[Analytical Perspectives]
[Performance and Management Assessments]
[2. Budget and Performance Integration and the Program Assessment RatingTool (PART)]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
[[Page 9]]
2. BUDGET AND PERFORMANCE INTEGRATION AND THE PROGRAM ASSESSMENT RATING
TOOL
The President's Management Agenda (PMA) is helping the Federal
Government become results-oriented. In addition to making it more
efficient--reducing waste, fraud, and abuse--it is leading managers to
ask whether programs are working as intended and if not, what can be
done to achieve greater results.
Government programs, however worthy their goals, should demonstrate
they are actually effective at solving problems. That is why it is so
important that we consistently ask, for instance, whether the Generation
IV Nuclear Energy Systems Initiative at the Department of Energy is
meeting its goals toward creating a next-generation nuclear energy
system, or whether the National Institutes of Health's HIV/AIDS Research
program is on track to developing an HIV/AIDS vaccine by 2010. If we are
not meeting our goals, then we should do something differently to
address the shortfall. If we are not measuring our performance at all,
that is a bigger problem.
The Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) is designed to help assess
the management and performance of individual programs. The PART helps
evaluate a program's purpose, design, planning, management, results, and
accountability to determine its overall effectiveness. Recommendations
are then made to improve program management and performance.
The Administration has assessed approximately 400 programs
representing approximately 40 percent of the Federal Budget; 234
programs were assessed last year and another 173 programs were assessed
this year.\1\ In three more years, the Administration plans to have
assessed the performance and management of roughly 100 percent of the
Federal Budget.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Some reassessed programs were combined for review for the 2005
Budget, which is why the number of programs assessed for the 2004 Budget
and the number of programs assessed for the 2005 Budget do not add up to
exactly 400 programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With the help of the PART, we know much more about the performance of
40 percent of the budget than we did before. This year, there is a
reduction in the percentage of programs that cannot demonstrate results
and there was a modest increase in the programs rated ``Effective.''
Other results:
About 40 percent of programs were rated either ``Effective''
or ``Moderately Effective''; a quarter of programs rated just
``Adequate'' or ``Ineffective''; and about 40 percent of
programs were unable to demonstrate results.
The PARTed programs for which we have current budget
information show: almost $713 billion spent effectively or
moderately effectively; almost $162 billion spent just
adequately or ineffectively; and almost $209 billion spent on
programs for which we cannot demonstrate results.
The goal of the Budget and Performance Integration Initiative (part of
the President's Management Agenda) is to have the Congress and the
Executive Branch routinely consider performance information, among other
factors, when making management and funding decisions. This will enable
the Government to better describe to taxpayers what they are getting for
their money. The evolution and institutionalization of the PART goes a
long way towards achieving this goal.
There are a number of programs that have substantially improved their
management practices or actual performance by implementing
recommendations made through the PART process. For example:
The Broadcasting Board of Governors' efforts to broadcast to
Near East Asia and South Asia could not demonstrate that they
were achieving results last year. But following the
recommendations in last year's PART, the program this year set
goals for weekly audience, program quality, signal strength
and cost-per-listener. With additional funding, the program
dramatically increased its reach to Arab speaking countries to
an estimated 10.5 million listeners each week, up from just
3.9 million in 2002.
Last year, the Administration on Aging, which provides
services and benefits to the elderly so they can remain in
their homes and communities, could not measure its impact.
This year, the program was able to show it was moderately
effective after demonstrating that its services enable the
elderly to remain in their homes and communities and setting
goals for increasing the number of people served per each
million dollars spent. With level funding, the program plans
to increase by 6 percent in 2004 and 8 percent in 2005 the
number of people served per million dollars in funding.
The Department of Energy's (DOE) Advanced Scientific
Computing Research program--which provides world-class
scientific supercomputing facilities and funds research in
applied mathematics, computer science, and networking--did not
have a sufficient strategic vision or adequate performance
measures in last year's PART. This year, the program has
developed a strategic plan and has adopted performance
measures that will focus on keeping its supercomputer hardware
procurements on cost and schedule, and on making high-impact
scientific advances by dedicating a substantial fraction of
its supercomputing capacity to a small number of important,
computationally intensive, large-scale research projects.
These measures will routinely assess the usefulness and the
[[Page 10]]
efficiency of the facilities the program provides to
scientists.
The PART completed for the TRIO Upward Bound Program
(Department of Education), which provides intensive services
to improve academic performance and college preparation for
high school students, found the program was inadequately
targeted to the high-risk students who have potential for
college but are not performing successfully in high school. In
response, the Department of Education has created a special
competition and awarded $19.2 million to projects that serve
high-risk students. The Department will monitor the college
enrollment rate for these participants and will use the
results of this demonstration Initiative to guide future
changes in the program.
What is the PART?
The PART is a questionnaire which consists of approximately 30
questions. It examines four critical areas of assessment--purpose and
design, strategic planning, management, and results and accountability.
The first set of questions gauges whether the programs' design and
purpose are clear and defensible. The second section involves strategic
planning, and weighs whether the agency sets valid annual and long-term
goals for programs. The third section rates agency management of
programs, including financial oversight and program improvement efforts.
The fourth set of questions focuses on results that programs can report
with accuracy and consistency.
The answers to questions in each of the four sections result
in a numeric score for each section from 0 to 100 (100 being
the best). These scores are then combined to achieve an
overall qualitative rating of either Effective, Moderately
Effective, Adequate, or Ineffective. Programs that do not have
acceptable performance measures or have not yet collected
performance data generally receive a rating of Results Not
Demonstrated.
The PART helps determine a program's strengths and
weaknesses and focuses particularly on a program's
performance. The PART is best seen as a complement to
traditional management techniques, and can be used to
stimulate a constructive dialogue between program managers,
budget analysts, and policy officials. The PART serves its
purpose if its findings and recommendations play a substantial
role in spending, management and other decisions on programs.
The PART was revised for the 2005 Budget to clarify the
guidance and questions. The accompanying table provides a
brief description of the four sections along with examples of
programs that scored high or low in 2005. For more detailed
information regarding PART guidance and PART worksheets, visit
the OMB website at www.omb.gov/part.
Table 2-1. THE PART IN SECTIONS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section Description Low Score Example High Score Example
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program Purpose and Design
To assess whether the program's USDA Direct Crops Payment Program-- USDA Soil Survey Program--clear
Weight = 20 percent purpose and design are clear and program design needs improvement to program; strong purpose commonly
sound effectively reduce need for held by interested parties
government income support
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Strategic Planning
To assess whether the agency has EPA Brownfields Program--lacks EPA Existing Chemicals Program--Long-
Weight = 10 percent established valid long-term and strategic planning, ambitious goal term measures are outcome focused
annual measures and targets for the setting
program
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program Management
To rate agency management of the DOE Fusion Energy Sciences Program-- DOE Distributed Energy Resources
Weight = 20 percent program, including financial program merit review processes yet Program--strong and responsive
oversight and program improvement to be validated for impact on management and oversight
efforts quality and performance of the
research portfolio
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program Results/Accountability
To rate program performance on DOD Defense Health Program--no fully DOD Energy Conservation Improvement
Weight = 50 percent measures and targets reviewed in the developed performance measures Program--program achieves results,
strategic planning section through reduction in cost, net savings for
other evaluations investment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 11]]
The following table illustrates some key questions from each section
of the PART.
