<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE resolution PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/res.dtd//EN" "res.dtd">
<resolution dms-id="H3365C7B6466149FBA16E299D27693D93" key="H" public-private="public" resolution-stage="Introduced-in-House" resolution-type="house-resolution" star-print="no-star-print">
	<form>
		<distribution-code display="yes">IV</distribution-code>
		<congress display="yes">112th CONGRESS</congress>
		<session display="yes">1st Session</session>
		<legis-num>H. RES. 469</legis-num>
		<current-chamber>IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</current-chamber>
		<action display="yes">
			<action-date date="20111116">November 16, 2011</action-date>
			<action-desc><sponsor name-id="R000582">Mr. Roe of Tennessee</sponsor>
			 submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
			 <committee-name committee-id="HJU00">Committee on the
			 Judiciary</committee-name>, and in addition to the Committees on
			 <committee-name committee-id="HIF00">Energy and Commerce</committee-name>,
			 <committee-name committee-id="HWM00">Ways and Means</committee-name>,
			 <committee-name committee-id="HED00">Education and the
			 Workforce</committee-name>, <committee-name committee-id="HII00">Natural
			 Resources</committee-name>, <committee-name committee-id="HHA00">House
			 Administration</committee-name>, <committee-name committee-id="HRU00">Rules</committee-name>, and
			 <committee-name committee-id="HAP00">Appropriations</committee-name>, for a
			 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for
			 consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the
			 committee concerned</action-desc>
		</action>
		<legis-type>RESOLUTION</legis-type>
		<official-title display="yes">Expressing the sense of the House of
		  Representatives that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is
		  unconstitutional.</official-title>
	</form>
	<preamble>
		<whereas><text>Whereas section 1501 of the Patient Protection and
			 Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18091), commonly referred to as the
			 <quote>individual mandate</quote>, is unconstitutional because it was not an
			 exercise of Congress’s power to tax, and it is beyond Congress’s power under
			 the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the individual mandate is not severable from the
			 remainder of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18001
			 note, et seq.): Now, therefore, be it</text>
		</whereas></preamble>
	<resolution-body id="H17CC87CFDA8F4C6090F953C3BE99A04C" style="traditional">
		<section display-inline="yes-display-inline" id="H18C3C3DB84A842C4A2226CFB0F01D04E" section-type="undesignated-section"><enum></enum><text>That it is the sense of the House of
			 Representatives that—</text>
			<paragraph id="HC9B892F827FD4A3E86A71A8532A2C66E"><enum>(1)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
			 Act is unconstitutional in its entirety; and</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="H38A91E6511D74007B101D36AC56E2F9F"><enum>(2)</enum><text>the
			 Anti-Injunction Act (28 U.S.C. 2283) does not apply to the penalty provision
			 that enforces the individual mandate, and therefore does not preclude the
			 Federal courts from finding that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
			 is unconstitutional in its entirety.</text>
			</paragraph></section></resolution-body>
</resolution>
