[House Document 106-315]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
106th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 106-315
NATIONAL EMERGENCY CAUSED BY THE LAPSE OF THE EXPORT ADMINISTRATION
ACT OF 1979 FOR FEBRUARY 19, 2000 TO AUGUST 19, 2000
__________
COMMUNICATION
from
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
transmitting
A 6-MONTH PERIODIC REPORT ON THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY DECLARED BY
EXECUTIVE ORDER 12924 OF AUGUST 19, 1994, TO DEAL WITH THE THREAT TO
THE NATIONAL SECURITY, FOREIGN POLICY, AND ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES
CAUSED BY THE LAPSE OF THE EXPORT ADMINISTRATION ACT OF 1979, PURSUANT
TO 50 U.S.C. 1703(c)
December 4, 2000.--Referred to the Committee on International Relations
and ordered to be printed
__________
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
89-011 WASHINGTON : 2000
The White House,
Washington, November 17, 2000.
Hon. J. Dennis Hastert,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Dear Mr. Speaker: As required by section 204(c) of the
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1703(c))
and section 401(c) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C.
1641(c)), I transmit herewith a 6-month periodic report on the
national emergency declared by Executive Order 12924 of August
19, 1994, to deal with the threat to the national security,
foreign policy, and economy of the United States caused by the
lapse of the Export Administration Act of 1979.
Sincerely,
William J. Clinton.
President's Periodic Report on the National Emergency Caused by the
Lapse of the Export Administration Act of 1979 for February 19, 2000
to August 19, 2000
On August 19, 1994, in Executive Order No. 12924, I
declared a national emergency under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) to deal
with the threat to the national security, foreign policy, and
economy of the United States caused by the lapse of the Export
Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2401 et
seq.) and the system of controls maintained under that Act. In
that order, I continued in effect, to the extent permitted by
law, the provisions of the Export Administration Act of 1979,
as amended, the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR 730
et seq.), and the delegations of authority set forth in
Executive Order No. 12002 of July 7, 1977 (as amended by
Executive Order No. 12755 of March 12, 1991), Executive Order
No. 12214 of May 2, 1980, Executive Order No. 12735 of November
16, 1990 (subsequently revoked by Executive Order No. 12938 of
November 14, 1994), and Executive Order No. 12851 of June 11,
1993. As required by the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C.
1622(d)), I issued notices on August 15, 1995, August 14, 1996,
August 13, 1997, August 13, 1998, August 10, 1999, and August
3, 2000, continuing the emergency declared in Executive Order
No. 12924.
In 1996, I issued two Executive orders concerning the
transfer of items from the U.S. Munitions List to the Commerce
Control List. On October 12, 1996, I issued Executive Order No
13020 (regarding hot-section technologies for commercial
aircraft engines) and on November 15, 1996, I issued Executive
Order No 13026 (regarding encryption products).
I issued Executive Order No. 12924 pursuant to the
authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and
laws of the United States, including, but not limited to,
IEEPA. At that time, I also submitted a report to the Congress
pursuant to section 204(b) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(b)).
Section 204 of IEEPA requires follow-up reports, with respect
to actions or changes, to be submitted every six months.
Additionally, section 401(c) of the National Emergencies Act
(50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) requires that the President, within 90 days
after the end of each six-month period following a declaration
of a national emergency, report to the Congress on the total
expenditures directly attributable to that declaration. To
comply with these requirements, I have submitted combined
activities and expenditures reports for the 6-month periods
ending February 19, 1995, August 19, 1995, February 19, 1996,
August 19, 1996, February 19, 1997, August 19, 1997, February
19, 1998, August 19, 1998, February 19, 1999, August 19, 1999,
and February 19, 2000. The following report covers the 6-month
period from February 19, 2000, to August 19, 2000. Detailed
information on export control activities is contained in the
most recent Export Administration Annual Report for Fiscal Year
1999 and the January 2000 Report on Foreign Policy Export
Controls, required by section 14 and section 6(f) of the Export
Administration Act, respectively, which the Department of
Commerce continues to submit to the Congress under a policy of
conforming actions under the Executive Order to the provisions
of the Export Administration Act, as appropriate.
