprove the application relieves the owner or operator of the
responsibility to comply with any provisions of this subpart.
(6) The Administrator may decide at any time, on a case-by-case
basis, that additional or alternative operating limits, or alternative
approaches to establishing operating limits, are necessary to
demonstrate compliance with the emission standards of this subpart.
[65 FR 15710, Mar. 23, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 59792, Sept. 24, 2002;
67 FR 79816, Dec. 30, 2002; 69 FR 53984, Sept. 3, 2004; 80 FR 56741,
Sept. 18, 2015; 81 FR 38087, June 13, 2016]
Sec. 63.1511 Performance test/compliance demonstration general requirements.
(a) Site-specific test plan. Prior to conducting any performance
test required by this subpart, the owner or operator must prepare a
site-specific test plan which satisfies all of the rule requirements,
and must obtain approval of the plan pursuant to the procedures set
forth in Sec. 63.7. Performance tests shall be conducted under such
conditions as the Administrator specifies to the owner or operator based
on representative performance of the affected source for the period
being tested. Upon request, the owner or operator shall make available
to the Administrator such records as may be necessary to determine the
conditions of performance tests.
(b) Initial performance test. Following approval of the site-
specific test plan, the owner or operator must demonstrate initial
compliance with each
[[Page 80]]
applicable emission, equipment, work practice, or operational standard
for each affected source and emission unit, and report the results in
the notification of compliance status report as described in Sec.
63.1515(b). The owner or operator of any affected source constructed
before February 14, 2012, for which an initial performance test is
required to demonstrate compliance must conduct this initial performance
test no later than the date for compliance established by Sec. 63.1501.
The owner or operator of any affected source constructed or
reconstructed after February 14, 2012, for which an initial performance
test is required must conduct this initial performance test within 180
days after the date for compliance established by Sec. 63.1501. Except
for the date by which the performance test must be conducted, the owner
or operator must conduct each performance test in accordance with the
requirements and procedures set forth in Sec. 63.7(c). Owners or
operators of affected sources located at facilities which are area
sources are subject only to those performance testing requirements
pertaining to D/F. Owners or operators of sweat furnaces meeting the
specifications of Sec. 63.1505(f)(1) are not required to conduct a
performance test.
(1) The performance tests must be conducted under representative
conditions expected to produce the highest level of HAP emissions
expressed in the units of the emission standards for the HAP
(considering the extent of feed/charge contamination, reactive flux
addition rate and feed/charge rate). If a single test condition is not
expected to produce the highest level of emissions for all HAP, testing
under two or more sets of conditions (for example high contamination at
low feed/charge rate, and low contamination at high feed/charge rate)
may be required. Any subsequent performance tests for the purposes of
establishing new or revised parametric limits shall be allowed upon pre-
approval from the permitting authority for major sources, or the
Administrator for area sources. These new parametric settings shall be
used to demonstrate compliance for the period being tested.
(2) Each performance test for a continuous process must consist of 3
separate runs; pollutant sampling for each run must be conducted for the
time period specified in the applicable method or, in the absence of a
specific time period in the test method, for a minimum of 3 hours.
(3) Each performance test for a batch process must consist of three
separate runs; pollutant sampling for each run must be conducted over
the entire process operating cycle. Additionally, for batch processes
where the length of the process operating cycle is not known in advance,
and where isokinetic sampling must be conducted based on the procedures
in Method 5 in appendix A to part 60, use the following procedure to
ensure that sampling is conducted over the entire process operating
cycle:
(i) Choose a minimum operating cycle length and begin sampling
assuming this minimum length will be the run time (e.g., if the process
operating cycle is known to last from four to six hours, then assume a
sampling time of four hours and divide the sampling time evenly between
the required number of traverse points);
(ii) After each traverse point has been sampled once, begin sampling
each point again for the same time per point, in the reverse order,
until the operating cycle is complete. All traverse points as required
by Method 1 of appendix A to part 60, must be sampled at least once
during each test run;
(iii) In order to distribute the sampling time most evenly over all
the traverse points, do not perform all runs using the same sampling
point order (e.g., if there are four ports and sampling for run 1 began
in port 1, then sampling for run 2 could begin in port 4 and continue in
reverse order.)
(4) Where multiple affected sources or emission units are exhausted
through a common stack, pollutant sampling for each run must be
conducted over a period of time during which all affected sources or
emission units complete at least 1 entire process operating cycle or for
24 hours, whichever is shorter.
(5) Initial compliance with an applicable emission limit or standard
is demonstrated if the average of three runs conducted during the
performance
[[Page 81]]
test is less than or equal to the applicable emission limit or standard.
(6) Apply paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this section for each
pollutant separately if a different production rate, charge material or,
if applicable, reactive fluxing rate would apply and thereby result in a
higher expected emissions rate for that pollutant.
(7) The owner or operator may not conduct performance tests during
periods of malfunction.
(c) Test methods. The owner or operator must use the following
methods in appendix A to 40 CFR part 60 to determine compliance with the
applicable emission limits or standards:
(1) Method 1 for sample and velocity traverses.
(2) Method 2 for velocity and volumetric flow rate.
(3) Method 3 for gas analysis.
(4) Method 4 for moisture content of the stack gas.
(5) Method 5 for the concentration of PM.
(6) Method 9 for visible emission observations.
(7) Method 23 for the concentration of D/F.
(8) Method 25A for the concentration of THC, as propane.
(9) Method 26A for the concentration of HCl and HF. Method 26 may
also be used, except at sources where entrained water droplets are
present in the emission stream. Where a lime-injected fabric filter is
used as the control device to comply with the 90 percent reduction
standard, the owner or operator must measure the fabric filter inlet
concentration of HCl at a point before lime is introduced to the system.
(d) Alternative methods. The owner or operator may use alternative
test methods as provided in paragraphs (d)(1) through (3) of this
section.
(1) The owner or operator may use test method ASTM D7520-13 as an
alternative to EPA Method 9 subject to conditions described in Sec.
63.1510(f)(4).
(2) In lieu of conducting the annual flow rate measurements using
Methods 1 and 2, the owner or operator may use Method 204 in Appendix M
to 40 CFR part 51 to conduct annual verification of a permanent total
enclosure for the affected source/emission unit.
(3) The owner or operator may use an alternative test method
approved by the Administrator.
(e) Repeat tests. The owner or operator of new or existing affected
sources and emission units located at secondary aluminum production
facilities that are major sources must conduct a performance test every
5 years following the initial performance test.
(f) Testing of representative emission units. With the prior
approval of the permitting authority for major sources, or the
Administrator for area sources, an owner or operator may utilize
emission rates obtained by testing a particular type of group 1 furnace
that does not have an add-on air pollution control device, or by testing
an in-line flux box that does not have an add-on air pollution control
device, to determine the emission rate for other units of the same type
at the same facility. Such emission test results may only be considered
to be representative of other units if all of the following criteria are
satisfied:
(1) The tested emission unit must use feed materials and charge
rates which are comparable to the emission units that it represents;
(2) The tested emission unit must use the same type of flux
materials in the same proportions as the emission units it represents;
(3) The tested emission unit must be operated utilizing the same
work practices as the emission units that it represents;
(4) The tested emission unit must be of the same design as the
emission units that it represents; and
(5) The tested emission unit must be tested under the highest load
or capacity reasonably expected to occur for any of the emission units
that it represents.
(6) All 3 separate runs of a performance test must be conducted on
the same emission unit.
(g) Establishment of monitoring and operating parameter values. The
owner or operator of new or existing affected sources and emission units
must establish a minimum or maximum operating parameter value, or an
operating parameter range for each parameter to be monitored as required
by Sec. 63.1510 that ensures compliance with the applicable
[[Page 82]]
emission limit or standard. To establish the minimum or maximum value or
range, the owner or operator must use the appropriate procedures in this
section and submit the information required by Sec. 63.1515(b)(4) in
the notification of compliance status report. The owner or operator may
use existing data in addition to the results of performance tests to
establish operating parameter values for compliance monitoring provided
each of the following conditions are met to the satisfaction of the
permitting authority for major sources, or the Administrator for area
sources:
(1) The complete emission test report(s) used as the basis of the
parameter(s) is submitted.
(2) The same test methods and procedures as required by this subpart
were used in the test.
(3) The owner or operator certifies that no design or work practice
changes have been made to the source, process, or emission control
equipment since the time of the report.
(4) All process and control equipment operating parameters required
to be monitored were monitored as required in this subpart and
documented in the test report.
(5) If the owner or operator wants to conduct a new performance test
and establish different operating parameter values, they must submit a
revised site specific test plan and receive approval in accordance with
paragraph (a) of this section. In addition, if an owner or operator
wants to use existing data in addition to the results of the new
performance test to establish operating parameter values, they must meet
the requirements in paragraphs (g)(1) through (4) of this section.
(h) Testing of commonly-ducted units within a secondary aluminum
processing unit. When group 1 furnaces and/or in-line fluxers are
included in a single existing SAPU or new SAPU, and the emissions from
more than one emission unit within that existing SAPU or new SAPU are
manifolded to a single control device, compliance for all units within
the SAPU is demonstrated if the total measured emissions from all
controlled and uncontrolled units in the SAPU do not exceed the emission
limits calculated for that SAPU based on the applicable equation in
Sec. 63.1505(k).
(i) Testing of commonly-ducted units not within a secondary aluminum
processing unit. With the prior approval of the permitting authority for
major sources, or the Administrator for area sources, an owner or
operator may do combined performance testing of two or more individual
affected sources or emission units which are not included in a single
existing SAPU or new SAPU, but whose emissions are manifolded to a
single control device. Any such performance testing of commonly-ducted
units must satisfy the following basic requirements:
(1) All testing must be designed to verify that each affected source
or emission unit individually satisfies all emission requirements
applicable to that affected source or emission unit;
(2) All emissions of pollutants subject to a standard must be tested
at the outlet from each individual affected source or emission unit
while operating under the highest load or capacity reasonably expected
to occur, and prior to the point that the emissions are manifolded
together with emissions from other affected sources or emission units;
(3) The combined emissions from all affected sources and emission
units which are manifolded to a single emission control device must be
tested at the outlet of the emission control device;
(4) All tests at the outlet of the emission control device must be
conducted with all affected sources and emission units whose emissions
are manifolded to the control device operating simultaneously under the
highest load or capacity reasonably expected to occur; and
(5) For purposes of demonstrating compliance of a commonly-ducted
unit with any emission limit for a particular type of pollutant, the
emissions of that pollutant by the individual unit shall be presumed to
be controlled by the same percentage as total emissions of that
pollutant from all commonly-
[[Page 83]]
ducted units are controlled at the outlet of the emission control
device.
[65 FR 15710, Mar. 23, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 59792, Sept. 24, 2002;
67 FR 79817, Dec. 30, 2002; 79 FR 11284, Feb. 27, 2014; 80 FR 56745,
Sept. 18, 2015; 81 FR 38087, June 13, 2016]
Sec. 63.1512 Performance test/compliance demonstration requirements
and procedures.
(a) Aluminum scrap shredder. The owner or operator must conduct
performance tests to measure PM emissions at the outlet of the control
system. If visible emission observation is the selected monitoring
option, the owner or operator must record visible emission observations
from each exhaust stack for all consecutive 6-minute periods during the
PM emission test according to the requirements of Method 9 in appendix A
to 40 CFR part 60. If emissions observations by ASTM Method D7520-13
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14) is the selected monitoring
option, the owner or operator must record opacity observations from each
exhaust stack for all consecutive 6-minute periods during the PM
emission test.
(b) Thermal chip dryer. The owner or operator must conduct a
performance test to measure THC and D/F emissions at the outlet of the
control device while the unit processes only unpainted aluminum chips.
(c) Scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln. The owner or
operator must conduct performance tests to measure emissions of THC, D/
F, HCl, and PM at the outlet of the control device.
(1) If the scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln is subject
to the alternative emission limits in Sec. 63.1505(e), the average
afterburner operating temperature in each 3-hour block period must be
maintained at or above 760 [deg]C (1400 [deg]F) for the test.
(2) The owner or operator of a scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/
decoating kiln subject to the alternative limits in Sec. 63.1505(e)
must submit a written certification in the notification of compliance
status report containing the information required by Sec.
63.1515(b)(7).
(d) Group 1 furnace with add-on air pollution control devices. (1)
The owner or operator of a group 1 furnace that processes scrap other
than clean charge materials with emissions controlled by a lime-injected
fabric filter must conduct performance tests to measure emissions of PM
and D/F at the outlet of the control device and emissions of HCl at the
outlet (for the emission limit) or the inlet and the outlet (for the
percent reduction standard).
(2) The owner or operator of a group 1 furnace that processes only
clean charge materials with emissions controlled by a lime-injected
fabric filter must conduct performance tests to measure emissions of PM
at the outlet of the control device and emissions of HCl at the outlet
(for the emission limit) or the inlet and the outlet (for the percent
reduction standard).
(3) The owner or operator may choose to determine the rate of
reactive flux addition to the group 1 furnace and assume, for the
purposes of demonstrating compliance with the SAPU emission limit, that
all reactive flux added to the group 1 furnace is emitted. Under these
circumstances, the owner or operator is not required to conduct an
emission test for HCl.
(4) The owner or operator of a sidewell group 1 furnace that
conducts reactive fluxing (except for cover flux) in the hearth, or that
conducts reactive fluxing in the sidewell at times when the level of
molten metal falls below the top of the passage between the sidewell and
the hearth, must conduct the performance tests required by paragraph
(d)(1) or (d)(2) of this section, to measure emissions from both the
sidewell and the hearth.
(e) Group 1 furnace (including melting holding furnaces) without
add-on air pollution control devices. In the site-specific monitoring
plan required by Sec. 63.1510(o), the owner or operator of a group 1
furnace (including a melting/holding furnaces) without add-on air
pollution control devices must include data and information
demonstrating compliance with the applicable emission limits.
(1) If the group 1 furnace processes other than clean charge
material, the owner or operator must conduct emission tests to measure
emissions of PM, HCl, HF, and D/F at the furnace exhaust outlet.
[[Page 84]]
(2) If the group 1 furnace processes only clean charge, the owner or
operator must conduct emission tests to simultaneously measure emissions
of PM, HCl and HF. A D/F test is not required. Each test must be
conducted while the group 1 furnace (including a melting/holding
furnace) processes only clean charge.
(3) The owner or operator may choose to determine the rate of
reactive flux addition to the group 1 furnace and assume, for the
purposes of demonstrating compliance with the SAPU emission limit, that
all chlorine and fluorine contained in reactive flux added to the group
1 furnace is emitted as HCl and HF. Under these circumstances, the owner
or operator is not required to conduct an emission test for HCl or HF.
(4) When testing an existing uncontrolled furnace, the owner or
operator must comply with the requirements of either paragraphs
(e)(4)(i), (ii), or (iii) of this section at the next required
performance test required by Sec. 63.1511(e).
(i) Install hooding that meets ACGIH Guidelines (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 63.14), or
(ii) At least 180 days prior to testing petition the permitting
authority for major sources, or the Administrator for area sources, that
such hoods are impractical under the provisions of paragraph (e)(6) of
this section and propose testing procedures that will minimize
unmeasured emissions during the performance test according to the
paragraph (e)(7) of this section, or
(iii) Assume an 80-percent capture efficiency for the furnace
exhaust (i.e., multiply emissions measured at the furnace exhaust outlet
by 1.25). If the source fails to demonstrate compliance using the 80-
percent capture efficiency assumption, the owner or operator must re-
test with a hood that meets the ACGIH Guidelines within 180 days, or
petition the permitting authority for major sources, or the
Administrator for area sources, within 180 days that such hoods are
impractical under the provisions of paragraph (e)(6) of this section and
propose testing procedures that will minimize unmeasured emissions
during the performance test according to paragraph (e)(7) of this
section.
(iv) The 80-percent capture efficiency assumption is not applicable
in the event of testing conducted under an approved petition submitted
pursuant to paragraphs (e)(4)(ii) or (iii) of this section.
(v) Round top furnaces constructed before February 14, 2012, and
reconstructed round top furnaces are exempt from the requirements of
paragraphs (e)(4)(i), (ii), and (iii) of this section. Round top
furnaces must be operated to minimize unmeasured emissions according to
paragraph (e)(7) of this section.
(5) When testing a new uncontrolled furnace, other than a new round
top furnace, constructed after February 14, 2012, the owner or operator
must comply with the requirements of paragraph (e)(5)(i) or (ii) of this
section at the next required performance test required by Sec.
63.1511(e). When testing a new round top furnace constructed after
February 14, 2012, the owner or operator must comply with the
requirements of either paragraphs (e)(5)(i), (ii), or (iii) of this
section at the next required performance test required by Sec.
63.1511(e).
(i) Install hooding that meets ACGIH Guidelines (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 63.14), or
(ii) At least 180 days prior to testing petition the permitting
authority for major sources, or the Administrator for area sources, that
such hoods are impractical under the provisions of paragraph (e)(6) of
this section and propose testing procedures that will minimize
unmeasured emissions during the performance test according to the
paragraph (e)(7) of this section, or
(iii) Assume an 80-percent capture efficiency for the furnace
exhaust (i.e., multiply emissions measured at the furnace exhaust outlet
by 1.25). If the source fails to demonstrate compliance using the 80-
percent capture efficiency assumption, the owner or operator must re-
test with a hood that meets the ACGIH Guidelines within 180 days, or
petition the permitting authority for major sources, or the
Administrator for area sources, within 180 days that such hoods are
impractical under the provisions of paragraph (e)(6) of this section and
propose testing procedures that will minimize unmeasured
[[Page 85]]
emissions during the performance test according to paragraph (e)(7) of
this section.
(iv) The 80-percent capture efficiency assumption is not applicable
in the event of testing conducted under an approved petition submitted
pursuant to paragraphs (e)(5)(ii) or (iii) of this section.
(6) The installation of hooding that meets ACGIH Guidelines
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14) is considered impractical
if any of the following conditions exist:
(i) Building or equipment obstructions (for example, wall, ceiling,
roof, structural beams, utilities, overhead crane or other obstructions)
are present such that the temporary hood cannot be located consistent
with acceptable hood design and installation practices;
(ii) Space limitations or work area constraints exist such that the
temporary hood cannot be supported or located to prevent interference
with normal furnace operations or avoid unsafe working conditions for
the furnace operator; or
(iii) Other obstructions and limitations subject to agreement of the
permitting authority for major sources, or the Administrator for area
sources.
(7) Testing procedures that will minimize unmeasured emissions may
include, but are not limited to the following:
(i) Installing a hood that does not entirely meet ACGIH guidelines;
(ii) Using the building as an enclosure, and measuring emissions
exhausted from the building if there are no other furnaces or other
significant sources in the building of the pollutants to be measured;
(iii) Installing temporary baffles on those sides or top of furnace
opening if it is practical to do so where they will not interfere with
material handling or with the furnace door opening and closing;
(iv) Minimizing the time the furnace doors are open or the top is
off;
(v) Delaying gaseous reactive fluxing until charging doors are
closed and, for round top furnaces, until the top is on;
(vi) Agitating or stirring molten metal as soon as practicable after
salt flux addition and closing doors as soon as possible after solid
fluxing operations, including mixing and dross removal;
(vii) Keeping building doors and other openings closed to the
greatest extent possible to minimize drafts that would divert emissions
from being drawn into the furnace;
(viii) Maintaining burners on low-fire or pilot operation while the
doors are open or the top is off;
(ix) Use of fans or other device to direct flow into a furnace when
door is open; or
(x) Removing the furnace cover one time in order to add a smaller
but representative charge and then replacing the cover.
(f) Sweat furnace. Except as provided in Sec. 63.1505(f)(1), the
owner or operator must measure emissions of D/F from each sweat furnace
at the outlet of the control device.
(g) Dross-only furnace. The owner or operator must conduct a
performance test to measure emissions of PM from each dross-only furnace
at the outlet of each control device while the unit processes only dross
and salt flux as the sole feedstock.
(h) In-line fluxer. (1) The owner or operator of an in-line fluxer
that uses reactive flux materials must conduct a performance test to
measure emissions of HCl and PM or otherwise demonstrate compliance in
accordance with paragraph (h)(2) of this section. If the in-line fluxer
is equipped with an add-on control device, the emissions must be
measured at the outlet of the control device.
(2) The owner or operator may choose to limit the rate at which
reactive flux is added to an in-line fluxer and assume, for the purposes
of demonstrating compliance with the SAPU emission limit, that all
chlorine in the reactive flux added to the in-line fluxer is emitted as
HCl. Under these circumstances, the owner or operator is not required to
conduct an emission test for HCl. If the owner or operator of any in-
line flux box that has no ventilation ductwork manifolded to any outlet
or emission control device chooses to demonstrate compliance with the
emission limits for HCl by limiting use of reactive flux and assuming
that all chlorine in the flux is
[[Page 86]]
emitted as HCl, compliance with the HCl limit shall also constitute
compliance with the emission limit for PM and no separate emission test
for PM is required. In this case, the owner or operator of the unvented
in-line flux box must use the maximum permissible PM emission rate for
the in-line flux boxes when determining the total emissions for any SAPU
which includes the flux box.
(i) Rotary dross cooler. The owner or operator must conduct a
performance test to measure PM emissions at the outlet of the control
device.
(j) Secondary aluminum processing unit. The owner or operator must
conduct performance tests as described in paragraphs (j)(1) through (3)
of this section. The results of the performance tests are used to
establish emission rates in lb/ton of feed/charge for PM, HCl and HF and
[micro]g TEQ/Mg of feed/charge for D/F emissions from each emission
unit. These emission rates are used for compliance monitoring in the
calculation of the 3-day, 24-hour rolling average emission rates using
the equation in Sec. 63.1510(t). A performance test is required for:
(1) Each group 1 furnace processing only clean charge to measure
emissions of PM and either:
(i) Emissions of HF and HCl (for determining the emission limit); or
(ii) The mass flow rate of HCl at the inlet to and outlet from the
control device (for the percent reduction standard).
(2) Each group 1 furnace that processes scrap other than clean
charge to measure emissions of PM and D/F and either:
(i) Emissions of HF and HCl (for determining the emission limit); or
(ii) The mass flow rate of HCl at the inlet to and outlet from the
control device (for the percent reduction standard).
(3) Each in-line fluxer to measure emissions of PM and HCl.
(k) Feed/charge weight measurement. During the emission test(s)
conducted to determine compliance with emission limits in a kg/Mg (lb/
ton) format, the owner or operator of an affected source or emission
unit, subject to an emission limit in a kg/Mg (lb/ton) of feed/charge
format, must measure (or otherwise determine) and record the total
weight of feed/charge to the affected source or emission unit for each
of the three test runs and calculate and record the total weight. An
owner or operator that chooses to demonstrate compliance on the basis of
the aluminum production weight must measure the weight of aluminum
produced by the emission unit or affected source instead of the feed/
charge weight.
(l) Continuous opacity monitoring system. The owner or operator of
an affected source or emission unit using a continuous opacity
monitoring system must conduct a performance evaluation to demonstrate
compliance with Performance Specification 1 in appendix B to 40 CFR part
60. Following the performance evaluation, the owner or operator must
measure and record the opacity of emissions from each exhaust stack for
all consecutive 6-minute periods during the PM emission test.
(m) Afterburner. These requirements apply to the owner or operator
of an affected source using an afterburner to comply with the
requirements of this subpart.
(1) Prior to the initial performance test, the owner or operator
must conduct a performance evaluation for the temperature monitoring
device according to the requirements of Sec. 63.8.
(2) The owner or operator must use these procedures to establish an
operating parameter value or range for the afterburner operating
temperature.
(i) Continuously measure and record the operating temperature of
each afterburner every 15 minutes during the THC and D/F performance
tests;
(ii) Determine and record the 15-minute block average temperatures
for the three test runs; and
(iii) Determine and record the 3-hour block average temperature
measurements for the 3 test runs.
(n) Inlet gas temperature. The owner or operator of a scrap dryer/
delacquering kiln/decoating kiln or a group 1 furnace using a lime-
injected fabric filter must use these procedures to establish an
operating parameter value or range for the inlet gas temperature.
(1) Continuously measure and record the temperature at the inlet to
the
[[Page 87]]
lime-injected fabric filter every 15 minutes during the HCl and D/F
performance tests;
(2) Determine and record the 15-minute block average temperatures
for the 3 test runs; and
(3) Determine and record the 3-hour block average of the recorded
temperature measurements for the 3 test runs.
(o) Flux injection rate. The owner or operator must use these
procedures to establish an operating parameter value or range for the
total reactive chlorine flux injection rate and, for uncontrolled
furnaces, the total reactive fluorine flux injection rate.
(1) Continuously measure and record the weight of gaseous or liquid
reactive flux injected for each 15 minute period during the HCl, HF and
D/F tests, determine and record the 15-minute block average weights, and
calculate and record the total weight of the gaseous or liquid reactive
flux for the 3 test runs;
(2) Record the identity, composition, and total weight of each
addition of solid reactive flux for the 3 test runs;
(3) Determine the total reactive chlorine flux injection rate and,
for uncontrolled furnaces, the total reactive fluorine flux injection
rate by adding the recorded measurement of the total weight of chlorine
and, for uncontrolled furnaces, fluorine in the gaseous or liquid
reactive flux injected and the total weight of chlorine and, for
uncontrolled furnaces, fluorine in the solid reactive flux using
Equation 5:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18SE15.011
Where:
Wt = Total chlorine or fluorine usage, by weight;
F1 = Fraction of gaseous or liquid flux that is chlorine or
fluorine;
W1 = Weight of reactive flux gas injected;
F2 = Fraction of solid reactive chloride flux that is
chlorine (e.g., F = 0.75 for magnesium chloride) or fraction
of solid reactive fluoride flux that is fluorine (e.g., F =
0.33 for potassium fluoride); and
W2 = Weight of solid reactive flux;
(4) Divide the weight of total chlorine or fluorine usage
(Wt) for the 3 test runs by the recorded measurement of the
total weight of feed for the 3 test runs; and
(5) If a solid reactive flux other than magnesium chloride or
potassium fluoride is used, the owner or operator must derive the
appropriate proportion factor subject to approval by the permitting
authority for major sources, or the Administrator for area sources.
(p) Lime injection. The owner or operator of an affected source or
emission unit using a lime-injected fabric filter system must use these
procedures during the HCl and D/F tests to establish an operating
parameter value for the feeder setting for each operating cycle or time
period used in the performance test.
(1) For continuous lime injection systems, ensure that lime in the
feed hopper or silo is free-flowing at all times; and
(2) Record the feeder setting and lime injection rate for the 3 test
runs. If the feed rate setting and lime injection rates vary between the
runs, determine and record the average feed rate and lime injection rate
from the 3 runs.
(q) Bag leak detection system. The owner or operator of an affected
source or emission unit using a bag leak detection system must submit
the information described in Sec. 63.1515(b)(6) as part of the
notification of compliance status report to document conformance with
the specifications and requirements in Sec. 63.1510(f).
(r) Labeling. The owner or operator of each scrap dryer/delacquering
kiln/decoating kiln, group 1 furnace, group 2 furnace and in-line fluxer
must submit the information described in Sec. 63.1515(b)(3) as part of
the notification of compliance status report to document conformance
with the operational standard in Sec. 63.1506(b).
(s) Capture/collection system. The owner or operator of a new or
existing affected source or emission unit with an add-on control device
must submit the information described in
[[Page 88]]
Sec. 63.1515(b)(2) as part of the notification of compliance status
report to document conformance with the operational standard in Sec.
63.1506(c).
[65 FR 15710, Mar. 23, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 79817, Dec. 30, 2002;
69 FR 53984, Sept. 3, 2004; 80 FR 56746, Sept. 18, 2015; 81 FR 38087,
June 13, 2016]
Sec. 63.1513 Equations for determining compliance.
(a) THC emission limit. Use Equation 6 to determine compliance with
an emission limit for THC:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR23MR00.004
Where,
E = Emission rate of measured pollutant, kg/Mg (lb/ton) of feed;
C = Measured volume fraction of pollutant, ppmv;
MW = Molecular weight of measured pollutant, g/g-mole (lb/lb-mole): THC
(as propane) = 44.11;
Q = Volumetric flow rate of exhaust gases, dscm/hr (dscf/hr);
K1 = Conversion factor, 1 kg/1,000 g (1 lb/lb);
K2 = Conversion factor, 1,000 L/m\3\ (1 ft\3\/ft\3\);
Mv = Molar volume, 24.45 L/g-mole (385.3 ft\3\/lb-mole); and
P = Production rate, Mg/hr (ton/hr).
(b) PM, HCl, HF and D/F emission limits. (1) Use Equation 7 of this
section to determine compliance with an emission limit for PM, HCl or
HF:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18SE15.012
Where:
E = Emission rate of PM, HCl or HF, in kg/Mg (lb/ton) of feed;
C = Concentration of PM, HCl or HF, in g/dscm (gr/dscf);
Q = Volumetric flow rate of exhaust gases, in dscm/hr (dscf/hr);
K1 = Conversion factor, 1 kg/1,000 g (1 lb/7,000 gr); and
P = Production rate, in Mg/hr (ton/hr).
(2) Use Equation 7A of this section to determine compliance with an
emission limit for D/F:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR03SE04.019
Where:
E = Emission rate of D/F, [micro]g/Mg (gr/ton) of feed;
C = Concentration of D/F, [micro]g/dscm (gr/dscf);
Q = Volumetric flow rate of exhaust gases, dscm/hr (dscf/hr); and
P = Production rate, Mg/hr (ton/hr).
(c) HCl percent reduction standard. Use Equation 8 to determine
compliance with an HCl percent reduction standard:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR23MR00.006
Where,
%R = Percent reduction of the control device;
Li = Inlet loading of pollutant, kg/Mg (lb/ton); and
Lo = Outlet loading of pollutant, kg/Mg (lb/ton).
(d) Conversion of D/F measurements to TEQ units. To convert D/F
measurements to TEQ units, the owner or operator must use the procedures
and equations in Interim Procedures for Estimating Risks Associated with
Exposures to Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and -
Dibenzofurans (CDDs and CDFs) and 1989 Update, incorporated by reference
see Sec. 63.14.
(e) Secondary aluminum processing unit. Use the procedures in
paragraphs (e)(1), (2), and (3) or the procedure in paragraph (e)(4) of
this section to determine compliance with emission limits for a
secondary aluminum processing unit.
(1) Use Equation 9 to compute the mass-weighted PM emissions for a
secondary aluminum processing unit. Compliance is achieved if the mass-
weighted emissions for the secondary aluminum processing unit
(EcPM) is less than or equal to the emission limit for the
secondary aluminum processing unit (LcPM) calculated using
Equation 1 in Sec. 63.1505(k).
[[Page 89]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18SE15.013
Where:
EcPM = The mass-weighted PM emissions for the secondary
aluminum processing unit;
EtiPM = Measured PM emissions for individual emission unit,
or group of co-controlled emission units, i;
Tti = The average feed rate for individual emission unit i
during the operating cycle or performance test period, or the
sum of the average feed rates for all emission units in the
group of co-controlled emission units i; and
n = The number of emission units, and groups of co-controlled emission
units in the secondary aluminum processing unit.
(2) Use Equation 10 to compute the aluminum mass-weighted HCl or HF
emissions for the secondary aluminum processing unit. Compliance is
achieved if the mass-weighted emissions for the secondary aluminum
processing unit (EcHCl/HF) is less than or equal to the
emission limit for the secondary aluminum processing unit
(LcHCl/HF) calculated using Equation 2 in Sec. 63.1505(k).
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18SE15.014
Where:
EcHCl/HF = The mass-weighted HCl or HF emissions for the
secondary aluminum processing unit; and
EtiHCl/HF = Measured HCl or HF emissions for individual
emission unit, or group of co-controlled emission units i.
(3) Use Equation 11 to compute the aluminum mass-weighted D/F
emissions for the secondary aluminum processing unit. Compliance is
achieved if the mass-weighted emissions for the secondary aluminum
processing unit is less than or equal to the emission limit for the
secondary aluminum processing unit (LcD/F) calculated using
Equation 3 in Sec. 63.1505(k).
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18SE15.015
Where:
EcD/F = The mass-weighted D/F emissions for the secondary
aluminum processing unit; and
EtiD/F = Measured D/F emissions for individual emission unit,
or group of co-controlled emission units i.
(4) As an alternative to using the equations in paragraphs (e)(1),
(2), and
[[Page 90]]
(3) of this section, the owner or operator may demonstrate compliance
for a secondary aluminum processing unit by demonstrating that each
existing group 1 furnace is in compliance with the emission limits for a
new group 1 furnace in Sec. 63.1505(i) and that each existing in-line
fluxer is in compliance with the emission limits for a new in-line
fluxer in Sec. 63.1505(j).
(f) Periods of startup and shutdown. For a new or existing affected
source, or a new or existing emission unit subject to an emissions limit
in paragraphs Sec. 63.1505(b) through (j) expressed in units of pounds
per ton of feed/charge, or [micro]g TEQ or ng TEQ per Mg of feed/charge,
demonstrate compliance during periods of startup and shutdown in
accordance with paragraph (f)(1) of this section or determine your
emissions per unit of feed/charge during periods of startup and shutdown
in accordance with paragraph (f)(2) of this section. Startup and
shutdown emissions for group 1 furnaces and in-line fluxers must be
calculated individually, and not on the basis of a SAPU. Periods of
startup and shutdown are excluded from the calculation of SAPU emission
limits in Sec. 63.1505(k), the SAPU monitoring requirements in Sec.
63.1510(t) and the SAPU emissions calculations in Sec. 63.1513(e).
(1) For periods of startup and shutdown, records establishing a
feed/charge rate of zero, a flux rate of zero, and that the affected
source or emission unit was either heated with electricity, propane or
natural gas as the sole sources of heat or was not heated, may be used
to demonstrate compliance with the emission limit, or
(2) For periods of startup and shutdown, divide your measured
emissions in lb/hr or [micro]g/hr or ng/hr by the feed/charge rate in
tons/hr or Mg/hr from your most recent performance test associated with
a production rate greater than zero, or the rated capacity of the
affected source if no prior performance test data are available.
[65 FR 15710, Mar. 23, 2000, as amended at 69 FR 53984, Sept. 3, 2004;
80 FR 56748, Sept. 18, 2015; 81 FR 38088, June 13, 2016]
Sec. 63.1514 Change of furnace classification.
The requirements of this section are in addition to the other
requirements of this subpart that apply to group 1 and group 2 furnaces.
(a) Changing from a group 1 controlled furnace processing other than
clean charge to group 1 uncontrolled furnace processing other than clean
charge. An owner or operator wishing to change operating modes must
conduct performance tests in accordance with Sec. Sec. 63.1511 and
63.1512 to demonstrate to the permitting authority for major sources, or
the Administrator for area sources that compliance can be achieved under
both modes. Operating parameters relevant to each mode of operation must
be established during the performance test.
(1) Operators of major sources must conduct performance tests for
PM, HCl and D/F, according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512(d) with
the capture system and control device operating normally if compliance
has not been previously demonstrated in this operating mode. Performance
tests must be repeated at least once every 5 years to demonstrate
compliance for each operating mode.
(i) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted in accordance
with Sec. 63.1511(b)(1) in the controlled mode.
(ii) Operating parameters must be established during these tests, as
required by Sec. 63.1511(g).
(iii) The emission factors for this mode of operation for use in the
demonstration of compliance with the emission limits for SAPUs specified
in Sec. 63.1505(k) must be determined.
(2) Operators of major sources must conduct performance tests for
PM, HCl, HF and D/F, according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512(e)
without operating a control device if compliance has not been previously
demonstrated for this operating mode. Performance tests must be repeated
at least once every 5 years to demonstrate compliance for each operating
mode.
(i) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted in accordance
with Sec. 63.1511(b)(1) in the uncontrolled mode.
(ii) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted with furnace
emissions captured in accordance with the
[[Page 91]]
provisions of Sec. 63.1506(c) and directed to the stack or vent tested.
(iii) Operating parameters representing uncontrolled operation must
be established during these tests, as required by Sec. 63.1511(g). For
furnaces in batch (cyclic) operation, the number of tap-to-tap cycles
(including zero, if none) elapsed using the feed/charge type, feed/
charge rate and flux rate must be established as a parameter to be met
before changing to uncontrolled mode. For furnaces in continuous (non-
cyclic) operation, the time period elapsed (including no time, if none)
using the feed/charge type, feed/charge rate and flux rate must be
established as a parameter to be met before changing to uncontrolled
mode.
(iv) The emission factors for this mode of operation for use in the
demonstration of compliance with the emission limits for SAPUs specified
in Sec. 63.1505(k) must be determined.
(3) Operators of area sources must conduct performance tests for D/
F, according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512(d) with the capture
system and control device operating normally, if compliance has not been
previously demonstrated for this operating mode.
(i) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted in accordance
with Sec. 63.1511(b)(1) in the controlled mode.
(ii) Operating parameters must be established during these tests, as
required by Sec. 63.1511(g).
(iii) The D/F emission factor for this mode of operation for use in
the demonstration of compliance with the emission limits for SAPUs
specified in Sec. 63.1505(k) must be determined.
(4) Operators of area sources must conduct performance tests for D/
F, according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512(e) without operating a
control device, if compliance has not been previously demonstrated for
this operating mode.
(i) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted in accordance
with Sec. 63.1511(b)(1).
(ii) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted with furnace
emissions captured in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 63.1506(c)
and directed to the stack or vent tested.
(iii) Operating parameters representing uncontrolled operation must
be established during these tests, as required by Sec. 63.1511(g). For
furnaces in batch (cyclic) operation, the number of tap-to-tap cycles
(including zero, if none) elapsed using the feed/charge type, feed/
charge rate and flux rate must be established as a parameter to be met
before changing to uncontrolled mode. For furnaces in continuous (non-
cyclic) operation, the time period elapsed (including no time, if none)
using the feed/charge type, feed/charge rate and flux rate must be
established as a parameter to be met before changing to uncontrolled
mode.
(iv) The D/F emission factor for this mode of operation for use in
the demonstration of compliance with the emission limits for SAPUs
specified in Sec. 63.1505(k) must be determined.
(5) To change modes of operation from uncontrolled to controlled,
the owner or operator must perform the following, before charging scrap
to the furnace that exceeds the contaminant level established for
uncontrolled mode:
(i) Change the label on the furnace to reflect controlled operation;
(ii) Direct the furnace emissions to the control device;
(iii) Turn on the control device and begin lime addition to the
control device at the rate established for controlled mode; and
(iv) Ensure the control device is operating properly.
(6) To change modes of operation from controlled to uncontrolled,
the owner or operator must perform the following, before turning off or
bypassing the control device:
(i) Change the label on the furnace to reflect uncontrolled
operation;
(ii) Charge scrap with a level of contamination no greater than that
used in the performance test for uncontrolled furnaces for the number of
tap-to-tap cycles that elapsed (or, for continuously operated furnaces,
the time elapsed) before the uncontrolled mode performance test was
conducted; and
(iii) Decrease the flux addition rate to no higher than the flux
addition rate used in the uncontrolled mode performance test.
(7) In addition to the recordkeeping requirements of Sec. 63.1517,
the owner or operator must maintain records of the nature of each mode
change (controlled
[[Page 92]]
to uncontrolled, or uncontrolled to controlled), the time the change is
initiated, and the time the exhaust gas is diverted from control device
to bypass or bypass to control device.
(b) Changing from a group 1 controlled furnace processing other than
clean charge to a group 1 uncontrolled furnace processing clean charge.
An owner or operator wishing to change operating modes must conduct
performance tests in accordance with Sec. Sec. 63.1511 and 63.1512 to
demonstrate to the permitting authority for major sources, or the
Administrator for area sources that compliance can be achieved in both
modes. Operating parameters relevant to each mode of operation must be
established during the performance test.
(1) Operators of major sources must conduct performance tests for
PM, HCl and D/F, according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512(d) with
the capture system and control device operating normally if compliance
has not been previously demonstrated in this operating mode. Performance
tests must be repeated at least once every 5 years to demonstrate
compliance for each operating mode.
(i) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted in accordance
with Sec. 63.1511(b)(1) in the controlled mode.
(ii) Operating parameters must be established during these tests, as
required by Sec. 63.1511(g).
(iii) The emission factors for this mode of operation for use in the
demonstration of compliance with the emission limits for SAPUs specified
in Sec. 63.1505(k) must be determined.
(2) Operators of major sources must conduct performance tests for
PM, HCl, HF and D/F, according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512(e)
without operating a control device if compliance has not been previously
demonstrated for this operating mode. Performance tests must be repeated
at least once every 5 years to demonstrate compliance for each operating
mode.
(i) Testing under this paragraph may be conducted at any time after
operation with clean charge has commenced.
(ii) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted with furnace
emissions captured in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 63.1506(c)
and directed to the stack or vent tested.
(iii) Operating parameters representing uncontrolled operation must
be established during these tests, as required by Sec. 63.1511(g). For
furnaces in batch (cyclic) operation, the number of tap-to-tap cycles
(including zero, if none) elapsed using the feed/charge type, feed/
charge rate and flux rate must be established as a parameter to be met
before changing to uncontrolled mode. For furnaces in continuous (non-
cyclic) operation, the time period elapsed (including no time if none)
using the feed/charge type, feed/charge rate and flux rate must be
established as a parameter to be met before changing to uncontrolled
mode.
(iv) Emissions of D/F during this test must not exceed 1.5 [micro]g
TEQ/Mg of feed/charge.
(v) The emission factors for this mode of operation for use in the
demonstration of compliance with the emission limits for SAPUs specified
in Sec. 63.1505(k), must be determined.
(3) Operators of area sources must conduct performance tests for D/
F, according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512(d) with the capture
system and control device operating normally, if compliance has not been
previously demonstrated for this operating mode.
(i) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted in accordance
with Sec. 63.1511(b)(1).
(ii) Operating parameters must be established during these tests, as
required by Sec. 63.1511(g).
(iii) The D/F emission factor for this mode of operation for use in
the demonstration of compliance with the emission limits for SAPUs
specified in Sec. 63.1505(k) must be determined.
(4) Operators of area sources must conduct performance tests for D/
F, according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512(e) without operating a
control device if compliance has not been previously demonstrated for
this operating mode.
(i) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted at any time after
operation with clean charge has commenced and must be conducted in
accordance with Sec. 63.1511(b)(1) and under representative conditions
expected to produce the highest level of D/F in the uncontrolled mode.
[[Page 93]]
(ii) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted with furnace
emissions captured in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 63.1506(c)
and directed to the stack or vent tested.
(iii) Operating parameters representing uncontrolled operation must
be established during these tests, as required by Sec. 63.1511(g). For
furnaces in batch (cyclic) operation, the number of tap-to-tap cycles
elapsed (including zero, if none) using the feed/charge type, feed/
charge rate and flux rate must be established as a parameter to be met
before changing to uncontrolled mode. For furnaces in continuous (non-
cyclic) operation, the time period elapsed (including no time, if none)
using the feed/charge type, feed/charge rate and flux rate must be
established as a parameter to be met before changing to uncontrolled
mode.
(iv) Emissions of D/F during this test must not exceed 1.5 [micro]g
TEQ/Mg of feed/charge.
(5) To change modes of operation from uncontrolled to controlled,
the owner or operator must perform the following, before charging scrap
to the furnace that exceeds the contaminant level established for
uncontrolled mode:
(i) Change the label on the furnace to reflect controlled operation;
(ii) Direct the furnace emissions to the control device;
(iii) Turn on the control device and begin lime addition to the
control device at the rate established for controlled mode; and
(iv) Ensure the control device is operating properly.
(6) To change modes of operation from controlled to uncontrolled,
the owner or operator must perform the following, before turning off or
bypassing the control device:
(i) Change the label on the furnace to reflect uncontrolled
operation;
(ii) Charge clean charge for the number of tap-to-tap cycles that
elapsed (or, for continuously operated furnaces, the time elapsed)
before the uncontrolled mode performance test was conducted; and
(iii) Decrease the flux addition rate to no higher than the flux
addition rate used in the uncontrolled mode performance test.
(7) In addition to the recordkeeping requirements of Sec. 63.1517,
the owner or operator must maintain records of the nature of each mode
change (controlled to uncontrolled, or uncontrolled to controlled), the
time the furnace operating mode change is initiated, and the time the
exhaust gas is diverted from control device to bypass or from bypass to
control device.
(c) Changing from a group 1 controlled or uncontrolled furnace to a
group 2 furnace. An owner or operator wishing to change operating modes
must conduct performance tests in accordance with Sec. Sec. 63.1511 and
63.1512 to demonstrate to the permitting authority for major sources, or
the Administrator for area sources that compliance can be achieved under
both modes and establish the number of cycles (or time) of operation
with clean charge and no reactive flux addition necessary before
changing to group 2 mode. Operating parameters relevant to group 1
operation must be established during the performance test.
(1) Operators of major sources must conduct performance tests for
PM, HCl and D/F (and HF for uncontrolled group 1 furnaces) according to
the procedures in Sec. 63.1512 if compliance has not been previously
demonstrated for the operating mode. Controlled group 1 furnaces must
conduct performance tests according to the procedures in Sec.
63.1512(d) with the capture system and control device operating
normally. Uncontrolled group 1 furnaces must conduct performance tests
according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512(e) without operating a
control device. Performance tests must be repeated at least once every 5
years to demonstrate compliance for each operating mode.
(i) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted in accordance
with Sec. 63.1511(b)(1) in both modes.
(ii) Operating parameters must be established during these tests, as
required by Sec. 63.1511(g).
(iii) The emission factors for this mode of operation for use in the
demonstration of compliance with the emission limits for SAPUs specified
in Sec. 63.1505(k) must be determined.
(2) While in compliance with the operating requirements of Sec.
63.1506(o) for group 2 furnaces, operators of major
[[Page 94]]
sources must conduct performance tests for PM, HCl, HF and D/F,
according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512(e) without operating a
control device if compliance has not been previously demonstrated for
this operating mode. Performance tests must be repeated at least once
every 5 years to demonstrate compliance for each operating mode.
(i) Testing under this paragraph may be conducted at any time after
the furnace has commenced operation with clean charge and without
reactive flux addition.
(ii) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted with furnace
emissions captured in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 63.1506(c)
and directed to the stack or vent tested.
(iii) Owners or operators must demonstrate that emissions are no
greater than:
(A) 1.5 [micro]g D/F (TEQ) per Mg of feed/charge;
(B) 0.040 lb HCl or HF per ton of feed/charge; and
(C) 0.040 lb PM per ton of feed/charge.
(iv) The number of tap-to-tap cycles, or time elapsed between
starting operation with clean charge and no reactive flux addition and
the group 2 furnace performance test must be established as an operating
parameter to be met before changing to group 2 mode.
(3) Operators of area sources must conduct a performance tests for
D/F, according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512 if compliance has not
been previously demonstrated for the operating mode. Controlled group 1
furnaces must conduct performance tests according to the procedures in
Sec. 63.1512(d) with the capture system and control device operating
normally. Uncontrolled group 1 furnaces must conduct performance tests
according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512(e) without operating a
control device.
(i) The performance tests must be conducted in accordance with Sec.
63.1511(b)(1) under representative conditions expected to produce the
highest expected level of D/F in the group 1 mode.
(ii) Operating parameters must be established during these tests, as
required by Sec. 63.1511(g).
(iii) The D/F emission factor for this mode of operation, for use in
the demonstration of compliance with the emission limits for SAPUs
specified in Sec. 63.1505(k) must be determined.
(4) While in compliance with the operating requirements of Sec.
63.1506(o) for group 2 furnaces, operators of area sources must conduct
performance tests for D/F, according to the procedures in Sec.
63.1512(e) without operating a control device if compliance has not been
previously demonstrated for this operating mode.
(i) Testing under this paragraph may be conducted at any time after
the furnace has commenced operation with clean charge, and without
reactive flux addition.
(ii) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted with furnace
emissions captured in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 63.1506(c)
and directed to the stack or vent tested.
(iii) Owners or operators must demonstrate that emissions are no
greater than 1.5 [micro]g D/F (TEQ) per Mg of feed/charge.
(iv) The number of tap-to-tap cycles, or time elapsed between
starting operation with clean charge and no reactive flux and the group
2 furnace performance tests must be established as an operating
parameter to be met before changing to group 2 mode.
(5) To change modes of operation from a group 2 furnace to a group 1
furnace, the owner or operator must perform the following before adding
other than clean charge and before adding reactive flux to the furnace:
(i) Change the label on the furnace to reflect group 1 operation;
(ii) Direct the furnace emissions to the control device, if it is
equipped with a control device;
(iii) If the furnace is equipped with a control device, turn on the
control device and begin lime addition to the control device at the rate
established for group 1 mode; and
(iv) Ensure the control device is operating properly.
(6) To change mode of operation from a group 1 furnace to group 2
furnace, the owner or operator must perform the following, before
turning off or bypassing the control device:
(i) Change the label on the furnace to reflect group 2 operation;
[[Page 95]]
(ii) Charge clean charge for the number of tap-to-tap cycles that
elapsed (or, for continuously operated furnaces, the time elapsed)
before the group 2 performance test was conducted; and,
(iii) Use no reactive flux.
(7) In addition to the recordkeeping requirements of Sec. 63.1517,
the owner or operator must maintain records of the nature of each mode
change (controlled or uncontrolled to group 2), the time the change is
initiated, and the time the exhaust gas is diverted from control device
to bypass or from bypass to control device.
(d) Changing from a group 1 controlled or uncontrolled furnace to
group 2 furnace, for tilting reverberatory furnaces capable of
completely removing furnace contents between batches. An owner or
operator of a tilting reverberatory furnace capable of completely
removing furnace contents between batches who wishes to change operating
modes must conduct performance tests in accordance with Sec. Sec.
63.1511 and 63.1512 to demonstrate to the permitting authority for major
sources, or the Administrator for area sources that compliance can be
achieved under group 1 modes. Operating parameters relevant to group 1
operation must be established during the performance test.
(1) Operators of major sources must conduct performance tests for
PM, HCl, and D/F (and HF for uncontrolled furnaces) according to the
procedures in Sec. 63.1512 if compliance has not been previously
demonstrated for this operating mode. Controlled group 1 furnaces must
conduct performance tests with the capture system and control device
operating normally if compliance has not been previously demonstrated
for the operating mode. Controlled group 1 furnaces must conduct
performance tests according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512(d) with
the capture system and control device operating normally. Uncontrolled
group 1 furnaces must conduct performance tests according to the
procedures in Sec. 63.1512(e) without operating a control device.
Performance tests must be repeated at least once every 5 years to
demonstrate compliance for each operating mode.
(i) Testing under this paragraph must be conducted in accordance
with Sec. 63.1511(b)(1) in both modes.
(ii) Operating parameters must be established during these tests, as
required by Sec. 63.1511(g).
(iii) The emission factors for this mode of operation for use in the
demonstration of compliance with the emission limits for SAPUs specified
in Sec. 63.1505(k), must be determined.
(2) Operators of area sources must conduct performance tests for D/F
according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512 if compliance has not been
previously demonstrated for this operating mode. Controlled group 1
furnaces must conduct performance tests according to the procedures in
Sec. 63.1512(d) with the capture system and control device operating
normally. Uncontrolled group 1 furnaces must conduct performance tests
according to the procedures in Sec. 63.1512(e) without operating a
control device.
(i) The performance test must be conducted in accordance with Sec.
63.1511(b)(1) under representative conditions expected to produce the
highest expected level of D/F in the group 1 mode.
(ii) Operating parameters must be established during these tests, as
required by Sec. 63.1511(g).
(iii) The D/F emission factor for this mode of operation for use in
the demonstration of compliance with the emission limits for SAPUs
specified in Sec. 63.1505(k) must be determined.
(3) To change modes of operation from a group 1 furnace to a group 2
furnace, the owner or operator must perform the following before turning
off or bypassing the control device:
(i) Completely remove all aluminum from the furnace;
(ii) Change the label on the furnace to reflect group 2 operation;
(iii) Use only clean charge; and
(iv) Use no reactive flux.
(4) To change modes of operation from a group 2 furnace to a group 1
furnace, the owner or operator must perform the following before adding
other than clean charge and before adding reactive flux to the furnace:
(i) Change the label on the furnace to reflect group 1 operation;
[[Page 96]]
(ii) Direct the furnace emissions to the control device, if it is
equipped with a control device;,
(iii) If the furnace is equipped with a control device, turn on the
control device and begin lime addition to the control device at the rate
established for group 1 mode; and
(iv) Ensure the control device is operating properly.
(5) In addition to the recordkeeping requirements of Sec. 63.1517,
the owner or operator must maintain records of the nature of each mode
change (group 1 to group 2, or group 2 to group 1), the time the furnace
operating mode change is initiated, and, if the furnace is equipped with
a control device, the time the exhaust gas is diverted from control
device to bypass or from bypass to control device.
(e) Limit on frequency of changing furnace operating mode. (1) A
change in furnace operating mode, which consists of changing from one
furnace operating mode to another and subsequently back to the initial
operating mode, as provided in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this
section, may not be done more frequently than 4 times in any 6-month
period unless you receive approval from the permitting authority or
Administrator for additional changes pursuant to paragraph (e)(2).
(2) If additional changes are needed, the owner or operator must
apply in advance to the permitting authority, for major sources, or the
Administrator, for area sources, for approval of the additional changes
in operating mode.
[80 FR 56749, Sept. 18, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 38088, June 13, 2016]
Notifications, Reports, And Records
Sec. 63.1515 Notifications.
(a) Initial notifications. The owner or operator must submit initial
notifications to the permitting authority for major sources, or the
Administrator for area sources as described in paragraphs (a)(1) through
(7) of this section.
(1) As required by Sec. 63.9(b)(1), the owner or operator must
provide notification for an area source that subsequently increases its
emissions such that the source is a major source subject to the
standard.
(2) As required by Sec. 63.9(b)(3), the owner or operator of a new
or reconstructed affected source, or a source that has been
reconstructed such that it is an affected source, that has an initial
startup after the effective date of this subpart and for which an
application for approval of construction or reconstruction is not
required under Sec. 63.5(d), must provide notification that the source
is subject to the standard.
(3) As required by Sec. 63.9(b)(4), the owner or operator of a new
or reconstructed major affected source that has an initial startup after
the effective date of this subpart and for which an application for
approval of construction or reconstruction is required by Sec. 63.5(d)
must provide the following notifications:
(i) Intention to construct a new major affected source, reconstruct
a major source, or reconstruct a major source such that the source
becomes a major affected source;
(ii) Date when construction or reconstruction was commenced
(submitted simultaneously with the application for approval of
construction or reconstruction if construction or reconstruction was
commenced before the effective date of this subpart, or no later than 30
days after the date construction or reconstruction commenced if
construction or reconstruction commenced after the effective date of
this subpart);
(iii) Anticipated date of startup; and
(iv) Actual date of startup.
(4) As required by Sec. 63.9(b)(5), after the effective date of
this subpart, an owner or operator who intends to construct a new
affected source or reconstruct an affected source subject to this
subpart, or reconstruct a source such that it becomes an affected source
subject to this subpart, must provide notification of the intended
construction or reconstruction. The notification must include all the
information required for an application for approval of construction or
reconstruction as required by Sec. 63.5(d). For major sources, the
application for approval of construction or reconstruction may be used
to fulfill these requirements.
(i) The application must be submitted as soon as practicable before
the construction or reconstruction is
[[Page 97]]
planned to commence (but no sooner than the effective date) if the
construction or reconstruction commences after the effective date of
this subpart; or
(ii) The application must be submitted as soon as practicable before
startup but no later than 90 days after the effective date of this
subpart if the construction or reconstruction had commenced and initial
startup had not occurred before the effective date.
(5) As required by Sec. 63.9(d), the owner or operator must provide
notification of any special compliance obligations for a new source.
(6) As required by Sec. 63.9(e) and (f), the owner or operator must
provide notification of the anticipated date for conducting performance
tests and visible emission observations. The owner or operator must
notify the Administrator of the intent to conduct a performance test at
least 60 days before the performance test is scheduled; notification of
opacity or visible emission observations for a performance test must be
provided at least 30 days before the observations are scheduled to take
place.
(7) As required by Sec. 63.9(g), the owner or operator must provide
additional notifications for sources with continuous emission monitoring
systems or continuous opacity monitoring systems.
(b) Notification of compliance status report. Each owner or operator
of an existing affected source must submit a notification of compliance
status report within 60 days after the compliance date established by
Sec. 63.1501. Each owner or operator of a new affected source must
submit a notification of compliance status report within 90 days after
conducting the initial performance test required by Sec. 63.1511(b), or
within 90 days after the compliance date established by Sec. 63.1501 if
no initial performance test is required. The notification must be signed
by the responsible official who must certify its accuracy. A complete
notification of compliance status report must include the information
specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (10) of this section. The
required information may be submitted in an operating permit
application, in an amendment to an operating permit application, in a
separate submittal, or in any combination. In a State with an approved
operating permit program where delegation of authority under section
112(l) of the CAA has not been requested or approved, the owner or
operator must provide duplicate notification to the applicable Regional
Administrator. If an owner or operator submits the information specified
in this section at different times or in different submittals, later
submittals may refer to earlier submittals instead of duplicating and
resubmitting the information previously submitted. A complete
notification of compliance status report must include:
(1) All information required in Sec. 63.9(h). The owner or operator
must provide a complete performance test report for each affected source
and emission unit for which a performance test is required. A complete
performance test report includes all data, associated measurements, and
calculations (including visible emission and opacity tests).
(2) The approved site-specific test plan and performance evaluation
test results for each continuous monitoring system (including a
continuous emission or opacity monitoring system).
(3) Unit labeling as described in Sec. 63.1506(b), including
process type or furnace classification and operating requirements.
(4) The compliant operating parameter value or range established for
each affected source or emission unit with supporting documentation and
a description of the procedure used to establish the value (e.g., lime
injection rate, total reactive chlorine flux injection rate, total
reactive fluorine flux injection rate for uncontrolled group 1 furnaces,
afterburner operating temperature, fabric filter inlet temperature),
including the operating cycle or time period used in the performance
test.
(5) Design information and analysis, with supporting documentation,
demonstrating conformance with the requirements for capture/collection
systems in Sec. 63.1506(c).
(6) If applicable, analysis and supporting documentation
demonstrating conformance with EPA guidance and specifications for bag
leak detection systems in Sec. 63.1510(f).
[[Page 98]]
(7) Manufacturer's specification or analysis documenting the design
residence time of no less than 1 second for each afterburner used to
control emissions from a scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln
subject to alternative emission standards in Sec. 63.1505(e).
(8) Manufacturer's specification or analysis documenting the design
residence time of no less than 0.8 seconds and design operating
temperature of no less than 1,600 [deg]F for each afterburner used to
control emissions from a sweat furnace that is not subject to a
performance test.
(9) The OM&M plan (including site-specific monitoring plan for each
group 1 furnace with no add-on air pollution control device).
[65 FR 15710, Mar. 23, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 59793, Sept. 24, 2002;
67 FR 79818, Dec. 30, 2002; 80 FR 56752, Sept. 18, 2015; 81 FR 38088,
June 13, 2016]
Sec. 63.1516 Reports.
(a) [Reserved]
(b) Excess emissions/summary report. The owner or operator of a
major or area source must submit semiannual reports according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.10(e)(3). Except, the owner or operator must
submit the semiannual reports within 60 days after the end of each 6-
month period instead of within 30 days after the calendar half as
specified in Sec. 63.10(e)(3)(v). When no deviations of parameters have
occurred, the owner or operator must submit a report stating that no
excess emissions occurred during the reporting period.
(1) A report must be submitted if any of these conditions occur
during a 6-month reporting period:
(i) The corrective action specified in the OM&M plan for a bag leak
detection system alarm was not initiated within 1 hour.
(ii) The corrective action specified in the OM&M plan for a
continuous opacity monitoring deviation was not initiated within 1 hour.
(iii) The corrective action specified in the OM&M plan for visible
emissions from an aluminum scrap shredder was not initiated within 1
hour.
(iv) An excursion of a compliant process or operating parameter
value or range (e.g., lime injection rate or screw feeder setting, total
reactive chlorine flux injection rate, afterburner operating
temperature, fabric filter inlet temperature, definition of acceptable
scrap, or other approved operating parameter).
(v) [Reserved]
(vi) An affected source (including an emission unit in a secondary
aluminum processing unit) was not operated according to the requirements
of this subpart.
(vii) A deviation from the 3-day, 24-hour rolling average emission
limit for a secondary aluminum processing unit.
(2) Each report must include each of these certifications, as
applicable:
(i) For each thermal chip dryer: ``Only unpainted aluminum chips
were used as feedstock in any thermal chip dryer during this reporting
period.''
(ii) For each dross-only furnace: ``Only dross and salt flux were
used as the charge materials in any dross-only furnace during this
reporting period.''
(iii) For each sidewell group 1 furnace with add-on air pollution
control devices: ``Each furnace was operated such that the level of
molten metal remained above the top of the passage between the sidewell
and hearth during reactive fluxing, and reactive flux, except for cover
flux, was added only to the sidewell or to a furnace hearth equipped
with an add-on air pollution control device for PM, HCl, and D/F
emissions during this reporting period.''
(iv) For each group 1 melting/holding furnace without add-on air
pollution control devices and using pollution prevention measures that
processes only clean charge material: ``Each group 1 furnace without
add-on air pollution control devices subject to emission limits in Sec.
63.1505(i)(2) processed only clean charge during this reporting
period.''
(v) For each group 2 furnace: ``Only clean charge materials were
processed in any group 2 furnace during this reporting period, and no
fluxing was performed or all fluxing performed was conducted using only
nonreactive, non-HAP-containing/non-HAP-generating fluxing gases or
agents, except for cover fluxes, during this reporting period.''
[[Page 99]]
(vi) For each in-line fluxer using no reactive flux: ``Only
nonreactive, non-HAP-containing, non-HAP-generating flux gases, agents,
or materials were used at any time during this reporting period.''
(vii) For each affected source choosing to demonstrate compliance
during periods of startup and shutdown in accordance with Sec.
63.1513(f)(1): ``During each startup and shutdown, no flux and no feed/
charge were added to the emission unit, and electricity, propane or
natural gas were used as the sole source of heat or the emission unit
was not heated.''
(3) The owner or operator must submit the results of any performance
test conducted during the reporting period, including one complete
report documenting test methods and procedures, process operation, and
monitoring parameter ranges or values for each test method used for a
particular type of emission point tested.
(i) Within 60 days after the date of completing each performance
test (as defined in Sec. 63.2) required by this subpart, you must
submit the results of the performance tests, including any associated
fuel analyses, following the procedure specified in either paragraph
(b)(3)(i)(A) or (B) of this section.
(A) For data collected using test methods supported by the EPA's
Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) as listed on the EPA's ERT Web site
(https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ert/ert_info.html), you must submit the
results of the performance test to the EPA via the Compliance and
Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI). (CEDRI can be accessed
through the EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) (https://cdx.epa.gov/).)
Performance test data must be submitted in a file format generated
through the use of the EPA's ERT or an alternate electronic file format
consistent with the extensible markup language (XML) schema listed on
the EPA's ERT Web site. If you claim that some of the performance test
information being submitted is confidential business information (CBI),
you must submit a complete file generated through the use of the EPA's
ERT or an alternate electronic file consistent with the XML schema
listed on the EPA's ERT Web site, including information claimed to be
CBI, on a compact disc, flash drive, or other commonly used electronic
storage media to the EPA. The electronic media must be clearly marked as
CBI and mailed to U.S. EPA/OAQPS/CORE CBI Office, Attention: Group
Leader, Measurement Policy Group, MD C404-02, 4930 Old Page Rd., Durham,
NC 27703. The same ERT or alternate file with the CBI omitted must be
submitted to the EPA via the EPA's CDX as described earlier in this
paragraph.
(B) For data collected using test methods that are not supported by
the EPA's ERT as listed on the EPA's ERT Web site, you must submit the
results of the performance test to the Administrator at the appropriate
address listed in Sec. 63.13.
(ii) [Reserved]
(4) A malfunction report that is required under paragraph (d) of
this section shall be submitted simultaneously with the semiannual
excess emissions/summary report required by paragraph (b) of this
section.
(c) Annual compliance certifications. For the purpose of annual
certifications of compliance required by 40 CFR part 70 or 71, the owner
or operator of a major source subject to this subpart must certify
continuing compliance based upon, but not limited to, the following
conditions:
(1) Any period of excess emissions, as defined in paragraph (b)(1)
of this section, that occurred during the year were reported as required
by this subpart; and
(2) All monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements were
met during the year.
(d) If there was a malfunction during the reporting period, the
owner or operator must submit a report that includes the emission unit
ID, monitor ID, pollutant or parameter monitored, beginning date and
time of the event, end date and time of the event, cause of the
deviation or exceedance and corrective action taken for each malfunction
which occurred during the reporting period and which caused or may have
caused any applicable emission limitation to be exceeded. The report
must include a list of the affected source or equipment, an estimate of
[[Page 100]]
the quantity of each regulated pollutant emitted over any emission
limit, and a description of the method used to estimate the emissions,
including, but not limited to, product-loss calculations, mass balance
calculations, measurements when available, or engineering judgment based
on known process parameters. The report must also include a description
of actions taken by an owner or operator during a malfunction of an
affected source to minimize emissions in accordance with Sec.
63.1506(a)(5).
(e) All reports required by this subpart not subject to the
requirements in paragraph (b) of this section must be sent to the
Administrator at the appropriate address listed in Sec. 63.13. If
acceptable to both the Administrator and the owner or operator of a
source, these reports may be submitted on electronic media. The
Administrator retains the right to require submittal of reports subject
to paragraph (b) of this section in paper format.
[65 FR 15710, Mar. 23, 2000, as amended at 69 FR 53984, Sept. 3, 2004;
71 FR 20461, Apr. 20, 2006; 80 FR 56753, Sept. 18, 2015; 81 FR 38088,
June 13, 2016]
Sec. 63.1517 Records.
(a) As required by Sec. 63.10(b), the owner or operator shall
maintain files of all information (including all reports and
notifications) required by the general provisions and this subpart.
(1) The owner or operator must retain each record for at least 5
years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance,
corrective action, report, or record. The most recent 2 years of records
must be retained at the facility. The remaining 3 years of records may
be retained off site.
(2) The owner or operator may retain records on microfilm, computer
disks, magnetic tape, or microfiche; and
(3) The owner or operator may report required information on paper
or on a labeled computer disk using commonly available and EPA-
compatible computer software.
(b) In addition to the general records required by Sec. 63.10(b),
the owner or operator of a new or existing affected source (including an
emission unit in a secondary aluminum processing unit) must maintain
records of:
(1) For each affected source and emission unit with emissions
controlled by a fabric filter or a lime-injected fabric filter:
(i) If a bag leak detection system is used, the number of total
operating hours for the affected source or emission unit during each 6-
month reporting period, records of each alarm, the time of the alarm,
the time corrective action was initiated and completed, and a brief
description of the cause of the alarm and the corrective action(s)
taken.
(ii) If a continuous opacity monitoring system is used, records of
opacity measurement data, including records where the average opacity of
any 6-minute period exceeds 5 percent, with a brief explanation of the
cause of the emissions, the time the emissions occurred, the time
corrective action was initiated and completed, and the corrective action
taken.
(iii) If an aluminum scrap shredder is subject to visible emission
observation requirements, records of all Method 9 observations,
including records of any visible emissions during a 30-minute daily test
or records of all ASTM D7520-13 observations (incorporated by reference,
see Sec. 63.14), including data sheets and all raw unaltered JPEGs used
for opacity determination, with a brief explanation of the cause of the
emissions, the time the emissions occurred, the time corrective action
was initiated and completed, and the corrective action taken.
(2) For each affected source with emissions controlled by an
afterburner:
(i) Records of 15-minute block average afterburner operating
temperature, including any period when the average temperature in any 3-
hour block period falls below the compliant operating parameter value
with a brief explanation of the cause of the excursion and the
corrective action taken; and
(ii) Records of annual afterburner inspections.
(3) For each scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln and group
1 furnace, subject to D/F and HCl emission standards with emissions
controlled by a lime-injected fabric filter, records of
[[Page 101]]
15-minute block average inlet temperatures for each lime-injected fabric
filter, including any period when the 3-hour block average temperature
exceeds the compliant operating parameter value +14 [deg]C (+ 25
[deg]F), with a brief explanation of the cause of the excursion and the
corrective action taken.
(4) For each affected source and emission unit with emissions
controlled by a lime-injected fabric filter:
(i) Records of inspections at least once every 8-hour period
verifying that lime is present in the feeder hopper or silo and flowing,
including any inspection where blockage is found, with a brief
explanation of the cause of the blockage and the corrective action
taken, and records of inspections at least once every 4-hour period for
the subsequent 3 days. If flow monitors, pressure drop sensors or load
cells are used to verify that lime is present in the hopper and flowing,
records of all monitor or sensor output including any event where
blockage was found, with a brief explanation of the cause of the
blockage and the corrective action taken;
(ii) If lime feeder setting is monitored, records of daily and
monthly inspections of feeder setting, including records of any
deviation of the feeder setting from the setting used in the performance
test, with a brief explanation of the cause of the deviation and the
corrective action taken. If a lime feeder has been repaired or replaced,
this action must be documented along with records of the new feeder
calibration and the feed mechanism set points necessary to maintain the
lb/hr feed rate operating limit. These records must be maintained on
site and available upon request.
(iii) If lime addition rate for a noncontinuous lime injection
system is monitored pursuant to the approved alternative monitoring
requirements in Sec. 63.1510(v), records of the time and mass of each
lime addition during each operating cycle or time period used in the
performance test and calculations of the average lime addition rate (lb/
ton of feed/charge).
(5) For each group 1 furnace (with or without add-on air pollution
control devices) or in-line fluxer, records of 15-minute block average
weights of gaseous or liquid reactive flux injection, total reactive
flux injection rate and calculations (including records of the identity,
composition, and weight of each addition of gaseous, liquid or solid
reactive flux), including records of any period the rate exceeds the
compliant operating parameter value and corrective action taken.
(6) For each continuous monitoring system, records required by Sec.
63.10(c).
(7) For each affected source and emission unit subject to an
emission standard in kg/Mg (lb/ton) of feed/charge, records of feed/
charge (or throughput) weights for each operating cycle or time period
used in the performance test.
(8) Approved site-specific monitoring plan for a group 1 furnace
without add-on air pollution control devices with records documenting
conformance with the plan.
(9) Records of all charge materials for each thermal chip dryer,
dross-only furnace, and group 1 melting/holding furnaces without air
pollution control devices processing only clean charge.
(10) Operating logs for each group 1 sidewell furnace with add-on
air pollution control devices documenting conformance with operating
standards for maintaining the level of molten metal above the top of the
passage between the sidewell and hearth during reactive flux injection
and for adding reactive flux only to the sidewell or a furnace hearth
equipped with a control device for PM, HCl, and D/F emissions.
(11) For each in-line fluxer for which the owner or operator has
certified that no reactive flux was used:
(i) Operating logs which establish that no source of reactive flux
was present at the in-line fluxer;
(ii) Labels required pursuant to Sec. 63.1506(b) which establish
that no reactive flux may be used at the in-line fluxer; or
(iii) Operating logs which document each flux gas, agent, or
material used during each operating cycle.
(12) Records of all charge materials and fluxing materials or agents
for a group 2 furnace.
(13) Records of monthly inspections for proper unit labeling for
each affected source and emission unit subject to labeling requirements.
[[Page 102]]
(14) Records of annual inspections of emission capture/collection
and closed vent systems or, if the alternative to the annual flow rate
measurements is used, records of differential pressure; fan RPM or fan
motor amperage; static pressure measurements; or duct centerline
velocity using a hotwire anemometer, ultrasonic flow meter, cross-duct
pressure differential sensor, venturi pressure differential monitoring
or orifice plate equipped with an associated thermocouple, as
appropriate.
(15) Records for any approved alternative monitoring or test
procedure.
(16) Current copy of all required plans, including any revisions,
with records documenting conformance with the applicable plan,
including:
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) OM&M plan; and
(iii) Site-specific secondary aluminum processing unit emission plan
(if applicable).
(17) For each secondary aluminum processing unit, records of total
charge weight, or if the owner or operator chooses to comply on the
basis of aluminum production, total aluminum produced for each 24-hour
period and calculations of 3-day, 24-hour rolling average emissions.
(18) For any failure to meet an applicable standard, the owner or
operator must maintain the following records;
(i) Records of the emission unit ID, monitor ID, pollutant or
parameter monitored, beginning date and time of the event, end date and
time of the event, cause of the deviation or exceedance and corrective
action taken.
(ii) Records of actions taken during periods of malfunction to
minimize emissions in accordance with Sec. 63.1506(a)(5), including
corrective actions to restore malfunctioning process and air pollution
control and monitoring equipment to its normal or usual manner of
operation.
(19) For each period of startup or shutdown for which the owner or
operator chooses to demonstrate compliance for an affected source, the
owner or operator must comply with (b)(19)(i) or (ii) of this section.
(i) To demonstrate compliance based on a feed/charge rate of zero, a
flux rate of zero and the use of electricity, propane or natural gas as
the sole sources of heating or the lack of heating, the owner or
operator must submit a semiannual report in accordance with Sec.
63.1516(b)(2)(vii) or maintain the following records:
(A) The date and time of each startup and shutdown;
(B) The quantities of feed/charge and flux introduced during each
startup and shutdown; and
(C) The types of fuel used to heat the unit, or that no fuel was
used, during startup and shutdown; or
(ii) To demonstrate compliance based on performance tests, the owner
or operator must maintain the following records:
(A) The date and time of each startup and shutdown;
(B) The measured emissions in lb/hr or [micro]g/hr or ng/hr;
(C) The measured feed/charge rate in tons/hr or Mg/hr from your most
recent performance test associated with a production rate greater than
zero, or the rated capacity of the affected source if no prior
performance test data is available; and
(D) An explanation to support that such conditions are considered
representative startup and shutdown operations.
(20) For owners or operators that choose to change furnace operating
modes, the following records must be maintained:
(i) The date and time of each change in furnace operating mode, and
(ii) The nature of the change in operating mode (for example, group
1 controlled furnace processing other than clean charge to group 2).
[65 FR 15710, Mar. 23, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 79818, Dec. 30, 2002;
80 FR 56753, Sept. 18, 2015; 81 FR 38089, June 13, 2016]
Other
Sec. 63.1518 Applicability of general provisions.
The requirements of the general provisions in subpart A of this part
that are applicable to the owner or operator subject to the requirements
of this subpart are shown in appendix A to this subpart.
[[Page 103]]
Sec. 63.1519 Implementation and enforcement.
(a) This subpart can be implemented and enforced by the U.S. EPA, or
a delegated authority such as the applicable State, local, or Tribal
agency. If the U.S. EPA Administrator has delegated authority to a
State, local, or Tribal agency, then that agency, in addition to the
U.S. EPA, has the authority to implement and enforce this regulation.
Contact the applicable U.S. EPA Regional Office to find out if this
subpart is delegated to a State, local, or Tribal agency.
(b) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority of this
regulation to a State, local, or Tribal agency under subpart E of this
part, the authorities contained in paragraph (c) of this section are
retained by the Administrator of U.S. EPA and cannot be transferred to
the State, local, or Tribal agency.
(c) The authorities that cannot be delegated to State, local, or
Tribal agencies are as specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of
this section.
(1) Approval of alternatives to the requirements in Sec. Sec.
63.1500 through 63.1501 and 63.1505 through 63.1506.
(2) Approval of major alternatives to test methods for under Sec.
63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), as defined in Sec. 63.90, and as required in
this subpart.
(3) Approval of major alternatives to monitoring under Sec.
63.8(f), as defined in Sec. 63.90, and as required in this subpart.
(4) Approval of major alternatives to recordkeeping and reporting
under Sec. 63.10(f), as defined in Sec. 63.90, and as required in this
subpart.
[68 FR 37359, June 23, 2003]
Sec. 63.1520 [Reserved]
[[Page 104]]
Sec. Table 1 to Subpart RRR of Part 63--Emission Standards for New and
Existing Affected Sources
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR13JN16.012
[[Page 105]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR13JN16.013
[81 FR 38089, June 13, 2016]
[[Page 106]]
Sec. Table 2 to Subpart RRR of Part 63--Summary of Operating
Requirements for New and Existing Affected Sources and Emission Units
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor type/operation/
Affected source/emission unit process Operating requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All affected sources and emission units Emission capture and Design and install in accordance with
with an add-on air pollution control collection system. ACGIH Guidelines; \e\ operate in
device. accordance with OM&M plan (sweat
furnaces may be operated according to
63.1506(c)(4)).\b\
All affected sources and emission units Charge/feed weight or Operate a device that records the weight
subject to production-based (lb/ton of Production weight. of each charge; Operate in accordance
feed) emission limits \a\. with OM&M plan. \b\
Group 1 furnace, group 2 furnace, in-line Labeling................... Identification, operating parameter
fluxer and scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/ ranges and operating requirements
decoating kiln. posted at affected sources and emission
units; control device temperature and
residence time requirements posted at
scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating
kiln.
Aluminum scrap shredder with fabric Bag leak detector or....... Initiate corrective action within 1-hr
filter. of alarm and complete in accordance
with OM&M plan \b\; operate such that
alarm does not sound more than 5% of
operating time in 6-month period.
COM or..................... Initiate corrective action within 1-hr
of a 6-minute average opacity reading
of 5% or more and complete in
accordance with OM&M plan. \b\
VE......................... Initiate corrective action within 1-hr
of any observed VE and complete in
accordance with the OM&M plan. \b\
Thermal chip dryer with afterburner...... Afterburner operating Maintain average temperature for each 3-
temperature. hr period at or above average operating
temperature during the performance
test.
Afterburner operation...... Operate in accordance with OM&M plan.
\b\
Feed material.............. Operate using only unpainted aluminum
chips.
Scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating Afterburner operating Maintain average temperature for each 3-
kiln with afterburner and lime-injected temperature. hr period at or above average operating
fabric filter. temperature during the performance
test.
Afterburner operation...... Operate in accordance with OM&M plan.\b\
Bag leak detector or....... Initiate corrective action within 1-hr
of alarm and complete in accordance
with the OM&M plan; \b\ operate such
that alarm does not sound more than 5%
of operating time in 6-month period.
COM........................ Initiate corrective action within 1-hr
of a 6-minute average opacity reading
of 5% or more and complete in
accordance with the OM&M plan.\b\
Fabric filter inlet Maintain average fabric filter inlet
temperature. temperature for each 3-hr period at or
below average temperature during the
performance test +14 [deg]C (+25
[deg]F).
Lime injection rate........ Maintain free-flowing lime in the feed
hopper or silo at all times for
continuous injection systems; maintain
feeder setting at or above the level
established during the performance test
for continuous injection systems.
Sweat furnace with afterburner........... Afterburner operating If a performance test was conducted,
temperature. maintain average temperature for each 3-
hr period at or above average operating
temperature during the performance
test; if a performance test was not
conducted, and afterburner meets
specifications of Sec. 63.1505(f)(1),
maintain average temperature for each 3-
hr period at or above 1600 [deg]F.
Afterburner operation...... Operate in accordance with OM&M plan.
\b\
Dross-only furnace with fabric filter.... Bag leak detector or....... Initiate corrective action within 1-hr
of alarm and complete in accordance
with the OM&M plan; \b\ operate such
that alarm does not sound more than 5%
of operating time in 6-month period.
COM........................ Initiate corrective action within 1-hr
of a 6-minute average opacity reading
of 5% or more and complete in
accordance with the OM&M plan. \b\
Feed/charge material....... Operate using only dross as the feed
material.