Table 2-2. THE PART QUESTIONNAIRE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key Questions for Every Program Description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROGRAM PURPOSE AND DESIGN
Is the program purpose clear?
Does the program address a specific and existing problem,
interest, or need?
Is the program designed so it is not redundant or duplicative of
any other federal, state, local or private need?
Is the program designed free of major flaws that would limit
program effectiveness?
This section examines the clarity of program purpose and soundness of
Is the program effectively targeted, so that resources will reach program design. It looks at factors including those the program, agency,
the intended beneficiaries and/or otherwise address the program's purpose or Administration may not directly control but which are within their
directly? influence, such as legislation and market factors. Programs should
generally be designed to address a market failure--either an efficiency
matter, such as a public good or externality, or a distributional
objective, such as assisting low-income families--in the least costly or
most efficient manner. A clear understanding of program purpose is
essential to setting program goals, measures, and targets; maintaining
focus; and managing the program. Potential source documents and evidence
for answering questions in this section include authorizing legislation,
agency strategic plans, annual performance plans, and other agency
reports. Options for answers are Yes, No or Not Applicable.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STRATEGIC PLANNING
Does the program have a limited number of specific long-term
performance measures that focus on outcomes and meaningfully reflect the
purpose of the program?
Does the program have ambitious targets and timeframes for its
long-term measures?
Does the program have a limited number of specific annual
performance goals that can demonstrate progress toward achieving the
program's long-term goals?
Does the program have baselines and ambitious targets for its
annual measures?
Do all partners (grantees, sub-grantees, contractors, cost-sharing
partners, and other government partners) commit to and work toward the
annual and/or long-term goals of the program?
Are independent evaluations of sufficient scope conducted on a
regular basis or as needed to support program improvements and evaluate
effectiveness and relevance to the problem, interest or need?
Are Budget requests explicitly tied to accomplishment of the
annual and long-term performance goals, and are the resource needs
presented in a complete and transparent manner in the program's budget?
Has the program taken meaningful steps to address its strategic This section focuses on program planning, priority setting, and resource
planning deficiencies? allocation. Key elements include an assessment of whether the program has
a limited number of performance measures with ambitious--yet achievable--
targets, to ensure planning, management, and budgeting are strategic and
focused. Potential source documents and evidence for answering questions
include strategic planning documents, agency performance plans and
reports, reports and submissions from program partners, evaluation plans,
budget submissions and other program documents. Options for answers are
Yes, No or Not Applicable.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
Does the agency regularly collect timely and credible performance
information from key program partners, and use it to manage the program
and improve performance?
Are Federal managers and program partners (including grantees, sub-
grantees, contractors, cost-sharing partners, and other government
partners) held accountable for cost, schedule and performance results?
Are funds (Federal and partners') obligated in a timely manner and
spent for the intended purpose?
Does the program have procedures (i.e. competitive sourcing/cost
comparisons, IT improvements, appropriate incentives) to measure and
achieve efficiencies and cost effectiveness in program execution?
Does the program collaborate and coordinate effectively with
related programs?
Does the program use strong financial management practices?
This section focuses on a variety of elements related to whether the
Has the program taken meaningful steps to address its management program is effectively managed to meet program performance goals. Key
deficiencies? areas include financial oversight, evaluation of program improvements,
performance data collection, and program manager accountability.
Additionally, specific areas of importance for each program type are also
explored. Potential source documents and evidence for answering questions
in this section include financial statements, GAO reports, IG reports,
performance plans, budget execution data, IT plans, and independent
program evaluations. Options for answers are Yes, No or Not Applicable.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROGRAM RESULTS
Has the program demonstrated adequate progress in achieving its
long-term performance goal(s)?
Does the program (including program partners) achieve its annual
performance goals?
Does the program demonstrate improved efficiencies or cost
effectiveness in achieving program goals each year?
Does the performance of this program compare favorably to other
programs, including government, private, etc., with similar purpose and
goals?
This section considers whether a program is meeting its long-term and
Do independent evaluations of sufficient scope and quality annual performance goals. This section also assesses how well the program
indicate that the program is effective and achieving results? compares to similar programs and how effective the program is based on
independent evaluations. Potential source documents and evidence for
answering questions in this section include annual performance reports,
evaluations, GAO reports, IG reports and other agency documents.
Assessments of program results should be based on the most recent
reporting cycle or other relevant data. Answers in this section are rated
as Yes, Large Extent, Small Extent, and No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12]]
The PART segments mandatory and discretionary federal programs into
seven categories. In addition to the questions which apply to all
programs, each section includes questions that have been tailored for a
specific type of program. A complete list of these questions is
available at the OMB website. Table 2-3 describes the program
categories.
Table 2-3. THE PART, BY CATEGORY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program Type Description Examples
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Competitive Grant Programs Programs that distribute funds to Head Start
state, local and tribal
governments, organizations,
individuals and other entities
through a competitive process
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Block/Formula Grant Programs Programs that distribute funds to Vocational Education State
state, local and tribal governments Grants
and other entities by formula or
block grant
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory-Based Programs Programs that employ regulatory Occupational Safety and
action to achieve program and Health Administration
agency goals through rulemaking
that implements, interprets or
prescribes law or policy, or
describes procedure or practice
requirements. These programs issue
significant regulations, which are
subject to OMB review
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital Assets and Service Programs where the primary means to Youth Anti-Drug Media
Acquisition Programs achieve goals is the development Campaign
and acquisition of capital assets
(such as land, structures,
equipment, and intellectual
property) or the purchase of
services (such as maintenance and
information technology) from a
commercial source
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Credit Programs Programs that provide support Rural Electric Utility
through loans, loan guarantees and Loans and Guarantees
direct credit
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Direct Federal Programs Programs in which support and Coin Production
services are provided primarily by
federal employees
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Research and Development Programs Programs that focus on creating Solar Energy
knowledge or applying it toward the
creation of systems, devices,
methods, materials or technologies
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Problems and Revisions
Since its inception, the PART has been improved annually based on
feedback received from agencies and the public. Last year approximately
20 percent of programs were addressed using the PART, and for the 2005
Budget an additional 20 percent of programs were assessed. Those
programs originally PARTed for the 2004 Budget were reassessed only
where evidence showed an agency's rating was likely to change.
