[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5460 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5460

   To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish a review 
process to review applications for certain grants to purchase equipment 
or systems that do not meet or exceed any applicable national voluntary 
              consensus standards, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2016

Mr. Payne (for himself and Mr. Donovan) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
   To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish a review 
process to review applications for certain grants to purchase equipment 
or systems that do not meet or exceed any applicable national voluntary 
              consensus standards, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First Responder Access to Innovative 
Technologies Act''.

SEC. 2. APPROVAL OF CERTAIN EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (f) of section 2008 of the Homeland 
Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 609) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``If an applicant'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) Application requirement.--If an applicant''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
            ``(2) Review process.--The Administrator shall implement a 
        uniform process for reviewing applications that, in accordance 
        with paragraph (1), contain explanations to use grants provided 
        under section 2003 or 2004 to purchase equipment or systems 
        that do not meet or exceed any applicable national voluntary 
        consensus standards developed under section 647 of the Post-
        Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 (6 U.S.C. 747).
            ``(3) Factors.--In carrying out the review process under 
        paragraph (2), the Administrator shall consider the following:
                    ``(A) Current or past use of proposed equipment or 
                systems by Federal agencies or the Armed Forces.
                    ``(B) The absence of a national voluntary consensus 
                standard for such equipment or systems.
                    ``(C) The existence of an international consensus 
                standard for such equipment or systems, and whether 
                such equipment or systems meets such standard.
                    ``(D) The nature of the capability gap identified 
                by the applicant and how such equipment or systems will 
                address such gap.
                    ``(E) The degree to which such equipment or systems 
                will serve the needs of the applicant better than 
                equipment or systems that meet or exceed existing 
                consensus standards.
                    ``(F) Any other factor determined appropriate by 
                the Administrator.''.
    (b) Inspector General Report.--Not later than three years after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the 
Department of Homeland Security shall submit to the Committee on 
Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report 
assessing the implementation of review process established under 
paragraph (2) of subsection (f) of section 2008 of the Homeland 
Security Act of 2002 (as added by subsection (a) of this section), 
including information on the following:
            (1) The number of requests to purchase equipment or systems 
        that do not meet or exceed any applicable consensus standard 
        evaluated under such review process.
            (2) The number of such requests granted and denied.
            (3) The processing time for the review of such requests.
                                 <all>