Rotary dross cooler with fabric filter... Bag leak detector or....... Initiate corrective action within 1-hr
of alarm and complete in accordance
with the OM&M plan; \b\ operate such
that alarm does not sound more than 5%
of operating time in 6-month period.
COM........................ Initiate corrective action within 1-hr
of a 6-minute average opacity reading
of 5% or more and complete in
accordance with the OM&M plan. \b\
In-line fluxer with lime-injected fabric Bag leak detector or....... Initiate corrective action within 1-hr
filter (including those that are part of of alarm and complete in accordance
a secondary aluminum processing unit). with the OM&M plan; \b\ operate such
that alarm does not sound more than 5%
of operating time in 6-month period.
[[Page 107]]
COM........................ Initiate corrective action within 1-hr
of a 6-minute average opacity reading
of 5% or more and complete in
accordance with the OM&M plan.\b\
Lime injection rate........ Maintain free-flowing lime in the feed
hopper or silo at all times for
continuous injection systems; maintain
feeder setting at or above the level
established during performance test for
continuous injection systems.
Reactive flux injection Maintain reactive flux injection rate at
rate. or below rate used during the
performance test for each operating
cycle or time period used in the
performance test.
In-line fluxer (using no reactive flux Flux materials............. Use no reactive flux.
material).
Group 1 furnace with lime-injected fabric Bag leak detector or....... Initiate corrective action within 1-hr
filter (including those that are part of of alarm; operate such that alarm does
a secondary of aluminum processing unit). not sound more than 5% of operating
time in 6-month period; complete
corrective action in accordance with
the OM&M plan.\b\
COM........................ Initiate corrective action within 1-hr
of a 6-minute average opacity reading
of 5% or more; complete corrective
action in accordance with the OM&M
plan.\b\
Fabric filter inlet Maintain average fabric filter inlet
temperature. temperature for each 3-hour period at
or below average temperature during the
performance test +14 [deg]C (+25
[deg]F).
Natural gas-fired, propane- Operation of associated capture/
fired or electrically collection systems and APCD \b\ may be
heated group 1 furnaces temporarily stopped. Operation of these
that will be idled for at capture/collection systems and control
least 24 hours. devices must be restarted before feed/
charge, flux or alloying materials are
added to the furnace.
Reactive flux injection Maintain reactive flux injection rate
rate. (kg/Mg) (lb/ton) at or below rate used
during the performance test for each
furnace cycle.
Lime injection rate........ Maintain free-flowing lime in the feed
hopper or silo at all times for
continuous injection systems; maintain
feeder setting at or above the level
established at performance test for
continuous injection systems.
Maintain molten aluminum Operate sidewell furnaces such that the
level. level of molten metal is above the top
of the passage between sidewell and
hearth during reactive flux injection,
unless the hearth is also controlled.
Fluxing in sidewell furnace Add reactive flux only to the sidewell
hearth. of the furnace unless the hearth is
also controlled.
Group 1 furnace without add-on air Reactive flux injection Maintain the total reactive chlorine
pollution controls (including those that rate. flux injection rate and total reactive
are part of a secondary aluminum fluorine flux injection rate for each
processing unit). operating cycle or time period used in
the performance test at or below the
average rate established during the
performance test.
Clean (group 2) furnace.................. Charge and flux materials.. Use only clean charge. Use no reactive
flux.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Thermal chip dryers, scrap dryers/delacquering kilns/decoating kilns, dross-only furnaces, in-line fluxers
and group 1 furnaces including melting/holding furnaces.
\b\ OM&M plan--Operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan.
\c\ Site-specific monitoring plan. Owner/operators of group 1 furnaces without add-on APCD must include a
section in their OM&M plan that documents work practice and pollution prevention measures, including
procedures for scrap inspection, by which compliance is achieved with emission limits and process or feed
parameter-based operating requirements. This plan and the testing to demonstrate adequacy of the monitoring
plan must be developed in coordination with and approved by the permitting authority for major sources, or the
Administrator for area sources.
\d\ APCD--Air pollution control device.
\e\ Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14.
[65 FR 15710, Mar. 23, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 79818, Dec. 30, 2002;
69 FR 53984, Sept. 3, 2004; 80 FR 56757, Sept. 18, 2015; 81 FR 38092,
June 13, 2016]
Sec. Table 3 to Subpart RRR of Part 63--Summary of Monitoring
Requirements for New and Existing Affected Sources and Emission Units
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor type/Operation/
Affected source/Emission unit Process Monitoring requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All affected sources and emission units Emission capture and Annual inspection of all emission
with an add-on air pollution control collection system. capture, collection, and transport
device. systems to ensure that systems continue
to operate in accordance with ACGIH
Guidelines.\e\ Inspection includes
volumetric flow rate measurements or
verification of a permanent total
enclosure using EPA Method 204.\d\
[[Page 108]]
All affected sources and emission units Feed/charge weight......... Record weight of each feed/charge,
subject to production-based (lb/ton or weight measurement device or other
gr/ton of feed/charge) emission procedure accuracy of 1%; \b\ calibrate according to
manufacturer's specifications, or at
least once every 6 months.
Group 1 furnace, group 2 furnace, in-line Labeling................... Check monthly to confirm that labels are
fluxer, and scrap dryer/delacquering intact and legible.
kiln/decoating kiln.
Aluminum scrap shredder with fabric Bag leak detector or....... Install and operate in accordance with
filter. manufacturer's operating instructions.
COM or..................... Design and install in accordance with PS-
1; collect data in accordance with
subpart A of 40 CFR part 63; determine
and record 6-minute block averages.
VE......................... Conduct and record results of 30-minute
daily test in accordance with Method 9
or ASTM D7520-13.\e\
Thermal chip dryer with afterburner...... Afterburner operating Continuous measurement device to meet
temperature. specifications in Sec. 63.1510(g)(1);
record average temperature for each 15-
minute block; determine and record 3-hr
block averages.
Afterburner operation...... Annual inspection of afterburner
internal parts; complete repairs in
accordance with the OM&M plan.
Feed/charge material....... Record identity of each feed/charge;
certify feed/charge materials every 6
months.
Scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating Afterburner operating Continuous measurement device to meet
kiln with afterburner and lime-injected temperature. specifications in Sec. 63.1510(g)(1);
fabric filter. record temperature for each 15-minute
block; determine and record 3-hr block
averages.
Afterburner operation...... Annual inspection of afterburner
internal parts; complete repairs in
accordance with the OM&M plan.
Bag leak detector or....... Install and operate in accordance with
manufacturer's operating instructions.
COM........................ Design and Install in accordance with PS-
1; collect data in accordance with
subpart A of 40 CFR part 63; determine
and record 6-minute block averages.
Lime injection rate........ For continuous injection systems,
inspect each feed hopper or silo every
8 hours to verify that lime is free
flowing; record results of each
inspection. If blockage occurs, inspect
every 4 hours for 3 days; return to 8-
hour inspections if corrective action
results in no further blockage during 3-
day period, record feeder setting
daily. Verify monthly that lime
injection rate is no less than 90
percent of the rate used during the
compliance demonstration test.
Fabric filter inlet Continuous measurement device to meet
temperature. specifications in Sec. 63.1510(h)(2);
record temperatures in 15-minute block
averages; determine and record 3-hr
block averages.
Sweat furnace with afterburner........... Afterburner operating Continuous measurement device to meet
temperature. specifications in Sec. 63.1510(g)(1);
record temperatures in 15-minute block
averages; determine and record 3-hr
block averages.
Afterburner operation...... Annual inspection of afterburner
internal parts; complete repairs in
accordance with the OM&M plan.
Dross-only furnace with fabric filter.... Bag leak detector or....... Install and operate in accordance with
manufacturer's operating instructions.
COM........................ Design and install in accordance with PS-
1; collect data in accordance with
subpart A of 40 CFR part 63; determine
and record 6-minute block averages.
Feed/charge material....... Record identity of each feed/charge;
certify charge materials every 6
months.
Rotary dross cooler with fabric filter... Bag leak detector or....... Install and operate in accordance with
manufacturer's operating instructions.
COM........................ Design and install in accordance with PS-
1; collect data in accordance with
subpart A of 40 CFR part 63; determine
and record 6-minute block averages.
In-line fluxer with lime-injected fabric Bag leak detector or....... Install and operate in accordance with
filter. manufacturer's operating instructions.
COM........................ Design and install in accordance with PS-
1; collect data in accordance with
subpart A of 40 CFR part 63; determine
and record 6-minute block averages.
[[Page 109]]
Reactive flux injection Weight measurement device accuracy of
rate. 1%; \b\ calibrate
according to manufacturer's
specifications or at least once every 6
months; record time, weight and type of
reactive flux added or injected for
each 15-minute block period while
reactive fluxing occurs; calculate and
record total reactive chlorine flux
injection rate and the total reactive
fluorine flux injection rate for each
operating cycle or time period used in
performance test; or Alternative flux
injection rate determination procedure
per Sec. 63.1510(j)(5). For solid
flux added intermittently, record the
amount added for each operating cycle
or time period used in the performance
test.
In-line fluxer using no reactive flux.... Flux materials............. Record flux materials; certify every 6
months for no reactive flux.
Group 1 furnace with lime-injected fabric Bag leak detector or....... Install and operate in accordance with
filter. manufacturer's operating instructions.
COM........................ Design and install in accordance with PS-
1; collect data in accordance with
subpart A of 40 part CFR 63; determine
and record 6-minute block averages.
Lime injection rate........ For continuous injection systems, record
feeder setting daily and inspect each
feed hopper or silo every 8 hours to
verify that lime is free-flowing;
record results of each inspection. If
blockage occurs, inspect every 4 hours
for 3 days; return to 8-hour
inspections if corrective action
results in no further blockage during 3-
day period.\c\ Verify monthly that the
lime injection rate is no less than 90
percent of the rate used during the
compliance demonstration test.
Reactive flux injection Weight measurement device accuracy of
rate. 1%; \b\ calibrate
every 3 months; record weight and type
of reactive flux added or injected for
each 15-minute block period while
reactive fluxing occurs; calculate and
record total reactive chlorine flux
injection rate and the total reactive
fluorine flux injection rate for each
operating cycle or time period used in
performance test; or Alternative flux
injection rate determination procedure
per Sec. 63.1510(j)(5). For solid
flux added intermittently, record the
amount added for each operating cycle
or time period used in the performance
test.
Group 1 furnace without add-on controls.. Fluxing in sidewell furnace Maintain flux addition operating log;
hearth. certify every 6 months.
Reactive flux injection Weight measurement device accuracy of
rate. +1%; \b\ calibrate according to
manufacturer's specifications or at
least once every six months; record
weight and type of reactive flux added
or injected for each 15-minute block
period while reactive fluxing occurs;
calculate and record total reactive
flux injection rate for each operating
cycle or time period used in
performance test. For solid flux added
intermittently, record the amount added
for each operating cycle or time period
used in the performance test.
OM&M plan (approved by Demonstration of site-specific
permitting agency). monitoring procedures to provide data
and show correlation of emissions
across the range of charge and flux
materials and furnace operating
parameters.
Feed material (melting/ Record type of permissible feed/charge
holding furnace). material; certify charge materials
every 6 months.
Clean (group 2) furnace.................. Charge and flux materials.. Record charge and flux materials;
certify every 6 months for clean charge
and no reactive flux.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Thermal chip dryers, scrap dryers/delacquering kilns/decoating kilns, dross-only furnaces, in-line fluxers
and group 1 furnaces or melting/holding furnaces.
\b\ Permitting agency may approve measurement devices of alternative accuracy, for example in cases where flux
rates are very low and costs of meters of specified accuracy are prohibitive; or where feed/charge weighing
devices of specified accuracy are not practicable due to equipment layout or charging practices.
\c\ Permitting authority for major sources, or the Administrator for area sources may approve other alternatives
including load cells for lime hopper weight, sensors for carrier gas pressure, or HCl monitoring devices at
fabric filter outlet.
\d\ The frequency of volumetric flow rate measurements may be decreased to once every 5 years if daily
differential pressure measures, daily fan RPM, or daily fan motor amp measurements are made in accordance with
Sec. 63.1510(d)(2)(ii)-(iii). The frequency of annual verification of a permanent total enclosure may be
decreased to once every 5 years if negative pressure measurements in the enclosure are made daily in
accordance with Sec. 63.1510(d)(2)(iv). In lieu of volumetric flow rate measurements or verification of
permanent total enclosure, sweat furnaces may demonstrate annually negative air flow into the sweat furnace
opening in accordance with Sec. 63.1510(d)(3).
\e\ Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14.
[65 FR 15710, Mar. 23, 2000, as amended at 69 FR 53985, Sept. 3, 2004;
80 FR 56758, Sept. 18, 2015; 81 FR 38092, June 13, 2016]
[[Page 110]]
Sec. Appendix A to Subpart RRR of Part 63--General Provisions
Applicability to Subpart RRR
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citation Requirement Applies to RRR Comment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 63.1(a)(1)-(4)................ General Applicability.. Yes....................
Sec. 63.1(a)(5).................... ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.1(a)(6).................... ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.1(a)(7)-(9)................ ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.1(a)(10)-(12).............. ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.1(b)....................... Initial Applicability Yes.................... EPA retains approval
Determination. authority.
Sec. 63.1(c)(1).................... Applicability After Yes....................
Standard Established.
Sec. 63.1(c)(2).................... ....................... Yes.................... Sec. 63.1500(e)
exempts area sources
subject to this
subpart from the
obligation to obtain
Title V operating
permits.
Sec. 63.1(c)(3)-(4)................ ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.1(c)(5).................... ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.1(d)....................... ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.1(e)....................... Applicability of Permit Yes....................
Program.
Sec. 63.2.......................... Definitions............ Yes.................... Additional definitions
in Sec. 63.1503.
Sec. 63.3.......................... Units and Abbreviations Yes....................
Sec. 63.4(a)(1)-(2)................ Prohibited Activities.. Yes....................
Sec. 63.4(a)(3)-(5)................ ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.4(b)....................... Circumvention.......... Yes....................
Sec. 63.4(c)....................... Fragmentation.......... Yes....................
Sec. 63.5(a)....................... Applicability of Yes....................
Preconstruction Review
and Notification.
Sec. 63.5(b)(1).................... Requirements for Yes....................
Existing, Newly,
Constructed Sources
and Reconstructed
Sources.
Sec. 63.5(b)(2).................... ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.5(b)(3)-(4)................ ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.5(b)(5).................... ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.5(b)(6).................... ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.5(c)....................... ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.5(d)....................... Application for Yes....................
Approval of
Construction or
Reconstruction.
Sec. 63.5(e)....................... Approval of Yes....................
Construction or
Reconstruction.
Sec. 63.5(f)....................... Approval of Yes....................
Construction or
Reconstruction Based
on Prior State
Preconstruction Review.
Sec. 63.6(a)....................... Applicability for Yes....................
Compliance with
Standards and
Maintenance
Requirements.
Sec. 63.6(b)(1)-(5)................ Compliance Dates for Yes.................... Sec. 63.1501
New and Reconstructed specifies dates.
Sources.
Sec. 63.6(b)(6).................... ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.6(b)(7).................... ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.6(c)(1).................... Compliance Dates for Yes.................... Sec. 63.1501
Existing Sources. specifies dates.
Sec. 63.6(c)(2).................... ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.6(c)(3)-(4)................ ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.6(c)(5).................... ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.6(d)....................... ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.6(e)(1)(i)................. Operation and No..................... See Sec.
Maintenance 63.1506(a)(5) for
Requirements. general duty
requirement. Any other
cross reference to
Sec. 63.6(3)(1)(i)
in any other general
provision referenced
shall be treated as a
cross reference to
Sec. 63.1506(a)(5).
Sec. 63.6(e)(1)(ii)................ ....................... No.....................
Sec. 63.6(e)(2).................... ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.6(e)(3).................... Startup, Shutdown, and No.....................
Malfunction Plan.
Sec. 63.6(f)(1).................... Compliance with No.....................
Nonopacity Emission
Standards.
Sec. 63.6(f)(2).................... ....................... Yes....................
[[Page 111]]
Sec. 63.6(g)....................... Use of an Alternative No.....................
Nonopacity Emission
Standard.
Sec. 63.6(h)(1).................... Applicability for No.....................
Compliance with
Opacity and Visible
Emission Standards.
Sec. 63.6(h)(2).................... Methods for Determining Yes....................
Compliance.
Sec. 63.6(h)(3).................... ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.6(h)(4)-(9)................ ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.6(i)(1)-(14)............... Extension of Compliance Yes....................
Sec. 63.6(i)(15)................... ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.6(i)(16)................... ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.6(j)....................... Exemption from Yes....................
Compliance.
Sec. 63.7(a)....................... Applicability and Yes.................... Except Sec. 63.1511
Performance Test Dates. establishes dates for
initial performance
tests.
Sec. 63.7(b)....................... Notification of Yes....................
Performance Test.
Sec. 63.7(c)....................... Quality Assurance Yes....................
Program.
Sec. 63.7(d)....................... Performance Testing Yes....................
Facilities.
Sec. 63.7(e)(1).................... Conduct of Performance No.....................
Tests.
Sec. 63.7(e)(2).................... ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.7(e)(3).................... ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.7(f)....................... Use of an Alternative Yes....................
Test Method.
Sec. 63.7(g)(1)-(3)................ Data Analysis, Yes.................... Except for Sec.
Recordkeeping, and 63.7(g)(2), which is
Reporting. reserved.
Sec. 63.7(h)(1)-(5)................ Waiver of Performance Yes....................
Tests.
Sec. 63.8(a)(1).................... Applicability for Yes....................
Monitoring
Requirements.
Sec. 63.8(a)(2).................... ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.8(a)(3).................... ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.8(a)(4).................... ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.8(b)....................... Conduct of Monitoring.. Yes....................
Sec. 63.8(c)(1)(i)................. Operation and No..................... See Sec.
Maintenance of 63.1506(a)(5) for
Continuous Monitoring general duty
Systems (CMS). requirement.
Sec. 63.8(c)(1)(ii)................ ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.8(c)(1)(iii)............... ....................... No.....................
Sec. 63.8(c)(2)-(8)................ ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.8(d)(1)-(2)................ Quality Control Program Yes....................
Sec. 63.8(d)(3).................... ....................... Yes, except for last
sentence, which refers
to an SSM plan. SSM
plans are not required.
Sec. 63.8(e)....................... Performance Evaluation Yes....................
of CMS.
Sec. 63.8(f)(1)-(5)................ Use of an Alternative No..................... Sec. 63.1501(w)
Monitoring Method. includes provisions
for monitoring
alternatives.
Sec. 63.8(f)(6).................... Alternative to the Yes....................
Relative Accuracy Test.
Sec. 63.8(g)(1).................... Reduction of Monitoring Yes....................
Data.
Sec. 63.8(g)(2).................... ....................... No..................... Sec. 63.1512 requires
five 6-minute averages
for an aluminum scrap
shredder.
Sec. 63.8(g)(3)-(5)................ ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.9(a)....................... Applicability and Yes....................
General Information
for Notification
Requirements.
Sec. 63.9(b)(1)-(5)................ Initial Notifications.. Yes.................... Except Sec.
63.9(b)(3) is
reserved.
Sec. 63.9(c)....................... Request for Compliance Yes....................
Extension.
Sec. 63.9(d)....................... Notification that Yes....................
Source is Subject to
Special Compliance
Requirements.
Sec. 63.9(e)....................... Notification of Yes....................
Performance Test.
Sec. 63.9(f)....................... Notification of Opacity Yes....................
and Visible Emission
Observations.
Sec. 63.9(g)....................... Additional Notification Yes....................
Requirement for
Sources with CMS.
[[Page 112]]
Sec. 63.9(h)(1)-(3)................ Notification of Yes.................... Except Sec. 63.1515
Compliance Status. establishes dates
notification of
compliance status
reports.
Sec. 63.9(h)(4).................... ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.9(h)(5)-(6)................ ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.9(i)....................... Adjustment of Deadlines Yes....................
for Required
Communications.
Sec. 63.9(j)....................... Change in Information Yes....................
Already Provided.
Sec. 63.10(a)...................... Applicability and Yes....................
General Information
for Recordkeeping and
Reporting Requirements.
Sec. 63.10(b)(1)................... General Recordkeeping Yes....................
Requirements.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(i), (ii), (iv), ....................... No.....................
(v).
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(iii), (vi)-(xiv).. ....................... Yes.................... Sec. 63.1517 includes
additional
requirements.
Sec. 63.10(b)(3)................... Recordkeeping Yes....................
Requirement for
Applicability
Determinations.
Sec. 63.10(c)(1)................... Additional Yes....................
Recordkeeping
Requirements for
Sources with CMS.
Sec. 63.10(c)(2)-(4)............... ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.10(c)(5)................... ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.10(c)(6)................... ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.10(c)(7)-(8)............... ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.10(c)(9)................... ....................... No..................... [Reserved]
Sec. 63.10(c)(10)-(13)............. ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.10(c)(14).................. ....................... Yes....................
Sec. 63.10(c)(15).................. ....................... No.....................
Sec. 63.10(d)(1)................... General Reporting Yes....................
Requirements.
Sec. 63.10(d)(2)................... Reporting Results of Yes....................
Performance Tests.
Sec. 63.10(d)(3)................... Reporting Results of Yes....................
Opacity or Visible
Emission Observations.
Sec. 63.10(d)(4)................... Progress Reports....... No..................... See Sec. 63.1516(d).
Sec. 63.10(d)(5)................... Periodic Startup, No..................... See Sec. 63.1516(d).
Shutdown, and
Malfunction Reports.
Sec. 63.10(e)(1)-(2)............... Additional Reporting Yes....................
Requirements for
Sources with CMS.
Sec. 63.10(e)(3)................... Excess Emissions and Yes.................... Reporting deadline
CMS Performance Report given in Sec.
and Summary Report. 63.1516.
Sec. 63.10(e)(4)................... Continuous Opacity Yes....................
Monitoring System
(COMS) Data Produced
During a Performance
Test.
Sec. 63.10(f)...................... Waiver of Recordkeeping Yes....................
or Reporting
Requirements.
Sec. 63.11(a)-(e).................. Control Device and Work No..................... Flares not applicable.
Practice Requirements.
Sec. 63.12(a)-(c).................. State Authority and Yes.................... EPA retains authority
Delegations. for applicability
determinations.
Sec. 63.13......................... Addresses.............. Yes....................
Sec. 63.14......................... Incorporations by Yes.................... ACGIH Guidelines, ASTM
Reference. D7520-13, and Interim
Procedures for
Estimating Risks
Associated with
Exposures to Mixtures
of Chlorinated Dibenzo-
p-Dioxins and -
Dibenzofurans (CDDs
and CDFs) and 1989
Update.
Sec. 63.15......................... Availability of Yes....................
Information and
Confidentiality.
Sec. 63.16......................... Performance Track No.....................
Provisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[81 FR 38093, June 13, 2016]
[[Page 113]]
Subpart SSS [Reserved]
Subpart TTT_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Primary Lead Smelting
Source: 64 FR 30204, June 4, 1999, unless otherwise noted.
Sec. 63.1541 Applicability.
(a) The provisions of this subpart apply to any facility engaged in
producing lead metal from ore concentrates. The category includes, but
is not limited to, the following smelting processes: Sintering,
reduction, preliminary treatment, refining and casting operations,
process fugitive sources, and fugitive dust sources. The sinter process
includes an updraft or downdraft sintering machine. The reduction
process includes the blast furnace, electric smelting furnace with a
converter or reverberatory furnace, and slag fuming furnace process
units. The preliminary treatment process includes the drossing kettles
and dross reverberatory furnace process units. The refining process
includes the refinery process unit. The provisions of this subpart do
not apply to secondary lead smelters, lead refiners, or lead remelters.
(b) Table 1 of this subpart specifies the provisions of subpart A of
this part that apply and those that do not apply to owners and operators
of primary lead processors.
[76 FR 70852, Nov. 15, 2011]
Sec. 63.1542 Definitions.
Terms used in this subpart are defined in the Act, in subpart A of
this part, or in this section as follows:
Affirmative defense means, in the context of an enforcement
proceeding, a response or defense put forward by a defendant, regarding
which the defendant has the burden of proof, and the merits of which are
independently and objectively evaluated in a judicial or administrative
proceeding.
Bag leak detection system means a system that is capable of
continuously monitoring relative particulate matter (dust) loadings in
the exhaust of a baghouse in order to detect bag leaks and other upset
conditions. A bag leak detection system includes, but is not limited to,
an instrument that operates on triboelectric, light scattering, light
transmittance, or other effect to continuously monitor relative
particulate matter loadings.
Blast furnace means any reduction furnace to which sinter is charged
and which forms separate layers of molten slag and lead bullion.
Building means a roofed and walled structure with limited openings
to allow access and egress for people and vehicles.
Charging location means the physical opening through which raw
materials are introduced into a sinter machine, blast furnace, or dross
furnace.
Dross furnace means any smelting furnace to which drosses are
charged and which chemically and physically separates lead from other
impurities.
Drossing and refining kettle means an open-top vessel that is
constructed of cast iron or steel and is indirectly heated from below
and contains molten lead for the purpose of drossing, refining, or
alloying lead. Included are pot furnaces, receiving kettles, and holding
kettles.
Fugitive dust source means a stationary source of hazardous air
pollutant emissions at a primary lead processor resulting from the
handling, storage, transfer, or other management of lead-bearing
materials where the source is not part of a specific process, process
vent, or stack. Fugitive dust sources include roadways, storage piles,
materials handling transfer points, and materials transport areas.
Furnace area means any area of a primary lead processor in which a
blast furnace or dross furnace is located.
Lead refiner means any facility that refines lead metal that is not
located at a primary lead processor.
Lead remelter means any facility that remelts lead metal that is not
located at a primary lead processor.
Malfunction means any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably
preventable failure of air pollution control and monitoring equipment,
process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner
which causes, or
[[Page 114]]
has the potential to cause, the emission limitations in an applicable
standard to be exceeded. Failures that are caused in part by poor
maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions.
Materials storage and handling area means any area of a primary lead
processor in which lead-bearing materials (including ore concentrate,
sinter, granulated lead, dross, slag, and flue dust) are stored or
handled between process steps, including areas in which materials are
stored in piles, bins, or tubs, and areas in which material is prepared
for charging to a sinter machine or smelting furnace or other lead
processing operation.
Operating time means the period of time in hours that an affected
source is in operation beginning at a startup and ending at the next
shutdown.
Plant operating time means the period of time in hours that either a
sinter machine or blast furnace is in operation.
Plant roadway means any area of a primary lead processor that is
subject to vehicle traffic, including traffic by forklifts, front-end
loaders, or vehicles carrying ore concentrates or cast lead ingots.
Excluded from this definition are employee and visitor parking areas,
provided they are not subject to traffic by vehicles carrying lead-
bearing materials.
Primary lead processor means any facility engaged in the production
of lead metal from lead sulfide ore concentrates through the use of
pyrometallurgical or other techniques.
Process fugitive source means a source of hazardous air pollutant
emissions at a primary lead processor that is associated with lead
smelting, processing or refining but is not the primary exhaust stream
and is not a fugitive dust source. Process fugitive sources include
sinter machine charging locations, sinter machine discharge locations,
sinter crushing and sizing equipment, furnace charging locations,
furnace taps, and drossing kettle and refining kettle charging or
tapping locations.
Refining and casting area means any area of a primary lead processor
in which drossing or refining operations occur, or casting operations
occur.
Secondary lead smelter means any facility at which lead-bearing
scrap material, primarily, but not limited to, lead-acid batteries, is
recycled into elemental lead or lead alloys by smelting.
Shutdown means the cessation of operation of an affected source for
any purpose.
Sinter machine means any device in which a lead sulfide ore
concentrate charge is heated in the presence of air to eliminate sulfur
contained in the charge and to agglomerate the charge into a hard porous
mass called sinter.
Sinter machine area means any area of a primary lead processor where
a sinter machine, or sinter crushing and sizing equipment is located.
Sinter machine discharge end means the physical opening at the end
of a sinter machine where the sinter exits the sinter machine.
Startup means the setting in operation of an affected source for any
purpose.
Tapping location means the opening thru which lead and slag are
removed from the furnace.
Tapping location means the opening through which lead and slag are
removed from the furnace.
[64 FR 30204, June 4, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 20462, Apr. 20, 2006; 76
FR 70852, Nov. 15, 2011]
Sec. 63.1543 Standards for process and process fugitive sources.
(a) No owner or operator of any existing, new, or reconstructed
primary lead processor shall discharge or cause to be discharged into
the atmosphere lead compounds in excess of 0.97 pounds per ton of lead
metal produced from the aggregation of emissions discharged from air
pollution control devices used to control emissions from the sources
listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (9) of this section.
(1) Sinter machine;
(2) Blast furnace;
(3) Dross furnace;
(4) Dross furnace charging location;
(5) Blast furnace and dross furnace tapping location;
(6) Sinter machine charging location;
(7) Sinter machine discharge end;
(8) Sinter crushing and sizing equipment; and
(9) Sinter machine area.
[[Page 115]]
(b) No owner or operator of any existing, new, or reconstructed
primary lead processor shall discharge or cause to be discharged into
the atmosphere lead compounds in excess of 1.2 tons per year from the
aggregation of the air pollution control devices used to control
emissions from furnace area and refining and casting operations.
(c) The process fugitive sources listed in paragraphs (a)(4) through
(8) of this section must be equipped with a hood and must be ventilated
to a baghouse or equivalent control device. The hood design and
ventilation rate must be consistent with American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists recommended practices.
(d) The sinter machine area must be enclosed in a building that is
ventilated to a baghouse or equivalent control device at a rate that
maintains a positive in-draft through any doorway opening.
(e) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, following
the initial tests to demonstrate compliance with paragraphs (a) and (b)
of this section, the owner or operator of a primary lead processor must
conduct compliance tests for lead compounds on a quarterly basis (no
later than 100 days following any previous compliance test).
(f) If the 12 most recent compliance tests demonstrate compliance
with the emission limit specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
section, the owner or operator of a primary lead processor shall be
allowed up to 12 calendar months from the last compliance test to
conduct the next compliance test for lead compounds.
(g) The owner or operator of a primary lead processor must maintain
and operate each baghouse used to control emissions from the sources
listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (9) and (b) of this section such
that the alarm on a bag leak detection system required under Sec.
63.1547(c)(8) does not sound for more than five percent of the total
operating time in a 6-month reporting period.
(h) The owner or operator of a primary lead processor must record
the date and time of a bag leak detection system alarm and initiate
procedures to determine the cause of the alarm according to the
corrective action plan required under Sec. 63.1547(f) within 1 hour of
the alarm. The cause of the alarm must be corrected as soon as
practicable.
(i) At all times, the owner or operator must operate and maintain
any affected source, including associated air pollution control
equipment and monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with safety
and good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions.
Determination of whether such operation and maintenance procedures are
being used will be based on information available to the Administrator
which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, review of
operation and maintenance procedures, review of operation and
maintenance records, and inspection of the source.
[76 FR 70853, Nov. 15, 2011]
Sec. 63.1544 Standards for fugitive dust sources.
(a) Each owner or operator of a primary lead processor must prepare,
and at all times operate according to, a standard operating procedures
manual that describes in detail the measures that will be put in place
to control fugitive dust emissions from the sources listed in paragraphs
(a)(1) through (a)(5) of this section that incorporates each of the
specific work practices listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(5) of
this section:
(1) Plant roadways. (i) Paved plant roadways must be cleaned using a
wet sweeper unless the temperature falls below 39 degrees Fahrenheit or
when the application of water results in the formation of ice. During
periods when the temperature is below 39 degrees Fahrenheit, paved plant
roadways must be cleaned using a high efficiency dry sweeper.
(ii) Continuously operate a sprinkler system to wet plant roadways
to prevent fugitive dust entrainment. This sprinkler system must be
operated except during periods when the temperature is less than 39
degrees Fahrenheit or when the application of water results in formation
of ice.
(2) Material storage and handling area(s). (i) Chemically stabilize
inactive concentrate storage piles a minimum of once every month to
reduce
[[Page 116]]
particulate from wind born re-suspension.
(ii) Finished sinter must be sufficiently wetted to ensure fugitive
dust emissions are minimized prior to loading to railcars.
(3) Sinter machine area(s). (i) Personnel doors must be kept closed
during operations except when entering or exiting the furnace building
by the aid of door weights or similar device for automatic closure.
(ii) Large equipment doors must remain closed except when entering
or existing the building using an automatic closure system or equivalent
lock-and-key method.
(iii) It may be necessary to open doors subject to the requirements
in Sec. 63.1544(a)(3)(i) and (ii) to prevent heat stress or exhaustion
of workers inside the sinter plant building. Records of such periods
must be included in the report required under Sec. 63.1549(e)(8).
(4) Furnace area(s). (i) Personnel doors must be kept closed during
operations except when entering or exiting the furnace building by the
aid of door weights or similar device for automatic closure.
(ii) Large equipment doors must remain closed except when entering
or existing the building using an automatic closure system or equivalent
lock-and-key method.
(iii) It may be necessary to open doors subject to the requirements
in Sec. 63.1544(a)(4)(i) and (ii) to prevent heat stress or exhaustion
of workers inside the blast furnace building. Records of such periods
must be included in the report required under Sec. 63.1549(e)(8).
(5) Refining and casting area(s). (i) Personnel doors must be kept
closed during operations except when entering or exiting the furnace
building by the aid of door weights or similar device for automatic
closure.
(ii) Large equipment doors must remain closed except when entering
or existing the building using an automatic closure system or equivalent
lock-and-key method.
(iii) It may be necessary to open doors subject to the requirements
in Sec. 63.1544(a)(5)(i) and (ii) to prevent heat stress or exhaustion
of workers inside the refining and casting building. Records of such
periods must be included in the report required under Sec.
63.1549(e)(8).
(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (c) of this section, the standard
operating procedures manual shall be submitted to the Administrator or
delegated authority for review and approval.
(c) Existing manuals that describe the measures in place to control
fugitive dust sources required as part of a State implementation plan
for lead shall satisfy the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section
provided they include all the work practices as described in paragraphs
(a)(1) through (5) of this section and provided they address all the
sources listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (5) of this section.
(d) At all times, the owner or operator must operate and maintain
any affected source, including associated air pollution control
equipment and monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with safety
and good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions.
Determination of whether such operation and maintenance procedures are
being used will be based on information available to the Administrator
which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, review of
operation and maintenance procedures, review of operation and
maintenance records, and inspection of the source.
[76 FR 70853, Nov. 15, 2011]
Sec. 63.1545 Compliance dates.
(a) Each owner or operator of an existing primary lead processor
must achieve compliance with the requirements in Sec. 16.1543(a) no
later than January 17, 2012. Each owner or operator of an existing
primary lead processor must achieve compliance with the requirements of
Sec. 63.1544 no later than February 13, 2012. Each owner or operator of
an existing primary lead processor must achieve compliance with the
requirements in Sec. 63.1543(b) and (e) of this subpart no later than
November 15, 2013.
(b) Each owner or operator of a new primary lead processor must
achieve compliance with the requirements of this subpart no later than
January 17, 2012 or startup, whichever is later.
(c) Prior to the dates specified in Sec. 63.1545(a), each owner or
operator of
[[Page 117]]
an existing primary lead processor must continue to comply with the
requirements of Sec. Sec. 63.1543 and 63.1544 as promulgated in the
June 4, 1999 NESHAP for Primary Lead Smelting.
(d) Each owner or operator of an existing primary lead processor
must comply with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 63.1547(g)(1) and (2),
63.1551, and Table 1 of Subpart TTT of Part 63 on November 15, 2011.
[76 FR 70854, Nov. 15, 2011]
Sec. 63.1546 Performance testing.
(a) The following procedures must be used to determine quarterly
compliance with the emissions standard for lead compounds under Sec.
63.1543(a) and (b) for existing sources:
(1) Each owner or operator of existing sources listed in Sec.
63.1543(a)(1) through (9) and (b) must determine the lead compound
emissions rate, in units of pounds of lead per hour according to the
following test methods in appendix A of part 60 of this chapter:
(i) Method 1 must be used to select the sampling port location and
the number of traverse points.
(ii) Method 2, 2F, 2G must be used to measure volumetric flow rate.
(iii) Method 3, 3A, 3B must be used for gas analysis.
(iv) Method 4 must be used to determine moisture content of the
stack gas.
(v) Method 12 or Method 29 must be used to determine lead emissions
rate of the stack gas.
(2) A performance test shall consist of at least three runs. For
each test run with Method 12 or Method 29, the minimum sample time must
be 60 minutes and the minimum volume must be 1 dry standard cubic meter
(35 dry standard cubic feet).
(3) Performance tests shall be completed quarterly, once every 3
months, to determine compliance.
(4) The lead emission rate in pounds per quarter is calculated by
multiplying the quarterly lead emission rate in pounds per hour by the
quarterly plant operating time, in hours as shown in Equation 1:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR15NO11.000
Where:
EPb = quarterly lead emissions, pounds per quarter;
ERPb = quarterly lead emissions rate, pounds per hour; and
QPOT = quarterly plant operating time, hours per quarter.
(5) The lead production rate, in units of tons per quarter, must be
determined based on production data for the previous quarter according
to the procedures detailed in paragraphs (a)(5)(i) through (iv) of this
section:
(i) Total lead products production multiplied by the fractional lead
content must be determined in units of tons.
(ii) Total copper matte production multiplied by the fractional lead
content must be determined in units of tons.
(iii) Total copper speiss production multiplied by the fractional
lead content must be determined in units of tons.
(iv) Total quarterly lead production must be determined by summing
the values obtained in paragraphs (a)(5)(i) through (iii) of this
section.
(6) To determine compliance with the production-based lead compound
emission rate in Sec. 63.1543(a), the quarterly production-based lead
compound emission rate, in units of pounds of lead emissions per ton of
lead produced, is calculated as shown in Equation 2 by dividing lead
emissions by lead production.
[[Page 118]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR15NO11.001
Where:
CEPb = quarterly production-based lead compound emission
rate, in units of pounds of lead emissions per ton of lead
produced;
EPb = quarterly lead emissions, pounds per quarter; and
PPb = quarterly lead production, tons per quarter.
(7) To determine quarterly compliance with the emissions standard
for lead compounds under Sec. 63.1543(b), sum the lead compound
emission rates for the current and previous three quarters for the
sources in Sec. 63.1543(b), as determined in accordance with paragraphs
(a)(1) through (4) of this section.
(b) Owners and operators must perform an initial compliance test to
demonstrate compliance with the sinter building in-draft requirements of
Sec. 63.1543(d) at each doorway opening in accordance with paragraphs
(b)(1) through (4) of this section.
(1) Use a propeller anemometer or equivalent device.
(2) Determine doorway in-draft by placing the anemometer in the
plane of the doorway opening near its center.
(3) Determine doorway in-draft for each doorway that is open during
normal operation with all remaining doorways in their customary position
during normal operation.
(4) Do not determine doorway in-draft when ambient wind speed
exceeds 2 meters per second.
(c) Performance tests shall be conducted under such conditions as
the Administrator specifies to the owner or operator based on
representative performance of the affected source for the period being
tested. Upon request, the owner or operator shall make available to the
Administrator such records as may be necessary to determine the
conditions of performance tests.
[76 FR 70854, Nov. 15, 2011]
Sec. 63.1547 Monitoring requirements.
(a) Owners and operators of primary lead processors must prepare,
and at all times operate according to, a standard operating procedures
manual that describes in detail the procedures for inspection,
maintenance, and bag leak detection and corrective action for all
baghouses that are used to control process, process fugitive, or
fugitive dust emissions from any source subject to the lead emission
standards in Sec. Sec. 63.1543 and 63.1544, including those used to
control emissions from general ventilation systems.
(b) The standard operating procedures manual for baghouses required
by paragraph (a) of this section must be submitted to the Administrator
or delegated authority for review and approval.
(c) The procedures specified in the standard operating procedures
manual for inspections and routine maintenance must, at a minimum,
include the requirements of paragraphs (c)(1) through (8) of this
section.
(1) Weekly confirmation that dust is being removed from hoppers
through visual inspection or equivalent means of ensuring the proper
functioning of removal mechanisms.
(2) Daily check of compressed air supply for pulse-jet baghouses.
(3) An appropriate methodology for monitoring cleaning cycles to
ensure proper operation.
(4) Monthly check of bag cleaning mechanisms for proper functioning
through visual inspection or equivalent means.
(5) Quarterly visual check of bag tension on reverse air and shaker-
type baghouses to ensure that bags are not kinked (kneed or bent) or
laying on their sides. Such checks are not required for shaker-type
baghouses using self-tensioning (spring loaded) devices.
(6) Quarterly confirmation of the physical integrity of the baghouse
through visual inspection of the baghouse interior for air leaks.
(7) Quarterly inspection of fans for wear, material buildup, and
corrosion through visual inspection, vibration detectors, or equivalent
means.
[[Page 119]]
(8) Except as provided in paragraph (h) of this section, continuous
operation of a bag leak detection system.
(d) The procedures specified in the standard operating procedures
manual for maintenance must, at a minimum, include a preventative
maintenance schedule that is consistent with the baghouse manufacturer's
instructions for routine and long-term maintenance.
(e) The bag leak detection system required by paragraph (c)(8) of
this section must meet the specifications and requirements of (e)(1)
through (8) of this section.
(1) The bag leak detection system must be certified by the
manufacturer to be capable of detecting particulate matter emissions at
concentrations of 10 milligram per actual cubic meter (0.0044 grains per
actual cubic foot) or less.
(2) The bag leak detection system sensor must provide output of
relative particulate matter loadings, and the owner or operator must
continuously record the output from the bag leak detection system.
(3) The bag leak detection system must be equipped with an alarm
system that will sound when an increase in relative particulate loading
is detected over a preset level, and the alarm must be located such that
it can be heard or otherwise determined by the appropriate plant
personnel.
(4) Each bag leak detection system that works based on the
triboelectric effect must be installed, calibrated, and maintained in a
manner consistent with guidance provided in the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency guidance document ``Fabric Filter Bag Leak Detection
Guidance'' (EPA-454/R-98-015). Other bag leak detection systems must be
installed, calibrated, and maintained in a manner consistent with the
manufacturer's written specifications and recommendations.
(5) The initial adjustment of the system must, at a minimum, consist
of establishing the baseline output by adjusting the sensitivity (range)
and the averaging period of the device, and establishing the alarm set
points and the alarm delay time.
(6) Following initial adjustment, the owner or operator must not
adjust the sensitivity or range, averaging period, alarm set points, or
alarm delay time, except as detailed in the approved SOP required under
paragraph (a) of this section. In no event shall the sensitivity be
increased by more than 100 percent or decreased more than 50 percent
over a 365-day period unless a responsible official certifies that the
baghouse has been inspected and found to be in good operating condition.
(7) For negative pressure, induced air baghouses, and positive
pressure baghouses that are discharged to the atmosphere through a
stack, the bag leak detector must be installed downstream of the
baghouse and upstream of any wet acid gas scrubber.
(8) Where multiple detectors are required, the system's
instrumentation and alarm may be shared among detectors.
(f) The standard operating procedures manual required by paragraph
(a) of this section must include a corrective action plan that specifies
the procedures to be followed in the event of a bag leak detection
system alarm. The corrective action plan must include at a minimum,
procedures to be used to determine the cause of an alarm, as well as
actions to be taken to minimize emissions, which may include, but are
not limited to, the following.
(1) Inspecting the baghouse for air leaks, torn or broken bags or
filter media, or any other condition that may cause an increase in
emissions.
(2) Sealing off defective bags or filter media.
(3) Replacing defective bags or filter media, or otherwise repairing
the control device.
(4) Sealing off a defective baghouse compartment.
(5) Cleaning the bag leak detection system probe, or otherwise
repairing or maintaining the bag leak detection system.
(6) Shutting down the process producing the particulate emissions.
(g) The percentage of total operating time the alarm on the bag leak
detection system sounds in a 6-month reporting period must be calculated
in order to determine compliance with the five percent operating limit
in Sec. 63.1543(g). The percentage of time the alarm on the bag leak
detection system
[[Page 120]]
sounds must be determined according to paragraphs (g)(1) through (3) of
this section.
(1) For each alarm where the owner or operator initiates procedures
to determine the cause of an alarm within 1 hour of the alarm, 1 hour of
alarm time must be counted.
(2) For each alarm where the owner or operator does not initiate
procedures to determine the cause of the alarm within 1 hour of the
alarm, alarm time will be counted as the actual amount of time taken by
the owner or operator to initiate procedures to determine the cause of
the alarm.
(3) The percentage of time the alarm on the bag leak detection
system sounds must be calculated as the ratio of the sum of alarm times
to the total operating time multiplied by 100.
(h) Baghouses equipped with HEPA filters as a secondary filter used
to control process or process fugitive sources subject to the lead
emission standards in Sec. 63.1543 are exempt from the requirement in
paragraph (c)(8) of this section to be equipped with a bag leak
detector. The owner or operator of an affected source that uses a HEPA
filter must monitor and record the pressure drop across the HEPA filter
system daily. If the pressure drop is outside the limit(s) specified by
the filter manufacturer, the owner or operator must take appropriate
corrective measures, which may include, but not be limited to, the
following:
(1) Inspecting the filter and filter housing for air leaks and torn
or broken filters.
(2) Replacing defective filter media, or otherwise repairing the
control device.
(3) Sealing off a defective control device by routing air to other
comparable control devices.
(4) Shutting down the process producing the particulate emissions.
(i) Owners and operators must monitor sinter machine building in-
draft to demonstrate continued compliance with the operating standard
specified in Sec. 63.1543(d) in accordance with either paragraph
(i)(1), (2), or (3) of this section.
(1) Owners and operators must check and record on a daily basis
doorway in-draft at each doorway in accordance with the methodology
specified in Sec. 63.1546(b).
(2) Owners and operators must establish and maintain baseline
ventilation parameters which result in a positive in-draft according to
paragraphs (i)(2)(i) through (iv) of this section.
(i) Owners and operators must install, calibrate, maintain, and
operate a monitoring device that continuously records the volumetric
flow rate through each separately ducted hood; or install, calibrate,
maintain, and operate a monitoring device that continuously records the
volumetric flow rate at the control device inlet of each exhaust system
ventilating the building. The flow rate monitoring device(s) can be
installed in any location in the exhaust duct such that reproducible
flow rate measurements will result. The flow rate monitoring device(s)
must have an accuracy of plus or minus 10 percent over the normal
process operating range and must be calibrated according to
manufacturer's instructions.
(ii) During the initial demonstration of sinter building in-draft,
and at any time the owner or operator wishes to re-establish the
baseline ventilation parameters, the owner or operator must continuously
record the volumetric flow rate through each separately ducted hood, or
continuously record the volumetric flow rate at the control device inlet
of each exhaust system ventilating the building and record exhaust
system damper positions. The owner or operator must determine the
average volumetric flow rate(s) corresponding to the period of time the
in-draft compliance determinations are being conducted.
(iii) The owner or operator must maintain the volumetric flow
rate(s) at or above the value(s) established during the most recent in-
draft determination at all times the sinter machine is in operation.
Volumetric flow rate(s) must be calculated as a 15-minute average.
(iv) If the volumetric flow rate is monitored at the control device
inlet, the owner or operator must check and record damper positions
daily to ensure they are in the positions they were in
[[Page 121]]
during the most recent in-draft determination.
(3) An owner or operator may request an alternative monitoring
method by following the procedures and requirements in Sec. 63.8(f) of
the General Provisions.
(j) Each owner or operator of new or modified sources listed under
Sec. 63.1543 (a)(1) through (9) and (b) must install, calibrate,
maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) for
measuring lead emissions and a continuous emission rate monitoring
system (CERMS) subject to Performance Specification 6 of appendix B to
part 60.
(1) Each owner or operator of a source subject to the emissions
limits for lead compounds under Sec. 63.1543(a)and (b) must install a
CEMS for measuring lead emissions within 180 days of promulgation of
performance specifications for lead CEMS.
(i) Prior to promulgation of performance specifications for CEMS
used to measure lead concentrations, an owner or operator must use the
procedure described in Sec. 63.1546(a)(1) through (7) of this section
to determine compliance.
(2) If a CEMS used to measure lead emissions is applicable, the
owner or operator must install a CERMS with a sensor in a location that
provides representative measurement of the exhaust gas flow rate at the
sampling location of the CEMS used to measure lead emissions, taking
into account the manufacturer's recommendations. The flow rate sensor is
that portion of the system that senses the volumetric flow rate and
generates an output proportional to that flow rate.
(i) The CERMS must be designed to measure the exhaust gas flow rate
over a range that extends from a value of at least 20 percent less than
the lowest expected exhaust flow rate to a value of at least 20 percent
greater than the highest expected exhaust gas flow rate.
(ii) The CERMS must be equipped with a data acquisition and
recording system that is capable of recording values over the entire
range specified in paragraph (j)(2)(i) of this section.
(iii) Each owner or operator must perform an initial relative
accuracy test of the CERMS in accordance with the applicable Performance
Specification in appendix B to part 60 of the chapter.
(iv) Each owner or operator must operate the CERMS and record data
during all periods of operation of the affected facility including
periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, except for periods of
monitoring system malfunctions, repairs associated with monitoring
system malfunctions, and required monitoring system quality assurance or
quality control activities (including, as applicable, calibration checks
and required zero and span adjustments.
(3) Each owner or operator must calculate the lead emissions rate in
tons per year by summing all hours of CEMS data for a year to determine
compliance with Sec. 63.1543(b).
(i) When the CERMS are unable to provide quality assured data the
following applies:
(A) When data are not available for periods of up to 48 hours, the
highest recorded hourly emission rate from the previous 24 hours must be
used.
(B) When data are not available for 48 or more hours, the maximum
daily emission rate based on the previous 30 days must be used.
[76 FR 70855, Nov. 15, 2011]
Sec. 63.1548 Notification requirements.
(a) The owner or operator of a primary lead processor must comply
with the notification requirements of Sec. 63.9 of subpart A, General
Provisions as specified in Table 1 of this subpart.
(b) The owner or operator of a primary lead processor must submit
the standard operating procedures manual for baghouses required under
Sec. 63.1547(a) to the Administrator or delegated authority along with
a notification that the primary lead processor is seeking review and
approval of the manual and procedures. Owners or operators of existing
primary lead processors must submit this notification no later than
November 6, 2000. The owner or operator of a primary lead processor that
commences construction or reconstruction after April 17, 1998, must
submit this notification no later than 180 days
[[Page 122]]
before startup of the constructed or reconstructed primary lead
processor, but no sooner than September 2, 1999.
[76 FR 70857, Nov. 15, 2011]
Sec. 63.1549 Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
(a) The owner or operator of a primary lead processor must comply
with the recordkeeping requirements of Sec. 63.10 of subpart A, General
Provisions as specified in Table 1 of this subpart.
(b) In addition to the general records required by paragraph (a) of
this section, each owner or operator of a primary lead processor must
maintain for a period of 5 years, records of the information listed in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (10) of this section.
(1) Production records of the weight and lead content of lead
products, copper matte, and copper speiss.
(2) Records of the bag leak detection system output.
(3) An identification of the date and time of all bag leak detection
system alarms, the time that procedures to determine the cause of the
alarm were initiated, the cause of the alarm, an explanation of the
actions taken, and the date and time the cause of the alarm was
corrected.
(4) Any recordkeeping required as part of the practices described in
the standard operating procedures manual for baghouses required under
Sec. 63.1547(a).
(5) If an owner or operator chooses to demonstrate continuous
compliance with the sinter building in-draft requirement under Sec.
63.1543(d) by employing the method allowed in Sec. 63.1547(i)(1), the
records of the daily doorway in-draft checks, an identification of the
periods when there was not a positive in-draft, and an explanation of
the corrective actions taken.
(6) If an owner or operator chooses to demonstrate continuous
compliance with the sinter building in-draft requirement under Sec.
63.1543(d) by employing the method allowed in Sec. 63.1547(i)(2), the
records of the output from the continuous volumetric flow monitor(s), an
identification of the periods when the 15-minute volumetric flow rate
dropped below the minimum established during the most recent in-draft
determination, and an explanation of the corrective actions taken.
(7) If an owner or operator chooses to demonstrate continuous
compliance with the sinter building in-draft requirement under Sec.
63.1543(d) by employing the method allowed in Sec. 63.1547(i)(2), and
volumetric flow rate is monitored at the baghouse inlet, records of the
daily checks of damper positions, an identification of the days that the
damper positions were not in the positions established during the most
recent in-draft determination, and an explanation of the corrective
actions taken.
(8) Records of the occurrence and duration of each malfunction of
operation (i.e., process equipment) or the air pollution control
equipment and monitoring equipment.
(9) Records of actions taken during periods of malfunction to
minimize emissions in accordance with Sec. Sec. 63.1543(i) and
63.1544(d), including corrective actions to restore malfunctioning
process and air pollution control and monitoring equipment to its normal
or usual manner of operation.
(c) Records for the most recent 2 years of operation must be
maintained on site. Records for the previous 3 years may be maintained
off site.
(d) The owner or operator of a primary lead processor must comply
with the reporting requirements of Sec. 63.10 of subpart A, General
Provisions as specified in Table 1 of this subpart.
(e) In addition to the information required under Sec. 63.10 of the
General Provisions, the owner or operator must provide semi-annual
reports containing the information specified in paragraphs (e)(1)
through (9) of this section to the Administrator or designated
authority.
(1) The reports must include records of all alarms from the bag leak
detection system specified in Sec. 63.1547(e).
(2) The reports must include a description of the actions taken
following each bag leak detection system alarm pursuant to Sec.
63.1547(f).
(3) The reports must include a calculation of the percentage of time
the alarm on the bag leak detection system sounded during the reporting
period pursuant to Sec. 63.1547(g).
(4) If an owner or operator chooses to demonstrate continuous
compliance
[[Page 123]]
with the sinter building in-draft requirement under Sec. 63.1543(d) by
employing the method allowed in Sec. 63.1547(i)(1), the reports must
contain an identification of the periods when there was not a positive
in-draft, and an explanation of the corrective actions taken.
(5) If an owner or operator chooses to demonstrate continuous
compliance with the sinter building in-draft requirement under Sec.
63.1543(d) by employing the method allowed in Sec. 63.1547(i)(2), the
reports must contain an identification of the periods when the 15-minute
volumetric flow rate(s) dropped below the minimum established during the
most recent in-draft determination, and an explanation of the corrective
actions taken.
(6) If an owner or operator chooses to demonstrate continuous
compliance with the sinter building in-draft requirement under Sec.
63.1543(d) by employing the method allowed in Sec. 63.1547(i)(2), and
volumetric flow rate is monitored at the baghouse inlet, the reports
must contain an identification of the days that the damper positions
were not in the positions established during the most recent in-draft
determination, and an explanation of the corrective actions taken.
(7) The reports must contain a summary of the records maintained as
part of the practices described in the standard operating procedures
manual for baghouses required under Sec. 63.1547(a), including an
explanation of the periods when the procedures were not followed and the
corrective actions taken.
(8) The reports shall contain a summary of the fugitive dust control
measures performed during the required reporting period, including an
explanation of any periods when the procedures outlined in the standard
operating procedures manual required by Sec. 63.1544(a) were not
followed and the corrective actions taken. The reports shall not contain
copies of the daily records required to demonstrate compliance with the
requirements of the standard operating procedures manuals required under
Sec. Sec. 63.1544(a) and 63.1547(a).
(9) If there was a malfunction during the reporting period, the
report shall also include the number, duration, and a brief description
for each type of malfunction which occurred during the reporting period
and which caused or may have caused any applicable emission limitation
to be exceeded. The report must also include a description of actions
taken by an owner or operator during a malfunction of an affected source
to minimize emissions in accordance with Sec. Sec. 63.1543(i) and
63.1544(d), including actions taken to correct a malfunction.
[76 FR 70857, Nov. 15, 2011]
Sec. 63.1550 Delegation of authority.
(a) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority to a
State under section 112(l) of the act, the authorities contained in
paragraph (b) of this section must be retained by the Administrator and
not transferred to a State.
(b) Authorities which will not be delegated to States: No
restrictions.
[76 FR 70858, Nov. 15, 2011]
Sec. 63.1551 Affirmative defense for exceedance of emission limit
during malfunction.
In response to an action to enforce the standards set forth in this
subpart you may assert an affirmative defense to a claim for civil
penalties for exceedances of such standards that are caused by
malfunction, as defined at 40 CFR 63.2. Appropriate penalties may be
assessed, however, if you fail to meet your burden of proving all of the
requirements in the affirmative defense. The affirmative defense shall
not be available for claims for injunctive relief.
(a) Affirmative defense. To establish the affirmative defense in any
action to enforce such a limit, you must timely meet the notification
requirements in paragraph (b) of this section, and must prove by a
preponderance of evidence that:
(1) The excess emissions:
(i) Were caused by a sudden, infrequent, and unavoidable failure of
air pollution control and monitoring equipment, process equipment, or a
process to operate in a normal or usual manner, and
(ii) Could not have been prevented through careful planning, proper
design
[[Page 124]]
or better operation and maintenance practices; and
(iii) Did not stem from any activity or event that could have been
foreseen and avoided, or planned for; and
(iv) Were not part of a recurring pattern indicative of inadequate
design, operation, or maintenance; and
(2) Repairs were made as expeditiously as possible when the
applicable emission limitations were being exceeded. Off-shift and
overtime labor were used, to the extent practicable to make these
repairs; and
(3) The frequency, amount and duration of the excess emissions
(including any bypass) were minimized to the maximum extent practicable
during periods of such emissions; and
(4) If the excess emissions resulted from a bypass of control
equipment or a process, then the bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss
of life, personal injury, or severe property damage; and
(5) All possible steps were taken to minimize the impact of the
excess emissions on ambient air quality, the environment and human
health; and
(6) All emissions monitoring and control systems were kept in
operation if at all possible, consistent with safety and good air
pollution control practices; and
(7) All of the actions in response to the excess emissions were
documented by properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs; and
(8) At all times, the facility was operated in a manner consistent
with good practices for minimizing emissions; and
(9) A written root cause analysis has been prepared, the purpose of
which is to determine, correct, and eliminate the primary causes of the
malfunction and the excess emissions resulting from the malfunction
event at issue. The analysis shall also specify, using best monitoring
methods and engineering judgment, the amount of excess emissions that
were the result of the malfunction.
(b) Notification. The owner or operator of the facility experiencing
an exceedance of its emission limit(s) during a malfunction shall notify
the Administrator by telephone or facsimile (FAX) transmission as soon
as possible, but no later than two business days after the initial
occurrence of the malfunction, if it wishes to avail itself of an
affirmative defense to civil penalties for that malfunction. The owner
or operator seeking to assert an affirmative defense shall also submit a
written report to the Administrator within 45 days of the initial
occurrence of the exceedance of the standards in this subpart to
demonstrate, with all necessary supporting documentation, that it has
met the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section. The
owner or operator may seek an extension of this deadline for up to 30
additional days by submitting a written request to the Administrator
before the expiration of the 45 day period. Until a request for an
extension has been approved by the Administrator, the owner or operator
is subject to the requirement to submit such report within 45 days of
the initial occurrence of the exceedance.
[76 FR 70858, Nov. 15, 2011]
Sec. Table 1 to Subpart TTT of Part 63--General Provisions Applicability
to Subpart TTT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applies to
Reference subpart TTT Comment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.6(a), (b), (c)............. Yes.
63.6(d)....................... No............... Section reserved.
63.6(e)(1)(i)................. No............... See 63.1543(i) and
63.1544(d) for
general duty
requirement.
63.6(e)(1)(ii)................ No.
63.6(e)(1)(iii)............... Yes.
63.6(e)(2).................... No............... Section reserved.
63.6(e)(3).................... No.
63.6(f)(1).................... No.
63.6(g)....................... Yes.
63.6(h)....................... No............... No opacity limits in
rule.
63.6(i)....................... Yes.
[[Page 125]]
63.6(j)....................... Yes.
Sec. 63.7(a)-(d)............ Yes.
Sec. 63.7(e)(1)............. No............... See 63.1546(c).
Sec. 63.7(e)(2)-(e)(4)...... Yes.
63.7(f), (g), (h)............. Yes.
63.8(a)-(b)................... Yes.
63.8(c)(1)(i)................. No.
63.8(c)(1)(ii)................ Yes.
63.8(c)(1)(iii)............... No.
63.8(c)(2)-(d)(2)............. Yes.
63.8(d)(3).................... Yes, except for
last sentence.
63.8(e)-(g)................... Yes.
63.9(a), (b), (c), (e), (g), Yes.
(h)(1) through (3), (h)(5)
and (6), (i) and (j).
63.9(f)....................... No.
63.9(h)(4).................... No............... Reserved.
63.10(b)(2)(i)................ No.
63.10(b)(2)(ii)............... No............... See 63.1549(b)(9) and
(10) for
recordkeeping of
occurrence and
duration of
malfunctions and
recordkeeping of
actions taken during
malfunction.
63.10(b)(2)(iii).............. Yes.
63.10(b)(2)(iv)-(b)(2)(v)..... No.
63.10(b)(2)(vi)-(b)(2)(xiv)... Yes.
63.(10)(b)(3)................. Yes.
63.10(c)(1)-(9)............... Yes.
63.10(c)(10)-(11)............. No............... See 63.1549(b)(9) and
(10) for
recordkeeping of
malfunctions.
63.10(c)(12)-(c)(14).......... Yes.
63.10(c)(15).................. No.
63.10(d)(1)-(4)............... Yes.
63.10(d)(5)................... No............... See 63.1549(e)(9) for
reporting of
malfunctions.
63.10(e)-(f).................. Yes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[76 FR 70858, Nov. 15, 2011]
Subpart UUU_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming
Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units
Source: 67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, unless otherwise noted.
What This Subpart Covers
Sec. 63.1560 What is the purpose of this subpart?
This subpart establishes national emission standards for hazardous
air pollutants (HAP) emitted from petroleum refineries. This subpart
also establishes requirements to demonstrate initial and continuous
compliance with the emission limitations and work practice standards.
Sec. 63.1561 Am I subject to this subpart?
(a) You are subject to this subpart if you own or operate a
petroleum refinery that is located at a major source of HAP emissions.
(1) A petroleum refinery is an establishment engaged primarily in
petroleum refining as defined in the Standard Industrial Classification
(SIC) code 2911 and the North American Industry Classification (NAIC)
code 32411, and used mainly for:
(i) Producing transportation fuels (such as gasoline, diesel fuels,
and jet fuels), heating fuels (such as kerosene, fuel gas distillate,
and fuel oils), or lubricants;
(ii) Separating petroleum; or
(iii) Separating, cracking, reacting, or reforming an intermediate
petroleum stream, or recovering a by-product(s) from the intermediate
petroleum stream (e.g., sulfur recovery).
(2) A major source of HAP is a plant site that emits or has the
potential to emit any single HAP at a rate of 9.07 megagrams (10 tons)
or more per year
[[Page 126]]
or any combination of HAP at a rate of 22.68 megagrams (25 tons) or more
per year.
(b) [Reserved]
Sec. 63.1562 What parts of my plant are covered by this subpart?
(a) This subpart applies to each new, reconstructed, or existing
affected source at a petroleum refinery.
(b) The affected sources are:
(1) The process vent or group of process vents on fluidized
catalytic cracking units that are associated with regeneration of the
catalyst used in the unit (i.e., the catalyst regeneration flue gas
vent).
(2) The process vent or group of process vents on catalytic
reforming units (including but not limited to semi-regenerative, cyclic,
or continuous processes) that are associated with regeneration of the
catalyst used in the unit. This affected source includes vents that are
used during the unit depressurization, purging, coke burn, and catalyst
rejuvenation.
(3) The process vent or group of process vents on Claus or other
types of sulfur recovery plant units or the tail gas treatment units
serving sulfur recovery plants that are associated with sulfur recovery.
(4) Each bypass line serving a new, existing, or reconstructed
catalytic cracking unit, catalytic reforming unit, or sulfur recovery
unit. This means each vent system that contains a bypass line (e.g.,
ductwork) that could divert an affected vent stream away from a control
device used to comply with the requirements of this subpart.
(c) An affected source is a new affected source if you commence
construction of the affected source after September 11, 1998, and you
meet the applicability criteria in Sec. 63.1561 at the time you
commenced construction.
(d) Any affected source is reconstructed if you meet the criteria in
Sec. 63.2.
(e) An affected source is existing if it is not new or
reconstructed.
(f) This subpart does not apply to:
(1) A thermal catalytic cracking unit.
(2) A sulfur recovery unit that does not recover elemental sulfur or
where the modified reaction is carried out in a water solution which
contains a metal ion capable of oxidizing the sulfide ion to sulfur
(e.g., the LO-CAT II process).
(3) A redundant sulfur recovery unit not located at a petroleum
refinery and used by the refinery only for emergency or maintenance
backup.
(4) Equipment associated with bypass lines such as low leg drains,
high point bleed, analyzer vents, open-ended valves or lines, or
pressure relief valves needed for safety reasons.
(5) Gaseous streams routed to a fuel gas system, provided that on
and after January 30, 2019, any flares receiving gas from the fuel gas
system are subject to Sec. 63.670.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6938, Feb. 9, 2005; 80
FR 75273, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. 63.1563 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
(a) If you have a new or reconstructed affected source, you must
comply with this subpart according to the requirements in paragraphs
(a)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) If you startup your affected source before April 11, 2002, then
you must comply with the emission limitations and work practice
standards for new and reconstructed sources in this subpart no later
than April 11, 2002 except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section.
(2) If you startup your affected source after April 11, 2002, you
must comply with the emission limitations and work practice standards
for new and reconstructed sources in this subpart upon startup of your
affected source except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section.
(b) If you have an existing affected source, you must comply with
the emission limitations and work practice standards for existing
affected sources in this subpart by no later than April 11, 2005 except
as specified in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
(c) We will grant an extension of compliance for an existing
catalytic cracking unit allowing additional time to meet the emission
limitations and work practice standards for catalytic cracking units in
Sec. Sec. 63.1564 and 63.1565 if
[[Page 127]]
you commit to hydrotreating the catalytic cracking unit feedstock and to
meeting the emission limitations of this subpart on the same date that
your facility meets the final Tier 2 gasoline sulfur control standard
(40 CFR part 80, subpart J). To obtain an extension, you must submit a
written notification to your permitting authority according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1574(e). Your notification must include the
information in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) Identification of the affected source with a brief description
of the controls to be installed (if needed) to comply with the emission
limitations for catalytic cracking units in this subpart.
(2) A compliance schedule, including the information in paragraphs
(c)(2)(i) through (iv) of this section.
(i) The date by which onsite construction or the process change is
to be initiated.
(ii) The date by which onsite construction or the process change is
to be completed.
(iii) The date by which your facility will achieve final compliance
with both the final Tier 2 gasoline sulfur control standard as specified
in Sec. 80.195, and the emission limitations and work practice
standards for catalytic cracking units in this subpart. In no case will
your permitting authority grant an extension beyond the date you are
required to meet the Tier 2 gasoline sulfur control standard or December
31, 2009, whichever comes first. If you don't comply with the emission
limitations and work practice standards for existing catalytic cracking
units by the specified date, you will be out-of-compliance with the
requirements for catalytic cracking units beginning April 11, 2005.
(iv) A brief description of interim emission control measures that
will be taken to ensure proper operation and maintenance of the process
equipment during the period of the compliance extension.
(d) You must comply with the applicable requirements in Sec. Sec.
63.1564(a)(5), 63.1565(a)(5) and 63.1568(a)(4) as specified in paragraph
(d)(1) or (2) of this section, as applicable.
(1) For sources which commenced construction or reconstruction
before June 30, 2014, you must comply with the applicable requirements
in Sec. Sec. 63.1564(a)(5), 63.1565(a)(5) and 63.1568(a)(4) on or
before August 1, 2017 unless an extension is requested and approved in
accordance with the provisions in Sec. 63.6(i). After February 1, 2016
and prior to the date of compliance with the provisions in Sec. Sec.
63.1564(a)(5), 63.1565(a)(5) and 63.1568(a)(4), you must comply with the
requirements in Sec. 63.1570(c) and (d).
(2) For sources which commenced construction or reconstruction on or
after June 30, 2014, you must comply with the applicable requirements in
Sec. Sec. 63.1564(a)(5), 63.1565(a)(5) and 63.1568(a)(4) on or before
February 1, 2016 or upon startup, whichever is later.
(e) If you have an area source that increases its emissions or its
potential to emit such that it becomes a major source of HAP, the
requirements in paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this section apply.
(1) Any portion of the existing facility that is a new affected
source or a new reconstructed source must be in compliance with the
requirements of this subpart upon startup.
(2) All other parts of the source must be in compliance with the
requirements of this subpart by no later than 3 years after it becomes a
major source or, if applicable, the extended compliance date granted
according to the requirements in paragraph (c) of this section.
(f) You must meet the notification requirements in Sec. 63.1574
according to the schedule in Sec. 63.1574 and in 40 CFR part 63,
subpart A. Some of the notifications must be submitted before the date
you are required to comply with the emission limitations and work
practice standards in this subpart.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 81 FR 45243, July 13, 2016]
[[Page 128]]
Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming Units, Sulfur Recovery
Units, and Bypass Lines
Sec. 63.1564 What are my requirements for metal HAP emissions
from catalytic cracking units?
(a) What emission limitations and work practice standards must I
meet? You must:
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(5) of this section, meet
each emission limitation in table 1 of this subpart that applies to you.
If your catalytic cracking unit is subject to the NSPS for PM in Sec.
60.102 of this chapter or is subject to Sec. 60.102a(b)(1) of this
chapter, you must meet the emission limitations for NSPS units. If your
catalytic cracking unit is not subject to the NSPS for PM, you can
choose from the six options in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (vi) of this
section:
(i) You can elect to comply with the NSPS for PM in Sec. 60.102 of
this chapter (Option 1a);
(ii) You can elect to comply with the NSPS for PM coke burn-off
emission limit in Sec. 60.102a(b)(1) of this chapter (Option 1b);
(iii) You can elect to comply with the NSPS for PM concentration
limit in Sec. 60.102a(b)(1) of this chapter (Option 1c);
(iv) You can elect to comply with the PM per coke burn-off emission
limit (Option 2);
(v) You can elect to comply with the Nickel (Ni) lb/hr emission
limit (Option 3); or
(vi) You can elect to comply with the Ni per coke burn-off emission
limit (Option 4).
(2) Comply with each operating limit in Table 2 of this subpart that
applies to you. When a specific control device may be monitored using
more than one continuous parameter monitoring system, you may select the
parameter with which you will comply. You must provide notice to the
Administrator (or other designated authority) if you elect to change the
monitoring option.
(3) Prepare an operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan according
to the requirements in Sec. 63.1574(f) and operate at all times
according to the procedures in the plan.
(4) The emission limitations and operating limits for metal HAP
emissions from catalytic cracking units required in paragraphs (a)(1)
and (2) of this section do not apply during periods of planned
maintenance preapproved by the applicable permitting authority according
to the requirements in Sec. 63.1575(j).
(5) On or before the date specified in Sec. 63.1563(d), you must
comply with one of the two options in paragraphs (a)(5)(i) and (ii) of
this section during periods of startup, shutdown and hot standby:
(i) You can elect to comply with the requirements in paragraphs
(a)(1) and (2) of this section, except catalytic cracking units
controlled using a wet scrubber must maintain only the liquid to gas
ratio operating limit (the pressure drop operating limit does not
apply); or
(ii) You can elect to maintain the inlet velocity to the primary
internal cyclones of the catalytic cracking unit catalyst regenerator at
or above 20 feet per second.
(b) How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations and work practice standard? You must:
(1) Install, operate, and maintain a continuous monitoring system(s)
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.1572 and Table 3 of this
subpart.
(2) Conduct a performance test for each catalytic cracking unit
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.1571 and under the conditions
specified in Table 4 of this subpart.
(3) Establish each site-specific operating limit in Table 2 of this
subpart that applies to you according to the procedures in Table 4 of
this subpart.
(4) Use the procedures in paragraphs (b)(4)(i) through (iv) of this
section to determine initial compliance with the emission limitations.
(i) If you elect Option 1b or Option 2 in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) or
(iv) of this section, compute the PM emission rate (lb/1,000 lb of coke
burn-off) for each run using Equations 1, 2, and 3 (if applicable) of
this section and the site-specific opacity limit, if applicable, using
Equation 4 of this section as follows:
[[Page 129]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01DE15.018
Where:
Rc = Coke burn-off rate, kg/hr (lb/hr);
Qr = Volumetric flow rate of exhaust gas from catalyst
regenerator before adding air or gas streams. Example: You may
measure upstream or downstream of an electrostatic
precipitator, but you must measure upstream of a carbon
monoxide boiler, dscm/min (dscf/min). You may use the
alternative in either Sec. 63.1573(a)(1) or (2), as
applicable, to calculate Qr;
Qa = Volumetric flow rate of air to catalytic cracking unit
catalyst regenerator, as determined from instruments in the
catalytic cracking unit control room, dscm/min (dscf/min);
%CO2 = Carbon dioxide concentration in regenerator exhaust,
percent by volume (dry basis);
%CO = Carbon monoxide concentration in regenerator exhaust, percent by
volume (dry basis);
%O2 = Oxygen concentration in regenerator exhaust, percent by
volume (dry basis);
K1 = Material balance and conversion factor, 0.2982 (kg-min)/
(hr-dscm-%) (0.0186 (lb-min)/(hr-dscf-%));
K2 = Material balance and conversion factor, 2.088 (kg-min)/
(hr-dscm) (0.1303 (lb-min)/(hr-dscf));
K3 = Material balance and conversion factor, 0.0994 (kg-min)/
(hr-dscm-%) (0.0062 (lb-min)/(hr-dscf-%));
Qoxy = Volumetric flow rate of oxygen-enriched air stream to
regenerator, as determined from instruments in the catalytic
cracking unit control room, dscm/min (dscf/min); and
%Oxy = Oxygen concentration in oxygen-enriched air stream,
percent by volume (dry basis).
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01DE15.019
Where:
E = Emission rate of PM, kg/1,000 kg (lb/1,000 lb) of coke burn-off;
Cs = Concentration of PM, g/dscm (lb/dscf);
Qsd = Volumetric flow rate of the catalytic cracking unit
catalyst regenerator flue gas as measured by Method 2 in
appendix A-1 to part 60 of this chapter, dscm/hr (dscf/hr);
Rc = Coke burn-off rate, kg coke/hr (1,000 lb coke/hr); and
K = Conversion factor, 1.0 (kg\2\/g)/(1,000 kg) (1,000 lb/(1,000 lb)).
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01DE15.020
Where:
Es = Emission rate of PM allowed, kg/1,000 kg (1b/1,000 lb)
of coke burn-off in catalyst regenerator;
1.0 = Emission limitation, kg coke/1,000 kg (lb coke/1,000 lb);
A = Allowable incremental rate of PM emissions. Before August 1, 2017, A
= 0.18 g/million cal (0.10 lb/million Btu). On or after August
1, 2017, A = 0 g/million cal (0 lb/million Btu);
H = Heat input rate from solid or liquid fossil fuel, million cal/hr
(million Btu/hr). Make sure your permitting authority approves
procedures for determining the heat input rate;
Rc = Coke burn-off rate, kg coke/hr (1,000 lb coke/hr)
determined using Equation 1 of this section; and
K' = Conversion factor to units to standard, 1.0 (kg2/g)/
(1,000 kg) (103 lb/(1,000 lb)).
[[Page 130]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01DE15.021
Where:
Opacity Limit = Maximum permissible hourly average opacity, percent, or
10 percent, whichever is greater;
Opacityst = Hourly average opacity measured during the source
test, percent; and
PMEmRst = PM emission rate measured during the source test,
lb/1,000 lb coke burn.
(ii) If you elect Option 1c in paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this
section, the PM concentration emission limit, determine the average PM
concentration from the initial performance test used to certify your PM
CEMS.
(iii) If you elect Option 3 in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of this section,
the Ni lb/hr emission limit, compute your Ni emission rate using
Equation 5 of this section and your site-specific Ni operating limit (if
you use a continuous opacity monitoring system) using Equations 6 and 7
of this section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR11AP02.004
Where:
ENi1 = Mass emission rate of Ni, mg/hr (lb/hr); and
CNi = Ni concentration in the catalytic cracking unit
catalyst regenerator flue gas as measured by Method 29 in
appendix A to part 60 of this chapter, mg/dscm (lbs/dscf).
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR11AP02.005
Where:
Opacityl = Opacity value for use in Equation 7 of this
section, percent, or 10 percent, whichever is greater; and
NiEmR1st = Average Ni emission rate calculated as the
arithmetic average Ni emission rate using Equation 5 of this
section for each of the performance test runs, g Ni/hr.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR11AP02.006
Where:
Ni operating limit1 = Maximum permissible hourly average Ni
operating limit, percent-acfm-ppmw, i.e., your site-specific
Ni operating limit;
Qmon,st = Hourly average actual gas flow rate as measured by
the continuous parameter monitoring system during the
performance test or using the alternative procedure in Sec.
63.1573, acfm; and
E-Catst = Ni concentration on equilibrium catalyst measured
during source test, ppmw.
(iv) If you elect Option 4 in paragraph (a)(1)(vi) of this section,
the Ni per coke burn-off emission limit, compute your Ni emission rate
using Equations 1 and 8 of this section and your site-specific Ni
operating limit (if you use a continuous opacity monitoring system)
using Equations 9 and 10 of this section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01DE15.022
[[Page 131]]
Where:
ENi2 = Normalized mass emission rate of Ni, mg/kg coke (lb/
1,000 lb coke).
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01DE15.023
Where:
Opacity2 = Opacity value for use in Equation 10 of this
section, percent, or 10 percent, whichever is greater; and
NiEmR2st = Average Ni emission rate calculated as the
arithmetic average Ni emission rate using Equation 8 of this
section for each of the performance test runs, mg/kg coke.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01DE15.024
Where:
Ni Operating Limit2 = Maximum permissible hourly average Ni
operating limit, percent-ppmw-acfm-hr/kg coke, i.e., your
site-specific Ni operating limit; and
Rc,st = Coke burn rate from Equation 1 of this section, as
measured during the initial performance test, kg coke/hr.
(5) Demonstrate initial compliance with each emission limitation
that applies to you according to Table 5 of this subpart.
(6) Demonstrate initial compliance with the work practice standard
in paragraph (a)(3) of this section by submitting your operation,
maintenance, and monitoring plan to your permitting authority as part of
your Notification of Compliance Status.
(7) Submit the Notification of Compliance Status containing the
results of the initial compliance demonstration according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1574.
(c) How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations and work practice standards? You must:
(1) Demonstrate continuous compliance with each emission limitation
in Tables 1 and 2 of this subpart that applies to you according to the
methods specified in Tables 6 and 7 of this subpart.
(2) Demonstrate continuous compliance with the work practice
standard in paragraph (a)(3) of this section by maintaining records to
document conformance with the procedures in your operation, maintenance,
and monitoring plan.
(3) If you use a continuous opacity monitoring system and elect to
comply with Option 3 in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of this section, determine
continuous compliance with your site-specific Ni operating limit by
using Equation 11 of this section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR11AP02.010
Where:
Ni operating value1 = Maximum permissible hourly average Ni
standard operating value, %-acfm-ppmw;
Opacity = Hourly average opacity, percent;
Qmon = Hourly average actual gas flow rate as measured by
continuous parameter monitoring system or calculated by
alternative procedure in Sec. 63.1573, acfm; and
E-Cat = Ni concentration on equilibrium catalyst from weekly or more
recent measurement, ppmw.