Changes to the PART centered on clarification of PART guidance and
refinement of PART questions. Although all sections were revised to some
degree, the strategic planning section received the bulk of the
revision, having two key questions on long-term and annual performance
measures enhanced to require more detailed information on appropriate
measures and targets. Because of the strong focus on strategic planning
and results and accountability, several questions in the two sections
are linked. For instance, if a program was not able to demonstrate
appropriate goals and targets in the strategic planning section, they
were not given credit for measuring results against those targets in the
performance results section. To alleviate this problem, agencies must
improve the quality of the goals and targets arrived at through their
strategic planning process.
This year's guidance was changed to include clarification on PART
metrics. While the PART strives to focus on outcome performance
measures, outputs can be appropriate practical measures in some cases.
The 2005 guidance articulated the need for a high standard of
justification for answers to receive a Yes. The completed PART is
available to the public and as such, the review and its scores must be
based on evidence.
For the 2005 Budget, PART worksheets were revised in order to produce
a database of PART responses more effectively. PART responses across
agencies are available at www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/pma.html.
Possible Areas for Improvement
PART assessments will continue to be used for informing budget
decisions, supporting management, identifying design problems, and
promoting performance measurement and accountability. The performance of
Government activities is sometimes difficult to measure and it will
always be a challenge to assess the diversity of its programs in a
uniform way. The Admin
[[Page 13]]
istration, however, is committed to assessing the performance of the
Government's programs and to addressing and attempting to overcome the
challenges associated with the effort.
One area that will require additional attention is the consistency
among assessments. OMB will continue to promote consistency in the
standards applied to PART assessments. This year the internal OMB
Performance Evaluation Team again conducted a consistency check on PART
worksheets. This review was then examined by the Performance Consortium
of the National Academy of Public Administration. Recommendations for
strengthening the PART review process for next year include adequately
justifying explanations with evidence; explicitly addressing statutory
barriers to improved performance; focusing on completed, not planned,
actions; and rating new programs.
How the PARTs affect budget decisions
PART ratings do not result in automatic decisions about funding.
Clearly, over time, funding should be targeted to programs that can
prove they achieve measurable results. But a PART rating of Ineffective
or Results Not Demonstrated may suggest that greater funding is
necessary to overcome identified shortcomings, while a program rated
Effective may be in line for a proposed funding decrease. For example:
Although the Youth Activities program was rated
``Ineffective,'' the program's proposed funding remains
relatively stable. The program provides formula grants to
States and local areas to provide training to low-income and
other disadvantaged youth to help them secure employment, but
does not have the authority to target funds to the areas of
greatest need. To allow it to be more effective, the
Administration proposes to give the Secretary of Labor and
States increased authority to reallocate resources to areas of
need.
Despite the Department of Energy's Distributed Energy
Resources Program's ``Moderately Effective'' rating, the
Administration proposes a small reduction in funding for the
program. The program funds research for improved energy
efficiency of and reduced emissions from on-site energy
production. The decrease in funding is attributable not to the
program's rating, but to relative priorities among Department
of Energy programs.
The following table lists summary PART results and funding information
for each assessed program. It affirms the fact that PART ratings are one
factor, but not the only factor, in the Administration's budget
formulation process. The PART gives the Executive Branch, the Congress,
and individual program managers valuable insight into ways we can
improve program performance on behalf of the American people. Individual
PART summaries are included on the CD that accompanies the Analytical
Perspectives volume; full PART worksheets can be found on OMB's web page
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/pma.html.
Table 2-4. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT RATING TOOL (PART)
(Current Data for All Programs Assessed by PART) \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program Funding Level (dollars
in millions)
Agency/ Program Title Rating Primary Program Type --------------------------------
2003 2004 2005
Actual Estimate Estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Department of Agriculture:
Agricultural Credit Insurance Moderately Effective Credit 3,080 2,416 2,866
Fund--Guaranteed Loans......
Animal Welfare............... Adequate Regulatory Based 16 16 17
APHIS Plant and Animal Health Effective Regulatory Based 165 173 261
Monitoring Programs.........
Bioenergy.................... Adequate Direct Federal 116 150 100
CCC Marketing Loan Payments.. Moderately Effective Direct Federal 4,999 2,701 2,954
Community Facilities Program. Results Not Credit 489 508 527
Demonstrated
Conservation Technical Results Not Direct Federal 663 694 560
Assistance.................. Demonstrated
Crop Insurance............... Results Not Direct Federal 2,982 3,372 3,295
Demonstrated
Direct Crop Payments......... Adequate Direct Federal 4,151 5,375 5,284
Farmland Protection Program.. Results Not Competitive Grant 78 101 121
Demonstrated
Food Aid Programs............ Results Not Mixed 154 152 148
Demonstrated
Food Safety and Inspection Adequate Regulatory Based 755 775 715
Service.....................
Food Safety Research......... Results Not Research and 95 97 106
Demonstrated Development
Food Stamp Program........... Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 23,653 27,293 28,917
Forest Legacy Program (FLP).. Results Not Competitive Grant 68 64 100
Demonstrated
Forestry Research Grants..... Results Not Block/Formula Grant 22 22 22
Demonstrated
Land Acquisition............. Results Not Direct Federal 133 67 67
Demonstrated
Multifamily Housing Direct Results Not Mixed 775 776 769
Loans and Rental Assistance. Demonstrated
National Forest Improvement Adequate Capital Assets and 548 559 505
and Maintenance............. Service Acquisition
National Resources Inventory. Results Not Direct Federal 29 29 22
Demonstrated
National School Lunch........ Results Not Block/Formula Grant 6,352 6,623 6,786
Demonstrated
[[Page 14]]
Pesticide Data/ Adequate Direct Federal 22 21 21
Microbiological Data
Programs....................
Plant Materials Program...... Results Not Research and 11 11 10
Demonstrated Development
RBS Business and Industry Adequate Credit 894 556 600
Guaranteed Loan Program.....
Rural Electric Utility Loans Results Not Credit 4,069 3,989 2,640
and Guarantees.............. Demonstrated
Rural Utilities Service Results Not Credit 495 514 495
Telecommunications Loan Demonstrated
Programs....................
Rural Water and Wastewater Results Not Mixed 1,596 1,628 1,475
Grants and Loans............ Demonstrated
Snow Survey and Water Supply Results Not Direct Federal 9 9 9
Forecasting................. Demonstrated
Soil Survey Program.......... Moderately Effective Direct Federal 85 86 87
USDA Wildland Fire Management Results Not Direct Federal 1,371 1,633 1,695
Demonstrated
Wildlife Habitat Incentives Results Not Direct Federal 24 52 59
Program..................... Demonstrated
Department of Commerce:
Advanced Technology Program.. Adequate Competitive Grant 179 171 .........
Bureau of Economic Analysis.. Effective Direct Federal 65 67 82
Coastal Zone Management Act Results Not Block/Formula Grant 129 113 111
Programs.................... Demonstrated
Commerce Small Business Results Not Competitive Grant 8 4 .........
Innovation Research (SBIR) Demonstrated
Program.....................
Current Demographic Moderately Effective Direct Federal 54 58 61
Statistics..................
