[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 761 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 761

     To require the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
    Agriculture to more efficiently develop domestic sources of the 
minerals and mineral materials of strategic and critical importance to 
    United States economic and national security and manufacturing 
                            competitiveness.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2013

 Mr. Amodei (for himself, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Bishop of Utah, 
Mr. Jones, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Heck of Nevada, Mr. 
 Tipton, Mr. Walden, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Latta, Mr. 
 Young of Alaska, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Benishek, Mr. Daines, Mr. Gardner, 
Mr. Schweikert, Mr. Matheson, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Labrador, Mr. 
   Stewart, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. 
 Pearce, and Mr. Luetkemeyer) introduced the following bill; which was 
referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
     To require the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
    Agriculture to more efficiently develop domestic sources of the 
minerals and mineral materials of strategic and critical importance to 
    United States economic and national security and manufacturing 
                            competitiveness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Strategic and Critical 
Minerals Production Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The industrialization of China and India has driven 
        demand for nonfuel mineral commodities, sparking a period of 
        resource nationalism exemplified by China's reduction in 
        exports of rare-earth elements necessary for 
        telecommunications, military technologies, healthcare 
        technologies, and conventional and renewable energy 
        technologies.
            (2) The availability of minerals and mineral materials are 
        essential for economic growth, national security, technological 
        innovation, and the manufacturing and agricultural supply 
        chain.
            (3) The exploration, production, processing, use, and 
        recycling of minerals contribute significantly to the economic 
        well-being, security and general welfare of the Nation.
            (4) The United States has vast mineral resources, but is 
        becoming increasingly dependent upon foreign sources of these 
        mineral materials, as demonstrated by the following:
                    (A) Twenty-five years ago the United States was 
                dependent on foreign sources for 30 nonfuel mineral 
                materials, 6 of which the United States imported 100 
                percent of the Nation's requirements, and for another 
                16 commodities the United States imported more than 60 
                percent of the Nation's needs.
                    (B) By 2011 the United States import dependence for 
                nonfuel mineral materials had more than doubled from 30 
                to 67 commodities, 19 of which the United States 
                imported 100 percent of the Nation's requirements, and 
                for another 24 commodities, imported more than 50 
                percent of the Nation's needs.
                    (C) The United States share of worldwide mineral 
                exploration dollars was 8 percent in 2011, down from 19 
                percent in the early 1990s.
                    (D) In the 2012 Ranking of Countries for Mining 
                Investment, out of 25 major mining countries, the 
                United States ranked last with Papua New Guinea in 
                permitting delays, and towards the bottom regarding 
                government take and social issues affecting mining.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Strategic and critical minerals.--The term ``strategic 
        and critical minerals'' means minerals that are necessary--
                    (A) for national defense and national security 
                requirements;
                    (B) for the Nation's energy infrastructure, 
                including pipelines, refining capacity, electrical 
                power generation and transmission, and renewable energy 
                production;
                    (C) to support domestic manufacturing, agriculture, 
                housing, telecommunications, healthcare, and 
                transportation infrastructure; and
                    (D) for the Nation's economic security and balance 
                of trade.
            (2) Agency.--The term ``agency'' means any agency, 
        department, or other unit of Federal, State, local, or tribal 
        government, or Alaska Native Corporation.
            (3) Mineral exploration or mine permit.--The term ``mineral 
        exploration or mine permit'' includes plans of operation issued 
        by the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service 
        pursuant to 43 C.F.R. 3809 and 36 C.F.R. 228A, respectively.

  TITLE I--DEVELOPMENT OF DOMESTIC SOURCES OF STRATEGIC AND CRITICAL 
                                MINERALS

SEC. 101. IMPROVING DEVELOPMENT OF STRATEGIC AND CRITICAL MINERALS.

    Domestic mines that will provide strategic and critical minerals 
shall be considered an ``infrastructure project'' as described in 
Presidential Order ``Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and 
Review of Infrastructure Projects'' dated March 22, 2012.

SEC. 102. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE LEAD AGENCY.