[[Page 132]]
(4) If you use a continuous opacity monitoring system and elect to
comply with Option 4 in paragraph (a)(1)(vi) of this section, determine
continuous compliance with your site-specific Ni operating limit by
using Equation 12 of this section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR11AP02.011
Where:
Ni operating value2 = Maximum permissible hourly average Ni
standard operating value, percent-acfm-ppmw-hr/kg coke.
(5) If you elect to comply with the alternative limit in paragraph
(a)(5)(ii) of this section during periods of startup, shutdown and hot
standby, demonstrate continuous compliance on or before the date
specified in Sec. 63.1563(d) by:
(i) Collecting the volumetric flow rate from the catalyst
regenerator (in acfm) and determining the average flow rate for each
hour. For events lasting less than one hour, determine the average flow
rate during the event.
(ii) Determining the cumulative cross-sectional area of the primary
internal cyclone inlets in square feet (ft\2\) using design drawings of
the primary (first-stage) internal cyclones to determine the inlet
cross-sectional area of each primary internal cyclone and summing the
cross-sectional areas for all primary internal cyclones in the catalyst
regenerator or, if primary cyclones. If all primary internal cyclones
are identical, you may alternatively determine the inlet cross-sectional
area of one primary internal cyclone using design drawings and multiply
that area by the total number of primary internal cyclones in the
catalyst regenerator.
(iii) Calculating the inlet velocity to the primary internal
cyclones in feet per second (ft/sec) by dividing the average volumetric
flow rate (acfm) by the cumulative cross-sectional area of the primary
internal cyclone inlets (ft\2\) and by 60 seconds/minute (for unit
conversion).
(iv) Maintaining the inlet velocity to the primary internal cyclones
at or above 20 feet per second for each hour during the startup,
shutdown, or hot standby event or, for events lasting less than 1 hour,
for the duration of the event.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6938, Feb. 9, 2005; 80
FR 75273, Dec. 1, 2015; 81 FR 45243, July 13, 2016; 83 FR 60722, Nov.
26, 2018]
Sec. 63.1565 What are my requirements for organic HAP emissions
from catalytic cracking units?
(a) What emission limitations and work practice standards must I
meet? You must:
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(5) of this section, meet
each emission limitation in Table 8 of this subpart that applies to you.
If your catalytic cracking unit is subject to the NSPS for carbon
monoxide (CO) in Sec. 60.103 of this chapter or is subject to Sec.
60.102a(b)(4) of this chapter, you must meet the emission limitations
for NSPS units. If your catalytic cracking unit is not subject to the
NSPS for CO, you can choose from the two options in paragraphs (a)(1)(i)
through (ii) of this section:
(i) You can elect to comply with the NSPS requirements (Option 1);
or
(ii) You can elect to comply with the CO emission limit (Option 2).
(2) Comply with each site-specific operating limit in Table 9 of
this subpart that applies to you.
(3) Prepare an operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan according
to the requirements in Sec. 63.1574(f) and operate at all times
according to the procedures in the plan.
(4) The emission limitations and operating limits for organic HAP
emissions from catalytic cracking units required in paragraphs (a)(1)
and (2) of this section do not apply during periods of planned
maintenance
[[Page 133]]
preapproved by the applicable permitting authority according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1575(j).
(5) On or before the date specified in Sec. 63.1563(d), you must
comply with one of the two options in paragraphs (a)(5)(i) and (ii) of
this section during periods of startup, shutdown and hot standby:
(i) You can elect to comply with the requirements in paragraphs
(a)(1) and (2) of this section; or
(ii) You can elect to maintain the oxygen (O2)
concentration in the exhaust gas from your catalyst regenerator at or
above 1 volume percent (dry basis) or 1 volume percent (wet basis with
no moisture correction).
(b) How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations and work practice standards? You must:
(1) Install, operate, and maintain a continuous monitoring system
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.1572 and Table 10 of this
subpart. Except:
(i) Whether or not your catalytic cracking unit is subject to the
NSPS for CO in Sec. 60.103 of this chapter, you don't have to install
and operate a continuous emission monitoring system if you show that CO
emissions from your vent average less than 50 parts per million (ppm),
dry basis. You must get an exemption from your permitting authority,
based on your written request. To show that the emissions average is
less than 50 ppm (dry basis), you must continuously monitor CO emissions
for 30 days using a CO continuous emission monitoring system that meets
the requirements in Sec. 63.1572.
(ii) If your catalytic cracking unit isn't subject to the NSPS for
CO, you don't have to install and operate a continuous emission
monitoring system or a continuous parameter monitoring system if you
vent emissions to a boiler (including a ``CO boiler'') or process heater
that has a design heat input capacity of at least 44 megawatts (MW).
(iii) If your catalytic cracking unit isn't subject to the NSPS for
CO, you don't have to install and operate a continuous emission
monitoring system or a continuous parameter monitoring system if you
vent emissions to a boiler or process heater in which all vent streams
are introduced into the flame zone.
(2) Conduct each performance test for a catalytic cracking unit not
subject to the NSPS for CO according to the requirements in Sec.
63.1571 and under the conditions specified in Table 11 of this subpart.
(3) Establish each site-specific operating limit in Table 9 of this
subpart that applies to you according to the procedures in Table 11 of
this subpart.
(4) Demonstrate initial compliance with each emission limitation
that applies to you according to Table 12 of this subpart.
(5) Demonstrate initial compliance with the work practice standard
in paragraph (a)(3) of this section by submitting the operation,
maintenance, and monitoring plan to your permitting authority as part of
your Notification of Compliance Status according to Sec. 63.1574.
(6) Submit the Notification of Compliance Status containing the
results of the initial compliance demonstration according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1574.
(c) How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations and work practice standards? You must:
(1) Demonstrate continuous compliance with each emission limitation
in Tables 8 and 9 of this subpart that applies to you according to the
methods specified in Tables 13 and 14 of this subpart.
(2) Demonstrate continuous compliance with the work practice
standard in paragraph (a)(3) of this section by complying with the
procedures in your operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 80 FR 75275, Dec. 1, 2015; 81
FR 45243, July 13, 2016; 83 FR 60723, Nov. 26, 2018]
Sec. 63.1566 What are my requirements for organic HAP emissions
from catalytic reforming units?
(a) What emission limitations and work practice standards must I
meet? You must:
(1) Meet each emission limitation in Table 15 of this subpart that
applies to you. You can choose from the two options in paragraphs
(a)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(i) You can elect to vent emissions of total organic compounds (TOC)
to a
[[Page 134]]
flare (Option 1). On and after January 30, 2019, the flare must meet the
requirements of Sec. 63.670. Prior to January 30, 2019, the flare must
meet the control device requirements in Sec. 63.11(b) or the
requirements of Sec. 63.670.
(ii) You can elect to meet a TOC or nonmethane TOC percent reduction
standard or concentration limit, whichever is less stringent (Option 2).
(2) Comply with each site-specific operating limit in Table 16 of
this subpart that applies to you.
(3) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, the
emission limitations in Tables 15 and 16 of this subpart apply to
emissions from catalytic reforming unit process vents associated with
initial catalyst depressuring and catalyst purging operations that occur
prior to the coke burn-off cycle. The emission limitations in Tables 15
and 16 of this subpart do not apply to the coke burn-off, catalyst
rejuvenation, reduction or activation vents, or to the control systems
used for these vents.
(4) The emission limitations in tables 15 and 16 of this subpart do
not apply to emissions from process vents during passive depressuring
when the reactor vent pressure is 5 pounds per square inch gauge (psig)
or less or during active depressuring or purging prior to January 30,
2019, when the reactor vent pressure is 5 psig or less. On and after
January 30, 2019, the emission limitations in tables 15 and 16 of this
subpart do apply to emissions from process vents during active purging
operations (when nitrogen or other purge gas is actively introduced to
the reactor vessel) or active depressuring (using a vacuum pump, ejector
system, or similar device) regardless of the reactor vent pressure.
(5) Prepare an operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan according
to the requirements in Sec. 63.1574(f) and operate at all times
according to the procedures in the plan.
(b) How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations and work practice standard? You must:
(1) Install, operate, and maintain a continuous monitoring system(s)
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.1572 and Table 17 of this
subpart.
(2) Conduct each performance test for a catalytic reforming unit
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.1571 and under the conditions
specified in Table 18 of this subpart.
(3) Establish each site-specific operating limit in Table 16 of this
subpart that applies to you according to the procedures in Table 18 of
this subpart.
(4) Use the procedures in paragraph (b)(4)(i) or (ii) of this
section to determine initial compliance with the emission limitations.
(i) If you elect the percent reduction standard under Option 2,
calculate the emission rate of nonmethane TOC using Equation 1 of this
section (if you use Method 25) or Equation 2 of this section (if you use
Method 25A or Methods 25A and 18), then calculate the mass emission
reduction using Equation 3 of this section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR11AP02.012
Where:
E = Emission rate of nonmethane TOC in the vent stream, kilograms-C per
hour;
K4 = Constant, 6.0 x 10-5 (kilograms per
milligram)(minutes per hour);
Mc = Mass concentration of total gaseous nonmethane organic
(as carbon) as measured and calculated using Method 25 in
appendix A to part 60 of this chapter, mg/dscm; and
Qs = Vent stream flow rate, dscm/min, at a temperature of 20
degrees Celsius (C).
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09FE05.001
Where:
K5 = Constant, 1.8 x 10-4 (parts per million)
-1 (gram-mole per standard cubic meter) (gram-C per
gram-mole-hexane) (kilogram per gram) (minutes per hour),
where the standard temperature (standard cubic meter) is at 20
degrees C (uses 72g-C/g.mole hexane);
C TOC = Concentration of TOC on a dry basis in ppmv as hexane
as measured by Method 25A in appendix A to part 60 of this
chapter;
C methane = Concentration of methane on a dry basis in ppmv
as measured by Method 18 in appendix A to part 60 of this
chapter. If the concentration of methane is not determined,
assume C methane equals zero; and
Q s = Vent stream flow rate, dry standard cubic meters per
minute, at a temperature of 20 degrees C.
[[Page 135]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR11AP02.014
Where:
E i = Mass emission rate of TOC at control device inlet, kg/
hr; and
E o = Mass emission rate of TOC at control device outlet, kg/
hr.
(ii) If you elect the 20 parts per million by volume (ppmv)
concentration limit, correct the measured TOC concentration for oxygen
(O2) content in the gas stream using Equation 4 of this
section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09FE05.002
Where:
CNMTOC, 3O2 = Concentration of nonmethane
TOC on a dry basis in ppmv as hexane corrected to 3 percent
oxygen.
(5) You are not required to do a TOC performance test if:
(i) You elect to vent emissions to a flare as provided in paragraph
(a)(1)(i) of this section (Option 1); or
(ii) You elect the TOC percent reduction or concentration limit in
paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section (Option 2), and you use a boiler or
process heater with a design heat input capacity of 44 MW or greater or
a boiler or process heater in which all vent streams are introduced into
the flame zone.
(6) Demonstrate initial compliance with each emission limitation
that applies to you according to Table 19 of this subpart.
(7) Demonstrate initial compliance with the work practice standard
in paragraph (a)(5) of this section by submitting the operation,
maintenance, and monitoring plan to your permitting authority as part of
your Notification of Compliance Status.
(8) Submit the Notification of Compliance Status containing the
results of the initial compliance demonstration according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1574.
(c) How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations and work practice standards? You must:
(1) Demonstrate continuous compliance with each emission limitation
in Tables 15 and 16 of this subpart that applies to you according to the
methods specified in Tables 20 and 21 of this subpart.
(2) Demonstrate continuous compliance with the work practice
standards in paragraph (a)(3) of this section by complying with the
procedures in your operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6938, Feb. 9, 2005; 80
FR 75275, Dec. 1, 2015; 81 FR 45243, July 13, 2016]
Sec. 63.1567 What are my requirements for inorganic HAP emissions
from catalytic reforming units?
(a) What emission limitations and work practice standards must I
meet? You must:
(1) Meet each emission limitation in Table 22 to this subpart that
applies to you. If you operate a catalytic reforming unit in which
different reactors in the catalytic reforming unit are regenerated in
separate regeneration systems, then these emission limitations apply to
each separate regeneration system. These emission limitations apply to
emissions from catalytic reforming unit process vents associated with
the coke burn-off and catalyst rejuvenation operations during coke burn-
off and catalyst regeneration. You can choose from the two options in
paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (ii) of this section:
(i) You can elect to meet a percent reduction standard for hydrogen
chloride (HCl) emissions (Option 1); or
[[Page 136]]
(ii) You can elect to meet an HCl concentration limit (Option 2).
(2) Meet each site-specific operating limit in Table 23 of this
subpart that applies to you. These operating limits apply during coke
burn-off and catalyst rejuvenation.
(3) Prepare an operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan according
to the requirements in Sec. 63.1574(f) and operate at all times
according to the procedures in the plan.
(b) How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations and work practice standard? You must:
(1) Install, operate, and maintain a continuous monitoring system(s)
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.1572 and Table 24 of this
subpart.
(2) Conduct each performance test for a catalytic reforming unit
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.1571 and the conditions
specified in Table 25 of this subpart.
(3) Establish each site-specific operating limit in Table 23 of this
subpart that applies to you according to the procedures in Table 25 of
this subpart.
(4) Use the equations in paragraphs (b)(4)(i) through (iv) of this
section to determine initial compliance with the emission limitations.
(i) Correct the measured HCl concentration for oxygen
(O2) content in the gas stream using Equation 1 of this
section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09FE05.003
Where:
CHCl,3 O2 = Concentration of HCl on a dry
basis in ppmv corrected to 3 percent oxygen or 1 ppmv,
whichever is greater;
CHCl = Concentration of HCl on a dry basis in ppmv, as
measured by Method 26A in 40 CFR part 60, appendix A; and
%O2 = Oxygen concentration in percent by volume (dry basis).
(ii) If you elect the percent reduction standard, calculate the
emission rate of HCl using Equation 2 of this section; then calculate
the mass emission reduction from the mass emission rates using Equation
3 of this section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09FE05.004
Where:
E HCl = Emission rate of HCl in the vent stream, grams per
hour;
K6 = Constant, 0.091 (parts per million) -1 (grams
HCl per standard cubic meter) (minutes per hour), where the
standard temperature (standard cubic meter) is at 20 degrees
Celsius (C); and
Q s = Vent stream flow rate, dscm/min, at a temperature of 20
degrees C.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09FE05.005
Where:
E HCl,i = Mass emission rate of HCl at control device inlet,
g/hr; and
E HCl,o = Mass emission rate of HCl at control device outlet,
g/hr.
(iii) If you are required to use a colormetric tube sampling system
to demonstrate continuous compliance with the HCl concentration
operating limit, calculate the HCl operating limit using Equation 4 of
this section as follows:
[[Page 137]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09FE05.006
Where:
CHCl,ppmvLimit = Maximum permissible HCl concentration for
the HCl concentration operating limit, ppmv;
CHCl,AveTube = Average HCl concentration from the colormetric
tube sampling system, calculated as the arithmetic average of
the average HCl concentration measured for each performance
test run, ppmv or 1 ppmv, whichever is greater; and
CHCl,RegLimit = Maximum permissible outlet HCl concentration
for the applicable catalytic reforming unit as listed in Table
22 of this subpart, either 10 or 30 ppmv.
(iv) If you are required to use a colormetric tube sampling system
to demonstrate continuous compliance with the percent reduction
operating limit, calculate the HCl operating limit using Equation 5 of
this section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09FE05.007
Where:
CHCl,Limit = Maximum permissible HCl
concentration for the percent reduction operating limit, ppmv;
%HCl ReductionLimit = Minimum permissible HCl reduction for
the applicable catalytic reforming unit as listed in Table 22
of this subpart, either 97 or 92 percent; and
%HCl ReductionTest = Average percent HCl reduction calculated
as the arithmetic average HCl reduction calculated using
Equation 3 of this section for each performance source test,
percent.
(5) Demonstrate initial compliance with each emission limitation
that applies to you according to Table 26 of this subpart.
(6) Demonstrate initial compliance with the work practice standard
in paragraph (a)(3) of this section by submitting the operation,
maintenance, and monitoring plan to your permitting authority as part of
your Notification of Compliance Status.
(7) Submit the Notification of Compliance Status containing the
results of the initial compliance demonstration according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1574.
(c) How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations and work practice standard? You must:
(1) Demonstrate continuous compliance with each emission limitation
in Tables 22 and 23 of this subpart that applies to you according to the
methods specified in Tables 27 and 28 of this subpart.
(2) Demonstrate continuous compliance with the work practice
standard in paragraph (a)(3) of this section by maintaining records to
document conformance with the procedures in your operation, maintenance
and monitoring plan.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6939, Feb. 9, 2005]
Sec. 63.1568 What are my requirements for HAP emissions
from sulfur recovery units?
(a) What emission limitations and work practice standard must I
meet? You must:
(1) Meet each emission limitation in Table 29 of this subpart that
applies to you. If your sulfur recovery unit is subject to the NSPS for
sulfur oxides in Sec. 60.104 or Sec. 60.102a(f)(1) of this chapter,
you must meet the emission limitations for NSPS units. If your sulfur
recovery unit is not subject to one of these NSPS for sulfur oxides, you
can choose from the options in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (ii) of this
section:
(i) You can elect to meet the NSPS requirements in Sec.
60.104(a)(2) or Sec. 60.102a(f)(1) of this chapter (Option 1); or
[[Page 138]]
(ii) You can elect to meet the total reduced sulfur (TRS) emission
limitation (Option 2).
(2) Meet each operating limit in Table 30 of this subpart that
applies to you.
(3) Prepare an operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan according
to the requirements in Sec. 63.1574(f) and operate at all times
according to the procedures in the plan.
(4) On or before the date specified in Sec. 63.1563(d), you must
comply with one of the three options in paragraphs (a)(4)(i) through
(iii) of this section during periods of startup and shutdown.
(i) You can elect to comply with the requirements in paragraphs
(a)(1) and (2) of this section.
(ii) You can elect to send any startup or shutdown purge gases to a
flare. On and after January 30, 2019, the flare must meet the
requirements of Sec. 63.670. Prior to January 30, 2019, the flare must
meet the design and operating requirements in Sec. 63.11(b) or the
requirements of Sec. 63.670.
(iii) You can elect to send any startup or shutdown purge gases to a
thermal oxidizer or incinerator operated at a minimum hourly average
temperature of 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit in the firebox and a minimum
hourly average outlet oxygen (O2) concentration of 2 volume
percent (dry basis).
(b) How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations and work practice standards? You must:
(1) Install, operate, and maintain a continuous monitoring system
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.1572 and Table 31 of this
subpart.
(2) Conduct each performance test for a sulfur recovery unit not
subject to the NSPS for sulfur oxides according to the requirements in
Sec. 63.1571 and under the conditions specified in Table 32 of this
subpart.
(3) Establish each site-specific operating limit in Table 30 of this
subpart that applies to you according to the procedures in Table 32 of
this subpart.
(4) Correct the reduced sulfur samples to zero percent excess air
using Equation 1 of this section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR11AP02.016
Where:
Cadj = pollutant concentration adjusted to zero percent
oxygen, ppm or g/dscm;
Cmeas = pollutant concentration measured on a dry basis, ppm
or g/dscm;
20.9c = 20.9 percent oxygen--0.0 percent oxygen (defined
oxygen correction basis), percent;
20.9 = oxygen concentration in air, percent;
%O2 = oxygen concentration measured on a dry basis, percent.
(5) Demonstrate initial compliance with each emission limitation
that applies to you according to Table 33 of this subpart.
(6) Demonstrate initial compliance with the work practice standard
in paragraph (a)(3) of this section by submitting the operation,
maintenance, and monitoring plan to your permitting authority as part of
your notification of compliance status.
(7) Submit the notification of compliance status containing the
results of the initial compliance demonstration according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1574.
(c) How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission
limitations and work practice standards? You must:
(1) Demonstrate continuous compliance with each emission limitation
in Tables 29 and 30 of this subpart that applies to you according to the
methods specified in Tables 34 and 35 of this subpart.
(2) Demonstrate continuous compliance with the work practice
standard in paragraph (a)(3) of this section by complying with the
procedures in your operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 80 FR 75275, Dec. 1, 2015; 81
FR 45244, July 13, 2016]
[[Page 139]]
Sec. 63.1569 What are my requirements for HAP emissions from bypass lines?
(a) What work practice standards must I meet? (1) You must meet each
work practice standard in Table 36 of this subpart that applies to you.
You can choose from the four options in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through
(iv) of this section:
(i) You can elect to install an automated system (Option 1);
(ii) You can elect to use a manual lock system (Option 2);
(iii) You can elect to seal the line (Option 3); or
(iv) You can elect to vent to a control device (Option 4).
(2) As provided in Sec. 63.6(g), we, the EPA, may choose to grant
you permission to use an alternative to the work practice standard in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
(3) You must prepare an operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.1574(f) and operate at all
times according to the procedures in the plan.
(b) How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the work practice
standards? You must:
(1) If you elect the option in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section,
conduct each performance test for a bypass line according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1571 and under the conditions specified in
Table 37 of this subpart.
(2) Demonstrate initial compliance with each work practice standard
in Table 36 of this subpart that applies to you according to Table 38 of
this subpart.
(3) Demonstrate initial compliance with the work practice standard
in paragraph (a)(3) of this section by submitting the operation,
maintenance, and monitoring plan to your permitting authority as part of
your notification of compliance status.
(4) Submit the notification of compliance status containing the
results of the initial compliance demonstration according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1574.
(c) How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the work
practice standards? You must:
(1) Demonstrate continuous compliance with each work practice
standard in Table 36 of this subpart that applies to you according to
the requirements in Table 39 of this subpart.
(2) Demonstrate continuous compliance with the work practice
standard in paragraph (a)(3) of this section by complying with the
procedures in your operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 83 FR 60723, Nov. 26, 2018]
General Compliance Requirements
Sec. 63.1570 What are my general requirements for complying
with this subpart?
(a) You must be in compliance with all of the non-opacity standards
in this subpart at all times.
(b) You must be in compliance with the opacity and visible emission
limits in this subpart at all times.
(c) At all times, you must operate and maintain any affected source,
including associated air pollution control equipment and monitoring
equipment, in a manner consistent with safety and good air pollution
control practices for minimizing emissions. The general duty to minimize
emissions does not require you to make any further efforts to reduce
emissions if levels required by the applicable standard have been
achieved. Determination of whether a source is operating in compliance
with operation and maintenance requirements will be based on information
available to the Administrator which may include, but is not limited to,
monitoring results, review of operation and maintenance procedures,
review of operation and maintenance records, and inspection of the
source.
(d) During the period between the compliance date specified for your
affected source and the date upon which continuous monitoring systems
have been installed and validated and any applicable operating limits
have been set, you must maintain a log that documents the procedures
used to minimize emissions from process and emissions control equipment
according to the general duty in paragraph (c) of this section.
(e) [Reserved]
(f) You must report each instance in which you did not meet each
emission
[[Page 140]]
limitation and each operating limit in this subpart that applies to you.
This includes periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction. You also
must report each instance in which you did not meet the work practice
standards in this subpart that apply to you. These instances are
deviations from the emission limitations and work practice standards in
this subpart. These deviations must be reported according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.1575.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 20462, Apr. 20, 2006;
80 FR 75276, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. 63.1571 How and when do I conduct a performance test
or other initial compliance demonstration?
(a) When must I conduct a performance test? You must conduct initial
performance tests and report the results by no later than 150 days after
the compliance date specified for your source in Sec. 63.1563 and
according to the provisions in Sec. Sec. 63.7(a)(2) and 63.1574(a)(3).
If you are required to do a performance evaluation or test for a semi-
regenerative catalytic reforming unit catalyst regenerator vent, you may
do them at the first regeneration cycle after your compliance date and
report the results in a followup Notification of Compliance Status
report due no later than 150 days after the test. You must conduct
additional performance tests as specified in paragraphs (a)(5) and (6)
of this section and report the results of these performance tests
according to the provisions in Sec. 63.1575(f).
(1) For each emission limitation or work practice standard where
initial compliance is not demonstrated using a performance test, opacity
observation, or visible emission observation, you must conduct the
initial compliance demonstration within 30 calendar days after the
compliance date that is specified for your source in Sec. 63.1563.
(2) For each emission limitation where the averaging period is 30
days, the 30-day period for demonstrating initial compliance begins at
12:00 a.m. on the compliance date that is specified for your source in
Sec. 63.1563 and ends at 11:59 p.m., 30 calendar days after the
compliance date that is specified for your source in Sec. 63.1563.
(3) If you commenced construction or reconstruction between
September 11, 1998 and April 11, 2002, you must demonstrate initial
compliance with either the proposed emission limitation or the
promulgated emission limitation no later than October 8, 2002 or within
180 calendar days after startup of the source, whichever is later,
according to Sec. 63.7(a)(2)(ix).
(4) If you commenced construction or reconstruction between
September 11, 1998 and April 11, 2002, and you chose to comply with the
proposed emission limitation when demonstrating initial compliance, you
must conduct a second compliance demonstration for the promulgated
emission limitation by October 10, 2005, or after startup of the source,
whichever is later, according to Sec. 63.7(a)(2)(ix).
(5) Periodic performance testing for PM or Ni. Except as provided in
paragraphs (a)(5)(i) and (ii) of this section, conduct a periodic
performance test for PM or Ni for each catalytic cracking unit at least
once every 5 years according to the requirements in Table 4 of this
subpart. You must conduct the first periodic performance test no later
than August 1, 2017 or within 150 days of startup of a new unit.
(i) Catalytic cracking units monitoring PM concentration with a PM
CEMS are not required to conduct a periodic PM performance test.
(ii) Conduct a performance test annually if you comply with the
emission limits in Item 1 (NSPS subpart J) or Item 4 (Option 1a) in
Table 1 of this subpart and the PM emissions measured during the most
recent performance source test are greater than 0.80 g/kg coke burn-off.
(6) One-time performance testing for Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN). Conduct
a performance test for HCN from each catalytic cracking unit no later
than August 1, 2017 or within 150 days of startup of a new unit
according to the applicable requirements in paragraphs (a)(6)(i) and
(ii) of this section.
(i) If you conducted a performance test for HCN for a specific
catalytic cracking unit between March 31, 2011 and February 1, 2016, you
may submit a request to the Administrator to use the previously
conducted performance test
[[Page 141]]
results to fulfill the one-time performance test requirement for HCN for
each of the catalytic cracking units tested according to the
requirements in paragraphs (a)(6)(i)(A) through (D) of this section.
(A) The request must include a copy of the complete source test
report, the date(s) of the performance test and the test methods used.
If available, you must also indicate whether the catalytic cracking unit
catalyst regenerator was operated in partial or complete combustion mode
during the test, the control device configuration, including whether
platinum or palladium combustion promoters were used during the test,
and the CO concentration (measured using CO CEMS or manual test method)
for each test run.
(B) You must submit a separate request for each catalytic cracking
unit tested and you must submit each request to the Administrator no
later than March 30, 2016.
(C) The Administrator will evaluate each request with respect to the
completeness of the request, the completeness of the submitted test
report and the appropriateness of the test methods used. The
Administrator will notify the facility within 60 days of receipt of the
request if it is approved or denied. If the Administrator fails to
respond to the facility within 60 days of receipt of the request, the
request will be automatically approved.
(D) If the request is approved, you do not need to conduct an
additional HCN performance test. If the request is denied, you must
conduct an additional HCN performance test following the requirements in
(a)(6)(ii) of this section.
(ii) Unless you receive approval to use a previously conducted
performance test to fulfill the one-time performance test requirement
for HCN for your catalytic cracking unit as provided in paragraph
(a)(6)(i) of this section, conduct a performance test for HCN for each
catalytic cracking unit no later than August 1, 2017 according to
following requirements:
(A) Select sampling port location, determine volumetric flow rate,
conduct gas molecular weight analysis and measure moisture content as
specified in either Item 1 of Table 4 of this subpart or Item 1 of Table
11 of this subpart.
(B) Measure HCN concentration using Method 320 of appendix A of this
part. The method ASTM D6348-03 (Reapproved 2010) including Annexes A1
through A8 (incorporated by reference--see Sec. 63.14) is an acceptable
alternative to EPA Method 320 of appendix A of this part. The method
ASTM D6348-12e1 (incorporated by reference--see Sec. 63.14) is an
acceptable alternative to EPA Method 320 of appendix A of this part with
the following two caveats:
(1) The test plan preparation and implementation in the Annexes to
ASTM D6348-03 (Reapproved 2010), Sections A1 through A8 are mandatory;
and
(2) In ASTM D6348-03 (Reapproved 2010) Annex A5 (Analyte Spiking
Technique), the percent (%) R must be determined for each target analyte
(Equation A5.5). In order for the test data to be acceptable for a
compound, %R must be 70% = R <= 130%. If the %R value does
not meet this criterion for a target compound, the test data is not
acceptable for that compound and the test must be repeated for that
analyte (i.e., the sampling and/or analytical procedure should be
adjusted before a retest). The %R value for each compound must be
reported in the test report, and all field measurements must be
corrected with the calculated %R value for that compound by using the
following equation:
Reported Result = (Measured Concentration in the Stack x 100//% R.
(C) Measure CO concentration as specified in either Item 2 or 3a of
Table 11 of this subpart.
(D) Record and include in the test report an indication of whether
the catalytic cracking unit catalyst regenerator was operated in partial
or complete combustion mode and the control device configuration,
including whether platinum or palladium combustion promoters were used
during the test.
(b) What are the general requirements for performance test and
performance evaluations? You must:
(1) Performance tests shall be conducted according to the provisions
of Sec. 63.7(e) except that performance tests shall be conducted at
maximum representative operating capacity for the
[[Page 142]]
process. During the performance test, you must operate the control
device at either maximum or minimum representative operating conditions
for monitored control device parameters, whichever results in lower
emission reduction. You must not conduct a performance test during
startup, shutdown, periods when the control device is bypassed or
periods when the process, monitoring equipment or control device is not
operating properly. You may not conduct performance tests during periods
of malfunction. You must record the process information that is
necessary to document operating conditions during the test and include
in such record an explanation to support that the test was conducted at
maximum representative operating capacity. Upon request, you must make
available to the Administrator such records as may be necessary to
determine the conditions of performance tests.
(2) Except for opacity and visible emission observations, conduct
three separate test runs for each performance test as specified in Sec.
63.7(e)(3). Each test run must last at least 1 hour.
(3) Conduct each performance evaluation according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.8(e).
(4) Calculate the average emission rate for the performance test by
calculating the emission rate for each individual test run in the units
of the applicable emission limitation using Equation 2, 5, or 8 of Sec.
63.1564, and determining the arithmetic average of the calculated
emission rates.
(c) What procedures must I use for an engineering assessment? You
may choose to use an engineering assessment to calculate the process
vent flow rate, net heating value, TOC emission rate, and total organic
HAP emission rate expected to yield the highest daily emission rate when
determining the emission reduction or outlet concentration for the
organic HAP standard for catalytic reforming units. If you use an
engineering assessment, you must document all data, assumptions, and
procedures to the satisfaction of the applicable permitting authority.
An engineering assessment may include the approaches listed in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4) of this section. Other engineering
assessments may be used but are subject to review and approval by the
applicable permitting authority.
(1) You may use previous test results provided the tests are
representative of current operating practices at the process unit, and
provided EPA methods or approved alternatives were used;
(2) You may use bench-scale or pilot-scale test data representative
of the process under representative operating conditions;
(3) You may use maximum flow rate, TOC emission rate, organic HAP
emission rate, or organic HAP or TOC concentration specified or implied
within a permit limit applicable to the process vent; or
(4) You may use design analysis based on engineering principles,
measurable process parameters, or physical or chemical laws or
properties. Examples of analytical methods include, but are not limited
to:
(i) Use of material balances based on process stoichiometry to
estimate maximum TOC concentrations;
(ii) Calculation of hourly average maximum flow rate based on
physical equipment design such as pump or blower capacities; and
(iii) Calculation of TOC concentrations based on saturation
conditions.
(d) Can I adjust the process or control device measured values when
establishing an operating limit? If you do a performance test to
demonstrate compliance, you must base the process or control device
operating limits for continuous parameter monitoring systems on the
results measured during the performance test. You may adjust the values
measured during the performance test according to the criteria in
paragraphs (d)(1) through (3) of this section.
(1) If you must meet the HAP metal emission limitations in Sec.
63.1564, you elect the option in paragraph (a)(1)(v) in Sec. 63.1564
(Ni lb/hr), and you use continuous parameter monitoring systems, you
must establish an operating limit for the equilibrium catalyst Ni
concentration based on the laboratory analysis of the equilibrium
catalyst Ni concentration from the initial performance test. Section
63.1564(b)(2) allows you to adjust the laboratory measurements of the
equilibrium catalyst Ni
[[Page 143]]
concentration to the maximum level. You must make this adjustment using
Equation 1 of this section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR11AP02.017
Where:
Ecat-Limit = Operating limit for equilibrium catalyst Ni concentration,
mg/kg;
NiEmR1st = Average Ni emission rate calculated as the
arithmetic average Ni emission rate using Equation 5 of this
section for each performance test run, g Ni/hr; and
Ecatst = Average equilibrium Ni concentration from laboratory
test results, mg/kg.
(2) If you must meet the HAP metal emission limitations in Sec.
63.1564, you elect the option in paragraph (a)(1)(vi) in Sec. 63.1564
(Ni per coke burn-off), and you use continuous parameter monitoring
systems, you must establish an operating limit for the equilibrium
catalyst Ni concentration based on the laboratory analysis of the
equilibrium catalyst Ni concentration from the initial performance test.
Section 63.1564(b)(2) allows you to adjust the laboratory measurements
of the equilibrium catalyst Ni concentration to the maximum level. You
must make this adjustment using Equation 2 of this section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR11AP02.018
Where:
NiEmR2st = Average Ni emission rate calculated as the
arithmetic average Ni emission rate using Equation 8 of Sec.
63.1564 for each performance test run, mg/kg coke burn-off.
(3) If you choose to adjust the equilibrium catalyst Ni
concentration to the maximum level, you can't adjust any other monitored
operating parameter (i.e., gas flow rate, voltage, pressure drop,
liquid-to-gas ratio).
(4) Except as specified in paragraph (d)(3) of this section, if you
use continuous parameter monitoring systems, you may adjust one of your
monitored operating parameters (flow rate, total power and secondary
current, pressure drop, liquid-to-gas ratio) from the average of
measured values during the performance test to the maximum value (or
minimum value, if applicable) representative of worst-case operating
conditions, if necessary. This adjustment of measured values may be done
using control device design specifications, manufacturer
recommendations, or other applicable information. You must provide
supporting documentation and rationale in your Notification of
Compliance Status, demonstrating to the satisfaction of your permitting
authority, that your affected source complies with the applicable
emission limit at the operating limit based on adjusted values.
(e) Can I change my operating limit? You may change the established
operating limit by meeting the requirements in paragraphs (e)(1) through
(3) of this section.
(1) You may change your established operating limit for a continuous
parameter monitoring system by doing an additional performance test, a
performance test in conjunction with an engineering assessment, or an
engineering assessment to verify that, at the new operating limit, you
are in compliance with the applicable emission limitation.
(2) You must establish a revised operating limit for your continuous
parameter monitoring system if you make
[[Page 144]]
any change in process or operating conditions that could affect control
system performance or you change designated conditions after the last
performance or compliance tests were done. You can establish the revised
operating limit as described in paragraph (e)(1) of this section.
(3) You may change your site-specific opacity operating limit or Ni
operating limit only by doing a new performance test.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 80 FR 75276, Dec. 1, 2015; 83
FR 60723, Nov. 26, 2018]
Sec. 63.1572 What are my monitoring installation, operation,
and maintenance requirements?
(a) You must install, operate, and maintain each continuous emission
monitoring system according to the requirements in paragraphs (a)(1)
through (4) of this section.
(1) You must install, operate, and maintain each continuous emission
monitoring system according to the requirements in Table 40 of this
subpart.
(2) If you use a continuous emission monitoring system to meet the
NSPS CO or SO2 limit, you must conduct a performance
evaluation of each continuous emission monitoring system according to
the requirements in Sec. 63.8 and Table 40 of this subpart. This
requirement does not apply to an affected source subject to the NSPS
that has already demonstrated initial compliance with the applicable
performance specification.
(3) As specified in Sec. 63.8(c)(4)(ii), each continuous emission
monitoring system must complete a minimum of one cycle of operation
(sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for each successive 15-minute
period.
(4) Data must be reduced as specified in Sec. 63.8(g)(2).
(b) You must install, operate, and maintain each continuous opacity
monitoring system according to the requirements in paragraphs (b)(1)
through (3) of this section.
(1) Each continuous opacity monitoring system must be installed,
operated, and maintained according to the requirements in Table 40 of
this subpart.
(2) If you use a continuous opacity monitoring system to meet the
NSPS opacity limit, you must conduct a performance evaluation of each
continuous opacity monitoring system according to the requirements in
Sec. 63.8 and Table 40 of this subpart. This requirement does not apply
to an affected source subject to the NSPS that has already demonstrated
initial compliance with the applicable performance specification.
(3) As specified in Sec. 63.8(c)(4)(i), each continuous opacity
monitoring system must complete a minimum of one cycle of sampling and
analyzing for each successive 10-second period and one cycle of data
recording for each successive 6-minute period.
(c) Except for flare monitoring systems, you must install, operate,
and maintain each continuous parameter monitoring system according to
the requirements in paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of this section. For
flares, on and after January 30, 2019, you must install, operate,
calibrate, and maintain monitoring systems as specified in Sec. Sec.
63.670 and 63.671. Prior to January 30, 2019, you must either meet the
monitoring system requirements in paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of this
section or meet the requirements in Sec. Sec. 63.670 and 63.671.
(1) You must install, operate, and maintain each continuous
parameter monitoring system according to the requirements in Table 41 of
this subpart. You must also meet the equipment specifications in Table
41 of this subpart if pH strips or colormetric tube sampling systems are
used. You must meet the requirements in Table 41 of this subpart for BLD
systems. Alternatively, before August 1, 2017, you may install, operate,
and maintain each continuous parameter monitoring system in a manner
consistent with the manufacturer's specifications or other written
procedures that provide adequate assurance that the equipment will
monitor accurately.
(2) The continuous parameter monitoring system must complete a
minimum of one cycle of operation for each successive 15-minute period.
You must have a minimum of four successive cycles of operation to have a
valid
[[Page 145]]
hour of data (or at least two if a calibration check is performed during
that hour or if the continuous parameter monitoring system is out-of-
control).
(3) Each continuous parameter monitoring system must have valid
hourly average data from at least 75 percent of the hours during which
the process operated, except for BLD systems.
(4) Each continuous parameter monitoring system must determine and
record the hourly average of all recorded readings and if applicable,
the daily average of all recorded readings for each operating day,
except for BLD systems. The daily average must cover a 24-hour period if
operation is continuous or the number of hours of operation per day if
operation is not continuous, except for BLD systems.
(5) Each continuous parameter monitoring system must record the
results of each inspection, calibration, and validation check.
(d) You must monitor and collect data according to the requirements
in paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) Except for monitoring malfunctions, associated repairs, and
required quality assurance or control activities (including as
applicable, calibration checks and required zero and span adjustments),
you must conduct all monitoring in continuous operation (or collect data
at all required intervals) at all times the affected source is
operating.
(2) You may not use data recorded during required quality assurance
or control activities (including, as applicable, calibration checks and
required zero and span adjustments) for purposes of this regulation,
including data averages and calculations, for fulfilling a minimum data
availability requirement, if applicable. You must use all the data
collected during all other periods in assessing the operation of the
control device and associated control system.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6940, Feb. 9, 2005; 80
FR 75277, Dec. 1, 2015; 83 FR 60723, Nov. 26, 2018]
Sec. 63.1573 What are my monitoring alternatives?
(a) What are the approved alternatives for measuring gas flow rate?
(1) You may use this alternative to a continuous parameter monitoring
system for the catalytic regenerator exhaust gas flow rate for your
catalytic cracking unit if the unit does not introduce any other gas
streams into the catalyst regeneration vent (i.e., complete combustion
units with no additional combustion devices). You may also use this
alternative to a continuous parameter monitoring system for the
catalytic regenerator atmospheric exhaust gas flow rate for your
catalytic reforming unit during the coke burn and rejuvenation cycles if
the unit operates as a constant pressure system during these cycles. You
may also use this alternative to a continuous parameter monitoring
system for the gas flow rate exiting the catalyst regenerator to
determine inlet velocity to the primary internal cyclones as required in
Sec. 63.1564(c)(5) regardless of the configuration of the catalytic
regenerator exhaust vent downstream of the regenerator (i.e., regardless
of whether or not any other gas streams are introduced into the catalyst
regeneration vent). Except, if you only use this alternative to
demonstrate compliance with Sec. 63.1564(c)(5), you shall use this
procedure for the performance test and for monitoring after the
performance test. You shall:
(i) Install and operate a continuous parameter monitoring system to
measure and record the hourly average volumetric air flow rate to the
catalytic cracking unit or catalytic reforming unit regenerator. Or, you
may determine and record the hourly average volumetric air flow rate to
the catalytic cracking unit or catalytic reforming unit regenerator
using the appropriate control room instrumentation.
(ii) Install and operate a continuous parameter monitoring system to
measure and record the temperature of the gases entering the control
device (or exiting the catalyst regenerator if you do not use an add-on
control device).
(iii) Calculate and record the hourly average actual exhaust gas
flow rate using Equation 1 of this section as follows:
[[Page 146]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09FE05.008
Where
Q gas = Hourly average actual gas flow rate, acfm;
1.12 = Default correction factor to convert gas flow from dry standard
cubic feet per minute (dscfm) to standard cubic feet per
minute (scfm);
Q air = Volumetric flow rate of air to regenerator, as
determined from the control room instrumentations, dscfm;
Q other = Volumetric flow rate of other gases entering the
regenerator as determined from the control room
instrumentations, dscfm. (Examples of ``other'' gases include
an oxygen-enriched air stream to catalytic cracking unit
regenerators and a nitrogen stream to catalytic reforming unit
regenerators.);
Tempgas = Temperature of gas stream in vent measured as near
as practical to the control device or opacity monitor, [deg]K.
For wet scrubbers, temperature of gas prior to the wet
scrubber; and
Pvent = Absolute pressure in the vent measured as near as
practical to the control device or opacity monitor, as
applicable, atm. When used to assess the gas flow rate in the
final atmospheric vent stack, you can assume Pvent
= 1 atm.
(2) You may use this alternative to calculating Q r, the
volumetric flow rate of exhaust gas for the catalytic cracking
regenerator as required in Equation 1 of Sec. 63.1564, if you have a
gas analyzer installed in the catalytic cracking regenerator exhaust
vent prior to the addition of air or other gas streams. You may measure
upstream or downstream of an electrostatic precipitator, but you shall
measure upstream of a carbon monoxide boiler. You shall:
(i) Install and operate a continuous parameter monitoring system to
measure and record the hourly average volumetric air flow rate to the
catalytic cracking unit regenerator. Or, you can determine and record
the hourly average volumetric air flow rate to the catalytic cracking
unit regenerator using the catalytic cracking unit control room
instrumentation.
(ii) Install and operate a continuous gas analyzer to measure and
record the concentration of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and oxygen
of the catalytic cracking regenerator exhaust.
(iii) Calculate and record the hourly average flow rate using
Equation 2 of this section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09FE05.009
Where:
Q r = Volumetric flow rate of exhaust gas from the catalyst
regenerator before adding air or gas streams, dscm/min (dscf/
min);
79 = Default concentration of nitrogen and argon in dry air, percent by
volume (dry basis);
%Oxy = Oxygen concentration in oxygen-enriched air stream,
percent by volume (dry basis);
Q oxy = Volumetric flow rate of oxygen-enriched air stream to
regenerator as determined from the catalytic cracking unit
control room instrumentations, dscm/min (dscf/min);
%CO2 = Carbon dioxide concentration in regenerator exhaust,
percent by volume (dry basis);
CO = Carbon monoxide concentration in regenerator exhaust, percent by
volume (dry basis); and
%O2 = Oxygen concentration in regenerator exhaust, percent by
volume (dry basis).
(b) What is the approved alternative for monitoring pressure drop?
You may use this alternative to a continuous parameter monitoring system
for pressure drop if you operate a jet ejector type wet scrubber or
other type of wet scrubber equipped with atomizing spray nozzles. You
shall:
[[Page 147]]
(1) Conduct a daily check of the air or water pressure to the spray
nozzles;
(2) Maintain records of the results of each daily check; and
(3) Repair or replace faulty (e.g., leaking or plugged) air or water
lines within 12 hours of identification of an abnormal pressure reading.
(c) What is the approved alternative for monitoring pH or alkalinity
levels? You may use the alternative in paragraph (c)(1) or (2) of this
section for a catalytic reforming unit.
(1) You shall measure and record the pH of the water (or scrubbing
liquid) exiting the wet scrubber or internal scrubbing system at least
once an hour during coke burn-off and catalyst rejuvenation using pH
strips as an alternative to a continuous parameter monitoring system.
The pH strips must meet the requirements in Table 41 of this subpart.
(2) You shall measure and record the alkalinity of the water (or
scrubbing liquid) exiting the wet scrubber or internal scrubbing system
at least once an hour during coke burn-off and catalyst rejuvenation
using titration as an alternative to a continuous parameter monitoring
system.
(d) Can I use another type of monitoring system? You may use an
automated data compression system. An automated data compression system
does not record monitored operating parameter values at a set frequency
(e.g., once every hour) but records all values that meet set criteria
for variation from previously recorded values. You must maintain a
record of the description of the monitoring system and data recording
system, including the criteria used to determine which monitored values
are recorded and retained, the method for calculating daily averages,
and a demonstration that the system meets all of the criteria in
paragraphs (d)(1) through (5) of this section:
(1) The system measures the operating parameter value at least once
every hour;
(2) The system records at least 24 values each day during periods of
operation;
(3) The system records the date and time when monitors are turned
off or on;
(4) The system recognizes unchanging data that may indicate the
monitor is not functioning properly, alerts the operator, and records
the incident; and
(5) The system computes daily average values of the monitored
operating parameter based on recorded data.
(e) Can I monitor other process or control device operating
parameters? You may request approval to monitor parameters other than
those required in this subpart. You must request approval if:
(1) You use a control device other than a thermal incinerator,
boiler, process heater, flare, electrostatic precipitator, or wet
scrubber;
(2) You use a combustion control device (e.g., incinerator, flare,
boiler or process heater with a design heat capacity of at least 44 MW,
boiler or process heater where the vent stream is introduced into the
flame zone), electrostatic precipitator, or scrubber but want to monitor
a parameter other than those specified; or
(3) You wish to use another type of continuous emission monitoring
system that provides direct measurement of a pollutant (i.e., a PM or
multi-metals HAP continuous emission monitoring system, a carbonyl
sulfide/carbon disulfide continuous emission monitoring system, a TOC
continuous emission monitoring system, or HCl continuous emission
monitoring system).
(f) How do I request to monitor alternative parameters? You must
submit a request for review and approval or disapproval to the
Administrator. The request must include the information in paragraphs
(f)(1) through (5) of this section.
(1) A description of each affected source and the parameter(s) to be
monitored to determine whether the affected source will continuously
comply with the emission limitations and an explanation of the criteria
used to select the parameter(s).
(2) A description of the methods and procedures that will be used to
demonstrate that the parameter can be used to determine whether the
affected source will continuously comply with the emission limitations
and the schedule for this demonstration. You must
[[Page 148]]
certify that you will establish an operating limit for the monitored
parameter(s) that represents the conditions in existence when the
control device is being properly operated and maintained to meet the
emission limitation.
(3) The frequency and content of monitoring, recording, and
reporting, if monitoring and recording are not continuous. You also must
include the rationale for the proposed monitoring, recording, and
reporting requirements.
(4) Supporting calculations.
(5) Averaging time for the alternative operating parameter.
(g) How do I apply for alternative monitoring requirements if my
catalytic cracking unit is equipped with a wet scrubber and I have
approved alternative monitoring requirements under the new source
performance standards for petroleum refineries? (1) You may request
alternative monitoring requirements according to the procedures in this
paragraph if you meet each of the conditions in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)
through (iii) of this section:
(i) Your fluid catalytic cracking unit regenerator vent is subject
to the PM limit in 40 CFR 60.102(a)(1) and uses a wet scrubber for PM
emissions control;
(ii) You have alternative monitoring requirements for the continuous
opacity monitoring system requirement in 40 CFR 60.105(a)(1) approved by
the Administrator; and
(iii) You are required by this subpart to install, operate, and
maintain a continuous opacity monitoring system for the same catalytic
cracking unit regenerator vent for which you have approved alternative
monitoring requirements.
(2) You can request approval to use an alternative monitoring method
prior to submitting your notification of compliance status, in your
notification of compliance status, or at any time.
(3) You must submit a copy of the approved alternative monitoring
requirements along with a monitoring plan that includes a description of
the continuous monitoring system or method, including appropriate
operating parameters that will be monitored, test results demonstrating
compliance with the opacity limit used to establish an enforceable
operating limit(s), and the frequency of measuring and recording to
establish continuous compliance. If applicable, you must also include
operation and maintenance requirements for the continuous monitoring
system.
(4) We will contact you within 30 days of receipt of your
application to inform you of approval or of our intent to disapprove
your request.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6940, Feb. 9, 2005; 80
FR 75277, Dec. 1, 2015; 83 FR 60723, Nov. 26, 2018]
Notifications, Reports, and Records
Sec. 63.1574 What notifications must I submit and when?
(a) Except as allowed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this
section, you must submit all of the notifications in Sec. Sec. 63.6(h),
63.7(b) and (c), 63.8(e), 63.8(f)(4), 63.8(f)(6), and 63.9(b) through
(h) that apply to you by the dates specified.
(1) You must submit the notification of your intention to construct
or reconstruct according to Sec. 63.9(b)(5) unless construction or
reconstruction had commenced and initial startup had not occurred before
April 11, 2002. In this case, you must submit the notification as soon
as practicable before startup but no later than July 10, 2002. This
deadline also applies to the application for approval of construction or
reconstruction and approval of construction or reconstruction based on
State preconstruction review required in Sec. Sec. 63.5(d)(1)(i) and
63.5(f)(2).
(2) You must submit the notification of intent to conduct a
performance test required in Sec. 63.7(b) at least 30 calendar days
before the performance test is scheduled to begin (instead of 60 days).
(3) If you are required to conduct an initial performance test,
performance evaluation, design evaluation, opacity observation, visible
emission observation, or other initial compliance demonstration, you
must submit a notification of compliance status according to Sec.
63.9(h)(2)(ii). You can submit this information in an operating permit
application, in an amendment to an operating permit application, in a
separate submission, or in any combination. In a State with an approved
operating permit program where delegation of authority under section
112(l) of the
[[Page 149]]
CAA has not been requested or approved, you must provide a duplicate
notification to the applicable Regional Administrator. If the required
information has been submitted previously, you do not have to provide a
separate notification of compliance status. Just refer to the earlier
submissions instead of duplicating and resubmitting the previously
submitted information.
(i) For each initial compliance demonstration that does not include
a performance test, you must submit the Notification of Compliance
Status no later than 30 calendar days following completion of the
initial compliance demonstration.
(ii) For each initial compliance demonstration that includes a
performance test, you must submit the notification of compliance status
no later than 150 calendar days after the compliance date specified for
your affected source in Sec. 63.1563. For data collected using test
methods supported by the EPA's Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) as listed
on the EPA's ERT website (https://www.epa.gov/electronic-reporting-air-
emissions/electronic-reporting-tool-ert) at the time of the test, you
must submit the results in accordance with Sec. 63.1575(k)(1)(i) by the
date that you submit the Notification of Compliance Status, and you must
include the process unit(s) tested, the pollutant(s) tested, and the
date that such performance test was conducted in the Notification of
Compliance Status. For performance evaluations of continuous monitoring
systems (CMS) measuring relative accuracy test audit (RATA) pollutants
that are supported by the EPA's ERT as listed on the EPA's ERT website
at the time of the evaluation, you must submit the results in accordance
with Sec. 63.1575(k)(2)(i) by the date that you submit the Notification
of Compliance Status, and you must include the process unit where the
CMS is installed, the parameter measured by the CMS, and the date that
the performance evaluation was conducted in the Notification of
Compliance Status. All other performance test and performance evaluation
results (i.e., those not supported by EPA's ERT) must be reported in the
Notification of Compliance Status.
(b) As specified in Sec. 63.9(b)(2), if you startup your new
affected source before April 11, 2002, you must submit the initial
notification no later than August 9, 2002.
(c) If you startup your new or reconstructed affected source on or
after April 11, 2002, you must submit the initial notification no later
than 120 days after you become subject to this subpart.
(d) You also must include the information in Table 42 of this
subpart in your notification of compliance status.
(e) If you request an extension of compliance for an existing
catalytic cracking unit as allowed in Sec. 63.1563(c), you must submit
a notification to your permitting authority containing the required
information by October 13, 2003.
(f) As required by this subpart, you must prepare and implement an
operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan for each control system and
continuous monitoring system for each affected source. The purpose of
this plan is to detail the operation, maintenance, and monitoring
procedures you will follow.
(1) You must submit the plan to your permitting authority for review
and approval along with your notification of compliance status. While
you do not have to include the entire plan in your permit under part 70
or 71 of this chapter, you must include the duty to prepare and
implement the plan as an applicable requirement in your part 70 or 71
operating permit. You must submit any changes to your permitting
authority for review and approval and comply with the plan as submitted
until the change is approved.
(2) Each plan must include, at a minimum, the information specified
in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) through (xii) of this section.
(i) Process and control device parameters to be monitored for each
affected source, along with established operating limits.
(ii) Procedures for monitoring emissions and process and control
device operating parameters for each affected source.
(iii) Procedures that you will use to determine the coke burn-rate,
the volumetric flow rate (if you use process
[[Page 150]]
data rather than direct measurement), and the rate of combustion of
liquid or solid fossil fuels if you use an incinerator-waste heat boiler
to burn the exhaust gases from a catalyst regenerator.
(iv) Procedures and analytical methods you will use to determine the
equilibrium catalyst Ni concentration, the equilibrium catalyst Ni
concentration monthly rolling average, and the hourly or hourly average
Ni operating value.
(v) Procedures you will use to determine the pH of the water (or
scrubbing liquid) exiting a wet scrubber if you use pH strips.
(vi) Procedures you will use to determine the HCl concentration of
gases from a catalytic reforming unit when you use a colormetric tube
sampling system, including procedures for correcting for pressure (if
applicable to the sampling equipment) and the sampling locations that
will be used for compliance monitoring purposes.
(vii) Procedures you will use to determine the gas flow rate for a
catalytic cracking unit if you use the alternative procedure based on
air flow rate and temperature.
(viii) Monitoring schedule, including when you will monitor and when
you will not monitor an affected source (e.g., during the coke burn-off,
regeneration process).
(ix) Quality control plan for each continuous opacity monitoring
system and continuous emission monitoring system you use to meet an
emission limit in this subpart. This plan must include procedures you
will use for calibrations, accuracy audits, and adjustments to the
system needed to meet applicable requirements for the system.
(x) Maintenance schedule for each monitoring system and control
device for each affected source that is generally consistent with the
manufacturer's instructions for routine and long-term maintenance.
(xi) If you use a fixed-bed gas-solid adsorption system to control
emissions from a catalytic reforming unit, you must implement corrective
action procedures if the HCl concentration measured at the selected
compliance monitoring sampling location within the bed exceeds the
operating limit. These procedures must require, at minimum, repeat
measurement and recording of the HCl concentration in the adsorption
system exhaust gases and at the selected compliance monitoring sampling
location within the bed. If the HCl concentration at the selected
compliance monitoring location within the bed is above the operating
limit during the repeat measurement while the HCl concentration in the
adsorption system exhaust gases remains below the operating limit, the
adsorption bed must be replaced as soon as practicable. Your procedures
must specify the sampling frequency that will be used to monitor the HCl
concentration in the adsorption system exhaust gases subsequent to the
repeat measurement and prior to replacement of the sorbent material (but
not less frequent than once every 4 hours during coke burn-off). If the
HCl concentration of the adsorption system exhaust gases is above the
operating limit when measured at any time, the adsorption bed must be
replaced within 24 hours or before the next regeneration cycle,
whichever is longer.
(xii) Procedures that will be used for purging the catalyst if you
do not use a control device to comply with the organic HAP emission
limits for catalytic reforming units. These procedures will include, but
are not limited to, specification of the minimum catalyst temperature
and the minimum cumulative volume of gas per mass of catalyst used for
purging prior to uncontrolled releases (i.e., during controlled purging
events); the maximum purge gas temperature for uncontrolled purge
events; and specification of the monitoring systems that will be used to
monitor and record data during each purge event.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6941, Feb. 9, 2005; 80
FR 75278, Dec. 1, 2015; 83 FR 60724, Nov. 26, 2018]
Sec. 63.1575 What reports must I submit and when?
(a) You must submit each report in Table 43 of this subpart that
applies to you.
(b) Unless the Administrator has approved a different schedule, you
must submit each report by the date in
[[Page 151]]
Table 43 of this subpart and according to the requirements in paragraphs
(b)(1) through (5) of this section.
(1) The first compliance report must cover the period beginning on
the compliance date that is specified for your affected source in Sec.
63.1563 and ending on June 30 or December 31, whichever date is the
first date following the end of the first calendar half after the
compliance date that is specified for your affected source in Sec.
63.1563.
(2) The first compliance report must be postmarked or delivered no
later than July 31 or January 31, whichever date follows the end of the
first calendar half after the compliance date that is specified for your
affected source in Sec. 63.1563.
(3) Each subsequent compliance report must cover the semiannual
reporting period from January 1 through June 30 or the semiannual
reporting period from July 1 through December 31.
(4) Each subsequent compliance report must be postmarked or
delivered no later than July 31 or January 31, whichever date is the
first date following the end of the semiannual reporting period.
(5) For each affected source that is subject to permitting
regulations pursuant to part 70 or 71 of this chapter, and if the
permitting authority has established dates for submitting semiannual
reports pursuant to Sec. 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) or Sec. 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A)
of this chapter, you may submit the first and subsequent compliance
reports according to the dates the permitting authority has established
instead of according to the dates in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of
this section.
(c) The compliance report must contain the information required in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this section.
(1) Company name and address.
(2) Statement by a responsible official, with that official's name,
title, and signature, certifying the accuracy of the content of the
report.
(3) Date of report and beginning and ending dates of the reporting
period.
(4) If there are no deviations from any emission limitation that
applies to you and there are no deviations from the requirements for
work practice standards, a statement that there were no deviations from
the emission limitations or work practice standards during the reporting
period and that no continuous emission monitoring system or continuous
opacity monitoring system was inoperative, inactive, malfunctioning,
out-of-control, repaired, or adjusted.
(d) For each deviation from an emission limitation and for each
deviation from the requirements for work practice standards that occurs
at an affected source where you are not using a continuous opacity
monitoring system or a continuous emission monitoring system to comply
with the emission limitation or work practice standard in this subpart,
the semiannual compliance report must contain the information in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this section and the information in
paragraphs (d)(1) through (4) of this section.
(1) The total operating time of each affected source during the
reporting period and identification of the sources for which there was a
deviation.
(2) Information on the number, date, time, duration, and cause of
deviations (including unknown cause, if applicable).
(3) Information on the number, duration, and cause for monitor
downtime incidents (including unknown cause, if applicable, other than
downtime associated with zero and span and other daily calibration
checks).
(4) The applicable operating limit or work practice standard from
which you deviated and either the parameter monitor reading during the
deviation or a description of how you deviated from the work practice
standard.
(e) For each deviation from an emission limitation occurring at an
affected source where you are using a continuous opacity monitoring
system or a continuous emission monitoring system to comply with the
emission limitation, you must include the information in paragraphs
(c)(1) through (3) of this section, in paragraphs (d)(1) through (3) of
this section, and in paragraphs (e)(2) through (13) of this section.
(1) [Reserved]
(2) The date and time that each continuous opacity monitoring system
or
[[Page 152]]
continuous emission monitoring system was inoperative, except for zero
(low-level) and high-level checks.
(3) The date and time that each continuous opacity monitoring system
or continuous emission monitoring system was out-of-control, including
the information in Sec. 63.8(c)(8).
(4) An estimate of the quantity of each regulated pollutant emitted
over the emission limit during the deviation, and a description of the
method used to estimate the emissions.
(5) A summary of the total duration of the deviation during the
reporting period (recorded in minutes for opacity and hours for gases
and in the averaging period specified in the regulation for other types
of emission limitations), and the total duration as a percent of the
total source operating time during that reporting period.
(6) A breakdown of the total duration of the deviations during the
reporting period and into those that are due to control equipment
problems, process problems, other known causes, and other unknown
causes.
(7) A summary of the total duration of downtime for the continuous
opacity monitoring system or continuous emission monitoring system
during the reporting period (recorded in minutes for opacity and hours
for gases and in the averaging time specified in the regulation for
other types of standards), and the total duration of downtime for the
continuous opacity monitoring system or continuous emission monitoring
system as a percent of the total source operating time during that
reporting period.
(8) A breakdown of the total duration of downtime for the continuous
opacity monitoring system or continuous emission monitoring system
during the reporting period into periods that are due to monitoring
equipment malfunctions, non-monitoring equipment malfunctions, quality
assurance/quality control calibrations, other known causes, and other
unknown causes.
(9) An identification of each HAP that was monitored at the affected
source.
(10) A brief description of the process units.
(11) The monitoring equipment manufacturer(s) and model number(s).
(12) The date of the latest certification or audit for the
continuous opacity monitoring system or continuous emission monitoring
system.
(13) A description of any change in the continuous emission
monitoring system or continuous opacity monitoring system, processes, or
controls since the last reporting period.
(f) You also must include the information required in paragraphs
(f)(1) through (2) of this section in each compliance report, if
applicable.
(1) A copy of any performance test or performance evaluation of a
CMS done during the reporting period on any affected unit, if
applicable. The report must be included in the next semiannual
compliance report. The copy must include a complete report for each test
method used for a particular kind of emission point tested. For
additional tests performed for a similar emission point using the same
method, you must submit the results and any other information required,
but a complete test report is not required. A complete test report
contains a brief process description; a simplified flow diagram showing
affected processes, control equipment, and sampling point locations;
sampling site data; description of sampling and analysis procedures and
any modifications to standard procedures; quality assurance procedures;
record of operating conditions during the test; record of preparation of
standards; record of calibrations; raw data sheets for field sampling;
raw data sheets for field and laboratory analyses; documentation of
calculations; and any other information required by the test method. For
data collected using test methods supported by the EPA's Electronic
Reporting Tool (ERT) as listed on the EPA's ERT website (https://
www.epa.gov/electronic-reporting-air-emissions/electronic-reporting-
tool-ert) at the time of the test, you must submit the results in
accordance with paragraph (k)(1)(i) of this section by the date that you
submit the compliance report, and instead of including a copy of the
test report in the compliance report, you must include the process
unit(s) tested, the pollutant(s) tested, and the date that such
performance test was conducted in the compliance report. For performance
evaluations of
[[Page 153]]
CMS measuring relative accuracy test audit (RATA) pollutants that are
supported by the EPA's ERT as listed on the EPA's ERT website at the
time of the evaluation, you must submit the results in accordance with
paragraph (k)(2)(i) of this section by the date that you submit the
compliance report, and you must include the process unit where the CMS
is installed, the parameter measured by the CMS, and the date that the
performance evaluation was conducted in the compliance report. All other
performance test and performance evaluation results (i.e., those not
supported by EPA's ERT) must be reported in the compliance report.
(2) Any requested change in the applicability of an emission
standard (e.g., you want to change from the PM standard to the Ni
standard for catalytic cracking units or from the HCl concentration
standard to percent reduction for catalytic reforming units) in your
compliance report. You must include all information and data necessary
to demonstrate compliance with the new emission standard selected and
any other associated requirements.
(g) You may submit reports required by other regulations in place of
or as part of the compliance report if they contain the required
information.
(h) [Reserved]
(i) If the applicable permitting authority has approved a period of
planned maintenance for your catalytic cracking unit according to the
requirements in paragraph (j) of this section, you must include the
following information in your compliance report.
(1) In the compliance report due for the 6-month period before the
routine planned maintenance is to begin, you must include a full copy of
your written request to the applicable permitting authority and written
approval received from the applicable permitting authority.
(2) In the compliance report due after the routine planned
maintenance is complete, you must include a description of the planned
routine maintenance that was performed for the control device during the
previous 6-month period, and the total number of hours during those 6
months that the control device did not meet the emission limitations and
monitoring requirements as a result of the approved routine planned
maintenance.
(j) If you own or operate multiple catalytic cracking units that are
served by a single wet scrubber emission control device (e.g., a Venturi
scrubber), you may request the applicable permitting authority to
approve a period of planned routine maintenance for the control device
needed to meet requirements in your operation, maintenance, and
monitoring plan. You must present data to the applicable permitting
authority demonstrating that the period of planned maintenance results
in overall emissions reductions. During this pre-approved time period,
the emission control device may be taken out of service while
maintenance is performed on the control device and/or one of the process
units while the remaining process unit(s) continue to operate. During
the period the emission control device is unable to operate, the
emission limits, operating limits, and monitoring requirements
applicable to the unit that is operating and the wet scrubber emission
control device do not apply. The applicable permitting authority may
require that you take specified actions to minimize emissions during the
period of planned maintenance.
(1) You must submit a written request to the applicable permitting
authority at least 6 months before the planned maintenance is scheduled
to begin with a copy to the EPA Regional Administrator.
(2) Your written request must contain the information in paragraphs
(j)(2)(i) through (v) of this section.
(i) A description of the planned routine maintenance to be performed
during the next 6 months and why it is necessary.
(ii) The date the planned maintenance will begin and end.
(iii) A quantified estimate of the HAP and criteria pollutant
emissions that will be emitted during the period of planned maintenance.
(iv) An analysis showing the emissions reductions resulting from the
planned maintenance as opposed to delaying the maintenance until the
next unit turnaround.
[[Page 154]]
(v) Actions you will take to minimize emissions during the period of
planned maintenance.
(k) Electronic submittal of performance test and CEMS performance
evaluation data. For performance tests or CEMS performance evaluations
conducted on and after February 1, 2016, if required to submit the
results of a performance test or CEMS performance evaluation, you must
submit the results according to the procedures in paragraphs (k)(1) and
(2) of this section.
(1) Unless otherwise specified by this subpart, within 60 days after
the date of completing each performance test as required by this
subpart, you must submit the results of the performance tests following
the procedure specified in either paragraph (k)(1)(i) or (ii) of this
section.
(i) For data collected using test methods supported by the EPA's
Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) as listed on the EPA's ERT Web site
(http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ert/index.html) at the time of the test,
you must submit the results of the performance test to the EPA via the
Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI). (CEDRI can be
accessed through the EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) (https://
cdx.epa.gov/).) Performance test data must be submitted in a file format
generated through use of the EPA's ERT or an alternate electronic file
format consistent with the extensible markup language (XML) schema
listed on the EPA's ERT Web site. If you claim that some of the
performance test information being submitted is confidential business
information (CBI), you must submit a complete file generated through the
use of the EPA's ERT or an alternate electronic file consistent with the
XML schema listed on the EPA's ERT Web site, including information
claimed to be CBI, on a compact disc, flash drive or other commonly used
electronic storage media to the EPA. The electronic storage media must
be clearly marked as CBI and mailed to U.S. EPA/OAQPS/CORE CBI Office,
Attention: Group Leader, Measurement Policy Group, MD C404-02, 4930 Old
Page Rd., Durham, NC 27703. The same ERT or alternate file with the CBI
omitted must be submitted to the EPA via the EPA's CDX as described
earlier in this paragraph (k)(1)(i).
(ii) For data collected using test methods that are not supported by
the EPA's ERT as listed on the EPA's ERT Web site at the time of the
test, you must submit the results of the performance test to the
Administrator at the appropriate address listed in Sec. 63.13.
(2) Unless otherwise specified by this subpart, within 60 days after
the date of completing each CEMS performance evaluation required by
Sec. 63.1571(a) and (b), you must submit the results of the performance
evaluation following the procedure specified in either paragraph
(k)(2)(i) or (ii) of this section.
(i) For performance evaluations of continuous monitoring systems
measuring relative accuracy test audit (RATA) pollutants that are
supported by the EPA's ERT as listed on the EPA's ERT Web site at the
time of the evaluation, you must submit the results of the performance
evaluation to the EPA via the CEDRI. (CEDRI is accessed through the
EPA's CDX.) Performance evaluation data must be submitted in a file
format generated through the use of the EPA's ERT or an alternate file
format consistent with the XML schema listed on the EPA's ERT Web site.
If you claim that some of the performance evaluation information being
submitted is CBI, you must submit a complete file generated through the
use of the EPA's ERT or an alternate electronic file consistent with the
XML schema listed on the EPA's ERT Web site, including information
claimed to be CBI, on a compact disc, flash drive or other commonly used
electronic storage media to the EPA. The electronic storage media must
be clearly marked as CBI and mailed to U.S. EPA/OAQPS/CORE CBI Office,
Attention: Group Leader, Measurement Policy Group, MD C404-02, 4930 Old
Page Rd., Durham, NC 27703. The same ERT or alternate file with the CBI
omitted must be submitted to the EPA via the EPA's CDX as described
earlier in this paragraph (k)(2)(i).
(ii) For any performance evaluations of continuous monitoring
systems measuring RATA pollutants that are not supported by the EPA's
ERT as
[[Page 155]]
listed on the EPA's ERT Web site at the time of the evaluation, you must
submit the results of the performance evaluation to the Administrator at
the appropriate address listed in Sec. 63.13.
(l) Extensions to electronic reporting deadlines. (1) If you are
required to electronically submit a report through the Compliance and
Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) in the EPA's Central Data
Exchange (CDX), and due to a planned or actual outage of either the
EPA's CEDRI or CDX systems within the period of time beginning 5
business days prior to the date that the submission is due, you will be
or are precluded from accessing CEDRI or CDX and submitting a required
report within the time prescribed, you may assert a claim of EPA system
outage for failure to timely comply with the reporting requirement. You
must submit notification to the Administrator in writing as soon as
possible following the date you first knew, or through due diligence
should have known, that the event may cause or caused a delay in
reporting. You must provide to the Administrator a written description
identifying the date(s) and time(s) the CDX or CEDRI were unavailable
when you attempted to access it in the 5 business days prior to the
submission deadline; a rationale for attributing the delay in reporting
beyond the regulatory deadline to the EPA system outage; describe the
measures taken or to be taken to minimize the delay in reporting; and
identify a date by which you propose to report, or if you have already
met the reporting requirement at the time of the notification, the date
you reported. In any circumstance, the report must be submitted
electronically as soon as possible after the outage is resolved. The
decision to accept the claim of EPA system outage and allow an extension
to the reporting deadline is solely within the discretion of the
Administrator.
(2) If you are required to electronically submit a report through
CEDRI in the EPA's CDX and a force majeure event is about to occur,
occurs, or has occurred or there are lingering effects from such an
event within the period of time beginning 5 business days prior to the
date the submission is due, the owner or operator may assert a claim of
force majeure for failure to timely comply with the reporting
requirement. For the purposes of this section, a force majeure event is
defined as an event that will be or has been caused by circumstances
beyond the control of the affected facility, its contractors, or any
entity controlled by the affected facility that prevents you from
complying with the requirement to submit a report electronically within
the time period prescribed. Examples of such events are acts of nature
(e.g., hurricanes, earthquakes, or floods), acts of war or terrorism, or
equipment failure or safety hazard beyond the control of the affected
facility (e.g., large scale power outage). If you intend to assert a
claim of force majeure, you must submit notification to the
Administrator in writing as soon as possible following the date you
first knew, or through due diligence should have known, that the event
may cause or caused a delay in reporting. You must provide to the
Administrator a written description of the force majeure event and a
rationale for attributing the delay in reporting beyond the regulatory
deadline to the force majeure event; describe the measures taken or to
be taken to minimize the delay in reporting; and identify a date by
which you propose to report, or if you have already met the reporting
requirement at the time of the notification, the date you reported. In
any circumstance, the reporting must occur as soon as possible after the
force majeure event occurs. The decision to accept the claim of force
majeure and allow an extension to the reporting deadline is solely
within the discretion of the Administrator.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 80 FR 75278, Dec. 1, 2015; 83
FR 60724, Nov. 26, 2018]
Sec. 63.1576 What records must I keep, in what form, and for how long?
(a) You must keep the records specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through
(3) of this section.
(1) A copy of each notification and report that you submitted to
comply with this subpart, including all documentation supporting any
initial notification or Notification of Compliance
[[Page 156]]
Status that you submitted, according to the requirements in Sec.
63.10(b)(2)(xiv).
(2) The records specified in paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (iv) of
this section.
(i) Record the date, time, and duration of each startup and/or
shutdown period for which the facility elected to comply with the
alternative standards in Sec. 63.1564(a)(5)(ii) or Sec.
63.1565(a)(5)(ii) or Sec. 63.1568(a)(4)(ii) or (iii).
(ii) In the event that an affected unit fails to meet an applicable
standard, record the number of failures. For each failure record the
date, time and duration of each failure.
(iii) For each failure to meet an applicable standard, record and
retain a list of the affected sources or equipment, an estimate of the
volume of each regulated pollutant emitted over any emission limit and a
description of the method used to estimate the emissions.
(iv) Record actions taken to minimize emissions in accordance with
Sec. 63.1570(c) and any corrective actions taken to return the affected
unit to its normal or usual manner of operation.
(3) Records of performance tests, performance evaluations, and
opacity and visible emission observations as required in Sec.
63.10(b)(2)(viii).
(b) For each continuous emission monitoring system and continuous
opacity monitoring system, you must keep the records required in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this section.
(1) Records described in Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(vi) through (xi).
(2) Monitoring data for continuous opacity monitoring systems during
a performance evaluation as required in Sec. 63.6(h)(7)(i) and (ii).
(3) The performance evaluation plan as described in Sec. 63.8(d)(2)
for the life of the affected source or until the affected source is no
longer subject to the provisions of this part, to be made available for
inspection, upon request, by the Administrator. If the performance
evaluation plan is revised, you must keep previous (i.e., superseded)
versions of the performance evaluation plan on record to be made
available for inspection, upon request, by the Administrator, for a
period of 5 years after each revision to the plan. The program of
corrective action should be included in the plan required under Sec.
63.8(d)(2).
(4) Requests for alternatives to the relative accuracy test for
continuous emission monitoring systems as required in Sec.
63.8(f)(6)(i).
(5) Records of the date and time that each deviation started and
stopped.
(c) You must keep the records in Sec. 63.6(h) for visible emission
observations.
(d) You must keep records required by Tables 6, 7, 13, and 14 of
this subpart (for catalytic cracking units); Tables 20, 21, 27 and 28 of
this subpart (for catalytic reforming units); Tables 34 and 35 of this
subpart (for sulfur recovery units); and Table 39 of this subpart (for
bypass lines) to show continuous compliance with each emission
limitation that applies to you.
(e) You must keep a current copy of your operation, maintenance, and
monitoring plan onsite and available for inspection. You also must keep
records to show continuous compliance with the procedures in your
operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan.
(f) You also must keep the records of any changes that affect
emission control system performance including, but not limited to, the
location at which the vent stream is introduced into the flame zone for
a boiler or process heater.
(g) Your records must be in a form suitable and readily available
for expeditious review according to Sec. 63.10(b)(1).
(h) As specified in Sec. 63.10(b)(1), you must keep each record for
5 years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance,
corrective action, report, or record.
(i) You must keep each record on site for at least 2 years after the
date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,
report, or record, according to Sec. 63.10(b)(1). You can keep the
records offsite for the remaining 3 years.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6942, Feb. 9, 2005; 80
FR 75279, Dec. 1, 2015; 83 FR 60725, Nov. 26, 2018]
[[Page 157]]
Other Requirements and Information
Sec. 63.1577 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
Table 44 of this subpart shows which parts of the General Provisions
in Sec. Sec. 63.1 through 63.15 apply to you.
Sec. 63.1578 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
(a) This subpart can be implemented and enforced by us, the U.S.
EPA, or a delegated authority such as your State, local, or tribal
agency. If the U.S. EPA Administrator has delegated authority to your
State, local, or tribal agency, then that Agency has the authority to
implement and enforce this subpart. You should contact your U.S. EPA
Regional Office to find out if this subpart is delegated to your State,
local, or tribal agency.
(b) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority of this
subpart to a State, local, or tribal agency under 40 CFR part 63,
subpart E, the authorities contained in paragraph (c) of this section
are retained by the Administrator of the U.S. EPA and are not
transferred to the State, local, or tribal agency.
(c) The authorities that will not be delegated to State, local, or
tribal agencies are listed in paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of this
section.
(1) Approval of alternatives to the non-opacity emission limitations
and work practice standards in Sec. Sec. 63.1564 through 63.1569 under
Sec. 63.6(g).
(2) Approval of alternative opacity emission limitations in
Sec. Sec. 63.1564 through 63.1569 under Sec. 63.6(h)(9).
(3) Approval of major alternatives to test methods under Sec.
63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f) and as defined in Sec. 63.90.
(4) Approval of major alternatives to monitoring under Sec. 63.8(f)
and as defined in Sec. 63.90.
(5) Approval of major alternatives to recordkeeping and reporting
under Sec. 63.10(f) and as defined in Sec. 63.90.
Sec. 63.1579 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Terms used in this subpart are defined in the Clean Air Act (CAA),
in 40 CFR 63.2, the General Provisions of this part (Sec. Sec. 63.1
through 63.15), and in this section as listed. If the same term is
defined in subpart A of this part and in this section, it shall have the
meaning given in this section for purposes of this subpart.
Boiler means any enclosed combustion device that extracts useful
energy in the form of steam and is not an incinerator.
Catalytic cracking unit means a refinery process unit in which
petroleum derivatives are continuously charged; hydrocarbon molecules in
the presence of a catalyst suspended in a fluidized bed are fractured
into smaller molecules, or react with a contact material suspended in a
fluidized bed to improve feedstock quality for additional processing;
and the catalyst or contact material is continuously regenerated by
burning off coke and other deposits. The unit includes, but is not
limited to, the riser, reactor, regenerator, air blowers, spent catalyst
or contact material stripper, catalyst or contact material recovery
equipment, and regenerator equipment for controlling air pollutant
emissions and equipment used for heat recovery.
Catalytic cracking unit catalyst regenerator means one or more
regenerators (multiple regenerators) which comprise that portion of the
catalytic cracking unit in which coke burn-off and catalyst or contact
material regeneration occurs and includes the regenerator combustion air
blower(s).
Catalytic reforming unit means a refinery process unit that reforms
or changes the chemical structure of naphtha into higher octane
aromatics through the use of a metal catalyst and chemical reactions
that include dehydrogenation, isomerization, and hydrogenolysis. The
catalytic reforming unit includes the reactor, regenerator (if
separate), separators, catalyst isolation and transport vessels (e.g.,
lock and lift hoppers), recirculation equipment, scrubbers, and other
ancillary equipment.
Catalytic reforming unit regenerator means one or more regenerators
which comprise that portion of the catalytic reforming unit and
ancillary equipment in which the following regeneration steps typically
are performed: depressurization, purge, coke burn-off, catalyst
rejuvenation with a chloride (or other halogenated) compound(s),
[[Page 158]]
and a final purge. The catalytic reforming unit catalyst regeneration
process can be done either as a semi-regenerative, cyclic, or continuous
regeneration process.
