1.This Act may be cited as the
NATO Enhancement Act of
2012
.
2.Congress makes the following
findings:
(1)The sustained
commitment of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) to mutual defense
has made possible the democratic transformation of Central and Eastern
Europe.
(2)Lasting stability
and security in Europe requires the further military, economic, and political
integration of emerging democracies into existing European and transatlantic
structures.
(3)NATO is not
directed against any single adversary and must continue to develop close
partnerships with non-member nations.
(4)In an era of
threats from terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction,
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization has effectively adapted its mission and
responded to new threats and challenges.
(5)NATO is currently
involved in several operations benefiting United States national security,
including the International Security and Assistance Force (ISAF) for
Afghanistan, NATO’s Kosovo Force (KFOR), the counter-terrorism Operation Active
Endeavor in the Mediterranean Sea, anti-piracy Operation Ocean Shield off the
Horn of Africa, support for African Union missions, as well as the completed
missions of Operation Unified Protector in Libya in 2011, the Implementation
(IFOR) and Stabilization Forces (SFOR) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Operation
Essential Harvest in Macedonia, training of Iraqi security forces, and
humanitarian missions after Hurricane Katrina, in Darfur, and in
Pakistan.
(6)NATO serves as a
force multiplier, whose command structures, training institutions, and
multilateral exercises have generated unprecedented multinational contributions
to United States national security priorities and enabled European soldiers to
fight side-by-side with members of the United States Armed Forces.
(7)NATO is a
community of democracies that can act collectively to promote freedom,
stability, and peace around the globe.
(8)Allies who have
recently acceded to NATO, as well as partner nations such as Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Georgia, the Republic of Macedonia, and Montenegro are among the
highest per capita contributors to NATO missions.
(9)Members of the
United States Armed Forces and NATO forces have provided tremendous sacrifice
on behalf of the freedom and security of the NATO alliance, and those soldiers
who have perished fighting on behalf of the Western alliance should be forever
remembered for their ultimate sacrifice.
(10)In the NATO
Participation Act of 1994 (title II of Public Law 103–447; 22 U.S.C. 1928
note), Congress declared that full and active participants in the
Partnership for Peace in a position to further the principles of the North
Atlantic Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area
should be invited to become full NATO members in accordance with Article 10 of
such Treaty at an early date
.
(11)In the NATO
Enlargement Facilitation Act of 1996 (22 U.S.C. 1928 note 110 Stat. 3009–173),
Congress called for the prompt admission of Poland, Hungary, the Czech
Republic, and Slovenia to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and declared
that in order to promote economic stability and security in Slovakia,
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, Moldova, and Ukraine …
the process of enlarging NATO to include emerging democracies in Central and
Eastern Europe should not be limited to consideration of admitting Poland,
Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovenia as full members of the NATO
Alliance
.
(12)At the Madrid
Summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in July 1997, Poland, Hungary,
and the Czech Republic were invited to join the Alliance, and the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Heads of State and Government issued a declaration
stating, The alliance expects to extend further invitations in coming
years to nations willing and able to assume the responsibilities and
obligations of membership … No European democratic country whose admission
would fulfill the objectives of the [North Atlantic] Treaty will be excluded
from consideration.
.
(13)In the European
Security Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 1928 note; 112 Stat. 2681–839), Congress
declared that Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic should not be the
last emerging democracies in Central and Eastern Europe invited to join
NATO
and that Romania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Bulgaria
… would make an outstanding contribution to furthering the goals of NATO and
enhancing stability, freedom, and peace in Europe should they become NATO
members [and] upon complete satisfaction of all relevant criteria should be
invited to become full NATO members at the earliest possible
date
.
(14)On February 11,
1998, the Senate approved the resolution of advice and consent to ratification
of the Protocols to the North Atlantic Treaty of 1949 on Accession of Poland,
Hungary, and the Czech Republic (Treaty Document 105–36), inviting Poland,
Hungary, and the Czech Republic to join the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization.
(15)At the Washington
Summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in April 1999, the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Heads of State and Government issued a communique
declaring, We pledge that NATO will continue to welcome new members in a
position to further the principles of the [North Atlantic] Treaty and
contribute to peace and security in the Euro-Atlantic area … The three new
members will not be the last … No European democratic country whose admission
would fulfill the objectives of the Treaty will be excluded from consideration,
regardless of its geographic location …
.
(16)In the Gerald B.
H. Solomon Freedom Consolidation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–187; 22 U.S.C.
1928 note), Congress endorsed the vision of further enlargement of the
NATO Alliance articulated by President George W. Bush on June 15, 2001, and by
former President William J. Clinton on October 22, 1996
.
