[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5892 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5892

 To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2010

   Mr. Oberstar (for himself and Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 2010''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act is as 
follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.
                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 1001. Project authorizations.
Sec. 1002. Small projects for flood damage reduction.
Sec. 1003. Small projects for emergency streambank protection.
Sec. 1004. Small projects for navigation.
Sec. 1005. Small projects for improvement of the quality of the 
                            environment.
Sec. 1006. Small projects for aquatic ecosystem and estuary 
                            restoration.
Sec. 1007. Small projects for shoreline protection.
Sec. 1008. Small projects for aquatic plant control.
                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 2001. Credit for in-kind contributions.
Sec. 2002. Fish and wildlife mitigation.
Sec. 2003. Remote and subsistence harbors.
Sec. 2004. Revision of project partnership agreement.
Sec. 2005. Independent peer review.
Sec. 2006. Safety assurance review.
Sec. 2007. Funding for harbor maintenance programs.
Sec. 2008. Funding to process permits.
Sec. 2009. Project modifications for improvement of environment.
Sec. 2010. Aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration.
Sec. 2011. Operation and maintenance of navigation and hydroelectric 
                            facilities.
Sec. 2012. Repeal.
Sec. 2013. Cost estimates for feasibility reports.
Sec. 2014. Mitigation status report.
                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 3001. Douglas Harbor, Juneau, Alaska.
Sec. 3002. Nogales Wash and tributaries flood control project, Arizona.
Sec. 3003. Rio de Flag, Arizona.
Sec. 3004. Tres Rios, Arizona.
Sec. 3005. Russian River project, Sonoma County, California.
Sec. 3006. South Sacramento County streams, California.
Sec. 3007. Chatfield Reservoir, Colorado.
Sec. 3008. Rio Grande environmental management program, Colorado, New 
                            Mexico, and Texas.
Sec. 3009. Potomac River, Washington, District of Columbia.
Sec. 3010. Kissimmee River restoration, Florida.
Sec. 3011. Ponce de Leon Inlet, Florida.
Sec. 3012. Savannah Harbor expansion, Georgia.
Sec. 3013. Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal dispersal barriers project, 
                            Illinois.
Sec. 3014. Lower Ohio River, Illinois and Kentucky.
Sec. 3015. Wood River levee system reconstruction, Madison County, 
                            Illinois.
Sec. 3016. Little Calumet River, Indiana.
Sec. 3017. Rhodes Point Jetty, Smith Island, Maryland.
Sec. 3018. Muddy River, Brookline and Boston, Massachusetts.
Sec. 3019. Ada, Minnesota.
Sec. 3020. Montevideo, Minnesota.
Sec. 3021. Two Harbors, Minnesota.
Sec. 3022. Blue River basin, Kansas City, Missouri.
Sec. 3023. Lower Assunpink Creek, Trenton, New Jersey.
Sec. 3024. Ocean Gate, Ocean County, New Jersey.
Sec. 3025. Orchard Beach, Bronx, New York.
Sec. 3026. Spring Creek, New York.
Sec. 3027. Hocking River basin, Monday Creek, Ohio.
Sec. 3028. Lower Columbia River and Tillamook Bay ecosystem 
                            restoration, Oregon and Washington.
Sec. 3029. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Corpus Christi, Texas.
Sec. 3030. Dallas Floodway, Dallas, Texas.
Sec. 3031. Houston-Galveston navigation channels, Texas.
Sec. 3032. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 3033. Project deauthorizations.
                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 4001. Hollis, Alaska.
Sec. 4002. Bullard Wash, Goodyear, Arizona.
Sec. 4003. Lower Santa Cruz River, Casa Grande, Arizona.
Sec. 4004. Maricopa County, Arizona.
Sec. 4005. Ouachita River, Ouachita, Union, and Ashley Counties, 
                            Arkansas.
Sec. 4006. Oil Trough, Arkansas.
Sec. 4007. Randolph County, Arkansas.
Sec. 4008. Berkeley Marina, Berkeley, California.
Sec. 4009. Chelsea Wetlands, Hercules, California.
Sec. 4010. Colorado Lagoon and Alamitos Bay, Long Beach, California.
Sec. 4011. Lodi Lake, Lodi, California.
Sec. 4012. Oakland-Inner Harbor Tidal Canal, Oakland, California.
Sec. 4013. Noyo Harbor District, Noyo, California.
Sec. 4014. Port of San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Sec. 4015. Redwood City Navigation Channel, California.
Sec. 4016. Rialto Channel and Cactus Channel, Rialto, California.
Sec. 4017. Sacramento Regional Sanitation District, Sacramento, 
                            California.
Sec. 4018. San Pablo Bay, Hercules, California.
Sec. 4019. Stockton, California.
Sec. 4020. Tijuana River environmental restoration, San Diego, 
                            California.
Sec. 4021. Tijuana River wetlands restoration, San Diego County, 
                            California.
Sec. 4022. Ventura River, Ventura County, California.
Sec. 4023. Willowbrook, Los Angeles County, California.
Sec. 4024. Fountain Spring watershed, Pueblo, Colorado.
Sec. 4025. Ralston Creek, Arvada, Colorado.
Sec. 4026. Holly Pond and Norotan River, Stamford, Connecticut.
Sec. 4027. Housatonic River, New Milford, Connecticut.
Sec. 4028. Long Island Sound and Mill River, Stamford, Connecticut.
Sec. 4029. Meriden, Connecticut.
Sec. 4030. South Cove, Old Saybrook, Connecticut.
Sec. 4031. West River, New Haven Harbor, West Haven, Connecticut.
Sec. 4032. Chesapeake Bay, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia.
Sec. 4033. Washington, District of Columbia.
Sec. 4034. Lake County, Florida.
Sec. 4035. Marion County, Florida.
Sec. 4036. Miami, Florida.
Sec. 4037. Oakland Park, Florida.
Sec. 4038. Riviera Beach, Florida.
Sec. 4039. South Daytona, Florida.
Sec. 4040. Tampa, Florida.
Sec. 4041. Peavine Creek, Decatur, Georgia.
Sec. 4042. Richland Creek, Lawrenceville, Georgia.
Sec. 4043. Study for water supply, Georgia.
Sec. 4044. Suwannee Creek, Lawrenceville, Georgia.
Sec. 4045. Agat and Merizo, Guam.
Sec. 4046. Waiakea Stream and Palai Stream, Hilo, Hawaii.
Sec. 4047. Waialua-Kaiaka watershed, Oahu, Hawaii.
Sec. 4048. Albany Park, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 4049. Carpenter Creek, Carpentersville, Illinois.
Sec. 4050. Des Plaines River, Cook County, Illinois.
Sec. 4051. Ferson-Otter Creek Dam, St. Charles, Illinois.