Coke burn-off means the coke removed from the surface of the
catalytic cracking unit catalyst or the catalytic reforming unit
catalyst by combustion in the catalyst regenerator. The rate of coke
burn-off is calculated using Equation 2 in Sec. 63.1564.
Combustion device means an individual unit of equipment such as a
flare, incinerator, process heater, or boiler used for the destruction
of organic HAP or VOC.
Combustion zone means the space in an enclosed combustion device
(e.g., vapor incinerator, boiler, furnace, or process heater) occupied
by the organic HAP and any supplemental fuel while burning. The
combustion zone includes any flame that is visible or luminous as well
as that space outside the flame envelope in which the organic HAP
continues to be oxidized to form the combustion products.
Contact material means any substance formulated to remove metals,
sulfur, nitrogen, or any other contaminants from petroleum derivatives.
Continuous regeneration reforming means a catalytic reforming
process characterized by continuous flow of catalyst material through a
reactor where it mixes with feedstock, and a portion of the catalyst is
continuously removed and sent to a special regenerator where it is
regenerated and continuously recycled back to the reactor.
Control device means any equipment used for recovering, removing, or
oxidizing HAP in either gaseous or solid form. Such equipment includes,
but is not limited to, condensers, scrubbers, electrostatic
precipitators, incinerators, flares, boilers, and process heaters.
Cyclic regeneration reforming means a catalytic reforming process
characterized by continual batch regeneration of catalyst in situ in any
one of several reactors (e.g., 4 or 5 separate reactors) that can be
isolated from and returned to the reforming operation while maintaining
continuous reforming process operations (i.e., feedstock continues
flowing through the remaining reactors without change in feed rate or
product octane).
Deviation means any instance in which an affected source subject to
this subpart, or an owner or operator of such a source:
(1) Fails to meet any requirement or obligation established by this
subpart, including but not limited to any emission limit, operating
limit, or work practice standard; or
(2) Fails to meet any term or condition that is adopted to implement
an applicable requirement in this subpart and that is included in the
operating permit for any affected source required to obtain such a
permit.
Emission limitation means any emission limit, opacity limit,
operating limit, or visible emission limit.
Flame zone means the portion of a combustion chamber of a boiler or
process heater occupied by the flame envelope created by the primary
fuel.
Flow indicator means a device that indicates whether gas is flowing,
or whether the valve position would allow gas to flow, in or through a
line.
Fuel gas system means the offsite and onsite piping and control
system that gathers gaseous streams generated by the source, may blend
them with sources of gas, if available, and transports the blended
gaseous fuel at suitable pressures for use as fuel in heaters, furnaces,
boilers, incinerators, gas turbines, and other combustion devices
located within or outside of the refinery. The fuel is piped directly to
each individual combustion device, and the system typically operates at
pressures over atmospheric. The gaseous streams can contain a mixture of
methane, light hydrocarbons, hydrogen, and other miscellaneous species.
HCl means for the purposes of this subpart, gaseous emissions of
hydrogen chloride that serve as a surrogate measure for total emissions
of hydrogen chloride and chlorine as measured by Method 26 or 26A in
appendix A to part 60 of this chapter or an approved alternative method.
Hot standby means periods when the catalytic cracking unit is not
receiving fresh or recycled feed oil but the catalytic cracking unit is
maintained at elevated temperatures, typically using torch oil in the
catalyst regenerator
[[Page 159]]
and recirculating catalyst, to prevent a complete shutdown and cold
restart of the catalytic cracking unit.
Incinerator means an enclosed combustion device that is used for
destroying organic compounds, with or without heat recovery. Auxiliary
fuel may be used to heat waste gas to combustion temperatures. An
incinerator may use a catalytic combustion process where a substance is
introduced into an exhaust stream to burn or oxidize contaminants while
the substances itself remains intact, or a thermal process which uses
elevated temperatures as a primary means to burn or oxidize
contaminants.
Internal scrubbing system means a wet scrubbing, wet injection, or
caustic injection control device that treats (in-situ) the catalytic
reforming unit recirculating coke burn exhaust gases for acid (HCl)
control during reforming catalyst regeneration upstream of the
atmospheric coke burn vent.
Ni means, for the purposes of this subpart, particulate emissions of
nickel that serve as a surrogate measure for total emissions of metal
HAP, including but not limited to: antimony, arsenic, beryllium,
cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium as
measured by Method 29 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter or by an
approved alternative method.
Nonmethane TOC means, for the purposes of this subpart, emissions of
total organic compounds, excluding methane, that serve as a surrogate
measure of the total emissions of organic HAP compounds including, but
not limited to, acetaldehyde, benzene, hexane, phenol, toluene, and
xylenes and nonHAP VOC as measured by Method 25 in appendix A to part 60
of this chapter, by the combination of Methods 18 and 25A in appendix A
to part 60 of this chapter, or by an approved alternative method.
Oxidation control system means an emission control system which
reduces emissions from sulfur recovery units by converting these
emissions to sulfur dioxide.
PM means, for the purposes of this subpart, emissions of particulate
matter that serve as a surrogate measure of the total emissions of
particulate matter and metal HAP contained in the particulate matter,
including but not limited to: Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium as measured by
Methods 5, 5B or 5F in appendix A-3 to part 60 of this chapter or by an
approved alternative method.
Process heater means an enclosed combustion device that primarily
transfers heat liberated by burning fuel directly to process streams or
to heat transfer liquids other than water.
Process vent means, for the purposes of this subpart, a gas stream
that is continuously or periodically discharged during normal operation
of a catalytic cracking unit, catalytic reforming unit, or sulfur
recovery unit, including gas streams that are discharged directly to the
atmosphere, gas streams that are routed to a control device prior to
discharge to the atmosphere, or gas streams that are diverted through a
product recovery device line prior to control or discharge to the
atmosphere.
Reduced sulfur compounds means hydrogen sulfide, carbonyl sulfide,
and carbon disulfide.
Reduction control system means an emission control system which
reduces emissions from sulfur recovery units by converting these
emissions to hydrogen sulfide.
Responsible official means responsible official as defined in 40 CFR
70.2.
Semi-regenerative reforming means a catalytic reforming process
characterized by shutdown of the entire reforming unit (e.g., which may
employ three to four separate reactors) at specified intervals or at the
owner's or operator's convenience for in situ catalyst regeneration.
Sulfur recovery unit means a process unit that recovers elemental
sulfur from gases that contain reduced sulfur compounds and other
pollutants, usually by a vapor-phase catalytic reaction of sulfur
dioxide and hydrogen sulfide. This definition does not include a unit
where the modified reaction is carried out in a water solution which
contains a metal ion capable of oxidizing the sulfide ion to sulfur,
e.g., the LO-CAT II process.
TOC means, for the purposes of this subpart, emissions of total
organic
[[Page 160]]
compounds that serve as a surrogate measure of the total emissions of
organic HAP compounds including, but not limited to, acetaldehyde,
benzene, hexane, phenol, toluene, and xylenes and nonHAP VOC as measured
by Method 25A in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter or by an approved
alternative method.
TRS means, for the purposes of this subpart, emissions of total
reduced sulfur compounds, expressed as an equivalent sulfur dioxide
concentration, that serve as a surrogate measure of the total emissions
of sulfide HAP carbonyl sulfide and carbon disulfide as measured by
Method 15 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter or by an approved
alternative method.
Work practice standard means any design, equipment, work practice,
or operational standard, or combination thereof, that is promulgated
pursuant to section 112(h) of the CAA.
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6942, Feb. 9, 2005; 80
FR 75279, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 1 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Metal HAP Emission Limits for
Catalytic Cracking Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1564(a)(1), you shall meet each emission
limitation in the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall meet the following
For each new or existing catalytic emission limits for each
cracking unit . . . catalyst regenerator vent . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to new source performance PM emissions must not exceed
standard (NSPS) for PM in 40 CFR 1.0 gram per kilogram (g/kg)
60.102 and not electing Sec. (1.0 lb/1,000 lb) of coke burn-
60.100(e). off, and the opacity of
emissions must not exceed 30
percent, except for one 6-
minute average opacity reading
in any 1-hour period. Before
August 1, 2017, if the
discharged gases pass through
an incinerator or waste heat
boiler in which you burn
auxiliary or in supplemental
liquid or solid fossil fuel,
the incremental rate of PM
emissions must not exceed 43.0
grams per Gigajoule (g/GJ) or
0.10 pounds per million
British thermal units (lb/
million Btu) of heat input
attributable to the liquid or
solid fossil fuel; and the
opacity of emissions must not
exceed 30 percent, except for
one 6-minute average opacity
reading in any 1-hour period.
2. Subject to NSPS for PM in 40 CFR PM emissions must not exceed
60.102a(b)(1)(i); or 40 CFR 60.102 and 1.0 g/kg (1.0 lb PM/1,000 lb)
electing Sec. 60.100(e). of coke burn-off or, if a PM
CEMS is used, 0.040 grain per
dry standard cubic feet (gr/
dscf) corrected to 0 percent
excess air.
3. Subject to NSPS for PM in 40 CFR PM emissions must not exceed
60.102a(b)(1)(ii). 0.5 g/kg coke burn-off (0.5 lb/
1000 lb coke burn-off) or, if
a PM CEMS is used, 0.020 gr/
dscf corrected to 0 percent
excess air.
4. Option 1a: Elect NSPS subpart J PM emissions must not exceed
requirements for PM per coke burn the limits specified in Item 1
limit and 30% opacity, not subject to of this table.
the NSPS for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or
60.102a(b)(1).
5. Option 1b: Elect NSPS subpart Ja PM emissions must not exceed
requirements for PM per coke burn-off 1.0 g/kg (1.0 lb PM/1000 lb)
limit, not subject to the NSPS for PM of coke burn-off.
in 40 CFR 60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1).
6. Option 1c: Elect NSPS subpart Ja PM emissions must not exceed
requirements for PM concentration 0.040 gr/dscf corrected to 0
limit, not subject to the NSPS for PM percent excess air.
in 40 CFR 60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1).
7. Option 2: PM per coke burn-off PM emissions must not exceed
limit, not subject to the NSPS for PM 1.0 g/kg (1.0 lb PM/1000 lb)
in 40 CFR 60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1). of coke burn-off in the
catalyst regenerator.
8. Option 3: Ni lb/hr limit, not Nickel (Ni) emissions must not
subject to the NSPS for PM in 40 CFR exceed 13,000 milligrams per
60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1). hour (mg/hr) (0.029 lb/hr).
9. Option 4: Ni per coke burn-off Ni emissions must not exceed
limit, not subject to the NSPS for PM 1.0 mg/kg (0.001 lb/1,000 lb)
in 40 CFR 60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1). of coke burn-off in the
catalyst regenerator.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75280, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 2 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Operating Limits for Metal HAP
Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1564(a)(2), you shall meet each operating
limit in the following table that applies to you.
[[Page 161]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For this type of
For each new or existing catalytic continuous monitoring For this type of You shall meet this
cracking unit . . . system . . . control device . . . operating limit . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to the NSPS for PM in 40 Continuous opacity Any.................... On and after August 1,
CFR 60.102 and not elect Sec. monitoring system. 2017, maintain the 3-
60.100(e). hour rolling average
opacity of emissions
from your catalyst
regenerator vent no
higher than 20
percent.
2. Subject to NSPS for PM in 40 CFR a. PM CEMS............. Any.................... Not applicable.
60.102a(b)(1)(i) or electing Sec.
60.100(e).
b. Continuous opacity Cyclone or Maintain the 3-hour
monitoring system used electrostatic rolling average
to comply with a site- precipitator. opacity of emissions
specific opacity limit. from your catalyst
regenerator vent no
higher than the site-
specific opacity limit
established during the
performance test.
c. Continuous parameter Electrostatic i. Maintain the daily
monitoring systems. precipitator. average coke burn-off
rate or daily average
flow rate no higher
than the limit
established in the
performance test.
ii. Maintain the 3-hour
rolling average total
power and secondary
current above the
limit established in
the performance test.
d. Continuous parameter Wet scrubber........... i. Maintain the 3-hour
monitoring systems. rolling average liquid-
to-gas ratio above the
limit established in
the performance test.
ii. Except for periods
of startup, shutdown,
and hot standby,
maintain the 3-hour
rolling average
pressure drop above
the limit established
in the performance
test.\1\
e. Bag leak detection Fabric filter.......... Maintain particulate
(BLD) system. loading below the BLD
alarm set point
established in the
initial adjustment of
the BLD system or
allowable seasonal
adjustments.
3. Subject to NSPS for PM in 40 CFR Any.................... Any.................... The applicable
60.102a(b)(1)(ii). operating limits in
Item 2 of this table.
4. Option 1a: Elect NSPS subpart J Any.................... Any.................... See Item 1 of this
requirements for PM per coke burn table.
limit, not subject to the NSPS for
PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1).
5. Option 1b: Elect NSPS subpart Ja Any.................... Any.................... The applicable
requirements for PM per coke burn- operating limits in
off limit, not subject to the NSPS Item 2.b, 2.c, 2.d,
for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or and 2.e of this table.
60.102a(b)(1).
6. Option 1c: Elect NSPS subpart Ja PM CEMS................ Any.................... Not applicable.
requirements for PM concentration
limit, not subject to the NSPS for
PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1).
7. Option 2: PM per coke burn-off a. Continuous opacity Cyclone, fabric filter, See Item 2.b of this
limit not subject to the NSPS for PM monitoring system used or electrostatic table. Alternatively,
in 40 CFR 60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1). to comply with a site- precipitator. before August 1, 2017,
specific opacity limit. you may maintain the
hourly average opacity
of emissions from your
catalyst generator
vent no higher than
the site-specific
opacity limit
established during the
performance test.
[[Page 162]]
b. Continuous parameter i. Electrostatic (1) See Item 2.c.i of
monitoring systems. precipitator. this table.
(2) See item 2.c.ii of
this table.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017, you
may maintain the daily
average voltage and
secondary current
above the limit
established in the
performance test.
ii. Wet scrubber....... (1) See Item 2.d.i of
this table.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017, you
may maintain the daily
average liquid-to-gas
ratio above the limit
established in the
performance test.
(2) See Item 2.d.ii of
the table.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017, you
may maintain the daily
average pressure drop
above the limit
established in the
performance test (not
applicable to a wet
scrubber of the non-
venturi jet-ejector
design).
c. Bag leak detection Fabric filter.......... See item 2.e of this
(BLD) system. table.
8. Option 3: Ni lb/hr limit not a. Continuous opacity Cyclone, fabric filter, Maintain the 3-hour
subject to the NSPS for PM in 40 CFR monitoring system. or electrostatic rolling average Ni
60.102. precipitator. operating value no
higher than the limit
established during the
performance test.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017, you
may maintain the daily
average Ni operating
value no higher than
the limit established
during the performance
test.
b. Continuous parameter i. Electrostatic (1) See Item 2.c.i of
monitoring systems. precipitator. this table.
(2) Maintain the
monthly rolling
average of the
equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration no
higher than the limit
established during the
performance test.
(3) See Item 2.c.ii of
this table.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017, you
may maintain the daily
average voltage and
secondary current (or
total power input)
above the established
during the performance
test.
ii. Wet scrubber....... (1) Maintain the
monthly rolling
average of the
equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration no
higher than the limit
established during the
performance test.
(2) See Item 2.d.i of
this table.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017, you
may maintain the daily
average liquid-to-gas
ratio above the limit
established during the
performance test.
[[Page 163]]
(3) See Item 2.d.ii of
this table.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017, you
may maintain the daily
average pressure drop
above the limit
established during the
performance test (not
applicable to a non-
venturi wet scrubber
of the jet-ejector
design).
c. Bag leak detection Fabric filter.......... See item 2.e of this
(BLD) system. table.
9. Option 4: Ni per coke burn-off a. Continuous opacity Cyclone, fabric filter, Maintain the 3-hour
limit not subject to the NSPS for PM monitoring system. or electrostatic rolling average Ni
in 40 CFR 60.102. precipitator. operating value no
higher than Ni
operating limit
established during the
performance test.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017, you
may elect to maintain
the daily average Ni
operating value no
higher than the Ni
operating limit
established during the
performance test.
b. Continuous parameter i. Electrostatic (1) Maintain the
monitoring systems. precipitator. monthly rolling
average of the
equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration no
higher than the limit
established during the
performance test.
(2) See Item 2.c.ii of
this table.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017, you
may maintain the daily
average voltage and
secondary current (or
total power input)
above the limit
established during the
performance test.
ii. Wet scrubber....... (1) Maintain the
monthly rolling
average of the
equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration no
higher than the limit
established during the
performance test.
(2) See Item 2.d.i of
this table.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017, you
may maintain the daily
average liquid-to-gas
ratio above the limit
established during the
performance test.
(3) See Item 2.d.ii of
this table.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017, you
may maintain the daily
average pressure drop
above the limit
established during the
performance test (not
applicable to a non-
venturi wet scrubber
of the jet-ejector
design).
c. Bag leak detection Fabric filter.......... See item 2.e of this
(BLD) system. table.
10. During periods of startup, Any.................... Any.................... Meet the requirements
shutdown, or hot standby. in Sec.
63.1564(a)(5).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If you use a jet ejector type wet scrubber or other type of wet scrubber equipped with atomizing spray
nozzles, you can use the alternative in Sec. 63.1573(b), and comply with the daily inspections,
recordkeeping, and repair provisions, instead of a continuous parameter monitoring system for pressure drop
across the scrubber.
[80 FR 75280, Dec. 1, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 45244, July 13, 2016]
[[Page 164]]
Sec. Table 3 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Monitoring Systems
for Metal HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1564(b)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you use this
For each new or existing type of control You shall install,
catalytic cracking unit . . . device for your operate, and maintain
vent . . . a . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to the NSPS for PM Any.............. Continuous opacity
in 40 CFR 60.102 and not monitoring system to
electing Sec. 60.100(e). measure and record
the opacity of
emissions from each
catalyst regenerator
vent.
2. Subject to NSPS for PM in a. Cyclone....... Continuous opacity
40 CFR 60.102a(b)(1)(i); or b. Electrostatic monitoring system to
in Sec. 60.102 and electing precipitator. measure and record
Sec. 60.100(e); electing to the opacity of
meet the PM per coke burn-off emissions from each
limit. catalyst regenerator
vent.
Continuous opacity
monitoring system to
measure and record
the opacity of
emissions from each
catalyst regenerator
vent; or continuous
parameter monitoring
systems to measure
and record the coke
burn-off rate or the
gas flow rate
entering or exiting
the control
device,\1\ the
voltage, current,
and secondary
current to the
control device.
c. Wet scrubber.. Continuous parameter
monitoring system to
measure and record
the pressure drop
across the
scrubber,\2\ the gas
flow rate entering
or exiting the
control device,\1\
and total liquid (or
scrubbing liquor)
flow rate to the
control device.
d. Fabric Filter. Continuous bag leak
detection system to
measure and record
increases in
relative particulate
loading from each
catalyst regenerator
vent.
3. Subject to NSPS for PM in Any.............. Continuous emission
40 CFR 60.102a(b)(1)(i); or monitoring system to
in Sec. 60.102 and electing measure and record
Sec. 60.100(e); electing to the concentration of
meet the PM concentration PM and oxygen from
limit. each catalyst
regenerator vent.
4. Subject to NSPS for PM in Any.............. The applicable
40 CFR 60.102a(b)(1)(ii) continuous
electing to meet the PM per monitoring systems
coke burn-off limit. in item 2 of this
table.
5. Subject to NSPS for PM in Any.............. See item 3 of this
40 CFR 60.102a(b)(1)(ii) table.
electing to meet the PM
concentration limit.
6. Option 1a: Elect NSPS Any.............. See item 1 of this
subpart J, PM per coke burn- table.
off limit, not subject to the
NSPS for PM in 40 CFR 60.102
or 60.102a(b)(1).
7. Option 1b: Elect NSPS Any.............. The applicable
subpart Ja, PM per coke burn- continuous
off limit, not subject to the monitoring systems
NSPS for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 in item 2 of this
or 60.102a(b)(1). table.
8. Option 1c: Elect NSPS Any.............. See item 3 of this
subpart Ja, PM concentration table.
limit not subject to the NSPS
for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or
60.102a(b)(1).
9. Option 2: PM per coke burn- Any.............. The applicable
off limit, not subject to the continuous
NSPS for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 monitoring systems
or 60.102a(b)(1). in item 2 of this
table.
10. Option 3: Ni lb/hr limit a. Cyclone....... Continuous opacity
not subject to the NSPS for monitoring system to
PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or measure and record
60.102a(b)(1). the opacity of
emissions from each
catalyst regenerator
vent and continuous
parameter monitoring
system to measure
and record the gas
flow rate entering
or exiting the
control device.\1\
b. Electrostatic Continuous opacity
precipitator. monitoring system to
measure and record
the opacity of
emissions from each
catalyst regenerator
vent and continuous
parameter monitoring
system to measure
and record the gas
flow rate entering
or exiting the
control device \1\;
or continuous
parameter monitoring
systems to measure
and record the coke
burn-off rate or the
gas flow rate
entering or exiting
the control device
\1\ and the voltage
and current (to
measure the total
power to the system)
and secondary
current to the
control device.
[[Page 165]]
c. Wet scrubber.. Continuous parameter
monitoring system to
measure and record
the pressure drop
across the
scrubber,\2\ gas
flow rate entering
or exiting the
control device,\1\
and total liquid (or
scrubbing liquor)
flow rate to the
control device.
d. Fabric Filter. Continuous bag leak
detection system to
measure and record
increases in
relative particulate
loading from each
catalyst regenerator
vent or the
monitoring systems
specified in item
10.a of this table.
11. Option 4: Ni per coke burn- a. Cyclone....... Continuous opacity
off limit not subject to the monitoring system to
NSPS for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 measure and record
or 60.102a(b)(1). the opacity of
emissions from each
catalyst regenerator
vent and continuous
parameter monitoring
system to measure
and record the coke
burn-off rate and
the gas flow rate
entering or exiting
the control
device.\1\
b. Electrostatic Continuous opacity
precipitator. monitoring system to
measure and record
the opacity of
emissions from each
catalyst regenerator
vent and continuous
parameter monitoring
system to measure
and record the coke
burn-off rate and
the gas flow rate
entering or exiting
the control device
\1\; or continuous
parameter monitoring
systems to measure
and record the coke
burn-off rate or the
gas flow rate
entering or exiting
the control device
\1\ and voltage and
current (to measure
the total power to
the system) and
secondary current to
the control device.
c. Wet scrubber.. Continuous parameter
monitoring system to
measure and record
the pressure drop
across the
scrubber,\2\ gas
flow rate entering
or exiting the
control device,\1\
and total liquid (or
scrubbing liquor)
flow rate to the
control device.
d. Fabric Filter. Continuous bag leak
detection system to
measure and record
increases in
relative particulate
loading from each
catalyst regenerator
vent or the
monitoring systems
specified in item
11.a of this table.
12. Electing to comply with Any.............. Continuous parameter
the operating limits in Sec. monitoring system to
63.1564(a)(5)(ii) during measure and record
periods of startup, shutdown, the gas flow rate
or hot standby. exiting the catalyst
regenerator.\1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If applicable, you can use the alternative in Sec. 63.1573(a)(1)
instead of a continuous parameter monitoring system for gas flow rate.
\2\ If you use a jet ejector type wet scrubber or other type of wet
scrubber equipped with atomizing spray nozzles, you can use the
alternative in Sec. 63.1573(b) instead of a continuous parameter
monitoring system for pressure drop across the scrubber.
[80 FR 75283, Dec. 1, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 45244, July 13, 2016; 83
FR 60725, Nov. 26, 2018]
Sec. Table 4 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance
Tests for Metal HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
As stated in Sec. Sec. 63.1564(b)(2) and 63.1571(a)(5), you shall
meet each requirement in the following table that applies to you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each new or existing catalytic
cracking unit catalyst regenerator You must . . . Using . . . According to these
vent . . . requirements . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Any............................... a. Select sampling Method 1 or 1A in Sampling sites must be
port's location and appendix A-1 to part located at the outlet
the number of traverse 60 of this chapter. of the control device
ports. or the outlet of the
regenerator, as
applicable, and prior
to any releases to the
atmosphere.
b. Determine velocity Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2D,
and volumetric flow or 2F in appendix A-1
rate. to part 60 of this
chapter, or Method 2G
in appendix A-2 to
part 60 of this
chapter, as applicable.
c. Conduct gas Method 3, 3A, or 3B in
molecular weight appendix A-2 to part
analysis. 60 of this chapter, as
applicable.
d. Measure moisture Method 4 in appendix A-
content of the stack 3 to part 60 of this
gas. chapter.
[[Page 166]]
e. If you use an
electrostatic
precipitator, record
the total number of
fields in the control
system and how many
operated during the
applicable performance
test.
f. If you use a wet
scrubber, record the
total amount (rate) of
water (or scrubbing
liquid) and the amount
(rate) of make-up
liquid to the scrubber
during each test run.
2. Subject to the NSPS for PM in 40 a. Measure PM emissions Method 5, 5B, or 5F (40 You must maintain a
CFR 60.102 and not elect Sec. CFR part 60, appendix sampling rate of at
60.100(e). A-3) to determine PM least 0.15 dry
emissions and standard cubic meters
associated moisture per minute (dscm/min)
content for units (0.53 dry standard
without wet scrubbers. cubic feet per minute
Method 5 or 5B (40 CFR (dscf/min)).
part 60, appendix A-3)
to determine PM
emissions and
associated moisture
content for unit with
wet scrubber.
b. Compute coke burn- Equations 1, 2, and 3
off rate and PM of Sec. 63.1564 (if
emission rate (lb/ applicable).
1,000 lb of coke burn-
off).
c. Measure opacity of Continuous opacity You must collect
emissions. monitoring system. opacity monitoring
data every 10 seconds
during the entire
period of the Method
5, 5B, or 5F
performance test and
reduce the data to 6-
minute averages.
3. Subject to the NSPS for PM in 40 a. Measure PM emissions Method 5, 5B, or 5F (40 You must maintain a
CFR 60.102a(b)(1) or elect Sec. CFR part 60, appendix sampling rate of at
60.100(e), electing the PM for coke A-3) to determine PM least 0.15 dscm/min
burn-off limit. emissions and (0.53 dscf/min).
associated moisture
content for units
without wet scrubbers.
Method 5 or 5B (40 CFR
part 60, appendix A-3)
to determine PM
emissions and
associated moisture
content for unit with
wet scrubber.
b. Compute coke burn- Equations 1, 2, and 3
off rate and PM of Sec. 63.1564 (if
emission rate (lb/ applicable).
1,000 lb of coke burn-
off).
c. Establish site- Continuous opacity If you elect to comply
specific limit if you monitoring system. with the site-specific
use a COMS. opacity limit in Sec.
63.1564(b)(4)(i), you
must collect opacity
monitoring data every
10 seconds during the
entire period of the
Method 5, 5B, or 5F
performance test. For
site specific opacity
monitoring, reduce the
data to 6-minute
averages; determine
and record the average
opacity for each test
run; and compute the
site-specific opacity
limit using Equation 4
of Sec. 63.1564.
[[Page 167]]
4. Subject to the NSPS for PM in 40 a. Measure PM emissions Method 5, 5B, or 5F (40 You must maintain a
CFR 60.102a(b)(1) or elect Sec. CFR part 60, appendix sampling rate of at
60.100(e). A-3) to determine PM least 0.15 dscm/min
emissions and (0.53 dscf/min).
associated moisture
content for units
without wet scrubbers.
Method 5 or 5B (40 CFR
part 60, appendix A-3)
to determine PM
emissions and
associated moisture
content for unit with
wet scrubber.
5. Option 1a: Elect NSPS subpart J See item 2 of this
requirements for PM per coke burn- table.
off limit, not subject to the NSPS
for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or
60.102a(b)(1).
6. Option 1b: Elect NSPS subpart Ja See item 3 of this
requirements for PM per coke burn- table.
off limit, not subject to the NSPS
for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or
60.102a(b)(1).
7. Option 1c: Elect NSPS requirements See item 4 of this
for PM concentration, not subject to table.
the NSPS for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or
60.102a(b)(1).
8. Option 2: PM per coke burn-off See item 3 of this
limit, not subject to the NSPS for table.
PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1).
9. Option 3: Ni lb/hr limit, not a. Measure Method 29 (40 CFR part
subject to the NSPS for PM in 40 CFR concentration of Ni. 60, appendix A-8).
60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1). ....................... Equation 5 of Sec.
b. Compute Ni emission 63.1564.
rate (lb/hr).
c. Determine the XRF procedure in You must obtain 1
equilibrium catalyst appendix A to this sample for each of the
Ni concentration. subpart 1; or EPA 3 test runs; determine
Method 6010B or 6020 and record the
or EPA Method 7520 or equilibrium catalyst
7521 in SW-8462; or an Ni concentration for
alternative to the SW- each of the 3 samples;
846 method and you may adjust the
satisfactory to the laboratory results to
Administrator. the maximum value
using Equation 1 of
Sec. 63.1571, if
applicable.
d. If you use a i. Equations 6 and 7 of (1) You must collect
continuous opacity Sec. 63.1564 using opacity monitoring
monitoring system, data from continuous data every 10 seconds
establish your site- opacity monitoring during the entire
specific Ni operating system, gas flow rate, period of the initial
limit. results of equilibrium Ni performance test;
catalyst Ni reduce the data to 6-
concentration minute averages; and
analysis, and Ni determine and record
emission rate from the average opacity
Method 29 test. from all the 6-minute
averages for each test
run.
(2) You must collect
gas flow rate
monitoring data every
15 minutes during the
entire period of the
initial Ni performance
test; measure the gas
flow as near as
practical to the
continuous opacity
monitoring system; and
determine and record
the hourly average
actual gas flow rate
for each test run.
[[Page 168]]
10. Option 4: Ni per coke burn-off a. Measure Method 29 (40 CFR part
limit, not subject to the NSPS for concentration of Ni. 60, appendix A-8).
PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1). ....................... Equations 1 and 8 of
b. Compute Ni emission Sec. 63.1564.
rate (lb/1,000 lb of
coke burn-off).
c. Determine the See item 9.c. of this You must obtain 1
equilibrium catalyst table. sample for each of the
Ni concentration. 3 test runs; determine
and record the
equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration for
each of the 3 samples;
and you may adjust the
laboratory results to
the maximum value
using Equation 2 of
Sec. 63.1571, if
applicable.
d. If you use a i. Equations 9 and 10 (1) You must collect
continuous opacity of Sec. 63.1564 with opacity monitoring
monitoring system, data from continuous data every 10 seconds
establish your site- opacity monitoring during the entire
specific Ni operating system, coke burn-off period of the initial
limit. rate, results of Ni performance test;
equilibrium catalyst reduce the data to 6-
Ni concentration minute averages; and
analysis, and Ni determine and record
emission rate from the average opacity
Method 29 test. from all the 6-minute
averages for each test
run.
(2) You must collect
gas flow rate
monitoring data every
15 minutes during the
entire period of the
initial Ni performance
test; measure the gas
flow rate as near as
practical to the
continuous opacity
monitoring system; and
determine and record
the hourly average
actual gas flow rate
for each test run.
e. Record the catalyst
addition rate for each
test and schedule for
the 10-day period
prior to the test.
11. If you elect item 5 Option 1b in a. Establish each Data from the
Table 1, item 7 Option 2 in Table 1, operating limit in continuous parameter
item 8 Option 3 in Table 1, or item Table 2 of this monitoring systems and
9 Option 4 in Table 1 of this subpart that applies applicable performance
subpart and you use continuous to you. test methods.
parameter monitoring systems.
b. Electrostatic i. Data from the (1) You must collect
precipitator or wet continuous parameter gas flow rate
scrubber: Gas flow monitoring systems and monitoring data every
rate. applicable performance 15 minutes during the
test methods. entire period of the
initial performance
test; determine and
record the average gas
flow rate for each
test run.
(2) You must determine
and record the 3-hr
average gas flow rate
from the test runs.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017, you
may determine and
record the maximum
hourly average gas
flow rate from all the
readings.
[[Page 169]]
c. Electrostatic i. Data from the (1) You must collect
precipitator: Total continuous parameter voltage, current, and
power (voltage and monitoring systems and secondary current
current) and secondary applicable performance monitoring data every
current. test methods. 15 minutes during the
entire period of the
performance test; and
determine and record
the average voltage,
current, and secondary
current for each test
run. Alternatively,
before August 1, 2017,
you may collect
voltage and secondary
current (or total
power input)
monitoring data every
15 minutes during the
entire period of the
initial performance
test.
(2) You must determine
and record the 3-hr
average total power to
the system for the
test runs and the 3-hr
average secondary
current from the test
runs. Alternatively,
before August 1, 2017,
you may determine and
record the minimum
hourly average voltage
and secondary current
(or total power input)
from all the readings.
d. Electrostatic Results of analysis for You must determine and
precipitator or wet equilibrium catalyst record the average
scrubber: Equilibrium Ni concentration. equilibrium catalyst
catalyst Ni Ni concentration for
concentration. the 3 runs based on
the laboratory
results. You may
adjust the value using
Equation 1 or 2 of
Sec. 63.1571 as
applicable.
e. Wet scrubber: i. Data from the (1) You must collect
Pressure drop (not continuous parameter pressure drop
applicable to non- monitoring systems and monitoring data every
venturi scrubber of applicable performance 15 minutes during the
jet ejector design). test methods. entire period of the
initial performance
test; and determine
and record the average
pressure drop for each
test run.
(2) You must determine
and record the 3-hr
average pressure drop
from the test runs.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017, you
may determine and
record the minimum
hourly average
pressure drop from all
the readings.
f. Wet scrubber: Liquid- i. Data from the (1) You must collect
to-gas ratio. continuous parameter gas flow rate and
monitoring systems and total water (or
applicable performance scrubbing liquid) flow
test methods. rate monitoring data
every 15 minutes
during the entire
period of the initial
performance test;
determine and record
the average gas flow
rate for each test
run; and determine the
average total water
(or scrubbing liquid)
flow for each test
run.
[[Page 170]]
(2) You must determine
and record the hourly
average liquid-to-gas
ratio from the test
runs. Alternatively,
before August 1, 2017,
you may determine and
record the hourly
average gas flow rate
and total water (or
scrubbing liquid) flow
rate from all the
readings.
(3) You must determine
and record the 3-hr
average liquid-to-gas
ratio. Alternatively,
before August 1, 2017,
you may determine and
record the minimum
liquid-to-gas ratio.
g. Alternative i. Data from the (1) You must collect
procedure for gas flow continuous parameter air flow rate
rate. monitoring systems and monitoring data or
applicable performance determine the air flow
test methods. rate using control
room instrumentation
every 15 minutes
during the entire
period of the initial
performance test.
(2) You must determine
and record the 3-hr
average rate of all
the readings from the
test runs.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017, you
may determine and
record the hourly
average rate of all
the readings.
(3) You must determine
and record the maximum
gas flow rate using
Equation 1 of Sec.
63.1573.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Determination of Metal Concentration on Catalyst Particles (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure).
\2\ EPA Method 6010B, Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry, EPA Method 6020, Inductively
Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry, EPA Method 7520, Nickel Atomic Absorption, Direct Aspiration, and EPA Method
7521, Nickel Atomic Absorption, Direct Aspiration are included in ``Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods,'' EPA Publication SW-846, Revision 5 (April 1998). The SW-846 and Updates (document
number 955-001-00000-1) are available for purchase from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government
Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402, (202) 512-1800; and from the National Technical Information Services
(NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 487-4650. Copies may be inspected at the EPA Docket
Center, William Jefferson Clinton (WJC) West Building, (Air Docket), Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street NW., Suite 700, Washington,
DC.
[80 FR 75285, Dec. 1, 2015, as amended at 83 FR 60725, Nov. 26, 2018]
Sec. Table 5 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Initial Compliance With Metal
HAP Emission Limits for Catalytic Cracking Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1564(b)(5), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
[[Page 171]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each new and existing For the following
catalytic cracking unit emission limit . You have demonstrated
catalyst regenerator vent . . . . initial compliance if
. . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to the NSPS for PM PM emissions must You have already
in 40 CFR 60.102 and not not exceed 1.0 g/ conducted a
electing Sec. 60.100(e). kg (1.0 lb/1,000 performance test to
lb) of coke burn- demonstrate initial
off, and the compliance with the
opacity of NSPS and the
emissions must measured PM emission
not exceed 30 rate is less than or
percent, except equal to 1.0 g/kg
for one 6-minute (1.0 lb/1,000 lb) of
average opacity coke burn-off in the
reading in any 1- catalyst
hour period. regenerator. As part
Before August 1, of the Notification
2017, if the of Compliance
discharged gases Status, you must
pass through an certify that your
incinerator or vent meets the PM
waste heat limit. You are not
boiler in which required to do
you burn another performance
auxiliary or test to demonstrate
supplemental initial compliance.
liquid or solid You have already
fossil fuel, the conducted a
incremental rate performance test to
of PM must not demonstrate initial
exceed 43.0 g/GJ compliance with the
or 0.10 lb/ NSPS and the average
million Btu of hourly opacity is no
heat input more than 30
attributable to percent, except that
the liquid or one 6-minute average
solid fossil in any 1-hour period
fuel; and the can exceed 30
opacity of percent. As part of
emissions must the Notification of
not exceed 30 Compliance Status,
percent, except you must certify
for one 6-minute that your vent meets
average opacity the 30 percent
reading in any 1- opacity limit. As
hour period. part of your
Notification of
Compliance Status,
you certify that
your continuous
opacity monitoring
system meets the
requirements in Sec.
63.1572.
2. Subject to NSPS for PM in PM emissions must You have already
40 CFR 60.102a(b)(1)(i); or not exceed 1.0 g/ conducted a
in Sec. 60.102 and electing kg (1.0 lb PM/ performance test to
Sec. 60.100(e) and electing 1,000 lb) of demonstrate initial
to meet the PM per coke burn- coke burn-off. compliance with the
off limit. NSPS and the
measured PM emission
rate is less than or
equal to 1.0 g/kg
(1.0 lb/1,000 lb) of
coke burn-off in the
catalyst
regenerator. As part
of the Notification
of Compliance
Status, you must
certify that your
vent meets the PM
limit. You are not
required to do
another performance
test to demonstrate
initial compliance.
As part of your
Notification of
Compliance Status,
you certify that
your BLD; CO2, O2,
or CO monitor; or
continuous opacity
monitoring system
meets the
requirements in Sec.
63.1572.
3. Subject to NSPS for PM in PM emissions must You have already
40 CFR 60.102a(b)(1)(ii), not exceed 0.5 g/ conducted a
electing to meet the PM per kg (0.5 lb PM/ performance test to
coke burn-off limit. 1,000 lb) of demonstrate initial
coke burn-off). compliance with the
NSPS and the
measured PM emission
rate is less than or
equal to 0.5 g/kg
(0.5 lb/1,000 lb) of
coke burn-off in the
catalyst
regenerator. As part
of the Notification
of Compliance
Status, you must
certify that your
vent meets the PM
limit. You are not
required to do
another performance
test to demonstrate
initial compliance.
As part of your
Notification of
Compliance Status,
you certify that
your BLD; CO2, O2,
or CO monitor; or
continuous opacity
monitoring system
meets the
requirements in Sec.
63.1572.
4. Subject to NSPS for PM in If a PM CEMS is You have already
40 CFR 60.102a(b)(1)(i), used, 0.040 conducted a
electing to meet the PM grain per dry performance test to
concentration limit. standard cubic demonstrate initial
feet (gr/dscf) compliance with the
corrected to 0 NSPS and the
percent excess measured PM
air. concentration is
less than or equal
to 0.040 grain per
dry standard cubic
feet (gr/dscf)
corrected to 0
percent excess air.
As part of the
Notification of
Compliance Status,
you must certify
that your vent meets
the PM limit. You
are not required to
do another
performance test to
demonstrate initial
compliance. As part
of your Notification
of Compliance
Status, you certify
that your PM CEMS
meets the
requirements in Sec.
63.1572.
5. Subject to NSPS for PM in If a PM CEMS is You have already
40 CFR 60.102a(b)(1)(ii), used, 0.020 gr/ conducted a
electing to meet the PM dscf corrected performance test to
concentration limit. to 0 percent demonstrate initial
excess air. compliance with the
NSPS and the
measured PM
concentration is
less than or equal
to 0.020 gr/dscf
corrected to 0
percent excess air.
As part of the
Notification of
Compliance Status,
you must certify
that your vent meets
the PM limit. You
are not required to
do another
performance test to
demonstrate initial
compliance. As part
of your Notification
of Compliance
Status, you certify
that your PM CEMS
meets the
requirements in Sec.
63.1572.
[[Page 172]]
6. Option 1a: Elect NSPS PM emissions must The average PM
subpart J requirements for PM not exceed 1.0 emission rate,
per coke burn-off limit, not gram per measured using EPA
subject to the NSPS for PM in kilogram (g/kg) Method 5, 5B, or 5F
40 CFR 60.102 or (1.0 lb/1,000 (for a unit without
60.102a(b)(1). lb) of coke burn- a wet scrubber) or 5
off, and the or 5B (for a unit
opacity of with a wet scrubber)
emissions must (40 CFR part 60,
not exceed 30 appendix A-3), over
percent, except the period of the
for one 6-minute initial performance
average opacity test, is no higher
reading in any 1- than 1.0 g/kg coke
hour period. burn-off (1.0 lb/
Before August 1, 1,000 lb) in the
2017, PM catalyst
emission must regenerator. The PM
not exceed 1.0 g/ emission rate is
kg (1.0 lb/1,000 calculated using
lb) of coke burn- Equations 1, 2, and
off in the 3 of Sec. 63.1564.
catalyst As part of the
regenerator; if Notification of
the discharged Compliance Status,
gases pass you must certify
through an that your vent meets
incinerator or the PM limit. The
waste heat average hourly
boiler in which opacity is no more
you burn than 30 percent,
auxiliary or except that one 6-
supplemental minute average in
liquid or solid any 1-hour period
fossil fuel, the can exceed 30
incremental rate percent. As part of
of PM must not the Notification of
exceed 43.0 g/GJ Compliance Status,
(0.10 lb/million you must certify
Btu) of heat that your vent meets
input the 30 percent
attributable to opacity limit. If
the liquid or you use a continuous
solid fossil opacity monitoring
fuel; and the system, your
opacity of performance
emissions must evaluation shows the
not exceed 30 system meets the
percent, except applicable
for one 6-minute requirements in Sec.
average opacity 63.1572.
reading in any 1-
hour period.
7. Option 1b: Elect NSPS PM emissions must The average PM
subpart Ja requirements for not exceed 1.0 g/ emission rate,
PM per coke burn-off limit, kg (1.0 lb/1,000 measured using EPA
not subject to the NSPS for lb) of coke burn- Method 5, 5B, or 5F
PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or off. (for a unit without
60.102a(b)(1). a wet scrubber) or 5
or 5B (for a unit
with a wet scrubber)
(40 CFR part 60,
appendix A-3), over
the period of the
initial performance
test, is no higher
than 1.0 g/kg coke
burn-off (1.0 lb/
1,000 lb) in the
catalyst
regenerator. The PM
emission rate is
calculated using
Equations 1, 2, and
3 of Sec. 63.1564.
If you use a BLD;
CO2, O2, CO monitor;
or continuous
opacity monitoring
system, your
performance
evaluation shows the
system meets the
applicable
requirements in Sec.
63.1572.
8. Option 1c: Elect NSPS PM emissions must The average PM
subpart Ja requirements for not exceed 0.040 concentration,
PM concentration limit, not gr/dscf measured using EPA
subject to the NSPS for PM in corrected to 0 Method 5, 5B, or 5F
40 CFR 60.102 or percent excess (for a unit without
60.102a(b)(1). air. a wet scrubber) or
Method 5 or 5B (for
a unit with a wet
scrubber) (40 CFR
part 60, appendix A-
3), over the period
of the initial
performance test, is
less than or equal
to 0.040 gr/dscf
corrected to 0
percent excess air.
Your performance
evaluation shows
your PM CEMS meets
the applicable
requirements in Sec.
63.1572.
9. Option 2: PM per coke burn- PM emissions must The average PM
off limit, not subject to the not exceed 1.0 g/ emission rate,
NSPS for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 kg (1.0 lb/1,000 measured using EPA
or 60.102a(b)(1). lb) of coke burn- Method 5, 5B, or 5F
off. (for a unit without
a wet scrubber) or 5
or 5B (for a unit
with a wet scrubber)
(40 CFR part 60,
appendix A-3), over
the period of the
initial performance
test, is no higher
than 1.0 g/kg coke
burn-off (1.0 lb/
1,000 lb) in the
catalyst
regenerator. The PM
emission rate is
calculated using
Equations 1, 2, and
3 of Sec. 63.1564.
If you use a BLD;
CO2, O2, CO monitor;
or continuous
opacity monitoring
system, your
performance
evaluation shows the
system meets the
applicable
requirements in Sec.
63.1572.
10. Option 3: Ni lb/hr limit, Nickel (Ni) The average Ni
not subject to the NSPS for emissions from emission rate,
PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or your catalyst measured using
60.102a(b)(1). regenerator vent Method 29 (40 CFR
must not exceed part 60, appendix A-
13,000 mg/hr 8) over the period
(0.029 lb/hr). of the initial
performance test, is
not more than 13,000
mg/hr (0.029 lb/hr).
The Ni emission rate
is calculated using
Equation 5 of Sec.
63.1564; and if you
use a BLD; CO2, O2,
or CO monitor; or
continuous opacity
monitoring system,
your performance
evaluation shows the
system meets the
applicable
requirements in Sec.
63.1572.
[[Page 173]]
11. Option 4: Ni per coke burn- Ni emissions from The average Ni
off limit not subject to the your catalyst emission rate,
NSPS for PM. regenerator vent measured using
must not exceed Method 29 (40 CFR
1.0 mg/kg (0.001 part 60, appendix A-
lb/1,000 lb) of 8) over the period
coke burn-off in of the initial
the catalyst performance test, is
regenerator. not more than 1.0 mg/
kg (0.001 lb/1,000
lb) of coke burn-off
in the catalyst
regenerator. The Ni
emission rate is
calculated using
Equation 8 of Sec.
63.1564; and if you
use a BLD; CO2, O2,
or CO monitor; or
continuous opacity
monitoring system,
your performance
evaluation shows the
system meets the
applicable
requirements in Sec.
63.1572.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75290, Dec. 1, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 45244, July 13, 2016; 83
FR 60726, Nov. 26, 2018]
Sec. Table 6 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With Metal
HAP Emission Limits for Catalytic Cracking Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1564(c)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject to this
emission limit You shall demonstrate
For each new and existing for your catalyst continuous compliance
catalytic cracking unit . . . regenerator vent by . . .
. . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to the NSPS for PM a. PM emissions i. Determining and
in 40 CFR 60.102 and not must not exceed recording each day
electing Sec. 60.100(e). 1.0 g/kg (1.0 lb/ the average coke
1,000 lb) of burn-off rate
coke burn-off, (thousands of
and the opacity kilograms per hour)
of emissions using Equation 1 in
must not exceed Sec. 63.1564 and
30 percent, the hours of
except for one 6- operation for each
minute average catalyst
opacity reading regenerator.
in any 1-hour
period. Before
August 1, 2017,
if the
discharged gases
pass through an
incinerator or
waste heat
boiler in which
you burn
auxiliary or
supplemental
liquid or solid
fossil fuel, the
incremental rate
of PM must not
exceed 43.0 g/GJ
(0.10 lb/million
Btu) of heat
input
attributable to
the liquid or
solid fossil
fuel; and the
opacity of
emissions must
not exceed 30
percent, except
for one 6-minute
average opacity
reading in any 1-
hour period.
ii. Conducting a
performance test
before August 1,
2017 or within 150
days of startup of a
new unit and
thereafter following
the testing
frequency in Sec.
63.1571(a)(5) as
applicable to your
unit.
iii. Collecting the
continuous opacity
monitoring data for
each catalyst
regenerator vent
according to Sec.
63.1572 and
maintaining each 6-
minute average at or
below 30 percent,
except that one 6-
minute average
during a 1-hour
period can exceed 30
percent.
iv. Before August 1,
2017, if applicable,
determining and
recording each day
the rate of
combustion of liquid
or solid fossil
fuels (liters/hour
or kilograms/hour)
and the hours of
operation during
which liquid or
solid fossil-fuels
are combusted in the
incinerator-waste
heat boiler; if
applicable,
maintaining the
incremental rate of
PM at or below 43 g/
GJ (0.10 lb/million
Btu) of heat input
attributable to the
solid or liquid
fossil fuel.
2. Subject to NSPS for PM in PM emissions must Determining and
40 CFR 60.102a(b)(1)(i), not exceed 1.0 g/ recording each day
electing to meet the PM per kg (1.0 lb PM/ the average coke
coke burn-off limit. 1,000 lb) of burn-off rate
coke burn-off. (thousands of
kilograms per hour)
using Equation 1 in
Sec. 63.1564 and
the hours of
operation for each
catalyst
regenerator;
maintaining PM
emission rate below
1.0 g/kg (1.0 lb PM/
1,000 lb) of coke
burn-off; and
conducting a
performance test
once every year.
[[Page 174]]
3. Subject to NSPS for PM in PM emissions must Determining and
40 CFR 60.102a(b)(1)(ii), not exceed 0.5 g/ recording each day
electing to meet the PM per kg coke burn-off the average coke
coke burn-off limit. (0.5 lb/1000 lb burn-off rate
coke burn-off). (thousands of
kilograms per hour)
using Equation 1 in
Sec. 63.1564 and
the hours of
operation for each
catalyst
regenerator;
maintaining PM
emission rate below
0.5 g/kg (0.5 lb/
1,000 lb) of coke
burn-off; and
conducting a
performance test
once every year.
4. Subject to NSPS for PM in If a PM CEMS is Maintaining PM
40 CFR 60.102a(b)(1)(i), used, 0.040 concentration below
electing to meet the PM grain per dry 0.040 gr/dscf
concentration limit. standard cubic corrected to 0
feet (gr/dscf) percent excess air.
corrected to 0
percent excess
air.
5. Subject to NSPS for PM in If a PM CEMS is Maintaining PM
40 CFR 60.102a(b)(1)(ii), used, 0.020 gr/ concentration below
electing to meet the PM dscf corrected 0.020 gr/dscf
concentration limit. to 0 percent corrected to 0
excess air. percent excess air.
6. Option 1a: Elect NSPS See item 1 of See item 1 of this
subpart J requirements for PM this table. table.
per coke burn-off limit, not
subject to the NSPS for PM in
40 CFR 60.102 or
60.102a(b)(1).
7. Option 1b: Elect NSPS PM emissions must See item 2 of this
subpart Ja requirements for not exceed 1.0 g/ table.
PM per coke burn-off limit, kg (1.0 lb PM/
not subject to the NSPS for 1,000 lb) of
PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or coke burn-off.
60.102a(b)(1).
8. Option 1c: Elect NSPS PM emissions must See item 4 of this
subpart Ja requirements for not exceed 0.040 table.
PM concentration limit, not gr/dscf
subject to the NSPS for PM in corrected to 0
40 CFR 60.102 or percent excess
60.102a(b)(1). air.
9. Option 2: PM per coke burn- PM emissions must Determining and
off limit, not subject to the not exceed 1.0 g/ recording each day
NSPS for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 kg (1.0 lb PM/ the average coke
or 60.102a(b)(1). 1,000 lb) of burn-off rate and
coke burn-off. the hours of
operation and the
hours of operation
for each catalyst
regenerator by
Equation 1 of Sec.
63.1564 (you can use
process data to
determine the
volumetric flow
rate); maintaining
PM emission rate
below 1.0 g/kg (1.0
lb PM/1,000 lb) of
coke burn-off; and
conducting a
performance test
before August 1,
2017 and thereafter
following the
testing frequency in
Sec. 63.1571(a)(5)
as applicable to
your unit.
10. Option 3: Ni lb/hr limit, Ni emissions must Maintaining Ni
not subject to the NSPS for not exceed emission rate below
PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or 13,000 mg/hr 13,000 mg/hr (0.029
60.102a(b)(1). (0.029 lb/hr). lb/hr); and
conducting a
performance test
before August 1,
2017 and thereafter
following the
testing frequency in
Sec. 63.1571(a)(5)
as applicable to
your unit.
11. Option 4: Ni per coke burn- Ni emissions must Determining and
off limit, not subject to the not exceed 1.0 recording each day
NSPS for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 mg/kg (0.001 lb/ the average coke
or 60.102a(b)(1). 1,000 lb) of burn-off rate
coke burn-off in (thousands of
the catalyst kilograms per hour)
regenerator. and the hours of
operation for each
catalyst regenerator
by Equation 1 of
Sec. 63.1564 (you
can use process data
to determine the
volumetric flow
rate); and
maintaining Ni
emission rate below
1.0 mg/kg (0.001 lb/
1,000 lb) of coke
burn-off in the
catalyst
regenerator; and
conducting a
performance test
before August 1,
2017 and thereafter
following the
testing frequency in
Sec. 63.1571(a)(5)
as applicable to
your unit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75292, Dec. 1, 2015, as amended at 83 FR 60726, Nov. 26, 2018]
Sec. Table 7 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With
Operating Limits for Metal HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1564(c)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
[[Page 175]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall demonstrate
For each new or existing catalytic If you use . . . For this operating continuous compliance
cracking unit . . . limit . . . by . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to NSPS for PM in 40 CFR Continuous opacity The 3-hour average Collecting the
60.102 and not electing Sec. monitoring system. opacity of emissions continuous opacity
60.100(e). from your catalyst monitoring data for
regenerator vent must each regenerator vent
not exceed 20 percent. according to Sec.
63.1572 and maintain
each 3-hour rolling
average opacity of
emissions no higher
than 20 percent.
2. Subject to NSPS for PM in 40 CFR a. Continuous opacity The average opacity Collecting the hourly
60.102a(b)(1); or 40 CFR 60.102 and monitoring system, must not exceed the and 3-hr rolling
elect Sec. 60.100(e), electing to used for site-specific opacity established average opacity
meet the PM per coke burn-off limit. opacity limit--Cyclone during the performance monitoring data
or electrostatic test. according to Sec.
precipitator. 63.1572; maintaining
the 3-hr rolling
average opacity at or
above the site-
specific limit
established during the
performance test.
b. Continuous i. The average gas flow Collecting the hourly
parametric monitoring rate entering or and daily average coke
systems--electrostatic exiting the control burn-off rate or
precipitator. device must not exceed average gas flow rate
the operating limit monitoring data
established during the according to Sec.
performance test. 63.1572; and
maintaining the daily
average coke burn-off
rate or average gas
flow rate at or below
the limit established
during the performance
test.
ii. The average total Collecting the hourly
power and secondary and 3-hr rolling
current to the control average total power
device must not fall and secondary current
below the operating monitoring data
limit established according to Sec.
during the performance 63.1572; and
test. maintaining the 3-hr
rolling average total
power and secondary
current at or above
the limit established
during the performance
test.
c. Continuous i. The average liquid- Collecting the hourly
parametric monitoring to-gas ratio must not and 3-hr rolling
systems--wet scrubber. fall below the average gas flow rate
operating limit and scrubber liquid
established during the flow rate monitoring
performance test. data according to Sec.
63.1572; determining
and recording the 3-hr
liquid-to-gas ratio;
and maintaining the 3-
hr rolling average
liquid-to-gas ratio at
or above the limit
established during the
performance test.
ii. Except for periods Collecting the hourly
of startup, shutdown and 3-hr rolling
and hot standby, the average pressure drop
average pressure drop monitoring data
across the scrubber according to Sec.
must not fall below 63.1572; and except
the operating limit for periods of
established during the startup, shutdown and
performance test. hot standby,
maintaining the 3-hr
rolling average
pressure drop at or
above the limit
established during the
performance test.
d. BLD--fabric filter.. Increases in relative Collecting and
particulate. maintaining records of
BLD system output;
determining the cause
of the alarm within 1
hour of the alarm; and
alleviating the cause
of the alarm within 3
hours by corrective
action.
3. Subject to NSPS for PM in 40 CFR PM CEMS................ Not applicable......... Complying with Table 6
60.102a(b)(1), electing to meet the of this subpart, item
PM concentration limit. 4 or 5.
[[Page 176]]
4. Option 1a: Elect NSPS subpart J Continuous opacity The 3-hour average Collecting the 3-hr
requirements for PM per coke burn- monitoring system. opacity of emissions rolling average
off limit, not subject to the NSPS from your catalyst continuous opacity
for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or regenerator vent must monitoring system data
60.102a(b)(1). not exceed 20 percent. according to Sec.
63.1572; and
maintaining the 3-hr
rolling average
opacity no higher than
20 percent.
5. Option 1b: Elect NSPS subpart Ja a. Continuous opacity The opacity of Collecting the 3-hr
requirements for PM per coke burn- monitoring system. emissions from your rolling average
off limit, not subject to the NSPS catalyst regenerator continuous opacity
for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or vent must not exceed monitoring system data
60.102a(b)(1). the site-specific according to Sec.
opacity operating 63.1572; maintaining
limit established the 3-hr rolling
during the performance average opacity at or
test. below the site-
specific limit.
b. Continuous See item 2.b of this See item 2.b of this
parametric monitoring table. table.
systems--electrostatic
precipitator.
c. Continuous See item 2.c of this See item 2.c of this
parametric monitoring table. table.
systems--wet scrubber.
d. BLD--fabric filter.. See item 2.d of this See item 2.d of this
table. table.
6. Option 1c: Elect NSPS subpart Ja PM CEMS................ Not applicable......... Complying with Table 6
requirements for PM concentration of this subpart, item
limit, not subject to the NSPS for 4.
PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1).
7. Option 2: PM per coke burn-off a. Continuous opacity The opacity of Collecting the hourly
limit, not subject to the NSPS for monitoring system. emissions from your and 3-hr rolling
PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1). catalyst regenerator average continuous
vent must not exceed opacity monitoring
the site-specific system data according
opacity operating to Sec. 63.1572; and
limit established maintaining the 3-hr
during the performance rolling average
test. opacity at or below
the site-specific
limit established
during the performance
test. Alternatively,
before August 1, 2017,
collecting the hourly
average continuous
opacity monitoring
system data according
to Sec. 63.1572; and
maintaining the hourly
average opacity at or
below the site-
specific limit.
b. Continuous parameter i. The average coke Collecting the hourly
monitoring systems-- burn-off rate or and daily average coke
electrostatic average gas flow rate burn-off rate or gas
precipitator. entering or exiting flow rate monitoring
the control device data according to Sec.
must not exceed the 63.1572; and
operating limit maintaining the daily
established during the coke burn-off rate or
performance test. average gas flow rate
at or below the limit
established during the
performance test.
[[Page 177]]
ii. The average total Collecting the hourly
power (voltage and and 3-hr rolling
current) and secondary average total power
current to the control and secondary current
device must not fall monitoring data
below the operating according to Sec.
limit established 63.1572; and
during the performance maintaining the 3-hr
test. rolling average total
power and secondary
current at or above
the limit established
during the performance
test. Alternatively,
before August 1, 2017,
collecting the hourly
and daily average
voltage and secondary
current (or total
power input)
monitoring data
according to Sec.
63.1572; and
maintaining the daily
average voltage and
secondary current (or
total power input) at
or above the limit
established during the
performance test.
c. Continuous parameter i. The average liquid- Collecting the hourly
monitoring systems-- to-gas ratio must not and 3-hr rolling
wet scrubber. fall below the average gas flow rate
operating limit and scrubber liquid
established during the flow rate monitoring
performance test. data according to Sec.
63.1572; determining
and recording the 3-hr
liquid-to-gas ratio;
and maintaining the 3-
hr rolling average
liquid-to-gas ratio at
or above the limit
established during the
performance test.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017,
collecting the hourly
average gas flow rate
and water (or
scrubbing liquid) flow
rate monitoring data
according to Sec.
63.1572 \1\;
determining and
recording the hourly
average liquid-to-gas
ratio; determining and
recording the daily
average liquid-to-gas
ratio; and maintaining
the daily average
liquid-to-gas ratio
above the limit
established during the
performance test.
ii. Except for periods Collecting the hourly
of startup, shutdown and 3-hr rolling
and hot standby, the average pressure drop
average pressure drop monitoring data
across the scrubber according to Sec.
must not fall below 63.1572; and except
the operating limit for periods of
established during the startup, shutdown and
performance test. hot standby,
maintaining the 3-hr
rolling average
pressure drop at or
above the limit
established during the
performance test.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017,
collecting the hourly
and daily average
pressure drop
monitoring data
according to Sec.
63.1572; and
maintaining the daily
average pressure drop
above the limit
established during the
performance test.
d. BLD--fabric filter.. See item 2.d of this See item 2.d of this
table. table.
[[Page 178]]
8. Option 3: Ni lb/hr limit not a. Continuous opacity i. The daily average Ni (1) Collecting the
subject to the NSPS for PM in 40 CFR monitoring system. operating value must hourly average
60.102. not exceed the site- continuous opacity
specific Ni operating monitoring system data
limit established according to Sec.
during the performance 63.1572; determining
test. and recording
equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration at
least once a week \2\;
collecting the hourly
average gas flow rate
monitoring data
according to Sec.
63.1572 \1\; and
determining and
recording the hourly
average Ni operating
value using Equation
11 of Sec. 63.1564.
(2) Determining and
recording the 3-hour
rolling average Ni
operating value and
maintaining the 3-hour
rolling average Ni
operating value below
the site-specific Ni
operating limit
established during the
performance test.
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017,
determining and
recording the daily
average Ni operating
value and maintaining
the daily average Ni
operating value below
the site-specific Ni
operating limit
established during the
performance test.
b. Continuous parameter i. The average gas flow See item 7.b.i of this
monitoring systems-- rate entering or table.
electrostatic exiting the control
precipitator. device must not exceed
the operating limit
established during the
performance test.
ii. The average total See item 7.b.ii of this
power (voltage and table.
current) and secondary
current must not fall
below the level
established in the
performance test.
iii. The monthly Determining and
rolling average of the recording the
equilibrium catalyst equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration must Ni concentration at
not exceed the level least once a week \2\;
established during the determining and
performance test. recording the monthly
rolling average of the
equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration once
each week using the
weekly or most recent
value; and maintaining
the monthly rolling
average below the
limit established in
the performance test.
c. Continuous parameter i. The average liquid- See item 7.c.i of this
monitoring systems-- to-gas ratio must not table.
wet scrubber. fall below the
operating limit
established during the
performance test..
ii. Except for periods See item 7.c.ii of this
of startup, shutdown table.
and hot standby, the
average pressure drop
must not fall below
the operating limit
established in the
performance test.
[[Page 179]]
iii. The monthly Determining and
rolling average recording the
equilibrium catalyst equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration must Ni concentration at
not exceed the level least once a week \2\;
established during the determining and
performance test. recording the monthly
rolling average of
equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration once
each week using the
weekly or most recent
value; and maintaining
the monthly rolling
average below the
limit established in
the performance test.
d. BLD--fabric filter.. i. Increases in See item 7.d of this
relative particulate. table.
ii. The monthly rolling Determining and
average of the recording the
equilibrium catalyst equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration must Ni concentration at
not exceed the level least once a week \2\;
established during the determining and
performance test. recording the monthly
rolling average of the
equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration once
each week using the
weekly or most recent
value; and maintaining
the monthly rolling
average below the
limit established in
the performance test.
9. Option 4: Ni per coke burn-off a. Continuous opacity i. The daily average Ni (1) Collecting the
limit not subject to the NSPS for PM monitoring system. operating value must hourly average
in 40 CFR 60.102. not exceed the site- continuous opacity
specific Ni operating monitoring system data
limit established according to Sec.
during the performance 63.1572; collecting
test. the hourly average
coke burn rate and
hourly average gas
flow rate monitoring
data according to Sec.
63.15721;
determining and
recording equilibrium
catalyst Ni
concentration at least
once a week \2\; and
determining and
recording the hourly
average Ni operating
value using Equation
12 of Sec. 63.1564.
(2) Determining and
recording the 3-hour
rolling average Ni
operating value and
maintaining the 3-hour
rolling average Ni
operating value below
the site-specific Ni
operating limit
established during the
performance test
Alternatively, before
August 1, 2017,
determining and
recording the daily
average Ni operating
value and maintaining
the daily average Ni
operating value below
the site-specific Ni
operating limit
established during the
performance test.
b. Continuous parameter i. The average gas flow See item 7.b.i of this
monitoring systems-- rate to the control table.
electrostatic device must not exceed
precipitator. the level established
in the performance
test.
[[Page 180]]
ii. The average voltage See item 7.b.ii of this
and secondary current table.
(or total power input)
must not fall below
the level established
in the performance
test.
iii. The monthly See item 8.b.iii of
rolling average this table.
equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration must
not exceed the level
established during the
performance test.
c. Continuous parameter i. The average liquid- See item 7.c.i of this
monitoring systems-- to-gas ratio must not table.
wet scrubber. fall below the
operating limit
established during the
performance test.
ii. Except for periods See item 7.c.ii of this
of startup, shutdown table.
and hot standby, the
daily average pressure
drop must not fall
below the operating
limit established in
the performance test.
iii. The monthly See item 8.c.iii of
rolling average this table.
equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration must
not exceed the level
established during the
performance test.
d. BLD--fabric filter.. i. See item 2.d of this See item 2.d of this
table. table.
ii. The monthly rolling Determining and
average of the recording the
equilibrium catalyst equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration must Ni concentration at
not exceed the level least once a week \2\;
established during the determining and
performance test. recording the monthly
rolling average of the
equilibrium catalyst
Ni concentration once
each week using the
weekly or most recent
value; and maintaining
the monthly rolling
average below the
limit established in
the performance test.
10. During periods of startup, Any control device, if The inlet velocity Meeting the
shutdown, or hot standby. elected. limit to the primary requirements in Sec.
internal cyclones of 63.1564(c)(5).
the catalytic cracking
unit catalyst
regenerator in Sec.
63.1564(a)(5)(ii).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If applicable, you can use the alternative in Sec. 63.1573(a)(1) for gas flow rate instead of a continuous
parameter monitoring system if you used the alternative method in the initial performance test.
\2\ The equilibrium catalyst Ni concentration must be measured by the procedure, Determination of Metal
Concentration on Catalyst Particles (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) in appendix A to this subpart; or by EPA
Method 6010B, Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry, EPA Method 6020, Inductively Coupled
Plasma-Mass Spectrometry, EPA Method 7520, Nickel Atomic Absorption, Direct Aspiration, or EPA Method 7521,
Nickel Atomic Absorption, Direct Aspiration; or by an alternative to EPA Method 6010B, 6020, 7520, or 7521
satisfactory to the Administrator. The EPA Methods 6010B, 6020, 7520, and 7521 are included in ``Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,'' EPA Publication SW-846, Revision 5 (April 1998). The
SW-846 and Updates (document number 955-001-00000-1) are available for purchase from the Superintendent of
Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402, (202) 512-1800; and from the National
Technical Information Services (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 487-4650. Copies may
be inspected at the EPA Docket Center, William Jefferson Clinton (WJC) West Building (Air Docket), Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street
NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC. These methods are also available at http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/test/
main.htm.
[80 FR 75293, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 8 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Organic HAP Emission Limits for
Catalytic Cracking Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1565(a)(1), you shall meet each emission
limitation in the following table that applies to you.
[[Page 181]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall meet the following
For each new and existing catalytic emission limit for each
cracking unit . . . catalyst regenerator vent . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to the NSPS for carbon CO emissions from the catalyst
monoxide (CO) in 40 CFR 60.103 or regenerator vent or CO boiler
60.102a(b)(4). serving the catalytic cracking
unit must not exceed 500 parts
per million volume (ppmv) (dry
basis).
2. Not subject to the NSPS for CO in 40 a. CO emissions from the
CFR 60.103 or 60.102a(b)(4). catalyst regenerator vent or
CO boiler serving the
catalytic cracking unit must
not exceed 500 ppmv (dry
basis).
b. If you use a flare to meet
the CO limit, then on and
after January 30, 2019, the
flare must meet the
requirements of Sec. 63.670.
Prior to January 30, 2019, the
flare must meet the
requirements for control
devices in Sec. 63.11(b) and
visible emissions must not
exceed a total of 5 minutes
during any 2 consecutive
hours, or the flare must meet
the requirements of Sec.
63.670.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75299, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 9 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Operating Limits for Organic HAP
Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1565(a)(2), you shall meet each operating
limit in the following table that applies to you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For this type of
For each new or existing catalytic continuous monitoring For this type of You shall meet this
cracking unit . . . system . . . control device . . . operating limit . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to the NSPS for carbon Continuous emission Not applicable......... Not applicable.
monoxide (CO) in 40 CFR 60.103 or monitoring system.
60.102a(b)(4).
2. Not subject to the NSPS for CO in a. Continuous emission Not applicable......... Not applicable.
40 CFR 60.103 or 60.102a(b)(4). monitoring system.
b. Continuous parameter i. Thermal incinerator. Maintain the daily
monitoring systems. average combustion
zone temperature above
the limit established
during the performance
test; and maintain the
daily average oxygen
concentration in the
vent stream (percent,
dry basis) above the
limit established
during the performance
test.
ii. Boiler or process Maintain the daily
heater with a design average combustion
heat input capacity zone temperature above
under 44 MW or a the limit established
boiler or process in the performance
heater in which all test.
vent streams are not
introduced into the
flame zone.
iii. Flare............. On and after January
30, 2019, the flare
must meet the
requirements of Sec.
63.670. Prior to
January 30, 2019, the
flare pilot light must
be present at all
times and the flare
must be operating at
all times that
emissions may be
vented to it, or the
flare must meet the
requirements of Sec.
63.670.
3. During periods of startup, Any.................... Any.................... Meet the requirements
shutdown or hot standby. in Sec.
63.1565(a)(5).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75299, Dec. 1, 2015]
[[Page 182]]
Sec. Table 10 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Monitoring Systems
for Organic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1565(b)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall install,
And you use this operate, and
For each new or existing type of control maintain this type
catalytic cracking unit . . . device for your of continuous
vent . . . monitoring system
. . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to the NSPS for Not applicable.... Continuous
carbon monoxide (CO) in 40 CFR emission
60.103 or 60.102a(b)(4). monitoring system
to measure and
record the
concentration by
volume (dry
basis) of CO
emissions from
each catalyst
regenerator vent.
2. Not subject to the NSPS for a. Thermal Continuous
CO in 40 CFR 60.103 or incinerator. emission
60.102a(b)(4). monitoring system
to measure and
record the
concentration by
volume (dry
basis) of CO
emissions from
each catalyst
regenerator vent;
or continuous
parameter
monitoring
systems to
measure and
record the
combustion zone
temperature and
oxygen content
(percent, dry
basis) in the
incinerator vent
stream.
b. Process heater Continuous
or boiler with a emission
design heat input monitoring system
capacity under 44 to measure and
MW or process record the
heater or boiler concentration by
in which all vent volume (dry
streams are not basis) of CO
introduced into emissions from
the flame zone. each catalyst
regenerator vent;
or continuous
parameter
monitoring
systems to
measure and
record the
combustion zone
temperature.
c. Flare.......... On and after
January 30, 2019,
the monitoring
systems required
in Sec. Sec.
63.670 and
63.671. Prior to
January 30, 2019,
monitoring device
such as a
thermocouple, an
ultraviolet beam
sensor, or
infrared sensor
to continuously
detect the
presence of a
pilot flame, or
the monitoring
systems required
in Sec. Sec.
63.670 and
63.671.
d. No control Continuous
device. emission
monitoring system
to measure and
record the
concentration by
volume (dry
basis) of CO
emissions from
each catalyst
regenerator vent.
3. During periods of startup, Any............... Continuous
shutdown or hot standby parameter
electing to comply with the monitoring system
operating limit in Sec. to measure and
63.1565(a)(5)(ii). record the
concentration by
volume (wet or
dry basis) of
oxygen from each
catalyst
regenerator vent.
If measurement is
made on a wet
basis, you must
comply with the
limit as measured
(no moisture
correction).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75300, Dec. 1, 2015, as amended at 83 FR 60727, Nov. 26, 2018]
Sec. Table 11 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance
Tests for Organic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units Not
Subject to New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) for Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
As stated in Sec. 63.1565(b)(2) and (3), you shall meet each
requirement in the following table that applies to you.
[[Page 183]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to these
For . . . You must . . . Using . . . requirements . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Each new or existing catalytic a. Select sampling Method 1 or 1A in Sampling sites must be
cracking unit catalyst regenerator port's location and appendix A to part 60 located at the outlet
vent. the number of traverse of this chapter. of the control device
ports. or the outlet of the
regenerator, as
applicable, and prior
to any releases to the
atmosphere.
b. Determine velocity Method 2, 2A, 2D, 2F,
and volumetric flow or 2G in appendix A to
rate. part 60 of this
chapter, as
applicable.
c. Conduct gas Method 3, 3A, or 3B in
molecular weight appendix A to part 60
analysis. of this chapter, as
applicable.
d. Measure moisture Method 4 in appendix A
content of the stack to part 60 of this
gas. chapter.
2. For each new or existing catalytic Measure CO emissions... Data from your Collect CO monitoring
cracking unit catalyst regenerator continuous emission data for each vent for
vent if you use a continuous monitoring system. 24 consecutive
emission monitoring system. operating hours; and
reduce the continuous
emission monitoring
data to 1-hour
averages computed from
four or more data
points equally spaced
over each 1-hour
period.
3. Each catalytic cracking unit a. Measure the CO Method 10, 10A, or 10B
catalyst regenerator vent if you use concentration (dry in appendix A-4 to
continuous parameter monitoring basis) of emissions part 60 of this
systems exiting the control chapter, as applicable
device
b. Establish each Data from the
operating limit in continuous parameter
Table 9 of this monitoring systems
subpart that applies
to you
c. Thermal incinerator Data from the Collect temperature
combustion zone continuous parameter monitoring data every
temperature monitoring systems 15 minutes during the
entire period of the
CO initial performance
test; and determine
and record the minimum
hourly average
combustion zone
temperature from all
the readings.
d. Thermal incinerator: Data from the Collect oxygen
oxygen, content continuous parameter concentration
(percent, dry basis) monitoring systems. (percent, dry basis)
in the incinerator monitoring data every
vent stream 15 minutes during the
entire period of the
CO initial performance
test; and determine
and record the minimum
hourly average percent
excess oxygen
concentration from all
the readings.
e. If you use a process Data from the Collect the temperature
heater or boiler with continuous parameter monitoring data every
a design heat input monitoring systems. 15 minutes during the
capacity under 44 MW entire period of the
or process heater or CO initial performance
boiler in which all test; and determine
vent streams are not and record the minimum
introduced into the hourly average
flame zone, establish combustion zone
operating limit for temperature from all
combustion zone the readings.
temperature
f. If you use a flare, Method 22 (40 CFR part On and after January
conduct visible 60, appendix A-7). 30, 2019, meet the
emission observations requirements of Sec.
63.670. Prior to
January 30, 2019,
maintain a 2-hour
observation period;
and record the
presence of a flame at
the pilot light over
the full period of the
test or meet the
requirements of Sec.
63.670.
[[Page 184]]
g. If you use a flare, 40 CFR 63.11(b)(6) On and after January
determine that the through (8) 30, 2019, the flare
flare meets the must meet the
requirements for net requirements of Sec.
heating value of the 63.670. Prior to
gas being combusted January 30, 2019, the
and exit velocity flare must meet the
control device
requirements in Sec.
63.11(b) or the
requirements of Sec.
63.670.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6942, 6948, Feb. 9,
2005; 80 FR 75301, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 12 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Initial Compliance With Organic
HAP Emission Limits for Catalytic Cracking Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1565(b)(4), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the following
For each new and existing emission limit . You have demonstrated
catalytic cracking unit . . . . . initial compliance if
. . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to the NSPS for CO emissions from You have already
carbon monoxide (CO) in 40 your catalyst conducted a
CFR 60.103, 60.100(e), or regenerator vent performance test to
60.102a(b)(4). or CO boiler demonstrate initial
serving the compliance with the
catalytic NSPS and the
cracking unit measured CO
must not exceed emissions are less
500 ppmv (dry than or equal to 500
basis). ppm (dry basis). As
part of the
Notification of
Compliance Status,
you must certify
that your vent meets
the CO limit. You
are not required to
conduct another
performance test to
demonstrate initial
compliance. You have
already conducted a
performance
evaluation to
demonstrate initial
compliance with the
applicable
performance
specification. As
part of your
Notification of
Compliance Status,
you must certify
that your continuous
emission monitoring
system meets the
applicable
requirements in Sec.
63.1572. You are
not required to
conduct another
performance
evaluation to
demonstrate initial
compliance.
2. Not subject to the NSPS for a. CO emissions i. If you use a
CO in 40 CFR 60.103 from your continuous parameter
60.102a(b)(4). catalyst monitoring system,
regenerator vent the average CO
or CO boiler emissions measured
serving the by Method 10 over
catalytic the period of the
cracking unit initial performance
must not exceed test are less than
500 ppmv (dry or equal to 500 ppmv
basis). (dry basis).
ii. If you use a
continuous emission
monitoring system,
the hourly average
CO emissions over
the 24-hour period
for the initial
performance test are
not more than 500
ppmv (dry basis);
and your performance
evaluation shows
your continuous
emission monitoring
system meets the
applicable
requirements in Sec.
63.1572.
b. If you use a On and after January
flare, visible 30, 2019, the flare
emissions must meets the
not exceed a requirements of Sec.
total of 5 63.670. Prior to
minutes during January 30, 2019,
any 2 operating visible emissions,
hours. measured by Method
22 during the 2-hour
observation period
during the initial
performance test,
are no higher than 5
minutes, or the
flare meets the
requirements of Sec.
63.670.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75302, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 13 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With
Organic HAP Emission Limits for Catalytic Cracking Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1565(c)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
[[Page 185]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject to this
For each new and existing catalytic emission limit for your You shall demonstrate
cracking unit . . . catalyst regenerator If you must . . . continuous compliance
vent . . . by . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to the NSPS for carbon CO emissions from your Continuous emission Collecting the hourly
monoxide (CO) in 40 CFR 60.103, catalyst regenerator monitoring system. average CO monitoring
60.100(e), or 60.102a(b)(4). vent or CO boiler data according to Sec.
serving the catalytic 63.1572; and
cracking unit must not maintaining the hourly
exceed 500 ppmv (dry average CO
basis). concentration at or
below 500 ppmv (dry
basis).
2. Not subject to the NSPS for CO in a. CO emissions from Continuous emission Same as item 1.
40 CFR 60.103 or 60.102a(b)(4). your catalyst monitoring system.
regenerator vent or CO
boiler serving the
catalytic cracking
unit must not exceed
500 ppmv (dry basis).
b. CO emissions from Continuous parameter Maintaining the hourly
your catalyst monitoring system. average CO
regenerator vent or CO concentration below
boiler serving the 500 ppmv (dry basis).
catalytic cracking
unit must not exceed
500 ppmv (dry basis).
c. Visible emissions Control device-flare... On and after January
from a flare must not 30, 2019, meeting the
exceed a total of 5 requirements of Sec.
minutes during any 2- 63.670. Prior to
hour period. January 30, 2019,
maintaining visible
emissions below a
total of 5 minutes
during any 2-hour
operating period, or
meeting the
requirements of Sec.
63.670.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75302, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 14 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With
Operating Limits for Organic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1565(c)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall demonstrate
For each new existing catalytic If you use . . . For this operating continuous compliance
cracking unit . . . limit . . . by . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to NSPS for carbon Continuous emission Not applicable......... Complying with Table 13
monoxide (CO) in 40 CFR 60.103, monitoring system. of this subpart, item
60.100(e), 60.102a(b)(4). 1.