Decennial Census............. Moderately Effective Direct Federal 145 253 433
Economic Development Moderately Effective Competitive Grant 319 315 320
Administration..............
Intercensal Demographic Moderately Effective Direct Federal 9 9 11
Estimates...................
Manufacturing Extension Moderately Effective Competitive Grant 106 39 39
Partnership.................
Minority Business Development Results Not Competitive Grant 29 29 34
Agency...................... Demonstrated
National Marine Fisheries Adequate Regulatory Based 754 676 662
Service.....................
National Weather Service..... Effective Direct Federal 755 825 839
NIST Laboratories............ Effective Research and 423 401 482
Development
NOAA Navigation Services..... Moderately Effective Direct Federal 70 74 73
Pacific Coastal Salmon Results Not Block/Formula Grant 129 89 100
Recovery Fund............... Demonstrated
Survey Sample Redesign....... Effective Direct Federal 13 13 12
U.S. Patent and Trademark Adequate Direct Federal 1,053 1,090 1,371
Office--Patents.............
U.S. Patent and Trademark Moderately Effective Direct Federal 129 132 162
Office--Trademarks..........
US and Foreign Commercial Adequate Direct Federal 206 202 212
Service (USFCS).............
Department of Defense--
Military:
Air Combat Program........... Moderately Effective Capital Assets and 15,149 16,023 16,457
Service Acquisition
Airlift Program.............. Moderately Effective Capital Assets and 5,300 4,798 5,937
Service Acquisition
Basic Research............... Effective Research and 1,369 1,404 1,341
Development
Chemical Demilitarization.... Ineffective Capital Assets and 1,449 1,650 1,457
Service Acquisition
Comanche Helicopter Program.. Results Not Capital Assets and 877 1,079 1,252
Demonstrated Service Acquisition
Communications Infrastructure Results Not Capital Assets and 5,600 6,273 6,276
Demonstrated Service Acquisition
Defense Health............... Adequate Direct Federal 15,398 16,392 17,640
DoD Small Business Innovation Results Not Research and 963 1,100 1,133
Research/Technology Transfer Demonstrated Development
Energy Conservation Effective Capital Assets and 35 50 60
Improvement................. Service Acquisition
Facilities Sustainment, Adequate Direct Federal 6,620 6,424 6,643
Restoration, Modernization,
and Demolition..............
Housing...................... Moderately Effective Direct Federal 13,683 14,230 15,672
Military Force Management.... Effective Direct Federal 93,500 98,956 103,100
Missile Defense.............. Results Not Capital Assets and 7,490 9,095 10,298
Demonstrated Service Acquisition
Recruiting................... Moderately Effective Direct Federal 2,404 2,369 2,361
Shipbuilding................. Adequate Capital Assets and 9,457 12,201 11,477
Service Acquisition
Department of Education:
21st Century Community Adequate Block/Formula Grant 993 999 999
Learning Centers............
[[Page 15]]
Adult Education State Grants. Results Not Block/Formula Grant 587 590 590
Demonstrated
Comprehensive School Reform.. Adequate Block/Formula Grant 233 234 .........
Even Start................... Ineffective Block/Formula Grant 248 247 .........
Federal Family Education Adequate Credit 3,432 2,880 7,050
Loans.......................
Federal Pell Grants.......... Adequate Block/Formula Grant 11,365 12,007 12,830
Federal Perkins Loans........ Ineffective Credit 99 99 .........
Federal Work-Study........... Results Not Block/Formula Grant 999 999 999
Demonstrated
GEAR UP...................... Adequate Competitive Grant 293 298 298
IDEA Grants for Infants and Results Not Block/Formula Grant 434 444 467
Families.................... Demonstrated
IDEA Grants to States........ Results Not Block/Formula Grant 8,874 10,068 11,068
Demonstrated
IDEA Part D--Personnel Results Not Competitive Grant 92 91 91
Preparation................. Demonstrated
IDEA Part D--Research and Results Not Research and 77 78 78
Innovation.................. Demonstrated Development
IDEA Preschool Grants........ Results Not Block/Formula Grant 387 388 388
Demonstrated
Improving Teacher Quality Results Not Block/Formula Grant 2,931 2,930 2,930
State Grants................ Demonstrated
Independent Living (IL) Results Not Competitive Grant 85 96 96
Programs.................... Demonstrated
National Assessment.......... Effective Research and 95 95 95
Development
National Center for Education Effective Research and 89 92 92
Statistics.................. Development
Nat'l Institute on Disability Results Not Research and 109 107 107
and Rehab. Research (NIDRR). Demonstrated Development
Occupational and Employment Results Not Competitive Grant 9 9 .........
Information................. Demonstrated
Safe and Drug Free Schools Ineffective Block/Formula Grant 469 441 441
State Grants................
Student Aid Administration... Adequate Capital Assets and 900 912 935
Service Acquisition
Supplemental Educational Results Not Block/Formula Grant 760 770 770
Opportunity Grants.......... Demonstrated
Teacher Quality Enhancement.. Results Not Competitive Grant 89 89 89
Demonstrated
Tech-Prep Education State Results Not Block/Formula Grant 107 107 .........
Grants...................... Demonstrated
Tribally Controlled Results Not Competitive Grant 7 7 7
Postsecondary Vocational and Demonstrated
Technical Institutions......
TRIO Student Support Services Results Not Competitive Grant 264 264 267
Demonstrated
TRIO Talent Search........... Results Not Competitive Grant 145 146 146
Demonstrated
TRIO Upward Bound............ Ineffective Competitive Grant 279 282 281
Troops-to-Teachers........... Adequate Competitive Grant 29 15 15
Vocational Education State Ineffective Block/Formula Grant 1,192 1,195 1,012
Grants......................
Vocational Rehabilitation Adequate Block/Formula Grant 2,533 2,584 2,636
State Grants................
William D. Ford Direct Adequate Credit 4,225 2,381 -492
Student Loans...............
Department of Energy:
Advanced Fuel Cycle Moderately Effective Research and 57 67 46
Initiative.................. Development
Advanced Scientific Computing Moderately Effective Research and 167 202 204
Research.................... Development
Advanced Simulation and Effective Research and 674 721 741
Computing (ASCI)............ Development
Basic Energy Sciences........ Effective Research and 1,020 1,011 1,064
Development
Biological and Environmental Effective Research and 507 641 502
Research.................... Development
Bonneville Power Moderately Effective Capital Assets and -462 -30 -10
Administration.............. Service Acquisition
Building Technologies........ Adequate Research and 67 60 58
Development
Clean Coal Research Adequate Research and 345 378 447
Initiative.................. Development
Distributed Energy Resources. Moderately Effective Research and 61 61 53
Development
Elimination of Weapons-Grade Results Not Capital Assets and 122 50 50
Plutonium Production Program Demonstrated Service Acquisition
Environmental Management..... Adequate Capital Assets and 6,952 7,034 7,434
Service Acquisition
Facilities and Infrastructure Moderately Effective Capital Assets and 235 239 316
Service Acquisition
Fuel Cells (Stationary)...... Adequate Research and 61 71 23
Development
Fusion Energy Sciences....... Moderately Effective Research and 247 263 264
Development
Generation IV Nuclear Energy Moderately Effective Research and 17 24 31
Systems Initiative.......... Development
Geothermal Technology........ Moderately Effective Research and 29 26 26
Development
High Energy Physics.......... Moderately Effective Research and 718 734 737
Development
High Temperature Superducting Moderately Effective Research and 39 34 45
R&D......................... Development
Hydrogen Technology.......... Moderately Effective Research and 39 82 95
Development
Inertial Confinement Fusion Moderately Effective Research and 499 514 492
Ignition and High Yield Development
Campaign/NIF Construction
Project.....................
