[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8306 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






119th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8306

To require the Secretary of Commerce in coordination with the Director 
  of National Intelligence to implement a process for establishing a 
rolling annual standard for the sale of certain integrated circuits to 
                           certain countries.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2026

Mr. Moolenaar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Permanent Select 
 Committee on Intelligence, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To require the Secretary of Commerce in coordination with the Director 
  of National Intelligence to implement a process for establishing a 
rolling annual standard for the sale of certain integrated circuits to 
                           certain countries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Semiconductor Controls Adjusted to 
Limit Exports Act'' or the ``SCALE Act''.

SEC. 2. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

    It is the policy of the United States to--
            (1) lead in global diffusion of artificial intelligence 
        (AI) hardware and software;
            (2) shape international markets so that foreign adversaries 
        remain reliant on United States and allied supply chains for AI 
        hardware and software;
            (3) pursue export promotion and export control agendas that 
        enable the diffusion of United States AI hardware and software 
        and enduring United States leadership in advanced artificial 
        intelligence;
            (4) ensure that the United States and its allies 
        consistently apply export restrictions to ensure national 
        security objectives and prevent backfill amongst allied and 
        partner nations;
            (5) limit the ability of adversaries to indigenize their 
        own AI hardware production efforts, such limitation to include 
        by crowding out their domestic markets with United States AI 
        hardware;
            (6) provide business stability in export controls through a 
        systematic and repeatable process that annually assesses that 
        indigenous capability of an entity of concern to produce AI 
        hardware and set export control thresholds to an entity of 
        concern based on that process; and
            (7) prevent any foreign adversary from accumulating, 
        through any combination of indigenous production, import, or 
        third-party access, a quantity of AI hardware that approaches 
        parity with the aggregate AI hardware capacity of the United 
        States.

SEC. 3. EXPORT PROMOTION AND CONTROL POLICY.