Sec. 4052. Middle Mississippi River, Illinois and Missouri.
Sec. 4053. North Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 4054. River Park and Ronan Park, North Branch of the Chicago 
                            River, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 4055. Thillens Park, North Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, 
                            Illinois.
Sec. 4056. Village of Skokie, Illinois.
Sec. 4057. Bowman Creek, South Bend, Indiana.
Sec. 4058. Lake Michigan watershed, Indiana.
Sec. 4059. Burlington, Iowa.
Sec. 4060. Beneficial use of dredged material, Louisiana and 
                            Mississippi.
Sec. 4061. Jesuit Bend, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 4062. LaBranche Wetlands, St. Charles and St. John Counties, 
                            Louisiana.
Sec. 4063. Ruth Canal freshwater diversion, Vermilion, Louisiana.
Sec. 4064. Anacostia River watershed, Prince George's County, Maryland.
Sec. 4065. Chesapeake Bay Shoreline study, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and 
                            Virginia.
Sec. 4066. Dredged material disposal, Baltimore Harbor, Maryland.
Sec. 4067. Mid-Chesapeake Bay Island recreation and public access, 
                            Maryland.
Sec. 4068. Capisic Brook, Portland, Maine.
Sec. 4069. Fishing and Gooseberry Islands, Kittery, Maine.
Sec. 4070. Southern Maine/New Hampshire dredged material disposal 
                            study, Maine and New Hampshire.
Sec. 4071. Assabet, Charles, and Sudbury watersheds, Middlesex and 
                            Essex Counties, Massachusetts.
Sec. 4072. Hoosic River watershed, North Adams, Massachusetts.
Sec. 4073. Mystic River watershed, Massachusetts.
Sec. 4074. Quequechan River, Fall River, Massachusetts.
Sec. 4075. Clinton River, Clinton Township, Michigan.
Sec. 4076. Hamilton Dam, Flint, Michigan.
Sec. 4077. Upper Peninsula Flood Recovery, Michigan.
Sec. 4078. Amory, Mississippi.
Sec. 4079. Coastal Mississippi ecosystem restoration, Mississippi.
Sec. 4080. Fulton, Mississippi.
Sec. 4081. Gulfport, Mississippi.
Sec. 4082. Lucedale, Mississippi.
Sec. 4083. Magby Creek and Vernon Branch, Lowndes County, Mississippi.
Sec. 4084. Blue River basin, Kansas City, Missouri.
Sec. 4085. Little Blue River, Jackson County, Missouri.
Sec. 4086. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 4087. Las Vegas Wash, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Sec. 4088. New Hampshire.
Sec. 4089. Piscataqua River, New Hampshire.
Sec. 4090. Barnegat Bay watershed, Ocean and Monmouth Counties, New 
                            Jersey.
Sec. 4091. Beverly, New Jersey.
Sec. 4092. Borough of Pine Beach, New Jersey.
Sec. 4093. Haddon Township, New Jersey.
Sec. 4094. Rahway River watershed, New Jersey.
Sec. 4095. Third River, Belleville, Bloomfield, and Nutley, New Jersey.
Sec. 4096. Passaic River Channel, Nutley, New Jersey.
Sec. 4097. Township of Ocean, New Jersey.
Sec. 4098. Preakness Brook, Wayne, New Jersey.
Sec. 4099. Dona Ana, New Mexico.
Sec. 4100. Hidalgo County, New Mexico.
Sec. 4101. Otero County, New Mexico.
Sec. 4102. Valencia County, New Mexico.
Sec. 4103. Glen Cove, New York.
Sec. 4104. Hawtree basin, Hamilton Beach, New York.
Sec. 4105. Kill van Kull, Port Richmond, Staten Island, New York.
Sec. 4106. Mariners Marsh and Arlington Marsh, Staten Island, New York.
Sec. 4107. New York, New York.
Sec. 4108. Norton Basin Inlet, Far Rockaway, New York.
Sec. 4109. Queens, New York.
Sec. 4110. Rockaway Beach Seawall, Rockaway, New York.
Sec. 4111. Roosevelt island, East River, New York, New York.
Sec. 4112. Charlotte, North Carolina.
Sec. 4113. Nantahala River, Swain, North Carolina.
Sec. 4114. Missouri River and tributaries, South and Central North 
                            Dakota, North Dakota.
Sec. 4115. Big Creek watershed, Ohio.
Sec. 4116. Brandywine Creek watershed, Ohio.
Sec. 4117. Carlisle Township, Lorain County, Ohio.
Sec. 4118. Cuyahoga River watershed and Tuscarawas River watershed, 
                            Summit County, Ohio.
Sec. 4119. Euclid Creek watershed, Ohio.
Sec. 4120. Healy Creek, Brunswick, Ohio.
Sec. 4121. Lower Maumee River, Toledo, Ohio.
Sec. 4122. Ohio River, Ohio.
Sec. 4123. Shaker Lakes, Shaker Heights and Cleveland Heights, Ohio.
Sec. 4124. Stark County, Ohio.
Sec. 4125. Tinkers Creek watershed, Ohio.
Sec. 4126. Upper Tuscarawas River, Cuyahoga County, Ohio.
Sec. 4127. West Creek watershed, Ohio.
Sec. 4128. Yellow Creek and Short Creek, Jefferson County, Ohio.
Sec. 4129. Ferry Creek Reservoir, Brookings, Oregon.
Sec. 4130. Oregon Navigation Jetties and Breakwaters, Oregon.
Sec. 4131. Port Orford, Oregon.
Sec. 4132. Buhl Lake, Sharon, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4133. Delaware River and tributaries, Bucks County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4134. Elk Creek, Meadville, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4135. Mill Creek, Erie, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4136. Susquehanna River, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4137. Western Pennsylvania flood damage reduction.
Sec. 4138. Guayama, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 4139. Rincon, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 4140. Providence, Rhode Island.
Sec. 4141. South Carolina.
Sec. 4142. James River, South Dakota.
Sec. 4143. Station Camp Creek, Gallatin, Tennessee.
Sec. 4144. Brazos River, Texas.
Sec. 4145. Hickory Creek, City of Balch Springs, Texas.
Sec. 4146. Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels (Barbours Cut), Texas.
Sec. 4147. Port of Galveston, Texas.
Sec. 4148. Simsboro Aquifer, City of Balstrop, Texas.
Sec. 4149. Navasota River watershed, Grimes County, Texas.
Sec. 4150. Rio Grande basin, Texas.
Sec. 4151. Roma, Texas.
Sec. 4152. Cottonwood Heights, Utah.
Sec. 4153. Emery Town, Utah.
Sec. 4154. Big Sandy River reallocation study, Virginia and West 
                            Virginia.
Sec. 4155. Buckroe and Grandview Beaches, Hampton, Virginia.
Sec. 4156. Fort Monroe, Hampton, Virginia.
Sec. 4157. Hampton, Virginia.
Sec. 4158. James River watershed, Virginia.
Sec. 4159. Elliott Bay, Seattle, Washington.
Sec. 4160. Green River, Kent, Washington.
Sec. 4161. Vancouver Lake watershed, Vancouver, Washington.
Sec. 4162. Lake Michigan shoreline, City of Cudahy, Wisconsin.
                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS

Sec. 5001. Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection 
                            program.
Sec. 5002. Saint Lawrence Seaway.
Sec. 5003. Watershed management.
Sec. 5004. Comprehensive shoreline restoration.
Sec. 5005. Northeast Coastal Region ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 5006. Anacostia watershed, District of Columbia and Maryland.
Sec. 5007. Egmont Key, Florida.
Sec. 5008. Cambridge, Maryland.
Sec. 5009. Hart-Miller Island, Maryland.
Sec. 5010. Gallops Island, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sec. 5011. Sharkey County, Mississippi.
Sec. 5012. Sense of Congress on the promotion of General Michael J. 
                            Walsh to Major General, United States Army.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the 
Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 1001. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following 
projects for water resources development and conservation and other 
purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 
substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the 
conditions, described in the respective reports designated in this 
section:
            (1) Mid-chesapeake bay island ecosystem restoration 
        project, chesapeake bay, dorchester county, maryland.--The 
        project for ecosystem restoration, Mid-Chesapeake Bay Island 
        Ecosystem Restoration Project, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester 
        County, Maryland: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 
        24, 2009, at a total cost of $1,612,000,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $1,045,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
        cost of $567,000,000.
            (2) Mississippi coastal improvements program, hancock, 
        harrison, and jackson counties, mississippi.--The project for 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, Mississippi Coastal 
        Improvements Program, Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson Counties, 
        Mississippi: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated September 
        15, 2009, at a total cost of $1,182,600,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $746,750,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $435,850,000.
            (3) West onslow beach and new river inlet (topsail beach), 
        pender county, north carolina.--The project for hurricane and 
        storm damage reduction, West Onslow Beach and New River Inlet 
        (Topsail Beach), Pender County, North Carolina: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated September 28, 2009, at a total cost of 
        $32,131,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $20,708,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,423,000, and at an 
        estimated total cost of $113,904,000 for periodic beach 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $56,952,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $56,952,000.

SEC. 1002. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s):
            (1) Del rosa channel, san bernadino, california.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Del Rosa Channel, San Bernadino, 
        California.
            (2) Laguna creek, vacaville, california.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Laguna Creek, Vacaville, California.
            (3) Ulatis creek, vacaville, california.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Ulatis Creek, Vacaville, California.
            (4) Sanderson gulch, denver, colorado.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Sanderson Gulch, Denver, Colorado.
            (5) Willow creek, creede, colorado.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Willow Creek, Creede, Colorado.
            (6) Big econ river, orange, florida.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Big Econ River, Orange, Florida.
            (7) Bay gall creek, warner robbins, georgia.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Bay Gall Creek, Warner Robbins, 
        Georgia.
            (8) Des plaines river, park ridge, illinois.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Des Plaines River, Park Ridge, 
        Illinois.
            (9) Kishwaukee river, dekalb, illinois.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Kishwaukee River, DeKalb, Illinois.
            (10) Navajo creek, palos heights, illinois.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Navajo Creek, Palos Heights, Illinois.
            (11) Stony creek, oak lawn, illinois.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Stony Creek, Oak Lawn, Illinois.
            (12) Vicinity of the 71st street ditch, justice, 
        illinois.--Project for flood damage reduction, in the vicinity 
        of the 71st Street Ditch, Justice, Illinois.
            (13) West branch of mill creek, palos park, illinois.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, West Branch of Mill Creek, 
        Palos Park, Illinois.
            (14) Dry run creek, waterloo, iowa.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Dry Run Creek, Waterloo, Iowa.
            (15) Pond mill and black pond creek, louisville, 
        kentucky.--Project for flood damage reduction, Pond Mill and 
        Black Pond Creek, Louisville, Kentucky.
            (16) Baltimore city, maryland.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Baltimore City, Maryland, in the vicinity of Druid 
        Hill Park.
            (17) Pine tree brook, avon, massachusetts.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Pine Tree Brook, Avon, Massachusetts.
            (18) Pine tree brook, milton, massachusetts.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Pine Tree Brook, Milton, Massachusetts.
            (19) Harding canal seawall, detroit, michigan.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Harding Canal Seawall, Detroit, 
        Michigan.
            (20) Big river, jefferson, missouri.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Big River, Jefferson, Missouri.
            (21) Saw mill river basin, greehburgh, new york.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Saw Mill River basin, Greehburgh, 
        New York.
            (22) Sparkill creek, orangetown, new york.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Sparkill Creek, Orangetown, New York.
            (23) Independence, ohio.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Independence, Ohio.
            (24) Valley view, ohio.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Valley View, Ohio.
            (25) Winyeh bay, georgetown, south carolina.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Winyeh Bay, Georgetown, South Carolina.
            (26) Del rio, val verde, texas.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Del Rio, Val Verde, Texas.
            (27) Craford bay seawall, portsmouth, virginia.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Craford Bay Seawall, Portsmouth, 
        Virginia.
            (28) Southern branch of the elizabeth river, portsmouth, 
        virginia.--Project for flood damage reduction, Southern Branch 
        of the Elizabeth River, Portsmouth, Virginia.
            (29) Roxbury and westpoint townships, wisconsin.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Roxbury and Westpoint Townships, 
        Wisconsin.

