[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 272 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 272
To prevent States and local jurisdictions from interfering with the
production and distribution of agricultural products in interstate or
foreign commerce, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 8, 2019
Mr. King of Iowa (for himself, Mr. Peterson, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Estes,
and Mr. Gibbs) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on the
Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker,
in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the
jurisdiction of the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To prevent States and local jurisdictions from interfering with the
production and distribution of agricultural products in interstate or
foreign commerce, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Interstate Commerce Act of
2019''.
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST INTERFERENCE BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
WITH PRODUCTION OR MANUFACTURE OF ITEMS IN OTHER STATES.
Consistent with article I, section 8, clause 3 of the Constitution
of the United States, the government of a State or locality therein
shall not impose a standard or condition on the production or
manufacture of any agricultural product sold or offered for sale in
interstate commerce if--
(1) such production or manufacture occurs in another State;
and
(2) the standard or condition is in addition to the
standards and conditions applicable to such production or
manufacture pursuant to--
(A) Federal law; and
(B) the laws of the State and locality in which
such production or manufacture occurs.
SEC. 3. FEDERAL CAUSE OF ACTION TO CHALLENGE STATE REGULATION OF
INTERSTATE COMMERCE.
(a) Private Right of Action.--A person, including, but not limited
to, a producer, transporter, distributer, consumer, laborer, trade
association, the Federal Government, a State government, or a unit of
local government, which is affected by a regulation of a State or unit
of local government which regulates any aspect of an agricultural
product, including any aspect of the method of production, which is
sold in interstate commerce, or any means or instrumentality through
which such an agricultural product is sold in interstate commerce, may
bring an action in the appropriate court to invalidate such a
regulation and seek damages for economic loss resulting from such
regulation.
(b) Preliminary Injunction.--Upon a motion of the plaintiff
described in subsection (a), the court shall issue a preliminary
injunction to preclude the State or unit of local government from
enforcing the regulation at issue until such time as the court enters a
final judgment in the case, unless the State or unit of local
government proves by clear and convincing evidence that--
(1) the State or unit of local government is likely to
prevail on the merits at trial; and
(2) the injunction would cause irreparable harm to the
State or unit of local government.
(c) Statute of Limitations.--No action shall be maintained under
this section unless it is commenced within 10 years after the cause of
action arose.
SEC. 4. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT DEFINED.
In this Act, the term ``agricultural product'' has the meaning
given such term in section 207 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of
1946 (7 U.S.C. 1626).
<all>