[Title 32 CFR 750.23]
[Code of Federal Regulations (annual edition) - July 1, 2002 Edition]
[Title 32 - NATIONAL DEFENSE]
[Subtitle A - Department of Defense (Continued)]
[Chapter Vi - DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY]
[Subchapter E - CLAIMS]
[Part 750 - GENERAL CLAIMS REGULATIONS]
[Subpart B - Federal Tort Claims Act]
[Sec. 750.23 - Definitions.]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
32NATIONAL DEFENSE52002-07-012002-07-01falseDefinitions.750.23Sec. 750.23NATIONAL DEFENSEDepartment of Defense (Continued)DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYCLAIMSGENERAL CLAIMS REGULATIONSFederal Tort Claims Act
Sec. 750.23 Definitions.
(a) Negligent conduct. Generally, negligence is the failure to
exercise that degree of care, skill, or diligence a reasonable person
would exercise under similar circumstances. Negligent conduct can result
from either an act or a failure to act. The law of the place where the
conduct occurred will determine whether a cause of action lies against
the Government. 28 U.S.C. 1346(b) and 2674.
(b) Intentional torts. Although any employee who commits an
intentional tort is normally considered to be acting outside the scope
of employment, the FTCA does allow claimants to seek compensation for
injuries arising out of the intentional torts of assault, battery, false
imprisonment, false arrest, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution,
if committed by a Federal investigative or law enforcement officer. An
``investigative or law enforcement officer'' is any officer of the
United States empowered by law to execute searches, to seize evidence,
or to make arrests for violations of Federal law. 28 U.S.C. 2680(h).
(c) Government employees--(1) General. ``Employee of the
Government,'' defined at 28 U.S.C. 2671, includes officers or employees
of any Federal agency, members of the U.S. military or naval forces, and
persons acting on behalf of a Federal agency in an official capacity.
(2) Government contractors. Government (also referred to as
independent) contractors, are those individuals or businesses who enter
into contracts with the United States to provide goods or services.
Because the definition of ``Federal agency,'' found at 28 U.S.C. 2671,
specifically excludes ``any contractor with the United States,'' the
United States is generally not liable for the negligence of Government
contractors. There are, however, three limited exceptions to the general
rule, under which a cause of action against the United States has been
found to exist in some jurisdictions. They are:
(i) Where the thing or service contracted for is deemed to be an
``inherently dangerous activity'';
(ii) where a nondelegable duty in the employer has been created by
law; or,
(iii) where the employer retains control over certain aspects of the
contract and fails to discharge that control in a reasonable manner.
(3) Employees of nonappropriated-fund activities. Nonappropriated-
fund activities are entities established and operated for the benefit of
military members and their dependents, and have been judicially
determined to be ``arms'' of the Federal government. These entities
operate from self-generated funds, rather than from funds appropriated
by Congress. Examples include Navy and Marine Corps Exchanges, officer
or enlisted clubs, and recreational services activities. A claim arising
out of the act or omission of an employee of a nonappropriated-fund
activity not located in a foreign country, acting within the scope of
employment, is an act or omission committed by a Federal employee and
will be handled in accordance with the FTCA.
(d) Scope of employment. ``Scope of employment'' is defined by the
law of respondeat superior (master and servant) of the place where the
act or omission occurred. Although 28 U.S.C. 2671 states that acting
within the scope of employment means acting in the line of duty, the
converse is not always true. For administrative purposes, a Government
employee may be found ``in the line of duty,'' yet not meet the criteria
for a finding of ``within the scope of employment'' under the law of the
place where the act or omission occurred.