[Analytical Perspectives]
[Other Technical Presentations]
[20. Off-Budget Federal Entities]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
The Federal Government has used the unified budget concept as the
foundation for its budgetary analysis and presentation since the 1969
budget. This concept was developed by the President's Commission on
Budget Concepts in 1967. It calls for the budget to include all the
Federal Government's programs and all the fiscal transactions of these
programs with the public.
Since 1971, however, one or more Federal entities each year have been
off-budget. Off-budget Federal entities are federally owned and
controlled, but their transactions are excluded from the budget totals
by law. When a Federal entity is off-budget, its receipts, outlays, and
deficit or surplus are not included in budget receipts, budget outlays,
or the budget deficit; and its budget authority is not included in the
totals of budget authority for the budget. The off-budget Federal
entities conduct programs of the same type as entities included in the
budget totals. Most of the tables in the budget document include the on-
budget and off-budget amounts in combination, or add them together to
arrive at the consolidated Government totals, in order to show Federal
outlays and receipts comprehensively.
TABLE 20-1. COMPARISON OF TOTAL, ON-BUDGET, AND OFF-BUDGET TRANSACTIONS\1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Receipts Outlays Surplus or deficit (-)
Fiscal Year -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total On-budget Off-budget Total On-budget Off-budget Total On-budget Off-budget
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1970.............................................................. 192.8 159.3 33.5 195.6 168.0 27.6 -2.8 -8.7 5.9
1971.............................................................. 187.1 151.3 35.8 210.2 177.3 32.8 -23.0 -26.1 3.0
1972.............................................................. 207.3 167.4 39.9 230.7 193.8 36.9 -23.4 -26.4 3.1
1973.............................................................. 230.8 184.7 46.1 245.7 200.1 45.6 -14.9 -15.4 0.5
1974.............................................................. 263.2 209.3 53.9 269.4 217.3 52.1 -6.1 -8.0 1.8
1975.............................................................. 279.1 216.6 62.5 332.3 271.9 60.4 -53.2 -55.3 2.0
1976.............................................................. 298.1 231.7 66.4 371.8 302.2 69.6 -73.7 -70.5 -3.2
TQ................................................................ 81.2 63.2 18.0 96.0 76.6 19.4 -14.7 -13.3 -1.4
1977.............................................................. 355.6 278.7 76.8 409.2 328.5 80.7 -53.7 -49.8 -3.9
1978.............................................................. 399.6 314.2 85.4 458.7 369.1 89.7 -59.2 -54.9 -4.3
1979.............................................................. 463.3 365.3 98.0 504.0 404.1 100.0 -40.7 -38.7 -2.0
1980.............................................................. 517.1 403.9 113.2 590.9 476.6 114.3 -73.8 -72.7 -1.1
1981.............................................................. 599.3 469.1 130.2 678.2 543.1 135.2 -79.0 -74.0 -5.0
1982.............................................................. 617.8 474.3 143.5 745.8 594.4 151.4 -128.0 -120.1 -7.9
1983.............................................................. 600.6 453.2 147.3 808.4 661.3 147.1 -207.8 -208.0 0.2
1984.............................................................. 666.5 500.4 166.1 851.8 686.0 165.8 -185.4 -185.7 0.3
1985.............................................................. 734.1 547.9 186.2 946.4 769.6 176.8 -212.3 -221.7 9.4
1986.............................................................. 769.1 568.9 200.2 990.3 806.8 183.5 -221.2 -238.0 16.7
1987.............................................................. 854.1 640.7 213.4 1,003.9 810.1 193.8 -149.8 -169.3 19.6
1988.............................................................. 909.0 667.5 241.5 1,064.1 861.4 202.7 -155.2 -194.0 38.8
1989.............................................................. 990.7 727.0 263.7 1,143.2 932.3 210.9 -152.5 -205.2 52.8
1990.............................................................. 1,031.3 749.7 281.7 1,252.5 1,027.5 225.1 -221.2 -277.8 56.6
1991.............................................................. 1,054.3 760.4 293.9 1,323.6 1,081.9 241.7 -269.4 -321.6 52.2
1992.............................................................. 1,090.5 788.0 302.4 1,380.9 1,128.5 252.3 -290.4 -340.5 50.1
1993.............................................................. 1,153.5 841.6 311.9 1,408.7 1,142.1 266.6 -255.1 -300.5 45.3
1994.............................................................. 1,257.7 922.7 335.0 1,460.8 1,181.5 279.4 -203.1 -258.8 55.7
1995.............................................................. 1,355.2 1,004.1 351.1 1,519.1 1,230.5 288.7 -163.9 -226.3 62.4
1996 estimate..................................................... 1,426.8 1,059.3 367.4 1,572.4 1,270.3 302.1 -145.6 -211.0 65.3
1997 estimate..................................................... 1,495.2 1,107.2 388.0 1,635.3 1,317.7 317.7 -140.1 -210.4 70.3
1998 estimate..................................................... 1,577.9 1,171.6 406.3 1,675.9 1,346.9 329.0 -98.0 -175.3 77.3
1999 estimate..................................................... 1,652.5 1,224.8 427.8 1,716.9 1,375.0 342.0 -64.4 -150.2 85.8
2000 estimate..................................................... 1,733.8 1,283.9 450.0 1,761.4 1,403.5 357.8 -27.5 -119.7 92.1
2001 estimate..................................................... 1,819.8 1,348.6 471.2 1,811.5 1,439.2 372.3 8.3 -90.6 98.9
2002 estimate..................................................... 1,912.2 1,417.6 494.6 1,868.3 1,479.8 388.5 43.9 -62.2 106.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Off-budget transactions consist of the social security trust funds for all years and the Postal Service fund as of 1989.
