[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 590 Laid on Table in House (LTH)]
<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 590
Raising a question of the privileges of the House.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 25, 2019
Mr. McCarthy submitted the following resolution; which was laid on the
table
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Raising a question of the privileges of the House.
Whereas at a press conference on September 24, 2019, Speaker of the House Nancy
Pelosi stated: ``Therefore today, I'm announcing the House of
Representatives is moving forward with an official impeachment
inquiry.'';
Whereas House Practice states that: ``Under the modern practice, an impeachment
is normally instituted by the House by the adoption of a resolution
calling for a committee investigation of charges against the officer in
question.'';
Whereas in the past 25 years, the House of Representatives has moved forward
with impeachment against a Federal officer three times, each initiated
by an impeachment inquiry resolution approved by the full House, not by
a unilateral decree of the Speaker;
Whereas, on May 12, 2009, the House approved H. Res. 424, authorizing and
directing the Committee on the Judiciary to inquire whether the House
should impeach Samuel B. Kent, a judge of the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Texas;
Whereas, on January 13, 2009, the House approved H. Res. 15, authorizing and
directing the Committee on the Judiciary to inquire whether the House
should impeach G. Thomas Porteous, a judge of the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana;
Whereas, on October 8, 1998, the House approved H. Res. 581, authorizing and
directing the Committee on the Judiciary to investigate whether
sufficient grounds exist for the impeachment of William Jefferson
Clinton, President of the United States;
Whereas the Committee Report to accompany H. Res. 581 stated: ``Because the
issue of impeachment is of such overwhelming importance, the Committee
decided that it must receive authorization from the full House before
proceeding on any further course of action.'';
Whereas that report further stated: ``Because impeachment is delegated solely to
the House of Representatives by the Constitution, the full House of
Representatives should be involved in critical decision making regarding
various stages of impeachment.'';
Whereas the Speaker's extraordinary decision to move forward with an impeachment
inquiry without any debate or vote on such a resolution by the full
House undermines the voting privileges afforded to each Member and the
constituents they represent; and
Whereas this unprecedented and politically motivated decision by Speaker Pelosi
represents an abuse of power and brings discredit to the House of
Representatives: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives disapproves of the
actions of the Speaker of the House, Mrs. Pelosi of California, to
initiate an impeachment inquiry against the duly elected President of
the United States, Donald J. Trump.
<all>