[Analytical Perspectives]
[Special Analyses and Presentations]
[8. Underwriting Federal Credit and Insurance]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]
[[Page 181]]
8. UNDERWRITING FEDERAL CREDIT AND INSURANCE
Federal programs offer direct loans and/or loan guarantees for
housing, education, business, and exports. At the end of FY 1998, there
were $217 billion in Federal direct loans outstanding and $882 billion
in loan guarantees. In addition, net lending by Government-sponsored
enterprises totaled $2.0 trillion. The Federal Government also insures
bank, thrift, and credit union deposits up to $100,000, guarantees
vested define-benefit pensions, and insures against disasters, specified
international investment risks, and various other risks. These diverse
programs are operating in the context of rapidly evolving private
financial markets that are making some of their functions less necessary
while generating both new risks and new opportunities. Thus, program
managers are continually reassessing their roles and seeking to improve
their effectiveness in dynamic financial markets.
The introduction to this chapter summarizes key changes in financial
markets and their effects on Federal programs.
Its first section is a crosscutting assessment of the
rationale for a continued Federal role in providing credit and
insurance, performance measures for credit programs, and
criteria for reengineering credit programs so as to enhance
their benefits in relation to costs.
The second section reviews Federal credit programs and GSEs
in four sectors: housing, education, business and community
development, and exports, noting the rationale and goals of
these programs. It highlights a housing consortium recently
created to help program managers integrate with evolving
private sector practices, and efforts to improve the
effectiveness of student, business, and international credit
programs.
The final section assesses recent developments in Federal
deposit insurance, pension guarantees, and disaster insurance.
Evolving Financial Markets
Financial markets have been evolving rapidly in recent years. Both
intermediaries--banks and the many non-bank firms engaged in financial
services--and capital markets have been reaching out to new clients that
they did not serve a few years ago. Competition for business within and
across industry lines has become more intense as legal and regulatory
restrictions segmenting financial markets have eased. Massive databanks
and increasingly sophisticated analytical methods are being used to find
creditworthy borrowers among people and businesses previously thought
ineligible for private credit.
Moreover, funds are flowing more readily to their most productive uses
across the country and around the world. Interstate banking and
branching are almost nationwide, and growing numbers of large financial
institutions serve global markets. Capital market financing is available
to smaller companies and for a broader range of purposes than before.
Secondary markets are the main source of financing for mortgages, and a
rapidly growing source of financing for household durables, consumer
credit, and small business loans. Nonbanks and nonfinancial firms are
helping to funnel funds from capital markets to small clients in cities
and in rural areas.
Faster and cheaper information and communications systems have
revolutionized ``back office'' functions. These can be consolidated to
achieve economies of scale and located anywhere in the world where
capable help is available and economical. From these locations,
communications can bring the ``back office'' to the front line on a
computer terminal in the office of any realtor or supplier or in any
storefront or kiosk. From a timely information base, credit servicing
and workout have become much more efficient.
While the increased globalization of financial institutions and
capital markets provides extensive benefits, it also makes domestic
market conditions more sensitive to events abroad. In 1998, the
continued Asian crisis and further events in Russia and Brazil resulted
in a flight to liquidity and safety. This drove down U.S. Treasury bond
yields dramatically, and also helped to lower rates in the mortgage
market and on high-grade corporate debt. Some markets, however, were
temporarily disrupted; related to this was an increase in business
borrowing from banks, rather than directly from capital markets. Less
creditworthy borrowers faced higher rates or were temporarily unable to
find funds. As a result of this episode, awareness of the potential for
discontinuities in financial markets has increased.
Impact on Federal Programs
These changes are affecting the roles, risks, and operations of
Federal credit and insurance programs.
In some cases, private credit and insurance markets may
evolve sufficiently to take over functions previously left to
Federal programs. More likely, they may take away the best
risks among those who have been borrowing from the Government
or with its guarantee, leaving the Federal program facing a
smaller pool of riskier clients. If the Government is aware of
this in time, the result may be new benefit/cost calculations
that might help to redesign--or to end--the program. If the
Government is caught unaware, the result may be greater cost
for the taxpayers.
[[Page 182]]
At the same time, Federal programs can take advantage of
the growing private capability. They can leverage it to
provide additional assistance to their clients. With careful
attention to the incentives faced by the private sector, they
can develop a variety of partnerships with private entities.
And they can contract with the private sector wherever it can
provide specific credit servicing, collection, or asset
disposition services more efficiently.
Insurance programs, too, are affected by the evolution of the
financial marketplace. That is most obvious for deposit insurance, which
now backs a recovered, consolidating industry, but one that has assumed
the risks inherent in providing a growing array of increasingly
sophisticated services, including many off-balance sheet activities,
often on a world-wide basis. Depository institutions have become
increasingly vulnerable to adverse shocks in foreign financial markets
through loans, investments, foreign exchange transactions, and off-
balance-sheet activities. In pensions, the Government guarantees
defined-benefit plans, but defined-contribution plans play an increasing
role--attracting the support of younger workers in an aging workforce.
This trend may accelerate as the retirement of the baby boom generation
nears. In disaster insurance, private firms are gaining a better
understanding of their risks and exploring ways to diversify them in
capital markets.
In this changing environment for Federal credit and insurance
programs, this chapter asks three questions. First, what is our current
understanding of the roles of these programs? Second, how well they are
achieving their goals? And finally, could they be re-engineered to
achieve greater benefits in relation to costs? A consortium of housing
program managers, and managers of student, business, and international
credit programs will be working intensively on this third question next
year.
I. A CROSS-CUTTING ASSESSMENT
The Federal Role
In most lines of credit and insurance, the private market efficiently
allocates resources to meet societal demands, and Federal intervention
is unnecessary. However, Federal intervention may improve on the market
outcome in some situations. The following are six standard situations
where this may be the case, \1\ together with some examples of Federal
programs that address them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Economics textbooks also list pure public goods, like national
defense, where it is difficult or impossible to exclude people from
sharing the full benefits of the goods or services once they have been
produced. It is hard to imagine credit or insurance examples in this
category.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information failures occur when there is an asymmetry in
the information available to different agents in the
marketplace. A common Federal intervention in such cases is to
require the more knowledgeable agent, such as a financial
institution, to provide certain information to the other
party, for example, the borrower or investor. A different sort
of information failure occurs when the private market deems it
too risky to develop a new financial instrument or market.
This is rare nowadays, but it is worth remembering that the
Federal Government developed the market for amortized, fixed-
rate mortgages and other innovations in housing finance.
Externalities occur when people or entities either do not
pay the full cost of their activities (e.g., pollution) or do
not receive the full return. Federal credit assistance for
students is justified in part because, although people with
more education are likely to have higher income and even
better health, they do not receive the full benefits of their
education. Their colleagues at work, the residents of their
community, and the citizens of the Nation also benefit from
their greater knowledge and productivity.
Economic disequilibrium is a third rationale for Federal
intervention. This is one rationale for deposit insurance. If
many banks and thrifts are hurt simultaneously by an economic
shock, such as accelerating inflation in the 1970s, and
depositors have a hard time knowing which ones may become
insolvent, deposit insurance prevents a contagious rush to
withdraw deposits that could harm the whole economy.
Failure of competition, resulting from barriers to entry,
economies of scale, or foreign government intervention, may
also argue for Federal intervention--for example, by reducing
barriers to entry, as has often been done recently, by
negotiating to eliminate or reduce foreign government
subsidies, or by providing countervailing Federal credit
assistance to American exporters.
Incomplete markets occur if producers do not provide credit
or insurance even though customers might be willing to pay for
it. One example would be catastrophic insurance, where there
is a small risk of a very large loss; a disaster that occurred
sooner rather than later could bankrupt the insurer even if
premiums were set at an appropriate level to cover long-term
cost. Another example is caused by ``moral hazard'' problems,
where the borrower or insured could behave so as to take
advantage of the lender or insurer. This is the case for
pension guarantees, where sponsors might underfund plans, and
for deposit insurance, where banks might take more risk to
earn a higher return. In these cases, the Government's legal
and regulatory powers provide an advantage in comparison with
a private insurer.
[[Page 183]]
In addition to correcting market failures, Federal credit
programs are often used to redistribute resources by providing
subsidies from the general taxpayer to disadvantaged regions
or segments of the population.
In reviewing its credit and insurance programs, the Federal Government
must continually reassess whether the direct and indirect benefits to
the economy exceed the direct and indirect costs. This assessment should
include the costs associated with redirecting scarce resources away from
other investments. In some situations, the market may have recently
become capable of providing financial services, and older Federal
programs may need to be modified or ended to make room for private
markets to develop. Private providers in similar circumstances might go
bankrupt, merge, or change their line of business; for Federal programs,
a policy decision and usually a change in law are needed to eliminate
overcapacity. In other instances, Federal programs may be redesigned to
encourage the development of private credit market institutions or to
target Federal assistance more efficiently to groups still unable to
obtain credit and insurance in the private market.
What Are We Trying to Achieve?
If the main Federal role is to provide credit and insurance that
private markets would not provide--to stretch the boundaries in
providing credit and insurance--the Federal goal is to achieve a net
impact that benefits society. Together, these objectives make the
standard for success of a Federal credit or insurance program more
daunting than for a private credit or insurance firm.
For credit and insurance, as for all other programs, implementation of
the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) will help to assess
whether programs are achieving their intended results in practice--and
will improve the odds for success. GPRA requires agencies to develop
strategic plans in consultation with the Executive Branch, the Congress,
and interested parties; this process should refine and focus agency
missions. The strategic plans set long-range goals, annual performance
plans set milestones to be reached in the coming year, and annual
performance reports will measure agency progress toward achieving their
goals.
GPRA defines four kinds of measures for assessing programs: inputs
(the resources used), outputs (the goods or services produced), outcomes
(the gross effects on society achieved by the program), and net impacts
(the effects net of those that would have occurred in the absence of the
program, e.g., with private financing). For credit and insurance
programs, interesting interrelationships among these measures provide
the keys to program success.
Net impacts assess the net effect of the program on intended outcomes
compared with what would have occurred in the absence of the program.
They exclude, for example, effects that would have been achieved with
private credit in the absence of the program. Among the net impacts
toward which Federal credit programs strive are: a net increase in home
ownership, a net increase in higher education graduates, a net increase
in small businesses, a net increase in exports, and a net increase in
jobs.
For credit programs, the first key to achieving any of these net
impacts is outreach. In the spirit of the Federal role, programs need to
identify borrowers who would not get private credit. They need to reach
out to underserved populations (e.g., low-income or minority people) and
neighborhoods (urban and rural). They need to encourage the start-up of
new activities (e.g., beginning farmers, new businesses, new exporters).
They need to reach their legislatively targeted populations (e.g.,
students, veterans). Federal lending is often to higher-risk borrowers,
or for higher-risk purposes. In order to assist certain target groups or
encourage certain activities, credit may be extended for longer periods
or at a lower cost to the borrower.
Achieving program objectives, however, also means finding ways to
assist those borrowers at the boundary of private credit markets to
repay their loans. This is not just a financial goal; it is necessary to
achieve the program's social purpose. Home ownership requires mortgage
repayment. Education that enhances income is associated with repayment
of student loans. Remaining in business with a good credit rating
requires repayment of small business, farm, and export loans. And loan
repayment is inherent in program cost-effectiveness. Moreover, when the
Federal Government bears risk for less creditworthy borrowers and does
so in a way that fails to assist them to repay, they struggle with high
debt burdens and are left with poor credit records.
With implementation of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990, Federal
credit programs began to reconcile the tension between helping certain
groups or purposes and ``business-like'' financial management. With the
implementation of GPRA, they may begin to see program success and
financial success as two facets of the same goal. The challenge is
usually to identify ``boundary'' borrowers and to structure the loan and
its servicing (including technical assistance) so as to pull those
borrowers toward financial and programmatic success. In some cases,
savings from improved credit program management may be reinvested to
pull more borrowers across that boundary.
Outputs and outcomes, therefore, have an inter-relationship which is
crucial to the performance of credit programs. The most obvious output
of Federal credit programs is the number and value of direct loans
originated or loans guaranteed. But volume alone does not achieve the
objectives of Federal credit programs; indeed, large volume or market
share may mean that private lenders are displaced. Loans must have
certain characteristics in order to achieve the desired outcomes and net
impacts; these characteristics are therefore part of the desired program
output.
Because of the Federal role, output measures should include an
estimate of the percent of loans or guaran
[[Page 184]]
tees originated going to borrowers who would otherwise not have access
to private credit, and the percent of loans or guarantees originated
going to specific target groups (e.g., veterans) or for specific
purposes. Because of the Federal goal, output measures should include
the percent of loans or guarantees that are current. This should be
compared with the percent that were expected to be current at this point
in the repayment cycle.
To assess the latter, program data should be analyzed to determine
whether repayment prospects are enhanced by particular characteristics
of loan structure (such as higher initial borrower equity), of loan
origination (such as verifying borrower financial status), of loan
servicing (such as prompt counseling), or of guarantee conditions (such
as lender risk-sharing). When such characteristics help to control the
cost of credit programs and to achieve desired outcomes, then these
characteristics should be measured as part of the program's output.
The linkage between such output characteristics and the outcomes of
Federal credit programs is not always fully recognized. For example, one
desired outcome is to reach underserved populations or neighborhoods. To
achieve this outcome, it would be useful to monitor whether loans are
going to borrowers who would not otherwise have access to credit, or to
specific target groups. Other desired outcomes include supporting
investment important to the economy, encouraging start-up of new
activities, or contributing to sustained economic development. To
achieve these outcomes, it would be useful to monitor whether the
program's loans and operating procedures have characteristics that would
enhance borrower repayment.
Inputs. Program cost is also a performance measure. For credit and
insurance programs, it is a continuing challenge to understand and
control the risks that the Government assumes and to measure the
inherent cost. This is especially important in view of the rapid changes
in financial markets discussed above and the increasingly complex
financial instruments.
The subsidy cost of Federal credit programs, cumulated over time for
each cohort of the program's loans or loan guarantees, is the main
input. Another is the administrative cost of the program, including the
cost of credit extension, direct loan servicing and guaranteed loan
monitoring, collecting on delinquent loans and collateral, and other
administrative costs such as policy making or systems development.
The relationship between these inputs is also crucial for credit
programs. Careful servicing of loans, for example, can reduce default
costs, and perhaps total program costs. So good servicing is good
financial management for the taxpayer. But good servicing is also an
art, which can--by assisting borrowers to repay--help to achieve the
program's performance objectives. Private servicing of loans offers many
examples of the gains from matching repayment to the borrower's flow of
income, treating borrowers in different circumstances differently, and
in other ways maximizing the borrower's chances to make good.
In sum, there are three relationships that seem to hold the key to
excellence in credit program performance: the relationship between
repayment and the achievement of program objectives, the relationship
between the characteristics of credit program outputs and desired
outcomes, and the relationship between subsidy cost and good servicing
and program administration. Another important key to success is the
speed with which the program adapts to market changes, including its
ability to provoke or harness private markets into meeting Federal
goals.
Principles for Re-engineering
In order to improve the effectiveness of Federal credit programs, OMB
will be working with agencies to identify ways to re-engineer credit
management. This effort will focus on improving servicing, will consider
consolidation of functions such as data collection and asset
disposition, will rely on the private sector when that would improve
efficiency, will devise incentives to improve management and reduce
cost, and will ensure the development of data for management and subsidy
estimation.
The focus will be on managing the servicing, workout, and sale of any
collateral efficiently. For example, why does the Federal Government pay
claims on guaranteed loans and handle the workout, instead of leaving
this to the originating lender? Why does the Government take over
collateral? How do the timing and results of our asset disposition
compare with private practice? Why do we make loans to finance purchases
of collateral? What incentives and penalties would be useful for
programs and program staff? For guaranteed loan originators? For
contractors who service Federal loans or dispose of collateral?
OMB has developed a tentative set of principles for re-engineering
credit programs that builds on OMB Circular A-129 and initial research.
These will be modified by lessons learned as they are put into practice.
The resulting principles are intended to improve the performance of
Federal credit programs in the years ahead. Because private markets are
extending credit where it was formerly unavailable, and because there is
little purpose to re-engineering programs which are not justified, these
principles start with basic questions of program justification. But
their main focus is on how programs should be carried out.
[[Page 185]]
Program Justification
1. Credit assistance should be provided only when it has
been demonstrated that private credit markets cannot
achieve clearly defined Federal objectives. What is the
objective? Is access to private credit available? If
not, why not? If so, is there a reason why private terms
and conditions should be supplemented or subsidized? To
what extent?
2. Credit assistance should be provided only when it is the
best means to achieve Federal objectives. Can private
credit markets be developed? Can market imperfections be
overcome by information, regulatory changes, or other
means? Would small grants for downpayments,
capitalization for State, local, or non-profit revolving
funds, or other approaches be more efficient?
3. Credit assistance should be provided only when its
benefits exceed its cost. Analyze benefits and costs in
accordance with OMB Circular A-94.
Program Design
4. Credit programs should minimize substitution for private
credit. What features of program design minimize
displacement? Encourage and supplement private lending?
To what extent is credit for this objective expanded by
this program compared with what would be available in
the absence of the program? What is the economic cost of
the lending bumped from the credit queue?
5. Credit programs should stretch their resources and
better meet their objectives by controlling the risk of
default. What features of program design minimize risk?
Are there incentives and penalties for loan originators
and servicers to minimize risk? What features of the
loan contract, the process of origination, the quality
of servicing, and the workout procedures minimize risk?
Do borrowers have an equity interest? Is maturity
shorter than the economic life of the asset financed?
Are the timing and amount of payment matched with
availability of resources? Is timely reminder and
technical assistance provided? How well is risk
understood, measured, and monitored?
6. Credit programs should stretch their resources to better
meet their objectives by minimizing cost; where program
purposes allow, most should be self-sustaining. Do fees
and interest cover the Government's cost, including
administration? Are interest rates specified as a
percent of market rates on comparable maturity Treasury
securities? Are charges for riskier borrowers
proportional to their higher cost?