The off-budget Federal entities currently consist of the two social
security trust funds, old-age and survivors insurance and disability
insurance, and the Postal Service fund. Social security was removed from
the budget in 1985 and the Postal Service fund in 1989. The Budget
Enforcement Act of 1990 excludes these entities from the deficit targets
and other enforcement calculations except for the administrative
expenses of social security. Other entities were off-budget before 1986
but were moved onto the budget under subsequent law.
[[Page 284]]
The preceding table compares the total Federal Government receipts,
outlays, and deficit with the amounts that are on-budget and off-budget.
Social security is classified as off-budget for all years, in order to
provide consistent comparison over time. The much smaller Postal Service
transactions are classified as off-budget starting in 1989. Entities
that were off-budget at one time but are now on-budget are classified as
on-budget for all years.
In 1997 the off-budget receipts are an estimated 26 percent of total
receipts, and the off-budget outlays are an estimated 19 percent of
total outlays. The 1997 total deficit of $140.1 billion consists of an
off-budget surplus of $70.3 billion and an on-budget deficit of $210.4
billion. The off-budget surplus consists almost entirely of social
security. It grew substantially from the early 1980s to 1990 and is
estimated to increase each year throughout the projection period.
The Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 refined budget concepts by
distinguishing between the costs of credit programs, which are budgetary
in nature, and the other transactions of the credit programs, which are
not. For 1992 and subsequent years, the costs of direct loans and loan
guarantees have been calculated as the present value of estimated cash
outflows from the Government less the present value of estimated cash
inflows to the Government. These costs are equivalent to the outlays of
other Federal programs and are included in the budget as outlays of
credit program accounts when the Federal Government makes a direct loan
or guarantees a private loan. The cash transactions with the public--the
disbursement and repayment of loans, the payment of default claims on
guarantees, the collection of interest and fees, and so forth--are
recorded in separate financing accounts. The transactions of the
financing accounts do not represent costs to the Government above and
beyond those costs that are already included in the credit program
accounts. Therefore, they are non-budgetary in concept, and the Act
excludes them from the budget.\1\ Because the financing accounts are
non-budgetary in concept, they are not classified as off-budget Federal
entities.
\1\See sec. 505(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The budget outlays of credit programs thus reflect only the cost of
Government decisions, and they reflect this cost when the Federal credit
assistance is provided. This enables the budget to better fulfill its
purpose of being a financial plan for allocating resources among
alternative uses: comparing the cost of a program with its benefits,
comparing the cost of credit programs with the cost of other spending
programs, and comparing the cost of one type of credit assistance with
the cost of another type. Since the financing accounts do affect the
Government's cash position, they are a means of financing the deficit as
explained in Chapter 11 of this volume, ``Federal Borrowing and
Debt.''\2\
\2\Credit reform is further explained in Chapter 8 of this volume and
in Chapter VIII.A of the 1992 Budget, Part Two, pp. 223-26.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insurance programs have economic effects and pose a financial risk to
the Government, but under present budgetary accounting they do not
result in budget outlays unless the insured event occurs and the
Government pays a claim. In this respect their budgetary treatment is
similar to the treatment of loan guarantees before the Credit Reform
Act. Insurance programs are discussed in Chapter 8, ``Underwriting
Federal Credit and Insurance.''
Other activities related to the Federal Government are outside the
scope of budget outlays because of their inherent nature. The
Government-sponsored enterprises, which are mostly financial
intermediaries, are excluded from the budget on the grounds that they
are privately owned and controlled. However, because of their close
relationship to the Federal Government, detailed estimates of their
activities are reported in a separate chapter of the budget appendix and
an assessment of the risk they pose to the Government is presented in
Chapter 8.
Taxation provides the Government with income, which is included in the
budget as ``receipts'' and which withdraws purchasing power from the
private sector in order to finance Government expenditure. In addition
to this primary effect, taxation has important effects on the allocation
of resources among private uses and the distribution of income among
individuals. These effects are caused by the choice of taxes and by the
rates and other structural characteristics of each tax. The effects of
taxation on resource allocation and income distribution are analogous to
the effects of outlays, but they are not recorded as outlays nor are
they measured by receipts. Some of these effects arise from revenue
losses caused by special exclusions, exemptions, deductions, and so
forth. Such revenue losses have been defined as ``tax expenditures'' and
are discussed in Chapter 5, ``Tax Expenditures.''
Some types of regulation have economic effects that are similar to
budget outlays by requiring the private sector to make expenditures for
specified purposes such as safety and pollution control. Reforming
Federal regulation is discussed in Chapter 13 of the Budget-Supplement,
``Improving Government Performance,'' and the regulatory planning
process is described annually in Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda
of Federal Regulation.\3\
\3\The most recent publication was issued by the Regulatory
Information Service Center on November 28, 1995.