[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 496 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 496
Affirming that all Americans have the right to participate in boycotts
in pursuit of civil and human rights at home and abroad, as protected
by the First Amendment to the Constitution.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 16, 2019
Ms. Omar (for herself, Ms. Tlaib, and Mr. Lewis) submitted the
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the
Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Affirming that all Americans have the right to participate in boycotts
in pursuit of civil and human rights at home and abroad, as protected
by the First Amendment to the Constitution.
Whereas boycotts have been effectively used in the United States by advocates
for equal rights since the Boston Tea Party and include boycotts led by
civil rights activists during the 1950s and 1960s in order to advocate
for racial equality, such as the Montgomery bus boycott, and promote
workers' rights, such as the United Farm Workers-led boycott of table
grapes;
Whereas Americans of conscience have a proud history of participating in
boycotts to advocate for human rights abroad, including--
(1) attempting to slow Japanese aggression in the Pacific by boycotting
Imperial Japan in 1937 and 1938;
(2) boycotting Nazi Germany from March 1933 to October 1941 in response
to the dehumanization of the Jewish people in the lead-up to the Holocaust;
(3) the United States Olympic Committee boycotting the 1980 summer
Olympics in Moscow in protest of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the
preceding year; and
(4) leading the campaign in the 1980s to boycott South African goods in
opposition to apartheid in that country;
Whereas the Supreme Court, in the 1966 case Rosenblatt v. Baer, held that the
First Amendment to the Constitution ensures that ``[c]riticism of
government is at the very center of the constitutionally protected area
of free discussion'';
Whereas the Supreme Court held in the 1982 case NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware that
``[t]he right of the States to regulate economic activity could not
justify a complete prohibition against a nonviolent, politically
motivated boycott . . . .'';
Whereas the Supreme Court has recognized various activities as ``expressive
conduct'' warranting constitutional protection, such as flag burning,
wearing black armbands, silent sit-ins, and creating and designing
custom wedding cakes; and
Whereas despite this tradition, governments and nongovernmental organizations
alike have sought to criminalize, stigmatize, and delegitimize the use
of boycotts in an attempt to stifle constitutionally protected political
expression: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) affirms that all Americans have the right to
participate in boycotts in pursuit of civil and human rights at
home and abroad, as protected by the First Amendment to the
Constitution;
(2) opposes unconstitutional legislative efforts to limit
the use of boycotts to further civil rights at home and abroad;
and
(3) urges Congress, States, and civil rights leaders from
all communities to endeavor to preserve the freedom of advocacy
for all by opposing antiboycott resolutions and legislation.
<all>