    [Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
    [H.R. 9497 Introduced in House (IH)]

    <DOC>

    119th CONGRESS
      2d Session
                                    H. R. 9497

      To provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United
     States, to provide for the conservation and development of water and
                   related resources, and for other purposes.

    _______________________________________________________________________

                        IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                                 June 29, 2026

    Mr. Graves (for himself, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Collins, and Ms.
    Wilson of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to
               the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

    _______________________________________________________________________

                                     A BILL

      To provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United
     States, to provide for the conservation and development of water and
                   related resources, and for other purposes.

        Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
    United States of America in Congress assembled,

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

        (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources
    Development Act of 2026''.
        (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act is as
    follows:

    Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
    Sec. 2. Secretary defined.
                          TITLE I--GENERAL PROVISIONS

    Sec. 101. Program Offices within the Directorate of Civil Works.
    Sec. 102. Contracting efficiency.
    Sec. 103. Removal or remediation of contaminated sediment.
    Sec. 104. Levee owners board.
    Sec. 105. Categorical permissions.
    Sec. 106. Contributions by non-Federal interests.
    Sec. 107. Electronic submission and tracking of permit applications.
    Sec. 108. Project study schedule and cost estimate.
    Sec. 109. Continuing authority programs.
    Sec. 110. Dredged material management plans.
    Sec. 111. Dredging coordination.
    Sec. 112. Federal standard for dredged material disposal or placement.
    Sec. 113. Levee certifications.
    Sec. 114. Allocations from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.
    Sec. 115. Soo Lock operator wage rates.
    Sec. 116. Beneficial use of dredged material from harbors in the State
                                of Ohio.
    Sec. 117. Minimum real estate interest.
    Sec. 118. Real estate appraisal validity.
    Sec. 119. Watershed and river basin assessments.
    Sec. 120. Prohibition on diversion of water from Missouri River.
    Sec. 121. Law enforcement at water resources development projects.
    Sec. 122. Disaster debris removal.
    Sec. 123. Wildfire contingency strategies.
    Sec. 124. Reservoir sediment pilot program.
    Sec. 125. Environmental dredging.
    Sec. 126. Expenses for control of aquatic plant growths and invasive
                                species.
    Sec. 127. Feasibility studies; review of shoreline and streambank
                                protection.
    Sec. 128. Harmful algal bloom demonstration program.
    Sec. 129. Shoreline and riverine protection and restoration.
    Sec. 130. Fish and oyster habitat restoration.
    Sec. 131. Benefits and costs attributable to certain measures.
    Sec. 132. Policy on utilization of all Corps authorities and missions.
    Sec. 133. Comprehensive feasibility studies and approaches for flood
                                risk management and coastal storm risk
                                management.
    Sec. 134. Realignment of certain Corps of Engineers Districts.
    Sec. 135. Update of Corps policy.
    Sec. 136. Availability of project information.
    Sec. 137. Fish and wildlife mitigation.
    Sec. 138. Sense of Congress regarding evaluation of flood risk
                                management projects.
    Sec. 139. Recreational access.
    Sec. 140. Sense of Congress on munitions disposal.
    Sec. 141. Corps of Engineers workforce.
    Sec. 142. Reporting and oversight.
    Sec. 143. Ability to pay.
    Sec. 144. Pilot program prioritization.
                         TITLE II--STUDIES AND REPORTS

    Sec. 201. Authorization of proposed feasibility studies.
    Sec. 202. Expedited completion.
    Sec. 203. Expedited modification of existing feasibility studies.
    Sec. 204. Expedited completion of other feasibility studies.
    Sec. 205. Corps of Engineers reports.
    Sec. 206. Report on the inland waterways system.
    Sec. 207. GAO studies.
    Sec. 208. Inspector General reports.
    Sec. 209. Acceleration of emergency inland navigation projects.
    Sec. 210. Assessment of commercial fish landings data.
    Sec. 211. Assessments of dryland stream technologies and shoreline
                                stabilization technologies.
    Sec. 212. Assessment of nonstructural approaches to flood risk
                                management and hurricane and storm risk
                                reduction.
    Sec. 213. Post-disaster watershed assessment for impacted areas.
    Sec. 214. Updated plan on Federal hopper dredge recapitalization.
    Sec. 215. Choctawhatchee and Pea River basins, Alabama and Florida.
    Sec. 216. Mobile Harbor land use assessment.
    Sec. 217. Honolulu Harbor, Hawaii.
    Sec. 218. Chicago Area Waterway System.
    Sec. 219. Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin project, Brandon
                                Road, Will County, Illinois.
    Sec. 220. Columbia Lock and Dam, Louisiana.
    Sec. 221. Lower Mississippi River Comprehensive Management Study.
    Sec. 222. Disposition study for Cape Cod Canal, Massachusetts.
    Sec. 223. New England regional confined aquatic disposal facilities.
    Sec. 224. Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia.
    Sec. 225. Big Sandy Lake, Minnesota.
    Sec. 226. Upper Missouri River Basin sedimentation.
    Sec. 227. Table Rock Lake disposition study, Missouri and Arkansas.
    Sec. 228. Table Rock Lake, Missouri and Arkansas.
    Sec. 229. Evaluation of atomic contamination at Cochiti Lake, Sandoval
                                County, New Mexico.
    Sec. 230. National Academy of Sciences study on Upper Rio Grande Basin.
    Sec. 231. Arbuckle-Timbered Hills, Oklahoma.
    Sec. 232. Disposition and cost allocation study of Willamette Valley,
                                Oregon.
    Sec. 233. Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoir and Dam, Pennsylvania.
    Sec. 234. Humphreys County, Tennessee.
    Sec. 235. Sam Rayburn Reservoir, Texas.
    Sec. 236. Columbia River, Washington.
    Sec. 237. Tri-Cities Area, Washington.
                 TITLE III--DEAUTHORIZATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS

    Sec. 301. Deauthorization of inactive projects.
    Sec. 302. General reauthorizations.
    Sec. 303. Conveyances.
    Sec. 304. Land exchange, Walton and Bay Counties, Florida.
    Sec. 305. Port Canaveral, Florida.
    Sec. 306. Specific deauthorizations.
    Sec. 307. Environmental infrastructure.
    Sec. 308. Forecast-informed reservoir operations.
    Sec. 309. Floodplain management services.
    Sec. 310. Planning assistance to States.
    Sec. 311. Mendenhall Glacier outburst flooding, Alaska.
    Sec. 312. Hansen Dam, Los Angeles-San Gabriel River Basin, California.
    Sec. 313. Morro Bay, California.
    Sec. 314. Oceanside, California.
    Sec. 315. Pajaro River, California.
    Sec. 316. Rio Grande Environmental Management Program, Colorado, New
                                Mexico, and Texas.
    Sec. 317. Miami Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Florida.
    Sec. 318. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Louisiana.
    Sec. 319. Pilottown anchorage area, Louisiana.
    Sec. 320. Jack Hubbard Memorial Breakwater, Burt Township, Michigan.
    Sec. 321. Sardis Lake, Panola County, Mississippi.
    Sec. 322. Hydraulic evaluation of Upper Mississippi River.
    Sec. 323. Lower Missouri River comprehensive flood protection.
    Sec. 324. Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee.
    Sec. 325. Great Lakes Commission.
    Sec. 326. Great Lakes Fishery and ecosystem restoration.
    Sec. 327. Truckee River and tributaries, Nevada.
    Sec. 328. Cooperative agreements, New Mexico.
    Sec. 329. Kinzua Dam safety modification study, Allegheny River, New
                                York and Pennsylvania.
    Sec. 330. Surf City and North Topsail Beach, North Carolina.
    Sec. 331. Massillon Local Protection Project, Tuscarawas River, Ohio.
    Sec. 332. Toussaint River Federal navigation project, Carroll Township,
                                Ohio.
    Sec. 333. Rio Puerto Nuevo flood risk management project, San Juan,
                                Puerto Rico.
    Sec. 334. Buffalo Bayou Tributaries and Resiliency Study, Texas.
    Sec. 335. Chambers, Galveston, and Harris Counties, Texas, expedited
                                real estate transfers.
    Sec. 336. Coastal Virginia.
    Sec. 337. Norfolk Coastal Storm Risk Management, Virginia.
    Sec. 338. Puget Sound and adjacent waters restoration, Washington.
    Sec. 339. Lower Columbia River.
    Sec. 340. Lower Columbia River Basin ecosystem restoration assessment.
    Sec. 341. Puget Sound nearshore ecosystem restoration, Washington.
    Sec. 342. Washington Metropolitan Area, Washington, District of
                                Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia.
    Sec. 343. Federal Triangle Area, Washington, District of Columbia.
                    TITLE IV--WATER RESOURCES INFRASTRUCTURE

    Sec. 401. Project authorizations.
    Sec. 402. Expedited completion of projects and activities.
                              TITLE V--DAM SAFETY

    Sec. 501. National Dam Safety Program amendments.

    SEC. 2. SECRETARY DEFINED.

        In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the
    Army.

                          TITLE I--GENERAL PROVISIONS

    SEC. 101. PROGRAM OFFICES WITHIN THE DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL WORKS.

        (a) Office of Inland Navigation Construction Management.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish within the
            Directorate of Civil Works an office to be known as the
            ``Office of Inland Navigation Construction Management''.
                (2) Administration.--In establishing the office under this
            subsection, the Secretary shall--
                        (A) designate an Inland Program Manager, who shall
                    head the office and report directly to the Deputy
                    Commanding General for Civil Works and Emergency
                    Operations; and
                        (B) provide the office with sufficient
                    administrative, technical, and budgetary support to
                    direct, perform, and coordinate the following tasks
                    related to the inland waterways navigation mission of
                    the Corps of Engineers:
                                (i) Develop and maintain an inland waterway
                            program management plan.
                                (ii) Oversee inland waterways construction
                            projects and major rehabilitation projects
                            along the inland and intracoastal waterways of
                            the United States, as described in section 206
                            of the Inland Waterways Revenue Act of 1978 (33
                            U.S.C. 1804).
                                (iii) Coordinate, validate, and oversee
                            funding for the projects described in clause
                            (ii), including the transactions of the Inland
                            Waterway Trust Fund.
                                (iv) Conduct in-progress reviews for
                            individual project designs and construction.
                                (v) Provide updates at every meeting of the
                            Inland Waterways Users Board established under
                            section 302 of the Water Resources Development
                            Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2251).
                                (vi) Develop and annually update the
                            projects described in clause (ii) in accordance
                            with the capital investment strategy authorized
                            by section 302(d) of the Water Resources
                            Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2251).
                (3) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
            Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate, and make publicly available (including on
            a publicly available website), a report detailing the results
            of the status of the implementation of this subsection,
            including--
                        (A) the progress of the Secretary in establishing
                    the Office of Inland Navigation Construction
                    Management;
                        (B) the status of every inland waterway
                    construction project and major rehabilitation project
                    in the most recent capital investment strategy,
                    including any issues related to delays or cost
                    overruns; and
                        (C) any recommendations related to the operational
                    improvement of the Office of Inland Navigation
                    Construction Management.
        (b) Office of Water Supply, Water Conservation, and Drought
    Resiliency.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish within the
            Directorate of Civil Works an office to be known as the
            ``Office of Water Supply, Water Conservation, and Drought
            Resiliency''.
                (2) Administration.--In establishing the office under this
            subsection, the Secretary shall--
                        (A) designate a Water Supply, Water Conservation,
                    and Drought Resiliency Program Manager, who shall head
                    the office and report directly to the Deputy Commanding
                    General for Civil Works and Emergency Operations;
                        (B) staff the office with personnel who may reside
                    in any district or division of the Corps of Engineers;
                    and
                        (C) provide the office with sufficient
                    administrative, technical, and budgetary support to
                    direct, perform, and coordinate the following tasks
                    related to the water supply mission of the Corps of
                    Engineers:
                                (i) Identify and evaluate opportunities
                            using authorities of the Corps of Engineers to
                            promote water supply, water conservation, and
                            drought resiliency at water resource
                            development projects.
                                (ii) Provide to the Corps of Engineers,
                            States, and non-Federal interests information
                            on existing policies and guidance documents of
                            the Corps of Engineers related to, and make
                            recommendations on new policies and guidance
                            documents to improve, water supply, water
                            conservation, and drought resiliency,
                            including--
                                        (I) implementation of subtitle B of
                                    title I of the Water Resources
                                    Development Act of 2024;
                                        (II) the method for the accounting
                                    of storage use under water supply
                                    storage agreements at Corps of
                                    Engineers reservoirs;
                                        (III) the reallocation of storage
                                    space at Corps of Engineers reservoirs
                                    to water supply;
                                        (IV) the interpretation and
                                    implementation of the Water Supply Act
                                    of 1958 (43 U.S.C. 390b); and
                                        (V) the interpretation and
                                    implementation of section 6 of the Act
                                    of December 22, 1944 (33 U.S.C. 708).
                                (iii) Assist and provide guidance to States
                            and non-Federal interests on accessing
                            programs, services, and other technical and
                            financial assistance made available by the
                            Corps of Engineers related to water supply,
                            water conservation, and drought resiliency
                            efforts related to water resources development
                            projects.
                                (iv) Coordinate the review and completion
                            of water supply reallocation studies and
                            reports to clear backlogs and ensure new
                            studies and reports are completed in a timely
                            manner.
                                (v) Act as a liaison between the Corps of
                            Engineers and non-Federal interests for
                            studies, projects, and agreements for water
                            supply, water conservation, and drought
                            resiliency efforts related to water resources
                            development projects, including efforts to--
                                        (I) reallocate storage space in
                                    projects to store water for municipal
                                    and industrial water supply purposes
                                    pursuant to the Water Supply Act of
                                    1958 (43 U.S.C. 390b);
                                        (II) enter into surplus water
                                    contracts pursuant to section 6 of the
                                    Act of December 22, 1944 (33 U.S.C.
                                    708); and
                                        (III) modify the operation of
                                    projects under other authorities to
                                    produce water supply benefits
                                    incidental to and consistent with
                                    authorized purposes, including by--
                                                (aa) adjusting the timing
                                            of releases for other
                                            authorized purposes to create
                                            opportunities for water supply
                                            conservation, use, and storage;
                                                (bb) capturing stormwater;
                                                (cc) releasing water from
                                            storage to replenish aquifer
                                            storage and recovery;
                                                (dd) releasing water from
                                            storage to augment storage at
                                            another Federal or non-Federal
                                            storage facility; and
                                                (ee) other conservation
                                            measures that enhance the use
                                            of a Corps of Engineers project
                                            for water supply.
                                (vi) Conduct outreach and workshops for
                            potential non-Federal interests to provide
                            information on the authorities described in
                            clause (i).
                                (vii) Evaluate budget requests to ensure
                            sufficient resources are requested and
                            allocated by the Directorate to fulfill the
                            tasks described in this subparagraph.
                                (viii) Cooperate with State, regional, and
                            local government and planning authorities to
                            identify strategies to augment water supplies,
                            enhance drought resiliency, promote contingency
                            planning, and assist in the planning and
                            development of alternative water sources.
                                (ix) Other tasks in furtherance of the
                            water supply mission as determined by the
                            Secretary.
                (3) Report required.--Not later than 2 years after the date
            of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
            Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report that describes--
                        (A) the progress of the Secretary in establishing
                    the Office of Water Supply, Water Conservation, and
                    Drought Resiliency, including a description of the
                    status of implementing paragraph (2)(C);
                        (B) the number of staff assigned to such Office;
                    and
                        (C) for each water supply study or project being
                    conducted or implemented by the Corps of Engineers as
                    of the date on which such report is submitted--
                                (i) the status of each such study or
                            project;
                                (ii) the date upon which each such study or
                            project commenced;
                                (iii) the estimated date of completion of
                            each such study or project; and
                                (iv) any significant impediments or
                            obstacles that may reasonably affect the
                            timeline to complete each such study or
                            project.
        (c) Office on Technical Assistance and Community Outreach.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish within the
            Directorate of Civil Works an office to be known as the
            ``Office on Technical Assistance and Community Outreach''.
                (2) Administration.--In establishing the office under this
            subsection, the Secretary shall--
                        (A) designate a Technical Assistance and Community
                    Outreach Manager who shall head the office and report
                    directly to the Deputy Commanding General for Civil
                    Works and Emergency Operations;
                        (B) staff the office with personnel who may reside
                    in any district or division of the Corps of Engineers;
                    and
                        (C) provide the office with sufficient
                    administrative, technical, and budgetary support to
                    direct, perform, and coordinate the following tasks:
                                (i) Assist and provide guidance to non-
                            Federal interests on accessing programs,
                            services, and other technical and financial
                            assistance made available by the Corps of
                            Engineers relating to water resources
                            development projects, including under--
                                        (I) a continuing authority program
                                    (as such term is defined in section
                                    7001(c)(1)(D) of the Water Resources
                                    Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33
                                    U.S.C. 2282d));
                                        (II) section 206 of the Flood
                                    Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a),
                                    including the Silver Jackets program
                                    established pursuant to such section;
                                        (III) section 22 of the Water
                                    Resources Development Act of 1974 (42
                                    U.S.C. 1962d-16);
                                        (IV) section 203 of the Water
                                    Resources Development Act of 2000 (33
                                    U.S.C. 2269);
                                        (V) section 5014 of the Water
                                    Resources Reform and Development Act of
                                    2014 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note);
                                        (VI) section 118 of the Water
                                    Resources Development Act of 2020 (33
                                    U.S.C. 2201 note);
                                        (VII) section 165 of the Water
                                    Resources Development Act of 2020 (33
                                    U.S.C. 2201 note);
                                        (VIII) the Water Infrastructure
                                    Finance and Innovation Act (33 U.S.C.
                                    3901 et seq.);
                                        (IX) sections 1148 and 1305 of the
                                    Water Resources Development Act of 2024
                                    (138 Stat. 3039; 33 U.S.C. 2201 note);
                                        (X) section 103(m) of the Water
                                    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
                                    U.S.C. 2213m); and
                                        (XI) section 1148 of the Water
                                    Resources Development Act of 2024.
                                (ii) Coordinate the implementation of
                            public awareness, education, outreach, and
                            engagement requirements under section 8117 of
                            the Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (33
                            U.S.C. 2281b).
                                (iii) Identify programs, services, and
                            other assistance made available by other
                            Federal and State agencies relating to water
                            resources development projects for purposes of
                            advising potential non-Federal interests on the
                            best available applicable assistance.
                (3) Prioritization.--In carrying out paragraph (2)(C), to
            the maximum extent practicable, the Technical Assistance and
            Community Outreach Manager shall prioritize providing technical
            assistance and guidance to a non-Federal interest seeking to
            carry out a water resources development project that will
            benefit a rural community, a Tribal community, or a community
            described in the guidance issued by the Secretary pursuant to
            section 160 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33
            U.S.C. 2201 note).
                (4) Electronic portal.--
                        (A) Development.--In carrying out this subsection,
                    the Secretary shall develop an online, interactive
                    portal that--
                                (i) contains information relating to the
                            programs described in paragraph (2)(C)(i); and
                                (ii) can be used by a potential non-Federal
                            interest as a succinct guide to accessing such
                            programs for an applicable potential water
                            resources development project.
                        (B) Availability.--The Secretary shall ensure that
                    the portal developed under subparagraph (A) is made
                    available in a prominent location on the public-facing
                    website of the headquarters of the Corps of Engineers
                    and of each district and division of the Corps of
                    Engineers.
        (d) Office on Alternative Delivery Methods.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish within the
            Directorate of Civil Works an office to be known as the
            ``Office on Alternative Delivery Methods''.
                (2) Administration.--In establishing the office under this
            subsection, the Secretary shall--
                        (A) designate an Alternative Delivery Manager who
                    shall head the office and report directly to the Deputy
                    Commanding General for Civil Works and Emergency
                    Operations;
                        (B) staff the office with personnel who may reside
                    in any district or division of the Corps of Engineers;
                    and
                        (C) provide the office with sufficient
                    administrative, technical, and budgetary support to
                    direct, perform, and coordinate the following tasks:
                                (i) Assist and provide guidance to non-
                            Federal interests on accessing alternative
                            delivery programs, services, and other
                            technical and financial assistance made
                            available by the Corps of Engineers relating to
                            water resources development projects, including
                            under--
                                        (I) sections 203 and 204 of the
                                    Water Resources Development Act of 1986
                                    (33 U.S.C. 2231; 2232);
                                        (II) section 1043 of the Water
                                    Resources Reform and Development Act of
                                    2014 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note);
                                        (III) section 1113 of the Water
                                    Resources Development Act of 2016 (33
                                    U.S.C. 2326e);
                                        (IV) section 159 of the Water
                                    Resources Development Act of 2020; and
                                        (V) section 1107(a) of the Water
                                    Resources Development Act of 2024 (33
                                    U.S.C. 2201 note).
                                (ii) Coordinate with non-Federal interests
                            to establish clear review standards,
                            procedures, and timelines for the review and
                            approval of studies, plans, specifications, and
                            other materials submitted pursuant to the
                            programs described in clause (i).
                                (iii) Identify opportunities to accelerate
                            project delivery and reduce administrative
                            burdens associated with the use of alternative
                            delivery methods and contributed funds
                            authorities.
                                (iv) Coordinate across headquarters,
                            divisions, and districts of the Corps of
                            Engineers to ensure the consistent
                            implementation of alternative delivery
                            authorities.
                                (v) Develop and maintain guidance and best
                            practices for the acceptance and use of
                            contributed funds provided by non-Federal
                            interests to carry out activities related to
                            water resources development projects.
                                (vi) Provide technical assistance to non-
                            Federal interests regarding the eligibility of
                            expenditures for credit or reimbursement,
                            including expenditures incurred pursuant to
                            written agreements entered into under section
                            221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C.
                            1962d-5b).
                (3) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
            Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report that describes--
                        (A) the progress of the Secretary in establishing
                    the Office on Alternative Delivery Methods;
                        (B) the number of staff assigned to such Office;
                        (C) the activities carried out by the Office; and
                        (D) recommendations for legislative or
                    administrative actions to improve the efficiency and
                    effectiveness of alternative delivery methods.
        (e) Coordination; Funding.--
                (1) Coordination.--Each office established under
            subsections (a) through (d) shall coordinate with other offices
            established under such subsections and with any other office of
            the Corps of Engineers to ensure consistency across the Corps
            of Engineers.
                (2) Funding.--The offices established under subsections (a)
            through (d) shall be funded using amounts otherwise authorized
            to be appropriated for the general expenses of the Directorate
            of Civil Works.

    SEC. 102. CONTRACTING EFFICIENCY.

        (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
                (1) the Corps of Engineers should maximize the efficiency
            of contract actions through the use of multiyear or continuing
            contracts; and
                (2) multiyear or continuing contracts--
                        (A) provide cost savings by combining work across
                    multiple projects across different accounts of the
                    Corps of Engineers; and
                        (B) increase reliability of projects constructed or
                    maintained by the Corps of Engineers and ensure
                    realization of the benefits derived from such projects.
        (b) Review.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United
            States shall carry out a review of any considerations relating
            to and benefits of awarding multiyear or continuing contracts
            for the construction of authorized water resources development
            projects carried out by the Secretary.
                (2) Requirements.--In developing the review under paragraph
            (1), the Comptroller General shall--
                        (A) describe existing statutory authorities and
                    limitations under which the Corps of Engineers may
                    carry out water resources development projects
                    utilizing a multiyear or continuing contract, including
                    such authorities and limitations under section 10 of
                    the Act of September 22, 1922 (33 U.S.C. 621) and
                    section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of
                    1999 (33 U.S.C. 2331);
                        (B) review--
                                (i) prior instances in which the Secretary
                            has carried out an authorized water resources
                            development project utilizing a multiyear or
                            continuing contract for the construction;
                                (ii) prior instances in which the heads of
                            other Federal agencies, including the Secretary
                            of Defense, have carried out large-scale
                            infrastructure or asset construction projects
                            utilizing a multiyear or continuing contract
                            for the construction; and
                                (iii) the response of the Corps of
                            Engineers to prior recommendations of the
                            Comptroller General related to management of
                            water resources development projects that
                            utilize multiyear or continuing contracts; and
                        (C) evaluate--
                                (i) potential cost savings, considerations,
                            and benefits (including accelerated completion
                            of construction) from awarding multiyear or
                            continuing contracts for the construction of
                            authorized water resources development
                            projects; and
                                (ii) safeguards to minimize the inefficient
                            reprogramming of appropriated funds related to
                            multiyear or continuing contracts.
                (3) Report.--Upon completion of the review under paragraph
            (1), the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committee on
            Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report on the findings of such review,
            including any legislative recommendations that result from such
            review.

    SEC. 103. REMOVAL OR REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary shall not be liable under the
    Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
    of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) for the release of a hazardous
    substance or pollutant or contaminant resulting from any covered
    activity carried out in accordance with a joint plan developed under
    this section by the Secretary, in coordination with the non-Federal
    interest for the covered activity, and approved by the Administrator.
        (b) Joint Plan.--A joint plan developed under subsection (a)
    shall--
                (1) ensure that the covered activity protects human health
            and the environment; and
                (2) include--
                        (A) relevant and appropriate requirements of the
                    National Contingency Plan;
                        (B) a description of the work to be undertaken;
                        (C) identification of--
                                (i) the method to be used for dredged
                            material disposal;
                                (ii) the roles and responsibilities of the
                            Secretary and non-Federal interest; and
                                (iii) sources of funding; and
                        (D) such other terms and conditions as the
                    Administrator determines necessary.
        (c) Consultation; Public Comment.--In developing a joint plan under
    subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
                (1) consult with interested Federal, State, and local
            government officials; and
                (2) provide an opportunity for public comment.
        (d) Obligations of the Secretary.--Prior to carrying out any
    covered activity pursuant to a joint plan developed under subsection
    (a), the Secretary shall--
                (1) document any hazardous substance or pollutant or
            contaminant present in the contaminated sediment to be removed
            or remediated; and
                (2) seek to identify any person potentially responsible for
            the release of such hazardous substance or pollutant or
            contaminant.
        (e) Cost Recovery.--Nothing in this section affects the
    responsibility of the Federal Government to seek recovery under the
    Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
    of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) from responsible parties of response
    costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out a covered activity.
        (f) Definitions.--In this section:
                (1) Administrator.--The term ``Administrator'' means the
            Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.
                (2) Contaminated sediment.--The term ``contaminated
            sediment'' means sediment in which a hazardous substance or
            pollutant or contaminant is present.
                (3) Covered activity.--The term ``covered activity'' means
            the removal or remediation of contaminated sediment pursuant
            to--
                        (A) a water resources development project
                    specifically authorized by Congress for such purpose;
                    or
                        (B) section 312(f) of the Water Resources
                    Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 1272(f)).
                (4) Hazardous substance.--The term ``hazardous substance''
            has the meaning given that term in section 101 of the
            Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
            Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601).
                (5) National contingency plan.--The term ``National
            Contingency Plan'' means the national contingency plan
            published under section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental
            Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C.
            9605).
                (6) Pollutant or contaminant.--The term ``pollutant or
            contaminant'' has the meaning given that term in section 101 of
            the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
            Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601).

    SEC. 104. LEVEE OWNERS BOARD.

        (a) Establishment.--There is established a Levee Owners Board.
        (b) Membership.--
                (1) In general.--The Owners Board shall be composed of
            eleven members, each of which is a Federal levee system owner-
            operator, appointed by the Secretary so as to represent various
            regions of the country, including at least one member from each
            of the eight divisions of the Corps of Engineers.
                (2) Terms.--
                        (A) In general.--A member of the Owners Board shall
                    be appointed for a period of 3 years.
                        (B) Reappointment.--A member of the Owners Board
                    may be reappointed to the Owners Board, as the
                    Secretary determines to be appropriate.
                        (C) Vacancies.--A vacancy on the Owners Board shall
                    be filled in the same manner as the original
                    appointment was made.
                (3) Chairperson.--The members of the Owners Board shall
            appoint a chairperson from among the members of the Owners
            Board.
                (4) Observers.--The Secretary shall designate, and the
            Administrator may designate, a representative to act as an
            observer of the Owners Board.
        (c) Duties.--
                (1) In general.--The Owners Board shall meet not less
            frequently than semiannually to develop and make
            recommendations to the Secretary and Congress regarding levee
            system reliability throughout the United States.
                (2) Advice and recommendations.--The Owners Board shall
            provide--
                        (A) prior to the development of the budget proposal
                    of the President for a given fiscal year, advice and
                    recommendations to the Secretary regarding overall
                    levee system reliability;
                        (B) advice and recommendations to Congress
                    regarding any feasibility report for a flood risk
                    management project that has been submitted to Congress;
                        (C) not later than 60 days after the date of the
                    submission of the budget proposal of the President to
                    Congress for a given fiscal year, advice and
                    recommendations to Congress regarding flood risk
                    management project construction and rehabilitation
                    priorities and corresponding spending levels;
                        (D) advice and recommendations to the Secretary and
                    Congress regarding the effectiveness of the levee
                    safety program of the Corps of Engineers, including
                    comments and recommendations on relevant information
                    contained in the reports of Corps of Engineers
                    activities and expenditures provided by the Secretary
                    under subsection (d)(2); and
                        (E) advice and recommendations to the Secretary,
                    Congress, and the Administrator regarding the
                    effectiveness of the levee safety initiative, including
                    comments and recommendations on relevant information
                    contained in the reports of Corps of Engineers
                    activities and expenditures provided by the Secretary
                    under subsection (d)(2).
                (3) Independent judgment.--The Owners Board shall ensure
            that any advice or recommendations made under paragraph (2)
            reflect the independent judgment of the Owners Board.
        (d) Duties of the Secretary.--The Secretary shall--
                (1) designate an Executive Secretary who shall assist the
            chairperson in administering the Owners Board and ensuring that
            the Owners Board operates in accordance with chapter 10 of
            title 5, United States Code;
                (2) provide to the Owners Board detailed reports of Corps
            of Engineers activities and expenditures related to flood risk
            management and levees, including for the levee safety program
            of the Corps of Engineers and the levee safety initiative, not
            less frequently than semiannually; and
                (3) submit to the Owners Board a copy of any completed
            feasibility report for a flood risk management project
            submitted to Congress.
        (e) Administration.--
                (1) In general.--The Owners Board shall be subject to
            chapter 10 of title 5, other than section 1013, and with the
            consent of the appropriate agency head, the Owners Board may
            use the facilities and services of any Federal agency.
                (2) Members not considered special government employees.--
            For the purposes of complying with chapter 10 of title 5,
            United States Code, the members of the Owners Board shall not
            be considered special Government employees (as defined in
            section 202 of title 18, United States Code).
                (3) Travel expenses.--Non-Federal members of the Owners
            Board, while engaged in the performance of their duties away
            from their homes or regular places of business, may be allowed
            travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as
            authorized by section 5703 of title 5, United States Code.
        (f) Definitions.--In this section:
                (1) Levee safety initiative.--The term ``levee safety
            initiative'' means the levee safety initiative established
            under section 9005 of the Water Resources Development Act of
            2007 (33 U.S.C. 3303a).
                (2) National levee safety act of 2007 terms.--The terms
            ``Administrator'', ``levee'', ``levee system'', and
            ``rehabilitation'' have the meanings given those terms in
            section 9002 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33
            U.S.C. 3301).
                (3) Owners board.--The term ``Owners Board'' means the
            Levee Owners Board established by this section.

    SEC. 105. CATEGORICAL PERMISSIONS.

        (a) In General.--Section 14(a) of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33
    U.S.C. 408(a)) is amended--
                (1) by striking ``It shall not be lawful'' and inserting
            the following:
                ``(1) In general.--It shall not be lawful''; and
                (2) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(2) Categorical permissions.--
                        ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall, by rule,
                    establish categorical permissions for any category of
                    activities for which an application for permission
                    under paragraph (1) may be submitted.
                        ``(B) Scope.--In establishing categorical
                    permissions under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall
                    consider the following:
                                ``(i) The type and similarity of activities
                            to be included in any specific category.
                                ``(ii) The geographic area to which the
                            categorical permission will apply.
                                ``(iii) The type and similarity of the
                            public works with respect to which the
                            categorical permission will apply.
                                ``(iv) The effects of the activities to be
                            included in a category on the applicable public
                            works and on environmental and cultural
                            resources.
                                ``(v) Any additional Federal regulatory
                            requirements that apply to the activities to be
                            included in a category.
                                ``(vi) An appropriate period of validity
                            for the categorical permission.
                        ``(C) Requirement.--The Secretary may only
                    establish a categorical permission under this
                    subsection that the Secretary determines will apply to
                    a category of activities that--
                                ``(i) are similar in nature to activities
                            for which applications for permission are
                            regularly submitted under this section;
                                ``(ii) will cause only minimal adverse
                            environmental effects when carried out
                            separately; and
                                ``(iii) will cause only minimal cumulative
                            adverse environmental effects.
                        ``(D) Public input.--
                                ``(i) Scoping process.--In establishing
                            categorical permissions under this paragraph,
                            the Secretary shall solicit input from non-
                            Federal interests, including landowners,
                            hydropower operators, and resource agencies.
                                ``(ii) Comment period.--The Secretary shall
                            make all draft categorical permissions,
                            including any associated analyses and other
                            documentation, available for public review and
                            comment for not less than 30 days.
                        ``(E) Transparency.--The Secretary shall publish
                    all categorical permissions established under this
                    paragraph on an appropriate website of the Corps of
                    Engineers, including, for each categorical permission,
                    identification of--
                                ``(i) the types of activities to which the
                            categorical permission applies;
                                ``(ii) any specific circumstances that, if
                            present, would cause the categorical permission
                            to not apply to an activity of a type
                            identified under clause (i);
                                ``(iii) the geographic area to which the
                            categorical permission applies;
                                ``(iv) the types of public works with
                            respect to which the categorical permission
                            applies; and
                                ``(v) the period for which the categorical
                            permission is valid.
                        ``(F) Incorporation into application process.--
                                ``(i) Identification in request.--A non-
                            Federal entity may identify in an application
                            for permission under this subsection any
                            categorical permission that may apply to the
                            activity for which the permission is requested.
                                ``(ii) Inclusion in completeness
                            determination.--In informing a non-Federal
                            entity whether an application for permission
                            under this subsection is complete under
                            subsection (d)(1), the Secretary shall include
                            an assessment of whether a categorical
                            permission will apply to the activity for which
                            permission is requested, including an
                            evaluation of the applicability of--
                                        ``(I) any categorical permission
                                    identified by the non-Federal entity in
                                    the application; and
                                        ``(II) any other categorical
                                    permission the Secretary determines
                                    appropriate.
                        ``(G) Limitations.--Nothing in this paragraph
                    affects--
                                ``(i) the authority of the Secretary to
                            grant or deny permission under this section; or
                                ``(ii) any obligation to comply with the
                            provisions of any Federal or State law,
                            including--
                                        ``(I) the National Environmental
                                    Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
                                    seq.);
                                        ``(II) the Federal Water Pollution
                                    Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.);
                                    and
                                        ``(III) the Endangered Species Act
                                    of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
                        ``(H) Deadline for proposed rule.--Not later than
                    180 days after the date of enactment of the Water
                    Resources Development Act of 2026, the Secretary shall
                    publish a proposed rule establishing categorical
                    permissions under this paragraph.''.

    SEC. 106. CONTRIBUTIONS BY NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS.

        Section 902(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
    U.S.C. 2280(b)) is amended to read as follows:
        ``(b) Contributions by Non-Federal Interests.--Notwithstanding
    subsection (a), in accordance with section 5 of the Act of June 22,
    1936 (33 U.S.C. 701h), if the Chief of Engineers makes a determination
    under section 8155(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022
    (33 U.S.C. 2280 note) that an authorized water resources development
    project has exceeded, or is expected to exceed, its maximum cost under
    subsection (a), the Secretary may--
                ``(1) accept funds from the non-Federal interest for such
            project pursuant to a written agreement under section 221 of
            the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b); and
                ``(2) use such funds to carry out such project, if the use
            of such funds does not increase the Federal share of the cost
            of such project.''.

    SEC. 107. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION AND TRACKING OF PERMIT APPLICATIONS.

