[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4519 Introduced in House (IH)]
113th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 4519
To prohibit the United States from funding projects that discriminate
against Israeli organizations that operate beyond the 1949 armistice
lines.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 29, 2014
Mr. Stockman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Foreign Affairs
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To prohibit the United States from funding projects that discriminate
against Israeli organizations that operate beyond the 1949 armistice
lines.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Prohibiting Discrimination Against
Israel Act''.
SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.
Congress finds:
(1) In 1995, the Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the
Gaza Strip (commonly referred to as the Oslo II Accord)
formally divided Judea and Samaria into three administrative
divisions, with Area C being under full Israeli civil and
security control; therefore, foreign countries should not
discriminate against Israeli organizations that operate there.
(2) In 1995, the United States Congress passed the
Jerusalem Embassy Act (Public Law 104-45) which formally
recognized Jerusalem as the capital of the State of Israel, and
concluded that it should remain an undivided city.
(3) The claim that Israeli settlements beyond the 1949
armistice lines are an obstacle to peace has been repeatedly
disproven, and the 2005 expulsion from Gaza and the 2010 freeze
on natural growth in the settlements harmed the peace process
and led to an increase in violence, not a decrease.
(4) Notwithstanding allegations to the contrary, Israeli
settlements in these territories do not in any way violate
Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention; they are completely
voluntary, and do not involve ``individual or mass forcible
transfers'' prohibited by subpart (1) of Article 49.
(5) In 2009, the Kingdom of Spain refused to allow a team
from Ariel University Center of Samaria (now known as Ariel
University) to participate in a solar energy competition funded
by the United States Department of Energy solely because the
university was located beyond Israel's 1949 armistice line; at
the same time, the Spanish government funded projects from
universities in other disputed regions including Artsakh State
University in Nagorno-Karabakh and Eastern Mediterranean
University in Northern Cyprus.
(6) In 2010, The Government Pension Fund of Norway excluded
several Israeli companies based solely on the fact that they
operate in Judea and Samaria.
(7) In 2010, the European Court of Justice issued a ruling
in Brita GmbH v. Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen (Case C-386/08)
prohibiting Israeli products produced beyond the 1949 armistice
line from being labeled as ``Made in Israel'', which caused
them to be subject to higher tariffs.
(8) In 2010, the United Kingdom banned an Israeli tourism
advertisement because it included a photograph of the Old City
of Jerusalem, which is located beyond the 1949 armistice line
and was fully annexed by Israel in 1980.
(9) In 2013, the European Union issued orders forbidding
its member states from cooperating, transferring funds, or
giving scholarships or research grants to organizations beyond
Israel's 1949 armistice line.
SEC. 3. GENERAL AUTHORIZATION.
It shall be the policy of the United States that no funds
authorized or appropriated by Federal law may be expended for any
international project that prohibits participation of Israeli
organizations that operate beyond the 1949 armistice line.
SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.
The provisions of this Act shall take effect immediately following
enactment.
<all>