(17)At the Prague
Summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in November 2002, Bulgaria,
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia were invited to
join the Alliance in the second round of enlargement of the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization since the end of the Cold War, and the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization Heads of State and Government issued a declaration stating,
NATO's door will remain open to European democracies willing and able to
assume the responsibilities and obligations of membership, in accordance with
Article 10 of the Washington Treaty.
.
(18)On May 8, 2003,
the Senate unanimously approved the resolution of advice and consent to
ratification of the Protocols to the North Atlantic Treaty of 1949 on Accession
of Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia,
inviting Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia
(Treaty Document 108–4), inviting those countries to join the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization.
(19)At the Istanbul
Summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in June 2004, the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Heads of State and Government issued a communique
reaffirming that NATO's door remains open to new members, declaring, We
celebrate the success of NATO's Open Door Policy, and reaffirm today that our
seven new members will not be the last. The door to membership remains open. We
welcome the progress made by Albania, Croatia, and the former Yugoslav Republic
of Macedonia(1) in implementing their Annual
National Programmes under the Membership Action Plan, and encourage them to
continue pursuing the reforms necessary to progress toward NATO membership. We
also commend their contribution to regional stability and cooperation. We want
all three countries to succeed and will continue to assist them in their reform
efforts. NATO will continue to assess each country's candidacy individually,
based on the progress made towards reform goals pursued through the Membership
Action Plan, which will remain the vehicle to keep the readiness of each
aspirant for membership under review. We direct that NATO Foreign Ministers
keep the enlargement process, including the implementation of the Membership
Action Plan, under continual review and report to us. We will review at the
next Summit progress by aspirants towards membership based on that
report.
.
(20)At the Riga
Summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in November 2006, the Heads of
State and Government of the member countries of NATO issued a declaration
reaffirming that NATO's door remains open to new members, declaring,
[A]ll European democratic countries may be considered for MAP
(Membership Action Plan) or admission, subject to decision by the NAC (North
Atlantic Council) at each stage, based on the performance of these countries
towards meeting the objectives of the North Atlantic Treaty. We direct that
NATO Foreign Ministers keep that process under continual review and report to
us. We welcome the efforts of Albania, Croatia, and the former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia to prepare themselves for the responsibilities and
obligations of membership. We reaffirm that the Alliance will continue with
Georgia and Ukraine its Intensified Dialogues which cover the full range of
political, military, financial and security issues relating to those countries'
aspirations to membership, without prejudice to any eventual Alliance decision.
We reaffirm the importance of the NATO-Ukraine Distinctive Partnership, which
has its 10th anniversary next year and welcome the progress that has been made
in the framework of our Intensified Dialogue. We appreciate Ukraine's
substantial contributions to our common security, including through
participation in NATO-led operations and efforts to promote regional
cooperation. We encourage Ukraine to continue to contribute to regional
security. We are determined to continue to assist, through practical
cooperation, in the implementation of far-reaching reform efforts, notably in
the fields of national security, defence, reform of the defence-industrial
sector and fighting corruption. We welcome the commencement of an Intensified
Dialogue with Georgia as well as Georgia's contribution to international
peacekeeping and security operations. We will continue to engage actively with
Georgia in support of its reform process. We encourage Georgia to continue
progress on political, economic and military reforms, including strengthening
judicial reform, as well as the peaceful resolution of outstanding conflicts on
its territory. We reaffirm that it is of great importance that all parties in
the region should engage constructively to promote regional peace and
stability.
.
(21)In the NATO
Freedom Consolidation Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–17; 22 U.S.C. 1928 note),
Congress designated Albania, Croatia, Georgia, the Republic of Macedonia, and
Ukraine eligible to receive assistance under the NATO Participation Act of 1994
and expressed support for qualified candidate states, specifically by
entering into a Membership Action Plan with Georgia and recognizing the
progress toward meeting the responsibilities and obligations of NATO membership
by Albania, Croatia, Georgia, the Republic of Macedonia, and
Ukraine
.
(22)At the Bucharest
Summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in April 2008, the Heads of
State and Government of the member countries of NATO declared, NATO’s
ongoing enlargement process has been an historic success in advancing stability
and cooperation and bringing us closer to our common goal of a Europe whole and
free, united in peace, democracy and common values. NATO’s door will remain
open to European democracies willing and able to assume the responsibilities
and obligations of membership, in accordance with Article 10 of the Washington
Treaty. We reiterate that decisions on enlargement are for NATO itself to
make.
.
(23)At the Bucharest
Summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in April 2008, the Heads of
State and Government of the member countries of NATO declared, NATO
welcomes Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic aspirations for membership in
NATO. We agreed today that these countries will become members of NATO. Both
nations have made valuable contributions to Alliance
operations.