        (a) Electronic System.--Section 2040(a) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2345(a)) is amended--
                (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``Development of
            Electronic'' and inserting ``Electronic'';
                (2) by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows:
                ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall implement an
            electronic system to allow the electronic--
                        ``(A) preparation and submission of applications
                    for permits and requests for jurisdictional
                    determinations under the jurisdiction of the Secretary;
                    and
                        ``(B) tracking of documents related to Federal
                    environmental reviews for projects under the
                    jurisdiction of the Secretary or for which the Corps of
                    Engineers is designated as the lead Federal agency.'';
                (3) in paragraph (2)--
                        (A) in subparagraph (E), by striking ``; and'' and
                    inserting a semicolon;
                        (B) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period at
                    the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                        (C) by adding at the end the following:
                        ``(G) documents related to Federal environmental
                    reviews for projects under the jurisdiction of the
                    Secretary or for which the Corps of Engineers is
                    designated as the lead Federal agency.''; and
                (4) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(5) Coordination with other agencies.--To the maximum
            extent practicable, the Secretary shall use the electronic
            system required under paragraph (1) to enhance interagency
            coordination in the preparation of documents related to Federal
            environmental reviews.''.
        (b) System Requirements.--Section 2040(b) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2345(b)) is amended--
                (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``; and'' and inserting a
            semicolon;
                (2) in paragraph (5)(C), by striking the period at the end
            and inserting ``; and''; and
                (3) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(6) enable a non-Federal interest for a project to--
                        ``(A) submit information related to the preparation
                    of any Federal environmental review document associated
                    with the project; and
                        ``(B) track the status of a Federal environmental
                    review associated with the project.''.
        (c) Record Retention.--Section 2040(d) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2345(d)) is amended--
                (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``Record of
            Determinations'' and inserting ``Record Retention'';
                (2) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``, and all Federal
            environmental review documents included in the electronic
            system'' before the period at the end; and
                (3) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``and all Federal
            environmental review documents included in the electronic
            system'' before ``after the 5-year''.
        (d) Availability of Records.--Section 2040(e) of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2345(e)) is amended--
                (1) in the subsection heading, by striking
            ``Determinations'' and inserting ``Records''; and
                (2) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``, and all final
            Federal environmental review documents included in the
            electronic system,'' before ``available to the public''.
        (e) Deadline for Electronic System Implementation.--Section
    2040(f)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C.
    2345(f)(1)) is amended by striking ``2 years after the date of
    enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022'' and
    inserting ``1 year after the date of enactment of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 2026''.
        (f) Applicability.--Section 2040(g) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2345(g)) is amended by inserting ``,
    and the requirements described in subsections (d) and (e) relating to
    Federal environmental documents shall apply with respect to Federal
    environmental review documents that are prepared after the date of
    enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2026'' before the
    period at the end.
        (g) E-NEPA.--Section 2040 of the Water Resources Development Act of
    2007 (33 U.S.C. 2345) is amended by adding at the end the following:
        ``(i) Consistency With E-NEPA.--In carrying out this section, the
    Secretary shall take into consideration the results of the permitting
    portal study conducted pursuant to the amendment made by section 321(b)
    of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 (137 Stat. 44).''.
        (h) Conforming Amendment.--Section 2040 of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2345) is amended in the section
    heading by striking ``permit applications'' and inserting ``permit
    applications and other documents''.

    SEC. 108. PROJECT STUDY SCHEDULE AND COST ESTIMATE.

        (a) Vertical Integration and Acceleration of Studies.--Section 1001
    of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C.
    2282c) is amended--
                (1) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
        ``(a) In General.--In carrying out a feasibility study carried out
    by the Secretary pursuant to section 905(a) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282), the Secretary shall--
                ``(1) complete the feasibility study as efficiently and
            expeditiously as practicable;
                ``(2) align the scope of the feasibility study with the
            goals of the non-Federal interest, to the extent practicable in
            accordance with the authorities of the Secretary and statutory
            requirements relating to water resources development projects;
                ``(3) carry out the feasibility study in a manner that
            ensures that personnel from the district, division, and
            headquarters levels of the Corps of Engineers concurrently
            conduct the review required under such section 905; and
                ``(4) include in the report submitted with respect to the
            study under section 2033(f)(2) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2282a(f)(2)) sufficient
            information for Congress to fully review the study, which may
            be in the form of details relating to any remaining project
            cost uncertainties as appropriate for the maturity of the
            project design.'';
                (2) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ``the environmental
            review process under section 1005'' and inserting ``any
            required environmental review'';
                (3) by striking subsections (b), (c), (e), and (f); and
                (4) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (b).
        (b) Detailed Project Schedule.--Section 905(g) of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282(g)) is amended--
                (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``, to the maximum extent
            practicable,'';
                (2) by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:
                ``(3) Requirements.--
                        ``(A) In general.--In carrying out paragraph (2),
                    for each feasibility study, the relevant District
                    Engineer shall establish deadlines for milestones, and
                    a total cost estimate for the study, taking into
                    consideration, to the maximum extent practicable--
                                ``(i) the goals of the non-Federal
                            interest;
                                ``(ii) the statutory requirements and
                            authorities of the Corps of Engineers;
                                ``(iii) the complexity of the study; and
                                ``(iv) any other factors identified by the
                            District Engineer and the non-Federal interest.
                        ``(B) Collaboration with non-federal interest.--The
                    District Engineer shall collaborate with the relevant
                    non-Federal interest in establishing deadlines for
                    milestones under subparagraph (A).
                        ``(C) Complexity.--In determining the complexity of
                    a feasibility study for purposes of subparagraph (A),
                    the District Engineer shall consider, with respect to
                    the project that is the subject of the feasibility
                    study--
                                ``(i) the type, size, location, scope, and
                            overall projected cost of the project;
                                ``(ii) whether the project will use any
                            innovative design or construction techniques;
                                ``(iii) whether the project will require
                            significant action by other Federal, State, or
                            local agencies;
                                ``(iv) whether there is significant public
                            dispute as to the nature or effects of the
                            project; and
                                ``(v) whether there is significant public
                            dispute as to the economic or environmental
                            costs or benefits of the project.
                        ``(D) Extensions.--At the request of the relevant
                    non-Federal interest, the District Engineer shall
                    extend any deadline established under subparagraph
                    (A).''; and
                (3) by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following:
                ``(4) Congressional and public notification.--For each
            fiscal year, the Secretary shall--
                        ``(A) submit to the Committee on Transportation and
                    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the
                    Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate
                    an annual report that includes--
                                ``(i) a list of all detailed project
                            schedules established under paragraph (2) in
                            the fiscal year;
                                ``(ii) a description of any such project
                            schedule that is expected to result in the
                            completion of a final feasibility report more
                            than 4 years after the date on which the
                            Secretary determines the Federal interest for
                            purposes of the report pursuant to section
                            2033(f) of the Water Resources Development Act
                            of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2282a(f));
                                ``(iii) a description of any feasibility
                            study for which the maximum Federal cost is
                            expected to exceed $5,000,000, based on the
                            total cost estimate established under paragraph
                            (2), including an explanation of such
                            exceedance; and
                                ``(iv) an explanation of any missed
                            deadlines or extensions; and
                        ``(B) make publicly available (including on a
                    publicly available website) a copy of the annual report
                    described in subparagraph (A) not later than 14 days
                    after the date on which a report is submitted to
                    Congress.''.
        (c) Applicability.--
                (1) New studies.--The amendments made by this section shall
            apply to feasibility studies initiated on or after the date of
            enactment of this section.
                (2) Ongoing studies.--For any feasibility study initiated
            before the date of enactment of this section, but for which a
            final report of the Chief of Engineers has not been submitted
            to Congress pursuant to section 2033 of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2282a) on or before such
            date of enactment, the Secretary shall, upon request from the
            relevant non-Federal interest, apply the requirements of
            section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act
            of 2014 (as amended by this section) and section 905(g) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (as amended by this
            section) to the feasibility study.
        (d) Notification to Congress on Terminated Studies.--The Secretary
    shall provide written notice to the Committee on Transportation and
    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate on any feasibility study
    terminated or proposed to be terminated, including a summary of the
    reasons for such termination, and any proposed alternatives the non-
    Federal interest may pursue in lieu of a feasibility study.

    SEC. 109. CONTINUING AUTHORITY PROGRAMS.

        (a) Project Modifications for Improvements to Flood Risk
    Management.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a program to
            carry out studies and projects for the improvement of covered
            projects.
                (2) Requirements.--
                        (A) Studies.--
                                (i) In general.--The Secretary may carry
                            out a study of a covered project under this
                            subsection to determine whether there is a need
                            to modify the structure or operations of the
                            covered project in order to--
                                        (I) improve flood risk management;
                                    or
                                        (II) meet applicable Federal
                                    standards, including levee
                                    accreditation standards.
                                (ii) Flood risk assessment.--The Secretary
                            shall include in a study carried out under this
                            subsection--
                                        (I) as part of the calculation of
                                    benefits and costs, each calculation
                                    identified in section 2033(d) of the
                                    Water Resources Development Act of 2007
                                    (33 U.S.C. 2282a(d)); and
                                        (II) an assessment of geographical
                                    transfers of, or changes in, flood risk
                                    within and beyond the boundaries of the
                                    covered project.
                        (B) Projects.--The Secretary may carry out a
                    project under this subsection to make modifications to
                    the structure or operations of a covered project if the
                    Secretary determines, based on the study of the covered
                    project carried out under subparagraph (A), that--
                                (i) the modifications--
                                        (I) are feasible and consistent
                                    with the authorized purposes of the
                                    covered project;
                                        (II) will provide for flood risk
                                    management in the public interest; and
                                        (III) are cost effective; and
                                (ii) any increases in flood risk that may
                            result from the modifications will be offset
                            within the boundaries of the covered project.
                        (C) Coordination.--In carrying out this subsection,
                    the Secretary shall coordinate with appropriate
                    Federal, State, and local agencies.
                        (D) Items provided by the non-federal interest.--
                                (i) In general.--The non-Federal interest
                            for a project carried out under this subsection
                            shall provide all land, easements, rights-of-
                            way, and relocations necessary for the project.
                                (ii) Credit.--The value of land, easements,
                            rights-of-way, and relocations provided under
                            clause (i) shall be credited toward the non-
                            Federal share of the cost of the project
                            carried out under this subsection.
                        (E) Agreements.--Construction of a project under
                    this subsection shall be initiated only after a non-
                    Federal interest has entered into a binding agreement
                    with the Secretary to pay--
                                (i) the non-Federal share of the costs of
                            construction required under this subsection;
                            and
                                (ii) 100 percent of any operation,
                            maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation
                            costs associated with the project, in
                            accordance with regulations prescribed by the
                            Secretary.
                (3) Cost share.--
                        (A) Study.--Subject to subparagraph (C), the
                    Federal share of the cost of a study carried out under
                    this subsection shall be 50 percent, except that the
                    first $100,000 of the cost of the study shall be at
                    Federal expense.
                        (B) Construction.--
                                (i) In general.--Subject to subparagraph
                            (C), the non-Federal share of the cost of
                            construction of a project carried out under
                            this subsection shall be 75 percent.
                                (ii) In-kind contributions.--The non-
                            Federal share of the cost of construction of a
                            project carried out under this subsection may
                            be provided in the form of in-kind
                            contributions, including a contribution of a
                            facility or supply or of a service that is
                            necessary to carry out the project.
                                (iii) Other federal funds.--Subject to
                            subparagraph (C), the non-Federal share of the
                            cost of construction of a project carried out
                            under this subsection may be provided in the
                            form of funds provided to the non-Federal
                            interest by another Federal agency, if such
                            Federal agency provides written consent to the
                            non-Federal interest for the use of such funds
                            for the project.
                        (C) Limitation.--The total Federal amount expended
                    for a study or project under this subsection shall be
                    not more than $15,000,000.
                (4) Limitations.--
                        (A) Betterments.--The Secretary may include in a
                    project under this subsection a modification to the
                    structure or operations of a covered project that is
                    necessary solely for purposes of meeting State or local
                    building, zoning, or other standards only as an element
                    of a locally preferred plan.
                        (B) Deferred maintenance.--
                                (i) In general.--The Secretary may not
                            include in a project under this subsection any
                            modification to the structure or operations of
                            a covered project to address any operations and
                            maintenance responsibilities of the non-Federal
                            interest for the covered project, including to
                            address any deferred or incomplete maintenance
                            of the covered project by the non-Federal
                            interest.
                                (ii) Baseline condition.--The Secretary
                            shall use the as-built condition of a covered
                            project, including the as-built condition of
                            any modifications authorized by the Secretary,
                            as the basis for determining any modifications
                            to the structure or operations of the covered
                            project to be included in a project carried out
                            under this subsection.
                (5) Covered project defined.--In this subsection, the term
            ``covered project'' means--
                        (A) a water resources development project
                    constructed by the Secretary for the purpose of flood
                    risk management; and
                        (B) a project with respect to which the Secretary
                    is authorized to provide assistance under section 5 of
                    the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).
                (6) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized
            to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this
            subsection $50,000,000 for each fiscal year.
        (b) Applicability of Expenditure Limits.--
                (1) In general.--With respect to each covered water
            resources development project, the Secretary shall apply the
            maximum per-project Federal expenditure limit for the
            continuing authority program under which the project is
            authorized, as the provision of law establishing such limit is
            in effect on the day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                (2) Definitions.--In this subsection:
                        (A) Continuing authority program.--The term
                    ``continuing authority program'' has the meaning given
                    that term in section 7001(c)(1)(D)(iii) of the Water
                    Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C.
                    2282d(c)(1)(D)(iii)) (as amended by this Act).
                        (B) Covered water resources development project
                    defined.--The term ``covered water resources
                    development project'' means a water resources
                    development project authorized pursuant to a continuing
                    authority program, including a water resources
                    development project for which--
                                (i) an initial construction contract was
                            awarded before January 4, 2025; and
                                (ii) construction is not complete as of the
                            date of enactment of this Act.
        (c) Studies and Projects for Drought Resiliency.--Section 155 of
    the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2347c) is
    amended to read as follows:

    ``SEC. 155. STUDIES AND PROJECTS FOR DROUGHT RESILIENCY.

        ``(a) In General.--The Secretary shall establish a program to carry
    out, in partnership with non-Federal interests, studies and projects
    for drought resiliency.
        ``(b) Requirements.--
                ``(1) Studies.--The Secretary may carry out a study under
            this section for a project to provide for drought resiliency,
            including through--
                        ``(A) the implementation of water conservation
                    measures to mitigate and address drought conditions;
                        ``(B) the management of sediment for increased
                    water in the applicable watershed;
                        ``(C) mitigation and monitoring associated with
                    aquatic or riparian nonnative species that exacerbate
                    drought conditions, such as salt cedar;
                        ``(D) the planting of native plant species that
                    will reduce the risk of drought and the incidence of
                    nonnative plant species;
                        ``(E) the construction of small water storage
                    projects; or
                        ``(F) other actions that increase drought
                    resiliency and water conservation.
                ``(2) Projects.--The Secretary may carry out a project
            under this subsection if the Secretary determines, based on the
            study for the project carried out under paragraph (1), that the
            project--
                        ``(A) will provide for drought resiliency,
                    including through actions described in such paragraph;
                        ``(B) is in the public interest; and
                        ``(C) is cost effective.
                ``(3) Use of natural and nature-based features.--In
            carrying out a study or project under this section, the
            Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, seek to
            incorporate natural features and nature-based features (as
            those terms are defined in section 1184(a) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a(a))).
                ``(4) Items provided by non-federal interest.--
                        ``(A) In general.--The non-Federal interest for a
                    project carried out under this section shall provide
                    all land, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations
                    necessary for the project.
                        ``(B) Credit.--The value of the land, easements,
                    rights-of-way, and relocations provided under
                    subparagraph (A) shall be credited toward the non-
                    Federal share of the cost of the project.
                ``(5) Agreements.--Construction of a project under this
            section shall be initiated only after a non-Federal interest
            has entered into a binding agreement with the Secretary to
            pay--
                        ``(A) the non-Federal share of the costs of
                    construction required under this section; and
                        ``(B) 100 percent of any operation, maintenance,
                    replacement, and rehabilitation costs associated with
                    the project, in accordance with regulations prescribed
                    by the Secretary.
        ``(c) Cost-Share.--
                ``(1) Studies.--Subject to paragraph (3), the Federal share
            of the cost of a study carried out under this section shall be
            50 percent, except that the first $100,000 of the cost of the
            study shall be at Federal expense.
                ``(2) Construction.--
                        ``(A) In general.--Subject to paragraph (3), and
                    except as provided in subparagraph (B), the non-Federal
                    share of the cost of construction of a project carried
                    out under this section shall be 35 percent.
                        ``(B) Small water storage projects.--A small water
                    storage project carried out under this section shall be
                    subject to the cost-sharing requirements applicable to
                    construction of projects under section 103 of the Water
                    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213),
                    including--
                                ``(i) for municipal and industrial water
                            supply, the non-Federal share of the cost shall
                            be 100 percent;
                                ``(ii) for agricultural water supply, the
                            non-Federal share of the cost shall be 35
                            percent; and
                                ``(iii) for recreation, including
                            recreational navigation, the non-Federal share
                            of the cost shall be 50 percent of separable
                            costs and, in the case of any harbor or inland
                            harbor or channel project, 50 percent of joint
                            and separable costs allocated to recreational
                            navigation.
                ``(3) Limitation.--The total Federal amount expended for a
            study or project under this section shall be not more than
            $10,000,000.
        ``(d) Technical Assistance.--In carrying out this section, the
    Secretary may provide technical assistance to a non-Federal interest
    necessary to support comprehensive, systemwide approaches, and
    operations, maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation activities,
    that take into account changing conditions from extreme and prolonged
    weather events.
        ``(e) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out
    this section $35,000,000 for each fiscal year.
        ``(f) Small Water Storage Project Defined.--In this section, the
    term `small water storage project' means a project for water storage
    that--
                ``(1) in the case of a new project, has a water storage
            capacity of not less than 2,000 acre-feet and not more than
            30,000 acre-feet; or
                ``(2) in the case of an enlargement of an existing project,
            is for an enlargement of not less than 1,000 acre-feet and not
            more than 30,000 acre-feet.''.
        (d) Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection.--Section 14 of
    the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r) is amended by striking
    ``$50,000,000'' and inserting ``$62,500,000''.
        (e) Small Flood Control Projects.--Section 205 of the Flood Control
    Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) is amended, in the first sentence, by
    striking ``$90,000,000'' and inserting ``$100,000,000''.
        (f) Removal of Obstructions; Clearing Channels.--Section 2 of the
    Act of August 28, 1937 (33 U.S.C. 701g) is amended by striking
    ``$15,000,000'' and inserting ``$19,000,000''.
        (g) Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment or Drought
    Resiliency.--Section 1135(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(h)) is amended by striking ``$62,000,000'' and
    inserting ``$75,000,000''.
        (h) Conforming Amendments.--Section 7001(c)(1)(D)(iii) of the Water
    Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C.
    2282d(c)(1)(D)(iii)) is amended--
                (1) in subclause (IX), by striking ``; and'' and inserting
            a semicolon;
                (2) in subclause (X), by striking the period at the end and
            inserting a semicolon; and
                (3) by adding at the end the following:
                                        ``(XI) section 109(a) of the Water
                                    Resources Development Act of 2026; and
                                        ``(XII) section 155 of the Water
                                    Resources Development Act of 2020.''.

    SEC. 110. DREDGED MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS.

        (a) Planning Period.--In developing a dredged material management
    plan for an authorized water resources development project, the
    Secretary shall provide for a minimum of 10 years of dredged material
    placement capacity.
        (b) Exception.--The requirement established under subsection (a)
    shall not apply with respect to an authorized water resources
    development project if the Secretary finds that providing for a minimum
    of 10 years of dredged material placement capacity in the dredged
    material management plan for the project is not feasible due to
    complexity, controversy, or other compelling factors.

    SEC. 111. DREDGING COORDINATION.

        (a) Consultation.--
                (1) In general.--In determining the scope and performance
            timeline to be included in a contract entered into on or after
            the date of enactment of this Act with an entity to carry out
            maintenance dredging at an authorized water resources
            development project, the Secretary shall consult with
            stakeholders, including--
                        (A) the non-Federal interest for the project;
                        (B) relevant Federal and State entities; and
                        (C) to the extent practicable, other non-Federal
                    entities that utilize or rely on the project.
                (2) Exception.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1), if the
            Secretary determines that an emergency exists or there is an
            important national interest at stake, the Secretary may
            determine the scope and performance timeline to be included in
            a contract described in such paragraph without consulting with
            stakeholders that are not a party to the contract.
        (b) Communication.--If the Secretary receives, from an entity
    carrying out maintenance dredging at an authorized water resources
    development project under a contract entered into with the Secretary,
    information about changes with respect to the performance of such
    maintenance dredging, the Secretary shall, not later than 3 business
    days after receiving such information--
                (1) determine whether such changes are reasonably likely to
            affect the period of performance of dredging under the
            contract; and
                (2) if the Secretary determines that such changes are
            reasonably likely to affect such period, notify the applicable
            non-Federal interest of such changes.
        (c) Capability Numbers.--With respect to any maintenance dredging
    activity, the Secretary shall, upon request, make available to the
    applicable non-Federal interest the estimate made by the Secretary of
    the amount of funding that the Secretary could reasonably expend in a
    fiscal year with respect to such activity.

    SEC. 112. FEDERAL STANDARD FOR DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL OR PLACEMENT.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary shall update the regulations under
    chapter II of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations that are applicable
    to establishing the Federal standard for dredged material disposal or
    placement for a water resources development project--
                (1) to align the requirements and policy of such
            regulations with--
                        (A) section 1130 of the Water Resources Development
                    Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3018);
                        (B) section 125(a) of the Water Resources
                    Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2326g), including--
                                (i) the directive to include the economic
                            benefits and efficiencies from the beneficial
                            use of dredged material in any determination
                            relating to the Federal standard; and
                                (ii) the national goal established in
                            subsection (a)(1)(B) of such section of
                            beneficially using not less than 70 percent by
                            volume of suitable dredged material obtained
                            from the construction or operation and
                            maintenance of water resources development
                            projects; and
                        (C) section 1122 of the Water Resources Development
                    Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2326 note); and
                (2) taking into consideration--
                        (A) the capacity of facilities using the confined
                    aquatic disposal methodology to store dredged material,
                    including the available capacity to store contaminated
                    dredged material;
                        (B) benefits, including monetary value creation,
                    attributable to the beneficial use of dredged material;
                        (C) any monetary benefits of environmental and
                    coastal resiliency attributable to the beneficial use
                    of dredged material;
                        (D) the demand on the Corps of Engineers for
                    environmental and ecological restoration projects in
                    coastal areas; and
                        (E) any incremental cost borne by non-Federal
                    interests in implementing beneficial dredged material
                    placement separately from a project.
        (b) Initiation Timeline.--Not later than 6 months after the date of
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall initiate a rulemaking to
    carry out subsection (a).

    SEC. 113. LEVEE CERTIFICATIONS.

        Section 3014 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of
    2014 (42 U.S.C. 4131) is amended by adding at the end the following:
        ``(c) Rulemaking.--
                ``(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date
            of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary, in coordination
            with the Administrator and the Committee on Levee Safety
            established under section 9003 of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3302), shall initiate a
            rulemaking to establish the methodology or process by which the
            Secretary shall conduct a risk assessment in evaluating a levee
            under subsection (b).
                ``(2) Requirements.--In issuing the rule under this
            subsection, the Secretary shall--
                        ``(A) evaluate--
                                ``(i) multiple methodologies for conducting
                            risk assessments, including deterministic and
                            probabilistic methods; and
                                ``(ii) the significant differences between
                            each method with respect to--
                                        ``(I) cost of using each method;
                                        ``(II) reproducibility of results;
                                        ``(III) level of confidence in
                                    results produced by each method;
                                        ``(IV) how each method accounts for
                                    flood risk assessment and management
                                    implications, including risk to human
                                    life and property;
                                        ``(V) economic impacts; and
                                        ``(VI) other relevant factors; and
                        ``(B) provide for a public notice and comment
                    period of not less than 90 days.
                ``(3) Definitions.--In this subsection:
                        ``(A) Deterministic method.--The term
                    `deterministic method' means, with respect to levee
                    evaluations under this section, a physical-criteria-
                    based evaluation that determines compliance with the 1-
                    percent-annual chance flood event standard set forth in
                    section 65.10 of title 44, Code of Federal Regulations,
                    as in effect on the date of enactment of this
                    subsection, by measuring levee performance against
                    specific, fixed physical margins, including freeboard,
                    embankment protection, closure devices, and structural
                    stability, to establish a binary determination of
                    structural adequacy.
                        ``(B) Probabilistic method.--The term
                    `probabilistic method' means, with respect to levee
                    evaluations under this section, a statistical-
                    inference-based evaluation used as an alternative or
                    supplement to a deterministic methodology to determine
                    the likelihood of levee failure or overtopping during a
                    1-percent-annual chance flood event, through the use
                    of--
                                ``(i) system response curves or fragility
                            curves, which define the conditional
                            probability of failure as a function of water
                            stage or load;
                                ``(ii) Monte Carlo simulations or similar
                            stochastic modeling used to propagate
                            uncertainty in hydrologic, hydraulic, or
                            geotechnical parameters; and
                                ``(iii) catastrophe models or proprietary
                            risk-rating algorithms used to determine flood
                            insurance premiums or levee safety action
                            classifications.''.

    SEC. 114. ALLOCATIONS FROM THE HARBOR MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND.

        (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the
    Secretary should annually allocate all funds (including funds
    appropriated from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund) made available to
    the Secretary to pay for operations and maintenance costs of harbors
    and inland harbors within the United States, including costs of
    expanded uses carried out at an eligible harbor or inland harbor under
    section 210(d)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
    U.S.C. 2238(d)(2)), in accordance with the requirements of 102(a)(1) of
    the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2238 note).
        (b) Amendments.--Section 102(a) of the Water Resources Development
    Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2238 note) is amended--
                (1) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph
            (A)--
                        (A) by striking ``to the extent practicable,''; and
                        (B) by striking ``, to the extent there are
                    identifiable operations and maintenance needs,''; and
                (2) by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:
                ``(3) Annual reporting.--For each fiscal year, the
            Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and
            Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the
            Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate an
            annual report that includes the following:
                        ``(A) The total amount of expenditures made in the
                    fiscal year to pay for projects described in each of
                    subparagraphs (A) through (D) of paragraph (1).
                        ``(B) A list of projects for which such
                    expenditures were made, including the amounts expended
                    for each project.
                        ``(C) An explanation for any failure to make such
                    expenditures in compliance with the requirements of
                    paragraph (1) in the fiscal year, and a corrective plan
                    for the subsequent fiscal year.''.

    SEC. 115. SOO LOCK OPERATOR WAGE RATES.

        Notwithstanding any other law, rule, or regulation, nonsupervisory,
    leader, and supervisory wage employees of the Corps of Engineers at the
    navigation locks at Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan, who are engaged in
    operating lock and dam equipment or who repair and maintain navigation
    lock and dam operating machinery and equipment shall be paid from
    special wage schedules having rates identical to the regular wage
    schedule authorized for the Detroit District Office.

    SEC. 116. BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL FROM HARBORS IN THE STATE
                  OF OHIO.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite the review of a
    request of a non-Federal interest to enter into a partnership agreement
    under section 217(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33
    U.S.C. 2326a(c)) for the design, construction, or operation of a
    facility used to demonstrate potential beneficial uses of dredged
    material from a federally authorized harbor in the State of Ohio.
        (b) User Fees.--An agreement described in subsection (a) and
    entered into after an expedited review under subsection (a) may provide
    for the Secretary to reimburse the non-Federal interest for funds
    provided by such non-Federal interest for activities carried out
    pursuant to the agreement through the payment of subsequent user fees
    to the non-Federal interest in a manner consistent with section
    217(d)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C.
    2326a(d)(2)), as though the non-Federal interest is a private entity
    under such section.
        (c) Dredged Material Management Plan.--In reviewing a request
    pursuant to subsection (a), if the Secretary determines that timely
    completion of a dredged material management plan with respect to a
    federally authorized harbor described in subsection (a) is not feasible
    due to complexity, controversy, or other compelling factors, the
    Secretary may enter into the agreement prior to completion of such a
    dredged material management plan.
        (d) Practices and Procedures.--Prior to entering into an agreement
    reviewed pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary may apply the
    practices and procedures described in part 337 of title 33, Code of
    Federal Regulations, to the facility that is proposed to be subject to
    the requested agreement.

    SEC. 117. MINIMUM REAL ESTATE INTEREST.

        (a) Policy and Guidance Updates.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall revise or update the
            policy and guidance documents of the Corps of Engineers related
            to identifying and approving the appropriate minimum interest
            in real property necessary to support a water resources
            development project, including Chapter 12 of Engineering
            Regulation 405-1-12, entitled Real Estate Handbook, consistent
            with section 1104 of the Water Resources Development Act of
            2024 (33 U.S.C. 598b).
                (2) Publication.--The Secretary shall make publicly
            available (including on a publicly available website) the
            changes to any policy or guidance documents made pursuant to
            this section.
        (b) Delegation of Approval Authority.--Section 1104 of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 2024 (33 U.S.C. 598b) is amended by adding
    at the end the following:
        ``(f) Delegation of Approval Authority.--The Secretary shall, to
    the maximum extent practicable, delegate approval of the minimum
    interest in real property identified under subsection (b) necessary to
    support a specific water resources development project to the District
    Commander of the district of the Corps of Engineers in which the
    project is located.''.

    SEC. 118. REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL VALIDITY.

        (a) In General.--Not later than 210 days after the date of
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall--
                (1) complete a review of policies and guidance of the Corps
            of Engineers that are applicable to the real estate appraisal
            process for civil works projects for purposes of identifying
            efficiencies that may be incorporated into such process,
            including guidance related to review and approval of such
            appraisals; and
                (2) based on such review, issue revisions to such policies
            and guidance to ensure efficient project delivery and avoid
            delays during feasibility study review and approval, to the
            extent practicable.
        (b) Requirements.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary
    shall develop--
                (1) guidelines for determining the validity of an appraisal
            at any time during the period beginning on the date on which
            the Secretary receives the appraisal and ending on the date on
            which the certification of a total project cost estimate for
            the applicable project expires; and
                (2) standard--
                        (A) timeframes for review of appraisals; and
                        (B) delegations of authority to approve appraisals,
                    for use at the discretion of the Secretary.
        (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 30 days after completion of
    the review under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
    Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of
    the Senate a report that--
                (1) describes the findings of the review;
                (2) identifies any revisions to policy and guidance made as
            a result of the review; and
                (3) identifies any additional recommendations for
            legislative action to further improve the real estate appraisal
            process.

    SEC. 119. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS.

        Section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
    U.S.C. 2267a) is amended--
                (1) in subsection (a)(5), by inserting ``(including
            projected water supply needs for municipal, domestic,
            industrial, and agricultural purposes)'' after ``supply''; and
                (2) in subsection (d)--
                        (A) in paragraph (17), by striking ``; and'' and
                    inserting a semicolon;
                        (B) in paragraph (18), by striking the period at
                    the end and inserting a semicolon; and
                        (C) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(19) Eightmile River Watershed, Connecticut;
                ``(20) Central Florida watersheds;
                ``(21) Muskegon River Watershed, Michigan;
                ``(22) Great Egg Harbor River Watershed, New Jersey;
                ``(23) Middle Rio Grande Watershed, New Mexico;
                ``(24) the Upper Ohio River Basin;
                ``(25) the Rio Grande Basin, Texas; and
                ``(26) the Great Salt Lake Basin.''.

    SEC. 120. PROHIBITION ON DIVERSION OF WATER FROM MISSOURI RIVER.

        (a) Approval by Governors for Diversion of Water.--No water may be
    diverted or exported from any portion of the Missouri River, or from
    any tributary of the Missouri River, for use outside of a Missouri
    River State unless such diversion or export is approved by the Governor
    of each of the Missouri River States.
        (b) Approval of Governors for Diversion Studies.--Notwithstanding
    any other provision of law, the Secretary may not undertake any study,
    or expend any Federal funds to contract for any study, of the
    feasibility of diverting or exporting water from any portion of the
    Missouri River, or from any tributary of the Missouri River, for use
    outside the Missouri River States, unless such study or expenditure is
    approved by the Governor of each of the Missouri River States.
        (c) Previously Authorized Diversions.--The prohibition on diverting
    or exporting water under subsection (a) shall not apply to any
    diversion or export of water from the Missouri River that is authorized
    with respect to express or implied Federal reserved water rights on or
    before January 1, 2025.
        (d) Definitions.--In this section:
                (1) Missouri river.--The term ``Missouri River'' means the
            portions of the Missouri River within the United States.
                (2) Missouri river state.--The term ``Missouri River
            State'' means the States of Colorado, Minnesota, Montana, North
            Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and
            Wyoming.

    SEC. 121. LAW ENFORCEMENT AT WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.

        Section 120(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (42
    U.S.C. 1962d-5d(b)) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and
    inserting ``$20,000,000''.

    SEC. 122. DISASTER DEBRIS REMOVAL.

        (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the
    standard terms and provisions used by the Corps of Engineers in
    emergency debris removal contracts should facilitate effective and
    expedient removal of disaster-generated debris that poses a risk to
    public safety while maximizing the value to the taxpayer and minimizing
    the risk of unnecessary debris removal that harms property, natural
    systems, or wildlife.
        (b) Evaluation.--In determining the standard terms and provisions
    that the Corps of Engineers should use in emergency debris removal
    contracts, the Secretary shall evaluate--
                (1) the various contract and fee structures utilized by the
            Corps of Engineers and the impact of each such structure on
            total cost and work quality, including an assessment of such
            structures that is tied to the volume of debris removed;
                (2) the addition of terms requiring coordination between
            the Corps of Engineers, the contractor, Federal, State, and
            local agencies and officials and other relevant experts prior
            to removing debris to ensure protection of healthy vegetation,
            important habitats, and vulnerable wildlife; and
                (3) other terms and measures to protect private property,
            habitat, and wildlife during emergency debris removal
            activities.

    SEC. 123. WILDFIRE CONTINGENCY STRATEGIES.

        (a) In General.--At the request of the non-Federal interest for a
    water resources development project, the Secretary shall develop a
    wildfire contingency strategy for identifying both wildfire risks and
    possible wildfire mitigation with respect to such project.
        (b) Contents.--In developing a strategy under subsection (a), the
    Secretary shall include a--
                (1) wildfire risk assessment; and
                (2) wildfire mitigation plan.
        (c) Wildfire Risk Assessment.--In the wildfire risk assessment
    described in subsection (b)(1) for a project, the Secretary shall
    identify--
                (1) risks to such project from wildfires--
                        (A) that may affect the operation of and ability to
                    carry out the authorized purposes of the project,
                    including navigation, flood control, irrigation,
                    hydropower, water supply, recreation, and fish and
                    wildlife conservation; and
                        (B) that may affect life and private property in
                    the vicinity of the project; and
                (2) risks of sediment, debris, and associated runoff into
            the project that may occur after a wildfire.
        (d) Wildfire Mitigation Plan.--In the wildfire mitigation plan
    described in subsection (b)(2) for a project, the Secretary shall
    develop--
                (1) a strategy that identifies actions the Secretary or
            non-Federal interest may take to reduce or eliminate adverse
            impacts to the project from a wildfire, including--
                        (A) hazardous fuels management;
                        (B) fuel or fire breaks;
                        (C) treatments for invasive species and vegetation;
                        (D) aquatic ecosystem restoration activities to
                    increase wildfire resistance; and
                        (E) operational changes, including updates to water
                    control manuals or associated water control plans;
                (2) a summary of resources and capabilities to implement
            such plan;
                (3) a timeline to implement such plan; and
                (4) any other information determined necessary by the
            Secretary.
        (e) Consultation.--In developing strategies under subsection (a),
    the Secretary shall, as applicable, consult with other Federal
    agencies, States, Tribal governments, local governments, and relevant
    stakeholders.
        (f) Prioritization.--In responding to requests for wildfire
    contingency strategies from non-Federal interests pursuant to this
    section, the Secretary shall prioritize developing strategies for
    projects located in areas where there is considerable risk of wildfire
    or that has been subject to recent wildfires.
        (g) Report to Congress.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
    the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on
    the status of implementation of this section.

    SEC. 124. RESERVOIR SEDIMENT PILOT PROGRAM.

