[House Document 119-43]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
119th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 119-43
NOTIFICATION TO CONGRESS OF THE INTENT TO DESIGNATE RICHARD SMITH AS
ACTING INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
__________
COMMUNICATION
from
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
transmitting
NOTIFICATION TO CONGRESS OF THE INTENT TO DESIGNATE RICHARD SMITH AS
ACTING INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, PURSUANT TO 5
U.S.C. 403 NOTE; ADDED BY PUBLIC LAW 117-263, SEC. 5203(a); (136 STAT.
3229)
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
April 17, 2025.--Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform and ordered to be printed
_______
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE
59-011 WASHINGTON : 2025
The White House,
Washington, April 14, 2025.
Hon. Mike Johnson,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Dear Mr. Speaker: I am hereby notifying the Congress that I
intend to designate Richard Smith as Acting Inspector General
of the Department of Education, in place of the current Acting
Inspector General, Rene Rocque. Such designation will be
effective 30 days from delivery of this letter.
The Constitution vests ``the executive Power'' in the
President, who has a duty to ``take Care that the Laws be
faithfully executed.'' U.S. Const., Art. II, Sec. 1, cl. 1; id.
at Sec. 3. In exercising that power and duty, I have determined
that, based on the qualities outlined in 5 U.S.C. 403(a) and
the confidence I must place in my appointees, Mr. Smith is the
best available person to serve as Acting Inspector General of
the Department of Education at this time. In my judgment, Ms.
Rocque can better serve the Nation performing other duties
(i.e., returning to her position as Deputy Inspector General of
the Department of Education).
I am providing this notification as a courtesy, a show of
comity and respect between the executive and legislative
branches. It should not be interpreted as a concession that the
Congress can limit my power to remove any officer. ``Because no
single person could fulfill [the President's]
responsibilit[ies] alone, the Framers expected that the
President would rely on subordinate officers for assistance.''
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 591 U.S.
197, 203-204 (2020). And the Constitution gives the President
``the authority to remove those who assist him in carrying out
his duties.'' Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board, 561 U.S. 477, 513-514 (2010). ``Without such
power, the President could not be held fully accountable for
discharging his own responsibilities; the buck would stop
somewhere else.'' Id at 514.
Ultimately, I have determined that the changed priorities
of my Administration (as compared to the previous one) will be
better reflected with new leadership in this Office. Therefore,
I am apprising you of my intention to designate Mr. Smith as
Acting Inspector General of the Department of Education,
effective 30 days from delivery of this letter.
Sincerely,
Donald J. Trump.
[all]