Program Operations
7. Credit programs should take advantage of the capacity,
flexibility, and expertise available in competitive
private markets unless the benefits of direct Federal
operations can be shown to exceed the cost. Private
financial institutions may offer convenient access for
borrowers, potential for graduation to private credit,
economies of scale, ready adjustment to changing volume
or location of loans, and knowledge of current credit
conditions and techniques.
8. The lender (in the case of a loan guarantee), the
servicer, and the providers of workout and asset
disposition services should have a stake in the
successful and timely repayment of the loan or
collections on claims and collateral. Originators of
guaranteed loans should bear a share of each dollar of
default loss, and--unless other arrangements can be
shown to be more cost-effective--should be responsible
for handling workout. Each contract should include
incentives for good performance, and penalties,
including loss of business, for poor performance. The
duration and scope of each contract or agreement should
be limited so as to maximize specialization and
competition, unless those are offset by economies of
scale in operations and monitoring.
9. Criteria should be established for participation in
Federal loan guarantee programs by lenders, servicers,
and providers of workout and asset disposition services.
These criteria should include financial and capital
requirements for lenders and servicers not regulated by
a Federal financial institution regulatory agency, and
may include fidelity/surety bonding and/or errors and
omissions insurance, qualification requirements for
officers and staff, and requirements of good standing
and performance in relation to other contracts and
debts. Lenders transferring and/or assigning servicing,
and lenders or servicers transferring and/or assigning
workout or asset disposition, must use only entities
which have qualified under the Federal participation
criteria.
[[Page 186]]
10. When there are economies of scope or scale, the data
gathering and analysis, servicing, workout, asset
disposition, or other functions of specific credit
programs should be combined or coordinated. The sequence
of operations should be streamlined, and accountability
for each step clearly defined.
Program Monitoring
11. Each program should maintain or receive monthly loan-by-
loan transaction data and a system whereby this
information triggers servicing, workout, and follow-up
actions. These data shall be linked by loan number to an
analytical database showing characteristics of loans,
borrowers, projects financed, financial information,
credit ratings, and other data in a form suitable for
use in subsidy estimation and loan pricing.
12. Each program should design and carry out steps to foresee
problems, and to inspect, audit, and assess the
program's operations. Methods should be benchmarked
against the best practices used elsewhere. The program
and its lenders, servicers, and other contractors should
experiment with and assess ways in which the
effectiveness or efficiency of the program might be
improved or costs reduced.
II. CREDIT IN FOUR SECTORS
Housing Credit Programs and GSEs
The Federal Government provides loans and loan guarantees to expand
access to home ownership to people who lack the savings, income, or
credit history to qualify for a conventional home mortgage and to
finance rental housing for low-income persons. The Departments of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Veterans Affairs (VA), and
Agriculture (USDA) made $150 billion of loan and loan guarantee
commitments in 1998, helping nearly 1.5 million households. Roughly 1
out of 7 single-family mortgages originated in the United States
receives assistance from one of these programs.
HUD's Federal Housing Administration (FHA) runs a Mutual
Mortgage Insurance Fund that guaranteed $90 billion in
mortgages for one million households in 1998. Over three-
fourths of these went to first-time homebuyers.
The VA assists veterans, members of the Selected Reserve,
and active duty personnel to purchase homes as a recognition
of their service to the Nation. The program substitutes the
Federal guarantee for the borrower's down payment. In 1998, VA
provided $40 billion in guarantees to 369,000 borrowers.
USDA's Rural Housing Service (RHS) guarantees up to 90
percent of an unsubsidized home loan. The program's emphasis
is on reducing the number of rural residents living in
substandard housing. In 1998, $2.8 billion of guarantees went
to 39,400 households.
In addition, RHS offers a single-family direct loan program and both
direct and guaranteed multi-family mortgages. FHA guarantees mortgages
for multi-family housing and other specialized properties.
Housing Finance Challenges and Opportunities
Private banks, thrifts, and mortgage bankers, which originate the
mortgages that FHA, VA, and RHS guarantee, may deal with all three
programs, as well as with the Government National Mortgage Association
(Ginnie Mae), which guarantees timely payment on securities based on
pools of these mortgages. In addition, the same private firms originate
conventional mortgages, many of which are securitized by Government-
sponsored enterprises--the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie
Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac).
Many of these firms already use or are planning to use electronic loan
origination and are moving toward electronic underwriting. Behind such
underwriting are data warehouses showing default experience by type of
loan, borrower characteristics, home location, originator, and servicer,
and models relating these factors to default cost. ``Web lending'' is
also on the horizon.
These changes offer both challenges and opportunities to the Federal
mortgage guarantors and Ginnie Mae. They are challenged to become
electronically accessible to their clients and loan originators. They
are challenged to assess and monitor their risks more closely, now that
private firms are reaching out to the better risks among their potential
clients. They also have an opportunity to provide better service, to
lower cost and improve efficiency, and to target their efforts to help
borrowers to retain their homes.
The Housing Consortium
In FY 1998, the FHA, VA, and RHS housing guarantee programs and Ginnie
Mae formed The Federal Housing Consortium to adapt to the rapid shift to
electronic underwriting and other technological developments in the
private sector. The Consortium is the focus of agency efforts to keep
abreast of changes in the housing credit market, accelerate adoption of
best practices, establish common standards where possible, and make
government systems compatible with the private sector.
Data Systems. The Consortium members are currently pooling resources
to create a prototype data warehouse through which all members will have
access to integrated data on program and borrower characteristics,
lender and loan performance. It will provide timely, easily retrievable
information, giving managers
[[Page 187]]
the ability to monitor the changing risk and cost of guarantees and the
performance of guaranteed loan originators and servicers. Using the data
warehouse and learning from each other and from the private sector, the
Consortium will seek to improve loan origination, performance
measurement, risk sharing and pricing, and asset disposition.
The Consortium is also working with Ginnie Mae to integrate and
enhance Ginnie's two databases for use of all Consortium members.
Ginnie's databases, the Issuer Portfolio Analysis Database System
(IPADS) and the Correspondence Portfolio Analysis Database System
(CPADS), receive monthly data from issuers of mortgage-backed
securities, and monitor current performance by loan, originator,
servicer, mortgage pool, security, and security issuer. Performance can
be tracked and compared, taking account of differences between region,
economic conditions, size and type of business, and age of portfolio.
Because Ginnie Mae guarantees timely payment of principal and interest
on securities based on pools of mortgages guaranteed by FHA and VA, the
issuers of these securities are almost always FHA and VA servicers.
About 65 percent of RHS's single-family loans are also placed in Ginnie
Mae pools. Thus, although the current analytical system is designed fill
Ginnie Mae's needs, the same data and much the same system could be very
useful to the loan guarantee programs. For example, CPADS could enable
FHA and VA to monitor and assess how well the firms that originate and
service the loans they guarantee are doing their jobs. Ginnie Mae has
shared CPADS with FHA and VA for many years. RHS began a partnership
with Ginnie Mae in 1998, and this year will have access to loan and
lender performance data to analyze RHS loan guarantees.
Ginnie Mae has committed to making enhancements to IPADS/CPADS that
will provide additional benefits to all three loan guarantee programs.
The integration of IPADS and CPADS and an initial round of enhancements
will be implemented this year. Further enhancements are planned in the
future to enable the agencies to monitor and respond effectively to
technological, institutional, and financial developments in the
residential mortgage market.
Loan Origination. Electronic underwriting provides convenient, faster
service at a lower cost to both lenders and borrowers. Freddie Mac and
Fannie Mae are among the leaders in developing such systems and
encouraging their use.
Both FHA and VA now permit mortgage lenders to use approved automated
underwriting systems to originate their loans. Both undertook pilot
assessment of Freddie Mac's ``Loan Prospector'' system; VA approved its
use in October 1997 and FHA in February 1998. Both are now working with
Fannie Mae to pilot ``Desktop Underwriter,' and with other large
mortgage originators. FHA and VA are also increasing the use of
electronic data interchange to obtain information electronically from
mortgage originators and servicers and to provide notifications and
approvals for faster client services.
The RHS plans to develop the capacity to accept electronic loan
originations from their participating lenders. Utilizing electronic loan
origination technology will add significant benefits to loan processing
efficiency and timeliness for both RHS and the lenders. RHS is also
exploring using some form of automated underwriting and credit scoring.
RHS's goal is to implement these improvements as soon as possible, but
in order to ensure proper planning and maximum efficiency, complete
adoption of these procedures is several years away.
Performance Measurement. Measuring loan servicing performance
establishes a baseline for assessing changes to servicing practice.
Monthly data will not only give housing programs a better understanding
of how their guarantee portfolio behaves, but also how the federally
guaranteed housing market as a whole performs. This information is
critical for developing good performance standards.
FHA has created a loss mitigation program that scores lender
performance on loss mitigation annually and provides incentives to
lenders to hold down mortgage defaults and hold down FHA claim and
property disposition costs relative to other lenders in each FHA
insuring district.
RHS reviews at least 10 percent of the loans serviced by a lender
every two years. If deficiencies in loan servicing or underwriting are
noted, the lender is requested to take corrective action; its
eligibility will be terminated if it does not comply. Since 1998, RHS
has commissioned external audits of its largest loan servicers. The
audits focus on both loan origination and loan servicing requirements.
These audits have helped to pinpoint program weaknesses contributing to
loan delinquencies. In addition, they serve to alert and train servicers
on RHS guidelines and reporting requirements.
Risk Sharing and Pricing. Risk-based pricing is emerging in the
conventional mortgage market as an important means by which lenders can
take on more risk. Technology is giving lenders much more precise
ability to assess the initial default risk associated with making a
particular loan. This increasingly precise underwriting technology, in
turn, allows lenders and insurers to adjust fees or loan rates and/or
raise insurance premiums to reflect risk and loan cost accurately.
Federal loan guarantee programs will need to assess the impact of
private sector customization on their loan portfolios, and may need to
adopt a similar pricing structure or face adverse selection and larger
losses. Currently, premiums are fixed in statute and vary only slightly
with one dimension of risk, the initial loan-to-value ratio.
Asset Disposition. Common wisdom in the mortgage industry is to avoid
foreclosure because that is when significant losses occur, including
costs for maintenance and marketing. Managers of Federal guarantee pro
[[Page 188]]
grams have found that the best practice is to avoid taking the property
into possession, and having to manage and dispose of foreclosed
properties.
RHS already operates under the ``best practice'' for asset
disposition. The lender is paid the loss claim, including costs incurred
for up to six months after the default. After the loss claim is paid,
RHS has no involvement in the loan, and it becomes the sole
responsibility of the lender. In FY 2000, RHS will shorten the loss
claim period from six months to three months through regulatory changes
to encourage lenders to dispose of properties as efficiently as
possible.
In 1998 the Administration proposed and Congress passed legislation
giving new authority to FHA to pay claims prior to foreclosure, thereby
allowing FHA to pass along defaulted notes to the private sector for
servicing and/or disposition. When fully implemented, this new authority
will reduce foreclosures and, for properties that do go into
foreclosure, this new authority will greatly reduce the time such
properties remain on the market.
In 1999, VA will eliminate its role in the disposition of foreclosed
properties by outsourcing this function to the private sector. Thus, all
three housing guarantee programs will be following ``best practice.''
RHS Single-family Direct Loans
RHS also provides subsidized single-family direct loans to very-low-
and low-income borrowers unable to get credit elsewhere to purchase,
rehabilitate, or repair homes. The most recent and on-going servicing
improvement effort is the implementation of the Dedicated Loan
Origination Service System (DLOS), which centralizes the servicing of
the 502 Direct Loan program. DLOS has been a recent servicing
improvement and, in conjunction with 2 major regulations implemented
between 1996 and 1997, reduced RHS's direct loan subsidy rate by 40
percent.
RHS Multi-family Loans
RHS also offers direct loans to private developers to construct and
rehabilitate multi-family rental housing for very-low-to low-income
residents, elderly households, or handicapped individuals. It provided
$151 million in direct loans in 1998, that will provide 7,890 units for
very-low-income tenants. For the first time under permanent
authorization, RHS obligated $39.7 million in loan guarantees for multi-
family housing in 1998. The loan level is proposed to increase to $200
million for FY 2000, providing 5,380 new units for low to moderate
income tenants. The cost of this program is primarily due to the
subsidized interest component because default rates are expected to be
low. The budget includes a legislative proposal to remove the
requirement to provide subsidized interest on these loans, which would
result in a negative subsidy. The budget also provides $40 million, a 33
percent increase over FY 1999, for the farm labor housing program ($25
million in loans; $15 million in grants) as part of USDA's civil rights
initiative, which will provide an estimated 960 units for minority
farmworkers and their families.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
Because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the largest Government-sponsored
enterprises (GSEs), are the dominant firms in the secondary mortgage
market, their business activities have a significant impact on the
housing finance sector of the U.S. economy. These GSEs engage in two
main lines of business: they issue and guarantee mortgage-backed
securities (MBS), and they hold portfolios of mortgages, MBS, and other
mortgage-related securities that they finance by borrowing. As of
September 1998, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had $1.7 trillion outstanding
in mortgages purchased or guaranteed. Of this, $0.6 trillion was
retained in the GSEs' portfolios and $1.1 trillion was issued as MBSs
(excluding MBSs held in portfolio).
The Federal Housing Enterprises Safety and Soundness Act of 1992
reformed Federal regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This Act
created the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) to
manage the Government's exposure to risk by conducting examinations and
enforcing minimum and risk-based capital requirements. Both GSEs have
consistently met the minimum capital requirements, which are based on
leverage ratios. The risk-based capital requirements will be based on a
stress test. OFHEO has solicited public comment on a variety of issues
related to a risk-based capital regulation and, in June 1996, published
the first of two Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) on risk-based
capital. OFHEO expects to publish its second NPR for public comment in
1999.
As required by the 1992 Act, the Secretary of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) issued a final regulation at the end of 1995 that
established new goals for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to foster housing
credit for lower-income families and under-served communities. For 1997
through 1999, the regulation requires each GSE to devote:
42 percent of its mortgage purchases to finance dwelling
units that are affordable by low-and moderate-income families;
24 percent of its purchases to finance units in central
cities, rural areas, and other metropolitan areas with low and
moderate median family income and high concentrations of
minority residents; and
14 percent of its purchases to finance units that are
special affordable housing for very-low-income families and
low-income families living in low-in-come areas.
During 1993-95, the GSEs were subject to transitional goals, and in
1996, they were subject to interim goals that were slightly lower than
the goals for 1997-99. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each achieved all
three goals in 1996 and 1997. HUD expects to publish new affordable
housing goals for 2000 and thereafter in 1999.
In recent years, the GSEs have sought to maintain rapid growth in
their earnings through even more rapid growth of their debt-financed
holdings of mortgage as
[[Page 189]]
sets. From September 1997 to September 1998, outstanding retained GSE
holdings grew 28 percent in dollar volume, while total outstanding
mortgage purchases grew 14 percent. Increased asset volumes imply
increased risk exposures, as do some new activities, such as purchases
of lower quality mortgages.
By contrast, some of the GSEs' new business activities and innovations
may enhance their risk management capabilities. The GSEs' use of credit
scores and automated underwriting may improve risk measurement and
therefore mitigate the credit risks inherent in purchasing and
securitizing mortgages. Similarly, the gradual development of risk-based
pricing may more closely tie revenues to potential losses. For holders
of mortgage credit risk, sophisticated risk measurement and pricing
tools continue to lead to shifts in the distribution of risk among the
GSEs, private mortgage insurers, lenders, and mortgage investors.
Federal Home Loan Bank System
The Federal Home Loan Bank System (FHLBS) was established in 1932 to
provide liquidity to home mortgage lenders. The FHLBS carries out this
mission by issuing debt and using the proceeds to make secured loans,
called advances, to its members. Member institutions primarily use
advances to finance residential mortgages and other housing related
assets. Federally chartered thrifts are required to be FHLBS members,
but membership is open to state-chartered thrifts, commercial banks,
credit unions, and insurance companies on a voluntary basis. As of
September 30, 1998, 6,806 financial institutions were FHLBS members, an
increase of 388 over September 1997. About 71 percent of members are
commercial banks, 25 percent are thrifts, and the remaining 4 percent
are credit unions and insurance companies. However, nearly 50 percent of
outstanding FHLBS advances were held by Federally-chartered thrifts as
of September 30.
The FHLBS reported net income of $1.6 billion for the year ending
September 30, 1998, up from $1.5 billion in the previous 12 months.
System capital rose from $18 billion to $21 billion, while the ratio of
capital to assets fell from 5.7 percent to 5.4 percent. Average return
on equity was about 6.7 percent, after adjustment for payment of
interest to the Resolution Funding Corporation (REFCorp). Outstanding
advances to members reached $246 billion at September 30, 1998, a 35
percent increase over the $182 billion outstanding a year earlier.
System investments other than advances fell to $136 billion, or about 35
percent of total assets, as of September 30, 1998. A year earlier,
investments stood at $138 billion, or 42 percent of total assets.
The Federal Home Loan Banks are required by law to pay $300 million
annually toward the cost of interest on bonds issued by the Resolution
Funding Corporation and the greater of 10 percent of net income or $100
million to the Affordable Housing Program (AHP). In addition, the
FHLBanks are required to provide discounted advances for targeted
housing and community investment lending through a Community Investment
Program. The need to generate income to meet the REFCorp and AHP
obligations and still provide a competitive return on members'
investment was a driving force behind the substantial increase in the
System's investment activity in recent years. The System also needs to
service a capital requirement which is based on members' asset size,
mortgage holdings, and advances, rather than the amount of System risk.
In the past, the FHLBS' exposure to credit risk was virtually
nonexistent. All advances to member institutions are collateralized, and
the FHLBanks can call for additional or substitute collateral during the
life of an advance. No FHLBank has ever experienced a loss on an
advance.
While the FHLBanks face minimal credit risk on advances, the System's
investment activities, including certain ``pilots,'' do create certain
risks. To control the System's risk exposure, the Federal Housing
Finance Board (FHFB), the System's regulator, has established
regulations and policies that the FHLBanks must follow to evaluate and
manage their credit and interest rate risk. FHLBanks must file periodic
compliance reports, and the FHFB conducts an annual on-site examination
of each FHLBank. Each FHLBank's board of directors must establish risk
management policies that comport with FHFB guidelines.