2. Not subject to the NSPS for CO in a. Continuous emission Not applicable......... Complying with Table 13
40 CFR 60.103 or 60.102a(b)(4). monitoring system. of this subpart, item
2.a.
b. Continuous parameter i. The daily average Collecting the hourly
monitoring systems-- combustion zone and daily average
thermal incinerator. temperature must not temperature monitoring
fall below the level data according to Sec.
established during the 63.1572; and
performance test. maintaining the daily
average combustion
zone temperature above
the limit established
during the performance
test.
ii. The daily average Collecting the hourly
oxygen concentration and daily average
in the vent stream oxygen concentration
(percent, dry basis) monitoring data
must not fall below according to Sec.
the level established 63.1572; and
during the performance maintaining the daily
test. average oxygen
concentration above
the limit established
during the performance
test.
[[Page 186]]
c. Continuous parameter The daily combustion Collecting the average
monitoring systems-- zone temperature must hourly and daily
boiler or process not fall below the temperature monitoring
heater with a design level established in data according to Sec.
heat input capacity the performance test. 63.1572; and
under 44 MW or boiler maintaining the daily
or process heater in average combustion
which all vent streams zone temperature above
are not introduced the limit established
into the flame zone. during the performance
test.
d. Continuous parameter The flare pilot light On and after January
monitoring system-- must be present at all 30, 2019, meeting the
flare. times and the flare requirements of Sec.
must be operating at 63.670. Prior to
all times that January 30, 2019,
emissions may be collecting the flare
vented to it. monitoring data
according to Sec.
63.1572 and recording
for each 1-hour period
whether the monitor
was continuously
operating and the
pilot light was
continuously present
during each 1-hour
period, or meeting the
requirements of Sec.
63.670.
3. During periods of startup, Any control device..... The oxygen Collecting the hourly
shutdown or hot standby electing to concentration limit in average oxygen
comply with the operating limit in Sec. concentration
Sec. 63.1565(a)(5)(ii). 63.1565(a)(5)(ii). monitoring data
according to Sec.
63.1572 and
maintaining the hourly
average oxygen
concentration at or
above 1 volume percent
(dry basis).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75303, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 15 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Organic HAP Emission Limits for
Catalytic Reforming Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1566(a)(1), you shall meet each emission
limitation in the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall meet this emission
For each applicable process vent for a new limit during initial
or existing catalytic reforming unit . . . catalyst depressuring and
catalyst purging operations
. . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Option 1............................... On and after January 30,
2019, vent emissions to a
flare that meets the
requirements of Sec.
63.670. Prior to January
30, 2019, vent emissions to
a flare that meets the
requirements for control
devices in Sec. 63.11(b)
and visible emissions from
a flare must not exceed a
total of 5 minutes during
any 2-hour operating
period, or vent emissions
to a flare that meets the
requirements of Sec.
63.670.
2. Option 2............................... Reduce uncontrolled
emissions of total organic
compounds (TOC) or
nonmethane TOC from your
process vent by 98 percent
by weight using a control
device or to a
concentration of 20 ppmv
(dry basis as hexane),
corrected to 3 percent
oxygen, whichever is less
stringent. If you vent
emissions to a boiler or
process heater to comply
with the percent reduction
or concentration emission
limitation, the vent stream
must be introduced into the
flame zone, or any other
location that will achieve
the percent reduction or
concentration standard.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6942, 6951, Feb. 9,
2005; 80 FR 75304, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 16 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Operating Limits for Organic
HAP Emissions From Catalytic Reforming Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1566(a)(2), you shall meet each operating
limit in the following table that applies to you.
[[Page 187]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall meet this
operating limit
For each new or existing during initial
catalytic reforming unit . . For this type of catalyst
. control device . . . depressuring and
purging operations.
. .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Option 1: Vent to flare.. Flare............... On and after January
30, 2019, the flare
must meet the
requirements of
Sec. 63.670.
Prior to January
30, 2019, the flare
pilot light must be
present at all
times and the flare
must be operating
at all times that
emissions may be
vented to it, or
the flare must meet
the requirements of
Sec. 63.670.
2. Option 2: Percent a. Thermal The daily average
reduction or concentration incinerator, boiler combustion zone
limit. or process heater temperature must
with a design heat not fall below the
input capacity limit established
under 44 MW, or during the
boiler or process performance test.
heater in which all
vent streams are
not introduced into
the flame zone.
b. No control device Operate at all times
according to your
operation,
maintenance, and
monitoring plan
regarding minimum
catalyst purging
conditions that
must be met prior
to allowing
uncontrolled purge
releases.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6942, 6951, Feb. 9,
2005; 80 FR 75304, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 17 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Monitoring Systems
for Organic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Reforming Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1566(b)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall install
For each applicable process If you use this type and operate this
vent for a new or existing of control device . type of continuous
catalytic reforming unit . . . . monitoring system .
. . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Option 1: Vent to a flare Flare............... On and after January
30, 2019, the
monitoring systems
required in Sec.
Sec. 63.670 and
63.671. Prior to
January 30, 2019,
monitoring device
such as a
thermocouple, an
ultraviolet beam
sensor, or infrared
sensor to
continuously detect
the presence of a
pilot flame, or the
monitoring systems
required in Sec.
Sec. 63.670 and
63.671.
2. Option 2: percent Thermal incinerator, Continuous parameter
reduction or concentration process heater or monitoring systems
limit. boiler with a to measure and
design heat input record the
capacity under 44 combustion zone
MW, or process temperature.
heater or boiler in
which all vent
streams are not
introduced into the
flame zone.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6942, 6952, Feb. 9,
2005; 80 FR 75304, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 18 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance
Tests for Organic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Reforming Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1566(b)(2) and (3), you shall meet each
requirement in the following table that applies to you.
[[Page 188]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each new or existing catalytic According to these
reforming unit . . . You must . . . Using . . . requirements . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Option 1: Vent to a flare......... a. Conduct visible Method 22 (40 CFR part On and after January
emission observations. 60, appendix A-7) 30, 2019, the flare
must meet the
requirements of Sec.
63.670. Prior to
January 30, 2019, 2-
hour observation
period. Record the
presence of a flame at
the pilot light over
the full period of the
test, or the
requirements of Sec.
63.670.
b. Determine that the 40 CFR 63.11(b)(6) On and after January
flare meets the through (8) 30, 2019, the flare
requirements for net must meet the
heating value of the requirements of Sec.
gas being combusted 63.670. Prior to
and exit velocity. January 30, 2019, the
flare must meet the
control device
requirements in Sec.
63.11(b) or the
requirements of Sec.
63.670.
2. Option 2: Percent reduction or a. Select sampling site Method 1 or 1A (40 CFR Sampling sites must be
concentration limit. part 60, appendix A). located at the inlet
No traverse site (if you elect the
selection method is emission reduction
needed for vents standard) and outlet
smaller than 0.10 of the control device
meter in diameter. and prior to any
releases to the
atmosphere.
b. Measure gas Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2D,
volumetric flow rate. 2F, or 2G (40 CFR part
60, appendix A), as
applicable.
c. Measure TOC Method 25 (40 part 60, Take either an
concentration (for appendix A) to measure integrated sample or
percent reduction nonmethane TOC four grab samples
standard). concentration (in during each run. If
carbon equivalents) at you use a grab
inlet and outlet of sampling technique,
the control device. If take the samples at
the nonmethane TOC approximately equal
outlet concentration intervals in time,
is expected to be less such as 15-minute
than 50 ppm (as intervals during the
carbon), you can use run.
Method 25A to measure
TOC concentration (as
hexane) at the inlet
and the outlet of the
control device. If you
use Method 25A, you
may use Method 18 (40
CFR part 60, appendix
A) to measure the
methane concentration
to determine the
nonmethane TOC
concentration.
d. Calculate TOC or ....................... Calculate emission rate
nonmethane TOC by Equation 1 of Sec.
emission rate and mass 63.1566 (if you use
emission reduction. Method 25) or Equation
2 of Sec. 63.1566
(if you use Method
25A). Calculate mass
emission reduction by
Equation 3 of Sec.
63.1566.
e. For concentration Method 25A (40 CFR part
standard, measure TOC 60, appendix A) to
concentration. measure TOC
(Optional: Measure concentration (as
methane hexane) at the outlet
concentration.) of the control device.
You may elect to use
Method 18 (40 CFR part
60, appendix A) to
measure the methane
concentration.
f. Determine oxygen Method 3A or 3B (40 CFR
content in the gas part 60, appendix A),
stream at the outlet as applicable.
of the control device.
[[Page 189]]
g. Calculate the TOC or Equation 4 of Sec.
nonmethane TOC 63.1566.
concentration
corrected for oxygen
content (for
concentration
standard).
h. Establish each Data from the Collect the temperature
operating limit in continuous parameter monitoring data every
Table 16 of this monitoring systems. 15 minutes during the
subpart that applies entire period of the
to you for a thermal initial TOC
incinerator, or performance test.
process heater or Determine and record
boiler with a design the minimum hourly
heat input capacity average combustion
under 44 MW, or zone temperature.
process heater or
boiler in which all
vent streams are not
introduced into flame
zone.
i. If you do not use a Data from monitoring Procedures in the
control device, systems as identified operation,
document the purging in the operation, maintenance, and
conditions used prior maintenance, and monitoring plan.
to testing following monitoring plan.
the minimum
requirements in the
operation,
maintenance, and
monitoring plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6942, 6952, Feb. 9,
2005; 80 FR 75305, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 19 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Initial Compliance With Organic
HAP Emission Limits for Catalytic Reforming Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1566(b)(7), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each applicable process
vent for a new or existing For the following You have
catalytic reforming unit . . emission limit . . . demonstrated initial
. compliance if . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Option 1.................... Visible emissions On and after January
from a flare must 30, 2019, the flare
not exceed a total meets the
of 5 minutes during requirements of
any 2 consecutive Sec. 63.670.
hours. Prior to January
30, 2019, visible
emissions, measured
using Method 22
over the 2-hour
observation period
of the performance
test, do not exceed
a total of 5
minutes, or the
flare meets the
requirements of
Sec. 63.670.
Option 2.................... Reduce uncontrolled The mass emission
emissions of total reduction of
organic compounds nonmethane TOC
(TOC) or nonmethane measured by Method
TOC from your 25 over the period
process vent by 98 of the performance
percent by weight test is at least 98
using a control percent by weight
device or to a as calculated using
concentration of 20 Equations 1 and 3
ppmv (dry basis as of Sec. 63.1566;
hexane), corrected or the mass
to 3 percent emission reduction
oxygen, whichever of TOC measured by
is less stringent. Method 25A (or
nonmethane TOC
measured by Methods
25A and 18) over
the period of the
performance test is
at least 98 percent
by weight as
calculated using
Equations 2 and 3
of Sec. 63.1566;
or the TOC
concentration
measured by Method
25A (or the
nonmethane TOC
concentration
measured by Methods
25A and 18) over
the period of the
performance test
does not exceed 20
ppmv (dry basis as
hexane) corrected
to 3 percent oxygen
as calculated using
Equation 4 of Sec.
63.1566.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[70 FR 6953, Feb. 9, 2005, as amended at 80 FR 75305, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 20 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With
Organic HAP Emission Limits for Catalytic Reforming Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1566(c)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
[[Page 190]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall
demonstrate
For each applicable process continuous
vent for a new or existing For this emission compliance during
catalytic reforming unit . . limit . . . initial catalyst
. depressuring and
catalyst purging
operations by . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Option 1................. Vent emissions from On and after January
your process vent 30, 2019, meeting
to a flare. the requirements of
Sec. 63.670.
Prior to January
30, 2019,
maintaining visible
emissions from a
flare below a total
of 5 minutes during
any 2 consecutive
hours, or meeting
the requirements of
Sec. 63.670.
2. Option 2................. Reduce uncontrolled Maintaining a 98
emissions of total percent by weight
organic compounds emission reduction
(TOC) or nonmethane of TOC or
TOC from your nonmethane TOC; or
process vent by 98 maintaining a TOC
percent by weight or nonmethane TOC
using a control concentration of
device or to a not more than 20
concentration of 20 ppmv (dry basis as
ppmv (dry basis as hexane), corrected
hexane), corrected to 3 percent
to 3 percent oxygen, whichever
oxygen, whichever is less stringent.
is less stringent.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[70 FR 6954, Feb. 9, 2005, as amended at 80 FR 75305, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 21 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With
Operating Limits for Organic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Reforming
Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1566(c)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall demonstrate
continuous compliance
For each applicable process vent for For this operating during initial catalyst
a new or existing catalytic reforming If you use . . . limit . . . depressuring and
unit . . . purging operations by .
. .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Option 1.......................... Flare.................. The flare pilot light On and after January
must be present at all 30, 2019, meeting the
times and the flare requirements of Sec.
must be operating at 63.670. Prior to
all times that January 30, 2019,
emissions may be collecting flare
vented to it. monitoring data
according to Sec.
63.1572 and recording
for each 1-hour period
whether the monitor
was continuously
operating and the
pilot light was
continuously present
during each 1-hour
period, or meeting the
requirements of Sec.
63.670.
2. Option 2.......................... a. Thermal incinerator Maintain the daily Collecting, the hourly
boiler or process average combustion and daily temperature
heater with a design zone temperature above monitoring data
input capacity under the limit established according to Sec.
44 MW or boiler or during the performance 63.1572; and
process heater in test. maintaining the daily
which not all vent average combustion
streams are not zone temperature above
introduced into the the limit established
flame zone. during the performance
test.
b. No control device... Operate at all times Recording information
according to your to document compliance
operation, with the procedures in
maintenance, and your operation,
monitoring plan maintenance, and
regarding minimum monitoring plan.
purging conditions
that must be met prior
to allowing
uncontrolled purge
releases.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[70 FR 6954, Feb. 9, 2005, as amended at 80 FR 75306, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 22 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Inorganic HAP Emission Limits
for Catalytic Reforming Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1567(a)(1), you shall meet each emission
limitation in the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall meet this emission
limit for each applicable
catalytic reforming unit
For . . . process vent during coke burn-
off and catalyst rejuvenation .
. .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Each existing semi-regenerative Reduce uncontrolled emissions
catalytic reforming unit. of hydrogen chloride (HCl) by
92 percent by weight or to a
concentration of 30 ppmv (dry
basis), corrected to 3 percent
oxygen.
[[Page 191]]
2. Each existing cyclic or continuous Reduce uncontrolled emissions
catalytic reforming unit. of HCl by 97 percent by weight
or to a concentration of 10
ppmv (dry basis), corrected to
3 percent oxygen.
3. Each new semi-regenerative, cyclic, Reduce uncontrolled emissions
or continuous catalytic reforming unit. of HCl by 97 percent by weight
or to a concentration of 10
ppmv (dry basis), corrected to
3 percent oxygen.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[70 FR 6955, Feb. 9, 2005, as amended at 80 FR 75306, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 23 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Operating Limits for Inorganic
HAP Emission Limitations for Catalytic Reforming Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1567(a)(2), you shall meet each operating
limit in the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each applicable process vent
for a new or existing catalytic You shall meet this operating limit
reforming unit with this type of during coke burn-off and catalyst
control device . . . rejuvenation . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Wet scrubber................... The daily average pH or alkalinity
of the water (or scrubbing liquid)
exiting the scrubber must not fall
below the limit established during
the performance test; and the daily
average liquid-to-gas ratio must
not fall below the limit
established during the performance
test.
2. Internal scrubbing system or no The daily average HCl concentration
control device (e.g., hot regen in the catalyst regenerator exhaust
system) meeting outlet HCl gas must not exceed the limit
concentration limit. established during the performance
test.
3. Internal scrubbing system The daily average pH or alkalinity
meeting HCl percent reduction of the water (or scrubbing liquid)
standard. exiting the internal scrubbing
system must not fall below the
limit established during the
performance test; and the daily
average liquid-to-gas ratio must
not fall below the limit
established during the performance
test.
4. Fixed-bed gas-solid adsorption The daily average temperature of the
system. gas entering or exiting the
adsorption system must not exceed
the limit established during the
performance test; and the HCl
concentration in the adsorption
system exhaust gas must not exceed
the limit established during the
performance test.
5. Moving-bed gas-solid adsorption The daily average temperature of the
system (e.g., Chlorsorb \TM\ gas entering or exiting the
System). adsorption system must not exceed
the limit established during the
performance test; and the weekly
average chloride level on the
sorbent entering the adsorption
system must not exceed the design
or manufacturer's recommended limit
(1.35 weight percent for the
Chlorsorb \TM\ System); and the
weekly average chloride level on
the sorbent leaving the adsorption
system must not exceed the design
or manufacturer's recommended limit
(1.8 weight percent for the
Chlorsorb \TM\ System).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[70 FR 6955, Feb. 9, 2005]
Sec. Table 24 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Monitoring Systems
for Inorganic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Reforming Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1567(b)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall install and operate
If you use this type of control device this type of continuous
for your vent . . . monitoring system . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Wet scrubber........................ Continuous parameter monitoring
system to measure and record
the total water (or scrubbing
liquid) flow rate entering the
scrubber during coke burn-off
and catalyst rejuvenation; and
continuous parameter
monitoring system to measure
and record gas flow rate
entering or exiting the
scrubber during coke burn-off
and catalyst rejuvenation \1\;
and continuous parameter
monitoring system to measure
and record the pH or
alkalinity of the water (or
scrubbing liquid) exiting the
scrubber during coke burn-off
and catalyst rejuvenation. \2\
2. Internal scrubbing system or no Colormetric tube sampling
control device (e.g., hot regen system to measure the HCl
system) to meet HCl outlet concentration in the catalyst
concentration limit. regenerator exhaust gas during
coke burn-off and catalyst
rejuvenation. The colormetric
tube sampling system must meet
the requirements in Table 41
of this subpart.
[[Page 192]]
3. Internal scrubbing system to meet Continuous parameter monitoring
HCl percent reduction standard. system to measure and record
the gas flow rate entering or
exiting the internal scrubbing
system during coke burn-off
and catalyst rejuvenation; and
continuous parameter
monitoring system to measure
and record the total water (or
scrubbing liquid) flow rate
entering the internal
scrubbing system during coke
burn-off and catalyst
rejuvenation; and continuous
parameter monitoring system to
measure and record the pH or
alkalinity of the water (or
scrubbing liquid) exiting the
internal scrubbing system
during coke burn-off and
catalyst rejuvenation.\2\
4. Fixed-bed gas-solid adsorption Continuous parameter monitoring
system. system to measure and record
the temperature of the gas
entering or exiting the
adsorption system during coke
burn-off and catalyst
rejuvenation; and colormetric
tube sampling system to
measure the gaseous HCl
concentration in the
adsorption system exhaust and
at a point within the
absorbent bed not to exceed 90
percent of the total length of
the absorbent bed during coke
burn-off and catalyst
rejuvenation. The colormetric
tube sampling system must meet
the requirements in Table 41
of this subpart.
5. Moving-bed gas-solid adsorption Continuous parameter monitoring
system (e.g., Chlorsorb \TM\ System).. system to measure and record
the temperature of the gas
entering or exiting the
adsorption system during coke
burn-off and catalyst
rejuvenation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If applicable, you can use the alternative in Sec. 63.1573 (a)(1)
instead of a continuous parameter monitoring system for gas flow rate
or instead of a continuous parameter monitoring system for the
cumulative volume of gas.
\2\ If applicable, you can use the alternative in Sec. 63.1573(c)(1)
instead of a continuous parameter monitoring system for pH of the
water (or scrubbing liquid) or the alternative in Sec. 63.1573(c)(2)
instead of a continuous parameter monitoring system for alkalinity of
the water (or scrubbing liquid).
[70 FR 6956, Feb. 9, 2005, as amended at 80 FR 75306, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 25 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance
Tests for Inorganic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Reforming Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1567(b)(2) and (3), you shall meet each
requirement in the following table that applies to you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each new and existing catalytic
reforming unit using . . . You shall . . . Using . . . According to these
requirements . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Any or no control system........ a. Select sampling Method 1 or 1A (40 CFR (1) If you operate a
port location(s) and part 60, appendix A), control device and you
the number of as applicable. elect to meet an
traverse points. applicable HCl percent
reduction standard,
sampling sites must be
located at the inlet of
the control device or
internal scrubbing system
and at the outlet of the
control device or internal
scrubber system prior to
any release to the
atmosphere. For a series
of fixed-bed systems, the
outlet sampling site
should be located at the
outlet of the first fixed-
bed, prior to entering the
second fixed-bed in the
series.
(2) If you elect to meet an
applicable HCl outlet
concentration limit,
locate sampling sites at
the outlet of the control
device or internal
scrubber system prior to
any release to the
atmosphere. For a series
of fixed-bed systems, the
outlet sampling site
should be located at the
outlet of the first fixed-
bed, prior to entering the
second fixed-bed in the
series. If there is no
control device, locate
sampling sites at the
outlet of the catalyst
regenerator prior to any
release to the atmosphere.
b. Determine velocity Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2D,
and volumetric flow 2F, or 2G (40 CFR
rate. part 60, appendix A),
as applicable..
c. Conduct gas Method 3, 3A, or 3B
molecular weight (40 CFR part 60,
analysis. appendix A), as
applicable.
[[Page 193]]
d. Measure moisture Method 4 (40 CFR part
content of the stack 60, appendix A).
gas.
e. Measure the HCl Method 26 or 26A (40 (1) For semi-regenerative
concentration at the CFR part 60, appendix and cyclic regeneration
selected sampling A). If your control units, conduct the test
locations. device is a wet during the coke burn-off
scrubber or internal and catalyst rejuvenation
scrubbing system, you cycle, but collect no
must use Method 26A. samples during the first
hour or the last 6 hours
of the cycle (for semi-
regenerative units) or
during the first hour or
the last 2 hours of the
cycle (for cyclic
regeneration units). For
continuous regeneration
units, the test should be
conducted no sooner than 3
days after process unit or
control system start up.
(2) Determine and record
the HCl concentration
corrected to 3 percent
oxygen (using Equation 1
of Sec. 63.1567) for
each sampling location for
each test run.
(3) Determine and record
the percent emission
reduction, if applicable,
using Equation 3 of Sec.
63.1567 for each test run.
(4) Determine and record
the average HCl
concentration (corrected
to 3 percent oxygen) and
the average percent
emission reduction, if
applicable, for the
overall source test from
the recorded test run
values.
2. Wet scrubber.................... a. Establish operating i. Data from Measure and record the pH
limit for pH level or continuous parameter or alkalinity of the water
alkalinity. monitoring systems. (or scrubbing liquid)
exiting scrubber every 15
minutes during the entire
period of the performance
test. Determine and record
the minimum hourly average
pH or alkalinity level
from the recorded values.
ii. Alternative pH Measure and record the pH
procedure in Sec. of the water (or scrubbing
63.1573(b)(1). liquid) exiting the
scrubber during coke burn-
off and catalyst
rejuvenation using pH
strips at least three
times during each test
run. Determine and record
the average pH level for
each test run. Determine
and record the minimum
test run average pH level.
iii. Alternative Measure and record the
alkalinity method in alkalinity of the water
Sec. 63.1573(c)(2). (or scrubbing liquid)
exiting the scrubber
during coke burn-off and
catalyst rejuvenation
using discrete titration
at least three times
during each test run.
Determine and record the
average alkalinity level
for each test run.
Determine and record the
minimum test run average
alkalinity level.
b. Establish operating i. Data from Measure and record the gas
limit for liquid-to- continuous parameter flow rate entering or
gas ratio. monitoring systems. exiting the scrubber and
the total water (or
scrubbing liquid) flow
rate entering the scrubber
every 15 minutes during
the entire period of the
performance test.
Determine and record the
hourly average gas flow
rate and total water (or
scrubbing liquid) flow
rate. Determine and record
the minimum liquid-to-gas
ratio from the recorded,
paired values.
ii. Alternative Collect air flow rate
procedure for gas monitoring data or
flow rate in Sec. determine the air flow
63.1573(a)(1). rate using control room
instruments every 15
minutes during the entire
period of the initial
performance test.
Determine and record the
hourly average rate of all
the readings. Determine
and record the maximum gas
flow rate using Equation 1
of Sec. 63.1573.
[[Page 194]]
3. Internal scrubbing system or no Establish operating Data from continuous Measure and record the HCl
control device (e.g., hot regen limit for HCl parameter monitoring concentration in the
system) meeting HCl outlet concentration. system. catalyst regenerator
concentration limit. exhaust gas using the
colormetric tube sampling
system at least three
times during each test
run. Determine and record
the average HCl
concentration for each
test run. Determine and
record the average HCl
concentration for the
overall source test from
the recorded test run
averages. Determine and
record the operating limit
for HCl concentration
using Equation 4 of Sec.
63.1567.
4. Internal scrubbing system a. Establish operating i. Data from Measure and record the pH
meeting HCl percent reduction limit for pH level or continuous parameter alkalinity of the water
standard. alkalinity. monitoring system. (or scrubbing liquid)
exiting the internal
scrubbing system every 15
minutes during the entire
period of the performance
test. Determine and record
the minimum hourly average
pH or alkalinity level
from the recorded values.
ii. Alternative pH Measure and in record pH of
method in Sec. the water (or scrubbing
63.1573(c)(1). liquid) exiting the
internal scrubbing system
during coke burn-off and
catalyst rejuvenation
using pH strips at least
three times during each
test run. Determine and
record the average pH
level for each test run.
Determine and record the
minimum test run average
pH level.
iii. Alternative Measure and record the
alkalinity method in alkalinity water (or
Sec. 63.1573(c)(2). scrubbing liquid) exiting
the internal scrubbing
system during coke burn-
off and catalyst
rejuvenation using
discrete titration at
least three times during
each test run. Determine
and record the average
alkalinity level for each
test run. Determine and
record the minimum test
run average alkalinity
level.
b. Establish operating Data from continuous Measure and record the gas
limit for liquid-to- parameter monitoring entering or exiting the
gas ratio. systems. internal scrubbing system
and the total water (or
scrubbing liquid) flow
rate entering the internal
scrubbing system every 15
minutes during the entire
period of the performance
test. Determine and record
the hourly average gas
flow rate and total water
(or scrubbing liquid) flow
rate. Determine and record
the minimum liquid-to-gas
ratio from the recorded,
paired values.
5. Fixed-bed gas-solid adsorption a. Establish operating Data from continuous Measure and record the
system. Gas-solid. limit for temperature. parameter monitoring temperature of gas
system. entering or exiting the
adsorption system every 15
minutes. Determine and
record the maximum hourly
average temperature.
b. Establish operating i. Data from (1) Measure and record the
limit for HCl continuous parameter HCl concentration in the
concentration. monitoring systems. exhaust gas from the fixed-
bed adsorption system
using the colormetric tube
sampling system at least
three times during each
test run. Determine and
record the average HCl
concentration for each
test run. Determine and
record the average HCl
concentration for the
overall source test from
the recorded test run
averages.
(2) If you elect to comply
with the HCl outlet
concentration limit
(Option 2), determine and
record the operating limit
for HCl concentration
using Equation 4 of Sec.
63.1567. If you elect to
comply with the HCl
percent reduction standard
(Option 1), determine and
record the operating limit
for HCl concentration
using Equation 5 of Sec.
63.1567.
6. Moving-bed gas-solid adsorption a. Establish operating Data from continuous Measure and record the
system (e.g., Chlorsorb \TM\ limit for temperature. parameter monitoring temperature of gas
System). systems. entering or exiting the
adsorption system every 15
minutes. Determine and
record the maximum hourly
average temperature.
[[Page 195]]
b. Measure the Determination of Metal Measure and record the
chloride level on the Concentration on chloride concentration of
sorbent entering and Catalyst Particles the sorbent material
exiting the (Instrumental entering and exiting the
adsorption system. Analyzer Procedure) adsorption system at least
in appendix A to three times during each
subpart UUU; or EPA test run. Determine and
Method 5050 combined record the average weight
either with EPA percent chloride
Method 9056, or with concentration of the
EPA Method 9253; or sorbent entering the
EPA Method 9212 with adsorption system for each
the soil extraction test run. Determine and
procedures listed record the average weight
within the method.\1\ percent chloride
concentration of the
sorbent exiting the
adsorption system for each
test run.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The EPA Methods 5050, 9056, 9212 and 9253 are included in ``Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods,'' EPA Publication SW-846, Revision 5 (April 1998). The SW-846 and Updates (document
number 955-001-00000-1) are available for purchase from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government
Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402, (202) 512-1800; and from the National Technical Information Services
(NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 487-4650. Copies may be inspected at the EPA Docket
Center, William Jefferson Clinton (WJC) West Building (Air Docket), Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street NW., Suite 700, Washington,
DC. These methods are also available at http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/test/main.htm.
[70 FR 6956, Feb. 9, 2005, as amended at 80 FR 75307, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 26 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Initial Compliance With
Inorganic HAP Emission Limits for Catalytic Reforming Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1567(b)(4), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You have
For . . . For the following demonstrated initial
emission limit . . . compliance if . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Each existing semi- Reduce uncontrolled Average emissions
regenerative catalytic emissions of HCl by HCl measured using
reforming unit. 92 percent by Method 26 or 26A,
weight or to a as applicable, over
concentration of 30 the period of the
ppmv, (dry basis), performance test,
corrected to 3 are reduced by 92
percent oxygen. percent or to a
concentration less
than or equal to 30
ppmv (dry basis)
corrected to 3
percent oxygen.
2. Each existing cyclic or Reduce uncontrolled Average emissions of
continuous catalytic emissions of HCl by HCl measured using
reforming unit and each new 97 percent by Method 26 or 26A,
semi-regenerative, cyclic, weight or to a as applicable, over
or continuous catalytic concentration of 10 the period of the
reforming unit. ppmv (dry basis), performance test,
corrected to 3 are reduced by 97
percent oxygen. percent or to a
concentration less
than or equal to 10
ppmv (dry basis)
corrected to 3
percent oxygen.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[70 FR 6959, Feb. 9, 2005]
Sec. Table 27 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With
Inorganic HAP Emission Limits for Catalytic Reforming Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1567(c)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall
demonstrate
continuous
For this emission compliance during
For . . . limit . . . coke burn-off and
catalyst
rejuvenation by . .
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Each existing semi- Reduce uncontrolled Maintaining a 92
regenerative catalytic emissions of HCl by percent HCl
reforming unit. 92 percent by emission reduction
weight or to a or an HCl
concentration of 30 concentration no
ppmv (dry basis), more than 30 ppmv
corrected to 3 (dry basis),
percent oxygen.. corrected to 3
percent oxygen.
2. Each existing cyclic or Reduce uncontrolled Maintaining a 97
continuous catalytic emissions of HCl by percent HCl control
reforming unit. 97 percent by efficiency or an
weight or to a HCl concentration
concentration of 10 no more than 10
ppmv (dry basis), ppmv (dry basis),
corrected to 3 corrected to 3
percent oxygen. percent oxygen.
[[Page 196]]
3. Each new semi- Reduce uncontrolled Maintaining a 97
regenerative, cyclic, or emissions of HCl by percent HCl control
continuous catalytic 97 percent by efficiency or an
reforming unit. weight or to a HCl concentration
concentration of 10 no more than 10
ppmv (dry basis), ppmv (dry basis),
corrected to 3 corrected to 3
percent oxygen. percent oxygen.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[70 FR 6960, Feb. 9, 2005]
Sec. Table 28 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With
Operating Limits for Inorganic HAP Emissions From Catalytic Reforming
Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1567(c)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall
demonstrate
For each new and existing continuous
catalytic reforming unit For this operating compliance during
using this type of control limit . . . coke burn-off and
device or system . . . catalyst
rejuvenation by . .
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Wet scrubber............. a. The daily average Collecting the
pH or alkalinity of hourly and daily
the water (or average pH or
scrubbing liquid) alkalinity
exiting the monitoring data
scrubber must not according to Sec.
fall below the 63.1572 \1\; and
level established maintaining the
during the daily average pH or
performance test. alkalinity above
the operating limit
established during
the performance
test.
b. The daily average Collecting the
liquid-to-gas ratio hourly average gas
must not fall below flow rate \2\ and
the level total water (or
established during scrubbing liquid)
the performance flow rate
test. monitoring data
according to Sec.
63.1572; and
determining and
recording the
hourly average
liquid-to-gas
ratio; and
determining and
recording the daily
average liquid-to-
gas ratio; and
maintaining the
daily average
liquid-to-gas ratio
above the limit
established during
the performance
test.
2. Internal scrubbing system The daily average Measuring and
or no control device (e.g., HCl concentration recording the HCl
hot regen system) meeting in the catalyst concentration at
HCl concentration limit. regenerator exhaust least 4 times
gas must not exceed during a
the limit regeneration cycle
established during (equally spaced in
the performance time) or every 4
test. hours, whichever is
more frequent,
using a colormetric
tube sampling
system; calculating
the daily average
HCl concentration
as an arithmetic
average of all
samples collected
in each 24-hour
period from the
start of the coke
burn-off cycle or
for the entire
duration of the
coke burn-off cycle
if the coke burn-
off cycle is less
than 24 hours; and
maintaining the
daily average HCl
concentration below
the applicable
operating limit.
3. Internal scrubbing system a. The daily average Collecting the
meeting percent HCl pH or alkalinity of hourly and daily
reduction standard. the water (or average pH or
scrubbing liquid) alkalinity
exiting the monitoring data
internal scrubbing according to Sec.
system must not 63.1572 \1\ and
fall below the maintaining the
limit established daily average pH or
during the alkalinity above
performance test. the operating limit
established during
the performance
test.
b. The daily average Collecting the
liquid-to-gas ratio hourly average gas
must not fall below flow rate \2\ and
the level total water (or
established during scrubbing liquid)
the performance flow rate
test. monitoring data
according to Sec.
63.1572; and
determining and
recording the
hourly average
liquid-to-gas
ratio; and
determining and
recording the daily
average liquid-to-
gas ratio; and
maintaining the
daily average
liquid-to-gas ratio
above the limit
established during
the performance
test.
4. Fixed-bed gas-solid a. The daily average Collecting the
adsorption systems. temperature of the hourly and daily
gas entering or average temperature
exiting the monitoring data
adsorption system according to Sec.
must not exceed the 63.1572; and
limit established maintaining the
during the daily average
performance test. temperature below
the operating limit
established during
the performance
test.
[[Page 197]]
b. The HCl Measuring and
concentration in recording the
the exhaust gas concentration of
from the fixed-bed HCl weekly or
gas-solid during each
adsorption system regeneration cycle,
must not exceed the whichever is less
limit established frequent, using a
during the colormetric tube
performance test. sampling system at
a point within the
adsorbent bed not
to exceed 90
percent of the
total length of the
adsorption bed
during coke-burn-
off and catalyst
rejuvenation;
implementing
procedures in the
operating and
maintenance plan if
the HCl
concentration at
the sampling
location within the
adsorption bed
exceeds the
operating limit;
and maintaining the
HCl concentration
in the gas from the
adsorption system
below the
applicable
operating limit.
5. Moving-bed gas-solid a. The daily average Collecting the
adsorption system (e.g., temperature of the hourly and daily
Chlorsorb\TM\ System). gas entering or average temperature
exiting the monitoring data
adsorption system according to Sec.
must not exceed the 63.1572; and
limit established maintaining the
during the daily average
performance test. temperature below
the operating limit
established during
the performance
test.
b. The weekly Collecting samples
average chloride of the sorbent
level on the exiting the
sorbent entering adsorption system
the adsorption three times per
system must not week (on non-
exceed the design consecutive days);
or manufacturer's and analyzing the
recommended limit samples for total
(1.35 weight chloride\3\; and
percent for the determining and
Chlorsorb\TM\ recording the
System). weekly average
chloride
concentration; and
maintaining the
chloride
concentration below
the design or
manufacturer's
recommended limit
(1.35 weight
percent for the
Chlorsorb\TM\
System).
c. The weekly Collecting samples
average chloride of the sorbent
level on the exiting the
sorbent exiting the adsorption system
adsorption system three times per
must not exceed the week (on non-
design or consecutive days);
manufacturer's and analyzing the
recommended limit samples for total
(1.8 weight percent chloride
for the concentration; and
Chlorsorb\TM\ determining and
System). recording the
weekly average
chloride
concentration; and
maintaining the
chloride
concentration below
the design or
manufacturer's
recommended limit
(1.8 weight percent
Chlorsorb\TM\
System).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If applicable, you can use either alternative in Sec. 63.1573(c)
instead of a continuous parameter monitoring system for pH or
alkalinity if you used the alternative method in the initial
performance test.
\2\ If applicable, you can use the alternative in Sec. 63.1573(a)(1)
instead of a continuous parameter monitoring system for the gas flow
rate or cumulative volume of gas entering or exiting the system if you
used the alternative method in the initial performance test.
\3\ The total chloride concentration of the sorbent material must be
measured by the procedure, ``Determination of Metal Concentration on
Catalyst Particles (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)'' in appendix A
to this subpart; or by using EPA Method 5050, Bomb Preparation Method
for Solid Waste, combined either with EPA Method 9056, Determination
of Inorganic Anions by Ion Chromatography, or with EPA Method 9253,
Chloride (Titrimetric, Silver Nitrate); or by using EPA Method 9212,
Potentiometric Determination of Chloride in Aqueous Samples with Ion-
Selective Electrode, and using the soil extraction procedures listed
within the method. The EPA Methods 5050, 9056, 9212 and 9253 are
included in ``Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods,'' EPA Publication SW-846, Revision 5 (April 1998).
The SW-846 and Updates (document number 955-001-00000-1) are available
for purchase from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government
Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402, (202) 512-1800; and from the
National Technical Information Services (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road,
Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 487-4650. Copies may be inspected at the
EPA Docket Center, William Jefferson Clinton (WJC) West Building, (Air
Docket), Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC; or at
the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street NW.,
Suite 700, Washington, DC. These methods are also available at http://
www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/test/main.htm.
[70 FR 6954, Feb. 9, 2005, as amended at 80 FR 75308, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 29 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--HAP Emission Limits for Sulfur
Recovery Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1568(a)(1), you shall meet each emission
limitation in the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall meet this emission
For . . . limit for each process vent . .
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to NSPS. Each new or a. 250 ppmv (dry basis) of
existing Claus sulfur recovery unit sulfur dioxide (SO2) at zero
part of a sulfur recovery plant with percent excess air, or
design capacity greater than 20 long concentration determined using
tons per day (LTD) and subject to the Equation 1 of 40 CFR
NSPS for sulfur oxides in 40 CFR 60.102a(f)(1)(i), if you use
60.104(a)(2) or 60.102a(f)(1). an oxidation control system or
if you use a reduction control
system followed by
incineration.
[[Page 198]]
b. 300 ppmv of reduced sulfur
compounds calculated as ppmv
SO2 (dry basis) at zero
percent excess air, or
concentration determined using
Equation 1 of 40 CFR
60.102a(f)(1)(i), if you use a
reduction control system
without incineration.
2. Option 1: Elect NSPS. Each new or a. 250 ppmv (dry basis) of SO2
existing sulfur recovery unit (Claus at zero percent excess air, or
or other type, regardless of size) not concentration determined using
subject to the NSPS for sulfur oxides Equation 1 of 40 CFR
in 40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or 60.102a(f)(1)(i), if you use
60.102a(f)(1). an oxidation control system or
if you use a reduction control
system followed by
incineration.
b. 300 ppmv of reduced sulfur
compounds calculated as ppmv
SO2 (dry basis) at zero
percent excess air, or
concentration determined using
Equation 1 of 40 CFR
60.102a(f)(1)(i), if you use a
reduction control system
without incineration.
3. Option 2: TRS limit. Each new or 300 ppmv of total reduced
existing sulfur recovery unit (Claus sulfur (TRS) compounds,
or other type, regardless of size) not expressed as an equivalent SO2
subject to the NSPS for sulfur oxides concentration (dry basis) at
in 40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or zero percent oxygen.
60.102a(f)(1).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75309, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 30 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Operating Limits for HAP
Emissions From Sulfur Recovery Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1568(a)(2), you shall meet each operating
limit in the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall meet this
For . . . If use this type of operating limit . .
control device . . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to NSPS. Each new Not applicable...... Not applicable.
or existing Claus sulfur
recovery unit part of a
sulfur recovery plant with
design capacity greater
than 20 LTD and subject to
the NSPS for sulfur oxides
in 40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or
60.102a(f)(1).
2. Option 1: Elect NSPS. Not applicable...... Not applicable.
Each new or existing sulfur
recovery unit (Claus or
other type, regardless of
size) not subject to the
NSPS for sulfur oxides in
40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or
60.102a(f)(1).
3. Option 2: TRS limit, if Not applicable...... Not applicable.
using continuous emissions
monitoring systems. Each
new or existing sulfur
recovery unit (Claus or
other type, regardless of
size) not subject to the
NSPS for sulfur oxides in
40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or
60.102a(f)(1).
4. Option 2: TRS limit, if Thermal incinerator. Maintain the daily
using continuous parameter average combustion
monitoring systems. Each zone temperature
new or existing sulfur above the limit
recovery unit (Claus or established during
other type, regardless of the performance
size) not subject to the test; and maintain
NSPS for sulfur oxides in the daily average
40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or oxygen
60.102a(f)(1). concentration in
the vent stream
(percent, dry
basis) above the
limit established
during the
performance test.
5. Startup or shutdown Flare............... On and after January
option 1: Electing to 30, 2019, meet the
comply with Sec. applicable
63.1568(a)(4)(ii). Each new requirements of
or existing sulfur recovery Sec. 63.670.
unit (Claus or other type, Prior to January
regardless of size) during 30, 2019, meet the
periods of startup or applicable
shutdown. requirements of
either Sec.
63.11(b) or Sec.
63.670.
6. Startup or shutdown Thermal incinerator Maintain the hourly
option 2: Electing to or thermal oxidizer. average combustion
comply with Sec. zone temperature at
63.1568(a)(4)(iii). Each or above 1,200
new or existing sulfur degrees Fahrenheit
recovery unit (Claus or and maintain the
other type, regardless of hourly average
size) during startup or oxygen
shutdown events. concentration in
the exhaust gas
stream at or above
2 volume percent
(dry basis).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75310, Dec. 1, 2015]
[[Page 199]]
Sec. Table 31 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Monitoring Systems
for HAP Emissions From Sulfur Recovery Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1568(b)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall install
and operate this
For . . . For this limit . . . continuous
monitoring system .
. .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to NSPS. Each new a. 250 ppmv (dry Continuous emission
or existing Claus sulfur basis) of SO2 at monitoring system
recovery unit part of a zero percent excess to measure and
sulfur recovery plant with air if you use an record the hourly
design capacity greater oxidation or average
than 20 LTD and subject to reduction control concentration of
the NSPS for sulfur oxides system followed by SO2 (dry basis) at
in 40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or incineration. zero percent excess
60.102a(f)(1). air for each
exhaust stack. This
system must include
an oxygen monitor
for correcting the
data for excess
air.
b. 300 ppmv of Continuous emission
reduced sulfur monitoring system
compounds to measure and
calculated as ppmv record the hourly
SO2 (dry basis) at average
zero percent excess concentration of
air if you use a reduced sulfur and
reduction control oxygen (O2)
system without emissions.
incineration. Calculate the
reduced sulfur
emissions as SO2
(dry basis) at zero
percent excess air.
Exception: You can
use an instrument
having an air or
SO2 dilution and
oxidation system to
convert the reduced
sulfur to SO2 for
continuously
monitoring and
recording the
concentration (dry
basis) at zero
percent excess air
of the resultant
SO2 instead of the
reduced sulfur
monitor. The
monitor must
include an oxygen
monitor for
correcting the data
for excess oxygen.
c. If you use i. Complete either
Equation 1 of 40 item 1.a or item
CFR 1.b; and
60.102a(f)(1)(i) to ii. Either a
set your emission continuous emission
limit. monitoring system
to measure and
record the O2
concentration for
the inlet air/
oxygen supplied to
the system or a
continuous
parameter
monitoring system
to measure and
record the
volumetric gas flow
rate of ambient air
and purchased
oxygen-enriched
gas.
2. Option 1: Elect NSPS. a. 250 ppmv (dry Continuous emission
Each new or existing sulfur basis) of SO2 at monitoring system
recovery unit (Claus or zero percent excess to measure and
other type, regardless of air if you use an record the hourly
size) not subject to the oxidation or average
NSPS for sulfur oxides in reduction control concentration of
40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or system followed by SO2 (dry basis), at
60.102a(f)(1). incineration. zero percent excess
air for each
exhaust stack. This
system must include
an oxygen monitor
for correcting the
data for excess
air.
b. 300 ppmv of Continuous emission
reduced sulfur monitoring system
compounds to measure and
calculated as ppmv record the hourly
SO2 (dry basis) at average
zero percent excess concentration of
air if you use a reduced sulfur and
reduction control O2 emissions for
system without each exhaust stack.
incineration. Calculate the
reduced sulfur
emissions as SO2
(dry basis), at
zero percent excess
air. Exception: You
can use an
instrument having
an air or O2
dilution and
oxidation system to
convert the reduced
sulfur to SO2 for
continuously
monitoring and
recording the
concentration (dry
basis) at zero
percent excess air
of the resultant
SO2 instead of the
reduced sulfur
monitor. The
monitor must
include an oxygen
monitor for
correcting the data
for excess oxygen.
[[Page 200]]
c. If you use i. Complete either
Equation 1 of 40 item 2.a or item
CFR 2.b; and
60.102a(f)(1)(i) to ii. Either a
set your emission continuous emission
limit. monitoring system
to measure and
record the O2
concentration for
the inlet air/
oxygen supplied to
the system, or a
continuous
parameter
monitoring system
to measure and
record the
volumetric gas flow
rate of ambient air
and purchased
oxygen-enriched
gas.
3. Option 2: TRS limit. Each a. 300 ppmv of total i. Continuous
new or existing sulfur reduced sulfur emission monitoring
recovery unit (Claus or (TRS) compounds, system to measure
other type, regardless of expressed as an and record the
size) not subject to the equivalent SO2 hourly average
NSPS for sulfur oxides in concentration (dry concentration of
40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or basis) at zero TRS for each
60.102a(f)(1). percent oxygen. exhaust stack; this
monitor must
include an oxygen
monitor for
correcting the data
for excess oxygen;
or
ii. Continuous
parameter
monitoring systems
to measure and
record the
combustion zone
temperature of each
thermal incinerator
and the oxygen
content (percent,
dry basis) in the
vent stream of the
incinerator.
4. Startup or shutdown Any................. On and after January
option 1: electing to 30, 2019,
comply with Sec. monitoring systems
63.1568(a)(4)(ii). Each new as specified in
or existing sulfur recovery Sec. Sec. 63.670
unit (Claus or other type, and 63.671. Prior
regardless of size) during to January 30,
periods of startup or 2019, either
shutdown. continuous
parameter
monitoring systems
following the
requirements in
Sec. 63.11 (to
detect the presence
of a flame; to
measure and record
the net heating
value of the gas
being combusted;
and to measure and
record the
volumetric flow of
the gas being
combusted) or
monitoring systems
as specified in
Sec. Sec. 63.670
and 63.671.
5. Startup or shutdown Any................. Continuous parameter
option 2: electing to monitoring systems
comply with Sec. to measure and
63.1568(a)(4)(iii). Each record the firebox
new or existing sulfur temperature of each
recovery unit (Claus or thermal incinerator
other type, regardless of or oxidizer and the
size) during periods of oxygen content
startup or shutdown. (percent, dry
basis) in the
exhaust vent from
the incinerator or
oxidizer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75310, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 32 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance
Tests for HAP Emissions From Sulfur Recovery Units Not Subject to the
New Source Performance Standards for Sulfur Oxides
As stated in Sec. 63.1568(b)(2) and (3), you shall meet each
requirement in the following table that applies to you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to these
For . . . You must . . . Using . . . requirements . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Option 1: Elect NSPS. Each new and a. Measure SO2 Data from continuous Collect SO2 monitoring
existing sulfur recovery unit. concentration (for an emission monitoring data every 15 minutes
oxidation or reduction system. for 24 consecutive
system followed by operating hours.
incineration) or Reduce the data to 1-
measure the hour averages computed
concentration of from four or more data
reduced sulfur (or SO2 points equally spaced
if you use an over each 1-hour
instrument to convert period.
the reduced sulfur to
SO2) for a reduction
control system without
incineration.
[[Page 201]]
b. Measure O2 i. Data from continuous Collect O2 monitoring
concentration for the emission monitoring data every 15 minutes
inlet air/oxygen system; or for 24 consecutive
supplied to the operating hours.
system, if using Reduce the data to 1-
Equation 1 of 40 CFR hour averages computed
60.102a(f)1)(i) to set from four or more data
your emission limit. points equally spaced
You may use either an over each 1-hour
O2 CEMS method in item period; and average
1.b.i of this table or over the 24-hour
the flow monitor in period for input to
item 1.b.ii of this Equation 1 of 40 CFR
table. 60.102a(f)(1)(i).
ii. Data from flow Collect gas flow rate
monitor for ambient monitoring data every
air and purchased 15 minutes for 24
oxygen-enriched gas. consecutive operating
hours. Reduce the data
to 1-hour averages
computed from 4 or
more data points
equally spaced over
each 1-hour period;
calculate the hourly
O2 percent using
Equation 10 of 40 CFR
60.106a(a)(6)(iv); and
average over the 24-
hour period for input
to Equation 1 of 40
CFR 60.102a(f)(1)(i).
2. Option 2: TRS limit, using CEMS. Measure the Data from continuous Collect TRS data every
Each new and existing sulfur concentration of emission monitoring 15 minutes for 24
recovery unit. reduced sulfur (or SO2 system. consecutive operating
if you use an hours. Reduce the data
instrument to convert to 1-hour averages
the reduced sulfur to computed from four or
SO2). more data points
equally spaced over
each 1-hour period.
3. Option 2: TRS limit, if using a. Select sampling Method 1 or 1A in Sampling sites must be
continuous parameter monitoring port's location and Appendix A-1 to part located at the outlet
systems. Each new and existing the number of traverse 60 of this chapter. of the control device
sulfur recovery unit. ports. and prior to any
releases to the
atmosphere.
b. Determine velocity Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2D,
and volumetric flow or 2F in appendix A-1
rate. to part 60 of this
chapter, or Method 2G
in appendix A-2 to
part 60 of this
chapter, as applicable.
c. Conduct gas Method 3, 3A, or 3B in Take the samples
molecular weight appendix A-2 to part simultaneously with
analysis; obtain the 60 of this chapter, as reduced sulfur or
oxygen concentration applicable. moisture samples.
needed to correct the
emission rate for
excess air.
d. Measure moisture Method 4 in appendix A- Make your sampling time
content of the stack 3 to part 60 of this for each Method 4
gas. chapter. sample equal to that
for 4 Method 15
samples.
[[Page 202]]
e. Measure the Method 15 or 15A in If the cross-sectional
concentration of TRS. appendix A-5 to part area of the duct is
60 of this chapter, as less than 5 square
applicable. meters (m\2\) or 54
square feet, you must
use the centroid of
the cross section as
the sampling point. If
the cross-sectional
area is 5 m\2\ or more
and the centroid is
more than 1 meter (m)
from the wall, your
sampling point may be
at a point no closer
to the walls than 1 m
or 39 inches. Your
sampling rate must be
at least 3 liters per
minute or 0.10 cubic
feet per minute to
ensure minimum
residence time for the
sample inside the
sample lines.
f. Calculate the SO2 The arithmetic average
equivalent for each of the SO2 equivalent
run after correcting for each sample during
for moisture and the run.
oxygen.
g. Correct the reduced Equation 1 of Sec.
sulfur samples to zero 63.1568.
percent excess air.
h. Establish each Data from the
operating limit in continuous parameter
Table 30 of this monitoring system.
subpart that applies
to you.
i. Measure thermal Data from the Collect temperature
incinerator: continuous parameter monitoring data every
combustion zone monitoring system. 15 minutes during the
temperature. entire period of the
performance test; and
determine and record
the minimum hourly
average temperature
from all the readings.
j. Measure thermal Data from the Collect oxygen
incinerator: oxygen continuous parameter concentration
concentration monitoring system. (percent, dry basis)
(percent, dry basis) data every 15 minutes
in the vent stream. during the entire
period of the
performance test; and
determine and record
the minimum hourly
average percent excess
oxygen concentration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75312, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 33 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Initial Compliance With HAP
Emission Limits for Sulfur Recovery Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1568(b)(5), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
[[Page 203]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You have
For . . . For the following demonstrated initial
emission limit . . . compliance if . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to NSPS: Each new a. 250 ppmv (dry You have already
or existing Claus sulfur basis) SO2 at zero conducted a
recovery unit part of a percent excess air, performance test to
sulfur recovery plant with or concentration demonstrate initial
design capacity greater determined using compliance with the
than 20 LTD and subject to Equation 1 of 40 NSPS and each 12-
the NSPS for sulfur oxides CFR hour rolling
in 40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or 60.102a(f)(1)(i), average
60.102a(f)(1). if you use an concentration of
oxidation or SO2 emissions
reduction control measured by the
system followed by continuous emission
incineration. monitoring system
is less than or
equal to 250 ppmv
(dry basis) at zero
percent excess air,
or the
concentration
determined using
Equation 1 of 40
CFR
60.102a(f)(1)(i).
As part of the
Notification of
Compliance Status,
you must certify
that your vent
meets the SO2
limit. You are not
required to do
another performance
test to demonstrate
initial compliance.
You have already
conducted a
performance
evaluation to
demonstrate initial
compliance with the
applicable
performance
specification. As
part of your
Notification of
Compliance Status,
you must certify
that your
continuous emission
monitoring system
meets the
applicable
requirements in
Sec. 63.1572. You
are not required to
do another
performance
evaluation to
demonstrate initial
compliance.
b. 300 ppmv of You have already
reduced sulfur conducted a
compounds performance test to
calculated as ppmv demonstrate initial
SO2 (dry basis) at compliance with the
zero percent excess NSPS and each 12-
air, or hour rolling
concentration average
determined using concentration of
Equation 1 of 40 reduced sulfur
CFR compounds measured
60.102a(f)(1)(i), by your continuous
if you use a emission monitoring
reduction control system is less than
system without or equal to 300
incineration. ppmv, calculated as
ppmv SO2 (dry
basis) at zero
percent excess air,
or the
concentration
determined using
Equation 1 of 40
CFR
60.102a(f)(1)(i).
As part of the
Notification of
Compliance Status,
you must certify
that your vent
meets the SO2
limit. You are not
required to do
another performance
test to demonstrate
initial compliance.
You have already
conducted a
performance
evaluation to
demonstrate initial
compliance with the
applicable
performance
specification. As
part of your
Notification of
Compliance Status,
you must certify
that your
continuous emission
monitoring system
meets the
applicable
requirements in
Sec. 63.1572. You
are not required to
do another
performance
evaluation to
demonstrate initial
compliance.
2. Option 1: Elect NSPS. a. 250 ppmv (dry Each 12-hour rolling
Each new or existing sulfur basis) of SO2 at average
recovery unit (Claus or zero percent excess concentration of
other type, regardless of air, or SO2 emissions
size) not subject to the concentration measured by the
NSPS for sulfur oxides in determined using continuous emission
40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or Equation 1 of 40 monitoring system
60.102a(f)(1). CFR during the initial
60.102a(f)(1)(i), performance test is
if you use an less than or equal
oxidation or to 250 ppmv (dry
reduction control basis) at zero
system followed by percent excess air,
incineration. or the
concentration
determined using
Equation 1 of 40
CFR
60.102a(f)(1)(i);
and your
performance
evaluation shows
the monitoring
system meets the
applicable
requirements in
Sec. 63.1572.
[[Page 204]]
b. 300 ppmv of Each 12-hour rolling
reduced sulfur average
compounds concentration of
calculated as ppmv reduced sulfur
SO2 (dry basis) at compounds measured
zero percent excess by the continuous
air, or emission monitoring
concentration system during the
determined using initial performance
Equation 1 of 40 test is less than
CFR or equal to 300
60.102a(f)(1)(i), ppmv, calculated as
if you use a ppmv SO2 (dry
reduction control basis) at zero
system without percent excess air,
incineration. or the
concentration
determined using
Equation 1 of 40
CFR
60.102a(f)(1)(i);
and your
performance
evaluation shows
the continuous
emission monitoring
system meets the
applicable
requirements in
Sec. 63.1572.
3. Option 2: TRS limit. Each 300 ppmv of TRS If you use
new or existing sulfur compounds expressed continuous
recovery unit (Claus or as an equivalent parameter
other type, regardless of SO2 concentration monitoring systems,
size) not subject to the (dry basis) at zero the average
NSPS for sulfur oxides in percent oxygen. concentration of
40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or TRS emissions
60.102a(f)(1). measured using
Method 15 during
the initial
performance test is
less than or equal
to 300 ppmv
expressed as
equivalent SO2
concentration (dry
basis) at zero
percent oxygen. If
you use a
continuous emission
monitoring system,
each 12-hour
rolling average
concentration of
TRS emissions
measured by the
continuous emission
monitoring system
during the initial
performance test is
less than or equal
to 300 ppmv
expressed as an
equivalent SO2 (dry
basis) at zero
percent oxygen; and
your performance
evaluation shows
the continuous
emission monitoring
system meets the
applicable
requirements in
Sec. 63.1572.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75313, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 34 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With HAP
Emission Limits for Sulfur Recovery Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1568(c)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall
For this emission demonstrate
For . . . limit . . . continuous
compliance by . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to NSPS. Each new a. 250 ppmv (dry Collecting the
or existing Claus sulfur basis) of SO2 at hourly average SO2
recovery unit part of a zero percent excess monitoring data
sulfur recovery plant with air, or (dry basis, percent
design capacity greater concentration excess air) and, if
than 20 LTD and subject to determined using using Equation 1 of
the NSPS for sulfur oxides Equation 1 of 40 40 CFR
in 40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or CFR 60.102a(f)(1)(i),
60.102a(f)(1). 60.102a(f)(1)(i), collecting the
if you use an hourly O2
oxidation or concentration or
reduction control flow monitoring
system followed by data according to
incineration. Sec. 63.1572;
determining and
recording each 12-
hour rolling
average
concentration of
SO2; maintaining
each 12-hour
rolling average
concentration of
SO2 at or below the
applicable emission
limitation; and
reporting any 12-
hour rolling
average
concentration of
SO2 greater than
the applicable
emission limitation
in the semiannual
compliance report
required by Sec.
63.1575.
[[Page 205]]
b. 300 ppmv of Collecting the
reduced sulfur hourly average
compounds reduced sulfur (and
calculated as ppmv air or O2 dilution
SO2 (dry basis) at and oxidation)
zero percent excess monitoring data
air, or and, if using
concentration Equation 1 of 40
determined using CFR
Equation 1 of 40 60.102a(f)(1)(i),
CFR collecting the
60.102a(f)(1)(i), hourly O2
if you use a concentration or
reduction control flow monitoring
system without data according to
incineration. Sec. 63.1572;
determining and
recording each 12-
hour rolling
average
concentration of
reduced sulfur;
maintaining each 12-
hour rolling
average
concentration of
reduced sulfur at
or below the
applicable emission
limitation; and
reporting any 12-
hour rolling
average
concentration of
reduced sulfur
greater than the
applicable emission
limitation in the
semiannual
compliance report
required by Sec.
63.1575.
2. Option 1: Elect NSPS. a. 250 ppmv (dry Collecting the
Each new or existing sulfur basis) of SO2 at hourly average SO2
recovery unit (Claus or zero percent excess data (dry basis,
other type, regardless of air, or percent excess air)
size) not subject to the concentration and, if using
NSPS for sulfur oxides in determined using Equation 1 of 40
40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or Equation 1 of 40 CFR
60.102a(f)(1). CFR 60.102a(f)(1)(i),
60.102a(f)(1)(i), collecting the
if you use an hourly O2
oxidation or concentration or
reduction control flow monitoring
system followed by data according to
incineration. Sec. 63.1572;
determining and
recording each 12-
hour rolling
average
concentration of
SO2; maintaining
each 12-hour
rolling average
concentration of
SO2 at or below the
applicable emission
limitation; and
reporting any 12-
hour rolling
average
concentration of
SO2 greater than
the applicable
emission limitation
in the semiannual
compliance report
required by Sec.
63.1575.
b. 300 ppmv of Collecting the
reduced sulfur hourly average
compounds reduced sulfur (and
calculated as ppmv air or O2 dilution
SO2 (dry basis) at and oxidation)
zero percent excess monitoring data
air, or and, if using
concentration Equation 1 of 40
determined using CFR
Equation 1 of 40 60.102a(f)(1)(i),
CFR collecting the
60.102a(f)(1)(i), hourly O2
if you use a concentration or
reduction control flow monitoring
system without data according to
incineration. Sec. 63.1572;
determining and
recording each 12-
hour rolling
average
concentration of
reduced sulfur;
maintaining each 12-
hour rolling
average
concentration of
reduced sulfur at
or below the
applicable emission
limitation; and
reporting any 12-
hour rolling
average
concentration of
reduced sulfur
greater than the
applicable emission
limitation in the
semiannual
compliance report
required by Sec.
63.1575.
3. Option 2: TRS limit. Each 300 ppmv of TRS i. If you use
new or existing sulfur compounds, continuous
recovery unit (Claus or expressed as an SO2 parameter
other type, regardless of concentration (dry monitoring systems,
size) not subject to the basis) at zero collecting the
NSPS for sulfur oxides in percent oxygen or hourly average TRS
40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or reduced sulfur monitoring data
60.102a(f)(1). compounds according to Sec.
calculated as ppmv 63.1572 and
SO2 (dry basis) at maintaining each 12-
zero percent excess hour average
air. concentration of
TRS at or below the
applicable emission
limitation; or
ii. If you use a
continuous emission
monitoring system,
collecting the
hourly average TRS
monitoring data
according to Sec.
63.1572,
determining and
recording each 12-
hour rolling
average
concentration of
TRS; maintaining
each 12-hour
rolling average
concentration of
TRS at or below the
applicable emission
limitation; and
reporting any 12-
hour rolling
average TRS
concentration
greater than the
applicable emission
limitation in the
semiannual
compliance report
required by Sec.
63.1575.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 206]]
[80 FR 75315, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 35 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With
Operating Limits for HAP Emissions From Sulfur Recovery Units
As stated in Sec. 63.1568(c)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall
For this operating demonstrate
For . . . limit . . . continuous
compliance by . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to NSPS. Each new Not applicable...... Meeting the
or existing Claus sulfur requirements of
recovery unit part of a Table 34 of this
sulfur recovery plant with subpart.
design capacity greater
than 20 LTD and subject to
the NSPS for sulfur oxides
in 40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or
60.102a(f)(1).
2. Option 1: Elect NSPS. Not applicable...... Meeting the
Each new or existing sulfur requirements of
recovery unit (Claus or Table 34 of this
other type, regardless of subpart.
size) not subject to the
NSPS for sulfur oxides in
40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or
60.102a(f)(1).
3. Option 2: TRS limit. Each a. Maintain the Collecting the
new or existing sulfur daily average hourly and daily
recovery unit (Claus or combustion zone average temperature
other type, regardless of temperature above monitoring data
size) not subject to the the level according to Sec.
NSPS for sulfur oxides in established during 63.1572; and
40 CFR 60.104(a)(2) or the performance maintaining the
60.102a(f)(1). test. daily average
combustion zone
temperature at or
above the limit
established during
the performance
test
b. The daily average Collecting the
oxygen hourly and daily
concentration in average O2
the vent stream monitoring data
(percent, dry according to Sec.
basis) must not 63.1572; and
fall below the maintaining the
level established average O2
during the concentration above
performance test.. the level
established during
the performance
test.
4. Startup or shutdown Using a flare On and after January
option 1: Electing to meeting the 30, 2019, complying
comply with Sec. requirements in with the applicable
63.1568(a)(4)(ii). Each new Sec. 63.11(b) or requirements of
or existing sulfur recovery Sec. 63.670. Sec. 63.670.
unit (Claus or other type, Prior to January
regardless of size) during 30, 2019, complying
periods of startup or with the applicable
shutdown. requirements of
either Sec.
63.11(b) or Sec.
63.670.
5. Startup or shutdown a. Minimum hourly Collecting
option 2: Electing to average temperature continuous (at
comply with Sec. of 1,200 degrees least once every 15
63.1568(a)(4)(iii). Each Fahrenheit. minutes) and hourly
new or existing sulfur average temperature
recovery unit (Claus or monitoring data
other type, regardless of according to Sec.
size) during periods of 63.1572; and
startup or shutdown. maintaining the
daily average
firebox temperature
at or above 1,200
degrees Fahrenheit.
b. Minimum hourly Collecting
average outlet continuous (at
oxygen least once every 15
concentration of 2 minutes) and hourly
volume percent (dry average O2
basis). monitoring data
according to Sec.
63.1572; and
maintaining the
average O2
concentration at or
above 2 volume
percent (dry
basis).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75316, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 36 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Work Practice Standards for HAP
Emissions From Bypass Lines
As stated in Sec. 63.1569(a)(1), you shall meet each work practice
standard in the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall meet one of these equipment
Option standards . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Option 1..................... Install and operate a device
(including a flow indicator, level
recorder, or electronic valve
position monitor) to demonstrate,
either continuously or at least every
hour, whether flow is present in the
by bypass line. Install the device at
or as near as practical to the
entrance to any bypass line that
could divert the vent stream away
from the control device to the
atmosphere.
2. Option 2..................... Install a car-seal or lock-and-key
device placed on the mechanism by
which the bypass device flow position
is controlled (e.g., valve handle,
damper level) when the bypass device
is in the closed position such that
the bypass line valve cannot be
opened without breaking the seal or
removing the device.
3. Option 3..................... Seal the bypass line by installing a
solid blind between piping flanges.
4. Option 4..................... Vent the bypass line to a control
device that meets the appropriate
requirements in this subpart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 207]]
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6942, 6964, Feb. 9,
2005]
Sec. Table 37 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance
Tests for Bypass Lines
As stated in Sec. 63.1569(b)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For this standard . . . You shall . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Option 1: Install and operate a flow Record during the performance
indicator, level recorder, or test for each type of control
electronic valve position monitor. device whether the flow
indicator, level recorder, or
electronic valve position
monitor was operating and
whether flow was detected at
any time during each hour of
level the three runs
comprising the performance
test.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6942, Feb. 9, 2005]
Sec. Table 38 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Initial Compliance With Work
Practice Standards for HAP Emissions From Bypass Lines
As stated in Sec. 63.1569(b)(2), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For this work You have
Option . . . practice standard . demonstrated initial
. . compliance if . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Each new or existing a. Option 1: Install The installed
bypass line associated with and operate a equipment operates
a catalytic cracking unit, device (including a properly during
catalytic reforming unit, flow indicator, each run of the
or sulfur recovery unit. level recorder, or performance test
electronic valve and no flow is
position monitor) present in the line
to demonstrate, during the test.
either continuously
or at least every
hour, whether flow
is present in
bypass line.
Install the device
at or as near as
practical to the
entrance to any
bypass line that
could divert the
vent stream away
from the control
device to the
atmosphere.
b. Option 2: Install As part of the
a car-seal or lock- notification of
and-key device compliance status,
placed on the you certify that
mechanism by which you installed the
the bypass device equipment, the
flow position is equipment was
controlled (e.g., operational by your
valve handle, compliance date,
damper level) when and you identify
the bypass device what equipment was
is in the closed installed.
position such that
the bypass line
valve cannot be
opened without
breaking the seal
or removing the
device.
c. Option 3: Seal See item 1.b of this
the bypass line by table.
installing a solid
blind between
piping flanges.
d. Option 4: Vent See item 1.b of this
the bypass line to table.
a control device
that meets the
appropriate
requirements in
this subpart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[70 FR 6965, Feb. 9, 2005]
Sec. Table 39 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With Work
Practice Standards for HAP Emissions From Bypass Lines
As stated in Sec. 63.1569(c)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall demonstrate
If you elect this standard . . . continuous compliance by . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Option 1: Flow indicator, level Monitoring and recording on a
recorder, or electronic valve position continuous basis or at least
monitor. every hour whether flow is
present in the bypass line;
visually inspecting the device
at least once every hour if
the device is not equipped
with a recording system that
provides a continuous record;
and recording whether the
device is operating properly
and whether flow is present in
the bypass line.
2. Option 2: Car-seal or lock-and-key Visually inspecting the seal or
device. closure mechanism at least
once every month; and
recording whether the bypass
line valve is maintained in
the closed position and
whether flow is present in the
line.
3. Option 3: Solid blind flange........ Visually inspecting the blind
at least once a month; and
recording whether the blind is
maintained in the correct
position such that the vent
stream cannot be diverted
through the bypass line.
[[Page 208]]
4. Option 4: Vent to control device.... Monitoring the control device
according to appropriate
subpart requirements.
5. Option 1, 2, 3, or 4................ Recording and reporting the
time and duration of any
bypass.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6942, 6965, Feb. 9,
2005]
Sec. Table 40 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Installation,
Operation, and Maintenance of Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems and
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems
As stated in Sec. 63.1572(a)(1) and (b)(1), you shall meet each
requirement in the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This type of continuous opacity or Must meet these requirements .
emission monitoring system . . . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Continuous opacity monitoring system Performance specification 1 (40
CFR part 60, appendix B).
2. PM CEMS; this monitor must include The requirements in 40 CFR
an O2 monitor for correcting the data 60.105a(d).
for excess air.
3. CO continuous emission monitoring Performance specification 4 (40
system. CFR part 60, appendix B); span
value of 1,000 ppm; and
procedure 1 (40 CFR part 60,
appendix F) except relative
accuracy test audits are
required annually instead of
quarterly.
4. CO continuous emission monitoring Performance specification 4 (40
system used to demonstrate emissions CFR part 60, appendix B); and
average under 50 ppm (dry basis). span value of 100 ppm.
5. SO2 continuous emission monitoring Performance specification 2 (40
system for sulfur recovery unit with CFR part 60, appendix B); span
oxidation control system or reduction value of 500 ppm SO2, or if
control system; this monitor must using Equation 1 of 40 CFR
include an O2 monitor for correcting 60.102a(f)(1)(i), span value
the data for excess air. of two times the limit at the
highest O2 concentration; use
Methods 6 or 6C (40 CFR part
60, appendix A-4) for
certifying the SO2 monitor and
Methods 3A or 3B (40 CFR part
60, appendix A-2) for
certifying the O2 monitor; and
procedure 1 (40 CFR part 60,
appendix F) except relative
accuracy test audits are
required annually instead of
quarterly.
6. Reduced sulfur and O2 continuous Performance specification 5 (40
emission monitoring system for sulfur CFR part 60, appendix B),
recovery unit with reduction control except calibration drift
system not followed by incineration; specification is 2.5 percent
this monitor must include an O2 of the span value instead of 5
monitor for correcting the data for percent; span value is 450 ppm
excess air unless exempted. reduced sulfur, or if using
Equation 1 of 40 CFR
60.102a(f)(1)(i), span value
of two times the limit at the
highest O2 concentration; use
Methods 15 or 15A (40 CFR part
60, appendix A-5) for
certifying the reduced sulfur
monitor and Methods 3A or 3B
(40 CFR part 60, appendix A-2)
for certifying the O2 monitor;
if Method 3A or 3B yields O2
concentrations below 0.25
percent during the performance
evaluation, the O2
concentration can be assumed
to be zero and the O2 monitor
is not required; and procedure
1 (40 CFR part 60, appendix
F), except relative accuracy
test audits, are required
annually instead of quarterly.
7. Instrument with an air or O2 Performance specification 5 (40
dilution and oxidation system to CFR part 60, appendix B); span
convert reduced sulfur to SO2 for value of 375 ppm SO2 or if
continuously monitoring the using Equation 1 of 40 CFR
concentration of SO2 instead of 60.102a(f)(1)(i), span value
reduced sulfur monitor and O2 monitor. of two times the limit at the
highest O2 concentration; use
Methods 15 or 15A (40 CFR part
60, appendix A-5) for
certifying the reduced sulfur
monitor and 3A or 3B (40 CFR
part 60, appendix A-2) for
certifying the O2 monitor; and
procedure 1 (40 CFR part 60,
appendix F), except relative
accuracy test audits, are
required annually instead of
quarterly.
8. TRS continuous emission monitoring Performance specification 5 (40
system for sulfur recovery unit; this CFR part 60, appendix B).
monitor must include an O2 monitor for
correcting the data for excess air.
9. O2 monitor for oxygen concentration. If necessary due to
interferences, locate the
oxygen sensor prior to the
introduction of any outside
gas stream; performance
specification 3 (40 CFR part
60, appendix B; and procedure
1 (40 CFR part 60, appendix
F), except relative accuracy
test audits, are required
annually instead of quarterly.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75317, Dec. 1, 2015]
[[Page 209]]
Sec. Table 41 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Installation,
Operation, and Maintenance of Continuous Parameter Monitoring Systems
As stated in Sec. 63.1572(c)(1), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you use . . . You shall . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. pH strips............... Use pH strips with an accuracy of 10 percent.
2. pH meter................ Locate the pH sensor in a position that
provides a representative measurement of
pH; ensure the sample is properly mixed
and representative of the fluid to be
measured.
Use a pH sensor with an accuracy of at
least 0.2 pH units.
Check the pH meter's calibration on at
least one point at least once daily; check
the pH meter's calibration on at least two
points at least once quarterly; at least
monthly, inspect all components for
integrity and all electrical components
for continuity; record the results of each
calibration check and inspection.
3. Colormetric tube Use a colormetric tube sampling system with
sampling system. a printed numerical scale in ppmv, a
standard measurement range of 1 to 10 ppmv
(or 1 to 30 ppmv if applicable), and a
standard deviation for measured values of
no more than 15
percent. System must include a gas
detection pump and hot air probe if needed
for the measurement range.
4. CO2, O2, and CO monitors a. Locate the concentration sensor so that
for coke burn-off rate. it provides a representative measurement
of the content of the exit gas stream;
ensure the sample is properly mixed and
representative of the gas to be measured.
Use a sensor with an accuracy of at least
1 percent of the
range of the sensor or to a nominal gas
concentration of 0.5
percent, whichever is greater.
Use a monitor that is able to measure
concentration on a dry basis or is able to
correct for moisture content and record on
a dry basis.
Conduct calibration checks at least
annually; conduct calibration checks
following any period of more than 24 hours
throughout which the sensor reading
exceeds the manufacturer's specified
maximum operating range or install a new
sensor; at least quarterly, inspect all
components for integrity and all
electrical connections for continuity;
record the results of each calibration and
inspection.
b. As an alternative, the requirements in
40 CFR 60.105a(b)(2) may be used.
5. BLD..................... Follow the requirements in 40 CFR
60.105a(c).
6. Voltage, secondary Use meters with an accuracy of at least
current, or total power 5 percent over the
input sensors. operating range.
Each time that the unit is not operating,
confirm that the meters read zero. Conduct
a calibration check at least annually;
conduct calibration checks following any
period of more than 24 hours throughout
which the meter reading exceeds the
manufacturer's specified maximum operating
range; at least monthly, inspect all
components of the continuous parameter
monitoring system for integrity and all
electrical connections for continuity;
record the results of each calibration
check and inspection.
7. Pressure/Pressure Locate the pressure sensor(s) in a position
drop\1\ sensors. that provides a representative measurement
of the pressure and minimizes or
eliminates pulsating pressure, vibration,
and internal and external corrosion.
Use a gauge with an accuracy of at least
5 percent over the
normal operating range or 0.12 kilopascals
(0.5 inches of water column), whichever is
greater.
Review pressure sensor readings at least
once a week for straightline (unchanging)
pressure and perform corrective action to
ensure proper pressure sensor operation if
blockage is indicated; using an instrument
recommended by the sensor's manufacturer,
check gauge calibration and transducer
calibration annually; conduct calibration
checks following any period of more than
24 hours throughout which the pressure
exceeded the manufacturer's specified
maximum rated pressure or install a new
pressure sensor; at least quarterly,
inspect all components for integrity, all
electrical connections for continuity, and
all mechanical connections for leakage,
unless the CPMS has a redundant pressure
sensor; record the results of each
calibration check and inspection.
8. Air flow rate, gas flow Locate the flow sensor(s) and other
rate, or total water (or necessary equipment (such as straightening
scrubbing liquid) flow vanes) in a position that provides
rate sensors. representative flow; reduce swirling flow
or abnormal velocity distributions due to
upstream and downstream disturbances. If
you elect to comply with Option 3 (Ni lb/
hr) or Option 4 (Ni lb/1,000 lb of coke
burn-off) for the HAP metal emission
limitations in Sec. 63.1564, install the
continuous parameter monitoring system for
gas flow rate as close as practical to the
continuous opacity monitoring system; and
if you don't use a continuous opacity
monitoring system, install the continuous
parameter monitoring system for gas flow
rate as close as practical to the control
device.
Use a flow rate sensor with an accuracy of
at least 5 percent
over the normal range of flow measured, or
1.9 liter per minute (0.5 gallons per
minute), whichever is greater, for liquid
flow.
Use a flow rate sensor with an accuracy of
at least 5 percent
over the normal range of flow measured, or
280 liters per minute (10 cubic feet per
minute), whichever is greater, for gas
flow.
Conduct a flow sensor calibration check at
least biennially (every two years);
conduct a calibration check following any
period of more than 24 hours throughout
which the flow rate exceeded the
manufacturer's specified maximum rated
flow rate or install a new flow sensor; at
least quarterly, inspect all components
for leakage, unless the CPMS has a
redundant flow sensor; record the results
of each calibration check and inspection.
[[Page 210]]
9. Temperature sensors..... Locate the temperature sensor in the
combustion zone, or in the ductwork
immediately downstream of the combustion
zone before any substantial heat exchange
occurs or in the ductwork immediately
downstream of the regenerator; locate the
temperature sensor in a position that
provides a representative temperature;
shield the temperature sensor system from
electromagnetic interference and chemical
contaminants.
Use a temperature sensor with an accuracy
of at least 1
percent over the normal range of
temperature measured, expressed in degrees
Celsius (C), or 2.8 degrees C, whichever
is greater.
Conduct calibration checks at least
annually; conduct calibration checks
following any period of more than 24 hours
throughout which the temperature exceeded
the manufacturer's specified maximum rated
temperature or install a new temperature
sensor; at least quarterly, inspect all
components for integrity and all
electrical connections for continuity,
oxidation, and galvanic corrosion, unless
the CPMS has a redundant temperature
sensor; record the results of each
calibration check and inspection.
10. Oxygen content sensors Locate the oxygen sensor so that it
\2\. provides a representative measurement of
the oxygen content of the exit gas stream;
ensure the sample is properly mixed and
representative of the gas to be measured.
Use an oxygen sensor with an accuracy of at
least 1 percent of
the range of the sensor or to a nominal
gas concentration of 0.5 percent, whichever is greater.
Conduct calibration checks at least
annually; conduct calibration checks
following any period of more than 24 hours
throughout which the sensor reading
exceeds the manufacturer's specified
maximum operating range or install a new
oxygen sensor; at least quarterly, inspect
all components for integrity and all
electrical connections for continuity;
record the results of each calibration and
inspection.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Not applicable to non-venturi wet scrubbers of the jet-ejector
design.
\2\ This does not replace the requirements for oxygen monitors that are
required to use continuous emissions monitoring systems. The
requirements in this table apply to oxygen sensors that are continuous
parameter monitors, such as those that monitor combustion zone oxygen
concentration and regenerator exit oxygen concentration.
[80 FR 75318, Dec. 1, 2015]
Sec. Table 42 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Additional Information for
Initial Notification of Compliance Status
As stated in Sec. 63.1574(d), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall provide this additional
For . . . information . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Identification of affected Nature, size, design, method of
sources and emission points. operation, operating design capacity of
each affected source; identify each
emission point for each HAP; identify
any affected source or vent associated
with an affected source not subject to
the requirements of subpart UUU.