        (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish, using available
    funds, a pilot program under which the Secretary may accept services
    provided by a State for the removal of sediment captured behind a
    project for the purpose of restoring the authorized storage capacity of
    the project.
        (b) Requirements.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary
    shall--
                (1) review the services of the State to ensure that the
            services are consistent with the authorized purposes of the
            project;
                (2) ensure that the State will indemnify the United States
            for, or has entered into an agreement approved by the Secretary
            to address, any adverse impact to the project as a result of
            such services; and
                (3) require the State, prior to initiating the services and
            upon completion of the services, to conduct sediment surveys to
            determine the sediment profile and quality before and after the
            completion of such services.
        (c) Limitation.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary may not accept services
            under subsection (a) if the Secretary, after consultation with
            the Chief of Engineers, determines that accepting the services
            is not advantageous to the United States.
                (2) Report to congress.--If the Secretary makes a
            determination under paragraph (1) that accepting services is
            not advantageous to the United States, the Secretary shall
            provide to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
            of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
            Environment and Public Works of the Senate written notice
            describing the reasoning for the determination.
        (d) Agreement.--Prior to accepting services under subsection (a),
    the Secretary shall enter into a written agreement with the State and
    the non-Federal interest for the project that authorizes the Secretary
    to provide credit to the non-Federal interest for operation and
    maintenance of the project for the value of the services provided under
    subsection (a) that the Secretary determines are integral to the
    project.
        (e) Congressional Notification.--Prior to accepting services
    provided by a State under subsection (a), the Secretary shall provide
    to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
    Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of
    the Senate written notice that the Secretary intends to accept the
    services.
        (f) Prioritization.--In carrying out the pilot program under
    subsection (a), the Secretary shall prioritize accepting services for
    projects in the following locations:
                (1) John Redmond Reservoir, Kansas, authorized pursuant to
            section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 173).
                (2) Kanopolis Lake, Kansas, and the surrounding lands
            managed by the Corps of Engineers.
                (3) Tuttle Creek Lake, Kansas, authorized pursuant to
            section 2 of the Act of June 28, 1938 (chapter 795, 52 Stat.
            1218).
                (4) Sardis Lake reservoir, Oklahoma, authorized by section
            203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1187; 95 Stat.
            1137).
        (g) Project Defined.--In this section, the term ``project'' means a
    dam owned or operated by the United States and under the jurisdiction
    of the Secretary.
        (h) Termination.--This pilot program shall terminate on the date
    that is 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

    SEC. 125. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.

        Section 8127(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136
    Stat. 3716) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                ``(6) The project for navigation, Ipswich River,
            Massachusetts, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1968
            (82 Stat. 731).''.

    SEC. 126. EXPENSES FOR CONTROL OF AQUATIC PLANT GROWTHS AND INVASIVE
                  SPECIES.

        Section 104(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C.
    610(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                ``(4) Indirect costs.--Funds made available to carry out
            this section may be used to pay reasonable and necessary
            indirect costs associated with activities carried out under
            this section, including administrative expenses, overhead, and
            other costs not directly attributable to a specific project.''.

    SEC. 127. FEASIBILITY STUDIES; REVIEW OF SHORELINE AND STREAMBANK
                  PROTECTION.

        Section 116(b) of Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33
    U.S.C. 2282 note) is amended by inserting ``, shoreline protection, or
    emergency streambank protection'' after ``reduction''.

    SEC. 128. HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOM DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

        Section 128 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33
    U.S.C. 610 note) is amended--
                (1) in subsection (c)--
                        (A) in paragraph (15), by striking ``and'' at the
                    end;
                        (B) in paragraph (16), by striking the period at
                    the end and inserting a semicolon; and
                        (C) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(17) Putnam Lake, New York;
                ``(18) Ross Island Lagoon, Oregon;
                ``(19) Lakes and reservoirs in the Commonwealth of
            Pennsylvania, including Blue Marsh Lake; and
                ``(20) Rio Grande River Basin, Texas.''; and
                (2) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(h) Annual Update to Committees.--Not later than 1 year after the
    date of enactment of this subsection, and annually thereafter, the
    Secretary shall provide to the Committee on Transportation and
    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate an update on the status of
    the demonstration program carried out under subsection (a).''.

    SEC. 129. SHORELINE AND RIVERINE PROTECTION AND RESTORATION.

        Section 212(e)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999
    (33 U.S.C. 2332(e)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                        ``(N) Shoreline of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
                        ``(O) Blackstone River, Rhode Island.
                        ``(P) Rio Grande bordering counties, Texas.
                        ``(Q) Passumpsic River watershed, Vermont.''.

    SEC. 130. FISH AND OYSTER HABITAT RESTORATION.

        Section 704(b)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986
    (33 U.S.C. 2263(b)(2)) is amended--
                (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``and'' at the end;
                (2) in subparagraph (D)(v), by striking the period and
            inserting ``; and''; and
                (3) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:
                        ``(E) the restoration and rehabilitation of habitat
                    for fish, including native oysters, in the East River,
                    Flushing Bay and River, and Bronx River, New York,
                    including--
                                ``(i) the construction of oyster bars and
                            reefs;
                                ``(ii) the rehabilitation of existing
                            marginal habitat and oyster reef sites;
                                ``(iii) the use of appropriate alternative
                            substrate material in oyster bar and reef
                            construction;
                                ``(iv) the construction and upgrading of
                            oyster hatcheries; and
                                ``(v) activities relating to increasing the
                            output of native oyster broodstock for seeding
                            and monitoring of restored sites to ensure
                            ecological success.''.

    SEC. 131. BENEFITS AND COSTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO CERTAIN MEASURES.

        (a) In General.--In the evaluation by the Secretary of benefits and
    costs of an authorized water resources development project, the
    Secretary shall treat benefits attributable to measures that utilize a
    natural feature or nature-based feature (as such terms are defined in
    section 1184(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33
    U.S.C. 2289a(a))) to be at least equal to the costs of such measures.
        (b) Considerations.--
                (1) Applicability.--The Secretary shall utilize the
            authority under subsection (a) on not more than 10 projects
            that utilize a natural feature or nature-based feature,
            including the projects specified under paragraph (2).
                (2) Priority projects.--The Secretary shall utilize the
            authority under subsection (a) on--
                        (A) the project for flood and storm damage
                    reduction, New York and New Jersey Harbor and
                    Tributaries, New York and New Jersey, as authorized by
                    the Act of June 15, 1955 (chapter 140, 69 Stat. 132;
                    134 Stat. 2676; 138 Stat. 3152); and
                        (B) the development of a recommendation for
                    mitigation of hot spot erosion on an authorized coastal
                    storm risk management project in the State of New
                    Jersey developed under section 1217 of the Water
                    Resources Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3081).
        (c) Report.--Not later than 4 years after the date of enactment of
    this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation
    and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make publicly available
    (including on a publicly available website), a report detailing the
    results of each evaluation of benefits and costs carried out using the
    authority under this section.
        (d) Sunset.--The authority of the Secretary to initiate an
    evaluation under subsection (a) shall terminate on the date that is 5
    years after the date of enactment of this Act.

    SEC. 132. POLICY ON UTILIZATION OF ALL CORPS AUTHORITIES AND MISSIONS.

        (a) Policy.--
                (1) In general.--It is the policy of the United States for
            the Corps of Engineers, consistent with applicable statutory
            authorities, to--
                        (A) fully utilize the programmatic, technical and
                    planning assistance, and project-specific authorities
                    provided by Congress in addressing the mission areas
                    described in paragraph (2);
                        (B) maximize using the full array of authorities
                    and mission areas described in paragraph (2) to
                    comprehensively address local water resources
                    challenges, consistent with the goals of the applicable
                    non-Federal interest;
                        (C) fully identify and analyze national economic
                    development benefits, regional economic development
                    benefits, environmental quality benefits, and other
                    societal effects of proposed water resource development
                    activities and projects;
                        (D) ensure that the Corps of Engineers receives and
                    allocates sufficient funding to address the varied
                    local water resources challenges of diverse geographic
                    regions of the United States; and
                        (E) maximize the development, evaluation, and
                    recommendation of project alternatives for water
                    resources development projects that produce
                    comprehensive project benefits.
                (2) Mission areas described.--The mission areas described
            in this paragraph are the following:
                        (A) Navigation, including coastal and inland
                    waterways navigation.
                        (B) Flood risk management and coastal storm risk
                    management (including nonstructural, natural, or
                    nature-based features, and efforts to control, retain,
                    and reuse stormwater).
                        (C) Environmental and ecosystem restoration and
                    protection.
                        (D) Municipal, industrial, and agricultural water
                    supply, water conservation, and drought resiliency.
                        (E) Recreation, including recreational navigation.
                        (F) Hydropower.
                        (G) Aquatic plant and species control.
                        (H) Emergency response.
                        (I) Research and development.
        (b) Full Consideration.--In carrying out subsection (a), the
    Secretary shall give full consideration to requests and proposals from
    non-Federal interests that are in alignment with the authorized
    programmatic, technical and planning assistance, and project-specific
    authorities and mission areas described in subsection (a).

    SEC. 133. COMPREHENSIVE FEASIBILITY STUDIES AND APPROACHES FOR FLOOD
                  RISK MANAGEMENT AND COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT.

        (a) Clarification of Federal Policy Related to Comprehensive
    Flooding and Nonstructural Approaches.--
                (1) Declaration of policy.--Section 1 of the Act of June
            22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701a) is amended--
                        (A) by striking the section designator and all that
                    follows through ``recognized'' and inserting the
                    following:

    ``SECTION 1. DECLARATION OF POLICY.

        ``(a) In General.--It is recognized'';
                        (B) by inserting ``, other water bodies, and
                    shorelines'' after ``the rivers'';
                        (C) by inserting ``that such destructive floods can
                    originate or be augmented by the isolated or combined
                    impacts of water from a variety of drivers, such as
                    riverine discharges, extreme weather events, coastal
                    and tidal flooding, sea level rise, subsidence, and
                    stormwater;'' after ``national welfare;'';
                        (D) by inserting ``(including the reduction of
                    comprehensive flood risk from the isolated and compound
                    effects of any of the drivers identified in section
                    8106(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022
                    (33 U.S.C. 2282g(a)))'' before ``is a proper
                    activity'';
                        (E) by inserting ``(including the study and
                    implementation of water resources development projects
                    that provide comprehensive flood risk reduction)''
                    before ``are in the interest of the general welfare'';
                    and
                        (F) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(b) Nonstructural Approaches.--It is the sense of Congress that--
                ``(1) structural features and nonstructural features should
            be given equal consideration in every feasibility study
            conducted by the Chief of Engineers for flood risk management
            or hurricane and storm damage risk reduction; and
                ``(2) the implementation of nonstructural features
            determined by the Chief of Engineers to align with the policy
            established by section 2031(a) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 1962-3) is part of the
            primary mission of the Corps of Engineers for flood risk
            management and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction.''.
                (2) Definition of flood control.--Section 2 of the Act of
            December 22, 1944 (33 U.S.C. 701a-1) is amended by inserting
            ``and the reduction of comprehensive flood risk from the
            isolated and compound effects of any of the drivers identified
            in section 8106(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of
            2022 (33 U.S.C. 2282g(a));'' after ``damages,''.
        (b) Clarification on Scope of Feasibility Studies for Comprehensive
    Flood Risk.--Section 8106(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    2022 (33 U.S.C. 2282g(a)) is amended--
                (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking
            ``shall formulate'' and inserting ``shall include in the study
            any effects within the geographic scope of the study of, and
            formulate'';
                (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ``frequency'' and
            inserting ``frequency, including flooding associated with
            stormwater that flows at a rate of less than 800 cubic feet per
            second for the 10-percent flood'';
                (3) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (10) as clauses
            (i) through (x), respectively, and adjusting the margins
            accordingly;
                (4) in the matter preceding clause (i), as so redesignated,
            by striking ``In carrying out'' and inserting the following:
                ``(1) In general.--In carrying out''; and
                (5) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(2) Recommendation of comprehensive flood risk reduction
            alternative.--If the Secretary determines that a project
            alternative identified by the non-Federal interest pursuant to
            paragraph (1) is feasible, the Secretary shall incorporate such
            alternative in the recommended plan for the project as a
            project feature the costs of which are shared as
            construction.''.

    SEC. 134. REALIGNMENT OF CERTAIN CORPS OF ENGINEERS DISTRICTS.

        Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the
    Secretary shall realign the following districts of the Corps of
    Engineers as follows:
                (1) Atchison County, Missouri, and Holt County, Missouri,
            shall be transferred to the Kansas City District.
                (2) Northeast Missouri shall be transferred from the Rock
            Island District to the St. Louis District.

    SEC. 135. UPDATE OF CORPS POLICY.

        (a) In General.--Except as otherwise specifically provided by this
    Act, not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act,
    the Secretary shall--
                (1) issue any new policy or guidance document necessary to
            implement this Act; and
                (2) revise or update any policy or guidance document of the
            Corps of Engineers in effect on the date of enactment of this
            Act to be in compliance with this Act, including the amendments
            made by this Act.
        (b) Revocation of Prior Policy and Guidance.--Effective on the date
    that is 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, any policy or
    guidance document of the Corps of Engineers that is not in compliance
    with this Act, including the amendments made by this Act, is revoked.

    SEC. 136. AVAILABILITY OF PROJECT INFORMATION.

        (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the Corps
    of Engineers, including each district of the Corps of Engineers, should
    have open communications with each office of a Member of Congress.
        (b) In General.--At the request of the Chairman or Ranking Member
    of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
    Representatives or the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the
    Senate, the Secretary and the Chief of Engineers shall provide, as
    expeditiously as possible, information or technical assistance relating
    to water resources development projects, including information relating
    to feasibility studies, Chief's Reports, project justification and
    scope, authorization and implementation status, estimated project costs
    and schedules, operational capabilities, and other information relating
    to such projects.
        (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
    construed to grant any authority to the Secretary or the Chief to deny
    a request for information related to a water resources development
    project.

    SEC. 137. FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION.

        Section 906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
    U.S.C. 2283) is amended--
                (1) in subsection (d)--
                        (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``shall not
                    submit'' and all that follows through ``unless such
                    report contains'' and inserting ``may not approve any
                    proposal related to a water resources project unless
                    the Secretary has prepared a report relating to the
                    project that contains'';
                        (B) in paragraph (2)--
                                (i) by striking ``The Secretary'' and
                            inserting the following:
                        ``(A) In general.--The Secretary''; and
                                (ii) by adding at the end the following:
                        ``(B) Identification.--The Secretary shall consult
                    with the non-Federal interest for a water resources
                    project, and other stakeholders, to the maximum extent
                    practicable--
                                ``(i) to identify mitigation implementation
                            practices or accepted assessment methodologies
                            used in the region of the water resources
                            project and incorporate such practices and
                            methodologies into the mitigation plan for such
                            project; and
                                ``(ii) to identify projects that have not
                            been constructed, or concepts described in
                            mitigation plans for other water resources
                            projects, that may be used to meet the
                            restoration or mitigation needs of the water
                            resources project.''; and
                        (C) in paragraph (3)(B)(iv)(I), by inserting ``or a
                    description of the requirements for a third-party
                    mitigation instrument that would be developed in the
                    case that a contract for future delivery of credits
                    will be used'' after ``to be used'';
                (2) in subsection (i)(1)(A)--
                        (A) in clause (i), by inserting ``, for immediate
                    delivery or future delivery to be identified in the
                    mitigation instrument'' after ``banks''; and
                        (B) in clause (ii), by inserting ``, for immediate
                    delivery or future delivery to be identified in the
                    mitigation instrument'' after ``programs''; and
                (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(l) Separable Elements.--Mitigation of fish and wildlife losses
    required under this section that is provided in the form of credit
    shall be considered a separable element of a project without requiring
    further evaluation.
        ``(m) Transparency.--The Secretary shall ensure that--
                ``(1) the mitigation requirements for each water resources
            project--
                        ``(A) are made publicly available (including on a
                    publicly available website of the headquarters of the
                    Corps of Engineers); and
                        ``(B) include the location of the project, the
                    anticipated schedule for mitigation, the type of
                    mitigation required, the amount of mitigation required,
                    and the remaining mitigation needs;
                ``(2) the mitigation plan for such project is made publicly
            available, as applicable;
                ``(3) the information described in paragraph (1) is updated
            regularly; and
                ``(4) carrying out the requirements of this subsection with
            respect to each water resources project is considered a project
            expense.
        ``(n) Coordination.--To the maximum extent practicable, the
    Secretary shall ensure that the project delivery team and regulatory
    team of the Corps of Engineers work in coordination to successfully
    carry out mitigation efforts.''.

    SEC. 138. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING EVALUATION OF FLOOD RISK
                  MANAGEMENT PROJECTS.

        It is the sense of Congress that, for each flood risk management
    project completed by the Corps of Engineers prior to the date of
    enactment of this Act for which an interest in real property is
    required, the Secretary should--
                (1) review and, if necessary, update the minimum real
            estate interest necessary for the project, based on the As-
            built Drawings approved by the Secretary with respect to the
            project--
                        (A) to maintain project benefits pursuant to
                    applicable guidance of the Corps of Engineers;
                        (B) to comply with the requirements of the manual
                    prepared under section 5(c)(1) of the Flood Control Act
                    of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n(c)(1)); and
                        (C) to be able to receive any permissions under
                    section 14 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 408),
                    required for any anticipated construction, operation
                    and maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, or replacement
                    of the project;
                (2) provide a summary of the review under paragraph (1) to
            the non-Federal interest for, or levee operator of, the
            project, including with the review, if applicable,
            identification of any additional interest in real property that
            the non-Federal interest must acquire to meet the minimum real
            estate interest determined necessary in the review; and
                (3) develop a streamlined process through which the
            Secretary, upon request of a non-Federal interest, may update
            project boundaries to reflect any update to the minimum real
            estate interest necessary for the project, as determined by a
            review under paragraph (1).

    SEC. 139. RECREATIONAL ACCESS.

        (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the
    Secretary should, when a public recreational amenity, including a park,
    trail, green space, recreational waterway, or other public open space
    available for recreational opportunities, is affected by the
    construction of a water resources development project--
                (1) maintain a level of recreational access to such public
            recreational amenity that is equivalent to the level provided
            when the public recreational amenity is not affected by such
            construction, including by providing alternative access where
            necessary to ensure continued recreational opportunities during
            such construction; and
                (2) minimize temporary disruptions to such access through
            project planning and coordination with affected communities.
        (b) Recreational Access Preservation Plan.--To the maximum extent
    practicable, as part of a feasibility study for a water resources
    development project, the Secretary shall--
                (1) review the potential impact of construction of the
            project on existing public recreational amenities, including
            facilities for hiking, biking, walking, and waterborne
            recreation; and
                (2) include in any final recommendation for such project a
            plan to minimize disruptions and maintain recreational access,
            as described in subsection (a), to such amenities during and
            after construction of the project.

    SEC. 140. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MUNITIONS DISPOSAL.

        It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary should collaborate
    with the Secretary of Defense to identify the agency responsible for
    remediation of explosive ordnance and unexploded ordnance disposal in
    accordance with the authority provided in section 1027 of the Water
    Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 426e-2).

    SEC. 141. CORPS OF ENGINEERS WORKFORCE.

        (a) Sense of Congress on Corps of Engineers Workforce Needs.--It is
    the sense of Congress that--
                (1) the Corps of Engineers should maintain a professional
            workforce capable of addressing the varied statutory
            responsibilities entrusted to the Corps of Engineers in a
            timely manner, including--
                        (A) the technical expertise necessary to design and
                    deliver complex projects for navigation, flood and
                    storm risk reduction, ecosystem restoration, water
                    supply and water conservation, hydropower, and
                    recreation;
                        (B) the ability to partner with State and local
                    governments and Indian Tribes in providing technical
                    and planning assistance to communities in addressing
                    local water resources challenges; the personnel
                    required to meet its emergency response authorities;
                    and
                        (C) the regulatory expertise to administer
                    statutory reviews and approvals; and
                (2) the Corps of Engineers should--
                        (A) improve its recruiting efforts;
                        (B) offer clear paths to Federal internships for
                    students from high school through postgraduate school;
                        (C) offer clear paths to Federal careers for recent
                    graduates;
                        (D) promote the appropriate utilization of
                    volunteers; and
                        (E) provide meaningful training, mentoring, and
                    career development opportunities, including
                    apprenticeships, to ensure that future Corps of
                    Engineers workforce needs are met.
        (b) Evaluation of Corps of Engineers Workforce Needs.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall seek to contract with
            the National Academy of Public Administration to carry out a
            comprehensive review of workforce demands and needs of the
            Corps of Engineers, which shall include--
                        (A) an evaluation of the professional workforce
                    needs of the Corps of Engineers necessary to meet the
                    statutory responsibilities of the Corps of Engineers,
                    including--
                                (i) ensuring the full staffing of positions
                            that support missions, projects, or operations,
                            including such positions that are--
                                        (I) inherently governmental or
                                    related to public safety, navigational
                                    capacity, or national security; or
                                        (II) necessary for the review and
                                    resolution of statutory reviews and
                                    approvals in a timely manner; and
                                (ii) challenges facing the Corps of
                            Engineers related to recruitment, retention,
                            reductions-in-force, retirements,
                            credentialing, professional development, on-
                            the-job training, and other readiness-related
                            gaps;
                        (B) an evaluation of how increased use of public-
                    private partnerships and other efforts by non-Federal
                    interests to carry out responsibilities related to the
                    study, planning, design, and construction of authorized
                    water resources development projects affect future
                    Corps of Engineers workforce needs;
                        (C) an assessment of the existing technology used
                    by the Corps of Engineers, the effects of any
                    inefficiencies in the use of technology by the Corps of
                    Engineers, and recommendations for improved technology
                    or tools to accomplish the missions and
                    responsibilities of the Corps of Engineers; and
                        (D) recommendations based on the review under this
                    paragraph to improve the capacity and preparedness of
                    the Corps of Engineers workforce to ensure that such
                    responsibilities are fully and competently addressed in
                    a timely manner and increase the efficiency of the
                    Corps of Engineers project delivery.
                (2) Submission to congress.--Not later than 180 days after
            the date on which the Secretary receives the findings of the
            review under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the
            Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report that includes--
                        (A) a copy of such findings; and
                        (B) a detailed response to such findings, including
                    any recommendations the Secretary plans to implement to
                    ensure that the statutory responsibilities of the Corps
                    of Engineers are fully and competently addressed and
                    ensure the efficiency of project delivery.

    SEC. 142. REPORTING AND OVERSIGHT.

        (a) Report.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
            Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure and
            Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the
            Committees on Environment and Public Works and Appropriations
            of the Senate a report that includes for each report described
            in paragraph (2) the following:
                        (A) A summary of the status of the report,
                    including if the report has been initiated.
                        (B) The amount of funds that--
                                (i) have been made available to carry out
                            each such report; and
                                (ii) the Secretary requires to complete
                            each such report.
                        (C) A detailed summary of the resources and
                    procedures the Secretary intends to use to complete the
                    report, including the expected timeline for completion
                    of the report.
                        (D) Any other information regarding the report that
                    the Secretary determines may be relevant to such
                    committees in understanding the status, timing, and
                    progress towards completion of the report.
                (2) Reports described.--The reports described in this
            paragraph are the following:
                        (A) The initial report required under section
                    1150(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of
                    2024 (138 Stat. 3040).
                        (B) The report on turbidity in the Willamette
                    Valley, Oregon, required under section 1205(b) of the
                    Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat.
                    3071).
                        (C) The report on ice jam prevention and mitigation
                    required under section 1205(k) of the Water Resources
                    Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3075).
                        (D) The report on excess lands for Whittier Narrows
                    Dam, California, required under section 8213 of the
                    Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat.
                    3758).
                        (E) The report on recreational boating in the Great
                    Lakes basin required under section 8218 of the Water
                    Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3761).
                        (F) The report on the disposition study on
                    hydropower in the Willamette Valley, Oregon, required
                    under section 8220(b) of the Water Resources
                    Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3762).
                        (G) The report on the status of the implementation
                    of real estate administrative fees required under
                    section 1120 of the Water Resources Development Act of
                    2024 (138 Stat. 3014).
                        (H) The report summarizing comparisons of the
                    benefit-cost ratios of projects in covered communities
                    required under section 1148(d) of the Water Resources
                    Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3039).
                        (I) The report on dredge capacity required under
                    section 8205 of the Water Resources Development Act of
                    2022 (136 Stat. 3754).
                        (J) The report identifying opportunities for
                    potential exchange of land or flowage easements
                    associated with the Lake O' the Pines, Texas, project,
                    as required under section 1222 of the Water Resources
                    Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3082).
        (b) Prior Guidance.--Not later than 45 days after the date of
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidance regarding
    each of the following:
                (1) Section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act
            of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)).
                (2) Section 444 of the Water Resources Development Act of
            1996 (110 Stat. 3747; 113 Stat. 286; 138 Stat. 3149).
                (3) Section 8132 of the Water Resources Development Act of
            2022 (33 U.S.C. 2238e).
                (4) Section 1129 of the Water Resources Development Act of
            2024 (138 Stat. 3018).
                (5) Section 1148 of the Water Resources Development Act of
            2024 (138 Stat. 3039).

    SEC. 143. ABILITY TO PAY.

        Section 1139(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138
    Stat. 3026) is amended--
                (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting
            ``and studies'' after ``projects''; and
                (2) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(17) The project for flood risk management, Big Island
            Local Flood Protection Project, Illinois, authorized pursuant
            to section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 742).
                ``(18) The project for shoreline erosion management,
            Hickman Bluff Stabilization, Kentucky, authorized by section
            3071 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat.
            1124).
                ``(19) The study for the project for ecosystem restoration,
            Lower Osage River Basin, Missouri, authorized by section 201 of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2670).
                ``(20) The project for ecosystem restoration, Lower
            Blackstone River, Rhode Island, described in section 8361 of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3804).
                ``(21) The study for the reallocation of water supply
            storage, Aquilla Lake, Texas, carried out in accordance with
            section 301 of the Water Supply Act of 1958 (43 U.S.C. 390b),
            authorized by section 202(e) of the Water Resources Development
            Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2675).
                ``(22) The study to modify the project for hurricane and
            storm damage risk reduction, Norfolk Coastal Storm Risk
            Management, Virginia, authorized by section 401(3) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2738).''.

    SEC. 144. PILOT PROGRAM PRIORITIZATION.

        Section 118(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33
    U.S.C. 2201 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                ``(10) The project for flood risk management, Big Island
            Local Flood Protection Project, Illinois, authorized pursuant
            to section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 742).
                ``(11) The project for shoreline and riverine protection
            and restoration, Passumpsic River watershed, Vermont,
            authorized by section 212 of the Water Resources Development
            Act of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 2332).''.

                         TITLE II--STUDIES AND REPORTS

    SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF PROPOSED FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

