Environmental Pollution Prevention, Control, and Abatement

[Title 32 CFR J]
[Code of Federal Regulations (annual edition) - July 1, 2002 Edition]
[Title 32 - NATIONAL DEFENSE]
[Subtitle A - Department of Defense (Continued)]
[Chapter V - DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY (CONTINUED)]
[Subchapter K - ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY]
[Part 650 - ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT (AR 200-1)]
[Subpart J - Environmental Pollution Prevention, Control, and Abatement]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

32NATIONAL DEFENSE42002-07-012002-07-01falseEnvironmental Pollution Prevention, Control, and AbatementJSubpart JNATIONAL DEFENSEDepartment of Defense (Continued)DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY (CONTINUED)ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITYENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT (AR 200-1)
Subpart J--Environmental Pollution Prevention, Control, and Abatement
Report (RCS DD-I&L (SA) 1383)

General

Sec. 650.231 Purpose.

(a) This chapter provides reporting procedures to be followed within
the Department of the Army to control environmental pollution from
existing facilities as contained in section 3(a) (3) Executive Order
11752 of December 17, 1973, entitled, ``Prevention, Control and
Abatement of Environmental Pollution at Federal Facilities.'' This
section of the Executive Order provides that ``Heads of Federal agencies
shall, with regard to all facilities under their jurisdiction in the
United States: * * *. (3) Present to the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), annually, a plan to provide for such
improvement in the design, construction, management, operation, and
maintenance of existing facilities as may be necessary to meet
applicable standards specified * * *''
(b) The report described herein will be the principal mechanism for
identifying pollution control projects and those resources needed to
effectively execute installation and major command Environmental
Programs. Properly defined information presented in this report can be
used as a basis for necessary programing and budget actions by DA and
major commands.
(c) These instruction implement OMB Circular A-106, dated 31 Dec 74,
which supersedes OMB Circular A-78 and A-81, dated 18 May 70.

Sec. 650.232 Explanation of terms.

(a) The terms used herein will be the same as those defined in
chapter 1.
(b) The term ``project'' will mean an action to achieve needed
corrective measures relative to identified environmental pollution
sources.
(c) The term ``cost'' will mean the amount of funds required to
install the necessary environmental protection measures. These funds
include the capital costs of structures and equipment, irrespective of
the appropriation chargeable, but not the annual maintenance and
operating costs.

Sec. 650.233 Applicability.

Each active, semiactive and Army Reserve installation operated by or
for the Department of the Army, and National Guard facilities/sites
supported by Federally appropriated funds in the Continental United
States; Alaska and Hawaii, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin
Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Panama Canal Zone, and the Trust
Territories of the Pacific, whether Army-controlled or under
jurisdiction of the Army by lease or similar instrument, where
environmental protection measures do not meet the current requirements
and/or standards established by appropriated Federal, State or local
regulatory agencies are to be listed in the Environmental Pollution
Control Report. Each installation identifying a new pollution source or
environmental protection requirement will report through command
channels in accordance with these instructions. Negative report will be
rendered by responsible commands in the form of a listing of those
installations where remedial measures are not needed to correct a source
of pollution or where no additional resources are needed to meet the
provisions of this regulation.

Sec. 650.234 Scope.

(a) The report described herein consists of one exhibit to be
prepared at the installation or activity level and two exhibits to be
prepared at the major command level. Reports are to be forwarded through
channels to HQDA (DAEN-FEU) WASH, DC 20314, by November 15, and May 15,
of each year. The exhibits will reflect information as of October 20,
and April 20.
(b) Exhibit 1 is entitled--Proposed Project Report. Separate
Exhibits will be prepared for each project or activity on an
installation in each of the following categories:
(1) Air pollution.
(2) Water pollution.
(3) Solid waste pollution.
(4) Radiation pollution.
(5) Noise pollution.
(6) Pesticide and hazardous/toxic materials pollution.
(7) Environmental management.

[[Page 368]]

(c) Exhibit 2 is entitled--Status Report. It indicates the amount
programed, appropriated, or funded; the current working estimate (CWE);
and the status of each active project. Separate exhibits will be
completed by the major commands for each category or projects (i.e. air,
water, noise, solid waste, etc.). After the initial report, marked-up
copies of the ADP printout giving an update on all previously reported
projects is all that is necessary. The ADP printout to be used for this
purpose will be provided by HQDA (DAEN-FEU) WASH, DC 20314.
(d) Exhibit 3 is entitled--Narrative report. Major commands will
provide a short explanation of the objectives that will be achieved, the
elements of their environmental program that will be given particular
emphasis over the short term, and the extent that statutory pollution
control requirements and DA environmental goals and objectives will be
satisfied by executing the projects or actions listed in the report. For
any specific portion of the program that requires more than 12 months to
complete, an identification of the major milestones for accomplishing
the various actions are also to be included.

Sec. 650.235 Responsibilities.

