119 S4749 IS: Justice Against Weaponized Bureaucratic Overreach to Networked Expression Act U.S. Senate 2026-06-11 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

II119th CONGRESS2d SessionS. 4749IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESJune 11, 2026Mr. Cruz (for himself and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and TransportationA BILLTo amend the Communications Act of 1934 to create a Federal cause of action to address jawboning, and for other purposes.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Justice Against Weaponized Bureaucratic Overreach to Networked Expression Act or the JAWBONE Act.

2.

Findings

Congress finds the following:(1)Private speech intermediaries, such as broadcasters and interactive computer service providers, as well as providers of speech-enabling artificial intelligence systems, are critical for access to information and individual expression and have a right to independent editorial judgement.(2)Such entities can also serve as chokepoints convenient for the government to target for censorship of disfavored speech and information.(3)Government coercion of such private speech intermediaries and artificial intelligence system providers threatens freedom of speech and open inquiry, particularly for users who have no say in, or knowledge of, how their speech or access to information is affected.(4)At the same time, not all government communication to a private speech platform is coercive. Interactions between the government and websites, for example, may serve lawful enforcement purposes or facilitate legitimate dialogue with the private sector.(5)Members of the public also have an interest under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States in hearing what their government has to say. The people of the United States cannot engage with the views of their government unless the government can express those views.(6)It is therefore necessary to limit the ability of the government to create, through coercion, a system of speech regulation that evades convenient judicial redress and, consequently, the First Amendment, while maintaining the ability of the government to inform and persuade.

3.

Federal cause of action for jawboning

Title VII of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

723.

Prohibition on Federal agency or employee jawboning

(a)

Definitions

In this section: (1)

Agency

The term agency has the meaning given the term in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code. (2)

Artificial intelligence system

The term artificial intelligence system has the meaning given the term artificial intelligence in section 5002 of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 (15 U.S.C. 9401). (3)

Broadcaster

The term broadcaster means— (A) any licensee, operator, or owner of a broadcast station; and (B) any national broadcast network that provides television or radio programming to one or more broadcast stations, including through ownership of, or contractual network affiliation agreements with, those stations. (4)

Coerce

(A)

In general

The term coerce means to take a harmful, hostile, or unfavorable action, to imply the possibility of taking such action, or to threaten such action. (B)

Factors

Factors relevant to whether an action by an agency, officer, or employee satisfies the definition of coerce under subparagraph (A) include— (i) the word choice and tone of any relevant communication from the agency, officer, or employee; (ii) the existence of any Federal regulatory or enforcement authority over the recipient of any relevant communication from the agency, officer, or employee; (iii) whether any relevant communication from the agency, officer, or employee referred to adverse consequences to the recipient; (iv) whether any relevant communication from the agency, officer, or employee was private or public; (v) whether any relevant communication from the agency, officer, or employee included an affirmative disclaimer that the communication lacked legal force; (vi) whether any relevant communication from the agency, officer, or employee included a factual statement without legal force that could be useful to the decision-making of the recipient; (vii) whether any relevant communication from the agency, officer, or employee was for the purpose of aiding compliance with existing law; and (viii) whether any relevant communication from the agency, officer, or employee led the recipient to act contrary to its own policies. (5)

Content action

The term content action— (A) with respect to an interactive computer service, means— (i) adding information to, altering information on, or removing information from the interactive computer service, including with respect to a label appended to information; (ii) altering the presentation of information on the interactive computer service, including such presentation by the recommendation system of the interactive computer service; (iii) limiting interaction by an information content provider with the interactive computer service, including terminating or suspending an information content provider from the interactive computer service; or (iv) altering a policy of the interactive computer service affecting the moderation of information; (B) with respect to an artificial intelligence system, means— (i) adding, altering, or removing information generated or provided by the artificial intelligence system; or (ii) limiting interaction by an information content provider with the artificial intelligence system; and (C) with respect to a broadcaster, means adding information or programming to, altering information or programming on, or removing information or programming from a broadcast, including before the programming is finalized or while the programming is in an investigative or production phase of development. (6)

Employee

The term employee includes a fellow, contractor, or consultant. (7)

Information

The term information means lawful expression protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. (8)