SEC. 1003. SMALL PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 
1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
            (1) Naknek river, naknek, alaska.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Naknek River, Naknek, Alaska.
            (2) Quinnipiac river, new haven, connecticut.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Quinnipiac River, New Haven, 
        Connecticut.
            (3) Biscayne bay, north bay village, florida.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Biscayne Bay, North Bay 
        Village, Florida.
            (4) Bronx river, new york, new york.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Bronx River, New York, New York.
            (5) Ohio river, ironton, ohio.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Ohio River, Ironton, Ohio.
            (6) Newport, rhode island.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Newport, Rhode Island.
            (7) Tiverton, rhode island.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Tiverton, Rhode Island.

SEC. 1004. SMALL PROJECTS FOR NAVIGATION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
            (1) Detroit river, wyandotte, michigan.--Project for 
        navigation, Detroit River, Wyandotte, Michigan.
            (2) Stouts creek, lacey township, new jersey.--Project for 
        navigation, Stouts Creek, Lacey Township, New Jersey.
            (3) Brown's river, nassau county, new york.--Project for 
        navigation, Brown's River, Nassau County, New York.
            (4) Detroit harbor, wisconsin.--Project for navigation, 
        Detroit Harbor, Wisconsin.

SEC. 1005. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE 
              ENVIRONMENT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
appropriate, may carry out the project under section 1135 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a):
            (1) Rheem creek, contra costa county, california.--Project 
        for improvement of the quality of the environment, Rheem Creek, 
        Contra Costa County, California.
            (2) Rodeo creek, contra costa county, california.--Project 
        for improvement of the quality of the environment, Rodeo Creek, 
        Contra Costa County, California.

SEC. 1006. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM AND ESTUARY 
              RESTORATION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
appropriate, may carry out the project under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330):
            (1) Emeryville harbor, emeryville, california.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Emeryville Harbor, 
        Emeryville, California.
            (2) Los angeles river, cudahy, california.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Los Angeles River, 
        Cudahy, California.
            (3) Laguna salada, pacifica, california.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Laguna Salada, 
        Pacifica, California.
            (4) Animas river, la plata, colorado.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem and estuary restoration, Animas River, La Plata, 
        Colorado.
            (5) North fork of the gunnison river, delta, colorado.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, North 
        Fork of the Gunnison River, Delta, Colorado.
            (6) Line and cane creeks, henry county, georgia.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Line and Cane 
        Creeks, Henry County, Georgia.
            (7) Bremme creek, dupage, illinois.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem and estuary restoration, Bremme Creek, DuPage, 
        Illinois.
            (8) Blackberry creek, kendall, illinois.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Blackberry Creek, 
        Kendall, Illinois.
            (9) Gompers park, north branch chicago river, illinois.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Gompers 
        Park, North Branch Chicago River, Illinois.
            (10) Kankakee river, will county, illinois.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Kankakee River, Will 
        County, Illinois.
            (11) Prairie creek watershed, will county, illinois.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Prairie 
        Creek Watershed, Will County, Illinois.
            (12) West branch of the dupage river, dupage, illinois.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, West 
        Branch of the DuPage River, DuPage, Illinois.
            (13) Long creek watershed, cumberland, maine.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Long Creek 
        Watershed, Cumberland, Maine.
            (14) Cabin branch watershed, prince george's county, 
        maryland.--Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary 
        restoration, Cabin Branch Watershed, Prince George's County, 
        Maryland.
            (15) Little paint branch stream, prince george's county, 
        maryland.--Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary 
        restoration, Little Paint Branch Stream, Prince George's 
        County, Maryland.
            (16) Lower beaverdam creek, prince george's county, 
        maryland.--Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary 
        restoration, Lower Beaverdam Creek, Prince George's County, 
        Maryland.
            (17) Northeast anacostia river, prince george's county, 
        maryland.--Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary 
        restoration, Northeast Anacostia River, Prince George's County, 
        Maryland.
            (18) Northwest anacostia river, prince george's county, 
        maryland.--Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary 
        restoration, Northwest Anacostia River, Prince George's County, 
        Maryland.
            (19) Assabet river, middlesex and worcester, 
        massachusetts.--Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary 
        restoration, Assabet River, Middlesex and Worcester, 
        Massachusetts.
            (20) Lewis bay, yarmouth, massachusetts.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Lewis Bay, Yarmouth, 
        Massachusetts.
            (21) Pig's eye lake, st. paul, minnesota.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Pig's Eye Lake, St. 
        Paul, Minnesota.
            (22) Barnegat bay, ocean county, new jersey.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Barnegat Bay, Ocean 
        County, New Jersey.
            (23) Branchport creek, oceanport borough, new jersey.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, 
        Branchport Creek, Oceanport Borough, New Jersey.
            (24) Hackensack river, hudson county, new jersey.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Hackensack 
        River, Hudson County, New Jersey.
            (25) Lake topanemus, freehold, new jersey.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Lake Topanemus, 
        Freehold, New Jersey.
            (26) Las cruces dam, dona ana, new mexico.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Las Cruces Dam, Dona 
        Ana, New Mexico.
            (27) Pugsley creek, castle hill, new york.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Pugsley Creek, 
        Castle Hill, New York.
            (28) Olentangy river, franklin, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem and estuary restoration, Olentangy River, Franklin, 
        Ohio.
            (29) Scioto river, franklin, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem and estuary restoration, Scioto River, Franklin, 
        Ohio.
            (30) Woonasquatucket river, providence, rhode island.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, 
        Woonasquatucket River, Providence, Rhode Island.
            (31) Claytor lake, pulaski, virginia.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem and estuary restoration, Claytor Lake, Pulaski, 
        Virginia.

