[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1354 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1354

Impeaching Samuel Alito, Jr., Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of 
          the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2024

 Ms. Ocasio-Cortez (for herself, Ms. Escobar, Ms. Crockett, Mr. Frost, 
Ms. Stansbury, Mr. Casar, Mr. Bowman, Ms. Lee of California, Ms. Omar, 
    Mrs. Ramirez, Mr. Takano, Ms. Tlaib, Ms. Velazquez, Mrs. Watson 
 Coleman, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. McCollum, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Bush, and Ms. 
   Wilson of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Impeaching Samuel Alito, Jr., Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of 
          the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

    Resolved, That Samuel Alito, Jr., Associate Justice of the Supreme 
Court of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and 
misdemeanors and that the following articles of impeachment be 
exhibited to the United States Senate:
     Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives 
of the United States of America in the name of itself and of the people 
of the United States of America, against Samuel Alito, Jr., Associate 
Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, in maintenance and 
support of its impeachment against him for high crimes and 
misdemeanors.

article i: refusal to recuse from cases in which he had a personal bias 
                    or prejudice concerning a party

    
    The Constitution provides that the House of Representatives ``shall 
have the sole Power of Impeachment'' and that all civil officers of the 
United States``shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and 
Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and 
Misdemeanors''. Section 455 of title 28, United States Code, provides 
that ``[a]ny justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States 
shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality 
might reasonably be questioned''.
    On January 31, 2006, when Justice Alito assumed his role on the 
Supreme Court, he took two oaths of office--a Constitutional Oath and a 
Judicial Oath of office. When taking the Constitutional Oath codified 
at section 3331, of title 5, United States Code, Alito promised to 
``support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all 
enemies, foreign and domestic''. When taking the subsequent Judicial 
Oath codified at section 453, of title 28, United States Code, Alito 
promised to ``faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the 
duties incumbent upon me as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, 
under the constitution and laws of the United States''.
    Samuel Alito, in his conduct as an Associate Justice of the Supreme 
Court of the United States, engaged in high Crimes and Misdemeanors, by 
refusing to disqualify himself from proceedings in which his 
impartiality might reasonably be questioned, as follows:
    In January 2021, Justice Alito allowed an upside-down American flag 
to be flown outside his primary residence for several days. At the 
time, an upside-down American flag was widely understood to be an 
expression of support for the criminal efforts to overturn the results 
of the 2020 election and was a symbol displayed by those who attacked 
the Capitol on January 6, 2021, an event that occurred only shortly 
before Justice Alito allowed the flags to be flown outside his 
residence. By displaying this flag, he showed support for domestic 
enemies of the United States, some of whom engaged in an insurrection 
at the U.S. Capitol building, in violation of his Constitutional Oath 
of office.
     In summer 2023, by allowing a flag associated with the criminal 
efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election and with a 
partisan faction of a political party to be flown outside his secondary 
residence for several months, Justice Alito's behavior showed a lack of 
impartiality as required by his Judicial Oath of office, thereby 
undermining public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the 
judiciary.
     According to section 455(b)(1) of title 28, United States Code, a 
justice of the Supreme Court, like any judge, must recuse from matters 
in which he ``has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party''. 
Separately, section 455(a) of such title requires recusal in the 
circumstances that ``his impartiality might reasonably be questioned''. 
Justice Samuel Alito, Jr.'s failure to recuse in Trump v. United 
States, No. 23-939 (July 1, 2024), Fischer v. United States, No. 23-
5572 (June 28, 2024), and Trump v. Anderson, No. 23-719 (March 4, 2024) 
violates both provisions of section 455 and serves as the legal basis 
for impeachment.
     Trump v. United States, a Supreme Court case about the 
preservation of a functioning democracy, asked the question of whether 
a former president is entitled to absolute immunity from criminal 
prosecution for actions within his constitutional authority. The case 
arose from charges filed against Donald J. Trump for his role in 
inciting an insurrection in an attempt to stop the certification of 
votes following the 2020 election.
     Fischer v. United States asked whether section1512(c)(2) of title 
18, United States Code, a provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, can be 
applied to the insurrectionists who stormed the Capitol building on 
January 6, 2021, in order to attempt to stop the certification of votes 
following the 2020 election.
     Trump v. Anderson asked whether a State court could enforce Donald 
Trump's disqualification from office for engaging in insurrection 
against the United States Constitution when he incited the January 6th 
insurrection at the Capitol building and disrupted the transfer of 
presidential power in violation of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
    By repeatedly--over a period of multiple years--flying flags 
associated with the attempt to overturn the election results and stop 
the peaceful transfer of power, Justice Alito publicly displayed a bias 
toward those who incited and executed the January 6 insurrection. 
Because Justice Alito engaged in a pattern of declaring sympathy with 
the parties before the Supreme Court in Trump, Fischer, and Anderson, 
section 455 of title 28, United States Code, required Justice Alito to 
recuse from all matters related to the insurrection.
    Section 455 of title 28, United States Code, does not require an 
investigation into the heart and mind of individual justices. 
Subsection (a) of such section requires recusal whenever a justice's 
impartiality ``might reasonably be questioned''. Since a ``stop the 
steal'' symbol first flew on a flagpole outside Justice Alito's home, 
it has been reasonable to question Justice Alito's ability to 
impartially adjudicate matters related to the January 6 insurrection. 
The proper functioning of the United States Supreme Court depends on 
justices' commitment to impartiality in both fact and appearance. By 
disregarding his impartiality and aligning himself through public 
conduct and statements with the insurrectionary cause, the laws of the 
United States required Justice Alito to recuse himself in Trump v. 
United States, Fischer v. United States, and Trump v. Anderson.
     Failure to comply with subsection (a) and subsection (b)(1) of 
section 455 of title 28, United States Code, by refusing to recuse in 
Trump v. United States, Fischer v. United States, and Trump v. 
Anderson, each of which concerned the attempt to overturn the 2020 
election by interfering with the Joint Session of Congress to certify 
the election on January 6, 2021, is cause for impeachment for high 
crimes and misdemeanors.
     Justice Samuel Alito, Jr., has engaged in a pattern of conduct 
that is incompatible with the trust and confidence placed in him as a 
justice of the Supreme Court by failing to disqualify himself from 
cases in which he had a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party. 
Section 455 of title 28, United States Code, provides that any 
``justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall 
disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might 
reasonably be questioned'' or if ``he has a personal bias or prejudice 
concerning a party''. Justice Alito has indicated sympathy with the 
efforts to overturn the 2020 election by allowing symbols of support 
for those efforts to be flown outside his residences. Contrary to the 
clear dictates of the federal recusal statute, which requires 
disqualification if a justice's impartiality might reasonably be 
questioned, Justice Alito did not recuse himself in Trump v. United 
States, No. 23-939 (July 1, 2024), Fischer v. United States, No. 23-
5572 (June 28, 2024), or Trump v. Anderson, No. 23-719 (March 4, 2024) 
all of which concerned the attempt to overturn the 2020 election by 
interfering with the Joint Session of Congress to certify the election 
on January 6, 2021.
    In all this, Justice Alito betrayed his Constitutional Oath to 
``support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all 
enemies, foreign and domestic'' and his Judicial Oath to ``faithfully 
and impartially discharge and perform'' his duties ``under the 
Constitution and laws of the United States''.
    Wherefore, Samuel Alito Jr., by such conduct, thus warrants 
impeachment and trial, removal from office, and disqualification to 
hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United 
States.