[[Page 16]]
International Nuclear Effective Direct Federal 333 258 238
Materials Protection and
Cooperation.................
Natural Gas Technologies..... Ineffective Research and 47 43 26
Development
Nuclear Energy Research Results Not Research and 17 11 .........
Initiative.................. Demonstrated Development
Nuclear Physics.............. Effective Research and 380 390 401
Development
Nuclear Power 2010........... Adequate Research and 32 20 10
Development
Oil Technology............... Ineffective Research and 42 35 15
Development
Readiness in Technical Base Moderately Effective Capital Assets and 996 1,022 1,018
and Facilities (RTBF), Service Acquisition
Operations..................
Safeguards and Security...... Adequate Capital Assets and 529 553 667
Service Acquisition
Solar Energy................. Moderately Effective Research and 84 83 80
Development
Southeastern Power Moderately Effective Direct Federal 5 5 5
Administration..............
Southwestern Power Moderately Effective Direct Federal 27 28 29
Administration..............
Strategic Petroleum Reserve Effective Direct Federal 172 171 172
(SPR).......................
Weatherization Assistance.... Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 224 227 291
Western Area Power Moderately Effective Capital Assets and 168 177 173
Administration.............. Service Acquisition
Wind Energy.................. Moderately Effective Research and 42 41 42
Development
Yucca Mountain Project....... Adequate Capital Assets and 457 577 880
Service Acquisition
Department of Health and Human
Services:
317 Immunization Program..... Adequate Competitive Grant 651 643 534
Administration on Aging...... Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 1,367 1,374 1,377
Agency for Toxic Substances Adequate Competitive Grant 82 73 77
and Disease Registry........
CDC State and Local Results Not Block/Formula Grant 939 934 829
Preparedness Grants......... Demonstrated
Children's Hospitals Graduate Adequate Block/Formula Grant 290 303 303
Medical Education Payment
Program.....................
Childrens Mental Health Moderately Effective Competitive Grant 98 102 106
Services....................
Chronic Disease--Breast and Adequate Competitive Grant 199 210 220
Cervical Cancer.............
Chronic Disease--Diabetes.... Adequate Competitive Grant 63 67 67
Community Mental Health Adequate Block/Formula Grant 437 435 436
Services Block Grant........
Community Services Block Results Not Block/Formula Grant 646 642 495
Grant....................... Demonstrated
Data Collection and Moderately Effective Research and 62 67 64
Dissemination............... Development
Developmental Disabilities Adequate Block/Formula Grant 132 138 138
Grant Programs..............
Domestic HIV/AIDS Prevention. Results Not Competitive Grant 700 695 696
Demonstrated
Food and Drug Administration. Moderately Effective Regulatory Based 1,652 1,695 1,845
Foster Care.................. Adequate Block/Formula Grant 4,451 4,706 4,871
Head Start................... Results Not Competitive Grant 6,687 6,775 6,944
Demonstrated
Health Alert Network......... Adequate Competitive Grant 183 183 183
Health Care Fraud and Abuse Results Not Direct Federal 160 160 160
Control (HCFAC)............. Demonstrated
Health Centers............... Effective Competitive Grant 1,505 1,617 1,836
Health Professions........... Ineffective Competitive Grant 401 409 126
HIV/AIDS Research............ Moderately Effective Research and 2,716 2,850 2,930
Development
Hospital Preparedness Grants. Results Not Block/Formula Grant 515 515 476
Demonstrated
IHS Federally-Administered Moderately Effective Direct Federal 1,346 1,378 1,408
Activities..................
IHS Sanitation Facilities Moderately Effective Capital Assets and 93 93 103
Construction Program........ Service Acquisition
Low Income Home Energy Results Not Block/Formula Grant 1,788 1,900 2,001
Assistance Program.......... Demonstrated
Maternal and Child Health Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 730 730 730
Block Grant (MCHBG).........
Medicare..................... Moderately Effective Direct Federal 277,464 298,916 326,716
Medicare Integrity Program Effective Block/Formula Grant 720 720 720
(HCFAC).....................
National Health Service Corps Moderately Effective Competitive Grant 171 170 205
Nursing Education Loan Adequate Competitive Grant 20 27 32
Repayment and Scholarship
Program.....................
Office of Child Support Effective Block/Formula Grant 3,845 4,413 4,074
Enforcement.................
Patient Safety............... Adequate Research and 55 80 84
Development
[[Page 17]]
Projects for Assistance in Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 43 50 55
Transition from Homelessness
Refugee and Entrant Adequate Block/Formula Grant 481 448 473
Assistance..................
Resource and Patient Effective Capital Assets and 58 65 70
Management System........... Service Acquisition
Runaway and Homeless Youth... Results Not Competitive Grant 105 105 105
Demonstrated
Rural Health Activities...... Adequate Competitive Grant 184 147 56
Ryan White................... Adequate Block/Formula Grant 1,993 2,020 2,055
State Children's Health Adequate Block/Formula Grant 4,355 5,232 5,299
Insurance Program...........
Substance Abuse Prevention Ineffective Block/Formula Grant 1,754 1,779 1,832
and Treatment Block Grant...
Substance Abuse Treatment Adequate Competitive Grant 317 419 517
Programs of Regional and
National Significance.......
Translating Research into Adequate Research and 10 8 5
Practice.................... Development
Urban Indian Health Program.. Adequate Block/Formula Grant 31 32 32
Department of Homeland
Security:
Aids to Navigation........... Results Not Direct Federal 805 808 855
Demonstrated
Assistance to Firefighters Results Not Competitive Grant 745 746 500
Grant Program............... Demonstrated
Aviation Passenger Screening Results Not Direct Federal 1,875 1,531 1,586
Program..................... Demonstrated
Border Patrol................ Results Not Direct Federal 1,981 1,847 1,862
Demonstrated
Coast Guard Fisheries Moderately Effective Direct Federal 533 688 704
Enforcement.................