SEC. 1007. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores 
of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
426g):
            (1) Deerfield beach, broward county, florida.--Project for 
        shoreline protection, Deerfield Beach, Broward County, Florida.
            (2) Barnegat, ocean county, new jersey.--Project for 
        shoreline protection, Barnegat, Ocean County, New Jersey.
            (3) Manhasset bay, port washington, new york.--Project for 
        shoreline protection, Manhasset Bay, Port Washington, New York.

SEC. 1008. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project 
for aquatic nuisance plant control in the Republican River basin, 
Colorado, under section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 
U.S.C. 610).
    (b) Special Rule.--In carrying out the project under subsection 
(a), the Secretary may control and eradicate riverine nuisance plants.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 2001. CREDIT FOR IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS.

    (a) Limitation; Savings Provision.--Section 221(a)(4)(E) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4)(E)) is amended by 
striking clause (ii) and inserting the following:
                            ``(ii) Limitation.--In any case in which a 
                        specific provision of law provides for a non-
                        Federal interest to receive credit toward the 
                        non-Federal share of the cost of a study for, 
                        or construction or operation and maintenance 
                        of, a water resources project, the Secretary 
                        shall apply--
                                    ``(I) the specific provision of law 
                                instead of this paragraph; or
                                    ``(II) at the request of the non-
                                Federal interest, the specific 
                                provision of law and such provisions of 
                                this paragraph as the non-Federal 
                                interest may request.
                            ``(iii) Savings provision.--Nothing in this 
                        subparagraph affects the applicability of 
                        subsection (a)(4)(C).''.
    (b) Water Resources Project Defined.--Section 221(b) of such Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as 
        subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively;
            (2) by moving subparagraphs (A) and (B) (as so 
        redesignated) 2 ems to the right;
            (3) by striking ``(b)'' and all that follows through ``The 
        term'' and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions 
apply:
            ``(1) Non-federal interest.--The term''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Water resources project.--The term `water resources 
        project' includes projects studied, reviewed, designed, 
        constructed, operated and maintained, or otherwise subject to 
        Federal participation under the authority of the civil works 
        program of the Secretary of the Army for the purposes of 
        navigation, flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, water supply, recreation, 
        hydroelectric power, fish and wildlife conservation, water 
        quality, environmental infrastructure, resource protection and 
        development, and related purposes.''.
    (c) Technical Correction.--Section 221(c) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
1962d-5b(c)) is amended by striking ``enforcible'' and inserting 
``enforceable''.

SEC. 2002. FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION.

    (a) Mitigation Plans as Part of Project Proposals.--Section 
906(d)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2283(d)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by inserting ``for damages to ecological 
                resources, including terrestrial and aquatic resources, 
                and'' after ``mitigate'';
                    (B) by inserting ``ecological resources and'' after 
                ``impact on''; and
                    (C) by inserting ``without the implementation of 
                mitigation measures'' before the period; and
            (2) by inserting before the last sentence the following: 
        ``If the Secretary determines that mitigation to in-kind 
        conditions is not possible, the Secretary shall identify in the 
        report the basis for that determination.''.
    (b) Mitigation Requirements.--Section 906(d)(3)(A) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 2283(d)(3)(A)) is amended by inserting ``, at a minimum,'' after 
``complies with''.

SEC. 2003. REMOTE AND SUBSISTENCE HARBORS.

    Section 2006 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 
U.S.C. 2242) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Applicability.--This section shall apply to project studies 
that include--
            ``(1) a feasibility study, as defined in section 105(d) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2215(d)); or
            ``(2) a detailed project report, as defined in such section 
        105(d) and carried out under section 107(a) of the River and 
        Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577(a)).''.

SEC. 2004. REVISION OF PROJECT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.

    Section 2008(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 
U.S.C. 2340(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``This 
subsection shall apply without regard to whether the original 
partnership agreement was entered into before, on, or after the date of 
enactment of this subsection.''.

SEC. 2005. INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW.

    (a) Timing of Peer Review.--Section 2034(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2343(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
            ``(3) Reasons for timing.--If the Chief of Engineers does 
        not initiate a peer review for a project study at a time 
        described in paragraph (2), the Chief shall make publicly 
        available, including on the Internet, for each of such times 
        the reasons for not conducting the review, and shall include 
        the reasons in the decision document for the project study.''.
    (b) Establishment of Panels.--Section 2034(c)(4) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 2343(c)(4)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(4) Congressional and public notification.--Upon 
        identification of a project study for peer review under this 
        section, but prior to initiation of the review by the panel of 
        experts, the Chief of Engineers shall--
                    ``(A) notify the Committee on Environment and 
                Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
                Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
                Representatives of the review; and
                    ``(B) make publicly available, including on the 
                Internet, information on--
                            ``(i) the dates scheduled for beginning and 
                        ending the review;
                            ``(ii) the entity that has the contract for 
                        the review; and
                            ``(iii) the names and qualifications of the 
                        panel of experts.''.
    (c) Recommendations of Panel.--Section 2034(f) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 2343(f)) is amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 
following:
            ``(2) Public availability and transmittal to congress.--
        After receiving a report on a project study from a panel of 
        experts under this section, the Chief of Engineers shall make 
        available to the public, including on the Internet, and 
        transmit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
        the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives--
                    ``(A) a copy of the report within 3 days of 
                receiving the report; and
                    ``(B) a copy of any written response of the Chief 
                of Engineers on recommendations contained in the report 
                within 3 days of the date of the response.
            ``(3) Inclusion in project study.--A report on a project 
        study from a panel of experts under this section and the 
        written response of the Chief of Engineers shall be included in 
        the final decision document for the project study.''.

SEC. 2006. SAFETY ASSURANCE REVIEW.

    Section 2035 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 
U.S.C. 2344) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to a safety assurance review conducted 
under this section.''.

SEC. 2007. FUNDING FOR HARBOR MAINTENANCE PROGRAMS.