                    article ii: failure to disclose

    
    The Constitution provides that the House of Representatives ``shall 
have the sole Power of Impeachment'' and that all civil officers of the 
United States ``shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and 
Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and 
Misdemeanors''. Sections 13103 and 13104 of title 5, United States 
Code, require judicial officers, including Associate Justices of the 
Supreme Court, to file annual reports disclosing financial income, 
gifts and reimbursements, property interests, liabilities, 
transactions, among other information. Specifically, section 
13104(a)(2)(A) of such title requires disclosure of the ``identity of 
the source, a brief description, and the value of all gifts'' exceeding 
minimal value, and section 13104(a)(5)(A) of such title requires 
disclosure of ``a brief description, the date, and category of value of 
any purchase, sale or exchange'' of real property exceeding $1,000.
    Justice Samuel Alito, Jr., has engaged in a pattern of corrupt 
conduct that is incompatible with the trust and confidence placed in 
him as a justice of the Supreme Court by accepting and failing to 
disclose trips funded by private organizations and individuals, 
contrary to federal law and the ethical guidelines that govern the 
conduct of federal judges. After accepting luxury travel from a wealthy 
individual with interests before the Supreme Court, Justice Alito did 
not disclose the gift in his financial disclosure reports as required 
by Ethics in Government Act and repeatedly chose not to recuse himself 
from hearing cases in which the wealthy individual had direct interests 
in violation of section 7353 of title 5, United States Code.
    By failing to disclose the gift of luxury travel and failing to 
recuse from hearing cases affecting the donor's business interests, 
Justice Alito has undermined the impartiality and integrity of the 
Supreme Court in violation of the public trust. His conduct has caused 
a reasonable person to believe the gift was offered and accepted in 
return for being influenced in the performance of an official act and 
on a basis that would cause a reasonable person to believe that he used 
his public office for his own private gain or for the private gain of 
the donor.
    In all of this, Justice Alito has acted in a manner contrary to his 
trust as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United 
States, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice, to the 
manifest injury of the people of the United States.
    Wherefore, Justice Alito, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and 
trial and removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy 
any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.
                                 <all>