(a) Department of the Army Staff. (1) The Chief of Engineers will
compile the overall DA report based on submissions from major commands
and the National Guard Bureau.
(2) The Chief, Army Reserve will monitor those reports by the major
commands to ensure that Reserve installations for which they provide
logistic support are included in the Pollution Control Report.
(3) The Chief, National Guard Bureau will submit a report to the
Chief of Engineers including those projects for National Guard sites or
installations which are supported by federally appropriated funds.
(b) Major commands. (1) Major commands controlling installations or
activities, or providing logistical support to Reserve installations in
the United States, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Canal Zone, Guam,
American Samoa, Virgin Islands and the Trust Territories will submit
reports in accordance with this regulation.
(2) Major commands controlling installations or activities in
overseas areas will submit reports identifying pollution abatement
projects required for compliance with host nation regulations,
international or Status of Forces Agreements.
(3) Commanding General, US Army Materiel Development and Readiness
Command will submit reports on retrofit projects and programs to bring
mobile sources (vehicles, aircraft and watercraft) into compliance with
air, water and noise standards.

Instructions for the Preparation and Submission of Exhibits

Sec. 650.236 Exhibit 1--Proposed Project.

(a) An Exhibit 1 will be prepared and maintained current for all
known pollution control projects using the format in Figure 10-1 and for
valid environmental protection resource requirements using the format in
Figure 10-2. Exhibit 1's previously submitted on air and water pollution
control projects which are still valid, but not yet completed, do not
have to be resubmitted in the new format except when a significant
change takes place to make the earlier Exhibit 1 obsolete. Exhibit 1's
are not required for completed projects.
(b) Exhibit 1's for new or revised projects or requirements will be
submitted semi-annually by November 15, and May 15, of each year to
DAEN-FEU based on the latest information as of 30 days prior to the
above reporting dates.
(c) Each project will be identified as to the category of pollution
control needed (i.e., air, water, solid waste, radiation, noise,
pesticides, and environmental management). Projects within a category
will be assigned consecutive numbers by DAEN-FEU beginning with ``1.''
Project numbers are for permanent identification and may not be
reassigned to new projects. Existing air and water pollution control
projects previously numbered under RCS DD-I&L(SA) 1383 are to be
continued under their originally assigned numbers. These project numbers
apply strictly

[[Page 369]]

to this report and are not to be confused with or to replace programing
line-item numbers.
(d) Each project at the same installation required for a distinct
and separate purpose is to be considered a separate project. Separate
projects will be reported individually using the project number assigned
by DAEN-FEU.
(e) Every item in Figures 10-1 or 10-2 is to be completed for each
project. Where no entry is appropriate, enter NA (Not applicable). A
specific effort must be made by the installation to obtain any
information not immediately on hand.
(f) The following will be reported as other relevant information:
(1) Item 10 of Exhibit 1 will include information not shown
elsewhere on the exhibit which is necessary for the evaluation of the
project. For example, where the command knows of changing circumstances
which will affect the practicability of undertaking a project at a
particular facility (e.g., replacement of a facility or a change in
installation mission which would alter control needs), these changes are
to be stated. If a project is discontinued, state in this item the
reasons and circumstances, if any, which might lead to a re-activation
of the projects (e.g., plant is put in layaway; re-activation would be
based on further troop strength increase or mobilization requirements).
(2) For facilities leased by the Army which are subject to the
provisions of this regulation, describe under Item 10 the lease
arrangements that would affect the requirements for control measures for
such facilities. Such projects will be included in Exhibit 2 with a
reference in the margin to the explanation given on Exhibit 1.
(3) If a project proposed in one environmental category is likely to
generate pollution of other types, Item 10 is to include a brief
description and how it is to be controlled.
(4) Citations or other forms of litigation by regulatory agencies or
other official entities will be reported under Item 10.
(g) Enter in Item 11, Figure 10-1 or Item 5, Figure 10-2 known or
estimated funding requirements by appropriation account (OMA, MCA,
etc.). (This source of project and cost data can be helpful to major
commands in the development of annual budget requests to support their
environmental program.)
(1) Air--(i) Item 2. Identify the pollutant(s) by name for which the
project will be required (for example: Particulate matter, sulfur
oxides, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, etc).
(ii) Item 3. State the amount of pollutants emitted by each point of
emission being controlled within the facility. These amounts should be
measured amounts if available and expressed in the same terms of the
applicable emission standard, normally State standards (e.g., lb/hr,
ppm, etc.) in Item 8 at maximum process operating rate.
(iii) Item 4. Identify the specific emission point(s) which the
project will control. This identification should be specific (e.g., two
coal-fired boilers in building ``xyz'' rather than just ``boiler'').
(iv) Item 5. Specify the existing pollution control measures at the
individual emission points. If no control measures are being utilized,
so state.
(v) Item 6. Indicate the percentage of the pollutant which the
control device removes.
(vi) Item 7. Indicate the type control device or process
modification to be utilized to control emissions.
(vii) Item 8. Cite the applicable Federal, State or local air
pollution emission control standard which the facility is required to
meet, referencing the specific code, chapter, and part. Also, include
the date the statutory requirements became effective.
(viii) Item 9. Indicate the project schedules proposed by the
installation and that required by the statutory standards listed in Item
8. If the schedule for achieving compliance differs from statutory,
regulatory, or other milestones and deadlines, indicate the dates the
facility will meet them and explain why the statutory or regulatory
dates will not be met. If a compliance schedule has been negotiated and
accepted by the Regional EPA administrator, list those dates in lieu of
those cited in a statute or regulation and indicate the date the
compliance schedule was accepted.