        (a) New Projects.--The Secretary is authorized to conduct a
    feasibility study for the following projects for water resources
    development and conservation and other purposes, as identified in the
    reports titled ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources
    Development'' submitted to Congress pursuant to section 7001 of the
    Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or
    otherwise reviewed by Congress:
                (1) Africatown, alabama.--Project for ecosystem restoration
            in the vicinity of the community of Africatown in Mobile
            County, Alabama.
                (2) Big creek lake, alabama.--Project for ecosystem
            restoration, Big Creek Lake, Mobile County, Alabama.
                (3) Mobile county, alabama.--Project for ecosystem
            restoration in Mobile County, Alabama, in the vicinity of
            Chickasaw Creek, Hog Bayou, Three Mile Creek, and Mobile River.
                (4) Galena, alaska.--Project for flood risk management,
            City of Galena, Alaska.
                (5) Russian creek, alaska.--Project for flood risk
            management, including riverbank stabilization, Russian Creek,
            Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska, in the vicinity of the community
            of Bell Flats.
                (6) Scow bay, alaska.--Project for navigation, Scow Bay,
            Borough of Petersburg, Alaska.
                (7) Sitka, alaska.--Project for coastal storm risk
            management, City and Borough of Sitka, Alaska.
                (8) Dudleyville, arizona.--Project for flood risk
            management, Dudleyville, Arizona.
                (9) Carmel river, california.--Project for flood risk
            management and ecosystem restoration, Carmel River, Monterey
            County, California.
                (10) El monte, california.--Project for flood risk
            management and ecosystem restoration, City of El Monte,
            California.
                (11) Hayward, california.--Project for coastal storm risk
            management and ecosystem restoration, City of Hayward,
            California, in the vicinity of the Water Resource Recovery
            Facility.
                (12) Pasadena, california.--Project for flood risk
            management, ecosystem restoration, and recreation, Lower Arroyo
            Seco, City of Pasadena, California.
                (13) Redwood city, california.--Project for flood risk
            management, Redwood City, California.
                (14) San clemente shoreline, california.--Project for
            coastal storm risk management, including shoreline erosion
            protection, City of San Clemente, California.
                (15) Sweetwater reservoir, california.--Project for flood
            risk management, including sediment management, in the vicinity
            of the Sweetwater Reservoir, including its spillways and dikes,
            San Diego County, California.
                (16) Capitol region, connecticut.--Project for flood risk
            management in proximity to the Connecticut River, Capitol
            Region, Connecticut.
                (17) Coginchaug river, connecticut.--Project for flood risk
            management and ecosystem restoration, Coginchaug River, towns
            of Durham and Middlefield, Connecticut.
                (18) Delaware river, delaware.--Project for flood risk
            management, including shoreline damage prevention and
            mitigation, recreation, and ecosystem restoration, Delaware
            River, Delaware.
                (19) New castle, delaware.--Project for flood risk
            management, City of New Castle, Delaware.
                (20) Boggy creek watershed, florida.--Project for flood
            risk management and ecosystem restoration, including sediment
            and debris management, Boggy Creek Watershed, Florida.
                (21) Broward county, florida.--Project for flood risk
            management, coastal storm risk management, and ecosystem
            restoration, in the back bay system of Broward County, Florida.
                (22) Eatonville, florida.--Project for flood risk
            management and ecosystem restoration, town of Eatonville,
            Florida, in the vicinity of Lake King.
                (23) Flagler county, florida.--Project for coastal storm
            risk management, including effects on back bays and open-coast
            shorelines, Flagler County, Florida.
                (24) Horseshoe beach, florida.--Project for coastal storm
            risk management, including shoreline damage prevention and
            mitigation, town of Horseshoe Beach, Florida.
                (25) Lake hart watershed, florida.--Project for flood risk
            management and ecosystem restoration, including sediment and
            debris management, Lake Hart Watershed, Florida.
                (26) Little wekiva watershed, florida.--Project for flood
            risk management, ecosystem restoration, and recreation,
            including sediment management, and shoreline erosion, Little
            Wekiva Watershed, Orange County, Florida, including Lake Lawne
            and Lake Orlando.
                (27) Lower withlacoochee river watershed, florida.--Project
            for ecosystem restoration, Lower Withlacoochee River watershed,
            Florida.
                (28) Pasco county, florida.--Project for ecosystem
            restoration and water supply, Pasco County, Florida.
                (29) Shingle creek watershed, florida.--Project for flood
            risk reduction and ecosystem restoration within the Shingle
            Creek Watershed, including Lake Fran and Lake Richmond,
            Florida.
                (30) St. petersburg, florida.--Project for flood risk
            management, coastal storm risk management, and ecosystem
            restoration, city of St. Petersburg, Florida, including canals
            in the city of St. Petersburg.
                (31) Elkhorn lake, letcher county, kentucky.--Project for
            flood risk management and water supply at Elkhorn Lake, Letcher
            County, Kentucky.
                (32) Gwinnett county, georgia.--Project for flood risk
            management, Gwinnett County, Georgia.
                (33) South river watershed, georgia.--Project for flood
            risk management and ecosystem restoration, South River
            watershed, Georgia.
                (34) Honolulu, hawaii.--Project for flood risk management
            and coastal storm risk management, including shoreline erosion
            protection, in the vicinity of the Waikiki Natatorium War
            Memorial, Kaimana and Waikiki beaches, City and County of
            Honolulu, Hawaii.
                (35) Port allen, kaua`i county, hawaii.--Project for flood
            risk management, navigation, and coastal storm risk management,
            Port Allen, Kaua`i County, Hawaii.
                (36) Little soap creek watershed, iowa.--Project for flood
            risk management and ecosystem restoration, Little Soap Creek
            Watershed, Appanoose and Davis Counties, Iowa.
                (37) Lower des moines river watershed, iowa.--Project for
            flood risk management and ecosystem restoration, Lower Des
            Moines River Watershed, Appanoose, Davis, Marion, Monroe, and
            Wapello Counties, Iowa.
                (38) Comite river, louisiana.--Project for flood risk
            management and ecosystem restoration, including sediment and
            debris management, in the vicinity of East Baton Rouge Parish
            and East Feliciana Parish, Comite River, Louisiana.
                (39) Saint charles parish, louisiana.--Project for flood
            risk management and ecosystem restoration, including water and
            sediment management, Saint Charles Parish, Louisiana.
                (40) Scott's bluff, louisiana.--Project for flood risk
            management and ecosystem restoration, including shoreline
            erosion prevention along the Mississippi River, Scott's Bluff,
            City of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, which the Secretary shall, to
            the maximum extent practicable, carry out utilizing and
            incorporating existing work, including analysis provided
            pursuant to section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act
            of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16).
                (41) Rockville, maryland.--Project for flood risk
            management, City of Rockville, Maryland, in the vicinity of the
            Rockville Water Treatment Plant.
                (42) Island end river, massachusetts.--Project for flood
            risk management and coastal storm risk management in the
            vicinity of Island End River, cities of Chelsea and Everett,
            Massachusetts.
                (43) Provincetown, massachusetts.--Project for coastal
            storm risk management, including shoreline damage prevention
            and mitigation, Town of Provincetown, Massachusetts.
                (44) Winthrop, massachusetts.--Project for navigation in
            the vicinity of Winthrop Town Pier, Town of Winthrop,
            Massachusetts.
                (45) Bay city, michigan.--Project for flood risk
            management, Saginaw River, Bay City, Michigan.
                (46) Gladwin and midland counties, michigan.--Project for
            ecosystem restoration and streambank erosion prevention,
            Gladwin and Midland Counties, Michigan.
                (47) Oakland county, michigan.--Project for flood risk
            management and ecosystem restoration along the Caddell Drain,
            Oakland County, Michigan.
                (48) Wayne county, michigan.--Project for flood risk
            management and coastal storm risk management, Wayne County,
            Michigan, in the vicinity of the seawall along Lakeshore Drive.
                (49) Mississippi sound beaches, mississippi.--Project for
            ecosystem restoration and coastal storm risk management,
            including shoreline damage prevention and mitigation,
            Mississippi Sound beaches in Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson
            Counties, Mississippi.
                (50) St. louis, missouri.--Project for flood risk
            management, navigation, recreation, and ecosystem restoration
            in the vicinity of Laclede's Landing, city of St. Louis,
            Missouri.
                (51) Bergen county, new jersey.--Project for flood risk
            management in Bergen County, New Jersey.
                (52) Bogota, new jersey.--Project for flood risk
            management, borough of Bogota, New Jersey.
                (53) Camden and gloucester counties, new jersey.--Project
            for flood risk management and ecosystem restoration in riverine
            areas stemming from the Delaware River, Camden and Gloucester
            Counties, New Jersey.
                (54) Cresskill, new jersey.--Project for flood risk
            management, Borough of Cresskill, New Jersey.
                (55) Garwood, new jersey.--Project for flood risk
            management, Borough of Garwood, New Jersey.
                (56) Gloucester city, new jersey.--Project for flood risk
            management and coastal storm risk management in the vicinity of
            Proprietors Park, Gloucester City, New Jersey.
                (57) Overpeck creek watershed, new jersey.--Project for
            flood risk management, including debris management, Overpeck
            Creek watershed, Borough of Tenafly, New Jersey.
                (58) Pascack brook, new jersey.--Project for flood risk
            management, including debris management, in the vicinity of
            Pascack Brook, boroughs of Montvale and Park Ridge, New Jersey.
                (59) Pascack valley, new jersey.--Project for flood risk
            management along the Hackensack River, Pascack Brook, and
            Musquapsink Brook in the Pascack Valley, Bergen County, New
            Jersey.
                (60) West orange, new jersey.--Project for flood risk
            management, township of West Orange, New Jersey.
                (61) Rio grande basin, new mexico.--Project for water
            supply and ecosystem restoration, Rio Grande Basin, New Mexico.
                (62) Amity harbor, new york.--Project for flood risk
            management and coastal storm risk management, Amity Harbor, New
            York.
                (63) Atlantic beach, new york.--Project for flood risk
            management and coastal storm risk management, Village of
            Atlantic Beach, New York.
                (64) Bayport, new york.--Project for coastal storm risk
            management, including shoreline erosion protection, Bayport,
            New York.
                (65) Davis park, fire island, new york.--Project for flood
            risk and coastal storm risk management, including shoreline
            erosion protection, Davis Park, Fire Island, New York.
                (66) Lawrence, new york.--Project for flood risk
            management, coastal storm risk management, and navigation, in
            the vicinity of Bannister Bay and Village of Lawrence, New
            York.
                (67) Mattituck inlet, southold, new york.--Project for
            navigation, coastal storm risk management, and ecosystem
            restoration, in Mattituck Inlet, Town of Southold, New York.
                (68) Mohawk river and erie canal, new york.--Project for
            ecosystem restoration, including aquatic invasive species
            management, Mohawk River and Erie Canal in the vicinity of the
            City of Rome, New York.
                (69) Nissequogue river, new york.--Project for flood risk
            management, coastal storm risk management, navigation,
            ecosystem restoration, and recreation, in the vicinity of Stony
            Brook Harbor, Nissequogue River, New York.
                (70) Peconic bay, new york.--Project for navigation and
            coastal storm risk management, including shoreline damage
            prevention and mitigation, Peconic Bay and connected harbors
            and inlets, New York.
                (71) Point o' woods, fire island, new york.--Project for
            flood risk management, coastal storm risk management, including
            shoreline damage protection and mitigation, and ecosystem
            restoration, Point O' Woods, Fire Island, New York.
                (72) Port washington, new york.--Project for navigation, in
            the vicinity of Tom's Point, Port Washington, New York.
                (73) South shore, long island, new york.--Project for
            ecosystem restoration, flood risk management, coastal storm
            risk management, and navigation, Nassau and Suffolk Counties,
            New York.
                (74) Spring valley, new york.--Project for flood risk
            management in the vicinity of Memorial Park, Village of Spring
            Valley, New York.
                (75) Cape fear river, north carolina.--Project for water
            supply and ecosystem restoration, Cape Fear River in the
            vicinity of Cumberland County, North Carolina.
                (76) Fayetteville, north carolina.--Project for flood risk
            management and ecosystem restoration, Cross Creek,
            Fayetteville, North Carolina.
                (77) Topsail beach, north carolina.--Project for flood risk
            management, Town of Topsail Beach, North Carolina.
                (78) Whiteville, north carolina.--Project for flood risk
            management, City of Whiteville, North Carolina.
                (79) Whiteville, north carolina.--Project for flood risk
            management, Waccamaw River basin, City of Whiteville, North
            Carolina.
                (80) Maumee river, ohio.--Project for flood risk
            management, including riverbank stabilization, ecosystem
            restoration, and recreation, Maumee River, in the vicinity of
            Glass City Riverwalk, Ohio.
                (81) Hood river county, oregon.--Project for flood risk
            management and ecosystem restoration, including sediment
            management, Hood River County, Oregon.
                (82) Saucon creek, pennsylvania.--Project for flood risk
            management, Saucon Creek, in the vicinity of the Borough of
            Hellertown, Pennsylvania.
                (83) Ceiba, puerto rico.--Project for coastal storm risk
            management, including shoreline damage prevention and
            mitigation, and ecosystem restoration, Ceiba, Puerto Rico.
                (84) Fajardo, puerto rico.--Project for coastal storm risk
            management, including shoreline damage prevention and
            mitigation, and ecosystem restoration, Fajardo, Puerto Rico.
                (85) Loiza, puerto rico.--Project for coastal storm risk
            management, including shoreline damage prevention and
            mitigation, and ecosystem restoration, Loiza, Puerto Rico.
                (86) Naguabo, puerto rico.--Project for coastal storm risk
            management, including shoreline damage prevention and
            mitigation, and ecosystem restoration, Naguabo, Puerto Rico.
                (87) Rio anton ruiz, puerto rico.--Project for flood risk
            management and ecosystem restoration along the Rio Anton Ruiz
            and adjacent levees in Humacao, Puerto Rico.
                (88) Vega baja, puerto rico.--Project for flood risk
            management and coastal storm risk management, including
            sediment management, Puerto Nuevo Lagoon (also known as
            ``Quintin Valle Lagoon''), Vega Baja, Puerto Rico.
                (89) Yabucoa, puerto rico.--Project for coastal storm risk
            management, including shoreline damage prevention and
            mitigation, and ecosystem restoration, Yabucoa, Puerto Rico.
                (90) Easton pond, rhode island.--Project for coastal storm
            risk management, ecosystem restoration, and water supply,
            Easton Pond, City of Newport, Rhode Island.
                (91) West river watershed, rhode island.--Project for flood
            risk management, West River watershed, Rhode Island.
                (92) Cumberland county, tennessee.--Project for water
            supply, Cumberland County, Tennessee.
                (93) Duck river, tennessee.--Project for flood risk
            reduction, ecosystem restoration, water supply, and recreation,
            Duck River, Tennessee.
                (94) Enka dam, tennessee.--Project for ecosystem
            restoration, Enka Dam, in the vicinity of Newport, Tennessee.
                (95) Arroyo colorado river, texas.--Project for flood risk
            management and ecosystem restoration, including shoreline
            erosion protection, along the Arroyo Colorado River in the City
            of Rio Hondo, Texas.
                (96) Bell and mclennan counties, texas.--Project for water
            supply, Bell and McLennan Counties, Texas.
                (97) Cameron county, texas.--Project for flood risk
            management, water supply, and ecosystem restoration, in the
            vicinity of Sweeney Lake and Resaca de los Fresnos, Cameron
            County, Texas.
                (98) Escobares, texas.--Project for flood risk management,
            City of Escobares, Texas.
                (99) Nueces county shoreline, texas.--Project for coastal
            storm risk management, including shoreline erosion protection,
            Nueces County, Texas.
                (100) Odessa, texas.--Project for water supply in the City
            of Odessa, Texas.
                (101) Parker county, texas.--Project for water supply,
            Parker County, Texas.
                (102) Roma, texas.--Project for flood risk management, City
            of Roma, Texas.
                (103) Upper san jacinto river basin, texas.--Project for
            flood risk management and water supply, Upper San Jacinto River
            basin, in the vicinity of Liberty, Montgomery, and San Jacinto
            Counties, Texas.
                (104) Winn park, texas.--Project for flood risk management,
            Winn Park, City of Farmers Branch, Texas.
                (105) Lower spanish fork river, utah.--Project for
            ecosystem restoration, lower Spanish Fork River, Utah.
                (106) Clinch river, virginia.--Project for flood risk
            management and ecosystem restoration, along the Clinch River,
            Town of Richlands, Virginia.
                (107) Nooksack river, washington.--Project for flood risk
            management and ecosystem restoration, including shoreline
            erosion, Nooksack River, Whatcom County, Washington.
        (b) Project Modifications.--The Secretary is authorized to conduct
    a feasibility study for the following project modifications:
                (1) Lowell creek tunnel, seward, alaska.--Modifications to
            the project for flood diversion in Lowell Canyon, Seward,
            Alaska, authorized by section 5032 of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1205; 134 Stat. 2719; 138
            Stat. 3136), for environmental mitigation.
                (2) Morro bay, california.--Modifications to the project
            for harbor development, Morro Bay, California, authorized by
            section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 21), for
            navigation improvements and ecosystem restoration.
                (3) Naugatuck river, torrington, connecticut.--
            Modifications to the project for structural flood damage
            reduction, Naugatuck River, Connecticut, authorized pursuant to
            the first section of the Act of December 22, 1944 (33 U.S.C.
            701-1), to improve flood risk management and reduce erosion
            within the Naugatuck River Flood Damage Reduction System.
                (4) Assawoman canal, delaware.--Modifications to the
            project for navigation, Assawoman Canal, Delaware, authorized
            pursuant to section 9 of the Act of July 5, 1884 (chapter 229,
            23 Stat. 149), for flood risk management.
                (5) Pensacola harbor, florida.--Modifications to the
            project for navigation, Pensacola Harbor, Florida, authorized
            by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat.
            1174), for recreation and for additional deepening to 40 feet
            and widening.
                (6) Tampa harbor, florida.--Modifications to the project
            for navigation, Tampa Harbor, Pinellas and Hillsborough
            Counties, Florida, authorized by section 1401(1) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3167), for
            additional deepening to 47 feet.
                (7) Lake sidney lanier, gwinnett county, georgia.--
            Modifications to the project for flood protection, power
            production, water supply, navigation, recreation, and fish and
            wildlife management at Lake Sidney Lanier, Gwinnett County,
            Georgia, authorized pursuant to the first section of the Act of
            July 24, 1946 (chapter 595, 60 Stat. 635), to improve flood
            risk management, navigation safety, hydropower reliability, and
            water supply.
                (8) Chicago harbor lock, illinois.--Modifications to the
            project for navigation, Chicago Harbor Lock, Illinois,
            authorized pursuant to section 1 of the Act of July 11, 1870
            (chapter 240, 16 Stat. 226; 21 Stat. 182; 37 Stat. 217; 40
            Stat. 1283; 76 Stat. 1176), to add recreation as an authorized
            purpose.
                (9) Saylorville reservoir, iowa.--Modifications to the
            project for flood control, Saylorville Reservoir, Iowa,
            authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72
            Stat. 310), to include water supply and sediment management.
                (10) Lawrence, on kansas river, kansas.--Modifications to
            the project for flood protection, Lawrence, on Kansas River,
            Kansas, authorized pursuant to section 5 of the Act of June 22,
            1936 (chapter 688, 49 Stat. 1588), to study raising levees on
            the Kansas River in Lawrence, Kansas, north of Bowersock Dam.
                (11) Buckhorn lake, leslie and perry counties, kentucky.--
            Modifications to the project for flood control and other
            purposes authorized pursuant to section 4 of the Act of June
            28, 1938 (chapter 795, 52 Stat. 1217), to include sediment and
            debris management at Buckhorn Lake in Leslie and Perry
            Counties, Kentucky.
                (12) Louisville metropolitan flood protection system
            reconstruction, jefferson and bullitt counties, kentucky.--
            Modifications to the project for flood risk management,
            Louisville Metropolitan Flood Protection System Reconstruction,
            Jefferson and Bullitt Counties, Kentucky, authorized by section
            401(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134
            Stat. 2735), to expand project scope and incorporate features
            identified in the document prepared for the non-Federal
            interest for the project, issued in June 2017, and titled ``20-
            Year Comprehensive Facility Plan, Critical Repair and
            Reinvestment Plan, Volume 4: Ohio River Flood Protection''.
                (13) Curtis creek channel, maryland.--Modifications to the
            project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and Channels,
            Maryland, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act
            of 1958 (72 Stat. 297), to expand the Federal channel to
            include the Curtis Creek Channel to a depth of 29 feet.
                (14) Boston harbor, massachusetts.--Modifications to the
            project for navigation, Boston Harbor, Massachusetts,
            authorized by the first section of the Act of March 2, 1867
            (chapter 144, 14 Stat. 420; 104 Stat. 4607; 128 Stat. 1365),
            for additional deepening and widening.
                (15) Grenada lake, yazoo river and tributaries,
            mississippi.--Modifications to the project for flood control of
            the Yazoo River and Tributaries, Mississippi, authorized by
            section 10 of the Act of May 15, 1928 (chapter 569, 45 Stat.
            538), to add recreation as a project purpose on the Yalobusha
            River, including at Grenada Lake.
                (16) New jersey intracoastal waterway, new jersey.--
            Modifications to the project for navigation for the New Jersey
            Intracoastal Waterway, New Jersey, authorized pursuant to
            section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 13; 100 Stat.
            4181) to reroute the New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway near
            Ventnor City, New Jersey.
                (17) Rahway river basin, new jersey.--Modifications to the
            project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Rahway
            River Basin, New Jersey, authorized by section 401(3) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2737; 136
            Stat. 3736; 138 Stat. 3066), to improve flood risk management
            for municipalities within the basin that are subject to
            repetitive flooding.
                (18) Port of new york and new jersey, new york and new
            jersey.--Modifications to the project for navigation, Port of
            New York and New Jersey, New York and New Jersey, authorized by
            section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114
            Stat. 2576), to improve navigation south of the Elizabeth Port
            Authority Marine Terminal.
                (19) Allegheny river, pennsylvania.--Modifications to the
            project for navigation and ecosystem restoration, Allegheny
            River, Pennsylvania, authorized pursuant to the first section
            of the Act of July 25, 1912 (chapter 253, 37 Stat. 216; 46
            Stat. 928; 49 Stat. 1035), to add recreation as a project
            purpose.
                (20) Delaware and schuylkill rivers, pennsylvania.--
            Modifications to the project for navigation, Delaware River,
            Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania (including Philadelphia
            to the Sea), authorized by section 1 of the Act of June 25,
            1910 (chapter 382, 36 Stat. 637; 46 Stat. 921; 52 Stat. 803; 59
            Stat. 14; 68 Stat. 1249; 72 Stat. 297), and the project for
            navigation, Schuylkill River, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
            authorized by section 1 of the Act of August 8, 1917 (40 Stat.
            252; 46 Stat. 921; 60 Stat. 635), to improve navigation for
            large commercial vessels in the vicinity of the confluence of
            the Delaware and Schuylkill Rivers.
                (21) Charleston peninsula, south carolina.--Modifications
            to the project for coastal storm risk management, Charleston
            Peninsula, South Carolina, authorized by section 8401(3) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3842), to
            include features for tidal- and inland-related flood risk
            management measures.
                (22) Lake aquilla, brazos river basin, texas.--
            Modifications to the project for water supply, flood risk
            management, and recreation, Lake Aquilla, Brazos River Basin,
            Texas, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of
            1968 (82 Stat. 741), for reallocation of water supply storage.
                (23) James river, virginia.--Modifications to the project
            for navigation, James River, Virginia, authorized by section
            101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1174; 102
            Stat. 4045), to include additional portions at the Appomattox
            River and add flood risk management as a purpose.
                (24) Norfolk harbor and channels, virginia.--Modifications
            to the project for navigation, Norfolk Harbor and Channels,
            Virginia, authorized by section 201 of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4090; 132 Stat. 3840; 136
            Stat. 3763), to improve navigation in the Eastern Branch of the
            Elizabeth River.

    SEC. 202. EXPEDITED COMPLETION.

        (a) Feasibility Studies.--The Secretary shall expedite the
    completion of a feasibility study or general reevaluation report (as
    applicable) for each of the following projects, and if the Secretary
    determines that the project is justified in a completed report, may
    proceed directly to preconstruction planning, engineering, and design
    of the project:
                (1) Project for storm damage prevention and reduction,
            coastal erosion, and ice and glacial damage in the State of
            Alaska, authorized by section 8315 of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3783).
                (2) Project for reallocation of water supply storage,
            Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas, authorized pursuant to section 301
            of the Water Supply Act of 1958 (43 U.S.C. 390b).
                (3) Project for flood control and allied purposes, Homer
            Navigation Improvements, Alaska, authorized pursuant to section
            204 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1181).
                (4) Project for navigation, Port of Nome Modifications,
            Alaska, authorized by section 401(1) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2733).
                (5) Project for flood risk management, Cave Buttes Dam,
            Phoenix, Arizona, authorized by section 1201(a)(1) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3802).
                (6) Project for flood risk management, McMicken Dam and
            Trilby Wash, Maricopa County, Arizona, authorized by section
            8201 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat.
            3744; 138 Stat. 3065).
                (7) Project for ecosystem restoration, Rio Salado Oeste,
            Phoenix, Arizona, authorized pursuant to section 6 of the Act
            of June 28, 1938 (chapter 795, 52 Stat. 1225).
                (8) Project for flood risk management, Yavapai County, in
            the vicinity of the City of Cottonwood, Arizona, authorized by
            section 1201(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of
            2024 (138 Stat. 3050).
                (9) Project for flood control and other purposes, Calaveras
            River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, California,
            authorized by section 10 of the Act of December 22, 1944
            (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 902; 138 Stat. 3058).
                (10) Project for flood risk management, water supply, and
            ecosystem restoration, Chowchilla River, Ash Slough, and
            Berenda Slough, Madera County, California, authorized by
            section 6 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (chapter 688, 49 Stat.
            1595; 52 Stat. 1225; 138 Stat. 3059).
                (11) Project for flood control, water conservation,
            environmental restoration, water supply, and related purposes,
            Coyote Valley Dam, California, authorized by section 204 of the
            Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 177; 130 Stat. 1682; 132
            Stat. 3803; 134 Stat. 2672; 136 Stat. 3835; 138 Stat. 3065).
                (12) Project for ecosystem restoration and water supply
            conservation and recharge, Eastman Lake, California, authorized
            by section 1201(a)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of
            2024 (138 Stat. 3050).
                (13) Project for flood control, environmental restoration,
            and recreation, Murrieta Creek, California, authorized by
            section 103 of title I of appendix B of Public Law 106-377 (114
            Stat. 1441A-65; 136 Stat. 3786).
                (14) Project for ecosystem restoration, City of Petaluma,
            California, authorized by section 8201(a)(6) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3745).
                (15) Project for ecosystem restoration, water supply, and
            recreation, Pine Flat Dam, Fresno County, California,
            authorized by section 1201(a)(7) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3050).
                (16) Project for flood control, Redbank and Fancher Creeks,
            California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4112).
                (17) Project for flood risk management and ecosystem
            restoration, Salinas River, California, authorized by section
            1201(a)(9) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138
            Stat. 3050).
                (18) Project for flood risk management, including sea level
            rise, San Diego Bay, California, authorized by section
            1201(a)(11) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138
            Stat. 3050).
                (19) Project for flood risk management, including
            stormwater runoff reduction, City of San Mateo, California,
            authorized by section 1201(a)(14) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3051).
                (20) Project for ecosystem restoration, Central and South
            Florida, Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Program, Lake
            Okeechobee Watershed Restoration, Florida, authorized pursuant
            to section 601(d)(2)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act
            of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680; 121 Stat. 1179; 134 Stat. 2673; 136
            Stat. 3761; 138 Stat. 3067).
                (21) Project for flood risk management, water supply,
            ecosystem restoration, recreation, and related purposes, Lake
            Istokpoga, Florida, authorized pursuant to section 8214 of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3759).
                (22) Project for ecosystem restoration, Lake Runnymede,
            Florida, authorized by section 8201(a)(16) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3745).
                (23) Project for ecosystem restoration and flood risk
            management, Lake Tohopekaliga, Florida, authorized by section
            8201(a)(19) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136
            Stat. 3745).
                (24) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction
            and ecosystem restoration in the vicinity of MacDill Air Force
            Base, City of Tampa, Florida, authorized by section 1201(a)(37)
            of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat.
            3052).
                (25) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction,
            Port Tampa Bay, Florida, including McKay Bay, authorized by
            section 8201(a)(18) of the Water Resources Development Act of
            2022 (136 Stat. 3745).
                (26) Project for flood risk management, ecosystem
            restoration, and water storage, Shingle Creek and Kissimmee
            River, Osceola County, Florida, authorized by section 201(a)(5)
            of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2670;
            136 Stat. 3749).
                (27) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction
            and coastal storm risk management, Volusia County, Florida,
            authorized by the resolution of the Committee on Transportation
            and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, dated
            February 16, 2000, and required to be expedited by section
            1203(a)(14) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138
            Stat. 3065).
                (28) Project for local flood protection, Hanapepe River,
            island of Kaua`i, Hawaii, authorized by section 10 of the Act
            of December 22, 1944 (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 903; 138 Stat.
            3060).
                (29) Project for flood risk management, Kaiaka-Waialua
            watershed, O`ahu, Hawaii, authorized pursuant to section
            1201(a)(45) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138
            Stat. 3052).
                (30) Project for flood risk management and coastal storm
            risk management, County of Kaua`i, Hawaii, authorized pursuant
            to section 1201(a)(46) of the Water Resources Development Act
            of 2024 (138 Stat. 3052).
                (31) Project for flood risk management and ecosystem
            restoration, County of Maui, Hawaii, authorized by section
            1201(a)(47) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138
            Stat. 3052).
                (32) Project for flood control and allied purposes, Wailupe
            Stream, `Aina Haina, Honolulu, Hawaii, authorized pursuant to
            section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1197).
                (33) Project for flood risk management, Waimea River,
            County of Kaua`i, Hawaii, authorized pursuant to section 216 of
            the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1830).
                (34) Project for flood risk management, Hoosic River,
            Massachusetts, authorized pursuant to the resolution of the
            Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives adopted on December 2, 2010 (docket number
            2828), for environmental restoration, streambank stabilization,
            flood risk management, watershed management, floodplain
            management, and other allied purposes.
                (35) Project for navigation, Saginaw River, Michigan,
            authorized pursuant to section 456 of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 332).
                (36) Project for flood risk management and ecosystem
            restoration, Tittabawassee River, Chippewa River, Pine River,
            and Tobacco River, Michigan, authorized by section 8201(a)(46)
            of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat.
            3747).
                (37) Project for ecosystem restoration, Lower Osage River
            Basin, Missouri, authorized by section 201(a)(16) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2670).
                (38) Project for flood control of the Mississippi River in
            its alluvial valley and for its improvement from the Head of
            the Passes to Cape Girardeau, Missouri, authorized by the first
            section of the Act of May 15, 1928 (chapter 569, 45 Stat. 534;
            138 Stat. 3060).
                (39) Project for flood risk management, Berry's Creek, New
            Jersey, authorized by section 1201(a)(91) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3055).
                (40) Project for flood risk management, Fleischer Brook,
            New Jersey, authorized by section 1201(a)(92) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3055).
                (41) Project for flood risk management and hydropower,
            Great Falls Raceway, Paterson, New Jersey, authorized by
            section 1201(a)(93) of the Water Resources Development Act of
            2024 (138 Stat. 3055).
                (42) General reevaluation report for project for flood risk
            management, Green Brook Sub-basin, Raritan River Basin, New
            Jersey, authorized by section 401 of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4119; 134 Stat. 2671; 138
            Stat. 3066).
                (43) General reevaluation report for the project for
            hurricane and storm damage, Hereford Inlet to Cape May Inlet,
            Cape May County, New Jersey, authorized by section 1401(3) of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1712).
                (44) Project for flood risk management, Ho-Ho-Kus Brook and
            Saddle River, Village of Ridgewood, New Jersey, authorized by
            section 1201(a)(98) of the Water Resources Development Act of
            2024 (138 Stat. 3055).
                (45) Project for flood risk management and ecosystem
            restoration, Passaic River Basin, Bergen, Essex, Hudson,
            Morris, and Passaic Counties, New Jersey, authorized by section
            1201(a)(95) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138
            Stat. 3055).
                (46) Project for navigation and flood risk management,
            Passaic River, Paterson, New Jersey, authorized by section
            1201(a)(96) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138
            Stat. 3055).
                (47) Project for navigation, Borough of Paulsboro, New
            Jersey, authorized by section 1201(a)(97) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3055).
                (48) Project for flood risk management along the Peckman
            River Basin in the townships of Verona (and surrounding area),
            Cedar Grove, and West Caldwell, New Jersey, authorized by
            section 8201(a)(58) of the Water Resources Development Act of
            2022 (136 Stat. 3747).
                (49) Project for flood risk management, Whippany River
            Watershed, Morris County, New Jersey, authorized by section
            8201(a)(59) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136
            Stat. 3747).
                (50) Project for flood risk management, Wolf Creek, New
            Jersey, authorized by section 1201(a)(99) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3055).
                (51) Project for storm damage reduction, to include
            additional replacement of beach groins, Long Beach, New York,
            authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665; 138 Stat. 3061).
                (52) Project for ecosystem restoration, Great Salt Lake,
            Utah, authorized by section 8201(a)(88) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3749).
                (53) Project for coastal storm risk management, Virginia
            Coastal Storm Risk Management, authorized pursuant to the Act
            of June 15, 1955 (chapter 140, 69 Stat. 132).
        (b) Study Reports.--The Secretary shall expedite the completion of
    a final report of the Chief of Engineers or other decision document, as
    applicable, for each of the following projects for the project to be
    considered for authorization:
                (1) Project for flood risk management, Selma Flood Risk
            Management and Bank Stabilization, Alabama, authorized by
            section 8401(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022
            (136 Stat. 3839).
                (2) Project for ecosystem restoration, Salt River (Va
            Shly'Ay Akimel), Maricopa County, Arizona, as authorized by
            section 6 of the Act of June 28, 1938 (chapter 795, 52 Stat.
            1225).
                (3) Study for repairs to recontour and stabilize the slope
            at Dardanelle Lock and Dam, Arkansas, authorized pursuant to
            section 7 of the Act of July 24, 1946 (chapter 595, 60 Stat.
            640).
                (4) Project for ecosystem restoration and recreation, Los
            Angeles River, California, as authorized by section 1407(7) of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1714).
                (5) Project for flood risk reduction, San Francisco Bay,
            California, authorized by section 142 of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2930; 100 Stat. 4158; 134
            Stat. 2672; 138 Stat. 3136).
                (6) Project for ecosystem restoration, Central and South
            Florida, Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Program, Central
            Everglades Planning Project, Florida, authorized pursuant to
            section 601(d)(2)(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of
            2000 (114 Stat. 2684; 110 Stat. 3767; 114 Stat. 2680; 121 Stat.
            1052; 128 Stat. 1369; 130 Stat. 1713; 132 Stat. 3819; 136 Stat.
            3791; 138 Stat. 3067).
                (7) Project for navigation, Port Everglades, Florida,
            authorized by section 1401(1) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1709; 136 Stat. 3792).
                (8) Project for flood risk management and resiliency, Lower
            Missouri Jefferson City L-142 Flood Risk Management Study,
            Lower and Upper Missouri River Comprehensive Flood Protection,
            Missouri, authorized by section 2 of the Act of August 18, 1941
            (chapter 377, 55 Stat. 646; 58 Stat. 897; 134 Stat. 2687).
                (9) Project for flood and storm damage reduction, New York
            and New Jersey Harbor and Tributaries, New York and New Jersey,
            as authorized by the Act of June 15, 1955 (chapter 140, 69
            Stat. 132; 134 Stat. 2676; 138 Stat. 3152).
                (10) Project for navigation, Matagorda Ship Channel
            Improvement Project, Port Lavaca, Texas, authorized by section
            401(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134
            Stat. 2734; 138 Stat. 3083).
                (11) Project for hurricane and storm damage reduction,
            navigation, and ecosystem restoration, Chincoteague Island,
            Virginia, authorized by section 1201(27) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1683).
        (c) Watershed and River Basin Assessments.--The Secretary shall
    expedite the completion of an assessment under section 729 of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a) for Lower Rouge
    River Watershed, Michigan.
        (d) Dredged Materials Management Plans.--The Secretary shall
    expedite the completion of a dredged material management plan for each
    of the following projects:
                (1) Homer Small Boat Harbor, Homer, Alaska, authorized
            pursuant to section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (62
            Stat. 1181).
                (2) Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio, authorized by the first section
            of the Act of June 3, 1896 (chapter 314, 29 Stat. 209).
                (3) Cleveland Harbor, Ohio, authorized by the first section
            of the Act of August 14, 1876 (chapter 267, 19 Stat. 133; 100
            Stat. 4095; 101 Stat. 1329-107).
        (e) Water Control Manuals.--The Secretary shall, to the maximum
    extent practicable, expedite completion of updates to the water control
    manuals at the Terminus Dam and Lake Kaweah Project, Kaweah River,
    California, authorized by section 10 of the Act of December 22, 1944
    (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 901).
        (f) Issues Evaluation Studies.--The Secretary shall expedite the
    completion of the Issues Evaluation Study for Black Butte Lake, Stoney
    Creek, California, authorized pursuant to the Act of December 22, 1944
    (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 900).

    SEC. 203. EXPEDITED MODIFICATION OF EXISTING FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

        (a) Unalaska (Dutch Harbor), Alaska Modification.--The feasibility
    study for navigation, Unalaska (Dutch Harbor) Channels, Alaska,
    authorized by section 401(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    2020 (134 Stat. 2734) is modified to authorize the Secretary to include
    in the study coastal storm risk management and shoreline erosion
    protection.
        (b) Alexandria to the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana.--The feasibility
    study for flood control, navigation, wetland conservation and
    restoration, wildlife habitat, commercial and recreational fishing,
    saltwater intrusion, freshwater and sediment diversion, and other
    purposes, in the area drained by the intercepted drainage system of the
    West Atchafalaya Basin Protection Levee, from Alexandria, Louisiana to
    the Gulf of Mexico, being carried out under Committee Resolution 2535
    of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
    Representatives, adopted July 23, 1997, as authorized by section
    1202(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat.
    3064), is modified to include Vermilion Bay.
        (c) Expedited Completion.--The Secretary shall expedite the
    completion of the feasibility studies described in subsections (a) and
    (b), as modified by such subsections, and if the Secretary determines
    that a project that is the subject of the feasibility study described
    in subsection (a) or (b) is justified in the completed report, may
    proceed directly to preconstruction planning, engineering, and design
    of the project.

    SEC. 204. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF OTHER FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

        (a) Cedar Port Navigation and Improvement District Channel
    Deepening Project, Baytown, Texas.--The Secretary shall expedite the
    review and coordination of the feasibility study for the project for
    navigation, Cedar Port Navigation and Improvement District Channel
    Deepening Project, Baytown, Texas, under section 203(b) of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231(b)).
        (b) Raymondville Drain Project, Texas.--The Secretary shall
    expedite the review and coordination of the feasibility study for the
    project for flood control, Raymondville Drain Project, Lower Rio Grande
    Basin, Texas, under section 203(b) of the Water Resources Development
    Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231(b)).
        (c) Sabine-Neches Waterway Navigation Improvement Project, Texas.--
    The Secretary shall expedite the review and coordination of the
    feasibility study for the project for navigation, Sabine-Neches
    Waterway, Texas, under section 203(b) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231(b)).
        (d) Southern Florida Water Management District, Central and
    Southern Florida Flood Resiliency Study (Broward Basins), Florida.--The
    Secretary shall expedite the review and coordination of the Central and
    Southern Florida Resiliency Study--Broward Basins for the project for
    flood risk management, Southern Florida Water Management District,
    Florida, under section 203(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231(b)).

    SEC. 205. CORPS OF ENGINEERS REPORTS.

        (a) Report on the Formulation of Future Water Resources Development
    Projects.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
            enactment of this Act, and biennially thereafter for a period
            of 10 years, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
            Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report describing the use of the
            procedures under part 234 of title 33, Code of Federal
            Regulations, issued pursuant to section 110 of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 2020 (42 U.S.C. 1962-4), with
            respect to ongoing feasibility studies for water resources
            development projects.
                (2) Inclusion.--The Secretary shall include in the report
            submitted under paragraph (1)--
                        (A) a project-by-project identification of any
                    feasibility study carried out in accordance with the
                    procedures described in paragraph (1) and an
                    identification of, and rationale for, any study carried
                    out during the period applicable to the report that was
                    not developed using such procedures;
                        (B) an evaluation of the outcomes of such
                    procedures on the formulation, evaluation, and
                    recommendations for a proposed water resources
                    development project; and
                        (C) a summary of stakeholder engagement and public
                    input received related to the formulation, evaluation,
                    and recommendation of the project.
        (b) Report on Impacts of Commercial and Industrial Water Supply
    Users on Water Resources Development Projects.--Not later than 1 year
    after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to
    the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
    Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of
    the Senate a report describing the effects of new commercial and
    industrial water users on water resources development projects
    authorized for the purpose of water supply or water conservation.
        (c) Report on Forecast-Informed Reservoir Operations.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
            Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report detailing the implementation of
            forecast-informed reservoir operations at any reservoir
            constructed, owned, or operated by the Secretary, including a
            reservoir for which the Secretary is authorized to prescribe
            regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control
            or navigation pursuant to section 7 of the Act of December 22,
            1944 (33 U.S.C. 709).
                (2) Contents.--The Secretary shall include in the report
            submitted under paragraph (1)--
                        (A) a list of projects at which forecast-informed
                    reservoir operations have been implemented or evaluated
                    and, with respect to any project for which such
                    operations were evaluated but not implemented, a
                    rationale for why the operations were not implemented
                    at each such project;
                        (B) a list of projects at which the viability of
                    using airborne snow observatory flights has been
                    implemented or evaluated for use in forecast-informed
                    reservoir operations and, with respect to any project
                    for which such operations were evaluated but not
                    implemented, a rationale for why the operations were
                    not implemented at each such project;
                        (C) an assessment of the effectiveness of such
                    operations in improving water supply and flood risk
                    management, and other authorized project purposes;
                        (D) any barriers to implementation of forecast-
                    informed reservoir operations, including technical,
                    operational, or legal constraints; and
                        (E) recommendations for any modifications to
                    existing authorities to expand or improve such
                    operations.
        (d) Recreational Access for Floating Cabins.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
            Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report on floating cabins, including--
                        (A) a summary of any authorities and procedures the
                    Secretary uses to manage activities or permissions
                    relating to floating cabins;
                        (B) identification of any laws, regulations,
                    administrative barriers, or other limitations that
                    prohibit or inhibit greater use of, or installation of
                    new, floating cabins;
                        (C) recommendations of the Secretary with respect
                    to changes the Secretary may implement to facilitate
                    greater use of, or installation of new, floating
                    cabins; and
                        (D) with respect to each recommendation identified
                    under subparagraph (C)--
                                (i) the estimated cost to the Corps of
                            Engineers to implement, and operate under, such
                            change; and
                                (ii) a detailed description of any effects,
                            including benefits, that such change is
                            expected to have on--
                                        (I) any operations at water
                                    resources development projects operated
                                    and maintained by the Corps; and
                                        (II) the mission of the Corps as it
                                    relates to recreation.
                (2) Floating cabin defined.--In this subsection, the term
            ``floating cabin'' means a floating cabin, as such term is
            defined in section 1035 of the Water Resources Reform and
            Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1234), that is located on
            waters subject to the jurisdiction of the Secretary, including
            Federal water resources reservoirs or lake projects
            administered by the Secretary.
        (e) Report on Easements for Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction
    Projects.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this
    Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and
    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report describing the
    implementation of authorities granted in section 1145(d) of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 2024 (33 U.S.C. 598c(d)), including--
                (1) an assessment of any administrative actions taken
            (including any guidance issued, policy changes made, or process
            improvements implemented) by the Secretary to implement such
            section;
                (2) a summary of the use of each authority used by the
            Secretary in carrying out a project pursuant to such section,
            including--
                        (A) the number and types of projects for which each
                    such authority was used;
                        (B) the status of any easement acquisition,
                    easement relocation, or easement modification activity
                    carried out using each such authority; and
                        (C) any reduction in project delays or costs, or
                    any reduction in administrative burdens, attributable
                    to the use of each such authority; and
                (3) identification of any additional legislative
            authorities the Secretary determines are necessary to improve
            project delivery under such section.
        (f) Beneficial Use of Dredged Material; Management Plans Report.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
            Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate the strategic plan required by section
            8130(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136
            Stat. 3717), developed in accordance with the national goal
            described in section 125(a)(1)(B) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2326g(a)(1)(B)).
                (2) Failure to meet deadline.--If the Secretary fails to
            submit the strategic plan described in paragraph (1) by the
            deadline established by such paragraph, the Secretary shall,
            not later than 225 days after the date of enactment of this
            Act, submit to the Committee on Transportation and
            Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the
            Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate--
                        (A) a detailed explanation of why the Secretary
                    failed to submit the strategic plan by the deadline;
                        (B) a summary of the status of the development of
                    the strategic plan, including whether it has been
                    initiated; and
                        (C) a projected date for submission of the
                    strategic plan.
        (g) Report on the Applicability of Architectural and Engineering
    Fee Caps.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
            Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report on any statutory, regulatory, or
            policy limitation on architectural and engineering service fees
            applicable to water resources development projects carried out
            under the civil works program of the Corps of Engineers.
                (2) Requirements.--The Secretary shall include in the
            report submitted under paragraph (1)--
                        (A) a description of any limitation applied by the
                    Secretary to architectural and engineering service fees
                    for such projects, including, where applicable, the
                    identification of the authority for the limitation; and
                        (B) an assessment of the effects of any limitations
                    applied by the Secretary to such fees on the ability of
                    the Secretary to carry out such projects, including a
                    list of projects the cost or schedule of which was
                    affected by such limitations.
        (h) Report on Realignment of Corps Divisions.--Not later than 1
    year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
    submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the
    House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
    Works of the Senate a report detailing the implications and feasibility
    of realigning the divisions of the Corps to transfer the
    responsibilities of the Little Rock District to the Mississippi Valley
    Division.

    SEC. 206. REPORT ON THE INLAND WATERWAYS SYSTEM.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study
    to evaluate the condition and reliability of water resources
    development projects within inland and intracoastal waterways of the
    United States.
        (b) Components.--In carrying out the study required under
    subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
                (1) examine inland and intracoastal waterways of the United
            States and the ability of such waterways to meet the needs of
            the United States, including emergency and defense needs;
                (2) investigate the reliability and effectiveness of water
            resources development projects within such waterways with
            respect to commerce, navigation, environment, and recreation;
                (3) assess the condition of flood control structures
            (including locks, levees, and dams) along such waterways to
            determine the structural importance and identify any necessary
            repairs to maintain future reliability of such waterways;
                (4) assess the effectiveness of ecosystem restoration and
            mitigation efforts within such waterways;
                (5) evaluate water resources development projects
            (including separable elements) within such waterways that will
            reduce recurring dredging requirements to maintain authorized
            navigation dimensions of such waterways and prevent channel
            migration;
                (6) assess the funding needed to improve the reliability
            and effectiveness of water resources development projects
            within such waterways; and
                (7) identify components of water resources development
            projects that, in case of failure, would likely have
            significant impacts on the function of such waterways.
        (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
    the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on
    the study required under subsection (a).
        (d) Inland and Intracoastal Waterways of the United States
    Defined.--In this section, the term ``inland and intracoastal waterways
    of the United States'' means the inland and intracoastal waterways
    described in section 206 of the Inland Waterways Revenue Act of 1978
    (33 U.S.C. 1804).