    (a) Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund Guarantee.--
            (1) In general.--The total budget resources made available 
        from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund each fiscal year 
        pursuant to section 9505(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986 (relating to expenditures from the Harbor Maintenance 
        Trust Fund) shall be equal to the level of receipts plus 
        interest credited to the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund for that 
        fiscal year. Such amounts may be used only for harbor 
        maintenance programs described in section 9505(c) of such Code.
            (2) Guarantee.--No funds may be appropriated for harbor 
        maintenance programs described in such section unless the 
        amount described in paragraph (1) has been provided.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Total budget resources.--The term ``total budget 
        resources'' means the total amount made available by 
        appropriations Acts from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund for 
        a fiscal year for making expenditures under section 9505(c) of 
        the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
            (2) Level of receipts plus interest.--The term ``level of 
        receipts plus interest'' means the level of taxes and interest 
        credited to the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund under section 
        9505 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for a fiscal year as 
        set forth in the President's budget baseline projection as 
        defined in section 257 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
        Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 99-177) for that fiscal 
        year submitted pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United 
        States Code.

SEC. 2008. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS.

    Section 214 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594; 119 Stat. 2169; 120 Stat. 318; 120 
Stat. 3197; 121 Stat. 1067; 123 Stat. 3478) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``permits under the 
        jurisdiction'' and inserting ``permits of such entities related 
        to projects for a public purpose under the jurisdiction'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (e);
            (3) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Effect on Permitting.--
            ``(1) In general.--In carrying out this section, the 
        Secretary shall ensure that the use of funds accepted under 
        subsection (a) will not impact impartial decision-making with 
        respect to permits, either substantively or procedurally.
            ``(2) Impartial decisionmaking.--In carrying out this 
        section, the Secretary shall ensure that the evaluation of 
        permits carried out using funds accepted under this section 
        shall--
                    ``(A) be reviewed by the District Commander of the 
                Corps District in which the project or activity is 
                located, unless the evaluation of the permit is 
                initially conducted by the District Commander whereby 
                the review shall be conducted by the Commander of the 
                Corps Division in which the District is located; and
                    ``(B) utilize the same procedures for decisions 
                that would otherwise be required for the evaluation of 
                permits for similar projects or activities not carried 
                out using funds authorized under this section.
    ``(c) Limitation on Use of Funds.--None of the funds accepted under 
this section shall be used to carry out a review of the evaluation of 
permits required under subsection (b)(2)(A).
    ``(d) Public Availability.--The Secretary shall ensure that all 
final permit decisions carried out using funds authorized under this 
section are made available to the public, including on the Internet.''; 
and
            (4) in subsection (e) (as redesignated), by striking 
        ``2010'' and inserting ``2016''.

SEC. 2009. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT.

    Section 1135(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2309a(d)) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting 
``$10,000,000''.

SEC. 2010. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM AND ESTUARY RESTORATION.

    Section 206(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330(d)) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting 
``$10,000,000''.

SEC. 2011. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION AND HYDROELECTRIC 
              FACILITIES.

    Section 314 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 2321) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 314. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION AND HYDROELECTRIC 
              FACILITIES.

    ``Activities currently performed by personnel under the direction 
of the Secretary in connection with the operation and maintenance of 
navigation or hydroelectric power generating facilities, including all 
personnel under the direction of the Secretary in connection with the 
operation and maintenance of navigational infrastructure such as 
floodgates, locks, and dams, at Corps of Engineers water resources 
projects, are considered to be inherently governmental functions and 
not commercial activities. This section does not prohibit contracting 
out major maintenance or other functions that are currently contracted 
out or studying services not directly connected with project 
maintenance and operations.''.

SEC. 2012. REPEAL.

    Section 211 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (31 
U.S.C. 6505 note; 114 Stat. 2592) is repealed.

SEC. 2013. COST ESTIMATES FOR FEASIBILITY REPORTS.

    Section 905(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2282) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Cost estimates for feasibility reports.--In preparing 
        a feasibility report under this subsection, the Secretary shall 
        include in the report, and any budget documents (including 
        justification materials) submitted pursuant to section 1105(a) 
        of title 31, United States Code, an accounting of the total 
        cost of the recommended plan and an estimate of the Federal and 
        non-Federal participation in the plan based on the following 
        scenarios:
                    ``(A) The cost of the project based on optimal 
                levels of Federal funding for the recommended plan.
                    ``(B) The estimated cost of the project, based on a 
                50 percent increase in the period for implementation of 
                the recommended plan.
                    ``(C) The estimated cost of the project, based on a 
                100 percent increase in the period for implementation 
                of the recommended plan.''.

SEC. 2014. MITIGATION STATUS REPORT.

    Section 2036(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 
U.S.C. 2283a) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
            ``(3) Information included.--In reporting the status of all 
        projects included in the report, the Secretary shall--
                    ``(A) use a uniform methodology for determining the 
                status of all projects included in the report;
                    ``(B) use a methodology that describes both a 
                qualitative and quantitative status for all projects in 
                the report; and
                    ``(C) provide specific dates for and participants 
                in the consultations required under section 
                906(d)(4)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(d)(4)(B)).''.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 3001. DOUGLAS HARBOR, JUNEAU, ALASKA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for navigation, Douglas Harbor, Juneau, Alaska, being carried 
out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
577), shall be $7,000,000.

SEC. 3002. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood control, Nogales Wash and tributaries, 
Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(4) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606) and modified by section 303 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711), section 
302 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2600), 
and section 3008 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 
Stat. 1107), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project at a total cost of $55,500,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $50,100,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$5,400,000.

SEC. 3003. RIO DE FLAG, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Rio de Flag, Flagstaff, 
Arizona, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576) and modified by section 3007 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1107), is 
further modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
a total cost of $77,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$50,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $27,000,000.

SEC. 3004. TRES RIOS, ARIZONA.

    The project for ecosystem restoration, Tres Rios, Arizona, 
authorized by section 101(b)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2577), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project at a total cost of $230,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $149,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $80,500,000.

SEC. 3005. RUSSIAN RIVER PROJECT, SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, water conservation, and related 
purposes in the Russian River basin, California, authorized by section 
204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 177), and the project 
for Russian River, Dry Creek, California, authorized by section 203 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1192), are modified as follows:
            (1) The Secretary shall review the biological opinion on 
        the water supply, flood control, and channel maintenance 
        operations conducted by the Corps of Engineers, the Sonoma 
        County Water Agency, and the Mendocino County Russian River 
        Flood Control District, as transmitted by the National Oceanic 
        and Atmospheric Administration on September 24, 2008.
            (2) If the Secretary determines that the project is 
        feasible, the Secretary is authorized to construct the project 
        at a total cost of $92,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
        of $59,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $32,200,000.