Since the issuance of Executive Order No. 12924, the
Department of Commerce has continued to administer and enforce
the system of export controls, including anti-boycott
provisions, contained in the Export Administration Regulations
(EAR). In administering these controls, the Department has
acted under a policy of conforming actions under Executive
Orders No. 12924, 13020, and 13026 to the provisions of the
Export Administration Act, insofar as appropriate.
The expenses incurred by the Federal Government in the 6-
month period from February 19, 2000, to August 19, 2000, that
are directly attributable to the exercise of authorities
conferred by the declaration of a national emergency with
respect to export controls were largely centered in the
Department of Commerce, Bureau of Export Administration (BXA).
Expenditures by the Department of Commerce for the reporting
period are anticipated to be $21,270,000, most of which
represents program operating costs, wage and salary costs for
Federal personnel, and overhead expenses.
Since my last report to the Congress, there have been
several significant developments in the area of export
controls:
Multilateral developments
Wassenaar Arrangement. The Wassenaar Arrangement on Export
Controls is a multilateral regime currently consisting of 33
member countries. Its purpose is to contribute to regional and
international security and stability by promoting transparency
and greater responsibility in international transfers of
conventional arms and dual-use goods and technologies.
The United States Government has participated in
submissions of export data made by member countries in the
regime since the November 1996 implementation of the Wassenaar
dual-use export control list. The Wassenaar members make dual-
use data submissions on a semi-annual basis in April and
October.
In April 2000, BXA representatives attended an
Expert's Group meeting to review the Wassenaar Arrangement's
controls on conventional arms and dual-use goods and
technologies. Nearly 70 proposals were discussed to modify and
streamline Wassenaar's Dual-Use and Munitions Lists,
approximately 30 of which were submitted by the United States.
The majority of the proposals were in the areas of electronics,
computers, sensors, and machine tools. Several proposals
currently under review are tied to relaxing controls on
microprocessors and computers. As is typical of first round
discussions, the Expert's Group focused on presentation of
proposals and reached relatively few final decisions. Member
countries requested and provided additional information on
several proposals to further justify recommendations. However,
there continues to be strong pressure within the Arrangement to
relax controls on general-purpose microprocessors and digital
computers in light of rapid technological advances and
controllability factors. Several countries advocate a complete
decontrol of general-purpose microprocessors accompanied with
drastic liberalizations of computer controls.
Nearly all proposals require additional study by
member countries and decisions to adopt or reject these
proposals will occur later in the year. Also in April, BXA
representatives attended the 3rd Annual Licensing and
Enforcement Officers Meeting designed to exchange information
on national practices of respective licensing and enforcement
procedures. Discussions focused on 15 plenary-mandated agenda
items, including intangible transfers of technology and
software, catch-all controls, elements of effective
enforcement, and international import certificates. Further
discussions on intangible transfers, catch-all controls, and
elements of effective enforcement will continue during the
year.
In May 2000, BXA representatives attended a
General Working Group Meeting designed to increase the general
information exchange regarding regions and projects of concern
to the United States (e.g., Sudan, Ethiopia and Eritrea). The
group discussed the specific information exchange on dual-use
goods and technologies and the scope of dual-use notifications
and procedures associated with cases requiring ``extreme
vigilance.'' The group agreed to adopt a ``best practices''
procedure for exercising extreme vigilance for Very Sensitive
List items and to establish criteria for effective enforcement.
Member countries are still studying U.S. proposals for expanded
reporting of conventional arms exports, strengthening dual-use
export notification procedures by establishing a denial
consultation procedure, and implementing controls on man-
portable defense systems. Discussions on these issues will
continue during the next meeting, scheduled for late 2000. The
United States will continue to work with interested countries
in an attempt to bridge the gap between dual-use items and arms
in order to increase transparency and reduce differences in
licensing practices.