As a pilot activity, the FHFB has allowed some of the FHLBanks to
underwrite mortgages jointly with their members. Under one such pilot,
the FHLBanks finance the loans and assume the interest rate and
prepayment risks, while the members originate and service the loans and
assume the credit risk. All assets held by a FHLBank under this pilot
are required, pursuant to the terms of the program, to be credit
enhanced to at least the level of an AA security. Through these pilot
programs, the FHLBS is expanding its traditional role as a wholesale
lender as a means of promoting housing finance and community investment.
The FHLBS' investment activities also pose important public policy
issues about the degree to which the composition of assets on the FHLBS'
balance sheet adequately reflects the mission of the System. Over the
last year, outstanding advances as a percentage of the System's
outstanding debt increased by nearly ten percent. In addition, as of
September 30, 1998, about 60 percent of advances outstanding had a
remaining maturity of greater than one year--up from about 40 percent a
year earlier. Despite this progress, investments (other than advances)
currently represent over one-third of the System's assets and are used
to conduct extensive arbitrage--the System issues debt securities at
close to U.S. Treasury rates and invests the proceeds in other, higher-
yielding securities. In fact, in 1998 the FHLBS issued $2.4 trillion in
debt securities and became the world's largest issuer of debt. However,
the majority of debt issued by the System is short-term, and total debt
outstanding was only about $336 billion at the end of 1998.
An enormous, liquid, and efficient capital market exists for
conventional home mortgages today. And, over
[[Page 190]]
the years, the FHLBS has played an important role in developing and
expanding this market. The FHLBanks continue to provide valuable
services to their members. They assist members in remaining competitive
in housing finance and managing interest-rate risk, and offer their
members a reliable source of funds, as evidenced by the recent increase
in advances. However, as a result of GSE and Federal agency sponsorship
of secondary markets and the increasing presence of private
securitizers, lenders have access to substantial liquidity sources other
than FHLBS advances. As with other GSEs, the role and risks of the FHLBS
will be tested in the face of rapidly changing financial markets and
potential changes in the structure and activities of the industry served
by the FHLBS.
Education Credit Programs and GSEs
Student Loans
The Department of Education helps to finance student loans through two
major programs: the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) program and the
William D. Ford Federal Direct Student Loan (FDSL) program. Eligible
institutions of higher education may choose to participate in either
program. Loans are available to students and their parents regardless of
income. Borrowers with low family incomes are eligible for higher
interest subsidies.
In 2000, more than 6 million borrowers will receive 9.4 million loans
totaling over $41 billion. Of this amount, $34 billion is for new loans
and the remainder is to consolidate existing loans. Loan levels have
risen dramatically over the past 10 years as a result of rising
educational costs, higher loan limits, and more eligible borrowers. The
upward trend is expected to continue for the next five years.
The Federal Family Education Loan program provides loans through a
complex administrative structure involving over 4,100 lenders, 36 State
and private guaranty agencies, 50 participants in the secondary markets,
and nearly 4,000 participating schools. Under FFEL, banks and other
eligible lenders loan private capital to students and parents, guaranty
agencies insure the loans, and the Federal Government reinsures the
loans against borrower default. In FY 2000, FFEL lenders will disburse
more than 6 million loans exceeding $25 billion in principal. Lenders
bear two percent of the default risk, and the government and guaranty
agencies are responsible for the remainder. The Department also makes
administrative payments to guaranty agencies and pays interest subsidies
to lenders.
The Federal Direct Student Loan program was authorized by the Student
Loan Reform Act of 1993 to enable students and parents to obtain and
repay loans more easily than under the FFEL program. Under FDSL, the
Federal Government provides loan capital directly to 1,300 schools,
which then disburse loan funds to students--greatly streamlining loan
delivery for students, parents, and schools. In FY 2000, the FDSL
program will generate more than 3.4 million loans with a total of over
$16 billion. The program offers a variety of flexible repayment plans
including income-contingent repayment, under which annual repayment
amounts vary based on the income of the borrower and payments can be
made over 25 years.
Reform proposals. The Administration is proposing legislation to
restructure and improve the efficiency of the guaranteed loan system and
to provide additional benefits to students. Proposed changes will save
$4.6 billion over five years.
The Administration is proposing to extend the temporary Consolidation
Loan policies included in the recent Higher Education Amendments of 1998
(HEA) through the end of fiscal year 2000. This proposal would maintain
the interest rate on Direct Consolidation Loans--scheduled to increase
on February 1, 1999--at the 91-day Treasury bill rate plus 2.3 percent,
producing significant savings for students while encouraging competition
between the Direct Loan and Federal Family Education Loan programs. The
proposal would also maintain the reduced FFEL Consolidated Loan holder
fee at 0.62 percent of outstanding volume, rather than increase the fee
to 1.05 percent on February 1, 1999, as required under the HEA.
The Administration is also proposing to improve the management and
collection of defaulted loans through four new initiatives, three of
which build on provisions enacted in the HEA. First, the amount guaranty
agencies may retain on default collections will be reduced from 24
percent to 18.5 percent--approximately the rate paid on loans collected
by the Department of Education through competitively awarded contracts.
This will provide the guaranty agencies greater incentive to increase
collections on defaulted loans in order to bolster revenues. Second, the
Administration proposes increasing true risk-sharing between the Federal
government and guaranty agencies. Complementing the reduction of re-
insurance to guaranty agencies from 98 to 95 percent specified in HEA,
the Administration proposes eliminating provisions that allow agencies
to recoup this 5 percent cost from subsequent default collections. As
such, the Administration expects greater emphasis on default avoidance
activities. Third, the HEA extended the time before lenders may submit a
default claim on a delinquent loan from 180 days to 270 days. In order
to promote risk-sharing and increase lenders' incentive to bring these
loans back into repayment, the Administration is proposing that interest
not continue to accrue during this additional 90-day period. Again, this
proposal provides default avoidance incentives. Lastly, data from the
Department of Health and Human Services' National Directory of New Hires
(NDNH) will be made available to assist in the Department of Education's
default collection efforts. Defaulted
[[Page 191]]
debtor data matching will provide the Department of Education with
current borrower address information for collection activities.
The Administration is also proposing to expand the use of voluntary
agreements which were created by the HEA to afford greater regulatory
flexibility to a limited number of guaranty agencies. The broader
availability of these voluntary flexible agreements will reduce the need
for agencies to hold Federal reserve funds; accordingly, the
Administration is proposing to bring forward and augment the reserve
recall provisions included in the HEA. The Administration would recall a
total of $1.5 billion in additional reserves over fiscal years 2000-
2004.
The Administration is proposing to reduce interest subsidy payments to
20 basis points on FFEL loans funded through tax-exempt securities. This
reduction will bring lender returns on these loans in line with those
realized on loans funded with private capital.
The Department of Education continues to improve program integrity and
reduce default costs. The Department will use newly automated systems to
review and analyze institutional eligibility information, and will
target its regulatory and enforcement efforts on high-risk institutions.
Over the past several years, improvements in oversight and termination
of schools with high default rates have led to the removal of
approximately 1,700 schools. An additional 300 schools were eliminated
from the student loan programs, but remain eligible for other Federal
student aid. This has helped reduce the national student loan cohort
default rate from 10.4 percent for 1995 to 9.6 percent for 1996, the
fifth straight year of decline. This rate is the percentage of borrowers
who enter repayment in a given year and for whom a default claim is paid
before the end of the following year.
As one of Education's Performance Management Objectives, modernizing
student aid benefit delivery is a key priority. Accordingly, the
Department has converted the Office of Student Financial Assistance into
the government's first-ever Federal performance-based organization. The
PBO is designed to improve the management of all student aid programs,
using its expanded procurement and contracting flexibilities. This new
organization will focus on re-engineering information systems and
expanding electronic data exchange to improve customer service, enhance
data quality, and lower costs. The PBO will work with students, lenders,
guaranty agencies, and others to develop a strategic performance plan to
address customer needs, enabling more students to gain information on
Federal aid on the Internet, apply for it electronically, and have their
eligibility determined quickly.
Sallie Mae
The Student Loan Marketing Association (Sallie Mae) was charted by
Congress in 1972 as a for-profit, shareholder-owned, Government-
sponsored enterprise (GSE). Sallie Mae was privatized in 1997 pursuant
to the authority granted by the Student Loan Marketing Association
Reorganization Act of 1996. The GSE is a wholly owned subsidiary of SLM
Holding Corporation and must wind-down and be liquidated by September
30, 2008. Legislation in the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations for FY 1999 allows the SLM Holding
Corporation to affiliate with a financial institution upon the approval
of the Secretary of the Treasury. Any affiliation will require the
holding company to disolve the GSE within two years of the affiliation
date.
Sallie Mae makes funds available for student loans by providing
liquidity to lenders participating in the FFEL program. Sallie Mae
purchases insured student loans from eligible lenders and makes
warehousing advances (secured loans to lenders). Generally, under the
privatization legislation, the GSE cannot engage in any new business
activities or acquire any additional program assets other than
purchasing student loans. The GSE can continue to make warehousing
advances under contractual commitments existing on August 8, 1997.
Sallie Mae currently holds about one-third of all outstanding guaranteed
student loans.
Business and Rural Development Credit Programs and GSEs
Small Business Administration
Over the past six years, SBA has expanded small businesses' access to
credit, increasing its annual loan volume by 55 percent, from $7.4
billion in 1993 to $11.5 billion in 1998. This increase, across all of
SBA's business credit programs, has occurred while staffing has been
reduced by about 20 percent. Although SBA's general business lending
declined slightly in FY 1998 due to a favorable interest rate climate
and commercial lenders' aggressive small business lending goals, the
expansion of SBA's venture capital and capital asset financing programs
contributed to a net $5 billion increase in the total guaranteed
portfolio in FY 1998.
SBA's principal program, Section 7(a) General Business Loans, has
improved access to credit for the Nation's most under-served small
businesses over the last three years through several successful
initiatives. The Low Documentation (LowDoc) initiative reduced the
application form for 7(a) loans under $100,000 to a single page,
allowing both lenders and SBA to process loans in less than two days.
The SBAExpress program (the former FA$TRACK pilot, now permanent) allows
lenders to use their own forms and procedures in exchange for a reduced
Government guarantee. These initiatives--and aggressive lending goals--
have helped to increase loan approvals to minority-and women-owned
businesses from $1.8 billion in FY 1993 to $4 billion in FY 1998.
[[Page 192]]
Increasing Access to Credit
SBA is proposing several new intiatives to further expand access to
credit by qualified borrowers who are unable to secure financing without
Government participation.
Targeting ``new markets.'' In FY 2000, SBA proposes to target ``new
markets''--regions where small business growth has been very limited.
The proposed initiatives will provide patient capital and technical
assistance to private-sector lenders and non-financial intermediaries in
underserved inner cities and rural areas. SBA will also expand the
number of participating intermediaries in the microloan program, which
to date has experienced no defaults as a result of strict agency
oversight and rigorous reserve requirements.
Financing smaller loans. Commercial lenders frequently avoid making
smaller loans due to high fixed costs per dollar lent, resulting in an
access barrier for many startup firms or established firms whose
financing needs do not meet the lenders' minimum thresholds. To close
this access gap, SBA is proposing to standardize the guarantee fee and
to increase the maximum guarantee percentage to 80 percent on loans up
to $150,000 in order to provide an incentive to lenders to make these
loans. This will result in higher subsidy costs due to reduced fee
revenue and higher claim payments in the event of default.
Integrating Private Sector Practices
Reliance on private sector partners. With its portfolio growing from
$20.7 billion in FY 1993 to $35.0 billion in FY 1998, SBA has relied
increasingly on private sector partners for loan servicing and
liquidation. The 7(a) program, which accounted for more than 70 percent
of SBA's business lending in FY 1998, has experienced the greatest shift
to private partnership. Under the Preferred Lender Program (PLP), SBA's
most experienced lenders have authority to approve, service, and
liquidate SBA-guaranteed loans in exchange for a reduced guarantee.
Loans approved through PLP lenders comprised 58 percent of all 7(a)
loans approved in FY 1998, a share that is expected to continue to grow.
SBA also requires all non-PLP lenders to service and liquidate their
SBA-guaranteed loans. These policies have shifted SBA's principal role
from origination and servicing to one of oversight and monitoring of
private sector partners.
In FY 2000, SBA proposes to broaden the universe of firms eligible to
make SBA-guaranteed loans by licensing up to 10 New Markets Lending
Companies, some of which may also fall into the category of Small
Business Lending Companies, SBA-approved and monitored non-depository
lending institutions. These non-financial intermediaries often operate
in regions where qualified borrowers' access to credit through
traditional commercial financial institutions is limited. In addition,
the Section 504 Certified Development Company (CDC) liquidation pilot
program was made permanent in FY 1998. Under this program, qualified
CDCs service and liquidate SBA-guaranteed Section 504 development
company debentures, increasing the agency's reliance on its non-Federal
partners.
Need for better oversight tools. Over the past six years, SBA has
significantly increased its loan portfolio, reduced staffing, and
delegated its servicing and liquidating authorities to its private
sector partners. During this period, commercial small business lenders
have become increasingly more sophisticated in identifying credit risk,
and many of them now pursue aggressive small business lending goals.
This expands small businesses' access to capital, but may also
concentrate higher-risk loans in SBA loan guarantee programs.
These trends reinforce SBA's need to improve oversight tools. SBA
continues to struggle with antiquated financial systems. Its managers
need improved access to timely and accurate analysis of portfolio trends
and information on the performance of its private sector partners. To
ensure that the agency meets its portfolio management responsibilities,
SBA will invest $8 million in 1999 to improve portfolio oversight. An
additional $8 million is requested for 2000. This funding will allow SBA
to improve internal accounting systems, recruit expertise in lender
oversight, develop the necessary in-house systems to support lender
monitoring, and create a centralized corporate database. Drawing on the
experience of financial institutions such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,
SBA will also establish loan servicing performance goals for its private
sector partners.
Reform initiatives. In FY 2000, SBA will continue to shift from loan
servicing to lender oversight. Initiatives already in progress include:
(1) delegating remaining 7(a) servicing and liquidation to its lending
partners, including requiring them to service and liquidate all
defaulted loans, (2) selling all direct loans and defaulted guarantees,
and (3) making strategic investments in better portfolio oversight
tools. This will allow SBA to focus on its goals of increasing access to
credit, while relying on private lenders to perform functions where they
have historically been more efficient. In conjunction with this shift in
agency focus, SBA is proposing to implement a multi-year workforce
transition strategy, beginning in FY 2000, to retrain workers in the
skills needed in the SBA of the 21st Century, move employees to those
functions where their skills will be most utilized, and provide
retirement incentives for those employees who do not wish to participate
in the transition effort.
Loan asset sales. One of the most significant events in completing the
transition from loan servicing to lender oversight is SBA's planned sale
of its current portfolio of defaulted guaranteed loans and direct loans
in 1999, 2000, and 2001. The Disaster loan portfolio will be sold in
1999 and 2000. Implementation of an ongoing sales program will be based
upon the knowledge gained in these upcoming sales. Drawing on the
experience of Federal agencies such as the Resolution Trust Cor
[[Page 193]]
poration and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and SBA's
analysis of its portfolio value stemming from its Liquidation
Improvement Project, the Administration estimates that SBA's business
loan assets (face value of approximately $2 billion) can be sold at a
gain to the government. It is estimated that disaster loans can be sold
at their current value. These sales are also expected to yield future
operational cost savings.
USDA Rural Infrastructure and Business Development Programs
USDA provides grants, loans, and loan guarantees to communities for
constructing facilities such as health-care clinics, day-care centers,
and water and wastewater systems. Direct loans are available at lower
interest rates for lower-income communities. These programs are targeted
to rural communities with fewer than 10,000 residents.
USDA also provides grants, direct loans, and loan guarantees to assist
rural businesses, including cooperatives, to increase employment and
diversify the rural economy. In 2000, USDA proposes to provide $1
billion in loan guarantees to rural businesses, and $50 million in
direct loans. USDA's assistance to rural businesses has grown from $100
million in 1993 to almost $1.1 billion in 1998. The default rate for
these community programs is low.
The 1996 Farm Bill enacted the Rural Community Assistance Program
(RCAP). Funding for 12 USDA rural development activities was
consolidated into a ``performance partnership'' to provide more
flexibility in targeting Federal assistance to the highest-priority
needs of States and localities. In FY 1997, Congress provided increased
flexibility through three funding ``streams,'' but blocked transfers
among streams. In FY 1998, Congress consolidated the three streams into
one RCAP account, but the FY 1998 and 1999 bills still did not allow
transfers between funding streams. The budget proposes $668 million for
a fully flexible RCAP.
Electric and Telecommunications Loans
USDA's rural electric and telecommunications program makes new loans
to maintain existing infrastructure and to modernize electric and
telephone service. Historically, the Federal risk associated with the
$33 billion loan portfolio in electric and telephone loans has been
small, although several large defaults occurred in the electric program,
primarily as a result of nuclear power construction loans, and $667
million was written off in 1997. However, both the telephone and
electric industries are moving into a more competitive environment.
In the electric industry, increased deregulation may erode loan
security and the ability of some borrowers to repay. Maintaining the
goal of ``affordable, universal service'' is also of concern to USDA.
Many rural cooperatives are by nature high cost providers of
electricity, since there are fewer subscribers per line-mile than in
urban areas. This Budget includes a legislative proposal for a new
direct Electric Loan Program with a loan level of $400 million.
Borrowers would pay an interest rate equal to the Treasury rate. This
loan program would be an additional tool to help provide for the
increasing demand for electric distribution loans as rural borrowers
begin to position themselves in a newly competitive deregulated
environment. The demand for loans to rural electric coops is expected to
continue to rise as borrowers replace many of the 40-year-old electric
plants.