.
(24)The Bucharest
Declaration also stated, [W]e have decided to invite Albania and Croatia
to begin accession talks to join our Alliance. We congratulate these countries
on this historic achievement, earned through years of hard work and a
demonstrated commitment to our common security and NATO’s shared
values.
.
(25)On September 25,
2008, the Senate approved the Resolution Advising and Consenting to
Ratification of the Protocols to the North Atlantic Treaty of 1949 on Accession
of Albania and Croatia (Treaty Document 110–20), inviting Croatia and Albania
to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
(26)At the
Strasbourg/Kehl NATO Summit, the Heads of State and Government participating in
the meeting of the North Atlantic Council on April 4, 2009, reiterated that
[i]n accordance with Article 10 of the Washington Treaty, NATO's door
will remain open to all European democracies which share the values of our
Alliance, which are willing and able to assume the responsibilities and
obligations of membership, and whose inclusion can contribute to common
security and stability
.
(27)On April 4, 2009,
at the Strasbourg/Kehl NATO Summit, President Barack Obama stated, I'd
also like to note that as we welcome Albania and Croatia to NATO, this will not
be the last time that we have such a celebration, and I look forward to the day
when we can welcome Macedonia to the Alliance. The door to membership will
remain open for other countries that meet NATO's standards and can make a
meaningful contribution to allied security.
.
(28)At the Lisbon
Summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in November 2010, the Heads of
State and Government of the member countries of NATO declared, NATO’s
door will remain open to all European democracies which share the values of our
Alliance, which are willing and able to assume the responsibilities and
obligations of membership, which are in a position to further the principles of
the Treaty, and whose inclusion can contribute to the security of the North
Atlantic area.
.
(29)The Lisbon
Declaration of November 2010 included the following statements:
(A)We
reiterate the agreement at our 2008 Bucharest Summit to extend an invitation to
the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia as soon as a mutually acceptable
solution to the name issue has been reached within the framework of the UN, and
urge intensified efforts towards that end.
.
(B)We welcome
the considerable progress that Montenegro has made on its road to Euro-Atlantic
integration and its contribution to security in the region and beyond,
including through its participation in ISAF. Its active engagement in the
Membership Action Plan (MAP) process demonstrates Montenegro's firm commitment
to join the Alliance.
.
(C)We fully
support the membership aspiration of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
.
(D)We welcome,
and continue to support, the Government of Serbia’s stated commitment to
Serbia's Euro-Atlantic integration.
.
(E)At the 2008
Bucharest Summit we agreed that Georgia will become a member of NATO and we
reaffirm all elements of that decision, as well as subsequent
decisions.
.
(F)A stable,
democratic and economically prosperous Ukraine is an important factor for
Euro-Atlantic security.
.
(30)The Republic of
Macedonia should not have been denied NATO Membership in 2008.
(31)Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Georgia, the Republic of Macedonia, and Montenegro have expressed
a clear national intent to join NATO and should therefore be granted Membership
Action Plans.
(32)The Governments
of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, the Republic of Macedonia, and Montenegro
have met the basic standards for accession (even as specific defense reforms
continue) and displayed their willingness and ability to meet the
responsibilities of membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and
the accession of these countries, as well as continued development of
cooperation with other Partnership for Peace members, would benefit security
and stability in Europe and advance United States national security
interests.
(33)The NATO Lisbon
Declaration of 2010 also enshrined NATO’s commitment to territorial missile
defense, stating, The threat to NATO European populations, territory and
forces posed by the proliferation of ballistic missiles is increasing. As
missile defence forms part of a broader response to counter this threat, we
have decided that the Alliance will develop a missile defence capability to
pursue its core task of collective defence.
.
(34)Political support
for missile defense as a NATO mission will be strongest if the costs and
benefits are broadly shared throughout the Alliance, including through greater
European financial and industrial contributions to the missile defense
mission.
(35)The NATO Lisbon
Declaration reaffirmed the Alliance commitment to fund NATO operations at
adequate levels, stating, We reaffirm our resolve to continue to provide
the resources, including the forces and capabilities required to perform the
full range of Alliance missions. … We are determined to pursue reform and
defence transformation and continue to make our forces more deployable,
sustainable, interoperable, and thus more usable.
.
3.