[[Page 370]]

(ix) Items 10 & 11. Complete according to instructions Sec. 650.236
(a) through (f).
(2) Water--(i) Item 2. Describes specific pollution and nature of
problem, e.g., unintercepted washrack wastes containing oil and grease;
overloaded sewage treatment plant bypasses raw or partly treated sewage
to river; combined sewage overflow carries untreated sewage to lake,
etc. Use this item and items 3, 6, and 7 as appropriate to describe
infiltration inflow problems and measures required by NPDES permit and/
or by ``Spill Control and Countermeasure Plans'' formulated pursuant to
40 CFR part 112, ``Oil Pollution Prevention,'' and promulgated in
chapter 9 of this regulation.
(ii) Item 3. Show amount of waste generated and treated. Indicate
gpd, tgd, or mgd.
(iii) Item 4. Show whether discharge is due to water (name of
receiving water and location thereon), sewer system (name), land
application, subsurface (e.g., septic system, drainfield, etc.).
(iv) Item 5. If problem as described in items 2 and 4 does not
relate to an existing or proposed treatment plant, identify in this item
the plant, if any, which ultimately receives, or will receive, and
treats the wastewater.
(v) Items 6 and 7. In appropriate item, show existing and proposed
ppm and/or lbs. in influent and effluent and percent removal for all
principal polluting constituents. As a minimum Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(BOD) (Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), and total organic carbon (TOC)
where applicable) and suspended solids data should be shown wherever
possible.
(vi) Item 8. Cite the applicable Federal, State or local discharge
standard which the facility is required to meet, referencing the
specific code, chapter and part. Also include date statutory requirement
became effective. Briefly summarize the discharge limitations if a NPDES
permit has not been issued. When a draft or final NPDES permit has been
issued, indicate:
(A) When a permit application was submitted;
(B) The application and/or permit number, and the effective and
expiration dates of any permit(s) issued; and
(C) The conditions of each permit in summary form, other than the
compliance dates which are to be entered in item 9.
(vii) Item 9. Indicate the project schedules proposed by the command
and as required by the standards listed in item 8. Where issued, NPDES
permit schedules should be entered in the Regulation Schedule column. If
the command schedule for achieving compliance differs from the
regulatory, or NPDES scheduled dates indicate the date the facility will
be in compliance and explain why the required dates will not be met.
(viii) Item 10. Under lease construction arrangements, state who is
responsible for obtaining NPDES permits or for meeting schedules and
requirements.
(ix) Item 11. Provide funding requirements.
(3) Solid waste--(i) Item 2. Indicate the activity which is not in
compliance with solid waste disposal standards; i.e., waste collection,
segregation of wastes, siting or operation of sanitary landfill.
Note: Particular attention is to be given to controlling leachate
from landfill seeping into ground or surface water sources, control of
surface runoff, sanitation of waste collection and transfer systems.
(ii) Item 3. If specific amounts of pollution are known, list or
otherwise provide best estimate.
(iii) Item 4. Give details of the problem; i.e., whatever it is that
is not in compliance with standards.
(iv) Item 5. Indicate, as applicable, quantities, types, and sources
of solid waste handled; frequency of operation; year of original
construction/operation; design life; and estimated remaining life.
(v) Item 6. Discuss effectiveness of existing solid waste management
system or practices, if applicable.
(vi) Item 7. Give brief description of proposed project which will
bring operation into compliance.
(vii) Item 8. Specify the DA, EPA, or other solid waste management
guideline applicable and the specific requirement that makes the project
necessary and the effective date of the regulation.

[[Page 371]]