    SEC. 207. GAO STUDIES.

        (a) Study on Cost-Sharing Efforts for Recreation Facilities.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United
            States shall initiate a review of the efforts of the Secretary
            to share with non-Federal public entities and private nonprofit
            entities the cost of managing recreation facilities and natural
            resources at water resource development projects under the
            jurisdiction of the Secretary.
                (2) Requirements.--In conducting the review under paragraph
            (1), the Comptroller General shall--
                        (A) describe the actions the Secretary is taking,
                    or plans to take, to implement section 225 of the Water
                    Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2328);
                        (B) evaluate the use of joint management
                    agreements, including cooperative agreements under
                    subsection (b)(1) of such section, and other
                    partnership authorities, that allow the Secretary to
                    share responsibilities with, or transfer or delegate
                    responsibilities to, non-Federal public entities and
                    private nonprofit entities, for the operation and
                    management of recreation facilities and natural
                    resources;
                        (C) assess the effectiveness of such agreements in
                    reducing Federal costs, improving facility conditions,
                    and maintaining or enhancing public access;
                        (D) identify any legal, regulatory, or
                    administrative barriers to the expanded use of such
                    agreements; and
                        (E) develop recommendations for legislative or
                    administrative actions to improve the efficiency and
                    effectiveness of such partnership authorities.
                (3) Report.--Upon completion of the review required under
            paragraph (1), the Comptroller General shall submit to the
            Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report that contains the results of such
            review, including any recommendations developed under paragraph
            (2)(E).
        (b) Study on Beach Renourishment Efforts.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United
            States shall initiate an analysis that includes--
                        (A) the statutory authorities and programs used by,
                    and available to, the Secretary to support beach
                    renourishment cycles, including initial construction,
                    periodic renourishment, and emergency renourishment
                    activities;
                        (B) an evaluation of financial, regulatory, and
                    technical barriers that contribute to delays in
                    carrying out beach renourishment activities;
                        (C) a description of the Corps of Engineers process
                    for evaluating the beneficial use of dredged material
                    for beach renourishment activities, including procuring
                    materials from other projects carried out by the Corps
                    of Engineers; and
                        (D) recommendations for legislative, regulatory, or
                    administrative actions to address barriers identified
                    under subparagraph (B) and to improve the efficiency,
                    predictability, and effectiveness of the beach
                    renourishment efforts of the Corps of Engineers.
                (2) Report.--Upon completion of the analysis required under
            paragraph (1), the Comptroller General shall submit to the
            Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report on the findings of such analysis.
        (c) Study on Architectural and Engineering Design Services.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United
            States shall initiate a review of the methods by which the
            Corps of Engineers performs architectural and engineering
            design services, including--
                        (A) an analysis of the procurement of such services
                    through contracts with private sector firms;
                        (B) an assessment of the extent to which employees
                    of the Corps of Engineers carry out such services; and
                        (C) a comparative assessment of the benefits and
                    costs of the methods described in subparagraphs (A) and
                    (B).
                (2) Report.--Upon completion of the review required under
            paragraph (1), the Comptroller General shall submit to the
            Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report on the findings of such review.
        (d) Review of Compliance With State Fish and Wildlife
    Recommendations.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United
            States shall initiate a review of the compliance of the
            Secretary with any requirements under, and incorporation of any
            recommendations submitted to the Secretary pursuant to, the
            following:
                        (A) Section 2 of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
                    Act (16 U.S.C. 662), including technical
                    recommendations related to evaluating impacts to fish
                    and wildlife resources.
                        (B) State management programs approved under
                    section 306 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972
                    (16 U.S.C. 1455).
                        (C) State comprehensive plans approved under
                    section 4 of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration
                    Act (16 U.S.C. 669c).
                (2) Requirements.--In conducting the review under paragraph
            (1), the Comptroller General shall--
                        (A) assess the extent to which the Corps of
                    Engineers incorporates any recommendation submitted by
                    a Federal or State agency pursuant to the statutes
                    identified in paragraph (1) in developing a feasibility
                    study for the construction or modification of a water
                    resources development project or an operations or
                    mitigation plan for a water resources development
                    project; and
                        (B) to the extent that any recommendation is not
                    incorporated, provide a detailed explanation and legal
                    justification as to why such recommendation was not
                    incorporated.
                (3) Report.--Upon completion of the review required under
            paragraph (1), the Comptroller General shall submit to the
            Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report on the findings of such review.

    SEC. 208. INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORTS.

        (a) Report on Inherently Governmental Functions.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Engineer Inspector General of the
            Corps of Engineers shall submit to the Committee on
            Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report on the policies of the Corps of
            Engineers related to identifying the inherently governmental
            function status of Corps of Engineers park rangers.
                (2) Contents.--In the report submitted under paragraph (1),
            the Engineer Inspector General shall include--
                        (A) an assessment of--
                                (i) the policies, guidance, and practices
                            of the Corps of Engineers for identifying and
                            classifying functions and duties related to
                            environmental management, public safety, and
                            enforcement duties for projects; and
                                (ii) the extent to which such policies,
                            guidance, and practices comply with the
                            requirements of the Federal Activities
                            Inventory Reform Act of 1998 (31 U.S.C. 501
                            note) and other applicable laws, regulations,
                            and guidance governing inherently governmental
                            functions;
                        (B) an assessment of any risks to environmental
                    management, public safety, enforcement duties, or
                    governmental decisionmaking resulting from the
                    potential misclassification of park ranger functions;
                        (C) an assessment of Corps of Engineers policies
                    and procedures for distinguishing functions that must
                    be performed by Federal employees from functions that
                    may appropriately be performed by contractors;
                        (D) an assessment of any potential deficiencies in
                    Corps of Engineers policies, procedures, internal
                    controls, staffing practices, or organizational
                    structures that may impair compliance with applicable
                    requirements governing inherently governmental
                    functions and the effective performance of
                    environmental management, public safety, and
                    enforcement duties; and
                        (E) any recommendations for administrative or
                    legislative actions necessary to improve compliance
                    with requirements governing inherently governmental
                    functions and the performance of park ranger
                    responsibilities.
        (b) Report on Tribal Policies and Programs.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Engineer Inspector General of the
            Corps of Engineers shall submit to the Committee on
            Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report on the implementation of policies
            and programs of the Corps of Engineers relating to Tribal
            communities, including the uniformity of application of such
            policies and programs across all districts of the Corps of
            Engineers.
                (2) Contents.--In the report submitted under paragraph (1),
            the Engineer Inspector General shall include--
                        (A) an assessment of the Tribal Liaison position
                    (as established by section 8112 of the Water Resources
                    Development Act of 2022 (33 U.S.C. 2281a)), including a
                    description of how each applicable district office has
                    implemented the position and the responsibilities of
                    such position;
                        (B) the implementation status of--
                                (i) section 203 of the Water Resources
                            Development Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269);
                                (ii) section 1141 of the Water Resources
                            Development Act of 2024 (33 U.S.C. 2269 note);
                            and
                                (iii) section 8115 of the Water Resources
                            Development Act of 2022 (33 U.S.C. 2281b note);
                        (C) an assessment of the Secretary's alignment with
                    requirements of subsections (c) and (d) of section 112
                    of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33
                    U.S.C. 2356) with respect to Tribal communities;
                        (D) an assessment of the alignment of the
                    Secretary's guidance, guidelines, and policies with
                    clearly stated congressional intent with respect to
                    Tribal communities; and
                        (E) an evaluation of barriers within the Corps of
                    Engineers that hinder or prohibit successful Tribal
                    engagement, consultation, or partnership.

    SEC. 209. ACCELERATION OF EMERGENCY INLAND NAVIGATION PROJECTS.

        In carrying out any authorized inland navigation project, the
    Secretary shall expedite completion of any modification, repair, or
    rehabilitation that is subject to an emergency declaration issued by
    the Secretary, including a non-breach emergency, to ensure continued
    navigation functionality and structural integrity, including by
    expediting the completion of investigations, engineering and design,
    and construction activities necessary to resolve emergency conditions.

    SEC. 210. ASSESSMENT OF COMMERCIAL FISH LANDINGS DATA.

        Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the
    Secretary shall provide to the Committee on Transportation and
    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate the results of the
    corrective action plan developed by the Secretary in response to the
    report of the Comptroller General of the United States, published on
    April 28, 2025, and titled ``Army Corps of Engineers: Commercial
    Fishing Data Could Help Inform Budget Process'' (GAO-25-107447).

    SEC. 211. ASSESSMENTS OF DRYLAND STREAM TECHNOLOGIES AND SHORELINE
                  STABILIZATION TECHNOLOGIES.

        (a) Assessment of Natural Infrastructure in Dryland Streams
    Technologies and Approaches.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary, acting through the Director
            of the Engineer Research and Development Center, shall carry
            out research and development activities on, and test the
            effectiveness of, natural infrastructure in dryland streams
            technologies and approaches to using such technologies in arid,
            semi-arid, and drought-prone areas.
                (2) Considerations.--In carrying out subsection (a), the
            Secretary shall, to the extent practicable--
                        (A) ensure that the locations where research and
                    development activities and tests are carried out are
                    geographically diverse;
                        (B) undertake research and development activities
                    and tests that include human-made infrastructure that
                    mimics natural infrastructure, such as rock check dams,
                    beaver dam analogs, gabions, and weirs; and
                        (C) based on information collected from the
                    carrying out and completion of research and development
                    activities described in paragraph (2), assess the
                    potential uses and effectiveness of such human-made
                    infrastructure with respect to restoring dryland
                    ecosystems, enhancing flood risk reduction efforts, and
                    enhancing water supply, water conservation, and drought
                    resiliency efforts.
                (3) Consultation.--In carrying out a research and
            development activity or test under subsection (a), the
            Secretary may consult with--
                        (A) the heads of other Federal agencies; and
                        (B) appropriate State government agencies in States
                    with arid or semi-arid areas.
                (4) Summary to congress.--Not later than 2 years after the
            date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to
            the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House
            of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate, and make publicly available (including on
            a publicly available website), a written summary of the
            activities and tests carried out under subsection (a).
        (b) Assessment of Shoreline Stabilization and Erosion Control
    Technologies.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary, acting through the Director
            of the Engineer Research and Development Center and, as
            appropriate, in consultation with other Federal agencies and
            coastal States, shall carry out research and development
            activities on, and test the effectiveness of, shoreline
            stabilization, erosion control, and wave energy reduction
            technologies applicable to coastal areas exposed to flooding
            and erosion, including flooding and erosional impacts
            associated with tidally influenced portions of rivers, bays,
            and estuaries that are hydrologically connected to the coastal
            water body.
                (2) Considerations.--In carrying out paragraph (1), the
            Secretary shall--
                        (A) to the maximum extent practicable, ensure that
                    research and development activities and testing are
                    carried out in diverse geographic locations; and
                        (B) carry out research and development activities
                    and testing of natural features and nature-based
                    features (as those terms are defined in section 1184(a)
                    of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33
                    U.S.C. 2289a(a))), including the use of engineered
                    technologies that mimic natural processes or
                    structures, or approaches that combine natural and
                    engineered elements.
                (3) Summary to congress.--Not later than 2 years after the
            date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to
            the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House
            of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate, and make publicly available (including on
            a publicly available website) a written summary of the
            activities carried out under this subsection.

    SEC. 212. ASSESSMENT OF NONSTRUCTURAL APPROACHES TO FLOOD RISK
                  MANAGEMENT AND HURRICANE AND STORM RISK REDUCTION.

        Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act,
    the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and
    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on the status of
    the following projects:
                (1) The project for flood risk management and ecosystem
            restoration, Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Morris, and Passaic
            Counties, New Jersey, including as it relates to buyouts in the
            Township of Wayne, Passaic County, New Jersey, authorized
            pursuant to section 101(a)(18) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607).
                (2) The project for flood risk management, Township of
            Denville, New Jersey, being carried out pursuant to section 205
            of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
                (3) The project for flood control, Green Brook Sub-basin,
            Raritan River Basin, New Jersey, authorized by section 401 of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4119;
            134 Stat. 2671).
                (4) The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction,
            New Jersey Back Bays, Cape May, Ocean, Atlantic, Monmouth, and
            Burlington Counties, authorized by resolutions of the Committee
            on Public Works and Transportation of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate, approved in December 1987.
                (5) The project for hurricane and storm damage risk
            reduction, Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, New York,
            authorized by section 401(3) of the Water Resources Development
            Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2738).

    SEC. 213. POST-DISASTER WATERSHED ASSESSMENT FOR IMPACTED AREAS.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a post-disaster
    watershed assessment under section 3025 of the Water Resources Reform
    and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2267b) for the following areas:
                (1) Areas of Catron and Grant Counties, New Mexico,
            impacted by the June 2025 wildfires.
                (2) Areas of Valencia County, New Mexico, impacted by the
            June 2025 wildfires.
                (3) Areas near Ruidoso, New Mexico, impacted by the June
            2024 wildfires.
        (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
    the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on
    the status of the post-disaster watershed assessments carried out under
    subsection (a).

    SEC. 214. UPDATED PLAN ON FEDERAL HOPPER DREDGE RECAPITALIZATION.

        Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the
    Secretary shall--
                (1) with respect to Federal hopper dredges identified in
            the analysis of the Corps of Engineers titled ``Hopper Dredge
            Recapitalization Analysis'' (published June 20, 2017) and owned
            and operated by the Corps of Engineers as of the date of
            enactment of this Act, update the plan and timeline for
            recapitalization of such Federal hopper dredges that is
            included in such analysis; and
                (2) submit to the Committee on Transportation and
            Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the
            Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate such
            updated plan and timeline.

    SEC. 215. CHOCTAWHATCHEE AND PEA RIVER BASINS, ALABAMA AND FLORIDA.

        (a) In General.--For purposes of carrying out the study of
    improvements for flood control, water quality, water supply, drought
    management, and fish and wildlife enhancement authorized by the
    Congressional Committee Resolution adopted April 24, 1990, by the
    Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate (relating to
    the Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins, Alabama and Florida, as
    described in House Document 242, 72d Congress, 1st session), and any
    related review conducted pursuant to the Congressional Committee
    Resolution adopted August 1, 1990, by the Committee on Public Works and
    Transportation of the House of Representatives (relating to the Pea
    River watershed, Alabama), the Secretary shall--
                (1) develop a scope of work, including a communications
            plan, in collaboration with the non-Federal interest, that is
            in accordance with the intent of such authorizing documents
            and, to the extent practicable, meets the objectives of the
            non-Federal interest;
                (2) include in the study area the entire Choctawhatchee
            River basin and Pea River basin, and all hydrologically
            connected downstream receiving waters, in the States of Alabama
            and Florida; and
                (3) coordinate, as practicable, with relevant State, local,
            and Tribal entities in Alabama and Florida and with appropriate
            Federal agencies.
        (b) Applicability.--This section shall apply to any feasibility
    study carried out pursuant to the authorizations described in
    subsection (a).

    SEC. 216. MOBILE HARBOR LAND USE ASSESSMENT.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out an assessment of the
    long-term viability of existing dredged material placement areas for
    Mobile Harbor, including State-owned upland dredged materials disposal
    facilities.
        (b) Beneficial Use.--In carrying out the assessment under
    subsection (a), the Secretary shall include recommendations for the
    beneficial use of dredged materials from Mobile Harbor, including the
    viability of using such dredged materials at locations on Pinto Island
    and Blakeley Island in Mobile, Alabama.

    SEC. 217. HONOLULU HARBOR, HAWAII.

        Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the
    Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and
    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate an update describing the
    status of the study to modify the project for navigation, Honolulu
    Harbor, Hawaii, authorized by the first section of the Act of March 3,
    1905 (chapter 1482, 33 Stat. 1146; 136 Stat. 3750; 138 Stat. 3064),
    including the status of the assessment of the benefits of the project
    modification on disaster resiliency and enhanced national security from
    utilization of the harbor by the Department of Defense authorized by
    section 1202(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138
    Stat. 3064).

    SEC. 218. CHICAGO AREA WATERWAY SYSTEM.

        (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment
    of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to the Committee on
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
    the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate an
    assessment of the Calumet Harbor Dredged Material Disposal Facility,
    also known as the Chicago Area Confined Disposal Facility, authorized
    pursuant to section 123 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat.
    1823).
        (b) Inclusion.--The Secretary shall include in the assessment under
    subsection (a)--
                (1) a description of work related to the ongoing and future
            dredging of the Calumet River and Harbor;
                (2) a plan for carrying out activities related to the
            closure of the Chicago Area Confined Disposal Facility, not
            later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act,
            including remediation, capping, seeding, and other measures
            necessary to stabilize the facility and ensure that the site of
            the facility is prepared for the authorized use of such site
            after such closure;
                (3) a plan of actions to be taken to ensure conveyance of
            the Chicago Area Confined Disposal Facility to the Chicago Park
            District in a timely fashion after the completion of closure
            activities carried out pursuant to the plan under paragraph
            (2); and
                (4) a plan of actions to be taken to ensure the Secretary
            coordinates with State and local governments in carrying out
            this section.

    SEC. 219. GREAT LAKES AND MISSISSIPPI RIVER INTERBASIN PROJECT, BRANDON
                  ROAD, WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

        Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the
    Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and
    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that includes--
                (1) the results of an assessment to identify any
            contaminated sediments associated with the project for
            ecosystem restoration, Great Lakes and Mississippi River
            Interbasin Study--Brandon Road, Will County, Illinois,
            authorized by section 401(5) of the Water Resources Development
            Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2740); and
                (2) a plan, developed in coordination with the non-Federal
            interest for such project, to remediate such sediments
            simultaneously with construction of the project.

    SEC. 220. COLUMBIA LOCK AND DAM, LOUISIANA.

        Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act,
    the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and
    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report regarding the
    Columbia Lock and Dam, Louisiana, authorized by the first section of
    the Act of June 13, 1902 (chapter 1079, 32 Stat. 357), that includes--
                (1) a description of the nature and extent of the
            structural concerns that resulted in the declaration by the
            Secretary in August, 2024, of a non-breach emergency at the
            lock and dam;
                (2) a summary of actions taken by the Corps of Engineers to
            address such concerns, including interim operational or
            emergency measures;
                (3) recommended permanent remedial actions necessary to
            ensure continued navigation functionality and structural
            integrity;
                (4) an evaluation of whether such recommended permanent
            remedial actions may be implemented as discrete, segmented
            projects or phases, including an assessment of--
                        (A) the technical feasibility of such segmentation;
                        (B) potential cost efficiencies or risk reduction
                    associated with phased implementation; and
                        (C) the extent to which segmentation could
                    accelerate completion of critical repairs; and
                (5) an estimated schedule and cost range for implementation
            of such recommended permanent remedial actions, including any
            segmented or phased approach identified based on the evaluation
            under paragraph (4).

    SEC. 221. LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT STUDY.

        The Secretary shall expedite completion of the Lower Mississippi
    River Comprehensive Management Study, authorized by section 213 of the
    Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2684; 136 Stat.
    3795).

    SEC. 222. DISPOSITION STUDY FOR CAPE COD CANAL, MASSACHUSETTS.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a disposition study
    under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a) for
    the deauthorization of a portion of the project for navigation, Cape
    Cod Canal, Massachusetts, authorized by the first section of the Act of
    August 30, 1935 (chapter 831, 49 Stat. 1029), that the Secretary
    determines--
                (1) is not needed to carry out the authorized purposes of
            the project; and
                (2) could be conveyed to the Town of Sandwich or the Town
            of Bourne, Massachusetts, for the construction of a new
            wastewater treatment plant.
        (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
    the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on
    the status of the disposition study required under subsection (a).

    SEC. 223. NEW ENGLAND REGIONAL CONFINED AQUATIC DISPOSAL FACILITIES.

        (a) Expedite Assessment.--The Secretary shall expedite the
    completion of the assessment of the availability of confined aquatic
    disposal facilities in the New England District region required under
    section 8128(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136
    Stat. 3716).
        (b) Submission to Congress.--Upon completion of the assessment
    under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
    the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate the results
    of such assessment.
        (c) Study Authorization.--The Secretary is authorized to conduct--
                (1) a study for the construction of confined aquatic
            disposal facilities in the Massachusetts Bay and Ipswich Bay
            region for the disposal of contaminated dredged material in
            such region; and
                (2) any other study recommended by the Secretary in the
            assessment under subsection (a).

    SEC. 224. ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA.

        Section 534(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110
    Stat. 3775) is amended by striking ``$35,000,000'' and inserting
    ``$45,000,000''.

    SEC. 225. BIG SANDY LAKE, MINNESOTA.

        (a) Shoreline Management Plan.--Not later than 18 months after the
    date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish a
    shoreline management plan for the Big Sandy Lake project.
        (b) Shoreline Use Permits.--Upon the establishment of a shoreline
    management plan under subsection (a), the Secretary is authorized to
    issue to an owner of land adjacent to the Big Sandy Lake project, upon
    request by the owner and consistent with the shoreline management plan,
    a shoreline use permit for activities relating to an existing structure
    or a new structure on land that is held by the Corps of Engineers for
    the project and adjacent to the land of the owner.
        (c) Disposition Study.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out a
            disposition study under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of
            1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a) for the release, transfer, conveyance, or
            exchange of excess easements, or the conveyance of excess land,
            held for the Big Sandy Lake project.
                (2) Scope.--In carrying out the disposition study under
            paragraph (1), the Secretary shall--
                        (A) for each segment of shoreline property owned by
                    the Corps of Engineers at the Big Sandy Lake project
                    that corresponds to the width of an adjacent plot of
                    private property, identify--
                                (i) the appraised value of the segment of
                            shoreline property; and
                                (ii) a legal description and the acreage of
                            the segment of shoreline property; and
                        (B) develop recommendations for any restrictions or
                    conditions on any shoreline property at the Big Sandy
                    Lake project that is owned by, or subject to an
                    easement held by, the Corps of Engineers that would be
                    necessary to sustain the authorized purposes of the Big
                    Sandy Lake project if the shoreline property were to be
                    conveyed to, or the easement were to be released,
                    transferred or conveyed to, or exchanged with, a non-
                    Federal entity.
                (3) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
            Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate a report on the status of the disposition
            study required under paragraph (1).
        (d) Big Sandy Lake Project Defined.--In this section, the term
    ``Big Sandy Lake project'' means the Sandy Lake dam and reservoir,
    located in Aitkin County, Minnesota, originally authorized as one of
    the six Mississippi River Headwater reservoirs authorized by the first
    section of the Act of June 14, 1880 (chapter 211, 21 Stat. 193; 22
    Stat. 203).

    SEC. 226. UPPER MISSOURI RIVER BASIN SEDIMENTATION.

        (a) Comprehensive Study.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a
            comprehensive study to identify the core sedimentation issues
            in the Upper Missouri River Basin.
                (2) Recommendations.--In conducting the study under this
            subsection, the Secretary may develop recommendations for--
                        (A) the construction of a water resources
                    development project;
                        (B) the structural or operational modification of
                    existing water resources development projects, except
                    as provided in subsection (f);
                        (C) monitoring or adaptive management measures for
                    water resources development projects to respond to
                    changing conditions in the Upper Missouri River Basin;
                        (D) additional studies focusing on specific
                    geographic areas within the Upper Missouri River Basin;
                        (E) management plans and actions, to be carried out
                    by responsible Federal agencies, to address or reduce
                    sedimentation in the Upper Missouri River Basin; and
                        (F) further research on issues with respect to
                    which data or current technology does not allow for
                    immediate solutions.
        (b) Continuation of Study.--The following studies shall be
    considered a continuation of the study conducted under subsection (a):
                (1) Any study recommended to be carried out in a report
            that the Chief of Engineers prepares for the study conducted
            under subsection (a).
                (2) Any additional study recommended under subsection
            (a)(2).
                (3) Any study spun off from the study conducted under
            subsection (a), or from an additional study recommended under
            paragraph (2) of such subsection, before the completion of such
            study.
        (c) Use of Existing Data.--In conducting the study under subsection
    (a), and in carrying out any study pursuant to subsection (b), the
    Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable and where
    appropriate, make use of existing data provided to the Secretary by any
    applicable Federal, State, and local agency, Indian Tribe, non-Federal
    interest, or other stakeholder, or from any relevant multistate
    monitoring program.
        (d) Costs.--
                (1) Limitation.--The total cost of the study conducted
            under subsection (a) shall not exceed $25,000,000.
                (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of the
            study conducted under subsection (a) and any study carried out
            pursuant to subsection (b) shall be 65 percent.
        (e) Deadline.--Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment
    of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
    the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report
    that contains the results of the study conducted under subsection (a),
    including any recommendations developed under paragraph (2) of such
    subsection.
        (f) Prohibition.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), and
    in carrying out any study pursuant to subsection (b), the Secretary may
    not consider any changes to the Missouri River Basin Mainstem Reservoir
    System Master Water Control Manual.

    SEC. 227. TABLE ROCK LAKE DISPOSITION STUDY, MISSOURI AND ARKANSAS.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a disposition study
    under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a) for
    the release, transfer, conveyance, or exchange of excess easements, or
    the exchange of excess land, held for flood risk management and
    operation of the Table Rock Lake project of the Corps of Engineers,
    located in Missouri and Arkansas, authorized as one of the multipurpose
    reservoir projects in the White River Basin by section 4 of the Act of
    June 28, 1938 (chapter 795, 52 Stat. 1218).
        (b) Actions.--In carrying out the study required under subsection
    (a), the Secretary shall--
                (1) ensure that the relevant non-Federal interest for the
            Table Rock Lake project is provided right of first refusal for
            any potential release, transfer, conveyance, or exchange of
            excess easements; and
                (2) work alongside such non-Federal interest in identifying
            opportunities for land exchanges, where possible.
        (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
    the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report of
    the status of the disposition study required under subsection (a).

    SEC. 228. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MISSOURI AND ARKANSAS.

        Section 1323 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138
    Stat. 3143) is amended--
                (1) by striking subsections (a) and (b) and inserting the
            following:
        ``(a) Structures.--The Secretary shall permit the ongoing presence
    of an eligible structure at the Table Rock Lake project until the
    abandonment of the eligible structure.
        ``(b) Sewer or Septic Systems.--The Secretary shall permit the
    ongoing presence of an eligible sewer or septic system at the Table
    Rock Lake project until the abandonment or imminent failure of the
    eligible sewer or septic system.'';
                (2) in subsection (c)--
                        (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``eligible
                    structure, means the allowance of the structure'' and
                    inserting ``eligible structure or eligible sewer or
                    septic system, means the allowance of the structure or
                    sewer or septic system'';
                        (B) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as
                    paragraphs (4) and (6), respectively;
                        (C) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the
                    following:
                ``(2) Eligible sewer or septic system.--The term `eligible
            sewer or septic system' means a privately owned sewer or septic
            system that--
                        ``(A) as of the date of enactment of the Water
                    Resources Development Act of 2026, is located on fee
                    land or land subject to a flowage easement held by the
                    United States; and
                        ``(B) does not impact the reservoir level, water
                    quality, or operations of the Table Rock Lake project.
                ``(3) Eligible structure.--The term `eligible structure'
            means a structure for human habitation, shed, retaining wall,
            deck, patio, gazebo, driveway, fence, or similar structure,
            that, as of the date of enactment of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2026, is located--
                        ``(A) on fee land or land subject to a flowage
                    easement held by the United States; and
                        ``(B) higher than the elevation contour of 936 feet
                    above mean sea level.''; and
                        (D) by inserting before paragraph (6), as so
                    redesignated, the following:
                ``(5) Imminent failure.--The term `imminent failure' means,
            with respect to an eligible sewer or septic system, a final
            order by the applicable unit of local government to the owner
            of an eligible sewer or septic system that such system be
            replaced.''; and
                (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(d) Savings Clause.--Nothing in the section shall prevent the
    Secretary from issuing a shoreline use permit, other applicable permit,
    easement, or outgrant, consistent with a shoreline management plan or
    other applicable policy, for a structure, sewer system, or septic
    system proposed to be built or modified after the date of enactment of
    the Water Resources Development Act of 2026 at the Table Rock Lake
    project.''.

    SEC. 229. EVALUATION OF ATOMIC CONTAMINATION AT COCHITI LAKE, SANDOVAL
                  COUNTY, NEW MEXICO.

        (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment
    of this Act, the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of
    Energy and the People of Cochiti Pueblo, shall initiate an evaluation
    of the area including the lands adjacent to and including the Cochiti
    Lake in relation to the early atomic energy program of the United
    States, including the Manhattan Engineering District, to determine
    whether the area is eligible to be added to the Formerly Utilized Sites
    Remedial Action Program of the Corps of Engineers.
        (b) Congressional Notification.--Not later than 1 year after the
    date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall notify the Committee
    on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives
    and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate of the
    results of the evaluation initiated under subsection (a), including--
                (1) whether the area referred to in subsection (a) contains
            contamination that resulted from the early atomic energy
            program;
                (2) whether further remedial action in the area is needed;
            and
                (3) if eligible, the timeline for adding the area to the
            Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program.

    SEC. 230. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES STUDY ON UPPER RIO GRANDE BASIN.

        Section 1230 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138
    Stat. 3086) is amended by adding at the end the following:
        ``(d) Implementation Updates.--Not later than 30 days after the
    date of enactment of this subsection, and annually thereafter until the
    report prepared under subsection (a) is completed, the Secretary shall
    submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the
    House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
    Works of the Senate an update describing the status of the
    implementation of this section.''.

    SEC. 231. ARBUCKLE-TIMBERED HILLS, OKLAHOMA.

        (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary, in
    coordination with relevant Federal and State agencies and non-Federal
    interests, may conduct a study on water supply, water storage capacity,
    and drought resiliency for the regions overlaying the Arbuckle-Timbered
    Hills Aquifer, Oklahoma.
        (b) Components.--In carrying out a study under subsection (a), the
    Secretary shall identify infrastructure needs to support increased
    water storage in and around the Arbuckle-Timbered Hills Aquifer.

    SEC. 232. DISPOSITION AND COST ALLOCATION STUDY OF WILLAMETTE VALLEY,
                  OREGON.

        (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
    enactment of this section, the Secretary shall issue the report
    required by section 8220 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022
    (136 Stat. 3762), as modified by this section.
        (b) Cost Allocation.--The Secretary shall include in the report
    described in subsection (a)--
                (1) a review of the cost allocation for capital investments
            for fish passage, and associated monitoring facilities,
            constructed or proposed after September 30, 2025, and for
            operation and expenses related to such capital investments, at
            the dams, reservoirs, and related facilities of the Willamette
            Valley hydropower project; and
                (2) a description of the relative public value of continued
            hydropower operations at the Willamette Valley hydropower
            project compared to flood control and other authorized
            purposes.
        (c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Willamette Valley
    hydropower project'' has the meaning given that term in section 8220(d)
    of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3762).

    SEC. 233. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS RESERVOIR AND DAM, PENNSYLVANIA.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a disposition study
    under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a) for
    the release, transfer, conveyance, or exchange of excess easements, or
    the exchange of excess land, held for flood risk management and
    operation of the Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoir and Dam project,
    located in Pennsylvania and constructed as one of the flood risk
    management reservoir projects in the plan for flood protection on the
    West Branch of the Susquehanna River, Pennsylvania and New York,
    authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat.
    1257).
        (b) Scope.--The disposition study required by subsection (a) shall
    include--
                (1) identification of the minimum real property required
            for the operation or maintenance of the Foster Joseph Sayers
            Reservoir and Dam project;
                (2) evaluation of the potential effects of the release,
            transfer, conveyance, or exchange of excess property interests
            on flood control and recreation missions of the Corps of
            Engineers; and
                (3) identification of the exact legal description and
            acreage of the property interests, including easements,
            suitable for conveyance.
        (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
    the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report of
    the status of the disposition study required under subsection (a).

    SEC. 234. HUMPHREYS COUNTY, TENNESSEE.

        The Secretary shall coordinate with representatives of the Natural
    Resources Conservation Service to expedite completion of watershed
    planning assistance to Humphreys County, Tennessee, pursuant to the
    agreement entered into between the Secretary and the Chief of the
    Natural Resources Conservation Service on November 30, 2022, for such
    assistance.

    SEC. 235. SAM RAYBURN RESERVOIR, TEXAS.

        (a) Joint Assessment.--Upon request of the Secretary of
    Agriculture, the Secretary and the Secretary of Agriculture, acting
    through the Chief of the Forest Service, shall jointly assess the
    condition of the Harvey Creek boat ramp at Sam Rayburn Reservoir, San
    Augustine County, Texas, to identify any repairs to the boat ramp that
    may be necessary.
        (b) Technical Assistance to the Forest Service.--Upon request of
    the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary shall provide technical and
    design assistance to the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the
    Chief, for any repairs to the boat ramp described in subsection (a)
    that the Secretary of Agriculture determines necessary based on an
    assessment under subsection (a).

    SEC. 236. COLUMBIA RIVER, WASHINGTON.

        (a) Tri-Cities Disposition Study.--The Secretary shall carry out a
    disposition study under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970
    (33 U.S.C. 549a) for the conveyance of covered lands to a covered
    entity for a public purpose.
        (b) Land Into Trust Disposition Study.--The Secretary shall carry
    out a disposition study under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of
    1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a) for the transfer of covered lands to the
    Secretary of the Interior to be taken into trust for the benefit of a
    covered Tribal entity.
        (c) Consultation.--To identify the exact location, acreage, and
    boundaries of the covered lands to be included in a disposition study
    under this section, the Secretary shall consult with covered entities,
    covered Tribal entities, and other stakeholders, as applicable.
        (d) Contents.--In carrying out a disposition study under this
    section, the Secretary shall--
                (1) review and describe the effects, if any, on the
            authorized purpose of each Corps of Engineers project expected
            to be affected by a conveyance or transfer, as applicable, of
            covered lands that are the subject of the study;
                (2) identify all Federal easements on such covered lands;
                (3) identify all federally owned flood risk management and
            flood control infrastructure on such covered lands;
                (4) identify and describe each new authority needed, if
            any, to convey or transfer, as applicable, such covered lands;
                (5) for each parcel of land within such covered lands,
            identify and describe any rights-of-way, access easements,
            flood easements, and other similar legal instruments,
            agreements, or encumbrances needed to operate and maintain all
            flood control infrastructure operated and maintained by the
            Corps of Engineers;
                (6) identify and describe any current agreements entered
            into by the Corps of Engineers and a non-Federal entity for use
            of, or access to, such covered lands; and
                (7) identify any restrictions or conditions on lands
            proposed for conveyance that the Secretary recommends and
            determines to be necessary to sustain the authorized purposes
            of each Corps of Engineers project expected to be affected by a
            conveyance or transfer, as applicable, of such covered lands.
        (e) Report to Congress.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
    the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on
    the status of each disposition study required under this section.
        (f) Definitions.--In this section:
                (1) Covered entity.--The term ``covered entity'' means--
                        (A) the City of Kennewick, Washington;
                        (B) the City of Pasco, Washington;
                        (C) the City of Richland, Washington;
                        (D) Benton County, Washington;
                        (E) Franklin County, Washington; and
                        (F) the Port Commission of the Port of Pasco,
                    located in the City of Pasco, Washington.
                (2) Covered lands.--The term ``covered lands'' means the
            shoreline and adjacent lands located along the Columbia River
            within in the following areas of land owned by the Corps of
            Engineers:
                        (A) With respect to the disposition study required
                    in subsection (a)--
                                (i) the area of approximately 370 acres in
                            Benton County, Washington;
                                (ii) the area of approximately 465 acres in
                            the City of Kennewick, Washington;
                                (iii) the area of approximately 350 acres
                            in the City of Pasco, Washington;
                                (iv) the area of approximately 640 acres in
                            the City of Richland, Washington;
                                (v) the area of approximately 8 acres
                            within the Port of Pasco, Washington; and
                                (vi) the area of approximately 520 acres in
                            Franklin County, Washington.
                        (B) With respect to the disposition study required
                    in subsection (b)--
                                (i) the area of approximately 200 acres
                            within the Umatilla Indian Reservation;
                                (ii) the area of approximately 160 acres
                            within the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the
                            Yakama Nation; and
                                (iii) any additional areas, as determined
                            by the Secretary.
                (3) Covered tribal entity.--The term ``covered Tribal
            entity'' means--
                        (A) the Confederated Tribes of Umatilla Indian
                    Reservation;
                        (B) the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama
                    Nation; and
                        (C) other federally recognized Indian Tribes, as
                    determined appropriate by the Secretary.

