[House Document 104-179]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
104th Congress 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 104-179
REQUEST FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS
__________
COMMUNICATION
from
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
transmitting
HIS REQUEST TO MAKE AVAILABLE APPROPRIATIONS TOTALING $620 MILLION IN
BUDGETARY AUTHORITY FOR DOD OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE NATO-LED
BOSNIA PEACE IMPLEMENTATION FORCE (IFOR) AND OPERATION DENY FLIGHT, AND
$200 MILLION FOR CIVILIAN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DAYTON PEACE ACCORD AND
TO DESIGNATE THE AMOUNTS MADE AVAILABLE AS AN EMERGENCY REQUIREMENT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 251(b)(2)(D)(i) OF THE BALANCED BUDGET AND
EMERGENCY DEFICIT CONTROL ACT OF 1985, AS AMENDED, PURSUANT TO 31
U.S.C. 1107
February 23, 1996--Referred to the Committee on Appropriations and
ordered to be printed
The White House,
Washington, DC, February 21, 1996.
The Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Sir: The United States and its allies have begun the
difficult task of bringing peace to Bosnia. Under the agreement
brokered by the United States that resulted in the Dayton Peace
Accords, I have committed our troops to a multinational force
in Bosnia and Herzegovina and pledged U.S. help in
multinational civilian peace implementation programs. I ask
Congress to consider expeditiously the enclosed requests for FY
1996 supplemental appropriations in support of these efforts.
These requests seek $620 million for Department of Defense
operations associated with the NATO-led Bosnia Peace
Implementation Force (IFOR) and Operation Deny Flight, and $200
million for civilian implementation of the Dayton Peace
Accords.
The security and success of the IFOR mission go hand-in-
hand with the implementation of all aspects of the Dayton Peace
Accords. Our planned civilian programs will not only underpin
the Dayton Accords but also support IFOR and American troops,
enhancing their security as they perform their mission and
facilitating their safe and smooth withdrawal upon its
completion.
I hereby designate the amounts requested as emergency
requirements pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(D)(i) of the
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, as
amended. Nevertheless, the requested increases in budget
authority are fully offset by rescissions from funds available
to the Defense Department, as proposed in the accompanying
Special Message.
The details of these requests are set forth in the enclosed
letter from the Director of the Office of Management and
Budget. I concur with her comments and observations.
Sincerely,
William J. Clinton.
Enclosure.