(viii) Items 9, 10 and 11. Complete according to instructions
Sec. 650.236 (a) through (f)).
(4) Radiation--(i) Item 2. Identify specific type of pollutant;
i.e., plutonium, cobalt 60 and other substances emitting ionizing
radiations.
(ii) Item 3. Indicate levels of contamination (Curies or subunits,
etc.)
(iii) Item 4. Give details of the problem.
(iv) Item 5. Explain current protection measures being employed, if
any.
(v) Item 6. Discuss effectiveness of current control measures.
(vi) Item 7. Give brief description of proposed remedial measures.
(vii) Item 8. Specify NRC, EPA, or DA standards that are applicable
and effective date of the regulation.
(viii) Items 9, 10 and 11. Complete according to instructions
Sec. 650.236 (a) through (f)).
(5) Noise Pollution--(i) Item 2. Specify the character of the noise
if known or by answering the following questions:
(A) Is the noise impulsive or nonimpulsive?
(B) Is the noise on continuously or is it on-and-off intermittently?
(C) When the noise is on, is it steady in level, or does the level
of loudness fluctuate?
(D) Is there a discernable tone or whine in the noise?
(ii) Item 3. Specify: (A) The sound level, if measured, and the
measurement methodology utilized;
(B) The elevation of the noise source, and the distance from the
source to the noise impacted area;
(C) Identify the facilities or areas affected including the nature
of the activities affected by the noise intrusions; e.g., churches,
schools, hospitals, homes, recreational areas, offices and business
areas, etc., and
(D) Whether areas affected are on or off-post. Technical assistance
on identification and characterization of noises should be requested
from Commander, US Army Health Services Command (HSC-PA), Fort Sam
Houston, TX 78234.
(iii) Item 4. Identify the specific course of noise pollution which
requires control. Report as a minimum, those sources which have been the
subject of citizen complaints.
(iv) Item 5. (A) Give description of existing level of noise control
provided in terms of noise control management techniques such as
engineering noise reduction, land use planning, or administrative
procedures on controlling the source, path or receptor.
(B) State if sources of acoustic expertise were provided by an
accoustical laboratory within the Army, or from commercial acoustical
consultants to obtain noise level data.
(v) Item 6. Describe the effectiveness of existing treatment and
control measures.
(vi) Item 7. Describe any remedial measures proposed and estimated
effect in correcting the noise problem.
(vii) Item 8. Specify those portions and effective dates of
applicable Federal, State or local noise regulations, statutes,
standards to which the project responds, and the acceptable sound level
permitted thereafter. If no regulations are known to apply, indicate if
the nature of citizen complaints would justify some form of corrective
action.
(viii) Item 9. Indicate the project schedules proposed to comply
with standards listed in Item 8. If the schedule for achieving
compliance differs from statutory or, regulatory laws, indicate the
dates the requirements will be met and explain the reasons therefor.
(ix) Item 10. (A) Identify the complaints received on the noise
source in terms of the nature and number of complaints, source of
complaints (military or civilian) and how they were registered with the
installation (e.g., petitions, phone calls, letters, telegrams, etc.).
(B) Indicate if any legal actions are anticipated or have been
initiated against the installation as a result of this reported source
of environmental noise pollution.
(x) Item 11. Provide funding requirements.
(6) Pesticides and hazardous/toxic materials. (i) Projects to be
reported should involve the control and abatement of pesticide and
hazardous/toxic material pollution. Do not describe proposed and/or
current programs involving the use of pesticides. Examples of pollution
control projects would be measures to correct inadequate storage or
disposal

[[Page 372]]

facilities to clean up land areas contaminated as a result of a
pesticide spill, to provide mixing sinks and bathing facilities for
personnel to repackage leaking chemical stock's, etc.
(ii) Item 2. Identify the pesticide or chemical that is the source
of pollution and indicate the reason for correcting existing conditions.
(iii) Items 3 thru 6. Complete according to instructions
(Sec. 650.236(a) through (f)).
(iv) Item 7. Describe the proposed method of disposal or nature of
proposed corrective action.
(v) Items 8 thru 11. Complete according to instructions
(Sec. 650.236(a) through (f)).
(7) Environmental Management. (i) Exhibit 1-EM (figure 10-2) will be
used to identify needed resources not included in an Exhibit 1 prepared
in accordance with a previous paragraph but are required to comply with
the provisions of this regulation. Items to be reported are those needed
for the management of an installation environmental program and can
logically include:
(A) NEPA resources--Preparation of Environmental Assessments and
Environmental Impact Statements.
(B) Manpower resources--Full time environmental coordinators, staff
officers, instructors, etc.
(C) Training--Schooling for operators (i.e., sewage treatment plant
operators, lab technicians, pesticide applicators); training for
management personnel (i.e., environmental co-ordinator, sanitary
engineers, etc.).
(D) Environmental surveys--Ecological or archelogical surveys of an
installation to obtain information needed for an Environmental Impact
Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS or EIS).
(E) Special studies--Technical or engineering studies to define
sources of pollution and identify possible remedial measures.
(F) Other--Specify.
(ii) Item 2. Identify the basic requirement using the
identifications in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) (A) through (F) of this section.
(iii) Item 3. Explain the requirement and provide a brief
justification for any new or additional resources needed for the
management of the installation environmental program.
(iv) Item 4. List only those items which are quantifiable, such as
number of personnel required, special equipment items, school courses,
man-year requirements for studies, etc. by fiscal year.
(v) Item 5. Cite one-time costs or 5- year projected costs by
appropriation as applicable.
(vi) Item 6. List other relevant information and specify. (See
figure 10-9 and Sec. 650.236(f).)
(h) Sample Exhibits--Examples of Exhibit 1's for each of the media
are shown in figures 10-3 through 10-9.

Sec. 650.237 Exhibit 2--Status Report.