    SEC. 237. TRI-CITIES AREA, WASHINGTON.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite the property
    conveyances authorized under section 501(i) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3752).
        (b) Congressional Notification.--If the Secretary fails to convey
    any property to the appropriate non-Federal entity pursuant to section
    501(i) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 within 18 months
    of the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall notify the
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
    Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of
    the Senate--
                (1) which property has not been conveyed;
                (2) why such property has not been conveyed; and
                (3) of the timeline to convey such property.

                 TITLE III--DEAUTHORIZATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS

    SEC. 301. DEAUTHORIZATION OF INACTIVE PROJECTS.

        Section 301 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33
    U.S.C. 579d-2) is amended--
                (1) in subsection (a)--
                        (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the
                    end;
                        (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the
                    end and inserting ``; and''; and
                        (C) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(4) to address the backlog of water resources development
            projects that the Secretary is authorized to construct.'';
                (2) in subsection (b)(1)(A), by striking ``Water Resources
            Development Act of 2024'' and inserting ``Water Resources
            Development Act of 2026'' each place it appears; and
                (3) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following:
                ``(3) Updates.--After submission of the final
            deauthorization list and appendix under paragraph (1), the
            Secretary shall--
                        ``(A) review and update the list and appendix as
                    necessary; and
                        ``(B) not less than every six months, beginning
                    after the date of such submission--
                                ``(i) provide to the committees described
                            in paragraph (1)(A) the updated list and
                            appendix; and
                                ``(ii) publish the updated list and
                            appendix in the Federal Register.''.

    SEC. 302. GENERAL REAUTHORIZATIONS.

        (a) Lakes Program.--Section 602 of the Water Resources Development
    Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148; 138 Stat. 3164) is amended--
                (1) in subsection (a)--
                        (A) in paragraph (38), by striking ``and'' at the
                    end;
                        (B) in paragraph (39), by striking the period at
                    the end and inserting a semicolon; and
                        (C) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(40) Lake Waumpi, Orange County, Florida;
                ``(41) Lake Becerra, Glendale Heights, Illinois;
                ``(42) Electric Lake (Mill Pond), Park Ridge, New Jersey;
                ``(43) Pondside Park pond, Harrington Park, New Jersey; and
                ``(44) Putnam Lake, Putnam County, New York.''; and
                (2) in subsection (e), by striking ``$40,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$60,000,000''.
        (b) Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery Program.--Section 704(b)(1) of
    the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2263) is
    amended, in the second sentence, by striking ``$120,000,000'' and
    inserting ``$150,000,000''.
        (c) Civil Works Research and Development.--Section 7(c)(8) of the
    Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C. 2313) is amended by
    striking ``2028'' and inserting ``2030''.
        (d) Rehabilitation of Corps of Engineers Constructed Dams.--Section
    1177(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 467f-
    2 note) is amended by striking ``$60,000,000'' and inserting
    ``$80,000,000''.
        (e) Chattahoochee River Program.--Section 8144(k) of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3724) is amended by
    striking ``$40,000,000'' and inserting ``$50,000,000''.
        (f) Columbia River Basin.--Section 8309(c)(2) of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3780; 138 Stat. 3043) is
    amended by striking ``2026 and 2027'' and inserting ``2026 through
    2030''.
        (g) Lower Missouri River Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and
    Demonstration Program.--Section 8350(f) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3798) is amended by striking ``5
    years'' and inserting ``8 years''.
        (h) Non-Federal Implementation of Feasibility Studies.--Section
    1043(a) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33
    U.S.C. 2201 note) is amended--
                (1) in paragraph (7), by striking ``terminates on the date
            that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act'' and
            inserting ``terminates on September 30, 2030''; and
                (2) in paragraph (8), by striking ``2019'' and inserting
            ``2030''.
        (i) Acequias Irrigation System.--Section 1113(e) of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4232; 110 Stat. 3719; 136
    Stat. 3781; 138 Stat. 3161) is amended by striking ``$90,000,000'' and
    inserting ``$120,000,000''.
        (j) Monitoring and Assessment Program for Saline Lakes in the Great
    Basin.--Section 8143(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022
    (136 Stat. 3724) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting
    ``$12,500,000''.
        (k) Non-Federal Interest Dredging Authority.--Section 1113(g) of
    the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2326e) is
    amended by striking ``10'' and inserting ``14''.

    SEC. 303. CONVEYANCES.

        (a) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
                (1) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage
            and the legal description of any real property to be conveyed
            under this section shall be determined by a survey that is
            satisfactory to the Secretary.
                (2) Applicability of property screening provisions.--
            Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply
            to any conveyance under this section.
                (3) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a conveyance
            is made under this section shall be responsible for all
            reasonable and necessary costs, including real estate
            transaction and environmental documentation costs, associated
            with the conveyance.
                (4) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made
            under this section shall hold the United States harmless from
            any liability with respect to activities carried out, on or
            after the date of the conveyance, on the real property
            conveyed. The United States shall remain responsible for any
            liability with respect to activities carried out, before such
            date, on the real property conveyed.
                (5) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may
            require that any conveyance under this section be subject to
            such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers
            necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the
            United States.
        (b) City of Corona, California.--
                (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary may convey,
            without consideration, to the City of Corona, California, all
            right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the
            real property described in paragraph (2), for the purpose of
            public water reclamation, wastewater treatment, environmental
            management, or related municipal purposes.
                (2) Property.--The property to be conveyed under this
            subsection is the approximately 48 acres of land, including
            improvements located at 2205 Railroad Street, Corona,
            California.
                (3) Reservation of rights.--In carrying out the conveyance
            under this subsection, the Secretary shall, after consultation
            with the City of Corona, reserve and retain from the conveyance
            under this subsection such easements, rights-of-way, and other
            interests that the Secretary determines to be necessary and
            appropriate to ensure the continued operation of the Prado Dam
            Basin flood control project, authorized pursuant to section 5
            of the Act of June 22, 1936 (chapter 688, 49 Stat. 1589; 100
            Stat. 4113).
                (4) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines at any time
            that the property conveyed under this subsection is not in
            accordance with the purpose specified in paragraph (1), all
            right, title, and interest in and to the property shall revert,
            at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United States.
        (c) Town of Duck, North Carolina.--
                (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary shall convey,
            without consideration, to the Town of Duck, North Carolina, all
            right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the
            real property described in paragraph (2), for the purpose of
            housing a fire station and public safety facility.
                (2) Property.--The property to be conveyed under this
            subsection is the approximately 4.02 acres of land, with
            approximately 330 linear feet of road frontage and
            approximately 530 linear feet of depth, including improvements
            on that land, located at 1259 Duck Road, Duck, North Carolina.
                (3) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines at any time
            that the property conveyed under this subsection is not in
            accordance with the purpose specified in paragraph (1), all
            right, title, and interest in and to the property shall revert,
            at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United States.
        (d) City of Toledo, Ohio.--
                (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary may convey,
            without consideration, to the City of Toledo, Ohio, all right,
            title, and interest of the United States in and to the real
            property described in paragraph (2), for the purpose of public
            benefit, including parks and recreation.
                (2) Property.--The property to be conveyed under this
            subsection is the small land mass known as Grassy Island,
            including any improvements on that land, located in Maumee Bay
            at the mouth of Maumee River in Ohio.
                (3) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines at any time
            that the property conveyed under this subsection is not in
            accordance with the purpose specified in paragraph (1), all
            right, title, and interest in and to the property shall revert,
            at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United States.
        (e) County of Umatilla, Oregon.--
                (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary may convey to the
            County of Umatilla, Oregon, all right, title, and interest of
            the United States in and to the real property described in
            paragraph (2), for the purpose of public benefit.
                (2) Property.--The property to be conveyed under this
            subsection is approximately 25 acres of Federal land, including
            improvements on that land, in Umatilla County, Oregon, and
            described as follows:
                        (A) All of Tax Lot 1301.
                        (B) Approximately 12 acres of Tax Lot 1001.
                (3) Reservation of rights.--The Secretary shall, after
            consultation with the County of Umatilla, reserve and retain
            from the conveyance under this subsection such easements,
            rights-of-way, licenses, and other interests that the Secretary
            determines to be necessary and appropriate to ensure the
            continued operation of the project for flood control and other
            purposes, John Day Dam, Columbia River, Washington and Oregon,
            authorized under section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950
            (64 Stat. 179).
                (4) Additional requirements.--The Secretary shall--
                        (A) identify all agreements and other encumbrances
                    entered into with a non-Federal entity on the property
                    to be conveyed under this subsection; and
                        (B) in a form and manner determined by the
                    Secretary, transfer any such agreements and
                    encumbrances identified under subparagraph (A) to the
                    County of Umatilla, as appropriate.
                (5) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under
            this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and
            conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect
            the interests of the United States.
                (6) Consideration.--The County of Umatilla shall pay to the
            Secretary an amount that is not less than the fair market value
            of the property conveyed under this subsection, as determined
            by the Secretary.

    SEC. 304. LAND EXCHANGE, WALTON AND BAY COUNTIES, FLORIDA.

        (a) In General.--Upon conveyance, by warranty deed acceptable to
    the Secretary, by The St. Joe Company to the United States of all
    right, title, and interest in and to the non-Federal land, the
    Secretary shall release, by quitclaim deed, to The St. Joe Company, all
    interests held by the United States in any easements on the covered
    land other than the interests described in the covered easement.
        (b) Consideration.--As consideration for the conveyance and release
    of interests under subsection (a), The St. Joe Company shall pay to the
    Secretary an amount equal to the difference between the fair market
    value of the interests the Secretary is releasing under subsection (a)
    and the fair market value of the non-Federal land, as determined by an
    appraised value mutually agreed upon by the Secretary and The St. Joe
    Company.
        (c) Deadline.--The conveyance and release of interests under
    subsection (a) shall be completed not later than 180 days after the
    date of enactment of this Act.
        (d) Applicability of Property Screening Provisions.--Section 2696
    of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to any conveyance
    under this section.
        (e) Costs of Conveyance.--The St. Joe Company shall be responsible
    for all reasonable and necessary costs, including real estate
    transaction and environmental documentation costs, associated with any
    conveyance or release of easements under this section.
        (f) Liability.--The St. Joe Company shall hold the United States
    harmless from any liability with respect to activities carried out, on
    or after the date of the conveyance, on the real property conveyed
    under this section. The United States shall remain responsible for any
    liability with respect to activities carried out, before such date, on
    the real property conveyed.
        (g) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require
    that any conveyance or release of interests under this section be
    subject to such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary
    considers necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the
    United States.
        (h) Definitions.--In this section:
                (1) Covered easement.--The term ``covered easement'' means
            any non-exclusive, perpetual easement on the covered land,
            which grants the Secretary the right, to maintain the following
            easements as set forth in the nonstandard estate language:
                        (A) The channel maintenance and operations
                    easement.
                        (B) The ingress and egress easement.
                        (C) The drainage trench easement.
                (2) Covered land.--The term ``covered land'' means the
            approximately 79.60 acres of land in Bay County and Walton
            County, Florida, as generally depicted on the map entitled
            ``Boundary Survey Giles Land Swap Intracoastal Waterway Parcel
            Bay County and Walton County, Florida'', prepared by Dewberry
            Engineers, Inc., and dated January 26, 2021, under Project
            Number 50135600.
                (3) Non-federal land.--The term ``non-Federal land'' means
            the approximately 103.49 acres of land in Bay County, Florida,
            as generally depicted as Parcel B on the map entitled
            ``Description Sketch Land Exchange (USACE/SJC) East Bay Parcel
            SEC. 13, T-5-S, R-12-W Bay County, Florida'', prepared by
            Dewberry Engineers, Inc., and dated September 28, 2021, under
            Project Number 50145235.
                (4) The st. joe company.--The term ``The St. Joe Company''
            means The St. Joe Company, headquartered in Panama City Beach,
            Florida, originally incorporated in 1936, and previously known
            as the St. Joe Paper Company.

    SEC. 305. PORT CANAVERAL, FLORIDA.

        (a) In General.--On receipt of a written request from the Canaveral
    Port Authority, the Secretary shall--
                (1) review the covered land, including any easements on
            such land, and determine whether any portion of such land or
            easements are no longer required for the purposes of the
            Canaveral Harbor project;
                (2) identify any portion of the covered land that the
            Secretary determines is no longer required under paragraph (1)
            and that would be suitable for conveyance or exchange with the
            Canaveral Port Authority; and
                (3) as appropriate--
                        (A) convey, at fair market value to, or through
                    exchange for real property of not less than equal value
                    with, the Canaveral Port Authority any portion of the
                    covered land that the Secretary determines is no longer
                    required under paragraph (1); and
                        (B) grant to the Canaveral Port Authority any
                    easement on the covered land that the Secretary
                    determines under paragraph (1) is no longer required
                    and will not adversely impact the operation of the
                    Canaveral Harbor project.
        (b) Actions.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
                (1) determine the exact acreage and the legal description
            of any real property interest to be conveyed under this section
            based on a survey that is satisfactory to the Secretary and
            completed by the non-Federal interest of the Canaveral Harbor
            project;
                (2) coordinate with the Canaveral Port Authority in
            identifying opportunities for land exchanges, where possible;
            and
                (3) ensure that any conveyance, grant of easements, or
            exchange of land carried out under this section, does not
            interfere with any Federal navigation project that has been
            constructed or is authorized to be constructed as of the date
            of enactment of this Act.
        (c) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey any property described in
    subsection (a)(3)(A) under this section by quitclaim deed under such
    terms and conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect
    the interests of the United States.
        (d) Applicability of Real Property Screening Requirements.--Section
    2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to the conveyance
    of property under this section.
        (e) Costs of Conveyance or Grant of an Easement.--The Canaveral
    Port Authority shall be responsible for all reasonable and necessary
    costs, including real estate transaction and environmental
    documentation costs, associated with a conveyance or grant of an
    easement under this section.
        (f) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance or grant of an
    easement is made under this section shall hold the United States
    harmless from any liability with respect to activities carried out, on
    or after the date of the conveyance or grant of an easement, on the
    real property conveyed, or with respect to which an easement is
    granted. The United States shall remain responsible for any liability
    with respect to activities carried out, before such date, on the real
    property conveyed or with respect to which an easement is granted.
        (g) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require
    that any conveyance or grant of an easement under this section be
    subject to such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary
    considers necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the
    United States.
        (h) Definitions.--In this section:
                (1) Canaveral harbor project.--The term ``Canaveral Harbor
            project'' means the project for navigation, Canaveral Harbor,
            Port Canaveral, Florida, authorized by section 2 of Act of
            March 2, 1945 (chapter 19, 59 Stat. 16).
                (2) Covered land.--The term ``covered land'' means the land
            owned and known as ``USACOE TRACT 100'' that is held by the
            United States for the Canaveral Harbor project.

    SEC. 306. SPECIFIC DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

        (a) Deauthorization of Designated Portions of Los Angeles County
    Drainage Area, California.--
                (1) In general.--The portion of the project for flood risk
            management, Los Angeles County Drainage Area, California,
            authorized by section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (chapter
            688, 49 Stat. 1589; 50 Stat. 167; 52 Stat. 1215; 55 Stat. 647;
            64 Stat. 177; 104 Stat. 4611; 136 Stat. 3785; 138 Stat. 3019),
            consisting of the flood channels described in paragraph (2), is
            no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this
            Act.
                (2) Flood channels described.--The flood channels referred
            to in paragraph (1) are the following flood channels operated
            and maintained by the Los Angeles County Flood Control
            District, as generally defined in Corps of Engineers operations
            and maintenance manuals as may be further described in an
            agreement entered into under paragraph (3):
                        (A) Alhambra Wash Channel (Valley Blvd. to Rio
                    Hondo).
                        (B) Arcadia Wash Channel.
                        (C) Ballona Creek Channel (La Salle Ave. to Vista
                    Del Mar).
                        (D) Ballona Creek Channel (Redondo Blvd. to
                    Washington Blvd.).
                        (E) Benedict Canyon Channel.
                        (F) Burbank Western Channel (Roscoe Blvd. to
                    Victory Blvd.).
                        (G) Caballero Creek Channel.
                        (H) Centinela Creek Channel.
                        (I) Compton Creek Channel (Main St. to 122nd St.).
                        (J) Compton Creek Channel (Southern Pacific Rail
                    Yard to Los Angeles River).
                        (K) Coyote Creek Channel (Valley View St. to San
                    Gabriel River).
                        (L) Eaton Wash Channel.
                        (M) Grandview Ave Channel.
                        (N) Haines Canyon Channel (Plainview Ave. to
                    Tujunga Wash).
                        (O) Kenter Canyon Channel.
                        (P) Lopez Canyon Diversion Channel.
                        (Q) Los Angeles River (Owensmouth Ave. to Sepulveda
                    Flood Control Basin).
                        (R) Los Angeles River (Sepulveda Flood Control
                    Basin to Lankershim Blvd.).
                        (S) Los Angeles River (Stewart and Grey Rd. to
                    Pacific Ocean).
                        (T) North Fork Channel.
                        (U) Pacoima Wash Channel.
                        (V) Rio Hondo Channel (Lower Azusa Rd. to Rosemead
                    Blvd.).
                        (W) Rio Hondo Channel (500 ft. south of Whittier
                    Narrows Dam to Union Pacific Rail Yard).
                        (X) Rubio Wash Channel.
                        (Y) San Gabriel River Channel (Santa Fe Flood
                    Control Basin to Thienes Ave.).
                        (Z) San Gabriel River Channel (Whittier Narrows Dam
                    to Pacific Ocean).
                        (AA) San Jose Creek Channel (Thomas Creek to San
                    Jose Creek Diversion).
                        (BB) Santa Anita Wash Channel.
                        (CC) Sawpit Wash Channel.
                        (DD) Sawtelle-Westwood Channel.
                        (EE) Sycamore Wash Channel.
                        (FF) Tujunga Wash Channel (436 ft. south of Hansen
                    Dam to Los Angeles River).
                        (GG) Verdugo Wash Channel (Verdugo Debris Basin to
                    San Fernando Rd.).
                (3) Agreement.--Not later than 90 days after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall seek to enter into
            an agreement with the Los Angeles County Flood Control District
            to ensure that the Los Angeles County Flood Control District--
                        (A) will continue to operate, maintain, repair,
                    rehabilitate, and replace as necessary, the flood
                    channels described in paragraph (2)--
                                (i) in perpetuity at no cost to the United
                            States; and
                                (ii) in a manner that does not reduce the
                            level of flood protection of the project
                            described in paragraph (1);
                        (B) will retain public ownership of all real
                    property and easements required for the continued
                    functioning of the flood channels described in
                    paragraph (2), consistent with authorized purposes of
                    the project described in paragraph (1);
                        (C) will allow the Corps of Engineers to continue
                    to operate, maintain, repair, rehabilitate, and replace
                    any appurtenant structures, such as rain and stream
                    gages, existing as of the date of enactment of this Act
                    and located within the flood channels subject to
                    deauthorization under paragraph (1) as necessary to
                    ensure the continued functioning of the project
                    described in paragraph (1); and
                        (D) will hold and save the United States harmless
                    from damages due to floods, breach, failure, operation,
                    or maintenance of the flood channels described in
                    paragraph (2).
                (4) Administrative costs.--The Secretary may accept and
            expend funds voluntarily contributed by the Los Angeles County
            Flood Control District to cover the administrative costs
            incurred by the Secretary to--
                        (A) enter into an agreement under paragraph (3);
                    and
                        (B) monitor compliance with such agreement.
                (5) Repeal.--The following are repealed:
                        (A) Subsections (c) and (d) of section 8320 of the
                    Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat.
                    3785).
                        (B) Paragraphs (3) and (4) of section 1302(b) of
                    the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat.
                    3109).
        (b) Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, California.--
                (1) In general.--The portion of the project for flood
            protection on the Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries,
            California, authorized by section 10 of the Act of December 22,
            1944 (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 901), consisting of the 3.76 mile
            Dos Rios Levee along the right bank of the San Joaquin River
            between River Mile 88 and River Mile 85, is no longer
            authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
                (2) Repeal.--Section 1302(p) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3114) is repealed.
        (c) Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam, Minneapolis, Minnesota.--
    Section 2010 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014
    (128 Stat. 1270; 132 Stat. 3812; 136 Stat. 3795) is amended by adding
    at the end the following:
        ``(h) Clarification.--
                ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding the requirements of
            section 356(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020
            (134 Stat. 2724; 138 Stat. 3141), the Secretary shall retain
            ownership of, and operation and maintenance responsibility for,
            the underwater cutoff wall constructed by the Secretary on the
            riverbed in the vicinity of St. Anthony Falls, Minnesota.
                ``(2) Assessment.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
            enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall complete and
            transmit to the State of Minnesota and to the Committee on
            Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
            Works of the Senate an assessment of the condition of the
            underwater cutoff wall described in paragraph (1).''.
        (d) Harlem River Federal Navigation Channel, New York.--
                (1) In general.--Beginning on the date of enactment of this
            Act, the project for navigation, Harlem River, New York,
            authorized by the first section of the Act of June 18, 1878
            (chapter 264, 20 Stat. 158), is modified to deauthorize the
            portion of the project consisting of the areas described in
            paragraph (2).
                (2) Areas described.--The areas referred to in paragraph
            (1) are--
                        (A) the area that is a closed polygon formed by
                    straight lines connecting, in the order listed, the
                    following points, and thence extending landward to the
                    existing physical shoreline--
                                (i) beginning at a point on the shoreline
                            north of the Macombs Dam Bridge at N244191.72,
                            E1002503.69;
                                (ii) running south-southwesterly
                            approximately 59.5 feet to a point at
                            N244133.98, E1002489.25;
                                (iii) running south-southwesterly
                            approximately 579.8 feet to a point at
                            N243572.61, E1002344.44;
                                (iv) running southerly approximately 173.9
                            feet to a point at N243399.67, E1002326.56;
                                (v) running southerly approximately 189.0
                            feet to a point at N243212.20, E1002302.50;
                                (vi) running southerly approximately 354.4
                            feet to a point at N242858.69, E1002277.63;
                                (vii) running southerly approximately 292.3
                            feet to a point at N242566.45, E1002281.31;
                                (viii) running southerly approximately
                            791.2 feet to a point at N241778.27,
                            E1002350.13;
                                (ix) running southerly approximately 254.5
                            feet to a point at N241525.84, E1002382.88;
                                (x) running southerly approximately .6 feet
                            to a point at N241469.61, E1002389.06;
                                (xi) running southerly approximately 190.2
                            feet to a point at N241280.22, E1002406.69;
                                (xii) running southwesterly approximately
                            93.6 feet to a point at N241209.59,
                            E1002345.25; and
                                (xiii) running southwesterly approximately
                            15.4 feet terminating at a point on the
                            shoreline at N241197.95, E1002335.13; and
                        (B) the area that is a closed polygon formed by
                    straight lines connecting, in the order listed, the
                    following points, and thence extending landward to the
                    existing physical shoreline--
                                (i) beginning at a point on the shoreline
                            south of the Macombs Dam Bridge at N240595.14,
                            E1002396.69;
                                (ii) running south-southeasterly
                            approximately 30.5 feet to a point at
                            N240569.30, E1002412.94;
                                (iii) running south-southeasterly
                            approximately 97.5 feet to a point at
                            N240486.75, E1002464.88;
                                (iv) running southerly approximately 477.6
                            feet to a point at N240010.61, E1002502.81;
                                (v) running southerly approximately 60.4
                            feet to a point at N239950.33, E1002506.19;
                                (vi) running southerly approximately 39.5
                            feet to a point at N239910.88, E1002506.94;
                                (vii) running southerly approximately .3
                            feet to a point at N239773.63, E1002509.38;
                                (viii) running southerly approximately 97.9
                            feet to a point at N239676.67, E1002523.13;
                                (ix) running southerly approximately 58.1
                            feet to a point at N239618.58, E1002524.19;
                                (x) running southerly approximately 289.1
                            feet to a point at N239330.02, E1002541.31;
                                (xi) running southerly approximately 331.3
                            feet to a point at N238999.31, E1002560.94;
                                (xii) running southerly approximately 583.2
                            feet to a point at N238416.61, E1002585.50;
                                (xiii) running southerly approximately
                            387.8 feet to a point at N238029.20,
                            E1002602.56;
                                (xiv) running southerly approximately 120.0
                            feet to a point at N237909.23, E1002603.81;
                                (xv) running west-northwesterly
                            approximately 42 feet to a point at N237919.38,
                            E1002563.06; and
                                (xvi) running west-northwesterly
                            approximately 1 foot to a point on the
                            shoreline at N237919.63, E1002562.06.
        (e) Hudson River Channel Partial Deauthorization, New York.--
                (1) In general.--Beginning on the date of enactment of this
            Act, the project for navigation, Hudson River Channel, New
            York, authorized by the first section of the Act of March 4,
            1913 (chapter 144, 37 Stat. 804), is modified to deauthorize
            the portion of the channel consisting of the area described in
            paragraph (2).
                (2) Area described.--The area referred to in paragraph (1)
            is the area bounded by the following coordinates:
                        (A) W 740004.90, N 404615.84.
                        (B) W 735957.24, N 404612.68.
                        (C) W 740015.09, N 404601.62.
                        (D) W 740007.71, N 404558.52.
        (f) Newtown Creek Federal Navigation Channel, New York.--
                (1) Definition of newtown creek, new york project.--In this
            subsection, the term ``Newtown Creek, New York project'' means
            the project for navigation, Newtown Creek, New York and
            associated tributaries, authorized by the first section of the
            Act of March 2, 1919 (chapter 95, 40 Stat. 1276; 46 Stat. 920;
            50 Stat. 845; 138 Stat. 3113).
                (2) Modification.--Beginning on the date of enactment of
            this Act, the Newtown Creek, New York project is modified to
            reduce, in part, the authorized dimensions of the project, such
            that the remaining authorized depths are as follows:
                        (A) A 20-foot deep channel with a center line
                    beginning at point North 40.735668 and West 73.9242159,
                    thence to a point North 40.733648 and West 73.940546.
                        (B) An 18-foot deep channel with a center line
                    beginning at point North 40.733648 and West 73.940546,
                    thence to a point North 40.722214 and West 73.925873.
                        (C) An 18-foot deep turning basin southwest of a
                    line formed by points North 40.726201 and West
                    73.927288; and North 40.723507 and West 73.924712.
                        (D) A 16-foot-deep channel with a center line
                    beginning at a point North 40.722214 and West
                    73.925873, thence to a point North 40.718066 and West
                    73.923931.
                        (E) A 16-foot-deep channel with a center line
                    beginning at a point North 40.718663 and West
                    73.924175, thence to a point North 40.717538 and West
                    73.927437.
                        (F) A 14-foot-deep channel with a center line
                    beginning at a point North 40.717538 and West
                    73.927437, thence to a point North 40.716610 and West
                    73.929278.
                        (G) A 12-foot-deep channel with a center line
                    beginning at a point North 40.716610 and West
                    73.929278, thence to a point North 40.713164 and West
                    73.931352.
                (3) Deauthorizations.--
                        (A) In general.--The portions of the Newtown Creek
                    navigation project described in subparagraph (B) are
                    deauthorized beginning on the date of enactment of this
                    Act.
                        (B) Portions described.--The portions referred to
                    in subparagraph (A) are--
                                (i) the portion of the project adjacent to
                            the turning basin consisting of--
                                        (I) the area east of a line formed
                                    by points North 40.726201 and West
                                    73.927288; and North 40.723507 and West
                                    73.924712; and
                                        (II) the area containing Maspeth
                                    Creek;
                                (ii) the upstream portion of English Kills
                            consisting of the area--
                                        (I) beginning at a point North
                                    40.713164 and West 73.931352; and
                                        (II) extending upstream to the
                                    project boundary; and
                                (iii) Dutch Kills, consisting of the area--
                                        (I) beginning at a point North
                                    40.737623 and West 73.946809; and
                                        (II) extending upstream to the
                                    project boundary.
        (g) Charleston, South Carolina.--
                (1) Deauthorization.--Upon completion of the sale of the
            Union Pier marine terminal property and cessation of commercial
            port operations at the Union Pier marine terminal by the South
            Carolina Ports Authority, the project for navigation,
            Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, authorized by section
            1401(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130
            Stat. 1708) consisting of the area described in paragraph (2)
            is no longer authorized.
                (2) Portion described.--The area referred to in paragraph
            (1) is the portion of the Federal channel located within
            Charleston Harbor bounded by the following coordinates: 32 47'
            14.754772" N, 79 55' 16.260605" W; to 32 47' 14.647666" N,
            79 55' 23.873993" W; to 32 46' 49.186843" N, 79 55'
            23.371716" W; to 32 46' 49.293940" N, 79 55' 15.758944" W; to
            32 47' 5.254548" N, 79 55' 16.073410" W; to 32 47' 9.672485"
            N, 79 55' 10.888283" W; thence back to 32 47' 14.754772" N,
            79 55' 16.260605" W.
        (h) Shot Pouch Creek, South Carolina.--The project for snagging and
    clearing, Shot Pouch Creek, South Carolina, authorized by section 2 of
    August 28, 1937 (33 U.S.C. 701g), consisting of 2.15 miles of Shot
    Pouch Creek from the Sumter Bypass to Swan Lake, is no longer
    authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.

    SEC. 307. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.