    (a) Performance Metrics.--
            (1) Establishment.--Not later than 180 days after the date 
        of enactment of this Act, the Secretary and the Director, in 
        coordination with other departments and agencies as necessary, 
        shall establish and publicly release objective performance 
        metrics that measure the state of AI hardware in entities of 
        concern. The Secretary shall submit a classified annex to the 
        appropriate congressional committees containing any information 
        that the Secretary determines cannot be publicly released.
            (2) Objectives.--The metrics shall assess--
                    (A) the capability of individual AI hardware items 
                indigenously produced by each entity of concern;
                    (B) the aggregate capability of all entities of 
                concern to indigenously produce AI hardware items 
                relative to the total demand for AI hardware of all 
                entities of concern who purchase AI hardware; and
                    (C) the aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware 
                located within all countries of concern or owned or 
                controlled by an entity of concern.
            (3) Inclusion of specific metrics.--Such metrics shall 
        include, but are not limited to, individual chip capabilities, 
        or where applicable aggregated, in the following categories:
                    (A) Total processing power.
                    (B) Interconnect bandwidth.
                    (C) Memory capacity bandwidth.
    (b) Assessment and Report.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after each update 
        to the metrics established under subsection (a), the Secretary 
        and the Director, in coordination with other departments and 
        agencies as such Secretary and Director determine necessary, 
        shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional 
        committees assessing the quantity and quality of AI hardware 
        produced in each country of concern using such metrics.
            (2) Contents.--The assessment required under paragraph (1) 
        shall include--
                    (A) for each metric, the aggregate estimated amount 
                of AI hardware, broken down by quarter, installed in 
                each country of concern, delineated by AI hardware 
                produced by AI hardware designers that are an entity of 
                concern and AI hardware produced outside of a country 
                of concern and imported into a country of concern;
                    (B) for each metric, the aggregate estimated amount 
                of AI hardware installed outside of a country of 
                concern and owned or controlled by any entity of 
                concern;
                    (C) for each metric, the aggregate estimated amount 
                of AI hardware--
                            (i) legally available to an entity of 
                        concern through remote access;
                            (ii) installed outside of a country of 
                        concern; and
                            (iii) not owned or controlled by an entity 
                        of concern;
                    (D) a breakdown of subparagraph (B) in terms of the 
                country of origin of the AI hardware designer (with 
                respect to this subparagraph, the country of origin of 
                a unit of AI hardware shall be considered to be the 
                country in which the designer of that unit of AI 
                hardware is domiciled);
                    (E) for each metric, the combined total of the 
                hardware identified in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), 
                expressed as a percentage of the aggregate amount of AI 
                hardware physically present in and intended for use 
                within the United States;
                    (F) a breakdown by country of origin of the 
                aggregate amount of AI hardware physically present in 
                and intended for use within the United States. For this 
                purpose, the country of origin of a unit of AI hardware 
                shall be considered to be the country in which the 
                designer of that unit of AI hardware is domiciled; and
                    (G) a technical assessment of the capability of the 
                most advanced AI hardware designed by an entity of 
                concern as compared to the state-of-the-art for that 
                hardware.
    (c) AI Export Control Threshold.--The Secretary shall adopt an 
export control policy for AI hardware, including such a policy for 
remote access of such hardware, to any entity of concern in accordance 
with the following:
            (1) Not later than 365 days after the date of enactment of 
        this Act, and not less than annually thereafter, use the 
        findings from the assessment in subsection (b), to set an upper 
        limit for the export of AI hardware to an entity of concern 
        expressed in terms of the metrics developed in subsection (a) 
        as follows:
                    (A) The upper limit shall be implemented as a 
                policy of denial for license applications to export, 
                reexport, transfer (in-country), or provide remote 
                access to AI hardware.
                    (B) The upper limit for any individual item of AI 
                hardware shall be set at a level not to exceed 110 
                percent of the performance, as measured by the metrics 
                developed under subsection (a), of the most capable AI 
                hardware item that meets the indigenous production 
                threshold established under subparagraph (C).
                    (C) An individual item of AI hardware produced by 
                an entity of concern shall be considered in 
                establishing the upper limit under subparagraph (B) 
                only if such item is manufactured in sustained serial 
                production at a volume sufficient to fulfill not less 
                than 25 percent of the estimated annual aggregate 
                demand for AI hardware among all entities of concern, 
                as assessed by the Secretary using the most recent 
                assessment under subsection (b). AI hardware produced 
                solely in experimental, prototype, or limited 
                demonstration quantities shall not be considered for 
                purposes of establishing the upper limit.
                    (D) If, at the time of any assessment under 
                subsection (b), no individual item of AI hardware 
                produced by an entity of concern meets the production 
                threshold established under subparagraph (C), then 
                applications for the export of or provision of remote 
                access to AI hardware to any entity of concern shall be 
                reviewed under a policy of denial.
                    (E) In no case shall the upper limit established 
                under this paragraph be lower than the upper limit in 
                effect during the preceding assessment period, unless 
                the Secretary provides a written determination to the 
                appropriate congressional committees that a reduction 
                is necessary to address a specific and identified 
                national security threat.
            (2) For each metric established under subsection (a), the 
        Secretary shall require a license for any export, reexport, 
        transfer (in-country), or provide remote access to, AI hardware 
        to any entity of concern, and shall review licenses under a 
        presumption of denial if the approval of such license would 
        cause the aggregate estimated amount of adversary AI hardware 
        to exceed, in the aggregate, 5 percent of the aggregate 
        estimated amount of AI hardware physically present in and 
        intended for use within the United States.
    (d) Authority To Update Metrics.--On and after the date that is 24 
months after the date on which the first assessment under subsection 
(b) is submitted, the Secretary may add, modify, or remove the metrics 
established under subsection (a), subject to the following:
            (1) The Secretary shall provide written notice to the 
        appropriate congressional committees not less than 90 days 
        before any such addition, modification, or removal takes 
        effect, including a detailed justification for each proposed 
        change and an assessment of how such change would affect the 
        export control thresholds established under subsection (d).
            (2) No modification or removal of a metric under this 
        subsection shall take effect if, within the 90-day notice 
        period under paragraph (1), either the Committee on Foreign 
        Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committee on 
        Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate submits to 
        the Secretary a written objection stating that the proposed 
        change would undermine the purposes of this Act.
    (e) Conditions for License Review on Other Than a Presumption of 
Denial Basis.--Any license application to export AI hardware to any 
entity of concern reviewed under the upper limit established under 
subsection (d)(1) on other than a presumption of denial basis shall 
include certification by the applicant that--
            (1) the license will not result in any delay in fulfilling 
        existing or new orders from customers in the United States for 
        end use in the United States for any advanced-node integrated 
        circuits produced by the applicant, taking into account normal 
        lead times, and that global foundry capacity that would 
        otherwise be used to produce similar or more advanced 
        integrated circuits for end users in the United States will not 
        be diverted to produce items authorized by the license;
            (2) for the AI hardware described in the license 
        application, the aggregate total processing performance of such 
        hardware exported to any entity of concern does not exceed 50 
        percent of the aggregate total processing performance of the 
        same hardware shipped to customers in the United States for end 
        use in the United States;
            (3) the items are not destined for military end use, 
        military-intelligence end use, or weapons of mass destruction 
        end use, and that the ultimate consignee will employ know-your-
        customer procedures to screen and prevent unauthorized remote 
        access by prohibited parties;
            (4) prior to export, every shipment of AI hardware 
        described in the license application will be reviewed by a 
        qualified independent third-party testing laboratory 
        headquartered in the United States, not under the control of 
        any entity of concern, and having no financial interest in any 
        party to the transaction, to confirm that the technical 
        capabilities of the items are consistent with the 
        representations in the license application; and
            (5) if the ultimate consignee or end user provides 
        infrastructure-as-a-service, the consignee or end user will not 
        transfer model weights trained on the exported AI hardware to 
        any end user not disclosed in the license application, and will 
        not provide any prohibited party with remote access to any 
        model trained on such hardware.

