[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2535 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2535
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to strengthen Drug Enforcement
Administration discretion in setting opioid quotas.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
March 12, 2018
Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Grassley, and Mrs. Feinstein)
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to strengthen Drug Enforcement
Administration discretion in setting opioid quotas.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Opioid Quota Reform Act''.
SEC. 2. STRENGTHENING CONSIDERATIONS FOR DEA OPIOID QUOTAS.
Section 306 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 826) is
amended--
(1) in the last sentence of subsection (a), by striking ``
and not in terms of individual pharmaceutical dosage forms
prepared from or containing such a controlled substance''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
``(i)(1) In fixing and adjusting production and manufacturing
quotas under this section for fentanyl, oxycodone, hydrocodone,
oxymorphone, and hydromorphone, the Attorney General shall consider the
impact of the production and manufacturing quotas on overall public
health and rates of diversion, abuse, and overdose deaths related to
these controlled substances in the United States. Any of the
considerations in this subsection or in subsection (a) may be used to
determine changes to levels of such production and manufacturing quotas
in a given year.
``(2)(A) For any year in which the approved production quota for
fentanyl, oxycodone, hydrocodone, oxymorphone, or hydromorphone is
higher than the approved production quota for the substance in the
previous year, the Attorney General shall include in its final order an
explanation of why the public health benefits of increasing such quota
outweigh the consequences of having an increased volume of such
substance available for sale, and potential diversion, in the United
States.
``(B) Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this
subsection and every year thereafter, the Attorney General shall
provide to the Caucus on International Narcotics Control, Committee on
the Judiciary, Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, and
Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on the
Judiciary, Committee on Energy and Commerce, and Committee on
Appropriations of the House of Representatives, the following
information with regard to each of the substances described in
subparagraph (A):
``(i) An anonymized count of the total number of
manufacturers issued individual manufacturing quotas that year
for that substance.
``(ii) A count of how many such manufacturers were issued
an approved manufacturing quota that was higher than the quota
issued to that manufacturer for that substance in the previous
year.
``(3) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this
subsection, the Attorney General shall submit to Congress a report on
how the Attorney General will ensure that the annual process of fixing
and adjusting production and manufacturing quotas under this section
takes into consideration--
``(A) efforts to reduce the costs, injuries, and deaths
associated with the diversion and abuse of prescription opioids
and heroin, including changes in the accepted medical use of
certain controlled substances; and
``(B) data collection and evaluation of the volume of
controlled substances that are diverted and collected from
approved drug collection receptacles, mail-back programs, and
take-back events.''.
<all>