<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE bill PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/bill.dtd//EN" "bill.dtd">
<bill bill-stage="Introduced-in-Senate" dms-id="A1" public-private="public">
	<metadata xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<dublinCore>
<dc:title>116 S909 IS: Separation of Powers Restoration Act</dc:title>
<dc:publisher>U.S. Senate</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2019-03-27</dc:date>
<dc:format>text/xml</dc:format>
<dc:language>EN</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.</dc:rights>
</dublinCore>
</metadata>
<form>
		<distribution-code display="yes">II</distribution-code>
		<congress>116th CONGRESS</congress><session>1st Session</session>
		<legis-num>S. 909</legis-num>
		<current-chamber>IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES</current-chamber>
		<action>
			<action-date date="20190327">March 27, 2019</action-date>
			<action-desc><sponsor name-id="S382">Mr. Sasse</sponsor> (for himself, <cosponsor name-id="S153">Mr. Grassley</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S378">Mr. Lankford</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S384">Mr. Tillis</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S399">Mr. Hawley</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S266">Mr. Crapo</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S287">Mr. Cornyn</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S346">Mr. Lee</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S381">Mr. Rounds</cosponsor>, and <cosponsor name-id="S236">Mr. Inhofe</cosponsor>) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the <committee-name committee-id="SSJU00">Committee on the Judiciary</committee-name></action-desc>
		</action>
		<legis-type>A BILL</legis-type>
		<official-title>To amend title 5, United States Code, with respect to the judicial review of agency interpretations
			 of statutory and regulatory provisions.</official-title>
	</form>
	<legis-body>
 <section id="HB23679E3338E4572B1072EDDC83A1A1D" section-type="section-one"><enum>1.</enum><header>Short title</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">This Act may be cited as the <quote><short-title>Separation of Powers Restoration Act</short-title></quote>.</text> </section><section id="HB8EF70F4452040FEB190171AAFB0BC49"><enum>2.</enum><header>Judicial review of statutory and regulatory interpretations</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">Section 706 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—</text>
 <paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="H721C7FD784714DA0B553DA0AF0100160"><enum>(1)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">by striking <quote>To the extent necessary</quote> and inserting <quote>(a) To the extent necessary</quote>;</text> </paragraph><paragraph id="H236C5807DF954508836110C66D885C74"><enum>(2)</enum><text>in subsection (a), as so designated—</text>
 <subparagraph id="H7BC6EFF4292F4D64B21018ACAE271928"><enum>(A)</enum><text>by striking <quote>decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and</quote>; and</text> </subparagraph><subparagraph id="H87DAEC17BF80468298589E9710AAA7D7"><enum>(B)</enum><text>by inserting after <quote>of the terms of an agency action</quote> the following: <quote>and decide de novo all relevant questions of law, including the interpretation of constitutional and statutory provisions, and rules made by agencies. If the reviewing court determines that a statutory or regulatory provision relevant to its decision contains a gap or ambiguity, the court shall not interpret that gap or ambiguity as an implicit delegation to the agency of legislative rule making authority and shall not rely on the gap or ambiguity as a justification for interpreting agency authority expansively or for deferring to the agency’s interpretation on the question of law. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, this subsection shall apply in any action for judicial review of agency action authorized under any provision of law. No law may exempt any such civil action from the application of this section except by specific reference to this section</quote>; and</text>
 </subparagraph></paragraph><paragraph id="H710650A603F04B38990CBE4A234DF373"><enum>(3)</enum><text>by striking <quote>The reviewing court shall—</quote> and inserting the following:</text> <quoted-block display-inline="no-display-inline" id="H5D5598AF66B24F33A89908C4C7130C22" style="USC"> <subsection commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="H793872A5C8D34E8AAEBE733160AA7C1E"><enum>(b)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The reviewing court shall—</text></subsection><after-quoted-block>.</after-quoted-block></quoted-block>
			</paragraph></section></legis-body>
</bill>