Information content provider

The term information content provider has the meaning given the term in section 230. (9)

Interactive computer service

The term interactive computer service has the meaning given to the term in section 230. (10)

Recommendation system

The term recommendation system means a fully or partially automated system used by an interactive computer service to suggest, promote, or rank information provided by an information content provider. (b)

Prohibition

(1)

In general

Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be unlawful for an agency, or an officer or employee of the United States under color or pretense of office or employment, to coerce or attempt to coerce a broadcaster, a provider of an interactive computer service, or a provider of an artificial intelligence system within the United States (including the territories of the United States) for the purpose of, or if a reasonable person would understand the coercion or attempted coercion to be for the purpose of, incentivizing the broadcaster or provider to take a content action. (2)

Exceptions

(A)

In general

Paragraph (1) shall not apply to— (i) an action that— (I) is taken pursuant to a lawful investigation under, or the enforcement of, Federal or State law; and (II) does not violate the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; (ii) an action or threat to take action authorized by a warrant issued using the procedures described in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (or, in the case of a State court, issued using State warrant procedures) by a court of competent jurisdiction; or (iii) directions from an agency, or an officer or employee of the United States, to a broadcaster, a provider of an interactive computer service, or a provider of an artificial intelligence system to take an action directly relating to the official use of the broadcast station, interactive computer service, or artificial intelligence system, respectively, by the agency, officer, or employee. (B)

Burden of establishing exception

An agency, officer, or employee against whom a civil action is brought under subsection (c) shall bear the burden of establishing that an exception under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph applies. (c)

Private right of action

(1)

In general

A person aggrieved by a violation of subsection (b), including an information content provider, may bring a civil action against the applicable agency, officer, or employee in an appropriate district court of the United States. (2)

Scope of review

In a civil action brought under paragraph (1), to the extent necessary to the decision and when presented, the court shall decide all relevant questions of law and interpret constitutional and statutory provisions. (3)

Relief

In a civil action brought under paragraph (1)— (A) a person may obtain compensatory damages and the cost of the civil action, including reasonable attorney fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred; (B) except as provided in subparagraph (C), the court may, in addition to any other relief available at law, grant equitable relief that may be appropriate or necessary to correct a violation of subsection (b); and (C) punitive damages may not be awarded. (4)

Pre-trial motion for limited discovery

(A)

Motion

If a party to a civil action brought under paragraph (1) moves to dismiss the action under rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or moves to dismiss the action for lack of standing, the party that opposes the motion to dismiss may file a pre-trial motion for limited discovery at the discretion of the court. (B)

Limitations on time and scope

If the court grants a pre-trial motion for limited discovery filed under subparagraph (A), the court shall enter an order limiting that discovery— (i) to a period of not more than 30 days; and (ii) to evidence that permits the party that did not move to dismiss the action under subparagraph (A) to respond to the merits of the motion to dismiss. (C)

Extension

(i)

Hearing

Upon request, the court may hold a hearing to determine whether to extend discovery, with respect to a motion for limited discovery granted under this paragraph, by not more than 1 additional period of not more than 30 days. (ii)

Determination

The court may extend discovery under clause (i) for good cause shown by the party seeking the extension. (5)

No immunity from liability for subjective belief of unprotected speech

No agency, officer, or employee that is a party to a civil action brought under paragraph (1) shall be immune from liability on the basis of a finding that the agency, officer, or employee had a subjective belief that the information that is the subject of the claim in the civil action was not lawful expression protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. (6)

Mandatory defense and indemnification of Federal employees

(A)

Defense

If a civil action is brought under paragraph (1) against an officer or employee of the United States in the individual capacity of that officer or employee, the Department of Justice, if the officer or employee so elects, shall represent the officer or employee. (B)

Indemnification

(i)

In general

If a civil action is brought under paragraph (1) against an officer or employee of the United States in the individual capacity of that officer or employee, the Federal Government shall indemnify the officer or employee for any verdict, judgment, or other monetary award rendered against the officer or employee. (ii)

Exception

In a civil action described in clause (i), if the court finds that the officer or employee acted in a willful and wanton manner in incurring liability under this section, clause (i) shall not apply and the court shall order the officer or employee to reimburse the Federal Government the reasonable costs and reasonable attorney fees expended for the defense of the officer or employee. (d)

Enforcement by States

Any attorney general of a State may bring a civil action in the name of the State, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in the State, in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the defendant to secure relief as provided in this section for injury sustained by those natural persons from a violation of subsection (b).

