[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9807 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 9807
To amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act to
prevent preemption of State law claims that are consistent with the
misbranding standards of such Act, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 21, 2026
Mrs. Luna (for herself, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Massie, and Ms. Pingree)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
Agriculture
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act to
prevent preemption of State law claims that are consistent with the
misbranding standards of such Act, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Americans vs. Poisonous Pesticides
Act''.
SEC. 2. STATE LAW CLAIMS ON MISBRANDING OF PESTICIDES.
(a) Preservation of State Failure-to-Warn Claims.--Section 24(b) of
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C.
136v(b)) is amended--
(1) in the subsection heading, by inserting ``of Labeling
Standards'' after ``Uniformity''; and
(2) by inserting ``This subsection does not preempt any
State law claim that is consistent with the misbranding
standards of section 2(q).'' after ``this Act.''.
(b) Misbranding Information.--Section 3(f) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136a(f)) is
amended--
(1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``The registration of a
pesticide, and the approval of the labeling of such pesticide
by the Administrator, shall not be construed as a defense to
any State law claim. In any proceeding, including a proceeding
on any State law claim, registration of a pesticide and the
approval of the labeling of such pesticide by the
Administrator, shall be prima facie evidence (but not
conclusive evidence) that the pesticide and its labeling comply
with this Act.'' after ``of the Act.''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
``(6) Duty to address misbranding information.--
``(A) In general.--If the registrant or the
Administrator obtains information indicating that a
pesticide may be misbranded under section 2(q) due to
potential effects on human health or the environment
which are not disclosed on the label of such pesticide,
the registrant of such pesticide may amend the labeling
of such pesticide to address such information without
prior approval of the Administrator.
``(B) Disapproval.--The Administrator may
disapprove, or otherwise take action under section 6
with respect to, the amendment of the labeling of a
pesticide under subparagraph (A).
``(C) Information defined.--In this paragraph, the
term `information' means any reliable data, findings,
study, report, or documentation and includes--
``(i) a government report;
``(ii) an independent peer-reviewed study;
``(iii) data of the registrant;
``(iv) material obtained through legal
discovery;
``(v) a disclosure by a whistleblower;
``(vi) material from a congressional or
other oversight investigation; and
``(vii) pesticide incident data under
section 6(a)(2).''.
(c) Application to Pending Actions.--The amendments made by this
Act shall apply to any civil action, including any action on remand or
appeal, that is pending on, or commenced on or after, the date of
enactment of this Act, regardless of the date on which the conduct that
gave rise to such action occurred.
(d) Rule of Construction.--None of the amendments made by this Act
shall be construed to modify, restrict, or otherwise affect any action
for damages or injunctive relief, or the liability of any person under
the law of any State.
<all>