Australia Group. The Australia Group (AG) is an informal
multilateral export control regime that seeks to impede the
proliferation of chemical and biological weapons through the
harmonization of export controls, an exchange of information on
global proliferation activities, and outreach of nonmembers.
The 30 member countries meet annually and communicate between
sessions to review and refine the list of controlled chemicals,
biological agents, and related equipment and technology.
At the 1999 AG Plenary, informal agreement was
reached between the United States and certain concerned AG
partners to exempt diagnostic test kits used in blood chemistry
and water quality analysis from export licensing. These kits
currently require an export license because they contain small
quantities of AG-controlled chemicals. A proposed U.S. text
drafted by BXA outlining the parameters of the exemption was
submitted for informal review by other AG members during the
week of August 14, 2000.
All AG members are State Parties to the Chemical
Weapons Convention (CWC) and the Biological Weapons Convention.
The CWC is an international arms control and nonproliferation
treaty that bans chemical weapons and monitors the legitimate
production, processing, consumption, export, and import of
certain toxic chemicals and precursors related to chemical
weapons. The BWC entered into force in 1975 to prohibit the
development, production, and stockpiling of biological agents
or toxins that do not have peaceful uses. AG members support
national export licensing policies that promote the purpose and
objectives of the CWC and BWC.
Chemical Weapons Convention. The CWC is an international
arms control and nonproliferation treaty that bans chemical
weapons (CW) and monitors the legitimate production,
processing, consumption, export, and import of certain toxic
chemicals and precursors related to CW. BXA has implemented
certain export control provisions of the Convention in the
Export Administration Regulations. During this reporting
period, BXA received two advance notifications of exports of
Schedule 1 chemicals, two annual reports on exports of Schedule
1 chemicals for the calendar year 1999, and 13 end-use
certificates for exports to Taiwan, Malaysia, Thailand, and
Israel.
Nuclear Suppliers Group. The Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG),
composed of 38 member countries with the European Commission as
a permanent observer, is an informal group of nations concerned
with the proliferation of nuclear weapons. The NSG has
established guidelines to assist member nations in
administering national nuclear export control programs.
Controls are focused on certain categories of goods: nuclear
material, equipment, and technology unique to the nuclear
industry, and so-called nuclear dual-use items that have both
nuclear and non-nuclear applications.
An NSG Working Group meeting was held the week of
March 6, 2000, in Vienna, Austria, to discuss the control of
parts and components exports. Under current rules, only a small
number of parts and components of controlled items are listed
in the NSG Guidelines as being subject to control. While a
number of NSG members would like to change that approach, the
United States favors continuing to allow each member's ``catch
all'' controls to apply to the export of spare parts and
components of controlled items.
At the NSG Plenary held in Paris, France, June 19-
June 24, 2000, the NSG took the following actions: (1) with the
support of the United States, it was decided that no further
action was needed to control parts and components; (2) it was
determined that a working group will continue to look at
possible options for simplifying the NSG's institutional
arrangement; (3) Turkey, Belarus, and Cyprus were welcomed as
new NSG members, and it was agreed that Slovenia, participating
at this Plenary as an observer, could be admitted to the NSG
intercessionally; and (4) the United States will host the 2001
Plenary in Aspen, Colorado, the week of May 7, 2001, when the
United States will take over the chairmanship of the NSG.
Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR). The MTCR is an
informal group of 32 countries that have agreed to coordinate
their national export controls for the prevention of missile
proliferation. Each member, under its own laws and practices,
has committed to adhere to the MTCR Guidelines for export
licensing policy for items found on the MTCR Equipment and
Technology Annex.
BXA staff represented the Department at a Missile
Technology Control Regime (MTCR) seminar in Munich, Germany, on
May 24-26. Topics of discussion included possible measures to
reduce regional and global security risks, further eliminate
existing missile stockpiles, and curtail indigenous missile
development programs. The consensus of views reached at the
seminar will be presented at the MTCR Plenary meeting in
October 2000 in Helsinki, Finland.