(a) Exhibit 2 is a command report which provides a financial summary
of the projects in the program and their status. A separate Exhibit 2 is
required for each media or category of projects (i.e., air, water,
noise, solid waste, etc.) and will be submitted semi-annually along with
Exhibit 1's on November 15, and May 15 of each year.
(b) Exhibit 2 will include all active projects plus those completed
or discontinued subsequent to the submission of the previous report.
Once a project is reported as completed or discontinued, it will be
dropped from the report. The May 15 report will contain all projects
which the command will submit in the next fiscal year budget. In
addition, the November 15 report will reflect congressional
appropriation action taken on the prior fiscal year budget.
(c) The initial Exhibit 2's for each media will be prepared by the
reporting command using the format in Figure 10-10. Subsequent reports
will be only an update of the previous command report. As each Exhibit 2
is received from a command, it will be converted to an ADP printout and
returned to the reporting command by DAEN-FEU in 45-60 days for use in
the next report update. The following updating procedures will be
observed:
(1) One copy of a marked-up printout of the previous Exhibit 2 will
accompany the semi-annual report.
(2) Corrections, changes and additions will be made neatly with a
RED marking pen.

[[Page 373]]

(3) An asterisk in the left margin will be used to identify projects
which have been completed, discontinued or changed.
(4) New projects will be added to the bottom of the appropriate
media printout.
(5) Exhibit 2's submitted on May 15 will contain the amount included
or proposed to be included in the President's budget for each project,
or the amount actually appropriated or funded.
(6) Major Command updating will be done only for non-MCA funded
projects. MCA funded project status will be updated by DAEN-FEU.
(7) Each revision of Exhibit 2 will reflect the information as of
October 20 and April 20, as appropriate.
(8) Funding totals by appropriation type for each fiscal year and
for each media reported will be provided at the bottom of the last page.
(9) Current and relevant information will be presented in the
``Status'' column using the following format:
(i) Indicate ``PP--'' if the project is in the preliminary planning
stage. The blank provided should contain the estimated completion date
for construction.
(ii) Indicate ``DES--'' if the project is under design or has been
designed, but is not under construction. The blank provided should
contain the estimated completion date for construction and not the
completion date of design.
(iii) Indicate ``CON--'' if the project is under construction. The
blank provided should contain the estimated completion date.
(iv) Indicate ``CPL--'' if the project has been completed. The blank
provided should contain the actual completion date.
(v) Indicate ``DIS'' if the project has been discontinued or
dropped. Reasons should be given.
(vi) Indicate ``DEF'' if the project has been deferred or
significantly delayed. Reasons for and what corrective actions taken, if
any, should be given.
(vii) Indicate ``OTH'' if other than the above circumstances apply.
An explanation should be given.

Sec. 650.238 Exhibit 3--Narrative Report.

(a) The narrative report will be a brief summary of the command
environmental program. No specific format is prescribed; however, it
will contain the following:
(1) Financial displays for the current FYDP period by appropriation
account (MCA, PA, OMA, etc.) and by program media (air, water, noise,
etc.). The elements of the program presented in the Exhibit 1-EM are to
be aggregated by management activity to identify funding requirements
for training, preparation of EIA/EIS, environmental surveys and studies,
personnel costs, etc.
(2) An explanation of the environmental objectives to be achieved by
completing the projects reported or funding those activities contained
in Exhibit 1's. For any specific portion of the program that requires
more than 12 months to complete, identify the major milestones for
accomplishing the actions.
(3) Elements of the command program that will be given particular
emphasis over the short term.
(4) Projection of when statutory pollution control requirements,
Federal or state, will be satisfied by the various elements of a
command.
(5) Summary of potential or pending environmental litigation
involving installations within the command.
(6) Explanation of anticipated problem areas requiring DA
assistance.
(b) The content of the narrative report is basically a forecast of
how the major command intends to accomplish its environmental program
during the succeeding 12 months. This requirement should not be confused
with the requirement for the annual status report (RCS DD-I&L(A) 1269),
specified in Sec. 650.9 of subpart A of this part of this regulation,
which is an annual summary of environmental protection accomplishments
for the specified preceding calendar year.

Exhibit 1

circular no. a-106

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Project Report

Agency:
Project No:

[[Page 374]]

Media:
Date Prepared:
Date Revised:
GSA Inventory
Control No.:
1. Facility.

Name____________________________________________________________________
Address_________________________________________________________________
(city, county, state)
Agency contact__________________________________________________________
(name, title, telephone)
2. Specific Type of Pollution.
3. Amount of Pollution.
4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting
Problem.
8. Applicable Standards. (Cite the specific State, interstate,
local, or Federal regulation and specific requirement for which the
project is needed.)
9. Project Schedule.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Regulation
schedule-- schedule--
month and month and
year year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design (completion)............................. .......... ..........
Construction (start)............................ .......... ..........
Construction (completion)....................... .......... ..........
Operation (start)............................... .......... ..........
Final compliance................................ .......... ..........
------------------------------------------------------------------------

10. Other Relevant Information.
11. Funding Schedule.

Figure 10-1

Exhibit 1-EM

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Management Requirement

Date Prepared:
Dated Revised:
GSA Inventory Control No.:
1. Facility.

