[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1285 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






119th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1285

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that over 25 years 
 of real-world evidence and hundreds of peer-reviewed studies proving 
 that mifepristone is safe and effective should be respected, and law 
 and policy governing access to lifesaving, time-sensitive medication 
 abortion care in the United States should be equitable, transparent, 
 and based on the best available peer-reviewed evidence-based science.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2026

  Ms. DeGette (for herself, Ms. Pressley, Ms. McClellan, Ms. Clark of 
    Massachusetts, Mr. Bell, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Ms. 
Velazquez, Mr. Moulton, Ms. Pettersen, Ms. Norton, Ms. Balint, and Ms. 
 Dexter) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that over 25 years 
 of real-world evidence and hundreds of peer-reviewed studies proving 
 that mifepristone is safe and effective should be respected, and law 
 and policy governing access to lifesaving, time-sensitive medication 
 abortion care in the United States should be equitable, transparent, 
 and based on the best available peer-reviewed evidence-based science.

Whereas Congress, by enacting the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
        U.S.C. 301 et seq.), authorized the Food and Drug Administration (in 
        this preamble referred to as the ``FDA'') to determine, based on the 
        scientific evidence, whether a drug is safe and effective for the 
        intended use of the drug;
Whereas Congress authorized the FDA to impose or maintain a Risk Evaluation and 
        Mitigation Strategy (in this preamble referred to as ``REMS'') for a 
        drug only where ``necessary to ensure that the benefits of the drug 
        outweigh the risks of the drug'' considering certain statutorily 
        enumerated factors;
Whereas Congress prohibited the FDA from imposing or maintaining an Element to 
        Assure Safe Use (in this preamble referred to as ``ETASU'') within a 
        REMS program if, inter alia, the ETASU is ``unduly burdensome on patient 
        access,'' considering in particular ``patients who have difficulty 
        accessing health care'';
Whereas mifepristone is a medication recommended by leading medical authorities 
        for its FDA-approved use to terminate a pregnancy and for its off-label 
        use to manage miscarriage;
Whereas mifepristone received approval from the FDA more than 25 years ago, and 
        according to the FDA, the ``efficacy and safety have become well-
        established by both research and experience, and serious complications 
        have proven to be extremely rare'';
Whereas the FDA approved mifepristone following a rigorous 54-month review 
        period that included the review of 3 complete phases of clinical trials 
        that involved thousands of participants and that showed mifepristone was 
        safe and effective for termination of an early pregnancy;
Whereas, despite mifepristone's exceptional safety record, the FDA still 
        regulates this medication more heavily than 99 percent of prescription 
        drugs;
Whereas, in December 2021, after an extensive review of high-quality research 
        and years of real-world data confirming that mifepristone remains just 
        as safe when patients can fill their prescription by mail or at a 
        pharmacy, the FDA concluded that the mifepristone REMS should be 
        modified to lessen the burdens on patient access and the health care 
        system and, in January 2023, approved this modification to the REMS that 
        removed the in-person dispensing ETASU and added a pharmacy 
        certification ETASU, allowing Mifeprex and its approved generics to be 
        dispensed by certified pharmacies, both in-person and by mail, as well 
        as by or under the supervision of certified prescribers;
Whereas numerous peer-reviewed studies since January 2023 have further 
        established that mifepristone remains highly safe and effective;
Whereas mifepristone is more accessible when dispensed to eligible patients by 
        mail or at a pharmacy after clinical evaluation and counseling through 
        telemedicine;
Whereas few drugs have been studied so extensively after their FDA approval and 
        few hold such an explicit and convincing safety record as mifepristone;
Whereas leading medical and scientific organizations, including the World Health 
        Organization, the American Medical Association, the American College of 
        Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Academy of Family 
        Physicians, the Society of Family Planning, and the Society for 
        Maternal-Fetal Medicine, recognize that mifepristone is safe and 
        effective, including when prescribed through telemedicine and dispensed 
        to eligible patients by mail or at a pharmacy, and continue to recommend 
        the use of mifepristone as part of an evidence-based regimen to safely 
        end a pregnancy;
Whereas the importance of medication abortion is recognized globally, and the 
        World Health Organization has included mifepristone on its list of 
        essential medicines since 2005;
Whereas the safety record of mifepristone is demonstrated by its availability in 
        more than 90 countries, including countries without restrictions like 
        the mifepristone REMS;
Whereas medication abortion accounted for 63 percent of all abortions in the 
        United States in 2023;
Whereas, following the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in 
        Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. 215 (2022), to 
        overturn decades of precedent in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and 
        Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), as of May 2026, bans 
        have eliminated all or some abortions in 20 States, compounding an 
        already complex landscape and exacerbating the existing abortion-access 
        crisis;
Whereas, in the years since the decision of the Supreme Court of the United 
        States to overturn Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned 
        Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's 
        Health Organization, 597 U.S. 215 (2022), anti-abortion politicians and 
        groups have filed multiple baseless lawsuits against the FDA over its 
        approval and regulation of mifepristone, attempting to use 
        misinformation about mifepristone to justify restricting access to this 
        essential medication nationwide, despite its longstanding safety record;
Whereas the impact to the health and well-being of patients across the country 
        would be devastating if any action reduced patient access to medication 
        abortion or increased barriers to prescribing and dispensing medication 
        abortion;
Whereas abortion bans and restrictions force patients to travel greater 
        distances for care and face longer wait times, and force some patients 
        who are unable to access care to remain pregnant against their will;
Whereas scientific research has demonstrated that restricting access to abortion 
        increases the risk of domestic violence for pregnant people and data 
        suggests that the privacy of a telehealth consultation may increase a 
        patient's willingness to disclose abuse or coercion; and
Whereas, due to discrimination, unnecessary restrictions on abortion, including 
        medication abortion, disproportionately push care out of reach for--