BXA represented the Department at the MTCR
intercessional Technical Experts Meeting (TEM) held in Berlin,
Germany, on July 4-6. The TEM, at which proposals on technical
changes to the MTCR Annex are reviewed and prepared for
consideration by the full MTCR membership, considered a
proposal tabled by the United States that would expand controls
on small fuel efficient engines and integrated navigation
systems used in unmanned air vehicles that can become potential
delivery vehicles for chemical and biological agents. The
proposal was well received, and will receive further
consideration at the next TEM to be held prior to the MTCR
Plenary scheduled for October 2000 in Helsinki, Finland.
Encryption/high performance computer policy
Encryption. During the period February 19, 2000, to August
19, 2000, BXA carried out a number of activities to implement
the Administration's encryption policy. These activities
included license and commodity classification processing,
meeting with industry representatives and technical advisory
committees, and working with interagency groups on formulating
encryption policy initiatives. BXA continues to manage a
significant workload as a result of U.S. companies seeking to
meet the increased consumer demand for encryption products
worldwide.
To support and explain U.S. encryption policy in
the international arena, BXA actively participates in policy
discussions with other nations. BXA attended several Wassenaar
Arrangement working group meetings to explain U.S. policy and
discuss its proposal to release encryption software considered
to be ``in the public domain.'' Wassenaar members also
discussed various proposals to ease key length restrictions for
mass-market hardware products. On May 8, 2000, BXA briefed the
Free Trade Area of the Americas E-Commerce Working Group on the
U.S. encryption regulations. BXA also held encryption export
control policy discussions with other foreign delegations on a
bilateral basis.
BXA continues to educate exporters and the general
public on the goals of the Administration's updated encryption
policy, and how to obtain export authorization through
licensing and classification. BXA presented information
technology licensing workshops at its conferences in San Diego
(``Update West 2000'') and Washington, D.C. (``Update 2000'').
Through regular meetings with U.S. companies and Web site
updates, BXA provides exporters with practical guidance
concerning encryption export control policy and procedures.
The Administration believes its encryption export
control policy continues to be effective and credible. During
this reporting period, Congress failed to pass any legislation
to move beyond these initiatives. The Administration opposes
proposed legislation such as the ``Security and Freedom Through
Encryption Act of 1999'' and the ``Promote Reliable On-Line
Transactions to Encourage Commerce and Trade Act of 1999.'' The
Administration believes that such legislation is unnecessary in
light of the current regulatory structure that promotes secure
electronic commerce, facilitates U.S. competitiveness in global
information technology markets, and protects privacy in balance
with public safety and national security interests.
High Performance Computers. During the past six months, BXA
has been engaged in various activities to keep pace with
technological trends in high-performance computers (HPCs).
These activities include updating export controls on HPCs,
studying alternative methods for controlling HPCs, meeting with
industry counterparts to assess their needs, and working on
developing bilateral and multilateral relationships with
certain countries to ensure appropriate safeguards are attached
to the export HPCs.
On August 3, 2000, the Administration announced
its intent to raise the National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) notification requirement for exports of HPCs to Tier 3
countries (as listed in Section 740.7 of the EAR) from 12,500
millions of theoretical operations per second (MTOPS) to 28,000
MTOPS, to account for rapid changes in technology over the
previous six months (MTOPS is a measure of a computer's
composite theoretical performance, or ``CTP''). Similarly, the
Tier 2 level for computers eligible for export under a license
exception will raise to 45,000 MTOPS. The Administration also
announced its intention to move Estonia from Tier 3 to Tier 2
effective December 28, 2000, and to move Argentina from Tier 2
to Tier 1 when BXA publishes its next computer regulation.
The Information Security Technical Advisory
Committee is continuing to study alternative control parameters
for HPCs. The Administration needs to continually update CTP-
based control levels to keep up with the rapid technological
advances in the computer industry. The need for these
significant adjustments calls into question the viability of
the current approach for determining HPC control levels. For
this reason, BXA will continue to work with other concerned
agencies to explore alternative control parameters that would
provide the flexibility necessary to accommodate future
advances in HPC and microprocessor technology.