Name:___________________________________________________________________
Address:________________________________________________________________
(city, county, state)
Agency Contact:_________________________________________________________
(name, title, telephone)
2. Resource Identification.
3. Explanation and Justification of Resource Requirement. Identify
why resources, personnel and/or funds are needed for the ``management''
or conduct of the installation environmental program.
4. Proposed Resource Schedule. List by fiscal year for the period of
the FYDP, when applicable.
5. Funding. Indicate appropriation account, amounts by fiscal year
and whether amount is programed or unprogramed.
6. Other Relevant Information.

Figure 10-2

Exhibit 1

circular no. a-106

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Project Report

Agency: Department of the Army
Media: Air
Project No.: A-078C
Dated Prepared: 5/26/73
Date Revised: 2/11/74
GSA Inventory Control No.:
1. Facility.

Name: ABC Army Ammunition Plant.
Address: Kingstown, George County, S.C.
Agency Contact: MJR B. A. Smith Facility Engineer (615) 765-4321.
2. Specific Type of Pollution. NO2
3. Amount of Pollution. 4,500/hr when process is operated at
maximum rate.
4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point.
Nitric Acid Plant No. 13, Bldg. A.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. No control
measures.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. 0% Removal
efficiency.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting
Problem. Construct packed column control device 94% efficient to achieve
full compliance.
8. Applicable Standards. (1) State: State Air Code, Chapter V,
S113.a(ii)
(2) Region:
(3) Actual standard or exact citation: Maximum of 450/hr allowed as
per the XYZ test method; effective date of emission standard is 1/31/72.
9. Project Schedule.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Regulation
schedule-- schedule--
month and month and
year year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design (completion)............................. 4-74 4-74
Construction (start)............................ 10-74 9-74
Construction (completion)....................... 1-75 11-74
Final Operation (start)......................... 6-75 5-75
Final compliance................................ 7-75 9-75
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Explanation of difference between items 8 and 9: project advanced to
provide margin of safety.
10. Other Relevant Information. Citizens complaints received on 12/
15/73. Suits initiated on 12/30/73 by Onaconda Environmental Study
Group.

[[Page 375]]

11. Funding.

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal years
PEMA -----------------------------------------
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Programed..................... \1\ $875 0 0 0 0
Unprogramed................... 0 0 0 0 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Included as part of plant modernization program.

Figure 10-3

Exhibit 1

circular no. a-106

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Project Report

Agency: Department of the Army
Media: Water
Project No.: A-999b.
Date Prepared: 2-29-72
Date Revised: 12-26-73
GSA Inventory Control No.: 45678
1. Facility.
Name: Camp Faraway.
Address: Mulch City, Enny County, S.D.
Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer. (615) 755-0022.
2. Specific Type of Pollution. Domestic sewage, partly treated.
Existing treatment plant overloaded. Excess flow bypassed to river.
Influent includes small amounts (.01 mgd) of filter backwash from water
treatment plant containing precipitates of alum, iron, and manganese.
3. Amount of Pollution. Total flow: 6.2 mgd. Treated: 4.0 mgd.
4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point.
Secondary treatment plant discharges to Obstacle River, 3 miles below
Mulch City water supply intake.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. Secondary--high
rate trickling filter plant, final sedimentation, and chlorination.
Design Capacity=4.0 mgd.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
In parts per million
-----------------------------------
Principal constituent Treated Percent
Influent effluent removal
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOD5................................ 235.00 36.00 83
Suspended solids.................... 392.00 60.00 85
Total phosphorous as P.............. 8.98 4.67 48
Total nitrogen as N................. 24.96 21.14 15
------------------------------------------------------------------------

7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting
Problem. Replace existing treatment plant with AWT plant: chemical/
activated sludge/multi-media filtration to achieve 95 percent removals
or better. Design capacity=7.5 mgd.
8. Applicable Standards. State Standards. SD Code: Water Poll--
Chapter 61, 1960 Supp. SD Code: Public Health--Chapter 27, 1960 Supp.
Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters: Reg E-1.10A (Rev.).
Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 125, 133, PL 92-500, SS 301, 313, PL 92-
500, S 402-NPDES, NPDES Permit Number-SD0012345, Permit Period--1974-
1979.
9. Project Schedule.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Regulation
schedule-- schedule--
month and month and
year year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design (completion)............................. 4-75 N/A
Construction (start)............................ 6-75 5-75
Construction (completion)....................... 2-77 1-77
Operation (start)............................... 4-77 N/A
Final compliance................................ 6-77 7-77
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Regulation schedule as required by NPDES permit. State water quality
standard requires adequate secondary treatment by 1/74.
Unable to meet State requirement because of design problems and
funding cycle. State has permitted delay on condition NPDES permit
deadline is met.
10. Other Relevant Information. Installation may become surplus in
FY 75 or FY 76 leading to project discontinuance.
Funding.

