<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE resolution PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/res.dtd//EN" "res.dtd">
<resolution dms-id="H4521163821A34AABB192F9D80BB5BD57" key="H" public-private="public" resolution-stage="Introduced-in-House" resolution-type="house-concurrent" star-print="no-star-print">
	<form>
		<distribution-code display="yes">IV</distribution-code>
		<congress display="yes">112th CONGRESS</congress>
		<session display="yes">1st Session</session>
		<legis-num>H. CON. RES. 25</legis-num>
		<current-chamber>IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</current-chamber>
		<action display="yes">
			<action-date date="20110303">March 3, 2011</action-date>
			<action-desc><sponsor name-id="H001053">Mrs. Hartzler</sponsor>
			 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the
			 <committee-name committee-id="HJU00">Committee on the
			 Judiciary</committee-name></action-desc>
		</action>
		<legis-type>CONCURRENT RESOLUTION</legis-type>
		<official-title display="yes">Expressing the sense of Congress with
		  respect to the Obama administration’s discontinuing to defend the Defense of
		  Marriage Act.</official-title>
	</form>
	<preamble>
		<whereas><text>Whereas on February 23, 2011, President Barack Obama
			 ordered the Justice Department to drop its defense of a central part of the
			 1996 law that bars the Federal Government from recognizing same-sex unions, the
			 Defense of Marriage Act, and both President Obama and Attorney General Eric
			 Holder concluded the law is unconstitutional;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas President Obama himself has said that marriage is
			 something sanctified between a man and a woman;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas passed by significant majorities in both chambers
			 of Congress and signed into law by President Bill Clinton, the Defense of
			 Marriage Act has never been overturned in any Federal lawsuit challenging its
			 constitutionality by a Federal Court, yet the Department of Justice has decided
			 not to defend this act in Federal court;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas on the contrary, the Department of Justice is
			 vigorously defending in numerous Federal courts across the country President
			 Obama’s signature health care reform law, the Patient Protection and Affordable
			 Care Act (Public Law 111–148), and the related Health Care and Education
			 Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152), after these bills barely
			 passed both chambers of Congress on party line votes, and whose critical
			 Individual Mandate provision has been declared unconstitutional by, separate
			 Federal district courts in the cases of Florida v. Department of Health and
			 Human Services, Case No.: 3:10–cv–91–RV/EMT (N.D. Fla., Jan. 31, 2011), and
			 Virginia ex rel. Cuccinelli v. Sebelius, No. 3:10cv188–HEH (E.D. Va., filed
			 Dec. 13, 2010); and</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the vast majority of Americans believe that
			 marriage should continue to be what it always has been—the legal and spiritual
			 union between one man and one woman: Now, therefore, be it</text>
		</whereas></preamble>
	<resolution-body id="HA06347F1D947411481D0F979BE651F84" style="traditional">
		<section display-inline="yes-display-inline" id="H922DBD60E0884851B5E298FAE9D7F14B" section-type="undesignated-section"><enum></enum><text>That the Congress—</text>
			<paragraph id="H047948E031E9486F9AD0E99EB204A1AA"><enum>(1)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">condemns the Obama administration’s
			 direction that the Department of Justice should discontinue defending the
			 Defense of Marriage Act; and</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="HD5D75F336F594DF1B4467D7791B179B6"><enum>(2)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">demands that the Department of Justice
			 continue to defend the Defense of Marriage Act in all instances.</text>
			</paragraph></section></resolution-body>
</resolution>