(a)It is the policy of the United
States—
(1)to continue to foster the creation of a
Europe whole, free, and at peace;
(2)to support the right of every nation of
Europe to choose its own defense alliances and security relationships;
(3)to reject the notion of privileged spheres
of influence;
(4)to continue to strongly support an
open door
policy with respect to the accession of additional
countries to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, including the NATO
aspirant nations of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, the Republic of Macedonia,
and Montenegro;
(5)to continue to provide assistance to
countries aspiring to accede to, or deepen relationships with, NATO in terms of
providing training, defense planning assistance, military exchanges, and
security assistance; and
(6)to continue to advocate these goals within
the NATO alliance and encourage the accession to NATO of all aspirant nations,
including Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, the Republic of Macedonia, and
Montenegro.
(b)With respect to United States forward
deployed nuclear weapons in Europe, the policy of the United States will be
guided by the following principles:
(1)As long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will
remain a nuclear alliance.
(2)The presence of nuclear weapons of the
United States in Europe—combined with NATO's unique nuclear sharing
arrangements under which non-nuclear members participate in nuclear planning
and possess specially configured aircraft capable of delivering nuclear
weapons—contributes to the cohesion of NATO and provides reassurance to allies
and partners who feel exposed to regional threats and a tool in dealing with
neighboring states hostile to NATO.
(3)The United States should pursue
negotiations with the Russian Federation aimed at the reduction of Russian
deployed and nondeployed, nonstrategic nuclear forces.
(4)Nonstrategic
nuclear weapons should be considered when weighing the balance of the nuclear
forces of the United States and the Russian Federation.
(5)Any geographical
relocation or storage of nonstrategic nuclear weapons by the Russian Federation
does not constitute a reduction or elimination of such weapons.
(6)The vast advantage
of the Russian Federation in nonstrategic nuclear weapons constitutes a threat
to the United States and its allies and a growing asymmetry in Western
Europe.
(c)It is the policy of
the United States that—
(1)the European Phased Adaptive Approach
(EPAA) is a United States program to support NATO’s mission of territorial
defense against ballistic missile attack;
(2)the United States will continue to
implement and fund, with financial support of allies, all four phases of the
EPAA, consistent with President Obama's letter to the Senate on December 18,
2010;
(3)the United States will continue to seek
further allied contributions to this mission (including radars, sensors,
interceptors, and financial support), in addition to European commitments
regarding NATO’s Active Layered Theater Ballistic Missile Defense (ALTBMD);
and
(4)broad allied
burden and risk sharing for the NATO territorial missile defense mission will
be critical to its long-term viability and success.
(d)It is the policy of the United States—
(1)to seek defense
efficiencies where possible to ensure that the NATO alliance is effective and
efficient, including elements of greater specialization, prioritization, and
cooperation (pooling and sharing); and
(2)to nonetheless
press NATO allies to reduce the defense gap with the United States by equipping
themselves with capabilities that are deemed to be critical, deployable, and
sustainable, to meet the agreed upon benchmark of spending at least 2 percent
of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on defense, and to demonstrate political
determination to achieve these goals.
4.It is the sense of
Congress that, at the Chicago Summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
in May 2012, the President should lead NATO efforts—
(1)to ensure that enlargement remains a
priority;
(2)to grant or
provide a clear roadmap for the granting of a NATO Membership Action Plan (or
other equivalent plan) to Georgia and Bosnia and Herzogovina; and
(3)to invite, or
provide a clear roadmap for inviting, the Republic of Macedonia and Montenegro
to join NATO.
5.Designation of
Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro as eligible to receive assistance under
the NATO Participation Act of 1994
(a)
(1)Bosnia and Herzegovina is designated as eligible to
receive assistance under the program established under section 203(a) of the
NATO Participation Act of 1994 (title II of Public Law 103–447; 22 U.S.C. 1928
note), and shall be deemed to have been so designated pursuant to section
203(d)(1) of such Act.
(2)Assistance to
place immovable defense property under ministry of defense
jurisdictionAssistance provided pursuant to paragraph (1) shall
in part be directed towards encouraging and assisting the Government of Bosnia
and Herzegovina in its efforts to place all immovable defense property under
the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Defense in order to fulfill the
requirements to join the NATO Membership Action Plan.
(b)Montenegro
is designated as eligible to receive assistance under the program established
under section 203(a) of the NATO Participation Act of 1994, and shall be deemed
to have been so designated pursuant to section 203(d)(1) of such Act.
6.Authorization of
security assistance to Bosnia and Herzogovina and Montenegro under the NATO
Participation Act of 1994Of
the amounts made available for fiscal year 2012 under section 23 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2763), such sums as may be necessary are
authorized to be appropriated for assistance to Bosnia and Herzegovina and
Montenegro.
7.Reauthorization
of security assistance for countries previously designated as eligible to
receive assistance under the NATO Participation Act of 1994Of the amounts made available for fiscal
year 2012 under section 23 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2763) such
sums as may be necessary are authorized to be appropriated for assistance to
Georgia, the Republic of Macedonia, and Ukraine.
