[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3336 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>






119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3336

   To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to carry out prize 
competitions to advance the science of interpretability and to develop 
    adversarial robustness with respect to artificial intelligence 
                   products, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 3, 2025

 Ms. Hassan (for herself and Mr. Banks) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
   To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to carry out prize 
competitions to advance the science of interpretability and to develop 
    adversarial robustness with respect to artificial intelligence 
                   products, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reliable Artificial Intelligence 
Research Act of 2025''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Adversarial robustness.--The term ``adversarial 
        robustness'' means the degree to which an artificial 
        intelligence model is able to resist attacks that would induce 
        it to produce incorrect, restricted, or harmful outputs, while 
        maintaining integrity, reliability, and privacy.
            (2) Artificial intelligence.--The term ``artificial 
        intelligence'' has the meaning given the term in section 5002 
        of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 
        (15 U.S.C. 9401).
            (3) Interpretability.--The term ``interpretability'' means 
        the degree to which humans are able to accurately understand 
        how an artificial intelligence model makes decisions and 
        considers inputs and how the outputs or behaviors of the model 
        respond to a change in the inputs.
            (4) Red-teaming.--The term ``red-teaming'' means a 
        structured, interactive, and adversarial process to test an 
        artificial intelligence system by simulating real-world actions 
        to find vulnerabilities or flaws in the system.
            (5) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Homeland Security.

SEC. 3. PRIZE COMPETITION FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTERPRETABILITY 
              RESEARCH.

    (a) Prize Competition Required.--Not later than 270 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall 
commence carrying out at least 1 prize competition under section 24 of 
the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3719) 
to advance the science of interpretability in a manner relevant to 
commercially available or widely used artificial intelligence products.
    (b) Consultation.--In carrying out the prize competition required 
by subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with--
            (1) the Secretary of Commerce;
            (2) the Director of the National Institute of Standards and 
        Technology;
            (3) the National Cyber Director;
            (4) the Director of the National Science Foundation; and
            (5) any industry expert from the artificial intelligence 
        sector in the United States that the Secretary considers 
        relevant.
    (c) Structure and Evaluation Criteria.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall develop the structure 
        and evaluation criteria for a prize competition carried out 
        under subsection (a) in accordance with the primary purpose 
        described in that subsection.
            (2) Competition structure.--The Secretary may--
                    (A) structure a competition under subsection (a) 
                into 1 or more phases, including submission of 
                interpretability frameworks, submission of 
                interpretable artificial intelligence models, and 
                unique basic research; and
                    (B) open these phases to the same, or to distinct, 
                contestant pools.
            (3) Evaluation considerations.--In developing the 
        evaluation criteria for the frameworks, models, or methods 
        submitted for a prize competition under subsection (a), the 
        Secretary shall consider--
                    (A) the degree to which a submission advances 
                broadly applicable principles of artificial 
                intelligence interpretability;
                    (B) the practical value of a submission in making 
                artificial intelligence more understandable and 
                reliable in high-risk, high-value use cases; and
                    (C) the likelihood that the unique research 
                submitted will create standards for artificial 
                intelligence interpretability in the government or 
                industry.
    (d) Program Administration.--The Secretary may enter into 
contracts, cooperative agreements, or other agreements with for-profit 
or nonprofit entities or State, territorial, local, or Tribal agencies 
to design and administer any prize competition carried out under 
subsection (a).

SEC. 4. PRIZE COMPETITION FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADVERSARIAL 
              ROBUSTNESS RESEARCH.

    (a) Prize Competition Required.--Not later than 270 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall commence carrying 
out at least 1 prize competition under section 24 of the Stevenson-
Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3719) to develop 
capable artificial intelligence models that are designed to exhibit 
adversarial robustness in circumstances necessary for at least 1 high-
impact, high-risk application in government or industry.
    (b) Consultation.--In carrying out a prize competition required by 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with--
            (1) the Secretary of Commerce;
            (2) the Director of the Institute of Standards and 
        Technology;
            (3) the National Cyber Director;
            (4) the Director of the National Science Foundation;
            (5) any industry expert from the artificial intelligence 
        sector in the United States that the Secretary considers 
        relevant; and
            (6) the head of any Federal agency who has authority or 
        expertise in a high-impact, high-risk application of artificial 
        intelligence that could be an appropriate subject for a prize 
        competition under subsection (a).
    (c) Structure and Evaluation Criteria.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall develop the structure 
        and evaluation criteria for a prize competition carried out 
        under subsection (a) in accordance with the primary purpose 
        described in that subsection.
            (2) Competition structure.--The Secretary may--
                    (A) structure a competition under subsection (a) 
                into 1 or more phases, including submission of 
                adversarial robustness frameworks, submission of 
                artificial intelligence models, and red-teaming; and
                    (B) open these phases to the same, or to distinct, 
                contestant pools.
            (3) Evaluation considerations.--In developing the 
        evaluation criteria for the frameworks, models, or methods 
        submitted for a prize competition under subsection (a), the 
        Secretary shall consider--
                    (A) the degree to which a submission advances 
                broadly applicable principles of artificial 
                intelligence robustness; and
                    (B) the practical value of the submission in 
                reducing the risk of adversarial attacks in high-risk, 
                high-value use cases of artificial intelligence.
    (d) Program Administration.--The Secretary may enter into 
contracts, cooperative agreements, or other agreements with for-profit 
or nonprofit entities or State, territorial, local, or Tribal agencies 
to design and administer any prize competition carried out under 
subsection (a).

SEC. 5. TRACKING AND REPORTING.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date on which 
the first prize competition concludes, the Secretary shall submit to 
the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes--
            (1) an evaluation of how the results of the competitions 
        inform the fields of interpretability and adversarial 
        robustness;
            (2) an assessment of any gaps in these fields identified by 
        the Secretary over the course of the competitions; and
            (3) any suggested action that Congress should take to 
        advance the fields of interpretability, adversarial robustness, 
        and any related research.
    (b) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this section, 
the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
            (1) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
        Affairs of the Senate; and
            (2) the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of 
        Representatives.

SEC. 6. APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry 
out this section $10,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2026 
through 2030.
                                 <all>