Container Security Initiative Results Not Direct Federal 48 62 126
Demonstrated
Detention and Removal........ Moderately Effective Direct Federal 1,150 1,130 1,259
Disaster Relief Fund--Public Results Not Direct Federal 1,113 1,037 1,075
Assistance.................. Demonstrated
Drug Interdiction............ Results Not Direct Federal 648 774 822
Demonstrated
Federal Air Marshal Service.. Results Not Direct Federal 537 640 613
Demonstrated
Federal Law Enforcement Results Not Direct Federal 171 192 196
Training Center............. Demonstrated
Federal Protective Service... Moderately Effective Direct Federal 448 424 478
Hazard Mitigation Grant...... Results Not Block/Formula Grant 167 155 161
Demonstrated
Immigration Services......... Adequate Direct Federal 1,425 1,653 1,711
Marine Environmental Moderately Effective Regulatory Based 145 252 267
Protection..................
Metropolitan Medical Response Results Not Block/Formula Grant 50 50 .........
System...................... Demonstrated
National Flood Insurance..... Moderately Effective Direct Federal 1,655 1,719 1,787
Search and Rescue............ Results Not Direct Federal 591 842 891
Demonstrated
Department of Housing and Urban
Development:
Community Development Block Ineffective Block/Formula Grant 4,340 4,331 4,331
Grant (Formula).............
HOME Investment Partnerships Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 1,987 2,006 2,084
Program.....................
HOPE VI...................... Ineffective Competitive Grant 570 149 .........
Housing for Persons with Results Not Competitive Grant 249 250 249
Disabilities................ Demonstrated
Housing for the Elderly...... Results Not Competitive Grant 778 774 773
Demonstrated
Housing Opportunities for Results Not Block/Formula Grant 290 295 295
Persons with AIDS........... Demonstrated
Housing Vouchers............. Moderately Effective Competitive Grant 12,458 14,602 13,364
Lead Hazard Grants........... Moderately Effective Competitive Grant 165 164 129
National Community Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 32 35 30
Development Initiative......
Native American Housing Block Results Not Block/Formula Grant 645 650 647
Grants...................... Demonstrated
Partnership for Advancing Results Not Research and 8 8 2
Technology in Housing (PATH) Demonstrated Development
Project-Based Rental Ineffective Capital Assets and 4,766 4,769 5,102
Assistance.................. Service Acquisition
Department of the Interior:
Abandoned Mine Land Results Not Block/Formula Grant 190 191 244
Reclamation................. Demonstrated
DOI Wildland Fire Management. Results Not Direct Federal 650 685 743
Demonstrated
Energy and Minerals Adequate Direct Federal 106 108 108
Management..................
Energy Resource Assessments.. Moderately Effective Research and 24 25 25
Development
Geologic Hazard Assessments.. Moderately Effective Research and 75 75 74
Development
Habitat Restoration Moderately Effective Direct Federal 145 147 147
Activities..................
Indian Forestry Program...... Adequate Direct Federal 49 52 53
Indian Law Enforcement....... Results Not Direct Federal 162 172 182
Demonstrated
Indian School Construction... Results Not Capital Assets and 294 295 229
Demonstrated Service Acquisition
Indian School Operations..... Adequate Direct Federal 513 522 522
[[Page 18]]
Land & Water Conservation Results Not Block/Formula Grant 97 94 94
Fund (LWCF) State Grants.... Demonstrated
Mineral Resource Assessments. Moderately Effective Research and 56 55 49
Development
Minerals Revenue Management.. Results Not Direct Federal 83 80 82
Demonstrated
National Fish Hatchery System Results Not Mixed 54 58 57
Demonstrated
National Historic Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 88 93 97
Preservation Programs.......
National Mapping............. Results Not Research and 133 130 128
Demonstrated Development
National Park Service Adequate Capital Assets and 657 700 725
Facility Management......... Service Acquisition
National Park Service Natural Moderately Effective Direct Federal 191 198 205
Resource Stewardship........
National Wildlife Refuge Results Not Direct Federal 368 391 388
Operations and Maintenance.. Demonstrated
Outer Continental Shelf Moderately Effective Research and 16 16 16
Environmental Studies....... Development
Partners for Fish and Adequate Direct Federal 38 42 50
Wildlife....................
Reclamation Hydropower....... Effective Capital Assets and 145 148 159
Service Acquisition
Recreation Management........ Adequate Direct Federal 58 61 59
Regulation of Surface Coal Results Not Regulatory Based 105 105 109
Mining Activities........... Demonstrated
Rural Water Supply Projects.. Results Not Capital Assets and 80 83 68
Demonstrated Service Acquisition
Science & Technology Program Effective Research and 13 16 10
(S&T)....................... Development
Title XVI Water Reuse and Moderately Effective Competitive Grant 32 28 12
Recycling...................
Tribal Courts................ Results Not Direct Federal 17 18 18
Demonstrated
Tribal Land Consolidation.... Moderately Effective Capital Assets and 8 22 75
Service Acquisition
Department of Justice:
ATF Firearms Programs-- Moderately Effective Direct Federal 601 615 632
Integrated Violence
Reduction Strategy..........
Bureau of Prisons............ Moderately Effective Direct Federal 4,045 4,414 4,517
Community Oriented Policing Results Not Competitive Grant 978 742 44
Services.................... Demonstrated
Cybercrime................... Adequate Direct Federal 157 206 265
Drug Courts.................. Results Not Competitive Grant 45 38 70
Demonstrated
Drug Enforcement Adequate Direct Federal 1,802 1,677 1,797
Administration..............
Juvenile Accountability Block Ineffective Block/Formula Grant 189 59 .........
Grants......................
National Criminal History Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 40 30 58
Improvement Program.........
Organized Crime/Drug Adequate Direct Federal 478 495 512
Enforcement.................
Residential Substance Abuse Results Not Block/Formula Grant 65 ......... 76
Treatment................... Demonstrated
State Criminal Alien Results Not Block/Formula Grant 248 297 .........
Assistance Program.......... Demonstrated
USMS Apprehension of Adequate Direct Federal 180 180 184
Fugitives...................
USMS Protection of the Adequate Direct Federal 514 540 554
Judicial Process............
Weed and Seed................ Results Not Competitive Grant 59 58 58
Demonstrated
White Collar Crime........... Adequate Direct Federal 474 512 509
Department of Labor:
Black Lung Benefits Program.. Moderately Effective Direct Federal 1,461 1,452 1,423
Bureau of Labor Statistics... Effective Direct Federal 492 519 532
Community Service Employment Ineffective Direct Federal 442 439 440
for Older Americans.........
Davis-Bacon Wage Results Not Regulatory Based 10 10 10
Determination Program....... Demonstrated
Dislocated Worker Assistance. Adequate Block/Formula Grant 1,150 1,173 1,106
Employee Benefits Security Results Not Regulatory Based 116 124 132
Administration (EBSA)....... Demonstrated
Federal Employees Moderately Effective Direct Federal 2,475 2,558 2,631
Compensation Act (FECA).....
Migrant and Seasonal Ineffective Competitive Grant 77 77 .........
Farmworkers.................