.

4.

Establishment of standards and guidelines for logging covered communications with broadcasters, providers interactive computer services, and providers of artificial intelligence systems

The National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 271 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

37.

Establishment of standards and guidelines for logging covered communications with broadcasters, providers interactive computer services, and providers of artificial intelligence systems

(a)

Definitions

In this section:(1)

Agency

The term agency has the meaning given such term in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code.(2)

Artificial intelligence system

The term artificial intelligence system has the meaning given to the term artificial intelligence in section 5002 of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 (15 U.S.C. 9401).(3)

Broadcaster

The term broadcaster has the meaning given such term in section 723 of the Communications Act of 1934.(4)

Child sexual abuse material

The term child sexual abuse material means a visual depiction defined in section 2256(8) of title 18, United States Code.(5)

Communication

The term communication means any transfer, in whole or in part, by wire, oral, or electronic means, of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, or data of any nature.(6)

Communication metadata

The term communication metadata means structural or descriptive information associated with a communication, such as—(A)the name of the sender and recipient;(B)the employer or institutional affiliation of each person identified in subparagraph (A);(C)contact information for each person identified in subparagraph (A), such as a telephone number or email address; and(D)the date on which the communication was conveyed.(7)

Covered communication

The term covered communication means the contents of a communication and communication metadata from an officer or employee of the United States under color or pretense of office or employment to a broadcaster, provider of an interactive computer service, or provider of an artificial intelligence system regarding an act or omission by such broadcaster, service, or system with respect to actual or potential expression on or from the broadcaster, service, or system, including any standards, processes, or policies of such broadcaster or provider governing the broadcast, publication, display, or moderation of expression on or from the broadcaster, service, or system, but excluding the contents of communications and communications metadata—(A)to the extent it consists of classified information, as defined in section 1 of the Classified Information Procedures Act (Public Law 96–456), if such information is so properly classified;(B)relating to child sexual abuse material; and(C)for actions, threats, or directions described in a subparagraph of section 723(b)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934.(8)

Expression

The term expression means any speech, text, images, video, or any other information distributed by an information content provider, an interactive computer service, artificial intelligence system, or a broadcaster.(9)

Information content provider

The term information content provider has the meaning given to the term in section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230).(10)

Interactive computer service

The term interactive computer service means an interactive computer service as defined in section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230).(b)

Standards and guidelines required

(1)

In general

Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of the Justice Against Weaponized Bureaucratic Overreach to Networked Expression Act, the Director shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and the head of any other agency the Director considers appropriate, develop standards and guidelines to assist agencies in carrying out the requirements of section 701 of the National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976, including the collection, retention, and transmission of covered communications through the portal established under such section.(2)

Accounting for and adapting for specific needs of agencies

In developing the standards and guidelines pursuant to paragraph (1), the Director shall account for and, as applicable, adapt such standards and guidelines to the specific needs of each agency.(c)

Elements

The standards and guidelines required by subsection (b) shall include recommendations regarding—(1)standard taxonomies and labeling of covered communications to be transmitted to the portal described in such subsection;(2)the collection and logging of communication metadata for each covered communication;(3)standard formats to ensure interoperability of covered communications transmitted to such portal;(4)data security standards and protocols for the collection and transmission of covered communications to such portal; and(5)audit, management, and monitoring controls for the retention of covered communications by the agency.(d)

Biennial updates to the standards and guidelines

Not less than once every 2 years, the Director shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, review the standards and guidelines issued under subsection (b) and may revise and update such standards and guidelines as necessary.(e)

Submission to the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy

The Director shall submit the standards and guidelines developed under subsection (b), and any revisions made under subsection (d), to the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy for purposes of carrying out section 701 of the National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976.

.

5.

Establishment of portal for covered communications with broadcasters, providers of interactive computer services, and providers of artificial intelligence systems

The National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 6611 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:.

6.

Severability

If any provision of this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, is determined to be unenforceable or invalid, the remaining provisions of this Act and the amendments made by this Act shall not be affected.