[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3629 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3629

  To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide that Federal law 
                      shall not preempt State law.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2015

  Ms. DeGette (for herself and Mr. Coffman) introduced the following 
  bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in 
 addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
  To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide that Federal law 
                      shall not preempt State law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Respect States' and Citizens' Rights 
Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. IN GENERAL.

    Section 708 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 903) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``No provision'' and inserting ``(a) In 
        General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), no provision''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Special Rule Regarding State Marihuana Laws.--In the case of 
any State law that pertains to marihuana, no provision of this title 
shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of the Congress 
to occupy the field in which that provision operates, including 
criminal penalties, to the exclusion of State law on the same subject 
matter, nor shall any provision of this title be construed as 
preempting any such State law.''.
                                 <all>