<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE resolution PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/res.dtd//EN" "res.dtd">
<resolution dms-id="HA3F141DB573442EB96699909E5475575" key="H" public-private="public" resolution-stage="Introduced-in-House" resolution-type="house-resolution" star-print="no-star-print">
	<form>
		<distribution-code display="yes">IV</distribution-code>
		<congress display="yes">112th CONGRESS</congress>
		<session display="yes">1st Session</session>
		<legis-num>H. RES. 475</legis-num>
		<current-chamber>IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</current-chamber>
		<action display="yes">
			<action-date date="20111129">November 29, 2011</action-date>
			<action-desc><sponsor name-id="R000582">Mr. Roe of Tennessee</sponsor>
			 (for himself, <cosponsor name-id="C001062">Mr. Conaway</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="G000550">Mr. Gingrey of Georgia</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="D000533">Mr. Duncan of Tennessee</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="P000601">Mr. Palazzo</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="B001275">Mr. Bucshon</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="B001269">Mr. Barletta</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="B001244">Mr. Bonner</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="H001045">Mr. Harper</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="B001257">Mr. Bilirakis</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="W000810">Mr. Woodall</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="C001087">Mr. Crawford</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="G000552">Mr. Gohmert</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="B001248">Mr. Burgess</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="A000361">Mr. Alexander</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="M001177">Mr. McClintock</cosponsor>, and
			 <cosponsor name-id="M001150">Mrs. Miller of Michigan</cosponsor>) submitted the
			 following resolution; which was referred to the
			 <committee-name committee-id="HWM00">Committee on Ways and
			 Means</committee-name>, and in addition to the Committees on
			 <committee-name committee-id="HIF00">Energy and Commerce</committee-name>,
			 <committee-name committee-id="HED00">Education and the
			 Workforce</committee-name>, <committee-name committee-id="HJU00">the
			 Judiciary</committee-name>, <committee-name committee-id="HII00">Natural
			 Resources</committee-name>, <committee-name committee-id="HHA00">House
			 Administration</committee-name>, <committee-name committee-id="HRU00">Rules</committee-name>, and
			 <committee-name committee-id="HAP00">Appropriations</committee-name>, for a
			 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for
			 consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the
			 committee concerned</action-desc>
		</action>
		<legis-type>RESOLUTION</legis-type>
		<official-title display="yes">Expressing the sense of the House of
		  Representatives that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is
		  unconstitutional.</official-title>
	</form>
	<preamble>
		<whereas><text>Whereas section 5000A(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of
			 1986, added by section 1501 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,
			 and commonly referred to as the <quote>individual mandate</quote>, and the
			 penalty provision in section 5000A(b) of such Code that enforces it, are
			 unconstitutional because they were not an exercise of Congress’s power to tax,
			 and they are beyond Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause and the
			 Necessary and Proper Clause; and</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the individual mandate and the penalty provision
			 that enforces it are not severable from the remainder of the Patient Protection
			 and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148): Now, therefore, be it</text>
		</whereas></preamble>
	<resolution-body id="H038C46C8703944A79F7580B0BC25A8B6" style="traditional">
		<section display-inline="yes-display-inline" id="HC0B1CAEAFE314DA7A6153410781B46A9" section-type="undesignated-section"><enum></enum><text>That it is the sense of the House of
			 Representatives that—</text>
			<paragraph id="HF09A7F005675459BB79DEAC7AAF05E86"><enum>(1)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
			 Act is unconstitutional in its entirety; and</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="HAC2FE5A06D004BB1A29B63B1A242C87E"><enum>(2)</enum><text>section 7421 of
			 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, commonly referred to as the
			 <quote>Anti-Injunction Act</quote>, applies neither to the individual mandate
			 nor to the penalty provision that enforces it, and therefore does not preclude
			 the Federal courts from finding that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
			 Act is unconstitutional in its entirety.</text>
			</paragraph></section></resolution-body>
</resolution>