BXA is also actively involved in negotiations with
one other HPC producing country to ensure that appropriate
safeguards and licensing mechanisms are in place to avoid
exports or transfers to countries of concern and proliferation
entities.
Bilateral cooperation/technical assistance
As part of the Administration's continuing effort to
encourage other countries to strengthen their export control
systems, the Department of Commerce and other agencies
conducted a wide range of discussions with a number of foreign
countries.
Hong Kong. Under the Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, the
United States Government committed itself to continuing its
export licensing treatment for Hong Kong as long as Hong Kong
maintains an effective and autonomous export control program.
BXA actively monitors the status of Hong Kong's post-reversion
export control program to ensure that it continues to be
effective and autonomous from that of the People's Republic of
China. By openly and vigilantly observing Hong Kong's program,
BXA supports Hong Kong's efforts to maintain the separation of
its export control system from the rest of China.
The United States and Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region (SAR) hold semi-annual meetings to exchange information
and enhance cooperation, as called for in the Agreed Minute on
Strategic Commodities Trade Controls signed by former Secretary
Daley and his Hong Kong counterpart in October 1997. These
meetings assist BXA in monitoring Hong Kong's export control
program to determine whether their system continues to be
effective and free from influence by the government of the PRC.
In March 2000, BXA led an interagency delegation to Hong Kong
for the fifth round of strategic trade talks since the two
sides signed the Agreed Minute. During the March meeting, BXA
encouraged Hong Kong to implement controls on intangible
technology transfers and provided Hong Kong officials with a
white paper and other materials on the subject. Hong Kong
officials gave a comprehensive overview of the SAR's new
licensing scheme for in-transit cargo at Hong Kong's airport.
The delegation visited strategic trade control facilities at
Chek Lap Kok airport, Lok Ma Chau boundary crossing, and Kwai
Chung container terminal port.
India. Under a regulation published on November 19, 1998,
the United States implemented economic sanctions on India by
imposing a policy of denial for the export or reexport of U.S.-
origin items controlled for nuclear nonproliferation and
missile technology reasons to India and Pakistan as stated in
part 742 of the EAR. Prior to the sanctions, the United States
reviewed applications for these items on a case-by-case basis
with a presumption of approval.
In early March 2000, BXA participated in a Commerce
Department delegation to India to prepare for the President's
visit to India. The trip's focus was advocacy for pending
contracts with U.S. companies, primarily in the power and
telecommunications industries. BXA participated in the trip to
address sanctions issues related to these and other projects.
In April 2000, BXA participated in State Department-led
meetings in Washington with a delegation of Indian export
control officials. The two sides discussed India's revisions to
its control list and recent U.S. policy changes. The United
States provided an analysis of the Indian revisions, which
expanded controls on munitions and missile-related items.
Indian officials indicated, however, that as long as their
civilian programs are targets of the multilateral
nonproliferation regimes, the Indian government would continue
to withhold membership in them. The two sides also discussed
initiating technical-level exchanges on export controls and
agreed to further discussions on the scope of such exchanges in
New Delhi in the summer.
On August 7-10, 2000, BXA participated in an interagency
visit to India to discuss India's specific interests in a
program of export control cooperation. In discussions with
officials in Indian Customs and the Directorate General of
Foreign Trade in the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, the two
sides agreed on a series of exchanges, to begin in fall 2000,
dealing with nonproliferation-related Customs procedures and
export licensing policies and procedures. This outreach program
is part of the U.S.-Indian dialogue on nonproliferation led by
the State Department that began after India's nuclear
detonations in May 1998. The first activity, a seminar on
licensing procedures and policies in Washington, is scheduled
for October 2000.
Asia. BXA officials attended the Asian Export Control
Seminar in Tokyo, Japan, from February 29-March 2, 2000.
Delegations from 12 Asian countries and regions, including
Australia, China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Chinese Taipei, plus
the United Kingdom, also attended the conference, which was
jointly chaired by Japan, the United States, Australia, and the
United Kingdom. The U.S. delegation, led by the Department of
State and including representatives from the Department of
Defense and Commerce/BXA, made presentations on the Wassenaar
Arrangement, enforcement issues, and export management systems.