SEC. 4. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act may be construed to direct the Secretary to--
            (1) decontrol or reduce export control thresholds based on 
        assessment findings; or
            (2) approve licenses for sales of AI hardware or software.

SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) AI hardware.--The term ``AI hardware'' means--
                    (A) any integrated circuit, computer, electronic 
                assembly, or other item classified under Export Control 
                Classification Numbers 3A090, 4A090, or any related 
                Export Control Classification Number designated with a 
                ``.z'' suffix under the Commerce Control List 
                (supplement number 1 to part 774 of title 15, Code of 
                Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation)); and
                    (B) any other item designated by the Secretary, by 
                regulation, as AI hardware for the purposes of this 
                Act.
            (2) Aggregate estimated amount of ai hardware.--The term 
        ``aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware'' means the total 
        quantity of AI hardware, as measured using the metrics 
        established by the Secretary under section 3(a).
            (3) Aggregate estimated amount of adversary ai hardware.--
        The term ``aggregate estimated amount of adversary AI 
        hardware'' means the aggregate estimated amount of AI 
        hardware--
                    (A) installed across all countries of concern; or
                    (B) accessible to any entity of concern, including 
                through remote access to AI hardware installed outside 
                of any country of concern.
            (4) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term 
        ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
                    (A) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House 
                of Representatives;
                    (B) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 
                of the House of Representatives;
                    (C) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
                Affairs of the Senate; and
                    (D) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
                Senate.
            (5) Country of concern.--The term ``country of concern'' 
        means--
                    (A) the People's Republic of China, including the 
                Hong Kong and Macau Special Administrative Regions;
                    (B) the Republic of Cuba;
                    (C) the Islamic Republic of Iran;
                    (D) the Democratic People's Republic of Korea;
                    (E) the Russian Federation; and
                    (F) any other foreign country--
                            (i) listed in the Country Group D:5 under 
                        Supplement No. 1 to part 740 of the Export 
                        Administration Regulations, as published on 
                        January 1, 2026;
                            (ii) designated by the Secretary of State 
                        as a country of concern for purposes of this 
                        section; and
                            (iii) notice of such designation has been 
                        published in the Federal Register.
            (6) Director.--The term ``Director'' means the Director of 
        National Intelligence.
            (7) Entity of concern.--The term ``entity of concern'' 
        means any entity--
                    (A) organized under the laws of any country of 
                concern;
                    (B) having its principal place of business in any 
                country of concern;
                    (C) of which more than 10 percent of the ultimate 
                beneficial ownership is held, directly or indirectly, 
                by one or more persons or entities that are organized 
                under the laws of, have their principal place of 
                business in, or are nationals of any country of 
                concern; or
                    (D) that is owned or controlled by, or acts on 
                behalf of, the government of any country of concern.
            (8) Indigenous production.--The term ``indigenous 
        production'', with respect to AI hardware--
                    (A) means AI hardware that is--
                            (i) physically fabricated within the 
                        territory of the People's Republic of China; 
                        and
                            (ii) designed by any entity of concern; and
                    (B) excludes AI hardware that is designed by any 
                entity of concern but fabricated outside of any country 
                of concern for purposes of this Act.
            (9) Remote access.--The term ``remote access'' means access 
        on a purposeful, knowing, reckless, or negligent basis to an 
        item subject to the jurisdiction of the United States under 
        this Act by a foreign person through a network connection, 
        including the internet or a cloud computing service, from a 
        location other than where the item is physically located if the 
        Secretary determines that the use of the item could pose a 
        serious risk to the national security or foreign policy of the 
        United States.
            (10) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Commerce.
                                 <all>