<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE resolution PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/res.dtd//EN" "res.dtd">
<resolution dms-id="H9D28C45F1BE944E1B21B8B428AD5B7D5" key="H" public-private="public" resolution-stage="Introduced-in-House" resolution-type="house-resolution" star-print="no-star-print">
	<form>
		<distribution-code display="yes">IV</distribution-code>
		<congress display="yes">111th CONGRESS</congress>
		<session display="yes">1st Session</session>
		<legis-num>H. RES. 778</legis-num>
		<current-chamber>IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</current-chamber>
		<action display="yes">
			<action-date date="20090924">September 24, 2009</action-date>
			<action-desc><sponsor name-id="M000934">Mr. Moran of Kansas</sponsor>
			 submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
			 <committee-name committee-id="HGO00">Committee on Oversight and Government
			 Reform</committee-name></action-desc>
		</action>
		<legis-type>RESOLUTION</legis-type>
		<official-title display="yes">Expressing the sense of the House of
		  Representatives that the White House’s increasing use of <quote>czars</quote>
		  leads to inadequate vetting standards and unacceptable growth in the size and
		  scope of the Federal Government.</official-title>
	</form>
	<preamble>
		<whereas><text>Whereas “czars” have traditionally been appointed by the
			 President of the United States to serve as policy advisors and agency
			 heads;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas President Obama has appointed an unprecedented
			 three dozen “czars” since his inauguration on January 20, 2009;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the “czar” nomination process rarely involves a
			 Senate vote of approval as outlined in the Constitution of the United States
			 while the President’s cabinet and Supreme Court nominees undergo careful public
			 scrutiny;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas “czars” have been intended to increase efficiency,
			 they traditionally reduce accountability, transparency, and legislative
			 oversight;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the implementation of three dozen czars adds to an
			 ever-expanding Federal bureaucracy in both size and scope while concentrating
			 policymaking decisions in the hands of a few unconfirmed officials;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the appointment of executive “czars” clouds the
			 issue of separation of powers between the “three separate, but equal” branches
			 of the Federal Government as outlined in the Constitution of the United
			 States;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the controversy surrounding the former
			 <quote>Green Jobs Czar</quote>, Van Jones, could have been avoided through the
			 constitutionally outlined practice of Senate confirmation proceedings;
			 and</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the “czars” unnecessarily inflate the payroll of
			 the administration by redundantly performing tasks under the jurisdictions of
			 the Senate-approved cabinet department secretaries: Now, therefore, be
			 it</text>
		</whereas></preamble>
	<resolution-body id="H7B7E7620C8E746CB8271C28B7E5A7D41" style="traditional">
		<section display-inline="yes-display-inline" id="HE084F5D29ACB4601A784F50F75B1D5A8" section-type="undesignated-section"><enum></enum><text>That the House of
			 Representatives—</text>
			<paragraph id="H120307DCC1AD44459EDFD05BC590DF6A"><enum>(1)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">demands that the White House rescind all
			 czar appointments until proper vetting can occur; and</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="HFA7A0CD38E954DEF9767501B5B26B21D"><enum>(2)</enum><text>opposes the growth
			 in size and scope of the Federal Government through the appointment of
			 unconfirmed personnel to policymaking positions.</text>
			</paragraph></section></resolution-body>
</resolution>