Mine Safety and Health Adequate Regulatory Based 273 269 276
Administration..............
Occupational Safety and Adequate Regulatory Based 450 458 462
Health Administration.......
Office of Federal Contract Results Not Regulatory Based 78 79 82
Compliance Programs (OFCCP). Demonstrated
Trade Adjustment Assistance.. Ineffective Direct Federal 972 1,338 1,057
Unemployment Insurance Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 2,634 2,619 2,711
Administration State Grants.
[[Page 19]]
Youth Activities............. Ineffective Block/Formula Grant 994 995 1,001
Department of State:
Anti-Terrorism Assistance.... Effective Direct Federal 64 96 128
Capital Security Construction Effective Capital Assets and 608 761 888
Program..................... Service Acquisition
Contribution to the United Results Not Block/Formula Grant 100 100 90
Nations Development Demonstrated
Programme (UNDP)............
Demining..................... Effective Direct Federal 45 50 59
Educational and Cultural Effective Competitive Grant 49 49 60
Exchange Programs in Near
East Asia and South Asia....
Humanitarian Migrants to Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 60 50 50
Israel......................
Military Assistance to new Moderately Effective Direct Federal 99 95 22
NATO and NATO Aspirant
Nations.....................
Nonproliferation and Results Not Direct Federal 15 30 30
Disarmament Fund............ Demonstrated
PKO--OSCE Programs........... Moderately Effective Direct Federal 18 32 3
Refugee Admissions to the U.S Moderately Effective Competitive Grant 113 136 136
Security Assistance for the Moderately Effective Direct Federal 124 158 124
Western Hemisphere..........
Security Assistance to Sub- Moderately Effective Direct Federal 102 60 96
Saharan Africa..............
Support for Eastern European Results Not Competitive Grant 1,277 1,026 950
Democracy & Freedom Support Demonstrated
Act.........................
Terrorist Interdiction Results Not Direct Federal 5 5 5
Program (TIP)............... Demonstrated
UN High Commissioner for Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 303 310 229
Refugees (UNHCR)............
Visa and Consular Services... Moderately Effective Direct Federal 664 807 865
Worldwide Security Upgrades.. Moderately Effective Direct Federal 553 647 659
Department of Transportation:
FAA Air Traffic Services..... Adequate Direct Federal 5,666 6,097 6,522
FAA Grants-in-Aid for Moderately Effective Competitive Grant 3,378 3,400 3,500
Airports (Airport
Improvement Program)........
Federal Lands................ Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 773 767 947
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 164 165 168
Administration Grant Program
FHWA Highway Infrastructure.. Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 29,847 32,462 32,138
Hazardous Materials Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 14 14 14
Transportation..............
National Highway Traffic Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 446 449 456
Safety Administration Grant
Program.....................
New Starts................... Moderately Effective Competitive Grant 1,275 1,356 1,599
Railroad Safety Program (RSP) Moderately Effective Regulatory Based 115 129 138
Research, Engineering & Effective Research and 163 113 117
Development................. Development
Department of the Treasury:
Administering the Public Debt Effective Direct Federal 189 174 175
African Development Fund..... Results Not Block/Formula Grant 107 112 118
Demonstrated
ATF Consumer Product Safety Adequate Regulatory Based 23 23 23
Activities..................
Bank Enterprise Award........ Results Not Competitive Grant 18 9 5
Demonstrated
Coin Production.............. Effective Direct Federal 311 431 441
Debt Collection.............. Effective Direct Federal 48 47 47
Earned Income Tax Credit Ineffective Direct Federal 145 201 176
(EITC) Compliance...........
International Development Adequate Block/Formula Grant 844 977 1,068
Association.................
IRS Tax Collection........... Results Not Direct Federal 957 1,002 1,083
Demonstrated
New Currency Manufacturing... Effective Direct Federal 90 325 400
OCC Bank Supervision......... Effective Regulatory Based 439 477 488
Office of Foreign Assets Results Not Direct Federal 20 21 22
Control (OFAC).............. Demonstrated
OTS Thrift Supervision....... Effective Regulatory Based 158 174 178
Submission Processing (SP)... Results Not Direct Federal 721 726 734
Demonstrated
Treasury Technical Assistance Adequate Direct Federal 33 19 18
Department of Veterans Affairs:
Burial Benefits.............. Moderately Effective Direct Federal 397 431 455
Disability Compensation...... Results Not Direct Federal 25,385 27,712 32,266
Demonstrated
Medical Care................. Adequate Direct Federal 25,348 28,297 29,471
Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Results Not Direct Federal 1,776 1,988 2,112
(Education Benefits)........ Demonstrated
VA Research and Development.. Results Not Research and 818 820 770
Demonstrated Development
[[Page 20]]
Corps of Engineers-Civil Works:
Corps Hydropower............. Results Not Capital Assets and 252 245 220
Demonstrated Service Acquisition
Emergency Management......... Moderately Effective Direct Federal 75 ......... 50
Flood Damage Reduction....... Results Not Capital Assets and 1,011 972 930
Demonstrated Service Acquisition
Inland Waterways Navigation.. Results Not Capital Assets and 715 690 630
Demonstrated Service Acquisition
Non-regulatory Wetlands Results Not Capital Assets and 279 260 300
Activities.................. Demonstrated Service Acquisition
USACE Regulatory Program..... Moderately Effective Regulatory Based 138 139 150
Environmental Protection
Agency:
Acid Rain.................... Moderately Effective Regulatory Based 17 17 17
Air Toxics................... Results Not Direct Federal 100 113 113
Demonstrated
Brownfields.................. Adequate Competitive Grant 167 170 210
Civil Enforcement............ Results Not Direct Federal 431 448 456
Demonstrated
Clean Water State Revolving Results Not Block/Formula Grant 1,341 1,342 850
Fund........................ Demonstrated
Criminal Enforcement......... Results Not Direct Federal 40 42 43
Demonstrated
Drinking Water State Results Not Block/Formula Grant 850 845 850
Revolving Fund.............. Demonstrated
Ecological Research.......... Results Not Research and 132 132 110
Demonstrated Development
Environmental Education...... Results Not Competitive Grant 9 9 .........