Audience response was very positive and there were questions
and follow-up discussions on the presentation on export
management systems. Presentations by other delegations covered
such issues as transshipment, export control legal authority,
and other multilateral export control regimes. The conference
featured small group discussions on a range of export control
issues.
Cuba. Since I announced streamlined procedures for sale of
medicines and medical equipment to Cuba in 1998, approved
licenses for sale to Cuba of these items have increased
significantly. However, the food-for-sale program initiated by
my Administration in 1999 has not been as effective as
anticipated because prospective U.S. exporters have had
difficulty in identifying purchasers of the food in Cuba that
are private, non-governmental organizations, as required by the
regulations.
Nonproliferation Export Control and International
Cooperation. During the period February 2, 2000, through August
19, 2000, BXA's Nonproliferation Export Control and
International Cooperation Program (NEC) hosted, participated
in, and/or coordinated 18 technical exchanges on export
controls in conjunction with representatives from the
Departments of State, Defense, Energy, Justice, and the
Treasury (U.S. Customs Service). These programs sought not only
to familiarize the governments of Russia, Central Europe, the
Balkans, the Baltics, the Causasus, and Central Asia with the
major elements comprising an export control system that meets
international standards for effectiveness, but also to assist
the governments in developing and strengthening their own
national export control systems. These elements involve five
functional areas: the legal and regulatory framework necessary
for an effective export control system, licensing procedures
and control lists, enforcement mechanisms, industry-government
relations, and system administration and automation support.
Programs conducted during this period also included special
activities and multilateral conferences that related to NEC
objectives. These programs have contributed to a reduction of
the proliferation threat from and through the participating
countries by strengthening these countries' national export
control systems.
Regulatory actions: Published and pending
Encryption. On January 14, 2000, BXA published regulations
implementing the Administration's September 16, 1999,
announcement to simplify the export of cryptography. The
Administration's encryption policy rests on three tenets: a
review of encryption products in advance of sale, a streamlined
post-export reporting system that takes into account industry's
distribution models, and review of exports to foreign
government end-users. In carrying out this policy, BXA analysts
review license applications for exports to government end-
users, classify encryption items to determine eligibility under
new license exception provisions, and handle industry
notifications of products released from export controls. BXA
actively reaches out to the public through correspondence,
meetings with industry, case consultation, and its Web site.
On July 17, 2000, the Administration announced changes to
U.S. encryption policy. The changes will be included in a
regulation to be published in fall 2000. The most significant
change in the soon-to-be released regulation is that U.S.
companies will be able to export encryption products and
technology under license exception to any end user in the 15
nations of the European Union as well as Australia, Norway,
Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Japan, New Zealand, and
Switzerland immediately upon notifying BXA of intent to export.
Even highly sophisticated encryption items such as source code,
general purpose toolkits, and high-end routers and switches
will be included under these new procedures. The upcoming
regulation will only require licenses for ``cryptanalytic
items,'' which are a specialized class of tools not normally
used in commercial environments. Other policy initiatives to be
implemented in new regulations include streamlined export
provisions for U.S. products that operate with foreign-origin
encryption through an Open Cryptographic Interface; are
compiled from ``open'' source code; are made publicly available
through submission to international standards bodies; implement
short-range wireless encryption technologies such as HomeRF and
Bluetooth; or that implement data encryption at key lengths
(e.g. 56-bits) that are not controlled by the Wassenaar
Arrangement. The rule implementing this policy was published on
October 19.
