[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5697 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 5697
To prohibit any officer or employee of the Federal Government who has
exercised extreme carelessness in the handling of classified
information from being granted or retaining a security clearance.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 8, 2016
Mr. McCaul (for himself and Mr. Olson) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,
and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration
of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee
concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To prohibit any officer or employee of the Federal Government who has
exercised extreme carelessness in the handling of classified
information from being granted or retaining a security clearance.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Taking Responsibility Using Secured
Technologies Act of 2016''.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS; SENSE OF CONGRESS.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) On July 5, 2016, the Director of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (in this section referred to as the ``FBI''),
James B. Comey, made a statement relating to the investigation
into the use of a personal e-mail system by Hillary Clinton
during the period that she was Secretary of State.
(2) The FBI found evidence that Secretary Clinton and her
colleagues were extremely careless in handling very sensitive,
highly classified information.
(3) The FBI also found that any reasonable individual in
the position of Secretary Clinton, or in the position of the
Federal employees with whom Secretary Clinton was corresponding
about these matters, should have known that using an
unclassified system was inappropriate when conducting
classified conversations.
(4) Because of the conduct of Secretary Clinton and her
colleagues, the FBI concluded that it is possible that hostile
actors gained access to the e-mail account of Secretary
Clinton.
(5) In similar circumstances, other individuals who engaged
in this kind of activity would often face adverse consequences,
including security or administrative sanctions.
(6) Presidential candidates typically receive classified
briefings even if the candidates lack the requisite security
clearance.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) Secretary Clinton should--
(A) have any security clearance that she holds
revoked; and
(B) be denied access to classified information
unless and until she earns the legal right to such
access; and
(2) colleagues of Secretary Clinton who demonstrated
extreme carelessness in their handling of classified
information should no longer have access to that information.
SEC. 3. SECURITY CLEARANCES WITH RESPECT TO INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE
MISHANDLED CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.
(a) Granting of Clearances.--No officer or employee of the Federal
Government who has exercised extreme carelessness in the handling of
classified information may be granted a security clearance.
(b) Revocation of Clearances.--The security clearance of any
officer or employee of the Federal Government who has exercised extreme
carelessness in the handling of classified information shall be
revoked.
SEC. 4. DEFINITION OF GROSS NEGLIGENCE.
Section 793(f) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(f)'';
(2) by striking ``(1) through'' and inserting ``(A)
through'';
(3) by striking ``(2) having'' and inserting ``(B)
having''; and
(4) by adding at the end the following:
``(2) In this subsection, the term `gross negligence' includes
extreme or reckless carelessness.''.
<all>