8.Reauthorization
of programs to facilitate transition to NATO membershipSection 203 of the NATO Participation Act
(Public Law 103–447; 22 U.S.C. 1928 note) is amended—
(1)in subsection
(a)—
(A)by striking
The President may establish a program
and inserting the
following: “The President—
(1)may establish a
program
;
and
(B)by striking
pursuant to subsection (d).
and inserting the following:
“pursuant to subsection (d); and
(2)shall establish
and regularly update bilateral programs to assist Bosnia and Herzogovina
Georgia, the Republic of Macedonia, and Montenegro to achieve full NATO
membership.
;
(2)in subsection
(b)—
(A)in paragraph (2),
by striking ; and
and inserting a semicolon;
(B)in paragraph (3),
by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and
(C)by adding at the
end the following new paragraphs:
(4)bilateral
exchanges of military officers;
(5)joint assessments
of defense needs upon the request of any country designated under subsection
(d), including with respect to the objectives under section 1242 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81);
and
(6)sales of defense
articles and services necessary to maintain sufficient territorial self-defense
capabilities in accordance with every nation’s right to self-defense under
Article 51 of the Charter of the United
Nations.
;
(3)in subsection
(c)—
(A)by striking
paragraph (5);
(B)by redesignating
paragraphs (2), (3), (4), (6), and (7) as paragraphs (3), (4), (6), (9), and
(11), respectively;
(C)by inserting after
paragraph (1) the following new paragraph:
(2)The transfer of
nonlethal excess defense articles under section 516 of the Foreign Assistance
Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j), without regard to the restriction in subsection
(a) of such section (relating to the justification of the foreign military
financing program for the fiscal year in which a transfer is
authorized).
;
(D)by inserting after
paragraph (4), as redesignated by subparagraph (B), the following new
paragraph:
(5)Approval of
commercial export sales under the Arms Export Control
Act.
;
(E)by inserting after
paragraph (6), as redesignated by subparagraph (B), the following new
paragraphs:
(7)Nonproliferation,
Anti-Terrorism, Demining, and Related Programs assistance.
(8)Assistance under
section 481 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291; relating to
international narcotics control and law
enforcement).
;
and
(F)by inserting after
paragraph (9), as redesignated by subparagraph (B), the following new
paragraph:
(10)Military
assistance under section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat.
2456).
;
and
(4)by inserting at
the end the following new subsection:
(h)The
programs established under subsection (a) shall not inhibit security
cooperation in terms of interoperability, training, reform, joint exercises,
and bilateral exchanges with nations previously designated as eligible to
receive security assistance under this Act but no longer expressing a national
intent to join the NATO
Alliance.
.
9.Priority delivery
of excess defense articlesNotwithstanding any other provision of law,
the provision and delivery of excess defense articles to Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Georgia, the Republic of Macedonia, and Montenegro under the
authority of paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 203(c) of the NATO Participation
Act of 1994 (Public Law 103–447; 22 U.S.C. 1928 note), as amended by section 8,
and section 516 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j) shall
be given priority to the maximum extent practicable.
10.
(a)Not later than 90
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall
provide to the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Armed
Services of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee
on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on NATO
accession.
(b)The report required under subsection (a)
shall include the following elements:
(1)A description of all assistance provided
under the programs established under section 203(a) of the NATO Participation
Act of 1994 (Public Law 103–447; 22 U.S.C. 1928 note), as amended by section 7,
or otherwise provided by the United States Government to facilitate the
transition to full NATO membership of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, the
Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, and other countries designated pursuant to
section 203(d) of the NATO Participation Act of 1994 (Public Law 103–447; 22
U.S.C. 1928 note).
(2)A description of United States diplomatic
efforts currently underway or anticipated to facilitate an agreement between
the Republic of Macedonia and Greece concerning the dispute over the official
name of the Republic of Macedonia, taking into consideration the December 5,
2011, judgment by the International Court of Justice concerning the
dispute.
(3)A description of additional national steps,
if any, that must be undertaken by Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, the
Republic of Macedonia, and Montenegro in terms of reform, doctrine, and
readiness in order to meet the qualifications necessary to achieve accession to
NATO.
(4)A
description of United States efforts to uphold the sovereignty and territorial
integrity of Georgia.
(5)A
description of all current and projected financial and technical contributions
by NATO allies to the NATO territorial missile defense mission, including all
national assets that have been or will be dedicated to the NATO missile defense
mission.
(c)The report shall be submitted in
unclassified format and may be supplemented by a classified annex.