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year
MCA -----------------------------------------
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Programed..................... 0 $8,000 0 0 0
Unprogramed................... 0 0 0 0 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 10-4

Exhibit 1

circular no. a-106

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Project Report

Agency: Department of the Army.
Media: Solid Waste.
Project No.: A-001
Date Prepared:
2/11/74
Date Revised:
GSA Inventory
Control No.:
1. Facility.
Name: Camp Faraway.
Address: Mulch City, Enny County, SD
Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities
Engineer (615) 755-0022.
2. Specific Type of Pollution. Camp landfill.
3. Amount of Pollution. Leachate of high BOD concentration.

[[Page 376]]

4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point.
Landfill is used for disposal of installation wastes. Due to frequent
rains, wastes build up high moisture content and leachate, which
emanates from side of fill. Also, area is noted to be a common breeding
ground for flies and mosquitos, and is generally unsightly.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. a. Landfill
receives 10 tons per day of solid waste altogether, 5 from the Camp and
5 from the nearby Lindberg Air Base. It consists mainly of normal
municipal-type wastes delivered on Monday, Wednesday and Friday of each
week. Once a week a large load of oily rags is dumped in one corner of
the landfill site.
b. Landfill was first opened in Summer of 1970 and is designed to
operate until 1990.
c. Some control of run-off waters is exercised by a trench on the
downhill side of landfill draining into a settling pond.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. Trench prevents
run-off waters from entering local bay waters, but does not solve
vector, or aesthetic problems, nor does it minimize the amount of
leachate forming.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting
Problem. Purchase of bulldozer to compact and cover wastes, minimize
formation of leachate, control vectors, and improve general appearance.
Relocate landfill to area with better drainage.
8. Applicable Standards. EPA Guidelines for Land Disposal of Solid
Wastes, published in Federal Register July 1, 1974, requirements under
Secs. 241.204, 241.207, 241.208, 241.209, and 241.210.
9. Project Schedule.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Agency
schedule schedule
month and month and
year year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design (completion)............................. N/A N/A
Construction (start)............................ N/A N/A
Construction (completion)....................... N/A N/A
Begin procurement action........................ 7-75 N/A
Operation (start)............................... 7-76 N/A
Final compliance................................ 7-76 N/A
------------------------------------------------------------------------

10. Other Relevant Information. Station planning to build an
incinerator in 1980 to extend life of landfill.
11. Funding.

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal years
---------------------------------------
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PEMA:
Programed....................... 0 0 0 0 0
Unprogramed..................... $30 0 0 0 0
OMA:
Programed engineering study..... $3 0 0 0 0
Unprogramed construction new ...... $10 ...... ...... ......
landfill.......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 10-5

Exhibit 1

circular no. a-106

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Project Report

Agency: Department of the Army.
Media: Radiation.
Project No.: A-001
Date Prepared:
6/14/74
Date Revised:
6/15/74
GSA Inventory Control No.:
1. Facility.
Name: Camp Faraway, Power Reactor.
Address: Mulch City, Enny County, S.D.
Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer (615) 755-0022.
2. Specific Type of Pollution. Tritium in primary water cooling
system.
3. Amount of Pollution. Tritium concerntrates exceed new NRC, EPA
and DA standards for discharge of primary coolant water.
4. Pollution Source and Discharge, Emission or Deposit Point.
Primary coolant water discharged to holding tank and then periodically
released to Lake Enny.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measure. Holding tank before
release to lake.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. Only limited
decay obtained from retention in holding tank.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting
Problem. Redesign holding tank system to include addition of ion
exchanger.
8. Applicable Standards and Regulations. 10 CFR parts 20 and 50, 40
CFR part 190 and AR 385-80.
9. Project Schedule.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Agency
schedule-- schedule--
month and month and
year year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design (completion)............................. 2-75 N/A
Construction (start)............................ 5-75 N/A
Construction (completion)....................... 7-75 N/A
Operation (start)............................... 8-75 N/A
Final compliance................................ 8-75 N/A
------------------------------------------------------------------------

10. Other Relevant Information. None.

[[Page 377]]

11. Funding.

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal years
MCA ---------------------------------------
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program......................... $375 ...... ...... ...... ......
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 10-6

Exhibit 1

circular no. a-106

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Project Report

Agency: Department of the Army
Media: Noise
Project No.: A-001
Date Prepared: 6/1/74
Date Revised:
GSA Inventory Control No.: 45678
1. Facility.
Name: Camp Faraway.
Address: Mulch City, Enny County, SD
Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer (615) 755-0022.
2. Specific Type of Pollution. Noise is broadband with discernible
tones. (Noise is nonimpulsive; it is continuous at a steady in level,
but with a discernible tone).
3. Amount of Pollution. The source measures 75 dBA at the property
line. Source is 20 feet from boundary line at a height of 15 feet.
Facilities or areas affected: Civilian school and housing (off the
installation).
4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. One
power plant with forced draft fans and cooling tower.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. No noise control
exists. Acoustic expertise-Acoustics, Inc., Chicago, IL.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. None.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting
Problems. Installation of commercially available mufflers on all forced
draft fans and noise enclosure on cooling tower. It is expected that
this action will lower the sound level below the background noise.
8. Applicable Standards. Mulch Noise Ordinance, Section 4-12,
Chapter 17 of the Municipal Code of Mulch, requires that the noise level
at the boundary line in business and commercial districts not exceed 62
dBA.
9. Project Schedule.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Agency
schedule-- schedule--
month and month and
year year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design (completion)............................. 9-76 N/A
Construction (start)............................ 11-74 N/A
Construction (completion)....................... 2-77 N/A
Operation (start)............................... 3-77 N/A
Final compliance................................ 4-77 N/A
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The standards require immediate compliance. Agency schedule provides
for earliest possible installation of control measures.
10. Other Relevant Information. (a) Community complaints have
included 26 telephone calls, 15 letters, and 3 personal visits. Nature
of complaints centered upon annoyance. (Log of noise complaints
attached.)
(b) Legal action has not been initiated but may be by County School
Board.
11. Funding.