Demonstrated
Existing Chemicals........... Adequate Direct Federal 16 17 17
Leaking Underground Storage Results Not Block/Formula Grant 72 76 73
Tanks....................... Demonstrated
New Chemicals................ Moderately Effective Direct Federal 15 15 15
Nonpoint Source Grants....... Results Not Block/Formula Grant 237 195 209
Demonstrated
Particulate Matter Research.. Results Not Research and 61 65 65
Demonstrated Development
Pesticide Registration....... Adequate Direct Federal 45 66 66
Pesticide Reregistration..... Results Not Direct Federal 72 77 83
Demonstrated
Pollution Prevention and New Results Not Research and 49 42 36
Technologies................ Demonstrated Development
RCRA Corrective Action....... Adequate Regulatory Based 35 39 39
Superfund Removal............ Results Not Direct Federal 196 200 183
Demonstrated
Tribal General Assistance.... Adequate Block/Formula Grant 57 62 62
General Services
Administration:
Asset Management of Federally- Results Not Capital Assets and 1,754 1,805 1,819
Owned Real Property......... Demonstrated Service Acquisition
GSA's Regional IT Solutions Results Not Capital Assets and 5,810 6,080 6,282
Program..................... Demonstrated Service Acquisition
Leasing Space................ Results Not Capital Assets and 3,467 3,641 4,018
Demonstrated Service Acquisition
Multiple Award Schedules..... Results Not Direct Federal 414 420 443
Demonstrated
Personal Property Management Results Not Direct Federal 26 27 27
Program (FBP)............... Demonstrated
Real Property Disposal (PR).. Results Not Direct Federal 32 40 44
Demonstrated
Supply Depots and Special Results Not Capital Assets and 993 847 856
Order....................... Demonstrated Service Acquisition
Vehicle Acquisition.......... Results Not Capital Assets and 1,227 1,216 1,199
Demonstrated Service Acquisition
Vehicle Leasing.............. Results Not Capital Assets and 1,230 1,447 1,569
Demonstrated Service Acquisition
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration:
Biological Sciences Research. Results Not Research and 269 368 492
Demonstrated Development
Earth Science Applications... Results Not Research and 78 91 77
Demonstrated Development
Mars Exploration............. Effective Research and 500 595 691
Development
Mission and Science Moderately Effective Research and 304 467 1,094
Measurement Technology...... Development
Solar System Exploration..... Effective Research and 1,039 1,316 1,187
Development
Space Shuttle................ Results Not Capital Assets and 3,301 3,945 4,319
Demonstrated Service Acquisition
and Service
Acquisition
Space Station................ Results Not Capital Assets and 1,462 1,498 1,863
Demonstrated Service Acquisition
National Science Foundation:
Facilities................... Effective Research and 527 612 683
Development
[[Page 21]]
Individuals.................. Effective Research and 417 447 498
Development
Information Technology Effective Research and 299 313 220
Research.................... Development
Nanoscale Science and Effective Research and 221 249 305
Engineering................. Development
Small Business Administration:
Business Information Centers. Results Not Direct Federal 14 14 .........
Demonstrated
Disaster Loan Program........ Moderately Effective Credit 190 169 197
Section 504 Certified Adequate Credit 13 17 14
Development Company
Guaranteed Loan Program.....
Service Corps of Retired Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 9 14 12
Executives..................
Small Business Development Moderately Effective Block/Formula Grant 95 98 103
Centers.....................
Small Business Investment Adequate Credit 13 13 13
Company.....................
Social Security Administration:
Disability Insurance......... Moderately Effective Direct Federal 71,523 78,645 84,119
Supplemental Security Income Moderately Effective Direct Federal 4,208 4,298 4,652
for the Aged................
International Assistance
Programs
Broadcasting Board of
Governors:
Broadcasting to Africa....... Moderately Effective Direct Federal 15 13 14
Broadcasting to Near East Moderately Effective Direct Federal 88 128 95
Asia and South Asia.........
Export-Import Bank of the
United States:
Export Import Bank--Long Term Moderately Effective Credit 564 55 156
Guarantees..................
Overseas Private Investment
Corporation:
Overseas Private Investment Adequate Credit 24 24 24
Corporation--Finance........
Overseas Private Investment Adequate Credit 1,753 1,800 2,000
Corporation--Insurance......
Trade and Development Agency:
U.S. Trade and Development Moderately Effective Competitive Grant 58 50 50
Agency......................
United States Agency for
International Development:
Child Survival and Health Results Not Competitive Grant 158 154 137
(LAC)....................... Demonstrated
Development Assistance....... Results Not Competitive Grant 261 268 242
Demonstrated
Office of Transition Moderately Effective Competitive Grant 50 55 63
Initiatives.................
Public Law 480 Title II Food Adequate Competitive Grant 1,441 1,185 1,185
Aid.........................
USAID Climate Change......... Adequate Competitive Grant 214 175 155
USAID Development Assistance-- Moderately Effective Competitive Grant 444 430 425
Population..................
Other Independent Agencies
American Battle Monuments
Commission:
World War II Memorial........ Effective Capital Assets and 76 55 22
Service Acquisition
Armed Forces Retirement Home:
Asset Management of AFRH Real Moderately Effective Capital Assets and 68 65 61
Property.................... Service Acquisition
Consumer Product Safety
Commission:
Consumer Product Safety Results Not Regulatory Based 57 60 63
Commission.................. Demonstrated
Corporation for National and
Community Service:
AmeriCorps................... Results Not Competitive Grant 174 312 292
Demonstrated
Federal Communications
Commission:
Schools and Libraries-- Results Not Regulatory Based 2,250 2,250 2,250
Universal Service Fund...... Demonstrated
Federal Election Commission:
Compliance--Enforcement...... Results Not Regulatory Based 50 51 52
Demonstrated
National Archives and Records
Administration:
Records Services Program..... Adequate Direct Federal 332 374 391
Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
Fuel Facilities Licensing & Effective Regulatory Based 14 16 26
Inspection..................
Reactor Inspection and Effective Regulatory Based 97 96 157
Performance Assessment......
Office of National Drug Control
Policy:
CTAC Counterdrug Research & Results Not Research and 22 18 18
Development................. Demonstrated Development
[[Page 22]]
CTAC Technology Transfer Results Not Competitive Grant 26 22 22
Program..................... Demonstrated
Drug-Free Communities Support Adequate Competitive Grant 60 70 80
Program.....................
High Intensity Drug Results Not Competitive Grant 226 226 208
Trafficking Areas (HIDTA)... Demonstrated
Youth Anti-Drug Media Results Not Capital Assets and 150 145 145
Campaign.................... Demonstrated Service Acquisition
Office of Personnel Management:
Federal Employees Group Life Results Not Direct Federal 2,022 2,069 2,164
Insurance (FEGLI)........... Demonstrated
Federal Employees Retirement Results Not Direct Federal 50,512 53,092 55,210
Program..................... Demonstrated
FEHBP Integrity.............. Effective Direct Federal 8 11 15
Public Defender Service for the
District of Columbia:
Public Defender Service for Results Not Direct Federal 23 25 30
the District of Columbia.... Demonstrated
Securities and Exchange
Commission:
Full Disclosure Program Results Not Regulatory Based 44 61 79
(Corporate Review).......... Demonstrated
Tennessee Valley Authority:
TVA Power.................... Moderately Effective Capital Assets and 7,585 7,474 7,579
Service Acquisition
TVA Resource Stewardship (Non- Effective Capital Assets and 83 84 83
Power)...................... Service Acquisition
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If a program definition changed between the 2004 Budget and the 2005 Budget, only the program that was most
recently PARTed is listed.
[[Page 23]]
======================================================================
CROSSCUTTING PROGRAMS
========================================================================