The Rural Telephone Bank (RTB) provides financing for rural
telecommunications systems. The FY 1998 Budget proposed, but did not
achieve, privatization of the RTB. The 2000 Budget proposes legislation
to charter the RTB as a Performance-Based Organization (PBO). As a PBO,
the RTB would remain under the Secretary of Agriculture through majority
Federal membership on the RTB Board of Directors. The RTB's managers
would be required to set strategic and financial goals. A key goal would
be to achieve privatization within 10 years; the RTB would be on-budget
until fully privatized.
As a PBO, the RTB would have authority to hire its own personnel, and
appoint its own CEO and CFO. It could seek waivers from government-wide
regulations, policies, and procedures. Funding for both administrative
expenses and subsidy budget authority would be provided from the RTB
liquidating account balances beginning in 2000. It could establish its
interest rates, charge administrative fees, and retain proceeds from any
negative subsidies for RTB operations. It would also have authority to
prepay its outstanding Treasury borrowing without penalty. This approach
would allow the RTB to establish a private governance structure and
demonstrate its ability to be financially self-sufficient, which should
help prepare it for privatization. A privatization feasibility study
will be required within 3 years.
Loans to Farm Operators
Farm Service Agency (FSA) direct and guaranteed operating loans
provide credit to farmers and ranchers for annual production expenses
and purchases of livestock, machinery, and equipment. Direct and
guaranteed farm ownership loans assist producers in acquiring their
farming or ranching operations. These loans are proposed to increase as
part of USDA's Civil Rights Initiative. As a condition of eligibility
for direct loans, borrowers must have been denied private credit at
reasonable rates and terms, or they must be beginning or socially
disadvantaged farmers. Loans are provided at Treasury rates or 5
percent. As FSA is the ``lender of last resort,'' high defaults and
delinquencies are inherent in the direct loan program; over $15 billion
in direct farm loans have been written off since 1988.
FSA guaranteed farm loans are made to more credit-worthy borrowers who
have access to private credit markets. Because the private loan
originators must retain 10 percent of the risk, they exercise care in
examining borrower repayment ability. As a result, guaran
[[Page 194]]
teed farm loans have not experienced losses as high as those on direct
loans.
The 1999 Appropriations Bill changed portions of the servicing
requirements for delinquent borrowers. A borrower who has received an
FSA loan write-down or write-off may now be eligible for an additional
farm operating loan when the borrower is current under a debt
reorganization plan or in certain emergency circumstances. Property
acquired through foreclosure on direct loans must now be sold at auction
within 105 days of acquisition, and leasing of inventory property is no
longer permitted except to beginning farmers. Prior to the 1996 Farm
Bill, acquired property remained in inventory on average for five years
before the FSA could dispose of it.
The Farm Credit System and Farmer Mac
The Farm Credit System (FCS) and the Federal Agricultural Mortgage
Corporation (Farmer Mac) are GSEs that enhance credit availability for
the agricultural sector. The FCS is a direct lender, financing its loans
largely through bond sales in the national credit markets, while Farmer
Mac facilitates a secondary market for agricultural loans. Both GSEs
face a business risk exceeding that of other GSEs because their
borrowers are generally dependent on a single economic sector:
agriculture. The Farm Credit Banks are also geographically limited,
often to areas dependent on one or a few commodities. The downturn in
the agricultural economy in the 1980s led the FCS to the brink of
insolvency. Legislation in 1987 provided Federal assistance to bail out
the FCS and created Farmer Mac.
The Nation's agricultural sector and its lenders are now on much
firmer ground, although periodic commodity price and income declines,
such as experienced in some parts of the country in 1998, highlight its
continuing volatility. Strong farm income has enabled most borrowers to
improve their debt-to-asset ratios, and lenders to augment their
capital. Farmland prices regained most of their previous levels in 1997
and generally held steady in 1998. Interest rates and inflationary
expectations remain low. Credit usage by farmers and credit standards of
lenders are more conservative. However, the emergence of non-
traditional, trade-credit lenders has increased competition among
lenders.
Another sign of the increasing health of agricultural finance is the
greater share of credit provided by commercial banks. From 1986 to 1997,
commercial banks' share of all farm debt increased from 24 percent to 41
percent, while the share for FCS declined from 29 percent to 26 percent
and for USDA from 12 percent to 6 percent. In 1995, however, FCS's share
of farm operating loans began to creep up--a trend that continued
through 1996, leveling-off in 1997. FCS is expected to maintain 1997
market share levels in 1998 at 19 percent.
The Farm Credit System
The Farm Credit System has achieved positive net income every year in
the past decade, including over $1 billion in each of the last five
years. Nonperforming loans increased slightly to 1.65 percent of the
portfolio, up from 1.5 percent in 1997. Loan volume has gradually
increased since 1992, although the $66.1 billion in September 1998 is
far below the high of over $80 billion in the early 1980s. Increases in
loan volume and declines in the cost of funds have widened the FCS's net
interest margin from less than one percent in 1987 to 2.93 in 1997.
Improved asset quality and income enabled FCS to post record capital
levels: by September 30, 1998, capital stood at $12.4 billion--an
increase of 9 percent for the year, primarily as a result of retained
earnings. Included in this capital are investments set aside to repay
about $600 million of the $1.3 billion of Federal assistance provided
through the Financial Assistance Corporation (FAC) due beginning in
2003. The System has adopted an annual repayment mechanism required of
FCS institutions to cover the remainder. The FCS has further reduced its
risk exposure by retiring all of its high-coupon long-term debt, using
marginal cost loan pricing, and adopting asset/liability management
practices designed to reduce its interest rate risk.
Operating risk is also being reduced. Substantial consolidation has
occurred in the structure of the FCS. In January 1988, there were 12 FCS
districts with 36 banks plus 376 associations; by December 1998, there
were only 6 FCS districts, 8 banks and 189 associations.
The 1987 Act established the FCS Insurance Corporation (FCSIC) to
insure timely payment of interest and principal on FCS obligations.
Insurance fund balances, largely comprised of premiums paid by FCS
institutions, supplement the System's capital, the joint and several
liability of all System banks for FCS obligations, and the Farm Credit
Administration's enforcement authorities. On September 30, 1998, the
Insurance Fund's net assets were $1.2 billion, and are estimated to
attain the statutorially required level of two percent of outstanding
debt in 2000.
Improvement in the FCS' financial condition is also reflected in the
evaluations of FCS member institutions by the Farm Credit Administration
(FCA), its Federal regulator. The FCA rates each of the System's
institutions for capital, asset quality, management, earnings, and
liquidity (CAMEL). At the end of 1990, 94 institutions carried the best
``CAMEL'' ratings of ``1'' or ``2,'' and 40 were rated in the problem
range of ``4'' or ``5.'' By September 1998, in contrast, 201
institutions were given the top ratings, only 3 received the mid-range
rating of ``3,'' and none was rated ``4.'' Enforcement actions to
correct illegal or unsafe operations were applied to 77 institutions,
with 80 percent of the FCS's assets, in 1991, but only 1 institution,
with 0.5 percent of the FCS's assets, in 1998.
FCS loans outstanding as of September 1998 were $66 billion, up 5
percent over 1997, and representing a 32 percent increase since 1990.
Loans to farmers and other eligible producers comprise 73 percent of the
System's portfolio. The volume of lending secured by farm land has been
generally stagnant since 1990, but farm operating loans have increased
by 41 percent since
[[Page 195]]
1992, with most of the gain since 1994. Loans to finance processing,
marketing, credit cooperatives, and rural utilities cooperatives
accounted for 21 percent of FCS's portfolio at fiscal year-end 1998.
During 1997, the FCA published regulations that expand the
agriculture-related business loan-making authority of Farm Credit System
banks. Previously, System banks could only lend to businesses that
provided custom services performed on the customer's farm, such as
hiring owner/operators of harvesting machinery. Under the revised rules,
farm-related businesses are eligible for full-firm financing if more
than 50 percent of their income is derived from farm-related services.
Furthermore, if less than 50 percent of the firm's income is farm-
service related, then at least the farm-related service portion of the
firm's business is eligible for financing. The rule also permits Farm
Credit banks to finance non-farm, single-family, moderately priced homes
for residents of rural areas (where the population does not exceed 2,500
in a village or town).
The Farm Credit System is stronger now than it has been in years. But
primarily due to its concentration in agriculture, it is exposed to
risks arising from natural disasters, changes in Government policies
toward agriculture, and to structural changes in the agricultural and
commercial banking sectors. From 1995 through 1998, FCS's loan growth
rate increased, in part due to more aggressive lending as its capital
strengthened. Volatility of agricultural exports and crop prices will
continue to be a risk factor for future repayment and collateral
capacity. However, 1998 farm income, including government assistance, is
anticipated be the fourth highest on record at $48 billion, down from
$49.8 billion in 1997.
Farmer Mac
Farmer Mac was established in 1987 to create and oversee a secondary
market for, and to guarantee securities based on, farm real estate and
rural housing loans. Since the 1987 Act, Farmer Mac's authorities have
been legislatively expanded to permit it to issue its own debt
securities, and to purchase and securitize the guaranteed portions of
farm program, rural business, and community development loans guaranteed
by the USDA (known as the ``Farmer Mac II'' program). The Farm Credit
System Reform Act of 1996 transformed Farmer Mac from just a guarantor
of securities formed from loan pools into a direct purchaser of
mortgages in order to form pools to securitize.
The 1996 Act was passed in response to a steady erosion of Farmer
Mac's capital base. Revenues had not met expectations and showed no
prospect of improvement. The new powers increase commercial banks'
incentives to participate in Farmer Mac. However, these powers also
subject the Corporation to more credit risk. As a direct purchaser of
loans with no required subordination, Farmer Mac is exposed to greater
risk and must set appropriate fees and level of capital reserves.
Farmer Mac has taken steps to minimize losses on securitized loans
under the new authorities. These steps include: (1) a higher annual
guarantee fee of 50 basis points on securitized loans, (2) a loan loss
reserve adequate to cover anticipated losses, and (3) loan underwriting
standards that include a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 70 percent for
loans up to $2.3 million and 60 percent for loans between $2.3 million
and $3.3 million.
The 1996 Act gave Farmer Mac three additional years to reach its
capital requirements, and 2 years to raise capital to $25 million. In
December 1996, Farmer Mac sold 1.4 million shares of Class C common
stock, generating $32 million of new equity. In November 1997, Farmer
Mac completed its second public offering, selling 400,000 shares of
Class C common stock and raising $23 million of new equity. Farmer Mac's
year-end 1998 capital is estimated to be about $80 million--three times
greater than the 1996 statutory capital requirement and fully compliant
with the revised regulatory capital requirements.
International Credit Programs
Seven Federal agencies, the Departments of Agriculture, Defense,
State, and Treasury and the Agency for International Development, the
Export-Import Bank, and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation,
provide direct loans, loan guarantees, and insurance to a variety of
foreign private and sovereign borrowers.
Through the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee (TPCC), agencies
providing export credit have developed a unified National Export
Strategy, and they are working together to make the delivery of trade
promotion support more effective and convenient for U.S. exporters.
Leveling the playing field. The Federal Government provides credit to
U.S. exporters to offset the subsidies that foreign governments, largely
in Europe and Japan, provide their exporters usually through export
credit agencies (ECAs). Although the Arrangement on Official Export
Credits of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD) has significantly constrained direct interest rate subsidies and
tied-aid grants, foreign ECAs continue to provide implicit subsidies (by
charging interest rates or fees that do not fully compensate for risk).
The Export-Import Bank (Eximbank) attempts to strategically ``level
the playing field'' and to fill gaps in the availability of private
export credit. Compared to the other major ECAs, Eximbank provides the
most unrestricted financing, and provides this financing in almost twice
as many markets as its nearest competitor.
USDA's GSM-102 and 103 programs guarantee credit extended by private
U.S. exporters and U.S. financial
[[Page 196]]
institutions to facilitate exports to buyers in countries where credit
is necessary to maintain or increase U.S. sales. The GSM programs are
targeted to countries where government guarantees are needed to counter
competition from countries that offer credit through ECAs or commodity
marketing boards.
The increase in world trade and the globalization of capital markets
have officially supported direct and guaranteed credit, including export
credit, somewhat less important in recent years. Aggregate net resource
flows to all developing countries grew from $144 billion in 1992 to $300
billion in 1997. In comparison, resource flows from official direct or
guaranteed credit fell from $23 billion in 1992 to $10 billion in 1997.
Stabilizing international financial and commercial markets. In today's
global economy, the health and prosperity of the American economy depend
importantly on the stability of the global financial system and the
economic health of our major trading partners. The United States has
several ways in which it can help to stabilize world financial markets.
It can provide resources on a multilateral basis through the IMF
(discussed in other sections of the President's Budget), or through a
bilateral loan provided by the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF).
The ESF provides ``bridge loans'' to other countries in times of
short-term liquidity problems and financial crises. In the past,
``bridge loans'' from ESF have usually provided dollars to a country
over the short period before the first disbursement under an IMF loan. A
$12.5 billion ``bridge loan'' of ESF was provided to Mexico during its
crisis in 1995. This loan was essential in helping to stabilize Mexico,
as well as the global financial markets. Mexico paid back its loan ahead
of schedule in 1997, and the loan didn't cost the taxpayers any money.
ESF support was offered in response to the crises in some Asian
economies, including South Korea. These ESF facilities would have
carried interest rates that would have resulted in zero subsidy cost for
the United States as defined under credit reform. While the ESF was not
drawn upon by any of these countries, the offer in and of itself helped
to provide the international confidence needed by these countries to
begin the stabilization process.
Export credit programs also help to ensure continued access for US
exporters to important overseas markets facing liquid problems. In
response to the Asian financial crisis, USDA's GSM programs in FY 1998
were expanded by 40 percent (to $4 billion) over the previous year to
assist these countries in meeting their food and agricultural import
needs.
Supporting more manufacturing exports in more markets. In FY 1998, Ex-
Im Bank supported exports totaling $13 billion with a budget of $683
million. Ex-Im Bank's role is particularly critical now, because banks
have rolled back, or stopped in some cases, providing credit to many
developing countries that are key markets for U.S. exports. The FY 2000
budget proposes $81 million in additional funds for Ex-Im Bank--10
percent above its FY 1999 budget of $815 million--so that Ex-Im Bank
can:
Help meet the demand for financing aircraft and capital
equipment exports in developing markets. One of every four
U.S. commercial aircraft is sold to an Asian airline, but
commercial credit has decreased drastically because of Asia's
economic problems. Ex-Im Bank currently finances 10 percent of
all U.S. capital equipment exports to the developing world.
More funding will allow Ex-Im to provide significantly more
long-term financing for exports of U.S. manufactured capital
goods and aircraft.
Expand short-term and medium-term credit to keep U.S.
products flowing to emerging markets where private sector
financing is no longer available. Ex-Im Bank supported 2,400
transactions involving more than $1 billion in U.S. exports to
Korea in 1998 (up from $50 million in 1997). Ex-Im has been
active in expanding support for U.S. businesses seeking to
sell goods and services to Brazil. To date in FY 1999, Ex-Im
has opened for financing short-, medium-, and long-term
transactions in the public sector and has increased its credit
limit to certain Brazilian banks seeking to purchase U.S.
products.
Finance exports to riskier markets. U.S. exporters
increasingly seek Ex-Im financing to meet the demand in
riskier markets, but the higher cost of providing such
financing strains Ex-Im's budget. Ex-Im support is critical in
these markets because bank financing often is unavailable, and
U.S. exporters compete with government-financed foreign firms.
Using credit to promote sustainable development. Credit has become an
increasingly important tool in U.S. bilateral assistance to promote
sustainable development. USAID received funding through transfer
authority in the FY 1998 budget for a new credit program, the
Development Credit Authority (DCA). The DCA will provide loan guarantees
in cases where credit is the most effective mechanism to achieve
sustainable development, such as more effective financial markets or
reductions in global climate change-causing emissions. Increased funding
for this program has been requested in the FY 2000 budget. However,
these funds cannot be used until OMB certifies that USAID can adequately
manage its credit programs, as required in the FY 1998 Foreign
Operations Appropriations Act. USAID is outsourcing many of its credit
management activities in order to comply with this requirement.
OPIC investment guarantees also support development by promoting U.S.
direct investment in developing countries. This can transfer skills and
technology and create more efficient financial markets. OPIC has
implemented investment funds, on-lending facilities, and bond
insurance--building onto its traditional political risk insurance,
lending, and guarantee products.
[[Page 197]]
International lending cost estimates. Since 1992, the President's
budget requests have used the same assumptions about default risk in
international lending. These assumptions became less accurate given the
changes in financial markets over the last six years. In addition, due
to the scarcity of emerging market debt information in 1992, these
assumptions were based on domestic corporate bond risk spreads, rather
than international bond market data.
Beginning with the FY 1999 budget, new assumptions about default risk,
as defined by the risk premia set for each country-risk category in the
International Country Risk Assessment System (ICRAS), were used to
estimate the cost of U.S. Government international lending. The new
premia reflect the risk spreads observed on international debt market
instruments from 1992 to 1997 for a variety of risk categories. These
new cost estimates will continue to be updated and refined over time,
given agencies' default experience and additional observation of
emerging market debt data.
The ``subsidy cost'' of international credit programs is the
government's contribution to an agency's long-term expense from
extending a foreign credit, excluding administrative costs. Agency
subsidy rates depend not only on the international lending risks
measured by the ICRAS risk premia, but also on what fees or subsidies
(such as below-market interest rates) the agencies offer with their
credits, and on transaction-specific risks for credits that do not have
a sovereign guarantee from the beneficiary country. Most international
credit agencies charge borrowers fees that substantially offset the cost
due to credit risk. The FY 2000 Budget Credit Supplement shows lending
terms and subsidy rates for each international credit agency.