Once implemented, this updated policy will reflect the
invaluable and ongoing dialogue between the interagency working
group on cryptography and various industry groups and
organizations advocating privacy protection. Through
consultation with groups such as the President's Export Council
Subcommittee on Encryption, Regulations and Procedures
Technical Advisory Committee, Alliance for Network Security,
Americans for Computer Privacy, and Computer Systems Policy
Project, the new regulations will take into account technology
trends and market realities, which, if not addressed as a
matter of policy, would only serve to disadvantage U.S.
industry and undermine the national interest. In addition to
facilitating exports to the European Union and other key
trading partners, the new regulation will ease the post-export
reporting burden on U.S. companies and will simplify exports to
telecommunication and internet service providers. For the first
time, exporters will be able to self-classify 56- and 64-bit
encryption products not controlled by the Wassenaar
Arrangement, and distribute ``beta test'' encryption software
under license exception. The regulation will also allow
incorporation of certain U.S.-origin retail encryption
components and software into foreign products outside of U.S.
export control without triggering a U.S. license requirement,
so long as total U.S. content does not exceed ``de minimis''
thresholds.
These initiatives will assure the continuing
competitiveness of U.S. companies in international markets,
consistent with the national interest in areas such as
electronic commerce, national security, and support to law
enforcement.
High Performance Computers. On March 10, 2000, BXA
published a regulation raising the technical level above which
exports of high performance computers require licenses
implementing the President's February 1 update announcement to
the Administration HPC export control policy. This update
raised the upper threshold of the license exception CTP for
exports to Computer Tier 2 countries from 20,000 MTOPS to
33,000 MTOPS, and from 12,300 MTOPS to 20,000 MTOPS for exports
to Tier 3 countries. On August 3, 2000, the Administration
announced a further modification of technical limits. BXA has a
rule pending to implement the changes. Due to rapid
technological advancement in the computer industry, the
technical level of computers is reviewed every six months.
India. On March 17, 2000, BXA published a regulation that
removed 51 Indian entities from the Entity List in Supplement 4
of Section 744 of the EAR. The regulation also changed the
policy for exports of non-sensitive ``EAR99'' items to listed
entities from ``presumption of denial'' to ``presumption of
approval.'' This rule represented the first significant
modification of measures associated with India sanctions since
their imposition in November 1998. Because many India
applications submitted to BXA since May 1998 have been for
EAR99 items that require a license under Glenn Amendment
sanctions, the March policy change has resulted in a
significant increase in the approval rate for India licenses.
On July 26, 2000, BXA published another rule that removed two
Indian entities from the Entity List and added one.
North Korea. On September 17, 1999, I announced my decision
to ease some of the sanctions against North Korea administered
under the Trading with the Enemy Act, the Defense Production
Act, and the EAR. On June 19, 2000, BXA published a regulation
easing restrictions on exports of low-level items to North
Korea in response to North Korea agreeing to halt further tests
of its missile program. Under sanctions easing measures, U.S.
exporters may now ship agricultural commodities, medical items,
and low-level industrial goods to North Korea without a
license. However, all multilaterally controlled items, as well
as items controlled unilaterally by the United States, continue
to require a license to North Korea.
Wassenaar Arrangement. On July 12, 2000, BXA published a
rule implementing the Wassenaar Arrangement's changes to their
list of dual-use items. This rule affected entries in
Categories 1 through 6, and 9 of the Commerce Control List.
Export Clearance. On July 10, 2000, BXA and the Census
Bureau jointly published final rules clarifying export
clearance, including the definition of exporter and the
requirements for filing a Shipper's Export Declaration. Public
comments contributed significantly to the development of these
rules.
Export license information
During the reporting period, BXA continued to receive many
requests for exports licensing information through the Freedom
of Information Act and through discovery requests during
enforcement proceedings. Under section 12(c) of the Export
Administration Act, BXA continues to withhold from public
disclosure information obtained for the purpose of
consideration of, or concerning, export license applications,
unless the release of such information is determined by the
Under Secretary to be in the national interest, pursuant to the
directive in Executive Order No. 12924 to carry out the
provisions of the Export Administration Act, to the extent
permitted by law, notwithstanding an adverse court decision
regarding BXA's authority to withhold such information. The
Department has appealed this decision.
BXA received two Congressional requests for large amounts
of export licensing information during the reporting period.
