<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE resolution PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/res.dtd//EN" "res.dtd">
<resolution public-private="public" resolution-stage="Introduced-in-Senate" resolution-type="senate-resolution" star-print="no-star-print">
	<form>
		<distribution-code display="yes">III</distribution-code>
		<congress display="yes">111th CONGRESS</congress>
		<session display="yes">2d Session</session>
		<legis-num>S. RES. 619</legis-num>
		<current-chamber>IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES</current-chamber>
		<action display="yes">
			<action-date date="20100914">September 14, 2010</action-date>
			<action-desc><sponsor name-id="S326">Mr. Udall of New Mexico</sponsor>
			 submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
			 <committee-name committee-id="SSRA00">Committee on Rules and
			 Administration</committee-name></action-desc>
		</action>
		<legis-type>RESOLUTION</legis-type>
		<official-title display="yes">Expressing the sense of the Senate that the
		  Senate of each new Congress is not bound by the Rules of previous
		  Senates.</official-title>
	</form>
	<preamble>
		<whereas><text>Whereas section 5 of article I of the United States
			 Constitution states <quote>Each House may determine the Rules of its
			 Proceedings</quote>, with no requirement for a supermajority to adopt or amend
			 the rules of either House;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas it is a longstanding common law principle, upheld
			 in Supreme Court decisions such as United States v. Ballin, that one
			 legislature cannot bind subsequent legislatures;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas advisory rulings by Vice Presidents Nixon,
			 Humphrey, and Rockefeller, sitting as the President of the Senate, have stated
			 that a Senate at the beginning of a Congress is not bound by the cloture
			 requirement imposed by a previous Senate and may end debate on a proposal to
			 adopt or amend the Standing Rules of the Senate by a majority vote; and</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the provision in rule XXII that requires a
			 two-thirds vote of Senators present and voting to limit debate on a measure or
			 motion to amend the Senate Rules is unconstitutional because its effect is to
			 deny a majority of the Senate of each new Congress from proceeding to a vote to
			 determine its own rules: Now, therefore, be it</text>
		</whereas></preamble>
	<resolution-body>
		<section display-inline="yes-display-inline" id="S1" section-type="undesignated-section"><enum></enum><text>That the Senate of each new Congress
			 is not bound by the rules of previous Senates and should, upon a motion by a
			 Senator to bring debate to a close, if said motion receives the affirmative
			 vote of a majority of the Senators duly chosen and sworn, proceed to determine
			 the Rules of its Proceedings in accordance with section 5 of article I of the
			 Constitution.</text>
		</section></resolution-body>
</resolution>