III. INSURANCE PROGRAMS
Deposit Insurance
Federal deposit insurance was begun in the 1930s to protect depositors
against losses from failures of insured institutions. Deposit insurance
also protects the Nation against widespread disruption in financial
markets by reducing the probability that the failure of one financial
institution will lead to a cascade of other failures. The Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insures the deposits of banks and
savings associations (thrifts) through separate insurance funds, the
Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) and the Savings Association Insurance Fund
(SAIF). Deposits of credit unions are insured through the National
Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
Deposits are currently insured up to $100,000 per account. The FDIC
insures about $2.8 trillion at over 8,900 commercial banks and about
1,700 savings institutions. The NCUA insures 11,125 credit unions with
$308 billion in insured deposits.
Current Industry and Insurance Fund Conditions. The 1980s and early
1990s were a turbulent period for the bank and thrift industries, with
over 1,400 bank failures and 1,100 thrift failures. The Federal
Government responded with the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery
and Enforcement Act of 1989 and the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation Improvement Act of 1991. These reforms, combined with more
favorable economic conditions, helped to restore the health of
depository institutions and the deposit insurance system. No thrifts
have failed in the last two years, and only three relatively small
commercial banks failed during 1998. Nineteen credit unions with $15
million in assets failed during 1998. The FDIC currently classifies only
88 institutions with $8 billion in assets as ``problem'' institutions,
compared to nearly 575 institutions with over $300 billion in assets
just five years ago.
Banks have achieved record levels of earnings in recent years, which
enabled the industry to recapitalize BIF in 1995 up to its statutorily-
designated reserve ratio of 1.25 percent of insured deposits. As of
September 30, 1998, BIF had estimated reserves of $29 billion, 1.41
percent of insured deposits.
The earnings of the thrift industry also have improved significantly
in recent years. With record profits again in 1998, the industry remains
in strong financial condition despite enactment of the Deposit Insurance
Funds Act of 1996 (DIFA) which imposed a $4.5 billion special assessment
to bring SAIF's reserves up to 1.25 percent of insured deposits. By
September 30, 1998, SAIF's reserves reached an estimated $9.7 billion or
1.39 percent of insured deposits. However, on January 1, 1999, in
accordance with the DIFA, the FDIC was required to transfer all funds in
the SAIF above 1.25 percent to a Special Reserve. Approximately $1
billion was transferred and is available only if SAIF's reserve ratio
falls below 0.625 percent.
The FDIC continues to maintain deposit insurance premiums in a range
from zero for the healthiest institutions to 27 cents per $100 of
deposits for the riskiest institutions. Due to the strong financial
condition of the industry and the insurance funds, 95 percent of
commercial banks and 92 percent of thrifts did not pay insurance
premiums in 1998.
The National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF) also remains
strong with assets of $3.8 billion. Each insured credit union is
required to deposit and maintain in the fund an amount equal to 1
percent of its member share accounts. In 1998, the income generated from
the 1 percent deposit eliminated the need to assess an additional
insurance premium, and after the end of the fiscal year, the NCUA Board
approved a dividend to reduce the Fund's equity ratio to the statutory
ceiling of 1.30 percent. This was the fourth consecutive year that the
Fund paid a dividend to feder
[[Page 198]]
ally insured credit unions. The Board also waived premiums for 1999.
Although depository institutions and their Federal insurance funds
currently are in good financial condition, the U. S. economy has
experienced strong growth in recent years. This trend is unlikely to
continue indefinitely. An economic downturn, international events or
other changes in the industry could put pressure on industry profits and
ultimately the deposit insurance funds. In the last quarter of fiscal
1998, some large banks reported lower-than-expected earnings from their
international operations due to recent international economic crises.
Legislative, Judicial and Regulatory Developments. Recent marketplace
and regulatory changes highlight the importance of financial
modernization in a rapidly changing financial market. Depository
institutions have faced increasing competition from non-bank providers
of financial services in recent years. Legislative and regulatory
changes that alter depository institution charters and/or expand the
range of permissible activities for bank subsidiaries, holding
companies, or affiliates will contribute to increasing integration and
efficiency in the financial services sector.
In May 1997, the Administration presented to Congress its
recommendations for modernizing the financial services industry and
developing a common depository institution charter. The Administration's
proposal would have removed Depression-era barriers to competition,
preserved the safety and soundness of our Nation's depository
institutions, and protected consumer rights. The proposal also would
have promoted competition and efficiency within the industry, fostering
the creation of new products and services and benefiting consumers.
However, Congress did not pass legislation to modernize the financial
services industry during the last session.
On February 25, 1998, the Supreme Court (in National Credit Union
Administration v. First National Bank and AT&T Family Federal Credit
Union v. First National Bank) struck down NCUA's longstanding policy of
allowing credit unions to accept members from multiple fields of
membership. On August 7, 1998, the President signed the Credit Union
Membership Access Act, overturning the Supreme Court's ruling and
allowing credit unions to accept members from multiple employers with
fewer than 3,000 employees. This will allow smaller firms and
associations greater opportunity to offer credit union services to their
employees and members. NCUA promulgated rules to implement this
legislation in January 1999, which is expected to increase the growth
rate and total size of credit unions and the NCUSIF.
The Federal regulators of depository institutions (FDIC, Comptroller
of the Currency, Office of Thrift Supervision, NCUA, and the Federal
Reserve) are aggressively reaching out to educate banks, thrifts, and
credit unions about the ``Year 2000 Problem,'' which refers to the
possibility that information technology and computer-aided systems may
malfunction on January 1, 2000 due to computer programming that reads
the date improperly. The regulators are conducting on-site examinations
of depository institutions and some of their service providers. They are
prepared to close institutions which fail to prevent disruptions to the
financial and payments systems and to protect depositors. As a result of
regulators' actions, the vast majority of depository institutions should
be ready for the Year 2000 date change well in advance of January 1,
2000.
Pension Guarantees
The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) insures most defined-
benefit pension plans sponsored by private employers. PBGC pays the
benefits guaranteed by law when a company with an underfunded pension
plan becomes insolvent. PBGC's exposure to claims relates to the
underfunding of pension plans, that is, to any amount by which expected
future benefits exceed plan assets. In the near term, its loss exposure
results from financially distressed firms with underfunded plans. In the
longer term, additional loss exposure results from firms that are
currently healthy but become distressed, and from changes in the funding
of plans and their investment results.
The number of plans insured by PBGC has been declining as small
companies with defined benefit plans terminate them and shift to defined
contribution pension arrangements such as 401(k) accounts. The number of
plans with 1,000 or more participants has increased slightly since 1980.
However, the number of active workers in defined benefit plans declined
from 29 million in 1985 to fewer than 25 million in 1994. If the trend
continues, by 2005 fewer than half of the participants in defined
benefit plans will be active workers.
In 1998, PBGC posted a positive financial position for the third
straight year after 21 years of being in a deficit position. This was
due to good economic conditions and favorable investment returns. But
risk remains. That risk has been reduced somewhat by steps taken by PBGC
and the Congress. Since 1990, PBGC has been working to more actively to
prevent and mitigate losses. Under its Early Warning Program, PBGC has
negotiated more than 75 major settlements, providing more than $16
billion in new pension contributions from companies and improving
pension security for 1.8 million people. In 1995, the Early Warning
Program was one of the first six Federal programs to receive an award
from the Ford Foundation and Harvard's Kennedy School of Government. The
program also received the National Performance Review's Hammer Award.
The Retirement Protection Act of 1994 (RPA) also is strengthening
PBGC's financial condition. The RPA requires companies to increase their
contributions to underfunded plans over 10 to 15 years, and relates
companies' premiums more fairly to PBGC's exposure by increasing the
insurance premiums for those pension plans that are the most
underfunded. RPA also required companies to notify participants if the
plan is
[[Page 199]]
less than 90 percent funded, so companies have increased funding to
avoid giving this notice. In addition, RPA requires privately held
companies with seriously underfunded plans to give PBGC advance notice
of certain transactions that potentially are harmful to their plans.
PBGC fared well in 1998. There were no major plan terminations, and
investment performance was strong. Premium revenues dropped somewhat,
largely reflecting lower underfunding-related premiums because of
improved pension funding and a previously-enacted increase in the
statutory interest rate for calculating the underfunding.
The multiemployer program guarantees pension benefits of certain
unionized plans offered by several employers in an industry. The program
continues to be financially strong. The Administration proposes to
increase the maximum guarantee level on pension benefits paid to
retirees for the first time since 1980. It would be increased from
$5,580 to $12,870 per year for retirees with 30 years of service.
This budget proposes a new and simplified defined-benefit pension plan
for small businesses, featuring accounts for individual participants.
Unlike defined-contribution plans, the new plan guarantees a known level
of annual income throughout a worker's retirement years. The new plan is
designed to be fully funded virtually constantly, but also would be
protected by PBGC at a reduced premium. The budget also proposes
expanding the PBGC's missing participant program to multiemployer and
defined-contribution plans.
Disaster Insurance
Flood Insurance
The Federal Government provides flood insurance through the National
Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) administered by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA). This insurance is available to property owners
living in communities that have adopted and enforced appropriate
floodplain management measures. Coverage is limited to buildings and
their contents. Policies for structures built before a community joined
the flood insurance program are subsidized by law, while policies for
structures built after a community joined the NFIP are actuarially
rated.
When the Federal flood insurance program was created in the early
1970s, private insurance companies, with little information on flood
risks by geographic area, had deemed the risk of floods uninsurable. In
response, the NFIP provided insurance coverage, required building
standards and other mitigation efforts to reduce losses, and undertook
flood hazard mapping to quantify the geographic risk of flooding. The
program has substantially met these goals.
The flood insurance policy base grew by approximately 10 percent from
1997 to 1998, exceeding the goal of a 5 percent increase set in 1997.
The NFIP's ``Cover America'' initiative, which is a major marketing and
advertising campaign, should continue to increase awareness of flood
insurance and educate people about the risks of floods. FEMA is using
three strategies to increase the number of flood insurance policies in
force: lender compliance, program simplification, and expanded
marketing.
The NFIP's Community Rating System (CRS) now allows policyholders in
over 900 communities to receive discounts of at least 5 percent on their
premiums by undertaking activities which will reduce flood losses,
facilitate more accurate insurance rating, and promote public awareness
of flood insurance and flood risk.
In 1997, the NFIP offered expanded insurance to cover increased costs
of compliance (ICC), as authorized by the National Flood Insurance
Reform Act of 1994. This separate coverage, which took effect May 1,
1997, allows repetitively flooded or substantially damaged structures to
be rebuilt in accordance with existing floodplain management
requirements. This will reduce the amount and cost of future flood
damage and allow those structures to be actuarially rated.
In 1999 and 2000, FEMA will continue efforts to reduce future flood
damage by educating Federal financial regulators about mandatory flood
insurance requirements for federally related home and business loans on
properties located in flood hazard areas; simplifying policy language;
using mitigation insurance to allow flood victims to rebuild to code,
thereby reducing future flood damage costs; and using flood insurance
premium adjustments to encourage community and State mitigation
activities beyond those required by the NFIP.
The President's FY 2000 budget proposes two additional reforms of this
program. First, $12 million is requested to begin the process of
purchasing and/or elevating insured properties that have filed four or
more flood insurance claims over the last 10 years. This effort will
ultimately result in lower claims payments. Second, the budget includes
a proposal to charge a $15 mortgage transaction fee, to supplement a
request of $5 million in discretionary funds, to support a multi-year
program to update and modernize FEMA's inventory of floodplain maps.
These maps are essential in developing appropriate risk-based flood
insurance premium charges, will ensure that property owners have
appropriate levels of insurance, and will result in a more actuarially
sound program.
Crop Insurance
Subsidized Federal crop insurance administered by USDA assists farmers
in managing yield shortfalls due to bad weather or other natural
disasters. Private companies are unwilling to offer multi-peril crop
insurance because losses tend to be correlated across geographic areas,
and the companies are therefore exposed to large losses. For example, a
drought will affect many farms at the same time. Damage from hail, on
the other hand, tends to be more localized, and a private market for
hail insurance has existed for over 100 years.
The USDA crop insurance program is a cooperative effort between the
Federal Government and the private insurance industry. Private insurance
companies sell
[[Page 200]]
and adjust crop insurance policies. The Federal Government reimburses
private companies for the administrative expenses associated with
extending crop insurance and reinsures the private companies for excess
insurance losses on all policies. The Federal Government also subsidizes
premiums for farmers.
A major program reform was enacted in 1994 to address a growing
problem caused by the repeated provision of Federal ad hoc agricultural
disaster payments. Participation in the crop insurance program had been
kept low by the availability of post-event disaster aid to farmers from
the Federal Government. Because disaster payments were no-cost grants,
farmers had little incentive to purchase Federal crop insurance. The
1994 reform repealed agricultural disaster payment authorities and
substituted a ``catastrophic'' insurance policy that indemnifies farmers
at a rate roughly equal to the previous disaster payments. The
catastrophic policy is free to farmers except for an administrative fee.
Private companies sell and adjust the catastrophic portion of the crop
insurance program, and also provide higher levels of coverage (which are
also federally subsidized.) In 1995, 82 percent of eligible acres
particiated in the program--140 percent over 1994. However, the 1996
Farm Bill eliminated the requirement that farmers participating in
USDA's commodity programs carry crop insurance, and participation
dropped in 1997 to an estimated 61 percent of eligible acres.
The 1996 Farm Bill significantly changed the commodity programs and
associated price and income support for farmers. The President's signing
statement for the Farm Bill stated: ``The fixed payments in the bill do
not adjust to changes in market conditions, which would leave farmers,
and the rural communities in which they live, vulnerable to reductions
in crop prices or yields. I am firmly committed to submitting
legislation and working with the Congress next year to strengthen the
farm safety net.'' To begin to address the safety net problem, the 1998
Budget proposed to expand the crop insurance program to include
``revenue insurance'' coverage. Revenue insurance protects farmers
against lost revenue caused by low prices, low yields, or any
combination of the two. Revenue insurance programs are now available in
36 states and further expansion is being studied. The Administration
will work with the Congress to enact further improvements to the Crop
Insurance program in 1999.
To ensure that sufficient funding is available to provide agent sales
commissions, the 1998 Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education
Reform Act shifted Federal funding to reimburse this private sector
administrative costs shifted from discretionary spending back to
mandatory spending through the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation Fund.
Further, the Administration developed, and Congress adopted, a
combination of program changes to reduce program costs such as reducing
the reimbursement rate paid to the private insurance companies from the
current 27 percent of premium to 25 percent and increasing
administrative fees.
[[Page 201]]
[[Page 202]]
Table 8-1. ESTIMATED FUTURE COST OF OUTSTANDING FEDERAL AND FEDERALLY ASSISTED CREDIT PROGRAMS
(in billions of dollars)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Outstanding Future Costs of Outstanding Future Costs of
Program 1997 1997 1998 1998
Outstanding \1\ Outstanding \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Direct Loans: \2\
Federal Student Loan Programs................... 35 1 49 2
Farm Service Agency (excl.CCC), Rural
Development, Rural Housing..................... 47 14 46 14
Rural Electrification Admin. and Rural Telephone
Bank........................................... 30 6 30 4
Housing and Urban Development................... 13 3 14 2
Agency for International Development............ 13 6 12 6
Public Law 480.................................. 11 7 11 7
Export-Import Bank.............................. 10 2 11 3
Commodity Credit Corporation.................... 9 1 9 2
Federal Communications Commission............... 7 1 7 2
Disaster Assistance............................. 10 ............... 7 1
Other Direct Loans.............................. 11 1 21 5
-------------------------------------------------------------
Total Direct Loans.............................. 196 41 217 45
-------------------------------------------------------------
Loan Guarantees: \2\
FHA Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund.............. 361 -1 380 -2
VA Mortgage..................................... 170 4 200 5
Federal Family Education Loan Program........... 96 13 101 4
FHA General/Special Risk Insurance Fund......... 88 7 89 7
Small Business.................................. 34 2 37 2
Export-Import Bank.............................. 22 ............... 22 1
International Assistance........................ 18 1 19 1
Farm Service Agency and Rural Housing........... 12 ............... 14 ...............
Other Loan Guarantees........................... 21 4 20 4
-------------------------------------------------------------
Total Loan Guarantees........................... 822 30 882 22
-------------------------------------------------------------
Total Federal Credit............................ 1,018 72 1,099 67
-------------------------------------------------------------
Government-Sponsored Enterprises: \3\
Federal National Mortgage Association........... 862 ............... 989 ...............
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.......... 627 ............... 702 ...............
Federal Home Loan Banks \4\..................... 182 ............... 238 ...............
Student Loan Marketing Association \5\.......... ............ ............... ............ ...............
Farm Credit System.............................. 59 ............... 60 ...............
-------------------------------------------------------------
Total Government-Sponsored Enterprises.......... 1,730 ............... 1,989 ...............
=============================================================
Total....................................... 2,748 72 3,088 67
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Direct loan future costs are the financing account allowance for subsidy cost and the liquidating account
allowance for estimated uncollectible principal and interest. Loan guarantee future costs are estimated
liabilites for loan guarantees.
\2\ Excludes loans and guarantees by deposit insurance agencies and programs not included under credit reform,
such as CCC farm supports. Defaulted guaranteed loans which become loans receivable are accounted for as
direct loans.
\3\ Net of purchases of federally guaranteed loans.
\4\ The lending by the Federal Home Loans Banks measures their advances to member thrift and other financial
institutions. In addition, their investment in private financial instruments at the end of 1998 was $135
billion, including federally guaranteed securities and GSE securities.
\5\ The face value and Federal costs of Federal Family Education Loans in Student Loan Marketing Association's
portfolio are included in the account of that program under guaranteed loans above.
[[Page 203]]
Table 8-2. REESTIMATES OF CREDIT SUBSIDIES ON LOANS DISBURSED BETWEEN 1992--1998 \1\
(In millions of dollars)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Direct Loans:
Agriculture credit insurance fund................................................... -72 28 2 -31 23 .........
Agricultural conservation........................................................... -1 ......... ......... ......... ......... .........
Rural electrification and telephone loans........................................... * 61 -37 84 ......... -79
Rural telephone bank................................................................ 1 ......... ......... 10 ......... -12
Rural housing insurance fund........................................................ 2 152 46 -73 ......... 82
Rural economic development loans.................................................... ......... ......... ......... 1 ......... -2
Rural development loan program...................................................... ......... 1 ......... ......... ......... -7
Rural community advancement program \2\............................................. ......... ......... ......... 8 ......... 4
P.L. 480 Title I loan program....................................................... ......... ......... -37 -1 ......... .........
