[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 20 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 20

 Expressing the sense of Congress that the overtime rule published in 
 the Federal Register by the Secretary of Labor on May 23, 2016, would 
 provide millions of workers with greater economic security and was a 
legally valid exercise of the authority of the Secretary under the Fair 
                      Labor Standards Act of 1938.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2017

    Mr. Brown (for himself, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Booker, Mr. Casey, Mr. 
  Sanders, Mr. Franken, Ms. Warren, Mr. Markey, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. 
 Blumenthal, Ms. Cantwell, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Baldwin, Ms. Hassan, Mr. 
     Merkley, Mr. Wyden, and Mr. Menendez) submitted the following 
 concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION


 
 Expressing the sense of Congress that the overtime rule published in 
 the Federal Register by the Secretary of Labor on May 23, 2016, would 
 provide millions of workers with greater economic security and was a 
legally valid exercise of the authority of the Secretary under the Fair 
                      Labor Standards Act of 1938.

Whereas the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) established 
        overtime compensation requirements for certain employees when they work 
        more than 40 hours in a given workweek;
Whereas under section 13(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 
        U.S.C. 213(a)(1)), Congress delegated to the Secretary of Labor the 
        authority to define and delimit the terms relating to the exemption for 
        bona fide executive, administrative, and professional employees 
        (commonly known as the ``white collar exemption'');
Whereas for more than 75 years, the Secretary of Labor has exercised its 
        delegated authority to issue regulations that define and delimit the 
        terms relating to the white collar exemption by applying a duties test 
        and applying a minimum compensation level or salary threshold;
Whereas the Secretary of Labor began utilizing a salary threshold in the initial 
        regulations defining and delimiting the terms relating to the white 
        collar exemption, which were first issued in 1938;
Whereas Congress has long approved the use of a salary threshold by the 
        Secretary of Labor, as demonstrated by the fact that Congress has 
        amended the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 at least 10 times since 
        1938 and has not precluded the Secretary from using a salary threshold;
Whereas the salary threshold became woefully out of date and ineffective as a 
        result of not being sufficiently updated to keep pace with a changing 
        economy, as evidenced by the fact that more than half of all full-time 
        salaried workers were covered by the salary threshold in 1975 and only 8 
        percent of these workers were covered by the salary threshold in 2015;
Whereas the salary threshold of $455 per week, or $23,660 per year, that was in 
        effect on May 22, 2016, was below the poverty line for a family of 4;
Whereas the Secretary of Labor updated the salary threshold on May 23, 2016, 
        through a final rule entitled ``Defining and Delimiting the Exemptions 
        for Executive, Administrative, Professional, Outside Sales and Computer 
        Employees'' (81 Fed. Reg. 32391) by increasing the salary threshold to 
        the 40th percentile of earnings of full-time salaried employees in the 
        lowest-wage Census Region, resulting in a salary threshold of $913 per 
        week or $47,476 per year;
Whereas the final rule would benefit more than 13,000,000 employees by providing 
        overtime compensation protections to 4,200,000 new employees and 
        strengthening overtime compensation protections for 8,900,000 additional 
        employees;
Whereas the Secretary of Labor went through a thorough process in crafting the 
        final rule, seeking public input and conducting extensive economic 
        analysis, including--

    (1) spending more than a year meeting with more than 200 interested 
parties to obtain input before issuing the proposed rule in 2015;

    (2) considering more than 270,000 comments received during the 60-day 
public comment period on the proposed rule; and

    (3) making significant changes in response to public input before 
issuing the final rule;

Whereas the public comments submitted to the Secretary of Labor regarding the 
        proposed rule were overwhelmingly positive and supportive of the rule;
Whereas the increase in the salary threshold, included in the final rule, to the 
        40th percentile of earnings of full-time salaried employees in the 
        lowest-wage Census Region, resulting in a threshold of $913 per week or 
        $47,476 per year, was a strong yet measured increase by almost any 
        measure, including as compared to--

    (1) the higher salary threshold of $970 per week or $50,440 per year, 
initially put forward by the Secretary of Labor in the proposed rule;

    (2) the salary threshold of $984 per week or $51,168 per year, which 
would be necessary to fully account for the erosion to the value of the 
salary threshold since 1975 due to inflation;

    (3) the salary threshold of $1,122 per week or $58,344 per year, which 
would be necessary to cover the same share of all salaried workers as were 
covered in 1975 after accounting for changes in the economy; and

    (4) the salary threshold of $1,327 per week or $69,004 per year, which 
would be necessary to cover the same percentage of all salaried workers as 
were covered in 1975;

Whereas the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas 
        erroneously called the authority of the Secretary of Labor under the 
        Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 into question when it issued a 
        preliminary injunction enjoining the Department of Labor from enforcing 
        the final overtime rule; and
Whereas millions of workers eagerly await a fair day's pay for a hard day's 
        work: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the final rule issued on May 23, 
2016, by the Secretary of Labor entitled ``Defining and Delimiting the 
Exemptions for Executive, Administrative, Professional, Outside Sales 
and Computer Employees'' (81 Fed. Reg. 32391)--
            (1) would provide more than 13,000,000 workers with greater 
        economic security;
            (2) was created through the legally valid exercise of the 
        congressionally delegated authority of the Secretary of Labor 
        under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938; and
            (3) should be defended and enforced with due haste.
                                 <all>