SEC. 3006. SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, environmental restoration, and 
recreation, South Sacramento County streams, California, authorized by 
section 101(a)(8) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 275), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project at a total cost of $104,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $67,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $36,800,000.

SEC. 3007. CHATFIELD RESERVOIR, COLORADO.

    Section 116 of the Energy and Water Development and Related 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2009 (123 Stat. 608) is amended by 
striking ``Colorado Department of Natural Resources is authorized'' and 
inserting ``Colorado Department of Natural Resources, or its assignee, 
is authorized''.

SEC. 3008. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, COLORADO, NEW 
              MEXICO, AND TEXAS.

    Section 5056(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 
Stat. 1213) is amended by striking ``2011'' and inserting ``2015''.

SEC. 3009. POTOMAC RIVER, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    The project for flood control, Potomac River, Washington, District 
of Columbia, authorized by section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 
(chapter 688; 49 Stat. 1574) and modified by section 301(a)(4) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3707) and section 
309 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 301), is 
further modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
a Federal cost of $8,100,000, in accordance with the post authorization 
change report dated June 29, 1998.

SEC. 3010. KISSIMMEE RIVER RESTORATION, FLORIDA.

    The project for ecosystem restoration, Kissimmee River Restoration, 
Florida, authorized by section 101(8) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4802), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $852,000,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $426,000,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $426,000,000.

SEC. 3011. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation and related purposes, Ponce de Leon 
Inlet, Volusia County, Florida, authorized by section 101(b)(8) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$15,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,500,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $6,500,000.

SEC. 3012. SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GEORGIA.

    The project for navigation, Savannah Harbor expansion, Georgia, 
authorized by section 101(b)(9) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project at a total cost of $675,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $405,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $270,000,000.

SEC. 3013. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIERS PROJECT, 
              ILLINOIS.

    (a) Authorization.--Section 3061(b)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1121) is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) upgrade and make permanent Barrier I in its 
                current location or at an alternative location, as 
                determined appropriate by the Secretary;'';
            (2) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``June 14, 2005'' and 
        inserting ``November 21, 2003, as amended on July 14, 2005'';
            (3) by redesignating subparagraphs (C), (D), and (E) as 
        subparagraphs (D), (E) and (F), respectively;
            (4) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following:
                    ``(C) acquire real estate interests necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of Barrier 
                I and Barrier II;'';
            (5) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (E) (as 
        redesignated by paragraph (3) of this subsection);
            (6) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (F) 
        (as redesignated by paragraph (3) of this subsection) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (7) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(G) construct additional barriers or other fish 
                deterrents at other locations in the vicinity of the 
                Chicago Area Waterway System, if determined appropriate 
                by the Secretary.''.
    (b) Use of Credit.--Section 3061(b)(2) of such Act (121 Stat. 1121) 
is amended by striking ``paragraph (1)(E)'' and inserting ``paragraph 
(1)(F)''.
    (c) Feasibility Study.--Section 3061(d) of such Act (121 Stat. 
1121) is amended by adding the end the following: ``The study shall 
include a fully developed analysis of an alternative for hydrologic 
separation between the Great Lakes and the Mississippi River basins. 
The hydrologic separation alternative shall include identification of 
measures to prevent the transfer of aquatic nuisance species between 
the Great Lakes and the Mississippi River basins through surface 
water.''.

SEC. 3014. LOWER OHIO RIVER, ILLINOIS AND KENTUCKY.

    The project for navigation, Lower Ohio River, Locks and Dams 52 and 
53, Illinois and Kentucky, authorized by section 3(a)(6) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$1,991,000,000.

SEC. 3015. WOOD RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM RECONSTRUCTION, MADISON COUNTY, 
              ILLINOIS.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Wood River Levee System 
Reconstruction, Madison County, Illinois, authorized by section 
1001(20) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 
1053), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
at a total cost of $120,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$78,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $42,000,000.

SEC. 3016. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Little Calumet River, Indiana, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (100 Stat. 4115) and modified by section 127 of the Energy and 
Water Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2259), is further modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$275,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $206,000,000, and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $69,000,000.

SEC. 3017. RHODES POINT JETTY, SMITH ISLAND, MARYLAND.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for navigation, Rhodes Point Jetty, Smith Island, Maryland, 
being carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 
(33 U.S.C. 577), shall be $7,000,000.

SEC. 3018. MUDDY RIVER, BROOKLINE AND BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.

    Section 522 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2656) is amended by striking ``draft evaluation report of the New 
England District Engineer entitled `Phase I Muddy River Master Plan', 
dated June 2000'' and inserting ``Final Decision Document and 
Environmental Assessment Report of the New England District Engineer 
entitled `Muddy River Flood Control and Ecosystem Restoration, Boston 
and Brookline, Massachusetts', dated September 2003, at a total cost of 
$79,200,000''.

SEC. 3019. ADA, MINNESOTA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for flood damage reduction, Wild Rice River, Ada, Minnesota, 
being carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
(33 U.S.C. 701s), shall be $10,600,000.

SEC. 3020. MONTEVIDEO, MINNESOTA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for flood damage reduction, Montevideo, Minnesota, being 
carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
U.S.C. 701s), shall be $10,000,000.

SEC. 3021. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA.

    Section 3101(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 
Stat. 1133) is amended by striking ``$7,000,000'' and inserting 
``$14,000,000''.

SEC. 3022. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI.

    The project for flood control, Blue River basin, Kansas City, 
Missouri, authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $45,500,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $34,125,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $11,375,000.

SEC. 3023. LOWER ASSUNPINK CREEK, TRENTON, NEW JERSEY.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for improvement of the quality of the environment, Lower 
Assunpink Creek, Trenton, New Jersey, being carried out under section 
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), 
shall be $10,000,000.

SEC. 3024. OCEAN GATE, OCEAN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for emergency streambank protection, Ocean Gate, Ocean County, 
New Jersey, being carried out under section 14 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), shall be $4,500,000.

SEC. 3025. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK.

    Section 554 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781), as amended by section 3122 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1139), is further amended by 
striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$27,000,000''.

SEC. 3026. SPRING CREEK, NEW YORK.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for improvement of the quality of the environment, Spring 
Creek, New York, being carried out under section 1135 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), shall be 
$6,000,000.