        (a) Consistency With Reports.--Congress finds that the projects and
    project modifications described in this subsection are in accordance
    with the reports submitted to Congress by the Secretary under section
    7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33
    U.S.C. 2282d), titled ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources
    Development'', or have otherwise been reviewed by Congress.
        (b) New Projects.--Section 219(f) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3115)
    is amended by adding at the end the following:
                ``(599) Auburn, alabama.--$3,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the city of Auburn, Alabama.
                ``(600) Edwardsville, alabama.--$4,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the town of Edwardsville, Alabama.
                ``(601) Gadsden, alabama.--$12,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and
            distribution systems, in the city of Gadsden, Alabama.
                ``(602) Lower alabama, alabama.--$40,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
            environmental restoration, and surface water protection, in
            Barbour, Bullock, Butler, Conecuh, Crenshaw, Macon, Mobile,
            Monroe, Montgomery, Pike, Russell, and Washington Counties,
            Alabama.
                ``(603) Mobile, alabama.--$10,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including ecosystem restoration and
            resiliency, in the city of Mobile, Alabama.
                ``(604) Southside, alabama.--$4,200,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including distribution systems, in
            the city of Southside, Alabama.
                ``(605) Nelson lagoon, alaska.--$3,300,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply and storage, in the
            Native Village of Nelson Lagoon, Alaska.
                ``(606) Sitka, alaska.--$7,000,000 for water and wastewater
            infrastructure, including reclamation and storage, in the city
            and borough of Sitka, Alaska.
                ``(607) Soldotna, alaska.--$1,300,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water reclamation and
            storage, in the city of Soldotna, Alaska.
                ``(608) Lee county, arkansas.--$50,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in Lee County, Arkansas.
                ``(609) Cottonwood, arizona.--$10,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water reclamation,
            distribution systems, and stormwater management, in the city of
            Cottonwood, Arizona.
                ``(610) Gila county, arizona.--$24,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water reclamation,
            treatment, and distribution systems, in Gila County, Arizona.
                ``(611) Gila river indian community, arizona.--$10,000,000
            for water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply
            and conservation, in the Gila River Indian Community, Arizona.
                ``(612) Maricopa, arizona.--$10,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water reclamation,
            distribution systems, and stormwater management, in the city of
            Maricopa, Arizona.
                ``(613) Pima county, arizona.--$7,500,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water reclamation and
            distribution systems and environmental restoration, in Pima
            County, Arizona.
                ``(614) Santa cruz county, arizona.--$30,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including water reclamation and
            distribution systems and environmental restoration, in Santa
            Cruz County, Arizona.
                ``(615) Artesia, california.--$1,200,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management and
            environmental infrastructure, in the city of Artesia,
            California.
                ``(616) Atascadero, california.--$20,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the city
            of Atascadero, California.
                ``(617) Belmont, san carlos, redwood city, and west bay
            sanitary district, california.--$9,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including environmental restoration,
            in the cities of Belmont, San Carlos, and Redwood City and the
            West Bay Sanitary District, California.
                ``(618) Burbank, california.--$20,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water distribution systems, in the
            city of Burbank, California.
                ``(619) Cerritos, california.--$16,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the city
            of Cerritos, California.
                ``(620) Coachella, california.--$10,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the city
            of Coachella, California.
                ``(621) El monte, california.--$18,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of El Monte, California.
                ``(622) El segundo, california.--$1,500,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of El Segundo, California.
                ``(623) Elsinore valley, california.--$5,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Lake Elsinore,
            California.
                ``(624) Encinitas, california.--$44,250,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
            drainage systems, and environmental restoration, in the city of
            Encinitas, California.
                ``(625) Irvine, california.--$20,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the city
            of Irvine, California.
                ``(626) La canada flintridge, california.--$29,024,625 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and
            storage capacity, in the city of La Canada Flintridge,
            California.
                ``(627) Laguna beach, california.--$10,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and
            stormwater management, in the city of Laguna Beach, California.
                ``(628) Lompoc, california.--$6,300,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Lompoc, California.
                ``(629) Manhattan beach, california.--$2,000,000 for water
            and water supply infrastructure in the city of Manhattan Beach,
            California.
                ``(630) Mission viejo, rancho santa margarita, and san
            clemente, california.--$20,000,000 for water and wastewater
            infrastructure, including water supply, water recycling, and
            stormwater management in the cities of Mission Viejo, Rancho
            Santa Margarita, and San Clemente, California.
                ``(631) Modesto, california.--$30,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including facility relocation, in
            the city of Modesto, California.
                ``(632) Monterey county, california.--$27,500,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
            in Monterey County, California.
                ``(633) Morgan hill, california.--$17,500,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the city of Morgan Hill,
            California.
                ``(634) Ojai, california.--$25,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Ojai, California.
                ``(635) Redwood city, california.--$3,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Redwood City, California.
                ``(636) Sacramento river basin, california.--$155,000,000
            for water and wastewater infrastructure, including
            environmental restoration and surface water protection in the
            Sacramento River Basin, California, including the counties of
            Shasta, Tehama, Butte, Glenn, Colusa, Sutter, Yuba, Sacramento,
            and Yolo, California.
                ``(637) San bernardino and riverside counties,
            california.--$67,500,000 for water and wastewater
            infrastructure, including water supply, distribution systems,
            stormwater management, and environmental restoration, in San
            Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California.
                ``(638) San fernando, california.--$28,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply and distribution
            systems, in the city of San Fernando, California.
                ``(639) San mateo county, california.--$30,665,000 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and
            water reuse and related facilities, in San Mateo County,
            California.
                ``(640) Santa barbara county, california.--$3,200,000 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure in Santa Barbara County,
            California.
                ``(641) Santa cruz, california.--$3,500,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water reclamation,
            distribution systems, and supply, in the city of Santa Cruz,
            California.
                ``(642) Seaside, california.--$14,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, stormwater
            management, and water reclamation and distribution systems, in
            the city of Seaside, California.
                ``(643) Solvang, california.--$2,000,000 for water and
            water supply infrastructure, including distribution systems, in
            the city of Solvang, California.
                ``(644) Sonoma and marin counties, california.--$60,000,000
            for water and wastewater infrastructure, including water
            supply, stormwater management, surface water protection, and
            environmental restoration, in Sonoma and Marin Counties,
            California.
                ``(645) Sutter, california.--$3,350,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the county of Sutter, California.
                ``(646) Turlock, california.--$20,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the city of Turlock, California.
                ``(647) Ventura county, california.--$23,459,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply and water storage, in
            Ventura County, California.
                ``(648) West covina, california.--$2,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of West Covina, California.
                ``(649) Aurora, colorado.--$15,600,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Aurora, Colorado.
                ``(650) Custer county, colorado.--$20,000,000 for water and
            water infrastructure, including water supply, in Custer County,
            Colorado.
                ``(651) Northern colorado.--$22,500,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply and environmental
            restoration, in Boulder, Broomfield, Larimer, Logan, Morgan,
            Sedgwick, Washington, and Weld Counties, Colorado.
                ``(652) Connecticut river valley, connecticut.--$12,500,000
            for water and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater
            management and environmental restoration, in the towns of
            Andover, Avon, Berlin, Bloomfield, Bolton, Canton, Columbia,
            Coventry, East Granby, East Hartford, East Windsor, Ellington,
            Enfield, Farmington, Glastonbury, Granby, Hartford, Hebron,
            Manchester, Mansfield, Marlborough, New Britain, Newington,
            Plainville, Rocky Hill, Simsbury, Somers, South Windsor,
            Southington, Stafford, Suffield, Tolland, Vernon, West
            Hartford, Wethersfield, Willington, Windsor, and Windsor Locks,
            and the cities of Hartford and New Britain, Connecticut.
                ``(653) Danbury, connecticut.--$32,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and water
            storage and distribution systems, in the city of Danbury,
            Connecticut.
                ``(654) Hartford, connecticut.--$50,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Hartford, Connecticut.
                ``(655) Lower connecticut river valley, connecticut.--
            $12,500,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including
            stormwater management and environmental restoration, in the
            towns of Chester, Clinton, Cromwell, Deep River, Durham, East
            Haddam, East Hampton, Essex, Haddam, Killingworth, Lyme,
            Middlefield, Old Lyme, Old Saybrook, Portland, and Westbrook,
            and the city of Middletown, Connecticut.
                ``(656) New britain, connecticut.--$5,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of New Britain, Connecticut.
                ``(657) Northeastern connecticut.--$12,500,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management
            and environmental restoration, in the towns of Ashford,
            Brooklyn, Canterbury, Chaplin, Eastford, Hampton, Killingly,
            Plainfield, Pomfret, Putnam, Scotland, Sterling, Thompson,
            Union, Voluntown, and Woodstock, Connecticut.
                ``(658) Southeastern connecticut.--$12,500,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management
            and environmental restoration, in the towns of Bozrah,
            Colchester, East Lyme, Franklin, Griswold, Groton, Lebanon,
            Ledyard, Lisbon, Montville, North Stonington, Preston, Salem,
            Sprague, Stonington, Waterford, and Windham, the boroughs of
            Jewett City and Stonington, and cities of Groton, New London,
            and Norwich, Connecticut.
                ``(659) Thomaston, connecticut.--$8,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the town of Thomaston, Connecticut.
                ``(660) Waterbury, connecticut.--$5,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply and distribution
            systems, in the city of Waterbury, Connecticut.
                ``(661) Altamonte springs, florida.--$4,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply,
            stormwater management, and water reclamation, in the city of
            Altamonte Springs, Florida.
                ``(662) Bunnell, florida.--$16,600,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the city of Bunnell, Florida.
                ``(663) Columbia and suwannee counties, florida.--
            $39,300,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure in Columbia
            and Suwannee Counties, Florida.
                ``(664) Escambia, walton, okaloosa, and santa rosa
            counties, florida.--$50,000,000 for water and wastewater
            infrastructure in Escambia, Walton, Okaloosa, and Santa Rosa
            Counties, Florida.
                ``(665) Gilchrist county, florida.--$200,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            Gilchrist County, Florida.
                ``(666) Hernando county, florida.--$29,600,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management
            and environmental restoration, in Hernando County, Florida.
                ``(667) Hollywood, florida.--$46,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the city of Hollywood, Florida.
                ``(668) North miami-dade county, florida.--$50,000,000 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure, including distribution
            systems, monitoring infrastructure, stormwater management, and
            environmental restoration, in the cities of Aventura, Miami
            Gardens, North Miami Beach, and Sunny Isles Beach, the town of
            Golden Beach, and Miami-Dade County, Florida.
                ``(669) Pasco county, florida.--$400,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including distribution systems, in
            Pasco County, Florida.
                ``(670) Riviera beach, florida.--$30,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, distribution
            systems, and stormwater management, in the city of Riviera
            Beach, Florida.
                ``(671) Sanford, florida.--$3,800,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply, in the city of Sanford,
            Florida.
                ``(672) Tampa bay, florida.--$100,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply, in Hillsborough, Pasco,
            and Pinellas Counties and the cities of New Port Richey, St.
            Petersburg, and Tampa, Florida.
                ``(673) Winter park, florida.--$25,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Winter Park, Florida.
                ``(674) Avondale estates, georgia.--$4,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
            in the city of Avondale Estates, Georgia.
                ``(675) Fairburn, georgia.--$5,670,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and
            distribution systems, in the city of Fairburn, Georgia.
                ``(676) Garden city, georgia.--$4,300,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the city of Garden City, Georgia.
                ``(677) Newton county, georgia.--$23,900,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and
            distribution systems, in Newton County, Georgia.
                ``(678) Addison, illinois.--$50,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the village of Addison, Illinois.
                ``(679) East moline, illinois.--$15,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the city
            of East Moline, Illinois.
                ``(680) Port byron, illinois.--$1,500,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the village of Port Byron,
            Illinois.
                ``(681) Shannon, illinois.--$1,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including distribution systems, in
            the village of Shannon, Illinois.
                ``(682) South pekin, illinois.--$8,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply, in the village of South
            Pekin, Illinois.
                ``(683) Baltimore, maryland.--$25,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Baltimore, Maryland.
                ``(684) Holyoke, massachusetts.--$50,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Holyoke, Massachusetts.
                ``(685) Bay region, michigan.--$50,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, stormwater
            management, and surface water protection, in Bay, Midland,
            Saginaw, Genesee, and Tuscola Counties, Michigan.
                ``(686) Kent county, michigan.--$20,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management and
            surface water resource protection, in Kent County, Michigan.
                ``(687) Lapeer, macomb, oakland, and st. clair counties,
            michigan.--$50,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure
            in Lapeer, Macomb, Oakland, and St. Clair Counties, Michigan.
                ``(688) Muskegon county, michigan.--$15,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management
            and surface water resource protection, in Muskegon County,
            Michigan.
                ``(689) Ottawa county, michigan.--$15,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management and
            surface water resource protection, in Ottawa County, Michigan.
                ``(690) Owosso, michigan.--$47,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply and desalination, in the
            city of Owosso, Michigan.
                ``(691) Westphalia, michigan.--$3,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the
            village of Westphalia, Michigan.
                ``(692) Cokato, minnesota.--$4,500,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the city
            of Cokato, Minnesota.
                ``(693) Norwood young america, minnesota.--$21,500,000 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in
            the city of Norwood Young America, Minnesota.
                ``(694) Sartell, minnesota.--$24,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, stormwater
            management, and surface water protection, in the city of
            Sartell, Minnesota.
                ``(695) Brandon, mississippi.--$10,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the city of Brandon, Mississippi.
                ``(696) Choctaw county, mississippi.--$10,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
            in Choctaw County, Mississippi.
                ``(697) Forest, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the city of Forest, Mississippi.
                ``(698) Grenada, mississippi.--$3,500,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Grenada, Mississippi.
                ``(699) Lucedale, mississippi.--$3,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Lucedale, Mississippi.
                ``(700) Sardis, mississippi.--$3,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Sardis, Mississippi.
                ``(701) West point, mississippi.--$10,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the city of West Point,
            Mississippi.
                ``(702) Kansas city, missouri.--$45,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management and
            water supply, in Kansas City, Missouri.
                ``(703) New london, new hampshire.--$15,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply, in the town of New
            London, New Hampshire.
                ``(704) Sullivan county, new hampshire.--$1,500,000 for
            water infrastructure, including water supply, in Sullivan
            County, New Hampshire.
                ``(705) Bergen county, new jersey.--$25,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
            in Bergen County, New Jersey.
                ``(706) Camden county, new jersey.--$45,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including environmental
            restoration, in Camden County, New Jersey.
                ``(707) Demarest, new jersey.--$2,310,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the borough of Demarest, New Jersey.
                ``(708) Jersey city, new jersey.--$1,300,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management and
            water supply, in Jersey City, New Jersey.
                ``(709) Palmyra, new jersey.--$5,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the borough of Palmyra, New
            Jersey.
                ``(710) Dona ana county, new mexico.--$25,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply and desalination, in
            Dona Ana County, New Mexico.
                ``(711) Los alamos county, new mexico.--$1,500,000 for
            water infrastructure, including water supply, in Los Alamos
            County, New Mexico.
                ``(712) Valencia county, new mexico.--$25,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
            in Valencia County, New Mexico.
                ``(713) Bronx county, new york.--$90,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            Bronx County, New York.
                ``(714) Brookhaven, new york.--$20,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the town of Brookhaven, New York.
                ``(715) Freeport, new york.--$3,300,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the village of Freeport, New York.
                ``(716) Garden city, new york.--$11,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply, in the village of
            Garden City, New York.
                ``(717) Lawrence, new york.--$130,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the village of Lawrence, New York.
                ``(718) Long beach, new york.--$25,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the city
            of Long Beach, New York.
                ``(719) Long island, new york.--$65,570,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, New
            York.
                ``(720) Nassau county, new york.--$20,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
            water reclamation, and environmental restoration, in Nassau
            County, New York.
                ``(721) North salem and lewisboro, new york.--$600,000 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater
            management, in the towns of North Salem and Lewisboro, New
            York.
                ``(722) Ossining, new york.--$40,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the village of Ossining, New York.
                ``(723) Port jefferson, new york.--$50,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
            in the village of Port Jefferson, New York.
                ``(724) Richmond county, new york.--$50,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
            in Richmond County, New York.
                ``(725) Westchester county, new york.--$49,400,000 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and
            storage, in Westchester County, New York.
                ``(726) Asheville, north carolina.--$50,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply, in the city of
            Asheville, North Carolina.
                ``(727) Durham, north carolina.--$20,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the city
            of Durham, North Carolina.
                ``(728) Granville county, north carolina.--$6,350,000 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in
            Granville County, North Carolina.
                ``(729) Harnett county, north carolina.--$35,670,500 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure in Harnett County, North
            Carolina.
                ``(730) Hillsborough, north carolina.--$6,820,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and
            distribution systems, in the town of Hillsborough, North
            Carolina.
                ``(731) Johnston county, north carolina.--$7,979,000 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in
            Johnston County, North Carolina.
                ``(732) Pitt county, north carolina.--$15,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure in Pitt County, North Carolina.
                ``(733) White lake, north carolina.--$40,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
            in the town of White Lake, North Carolina.
                ``(734) Clermont county, ohio.--$3,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in Clermont County, Ohio.
                ``(735) Jackson county, ohio.--$8,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in Jackson County, Ohio.
                ``(736) Lynchburg, ohio.--$6,380,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, in the village of Lynchburg, Ohio.
                ``(737) New holland, ohio.--$2,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the
            village of New Holland, Ohio.
                ``(738) Waverly, ohio.--$12,995,750 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in the village of Waverly, Ohio.
                ``(739) Chickasaw nation, oklahoma.--$45,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure in the territory under the
            jurisdiction of the Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma.
                ``(740) Klamath county, oregon.--$37,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and water
            recycling and reuse systems, in Klamath County, Oregon.
                ``(741) Milton-freewater, oregon.--$13,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply, in the city of Milton-
            Freewater, Oregon.
                ``(742) Salem, oregon.--$75,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, distribution
            systems, and environmental restoration, in the city of Salem,
            Oregon.
                ``(743) Bethlehem, pennsylvania.--$2,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
                ``(744) Blair county, pennsylvania.--$2,500,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply and distribution
            systems, in Blair County, Pennsylvania.
                ``(745) Cambria county, pennsylvania.--$3,500,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in
            Cambria County, Pennsylvania.
                ``(746) Carbon and schuylkill counties, pennsylvania.--
            $2,500,000 for water infrastructure, including water supply and
            water storage, in Carbon and Schuylkill Counties, Pennsylvania.
                ``(747) Chambersburg, pennsylvania.--$12,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure in the borough of Chambersburg,
            Pennsylvania.
                ``(748) Jim thorpe, pennsylvania.--$5,175,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and
            distribution systems, in the borough of Jim Thorpe,
            Pennsylvania.
                ``(749) Laurel mountain, pennsylvania.--$4,500,000 for
            water infrastructure, including water supply and distribution
            systems, in the borough of Laurel Mountain, Pennsylvania.
                ``(750) Mccalmont township, pennsylvania.--$60,000 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure in the McCalmont Township,
            Pennsylvania.
                ``(751) Mercersburg, pennsylvania.--$3,375,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure in the borough of Mercersburg,
            Pennsylvania.
                ``(752) Meyersdale, pennsylvania.--$3,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the borough of Meyersdale, Pennsylvania.
                ``(753) Montgomery county, pennsylvania.--$1,000,000 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater
            management and environmental restoration, in Montgomery County,
            Pennsylvania.
                ``(754) Paint borough, pennsylvania.--$600,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
            in Paint Borough, Pennsylvania.
                ``(755) Punxsutawney, pennsylvania.--$1,500,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
            in the borough of Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania.
                ``(756) Shippensburg, pennsylvania.--$2,400,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure in the borough of Shippensburg,
            Pennsylvania.
                ``(757) Springhill township, pennsylvania.--$1,000,000 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in
            Springhill Township, Pennsylvania.
                ``(758) Windber, pennsylvania.--$2,600,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the
            borough of Windber, Pennsylvania.
                ``(759) Corozal, puerto rico.--$10,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the
            municipality of Corozal.
                ``(760) Burrillville, rhode island.--$10,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply and distribution
            systems, in the town of Burrillville, Rhode Island.
                ``(761) Coventry, rhode island.--$10,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, in the town of Coventry, Rhode
            Island.
                ``(762) Narragansett, rhode island.--$10,000,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure in the town of Narragansett,
            Rhode Island.
                ``(763) North kingstown, rhode island.--$10,000,000 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure, including distribution
            systems, in the town of North Kingstown, Rhode Island.
                ``(764) Pawtucket, rhode island.--$16,600,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Pawtucket, Rhode Island.
                ``(765) Warwick, rhode island.--$10,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including distribution systems, in
            the city of Warwick, Rhode Island.
                ``(766) Berkeley county, south carolina.--$14,000,000 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and
            distribution systems, in Berkeley County, South Carolina.
                ``(767) Georgetown, south carolina.--$4,275,000 for water
            and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
            in the city of Georgetown, South Carolina.
                ``(768) Hilton head island, south carolina.--$10,000,000
            for water and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater
            management, in the town of Hilton Head Island, South Carolina.
                ``(769) Isle of palms, south carolina.--$10,000,000 for
            water and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater
            management, in the city of Isle of Palms, South Carolina.
                ``(770) Brazoria, fort bend, and galveston counties,
            texas.--$5,000,000 for water infrastructure, including water
            supply, in Brazoria, Fort Bend, and Galveston Counties, Texas.
                ``(771) Burleson, texas.--$12,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply and distribution
            systems, in the city of Burleson, Texas.
                ``(772) Granbury, texas.--$8,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply, in the city of
            Granbury, Texas.
                ``(773) Grandview, texas.--$10,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Grandview, Texas.
                ``(774) Harris county, texas.--$5,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure in Harris County, Texas.
                ``(775) Jim hogg county, texas.--$7,500,000 for water
            infrastructure, including distribution systems, in Jim Hogg
            County, Texas.
                ``(776) Kemah, texas.--$5,000,000 for water and wastewater
            infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the city of
            Kemah, Texas.
                ``(777) Kingsville, texas.--$19,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
            the city of Kingsville, Texas.
                ``(778) Laredo, texas.--$25,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, storage,
            distribution systems, environmental restoration, and stormwater
            management, in the city of Laredo, Texas.
                ``(779) Mercedes, texas.--$10,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and reuse
            systems, in the city of Mercedes, Texas.
                ``(780) Midland county, texas.--$25,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply, in Midland County,
            Texas.
                ``(781) Odessa, texas.--$25,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and storage,
            in the city of Odessa, Texas.
                ``(782) Port of brownsville, texas.--$18,700,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply and water reuse systems,
            in the Port of Brownsville, Texas.
                ``(783) Starr county, texas.--$7,500,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and
            distribution systems, in Starr County, Texas.
                ``(784) Centerville, utah.--$20,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and
            distribution systems, in the city of Centerville, Utah.
                ``(785) Ephraim, utah.--$20,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply, in the city of Ephraim,
            Utah.
                ``(786) Fairfax and prince william counties, virginia.--
            $20,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including
            stormwater management and water reclamation infrastructure, in
            Fairfax and Prince William Counties, Virginia.
                ``(787) Henrico county, virginia.--$25,000,000 for water
            infrastructure, including water supply and distribution
            systems, in Henrico County, Virginia.
                ``(788) Orange county, virginia.--$50,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and
            distribution systems, in Orange County, Virginia.
                ``(789) Arlington, washington.--$50,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the city
            of Arlington, Washington.
                ``(790) Moses lake, washington.--$50,000,000 for water and
            wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and
            distribution systems, in the city of Moses Lake, Washington.''.
        (c) Modifications.--
                (1) Flagstaff, arizona.--Section 219(f)(407) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 138 Stat. 3116) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$13,888,889''.
                (2) Tucson, arizona.--Section 219(f)(412) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 138 Stat. 3116) is amended by striking ``$30,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$57,013,889''.
                (3) Winslow, arizona.--Section 219(f)(413) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 138 Stat. 3116) is amended by striking ``$3,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$9,000,000''.
                (4) Alameda county, california.--Section 219(f)(278) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 136 Stat. 3808) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$116,000,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``including water supply,'' after
                    ``infrastructure,''.
                (5) Alameda and contra costa counties, california.--Section
            219(f)(80) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106
            Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1258; 138 Stat. 3127) is
            amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$45,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$51,000,000'';
                        (B) by inserting ``water and wastewater
                    infrastructure, including stormwater management, and''
                    after ``for''; and
                        (C) by striking ``within the East Bay Municipal
                    Utility District service area,'' and inserting ``in''.
                (6) Calaveras county, california.--Section 219(f)(86) of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835;
            113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1259; 136 Stat. 3816; 138 Stat. 3127)
            is amended by striking ``$16,300,000'' and inserting
            ``$27,000,000''.
                (7) Cambria, california.--Section 219(f)(48)(A) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 114 Stat. 2763A-220; 121 Stat. 1208) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$10,300,000'' and inserting
                    ``$17,800,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``water and wastewater
                    infrastructure,'' before ``desalination''.
                (8) Colton, california.--Section 219(f)(424) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335;) is amended by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting
            ``$40,000,000''.
                (9) East palo alto, california.--Section 219(f)(89) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1259) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$4,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$37,000,000''; and
                        (B) by striking ``a new pump station and stormwater
                    management and drainage system'' and inserting ``water
                    and wastewater infrastructure, including water storage,
                    water supply, and stormwater management''.
                (10) East san fernando valley, california.--Section
            219(f)(425) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106
            Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3117) is amended by
            striking ``$50,000,000'' and inserting ``$72,000,000''.
                (11) Fontana, california.--Section 219(f)(286) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 136 Stat. 3809) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``16,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$56,000,000''; and
                        (B) by striking ``stormwater management
                    infrastructure'' and inserting ``wastewater
                    infrastructure, including stormwater management, and
                    water supply and distribution systems''.
                (12) Inland empire, california.--Section 219(f)(288) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 336; 136 Stat. 3809) is amended by striking
            ``$60,000,000'' and inserting ``$65,000,000''.
                (13) Lake county, california.--Section 219(f)(432) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3117) is amended by striking
            ``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$30,000,000''.
                (14) Los angeles county, california.--Section 8319(e)(1) of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3784,
            138 Stat. 3128) is amended by striking ``$100,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$200,000,000''.
                (15) Los olivos, california.--Section 219(f)(440) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3117) is amended by striking
            ``$4,000,000'' and inserting ``$30,000,000''.
                (16) Orange county, california.--Section 219(f)(98) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1259) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$18,000,000'';
                        (B) by inserting ``and environmental restoration''
                    after ``water related infrastructure''; and
                        (C) by inserting ``including water supply,'' before
                    ``Anaheim''.
                (17) Perris, california.--Section 219(f)(100) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 121 Stat. 1260) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$3,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$28,000,000''; and
                        (B) by striking ``recycled water transmission
                    infrastructure'' and inserting ``water and wastewater
                    infrastructure, including stormwater management and
                    recycled water''.
                (18) Salinas, california.--Section 219(f)(450) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 138 Stat. 3118) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$25,000,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``and stormwater management''
                    after ``water supply''.
                (19) San bernardino county, california.--Section
            219(f)(101), Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat.
            4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1260; 138 Stat. 3128) is
            amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$24,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$84,000,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``including water supply and
                    stormwater management,'' after ``infrastructure,''.
                (20) San diego county, california.--Section 219(f)(453) of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835;
            113 Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3118) is amended by striking
            ``$200,000,000'' and inserting ``$211,500,000''.
                (21) Santa monica, california.--Section 219(f)(103) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1260) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$3,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$15,000,000''; and
                        (B) by striking ``improving'' and inserting ``water
                    and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater
                    management and improvements to''.
                (22) South gate, california.--Section 219(f)(454) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3118) is amended by striking
            ``$5,000,000'' and inserting ``$6,000,000''.
                (23) Torrance, california.--Section 219(f)(307) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 136 Stat. 3810) is amended by striking
            ``$100,000,000'' and inserting ``$133,000,000''.
                (24) Washington, district of columbia.--Section 219(f)(316)
            of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835;
            113 Stat. 335; 136 Stat. 3810) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$201,000,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``distribution systems'' after
                    ``stormwater management''.
                (25) Deltona, florida.--Section 219(f)(470) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 138 Stat. 3119) is amended by striking ``$31,200,000'' and
            inserting ``$50,000,000''.
                (26) Marion county, florida.--Section 219(f)(472) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3119) is amended by striking
            ``$10,000,000'' and inserting ``$20,500,000''.
                (27) Orange county, florida.--Section 219(f)(321) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 136 Stat. 3810) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$50,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$125,000,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``, stormwater management,'' after
                    ``reclamation''.
                (28) Oviedo, florida.--Section 219(f)(473) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 138 Stat. 3119) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$15,000,000''.
                (29) Sarasota county, florida.--Section 219(f)(126) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1261) is amended by striking
            ``$10,000,000'' and inserting ``$50,000,000''.
                (30) Georgia.--Section 219(f)(322) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 136
            Stat. 3811) is amended by striking ``$75,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$125,000,000''.
                (31) Atlanta, georgia.--Section 219 of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113
            Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3817; 138 Stat. 3129) is amended--
                        (A) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ``A
                    combined'' and inserting ``Water and wastewater
                    infrastructure, including stormwater management and a
                    combined''; and
                        (B) in subsection (e)(5), by striking
                    ``$100,000,000'' and inserting ``$142,000,000''.
                (32) East point, georgia.--Section 219(f)(136) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 121 Stat. 1261; 136 Stat. 3817; 138 Stat. 3129) is
            amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$24,000,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``, water supply,'' after
                    ``stormwater management''.
                (33) Guam.--Section 219(f)(323) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 136
            Stat. 3811; 138 Stat. 3129) is amended by striking
            ``$35,000,000'' and inserting ``$45,000,000''.
                (34) Cook county and lake county, illinois.--Section
            219(f)(54) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106
            Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 114 Stat. 2763A-221; 138 Stat. 3129)
            is amended by striking ``$149,000,000'' and inserting
            ``249,000,000''.
                (35) Rockford, illinois.--Section 219(f)(488) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 138 Stat. 3120) is amended by striking ``$4,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$7,000,000''.
                (36) Maryland.--Section 219(f)(341), of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 136
            Stat. 3812) is amended by striking ``$100,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$225,000,000''.
                (37) Haverhill, massachusetts.--Section 219(f)(337) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 136 Stat. 3812; 138 Stat. 3130) is amended by
            striking ``$30,000,000'' and inserting ``$40,000,000''.
                (38) Lowell, massachusetts.--Section 219(f)(339) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 136 Stat. 3812; 138 Stat. 3130) is amended by
            striking ``$30,000,000'' and inserting ``$40,000,000''.
                (39) Michigan.--Section 219(f)(157) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121
            Stat. 1262; 136 Stat. 3818; 138 Stat. 3130) is amended--
                        (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking
                    ``$160,000,000'' and inserting ``$225,000,000''; and
                        (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``(including
                    stormwater management)'' after ``wastewater treatment
                    and related facilities''.
                (40) Southeast michigan.--Section 219(f)(500) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 138 Stat. 3121) is amended by striking ``$58,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$93,000,000''.
                (41) Northeastern minnesota.--Section 569 of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368; 136 Stat.
            3820) is amended--
                        (A) in subsection (a), by inserting ``Lake of the
                    Woods,'' after ``Lake,''; and
                        (B) in subsection (h), by striking ``$80,000,000''
                    and inserting ``$120,000,000''.
                (42) Biloxi, mississippi.--Section 219(f)(163) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 121 Stat. 1263; 138 Stat. 3130) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$48,000,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``including stormwater management
                    and water supply,'' after ``infrastructure,''.
                (43) Desoto county, mississippi.--Section 219(f)(30) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 114 Stat. 2763A-220; 119 Stat. 282; 119 Stat. 2257;
            122 Stat. 1623; 134 Stat. 2718; 138 Stat. 3130) is amended by
            striking ``$170,000,000'' and inserting ``$175,000,000''.
                (44) Diamondhead, mississippi.--Section 219(f)(505) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3121) is amended by striking
            ``$7,000,000'' and inserting ``$10,000,000''.
                (45) Harrison county, mississippi.--Section 219(f)(166) of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835;
            113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1263) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$8,000,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``including stormwater management,
                    drainage systems, and surface water protection,'' after
                    ``infrastructure,''.
                (46) Jackson, mississippi.--Section 219(f)(167) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1263; 138 Stat. 3131) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$139,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$154,000,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``water supply, stormwater
                    management, and'' after ``including''.
                (47) Meridian, mississippi.--Section 219(f)(352) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 136 Stat. 3813) is amended by striking
            ``$26,000,000'' and inserting ``$50,000,000''.
                (48) Olive branch, mississippi.--Section 219(f)(510) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3122) is amended by striking
            ``$10,000,000'' and inserting ``$20,000,000''.
                (49) Oxford, mississippi.--Section 219(f)(353), Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 136 Stat. 3813) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$25,000,000''.
                (50) Pearl, mississippi.--Section 219(f)(511) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 138 Stat. 3122) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$7,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$14,000,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``water supply, water storage,''
                    after ``systems,''.
                (51) Picayune, mississippi.--Section 219(f)(512) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3122) is amended by striking
            ``$5,000,000'' and inserting ``$8,000,000''.
                (52) Starkville, mississippi.--Section 219(f)(513) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3122) is amended by striking
            ``$6,000,000'' and inserting ``$10,000,000''.
                (53) Lake tahoe basin restoration, nevada and california.--
            Section 108(c) of division C of the Consolidated Appropriations
            Act, 2005 (118 Stat. 2942; 136 Stat. 3820) is amended--
                        (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'';
                        (B) in paragraph (4), by striking the period and
                    inserting ``; and''; and
                        (C) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(5) aquatic invasive species identification, containment,
            mitigation, and eradication.''.
                (54) Essex and sussex counties, new jersey.--Section
            219(f)(358) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106
            Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 136 Stat. 3813) is amended by
            striking ``$60,000,000'' and inserting ``$85,000,000''.
                (55) Morris county, new jersey.--Section 219(f)(363) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 136 Stat. 3813) is amended by striking
            ``$30,000,000'' and inserting ``$55,000,000''.
                (56) New hampshire.--Section 219(f)(518) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 138 Stat. 3122) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$106,000,000''; and
                        (B) by striking ``including water and wastewater
                    infrastructure'' and inserting ``including water and
                    wastewater infrastructure (including water supply and
                    stormwater management), environmental restoration,
                    drought resiliency, and surface water protection''.
                (57) Farmington, new mexico.--Section 219(f)(372) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 136 Stat. 3814) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$15,500,000'' and inserting
                    ``$17,500,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``and stormwater management''
                    after ``supply''.
                (58) Dutchess county, new york.--Section 219(f)(530) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1258; 136 Stat. 3808; 138 Stat. 3123) is
            amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting
            ``$15,000,000''.
                (59) Kiryas joel, new york.--Section 219(f)(184) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1264; 138 Stat. 3131) is amended by
            striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting ``30,000,000''.
                (60) Newtown creek, new york.--Section 219(f)(535) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3123) is amended by striking
            ``$25,000,000'' and inserting ``$75,000,000''.
                (61) Orange county, new york.--Section 219(f)(537) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3123) is amended by striking
            ``$10,000,000'' and inserting ``$15,000,000''.
                (62) Queens, new york.--Section 219(f)(377) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 136 Stat. 3814; 138 Stat. 3131) is amended by striking
            ``$190,000,000'' and inserting ``$261,000,000''.
                (63) Ulster county, new york.--Section 219(f)(539) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3123) is amended by striking
            ``$10,000,000'' and inserting ``$15,000,000''.
                (64) Mooresville, north carolina.--Section 219(f)(195) of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835;
            113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1264) is amended by striking
            ``$4,000,000'' and inserting ``$20,000,000''.
                (65) Kelleys island, ohio.--Section 219(f)(558) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3125) is amended by striking
            ``$1,000,000'' and inserting ``$16,500,000''.
                (66) Stark county, ohio.--Section 219(f)(563) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 138 Stat. 3125) is amended by striking ``$24,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$49,000,000''.
                (67) Summit county, ohio.--Section 219(f)(562) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 138 Stat. 3125) is amended by striking ``$25,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$50,000,000''.
                (68) Toledo and oregon, ohio.--Section 219(f)(565) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3125) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$10,500,000'' and inserting
                    ``$45,000,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``, including stormwater
                    management, water supply, and environmental
                    restoration,'' after ``wastewater infrastructure''.
                (69) Midwest city, oklahoma.--Section 219(f)(231) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1266; 134 Stat. 2719; 138 Stat. 3132) is
            amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$20,000,000''; and
                        (B) by striking ``improvements to water related
                    infrastructure'' and inserting ``water and wastewater
                    infrastructure, including water supply''.
                (70) Pennsylvania environmental infrastructure.--Section
            1349(e)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138
            Stat. 3159) is amended by striking ``$25,000,000'' and
            inserting ``75,000,000''.
                (71) Chester county, pennsylvania.--Section 219(f)(574) of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835;
            113 Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3125) is amended by striking
            ``$7,000,000'' and inserting ``$20,500,000''.
                (72) Philadelphia, pennsylvania.--Section 219(f)(243) of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835;
            113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1266; 138 Stat. 3132) is amended by
            striking ``$3,000,000'' and inserting ``$53,000,000''.
                (73) South central pennsylvania.--Section 313(g)(1) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4845; 109
            Stat. 407; 110 Stat. 3723; 113 Stat. 310; 121 Stat. 1146; 134
            Stat. 2719; 136 Stat. 3821) is amended by striking
            ``$410,000,000'' and inserting ``$415,000,000''.
                (74) Southeastern pennsylvania and delaware river basin.--
            Section 566 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110
            Stat. 3786; 113 Stat. 352; 136 Stat. 3821) is amended--
                        (A) by striking the section heading and inserting
                    ``southeastern pennsylvania and delaware river
                    basin.'';
                        (B) in subsection (a), by striking ``Lower'';
                        (C) in subsection (b), by striking ``Lower'';
                        (D) by amending subsection (g) to read as follows:
        ``(g) Areas Defined.--In this section:
                ``(1) Delaware river basin.--The term `Delaware River
            Basin' means the Schuylkill Valley, Upper Estuary, Lower
            Estuary, and Delaware Bay Watersheds and the East Branch
            Delaware, Lackawaxen, Lehigh, Middle Delaware-Mongaup-Brodhead,
            Middle Delaware-Musconetcong, and Upper Delaware subwatersheds
            of the Delaware River Basin in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
            and the States of New Jersey, New York, and Delaware.
                ``(2) Southeastern pennsylvania.--The term `southeastern
            Pennsylvania' means Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and
            Montgomery Counties, Pennsylvania.''; and
                        (E) in subsection (h)--
                                (i) by striking ``Lower''; and
                                (ii) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and
                            inserting ``$92,690,000''.
                (75) Commonwealth of puerto rico.--Section 219(f)(246) of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835;
            113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$35,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$75,000,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``, including stormwater
                    management, surface water protection, and environmental
                    restoration,'' after ``infrastructure''.
                (76) Beaufort, south carolina.--Section 219(f)(390) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 136 Stat. 3815) is amended by striking
            ``$7,462,000'' and inserting ``$13,462,000''.
                (77) Florence county, south carolina.--Section 219(f)(580)
            of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835;
            113 Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3126) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$40,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$75,000,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``, including water supply,''
                    after ``infrastructure''.
                (78) Lakes marion and moultrie, south carolina.--Section
            219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106
            Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 114 Stat. 2763A-220; 117 Stat. 1838;
            130 Stat. 1677; 132 Stat. 3818; 134 Stat. 2719; 136 Stat. 3818;
            138 Stat. 3132) is amended by striking ``$235,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$295,000,000''.
                (79) Tipton county, tennessee.--Section 219(f)(582) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3126) is amended by striking
            ``$35,000,000'' and inserting ``$85,000,000''.
                (80) Tipton, haywood, and fayette counties, tennessee.--
            Section 219(f)(583) of the Water Resources Development Act of
            1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3126) is amended
            by striking ``$50,000,000'' and inserting ``$100,000,000''.
                (81) Portland, tennessee.--Section 219(f)(394) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 136 Stat. 3815) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$1,850,000'' and inserting
                    ``$19,850,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``and stormwater management''
                    after ``water supply''.
                (82) Amarillo, texas.--Section 219(f)(585) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 138 Stat. 3126) is amended by striking ``$38,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$56,000,000''.
                (83) Brownsville, texas.--Section 219(f)(586) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
            335; 138 Stat. 3126) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$40,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$42,300,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``including regional water and
                    water reuse infrastructure,'' after
                    ``infrastructure,''.
                (84) Zapata county, texas.--Section 219(f)(591) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 138 Stat. 3126) is amended--
                        (A) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$30,000,000''; and
                        (B) by inserting ``and distribution systems'' after
                    ``water supply''.
                (85) Port angeles, washington.--Section 219(f)(402) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113
            Stat. 335; 136 Stat. 3815) is amended by striking
            ``$7,500,000'' and inserting ``$12,000,000''.
                (86) Western rural water.--Section 595 of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 383; 117 Stat.
            139; 117 Stat. 142; 117 Stat. 1836; 118 Stat. 440; 121 Stat.
            1219; 123 Stat. 2851; 128 Stat. 1316; 130 Stat. 1681; 134 Stat.
            2719; 136 Stat. 3822; 138 Stat. 3133) is amended--
                        (A) in subsection (b), by inserting ``Colorado,''
                    before ``rural Idaho'';
                        (B) in subsection (c), by inserting ``Colorado,''
                    before ``Idaho''; and
                        (C) in subsection (i)--
                                (i) in paragraph (1)--
                                        (I) by striking ``$850,000,000''
                                    and inserting ``$890,000,000''; and
                                        (II) by striking ``and'' at the
                                    end; and
                                (ii) in paragraph (2)--
                                        (I) by striking ``$250,000,000''
                                    and inserting ``$351,598,000'';
                                        (II) by striking the period at the
                                    end and inserting ``; and''; and
                                        (III) by adding at the end the
                                    following:
                ``(3) $150,000,000 for Colorado.''.

    SEC. 308. FORECAST-INFORMED RESERVOIR OPERATIONS.

        (a) In General.--In carrying out the assessment required under
    section 1162(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (33
    U.S.C. 2319 note), the Secretary shall include an assessment of New
    Hogan Dam and Lake, Calaveras River, California, authorized pursuant to
    the section 10 of December 22, 1944 (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 902), and
    Shasta Dam and Lake, Sacramento River, California, authorized pursuant
    to section 2 of the Act of August 26, 1937 (chapter 832, 50 Stat. 850;
    54 Stat. 1199).
        (b) Additional Utilization.--Section 1222(c) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3811; 134 Stat. 2661; 136 Stat.
    3777) is amended--
                (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and the Apalachicola
            Chattahoochee Flint River Basin'' and inserting ``the
            Apalachicola Chattahoochee Flint River Basin, and the Pend
            Oreille River Basin''; and
                (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``or the Apalachicola
            Chattahoochee Flint River Basin'' and inserting ``the
            Apalachicola Chattahoochee Flint River Basin, or the Pend
            Oreille River Basin'' each place it appears.

    SEC. 309. FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES.

        (a) Eligibility.--Section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33
    U.S.C. 709a) is amended--
                (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``and to provide
            advice'' and inserting ``to support State efforts to establish
            and implement integrated floodplain management programs that
            both reduce flood risk and protect and restore floodplain
            functions; and to provide advice''; and
                (2) in subsection (e), by striking ``The Secretary of the
            Army is authorized to expend not to exceed'' and inserting
            ``Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be
            appropriated''.
        (b) Prioritizing Flood Risk Resiliency Technical Assistance.--
    Section 111(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33
    U.S.C. 709a note) is amended by striking ``or communities'' and
    inserting ``, rural communities, or communities''.

    SEC. 310. PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES.

        Section 22(a)(2)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974
    (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16(a)(2)(B)) is amended to read as follows:
                        ``(B) Types of assistance.--Technical assistance
                    under this paragraph may include--
                                ``(i) provision and integration of
                            hydrologic, economic, and environmental data
                            and analyses;
                                ``(ii) assessment of the structural
                            integrity of a water resources development
                            project;
                                ``(iii) development of integrated
                            floodplain management programs that both reduce
                            flood risk and protect and restore floodplain
                            functions; and
                                ``(iv) title research for abandoned
                            structures.''.