Federal direct student loans........................................................ ......... ......... 3 -83 172 -361
Bureau of Reclamation direct loans.................................................. ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 3
BIA-Indian direct loans............................................................. ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 18
High priority corridor loans........................................................ ......... ......... ......... ......... -3 .........
Veterans housing benefit program fund............................................... -39 30 76 -72 465 -22
Foreign military financing.......................................................... ......... ......... ......... 13 4 2
SBA-Disaster loans.................................................................. ......... ......... ......... ......... -193 -227
Export-Import Bank direct loans..................................................... -28 -16 37 ......... ......... .........
Spectrum auction program............................................................ ......... ......... ......... ......... 4,592 .........
Loan Guarantees:
Agriculture credit insurance fund................................................... 5 14 12 -51 96 .........
Commodity Credit Corporation export guarantees...................................... 3 103 -426 343 ......... .........
Rural development insurance fund.................................................... 49 ......... ......... -3 ......... .........
Rural housing insurance fund........................................................ 2 10 7 -10 ......... 122
Rural community advancement program \2\............................................. ......... ......... ......... -10 ......... 49
P.L. 480 Title I Food for Progress credits.......................................... ......... 84 -38 ......... ......... .........
Fisheries finance, guaranteed loans................................................. ......... ......... ......... ......... -2 .........
Federal family education (formerly GSL): \3\
Technical reestimate.............................................................. 97 421 60 ......... ......... 63
Volume reestimate................................................................. ......... ......... 535 99 ......... -216
FHA-Mutual mortgage................................................................. ......... ......... ......... -340 ......... 1,264
FHA-General and special risk........................................................ -175 ......... -110 -25 743 .........
BIA-Indian guaranteed loans......................................................... ......... ......... ......... 31 ......... -17
Maritime guaranteed loans (Title XI)................................................ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... -85
Veterans housing benefit fund guarantees............................................ -447 167 334 -706 38 34
AID housing guaranty................................................................ -2 -1 -7 ......... -14 .........
SBA-Business loans.................................................................. ......... ......... 257 -16 -279 -545
Export-Import Bank guarantees....................................................... -11 -59 13 ......... ......... .........
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................................................................. -616 995 727 -832 5,642 68
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* $500 thousand or less.
\1\ Additional information on credit reform subsidy rates is contained in the Federal Credit Supplement to the budget for 2000.
\2\ Includes rural water and waste disposal, rural community facilities, and rural business and industry programs.
\3\ Volume reestimates in mandatory programs represent a change in volume of loans disbursed in the prior years. These estimates are the result of
guarantee programs where data from loan issuers on actual disbursements of loans are not received until after the close of the fiscal year.
[[Page 204]]
Table 8-3. ESTIMATED 2000 SUBSIDY RATES, BUDGET AUTHORITY, AND LOAN LEVELS FOR DIRECT LOANS \1\
(in millions of dollars)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted
average Subsidy Estimated
Agency and Program subsidy as a budget loan
percentage of authority levels
disbursements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agriculture:
Agricultural credit insurance fund..................................... 4.86 38 782
Rural community advancement program.................................... 5.99 72 1,200
Rural electrification and telecommunications loans..................... 0.60 9 1,470
Rural telephone bank................................................... 1.88 3 175
Distance learning and telemedicine program............................. 0.35 1 200
Rural housing insurance fund........................................... 12.24 156 1,274
Rural development loan fund............................................ 31.95 33 102
Rural economic development loans....................................... 23.02 3 15
P.L. 480............................................................... 82.46 114 138
Commerce:
Fisheries finance...................................................... 1.00 1 56
Education:
Federal direct student loan program \2\................................ -5.16 -918 17,783
Housing and Urban Development:
FHA-mutual mortgage insurance.......................................... ............. .......... 50
FHA-General and special risk........................................... ............. .......... 50
Interior:
Bureau of reclamation loan............................................. 27.91 12 43
State:
Repatriation loans..................................................... 80.00 1 1
Transportation:
Minority business resource center...................................... 11.00 2 14
Federal-aid highways................................................... 9.00 79 884
Treasury:
Community development financial institutions fund...................... 31.05 17 53
Veterans Affairs:
Miscellaneous veterans housing loans................................... 7.72 .......... 21
Miscellaneous Veterans Programs loan fund.............................. 35.02 .......... 3
Veterans housing benefit program fund.................................. 10.79 70 648
Federal Emergency Management Agency:
Disaster assistance direct loan........................................ 4.15 2 25
International Assistance Programs:
Overseas private investment corporation................................ 11.00 14 130
Small Business Administration:
Disaster loans......................................................... 22.20 39 176
Business loans......................................................... 8.54 4 47
Other Independent Agencies:
Export Import Bank loans............................................... 1.90 32 1,687
--------------------------------------
Total................................................................ -0.57 -216 27,027
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Additional information on credit subsidy rates is contained in the Federal Credit Supplement.
\2\ Excludes savings from proposed modifications.
[[Page 205]]
Table 8-4. ESTIMATED 2000 SUBSIDY RATES, BUDGET AUTHORITY, AND LOAN LEVELS FOR LOAN GUARANTEES \1\
(in millions of dollars)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted
average Subsidy Estimated
Agency and Program subsidy as a budget loan
percentage of authority levels
disbursements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agriculture:
Agricultural credit insurance fund..................................... 1.57 35 2,226
Commodity Credit Corporation export loans.............................. 9.76 440 4,506
Rural community advancement program.................................... 2.28 29 1,285
Rural housing insurance fund........................................... 0.56 20 3,400
Defense--Military:
Defense, Family Housing Improvement Fund............................... 4.70 33 697
Education:
Federal family education loan \2\...................................... 12.12 3,371 27,780
Health and Human Services:
Health Resources and Services.......................................... 2.41 4 51
Housing and Urban Development:
Indian housing loan guarantee fund..................................... 8.13 6 72
Native American housing block grant.................................... 11.07 5 45
Community development loan guarantees.................................. 2.30 29 1,261
America's private investment companies................................. 3.60 36 1,000
FHA-mutual mortgage insurance.......................................... -1.99 -2,048 120,000
FHA-General and special risk \3\....................................... 0.48 .......... 18,100
Interior:
Indian guaranteed loan................................................. 7.54 4 60
Transportation:
Maritime guaranteed loan (Title XI).................................... 5.01 6 120
Veterans Affairs:
Miscellaneous veterans housing loans................................... 48.25 3 7
Veterans housing benefit program fund.................................. 0.68 212 31,237
International Assistance Programs:
Micro and small enterprise development................................. 4.94 1 30
Urban and environmental credit......................................... 1.15 3 26
Development credit authority........................................... 6.50 13 200
Overseas private investment corporation................................ 1.00 10 1,000
Small Business Administration:
Business loans......................................................... 1.13 144 16,159
Other Independent Agencies:
Export Import Bank loans............................................... 5.84 807 13,825
Presidio Trust......................................................... 0.52 1 200
--------------------------------------
Total................................................................ 1.47 3,165 243,287
--------------------------------------
ADDENDUM: SECONDARY GUARANTEED LOAN COMMITMENT LIMITATIONS
GNMA:
Guarantees of mortgage-backed securities loan guarantee................ -0.33 -422 200,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Additional information on credit subsidy rates is contained in the Federal Credit Supplement.
\2\ Excludes savings from proposed modifications.
\3\ Subsidy will be financed by $153 million of unobligated balances.
[[Page 206]]
Table 8-5. SUMMARY OF FEDERAL DIRECT LOANS AND LOAN GUARANTEES
(In billions of dollars)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actual Estimate
-----------------------------------------------------------
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Direct Loans:
Obligations..................................... 30.9 23.4 33.6 28.8 38.5 37.9
Disbursements................................... 22.0 23.6 32.2 28.7 39.6 36.2
Subsidy budget authority \1\.................... 2.6 1.8 2.4 6.5 1.1 -0.2
Loan Guarantees: \2\
Commitments..................................... 138.5 175.4 172.3 218.4 216.5 237.6
Lender Disbursements............................ 117.9 143.9 144.7 199.5 192.9 203.0
Subsidy budget authority \1\.................... 4.6 4.0 3.6 2.6 4.3 3.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Excludes subsidy reestimates made prior to 1998, and student loan modifications proposed for 2000.
\2\ GNMA secondary guarantees of loans that are guaranteed by FHA, VA and RHS are excluded from the totals to
avoid double-counting.
Table 8-6. DIRECT LOAN WRITE-OFFS AND GUARANTEED LOAN TERMINATIONS FOR DEFAULTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In millions of dollars As a percentage of outstanding loans
------------------------------------ \1\
Agency and Program --------------------------------------
1998 1999 2000 1999 2000
actual estimate estimate 1998 actual estimate estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DIRECT LOAN WRITEOFFS
Agriculture:
Agricultural credit insurance fund......................................... 320 327 330 3.39 3.61 3.96
Rural Development Insurance Fund........................................... 4 3 3 0.10 0.08 0.08
Rural Housing Insurance Fund............................................... 4 30 29 0.01 0.10 0.10
Rural development loans.................................................... 1 1 1 0.34 0.32 0.29
Commerce:
Economic development loans................................................. .......... 1 1 ........... 1.96 2.22
Education:
Student financial assistance............................................... 7 9 8 5.10 6.18 4.87
Federal direct student loan program........................................ 1 2 5 ........... ........... ...........
Housing and Urban Development:
Revolving fund (liquidating programs)...................................... 5 .......... .......... 2.27 ........... ...........
FHA--Mutual mortgage insurance............................................. .......... 1 2 ........... 6.89 6.55
Interior:
BIA--Revolving funds for loans............................................. 2 5 4 2.59 6.84 6.06
State:
Repatriation loans......................................................... 1 1 1 25.00 25.00 25.00
Veterans Affairs:
Veterans housing benefit program........................................... 49 49 24 3.38 3.14 1.61
Federal Emergency Management Agency:
FEMA--Disaster Assistance.................................................. 1 .......... .......... 0.54 ........... ...........
Small Business Administration:
Disaster loans............................................................. 16 23 18 0.23 0.32 0.25
Business loans............................................................. 100 54 20 9.18 7.44 6.25
Other Independent Agencies:
Spectrum auction program................................................... 2,539 .......... .......... 37.39 ........... ...........
Tennessee Valley Authority................................................. 2 1 1 4.65 2.06 1.73
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, direct loan writeoffs............................................. 3,052 507 447 1.64 0.26 0.21
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
GUARANTEED LOAN TERMINATIONS FOR DEFAULT
Agriculture:
Agricultural credit insurance fund......................................... 66 87 101 0.93 1.20 1.31
CCC Export guarantee programs.............................................. 78 402 465 1.80 8.80 9.94
Rural community advancement program........................................ 16 33 33 0.79 1.31 0.94
Rural Development Insurance Fund........................................... 54 32 19 23.78 17.53 17.11
Rural Housing Insurance Fund............................................... 27 44 61 0.37 0.51 0.54
Education:
Federal family education................................................... 4,095 3,390 3,734 4.07 3.28 3.44
[[Page 207]]
Health and Human Services:
Health education assistance loan program................................... 31 49 48 1.04 1.67 1.70
Housing and Urban Development:
FHA--Mutual mortgage insurance............................................. 5,310 6,527 5,581 1.39 1.59 1.19
FHA--General and special risk.............................................. 1,229 1,561 2,020 1.37 1.65 1.94
Transportation:
Federal ship financing fund................................................ .......... 34 .......... ........... 9.71 ...........
Veterans Affairs:
Veterans housing benefit program........................................... 2,544 3,424 3,682 1.27 1.63 1.61
International Assistance Programs:
Foreign military financing................................................. 2 1 .......... 0.03 0.01 ...........
Microenterprise and other development...................................... -1 1 2 -3.22 2.50 3.47
AID--Housing and other credit guaranty programs............................ 39 25 12 1.74 1.09 0.51
Overseas Private Investment Corporation.................................... 7 63 66 0.25 2.14 1.92
Small Business Administration:
Business loans............................................................. 492 486 516 1.31 1.24 1.21
Other Independent Agencies:
Export-Import Bank......................................................... 330 237 421 1.51 1.05 1.82
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, guaranteed loan terminations for default.......................... 14,319 16,396 16,761 1.00 1.11 1.05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, direct loan writeoffs and guaranteed loan terminations............ 17,371 16,903 17,208 1.07 1.01 0.96
==========================================================================
ADDENDUM: WRITEOFFS OF DEFAULTED GUARANTEED LOANS THAT RESULT IN LOANS
RECEIVABLE
Education:
Federal family education................................................... 515 455 463 2.93 2.52 2.42
Health and Human Services:
Health education assistance loan program................................... 20 20 20 3.80 3.73 3.61
Housing and Urban Development:
FHA--Mutual mortgage insurance............................................. 53 34 1 8.26 10.39 5.40
FHA--General and special risk.............................................. 224 133 319 9.23 5.20 11.70
Veterans Affairs:
Veterans housing benefit program........................................... 567 541 544 73.06 71.84 75.60
Small Business Administration:
Business loans............................................................. 195 213 218 8.47 10.75 13.47
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, writeoffs of loans receivable..................................... 1,574 1,396 1,565 5.04 4.47 4.91
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Average of loans outstanding for the year.
[[Page 208]]
Table 8-7. APPROPRIATIONS ACTS LIMITATIONS ON CREDIT LOAN LEVELS \1\
(In millions of dollars)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimate
Agency and Program 1998 -----------------------
Actual 1999 2000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DIRECT LOAN OBLIGATIONS
Agriculture: \2\
Agricultural credit insurance fund........................................ 803 946 782
Distance learning and telemedicine........................................ 5 150 200
Rural electrification and telecommunications.............................. 1,420 1,562 1,070
Rural electrification and telecommunications.............................. .......... .......... 400
Rural telephone bank...................................................... 175 158 175
Rural water and waste disposal direct loans............................... 752 724 900
Rural housing insurance fund.............................................. 1,230 1,158 1,275
Rural community facility direct loans..................................... 206 169 250
Rural economic development................................................ 25 15 15
Rural development loan fund............................................... 35 33 102
Rural business and industry direct loans.................................. 50 50 50
P.L. 480 Direct credit.................................................... 228 965 138
Housing and Urban Development:
FHA-General and special risk.............................................. 120 120 50
FHA-Mutual mortgage insurance............................................. 200 100 50
Interior:
Bureau of Reclamation..................................................... 31 38 43
State:
Repatriation loans........................................................ 1 1 1
Transportation:
Minority business resource center......................................... 15 14 14
Transportation infrastructure finance and innovation program.............. .......... 1,600 1,800
Treasury:
Community development financial institutions fund......................... 32 32 53
Federal Emergency Management Agency:
Disaster assistance....................................................... 25 30 25
International Assistance Programs:
Foreign military financing................................................ 100 167 ..........
Military debt reduction................................................... 5 .......... ..........
-----------------------------------
Total, limitations on direct loan obligations........................... 5,458 8,032 7,393
-----------------------------------
LOAN GUARANTEE COMMITMENTS
Agriculture: \2\
Agricultural credit insurance fund........................................ 1,653 1,880 2,227
Rural water and waste water disposal guaranteed loans..................... 75 75 75
Rural housing insurance fund.............................................. 3,040 3,075 3,300
Rural housing insurance fund.............................................. .......... .......... 100
Rural community facility guaranteed loans................................. 81 210 210
Rural business and industry guaranteed loans.............................. 1,099 1,078 1,000
Department of Defense:
Defense export loan guarantee program..................................... 15,000 15,000 15,000
Health and Human Services:
Health education assistance loans......................................... 85 .......... ..........
Health center............................................................. 160 151 51
Housing and Urban Development:
Indian housing loan guarantee fund........................................ 67 69 72
Title VI Indian Federal guarantees........................................ 45 54 45
Community development loan guarantees..................................... 1,261 1,261 1,261
America's private investment companies.................................... .......... .......... 1,000
FHA-General and special risk.............................................. 17,400 18,100 18,100
FHA-Loan guarantee recovery fund.......................................... 10 8 ..........
FHA-Mutual mortgage insurance............................................. 110,000 110,000 120,000
Interior:
Indian guaranteed loans................................................... 35 60 60
Transportation:
Maritime guaranteed loan (Title XI)....................................... 1,000 120 120
[[Page 209]]
International Assistance Programs:
Overseas private investment corporation................................... 1,800 1,750 1,100
Small Business Administration:
Business loans............................................................ 13,000 13,500 14,800
Other Independent Agencies:
Presidio trust............................................................ .......... .......... 200
-----------------------------------
Total, limitations on loan guarantee commitments........................ 150,811 151,391 163,721
===================================
ADDENDUM: SECONDARY GUARANTEED LOAN COMMITMENT LIMITATIONS
GNMA:
Guarantees of mortgage-backed securities.................................. 130,000 150,000 200,000
-----------------------------------
Total, limitations on secondary guaranteed loan commitments............. 130,000 150,000 200,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Data represents loan level limitations enacted or proposed to be enacted in appropriation acts. For
information on actual and estimated loan levels supportable by new subsidy budget authority requested, see
Tables 8-3 and 8-4.
\2\ Limitations for Agriculture are overridden by a general provision in the appropriations act.