2. Initial compliance........ Identification of each emission
limitation you will meet for each
affected source, including any option
you select (i.e., NSPS, PM or Ni, flare,
percent reduction, concentration,
options for bypass lines); if
applicable, certification that you have
already conducted a performance test to
demonstrate initial compliance with the
NSPS for an affected source;
certification that the vents meet the
applicable emission limit and the
continuous opacity or that the emission
monitoring system meets the applicable
performance specification; if
applicable, certification that you have
installed and verified the operational
status of equipment by your compliance
date for each bypass line that meets the
requirements of Option 2, 3, or 4 in
Sec. 63.1569 and what equipment you
installed; identification of the
operating limit for each affected
source, including supporting
documentation; if your affected source
is subject to the NSPS, certification of
compliance with NSPS emission
limitations and performance
specifications; a brief description of
performance test conditions (capacity,
feed quality, catalyst, etc.); an
engineering assessment (if applicable);
and if applicable, the flare design
(e.g., steam-assisted, air-assisted, or
non-assisted), all visible emission
readings, heat content determinations,
flow rate measurements, and exit
velocity determinations made during the
Method 22 test.
3. Continuous compliance..... Each monitoring option you elect; and
identification of any unit or vent for
which monitoring is not required; and
the definition of ``operating day.''
(This definition, subject to approval by
the applicable permitting authority,
must specify the times at which a 24-hr
operating day begins and ends.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[67 FR 17773, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 6942, Feb. 9, 2005]
Sec. Table 43 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Requirements for Reports
As stated in Sec. 63.1575(a), you shall meet each requirement in
the following table that applies to you.
[[Page 211]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You shall submit
You must submit . . . The report must the report . . .
contain . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. A compliance report........ If there are no Semiannually
deviations from any according to
emission limitation the
or work practice requirements in
standard that applies Sec.
to you, a statement 63.1575(b).
that there were no
deviations from the
standards during the
reporting period and
that no continuous
opacity monitoring
system or continuous
emission monitoring
system was
inoperative,
inactive, out-of-
control, repaired, or
adjusted; if you have
a deviation from any
emission limitation
or work practice
standard during the
reporting period, the
report must contain
the information in
Sec. 63.1575(c)
through (e).
2. Performance test and CEMS On and after February Semiannually
performance evaluation data. 1, 2016, the according to
information specified the
in Sec. requirements in
63.1575(k)(1). Sec.
63.1575(b) and
(f).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75319, Dec. 1, 2015, as amended at 83 FR 60727, Nov. 26, 2018]
Sec. Table 44 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Applicability of NESHAP General
Provisions to Subpart UUU
As stated in Sec. 63.1577, you shall meet each requirement in the
following table that applies to you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applies to subpart
Citation Subject UUU Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 63.1(a)(1)-(4).............. General Applicability... Yes..................
Sec. 63.1(a)(5).................. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.1(a)(6).................. ........................ Yes.................. Except the correct mail
drop (MD) number is C404-
04.
Sec. 63.1(a)(7)-(9).............. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.1(a)(10)-(12)............ ........................ Yes.................. Except that this subpart
specifies calendar or
operating day.
Sec. 63.1(b)(1).................. Initial Applicability Yes..................
Determination for this
part.
Sec. 63.1(b)(2).................. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.1(b)(3).................. ........................ Yes..................
Sec. 63.1(c)(1).................. Applicability of this Yes..................
part after a Relevant
Standard has been set
under this part.
Sec. 63.1(c)(2).................. ........................ No................... Area sources are not
subject to this subpart.
Sec. 63.1(c)(3)-(4).............. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.1(c)(5).................. ........................ Yes..................
Sec. 63.1(d)..................... [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.1(e)..................... Applicability of Permit Yes..................
Program.
Sec. 63.2........................ Definitions............. Yes.................. Sec. 63.1579 specifies
that if the same term is
defined in subparts A and
UUU of this part, it
shall have the meaning
given in this subpart.
Sec. 63.3........................ Units and Abbreviations. Yes..................
Sec. 63.4(a)(1)-(2).............. Prohibited Activities... Yes..................
Sec. 63.4(a)(3)-(5).............. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.4(b)-(c)................. Circumvention and Yes..................
Fragmentation.
Sec. 63.5(a)..................... Construction and Yes..................
Reconstruction.
Sec. 63.5(b)(1).................. ........................ Yes..................
Sec. 63.5(b)(2).................. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.5(b)(3)-(4).............. ........................ Yes.................. In Sec. 63.5(b)(4),
replace the reference to
Sec. 63.9(b) with Sec.
63.9(b)(4) and (5).
Sec. 63.5(b)(5).................. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.5(b)(6).................. ........................ Yes..................
Sec. 63.5(c)..................... [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.5(d)(1)(i)............... Application for Approval Yes.................. Except this subpart
of Construction or specifies the application
Reconstruction--General is submitted as soon as
Application practicable before
Requirements. startup but not later
than 90 days after the
promulgation date if
construction or
reconstruction had
commenced and initial
startup had not occurred
before promulgation.
Sec. 63.5(d)(1)(ii).............. ........................ Yes.................. Except that emission
estimates specified in
Sec. 63.5(d)(1)(ii)(H)
are not required, and
Sec. 63.5(d)(1)(ii)(G)
and (I) are Reserved and
do not apply.
[[Page 212]]
Sec. 63.5(d)(1)(iii)............. ........................ No................... This subpart specifies
submission of
notification of
compliance status.
Sec. 63.5(d)(2).................. ........................ Yes..................
Sec. 63.5(d)(3).................. ........................ Yes..................
Sec. 63.5(d)(4).................. ........................ Yes..................
Sec. 63.5(e)..................... Approval of Construction Yes..................
or Reconstruction.
Sec. 63.5(f)(1).................. Approval of Construction Yes..................
or Reconstruction Based
on State Review.
Sec. 63.5(f)(2).................. ........................ Yes.................. Except that the cross-
reference to Sec.
63.9(b)(2) does not
apply.
Sec. 63.6(a)..................... Compliance with Yes..................
Standards and
Maintenance--Applicabil
ity.
Sec. 63.6(b)(1)-(4).............. Compliance Dates for New Yes..................
and Reconstructed
Sources.
Sec. 63.6(b)(5).................. ........................ Yes.................. Except that this subpart
specifies different
compliance dates for
sources.
Sec. 63.6(b)(6).................. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.6(b)(7).................. Compliance Dates for New Yes..................
and Reconstructed Area
Sources That Become
Major.
Sec. 63.6(c)(1)-(2).............. Compliance Dates for Yes.................. Except that this subpart
Existing Sources. specifies different
compliance dates for
sources subject to Tier
II gasoline sulfur
control requirements.
Sec. 63.6(c)(3)-(4).............. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.6(c)(5).................. Compliance Dates for Yes..................
Existing Area Sources
That Become Major.
Sec. 63.6(d)..................... [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.6(e)(1)(i)............... General Duty to Minimize No................... See Sec. 63.1570(c) for
Emissions. general duty requirement.
Sec. 63.6(e)(1)(ii).............. Requirement to Correct No...................
Malfunctions as Soon as
Possible.
Sec. 63.6(e)(1)(iii)............. Compliance with Yes..................
Standards and
Maintenance
Requirements.
Sec. 63.6(e)(2).................. [Reserved].............. Not Applicable.......
Sec. 63.6(e)(3)(i)............... Startup, Shutdown, and No...................
Malfunction Plan
Requirements.
Sec. 63.6(e)(3)(ii).............. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.6(e)(3)(iii)-(ix)........ ........................ No...................
Sec. 63.6(f)(1).................. SSM Exemption........... No...................
Sec. 63.6(f)(2)(i)-(iii)(C)...... Compliance with Yes..................
Standards and
Maintenance
Requirements.
Sec. 63.6(f)(2)(iii)(D).......... ........................ Yes..................
Sec. 63.6(f)(2)(iv)-(v).......... ........................ Yes..................
Sec. 63.6(f)(3).................. ........................ Yes.................. Except the cross-
references to Sec.
63.6(f)(1) and (e)(1)(i)
are changed to Sec.
63.1570(c) and this
subpart specifies how and
when the performance test
results are reported.
Sec. 63.6(g)..................... Alternative Standard.... Yes..................
Sec. 63.6(h)(1).................. SSM Exemption for No...................
Opacity/VE Standards.
Sec. 63.6(h)(2)(i)............... Determining Compliance No................... This subpart specifies
with Opacity/VE methods.
Standards.
Sec. 63.6(h)(2)(ii).............. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.6(h)(2)(iii)............. ........................ Yes..................
Sec. 63.6(h)(3).................. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.6(h)(4).................. Notification of Opacity/ Yes.................. Applies to Method 22 (40
VE Observation Date. CFR part 60, appendix A-
7) tests.
Sec. 63.6(h)(5).................. Conducting Opacity/VE No...................
Observations.
Sec. 63.6(h)(6).................. Records of Conditions Yes.................. Applies to Method 22 (40
During Opacity/VE CFR part 60, appendix A-
Observations. 7) observations.
Sec. 63.6(h)(7)(i)............... Report COM Monitoring Yes.................. Except this subpart
Data from Performance specifies how and when
Test. the performance test
results are reported.
Sec. 63.6(h)(7)(ii).............. Using COM Instead of No...................
Method 9.
Sec. 63.6(h)(7)(iii)............. Averaging Time for COM Yes..................
during Performance Test.
Sec. 63.6(h)(7)(iv).............. COM Requirements........ Yes..................
Sec. 63.6(h)(7)(v)............... COMS Results and Visual Yes..................
Observations.
[[Page 213]]
Sec. 63.6(h)(8).................. Determining Compliance Yes.................. Except this subpart
with Opacity/VE specifies how and when
Standards. the performance test
results are reported.
Sec. 63.6(h)(9).................. Adjusted Opacity Yes..................
Standard.
Sec. 63.6(i)(1)-(14)............. Extension of Compliance. Yes.................. Extension of compliance
under Sec. 63.6(i)(4)
not applicable to a
facility that installs
catalytic cracking feed
hydrotreating and
receives an extended
compliance date under
Sec. 63.1563(c).
Sec. 63.6(i)(15)................. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.6(i)(16)................. ........................ Yes..................
Sec. 63.6(j)..................... Presidential Compliance Yes..................
Exemption.
Sec. 63.7(a)(1).................. Performance Test Yes.................. Except that this subpart
Requirements specifies the applicable
Applicability. test and demonstration
procedures.
Sec. 63.7(a)(2).................. Performance Test Dates.. Yes.................. Except this subpart
specifies that the
results of initial
performance tests must be
submitted within 150 days
after the compliance
date.
Sec. 63.7(a)(3).................. Section 114 Authority... Yes..................
Sec. 63.7(a)(4).................. Force Majeure........... Yes..................
Sec. 63.7(b)..................... Notifications........... Yes.................. Except that this subpart
specifies notification at
least 30 days prior to
the scheduled test date
rather than 60 days.
Sec. 63.7(c)..................... Quality Assurance Yes.................. Except that when this
Program/Site-Specific subpart specifies to use
Test Plan. 40 CFR part 60, appendix
F, out of control periods
are to be defined as
specified in part 60,
appendix F.
Sec. 63.7(d)..................... Performance Test Yes..................
Facilities.
Sec. 63.7(e)(1).................. Performance Testing..... No................... See Sec. 63.1571(b)(1).
Sec. 63.7(e)(2)-(4).............. Conduct of Tests........ Yes..................
Sec. 63.7(f)..................... Alternative Test Method. Yes..................
Sec. 63.7(g)..................... Data Analysis, Yes.................. Except this subpart
Recordkeeping, specifies how and when
Reporting. the performance test or
performance evaluation
results are reported and
Sec. 63.7(g)(2) is
reserved and does not
apply.
Sec. 63.7(h)..................... Waiver of Tests......... Yes..................
Sec. 63.8(a)(1).................. Monitoring Requirements- Yes..................
Applicability.
Sec. 63.8(a)(2).................. Performance Yes..................
Specifications.
Sec. 63.8(a)(3).................. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.8(a)(4).................. Monitoring with Flares.. Yes.................. Except that for a flare
complying with Sec.
63.670, the cross-
reference to Sec. 63.11
in this paragraph does
not include Sec.
63.11(b).
Sec. 63.8(b)(1).................. Conduct of Monitoring... Yes..................
Sec. 63.8(b)(2)-(3).............. Multiple Effluents and Yes.................. This subpart specifies the
Multiple Monitoring required monitoring
Systems. locations.
Sec. 63.8(c)(1).................. Monitoring System Yes..................
Operation and
Maintenance.
Sec. 63.8(c)(1)(i)............... General Duty to Minimize No................... See Sec. 63.1570(c).
Emissions and CMS
Operation.
Sec. 63.8(c)(1)(ii).............. Keep Necessary Parts for Yes..................
CMS.
Sec. 63.8(c)(1)(iii)............. Requirement to Develop No...................
SSM Plan for CMS.
Sec. 63.8(c)(2)-(3).............. Monitoring System Yes.................. Except that this subpart
Installation. specifies that for
continuous parameter
monitoring systems,
operational status
verification includes
completion of
manufacturer written
specifications or
installation, operation,
and calibration of the
system or other written
procedures that provide
adequate assurance that
the equipment will
monitor accurately.
Sec. 63.8(c)(4).................. Continuous Monitoring Yes..................
System Requirements.
Sec. 63.8(c)(5).................. COMS Minimum Procedures. Yes..................
Sec. 63.8(c)(6).................. CMS Requirements........ Yes..................
Sec. 63.8(c)(7)-(8).............. CMS Requirements........ Yes..................
[[Page 214]]
Sec. 63.8(d)(1)-(2).............. Quality Control Program Yes..................
for CMS.
Sec. 63.8(d)(3).................. Written Procedures for No...................
CMS.
Sec. 63.8(e)..................... CMS Performance Yes.................. Except this subpart
Evaluation. specifies how and when
the performance
evaluation results are
reported.
Sec. 63.8(f)(1)-(5).............. Alternative Monitoring Yes.................. Except that this subpart
Methods. specifies procedures for
requesting alternative
monitoring systems and
alternative parameters.
Sec. 63.8(f)(6).................. Alternative to Relative Yes.................. Applicable to continuous
Accuracy Test. emission monitoring
systems if performance
specification requires a
relative accuracy test
audit.
Sec. 63.8(g)(1)-(4).............. Reduction of Monitoring Yes.................. Applies to continuous
Data. opacity monitoring system
or continuous emission
monitoring system.
Sec. 63.8(g)(5).................. Data Reduction.......... No................... This subpart specifies
requirements.
Sec. 63.9(a)..................... Notification Yes.................. Duplicate Notification of
Requirements--Applicabi Compliance Status report
lity. to the Regional
Administrator may be
required.
Sec. 63.9(b)(1)-(2).............. Initial Notifications... Yes.................. Except that notification
of construction or
reconstruction is to be
submitted as soon as
practicable before
startup but no later than
30 days after the
effective date if
construction or
reconstruction had
commenced but startup had
not occurred before the
effective date.
Sec. 63.9(b)(3).................. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.9(b)(4)-(5).............. Initial Notification Yes.................. Except Sec.
Information. 63.9(b)(4)(ii)-(iv),
which are reserved and do
not apply.
Sec. 63.9(c)..................... Request for Extension of Yes..................
Compliance.
Sec. 63.9(d)..................... New Source Notification Yes..................
for Special Compliance
Requirements.
Sec. 63.9(e)..................... Notification of Yes.................. Except that notification
Performance Test. is required at least 30
days before test.
Sec. 63.9(f)..................... Notification of VE/ Yes..................
Opacity Test.
Sec. 63.9(g)..................... Additional Notification Yes..................
Requirements for
Sources with Continuous
Monitoring Systems.
Sec. 63.9(h)..................... Notification of Yes.................. Except that this subpart
Compliance Status. specifies the
notification is due no
later than 150 days after
compliance date, and
except that the reference
to Sec.
63.5(d)(1)(ii)(H) in Sec.
63.9(h)(5) does not
apply.
Sec. 63.9(i)..................... Adjustment of Deadlines. Yes..................
Sec. 63.9(j)..................... Change in Previous Yes..................
Information.
63.10(a)........................... Recordkeeping and Yes..................
Reporting Applicability.
Sec. 63.10(b)(1)................. General Recordkeeping Yes..................
Requirements.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(i).............. Recordkeeping of No...................
Occurrence and Duration
of Startups and
Shutdowns.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(ii)............. Recordkeeping of No................... See Sec. 63.1576(a)(2)
Malfunctions. for recordkeeping of (1)
date, time and duration;
(2) listing of affected
source or equipment, and
an estimate of the volume
of each regulated
pollutant emitted over
the standard; and (3)
actions taken to minimize
emissions and correct the
failure.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(iii)............ Maintenance Records..... Yes..................
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(iv)-(v)......... Actions Taken to No...................
Minimize Emissions
During SSM.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(vi)............. Recordkeeping for CMS Yes..................
Malfunctions.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(vii)-(xiv)...... Other CMS Requirements.. Yes..................
Sec. 63.10(b)(3)................. Recordkeeping for Yes..................
Applicability
Determinations..
[[Page 215]]
Sec. 63.10(c)(1)-(6)............. Additional Records for Yes.................. Except Sec. 63.10(c)(2)-
Continuous Monitoring (4), which are Reserved
Systems. and do not apply.
Sec. 63.10(c)(7)-(8)............. Additional Recordkeeping Yes..................
Requirements for CMS--
Identifying Exceedances
and Excess Emissions.
Sec. 63.10(c)(9)................. [Reserved].............. Not applicable.......
Sec. 63.10(c)(10)................ Recording Nature and No................... See Sec. 63.1576(a)(2)
Cause of Malfunctions. for malfunctions
recordkeeping
requirements.
Sec. 63.10(c)(11)................ Recording Corrective No................... See Sec. 63.1576(a)(2)
Actions. for malfunctions
recordkeeping
requirements.
Sec. 63.10(c)(12)-(14)........... Additional CMS Yes..................
Recordkeeping
Requirements.
Sec. 63.10(c)(15)................ Use of SSM Plan......... No...................
Sec. 63.10(d)(1)................. General Reporting Yes..................
Requirements.
Sec. 63.10(d)(2)................. Performance Test Results No................... This subpart specifies how
and when the performance
test results are
reported.
Sec. 63.10(d)(3)................. Opacity or VE Yes..................
Observations.
Sec. 63.10(d)(4)................. Progress Reports........ Yes..................
Sec. 63.10(d)(5)................. SSM Reports............. No................... See Sec. 63.1575(d) for
CPMS malfunction
reporting and Sec.
63.1575(e) for COMS and
CEMS malfunction
reporting.
Sec. 63.10(e)(1)-(2)............. Additional CMS Reports.. Yes.................. Except this subpart
specifies how and when
the performance
evaluation results are
reported.
Sec. 63.10(e)(3)................. Excess Emissions/CMS No................... This subpart specifies the
Performance Reports. applicable requirements.
Sec. 63.10(e)(4)................. COMS Data Reports....... Yes.................. Except this subpart
specifies how and when
the performance test
results are reported.
Sec. 63.10(f).................... Recordkeeping/Reporting Yes..................
Waiver.
Sec. 63.11(a).................... Control Device and Work Yes..................
Practice Requirements
Applicability.
Sec. 63.11(b).................... Flares.................. Yes.................. Except that flares
complying with Sec.
63.670 are not subject to
the requirements of Sec.
63.11(b).
Sec. 63.11(c)-(e)................ Alternative Work Yes..................
Practice for Monitoring
Equipment for Leaks.
Sec. 63.12....................... State Authority and Yes..................
Delegations.
Sec. 63.13....................... Addresses............... Yes..................
Sec. 63.14....................... Incorporation by Yes..................
Reference.
Sec. 63.15....................... Availability of Yes..................
Information and
Confidentiality.
Sec. 63.16....................... Performance Track Yes.................. ..........................
Provisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 75320, Dec. 1, 2015, as amended at 83 FR 60727, Nov. 26, 2018]
Sec. Appendix A to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Determination of Metal
Concentration on Catalyst Particles (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)
1.0 Scope and Application.
1.1 Analytes. The analytes for which this method is applicable
include any elements with an atomic number between 11 (sodium) and 92
(uranium), inclusive. Specific analytes for which this method was
developed include:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum detectable
Analyte CAS No. limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nickel compounds.................. 7440-02-0 <2 % of span.
Total chlorides................... 16887-00-6 <2 % of span.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.2 Applicability. This method is applicable to the determination of
analyte concentrations on catalyst particles. This method is applicable
for catalyst particles obtained from the fluid catalytic cracking unit
[[Page 216]]
(FCCU) regenerator (i.e., equilibrium catalyst), from air pollution
control systems operated for the FCCU catalyst regenerator vent (FCCU
fines), from catalytic reforming units (CRU), and other processes as
specified within an applicable regulation. This method is applicable
only when specified within the regulation.
1.3 Data Quality Objectives. Adherence to the requirements of this
method will enhance the quality of the data obtained from the analytical
method.
2.0 Summary of Method.
2.1 A representative sample of catalyst particles is collected,
prepared, and analyzed for analyte concentration using either energy or
wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescent (XRF) spectrometry instrumental
analyzers. In both types of XRF spectrometers, the instrument irradiates
the sample with high energy (primary) x-rays and the elements in the
sample absorb the x-rays and then re-emit secondary (fluorescent) x-rays
of characteristic wavelengths for each element present. In energy
dispersive XRF spectrometers, all secondary x-rays (of all wavelengths)
enter the detector at once. The detector registers an electric current
having a height proportional to the photon energy, and these pulses are
then separated electronically, using a pulse analyzer. In wavelength
dispersive XRF spectrometers, the secondary x-rays are dispersed
spatially by crystal diffraction on the basis of wavelength. The crystal
and detector are made to synchronously rotate and the detector then
receives only one wavelength at a time. The intensity of the x-rays
emitted by each element is proportional to its concentration, after
correcting for matrix effects. For nickel compounds and total chlorides,
the XRF instrument response is expected to be linear to analyte
concentration. Performance specifications and test procedures are
provided to ensure reliable data.
3.0 Definitions.
3.1 Measurement System. The total equipment required for the
determination of analyte concentration. The measurement system consists
of the following major subsystems:
3.1.1 Sample Preparation. That portion of a system used for one or
more of the following: sample acquisition, sample transport, sample
conditioning, or sample preparation prior to introducing the sample into
the analyzer.
3.1.2 Analyzer. That portion of the system that senses the analyte
to be measured and generates an output proportional to its
concentration.
3.1.3 Data Recorder. A digital recorder or personal computer used
for recording measurement data from the analyzer output.
3.2 Span. The upper limit of the gas concentration measurement range
displayed on the data recorder.
3.3 Calibration Standards. Prepared catalyst samples or other
samples of known analyte concentrations used to calibrate the analyzer
and to assess calibration drift.
3.4 Energy Calibration Standard. Calibration standard, generally
provided by the XRF instrument manufacturer, used for assuring accuracy
of the energy scale.
3.5 Accuracy Assessment Standard. Prepared catalyst sample or other
sample of known analyte concentrations used to assess analyzer accuracy
error.
3.6 Zero Drift. The difference in the measurement system output
reading from the initial value for zero concentration level calibration
standard after a stated period of operation during which no unscheduled
maintenance, repair, or adjustment took place.
3.7 Calibration Drift. The difference in the measurement system
output reading from the initial value for the mid-range calibration
standard after a stated period of operation during which no unscheduled
maintenance, repair, or adjustment took place.
3.8 Spectral Interferences. Analytical interferences and excessive
biases caused by elemental peak overlap, escape peak, and sum peak
interferences between elements in the samples.
3.9 Calibration Curve. A graph or other systematic method of
establishing the relationship between the analyzer response and the
actual analyte concentration introduced to the analyzer.
3.10 Analyzer Accuracy Error. The difference in the measurement
system output reading and the ideal value for the accuracy assessment
standard.
4.0 Interferences.
4.1 Spectral interferences with analyte line intensity determination
are accounted for within the method program. No action is required by
the XRF operator once these interferences have been addressed within the
method.
4.2 The X-ray production efficiency is affected by particle size for
the very lightest elements. However, particulate matter (PM) 2.5
particle size effects are substantially <1 percent for most elements.
The calibration standards should be prepared with material of similar
particle size or be processed (ground) to produce material of similar
particle size as the catalyst samples to be analyzed. No additional
correction for particle size is performed. Alternatively, the sample can
be fused in order to eliminate any potential particle size effects.
[[Page 217]]
5.0 Safety.
5.1 Disclaimer. This method may involve hazardous materials,
operations, and equipment. This test method may not address all of the
safety problems associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the
user of this test method to establish appropriate safety and health
practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations
prior to performing this test method.
5.2 X-ray Exposure. The XRF uses X-rays; XRF operators should follow
instrument manufacturer's guidelines to protect from accidental exposure
to X-rays when the instrument is in operation.
5.3 Beryllium Window. In most XRF units, a beryllium (Be) window is
present to separate the sample chamber from the X-ray tube and detector.
The window is very fragile and brittle. Do not allow sample or debris to
fall onto the window, and avoid using compressed air to clean the window
because it will cause the window to rupture. If the window should
rupture, note that Be metal is poisonous. Use extreme caution when
collecting pieces of Be and consult the instrument manufacturer for
advice on cleanup of the broken window and replacement.
6.0 Equipment and Supplies.
6.1 Measurement System. Use any measurement system that meets the
specifications of this method listed in section 13. The typical
components of the measurement system are described below.
6.1.1 Sample Mixer/Mill. Stainless steel, or equivalent to grind/mix
catalyst and binders, if used, to produce uniform particle samples.
6.1.2 Sample Press/Fluxer. Stainless steel, or equivalent to produce
pellets of sufficient size to fill analyzer sample window, or
alternatively, a fusion device capable of preparing a fused disk of
sufficient size to fill analyzer sample window.
6.1.3 Analytical Balance. 0.0001 gram accuracy
for weighing prepared samples (pellets).
6.1.4 Analyzer. An XRF spectrometer to determine the analyte
concentration in the prepared sample. The analyzer must meet the
applicable performance specifications in section 13.
6.1.5 Data Recorder. A digital recorder or personal computer for
recording measurement data. The data recorder resolution (i.e.,
readability) must be 0.5 percent of span. Alternatively, a digital or
analog meter having a resolution of 0.5 percent of span may be used to
obtain the analyzer responses and the readings may be recorded manually.
7.0 Reagents and Standards.
7.1 Calibration Standards. The calibration standards for the
analyzer must be prepared catalyst samples or other material of similar
particle size and matrix as the catalyst samples to be tested that have
known concentrations of the analytes of interest. Preparation (grinding/
milling/fusion) of the calibration standards should follow the same
processes used to prepare the catalyst samples to be tested. The
calibration standards values must be established as the average of a
minimum of three analyses using an approved EPA or ASTM method with
instrument analyzer calibrations traceable to the U.S. National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), if available. The maximum
percent deviation of the triplicate calibration standard analyses should
agree within 10 percent of the average value for the triplicate analysis
(see Figure 1). If the calibration analyses do not meet this criteria,
the calibration standards must be re-analyzed. If unacceptable
variability persists, new calibration standards must be prepared.
Approved methods for the calibration standard analyses include, but are
not limited to, EPA Methods 6010B, 6020, 7520, or 7521 of SW-846.\1\ Use
a minimum of four calibration standards as specified below (see Figure
1):
7.1.1 High-Range Calibration Standard. Concentration equivalent to
80 to 100 percent of the span. The concentration of the high-range
calibration standard should exceed the maximum concentration anticipated
in the catalyst samples.
7.1.2 Mid-Range Calibration Standard. Concentration equivalent to 40
to 60 percent of the span.
7.1.3 Low-Range Calibration Standard. Concentration equivalent to 1
to 20 percent of the span. The concentration of the low-range
calibration standard should be selected so that it is less than either
one-fourth of the applicable concentration limit or of the lowest
concentration anticipated in the catalyst samples.
7.1.4 Zero Calibration Standard. Concentration of less than 0.25
percent of the span.
7.2 Accuracy Assessment Standard. Prepare an accuracy assessment
standard and determine the ideal value for the accuracy assessment
standard following the same procedures used to prepare and analyze the
calibration standards as described in section 7.1. The maximum percent
deviation of the triplicate accuracy assessment standard analyses should
agree within 10 percent of the average value for the triplicate analysis
(see Figure 1). The concentration equivalent of the accuracy assessment
standard must be between 20 and 80 percent of the span.
7.3 Energy Calibration Standard. Generally, the energy calibration
standard will be provided by the XRF instrument manufacturer for energy
dispersive spectrometers. Energy calibration is performed using the
manufacturer's recommended calibration standard and involves measurement
of a specific energy line (based on the metal in the
[[Page 218]]
energy calibration standard). This is generally an automated procedure
used to assure the accuracy of the energy scale. This calibration
standard may not be applicable to all models of XRF spectrometers
(particularly wavelength dispersive XRF spectrometers).
8.0 Sample Collection, Preservation, Transport, and Storage. [Reserved]
9.0 Quality Control.
9.1 Energy Calibration. For energy dispersive spectrometers, conduct
the energy calibration by analyzing the energy calibration standard
provided by the manufacturer. The energy calibration involves
measurement of a specific energy line (based on the metal in the energy
calibration standard) and then determination of the difference between
the measured peak energy value and the ideal value. This analysis, if
applicable, should be performed daily prior to any sample analyses to
check the instrument's energy scale. This is generally an automated
procedure and assures the accuracy of the energy scale. If the energy
scale calibration process is not automated, follow the manufacturer's
procedures to manually adjust the instrument, as necessary.
9.2 Zero Drift Test. Conduct the zero drift test by analyzing the
analyte concentration output by the measurement system with the initial
calibration value for the zero calibration standard (see Figure 2). This
analysis should be performed with each set of samples analyzed.
9.3 Calibration Drift Test. Conduct the calibration drift test by
analyzing the analyte concentration output by the measurement system
with the initial calibration value for the mid-range calibration
standard (see Figure 2). This analysis should be performed with each set
of samples analyzed.
9.4 Analyzer Accuracy Test. Conduct the analyzer accuracy test by
analyzing the accuracy assessment standard and comparing the value
output by the measurement system with the ideal value for the accuracy
assessment standard (see Figure 2). This analysis should be performed
with each set of samples analyzed.
10.0 Calibration and Standardization.
10.1 Perform the initial calibration and set-up following the
instrument manufacturer's instructions. These procedures should include,
at a minimum, the major steps listed in sections 10.2 and 10.3.
Subsequent calibrations are to be performed when either a quality
assurance/quality control (QA/QC) limit listed in section 13 is exceeded
or when there is a change in the excitation conditions, such as a change
in the tube, detector, X-ray filters, or signal processor. Calibrations
are typically valid for 6 months to 1 year.
10.2 Instrument Calibration. Calibration is performed initially with
calibration standards of similar matrix and binders, if used, as the
samples to be analyzed (see Figure 1).
10.3 Reference Peak Spectra. Acquisition of reference spectra is
required only during the initial calibration. As long as no processing
methods have changed, these peak shape references remain valid. This
procedure consists of placing the standards in the instrument and
acquiring individual elemental spectra that are stored in the method
file with each of the analytical conditions. These reference spectra are
used in the standard deconvolution of the unknown spectra.
11.0 Analytical Procedure.
11.1 Sample Preparation. Prepare catalyst samples using the same
procedure used to prepare the calibration standards. Measure and record
the weight of sample used. Measure and record the amount of binder, if
any, used. Pellets or films must be of sufficient size to cover the
analyzer sample window.
11.2 Sample Analyses. Place the prepared catalyst samples into the
analyzer. Follow the manufacturer's instructions for analyzing the
samples.
11.3 Record and Store Data. Use a digital recorder or personal
computer to record and store results for each sample. Record any
mechanical or software problems encountered during the analysis.
12.0 Data Analysis and Calculations.
Carry out the following calculations, retaining at least one extra
significant figure beyond that of the acquired data. Round off figures
after final calculation.
12.1 Drift. Calculate the zero and calibration drift for the tests
described in sections 9.2 and 9.3 (see also Figure 2) as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09FE05.010
Where:
CurrentAnalyzerCal.Response = Instrument response for current QC sample
analyses;
InitialCal.Response = Initial instrument response for calibration
standard;
[[Page 219]]
QC Value = QC metric (zero drift or calibration drift), percent of span;
Span = Span of the monitoring system.
12.2 Analyzer Accuracy. Calculate the analyzer accuracy error for
the tests described in section 9.4 (see also Figure 2) as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09FE05.011
Where:
Accuracy Value = Percent difference of instrument response to the ideal
response for the accuracy assessment standard;
CurrentAnalyzerCal.Response = Instrument response for current QC sample
analyses;
IdealCal.Response = Ideal instrument response for the accuracy
assessment standard.
13.0 Method Performance.
13.1 Analytical Range. The analytical range is determined by the
instrument design. For this method, a portion of the analytical range is
selected by choosing the span of the monitoring system. The span of the
monitoring system must be selected such that it encompasses the range of
concentrations anticipated to occur in the catalyst sample. If
applicable, the span must be selected such that the analyte
concentration equivalent to the emission standard is not less than 30
percent of the span. If the measured analyte concentration exceeds the
concentration of the high-range calibration standard, the sample
analysis is considered invalid. Additionally, if the measured analyte
concentration is less than the concentration of the low-range
calibration standard but above the detectable limit, the sample analysis
results must be flagged with a footnote stating, in effect, that the
analyte was detected but that the reported concentration is below the
lower quantitation limit.
13.2 Minimum Detectable Limit. The minimum detectable limit depends
on the signal-to-noise ratio of the measurement system. For a well-
designed system, the minimum detectable limit should be less than 2
percent of the span.
13.3 Zero Drift. Less than 2 percent of the
span.
13.4 Calibration Drift. Less than 5 percent of
the span.
13.5 Analyzer Accuracy Error. Less than 10
percent.
14.0 Pollution Prevention. [Reserved]
15.0 Waste Management. [Reserved]
16.0 Alternative Procedures. [Reserved]
17.0 References.
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods. EPA Publication No.
SW-846, Revision 5 (April 1998). Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DC.
18.0 Tables, Diagrams, Flowcharts, and Validation Data.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analytic Method Used:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zero \a\ Low-Range \b\ Mid-Range \c\ High-Range \d\ Accuracy Std \e\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample Run:........................
1..............................
2..............................
3..............................
Average............................
Maximum Percent Deviation .........
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Average must be less than 0.25 percent of span.
\b\ Average must be 1 to 20 percent of span.
\c\ Average must be 40 to 60 percent of span.
\d\ Average must be 80 to 100 percent of span.
\e\ Average must be 20 to 80 percent of span.
Figure 1. Data Recording Sheet for Analysis of Calibration Samples.
Source Identification:
Run Number:
Test Personnel:
Span:
Date:
[[Page 220]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current
Initial analyzer Drift (percent
calibration calibration of span)
response response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zero Standard...................................................
Mid-range Standard..............................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current
Ideal analyzer Accuracy error
calibration calibration (percent of
response response ideal)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accuracy Standard...............................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 2. Data Recording Sheet for System Calibration Drift Data.
[70 FR 6970, Feb. 9, 2005, as amended at 80 FR 75325, Dec. 1, 2015]
Subpart VVV_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Publicly Owned Treatment Works
Source: 82 FR 49525, Oct. 26, 2017, unless otherwise noted.
Applicability
Sec. 63.1580 Am I subject to this subpart?
(a) You are subject to this subpart if the following are all true:
(1) You own or operate a publicly owned treatment works (POTW) that
includes an affected source (Sec. 63.1595);
(2) The affected source is located at a Group 2 POTW which is a
major source of HAP emissions, or at any Group 1 POTW regardless of
whether or not it is a major source of HAP; and
(3) Your POTW is required to develop and implement a pretreatment
program as defined by 40 CFR 403.8, or your POTW meets the general
criteria for development and implementation of a pretreatment program.
(b) If your existing POTW treatment plant is not located at a major
source as of October 26, 1999, but thereafter becomes a major source for
any reason other than reconstruction, then, for the purpose of this
subpart, your POTW treatment plant would be considered an existing
source.
Note to paragraph (b): See Sec. 63.2 of the National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) General Provisions in
subpart A of this part for the definitions of major source and area
source.
(c) If you commence construction or reconstruction of your POTW
treatment plant after December 1, 1998, then the requirements for a new
POTW apply.
Sec. 63.1581 Does the subpart distinguish between different types
of POTW treatment plants?
Yes, POTW treatment plants are divided into two subcategories: Group
1 POTW treatment plants and Group 2 POTW treatment plants, as described
in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section.
(a) Your POTW is a Group 1 POTW treatment plant if an industrial
user complies with its NESHAP by using the treatment and controls
located at your POTW treatment plant. Your POTW treatment plant accepts
the regulated waste stream and provides treatment and controls as an
agent for the industrial user. Group 1 POTW treatment plant is defined
in Sec. 63.1595.
(b) Your POTW is a Group 2 POTW treatment plant if your POTW treats
wastewater that is not subject to control by another NESHAP or the
industrial user does not comply with its NESHAP by using the treatment
and controls located at your POTW treatment plant. ``Group 2 POTW
treatment plant'' is defined in Sec. 63.1595.
(c) If, in the future, an industrial user complies with its NESHAP
by using the treatment and controls located at your POTW treatment
plant, then your Group 2 POTW treatment plant becomes a Group 1 POTW
treatment plant on the date your POTW begins treating that regulated
industrial wastewater stream.
[[Page 221]]
Requirements for Group 1 POTW Treatment Plants
Sec. 63.1582 [Reserved]
Sec. 63.1583 What are the emission points and control requirements
for a Group 1 POTW treatment plant?
(a) The emission points and control requirements for an existing
Group 1 POTW treatment plant are specified in the appropriate NESHAP for
the industrial user(s).
(b) The emission points and control requirements for a new Group 1
POTW treatment plant are both those specified by the appropriate NESHAP
which apply to the industrial user(s) who discharge their waste for
treatment to the POTW, and those emission points and control
requirements set forth in Sec. 63.1586(b) or (c), as applicable.
(c) If your existing or new Group 1 POTW treatment plant accepts one
or more specific regulated industrial waste streams as part of
compliance with one or more other NESHAP, then you are subject to all
the requirements of each appropriate NESHAP for each waste stream.
(d) At all times, the POTW must operate and maintain any affected
source, including associated air pollution control equipment and
monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with safety and good air
pollution control practices for minimizing emissions. The general duty
to minimize emissions does not require the POTW to make any further
efforts to reduce emissions if levels required by the applicable
standard have been achieved. Determination of whether a source is
operating in compliance with operation and maintenance requirements will
be based on information available to the Administrator, which may
include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, review of operation
and maintenance procedures, review of operation and maintenance records,
and inspection of the source.
Sec. 63.1584 [Reserved]
Sec. 63.1585 How does a Group 1 POTW treatment plant demonstrate compliance?
(a) An existing Group 1 POTW treatment plant demonstrates compliance
by operating treatment and control devices which meet all requirements
specified in the appropriate NESHAP. Requirements may include
performance tests, routine monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting.
(b) A new Group 1 POTW treatment plant demonstrates compliance by
operating treatment and control devices which meet all requirements
specified in the appropriate NESHAP and by meeting the requirements
specified in Sec. 63.1586, as applicable, as well as the applicable
requirements in Sec. Sec. 63.1588 through 63.1595.
Requirements for Group 1 and Group 2 POTW Treatment Plants
Sec. 63.1586 What are the emission points and control requirements
for a Group 1 or Group 2 POTW?
(a) An existing Group 1 or Group 2 POTW treatment plant must comply
with the initial notification requirements in Sec. 63.1591(a).
(b) Cover and control standard. Except as provided in paragraph (c)
of this section, new Group 1 and Group 2 POTW treatment plants must
install covers on the emission points up to, but not including, the
secondary influent pumping station or the secondary treatment units.
These emission points are treatment units that include, but are not
limited to, influent waste stream conveyance channels, bar screens, grit
chambers, grinders, pump stations, aerated feeder channels, primary
clarifiers, primary effluent channels, and primary screening stations.
In addition, all covered units, except primary clarifiers, must have the
air in the headspace underneath the cover ducted to a control device in
accordance with the standards for closed-vent systems and control
devices in Sec. 63.693 of subpart DD--National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants from Off-site Waste and Recovery Operations of
this part, except you may substitute visual inspections for leak
detection rather than Method 21 of appendix A-7 of part 60 of this
chapter. Covers must meet the following requirements:
(1) Covers must be tightly fitted and designed and operated to
prevent exposure of the wastewater to the atmosphere. This includes, but
is not limited
[[Page 222]]
to, the absence of visible cracks, holes, or gaps in the roof sections
or between the roof and the supporting wall; broken, cracked, or
otherwise damaged seals or gaskets on closure devices; and broken or
missing hatches, access covers, caps, or other closure devices.
(2) If wastewater is in a treatment unit, each opening in the cover
must be maintained in a closed, sealed position, unless plant personnel
are present and conducting wastewater or sludge sampling, or equipment
inspection, maintenance, or repair.
(c) HAP fraction emitted standard. As an alternative to the
requirements in paragraph (b) of this section, a new Group 1 and Group 2
POTW treatment plant may comply by demonstrating, for all emission
points up to, but not including, the secondary influent pumping station
or the secondary treatment units, that the annual rolling average HAP
fraction emitted (calculated as specified in Sec. 63.1588(c)(3)) does
not exceed 0.014. You must demonstrate that for your POTW treatment
plant, the sum of all HAP emissions from these units divided by the sum
of all HAP mass loadings to the POTW treatment plant results in an
annual rolling average of the HAP fraction emitted of no greater than
0.014. You may use any combination of pretreatment, wastewater treatment
plant modifications, and control devices to achieve this performance
standard.
(d) At all times, the POTW must operate and maintain any affected
source, including associated air pollution control equipment and
monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with safety and good air
pollution control practices for minimizing emissions. The general duty
to minimize emissions does not require the POTW to make any further
efforts to reduce emissions if the requirements of the applicable
standard have been met. Determination of whether a source is operating
in compliance with operation and maintenance requirements will be based
on information available to the Administrator, which may include, but is
not limited to, monitoring results, review of operation and maintenance
procedures, review of operation and maintenance records, and inspection
of the source.
Sec. 63.1587 When do I have to comply?
Sources subject to this subpart are required to achieve compliance
on or before the dates specified in table 2 of this subpart.
Sec. 63.1588 How do Group 1 and Group 2 POTW treatment plants
demonstrate compliance?
(a) If you are complying with Sec. 63.1586(b) by using covers, you
must conduct the following inspections:
(1) You must visually check the cover and its closure devices for
defects that could result in air emissions. Defects include, but are not
limited to, visible cracks, holes, or gaps in the roof sections or
between the roof and the supporting wall; broken, cracked, or otherwise
damaged seals or gaskets on closure devices; and broken or missing
hatches, access covers, caps, or other closure devices.
(2) You must perform an initial visual inspection within 60 calendar
days of becoming subject to this NESHAP and perform follow-up
inspections at least once per year, thereafter.
(3) In the event that you find a defect on a cover on a treatment
unit in use, you must repair the defect within 45 calendar days. If you
cannot repair within 45 calendar days, you must notify the EPA or the
delegated authority immediately and report the reason for the delay and
the date you expect to complete the repair. If you find a defect on a
cover on a treatment unit that is not in service, you must repair the
defect prior to putting the treatment unit back in wastewater service.
(b) If you own or operate a control device used to meet the
requirements for Sec. 63.1586(b), you must comply with the inspection
and monitoring requirements of Sec. 63.695(c) of subpart DD of this
part.
(c) To comply with the HAP fraction emitted standard specified in
Sec. 63.1586(c), you must develop, to the satisfaction of the
Administrator, an Inspection and Monitoring Plan. This Inspection and
Monitoring Plan must include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) A method to determine the influent HAP mass loading, i.e., the
annual
[[Page 223]]
mass quantity for each HAP entering the wastewater treatment plant.
(2) A method to determine your POTW treatment plant's annual HAP
emissions for all units up to, but not including, the secondary influent
pumping station or the secondary treatment units. The method you use to
determine your HAP emissions, such as modeling or direct source
measurement, must:
(i) Be approved by the Administrator for use at your POTW;
(ii) Account for all factors affecting emissions from your POTW
treatment plant including, but not limited to, emissions from wastewater
treatment units; emissions resulting from inspection, maintenance, and
repair activities; fluctuations (e.g., daily, monthly, annual, seasonal)
in your influent wastewater HAP concentrations; annual industrial
loading; performance of control devices; or any other factors that could
affect your annual HAP emissions; and
(iii) Include documentation that the values and sources of all data,
operating conditions, assumptions, etc., used in your method result in
an accurate estimation of annual emissions from your POTW treatment
plant.
(3) A method to demonstrate that your POTW treatment plant meets the
HAP fraction emitted standard specified in Sec. 63.1586(c), i.e., the
sum of all HAP emissions from paragraph (c)(2) of this section divided
by the sum of all HAP mass loadings from paragraph (c)(1) of this
section results in a fraction emitted of 0.014 or less to demonstrate
compliance with Sec. 63.1586(c). The Inspection and Monitoring Plan
must require, at a minimum, that you perform the calculations shown in
paragraphs (c)(3)(i) through (viii) of this section within 90 days of
the end of each month. This calculation shall demonstrate that your
annual rolling average of the HAP fraction emitted is 0.014 or less when
demonstrating compliance with Sec. 63.1586(c).
(i) Determine the average daily flow in million gallons per day
(MGD) of the wastewater entering your POTW treatment plant for the
month;
(ii) Determine the flow-weighted monthly concentration of each HAP
listed in Table 1 to subpart DD of this part that is reasonably
anticipated to be present in your influent;
(iii) Using the information in paragraphs (c)(3)(i) and (ii) of this
section, determine a total annual flow-weighted loading in pounds per
day (lbs/day) of each HAP entering your POTW treatment plant;
(iv) Sum up the values for each individual HAP loading in paragraph
(c)(3)(iii) of this section and determine a total annual flow-weighted
loading value (lbs/day) for all HAP entering your POTW treatment plant
for the current month;
(v) Based on the current month's information in paragraph
(c)(3)(iii) of this section along with source testing and emission
modeling, for each HAP, determine the annual emissions (lbs/day) from
all wastewater units up to, but not including, secondary treatment
units;
(vi) Sum up the values in paragraph (c)(3)(v) of this section and
calculate the total annual emissions value for the month for all HAP
from all wastewater treatment units up to, but not including, secondary
treatment units;
(vii) Calculate the HAP fraction emitted value for the month, using
Equation 1 of this section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR26OC17.018
Where:
femonthly = HAP fraction emitted for the previous month
[sum]E = Total HAP emissions value from paragraph (c)(3)(vi) of this
section
[sum]L = Total annual loading from paragraph (c)(3)(iv) of this section
(viii) Average the HAP fraction emitted value for the month
determined in paragraph (c)(3)(vii) of this section, with the values
determined for the previous 11 months, to calculate an annual rolling
average of the HAP fraction emitted.
(4) A method to demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the
Administrator, that your POTW treatment plant is in continuous
compliance with the requirements of Sec. 63.1586(c). Continuous
compliance means that your emissions, when averaged over the course of a
year, do not exceed the level of emissions that allows your POTW to
comply with Sec. 63.1586(c). For example, you may identify a
parameter(s) that you
[[Page 224]]
can monitor that assures your emissions, when averaged over the entire
year, will meet the requirements in Sec. 63.1586(c). Some example
parameters that may be considered for monitoring include your wastewater
influent HAP concentration and flow, industrial loading from your
permitted industrial users, and your control device performance
criteria. Where emission reductions are due to proper operation of
equipment, work practices, or other operational procedures, your
demonstration must specify the frequency of inspections and the number
of days to completion of repairs.
(d) Prior to receiving approval on the Inspection and Monitoring
Plan, you must follow the plan submitted to the Administrator as
specified in Sec. 63.1590(f).
Sec. 63.1589 What records must I keep?
(a) To comply with the cover and control standard specified in Sec.
63.1586(b), you must prepare and maintain the records required in
paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section:
(1) A record for each treatment unit inspection required by Sec.
63.1588(a). You must include a treatment unit identification number (or
other unique identification description as selected by you) and the date
of inspection.
(2) For each defect detected during inspections required by Sec.
63.1588(a), you must record the location of the defect, a description of
the defect, the date of detection, the corrective action taken to repair
the defect, and the date the repair to correct the defect is completed.
(3) If repair of the defect is delayed as described in Sec.
63.1588(a)(3), you must also record the reason for the delay and the
date you expect to complete the repair.
(4) If you own or operate a control device used to meet the
requirements for Sec. 63.1586(b), you must comply with the
recordkeeping requirements of Sec. 63.696(a), (b), (g), and (h).
(b) To comply with the HAP fraction emitted standard specified in
Sec. 63.1586(c), you must prepare and maintain the records required in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section:
(1) A record of the methods and data used to determine your POTW
treatment plant's annual HAP loading and HAP emissions as determined in
Sec. 63.1588(c)(1) and (2) as part of your Inspection and Monitoring
Plan;
(2) A record of the methods and data used to determine that your
POTW treatment plant meets the HAP fraction emitted standard of 0.014 or
less, as determined in Sec. 63.1588(c)(3) as part of your Inspection
and Monitoring Plan; and
(3) A record of the methods and data that demonstrates that your
POTW treatment plant is in continuous compliance with the requirements
of Sec. 63.1588(c)(4) to calculate annual emissions as specified in
your Inspection and Monitoring Plan.
(c) The POTW must record the malfunction information specified in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this section.
(1) In the event that an affected unit fails to meet an applicable
standard, record the number of failures. For each failure, record the
date, time, and duration of the failure.
(2) For each failure to meet an applicable standard, record and
retain a list of the affected sources or equipment, an estimate of the
tons per year of each regulated pollutant emitted over any emission
limit and a description of the method used to estimate the emissions.
(3) Record actions taken to minimize emissions in accordance with
Sec. 63.1583(d) or Sec. 63.1586(d) and any corrective actions taken to
return the affected unit to its normal or usual manner of operation.
(d) Any records required to be maintained by this part that are
submitted electronically via the EPA's Compliance and Emissions Data
Reporting Interface (CEDRI) may be maintained in electronic format. This
ability to maintain electronic copies does not affect the requirement
for facilities to make records, data, and reports available upon request
to a delegated air agency or the EPA as part of an on-site compliance
evaluation.
Sec. 63.1590 What reports must I submit?
(a) An existing Group 1 POTW must meet the reporting requirements
specified in the appropriate NESHAP for the industrial user(s).
[[Page 225]]
(b) A new Group 1 or Group 2 POTW must submit annual reports
containing the information specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of
this section, if applicable. You must submit annual reports following
the procedure specified in paragraph (b)(5) of this section. For new
units, the initial annual report is due 15 months after your POTW
becomes subject to the requirements in this subpart and must cover the
first 12 months of operation after your POTW becomes subject to the
requirements of this subpart. Subsequent annual reports are due by the
same date each year as the initial annual report and must contain
information for the 12-month period following the 12-month period
included in the previous annual report.
(1) The general information specified in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and
(ii) of this section must be included in all reports.
(i) The company name, POTW treatment plant name, and POTW treatment
plant address, including county where the POTW is located; and
(ii) Beginning and ending dates of the reporting period.
(2) If you use covers to comply with the requirements of Sec.
63.1586(b), you must submit the following:
(i) The dates of each visual inspection conducted;
(ii) The defects found during each visual inspection; and
(iii) For each defect found during a visual inspection, how the
defects were repaired, whether the repair has been completed, and either
the date each repair was completed or the date each repair is expected
to be completed.
(3) If you comply with the HAP fraction emitted standard in Sec.
63.1586(c), you must submit each value of the annual rolling average HAP
fraction emitted as calculated in Sec. 63.1588(c)(3)(vii) for the
period covered by the annual report. Identify each value by the final
month included in the calculation.
(4) If a source fails to meet an applicable standard, report such
events in the annual report. Report the number of failures to meet an
applicable standard. For each instance, report the start date, start
time, and duration of each failure, as well as a list of the affected
sources or equipment. If you comply with the cover and control standard
in Sec. 63.1586(b), for each failure, the report must include the
percent control achieved. If you comply with the HAP fraction emitted
standard in Sec. 63.1586(c), for each failure, the report must include
the HAP fraction emitted. You must include an estimate of the tons per
year of each regulated pollutant emitted over the emission limit and a
description of the method used to estimate the emissions in the report.
(5) You must submit the report to the Administrator at the
appropriate address listed in Sec. 63.13, unless the Administrator
agrees to or species an alternate reporting method. Beginning on October
28, 2019 or once the reporting form has been available in CEDRI for 1
year, whichever is later, you must submit subsequent annual reports to
the EPA via CEDRI. (CEDRI can be accessed through the EPA's Central Data
Exchange (CDX)(https://cdx.epa.gov/)). You must use the appropriate
electronic report template on the CEDRI Web site for this subpart or an
alternate electronic file format consistent with the extensible markup
language (XML) schema listed on the CEDRI Web site (https://www.epa.gov/
electronic-reporting-air-emissions/compliance-and-emissions-data-
reporting-interface-cedri). The date report templates become available
in CEDRI will be listed on the CEDRI Web site. The reports must be
submitted by the deadline specified in this subpart, regardless of the
method in which the reports are submitted. If you claim that some of the
information required to be submitted via CEDRI is confidential business
information (CBI), you shall submit a complete report generated using
the appropriate form in CEDRI or an alternate electronic file consistent
with the extensible markup language (XML) schema listed on the EPA's
CEDRI Web site, including information claimed to be CBI, on a compact
disc, flash drive, or other commonly used electronic storage medium to
the EPA. The electronic medium shall be clearly marked as CBI and mailed
to U.S. EPA/OAQPS/CORE CBI Office, Attention: Group Leader, Measurement
Policy Group, MD C404-02, 4930 Old Page Rd., Durham, NC 27703. The same
file with the CBI omitted shall be submitted to
[[Page 226]]
the EPA via the EPA's CDX as described earlier in this paragraph.
(c) If you own or operate a control device used to meet the cover
and control standard in Sec. 63.1586(b), you must submit the
notifications and reports required by Sec. 63.697(b), including a
notification of performance tests; a performance test report; a
malfunction report; and a summary report. These notifications and
reports must be submitted to the Administrator, except for performance
test reports. Within 60 calendar days after the date of completing each
performance test (as defined in Sec. 63.2) required by subpart DD of
this part, you must submit the results of the performance test following
the procedure specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this
section.
(1) For data collected using test methods supported by the EPA's
Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) as listed on the EPA's ERT Web site
(https://www.epa/gov/electronic-reporting-air-emissions/electronic-
reporting-tool-ert) at the time of the test, you must submit the results
of the performance test to the EPA via CEDRI. Performance test data must
be submitted in a file format generated through the use of the EPA's ERT
or an alternate electronic file format consistent with the XML schema
listed on the EPA's ERT Web site.
(2) For data collected using test methods that are not supported by
the EPA's ERT as listed on the EPA's ERT Web site at the time of the
test, you must submit the results of the performance test to the
Administrator at the appropriate address listed in Sec. 63.13 of
subpart A of this part, unless the Administrator agrees to or specifies
an alternate reporting method.
(3) If you claim that some of the performance test information being
submitted under paragraph (b)(1) of this section is CBI, you must submit
a complete file generated through the use of the EPA's ERT or an
alternate electronic file consistent with the XML schema listed on the
EPA's ERT Web site, including information claimed to be CBI, on a
compact disc, flash drive, or other commonly used electronic storage
medium to the EPA. The electronic medium must be clearly marked as CBI
and mailed to U.S. EPA/OAQPS/CORE CBI Office, Attention: Group Leader,
Measurement Policy Group, MD C404-02, 4930 Old Page Rd., Durham, NC
27703. The same ERT or alternate file with the CBI omitted must be
submitted to the EPA via the EPA's CDX as described in paragraph (c)(1)
of this section.
(d) You must comply with the delay of repair reporting required in
Sec. 63.1588(a)(3).
(e) You may apply to the Administrator for a waiver of recordkeeping
and reporting requirements by complying with the requirements of Sec.
63.10(f). Electronic reporting to the EPA cannot be waived.
(f) To comply with the HAP fraction emitted standard specified in
Sec. 63.1586(c), you must submit, for approval by the Administrator, an
Inspection and Monitoring Plan explaining your compliance approach 90
calendar days prior to beginning operation of your new POTW or by April
24, 2018, whichever is later.
(g) If you are required to electronically submit a report through
the CEDRI in the EPA's CDX, and due to a planned or actual outage of
either the EPA's CEDRI or CDX systems within the period of time
beginning 5 business days prior to the date that the submission is due,
you will be or are precluded from accessing CEDRI or CDX and submitting
a required report within the time prescribed, you may assert a claim of
EPA system outage for failure to timely comply with the reporting
requirement. You must submit notification to the Administrator in
writing as soon as possible following the date you first knew, or
through due diligence should have known, that the event may cause or
caused a delay in reporting. You must provide to the Administrator a
written description identifying the date, time and length of the outage;
a rationale for attributing the delay in reporting beyond the regulatory
deadline to the EPA system outage; describe the measures taken or to be
taken to minimize the delay in reporting; and identify a date by which
you propose to report, or if you have already met the reporting
requirement at the time of the notification, the
[[Page 227]]
date you reported. In any circumstance, the report must be submitted
electronically as soon as possible after the outage is resolved. The
decision to accept the claim of EPA system outage and allow an extension
to the reporting deadline is solely within the discretion of the
Administrator.
(h) If you are required to electronically submit a report through
CEDRI in the EPA's CDX and a force majeure event is about to occur,
occurs, or has occurred or there are lingering effects from such an
event within the period of time beginning five business days prior to
the date the submission is due, the owner or operator may assert a claim
of force majeure for failure to timely comply with the reporting
requirement. For the purposes of this section, a force majeure event is
defined as an event that will be or has been caused by circumstances
beyond the control of the affected facility, its contractors, or any
entity controlled by the affected facility that prevents you from
complying with the requirement to submit a report electronically within
the time period prescribed. Examples of such events are acts of nature
(e.g., hurricanes, earthquakes, or floods), acts of war or terrorism, or
equipment failure or safety hazard beyond the control of the affected
facility (e.g., large scale power outage). If you intend to assert a
claim of force majeure, you must submit notification to the
Administrator in writing as soon as possible following the date you
first knew, or through due diligence should have known, that the event
may cause or caused a delay in reporting. You must provide to the
Administrator a written description of the force majeure event and a
rationale for attributing the delay in reporting beyond the regulatory
deadline to the force majeure event; describe the measures taken or to
be taken to minimize the delay in reporting; and identify a date by
which you propose to report, or if you have already met the reporting
requirement at the time of the notification, the date you reported. In
any circumstance, the reporting must occur as soon as possible after the
force majeure event occurs. The decision to accept the claim of force
majeure and allow an extension to the reporting deadline is solely
within the discretion of the Administrator.
Sec. 63.1591 What are my notification requirements?
(a) You must submit an initial notification that your POTW treatment
plant is subject to these standards as specified in paragraphs (a)(1)
and (2) of this section.
(1) If you have an existing Group 1 or Group 2 POTW treatment plant,
you must submit an initial notification by October 26, 2018.
(2) If you have a new Group 1 or Group 2 POTW treatment plant, you
must submit an initial notification upon startup.
(b) The initial notification must include the information included
in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section.
(1) Your name and address;
(2) The address (i.e., physical location) of your POTW treatment
plant;
(3) An identification of these standards as the basis of the
notification and your POTW treatment plant's compliance date; and
(4) A brief description of the nature, size, design, and method of
operation of your POTW treatment plant, including its operating design
capacity and an identification of each point of emission for each HAP,
or if a definitive identification is not yet possible, a preliminary
identification of each point of emission for each HAP.
(c) You must submit a notification of compliance status as required
in Sec. 63.9(h), as specified below:
(1) If you comply with Sec. 63.1586(b) and use covers on the
emission points and route air in the headspace underneath the cover to a
control device, you must submit a notification of compliance status as
specified in Sec. 63.9(h) that includes a description of the POTW
treatment units and installed covers, as well as the information
required for control devices including the performance test results.
(2) If you comply with Sec. 63.1586(c) by meeting the HAP fraction
emitted standard, submission of the Inspection and Monitoring Plan as
required in Sec. Sec. 63.1588(c) and 63.1590(f) meets the requirement
for submitting a notification of compliance status report in Sec.
63.9(h).
[[Page 228]]
(d) You must notify the Administrator, within 30 calendar days of
discovering that you are out of compliance with an applicable
requirement of this subpart, including the following:
(1) The requirement to route the air in the headspace underneath the
cover of all units equipped with covers, except primary clarifiers, to a
control device as specified in Sec. 63.1586(b).
(2) The HAP fraction emitted standard as specified in Sec.
63.1586(c).
(3) The requirement to operate and maintain the affected source as
specified in Sec. 63.1586(d).
(4) The requirement to inspect covers annually and repair defects as
specified in Sec. 63.1588(a).
(5) The requirement to comply with the inspection and monitoring
requirements of Sec. 63.695(c) as specified in Sec. 63.1588(b).
(6) The procedures specified in an Inspection and Monitoring Plan
prepared as specified in Sec. 63.1588(c).
(7) The requirements specified in an appropriate NESHAP for which
the Group 1 POTW treatment plan treats regulated industrial waste as
specified in Sec. 63.1583(a) or (b), as applicable.
Sec. 63.1592 Which General Provisions apply to my POTW treatment plant?
(a) Table 1 to this subpart lists the General Provisions (40 CFR
part 63, subpart A) which do and do not apply to POTW treatment plants.
(b) Unless a permit is otherwise required by law, the owner or
operator of a Group 1 POTW treatment plant which is not a major source
is exempt from the permitting requirements established by 40 CFR part
70.
Sec. 63.1593 [Reserved]
Sec. 63.1594 Who enforces this subpart?
(a) This subpart can be implemented and enforced by the U.S. EPA, or
a delegated authority such as the applicable state, local, or tribal
agency. If the U.S. EPA Administrator has delegated authority to a
state, local, or tribal agency, then that agency, in addition to the
U.S. EPA, has the authority to implement and enforce this subpart.
Contact the applicable U.S. EPA Regional Office to find out if
implementation and enforcement of this subpart is delegated to a state,
local, or tribal agency.
(b) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority of this
subpart to a state, local, or tribal agency under subpart E of this
part, the authorities contained in paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this
section are retained by the Administrator of U.S. EPA and cannot be
delegated to the state, local, or tribal agency.
(1) Approval of alternatives to the requirements in Sec. Sec.
63.1580, 63.1583, and 63.1586 through 63.1588.
(2) Approval of major alternatives to test methods under Sec.
63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), as defined in Sec. 63.90, and as required in
this subpart.
(3) Approval of major alternatives to monitoring under Sec.
63.8(f), as defined in Sec. 63.90, and as required in this subpart.
(4) Approval of major alternatives to recordkeeping and reporting
under Sec. 63.10(f), as defined in Sec. 63.90, and as required in this
subpart.
(5) Approval of an alternative to any electronic reporting to the
EPA required by this subpart.
Sec. 63.1595 List of definitions.
As used in this subpart:
Affected source means the group of all equipment that comprise the
POTW treatment plant.
Cover means a device that prevents or reduces air pollutant
emissions to the atmosphere by forming a continuous barrier over the
waste material managed in a treatment unit. A cover may have openings
(such as access hatches, sampling ports, gauge wells) that are necessary
for operation, inspection, maintenance, and repair of the treatment unit
on which the cover is used. A cover may be a separate piece of equipment
which can be detached and removed from the treatment unit, or a cover
may be formed by structural features permanently integrated into the
design of the treatment unit. The cover and its closure devices must be
made of suitable materials that will prevent exposure of the waste
material to the atmosphere and will maintain the integrity of the cover
and its closure devices throughout its intended service life.
Existing source or existing POTW means a POTW that commenced
construction on or before December 1, 1998,
[[Page 229]]
and has not been reconstructed after December 1, 1998.
Fraction emitted means the fraction of the mass of HAP entering the
POTW wastewater treatment plant which is emitted prior to secondary
treatment.
Group 1 POTW means a POTW that accepts a waste stream regulated by
another NESHAP and provides treatment and controls as an agent for the
industrial user. The industrial user complies with its NESHAP by using
the treatment and controls located at the POTW. For example, an industry
discharges its benzene-containing waste stream to the POTW for treatment
to comply with 40 CFR part 61, subpart FF--National Emission Standard
for Benzene Waste Operations. This definition does not include POTW
treating waste streams not specifically regulated under another NESHAP.
Group 2 POTW means a POTW that does not meet the definition of a
Group 1 POTW. A Group 2 POTW can treat a waste stream that is either:
(1) Not specifically regulated by another NESHAP, or
(2) From an industrial user that complies with the specific
wastewater requirements in their applicable NESHAP prior to discharging
the waste stream to the POTW.
Industrial user means a nondomestic source introducing any pollutant
or combination of pollutants into a POTW. Industrial users can be
commercial or industrial facilities whose wastes enter local sewers.
New source or new POTW means any POTW that commenced construction or
reconstruction after December 1, 1998.
Publicly owned treatment works (POTW) means a treatment works, as
that term is defined by section 112(e)(5) of the Clean Air Act, which is
owned by a municipality (as defined by section 502(4) of the Clean Water
Act), a state, an intermunicipal or interstate agency, or any
department, agency, or instrumentality of the federal government. This
definition includes any intercepting sewers, outfall sewers, sewage
collection systems, pumping, power, and other equipment. The wastewater
treated by these facilities is generated by industrial, commercial, and
domestic sources. As used in this subpart, the term POTW refers to both
any publicly owned treatment works which is owned by a state,
municipality, or intermunicipal or interstate agency and, therefore,
eligible to receive grant assistance under the Subchapter II of the
Clean Water Act, and any federally owned treatment works as that term is
described in section 3023 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act.
POTW treatment plant means that portion of the POTW which is
designed to provide treatment (including recycling and reclamation) of
municipal sewage and industrial waste.
Secondary treatment means treatment processes, typically biological,
designed to reduce the concentrations of dissolved and colloidal organic
matter in wastewater.
Waste and wastewater means a material, or spent or used water or
waste, generated from residential, industrial, commercial, mining, or
agricultural operations or from community activities that contain
dissolved or suspended matter, and that is discarded, discharged, or is
being accumulated, stored, or physically, chemically, thermally, or
biologically treated in a publicly owned treatment works.
Sec. Table 1 to Subpart VVV of Part 63--Applicability of 40 CFR Part 63
General Provisions to Subpart VVV
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General provisions reference Applicable to subpart VVV Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 63.1....................... ............................................. Applicability.
Sec. 63.1(a)(1)................. Yes.......................................... Terms defined in the Clean
Air Act.
Sec. 63.1(a)(2)................. Yes.......................................... General applicability
explanation.
Sec. 63.1(a)(3)................. Yes.......................................... Cannot diminish a stricter
NESHAP.
Sec. 63.1(a)(4)................. Yes.......................................... Not repetitive. Doesn't apply
to section 112(r).
Sec. 63.1(a)(5)................. Yes.......................................... Section reserved.
Sec. 63.1(a)(6)-(8)............. Yes.......................................... Contacts and authorities.
Sec. 63.1(a)(9)................. Yes.......................................... Section reserved.
Sec. 63.1(a)(10)................ Yes.......................................... Time period definition.
Sec. 63.1(a)(11)................ Yes.......................................... Postmark explanation.
[[Page 230]]
Sec. 63.1(a)(12)-(14)........... Yes.......................................... Time period changes.
Regulation conflict. Force
and effect of subpart A.
Sec. 63.1(b)(1)................. Yes.......................................... Initial applicability
determination of subpart A.
Sec. 63.1(b)(2)................. Yes.......................................... Section reserved.
Sec. 63.1(b)(3)................. No........................................... Subpart VVV specifies
recordkeeping of records of
applicability determination.
Sec. 63.1(c)(1)................. Yes.......................................... Requires compliance with both
subparts A and subpart VVV.
Sec. 63.1(c)(2)(i).............. No........................................... State options regarding title
V permit. Unless required by
the State, area sources
subject to subpart VVV are
exempted from permitting
requirements.
Sec. 63.1(c)(2)(ii)-(iii)....... No........................................... State options regarding title
V permit.
Sec. 63.1(c)(3)................. Yes.......................................... Section reserved.
Sec. 63.1(c)(4)................. Yes.......................................... Extension of compliance.
Sec. 63.1(c)(5)................. No........................................... Subpart VVV addresses area
sources becoming major due
to increase in emissions.
Sec. 63.1(d).................... Yes.......................................... Section reserved.
Sec. 63.1(e).................... Yes.......................................... Title V permit before a
relevant standard is
established.
Sec. 63.2....................... Yes.......................................... Definitions.
Sec. 63.3....................... Yes.......................................... Units and abbreviations.
Sec. 63.4....................... ............................................. Prohibited activities and
circumvention.
Sec. 63.4(a)(1)-(3)............. Yes.......................................... Prohibits operation in
violation of subpart A.
Sec. 63.4(a)(4)................. Yes.......................................... Section reserved.
Sec. 63.4(a)(5)................. Yes.......................................... Compliance dates.
Sec. 63.4(b).................... Yes.......................................... Circumvention.
Sec. 63.4(c).................... Yes.......................................... Severability.
Sec. 63.5....................... ............................................. Preconstruction review and
notification requirements.
Sec. 63.5(a)(1)................. Yes.......................................... Construction and
reconstruction.
Sec. 63.5(a)(2)................. Yes.......................................... New source--effective dates.
Sec. 63.5(b)(1)................. Yes.......................................... New sources subject to
relevant standards.
Sec. 63.5(b)(2)................. Yes.......................................... Section reserved.
Sec. 63.5(b)(3)................. Yes.......................................... No new major sources without
Administrator approval.
Sec. 63.5(b)(4)................. Yes.......................................... New major source
notification.
Sec. 63.5(b)(5)................. Yes.......................................... New major sources must
comply.
Sec. 63.5(b)(6)................. Yes.......................................... New equipment added
considered part of major
source.
Sec. 63.5(c).................... Yes.......................................... Section reserved.
Sec. 63.5(d)(1)................. Yes.......................................... Implementation of section
112(I)(2)--application of
approval of new source
construction.
Sec. 63.5(d)(2)................. Yes.......................................... Application for approval of
construction for new sources
listing and describing
planned air pollution
control system.
Sec. 63.5(d)(3)................. Yes.......................................... Application for
reconstruction.
Sec. 63.5(d)(4)................. Yes.......................................... Administrator may request
additional information.
Sec. 63.5(e).................... Yes.......................................... Approval of reconstruction.
Sec. 63.5(f)(1)................. Yes.......................................... Approval based on State
review.
Sec. 63.5(f)(2)................. Yes.......................................... Application deadline.
Sec. 63.6....................... ............................................. Compliance with standards and
maintenance requirements.
Sec. 63.6(a).................... Yes.......................................... Applicability of compliance
with standards and
maintenance requirements.
Sec. 63.6(b).................... Yes.......................................... Compliance dates for new and
reconstructed sources.
Sec. 63.6(c).................... Yes.......................................... Compliance dates for existing
sources apply to existing
Group 1 POTW treatment
plants.
Sec. 63.6(d).................... Yes.......................................... Section reserved.
Sec. 63.6(e).................... Yes, except as noted below................... Operation and maintenance
requirements apply to new
sources.
Sec. 63.6(e)(1)(i).............. No........................................... General duty; See Sec.
63.1583(d) and Sec.
63.1586(d) for general duty
requirements.
Sec. 63.6(e)(1)(ii)............. No........................................... Requirement to correct
malfunctions.
Sec. 63.6(e)(3)................. No........................................... SSM plans are not required
for POTW.
Sec. 63.6(f).................... Yes, except as noted below................... Compliance with non-opacity
emission standards applies
to new sources.
Sec. 63.6(f)(1)................. No........................................... The POTW standards apply at
all times.
Sec. 63.6(g).................... Yes.......................................... Use of alternative non-
opacity emission standards
applies to new sources.
Sec. 63.6(h).................... No........................................... POTW treatment plants do not
typically have visible
emissions.
Sec. 63.6(i).................... Yes.......................................... Extension of compliance with
emission standards applies
to new sources.
Sec. 63.6(j).................... Yes.......................................... Presidential exemption from
compliance with emission
standards.
Sec. 63.7....................... ............................................. Performance testing
requirements.
[[Page 231]]
Sec. 63.7(a).................... Yes.......................................... Performance testing is
required for new sources.
Sec. 63.7(b).................... Yes.......................................... New sources must notify the
Administrator of intention
to conduct performance
testing.
Sec. 63.7(c).................... Yes.......................................... New sources must comply with
quality assurance program
requirements.
Sec. 63.7(d).................... Yes.......................................... New sources must provide
performance testing
facilities at the request of
the Administrator.
Sec. 63.7(e).................... Yes, except as noted below................... Requirements for conducting
performance tests apply to
new sources.
Sec. 63.7(e)(1)................. No........................................... The performance testing
provisions of Sec. 63.694
for control devices are
incorporated by reference
into subpart DD of this
part.
Sec. 63.7(f).................... Yes.......................................... New sources may use an
alternative test method.
Sec. 63.7(g).................... Yes.......................................... Requirements for data
analysis, recordkeeping, and
reporting associated with
performance testing apply to
new sources.
Sec. 63.7(h).................... Yes.......................................... New sources may request a
waiver of performance tests.
Sec. 63.8....................... ............................................. Monitoring requirements.
Sec. 63.8(a).................... Yes.......................................... Applicability of monitoring
requirements.
Sec. 63.8(b).................... Yes.......................................... Monitoring shall be conducted
by new sources.
Sec. 63.8(c).................... Yes, except as noted below................... New sources shall operate and
maintain continuous
monitoring systems (CMS).
Sec. 63.8(c)(1)(i).............. No........................................... See Sec. 63.1583(d) for
general duty requirement
with respect to minimizing
emissions and continuous
monitoring requirements.
Sec. 63.8(c)(1)(iii)............ No........................................... See the applicable CMS
quality control requirements
under Sec. 63.8(c) and
(d).
Sec. 63.8(d).................... Yes, except as noted below................... New sources must develop and
implement a CMS quality
control program.
Sec. 63.8(d)(3)................. No........................................... The owner or operator must
keep these written
procedures on record for the
life of the affected source
or until the affected source
is no longer subject to the
provisions of this part, and
make them available for
inspection, upon request, by
the Administrator. If the
performance evaluation plan
is revised, the owner or
operator must keep previous
(i.e., superseded) versions
of the performance
evaluation plan on record to
be made available for
inspection, upon request, by
the Administrator, for a
period of 5 years after each
revision of the plan. The
program of corrective action
should be included in the
plan required under Sec.
63.8(d)(2).
Sec. 63.8(e).................... Yes.......................................... New sources may be required
to conduct a performance
evaluation of CMS.
Sec. 63.8(f).................... Yes.......................................... New sources may use an
alternative monitoring
method.
Sec. 63.8(g).................... Yes.......................................... Requirements for reduction of
monitoring data.
Sec. 63.9....................... ............................................. Notification requirements.
Sec. 63.9(a).................... Yes.......................................... Applicability of notification
requirements.
Sec. 63.9(b).................... Yes, except as noted below................... Initial notification due
February 23, 2000 or 60 days
after becoming subject to
this subpart.
Sec. 63.9(c).................... Yes.......................................... Request for extension of
compliance with subpart VVV.
Sec. 63.9(d).................... Yes.......................................... Notification that source is
subject to special
compliance requirements as
specified in Sec.
63.6(b)(3) and (4).
Sec. 63.9(e).................... Yes.......................................... Notification of performance
test.
Sec. 63.9(f).................... No........................................... POTW treatment plants do not
typically have visible
emissions.
Sec. 63.9(g).................... Yes.......................................... Additional notification
requirements for sources
with continuous emission
monitoring systems.
Sec. 63.9(h).................... Yes, except as noted......................... Notification of compliance
status when the source
becomes subject to subpart
VVV. See exceptions in Sec.
63.1591(b).
Sec. 63.9(i).................... Yes.......................................... Adjustments to time periods
or postmark deadlines or
submittal and review of
required communications.
Sec. 63.9(j).................... Yes.......................................... Change of information already
provided to the
Administrator.
Sec. 63.10...................... ............................................. Recordkeeping and reporting
requirements.
Sec. 63.10(a)................... Yes.......................................... Applicability of notification
and reporting requirements.
Sec. 63.10(b)(1)-(2)............ Yes, except as noted below................... General recordkeeping
requirements.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(i)............. No........................................... Recordkeeping for occurrence
and duration of startup and
shutdown.
[[Page 232]]
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(ii)............ No........................................... Recordkeeping for failure to
meet a standard, see Sec.
63.696.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(iii)........... Yes.......................................... Maintenance records.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(iv)............ No........................................... Actions taken to minimize
emissions during SSM.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(v)............. No........................................... Action taken to minimize
emissions during SSM.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(vi)............ Yes.......................................... Recordkeeping for CMS
malfunctions.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(vii)-(ix)...... Yes.......................................... Other CMS requirements.
Sec. 63.10(b)(3)................ No........................................... Recording requirement for
applicability determination.
Sec. 63.10(c)................... Yes, except as noted below................... Additional recordkeeping
requirements for sources
with continuous monitoring
systems.
Sec. 63.10(c)(7)................ No........................................... See Sec. 63.696(h) for
recordkeeping of (1) date,
time, and duration; (2)
listing of affected source
or equipment, and an
estimate of the tons per
year of each regulated
pollutant emitted over the
standard; and (3) actions to
minimize emissions and
correct the failure.
Sec. 63.10(c)(8)................ No........................................... See Sec. 63.696(h) for
recordkeeping of (1) date,
time, and duration; (2)
listing of affected source
or equipment, and an
estimate of the tons per
year of each regulated
pollutant emitted over the
standard; and (3) actions to
minimize emissions and
correct the failure.
Sec. 63.10(c)(15)............... No........................................... Use of SSM plan.
Sec. 63.10(d)................... Yes, except as noted below................... General reporting
requirements.
Sec. 63.10(d)(5)................ No........................................... See Sec. 63.697(b) for
malfunction reporting
requirements.
Sec. 63.10(e)................... Yes.......................................... Additional reporting
requirements for sources
with continuous monitoring
systems.
Sec. 63.10(f)................... Yes, except as noted......................... Waiver of recordkeeping and
reporting requirements.
Electronic reporting to the
EPA cannot be waived.
Sec. 63.11...................... Yes.......................................... Control device and equipment
leak work practice
requirements.
Sec. 63.11(a) and (b)........... Yes.......................................... If a new source uses flares
to comply with the
requirements of subpart VVV,
the requirements of Sec.
63.11 apply.
Sec. 63.11(c), (d) and (e)...... Yes.......................................... Alternative work practice for
equipment leaks.
Sec. 63.12...................... Yes.......................................... State authority and
designation.
Sec. 63.13...................... Yes.......................................... Addresses of State air
pollution control agencies
and EPA Regional Offices.
Sec. 63.14...................... Yes.......................................... Incorporation by reference.
Sec. 63.15...................... Yes.......................................... Availability of information
and confidentiality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Table 2 to Subpart VVV of Part 63--Compliance Dates and
Requirements
------------------------------------------------------------------------
And the owner or
If the construction/ Then the owner or operator must
reconstruction date is operator must comply achieve
with compliance
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group 1 POTW:
(1) After December 27, 2016... (i) New source Upon initial
requirements in Sec. startup.
Sec. 63.1583(b);
63.1586(b) or (c);
and 63.1588 through
63.1591.