Office of Inspector General and the General Accounting Office
studies
During the reporting period, BXA continued its cooperation
with the Office of Inspector General (OIG) and the General
Accounting Office (GAO). OIG initiated three new studies and
GAO initiated nine. Also during the period, OIG closed three
studies and GAO closed six, with the issuance of final reports
or briefings.
Export enforcement
Export Enforcement continued, through its three constituent
offices, its programs of prevention of diversions,
investigation/
enforcement of the export control provisions of the Export
Administration Regulations, and enforcement of the antiboycott
provisions of the Export Administration Regulations.
Office of Enforcement Analysis
Preventive/Compliance Activities. Office of Enforcement
Analysis (OEA) prevention activities included designing a
systematic plan to target and prioritize pre-license checks
(PLCs) and post shipment verifications (PSVs) conducted by
representatives of U.S. diplomatic posts. The purpose of the
plan is to ensure that the PLC and PSV programs, which are
coordinated by BXA's Export Enforcement, reflect the full range
of U.S. export control concerns and use available resources as
effectively as possible.
PLCs validate information on export license applications
including the reliability of the end-users. In contrast, PSVs
strengthen assurances that exporters, shippers, consignees, and
end-users comply with the terms of export licenses and
licensing conditions that are intended to deter diversions from
approved end-users and end-uses of dual-use exports. The
overall objective for conducting PLCs and PSVs is to detect and
prevent the illegal transfer of controlled U.S.-origin goods
and technology.
Another major preventive enforcement activity of OEA is the
compiling of information regarding parties of export control
concern and maintaining these names on Export Enforcement's
watch list. All of the parties included on this watch list are
screened against names listed on export license applications
received by BXA. OEA analysts review all applications in detail
that include a match against a party on the watch list to
assess diversion risks, identify potential violations, and
determine the reliability of proposed end-users of controlled
U.S.-origin commodities or technical data.
NDAA Activities. OEA has responsibility for implementing
the High Performance Computer post-shipment verification and
annual report requirements of the NDAA for FY1998. OEA tracks
all post-shipment reporting on exports of HPCs over a set
operating level to ``Tier 3'' counties, as defined by the NDAA,
and oversees the post-shipment verifications performed on such
exports. OEA has the responsibility for reporting the total
number of HPCs exported and the number of NDAA HPC post-
shipment verifications performed to Congress in an Annual
Report.
Visa Review Program. During the reporting period, OEA
continued restructing its Visa Application Review Program to
prevent unauthorized access to controlled technology or
technical data by foreign nationals visiting the United States.
The Office has developed new criteria and thresholds for
evaluating visa applications for targeting purposes. OEA has
narrowed its focus and concentrated on specific products most
often used in weapons of mass destruction projects. OEA's
evaluation and analysis of visa application cable traffic
involves preventive enforcement efforts such as recommending
denial of certain visas and the referral of enforcement leads
to Office of Export Enforcement (OEE) field offices for
possible case development. In some instances, OEE Special
Agents uncovered possible visa fraud on the part of the foreign
applicant. These findings were forwarded to OEA and submitted
to the State Department's Visa Fraud Unit for further
investigation and action during the reporting period.
Shipper's Export Declaration Review Program. OEA
systematically reviews Shipper's Export Declarations (SEDs)
filed by exporters. Using a computerized index of data fields,
OEA produces a list of SEDs targeted for closer review. These
reviews focus particularly on licensed and license exception
shipments, shipments bound for destinations of concern, and
shipments of strategic commodities of proliferation concern.
Through these reviews, OEA identifies SEDs that may indicate
violations of the Export Administration Regulations and refers
them to OEE special agents for further enforcement actions.
Office of Export Enforcement
The Office of Export Enforcement opened 486 and closed 813
investigations during the reporting period.
Office of Antiboycott Compliance Activities
The Office of Antiboycott Compliance continued to supply
the State Department with information on boycott requests
received by U.S. persons. The State Department uses this
information in its discussions with boycotting countries
concerning ending the Arab boycott of Israel. The Office of
Antiboycott Compliance opened four and closed ten
investigations during the reporting period.