[[Page 210]]
Table 8-8. DIRECT LOAN TRANSACTIONS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
(in millions of dollars)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimate
Agency and Account 1998 -------------------------
Actual 1999 2000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Department of Agriculture
Farm Service Agency
Agricultural credit insurance fund liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... 2 2
Change in outstandings................................................ -1,010 -1,007 -998
Outstandings.......................................................... 6,699 5,692 4,694
Agricultural credit insurance fund direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 796 999 782
Loan disbursements.................................................... 816 859 867
Change in outstandings................................................ 457 289 236
Outstandings.......................................................... 2,715 3,004 3,240
Commodity credit corporation fund:
Obligations........................................................... 7,189 8,813 10,524
Loan disbursements.................................................... 7,189 8,813 10,524
Change in outstandings................................................ 864 -393 127
Outstandings.......................................................... 2,633 2,240 2,367
Rural Utilities Service
Rural communication development fund liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -1 -1 ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 8 7 7
Distance learning and telemedicine direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 5 150 200
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... 47 136
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... 44 122
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... 44 166
Rural development insurance fund liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 4 3 ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -327 -305 -284
Outstandings.......................................................... 3,808 3,503 3,219
Rural electrification and telecommunications direct loan financing
account:
Obligations........................................................... 1,322 1,562 1,470
Loan disbursements.................................................... 942 1,549 1,265
Change in outstandings................................................ 800 1,463 1,163
Outstandings.......................................................... 5,106 6,569 7,732
Rural telephone bank direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 168 158 175
Loan disbursements.................................................... 34 52 53
Change in outstandings................................................ 29 46 45
Outstandings.......................................................... 232 278 323
Rural water and waste disposal direct loans financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 786 730 900
Loan disbursements.................................................... 613 937 751
Change in outstandings................................................ 547 896 700
Outstandings.......................................................... 2,807 3,703 4,403
Rural electrification and telecommunications liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 34 21 8
Change in outstandings................................................ -1,170 -1,865 -2,949
Outstandings.......................................................... 27,076 25,211 22,262
Rural telephone bank liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 21 27 24
Change in outstandings................................................ -92 -93 -96
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,172 1,079 983
Rural Housing Service
[[Page 211]]
Rural housing insurance fund liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 6 ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -1,243 -1,192 -1,143
Outstandings.......................................................... 19,704 18,512 17,369
Rural housing insurance fund direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 1,226 1,158 1,275
Loan disbursements.................................................... 1,113 1,215 1,245
Change in outstandings................................................ 844 960 924
Outstandings.......................................................... 9,411 10,371 11,295
Rural community facility direct loans financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 211 171 250
Loan disbursements.................................................... 137 193 217
Change in outstandings................................................ 113 176 195
Outstandings.......................................................... 606 782 977
Rural Business--Cooperative Service
Rural economic development loans liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... -1
Outstandings.......................................................... 6 6 5
Rural economic development direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 25 15 15
Loan disbursements.................................................... 16 22 17
Change in outstandings................................................ 8 15 7
Outstandings.......................................................... 50 65 72
Rural development loan fund direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 35 33 102
Loan disbursements.................................................... 40 48 42
Change in outstandings................................................ 36 44 36
Outstandings.......................................................... 209 253 289
Rural business and industry direct loans financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 21 50 50
Loan disbursements.................................................... 16 22 40
Change in outstandings................................................ 16 21 38
Outstandings.......................................................... 19 40 78
Rural development loan fund liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 1 1 1
Change in outstandings................................................ -5 -4 -3
Outstandings.......................................................... 77 73 70
Foreign Agricultural Service
Expenses, Public Law 480, foreign assistance programs, Agriculture
liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -300 -369 -363
Outstandings.......................................................... 9,146 8,777 8,414
P.L. 480 Direct credit financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 228 965 138
Loan disbursements.................................................... 217 986 167
Change in outstandings................................................ 158 983 162
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,529 2,512 2,674
P.L. 480 Title I Food for Progress Credits, financing account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 508 508 508
[[Page 212]]
Debt reduction--financing account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... 142 80
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... 140 78
Outstandings.......................................................... 63 203 281
Department of Commerce
Economic Development Administration
Economic development revolving fund liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -4 -6 -6
Outstandings.......................................................... 54 48 42
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Fisheries finance, direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 34 229 56
Loan disbursements.................................................... 27 251 56
Change in outstandings................................................ 26 247 52
Outstandings.......................................................... 26 273 325
Department of Defense--Military
Operation and Maintenance
Defense vessel transfer program financing account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... 172 238
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... 172 238
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... 155 156
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... 155 311
Family Housing
Department of Defense, Family Housing Improvement, Direct Loan Financing
Account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... 11
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... 11
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... 11
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... ........... 11
Department of Education
Office of Postsecondary Education
Student financial assistance:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -4 17 20
Outstandings.......................................................... 137 154 174
College housing and academic facilities loans liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 4 ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -48 -35 -32
Outstandings.......................................................... 566 531 499
College housing and academic facilities loans financing account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 1 1 1
Change in outstandings................................................ 1 1 1
Outstandings.......................................................... 21 22 23
Federal direct student loan program, financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 13,861 17,853 17,868
Loan disbursements.................................................... 12,140 16,117 16,014
Change in outstandings................................................ 10,458 14,691 13,690
Outstandings.......................................................... 31,670 46,361 60,051
[[Page 213]]
Department of Energy
Power Marketing Administration
Bonneville Power Administration fund:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 2 2 2
Department of Health and Human Services
Health Resources and Services Administration
Medical facilities guarantee and loan fund:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -7 -7 -10
Outstandings.......................................................... 17 10 ...........
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Public and Indian Housing Programs
Low-rent public housing--loans and other expenses:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -70 -59 -45
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,492 1,433 1,388
Community Planning and Development
Revolving fund (liquidating programs):
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -51 -40 -35
Outstandings.......................................................... 220 180 145
Community development loan guarantees liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -6 -4 -4
Outstandings.......................................................... 30 26 22
Housing Programs
Nonprofit sponsor assistance liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 1 1 1
Flexible Subsidy Fund:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 35 21 7
Change in outstandings................................................ 26 17 3
Outstandings.......................................................... 769 786 789
FHA-Mutual mortgage and cooperative housing insurance funds liquidating
account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... -5 ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 5 ........... ...........
FHA-General and special risk insurance funds liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -6 -7 -7
Outstandings.......................................................... 72 65 58
FHA-General and special risk direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 1 20 50
Loan disbursements.................................................... 1 20 50
Change in outstandings................................................ 1 18 45
Outstandings.......................................................... 1 19 64
[[Page 214]]
Housing for the elderly or handicapped fund liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 5 ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -84 -88 -87
Outstandings.......................................................... 8,144 8,056 7,969
FHA-Mutual mortgage insurance direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 5 50 50
Loan disbursements.................................................... 4 40 40
Change in outstandings................................................ -1 22 15
Outstandings.......................................................... 1 23 38
Government National Mortgage Association
Guarantees of mortgage-backed securities liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 129 127 106
Change in outstandings................................................ 26 65 42
Outstandings.......................................................... 358 423 465
Department of the Interior
Bureau of Reclamation
Bureau of reclamation loan liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -3 -3 -3
Outstandings.......................................................... 69 66 63
Bureau of Reclamation direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 30 38 43
Loan disbursements.................................................... 39 35 46
Change in outstandings................................................ 39 35 45
Outstandings.......................................................... 120 155 200
National Park Service
Construction and major maintenance:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 6 6 6
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Revolving fund for loans liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -6 -6 -4
Outstandings.......................................................... 47 41 37
Indian direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -2 -2 -2
Outstandings.......................................................... 30 28 26
Insular Affairs
Assistance to territories:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -1 -1 -2
Outstandings.......................................................... 18 17 15
Department of State
Administration of Foreign Affairs
Repatriation loans financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 1 1 1
Loan disbursements.................................................... 1 1 1
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 4 4 4
[[Page 215]]
Department of Transportation
Office of the Secretary
Minority business resource center direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 6 8 14
Loan disbursements.................................................... 4 8 14
Change in outstandings................................................ 1 -3 3
Outstandings.......................................................... 7 4 7
Federal Highway Administration
Right-of-way revolving fund liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 7 20 20
Change in outstandings................................................ -2 -2 -4
Outstandings.......................................................... 182 180 176
Transportation infrastructure finance and innovation program direct loan
financing account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... 811 884
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... 608 866
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... 608 866
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... 608 1,474
Federal Railroad Administration
Amtrak corridor improvement loans liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -1 ........... -1
Outstandings.......................................................... 5 5 4
Alameda Corridor direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 140 120 ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ 140 120 ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 280 400 400
Railroad rehabilitation and improvement liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -4 -3 -5
Outstandings.......................................................... 56 53 48
Railroad rehabilitation and improvement direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 4 4 4
Department of the Treasury
Departmental Offices
Community development financial institutions fund direct loan financing
account:
Obligations........................................................... 7 5 16
Loan disbursements.................................................... 1 5 9
Change in outstandings................................................ 1 5 9
Outstandings.......................................................... 5 10 19
Department of Veterans Affairs
Veterans Benefits Administration
Veterans Housing Benefit Program Fund Liquidating Account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -94 -109 -56
Outstandings.......................................................... 326 217 161
Veterans Housing Benefit Program Fund Direct Loan Financing Account:
Obligations........................................................... 1,339 1,947 648
Loan disbursements.................................................... 1,339 1,947 648
Change in outstandings................................................ 130 327 -300
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,122 1,449 1,149
[[Page 216]]
Miscellaneous veterans housing loans direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 3 11 22
Loan disbursements.................................................... 3 10 22
Change in outstandings................................................ 2 10 21
Outstandings.......................................................... 16 26 47
Miscellaneous veterans programs loan fund direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 2 2 3
Loan disbursements.................................................... 2 2 2
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Miscellaneous veterans programs loan fund liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 1 1 1
Environmental Protection Agency
Abatement, control, and compliance direct loan liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -9 -9 -8
Outstandings.......................................................... 76 67 59
Abatement, control, and compliance direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -4 -5 -5
Outstandings.......................................................... 56 51 46
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Disaster assistance direct loan liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 37 37 37
Disaster assistance direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... 36 25
Loan disbursements.................................................... 24 36 25
Change in outstandings................................................ 20 34 23
Outstandings.......................................................... 147 181 204
International Assistance Programs
International Security Assistance
Foreign military loan liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 9 8 8
Change in outstandings................................................ -762 -816 -495
Outstandings.......................................................... 5,392 4,576 4,081
Foreign military financing direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 100 167 ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 291 433 470
Change in outstandings................................................ 131 171 157
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,582 1,753 1,910
Military debt reduction financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 5 ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 5 100 ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ 5 100 ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 9 109 109
Multilateral Assistance
International organizations and programs:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -2 -2 -2
Outstandings.......................................................... 30 28 26
[[Page 217]]
Agency for International Development
Economic assistance loans--liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -729 -547 -515
Outstandings.......................................................... 11,435 10,888 10,373
Debt reduction, financing account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... 53 ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -57 -4 -57
Outstandings.......................................................... 282 278 221
Microenterprise and small enterprise development credit direct loan
financing account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -1 ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 1 1 1
Overseas Private Investment Corporation
Overseas Private Investment Corporation liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -15 -8 -9
Outstandings.......................................................... 22 14 5
Overseas private investment corporation direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 76 136 130
Loan disbursements.................................................... 26 60 70
Change in outstandings................................................ -14 48 56
Outstandings.......................................................... 69 117 173
Small Business Administration
Business direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 10 40 60
Loan disbursements.................................................... 7 30 30
Change in outstandings................................................ -10 9 16
Outstandings.......................................................... 99 108 124
Disaster direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 639 814 221
Loan disbursements.................................................... 595 1,009 770
Change in outstandings................................................ -25 543 38
Outstandings.......................................................... 5,605 6,148 6,186
Disaster loan fund liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -203 -213 -410
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,254 1,041 631
Business loan fund liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 55 62 41
Change in outstandings................................................ -258 -737 -99
Outstandings.......................................................... 990 253 154
Other Independent Agencies
District of Columbia Financing
Loans to the District of Columbia for capital projects:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -12 -12 -12
Outstandings.......................................................... 39 27 15
Repayable advances to the District of Columbia direct loan financing
account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -223 ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... ........... ...........
[[Page 218]]
Export-Import Bank of the United States
Export-Import Bank of the United States liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 2 ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -667 -2,526 -482
Outstandings.......................................................... 5,721 3,195 2,713
Debt reduction financing account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 514 2,059 118
Change in outstandings................................................ 514 2,059 118
Outstandings.......................................................... 514 2,573 2,691
Export-Import Bank direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 103 1,286 1,687
Loan disbursements.................................................... 1,498 1,288 1,092
Change in outstandings................................................ 1,208 841 471
Outstandings.......................................................... 5,027 5,868 6,339
Farm Credit System Financial Assistance Corporation
Financial assistance corporation assistance fund, liquidating account:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -199 -33 -17
Outstandings.......................................................... 933 900 883
Federal Communications Commission
Spectrum auction direct loan financing account:
Obligations........................................................... 594 ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 594 ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -2,071 ........... -10
Outstandings.......................................................... 6,789 6,789 6,779
Bank Insurance
Bank insurance fund:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 100 100 100
FSLIC Resolution
FSLIC resolution fund:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -32 ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 63 63 63
National Credit Union Administration
Community development credit union revolving loan fund:
Obligations........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Loan disbursements.................................................... 3 4 3
Change in outstandings................................................ 1 2 ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 7 9 9
Tennessee Valley Authority
Tennessee Valley Authority fund:
Obligations........................................................... 16 22 22
Loan disbursements.................................................... 16 22 22
Change in outstandings................................................ 2 11 7
Outstandings.......................................................... 43 54 61
--------------------------------------
Subtotal, direct loan transactions:
Obligations........................................................... 28,844 38,452 37,930
Loan disbursements.................................................... 28,720 39,608 36,239
Change in outstandings................................................ 6,769 14,712 11,137
Outstandings.......................................................... 185,790 200,502 211,639
--------------------------------------
[[Page 219]]
ADDENDUM: DEFAULTED GUARANTEED LOANS THAT RESULT IN A LOAN RECEIVABLE
Department of Agriculture
Farm Service Agency
Commodity credit corporation export guarantee financing account:
Claim payments........................................................ 72 402 465
Change in outstandings................................................ 69 394 450
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,375 1,769 2,219
Commodity credit corporation guaranteed loans liquidating account:
Claim payments........................................................ 6 ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -76 -133 -80
Outstandings.......................................................... 4,923 4,790 4,710
Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Federal ship financing fund, fishing vessels liquidating account:
Claim payments........................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 24 24 24
Department of Education
Office of Postsecondary Education
Federal family education loan program, financing account:
Claim payments........................................................ 2,844 2,835 3,263
Change in outstandings................................................ 1,597 1,891 1,971
Outstandings.......................................................... 6,083 7,974 9,945
Federal family education loan liquidating account:
Claim payments........................................................ 953 287 188
Change in outstandings................................................ -544 -867 -910
Outstandings.......................................................... 11,458 10,591 9,681
Department of Health and Human Services
Health Resources and Services Administration
Health education assistance loans financing account:
Claim payments........................................................ 14 15 20
Change in outstandings................................................ 14 13 18
Outstandings.......................................................... 32 45 63
Health education assistance loans liquidating account:
Claim payments........................................................ 29 40 34
Change in outstandings................................................ 24 6 ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 494 500 500
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Housing Programs
FHA-Mutual mortgage and cooperative housing insurance funds liquidating
account:
Claim payments........................................................ ........... 3 2
Change in outstandings................................................ 6 -290 1
Outstandings.......................................................... 294 4 5
FHA-General and special risk insurance funds liquidating account:
Claim payments........................................................ 268 313 324
Change in outstandings................................................ -166 -45 -298
Outstandings.......................................................... 2,044 1,999 1,701
FHA-General and special risk guaranteed loan financing account:
Claim payments........................................................ 197 381 472
Change in outstandings................................................ 171 310 369
Outstandings.......................................................... 381 691 1,060
FHA-Mutual mortgage insurance guaranteed loan financing account:
Claim payments........................................................ 30 6 11
Change in outstandings................................................ 62 -338 10
Outstandings.......................................................... 347 9 19
[[Page 220]]
Department of the Interior
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Indian loan guaranty and insurance fund liquidating account:
Claim payments........................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 40 40 40
Indian guaranteed loan financing account:
Claim payments........................................................ 1 3 3
Change in outstandings................................................ 1 3 3
Outstandings.......................................................... 44 47 50
Department of Transportation
Maritime Administration
Federal ship financing fund liquidating account:
Claim payments........................................................ ........... 34 ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... 19 -9
Outstandings.......................................................... 46 65 56
Department of Veterans Affairs
Veterans Benefits Administration
Veterans Housing Benefit Program Fund Liquidating Account:
Claim payments........................................................ 121 103 88
Change in outstandings................................................ -45 -32 -27
Outstandings.......................................................... 620 588 561
Veterans Housing Benefit Program Fund Guaranteed Loan Financing Account:
Claim payments........................................................ 546 439 475
Change in outstandings................................................ 53 -14 6
Outstandings.......................................................... 156 142 148
International Assistance Programs
International Security Assistance
Foreign military loan liquidating account:
Claim payments........................................................ 26 11 25
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... 5 25
Outstandings.......................................................... 1 6 31
Agency for International Development
Housing and other credit guaranty programs liquidating account:
Claim payments........................................................ 56 31 15
Change in outstandings................................................ -2 -400 -1
Outstandings.......................................................... 485 85 84
Microenterprise and small enterprise development guaranteed loan
financing account:
Claim payments........................................................ 1 1 2
Change in outstandings................................................ 1 1 2
Outstandings.......................................................... 1 2 4
Overseas Private Investment Corporation
Overseas private investment corporation guaranteed loan financing
account:
Claim payments........................................................ 8 50 50
Change in outstandings................................................ 3 35 30
Outstandings.......................................................... 21 56 86
Small Business Administration
Pollution control equipment fund liquidating account:
Claim payments........................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -1 ........... -1
Outstandings.......................................................... 45 45 44
Business guaranteed loan financing account:
Claim payments........................................................ 416 425 475
Change in outstandings................................................ -36 -700 -128
Outstandings.......................................................... 834 134 6
[[Page 221]]
Business loan fund liquidating account:
Claim payments........................................................ 76 61 41
Change in outstandings................................................ 76 61 41
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,466 1,527 1,568
--------------------------------------
Subtotal, defaulted guaranteed loans that result in a loan receivable:
Claim payments........................................................ 5,664 5,440 5,953
Change in outstandings................................................ 1,207 -81 1,472
Outstandings.......................................................... 31,214 31,133 32,605
======================================
Total:
Obligations........................................................... 28,844 38,452 37,930
Loan disbursements.................................................... 34,384 45,048 42,192
Change in outstandings................................................ 7,976 14,631 12,609
Outstandings.......................................................... 217,004 231,635 244,244
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 222]]
Table 8-9. GUARANTEED LOAN TRANSACTIONS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
(in millions of dollars)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimate
Agency and Account 1998 -------------------------
Actual 1999 2000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Department of Agriculture
Farm Service Agency
Agricultural credit insurance fund liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -218 -213 -212
Outstandings.......................................................... 776 563 351
Agricultural credit insurance fund guaranteed loan financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 1,653 1,880 2,227
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 1,493 1,842 2,182
Change in outstandings................................................ 253 535 742
Outstandings.......................................................... 6,292 6,827 7,569
Commodity credit corporation export guarantee financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 5,000 4,721 4,506
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 2,733 4,721 4,506
Change in outstandings................................................ -216 471 -255
Outstandings.......................................................... 4,332 4,803 4,548
Commodity credit corporation guaranteed loans liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -16 ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Agricultural resource conservation demonstration guaranteed loan
financing account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 24 24 24
Rural Utilities Service
Rural communication development fund liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... -1 ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 5 4 4
Rural development insurance fund liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -148 -89 -54
Outstandings.......................................................... 227 138 84
Rural water and waste water disposal guaranteed loans financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 15 75 75
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 4 20 69
Change in outstandings................................................ 4 19 67
Outstandings.......................................................... 11 30 97
Rural electrification and telecommunications liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -24 -20 -20
Outstandings.......................................................... 618 598 578
Rural Housing Service
Rural housing insurance fund liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -3 -3 -3
Outstandings.......................................................... 27 24 21
Rural housing insurance fund guaranteed loan financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 2,862 3,075 3,400
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 2,416 2,927 3,125
Change in outstandings................................................ 2,167 2,585 2,669
Outstandings.......................................................... 7,206 9,791 12,460
[[Page 223]]
Rural community facility guaranteed loans financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 65 210 210
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 47 81 131
Change in outstandings................................................ 34 74 119
Outstandings.......................................................... 155 229 348
Rural Business--Cooperative Service
Rural business and industry guaranteed loans financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 1,171 1,096 1,000
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 801 1,019 1,019
Change in outstandings................................................ 597 879 841
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,855 2,734 3,575
Department of Commerce
Economic Development Administration
Economic development revolving fund liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -2 -1 -1
Outstandings.......................................................... 13 12 11
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Fisheries finance, guaranteed loan financing account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 8 ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -14 -22 -22
Outstandings.......................................................... 80 58 36
Federal ship financing fund, fishing vessels liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -17 -12 -10
Outstandings.......................................................... 68 56 46
Department of Defense--Military
Operation and Maintenance
Defense export loan guarantee financing account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... 25 ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 15 11 19
Change in outstandings................................................ 15 7 15
Outstandings.......................................................... 15 22 37
Procurement
Arms Initiative Guaranteed Loan Financing Account:
Commitments........................................................... 10 21 18
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 10 21 18
Change in outstandings................................................ 10 21 16
Outstandings.......................................................... 10 31 47
Family Housing
Department of Defense, Family Housing Improvement, Guaranteed Loan
Financing Account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... 177 697
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Department of Education
Office of Postsecondary Education
Federal family education loan liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -7,465 -5,367 -4,075
Outstandings.......................................................... 16,118 10,751 6,676
[[Page 224]]
Federal family education loan program, financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 26,820 26,182 27,780
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 21,966 23,170 24,550
Change in outstandings................................................ 9,016 10,685 9,007
Outstandings.......................................................... 84,402 95,087 104,094
Historically black college and university capital financing, guaranteed
loan financing account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... 1 7
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... 1 7
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... 1 8
Department of Health and Human Services
Health Resources and Services Administration
Health education assistance loans financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 85 ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 85 ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ 68 -16 -21
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,562 1,546 1,525
Health education assistance loans liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -66 -91 -96
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,412 1,321 1,225
Health center guaranteed loan financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 9 100 51
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 9 73 48
Change in outstandings................................................ 9 73 48
Outstandings.......................................................... 9 82 130
Medical facilities guarantee and loan fund:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -60 -40 -30
Outstandings.......................................................... 82 42 12
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Public and Indian Housing Programs
Low-rent public housing--loans and other expenses:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -279 -279 -279
Outstandings.......................................................... 3,307 3,028 2,749
Indian housing loan guarantee fund financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 22 69 72
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 24 34 40
Change in outstandings................................................ 21 34 40
Outstandings.......................................................... 38 72 112
Title VI Indian Federal guarantees financing account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... 54 45
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... ........... ...........