(2) After December 1, 1998 but (i) New source Upon initial
on or before December 27, requirements in Sec. startup through
2016. 63.1583(b) but October 26,
instead of complying 2020.
with both
requirements
(industrial user(s)
NESHAP and the POTW
standards in Sec.
Sec. 63.1586(b) or
(c)), you must comply
with the most
stringent
requirement\1\.
(ii) New source On or before
requirements in Sec. October 26,
Sec. 63.1586(b) or 2020.
(c); and 63.1588
through 63.1591.
(3) On or before December 1, (i) Existing source By the
1998. requirements in Sec. compliance date
Sec. 63.1583(a). specified in
the other
applicable
NESHAP.
(ii) Existing source On or before
requirements in Sec. October 26,
Sec. 63.1588 2018.
through 63.1591.
Group 2 POTW:
(4) After December 27, 2016... (i) New source Upon initial
requirements in Sec. startup.
Sec. 63.1586(b) or
(c); and 63.1588
through 63.1591.
(5) After December 1, 1998 but (i) New source Upon initial
on or before December 27, requirements in Sec. startup through
2016. 63.1586(b) or (c)\1\. October 26,
2020.
(ii) New source On or before
requirements in Sec. October 26,
Sec. 63.1586(b) or 2020.
(c); and 63.1588
through 63.1591.
[[Page 233]]
(6) On or before December 1, (i) Existing source On or before
1998. requirements in Sec. October 26,
Sec. 63.1586(a); 2018.
and 63.1591(a).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Note: This represents the new source requirements in the original
1999 NESHAP, which are applicable until October 26, 2020. Between
October 26, 2017 and October 26, 2020, you must transition to the new
requirements in Table 2 (2)(ii) and (5)(ii) for Group 1 and Group 2
POTW, respectively.
Subpart WWW [Reserved]
Subpart XXX_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Ferroalloys Production: Ferromanganese and Silicomanganese
Source: 64 FR 27458, May 20, 1999, unless otherwise noted.
Sec. 63.1620 Am I subject to this subpart?
(a) You are subject to this subpart if you own or operate a new or
existing ferromanganese and/or silicomanganese production facility that
is a major source or is co-located at a major source of hazardous air
pollutant emissions.
(b) You are subject to this subpart if you own or operate any of the
following equipment as part of a ferromanganese and/or silicomanganese
production facility:
(1) Electric arc furnace;
(2) Casting operations;
(3) Metal oxygen refining (MOR) process;
(4) Crushing and screening operations;
(5) Outdoor fugitive dust sources.
(c) A new affected source is any of the equipment listed in
paragraph (b) of this section for which construction or reconstruction
commenced after June 30, 2015.
(d) Table 1 of this subpart specifies the provisions of subpart A of
this part that apply to owners and operators of ferromanganese and
silicomanganese production facilities subject to this subpart.
(e) If you are subject to the provisions of this subpart, you are
also subject to title V permitting requirements under 40 CFR part 70 or
71, as applicable.
(f) Emission standards in this subpart apply at all times.
[80 FR 37390, June 30, 2015]
Sec. 63.1621 What are my compliance dates?
(a) Existing affected sources must be in compliance with the
provisions specified in Sec. Sec. 63.1620 through 63.1629 no later than
June 30, 2017.
(b) Affected sources in existence prior to June 30, 2015 must be in
compliance with the provisions specified in Sec. Sec. 63.1650 through
63.1661 by November 21, 2001 and until June 30, 2017. As of June 30,
2017, the provisions of Sec. Sec. 63.1650 through 63.1661 cease to
apply to affected sources in existence prior to June 30, 2015. The
provisions of Sec. Sec. 63.1650 through 63.1661 remain enforceable at a
source for its activities prior to June 30, 2017.
(c) If you own or operate a new affected source that commences
construction or reconstruction after November 23, 2011, you must comply
with the requirements of this subpart by June 30, 2015, or upon startup
of operations, whichever is later.
[80 FR 37390, June 30, 2015]
Sec. 63.1622 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Terms in this subpart are defined in the Clean Air Act (Act), in
subpart A of this part, or in this section as follows:
Bag leak detection system means a system that is capable of
continuously monitoring particulate matter (dust) loadings in the
exhaust of a baghouse in order to detect bag leaks and other upset
conditions. A bag leak detection system includes, but is not limited to,
an instrument that operates on triboelectric, light scattering, light
transmittance, or other effect to continuously monitor relative
particulate matter loadings.
Capture system means the collection of components used to capture
the
[[Page 234]]
gases and fumes released from one or more emissions points and then
convey the captured gas stream to a control device or to the atmosphere.
A capture system may include, but is not limited to, the following
components as applicable to a given capture system design: Duct intake
devices, hoods, enclosures, ductwork, dampers, manifolds, plenums, fans
and roofline ventilation systems.
Casting means the period of time from when molten ferroalloy is
removed from the tapping station until the pouring into casting molds or
beds is completed. This includes the following operations: Pouring alloy
from one ladle to another, slag separation, slag removal and ladle
transfer by crane, truck, or other conveyance.
Crushing and screening equipment means the crushers, grinders,
mills, screens and conveying systems used to crush, size and prepare for
packing manganese-containing materials, including raw materials,
intermediate products and final products.
Electric arc furnace means any furnace where electrical energy is
converted to heat energy by transmission of current between electrodes
partially submerged in the furnace charge. The furnace may be of an
open, semi-sealed, or sealed design.
Furnace process cycle means the period in which the furnace is
tapped to the time in which the furnace is tapped again and includes
periods of charging, smelting, tapping, casting and ladle raking. For
multiple furnaces operating within a single shop building, furnace
process cycle means a period sufficient to capture a full cycle of
charging, smelting, tapping, casting and ladle raking for each furnace
within the shop building.
Ladle treatment means a post-tapping process including metal and
alloy additions where chemistry adjustments are made in the ladle after
furnace smelting to achieve a specified product.
Local ventilation means hoods, ductwork, and fans designed to
capture process fugitive emissions close to the area where the emissions
are generated (e.g., tap hoods).
Metal oxygen refining (MOR) process means the reduction of the
carbon content of ferromanganese through the use of oxygen.
Outdoor fugitive dust source means a stationary source from which
hazardous air pollutant-bearing particles are discharged to the
atmosphere due to wind or mechanical inducement such as vehicle traffic.
Fugitive dust sources include plant roadways, yard areas and outdoor
material storage and transfer operation areas.
Plant roadway means any area at a ferromanganese and silicomanganese
production facility that is subject to plant mobile equipment, such as
forklifts, front end loaders, or trucks, carrying manganese-bearing
materials. Excluded from this definition are employee and visitor
parking areas, provided they are not subject to traffic by plant mobile
equipment.
Process fugitive emissions source means a source of hazardous air
pollutant emissions that is associated with a ferromanganese or
silicomanganese production facility and is not a fugitive dust source or
a stack emissions source. Process fugitive sources include emissions
that escape capture from the electric arc furnace, tapping operations,
casting operations, ladle treatment, MOR or crushing and screening
equipment.
Roofline ventilation system means an exhaust system designed to
evacuate process fugitive emissions that collect in the roofline area to
a control device.
Shop building means the building which houses one or more electric
arc furnaces or other processes that generate process fugitive
emissions.
Shutdown means the cessation of operation of an affected source for
any purpose.
Startup means the setting in operation of an affected source for any
purpose.
Tapping emissions means the gases and emissions associated with
removal of product from the electric arc furnace under normal operating
conditions, such as removal of metal under normal pressure and movement
by gravity down the spout into the ladle and filling the ladle.
Tapping period means the time from when a tap hole is opened until
the time a tap hole is closed.
[80 FR 37390, June 30, 2015]
[[Page 235]]
Sec. 63.1623 What are the emissions standards for new, reconstructed
and existing facilities?
(a) Electric arc furnaces. You must install, operate and maintain an
effective capture system that collects the emissions from each electric
arc furnace operation and conveys the collected emissions to a control
device for the removal of the pollutants specified in the emissions
standards specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (5) of this section.
(1) Particulate matter emissions. (i) You must not discharge exhaust
gases from each electric arc furnace operation containing particulate
matter in excess of 4.0 milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (mg/
dscm) into the atmosphere from any new or reconstructed electric arc
furnace.
(ii) You must not discharge exhaust gases from each electric arc
furnace operation containing particulate matter in excess of 25 mg/dscm
into the atmosphere from any existing electric arc furnace.
(2) Mercury emissions. (i) You must not discharge exhaust gases from
each electric arc furnace operation containing mercury emissions in
excess of 13 micrograms per dry standard cubic meter ([micro]g/dscm)
into the atmosphere from any new or reconstructed electric arc furnace
when producing ferromanganese.
(ii) You must not discharge exhaust gases from each electric arc
furnace operation containing mercury emissions in excess of 130
[micro]g/dscm into the atmosphere from any existing electric arc furnace
when producing ferromanganese.
(iii) You must not discharge exhaust gases from each electric arc
furnace operation containing mercury emissions in excess of 4 [micro]g/
dscm into the atmosphere from any new or reconstructed electric arc
furnace when producing silicomanganese.
(iv) You must not discharge exhaust gases from each electric arc
furnace operation containing mercury emissions in excess of 12 [micro]g/
dscm into the atmosphere from any existing electric arc furnace when
producing silicomanganese.
(3) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions. (i) You must not
discharge exhaust gases from each electric arc furnace operation
containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions in excess of 12,000
[micro]g/dscm into the atmosphere from any new or reconstructed electric
arc furnace when producing ferromanganese.
(ii) You must not discharge exhaust gases from each electric arc
furnace operation containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions
in excess of 12,000 [micro]g/dscm into the atmosphere from any existing
electric arc furnace when producing ferromanganese.
(iii) You must not discharge exhaust gases from each electric arc
furnace operation containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions
in excess of 72 [micro]g/dscm into the atmosphere from any new or
reconstructed electric arc furnace when producing silicomanganese.
(iv) You must not discharge exhaust gases from each electric arc
furnace operation containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions
in excess of 130 [micro]g/dscm into the atmosphere from any existing
electric arc furnace when producing silicomanganese.
(4) Hydrochloric acid emissions. (i) You must not discharge exhaust
gases from each electric arc furnace operation containing hydrochloric
acid emissions in excess of 180 [micro]g/dscm into the atmosphere from
any new or reconstructed electric arc furnace.
(ii) You must not discharge exhaust gases from each electric arc
furnace operation containing hydrochloric acid emissions in excess of
1,100 [micro]g/dscm into the atmosphere from any existing electric arc
furnace.
(5) Formaldehyde emissions. You must not discharge exhaust gases
from each electric arc furnace operation containing formaldehyde
emissions in excess of 201 [micro]g/dscm into the atmosphere from any
new, reconstructed or existing electric arc furnace.
(b) Process fugitive emissions. (1) You must install, operate and
maintain a capture system that is designed to collect 95 percent or more
of the emissions from process fugitive emissions sources and convey the
collected emissions to a control device that is demonstrated to meet the
applicable emission limit specified in paragraph (a)(1) or (c) of this
section.
[[Page 236]]
(2) The determination of the overall capture must be demonstrated as
required by Sec. 63.1624(a).
(3) Unless you meet the criteria of paragragh (b)(3)(iii) of this
section, you must not cause the emissions exiting from a shop building
to exceed an average of 8 percent opacity over a furnace or MOR process
cycle.
(i) This 8 percent opacity requirement is determined by averaging
the individual opacity readings observed during the furnace or MOR
process cycle.
(ii) An individual opacity reading shall be determined as the
average of 24 consecutive images recorded at 15-second intervals with
the opacity values from each individual digital image rounded to the
nearest 5 percent.
(iii) If the average opacity from the shop building is greater than
8 percent opacity during an observed furnace or MOR process cycle, the
opacity of two more additional furnace or MOR process cycles must be
observed within 7 days and the average of the individual opacity
readings during the three observation periods must be less than 8
percent opacity.
(iv) At no time during operation may the average of any two
consecutive individual opacity readings be greater than 20 percent
opacity.
(c) Local ventilation emissions. If you operate local ventilation to
capture tapping, casting, or ladle treatment emissions and direct them
to a control device other than one associated with the electric arc
furnace, you must not discharge into the atmosphere any captured
emissions containing particulate matter in excess of 4.0 mg/dscm.
(d) MOR process. You must not discharge into the atmosphere from any
new, reconstructed or existing MOR process exhaust gases containing
particulate matter in excess of 3.9 mg/dscm.
(e) Crushing and screening equipment. You must not discharge into
the atmosphere from any new, reconstructed, or existing piece of
equipment associated with crushing and screening exhaust gases
containing particulate matter in excess of 13 mg/dscm.
(f) At all times, you must operate and maintain any affected source,
including associated air pollution control equipment and monitoring
equipment, in a manner consistent with safety and good air pollution
control practices for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether
such operation and maintenance procedures are being used will be based
on information available to the Administrator that may include, but is
not limited to, monitoring results, review of operation and maintenance
procedures, review of operation and maintenance records and inspection
of the source.
[80 FR 37390, June 30, 2015]
Sec. 63.1624 What are the operational and work practice standards for new,
reconstructed, and existing facilities?
(a) Process fugitive emissions sources. (1) You must prepare, and at
all times operate according to, a process fugitive emissions ventilation
plan that documents the equipment and operations designed to effectively
capture process fugitive emissions. The plan will be deemed to achieve
effective capture if it consists of the following elements:
(i) Documentation of engineered hoods and secondary fugitive capture
systems designed according to the most recent, at the time of
construction, ventilation design principles recommended by the American
Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). The process
fugitive emissions capture systems must be designed to achieve
sufficient air changes to evacuate the collection area frequently enough
to ensure process fugitive emissions are effectively collected by the
ventilation system and ducted to the control device(s). The required
ventilation systems should also use properly positioned hooding to take
advantage of the inherent air flows of the source and capture systems
that minimize air flows while also intercepting natural air flows or
creating air flows to contain the fugitive emissions. Include a
schematic for each building indicating duct sizes and locations, hood
sizes and locations, control device types, size and locations and
exhaust locations. The design plan must identify the key
[[Page 237]]
operating parameters and measurement locations to ensure proper
operation of the system and establish monitoring parameter values that
reflect effective capture.
(ii) List of critical maintenance actions and the schedule to
conduct them.
(2) You must submit a copy of the process fugitive emissions
ventilation plan to the designated permitting authority on or before the
applicable compliance date for the affected source as specified in Sec.
63.1621 in electronic format and whenever an update is made to the plan.
The requirement for you to operate the facility according to the written
process fugitives ventilation plan and specifications must be
incorporated in the operating permit for the facility that is issued by
the designated permitting authority under part 70 or 71 of this chapter,
as applicable.
(3) You must update the information required in paragraphs (a)(1)
and (2) of this section every 5 years or whenever there is a significant
change in variables that affect process fugitives ventilation design
such as the addition of a new process.
(b) Outdoor fugitive dust sources. (1) You must prepare, and at all
times operate according to, an outdoor fugitive dust control plan that
describes in detail the measures that will be put in place to control
outdoor fugitive dust emissions from the individual fugitive dust
sources at the facility.
(2) You must submit a copy of the outdoor fugitive dust control plan
to the designated permitting authority on or before the applicable
compliance date for the affected source as specified in Sec. 63.1621.
The requirement for you to operate the facility according to a written
outdoor fugitive dust control plan must be incorporated in the operating
permit for the facility that is issued by the designated permitting
authority under part 70 or 71 of this chapter, as applicable.
(3) You may use existing manuals that describe the measures in place
to control outdoor fugitive dust sources required as part of a state
implementation plan or other federally enforceable requirement for
particulate matter to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of
this section.
[80 FR 37390, June 30, 2015]
Sec. 63.1625 What are the performance test and compliance requirements
for new, reconstructed, and existing facilities?
(a) Performance testing. (1) All performance tests must be conducted
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.7.
(2) Each performance test in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this
section must consist of three separate and complete runs using the
applicable test methods.
(3) Each run must be conducted under conditions that are
representative of normal process operations.
(4) Performance tests conducted on air pollution control devices
serving electric arc furnaces must be conducted such that at least one
tapping period, or at least 20 minutes of a tapping period, whichever is
less, is included in at least two of the three runs. The sampling time
for each run must be at least three times the average tapping period of
the tested furnace, but no less than 60 minutes.
(5) You must conduct the performance tests specified in paragraph
(c) of this section under such conditions as the Administrator specifies
based on representative performance of the affected source for the
period being tested. Upon request, you must make available to the
Administrator such records as may be necessary to determine the
conditions of performance tests.
(b) Test methods. The following test methods in appendices of part
60 or 63 of this chapter or as specified elsewhere must be used to
determine compliance with the emission standards.
(1) Method 1 of appendix A-1 of 40 CFR part 60 to select the
sampling port location and the number of traverse points.
(2) Method 2 of appendix A-1 of 40 CFR part 60 to determine the
volumetric flow rate of the stack gas.
(3)(i) Method 3A or 3B of appendix A-2 of 40 CFR part 60 (with
integrated bag sampling) to determine the outlet stack and inlet oxygen
and CO2 content.
[[Page 238]]
(ii) You must measure CO2 concentrations at both the
inlet and outlet of the positive pressure fabric filter in conjunction
with the pollutant sampling in order to determine isokinetic sampling
rates.
(iii) As an alternative to EPA Reference Method 3B, ASME PTC-19-10-
1981-Part 10 may be used (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14).
(4) Method 4 of appendix A-3 of 40 CFR part 60 to determine the
moisture content of the stack gas.
(5)(i) Method 5 of appendix A-3 of 40 CFR part 60 to determine the
particulate matter concentration of the stack gas for negative pressure
baghouses and positive pressure baghouses with stacks.
(ii) Method 5D of appendix A-3 of 40 CFR part 60 to determine
particulate matter concentration and volumetric flow rate of the stack
gas for positive pressure baghouses without stacks.
(iii) The sample volume for each run must be a minimum of 4.0 cubic
meters (141.2 cubic feet). For Method 5 testing only, you may choose to
collect less than 4.0 cubic meters per run provided that the filterable
mass collected (i.e., net filter mass plus mass of nozzle, probe and
filter holder rinses) is equal to or greater than 10 mg. If the total
mass collected for two of three of the runs is less than 10 mg, you must
conduct at least one additional test run that produces at least 10 mg of
filterable mass collected (i.e., at a greater sample volume). Report the
results of all test runs.
(6) Method 30B of appendix A-8 of 40 CFR part 60 to measure mercury.
Apply the minimum sample volume determination procedures as per the
method.
(7)(i) Method 26A of appendix A-8 of 40 CFR part 60 to determine
outlet stack or inlet hydrochloric acid concentration.
(ii) Collect a minimum volume of 2 cubic meters.
(8)(i) Method 316 of appendix A of this part to determine outlet
stack or inlet formaldehyde.
(ii) Collect a minimum volume of 1.0 cubic meter.
(9) ASTM D7520-16 to determine opacity (incorporated by reference,
see Sec. 63.14) with the following conditions:
(i) During the digital camera opacity technique (DCOT) certification
procedure outlined in Section 9.2 of ASTM D7520-16, you or the DCOT
vendor must present the plumes in front of various backgrounds of color
and contrast representing conditions anticipated during field use such
as blue sky, trees and mixed backgrounds (clouds and/or a sparse tree
stand).
(ii) You must have standard operating procedures in place including
daily or other frequency quality checks to ensure the equipment is
within manufacturing specifications as outlined in Section 8.1 of ASTM
D7520-16.
(iii) You must follow the recordkeeping procedures outlined in Sec.
63.10(b)(1) for the DCOT certification, compliance report, data sheets
and all raw unaltered JPEGs used for opacity and certification
determination.
(iv) You or the DCOT vendor must have a minimum of four (4)
independent technology users apply the software to determine the visible
opacity of the 300 certification plumes. For each set of 25 plumes, the
user may not exceed 20 percent opacity for any one reading and the
average error must not exceed 7.5 percent opacity.
(v) Use of this method does not provide or imply a certification or
validation of any vendor's hardware or software. The onus to maintain
and verify the certification and/or training of the DCOT camera,
software and operator in accordance with ASTM D7520-16 and these
requirements is on the facility, DCOT operator and DCOT vendor.
(10) California Air Resources Board (CARB) Method 429 (incorporated
by reference, see Sec. 63.14).
(11) The owner or operator may use alternative measurement methods
approved by the Administrator following the procedures described in
Sec. 63.7(f).
(c) Compliance demonstration with the emission standards--(1)
Initial performance test. You must conduct an initial performance test
for air pollution control devices or vent stacks subject to Sec.
63.1623(a), (b)(1), and (c) through (e) to demonstrate compliance with
the applicable emission standards.
(2) Periodic performance test. (i) You must conduct annual
particulate matter tests for wet scrubber air pollution control devices
subject to Sec. 63.1623(a)(1)
[[Page 239]]
to demonstrate compliance with the applicable emission standards.
(ii) You must conduct particulate matter tests every 5 years for
fabric filter air pollution control devices subject to Sec.
63.1623(a)(1) to demonstrate compliance with the applicable emission
standards.
(iii) You must conduct annual mercury performance tests for wet
scrubber and fabric filter air pollution control devices or vent stacks
subject to Sec. 63.1623(a)(2) to demonstrate compliance with the
applicable emission standards.
(iv) You must conduct PAH performance tests for wet scrubber and
fabric filter air pollution control devices or vent stacks subject to
Sec. 63.1623(a)(3) to demonstrate compliance with the applicable
emission standards.
(A) For furnaces producing silicomanganese, you must conduct a PAH
performance test every 5 years for each furnace that produces
silicomanganese subject to Sec. 63.1623(a)(3).
(B) For furnaces producing ferromanganese, you must conduct a PAH
performance test every 3 months or 2,190 cumulative hours of
ferromanganese production for each furnace subject to Sec.
63.1623(a)(3).
(C) If a furnace producing ferromanganese demonstrates compliance
with four consecutive PAH tests, the owner/operator may petition the
permitting authority to request reduced frequency of testing to
demonstrate compliance with the PAH emission standards. However, this
PAH compliance testing cannot be reduced to less than once per year.
(v) You must conduct ongoing performance tests every 5 years for air
pollution control devices or vent stacks subject to Sec. 63.1623(a)(4),
(a)(5), (b)(1), and (c) through (e) to demonstrate compliance with the
applicable emission standards.
(3) Compliance is demonstrated for all sources performing emissions
tests if the average concentration for the three runs comprising the
performance test does not exceed the standard.
(4) Operating limits. You must establish parameter operating limits
according to paragraphs (c)(4)(i) through (iv) of this section. Unless
otherwise specified, compliance with each established operating limit
shall be demonstrated for each 24-hour operating day.
(i) For a wet particulate matter scrubber, you must establish the
minimum liquid flow rate and pressure drop as your operating limits
during the three-run performance test. If you use a wet particulate
matter scrubber and you conduct separate performance tests for
particulate matter, you must establish one set of minimum liquid flow
rate and pressure drop operating limits. If you conduct multiple
performance tests, you must set the minimum liquid flow rate and
pressure drop operating limits at the highest minimum hourly average
values established during the performance tests.
(ii) For a wet acid gas scrubber, you must establish the minimum
liquid flow rate and pH, as your operating limits during the three-run
performance test. If you use a wet acid gas scrubber and you conduct
separate performance tests for hydrochloric acid, you must establish one
set of minimum liquid flow rate and pH operating limits. If you conduct
multiple performance tests, you must set the minimum liquid flow rate
and pH operating limits at the highest minimum hourly average values
established during the performance tests.
(iii) For emission sources with fabric filters that choose to
demonstrate continuous compliance through bag leak detection systems you
must install a bag leak detection system according to the requirements
in Sec. 63.1626(d) and you must set your operating limit such that the
sum duration of bag leak detection system alarms does not exceed 5
percent of the process operating time during a 6-month period.
(iv) If you choose to demonstrate continuous compliance through a
particulate matter CEMS, you must determine an operating limit
(particulate matter concentration in mg/dscm) during performance testing
for initial particulate matter compliance. The operating limit will be
the average of the PM filterable results of the three Method 5 or Method
5D of appendix A-3 of 40 CFR part 60 performance test
[[Page 240]]
runs. To determine continuous compliance, the hourly average PM
concentrations will be averaged on a rolling 30 operating day basis.
Each 30 operating day average will have to meet the PM operating limit.
(d) Compliance demonstration with shop building opacity standards.
(1)(i) If you are subject to Sec. 63.1623(b), you must conduct opacity
observations of the shop building to demonstrate compliance with the
applicable opacity standards according to Sec. 63.6(h)(5), which
addresses conducting opacity or visible emission observations.
(ii) You must conduct the opacity observations according to ASTM
D7520-16 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14), for a period that
includes at least one complete furnace process cycle for each furnace.
(iii) For a shop building that contains more than one furnace, you
must conduct the opacity observations according to ASTM D7520-16 for a
period that includes one tapping period from each furnace located in the
shop building.
(iv) You must conduct the opacity observations according to ASTM
D7520-16 for a 1-hour period that includes at least one pouring for each
MOR located in the shop building.
(v) You must conduct the opacity observations at least once per week
for each shop building containing one or more furnaces or MOR.
(vi) You may reduce the frequency of observations to once per month
for each shop building that demonstrates compliance with the weekly 8-
percent opacity limit for 26 consecutive complete observations that span
a period of at least 26 weeks. Any monthly observation in excess of 8-
percent opacity will return that shop building opacity observation to a
weekly compliance schedule. You may reduce the frequency of observations
again to once per month for each shop building that demonstrates
compliance with the weekly 8-percent opacity limit after another 26
consecutive complete observations that span a period of at least 26
weeks.
(2) You must determine shop building opacity operating parameters
based on either monitoring data collected during the compliance
demonstration or established in an engineering assessment.
(i) If you choose to establish parameters based on the initial
compliance demonstration, you must simultaneously monitor parameter
values for one of the following: The capture system fan motor amperes
and all capture system damper positions, the total volumetric flow rate
to the air pollution control device and all capture system damper
positions, or volumetric flow rate through each separately ducted hood
that comprises the capture system. Subsequently you must monitor these
parameters according to Sec. 63.1626(g) and ensure they remain within
10 percent of the value recorded during the compliant opacity readings.
(ii) If you choose to establish parameters based on an engineering
assessment, then a design analysis shall include, for example,
specifications, drawings, schematics and ventilation system diagrams
prepared by the owner or operator or capture or control system
manufacturer or vendor that describes the shop building opacity system
ventilation design based on acceptable engineering texts. The design
analysis shall address vent stream characteristics and ventilation
system design operating parameters such as fan amps, damper position,
flow rate and/or other specified parameters.
(iii) You may petition the Administrator to reestablish these
parameter ranges whenever you can demonstrate to the Administrator's
satisfaction that the electric arc furnace or MOR operating conditions
upon which the parameter ranges were previously established are no
longer applicable. The values of these parameter ranges determined
during the most recent demonstration of compliance must be maintained at
the appropriate level for each applicable period.
(3) You will demonstrate continuing compliance with the opacity
standards by following the monitoring requirements specified in Sec.
63.1626(g) and the reporting and recordkeeping requirements specified in
Sec. 63.1628(b)(5).
(e) Compliance demonstration with the operational and work practice
standards--(1) Process fugitive emissions sources. You will demonstrate
compliance by developing and maintaining a
[[Page 241]]
process fugitives ventilation plan, by reporting any deviations from the
plan and by taking necessary corrective actions to correct deviations or
deficiencies.
(2) Outdoor fugitive dust sources. You will demonstrate compliance
by developing and maintaining an outdoor fugitive dust control plan, by
reporting any deviations from the plan and by taking necessary
corrective actions to correct deviations or deficiencies.
(3) Baghouses equipped with bag leak detection systems. You will
demonstrate compliance with the bag leak detection system requirements
by developing an analysis and supporting documentation demonstrating
conformance with EPA guidance and specifications for bag leak detection
systems in Sec. 60.57c(h) of this chapter.
[80 FR 37390, June 30, 2015, as amended at 82 FR 5408, Jan. 18, 2017]
Sec. 63.1626 What monitoring requirements must I meet?
(a) Baghouse monitoring. You must prepare, and at all times operate
according to, a standard operating procedures manual that describes in
detail procedures for inspection, maintenance and bag leak detection and
corrective action plans for all baghouses (fabric filters or cartridge
filters) that are used to control process vents, process fugitive, or
outdoor fugitive dust emissions from any source subject to the emissions
standards in Sec. 63.1623.
(b) You must submit the standard operating procedures manual for
baghouses required by paragraph (a) of this section to the Administrator
or delegated authority for review and approval.
(c) For an existing positive pressure baghouse used to control
emissions from an electric arc furnace that is not equipped with a bag
leak detection system, you must specify in the standard operating
procedures manual for inspections and routine maintenance, at a minimum,
the requirements of paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) You must visually inspect the outlet of each baghouse using
Method 22 on a twice daily basis (at least 4 hours apart) for evidence
of any visible emissions indicating abnormal operations and must
initiate corrective actions within 1 hour of any visible emissions that
indicates abnormal operation. Corrective actions shall include, at a
minimum, isolating, shutting down and conducting an internal inspection
of the baghouse compartment that is the source of the visible emissions
that indicate abnormal operations.
(2) In addition to the daily visible emissions observation, you must
conduct the following activities:
(i) Weekly confirmation that dust is being removed from hoppers
through visual inspection, or equivalent means of ensuring the proper
functioning of removal mechanisms.
(ii) Daily check of compressed air supply for pulse-jet baghouses.
(iii) An appropriate methodology for monitoring cleaning cycles to
ensure proper operation.
(iv) Monthly check of bag cleaning mechanisms for proper functioning
through visual inspection or equivalent means.
(v) Quarterly visual check of bag tension on reverse air and shaker-
type baghouses to ensure that the bags are not kinked (kneed or bent) or
lying on their sides. Such checks are not required for shaker-type
baghouses using self-tensioning (spring loaded) devices.
(vi) Quarterly confirmation of the physical integrity of the
baghouse structure through visual inspection of the baghouse interior
for air leaks.
(vii) Semiannual inspection of fans for wear, material buildup and
corrosion through visual inspection, vibration detectors, or equivalent
means.
(d) For all other non-furnace baghouses that are not equipped with
bag leak detection or CEMS, the procedures that you specify in the
standard operating procedures manual for inspections and routine
maintenance must, at a minimum, include the requirements of paragraphs
(d)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) You must observe the baghouse outlet on a daily basis for the
presence of any visible emissions.
(2) In addition to the daily visible emissions observation, you must
conduct the following activities:
(i) Weekly confirmation that dust is being removed from hoppers
through visual inspection, or equivalent means
[[Page 242]]
of ensuring the proper functioning of removal mechanisms.
(ii) Daily check of compressed air supply for pulse-jet baghouses.
(iii) An appropriate methodology for monitoring cleaning cycles to
ensure proper operation.
(iv) Monthly check of bag cleaning mechanisms for proper functioning
through visual inspection or equivalent means.
(v) Quarterly visual check of bag tension on reverse air and shaker-
type baghouses to ensure that the bags are not kinked (kneed or bent) or
lying on their sides. Such checks are not required for shaker-type
baghouses using self-tensioning (spring loaded) devices.
(vi) Quarterly confirmation of the physical integrity of the
baghouse structure through visual inspection of the baghouse interior
for air leaks.
(vii) Semiannual inspection of fans for wear, material buildup and
corrosion through visual inspection, vibration detectors, or equivalent
means.
(e) Bag leak detection system. (1) For each baghouse used to control
emissions from an electric arc furnace, you must install, operate, and
maintain a bag leak detection system according to paragraphs (e)(2)
through (4) of this section, unless a system meeting the requirements of
paragraph (p) of this section, for a CEMS and continuous emissions rate
monitoring system, is installed for monitoring the concentration of
particulate matter, or an existing positive pressure baghouse used to
control emissions from an electric arc furnaces that is subject to
paragraph (c) of this section. You may choose to install, operate, and
maintain a bag leak detection system for any other baghouse in operation
at the facility according to paragraphs (e)(2) through (4) of this
section.
(2) The procedures you specified in the standard operating
procedures manual for baghouse maintenance must include, at a minimum, a
preventative maintenance schedule that is consistent with the baghouse
manufacturer's instructions for routine and long-term maintenance.
(3) Each bag leak detection system must meet the specifications and
requirements in paragraphs (e)(3)(i) through (viii) of this section.
(i) The bag leak detection system must be certified by the
manufacturer to be capable of detecting PM emissions at concentrations
of 1.0 milligram per dry standard cubic meter (0.00044 grains per actual
cubic foot) or less.
(ii) The bag leak detection system sensor must provide output of
relative PM loadings.
(iii) The bag leak detection system must be equipped with an alarm
system that will alarm when an increase in relative particulate loadings
is detected over a preset level.
(iv) You must install and operate the bag leak detection system in a
manner consistent with the guidance provided in ``Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Fabric Filter Bag Leak Detection
Guidance'' EPA-454/R-98-015, September 1997 (incorporated by reference,
see Sec. 63.14) and the manufacturer's written specifications and
recommendations for installation, operation and adjustment of the
system.
(v) The initial adjustment of the system must, at a minimum, consist
of establishing the baseline output by adjusting the sensitivity (range)
and the averaging period of the device and establishing the alarm set
points and the alarm delay time.
(vi) Following initial adjustment, you must not adjust the
sensitivity or range, averaging period, alarm set points, or alarm delay
time, except as detailed in the approved standard operating procedures
manual required under paragraph (a) of this section. You cannot increase
the sensitivity by more than 100 percent or decrease the sensitivity by
more than 50 percent over a 365-day period unless such adjustment
follows a complete baghouse inspection that demonstrates that the
baghouse is in good operating condition.
(vii) You must install the bag leak detector downstream of the
baghouse.
(viii) Where multiple detectors are required, the system's
instrumentation and alarm may be shared among detectors.
(4) You must include in the standard operating procedures manual
required by paragraph (a) of this section a corrective action plan that
specifies the procedures to be followed in the case of
[[Page 243]]
a bag leak detection system alarm. The corrective action plan must
include, at a minimum, the procedures that you will use to determine and
record the time and cause of the alarm as well as the corrective actions
taken to minimize emissions as specified in paragraphs (e)(4)(i) and
(ii) of this section.
(i) The procedures used to determine the cause of the alarm must be
initiated within 30 minutes of the alarm.
(ii) The cause of the alarm must be alleviated by taking the
necessary corrective action(s) that may include, but not be limited to,
those listed in paragraphs (e)(4)(ii)(A) through (F) of this section.
(A) Inspecting the baghouse for air leaks, torn or broken filter
elements, or any other malfunction that may cause an increase in
emissions.
(B) Sealing off defective bags or filter media.
(C) Replacing defective bags or filter media, or otherwise repairing
the control device.
(D) Sealing off a defective baghouse compartment.
(E) Cleaning the bag leak detection system probe, or otherwise
repairing the bag leak detection system.
(F) Shutting down the process producing the particulate emissions.
(f) If you use a wet particulate matter scrubber, you must collect
the pressure drop and liquid flow rate monitoring system data according
to Sec. 63.1628, reduce the data to 24-hour block averages and maintain
the 24-hour average pressure drop and liquid flow-rate at or above the
operating limits established during the performance test according to
Sec. 63.1625(c)(4)(i).
(g) If you use curtains or partitions to prevent process fugitive
emissions from escaping the area around the process fugitive emission
source or other parts of the building, you must perform quarterly
inspections of the physical condition of these curtains or partitions to
determine if there are any tears or openings.
(h) Shop building opacity. In order to demonstrate continuous
compliance with the opacity standards in Sec. 63.1623, you must comply
with the requirements Sec. 63.1625(d)(1) and one of the monitoring
options in paragraphs (h)(1) or (2) of this section. The selected option
must be consistent with that selected during the initial performance
test described in Sec. 63.1625(d)(2). Alternatively, you may use the
provisions of Sec. 63.8(f) to request approval to use an alternative
monitoring method.
(1) If you choose to establish operating parameters during the
compliance test as specified in Sec. 63.1625(d)(2)(i), you must meet
one of the following requirements.
(i) Check and record the control system fan motor amperes and
capture system damper positions once per shift.
(ii) Install, calibrate and maintain a monitoring device that
continuously records the volumetric flow rate through each separately
ducted hood.
(iii) Install, calibrate and maintain a monitoring device that
continuously records the volumetric flow rate at the inlet of the air
pollution control device and check and record the capture system damper
positions once per shift.
(2) If you choose to establish operating parameters during the
compliance test as specified in Sec. 63.1625(d)(2)(ii), you must
monitor the selected parameter(s) on a frequency specified in the
assessment and according to a method specified in the engineering
assessment
(3) All flow rate monitoring devices must meet the following
requirements:
(i) Be installed in an appropriate location in the exhaust duct such
that reproducible flow rate monitoring will result.
(ii) Have an accuracy 10 percent over its
normal operating range and be calibrated according to the manufacturer's
instructions.
(4) The Administrator may require you to demonstrate the accuracy of
the monitoring device(s) relative to Methods 1 and 2 of appendix A-1 of
part 60 of this chapter.
(5) Failure to maintain the appropriate capture system parameters
(e.g., fan motor amperes, flow rate and/or damper positions) establishes
the need to initiate corrective action as soon as practicable after the
monitoring excursion in order to minimize excess emissions.
(i) Furnace capture system. You must perform quarterly (once every
three
[[Page 244]]
months) inspections of the furnace fugitive capture system equipment to
ensure that the hood locations have not been changed or obstructed
because of contact with cranes or ladles, quarterly inspections of the
physical condition of hoods and ductwork to the control device to
determine if there are any openings or leaks in the ductwork, quarterly
inspections of the hoods and ductwork to determine if there are any flow
constrictions in ductwork due to dents or accumulated dust and quarterly
examinations of the operational status of flow rate controllers
(pressure sensors, dampers, damper switches, etc.) to ensure they are
operating correctly. Any deficiencies must be recorded and proper
maintenance and repairs performed.
(j) Requirements for sources using CMS. If you demonstrate
compliance with any applicable emissions limit through use of a
continuous monitoring system (CMS), where a CMS includes a continuous
parameter monitoring system (CPMS) as well as a continuous emissions
monitoring system (CEMS), you must develop a site-specific monitoring
plan and submit this site-specific monitoring plan, if requested, at
least 60 days before your initial performance evaluation (where
applicable) of your CMS. Your site-specific monitoring plan must address
the monitoring system design, data collection and the quality assurance
and quality control elements outlined in this paragraph and in Sec.
63.8(d). You must install, operate and maintain each CMS according to
the procedures in your approved site-specific monitoring plan. Using the
process described in Sec. 63.8(f)(4), you may request approval of
monitoring system quality assurance and quality control procedures
alternative to those specified in paragraphs (j)(1) through (6) of this
section in your site-specific monitoring plan.
(1) The performance criteria and design specifications for the
monitoring system equipment, including the sample interface, detector
signal analyzer and data acquisition and calculations;
(2) Sampling interface location such that the monitoring system will
provide representative measurements;
(3) Equipment performance checks, system accuracy audits, or other
audit procedures;
(4) Ongoing operation and maintenance procedures in accordance with
the general requirements of Sec. 63.8(c)(1) and (3);
(5) Conditions that define a continuous monitoring system that is
out of control consistent with Sec. 63.8(c)(7)(i) and for responding to
out of control periods consistent with Sec. 63.8(c)(7)(ii) and (c)(8)
or Table 1 to this subpart, as applicable; and
(6) Ongoing recordkeeping and reporting procedures in accordance
with provisions in Sec. 63.10(c), (e)(1) and (e)(2)(i), and Table 1 to
this subpart, as applicable.
(k) If you have an operating limit that requires the use of a CPMS,
you must install, operate and maintain each continuous parameter
monitoring system according to the procedures in paragraphs (k)(1)
through (7) of this section.
(1) The CPMS must complete a minimum of one cycle of operation for
each successive 15-minute period. You must have a minimum of four
successive cycles of operation to have a valid hour of data.
(2) Except for periods of monitoring system malfunctions, repairs
associated with monitoring system malfunctions and required monitoring
system quality assurance or quality control activities (including, as
applicable, system accuracy audits and required zero and span
adjustments), you must operate the CMS at all times the affected source
is operating. A monitoring system malfunction is any sudden, infrequent,
not reasonably preventable failure of the monitoring system to provide
valid data. Monitoring system failures that are caused in part by poor
maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions. You are required
to complete monitoring system repairs in response to monitoring system
malfunctions and to return the monitoring system to operation as
expeditiously as practicable.
[[Page 245]]
(3) You may not use data recorded during monitoring system
malfunctions, repairs associated with monitoring system malfunctions, or
required monitoring system quality assurance or control activities in
calculations used to report emissions or operating levels. You must use
all the data collected during all other required data collection periods
in assessing the operation of the control device and associated control
system.
(4) Except for periods of monitoring system malfunctions, repairs
associated with monitoring system malfunctions and required quality
monitoring system quality assurance or quality control activities
(including, as applicable, system accuracy audits and required zero and
span adjustments), failure to collect required data is a deviation of
the monitoring requirements.
(5) You must conduct other CPMS equipment performance checks, system
accuracy audits, or other audit procedures specified in your site-
specific monitoring plan at least once every 12 months.
(6) You must conduct a performance evaluation of each CPMS in
accordance with your site-specific monitoring plan.
(7) You must record the results of each inspection, calibration and
validation check.
(l) CPMS for measuring gaseous flow. (1) Use a flow sensor with a
measurement sensitivity of 5 percent of the flow rate or 10 cubic feet
per minute, whichever is greater;
(2) Check all mechanical connections for leakage at least every
month; and
(3) Perform a visual inspection at least every 3 months of all
components of the flow CPMS for physical and operational integrity and
all electrical connections for oxidation and galvanic corrosion if your
flow CPMS is not equipped with a redundant flow sensor.
(m) CPMS for measuring liquid flow. (1) Use a flow sensor with a
measurement sensitivity of 2 percent of the liquid flow rate; and
(2) Reduce swirling flow or abnormal velocity distributions due to
upstream and downstream disturbances.
(n) CPMS for measuring pressure. (1) Minimize or eliminate pulsating
pressure, vibration and internal and external corrosion; and
(2) Use a gauge with a minimum tolerance of 1.27 centimeters of
water or a transducer with a minimum tolerance of 1 percent of the
pressure range.
(3) Perform checks at least once each process operating day to
ensure pressure measurements are not obstructed (e.g., check for
pressure tap pluggage daily).
(o) CPMS for measuring pH. (1) Ensure the sample is properly mixed
and representative of the fluid to be measured.
(2) Check the pH meter's calibration on at least two points every
eight hours of process operation.
(p) Particulate Matter CEMS. If you are using a CEMS to measure
particulate matter emissions to meet requirements of this subpart, you
must install, certify, operate and maintain the particulate matter CEMS
as specified in paragraphs (p)(1) through (4) of this section.
(1) You must conduct a performance evaluation of the PM CEMS
according to the applicable requirements of Sec. 60.13 of this chapter
and Performance Specification 11 at 40 CFR part 60, appendix B.
(2) During each PM correlation testing run of the CEMS required by
Performance Specification 11 at 40 CFR part 60, appendix B, PM and
oxygen (or carbon dioxide) collect data concurrently (or within a 30- to
60-minute period) by both the CEMS and by conducting performance tests
using Method 5 or 5D at 40 CFR part 60, appendix A-3 or Method 17 at 40
CFR part 60, appendix A-6.
(3) Perform quarterly accuracy determinations and daily calibration
drift tests in accordance with Procedure 2 at 40 CFR part 60, appendix
F. Relative Response Audits must be performed annually and Response
Correlation Audits must be performed every 3 years.
(4) Within 60 days after the date of completing each CEMS relative
accuracy test audit or performance test conducted to demonstrate
compliance with this subpart, you must submit the relative accuracy test
audit data and the results of the performance test as specified in Sec.
63.1628(e).
[80 FR 37390, June 30, 2015, as amended at 82 FR 5408, Jan. 18, 2017]
[[Page 246]]
Sec. 63.1627 What notification requirements must I meet?
(a) You must comply with all of the notification requirements of
Sec. 63.9. Electronic notifications are encouraged when possible.
(b)(1) You must submit the process fugitive ventilation plan
required under Sec. 63.1624(a), the outdoor fugitive dust control plan
required under Sec. 63.1624(b), the site-specific monitoring plan for
CMS required under Sec. 63.1626(i) and the standard operating
procedures manual for baghouses required under Sec. 63.1626(a) to the
Administrator or delegated authority. You must submit this notification
no later than June 30, 2016. For sources that commenced construction or
reconstruction after June 30, 2015, you must submit this notification no
later than 180 days before startup of the constructed or reconstructed
ferromanganese or silicomanganese production facility. For an affected
source that has received a construction permit from the Administrator or
delegated authority on or before June 30, 2015, you must submit this
notification no later than June 30, 2016.
(2) The plans and procedures documents submitted as required under
paragraph (b)(1) of this section must be submitted to the Administrator
in electronic format and whenever an update is made to the procedure.
[80 FR 37390, June 30, 2015]
Sec. 63.1628 What recordkeeping and reporting requirements must I meet?
(a) You must comply with all of the recordkeeping and reporting
requirements specified in Sec. 63.10 of the General Provisions that are
referenced in Table 1 to this subpart.
(1) Records must be maintained in a form suitable and readily
available for expeditious review, according to Sec. 63.10(b)(1).
However, electronic recordkeeping and reporting is encouraged and
required for some records and reports.
(2) Records must be kept on site for at least 2 years after the date
of occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or
record, according to Sec. 63.10(b)(1).
(b) You must maintain, for a period of 5 years, records of the
information listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (11) of this section.
(1) Electronic records of the bag leak detection system output.
(2) An identification of the date and time of all bag leak detection
system alarms, the time that procedures to determine the cause of the
alarm were initiated, the cause of the alarm, an explanation of the
corrective actions taken and the date and time the cause of the alarm
was corrected.
(3) All records of inspections and maintenance activities required
under Sec. 63.1626(c) as part of the practices described in the
standard operating procedures manual for baghouses required under Sec.
63.1626(a).
(4) Electronic records of the pressure drop and water flow rate
values for wet scrubbers used to control particulate matter emissions as
required in Sec. 63.1626(e), identification of periods when the 1-hour
average pressure drop and water flow rate values are below the
established minimum operating limits and an explanation of the
corrective actions taken.
(5) Electronic records of the shop building capture system
monitoring required under Sec. 63.1626(g)(1) and (2), as applicable, or
identification of periods when the capture system parameters were not
maintained and an explanation of the corrective actions taken.
(6) Records of the results of quarterly inspections of the furnace
capture system required under Sec. 63.1626(h).
(7) Electronic records of the continuous flow monitors or pressure
monitors required under Sec. 63.1626(i) and (j) and an identification
of periods when the flow rate or pressure was not maintained as required
in Sec. 63.1626(e).
(8) Electronic records of the output of any CEMS installed to
monitor particulate matter emissions meeting the requirements of Sec.
63.1626(i).
(9) Records of the occurrence and duration of each startup and/or
shutdown.
(10) Records of the occurrence and duration of each malfunction of
operation (i.e., process equipment) or the air pollution control
equipment and monitoring equipment.
(11) Records that explain the periods when the procedures outlined
in the process fugitives ventilation plan required under Sec.
63.1624(a), the fugitives
[[Page 247]]
dust control plan required under Sec. 63.1624(b), the site-specific
monitoring plan for CMS required under Sec. 63.1626(i) and the standard
operating procedures manual for baghouses required under Sec.
63.1626(a).
(c) You must comply with all of the reporting requirements specified
in Sec. 63.10 of the General Provisions that are referenced in Table 1
to this subpart.
(1) You must submit reports no less frequently than specified under
Sec. 63.10(e)(3) of the General Provisions.
(2) Once a source reports a violation of the standard or excess
emissions, you must follow the reporting format required under Sec.
63.10(e)(3) until a request to reduce reporting frequency is approved by
the Administrator.
(d) In addition to the information required under the applicable
sections of Sec. 63.10, you must include in the reports required under
paragraph (c) of this section the information specified in paragraphs
(d)(1) through (7) of this section.
(1) Reports that identify and explain the periods when the
procedures outlined in the process fugitives ventilation plan required
under Sec. 63.1624(a), the fugitives dust control plan required under
Sec. 63.1624(b), the site-specific monitoring plan for CMS required
under Sec. 63.1626(i) and the standard operating procedures manual for
baghouses required under Sec. 63.1626(a) were not followed.
(2) Reports that identify the periods when the average hourly
pressure drop or flow rate of wet scrubbers used to control particulate
emissions dropped below the levels established in Sec. 63.1626(e) and
an explanation of the corrective actions taken.
(3) Bag leak detection system. Reports including the following
information:
(i) Records of all alarms.
(ii) Description of the actions taken following each bag leak
detection system alarm.
(4) Reports of the shop building capture system monitoring required
under Sec. 63.1626(g)(1) and (2), as applicable, identification of
periods when the capture system parameters were not maintained and an
explanation of the corrective actions taken.
(5) Reports of the results of quarterly inspections of the furnace
capture system required under Sec. 63.1626(h).
(6) Reports of the CPMS required under Sec. 63.1626, an
identification of periods when the monitored parameters were not
maintained as required in Sec. 63.1626 and corrective actions taken.
(7) If a malfunction occurred during the reporting period, the
report must include the number, duration and a brief description for
each type of malfunction that occurred during the reporting period and
caused or may have caused any applicable emissions limitation to be
exceeded. The report must also include a description of actions taken by
the owner or operator during a malfunction of an affected source to
minimize emissions in accordance with Sec. 63.1623(f), including
actions taken to correct a malfunction.
(e) Within 60 days after the date of completing each CEMS relative
accuracy test audit or performance test conducted to demonstrate
compliance with this subpart, you must submit the relative accuracy test
audit data and the results of the performance test in the method
specified by paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this section. The results of
the performance test must contain the information listed in paragraph
(e)(2) of this section.
(1)(i) Within 60 days after the date of completing each performance
test (as defined in Sec. 63.2) required by this subpart, you must
submit the results of the performance tests, including any associated
fuel analyses, following the procedure specified in either paragraph
(e)(1)(i)(A) or (B) of this section.
(A) For data collected using test methods supported by the EPA's
Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) as listed on the EPA's ERT Web site
(http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ert/index.html), you must submit the
results of the performance test to the EPA via the Compliance and
Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI). CEDRI can be accessed
through the EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) (http://cdx.epa.gov/
epa_home.asp). Performance test data must be submitted in a file format
generated through the use of the EPA's ERT. Alternatively, you may
submit performance test data in an electronic file format consistent
[[Page 248]]
with the extensible markup language (XML) schema listed on the EPA's ERT
Web site once the XML schema is available. If you claim that some of the
performance test information being submitted is confidential business
information (CBI), you must submit a complete file generated through the
use of the EPA's ERT or an alternate electronic file consistent with the
XML schema listed on the EPA's ERT Web site, including information
claimed to be CBI, on a compact disk, flash drive, or other commonly
used electronic storage media to the EPA. The electronic media must be
clearly marked as CBI and mailed to U.S. EPA/OAQPS/CORE CBI Office,
Attention: Group Leader, Measurement Policy Group, MD C404-02, 4930 Old
Page Rd., Durham, NC 27703. The same ERT or alternate file with the CBI
omitted must be submitted to the EPA via the EPA's CDX as described
earlier in this paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A).
(B) For data collected using test methods that are not supported by
the EPA's ERT as listed on the EPA's ERT Web site, you must submit the
results of the performance test to the Administrator at the appropriate
address listed in Sec. 63.13.
(ii) Within 60 days after the date of completing each CEMS
performance evaluation (as defined in Sec. 63.2), you must submit the
results of the performance evaluation following the procedure specified
in either paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section.
(A) For performance evaluations of continuous monitoring systems
measuring relative accuracy test audit (RATA) pollutants that are
supported by the EPA's ERT as listed on the EPA's ERT Web site, you must
submit the results of the performance evaluation to the EPA via the
CEDRI. (CEDRI can be accessed through the EPA's CDX.) Performance
evaluation data must be submitted in a file format generated through the
use of the EPA's ERT. Alternatively, you may submit performance
evaluation data in an electronic file format consistent with the XML
schema listed on the EPA's ERT Web site, once the XML schema is
available. If you claim that some of the performance evaluation
information being transmitted is CBI, you must submit a complete file
generated through the use of the EPA's ERT or an alternative electronic
file consistent with the XML schema listed on the EPA's ERT Web site,
including information claimed to be CBI, on a compact disk, flash drive
or other commonly used electronic storage media to the EPA. The
electronic storage media must be clearly marked as CBI and mailed to
U.S. EPA/OAQPS/CORE CBI Office, Attention: Group Leader, Measurement
Policy Group, MD C404-02, 4930 Old Page Rd., Durham, NC 27703. The same
ERT file or alternate file with the CBI omitted must be submitted to the
EPA via the EPA's CDX as described earlier in this paragraph
(e)(1)(ii)(A).
(B) For any performance evaluations of continuous monitoring systems
measuring RATA pollutants that are not supported by the EPA's ERT as
listed on the EPA's ERT Web site, you must submit the results of the
performance evaluation to the Administrator at the appropriate address
listed in Sec. 63.13.
(2) The results of a performance test shall include the purpose of
the test; a brief process description; a complete unit description,
including a description of feed streams and control devices; sampling
site description; pollutants measured; description of sampling and
analysis procedures and any modifications to standard procedures;
quality assurance procedures; record of operating conditions, including
operating parameters for which limits are being set, during the test;
record of preparation of standards; record of calibrations; raw data
sheets for field sampling; raw data sheets for field and laboratory
analyses; chain-of-custody documentation; explanation of laboratory data
qualifiers; example calculations of all applicable stack gas parameters,
emission rates, percent reduction rates and analytical results, as
applicable; and any other information required by the test method, a
relevant standard, or the Administrator.
[80 FR 37390, June 30, 2015]
[[Page 249]]
Sec. 63.1629 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
(a) This subpart can be implemented and enforced by the U.S. EPA, or
a delegated authority such as the applicable state, local, or tribal
agency. If the U.S. EPA Administrator has delegated authority to a
state, local, or tribal agency, then that agency, in addition to the
U.S. EPA, has the authority to implement and enforce this subpart.
Contact the applicable U.S. EPA Regional Office to find out if this
subpart is delegated to a state, local, or tribal agency.
(b) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority of this
subpart to a state, local, or tribal agency under subpart E of this
part, the authorities contained in paragraph (c) of this section are
retained by the Administrator of U.S. EPA and cannot be transferred to
the state, local, or tribal agency.
(c) The authorities that cannot be delegated to state, local, or
tribal agencies are as specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of
this section.
(1) Approval of alternatives to requirements in Sec. Sec. 63.1620
and 63.1621 and 63.1623 and 63.1624.
(2) Approval of major alternatives to test methods under Sec.
63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), as defined in Sec. 63.90 and as required in
this subpart.
(3) Approval of major alternatives to monitoring under Sec.
63.8(f), as defined in Sec. 63.90 and as required in this subpart.
(4) Approval of major alternatives to recordkeeping and reporting
under Sec. 63.10(f), as defined in Sec. 63.90 and as required in this
subpart.
[80 FR 37390, June 30, 2015]
Sec. Sec. 63.1630-63.1649 [Reserved]
Sec. 63.1650 Applicability and compliance dates.
(a) This subpart applies to all new and existing ferromanganese and
silicomanganese production facilities that manufacture ferromanganese or
silicomanganese and are major sources or are co-located at major sources
of hazardous air pollutant emissions.
(b) The following sources at a ferromanganese and silicomanganese
production facility are subject to this subpart:
(1) Open submerged arc furnaces with a furnace power input of 22 MW
or less when producing ferromanganese.
(2) Open submerged arc furnaces with a furnace power input greater
than 22 MW when producing ferromanganese.
(3) Open submerged arc furnaces with a furnace power input greater
than 25 MW when producing silicomanganese.
(4) Open submerged arc furnaces with a furnace power input of 25 MW
or less when producing silicomanganese.
(5) Semi-sealed submerged arc furnaces when producing
ferromanganese.
(6) Metal oxygen refining (MOR) process.
(7) Crushing and screening operations.
(8) Fugitive dust sources.
(c) A new affected source is one for which construction or
reconstruction commenced after August 4, 1998.
(d) Table 1 to this subpart specifies the provisions of subpart A of
this part that apply to owners and operators of ferroalloy production
facilities subject to this subpart.
(e) Compliance dates. (1) [Reserved]
(2) Each owner or operator of a new or reconstructed affected source
that commences construction or reconstruction after August 4, 1998 and
before November 23, 2011, must comply with the requirements of this
subpart by May 20, 1999 or upon startup of operations, whichever is
later.
[64 FR 27458, May 20, 1999, as amended at 66 FR 16012, Mar. 22, 2001; 80
FR 37399, June 30, 2015]
Sec. 63.1651 Definitions.
Terms in this subpart are defined in the Clean Air Act (Act), in
subpart A of this part, or in this section as follows:
Bag leak detection system means a system that is capable of
continuously monitoring particulate matter (dust) loadings in the
exhaust of a baghouse in order to detect bag leaks and other upset
conditions. A bag leak detection system includes, but is not limited to,
an instrument that operates on triboelectric, light scattering, light
transmittance, or other effect to continuously monitor relative
particulate matter loadings.
Capture system means the equipment (including hoods, ducts, fans,
dampers,
[[Page 250]]
etc.) used to capture or transport particulate matter generated by an
affected submerged arc furnace.
Casting means the period of time from when molten ferroalloy falls
from the furnace tapping runner into the ladle until pouring into molds
is completed. This includes the following operations: ladle filling,
pouring alloy from one ladle to another, slag separation, slag removal,
and ladle transfer by crane, truck, or other conveyance.
Crushing and screening equipment means the crushers, grinders,
mills, screens and conveying systems used to crush, size, and prepare
for packing manganese-containing materials, including raw materials,
intermediate products, and final products.
Fugitive dust source means a stationary source from which manganese-
bearing particles are discharged to the atmosphere due to wind or
mechanical inducement such as vehicle traffic. Fugitive dust sources
include plant roadways, yard areas, and outdoor material storage and
transfer operations.
Furnace power input means the resistive electrical power consumption
of a submerged arc furnace, expressed as megawatts (MW).
Malfunction means any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably
preventable failure of air pollution control equipment, process
equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner which
causes, or has the potential to cause, the emission limitations in an
applicable standard to be exceeded. Failures caused in part by poor
maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions.
Metal oxygen refining (MOR) process means the reduction of the
carbon content of ferromanganese through the use of oxygen.
Open submerged arc furnace means an electric submerged arc furnace
that is equipped with a canopy hood above the furnace to collect primary
emissions.
Operating time means the period of time in hours that the affected
source is in operation beginning at a startup and ending at the next
shutdown.
Plant roadway means any area at a ferromanganese and silicomanganese
production facility that is subject to plant mobile equipment, such as
fork lifts, front end loaders, or trucks, carrying manganese-bearing
materials. Excluded from this definition are employee and visitor
parking areas, provided they are not subject to traffic by plant mobile
equipment.
Primary emissions means gases and emissions collected by hoods and
ductwork located above an open furnace or under the cover of a semi-
closed or sealed furnace.
Sealed submerged arc furnace means an electric submerged arc furnace
equipped with a total enclosure or cover from which primary emissions
are evacuated directly.
Semi-closed submerged arc furnace means an electric submerged arc
furnace equipped with a partially sealed cover over the furnace. This
cover is equipped with openings to allow penetration of the electrodes
into the furnace. Mix is introduced into the furnace around the
electrode holes forming a partial seal between the electrodes and the
cover. Furnace emissions generated under the cover are ducted to an
emission control device. Emissions that escape the cover are collected
and vented through stacks directly to the atmosphere.
Shop means the building which houses one or more submerged arc
furnaces.
Shutdown means the cessation of operation of an affected source for
any purpose.
Startup means the setting in operation of an affected source for any
purpose.
Submerged arc furnace means any furnace wherein electrical energy is
converted to heat energy by transmission of current between electrodes
partially submerged in the furnace charge. The furnace may be of an
open, semi-sealed, or sealed design.
Tapping emissions means a source of air pollutant emissions that
occur during the process of removing the molten product from the
furnace.
Tapping period means the time from when a tap hole is opened until
the time a tap hole is closed.
[64 FR 27458, May 20, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 20462, Apr. 20, 2006]
Sec. 63.1652 Emission standards.
(a) New and reconstructed submerged arc furnaces. No owner or
operator shall
[[Page 251]]
cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any new or reconstructed
submerged arc furnace exhaust gases (including primary and tapping)
containing particulate matter in excess of one of the following:
(1) 0.23 kilograms per hour per megawatt (kg/hr/MW) (0.51 pounds per
hour per megawatt [lb/hr/MW]), or
(2) 35 milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (mg/dscm) (0.015
grains per dry standard cubic foot [gr/dscf]).
(b) Existing open submerged arc furnaces. No owner or operator shall
cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any existing open
submerged arc furnace exhaust gases (including primary and tapping)
containing particulate matter in excess of one of the following:
(1) 9.8 kilograms per hour (kg/hr) (21.7 pounds per hour (lb/hr))
when producing ferromanganese in an open furnace operating at a furnace
power input of 22 MW or less; or
(2) 13.5 kg/hr (29.8 lb/hr) when producing ferromanganese in an open
furnace operating at a furnace power input greater than 22 MW; or
(3) 16.3 kg/hr (35.9 lb/hr) when producing silicomanganese in an
open furnace operating at a furnace power input greater than 25 MW; or
(4) 12.3 kg/hr (27.2 lb/hr) when producing silicomanganese in an
open furnace operating at a furnace power input of 25 MW or less.
(c) Existing semi-sealed submerged arc furnaces. No owner or
operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any
existing semi-sealed submerged arc furnace exhaust gases (including
primary, tapping, and vent stacks) containing particulate matter in
excess of 11.2 kg/hr (24.7 lb/hr) when producing ferromanganese.
(d) MOR process. No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged
into the atmosphere from any new, reconstructed, or existing MOR process
exhaust gases containing particulate matter in excess of 69 mg/dscm
(0.03 gr/dscf).
(e) Crushing and screening equipment--(1) New and reconstructed
equipment. No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the
atmosphere from any new or reconstructed piece of equipment associated
with crushing and screening exhaust gases containing particulate matter
in excess of 50 mg/dscm (0.022 gr/dscf).
(2) Existing equipment. No owner or operator shall cause to be
discharged into the atmosphere from any existing piece of equipment
associated with crushing and screening exhaust gases containing
particulate matter in excess of 69 (mg/dscm) (0.03 gr/dscf).
(f) At all times, you must operate and maintain any affected source,
including associated air pollution control equipment and monitoring
equipment, in a manner consistent with safety and good air pollution
control practices for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether
such operation and maintenance procedures are being used will be based
on information available to the Administrator that may include, but is
not limited to, monitoring results, review of operation and maintenance
procedures, review of operation and maintenance records and inspection
of the source.
[64 FR 27458, May 20, 1999, as amended at 66 FR 16013, Mar. 22, 2001; 80
FR 37399, June 30, 2015]
Sec. 63.1653 Opacity standards.
No owner or operator shall cause emissions exiting from a shop due
solely to operations of any affected submerged arc furnace, to exceed 20
percent opacity for more than one 6-minute period during any performance
test, with the following exceptions:
(a) Visible particulate emissions from a shop due solely to
operation of a semi-closed submerged arc furnace, may exceed 20 percent
opacity, measured as a 6-minute average, one time during any performance
test, so long as the emissions never exceed 60 percent opacity, measured
as a 6-minute average.
(b) Blowing taps, poling and oxygen lancing of the tap hole;
burndowns associated with electrode measurements; and maintenance
activities associated with submerged arc furnaces and casting operations
are exempt from the opacity standards specified in this section.
[[Page 252]]
Sec. 63.1654 Operational and work practice standards.
(a) Fugitive dust sources. (1) Each owner or operator of an affected
ferromanganese and silicomanganese production facility must prepare, and
at all times operate according to, a fugitive dust control plan that
describes in detail the measures that will be put in place to control
fugitive dust emissions from the individual fugitive dust sources at the
facility.
(2) The owner or operator must submit a copy of the fugitive dust
control plan to the designated permitting authority on or before the
applicable compliance date for the affected source as specified in Sec.
63.1650(e). The requirement for the owner or operator to operate the
facility according to a written fugitive dust control plan must be
incorporated in the operating permit for the facility that is issued by
the designated permitting authority under part 70 of this chapter.
(3) The owner or operator may use existing manuals that describe the
measures in place to control fugitive dust sources required as part of a
State implementation plan or other federally enforceable requirement for
particulate matter to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of
this section.
(b) Baghouses equipped with bag leak detection systems. The owner or
operator of a new or reconstructed submerged arc furnace must install
and continuously operate a bag leak detection system if the furnace's
primary and/or tapping emissions are ducted to a negative pressure
baghouse or to a positive pressure baghouse equipped with a stack. The
owner or operator must maintain and operate each baghouse such that the
following conditions are met:
(1) The alarm on the system does not sound for more than 5 percent
of the total operating time in a 6-month reporting period.
(2) A record is made of the date and time of each alarm and
procedures to determine the cause of the alarm are initiated within 1
hour of the alarm according to the plan for corrective action required
under Sec. 63.1657(a)(7).
Sec. 63.1655 Maintenance requirements.
(a) The owner or operator of an affected source must comply with the
requirements of Sec. 63.6(e) of subpart A.
(b)(1) The owner or operator must develop and implement a written
maintenance plan for each air pollution control device associated with
submerged arc furnaces, metal oxygen refining processes, and crushing
and screening operations subject to the provisions of this part. The
owner or operator must keep the maintenance plan on record and available
for the Administrator's inspection for the life of the air pollution
control device or until the affected source is no longer subject to the
provisions of this part.
(2) To satisfy the requirement to develop maintenance plans, the
owner or operator may use the affected source's standard operating
procedures (SOP) manual or other plan, provided the alternative plan
meets the requirements of this paragraph and is made available for
inspection when requested by the Administrator.
(c) The procedures specified in the maintenance plan must include a
preventive maintenance schedule that is consistent with good air
pollution control practices for minimizing emissions and, for baghouses,
ensure that the requirements specified in Sec. 63.1657(a) are met.
(d) The owner or operator must perform monthly inspections of the
equipment that is important to the performance of the furnace capture
system. This inspection must include an examination of the physical
condition of the equipment, suitable for detecting holes in ductwork or
hoods, flow constrictions in ductwork due to dents or accumulated dust,
and operational status of flow rate controllers (pressure sensors,
dampers, damper switches, etc.). Any deficiencies must be recorded and
proper maintenance and repairs performed.
Sec. 63.1656 Performance testing, test methods,
and compliance demonstrations.
(a) Performance testing. (1) All performance tests must be conducted
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.7 of subpart A.
[[Page 253]]
(2) Each performance test must consist of three separate and
complete runs using the applicable test methods.
(3) Each run must be conducted under conditions that are
representative of normal process operations.
(4) Performance tests conducted on air pollution control devices
serving submerged arc furnaces must be conducted such that at least one
tapping period, or at least 20 minutes of a tapping period, whichever is
less, is included in at least two of the three runs. The sampling time
for each run must be at least as long as three times the average tapping
period of the tested furnace, but no less than 60 minutes.
(5) The sample volume for each run must be at least 0.9 dscm (30
dscf).
(6) You must conduct the performance tests specified in paragraph
(c) of this section under such conditions as the Administrator specifies
based on representative performance of the affected source for the
period being tested. Upon request, you must make available to the
Administrator such records as may be necessary to determine the
conditions of performance tests.
(b) Test methods. The following test methods in appendix A of part
60 of this chapter must be used to determine compliance with the
emission standards.
(1) Method 1 to select the sampling port location and the number of
traverse points.
(2) Method 2 to determine the volumetric flow rate of the stack gas.
(3) Method 3 to determine the dry molecular weight of the stack gas.
(4) Method 4 to determine the moisture content of the stack gas.
(5) Method 5 to determine the particulate matter concentration of
the stack gas for negative pressure baghouses and positive pressure
baghouses with stacks.
(6) Method 5D to determine particulate matter concentration and
volumetric flow rate of the stack gas for positive pressure baghouses
without stacks.
(7) Method 9 of appendix A-4 of 40 CFR part 60 to determine opacity.
ASTM D7520-16, ``Standard Test Method for Determining the Opacity of a
Plume in the Outdoor Ambient Atmosphere'' may be used (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 63.14) with the following conditions:
(i) During the digital camera opacity technique (DCOT) certification
procedure outlined in Section 9.2 of ASTM D7520-16, the owner or
operator or the DCOT vendor must present the plumes in front of various
backgrounds of color and contrast representing conditions anticipated
during field use such as blue sky, trees and mixed backgrounds (clouds
and/or a sparse tree stand).
(ii) The owner or operator must also have standard operating
procedures in place including daily or other frequency quality checks to
ensure the equipment is within manufacturing specifications as outlined
in Section 8.1 of ASTM D7520-16.
(iii) The owner or operator must follow the recordkeeping procedures
outlined in Sec. 63.10(b)(1) for the DCOT certification, compliance
report, data sheets and all raw unaltered JPEGs used for opacity and
certification determination.
(iv) The owner or operator or the DCOT vendor must have a minimum of
four (4) independent technology users apply the software to determine
the visible opacity of the 300 certification plumes. For each set of 25
plumes, the user may not exceed 15 percent opacity of any one reading
and the average error must not exceed 7.5 percent opacity.
(v) Use of this approved alternative does not provide or imply a
certification or validation of any vendor's hardware or software. The
onus to maintain and verify the certification and/or training of the
DCOT camera, software and operator in accordance with ASTM D7520-16 and
these requirements is on the facility, DCOT operator and DCOT vendor.
(8) The owner or operator may use equivalent alternative measurement
methods approved by the Administrator following the procedures described
in Sec. 63.7(f) of subpart A.
(c) Compliance demonstration with the emission standards. (1) The
owner or operator must conduct an initial performance test for air
pollution control devices or vent stacks subject to Sec. 63.1652(a)
through (e) to demonstrate
[[Page 254]]
compliance with the applicable emission standards.
(2) The owner or operator must conduct annual performance tests for
the air pollution control devices and vent stacks associated with the
submerged arc furnaces, with the exception of any air pollution control
devices that serve tapping emissions combined with non-furnace
emissions, such as the MOR process or equipment associated with crushing
and screening. Also excluded are air pollution control devices that
serve dedicated non-furnace emissions, such as the MOR process or
equipment associated with crushing and screening. The results of these
annual tests will be used to demonstrate compliance with the emission
standards in Sec. 63.1652(a) through (e), as applicable.
(3) Following development, and approval, if required, of the site-
specific test plan, the owner or operator must conduct a performance
test for each air pollution control device or vent stack to measure
particulate matter and determine compliance with the applicable
standard.
(i) An owner or operator of sources subject to the particulate
matter concentration standards in Sec. 63.1652(a)(2), (d), or (e), must
determine compliance as follows:
(A) Determine the particulate matter concentration using Method 5 or
5D, as applicable.
(B) Compliance is demonstrated if the average concentration for the
three runs comprising the performance test does not exceed the standard.
(ii) An owner or operator of sources subject to the particulate mass
rate standards in Sec. 63.1652(b) or (c) must determine compliance as
follows:
(A) Determine the particulate matter concentration and volumetric
flow rate using Method 5 or 5D, as applicable.
(B) Compute the mass rate (EM) of particulate matter for
each run using the following equation:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR20MY99.000
Where:
EM = mass rate of particulate matter, kg/hr (lb/hr).
N = total number of exhaust streams at which emissions are quantified.
Csi = concentration of particulate matter from exhaust stream
``i'', mg/dscm (gr/dscf).
Qsdi = volumetric flow rate of effluent gas from exhaust
stream ``i'', dscm/hr (dscf/hr)
K = conversion factor, 1 x 10\6\ mg/kg (7,000 gr/lb).
(C) Compliance is demonstrated if the average of the mass rates for
the three runs comprising the performance test does not exceed the
standard.
(iii) An owner or operator of sources subject to the particulate
matter process-weighted rate standard in Sec. 63.1652(a)(1) must
determine compliance as follows:
(A) Determine particulate matter concentration and volumetric flow
rate using Method 5 or 5D, as applicable.
(B) Compute the process-weighted mass rate (EP) of
particulate matter for each run using the following equation:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR20MY99.001
Where:
EP = process-weighted mass rate of particulate matter, kg/hr/
MW (lb/hr/MW).
N = total number of exhaust streams at which emissions are quantified.
Csi = concentration of particulate matter from exhaust stream
``i'', mg/dscm (gr/dscf)
Qsdi = volumetric flow rate of effluent gas from exhaust
stream ``i'', dscm/hr (dscf/hr)
P = Average furnace power input, MW
K = conversion factor, 1 x 10\6\ mg/kg (7,000 gr/lb).
(C) Compliance is demonstrated if the average process-weighted mass
rate for the three runs comprising the performance test does not exceed
the standard.
(4) If a venturi scrubber is used to comply with the emission
standards, the owner or operator must establish as a site-specific
operating parameter the lowest average pressure drop on any individual
complying run in the three runs constituting any compliant test. The
pressure drop must be monitored at least every 5 minutes during the test
and hourly averages recorded.
(i) [Reserved]
[[Page 255]]
(ii) The owner or operator may augment the data obtained under
paragraph (a)(4) of this section by conducting multiple performance
tests to establish a range of compliant operating parameter values. The
lowest value of this range would be selected as the operating parameter
monitoring value. The use of historic compliance data may be used to
establish the compliant operating parameter value if the previous values
were recorded during performance tests using the same test methods
specified in this subpart and established as required in paragraph
(a)(4) of this section.
(d) Compliance demonstration with opacity standards. (1)(i) The
owner or operator subject to Sec. 63.1653 must conduct initial opacity
observations of the shop building to demonstrate compliance with the
applicable opacity standards according to Sec. 63.6(h)(5), which
addresses the conduct of opacity or visible emission observations.
(ii) In conducting the opacity observations of the shop building,
the observer must limit his or her field of view to the area of the shop
building roof monitor that corresponds to the placement of the affected
submerged arc furnaces.
(iii) The owner or operator must conduct the opacity observations
according to EPA Method 9 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, for a minimum
of 60 minutes.
(2)(i) When demonstrating initial compliance with the shop building
opacity standard, as required by paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the
owner or operator must simultaneously establish parameter values for one
of the following: the control system fan motor amperes and all capture
system damper positions, the total volumetric flow rate to the air
pollution control device and all capture system damper positions, or
volumetric flow rate through each separately ducted hood that comprises
the capture system.
(ii) The owner or operator may petition the Administrator to
reestablish these parameters whenever he or she can demonstrate to the
Administrator's satisfaction that the submerged arc furnace operating
conditions upon which the parameters were previously established are no
longer applicable. The values of these parameters determined during the
most recent demonstration of compliance must be maintained at the
appropriate level for each applicable period.
(3) The owner or operator must demonstrate continuing compliance
with the opacity standards by following the monitoring requirements
specified in Sec. 63.1657(c) and the reporting and recordkeeping
requirements specified in Sec. Sec. 63.1659(b)(4) and 63.1660(b).
(e) Compliance demonstration with the operational and work practice
standards--(1) Fugitive dust sources. Failure to have a fugitive dust
control plan or failure to report deviations from the plan and take
necessary corrective action would be a violation of the general duty to
ensure that fugitive dust sources are operated and maintained in a
manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for
minimizing emissions per Sec. 63.1652(f).
(2) Baghouses equipped with bag leak detection systems. The owner or
operator demonstrates compliance with the bag leak detection system
requirements by submitting reports as required by Sec. 63.1659(b)(5)
showing that the alarm on the system does not sound for more than 5
percent of the total operating time in a 6-month period. Calculate the
percentage of total operating time the alarm on the bag leak detection
system sounds as follows:
(i) Do not include alarms that occur due solely to a malfunction of
the bag leak detection system in the calculation.
(ii) [Reserved]
(iii) Count 1 hour of alarm time for each alarm where the owner or
operator initiates procedures to determine the cause within 1 hour of
the alarm.
(iv) Count the actual time it takes the owner or operator to
initiate procedures to determine the cause of the alarm for each alarm
where the owner or operator does not initiate procedures to determine
the cause within 1 hour of the alarm.
(v) Calculate the percentage of time the alarm on the bag leak
detection system sounds as the ratio of the sum
[[Page 256]]
of alarm times to the total operating time multiplied by 100.
[64 FR 27458, May 20, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 20462, Apr. 20, 2006; 80
FR 37399, June 30, 2015; 82 FR 5409, Jan. 18, 2017]
Sec. 63.1657 Monitoring requirements.
(a) Baghouses. (1) For the baghouses serving the submerged arc
furnaces, the metal oxygen refining process, and crushing and screening
operations, the owner or operator must observe on a daily basis for the
presence of any visible emissions.
(2) In addition to the daily visible emissions observation, the
owner or operator must conduct the following activities:
(i) Daily monitoring of pressure drop across each baghouse cell, or
across the baghouse if it is not possible to monitor each cell
individually, to ensure the pressure drop is within the normal operating
range identified in the baghouse maintenance plan.
(ii) Weekly confirmation that dust is being removed from hoppers
through visual inspection, or equivalent means of ensuring the proper
functioning of removal mechanisms.
(iii) Daily check of compressed air supply for pulse-jet baghouses.
(iv) An appropriate methodology for monitoring cleaning cycles to
ensure proper operation.
(v) Monthly check of bag cleaning mechanisms for proper functioning
through visual inspection or equivalent means.
(vi) Quarterly visual check of bag tension on reverse air and
shaker-type baghouses to ensure that the bags are not kinked (kneed or
bent) or laying on their sides. Such checks are not required for shaker-
type baghouses using self-tensioning (spring loaded) devices.
(vii) Quarterly confirmation of the physical integrity of the
baghouse structure through visual inspection of the baghouse interior
for air leaks.
(viii) Semiannual inspection of fans for wear, material buildup, and
corrosion through visual inspection, vibration detectors, or equivalent
means.
(3) In addition to meeting the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) and
(a)(2) of this section, the owner or operator of a new or reconstructed
submerged arc furnace must install and continuously operate a bag leak
detection system if the furnace primary and/or tapping emissions are
ducted to a negative pressure baghouse or to a positive pressure
baghouse equipped with a stack. The bag leak detection system must meet
the following requirements:
(i) The bag leak detection system must be certified by the
manufacturer to be capable of detecting particulate matter emissions at
concentrations of 10 milligrams per actual cubic meter (0.0044 grains
per actual cubic foot) or less.
(ii) The bag leak detection system sensor must provide output of
relative particulate matter loadings, and the owner or operator must
continuously record the output from the bag leak detection system.
(iii) The bag leak detection system must be equipped with an alarm
system that will sound when an increase in relative particulate loadings
is detected over a preset level. The alarm must be located where it can
be heard by the appropriate plant personnel.
(iv) Each bag leak detection system that works based on the
triboelectric effect must be installed, calibrated, operated, and
maintained consistent with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
guidance document ``Fabric Filter Bag Leak Detection Guidance'' (EPA-
454/R-98-015). Other bag leak detection systems must be installed,
calibrated, and maintained consistent with the manufacturer's written
specifications and recommendations.
(v) The initial adjustment of the system must, at a minimum, consist
of establishing the baseline output by adjusting the sensitivity (range)
and the averaging period of the device, and establishing the alarm set
points and the alarm delay time.
