[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 298 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 298
To require the Government Accountability Office to study the role
pharmaceutical benefit managers play in the pharmaceutical supply chain
and provide Congress with appropriate policy recommendations, and for
other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
February 8, 2021
Mrs. Blackburn (for herself and Mr. Braun) introduced the following
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health,
Education, Labor, and Pensions
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To require the Government Accountability Office to study the role
pharmaceutical benefit managers play in the pharmaceutical supply chain
and provide Congress with appropriate policy recommendations, and for
other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Pharmacy Benefit Manager
Accountability Study Act of 2021''.
SEC. 2. GAO STUDY.
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee
on Finance and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
of the Senate and to the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee
on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report that--
(1) addresses, at minimum--
(A) the role that pharmacy benefit managers play in
the pharmaceutical supply chain;
(B) the state of competition among pharmacy benefit
managers, including the market share for the Nation's
10 largest pharmacy benefit managers;
(C) the use of rebates and fees by pharmacy benefit
managers, including data for each of the 10 largest
pharmacy benefit managers that reflects, for each drug
in the formulary of each such pharmacy benefit
manager--
(i) the amount of the rebate passed on to
patients;
(ii) the amount of the rebate passed on to
payors;
(iii) the amount of the rebate kept by the
pharmacy benefit manager; and
(iv) the role of fees charged by the
pharmacy benefit manager;
(D) whether pharmacy benefit managers structure
their formularies in favor of high-rebate prescription
drugs over lower-cost, lower-rebate alternatives;
(E) the average prior authorization approval time
for each of the 10 largest pharmacy benefit managers;
(F) factors affecting the use of step therapy in
each of the 10 largest pharmacy benefit managers; and
(G) the extent to which the price that pharmacy
benefit managers charge payors, such as the Medicare
program under title XXVIII of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.), State Medicaid programs under
title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et
seq.), the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program
under chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, or
private payors, for a drug is more than such pharmacy
benefit managers pay the pharmacy for the drug; and
(2) provides recommendations for legislative action to
lower the cost of prescription drugs for consumers and payors,
improve the efficiency of the pharmaceutical supply chain by
lowering intermediary costs, improve competition in pharmacy
benefit management, and provide transparency in pharmacy
benefit management.
<all>