Community Planning and Development
Revolving fund (liquidating programs):
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... -1 -1
Outstandings.......................................................... 2 1 ...........
Community development loan guarantees financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 382 1,261 1,261
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 547 1,000 1,000
Change in outstandings................................................ 415 800 800
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,190 1,990 2,790
[[Page 225]]
Community development loan guarantees liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -33 -30 -25
Outstandings.......................................................... 165 135 110
America's private investment companies financing account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... 1,000
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... 730
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... 730
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... ........... 730
Housing Programs
FHA-Mutual mortgage and cooperative housing insurance funds liquidating
account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -16,725 -5,150 -4,579
Outstandings.......................................................... 71,030 65,880 61,301
FHA-General and special risk insurance funds liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -5,815 -1,787 -2,536
Outstandings.......................................................... 36,590 34,803 32,267
FHA-General and special risk guaranteed loan financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 15,513 18,100 16,507
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 15,074 17,153 16,118
Change in outstandings................................................ 7,034 12,151 10,568
Outstandings.......................................................... 52,697 64,848 75,416
FHA-Loan guarantee recovery fund--financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 2 8 ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 1 5 4
Change in outstandings................................................ 1 5 4
Outstandings.......................................................... 1 6 10
FHA-Mutual mortgage insurance guaranteed loan financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 100,245 96,218 112,873
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 90,518 86,398 96,162
Change in outstandings................................................ 36,559 62,908 63,739
Outstandings.......................................................... 309,309 372,217 435,956
Government National Mortgage Association
Guarantees of mortgage-backed securities liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -434,033 -88,444 -6,954
Outstandings.......................................................... 96,009 7,565 611
Guarantees of mortgage-backed securities financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 130,000 150,000 200,000
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 138,450 119,390 127,884
Change in outstandings................................................ 445,615 92,791 18,409
Outstandings.......................................................... 445,615 538,406 556,815
Department of the Interior
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Indian loan guaranty and insurance fund liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -17 -13 -8
Outstandings.......................................................... 40 27 19
Indian guaranteed loan financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 35 60 60
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 28 45 45
Change in outstandings................................................ 11 24 15
Outstandings.......................................................... 113 137 152
[[Page 226]]
Department of Transportation
Maritime Administration
Federal ship financing fund liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -150 -94 -58
Outstandings.......................................................... 397 303 245
Maritime guaranteed loan (Title XI) financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 686 120 120
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 686 120 120
Change in outstandings................................................ 430 -146 -175
Outstandings.......................................................... 2,457 2,311 2,136
Department of Veterans Affairs
Veterans Benefits Administration
Veterans Housing Benefit Program Fund Liquidating Account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 9 ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -488 -454 -379
Outstandings.......................................................... 23,408 22,954 22,575
Veterans Housing Benefit Program Fund Guaranteed Loan Financing Account:
Commitments........................................................... 39,862 32,635 31,237
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 40,980 33,455 32,311
Change in outstandings................................................ 30,202 19,860 17,189
Outstandings.......................................................... 176,777 196,637 213,826
Miscellaneous veterans housing loans guaranteed loan financing account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... 7
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... 7
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... 7
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... ........... 7
International Assistance Programs
International Security Assistance
Foreign military loan liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -387 -380 -373
Outstandings.......................................................... 5,304 4,924 4,551
Agency for International Development
Loan guarantees to Israel financing account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 1,412 ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ 1,412 ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 9,226 9,226 9,226
Development credit authority guaranteed loan financing account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... 120 320
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... 31 95
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... 31 95
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... 31 126
Housing and other credit guaranty programs liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 19 20 10
Change in outstandings................................................ -50 -34 -46
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,834 1,800 1,754
Private sector revolving fund liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -8 ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... ........... ...........
[[Page 227]]
Microenterprise and small enterprise development guaranteed loan
financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 160 191 200
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 12 39 41
Change in outstandings................................................ -1 18 17
Outstandings.......................................................... 31 49 66
Urban and environmental credit guaranteed loan financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 18 14 26
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 64 107 35
Change in outstandings................................................ 64 107 35
Outstandings.......................................................... 407 514 549
Assistance for the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union:
Ukraine export credit insurance financing account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -81 -61 ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 61 ........... ...........
Overseas Private Investment Corporation
Overseas Private Investment Corporation liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -60 -53 -26
Outstandings.......................................................... 81 28 2
Overseas private investment corporation guaranteed loan financing
account:
Commitments........................................................... 2,418 2,600 2,100
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 760 950 1,000
Change in outstandings................................................ 632 550 500
Outstandings.......................................................... 2,613 3,163 3,663
Small Business Administration
Pollution control equipment fund liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -19 -11 -11
Outstandings.......................................................... 57 46 35
Business guaranteed loan financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 10,970 14,770 16,471
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 9,671 7,336 7,597
Change in outstandings................................................ 3,488 4,039 4,167
Outstandings.......................................................... 33,695 37,734 41,901
Business loan fund liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 1 1 1
Change in outstandings................................................ -1,201 -698 -579
Outstandings.......................................................... 3,804 3,106 2,527
Other Independent Agencies
Export-Import Bank of the United States
Export-Import Bank of the United States liquidating account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ -661 -493 -287
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,707 1,214 927
Export-Import Bank guaranteed loan financing account:
Commitments........................................................... 10,447 12,737 15,172
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 10,102 12,229 11,802
Change in outstandings................................................ 329 1,782 405
Outstandings.......................................................... 20,072 21,854 22,259
[[Page 228]]
National Credit Union Administration
Credit union share insurance fund:
Commitments........................................................... 1 1 ...........
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... ...........
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... -1 ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 1 ........... ...........
Presidio Trust
Presidio trust guaranteed loan financing account:
Commitments........................................................... ........... ........... 150
New guaranteed loans.................................................. ........... ........... 150
Change in outstandings................................................ ........... ........... 150
Outstandings.......................................................... ........... ........... 150
--------------------------------------
Subtotal, Guaranteed loans (gross)
Commitments........................................................... 348,451 366,520 437,585
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 337,945 312,199 330,826
Change in outstandings................................................ 70,129 106,446 109,286
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,423,337 1,529,783 1,639,069
Less, secondary guaranteed loans: \1\
GNMA guarantees of FmHA/VA/FHA pools:
Commitments........................................................... -130,000 -150,000 -200,000
New guaranteed loans.................................................. -138,450 -119,390 -127,884
Change in outstandings................................................ -11,582 -4,347 -11,455
Outstandings.......................................................... -541,624 -545,971 -557,426
======================================
Total, primary guaranteed loans:
Commitments........................................................... 218,451 216,520 237,585
New guaranteed loans.................................................. 199,495 192,809 202,942
Change in outstandings................................................ 58,547 102,099 97,831
Outstandings.......................................................... 881,713 983,812 1,081,643
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Loans guaranteed by FHA, VA, or FmHA are included above. GNMA places a secondary guarantee on these loans,
so they are deducted here to avoid double counting.
[[Page 229]]
Table 8-10. LENDING AND BORROWING BY GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED ENTERPRISES (GSEs) \1\
(in millions of dollars)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimate
Enterprise 1998 -------------------------
Actual 1999 2000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LENDING
Student Loan Marketing Association:
New transactions...................................................... 8,310 8,295 8,766
Net change............................................................ -4,791 -3,420 -5,787
Outstandings.......................................................... 29,468 26,048 20,261
Federal National Mortgage Association:
FNMA corporation accounts:
New transactions...................................................... 136,759 159,075 106,308
Net change............................................................ 71,499 100,812 55,636
Outstandings.......................................................... 393,210 494,022 549,658
FNMA mortgage-backed securities:
New transactions...................................................... 275,533 346,794 204,271
Net change............................................................ 60,509 98,275 58,480
Outstandings.......................................................... 627,451 725,726 784,206
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation:
FHLMC corporation accounts:
New transactions...................................................... 100,869 49,000 45,000
Net change............................................................ 59,357 20,000 20,000
Outstandings.......................................................... 216,522 236,522 256,522
FHLMC participation certificates pools:
New transactions...................................................... 217,539 175,000 169,000
Net change............................................................ 20,672 21,581 22,530
Outstandings.......................................................... 490,687 512,268 534,798
Farm Credit System:
Bank for Cooperatives:
New transactions...................................................... 8,267 7,171 6,892
Net change............................................................ -192 17 102
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,835 1,852 1,954
Agricultural credit bank:
New transactions...................................................... 41,710 45,000 50,000
Net change............................................................ -185 874 897
Outstandings.......................................................... 14,776 15,650 16,547
Farm Credit Banks:
New transactions...................................................... 36,673 36,936 37,754
Net change............................................................ 3,063 1,208 1,274
Outstandings.......................................................... 44,061 45,269 46,543
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation:
New transactions...................................................... 349 436 545
Net change............................................................ 234 292 366
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,048 1,340 1,706
Federal Home Loan Banks: \2\
New transactions...................................................... 952,121 952,121 952,121
Net change............................................................ 63,819 63,819 63,819
Outstandings.......................................................... 245,647 309,466 373,285
--------------------------------------
Subtotal GSE lending (gross):
New transactions...................................................... 1,778,130 1,779,828 1,580,657
Net change............................................................ 273,985 303,458 217,317
Outstandings.......................................................... 2,064,705 2,368,163 2,585,480
Less guaranteed loans purchased by:
Student Loan Marketing Association: \3\
Net change............................................................ -4,791 -3,420 -5,787
Outstandings.......................................................... 29,468 26,048 20,261
Federal National Mortgage Corporation:
Net change............................................................ 3,753 ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 31,626 31,626 31,626
Other:
Net change............................................................ -1,134 ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 14,525 14,525 14,525
--------------------------------------
Total GSE lending (net):
New transactions...................................................... 1,778,130 1,779,828 1,580,657
Net change............................................................ 276,157 306,878 223,104
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,989,086 2,295,564 2,519,068
[[Page 230]]
BORROWING
Student Loan Marketing Association:
Net Change............................................................ -6,713 -4,990 -5,384
Outstandings.......................................................... 33,517 28,527 23,143
Federal National Mortgage Association:
FNMA corporation accounts:
Net Change............................................................ 72,579 63,774 56,010
Outstandings.......................................................... 430,582 494,356 550,366
FNMA mortgage-backed securities:
Net Change............................................................ 60,509 98,275 58,480
Outstandings.......................................................... 627,451 725,726 784,206
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation:
FHLMC corporation accounts:
Net Change............................................................ 72,943 20,000 20,000
Outstandings.......................................................... 232,994 252,994 272,994
FHLMC participation certificates pools:
Net Change............................................................ 20,672 21,581 22,530
Outstandings.......................................................... 490,687 512,268 534,798
Farm Credit System:
Bank for Cooperatives:
Net Change............................................................ -241 -10 47
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,826 1,816 1,863
Agricultural credit bank:
Net Change............................................................ -216 755 845
Outstandings.......................................................... 16,253 17,008 17,853
Farm Credit Banks:
Net Change............................................................ 4,126 1,047 1,556
Outstandings.......................................................... 47,714 48,761 50,327
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation:
Net Change............................................................ 285 148 184
Outstandings.......................................................... 1,598 1,746 1,930
Federal Home Loan Banks:
Net Change............................................................ 51,717 61,761 62,221
Outstandings.......................................................... 336,262 398,023 460,244
Financing Corporation:
Net Change............................................................ 1 1 1
Outstandings.......................................................... 8,145 8,146 8,147
Resolution Funding Corporation:
Net Change............................................................ -3 -2 -2
Outstandings.......................................................... 30,069 30,067 30,065
--------------------------------------
Subtotal GSE borrowing (gross):
Net change............................................................ 275,659 262,340 216,488
Outstandings.......................................................... 2,257,098 2,519,438 2,735,936
Less borrowing from other GSEs:
Net Change............................................................ 14,398 ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 65,557 65,557 65,557
Less purchase of Federal debt securities:
Net Change............................................................ -841 412 580
Outstandings.......................................................... 8,123 8,535 9,115
Less borrowing to purchase loans guaranteed by:
Student Loan Marketing Association: \4\
Net change............................................................ -4,791 -3,420 -5,787
Outstandings.......................................................... 29,468 26,048 20,261
Federal National Mortgage Corporation:
Net change............................................................ 3,753 ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 31,626 31,626 31,626
Other:
Net change............................................................ -1,134 ........... ...........
Outstandings.......................................................... 14,525 14,525 14,525
--------------------------------------
[[Page 231]]
Total GSE borrowing (net):
Net change............................................................ 293,070 265,348 221,695
Outstandings.......................................................... 2,238,913 2,504,261 2,725,966
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The estimates of borrowing and lending were developed by the GSEs based on certain assumptions that they
made. The estimates are subject to periodic review and revision and do not represent offficial GSE forecasts
of future activity. The data for all years include programs of mortgage-backed securities. In cases where a
GSE owns securities issued by the same GSE, including mortgage-backed securities, the borrowing and lending
data for that GSE are adjusted to remove double-counting.
\2\ The lending by the Federal Home Loans Banks measures their advances to member thrift and other financial
institutions. In addition, their investment in private financial instruments at the end of 1998 was $135
billion, including federally guaranteed securities and GSE securities.
\3\ The change in debt outstanding is due solely to the amortization of discounts and premiums. No sale or
redemption of debt securities is estimates to occur in 1999 or 2000.
\4\ All SLMA loans acquired are guaranteed by the Federal Government and therefore also counted as guaranteed
loans.