(vi) Following initial adjustment, the owner or operator must not
adjust the sensitivity or range, averaging period, alarm set points, or
alarm delay time, except as detailed in the maintenance plan required
under Sec. 63.1655(b). In no event must the sensitivity be increased by
more than 100 percent or decreased more than 50 percent over a 365-day
period unless a responsible official certifies the baghouse has been
inspected
[[Page 257]]
and found to be in good operating condition.
(vii) Where multiple detectors are required, the system's
instrumentation and alarm may be shared among detectors.
(4) As part of the maintenance plan required by Sec. 63.1655(b),
the owner or operator must develop and implement corrective action
procedures to be followed in the case of a bag leak detection system
alarm (for baghouses equipped with such a system), the observation of
visible emissions from the baghouse, or the indication through the
periodic baghouse system inspections that the system is not operating
properly. The owner or operator must initiate corrective action as soon
as practicable after the occurrence of the observation or event
indicating a problem.
(5) The corrective action plan must include procedures used to
determine the cause of an alarm or other indications of problems as well
as actions to minimize emissions. These actions may include the
following:
(i) Inspecting the baghouse for air leaks, torn or broken bags or
filter media, or any other condition that may cause an increase in
emissions.
(ii) Sealing off defective bags or filter media.
(iii) Replacing defective bags or filter media, or otherwise
repairing the control device.
(iv) Sealing off a defective baghouse compartment.
(v) Cleaning the bag leak detection system probe, or otherwise
repairing the bag leak detection system.
(vi) Shutting down the process producing the particulate matter
emissions.
(6) Failure to monitor or failure to take corrective action under
the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section would be a violation
of the general duty to operate in a manner consistent with good air
pollution control practices that minimizes emissions per Sec.
63.1652(f).
(b) Venturi scrubbers. (1) The owner or operator must monitor the
pressure drop across the venturi at least every 5 minutes and record the
average hourly pressure drop. Measurement of an average hourly pressure
drop less than the pressure drop operating parameter limit established
during a successful compliance demonstration would be a violation of the
applicable emission standard, unless the excursion in the pressure drop
is due to a malfunction.
(2) As part of the maintenance plan required by Sec. 63.1655(b),
the owner or operator must develop and implement corrective action
procedures to be followed in the case of a violation of the pressure
drop requirement. The owner or operator must initiate corrective action
as soon as practicable after the excursion.
(3) Failure to monitor or failure to take corrective action under
the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section would be a violation
of the general duty to operate in a manner consistent with good air
pollution control practices that minimizes emissions per Sec.
63.1652(f).
(c) Shop opacity. The owner or operator subject to the opacity
standards in Sec. 63.1653 must comply with one of the monitoring
options in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2) or (c)(3) of this section. The
selected option must be consistent with that selected during the initial
performance test described in Sec. 63.1656(d)(2). Alternatively, the
owner or operator may use the provisions of Sec. 63.8(f) to request
approval to use an alternative monitoring method.
(1) The owner or operator must check and record the control system
fan motor amperes and capture system damper positions once per shift.
(2) The owner or operator must install, calibrate, and maintain a
monitoring device that continuously records the volumetric flow rate
through each separately ducted hood.
(3) The owner or operator must install, calibrate, and maintain a
monitoring device that continuously records the volumetric flow rate at
the inlet of the air pollution control device and must check and record
the capture system damper positions once per shift.
(4) The flow rate monitoring devices must meet the following
requirements:
(i) Be installed in an appropriate location in the exhaust duct such
that reproducible flow rate monitoring will result.
(ii) Have an accuracy 10 percent over its
normal operating range and be
[[Page 258]]
calibrated according to the manufacturer's instructions.
(5) The Administrator may require the owner or operator to
demonstrate the accuracy of the monitoring device(s) relative to Methods
1 and 2 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter.
(6) Failure to maintain the appropriate capture system parameters
(fan motor amperes, flow rate, and/or damper positions) establishes the
need to initiate corrective action as soon as practicable after the
monitoring excursion in order to minimize excess emissions.
(7) Failure to monitor or failure to take corrective action under
the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section would be a violation
of the general duty to operate in a manner consistent with good air
pollution control practices that minimizes emissions per Sec.
63.1652(f).
[64 FR 27458, May 20, 1999, as amended at 80 FR 37399, June 30, 2015]
Sec. 63.1658 Notification requirements.
(a) As required by Sec. 63.9(b) of subpart A, unless otherwise
specified in this subpart, the owner or operator must submit the
following written notifications to the Administrator:
(1) The owner or operator of an area source that subsequently
becomes subject to the requirements of the standard must provide
notification to the applicable permitting authority as required by Sec.
63.9(b)(1).
(2) As required by Sec. 63.9(b)(2), the owner or operator of an
affected source that has an initial startup before the effective date of
the standard must notify the Administrator that the source is subject to
the requirements of the standard. The notification must be submitted no
later than 120 calendar days after May 20, 1999 (or within 120 calendar
days after the source becomes subject to this standard) and must contain
the information specified in Sec. 63.9(b)(2)(i) through (b)(2)(v).
(3) As required by Sec. 63.9(b)(3), the owner or operator of a new
or reconstructed affected source, or a source that has been
reconstructed such that it is an affected source, that has an initial
startup after the effective date and for which an application for
approval of construction or reconstruction is not required under Sec.
63.5(d), must notify the Administrator in writing that the source is
subject to the standards no later than 120 days after initial startup.
The notification must contain the information specified in Sec.
63.9(b)(2)(i) through (b)(2)(v), delivered or postmarked with the
notification required in Sec. 63.9(b)(5).
(4) As required by Sec. 63.9(b)(4), the owner or operator of a new
or reconstructed major affected source that has an initial startup after
the effective date of this standard and for which an application for
approval of construction or reconstruction is required under Sec.
63.5(d) must provide the information specified in Sec. 63.9(b)(4)(i)
through (b)(4)(v).
(5) As required by Sec. 63.9(b)(5), the owner or operator who,
after the effective date of this standard, intends to construct a new
affected source or reconstruct an affected source subject to this
standard, or reconstruct a source such that it becomes an affected
source subject to this standard, must notify the Administrator, in
writing, of the intended construction or reconstruction.
(b) Request for extension of compliance. As required by Sec.
63.9(c), if the owner or operator of an affected source cannot comply
with this standard by the applicable compliance date for that source, or
if the owner or operator has installed BACT or technology to meet LAER
consistent with Sec. 63.6(i)(5), he or she may submit to the
Administrator (or the State with an approved permit program) a request
for an extension of compliance as specified in Sec. 63.6(i)(4) through
(i)(6).
(c) Notification that source is subject to special compliance
requirements. As required by Sec. 63.9(d), an owner or operator of a
new source that is subject to special compliance requirements as
specified in Sec. 63.6(b)(3) and (b)(4) must notify the Administrator
of his or her compliance obligations no later than the notification
dates established in Sec. 63.9(b) for new sources that are not subject
to the special provisions.
(d) Notification of performance test. As required by Sec. 63.9(e),
the owner or operator of an affected source must notify the
Administrator in writing of his or her intention to conduct a
performance
[[Page 259]]
test at least 30 calendar days before the performance test is scheduled
to begin to allow the Administrator to review and approve the site-
specific test plan required under Sec. 63.7(c) and to have an observer
present during the test.
(e) Notification of opacity and visible emission observations. As
required by Sec. 63.9(f), the owner or operator of an affected source
must notify the Administrator in writing of the anticipated date for
conducting the opacity or visible emission observations specified in
Sec. 63.6(h)(5). The notification must be submitted with the
notification of the performance test date, as specified in paragraph (d)
of this section, or if visibility or other conditions prevent the
opacity or visible emission observations from being conducted
concurrently with the initial performance test required under Sec.
63.7, the owner or operator must deliver or postmark the notification
not less than 30 days before the opacity or visible emission
observations are scheduled to take place.
(f) Notification of compliance status. The owner or operator of an
affected source must submit a notification of compliance status as
required by Sec. 63.9(h). The notification must be sent before the
close of business on the 60th day following completion of the relevant
compliance demonstration.
Sec. 63.1659 Reporting requirements.
(a) General reporting requirements. The owner or operator of a
ferromanganese and silicomanganese production facility must comply with
all of the reporting requirements under Sec. 63.10 of subpart A, unless
otherwise specified in this subpart.
(1) Frequency of reports. As provided by Sec. 63.10(a)(5), if the
owner or operator is required to submit periodic reports to a State on
an established time line, he or she may change the dates by which
periodic reports submitted under this part may be submitted (without
changing the frequency of reporting) to be consistent with the State's
schedule by mutual agreement between the owner or operator and the
State. This provision may be applied at any point after the source's
compliance date.
(2) Reporting results of performance tests. As required by Sec.
63.10(d)(2), the owner or operator of an affected source must report the
results of the initial performance test as part of the notification of
compliance status required in Sec. 63.1658(f).
(3) [Reserved]
(4) Reporting malfunctions. If a malfunction occurred during the
reporting period, the report must include the number, duration and a
brief description for each type of malfunction which occurred during the
reporting period and which caused or may have caused any applicable
emission limitation to be exceeded. The report must also include a
description of actions taken by an owner or operator during a
malfunction of an affected source to minimize emissions in accordance
with Sec. 63.1652(f), including actions taken to correct a malfunction.
(b) Specific reporting requirements. In addition to the information
required under Sec. 63.10, reports required under paragraph (a) of this
section must include the information specified in paragraphs (b)(1)
through (b)(5) of this section. As allowed by Sec. 63.10(a)(3), if any
State requires a report that contains all of the information required in
a report listed in this section, an owner or operator may send the
Administrator a copy of the report sent to the State to satisfy the
requirements of this section for that report.
(1) Air pollution control devices. The owner or operator must submit
reports that summarize the records maintained as part of the practices
described in the maintenance plan for air pollution control devices
required under Sec. 63.1655(b), including an explanation of the periods
when the procedures were not followed and the corrective actions taken.
(2) Venturi scrubbers. In addition to the information required to be
submitted in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the owner or operator
must submit reports that identify the periods when the average hourly
pressure drop of venturi scrubbers used to control particulate emissions
dropped below the levels established in Sec. 63.1656(c)(4), and an
explanation of the corrective actions taken.
(3) Fugitive dust. The owner or operator must submit reports that
explain the periods when the procedures outlined in the fugitive dust
control plan
[[Page 260]]
pursuant to Sec. 63.1654(a) were not followed and the corrective
actions taken.
(4) Capture system. The owner or operator must submit reports that
summarize the monitoring parameter excursions measured pursuant to Sec.
63.1657(c) and the corrective actions taken.
(5) Bag leak detection system. The owner or operator must submit
reports including the following information:
(i) Records of all alarms.
(ii) Description of the actions taken following each bag leak
detection system alarm.
(iii) Calculation of the percent of time the alarm on the bag leak
detection system sounded during the reporting period.
(6) Frequency of reports. (i) The owner or operator must submit
reports pursuant to Sec. 63.10(e)(3) that are associated with excess
emissions events such as the excursion of the scrubber pressure drop
limit per paragraph (b)(2) of this section. These reports are to be
submitted on a quarterly basis, unless the owner or operator can satisfy
the requirements in Sec. 63.10(e)(3) to reduce the frequency to a
semiannual basis.
(ii) All other reports specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(5)
of this section must be submitted semiannually.
[64 FR 27458, May 20, 1999, as amended at 80 FR 37399, June 30, 2015]
Sec. 63.1660 Recordkeeping requirements.
(a) General recordkeeping requirements. (1) The owner or operator of
a ferromanganese and silicomanganese production facility must comply
with all of the recordkeeping requirements under Sec. 63.10.
(2) As required by Sec. 63.10(b)(2), the owner or operator must
maintain records for 5 years from the date of each record of:
(i) Records of the occurrence and duration of each malfunction of
operation (i.e., process equipment) or the air pollution control
equipment and monitoring equipment;
(ii) Records of actions taken during periods of malfunction to
minimize emissions in accordance with Sec. 63.1652(f), including
corrective actions to restore malfunctioning process and air pollution
control and monitoring equipment to its normal or usual manner of
operation;
(iii) All maintenance performed on the air pollution control
equipment;
(iv)-(v) [Reserved]
(vi) All required measurements needed to demonstrate compliance with
the standard and to support data that the source is required to report,
including, but not limited to, performance test measurements (including
initial and any subsequent performance tests) and measurements as may be
necessary to determine the conditions of the initial test or subsequent
tests;
(vii) All results of initial or subsequent performance tests;
(viii) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver from
recordkeeping or reporting requirements under Sec. 63.10(f), any
information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements
for a waiver of recordkeeping or reporting requirements;
(ix) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver from the
initial performance test under Sec. 63.7(h), a copy of the full request
and the Administrator's approval or disapproval;
(x) All documentation supporting initial notifications and
notifications of compliance status required by Sec. 63.9; and
(xi) As required by Sec. 63.10(b)(3), records of any applicability
determination, including supporting analyses.
(b) Specific recordkeeping requirements. (1) In addition to the
general records required by paragraph (a) of this section, the owner or
operator must maintain records for 5 years from the date of each record
of:
(i) Records of pressure drop across the venturi if a venturi
scrubber is used.
(ii) Records of manufacturer certification that monitoring devices
are accurate to within 5 percent (unless otherwise specified in this
subpart) and of calibrations performed at the manufacturer's recommended
frequency, or at a frequency consistent with good engineering practice,
or as experience dictates.
(iii) Records of bag leak detection system output.
(iv) An identification of the date and time of all bag leak
detection system
[[Page 261]]
alarms, the time that procedures to determine the cause of the alarm
were initiated, the cause of the alarm, an explanation of the actions
taken, and the date and time the alarm was corrected.
(v) Copy of the written maintenance plan for each air pollution
control device.
(vi) Copy of the fugitive dust control plan.
(vii) Records of each maintenance inspection and repair,
replacement, or other corrective action.
(2) All records for the most recent 2 years of operation must be
maintained on site. Records for the previous 3 years may be maintained
off site.
[64 FR 27458, May 20, 1999, as amended at 80 FR 37400, June 30, 2015]
Sec. 63.1661 Implementation and enforcement.
(a) This subpart can be implemented and enforced by the U.S. EPA, or
a delegated authority such as the applicable State, local, or Tribal
agency. If the U.S. EPA Administrator has delegated authority to a
State, local, or Tribal agency, then that agency, in addition to the
U.S. EPA, has the authority to implement and enforce this subpart.
Contact the applicable U.S. EPA Regional Office to find out if this
subpart is delegated to a State, local, or Tribal agency.
(b) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority of this
subpart to a State, local, or Tribal agency under subpart E of this
part, the authorities contained in paragraph (c) of this section are
retained by the Administrator of U.S. EPA and cannot be transferred to
the State, local, or Tribal agency.
(c) The authorities that cannot be delegated to State, local, or
Tribal agencies are as specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of
this section.
(1) Approval of alternatives to requirements in Sec. Sec. 63.1650
and 63.1652 through 63.1654.
(2) Approval of major alternatives to test methods under Sec.
63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), as defined in Sec. 63.90, and as required in
this subpart.
(3) Approval of major alternatives to monitoring under Sec.
63.8(f), as defined in Sec. 63.90, and as required in this subpart.
(4) Approval of major alternatives to recordkeeping and reporting
under Sec. 63.10(f), as defined in Sec. 63.90, and as required in this
subpart.
[68 FR 37360, June 23, 2003]
Sec. Sec. 63.1662-63.1679 [Reserved]
Sec. Table 1 to Subpart XXX of Part 63--General Provisions Applicability
to Subpart XXX
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applies to
Reference subpart XXX Comment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 63.1................... Yes..............
Sec. 63.2................... Yes..............
Sec. 63.3................... Yes..............
Sec. 63.4................... Yes..............
Sec. 63.5................... Yes..............
Sec. 63.6(a), (b), (c)...... Yes..............
Sec. 63.6(d)................ No............... Section reserved.
Sec. 63.6(e)(1)(i).......... No............... See Sec. Sec.
63.1623(g) and
63.1652(f) for
general duty
requirement.
Sec. 63.6(e)(1)(ii)......... No...............
Sec. 63.6(e)(1)(iii)........ Yes..............
Sec. 63.6(e)(2)............. No............... Section reserved.
Sec. 63.6(e)(3)............. No...............
Sec. 63.6(f)(1)............. No...............
Sec. 63.6(f)(2)-(3)......... Yes..............
Sec. 63.6(g)................ Yes..............
Sec. 63.6(h)(1)............. No...............
Sec. 63.6(h)(2)-(9)......... Yes..............
Sec. 63.6(i)................ Yes..............
Sec. 63.6(j)................ Yes..............
Sec. 63.7(a)-(d)............ Yes..............
Sec. 63.7(e)(1)............. No............... See Sec. Sec.
63.1625(a)(5) and
63.1656(a)(6).
Sec. 63.7(e)(2)-(4)......... Yes..............
Sec. 63.7(f), (g), (h)...... Yes..............
Sec. 63.8(a)-(b)............ Yes..............
[[Page 262]]
Sec. 63.8(c)(1)(i).......... No............... See Sec. Sec.
63.1623(g) and
63.1652(f) for
general duty
requirement.
Sec. 63.8(c)(1)(ii)......... Yes..............
Sec. 63.8(c)(1)(iii)........ No...............
Sec. 63.8(c)(2)-(d)(2)...... Yes..............
Sec. 63.8(d)(3)............. Yes, except for SSM plans are not
last sentence. required.
Sec. 63.8(e)-(g)............ Yes..............
Sec. Yes..............
63.9(a),(b),(c),(e),(g),(h)(1
) through (3), (h)(5) and
(6), (i) and (j).
Sec. 63.9(f)................ Yes..............
Sec. 63.9(h)(4)............. No............... Section reserved.
Sec. 63.10(a)............... Yes..............
Sec. 63.10(b)(1)............ Yes..............
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(i)......... No...............
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(ii)........ No............... See Sec. Sec.
63.1628 and 63.1660
for recordkeeping of
(1) occurrence and
duration and (2)
actions taken during
malfunction.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(iii)....... Yes..............
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(iv)-(v).... No...............
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(vi)-(xiv).. Yes..............
Sec. 63.10)(b)(3)........... Yes..............
Sec. 63.10(c)(1)-(9)........ Yes..............
Sec. 63.10(c)(10)-(11)...... No............... See Sec. Sec.
63.1628 and 63.1660
for malfunction
recordkeeping
requirements.
Sec. 63.10(c)(12)-(14)...... Yes..............
Sec. 63.10(c)(15)........... No...............
Sec. 63.10(d)(1)-(4)........ Yes..............
Sec. 63.10(d)(5)............ No............... See Sec. Sec.
63.1628(d)(8) and
63.1659(a)(4) for
malfunction
reporting
requirements.
Sec. 63.10(e)-(f)........... Yes..............
Sec. 63.11.................. No............... Flares will not be
used to comply with
the emission limits.
Sec. Sec. 63.12-63.15...... Yes..............
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[80 FR 37400, June 30, 2015]
Subpart AAAA_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
Source: 68 FR 2238, Jan. 16, 2003, unless otherwise noted.
What This Subpart Covers
Sec. 63.1930 What is the purpose of this subpart?
This subpart establishes national emission standards for hazardous
air pollutants for existing and new municipal solid waste (MSW)
landfills. This subpart requires all landfills described in Sec.
63.1935 to meet the requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cc or WWW
and requires timely control of bioreactors. This subpart also requires
such landfills to meet the startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM)
requirements of the general provisions of this part and provides that
compliance with the operating conditions shall be demonstrated by
parameter monitoring results that are within the specified ranges. It
also includes additional reporting requirements.
Sec. 63.1935 Am I subject to this subpart?
You are subject to this subpart if you meet the criteria in
paragraph (a) or (b) of this section.
(a) You are subject to this subpart if you own or operate a MSW
landfill that has accepted waste since November 8, 1987 or has
additional capacity for waste deposition and meets any one of the three
criteria in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section:
(1) Your MSW landfill is a major source as defined in 40 CFR 63.2 of
subpart A.
(2) Your MSW landfill is collocated with a major source as defined
in 40 CFR 63.2 of subpart A.
(3) Your MSW landfill is an area source landfill that has a design
capacity equal to or greater than 2.5 million megagrams (Mg) and 2.5
million cubic
[[Page 263]]
meters (m \3\) and has estimated uncontrolled emissions equal to or
greater than 50 megagrams per year (Mg/yr) NMOC as calculated according
to Sec. 60.754(a) of the MSW landfills new source performance standards
in 40 CFR part 60, subpart WWW, the Federal plan, or an EPA approved and
effective State or tribal plan that applies to your landfill.
(b) You are subject to this subpart if you own or operate a MSW
landfill that has accepted waste since November 8, 1987 or has
additional capacity for waste deposition, that includes a bioreactor, as
defined in Sec. 63.1990, and that meets any one of the criteria in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section:
(1) Your MSW landfill is a major source as defined in 40 CFR 63.2 of
subpart A.
(2) Your MSW landfill is collocated with a major source as defined
in 40 CFR 63.2 of subpart A.
(3) Your MSW landfill is an area source landfill that has a design
capacity equal to our greater than 2.5 million Mg and 2.5 million m\3\
and that is not permanently closed as of January 16, 2003.
Sec. 63.1940 What is the affected source of this subpart?
(a) An affected source of this subpart is a MSW landfill, as defined
in Sec. 63.1990, that meets the criteria in Sec. 63.1935(a) or (b).
The affected source includes the entire disposal facility in a
contiguous geographic space where household waste is placed in or on
land, including any portion of the MSW landfill operated as a
bioreactor.
(b) A new affected source of this subpart is an affected source that
commenced construction or reconstruction after November 7, 2000. An
affected source is reconstructed if it meets the definition of
reconstruction in 40 CFR 63.2 of subpart A.
(c) An affected source of this subpart is existing if it is not new.
Sec. 63.1945 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
(a) If your landfill is a new affected source, you must comply with
this subpart by January 16, 2003 or at the time you begin operating,
whichever is last.
(b) If your landfill is an existing affected source, you must comply
with this subpart by January 16, 2004.
(c) If your landfill is a new affected source and is a major source
or is collocated with a major source, you must comply with the
requirements in Sec. Sec. 63.1955(b) and 63.1960 through 63.1980 by the
date your landfill is required to install a collection and control
system by 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2) of subpart WWW.
(d) If your landfill is an existing affected source and is a major
source or is collocated with a major source, you must comply with the
requirements in Sec. Sec. 63.1955(b) and 63.1960 through 63.1980 by the
date your landfill is required to install a collection and control
system by 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2) of subpart WWW, the Federal plan, or EPA
approved and effective State or tribal plan that applies to your
landfill or by January 13, 2004, whichever occurs later.
(e) If your landfill is a new affected source and is an area source
meeting the criteria in Sec. 63.1935(a)(3), you must comply with the
requirements of Sec. Sec. 63.1955(b) and 63.1960 through 63.1980 by the
date your landfill is required to install a collection and control
system by 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2) of subpart WWW.
(f) If your landfill is an existing affected source and is an area
source meeting the criteria in Sec. 63.1935(a)(3), you must comply with
the requirements in Sec. Sec. 63.1955(b) and 63.1960 through 63.1980 by
the date your landfill is required to install a collection and control
system by 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2) of subpart WWW, the Federal plan, or EPA
approved and effective State or tribal plan that applies to your
landfill or by January 16, 2004, whichever occurs later.
Sec. 63.1947 When do I have to comply with this subpart if I own
or operate a bioreactor?
You must comply with this subpart by the dates specified in Sec.
63.1945(a) or (b) of this subpart. If you own or operate a bioreactor
located at a landfill that is not permanently closed as of January 16,
2003 and has a design capacity equal to or greater than 2.5 million Mg
and 2.5 million m\3\, then you must install and operate a collection and
control system that meets the criteria in 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2)(v) of part
60,
[[Page 264]]
subpart WWW, the Federal plan, or EPA approved and effective State plan
according to the schedule specified in paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of
this section.
(a) If your bioreactor is at a new affected source, then you must
meet the requirements in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section:
(1) Install the gas collection and control system for the bioreactor
before initiating liquids addition.
(2) Begin operating the gas collection and control system within 180
days after initiating liquids addition or within 180 days after
achieving a moisture content of 40 percent by weight, whichever is
later. If you choose to begin gas collection and control system
operation 180 days after achieving a 40 percent moisture content instead
of 180 days after liquids addition, use the procedures in Sec.
63.1980(g) and (h) to determine when the bioreactor moisture content
reaches 40 percent.
(b) If your bioreactor is at an existing affected source, then you
must install and begin operating the gas collection and control system
for the bioreactor by January 17, 2006 or by the date your bioreactor is
required to install a gas collection and control system under 40 CFR
part 60, subpart WWW, the Federal plan, or EPA approved and effective
State plan or tribal plan that applies to your landfill, whichever is
earlier.
(c) If your bioreactor is at an existing affected source and you do
not initiate liquids addition to your bioreactor until later than
January 17, 2006, then you must meet the requirements in paragraphs
(c)(1) and (2) of this section:
(1) Install the gas collection and control system for the bioreactor
before initiating liquids addition.
(2) Begin operating the gas collection and control system within 180
days after initiating liquids addition or within 180 days after
achieving a moisture content of 40 percent by weight, whichever is
later. If you choose to begin gas collection and control system
operation 180 days after achieving a 40 percent moisture content instead
of 180 days after liquids addition, use the procedures in Sec.
63.1980(g) and (h) to determine when the bioreactor moisture content
reaches 40 percent.
Sec. 63.1950 When am I no longer required to comply with this subpart?
You are no longer required to comply with the requirements of this
subpart when you are no longer required to apply controls as specified
in 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2)(v) of subpart WWW, or the Federal plan or EPA
approved and effective State plan or tribal plan that implements 40 CFR
part 60, subpart Cc, whichever applies to your landfill.
Sec. 63.1952 When am I no longer required to comply with the requirements
of this subpart if I own or operate a bioreactor?
If you own or operate a landfill that includes a bioreactor, you are
no longer required to comply with the requirements of this subpart for
the bioreactor provided you meet the conditions of either paragraphs (a)
or (b).
(a) Your affected source meets the control system removal criteria
in 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2)(v) of part 60, subpart WWW or the bioreactor
meets the criteria for a nonproductive area of the landfill in 40 CFR
60.759(a)(3)(ii) of part 60, subpart WWW.
(b) The bioreactor portion of the landfill is a closed landfill as
defined in 40 CFR 60.751, subpart WWW, you have permanently ceased
adding liquids to the bioreactor, and you have not added liquids to the
bioreactor for at least 1 year. A closure report for the bioreactor must
be submitted to the Administrator as provided in 40 CFR 60.757(d) of
subpart WWW.
(c) Compliance with the bioreactor control removal provisions in
this section constitutes compliance with 40 CFR part 60, subpart WWW or
the Federal plan, whichever applies to your bioreactor.
Standards
Sec. 63.1955 What requirements must I meet?
(a) You must fulfill one of the requirements in paragraph (a)(1) or
(2) of this section, whichever is applicable:
(1) Comply with the requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart WWW.
(2) Comply with the requirements of the Federal plan or EPA approved
and effective State plan or tribal plan that implements 40 CFR part 60,
subpart Cc.
[[Page 265]]
(b) If you are required by 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2) of subpart WWW, the
Federal plan, or an EPA approved and effective State or tribal plan to
install a collection and control system, you must comply with the
requirements in Sec. Sec. 63.1960 through 63.1985 and with the general
provisions of this part specified in table 1 of this subpart.
(c) For approval of collection and control systems that include any
alternatives to the operational standards, test methods, procedures,
compliance measures, monitoring, recordkeeping or reporting provisions,
you must follow the procedures in 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2). If alternatives
have already been approved under 40 CFR part 60 subpart WWW or the
Federal plan, or EPA approved and effective State or tribal plan, these
alternatives can be used to comply with this subpart, except that all
affected sources must comply with the SSM requirements in Subpart A of
this part as specified in Table 1 of this subpart and all affected
sources must submit compliance reports every 6 months as specified in
Sec. 63.1980(a) and (b), including information on all deviations that
occurred during the 6-month reporting period. Deviations for continuous
emission monitors or numerical continuous parameter monitors must be
determined using a 3 hour monitoring block average.
(d) If you own or operate a bioreactor that is located at a MSW
landfill that is not permanently closed and has a design capacity equal
to or greater than 2.5 million Mg and 2.5 million m\3\, then you must
meet the requirements of paragraph (a) and the additional requirements
in paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) You must comply with the general provisions specified in Table 1
of this subpart and Sec. Sec. 63.1960 through 63.1985 starting on the
date you are required to install the gas collection and control system.
(2) You must extend the collection and control system into each new
cell or area of the bioreactor prior to initiating liquids addition in
that area, instead of the schedule in 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2)(ii)(A)(2).
General and Continuing Compliance Requirements
Sec. 63.1960 How is compliance determined?
Compliance is determined in the same way it is determined for 40 CFR
part 60, subpart WWW, including performance testing, monitoring of the
collection system, continuous parameter monitoring, and other credible
evidence. In addition, continuous parameter monitoring data, collected
under 40 CFR 60.756(b)(1), (c)(1), and (d) of subpart WWW, are used to
demonstrate compliance with the operating conditions for control
systems. If a deviation occurs, you have failed to meet the control
device operating conditions described in this subpart and have deviated
from the requirements of this subpart. Finally, you must develop a
written SSM plan according to the provisions in 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3). A
copy of the SSM plan must be maintained on site. Failure to write or
maintain a copy of the SSM plan is a deviation from the requirements of
this subpart.
[68 FR 2238, Jan. 16, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 20462, Apr. 20, 2006]
Sec. 63.1965 What is a deviation?
A deviation is defined in Sec. 63.1990. For the purposes of the
landfill monitoring and SSM plan requirements, deviations include the
items in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section.
(a) A deviation occurs when the control device operating parameter
boundaries described in 40 CFR 60.758(c)(1) of subpart WWW are exceeded.
(b) A deviation occurs when 1 hour or more of the hours during the
3-hour block averaging period does not constitute a valid hour of data.
A valid hour of data must have measured values for at least three 15-
minute monitoring periods within the hour.
(c) A deviation occurs when a SSM plan is not developed or
maintained on site.
[68 FR 2238, Jan. 16, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 20462, Apr. 20, 2006]
Sec. 63.1975 How do I calculate the 3-hour block average used
to demonstrate compliance?
Averages are calculated in the same way as they are calculated in 40
CFR
[[Page 266]]
part 60, subpart WWW, except that the data collected during the events
listed in paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of this section are not to
be included in any average computed under this subpart:
(a) Monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, and
zero (low-level) and high-level adjustments.
(b) Startups.
(c) Shutdowns.
(d) Malfunctions.
Notifications, Records, and Reports
Sec. 63.1980 What records and reports must I keep and submit?
(a) Keep records and reports as specified in 40 CFR part 60, subpart
WWW, or in the Federal plan, EPA approved State plan or tribal plan that
implements 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cc, whichever applies to your
landfill, with one exception: You must submit the annual report
described in 40 CFR 60.757(f) every 6 months.
(b) You must also keep records and reports as specified in the
general provisions of 40 CFR part 60 and this part as shown in Table 1
of this subpart. Applicable records in the general provisions include
items such as SSM plans and the SSM plan reports.
(c) For bioreactors at new affected sources you must submit the
initial semiannual compliance report and performance test results
described in 40 CFR 60.757(f) within 180 days after the date you are
required to begin operating the gas collection and control system by
Sec. 63.1947(a)(2) of this subpart.
(d) For bioreactors at existing affected sources, you must submit
the initial semiannual compliance report and performance test results
described in 40 CFR 60.757(f) within 180 days after the compliance date
specified in Sec. 63.1947(b) of this subpart, unless you have
previously submitted a compliance report for the bioreactor required by
40 CFR part 60, subpart WWW, the Federal plan, or an EPA approved and
effective State plan or tribal plan.
(e) For bioreactors that are located at existing affected sources,
but do not initiate liquids addition until later than the compliance
date in Sec. 63.1947(b) of this subpart, you must submit the initial
semiannual compliance report and performance tests results described in
40 CFR 60.757(f) within 180 days after the date you are required to
begin operating the gas collection and control system by Sec.
63.1947(c) of this subpart.
(f) If you must submit a semiannual compliance report for a
bioreactor as well as a semiannual compliance report for a conventional
portion of the same landfill, you may delay submittal of a subsequent
semiannual compliance report for the bioreactor according to paragraphs
(f)(1) through (3) of this section so that the reports may be submitted
on the same schedule.
(1) After submittal of your initial semiannual compliance report and
performance test results for the bioreactor, you may delay submittal of
the subsequent semiannual compliance report for the bioreactor until the
date the initial or subsequent semiannual compliance report is due for
the conventional portion of your landfill.
(2) You may delay submittal of your subsequent semiannual compliance
report by no more than 12 months after the due date for submitting the
initial semiannual compliance report and performance test results
described in 40 CFR 60.757(f) for the bioreactor. The report shall cover
the time period since the previous semiannual report for the bioreactor,
which would be a period of at least 6 months and no more than 12 months.
(3) After the delayed semiannual report, all subsequent semiannual
reports for the bioreactor must be submitted every 6 months on the same
date the semiannual report for the conventional portion of the landfill
is due.
(g) If you add any liquids other than leachate in a controlled
fashion to the waste mass and do not comply with the bioreactor
requirements in Sec. Sec. 63.1947, 63.1955(c) and 63.1980(c) through
(f) of this subpart, you must keep a record of calculations showing that
the percent moisture by weight expected in the waste mass to which
liquid is added is less than 40 percent. The calculation must consider
the waste mass, moisture content of the incoming waste, mass of water
added to the waste including leachate recirculation and other liquids
addition and precipitation, and the mass of water removed through
leachate or other water losses.
[[Page 267]]
Moisture level sampling or mass balances calculations can be used. You
must document the calculations and the basis of any assumptions. Keep
the record of the calculations until you cease liquids addition.
(h) If you calculate moisture content to establish the date your
bioreactor is required to begin operating the collection and control
system under Sec. 63.1947(a)(2) or (c)(2), keep a record of the
calculations including the information specified in paragraph (g) of
this section for 5 years. Within 90 days after the bioreactor achieves
40 percent moisture content, report the results of the calculation, the
date the bioreactor achieved 40 percent moisture content by weight, and
the date you plan to begin collection and control system operation.
Other Requirements and Information
Sec. 63.1985 Who enforces this subpart?
(a) This subpart can be implemented and enforced by the U.S. EPA, or
a delegated authority such as the applicable State, local, or tribal
agency. If the EPA Administrator has delegated authority to a State,
local, or tribal agency, then that agency as well as the U.S. EPA has
the authority to implement and enforce this subpart. Contact the
applicable EPA Regional Office to find out if this subpart is delegated
to a State, local, or tribal agency.
(b) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority of this
subpart to a State, local, or tribal agency under subpart E of this
part, the authorities contained in paragraph (c) of this section are
retained by the EPA Administrator and are not transferred to the State,
local, or tribal agency.
(c) The authorities that will not be delegated to State, local, or
tribal agencies are as follows. Approval of alternatives to the
standards in Sec. 63.1955. Where these standards reference another
subpart, the cited provisions will be delegated according to the
delegation provisions of the referenced subpart.
Sec. 63.1990 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Terms used in this subpart are defined in the Clean Air Act, 40 CFR
part 60, subparts A, Cc, and WWW; 40 CFR part 62, subpart GGG, and
subpart A of this part, and this section that follows:
Bioreactor means a MSW landfill or portion of a MSW landfill where
any liquid other than leachate (leachate includes landfill gas
condensate) is added in a controlled fashion into the waste mass (often
in combination with recirculating leachate) to reach a minimum average
moisture content of at least 40 percent by weight to accelerate or
enhance the anaerobic (without oxygen) biodegradation of the waste.
Deviation means any instance in which an affected source subject to
this subpart, or an owner or operator of such a source:
(1) Fails to meet any requirement or obligation established by this
subpart, including, but not limited to, any emissions limitation
(including any operating limit) or work practice standard;
(2) Fails to meet any term or condition that is adopted to implement
an applicable requirement in this subpart and that is included in the
operating permit for any affected source required to obtain such a
permit; or
(3) Fails to meet any emission limitation, (including any operating
limit), or work practice standard in this subpart during SSM, regardless
of whether or not such failure is permitted by this subpart.
Emissions limitation means any emission limit, opacity limit,
operating limit, or visible emissions limit.
EPA approved State plan means a State plan that EPA has approved
based on the requirements in 40 CFR part 60, subpart B to implement and
enforce 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cc. An approved State plan becomes
effective on the date specified in the notice published in the Federal
Register announcing EPA's approval.
Federal plan means the EPA plan to implement 40 CFR part 60, subpart
Cc for existing MSW landfills located in States and Indian country where
State plans or tribal plans are not currently in effect. On the
effective date of an EPA approved State or tribal plan, the Federal plan
no longer applies. The Federal plan is found at 40 CFR part 62, subpart
GGG.
[[Page 268]]
Municipal solid waste landfill or MSW landfill means an entire
disposal facility in a contiguous geographical space where household
waste is placed in or on land. A municipal solid waste landfill may also
receive other types of RCRA Subtitle D wastes (see Sec. 257.2 of this
chapter) such as commercial solid waste, nonhazardous sludge,
conditionally exempt small quantity generator waste, and industrial
solid waste. Portions of a municipal solid waste landfill may be
separated by access roads. A municipal solid waste landfill may be
publicly or privately owned. A municipal solid waste landfill may be a
new municipal solid waste landfill, an existing municipal solid waste
landfill, or a lateral expansion.
Tribal plan means a plan submitted by a tribal authority pursuant to
40 CFR parts 9, 35, 49, 50, and 81 to implement and enforce 40 CFR part
60, subpart Cc.
Work practice standard means any design, equipment, work practice,
or operational standard, or combination thereof, that is promulgated
pursuant to section 112(h) of the Clean Air Act.
As stated in Sec. Sec. 63.1955 and 63.1980, you must meet each
requirement in the following table that applies to you.
Sec. Table 1 to Subpart AAAA of Part 63--Applicability of NESHAP General
Provisions to Subpart AAAA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part 63 Citation Description Explanation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.1(a)..................... Applicability: Affected sources are
general already subject to
applicability of the provisions of
NESHAP in this part. paragraphs (a)(10)-
(12) through the
same provisions
under 40 CFR, part
60 subpart A.
63.1(b)..................... Applicability
determination for
stationary sources.
63.1(e)..................... Title V permitting..
63.2........................ Definitions.........
63.4........................ Prohibited Affected sources are
activities and already subject to
circumvention. the provisions of
paragraph (b)
through the same
provisions under 40
CFR, part 60
subpart A.
63.5(b)..................... Requirements for
existing, newly
constructed, and
reconstructed
sources.
63.6(e)..................... Operation and
maintenance
requirements,
startup, shutdown
and malfunction
plan provisions.
63.6(f)..................... Compliance with Affected sources are
nonopacity emission already subject to
standards. the provisions of
paragraphs (f)(1)
and (2)(i) through
the same provisions
under 40 CFR, part
60 subpart A.
63.10(b)(2)(i)-(b)(2)(v).... General
recordkeeping
requirements.
63.10(d)(5)................. If actions taken
during a startup,
shutdown and
malfunction plan
are consistent with
the procedures in
the startup,
shutdown and
malfunction plan,
this information
shall be included
in a semi-annual
startup, shutdown
and malfunction
plan report. Any
time an action
taken during a
startup, shutdown
and malfunction
plan is not
consistent with the
startup, shutdown
and malfunction
plan, the source
shall report
actions taken
within 2 working
days after
commencing such
actions, followed
by a letter 7 days
after the event.
63.12(a).................... These provisions do
not preclude the
State from adopting
and enforcing any
standard,
limitation, etc.,
requiring permits,
or requiring
emissions
reductions in
excess of those
specified.
63.15....................... Availability of
information and
confidentiality.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 269]]
Subpart BBBB [Reserved]
Subpart CCCC_National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Manufacturing of Nutritional Yeast
Source: 82 FR 48178, Oct. 16, 2017, unless otherwise noted.
What This Subpart Covers
Sec. 63.2130 What is the purpose of this subpart?
This subpart establishes national emission limitations for hazardous
air pollutants (HAP) emitted from manufacturers of nutritional yeast.
This subpart also establishes requirements to demonstrate initial and
continuous compliance with the emission limitations.
Sec. 63.2131 Am I subject to this subpart?
(a) You are subject to this subpart if you own or operate a
nutritional yeast manufacturing facility that is, is located at, or is
part of a major source of HAP emissions.
(1) A manufacturer of nutritional yeast is a facility that makes
yeast for the purpose of becoming an ingredient in dough for bread or
any other yeast-raised baked product, or for becoming a nutritional food
additive intended for consumption by humans. A manufacturer of
nutritional yeast does not include production of yeast intended for
consumption by animals, such as an additive for livestock feed.
(2) A major source of HAP emissions is any stationary source or
group of stationary sources located within a contiguous area and under
common control that emits or has the potential to emit, considering
controls, any single HAP at a rate of 9.07 megagrams (10 tons) or more
per year or any combination of HAP at a rate of 22.68 megagrams (25
tons) or more per year.
(b) [Reserved]
Sec. 63.2132 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
(a) This subpart applies to each new, reconstructed, or existing
``affected source'' that produces Saccharomyces cerevisiae at a
nutritional yeast manufacturing facility.
(b) The affected source is the collection of equipment used in the
manufacture of the nutritional yeast species Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
This collection of equipment includes fermentation vessels (fermenters),
as described in paragraph (c) of this section. The collection of
equipment used in the manufacture of the nutritional yeast species
Candida utilis (torula yeast) is not part of the affected source.
(c) The emission limitations in this subpart apply to fermenters in
the affected source that meet all of the criteria listed in paragraphs
(c)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) The fermenters are ``fed-batch'' as defined in Sec. 63.2192.
(2) The fermenters are used to support one of the last three
fermentation stages in a production run (i.e., third-to-last stage,
second-to-last stage, and last stage), which may be referred to as
``stock, first generation, and trade,'' ``seed, semi-seed, and
commercial,'' or ``CB4, CB5, and CB6'' stages.
(d) The emission limitations in this subpart do not apply to flask,
pure-culture, yeasting-tank, or any other set-batch (as defined in Sec.
63.2192) fermentation, and they do not apply to any operations after the
last dewatering operation, such as filtration.
(e) The emission limitations in Table 1 to this subpart do not apply
to fermenters during the production of specialty yeast (defined in Sec.
63.2192).
(f) An affected source is a ``new affected source'' if you commenced
construction of the affected source after October 19, 1998, and you met
the applicability criteria in Sec. 63.2131 at the time you commenced
construction.
(g) An affected source is ``reconstructed'' if it meets the criteria
for reconstruction as defined in Sec. 63.2.
(h) An affected source is ``existing'' if it is not new or
reconstructed.
Sec. 63.2133 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
(a) If you have a new or reconstructed affected source, then you
must comply with paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section.
(1) If you start up your affected source before May 21, 2001, then
you
[[Page 270]]
must comply with this subpart no later than May 21, 2001.
(2) If you start up your affected source on or after May 21, 2001,
then you must comply with this subpart upon startup of your affected
source.
(b) If you have an existing affected source, then you must comply
with this subpart no later than May 21, 2004.
(c) If you have an area source that increases its emissions, or its
potential to emit, so that it becomes a major source of HAP, then
paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section apply.
(1) Any portion of the existing facility that is a new affected
source or a new reconstructed source must be in compliance with this
subpart upon startup.
(2) All other parts of the affected source must be in compliance
with this subpart by no later than 1 year after it becomes a major
source.
(d) You must meet the notification requirements in Sec. 63.2180
according to the schedule in Sec. 63.2180 and in subpart A of this
part.
Emission Limitations
Sec. 63.2140 What emission limitations must I meet?
You must meet the applicable emission limitations in Table 1 to this
subpart, according to the timeline provided in Table 7 to this subpart.
General Compliance Requirements
Sec. 63.2150 What are my general requirements for complying
with this subpart?
(a) You must be in compliance with the applicable emission
limitations in Table 1 to this subpart at all times, and demonstrate
compliance according to paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section.
(1) To demonstrate compliance with emission limitations by using the
98-Percent Option, you must follow the procedures of Sec. 63.2171(b).
(2) To demonstrate compliance with emission limitations by using the
Average Option, you must follow the procedures of Sec. 63.2171(c).
(3) To demonstrate compliance with emission limitations by using the
Batch Option, you must follow the procedures of Sec. 63.2171(d).
(b) You must monitor VOC concentration continuously for each batch
by using the applicable monitoring method in Table 8 to this subpart.
(c) If the date upon which you must demonstrate initial compliance
as specified in Sec. 63.2160 falls after the compliance date specified
for your affected source in Sec. 63.2133, then you must maintain a log
detailing the operation and maintenance of the continuous emission
monitoring systems and the process and emissions control equipment
during the period between those dates.
(d) At all times, you must operate and maintain any affected source,
including associated air pollution control equipment and monitoring
equipment, in a manner consistent with safety and good air pollution
control practices for minimizing emissions. The general duty to minimize
emissions does not require you to make any further efforts to reduce
emissions if levels required by the applicable standard have been
achieved. Determination of whether an affected source is operating in
compliance with operation and maintenance requirements will be based on
information available to the Administrator that may include, but is not
limited to, monitoring results, review of operation and maintenance
procedures, review of operation and maintenance records, and inspection
of the affected source.
Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements
Sec. 63.2160 By what date must I conduct an initial compliance demonstration?
(a) For each emission limitation in Table 1 to this subpart for
which you demonstrate compliance using the Average Option, you must
demonstrate initial compliance for the period ending on the last day of
the month that is 12 calendar months (or 11 calendar months, if the
compliance date for your affected source is the first day of the month)
after the compliance date that is specified for your affected source in
Sec. 63.2133.
(b) For each emission limitation in Table 1 to this subpart for
which you demonstrate compliance using the Batch Option, you must
demonstrate
[[Page 271]]
initial compliance for the period ending June 30 or December 31 (use
whichever date is the first date following the compliance date that is
specified for your affected source in Sec. 63.2133).
Sec. 63.2161 What performance tests and other procedures must I use
if I monitor brew ethanol?
(a) You must conduct each performance test in Table 2 to this
subpart that applies to you, as specified in paragraphs (b) through (f)
of this section.
(b) You must conduct performance tests under such conditions as the
Administrator specifies, based on representative performance of the
affected source for the period being tested, and under the specific
conditions that this subpart specifies in Table 2 to this subpart and in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section. You must record the
process information that is necessary to document operating conditions
during the test and include in such record an explanation to support
that such conditions represent normal operation. Upon request, you must
make available to the Administrator such records as may be necessary to
determine the conditions of performance tests.
(1) You must conduct each performance test concurrently with brew
ethanol monitoring to establish a brew-to-exhaust correlation as
specified in paragraph (e) of this section.
(2) For each fermentation stage, you must conduct one run of the EPA
Test Method 25A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A-7, over the entire length
of a batch. The three fermentation stages do not have to be from the
same production run.
(3) You must obtain your test sample at a point in the exhaust-gas
stream before you inject any dilution air. For fermenters, dilution air
is any air not needed to control fermentation.
(4) You must record the results of the test for each fermentation
stage.
(c) You may not conduct performance tests during periods of
malfunction.
(d) You must collect data to correlate the brew ethanol
concentration to the VOC concentration in the fermenter exhaust
according to paragraphs (d)(1) through (3) of this section.
(1) You must collect a separate set of brew ethanol concentration
data for each fed-batch fermentation stage while manufacturing the
product that constitutes the largest percentage (by mass) of average
annual production.
(2) You must measure brew ethanol as specified in Sec. 63.2164
concurrently with conducting a performance test for VOC in fermenter
exhaust as specified in paragraph (b) of this section. You must measure
brew ethanol at least once during each successive 30-minute period over
the entire period of the performance test for VOC in fermenter exhaust.
(3) You must keep a record of the brew ethanol concentration data
for each fermentation stage over the period of EPA Test Method 25A of 40
CFR part 60, appendix A-7, performance test.
(e) For each set of data that you collected under paragraphs (b) and
(d) of this section, you must perform a linear regression of brew
ethanol concentration (percent) on VOC fermenter exhaust concentration
(parts per million by volume (ppmv) measured as propane). You must
ensure the correlation between the brew ethanol concentration, as
measured by the brew ethanol monitor, and the VOC fermenter exhaust
concentration, as measured by EPA Test Method 25A of 40 CFR part 60,
appendix A-7, is linear with a correlation coefficient of at least 0.90.
(f) You must calculate the VOC concentration in the fermenter
exhaust for each batch using the brew ethanol concentration data
according to Equation 1 of this section, and using the constants (CF and
y) calculated by the applicable linear regression performed under
paragraph (e) of this section.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR16OC17.000
[[Page 272]]
Where:
BAVOC = Batch-average concentration of VOC in fermenter exhaust (ppmv
measured as propane), calculated for compliance demonstration
BAE = Batch-average concentration of brew ethanol in fermenter liquid
(percent), measured by the brew ethanol monitor
CF = Constant established at performance test and representing the slope
of the regression line
y = Constant established at performance test and representing the y-
intercept of the regression line
Sec. 63.2162 When must I conduct subsequent performance tests
if I monitor brew ethanol?
(a) For each emission limitation in Table 1 to this subpart for
which compliance is demonstrated by monitoring brew ethanol
concentration and calculating VOC concentration in the fermenter exhaust
according to the procedures in Sec. 63.2161, you must conduct an EPA
Test Method 25A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A-7, performance test and
establish a brew-to-exhaust correlation according to the procedures in
Table 2 to this subpart and in Sec. 63.2161, at least once every year.
(b) The first subsequent performance test must be conducted no later
than 365 calendar days after the initial performance test conducted
according to Sec. 63.2160. Each subsequent performance test must be
conducted no later than 365 calendar days after the previous performance
test. You must conduct a performance test for each 365 calendar day
period during which you demonstrate compliance using the brew ethanol
correlation developed according to Sec. 63.2161.
Sec. 63.2163 If I monitor fermenter exhaust, what are my monitoring
installation, operation, and maintenance requirements?
(a) You must install and certify a CEMS that generates a single
combined response value for VOC concentration (VOC CEMS) according to
the procedures and requirements in Performance Specification 8--
Performance Specifications for Volatile Organic Compound Continuous
Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources in appendix B to part
60 of this chapter.
(b) You must operate and maintain your VOC CEMS according to the
procedures and requirements in Procedure 1--Quality Assurance
Requirements for Gas Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Used for
Compliance Determination in appendix F to part 60 of this chapter,
except with regard to provisions concerning relative accuracy test audit
(RATA), cylinder gas audit (CGA), and relative accuracy audit (RAA)
frequencies; out of control period definition; and CEMS data status
during out of control periods; which are instead specified in this
paragraph for frequencies; and Sec. 63.8(c)(7) for the definition of
and status of CEMS data during out of control periods.
(1) You must conduct a RATA at least once every 12 calendar
quarters, in accordance with sections 8 and 11, as applicable, of
Performance Specification 8.
(2) You must conduct a CGA or RAA in the calendar quarters during
which a RATA is not conducted, but in no more than 11 quarters in
succession.
(3) As necessary, rather than relying on citation 2 of Procedure 1
of appendix F to 40 CFR part 60, you must rely on EPA/600/R-12/531
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14).
(4) Your affected source must meet the criteria of Performance
Specification 8, section 13.2.
(c) You must use Method 25A in appendix A-7 to part 60 of this
chapter as the Reference Method.
(d) You must calibrate your VOC CEMS with propane.
(e) You must set your VOC CEMS span at less than 5 times the
relevant VOC emission limitation given in Table 1 of this subpart. Note
that the EPA considers 1.5 to 2.5 times the relevant VOC emission
limitation to be the optimum range, in general.
(f) You must complete the performance evaluation and submit the
performance evaluation report before the compliance date that is
specified for your affected source in Sec. 63.2133.
(g) You must monitor VOC concentration in fermenter exhaust at any
point prior to dilution of the exhaust stream.
(h) You must collect data using the VOC CEMS at all times during
each
[[Page 273]]
batch monitoring period, except for periods of monitoring system
malfunctions, required monitoring system quality assurance or quality
control activities (including, as applicable, calibration checks and
required zero and span adjustments), and any scheduled maintenance.
(i) For each CEMS, you must record the results of each inspection,
calibration, and validation check.
(j) You must check the zero (low-level) and high-level calibration
drifts for each CEMS in accordance with the applicable Performance
Specification of 40 CFR part 60, appendix B. You must adjust the zero
(low-level) and high-level calibration drifts, at a minimum, whenever
the zero (low-level) drift exceeds 2 times the limits of the applicable
Performance Specification. You must perform the calibration drift checks
at least once daily except under the conditions of paragraphs (j)(1)
through (3) of this section.
(1) If a 24-hour calibration drift check for your CEMS is performed
immediately prior to, or at the start of, a batch monitoring period of a
duration exceeding 24 hours, then you are not required to perform 24-
hour-interval calibration drift checks during that batch monitoring
period.
(2) If the 24-hour calibration drift exceeds 2.5 percent of the span
value in fewer than 5 percent of the checks over a 1-month period, and
the 24-hour calibration drift never exceeds 7.5 percent of the span
value, then you may reduce the frequency of calibration drift checks to
at least weekly (once every 7 days).
(3) If, during two consecutive weekly checks, the weekly calibration
drift exceeds 5 percent of the span value, then you must resume a
frequency of at least 24-hour interval calibration checks until the 24-
hour calibration checks meet the test of paragraph (j)(2) of this
section.
Sec. 63.2164 If I monitor brew ethanol, what are my monitoring installation,
operation, and maintenance requirements?
(a) You must install, operate, and maintain each brew ethanol
monitor according to the manufacturer's specifications and in accordance
with Sec. 63.2150(d).
(b) Each of your brew ethanol monitors must complete a minimum of
one cycle of operation (sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for
each successive 30-minute period within each batch monitoring period.
Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, you must have a
minimum of two cycles of operation in a 1-hour period to have a valid
hour of data.
(c) You must reduce the brew ethanol monitor data to arithmetic
batch averages computed from two or more data points over each 1-hour
period, except during periods when calibration, quality assurance, or
maintenance activities pursuant to provisions of this part are being
performed. During these periods, a valid hour of data must consist of at
least one data point representing a 30-minute period.
(d) You must have valid brew ethanol monitor data from all operating
hours over the entire batch monitoring period.
(e) You must set the brew ethanol monitor span to correspond to not
greater than 5 times the relevant emission limitation; note that we
consider 1.5 to 2.5 times the relevant emission limitation to be the
optimum range, in general. You must use the brew-to-exhaust correlation
equation established under Sec. 63.2161(f) to determine the span value
for your brew ethanol monitor that corresponds to the relevant emission
limitation.
(f) For each brew ethanol monitor, you must record the results of
each inspection, calibration, and validation check.
(g) The gas chromatograph (GC) that you use to calibrate your brew
ethanol monitor must meet the requirements of paragraphs (g)(1) through
(3) of this section.
(1) You must calibrate the GC at least daily, by analyzing standard
solutions of ethanol in water (0.05 percent, 0.15 percent, and 0.3
percent).
(2) For use in calibrating the GC, you must prepare the standard
solutions of ethanol using the procedures listed in paragraphs (g)(2)(i)
through (vi) of this section.
(i) Starting with 100-percent ethanol, you must dry the ethanol by
adding a
[[Page 274]]
small amount of anhydrous magnesium sulfate (granular) to 15-20
milliliters (ml) of ethanol.
(ii) You must place approximately 50 ml of water into a 100-ml
volumetric flask and place the flask on a balance. You must tare the
balance. You must weigh 2.3670 grams of the dry (anhydrous) ethanol into
the volumetric flask.
(iii) You must add the 100-ml volumetric flask contents to a 1000-ml
volumetric flask. You must rinse the 100-ml volumetric flask with water
into the 1000-ml flask. You must bring the volume to 1000 ml with water.
(iv) You must place an aliquot into a sample bottle labeled ``0.3%
Ethanol.''
(v) You must fill a 50-ml volumetric flask from the contents of the
1000-ml flask. You must add the contents of the 50-ml volumetric flask
to a 100-ml volumetric flask and rinse the 50-ml flask into the 100-ml
flask with water. You must bring the volume to 100 ml with water. You
must place the contents into a sample bottle labeled ``0.15% Ethanol.''
(vi) With a 10-ml volumetric pipette, you must add two 10.0-ml
volumes of water to a sample bottle labeled ``0.05% Ethanol.'' With a
10.0-ml volumetric pipette, you must pipette 10.0 ml of the 0.15 percent
ethanol solution into the sample bottle labeled ``0.05% Ethanol.''
(3) For use in calibrating the GC, you must dispense samples of the
standard solutions of ethanol in water in aliquots to appropriately
labeled and dated glass sample bottles fitted with caps having a
Teflon[supreg] seal. You may keep refrigerated samples unopened for 1
month. You must prepare new calibration standards of ethanol in water at
least monthly.
(h) You must calibrate the brew ethanol monitor according to
paragraphs (h)(1) through (3) of this section.
(1) To calibrate the brew ethanol monitor, you must inject a brew
sample into a calibrated GC and compare the simultaneous ethanol value
given by the brew ethanol monitor to that given by the GC. You must use
either the Porapak[supreg] Q, 80-100 mesh, 6[foot] x \1/8\,
stainless steel packed column; or the DB Wax, 0.53 millimeter x 30 meter
capillary column.
(2) If a brew ethanol monitor value for ethanol differs by 20
percent or more from the corresponding GC ethanol value, you must
determine the brew ethanol values throughout the rest of the batch
monitoring period by injecting brew samples into the GC not less
frequently than once every 30 minutes. From the time at which you detect
a difference of 20 percent or more until the batch monitoring period
ends, the GC data will serve as the brew ethanol monitor data.
(3) You must perform a calibration of the brew ethanol monitor at
least four times per batch.
Sec. 63.2165 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limitations if I monitor fermenter exhaust?
(a) You must demonstrate initial compliance with each emission
limitation in Table 1 to this subpart that applies to you according to
the methods in Table 3 to this subpart.
(b) You must submit the Notification of Compliance Status containing
the results of the initial compliance demonstration according to the
requirements in Sec. 63.2180(f).
Continuous Compliance Requirements
Sec. 63.2170 How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate
continuous compliance?
(a) You must monitor and collect data according to this section and
Sec. 63.2163 or Sec. 63.2164.
(b) Except for periods of monitoring system malfunctions, required
monitoring system quality assurance or control activities (including, as
applicable, calibration checks and required zero and span adjustments),
and any scheduled maintenance, you must collect data using the CEMS or
brew ethanol monitor, as applicable, at all times during each batch
monitoring period.
(c) You may not use data recorded during monitoring malfunctions,
associated repairs, and required quality assurance or quality control
activities in data averages and calculations used to report emission or
operating levels, or to fulfill a data collection requirement. You must
use all the data collected
[[Page 275]]
during all other periods in assessing the operation of the control
system.
(d) Any hour during the batch monitoring period for which quality-
assured VOC CEMS data or brew ethanol monitor data, as applicable, are
not obtained is a deviation from monitoring requirements and is counted
as an hour of monitoring system downtime.
Sec. 63.2171 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance
with the emission limitations?
(a) You must demonstrate continuous compliance with each emission
limitation in Table 1 to this subpart that applies to you according to
the methods specified in Table 4 to this subpart and the applicable
procedures of this section.
(b) To demonstrate compliance with emission limitations by using the
98-Percent Option, you must calculate the percentage of within-
concentration batches (as defined in Sec. 63.2192) for each 12-month
calculation period by following the procedures in this paragraph and
paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this section. At the end of each calendar
month, you must determine the percentage of batches that were in
compliance with the applicable maximum concentration in the 12-month
calculation period. The total number of batches in the calculation
period is the sum of the numbers of batches of each fermentation stage
for which emission limitations apply. To determine which batches are in
the 12-month calculation period, you must include those batches for
which the batch monitoring period ended at or after midnight on the
first day of the period and exclude those batches for which the batch
monitoring period did not end before midnight on the last day of the
period.
(c) To demonstrate compliance with emission limitations by using the
Average Option, you must follow the procedures in this paragraph and
paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this section. At the end of each calendar
month, you must determine the average VOC concentration from all batches
in each fermentation stage in a 12-month calculation period. To
determine which batches are in a 12-month calculation period, you must
include those batches for which the batch monitoring period ended at or
after midnight on the first day of the period and exclude those batches
for which the batch monitoring period did not end before midnight on the
last day of the period.
(d) To demonstrate compliance with emission limitations by using the
Batch Option, you must determine the average VOC concentration in the
fermenter exhaust for each batch of each fermentation stage in a
semiannual reporting period (i.e., January 1 through June 30 or July 1
through December 31). To determine which batches are in the semiannual
reporting period, you must include those batches for which the batch
monitoring period ended at or after midnight on the first day of the
period and exclude those batches for which the batch monitoring period
did not end before midnight on the last day of the period.
(e) To demonstrate compliance with an emission limitation using a
12-month calculation period, you must follow the procedures in
paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) The first 12-month calculation period begins on the compliance
date that is specified for your affected source in Sec. 63.2133 and
ends on the last day of the month that includes the date 1 year after
your compliance date, unless the compliance date for your affected
source is the first day of the month, in which case the first 12-month
calculation period ends on the last day of the month that is 11 calendar
months after the compliance date.
(2) The second 12-month calculation period and each subsequent 12-
month calculation period begins on the first day of the month following
the first full month of the previous 12-month calculation period and
ends on the last day of the month 11 calendar months later.
Notification, Reports, and Records
Sec. 63.2180 What notifications must I submit and when?
(a) You must submit all of the notifications in Sec. Sec. 63.7(b)
and (c); 63.8(e), (f)(4) and (6); and 63.9(b) through (h) that apply to
you by the dates specified.
(b) If you start up your affected source before May 21, 2001, you
are not
[[Page 276]]
subject to the initial notification requirements of Sec. 63.9(b)(2).
(c) If you are required to conduct a performance test as specified
in Sec. 63.2161 to this subpart, you must submit a notification of
intent to conduct a performance test at least 60 calendar days before
the performance test is scheduled to begin as required in Sec.
63.7(b)(1).
(d) If you are required to conduct a performance evaluation as
specified in Sec. 63.2163, you must submit a notification of the date
of the performance evaluation at least 60 days prior to the date the
performance evaluation is scheduled to begin as required in Sec.
63.8(e)(2).
(e) If you are required to conduct a performance test as specified
in Table 2 to this subpart, you must submit a Notification of Compliance
Status according to Sec. 63.9(h)(2)(ii).
(f) For each initial compliance demonstration required in Table 3 to
this subpart, you must submit the Notification of Compliance Status no
later than July 31 or January 31, whichever date follows the initial
compliance period that is specified for your affected source in Sec.
63.2160(a) or (b). The first compliance report, described in Sec.
63.2181(b)(1), serves as the Notification of Compliance Status.
Sec. 63.2181 What reports must I submit and when?
(a) You must submit each report in Table 5 to this subpart that
applies to you.
(1) On and after October 16, 2017, you must also comply with
reporting for performance tests or for performance evaluations as
specified in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(i) Within 60 days after the date of completing each performance
test as required by this subpart, you must submit the results of the
performance test following the procedures specified in paragraphs
(a)(1)(i)(A) through (C) of this section.
(A) For data collected using test methods supported by the EPA's
Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) as listed on the EPA's ERT Web site
(https://www.epa.gov/electronic-reporting-air-emissions/electronic-
reporting-tool-ert) at the time of the test, you must submit the results
of the performance test to the EPA via the Compliance and Emissions Data
Reporting Interface (CEDRI). (CEDRI can be accessed through the EPA's
Central Data Exchange (CDX) (https://cdx.epa.gov/).) Performance test
data must be submitted in a file format generated through the use of the
EPA's ERT or an alternate electronic file format consistent with the
extensible markup language (XML) schema listed on the EPA's ERT Web
site.
(B) For data collected using test methods that are not supported by
the EPA's ERT as listed on the EPA's ERT Web site at the time of the
test, you must submit the results of the performance test to the
Administrator at the appropriate address listed in Sec. 63.13, unless
the Administrator agrees to or specifies an alternate reporting method.
(C) If you claim that some of the performance test information being
submitted under paragraph (a)(1)(i)(A) of this section is confidential
business information (CBI), you must submit a complete file generated
through the use of the EPA's ERT or an alternate electronic file
consistent with the XML schema listed on the EPA's ERT Web site,
including information claimed to be CBI, on a compact disc, flash drive,
or other commonly used electronic storage media to the EPA. The
electronic media must be clearly marked as CBI and mailed to U.S. EPA/
OAQPS/CORE CBI Office, Attention: Group Leader, Measurement Policy
Group, MD C404-02, 4930 Old Page Rd., Durham, NC 27703. The same ERT or
alternate file with the CBI omitted must be submitted to the EPA via the
EPA's CDX as described in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(A) of this section.
(ii) Within 60 days after the date of completing each continuous
monitoring system performance evaluation (as defined in Sec. 63.2), you
must submit the results of the performance evaluation following the
procedures specified in paragraphs (a)(1)(ii)(A) through (C) of this
section.
(A) For performance evaluations of continuous monitoring systems
measuring RATA pollutants that are supported by the EPA's ERT as listed
on the EPA's ERT Web site at the time of
[[Page 277]]
the evaluation, you must submit the results of the performance
evaluation to the EPA via the CEDRI. Performance evaluation data must be
submitted in a file format generated through the use of the EPA's ERT or
an alternate file format consistent with the XML schema listed on the
EPA's ERT Web site.
(B) For any performance evaluations of continuous monitoring systems
measuring RATA pollutants that are not supported by the EPA's ERT as
listed on the EPA's ERT Web site at the time of the evaluation, you must
submit the results of the performance evaluation to the Administrator at
the appropriate address listed in Sec. 63.13, unless the Administrator
agrees to or specifies an alternate reporting method.
(C) If you claim that some of the performance evaluation information
being submitted is CBI, then you must submit a complete file generated
through the use of the EPA's ERT or an alternate electronic file
consistent with the XML schema listed on the EPA's ERT Web site,
including information claimed to be CBI, on a compact disc, flash drive
or other commonly used electronic storage media to the EPA. The
electronic storage media must be clearly marked as CBI and mailed to
U.S. EPA/OAQPS/CORE CBI Office, Attention: Group Leader, Measurement
Policy Group, MD C404-02, 4930 Old Page Rd., Durham, NC 27703. The same
ERT or alternate file with the CBI omitted must be submitted to the EPA
via the EPA's CDX as described earlier in this paragraph.
(b) Unless the Administrator has approved a different schedule for
submission of reports under Sec. 63.10(a), you must submit each report
according to the schedule in Table 5 to this subpart and according to
paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this section.
(1) The first compliance report must include the information
specified in paragraph (c) of this section. If you are demonstrating
compliance with an emission limitation using a 12-month calculation
period (e.g., the Average Option), then the first compliance report must
cover the period beginning on the compliance date that is specified for
your affected source in Sec. 63.2133 and ending on either June 30 or
December 31 (use whichever date is the first date following the end of
the first 12 calendar months after the compliance date that is specified
for your affected source in Sec. 63.2133). If you are demonstrating
compliance with an emission limitation using the Batch Option, then the
first compliance report must cover the period beginning on the
compliance date that is specified for your affected source in Sec.
63.2133 and ending on either June 30 or December 31 (use whichever date
is the first date following the compliance date that is specified for
your affected source in Sec. 63.2133).
(2) The first compliance report must be postmarked or delivered no
later than July 31 or January 31, whichever date follows the end of the
first compliance reporting period specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section.
(3) Each subsequent compliance report must cover the semiannual
reporting period from January 1 through June 30 or the semiannual
reporting period from July 1 through December 31. Each subsequent
compliance report must include the information specified in paragraph
(c) of this section.
(4) Each subsequent compliance report must be postmarked or
delivered no later than July 31 or January 31, whichever date is the
first date following the end of the semiannual reporting period.
(5) For each affected source that is subject to permitting
regulations pursuant to 40 CFR part 70 or part 71, and if the permitting
authority has established dates for submitting semiannual reports
pursuant to 40 CFR 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) or 40 CFR 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A), you
may submit the first and subsequent compliance reports according to the
dates the permitting authority has established instead of according to
the dates in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section.
(c) The compliance report must contain the information listed in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (8) of this section.
(1) Company name and address.
(2) Statement by a responsible official with that official's name,
title, and signature, certifying the accuracy of the content of the
report.
[[Page 278]]
(3) Date of report and beginning and ending dates of the reporting
period.
(4) For each 12-month calculation period ending on a calendar month
that falls within a reporting period for which you are using the 98-
Percent Option to comply, the percentage of batches that are within-
concentration batches.
(5) For each 12-month calculation period ending on a calendar month
that falls within a reporting period for which you are using the 98-
Percent Option to comply and your affected source fails to meet an
applicable standard, the information for each batch for which BAVOC
exceeded the applicable maximum VOC concentration in Table 1 to this
subpart and whether the batch was in production during a period of
malfunction or during another period.
(6) For each 12-month calculation period ending on a calendar month
that falls within a reporting period for which you are using the Average
Option to comply or for any reporting period for which you are using the
Batch Option to comply, and your affected source meets an applicable
standard, the information in paragraph (c)(6)(i) or (ii) of this
section, depending on the compliance option selected from Table 1 to
this subpart.
(i) If you are using the Average Option to comply, the average BAVOC
of all batches in each fermentation stage for each 12-month calculation
period ending on a calendar month that falls within the reporting period
that did not exceed the applicable emission limitation.
(ii) If you are using the Batch Option to comply, a certification
that BAVOC for each batch manufactured during the reporting period did
not exceed applicable emission limitations.
(7) For each 12-month calculation period ending on a calendar month
that falls within a reporting period for which you are using the Average
Option to comply or for any reporting period for which you are using the
Batch Option to comply and your affected source fails to meet an
applicable standard, the information in paragraph (c)(7)(i) or (ii) of
this section, depending on the compliance option selected from Table 1
to this subpart.
(i) If you are using the Average Option to comply, the average BAVOC
of all batches in each fermentation stage for each 12-month calculation
period that failed to meet the applicable standard; the fermenters that
operated in each fermentation stage that failed to meet the applicable
standard; the duration of each failure; an estimate of the quantity of
VOC emitted over the emission limitation; a description of the method
used to estimate the emissions; and the actions taken to minimize
emissions and correct the failure.
(ii) If you are using the Batch Option to comply, the fermenters and
batches that failed to meet the applicable standard; the date, time, and
duration of each failure; an estimate of the quantity of VOC emitted
over the emission limitation; a description of the method used to
estimate the emissions; and the actions taken to minimize emissions and
correct the failure.
(8) The total operating hours for each fermenter, the total hours of
monitoring system operation for each CEMS or brew ethanol monitor, and
the total hours of monitoring system downtime for each CEMS or brew
ethanol monitor.
Sec. 63.2182 What records must I keep?
(a) You must keep the records listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through
(3) of this section.
(1) A copy of each notification and report that you submitted to
comply with this subpart, including all documentation supporting any
Notification of Compliance Status and compliance report that you
submitted, according to the requirements in Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(xiv).
(2) Records of failures to meet a standard, specified in Sec.
63.2181(c)(5) and (7).
(3) Records of performance tests and performance evaluations as
required in Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(viii) and (ix).
(b) For each affected source that monitors brew ethanol, you must
keep records demonstrating the calculation of the brew-to-exhaust
correlations specified in Sec. 63.2161.
(c) For each CEMS and brew ethanol monitor, you must keep the
records listed in paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of this section.
[[Page 279]]
(1) Records described in Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(vi), (vii), (x), and
(xi). The CEMS must allow the amount of excess zero (low-level) and
high-level calibration drift measured at the interval checks to be
quantified and recorded.
(2) Records described in Sec. 63.10(c)(1) through (6).
(3) Records of the quality control program as specified in Sec.
63.8(d), including the program of corrective action; the current version
of the performance evaluation test plan, as specified in Sec.
63.8(e)(3); and previous (i.e., superseded) versions of the performance
evaluation test plan for a period of 5 years after each revision to the
plan.
(4) Requests for alternatives to RATA for CEMS as required in Sec.
63.8(f)(6)(i).
(5) Records of each deviation from monitoring requirements,
including a description of the time period during which the deviation
occurred, the nature and cause of the deviation, the corrective action
taken or preventive measures adopted, and the nature of repairs or
adjustments to the monitoring system.
(d) You must keep the records required to show continuous compliance
with each emission limitation that applies to you according to the
requirements in Table 4 to this subpart.
(e) You must also keep the records listed in paragraphs (e)(1)
through (3) of this section for each batch in your affected source.
(1) Unique batch identification number.
(2) Fermentation stage for which you are using the fermenter.
(3) Unique CEMS equipment identification number.
Sec. 63.2183 In what form and how long must I keep my records?
(a) Your records must be in a form suitable and readily available
for expeditious review, according to Sec. 63.10(b)(1).
(b) As specified in Sec. 63.10(b)(1), you must keep each record for
5 years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance,
corrective action, report, or record.
(c) You must keep each record on site for at least 2 years after the
date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,
report, or record, according to Sec. 63.10(b)(1). You may keep the
records off site for the remaining 3 years.
(d) Any records required to be maintained by this part that are
submitted electronically via the EPA's CEDRI may be maintained in
electronic format. This ability to maintain electronic copies does not
affect the requirement for facilities to make records, data, and reports
available upon request to a delegated air agency or the EPA as part of
an on-site compliance evaluation.
(e) You must keep written procedures documenting the CEMS quality
control program on record for the life of the affected source or until
the affected source is no longer subject to the provisions of this part,
to be made available for inspection, upon request, by the Administrator.
Other Requirements and Information
Sec. 63.2190 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
Table 6 to this subpart shows which parts of the General Provisions
in Sec. Sec. 63.1 through 63.15 apply to you.
Sec. 63.2191 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
(a) We, the U.S. EPA, or a delegated authority such as your state,
local, or tribal agency, can implement and enforce this subpart. If our
Administrator has delegated authority to your state, local, or tribal
agency, then that agency has the authority to implement and enforce this
subpart. You should contact the U.S. EPA Regional Office that serves you
to find out if this subpart is delegated to your state, local, or tribal
agency.
(b) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority of this
subpart to a state, local, or tribal agency under 40 CFR part 63,
subpart E, the authorities contained in paragraph (c) of this section
are retained by our Administrator and are not transferred to the state,
local, or tribal agency.
(c) The authorities that will not be delegated to state, local, or
tribal agencies are listed in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this
section.
[[Page 280]]
(1) Approval of alternatives to the non-opacity emission limitations
in Sec. 63.2140 under Sec. 63.6(g).
(2) Approval of major alternatives to test methods under Sec.
63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f) and as defined in Sec. 63.90.
(3) Approval of major alternatives to monitoring under Sec. 63.8(f)
and as defined in Sec. 63.90.
(4) Approval of major alternatives to recordkeeping and reporting
under Sec. 63.10(f) and as defined in Sec. 63.90.
Sec. 63.2192 What definitions apply to this subpart?
Terms used in this subpart are defined in the Clean Air Act, in 40
CFR 63.2, in the General Provisions of this part (Sec. Sec. 63.1
through 63.15), and in this section as follows:
Batch means a single fermentation cycle in a single fermentation
vessel (fermenter).
Batch monitoring period means the period that begins at the later of
either the start of aeration or the addition of yeast to the fermenter;
the period ends at the earlier of either the end of aeration or the
point at which the yeast has begun being emptied from the fermenter.
BAVOC means the average VOC concentration in the fermenter exhaust
over the duration of a batch (``batch-average VOC concentration'').
Brew means the mixture of yeast and additives in the fermenter.
Brew ethanol means the ethanol in fermenter liquid.
Brew ethanol monitor means the monitoring system that you use to
measure brew ethanol to demonstrate compliance with this subpart. The
monitoring system includes a resistance element used as an ethanol
sensor, with the measured resistance proportional to the concentration
of ethanol in the brew.
Brew-to-exhaust correlation means the correlation between the
concentration of ethanol in the brew and the concentration of VOC in the
fermenter exhaust. This correlation is specific to each fed-batch
fermentation stage and is established while manufacturing the product
that comprises the largest percentage (by mass) of average annual
production.
Emission limitation means any emission limit or operating limit.
Fed-batch means the yeast is fed carbohydrates and additives during
fermentation in the vessel.
Monitoring system malfunction means any sudden, infrequent, and not
reasonably preventable failure of the monitoring system to provide valid
data. Monitoring system failures that are caused in part by poor
maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions. You are required
to complete monitoring system repairs in response to monitoring system
malfunctions and to return the monitoring system to operation as
expeditiously as practicable.
1-hour period means any successive period commencing on the minute
at which the batch monitoring period begins and continuing for 60
minutes, except for the last period, which may be less than 60 minutes.
Product means the yeast resulting from the final stage in a
production run. Products are distinguished by yeast species, strain, and
variety.
Responsible official means responsible official as defined in 40 CFR
70.2.
Set-batch means the yeast is fed carbohydrates and additives only at
the start of the batch.
Specialty yeast includes, but is not limited to, yeast produced for
use in wine, champagne, whiskey, and beer.
Within-concentration batch means a batch for which BAVOC is not
higher than the maximum concentration that is allowed as part of the
applicable emission limitation.
[[Page 281]]
Sec. Table 1 to Subpart CCCC of Part 63--Emission Limitations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
98-percent option: You Average option: You Batch option: You must
must not exceed the must not exceed the not exceed the
For each fed-batch fermenter following VOC emission following VOC emission following VOC emission
producing yeast in the following limitation \a\ limitation \a\ limitation \a\
fermentation stage . . . according to the according to the according to the
timeline in Table 7 to timeline in Table 7 to timeline in Table 7 to
this subpart . . . this subpart . . . this subpart . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last stage........................... 100 ppmv (measured as 95 ppmv (measured as 100 ppmv (measured as
propane) for BAVOC for propane) for the propane) for BAVOC for
at least 98 percent of average BAVOC of all each batch.
all batches in each 12- batches in this stage
month calculation in each 12-month
period described in calculation period
Sec. 63.2171(b) and described in Sec.
(e). 63.2171(c) and (e).
Second-to-last stage................. 200 ppmv (measured as 190 ppmv (measured as 200 ppmv (measured as
propane) for BAVOC for propane) for the propane) for BAVOC for
at least 98 percent of average BAVOC of all each batch.
all batches in each 12- batches in this stage
month calculation in each 12-month
period described in calculation period
Sec. 63.2171(b) and described in Sec.
(e). 63.2171(c) and (e).
Third-to-last stage.................. 300 ppmv (measured as 285 ppmv (measured as 300 ppmv (measured as
propane) for BAVOC for propane) for the propane) for BAVOC for
at least 98 percent of average BAVOC of all each batch.
all batches in each 12- batches in this stage
month calculation in each 12-month
period described in calculation period
Sec. 63.2171(b) and described in Sec.
(e). 63.2171(c) and (e).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ The emission limitation does not apply during the production of specialty yeast.
Sec. Table 2 to Subpart CCCC of Part 63--Requirements for Performance
Tests If You Monitor Brew Ethanol
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each fed-batch fermenter
for which compliance is
determined by monitoring
brew ethanol concentration
and calculating VOC According to the
concentration in the Using . . . following
fermenter exhaust according requirements . . .
to the procedures in Sec.
63.2161, you must . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measure VOC as propane...... Method 25A,\a\ or an You must measure the
alternative VOC concentration
validated by EPA in the fermenter
Method 301 \b\ and exhaust at any
approved by the point prior to the
Administrator. dilution of the
exhaust stream.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ EPA Test Method 25A is found in appendix A-7 of 40 CFR part 60.
\b\ EPA Test Method 301 is found in appendix A of 40 CFR part 63.