    SEC. 311. MENDENHALL GLACIER OUTBURST FLOODING, ALASKA.

        The Secretary shall--
                (1) expedite the completion of the Mendenhall Glacier
            outburst flooding technical report, authorized pursuant to
            section 8315 of the Water Resource Development Act of 2022 (136
            Stat. 3783; 138 Stat. 3147); and
                (2) develop a recommendation that provides permanent and
            resilient flood control mitigation for glacial lake outburst
            floods that emanate from Suicide Basin and Lake Mendenhall and
            that affect Juneau, Alaska.

    SEC. 312. HANSEN DAM, LOS ANGELES-SAN GABRIEL RIVER BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

        In evaluating and implementing the water control manual for the
    Hansen Dam project, Los Angeles-San Gabriel River Basin and Ballona
    Creek, California, authorized by section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936
    (chapter 688, 49 Stat. 1589; 55 Stat. 647), the Secretary shall--
                (1) coordinate with the City of Los Angeles to identify new
            or expanded recreational opportunities on lands that are leased
            or could be leased by the City for recreation;
                (2) undertake necessary background studies to support the
            authorized purposes of the project, including recreation; and
                (3) ensure that the water quality parameters for the
            project are sufficient to meet authorized project purposes.

    SEC. 313. MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA.

        In carrying out operations and maintenance activities for the
    project for harbor development, Morro Bay, California, authorized by
    section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (chapter 19, 59 Stat. 21), the
    Secretary shall carry out any necessary repair or maintenance
    activities on a breakwater, revetment, or seawall constructed as part
    of the project in such a manner as to ensure each such activity is
    sufficient to meet the authorized purpose of the project.

    SEC. 314. OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA.

        In carrying out the study for the project for shoreline protection,
    Oceanside, California, authorized pursuant to section 414 of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2636; 121 Stat. 1176; 134
    Stat. 2672; 138 Stat. 3077), the Secretary shall coordinate with the
    city of Oceanside, California, on the development of a recommendation
    that--
                (1) is feasible;
                (2) maximizes the use of natural features and nature-based
            features (as those terms are defined in section 1184(a) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a(a)));
                (3) utilizes updated sediment sampling and analysis; and
                (4) is acceptable to the city of Oceanside.

    SEC. 315. PAJARO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

        At the request of the non-Federal interest, the Secretary is
    authorized to acquire any interest in real property required for the
    project for flood protection on the Pajaro River, California,
    authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 Stat.
    1421), in fee simple title.

    SEC. 316. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, COLORADO, NEW
                  MEXICO, AND TEXAS.

        Section 5056 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121
    Stat. 1213) is amended--
                (1) in subsection (b)(1)(A), by striking all that follows
            ``construction'' and inserting ``and design of water resource
            protection and restoration projects; and'';
                (2) by striking subsection (b)(2) and inserting:
                ``(2) Use of existing information.--In carrying out the
            program authorized by paragraph (1)(A), the Secretary shall
            consider data and analyses developed under paragraph (1)(B) and
            any relevant Federal, State, and local water resource planning
            efforts in the Rio Grande Basin.
                ``(3) Projects.--In carrying out the program authorized by
            paragraph (1)(A), the Secretary shall include projects for--
                        ``(A) drought, wildfire, flooding, and other
                    natural disaster resiliency mitigation, including
                    through the use of measures utilizing a natural feature
                    or nature-based feature (as those terms are defined in
                    section 1184(a) of the Water Resources Development Act
                    of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a));
                        ``(B) the protection and restoration of fish and
                    wildlife habitat;
                        ``(C) addressing the impacts of excess
                    sedimentation and salinity on surface and groundwater
                    availability;
                        ``(D) improvements or rehabilitation of water-
                    resources related infrastructure;
                        ``(E) the prevention and control of the spread of
                    aquatic invasive species; and
                        ``(F) other water resource protection and
                    restoration activities determined appropriate by the
                    Secretary.'';
                (3) in subsection (f), by striking ``$15,000,000 for each
            of fiscal years 2008 through 2029'' and inserting ``$20,000,000
            for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030''; and
                (4) by inserting at the end the following:
        ``(g) Reports.--Not later than December 31, 2027, and every 5 years
    thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that--
                ``(1) contains an evaluation of the program carried out
            under subsection (b)(1)(A), including a description of all
            projects carried out under such program;
                ``(2) contains a description of future projects planned to
            be carried out under such program;
                ``(3) provides updates of a systemic habitat needs
            assessment and an assessment of needs for other related
            purposes in the Rio Grande Basin, including flood damage
            reduction, wildfire risk mitigation, and drought mitigation;
            and
                ``(4) identifies any needed adjustments in the
            authorization of such program.''.

    SEC. 317. MIAMI HARBOR, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.

        (a) In General.--In accordance with the Act of October 15, 1940 (33
    U.S.C. 701h-1), the Secretary shall repay the non-Federal interest for
    the Federal share of any advanced funds contributed by the non-Federal
    interest for the project for navigation, Miami Harbor, Miami-Dade
    County, Florida, authorized by section 1001(17) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1052).
        (b) Application of Corps Policy.--In providing the repayment
    required under subsection (a), the Secretary may not require a new
    start determination for a project before providing such repayment.

    SEC. 318. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LOUISIANA.

        In carrying out the project for ecosystem restoration, Mississippi
    River-Gulf Outlet, Louisiana, authorized by section 7013(a)(4) of the
    Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1281),
    notwithstanding any requirement of the plan described in such section
    that the non-Federal interest provide land for the project in fee in
    order to satisfy the property rights requirements of the project, the
    Secretary shall, where feasible, allow the non-Federal interest to
    provide easements on the land for the project in order to satisfy such
    property rights requirements.

    SEC. 319. PILOTTOWN ANCHORAGE AREA, LOUISIANA.

        Pursuant to section 106 of the Water Resources Development Act of
    2020 (33 U.S.C. 635), the Secretary is authorized to operate and
    maintain, at Federal expense, the Pilottown anchorage area, Mississippi
    River above Head of Passes, Louisiana, extending from River Mile 6.7
    above Head of Passes to Mile 1.5 above Head of Passes established by
    the United States Coast Guard.

    SEC. 320. JACK HUBBARD MEMORIAL BREAKWATER, BURT TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN.

        (a) Designation.--The breakwater at the Grand Marais Harbor,
    Michigan, authorized pursuant to section 1 of the Act of June 14, 1880
    (chapter 211, 21 Stat. 190; 64 Stat. 166), shall hereafter be known and
    designated as the ``Jack Hubbard Memorial Breakwater''.
        (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
    paper, or other record of the United States to the breakwater referred
    to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Jack
    Hubbard Memorial Breakwater.

    SEC. 321. SARDIS LAKE, PANOLA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

        Section 8377(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (136
    Stat. 3824) is amended--
                (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``The Secretary is
            authorized to'' and inserting ``Not later than 180 days after
            the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of
            2026, the Secretary shall''; and
                (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ``subsection such
            easements'' and inserting ``subsection the minimum easements''.

    SEC. 322. HYDRAULIC EVALUATION OF UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER.

        Section 8219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (33
    U.S.C. 652 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:
        ``(e) Coordination With Upper Mississippi River System Flood Risk
    and Resiliency Study.--The Federal Emergency Management Agency may only
    use information developed under subsection (a) with respect to any area
    of the Upper Mississippi River in accordance with a congressionally
    authorized project described in a final report of the Chief of
    Engineers for a study conducted with respect to such area under section
    1227 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3084)
    (including any study described in subsection (d)(2) of such
    section).''.

    SEC. 323. LOWER MISSOURI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD PROTECTION.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a project for flood
    risk management in the Lower Missouri River, as identified in the
    System Plan, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
        (b) Eligible Activities.--
                (1) Projects included in system plan.--For any project
            identified in the System Plan as a System Plan component, the
            Secretary may carry out flood risk management measures for such
            project in accordance with the design criteria and guidelines
            of the System Plan.
                (2) Compatible measures.--The Secretary may include in a
            flood risk management project authorized under this section
            compatible measures for environmental improvements and
            recreation, if the Secretary determines the compatible measures
            are--
                        (A) feasible;
                        (B) consistent with System Plan recommendations;
                        (C) beneficial to the community;
                        (D) not detrimental to flood protection; and
                        (E) supported by State and local partners.
        (c) Spinoff Studies.--Any project or spinoff studies identified in
    the System Plan may be considered a continuation of the Lower Missouri
    Basin study and studied and designed in accordance with section 216(a)
    of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2681).
        (d) Coordination.--The Secretary shall coordinate activities
    carried out pursuant to this section with other activities carried out
    by the Secretary in the Missouri River Basin.
        (e) System Plan Update.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to update the
            System Plan, as necessary and in accordance with section 216 of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2681),
            as additional data is developed, and projects are implemented
            pursuant to this section.
                (2) Projects not included in system plan.--For any project
            not identified in the System Plan as a System Plan component,
            the Secretary is authorized to study such project and, if the
            Secretary determines that such project is feasible and
            consistent with the flood risk management measures identified
            in the feasibility report for such study and the goals
            identified in the System Plan, the Secretary shall update the
            System Plan pursuant to paragraph (1) so that the System Plan
            includes such project.
        (f) Cost Limitation.--
                (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the
            Secretary may not expend more than $60,000,000 in Federal funds
            for a single project carried out under this section in the
            State of Missouri.
                (2) Exception.--With respect to a project under this
            section in the State of Missouri for which the Federal share of
            costs is expected to exceed $60,000,000 or a project within the
            scope of the Lower Missouri Basin study, the Secretary may
            carry out the project if--
                        (A) the Secretary submits to the Committee on
                    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
                    Representatives and the Committee on Environment and
                    Public Works of the Senate the determination that the
                    project is feasible; and
                        (B) construction of the project, to be carried out
                    substantially in accordance with the System Plan and
                    subject to the conditions described in such
                    determination, is specifically authorized by Congress.
        (g) Limitation for Incomplete or Deferred Maintenance or Upkeep.--
    The Secretary may not carry out a project under this section to address
    deferred, or incomplete, maintenance or upkeep of such project, except
    if such maintenance or upkeep is--
                (1) attributable to changed conditions or design standards;
            and
                (2) in compliance with such project with respect to which
            the Secretary is authorized to provide assistance under section
            5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).
        (h) Definitions.--In this section:
                (1) Lower missouri basin study.--The term ``Lower Missouri
            Basin study'' has the meaning given such term in section
            216(a)(10) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134
            Stat. 2681).
                (2) System plan.--The term ``System Plan'' means the Lower
            Missouri Flood Risk and Resiliency System Plan prepared
            pursuant to section 216(a) of the Water Resources Development
            Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2681).

    SEC. 324. MISSOURI RIVER RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE.

        Section 5018 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121
    Stat. 1199) is amended--
                (1) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following:
                ``(6) Chair.--The Chair of the Committee shall be elected
            by the members of the Committee.''; and
                (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``The Federal Advisory
            Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.)'' and inserting ``Chapter 10 of
            title 5, United States Code,''.

    SEC. 325. GREAT LAKES COMMISSION.

        There is authorized to be appropriated to the Executive Director of
    the Great Lakes Commission established under Article IV of the Great
    Lakes Basin Compact (82 Stat. 414) to support water resources
    development efforts related to the execution of the Compact, and
    carried out in collaboration with the Secretary, $5,000,000 for each of
    fiscal years 2027 through 2030.

    SEC. 326. GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

        Section 506 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (42
    U.S.C. 1962d-22) is amended by adding at the end the following:
        ``(g) Limitation.--The total Federal amount expended for a project
    carried out under this section shall be not more than $20,000,000.''.

    SEC. 327. TRUCKEE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NEVADA.

        Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the features within
    the State of Nevada of the project for flood protection on Truckee
    River and tributaries, California and Nevada, authorized by section 203
    of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat.1264), are no longer
    authorized.

    SEC. 328. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS, NEW MEXICO.

        Section 3117 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121
    Stat. 1137) is amended by striking ``to assist in carrying out any
    operation or maintenance activity associated with the flood control
    project'' and inserting ``to assist in carrying out any operation,
    maintenance, recreational management, or related stewardship activities
    associated with the flood control project, including activities that
    improve recreational access, visitor use management, public safety, or
    natural and cultural resources stewardship''.

    SEC. 329. KINZUA DAM SAFETY MODIFICATION STUDY, ALLEGHENY RIVER, NEW
                  YORK AND PENNSYLVANIA.

        (a) In General.--In carrying out the dam safety modification study
    pursuant to section 8 of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C.
    467f) for the project for the Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, New
    York and Pennsylvania, authorized pursuant to section 5 of the Act of
    June 22, 1936 (chapter 688, 49 Stat. 1586; 52 Stat. 1217), the
    Secretary shall identify any real property associated with such project
    that the Secretary determines is not needed to carry out the authorized
    purposes of the project.
        (b) Conveyance Authorized.--Upon completion of the dam safety
    modification study described in subsection (a), the Secretary may
    convey, without consideration, to the Seneca Nation of Indians, all
    right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real
    property identified as excess under such subsection.
        (c) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the property
    conveyed under this section is not used for a public purpose, all
    right, title, and interest in and to the property shall revert, at the
    discretion of the Secretary, to the United States.

    SEC. 330. SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA.

        The project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Surf
    City and North Topsail Beach, North Carolina, authorized by section
    7002(3) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (128
    Stat. 1367) is modified to deauthorize the portion of the project known
    as North Topsail Beach, in accordance with the Supplemental Report of
    the Chief of Engineers dated December 9, 2025.

    SEC. 331. MASSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, TUSCARAWAS RIVER, OHIO.

        Pursuant to section 133 of the Water Resources Development Act of
    2020 (33 U.S.C. 2327a), the Secretary shall carry out rehabilitation
    efforts at the sluice gates of the Massillon Local Protection Project,
    Tuscarawas River, Ohio, authorized by section 6 of the Act of June 22,
    1936 (chapter 688, 49 Stat. 1592; 50 Stat. 879).

    SEC. 332. TOUSSAINT RIVER FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT, CARROLL TOWNSHIP,
                  OHIO.

        The cost share for operation and maintenance activities for the
    Toussaint River Federal navigation project, Carroll Township, Ohio,
    authorized pursuant to section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960
    (33 U.S.C. 577), shall be in accordance with the cost share described
    in section 101(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
    U.S.C. 2211(b)(1)).

    SEC. 333. RIO PUERTO NUEVO FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT, SAN JUAN,
                  PUERTO RICO.

        (a) In General.--In carrying out the project for flood control, Rio
    Puerto Nuevo, Puerto Rico, authorized by section 204(b) of the Flood
    Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1828; 100 Stat. 4127; 132 Stat. 76), the
    Secretary shall conduct a general reevaluation report to reconsider
    natural and nature-based approaches to flood control as alternatives to
    the construction of each project element described in subsection (b).
        (b) Project Elements Defined.--For purposes of subsection (a), the
    project elements to be reconsidered are--
                (1) Contract No. 4 for the Central Rio Piedras and Las
            Americas Bridges;
                (2) Contract No. 5A for the Notre Dame Bridge;
                (3) Contract No. 6A for the Upper Rio Piedras;
                (4) Contract No. 6B for Quebrada Buena Vista;
                (5) Contract No. 7B for Quebradas Dona Ana and Contract No.
            7A and 7C for Quebradas Josefina; and
                (6) Contract No. 5B for the West Pinero Avenue Bridge.
        (c) Inclusions in General Reevaluation Report.--In conducting the
    reevaluation report under subsection (a) the Secretary shall include in
    such report the following data and analyses, updated to reflect
    conditions as of the date of enactment of this Act:
                (1) Hydrologic and hydraulic data.
                (2) A review of local acceptability and economic conditions
            in the project area.
                (3) Any real estate costs analysis.
                (4) Cost apportionment analysis, including in such updated
            analysis a detailed description of projected operation and
            maintenance responsibilities associated with the completed
            project and the estimated cost to complete the project.
        (d) Consideration; Consultation.--In reevaluating the project
    elements under subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
                (1) consider the use of natural and nature-based features;
                (2) consult with the heads of applicable Federal agencies,
            agencies of Puerto Rico, and community stakeholders within the
            geographic scope of the project;
                (3) validate any findings through an external review
            process that is independent and outside of the Corps of
            Engineers; and
                (4) develop a process for public participation through
            which the Secretary shall--
                        (A) regularly publish any findings; and
                        (B) hold public hearings and regular consultation
                    meetings to give ample opportunity for public comment
                    on the findings.
        (e) Interim Progress Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date
    of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to the Committee
    on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives
    and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate an
    interim status report with respect to the reevaluation report required
    under subsection (a), and include in such interim status report--
                (1) any conclusions and recommendations made, and
            activities carried out, pursuant to subsection (a);
                (2) identification of any additional, site-specific areas
            within the geographic scope of the project for which the
            Secretary recommends any additional reevaluation; and
                (3) any interim actions taken by the Secretary to reduce
            comprehensive flood risk within the geographic scope of the
            project while carrying out the reevaluations under subsection
            (a), including if applicable, the cost of each such action.
        (f) Expedited Consideration.--The Secretary shall expedite the
    completion of each reevaluation of a project element under subsection
    (a).

    SEC. 334. BUFFALO BAYOU TRIBUTARIES AND RESILIENCY STUDY, TEXAS.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite completion of the
    Buffalo Bayou Tributaries and Resiliency Study, Texas, carried out
    pursuant to title IV of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (132 Stat.
    76; 138 Stat. 3082), any review required under the National
    Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) as part of
    the study, and the report of the Chief of Engineers for the study.
        (b) Reports.--The report of the Chief of Engineers for the study
    described in subsection (a) shall contain recommendations for carrying
    out a comprehensive project as described in subsection (c), and is not
    required to include further evaluation of alternatives to the
    comprehensive project that are not acceptable to the non-Federal
    interest for the project.
        (c) Comprehensive Project.--For purposes of subsection (b), a
    comprehensive project is a project--
                (1) to be carried out by the Secretary, in partnership with
            the Harris County Flood Control District, as part of the
            project in Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries, Texas, authorized
            by the Act of June 20, 1938 (chapter 535, 52 Stat. 804);
                (2) designed considering any prior studies and information
            provided to the Corps of Engineers by the Harris County Food
            Control District;
                (3) which shall include an analysis of a subterranean
            tunnel conveyance system; and
                (4) that, carried out pursuant to a comprehensive benefits
            plan developed by the Secretary and determined acceptable by
            the non-Federal interest--
                        (A) is capable of conveying, at an appropriate
                    rate, the volume of water in the Buffalo Bayou and
                    Tributaries Study area, based on an analysis that
                    includes conveyance during a storm event equivalent to
                    Hurricane Harvey;
                        (B) is designed to avoid, or minimize to the extent
                    practicable, any adverse effects on the environment and
                    community; and
                        (C) is designed to promote infrastructure
                    resiliency, including infrastructure necessary for
                    reservoir operations.
        (d) Deadline.--The Secretary shall prioritize Federal funding for
    the completion of the Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries Resiliency Study
    pursuant to subsection (a) in the first submission after the date of
    enactment of this Act of each of the following:
                (1) A budget submission.
                (2) A submission of a work plan to Congress pursuant to the
            joint explanatory statement for an annual appropriations Act or
            as part of the submission of a spend plan to Congress for a
            supplemental appropriations Act under which the Corps of
            Engineers receives funding.
        (e) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the date of
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
    the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate the report
    of the Chief of Engineers for the study described in subsection (a),
    regardless of design maturity status of the project covered by the
    report.
        (f) Comprehensive Benefits Plan Defined.--In this section, the term
    ``comprehensive benefits plan'' means a comprehensive benefits plan
    developed pursuant to the policies described in the memorandum relating
    to ``Policy Directive - Comprehensive Documentation of Benefits in
    Decision Document'', dated January 5, 2021, and signed by the Assistant
    Secretary for Civil Works.

    SEC. 335. CHAMBERS, GALVESTON, AND HARRIS COUNTIES, TEXAS, EXPEDITED
                  REAL ESTATE TRANSFERS.

        Section 1327(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138
    Stat. 3144) is amended--
                (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``(including the
            portions of Spilman Island and Pelican Island owned by, or
            subject to an easement held by, the United States), to
            determine whether any such land or easements are no longer
            required for project purposes'' before ``; and''; and
                (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``under such paragraph''
            before ``are no longer''.

    SEC. 336. COASTAL VIRGINIA.

        (a) In General.--In carrying out an analysis of a measure
    benefitting Federal land under the administrative jurisdiction of the
    head of another Federal agency as part of the feasibility study for
    flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, and navigation, Coastal
    Virginia, authorized by section 1201(9) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3802), the Secretary may use, for
    any portion of the cost of such analysis, funds--
                (1) made available to the Secretary for water resources
            development investigations; or
                (2) contributed by such agency head.
        (b) Federal Expense Requirement.--The Secretary shall carry out
    each analysis described in subsection (a) at Federal expense, except
    that, with respect to an analysis described in subsection (a) to the
    extent it relates to formulation of measures to reduce risk to a
    military installation, upon request of the non-Federal interest for the
    project described in subsection (a), the Secretary may use funds
    contributed by the non-Federal interest pursuant to the terms and
    conditions of the agreement between the Secretary and the non-Federal
    interest for the project that relate to sharing the cost of the study.
        (c) Savings Provision.--Nothing in this section affects any cost-
    sharing requirement applicable to the head of a Federal agency, other
    than the Secretary, for the construction of an authorized water
    resources development project, or a separable element of such project,
    resulting from the study described in subsection (a).

    SEC. 337. NORFOLK COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT, VIRGINIA.

        (a) In General.--In carrying out an analysis of a measure
    benefitting Federal land under the administrative jurisdiction of the
    head of another Federal agency as part of the feasibility study for the
    modification of the project for hurricane and storm damage risk
    reduction, Norfolk Coastal Storm Risk Management, Virginia, authorized
    by section 401(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134
    Stat. 2738), the Secretary may use, for any portion of the cost of such
    analysis, funds--
                (1) made available to the Secretary for water resources
            development investigations; or
                (2) contributed by such agency head.
        (b) Federal Expense Requirement.--The Secretary shall carry out
    each analysis described in subsection (a) at Federal expense, except
    that, with respect to an analysis described in subsection (a) to the
    extent it relates to formulation of measures to reduce risk to a
    military installation, upon request of the non-Federal interest for the
    project described in subsection (a), the Secretary may use funds
    contributed by the non-Federal interest pursuant to the terms and
    conditions of the agreement between the Secretary and the non-Federal
    interest for the project that relate to sharing the cost of the study.
        (c) Savings Provision.--Nothing in this section affects any cost-
    sharing requirement applicable to the head of a Federal agency, other
    than the Secretary, for the construction of an authorized water
    resources development project, or a separable element of such project,
    resulting from the study described in subsection (a).

    SEC. 338. PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS RESTORATION, WASHINGTON.

        Section 544(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114
    Stat. 2675; 132 Stat. 3826) is amended to read as follows:
        ``(f) Limitation.--The total Federal amount expended for a critical
    restoration project under this section shall not be more than
    $20,000,000.''.

    SEC. 339. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER.

        The total cost of constructing dredged material stabilization and
    retaining structures related to maintenance dredging for the project
    for navigation, Lower Willamette and Columbia Rivers, from Portland,
    Oregon, to the sea, authorized by the first section of the Act of June
    18, 1878 (chapter 264, 20 Stat. 157), shall be considered eligible
    operation and maintenance costs assigned to commercial navigation for
    the purpose of section 210(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act
    of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238(a)(2)).

    SEC. 340. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION ASSESSMENT.

        The Secretary shall conduct an assessment of the lower Columbia
    River Basin to identify opportunities to carry out cost-effective
    projects and measures to support salmon and steelhead restoration by--
                (1) restoring, improving, and reconnecting aquatic and
            riparian habitat; and
                (2) providing cold water refugia for native anadromous fish
            species.

    SEC. 341. PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WASHINGTON.

        In carrying out the project for ecosystem restoration, Puget Sound,
    Washington, authorized by section 1401(4) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1713; 136 Stat. 3806), the Secretary
    shall consider the removal, relocation, and replacement of the
    following sites to be a project feature the costs of which are shared
    as construction:
                (1) Highway 101 causeway and bridge over the Lilliwaup
            Estuary of the Hood Canal site.
                (2) NE North Shore Road roadway and bridge over the Tahuya
            Estuary of the Hood Canal site.
                (3) Highway 101 causeway and bridge over the Snow Creek and
            Salmon Creek (at the head of Discovery Bay) site.
                (4) County and local roads and bridges over the Nooksack
            and Lummi Rivers and Tennant Creek at the Nooksack Estuary of
            the Northern Puget Sound site.

    SEC. 342. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF
                  COLUMBIA, MARYLAND, AND VIRGINIA.

        (a) In General.--In carrying out the feasibility study for the
    project for water supply, Washington, District of Columbia, Maryland,
    and Virginia, authorized by section 8201(a)(14) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3745; 138 Stat. 3160), the Secretary
    shall carry out a second phase of the study focused on the
    identification of a secondary water source and additional water storage
    capability or other long-term and large-scale backup water supply
    solutions necessary to meaningfully reduce the structural water supply
    risk of the region.
        (b) Treatment of Study.--In carrying out the second phase of the
    study under this section, the Secretary--
                (1) shall treat such study as a continuation of the first
            phase of the study carried out under section 8201(a)(14) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 2022; and
                (2) shall continue such study without a new investment
            decision.

    SEC. 343. FEDERAL TRIANGLE AREA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

        (a) In General.--In carrying out an analysis of a measure
    benefitting Federal land under the administrative jurisdiction of the
    head of another Federal agency as part of the feasibility study for the
    project for flood risk management, Federal Triangle Area, Washington,
    District of Columbia, authorized by section 8201(a)(12) of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3745), the Secretary may
    use, for any portion of the cost of such analysis, funds--
                (1) made available to the Secretary for water resources
            development investigations; or
                (2) contributed by such agency head.
        (b) Federal Expense Requirement.--The Secretary shall carry out
    each analysis described in subsection (a) at Federal expense.
        (c) Savings Provision.--Nothing in this section affects any cost-
    sharing requirement applicable to the head of a Federal agency, other
    than the Secretary, for the construction of an authorized water
    resources development project, or a separable element of such project,
    resulting from the study described in subsection (a).

                    TITLE IV--WATER RESOURCES INFRASTRUCTURE

    SEC. 401. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

        The following projects for water resources development and
    conservation and other purposes, as identified in the reports titled
    ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development'' submitted
    to Congress pursuant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and
    Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise reviewed by
    Congress, are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary
    substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the
    conditions, described in the respective reports or decision documents
    designated in this section:
                (1) Navigation.--

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   C.  Date of
                                    Report of
    A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                    Engineers
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1. WA &   Columbia River      September 26,  Federal: $16,408,000
     OR        Turning Basins      2025          Non-Federal: $5,489,000
               Navigation                        Total: $21,897,000
               Improvements
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

                (2) Flood risk management.--

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   C.  Date of
                                    Report of
    A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                    Engineers
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1. KY     Kentucky River,     March 24,      Federal: $7,979,000
               Beattyville Flood   2026          Non-Federal: $4,562,000
               Risk Management                   Total: $12,541,000
               Project, Lee
               County
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

                (3) Ecosystem restoration.--

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   C.  Date of
                                    Report of
    A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                    Engineers
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1. WY     Little Goose        June 4, 2026   Federal: $45,333,000
               Creek, Sheridan                   Non-Federal: $35,601,000
                                                 Total: $80,934,000
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

                (4) Hurricane and storm damage risk reduction.--

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   C.  Date of
                                    Report of
    A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                    Engineers
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1. NC     Surf City, Onslow   July 15, 2025  Initial Federal:
               and Pender                         $121,750,000
               Counties, North                   Initial Non-Federal:
               Carolina, Coastal                  $76,863,000
               Storm Risk                        Total: $198,613,000
               Management                        Renourishment Federal:
                                                  $171,007,000
                                                 Renourishment Non-Federal:
                                                  $191,297,000
                                                 Renourishment Total:
                                                  $362,304,000
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

                (5) Modifications and other projects.--

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   C.  Date of
    A. State       B.  Name          Decision        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                     Document
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1. AZ     Rio de Flag,        June 12, 2026  ...........................
               Flagstaff                         ...........................
                                                 Total: $244,633,000
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    2. CA     Port of Long Beach  June 11, 2026  ...........................
               Deep Draft                        ...........................
               Navigation                        Total: $255,811,000
               project, Los
               Angeles County
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    3. FL     Central and         October 14,    Federal: $477,280,500
               Southern Florida,   2025          Non-Federal: $477,280,500
               Canal 111 (C-111)                 Total: $954,561,000
               South Dade
               Project
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    4. KY     Kentucky Lock       June 11, 2026  ...........................
               Addition, Lower                   ...........................
               Cumberland and                    Total: $2,741,549,000
               Tennessee Rivers
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    5. MS     Memphis             March 10,      Federal: $47,341,000
               Metropolitan        2026          Non-Federal: $25,491,000
               Stormwater--North                 Total: $72,832,000
               DeSoto County
               Feasibility
               Study, DeSoto
               County
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    6. TN     Chickamauga Lock    June 11, 2026  ...........................
               Replacement                       ...........................
               Project,                          Total: $1,566,787,000
               Chickamauga Lake,
               Hamilton County
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    SEC. 402. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES.

        (a) Continuing Authorities Programs.--The Secretary shall, to the
    maximum extent practicable, expedite completion of the following
    projects:
                (1) Projects for emergency streambank erosion and shoreline
            protection under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946
            (33 U.S.C. 701r) for the following areas:
                        (A) County Creek, Bartlett, Illinois.
                        (B) Ohio River, Brandenberg, Kentucky.
                        (C) Falmouth, Massachusetts, in the vicinity of
                    Menauhant Road.
                        (D) Muskegon Heights, Michigan.
                        (E) Old Mission Peninsula, Michigan.
                        (F) Euclid Creek, Euclid, Ohio.
                        (G) Little Miami River, Milford, Ohio.
                        (H) Mountain Creek, Macungie, Pennsylvania.
                (2) Project for beach erosion and hurricane and storm
            damage reduction, Bolongo Bay, St. Thomas, United States Virgin
            Islands, under section 3 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33
            U.S.C. 426g).
                (3) Projects for flood control under section 205 of the
            Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) for the following
            areas:
                        (A) Ak-Chin Levee, Pinal County, Arizona.
                        (B) Lower Santa Cruz River, Arizona.
                        (C) McCormick Wash, Globe, Arizona.
                        (A) Rose and Palm Garden Washes, Douglas, Arizona.
                        (B) Beseck Lake, Connecticut.
                        (C) Woodbridge, Connecticut.
                        (D) Little Wekiva River, Florida.
                        (E) Peachtree and Nancy Creek watersheds, Atlanta,
                    Georgia.
                        (F) Golconda, Illinois.
                        (G) Traverse City, Michigan.
                        (H) Marshall County, Minnesota.
                        (I) Peckman River, Verona, New Jersey.
                        (J) Third River, Clifton, New Jersey.
                        (K) Nanny Hagen Brook, Pleasantville, New York.
                        (L) McKenzie River, Springfield, Oregon.
                        (M) 42nd Street Levee, Springfield, Oregon.
                        (N) Medina Colonia, Zapata County, Texas.
                (4) Projects for navigation under section 107 of the River
            and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) for the following areas:
                        (A) Kodiak Harbor, Kodiak, Alaska.
                        (B) Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii.
                        (C) Black River and Lake Huron, Alcona Township,
                    Michigan.
                (5) Project for beneficial uses of dredged material, New
            Jersey Meadowlands (also known as Hackensack Meadowlands), New
            Jersey, under section 204 of the Water Resources Development
            Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326).
                (6) Projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration under
            section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33
            U.S.C. 2330) for the following areas:
                        (A) El Corazon de los Tres Rios del Norte, Pima
                    County, Arizona.
                        (B) North Haven, Connecticut.
                        (C) Savannah River below Augusta, Georgia.
                        (D) Waimea 400 Wetlands, Kaua`i, Hawaii.
                        (E) Marshall County, Minnesota.
                        (F) Polk Swamp, Dorchester County, South Carolina.
                        (G) Ficklen Island Dam, Fredericksburg, Virginia.
                (7) Projects to modify projects for improvement of the
            environment or drought resiliency under section 1135 of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) for
            the following areas:
                        (A) Wayne County, Iowa.
                        (B) Wild Rice River, Minnesota.
                        (C) Lower Pearl River, Mississippi.
                        (D) Rio Chama and Rio Grande between the Abiquiu
                    and Cochiti Reservoirs, New Mexico.
                (8) Projects to control, retain, and reuse stormwater
            associated with flood control efforts under section 1108 of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (138 Stat. 3006) for
            the following areas:
                        (A) Klondike Canyon, Rancho Palos Verdes,
                    California.
                        (B) City of Lompoc, California.
                        (C) Lake Avondale, Avondale Estates, Georgia.
                        (D) Falmouth, including Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
                        (E) Waveland, Mississippi.
        (b) Other Projects and Activities.--The Secretary shall, to the
    maximum extent practicable, expedite completion of the following:
                (1) Project for flood risk management, Little Colorado
            River, Navajo County, Arizona, authorized by section 401(2) of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2735).
                (2) Project for flood damage reduction, Rio de Flag,
            Flagstaff, Arizona, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576; 121
            Stat. 1107; 130 Stat. 1716; 136 Stat. 3833; 138 Stat. 3067) (as
            modified by this Act).
                (3) Project for ecosystem restoration, Tres Rios, Arizona,
            authorized by section 101(b)(4) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2577).
                (4) Project for beach erosion, Surfside Sunset and Newport
            Beach, Orange County, California, authorized by section 101 of
            the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1177).
                (5) Project for flood risk management, Westminster, East
            Garden Grove, California Flood Risk Management, authorized by
            section 401(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020
            (134 Stat. 2735).
                (6) Maintenance dredging at the Greenwich Harbor,
            Connecticut.
                (7) Maintenance dredging at the Southport Harbor,
            Connecticut.
                (8) Project for ecosystem restoration, water supply, flood
            control, and protection of water quality, Central and Southern
            Florida, Indian River Lagoon, Florida, authorized by section
            1001(14) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121
            Stat. 1051).
                (9) Comprehensive plan for the purpose of restoring,
            preserving, and protecting the Northern Estuaries Ecosystem,
            Florida, authorized by section 8215 of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3760; 138 Stat. 3138).
                (10) Operations and maintenance activities necessary as of
            the date of enactment of this Act for the project for
            navigation, Chicago Harbor Lock, Chicago, Illinois, authorized
            pursuant to the first section of the Act of July 11, 1870
            (chapter 240, 16 Stat. 226; 21 Stat. 182; 37 Stat. 217; 40
            Stat. 1283; 76 Stat. 1176).
                (11) Project for ecosystem restoration, Naval Weapons
            Station Earle Oyster Reef Restoration, Monmouth County, New
            Jersey, pursuant to the Hudson-Raritan Estuary Ecosystem
            Restoration project authorized by section 401(5) of the Water
            Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2740).
                (12) Project for navigation, Times Beach dike wall repair,
            Buffalo Harbor, New York, authorized by the Act of May 20, 1826
            (chapter 78, 4 Stat. 175).
                (13) Maintenance dredging of the project for navigation,
            Tillamook Bay, Oregon, authorized by the first section of the
            Act of July 27, 1912 (chapter 254, 37 Stat. 220).
                (14) Project for periodic beach nourishment, Presque Isle
            Peninsula, Erie, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 101 of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2918).
                (15) Project for ecosystem restoration, Lower Blackstone
            River, Rhode Island, authorized pursuant to section 206 of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330; 136
            Stat. 3804).
                (16) Maintenance dredging at Two Rivers Harbor, Two Rivers,
            Wisconsin, authorized pursuant to the Act of March 3, 1871
            (chapter 118, 16 Stat. 538; 34 Stat. 1101; 49 Stat. 1035; 72
            Stat. 298).
        (c) Tribal Partnership Program.--The Secretary shall, to the
    maximum extent practicable, expedite completion of the Pima-Maricopa
    Irrigation Project, associated with the Gila River Indian Community,
    Arizona, authorized pursuant to section 203 of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269).

                              TITLE V--DAM SAFETY

    SEC. 501. NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM AMENDMENTS.

        The National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467 et seq.) is
    amended--
                (1) in section 8(e)(4), by striking ``2'' and inserting
            ``7'';
                (2) in section 8A(j)(4), by striking ``2026'' and inserting
            ``2031''; and
                (3) in section 14(a)(2)(A)(ii)--
                        (A) in subclause (I), by striking ``and low-head
                    dams''; and
                        (B) in subclause (II), by striking ``and low-head
                    dams''.
                                     <all>