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal years
OMA ---------------------------------------
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Mufflers on forced draft
fans:
Programed..................... ...... $25 ...... ...... ......
Unprogramed................... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
(b) Enclosures on cooling tower:
Programed..................... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
Unprogramed................... ...... $10 ...... ...... ......
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 10-7

Exhibit 1

circular no. a-106

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Project Report

Agency: Department of the Army
Media: Pesticides & Hazardous/Toxic Materials
Project No.: A-002
Date Prepared:
Sept. 15, 1974
Date Revised:------
GSA Inventory Control No.:
1. Facility.
Name: Camp Faraway. Address: Mulch City, Enny County, S.D.
Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer (615) 755-0022.
2. Specific type of pollution. The following pesticides registered
for the control of pests: malathion, diazinon, chlorpyrifos, propoxur,
lindane, chlordane.
3. Amount of Pollution. Quantities of pesticide concentrate mixed
per month: Malathion, 10 gal; diazinon, 10 gal; chlorpyrifos, 7 gal;
propoxur, 10 gal; lindane, 2 gal; chlordane, 10 gal.

[[Page 378]]

4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. N/A.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. Mixing sink with
sump.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. Sink too small.
Inadequate neutralization and sump capacity. Requires manual bailing.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting
Problem. Replace small mixing sink with larger double mixing sink.
Install a neutralization and holding tank with sump pump for pesticide
rinses.
8. Applicable Standards. Executive Order 11643--Environmental
Safeguards on Activities for Animal Damage Control on Federal Lands.
February 8, 1972. Additionally, the EPA, under statutory authority of
Section 4, Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as
amended by the Federal Environmental Pesticide Control Act.
9. Project Schedule.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Agency
schedule-- schedule--
month and month and
year year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design (completion)............................. 10-75 N/A
Construction (start)............................ 1-76 N/A
Construction (completion)....................... 3-76 N/A
Operation (start)............................... 4-76 N/A
------------------------------------------------------------------------

10. Other Relevant Information. Other stocks of suspended on finally
cancelled pesticides will be stored until proper disposal methods are
developed. Inventory: 5 percent DDT in oil--350 gallons; 75 percent DDT
wettable powder--220 lbs.
11. Funding Schedule.

Figure 10-8

Exhibit 1-EM

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL

Proposed Management Report

Agency: Department of the Army
Media: Management
Date Prepared:
1 Oct 74
Date Revised:
GSA Inventory
Control No.:
12345
1. Facility.
Name: Fort Stoner.
Address: Podunk, Organ County, SD
Agency Contact: Col J. J. Jones, Facility Engineer, AV 823-1555.
2. Resource Identification. Training.
3. Explanation and Justification of Resource Requirement. Training
is required for sewage treatment plant superintendent, operators and
laboratory technician to meet certification standards of South Dakota. A
new sewage treatment plant will be put into operation in December 1975
and trained personnel will be required to operate it. Current personnel
are not familiar with the operation of the new plant and require
instructions on State requirements and standards.
4. Proposed Resource Schedule. Training offered at University of
South Dakota. Attendance at one-week courses is as follows:

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal years
OMA ---------------------------------------
1975 1976 1977 1978 1979
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Superintendent.................. ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
Operator........................ ...... 2 2 1 1
Lab technician.................. ...... 1 ...... ...... ......
------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. Funding.

6. Other Relevant Information. Outyear requirements reflect training
for new hires.

Figure 10-9

Exhibit 2
pollution status report
(media
)
Appropriation account: ------------------
(OMA, MCA, etc.)
Agency........................ Page ------ of ------
Agency contact................ Reporting Date ------------------
Telephone.....................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 379]]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project name and Project costs ($1,000's)--Amount in President's budget or agency plan or amount appropriated or funded
location (GSA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Present cost
Project No. inventory Current fiscal estimate Status
control No.) Fiscal year -2 Fiscal year -1 year Fiscal year +1 Fiscal year +2 Fiscal year +3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 10-10

Appendix A to Part 650--Procedures for the Protection of Historic and
Cultural Properties

FRIDAY, JANUARY 25, 1974

WASHINGTON, DC

Volume 39--Number 18

PART II

See Federal Register 39 FR 3366-3370, January 25, 1974.

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Procedures for the Protection
of Historic and Cultural Properties