    (a) In General.--The lead agency with responsibility for issuing a 
mineral exploration or mine permit shall appoint a project lead who 
shall coordinate and consult with other agencies, cooperating agencies, 
project proponents and contractors to ensure that agencies minimize 
delays, set and adhere to timelines and schedules for completion of 
reviews, set clear permitting goals and track progress against those 
goals.
    (b) Determination Under NEPA.--The lead agency with responsibility 
for issuing a mineral exploration or mine permit shall determine any 
such action would not constitute a major Federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of 
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 if the procedural and 
substantive safeguards of the lead agency's permitting process alone, 
any applicable State permitting process alone, or a combination of the 
two processes together provide an adequate mechanism to ensure that 
environmental factors are taken into account.
    (c) Coordination on Permitting and Review.--The lead agency with 
responsibility for issuing a mineral exploration or mine permit shall 
enhance government coordination on permitting and review by avoiding 
duplicative reviews, minimizing paperwork and engaging other agencies 
and stakeholders early in the process. The lead agency shall consider 
the following best practices:
            (1) Deferring to and relying upon baseline data, analysis 
        and reviews preformed by State agencies with jurisdiction over 
        the proposed project.
            (2) Conducting reviews concurrently rather than 
        sequentially to the extent practicable and when such concurrent 
        review will expedite rather than delay a decision.
    (d) Time Limits for Permit Review Process.--At the request of a 
project proponent, the project lead of the agency with responsibility 
for issuing a mineral exploration or mine permit shall enter into an 
agreement with the project proponent and other cooperating agencies 
that sets time limits for each part of the permit review process 
including the following:
            (1) The decision on whether to prepare a document required 
        under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
            (2) A determination of the scope of any document required 
        under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
            (3) The scope of and schedule for the baseline studies 
        required to prepare a document required under the National 
        Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
            (4) Preparation of any draft document required under the 
        National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
            (5) Preparation of a final document required under the 
        National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
            (6) Consultations required under applicable laws.
            (7) Submission and review of any comments required under 
        applicable law.
            (8) Publication of any public notices required under 
        applicable law.
            (9) A final or any interim decisions.
    (e) Time Limit for Total Review Process.--In no case should the 
total review process described in subsection (d) exceed 30 months 
unless agreed to by the signatories of the agreement.
    (f) Limitation on Addressing Public Comments.--The lead agency is 
not required to address agency or public comments that were not 
submitted during the public comment periods provided by the lead agency 
or otherwise required by law.
    (g) Financial Assurance.--The lead agency will determine the amount 
of financial assurance for reclamation of a mineral exploration or 
mining site, which must cover the estimated cost if the lead agency 
were to contract with a third party to reclaim the operations according 
to the reclamation plan, including construction and maintenance costs 
for any treatment facilities necessary to meet Federal, State or tribal 
environmental standards.
    (h) Application to Existing Permit Applications.--This section 
shall apply with respect to a mineral exploration or mine permit for 
which an application was submitted before the date of the enactment of 
this Act if the applicant for the permit submits a written request to 
the lead agency for the permit. The lead agency shall begin 
implementing this section with respect to such application within 30 
days after receiving such written request.
    (i) Strategic and Critical Materials Within National Forests.--With 
respect to strategic and critical materials within a federally 
administered unit of the National Forest System, the lead agency 
shall--
            (1) exempt all areas of identified mineral resources in 
        Land Use Designations, other than Non-Development Land Use 
        Designations, in existence as of the date of the enactment of 
        this Act from the procedures detailed at and all rules 
        promulgated under part 294 of title 36, Code for Federal 
        Regulations;
            (2) apply such exemption to all additional routes and areas 
        that the lead agency finds necessary to facilitate the 
        construction, operation, maintenance, and restoration of the 
        areas of identified mineral resources described in paragraph 
        (1); and
            (3) continue to apply such exemptions after approval of the 
        Minerals Plan of Operations for the unit of the National Forest 
        System.

SEC. 103. CONSERVATION OF THE RESOURCE.

    In developing the mineral exploration or mine permit, the priority 
of the lead agency shall be to maximize the development of the mineral 
resource, while mitigating environmental impacts, so that more of the 
mineral resource can be brought to the market place.

SEC. 104. FEDERAL REGISTER PROCESS FOR MINERAL EXPLORATION AND MINING 
              PROJECTS.

    (a) Preparation of Federal Notices for Mineral Exploration and Mine 
Development Projects.--The preparation of Federal Register notices 
required by law associated with the issuance of a mineral exploration 
or mine permit shall be delegated to the organization level within the 
agency responsible for issuing the mineral exploration or mine permit. 
All Federal Register notices regarding official document availability, 
announcements of meetings, or notices of intent to undertake an action 
shall be originated and transmitted to the Federal Register from the 
office where documents are held, meetings are held, or the activity is 
initiated.
    (b) Departmental Review of Federal Register Notices for Mineral 
Exploration and Mining Projects.--Absent any extraordinary circumstance 
or except as otherwise required by any Act of Congress, each Federal 
Register notice described in subsection (a) shall undergo any required 
reviews within the Department of the Interior or the Department of 
Agriculture and be published in its final form in the Federal Register 
no later than 30 days after its initial preparation.

TITLE II--JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AGENCY ACTIONS RELATING TO EXPLORATION AND 
                              MINE PERMITS

SEC. 201. DEFINITIONS FOR TITLE.

    In this title the term ``covered civil action'' means a civil 
action against the Federal Government containing a claim under section 
702 of title 5, United States Code, regarding agency action affecting a 
mineral exploration or mine permit.

SEC. 202. TIMELY FILINGS.

    A covered civil action is barred unless filed no later than the end 
of the 60-day period beginning on the date of the final Federal agency 
action to which it relates.

SEC. 203. RIGHT TO INTERVENE.

    The holder of any mineral exploration or mine permit may intervene 
as of right in any covered civil action by a person affecting rights or 
obligations of the permit holder under the permit.

SEC. 204. EXPEDITION IN HEARING AND DETERMINING THE ACTION.

    The court shall endeavor to hear and determine any covered civil 
action as expeditiously as possible.

SEC. 205. LIMITATION ON PROSPECTIVE RELIEF.

    In a covered civil action, the court shall not grant or approve any 
prospective relief unless the court finds that such relief is narrowly 
drawn, extends no further than necessary to correct the violation of a 
legal requirement, and is the least intrusive means necessary to 
correct that violation.

SEC. 206. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS' FEES.

    Sections 504 of title 5, United States Code, and 2412 of title 28, 
United States Code (together commonly called the Equal Access to 
Justice Act) do not apply to a covered civil action, nor shall any 
party in such a covered civil action receive payment from the Federal 
Government for their attorneys' fees, expenses, and other court costs.
                                 <all>