    (1) Black and Indigenous people;

    (2) people of color;

    (3) immigrants;

    (4) people with lower incomes;

    (5) people in rural communities;

    (6) LGBTQ+ people;

    (7) people living with disabilities;

    (8) people experiencing intimate partner violence; and

    (9) other pregnant people who have been disproportionately harmed by 
systemic inequities in health care: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) Food and Drug Administration policies affecting access 
        to medication abortion care in the United States must be based 
        on transparent scientific review of the full body of gold-
        standard medical evidence, as well as considerations of 
        potential burdens on patient access and the health care 
        delivery system, as required by the Federal Food, Drug, and 
        Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.);
            (2) Congress has granted the Food and Drug Administration 
        the authority to regulate prescription drug medications and 
        medical devices based on scientific determinations of their 
        safety and efficacy grounded in the best available peer-
        reviewed evidence-based science, and without political 
        interference;
            (3) the Food and Drug Administration has performed multiple 
        scientific reviews of mifepristone over 25 years, each time 
        finding mifepristone to be safe and effective for pregnancy 
        termination, including when mifepristone is prescribed through 
        telemedicine and dispensed to eligible patients by mail or at a 
        pharmacy, based on high-quality clinical research and real-
        world-safety data; and
            (4) preserving and expanding access to medication abortion 
        care, including preserving the ability to prescribe 
        mifepristone through telemedicine and dispense to eligible 
        patients by mail or at a pharmacy, is important to ensure 
        equitable access to abortion for patients harmed by statutory, 
        regulatory, financial, and circumstantial restrictions that 
        worsen reproductive health disparities for--
                    (A) Black and Indigenous people;
                    (B) people of color;
                    (C) immigrants;
                    (D) people with lower incomes;
                    (E) people in rural communities;
                    (F) LGBTQ+ people;
                    (G) people living with disabilities;
                    (H) people experiencing intimate partner violence; 
                and
                    (I) people in other marginalized communities.
                                 <all>