SEC. 3027. HOCKING RIVER BASIN, MONDAY CREEK, OHIO.

    Section 1001(37)(B)(iii) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2007 (121 Stat. 1055) is amended by striking ``$1,270,000'' and 
inserting ``$12,000,000''.

SEC. 3028. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER AND TILLAMOOK BAY ECOSYSTEM 
              RESTORATION, OREGON AND WASHINGTON.

    Section 536(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2662) is amended by striking ``$30,000,000'' and inserting 
``$45,000,000''.

SEC. 3029. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS.

    The project for navigation and ecosystem restoration, Corpus 
Christi Ship Channel, Texas, authorized by section 1001(40) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1056) is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$447,604,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $183,827,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $263,777,000.

SEC. 3030. DALLAS FLOODWAY, DALLAS, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, Trinity River and tributaries, 
Texas, authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing 
the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works on 
rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 1945, 
and modified by section 5141 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2007 (121 Stat. 1253), is further modified to authorize the Secretary 
to construct the project at a total cost of $882,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $573,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $308,700,000.

SEC. 3031. HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TEXAS.

    The project for navigation and environmental restoration, Houston-
Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(30) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3666), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to extend the boundaries of the 
Galveston channel approximately 2600 feet beyond Pier 38, if the 
Secretary determines that the extension is feasible.

SEC. 3032. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    The following project may be carried out by the Secretary and no 
construction on any such project may be initiated until the Secretary 
determines that the project is feasible: The Vincennes, Indiana portion 
of the project for flood control, Wabash River basin, Illinois and 
Indiana, authorized by section 10 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (60 
Stat. 649) and deauthorized by section 1002 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4209).

SEC. 3033. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The following projects are not authorized after 
the date of enactment of this Act:
            (1) Potomac river, washington channel, district of 
        columbia.--The portion of the project for navigation, Potomac 
        River, Washington Channel, District of Columbia, authorized by 
        the Act of August 30, 1935 (chapter 831; 49 Stat. 1028), 
        beginning at Washington Harbor Channel Geometry Centerline of 
        the 400-foot-wide main navigational ship channel, Centerline 
        Station No. 103+73.12, coordinates North 441,948.20, East 
        1,303,969.30, as stated and depicted on the Condition Survey 
        Anacostia, Virginia, Washington and Magazine Bar Shoal 
        Channels, Washington, D.C., Sheet 6 of 6, prepared by the 
        United States Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore district, July 
        2007; thence departing the aforementioned centerline traveling 
        the following courses and distances: N. 40 degrees 10 minutes 
        45 seconds E., 200.00 feet to a point, on the outline of said 
        400-foot-wide channel thence binding on said outline the 
        following three courses and distances: S. 49 degrees 49 minutes 
        15 seconds E., 1,507.86 feet to a point, thence; S. 29 degrees 
        44 minutes 42 seconds E., 2,083.17 feet to a point, thence; S. 
        11 degrees 27 minutes 04 seconds E., 363.00 feet to a point, 
        thence; S. 78 degrees 32 minutes 56 seconds W., 200.00 feet to 
        a point binding on the centerline of the 400-foot-wide main 
        navigational channel at computed Centerline Station No. 
        65+54.31, coordinates North 438,923.9874, East 1,306,159.9738, 
        thence; continuing with the aforementioned centerline the 
        following courses and distances: N. 11 degrees 27 minutes 04 
        seconds W., 330.80 feet to a point, Centerline Station No. 
        68+85.10, thence; N. 29 degrees 44 minutes 42 seconds W., 
        2,015.56 feet to a point, Centerline Station No. 89+00.67, 
        thence; N. 49 degrees 49 minutes 15 seconds W., 1,472.26 feet 
        to the point of beginning.
            (2) Chicago harbor, illinois.--The portion of the project 
        for navigation, Chicago Harbor, authorized by the River and 
        Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899 and March 2, 1919, beginning at 
        the southwest corner of Metropolitan Sanitary District of 
        Greater Chicago sluice gate that abuts the north wall of the 
        Chicago River Lock thence running north for approximately 290 
        feet, thence running east approximately 1,000 feet, thence 
        running south approximately 290 feet, thence running west 
        approximately 1,000 feet to the point of origin.
            (3) Ipswich river, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Ipswich River, Massachusetts, adopted 
        by the Rivers and Harbors Act of August 5, 1886, consisting of 
        a 4-foot channel located at the entrance to the inner harbor at 
        Ipswich Harbor, lying northwesterly of a line commencing at: 
        N3,074,938.09, E837,154.87, thence running easterly 
        approximately 60 feet to a point with coordinates 
        N3,074,972.62, E837,203.93.
            (4) Menemsha creek, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Menemsha Creek, Massachusetts, 
        authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1945, consisting of 
        the following areas--
                    (A) beginning at a point, N129,112.54, 
                E1,566,926.30, running north 52 degrees 12 minutes 55.9 
                seconds east 208.68 feet to a point N129,240.39, 
                E1,567,091.22, running south 77 degrees 28 minutes 13.7 
                seconds east 170.0 feet to a point N129,203.51, 
                E1,567,257.17, running south 37 degrees 25 minutes 45.4 
                seconds east 101.04 feet to a point N129,123.28, 
                E1,567,318.58, running north 77 degrees 28 minutes 13.7 
                seconds west 223.32 feet to a point N129,171.72, E 
                1,567,100.58, running south 52 degrees 12 minutes 55.9 
                seconds west 174.00 feet to a point N129,065.12, 
                E1,566,963.06, running north 37 degrees 47 minutes 04.1 
                seconds west 60.00 feet to the point of origin, and
                    (B) beginning at a point, N128,895.78, 
                E1,566,940.39, thence running north 52 degrees 31 
                minutes 25.8 seconds east 135.91 feet to a point 
                N128,978.47, E1,567,048.25, thence running south 77 
                degrees 28 minutes 13.7 seconds east 80.63 feet to a 
                point N128,960.98, E1,567,126.96, thence running south 
                37 degrees 25 minutes 32.9 seconds east 70.67 feet to a 
                point N128,904.86, E1,567,169.91, thence running north 
                73 degrees 59 minutes 15.6 seconds west 139.90 feet to 
                a point N128,943.45, E 1,567,035.44, thence running 
                south 52 degrees 31 minutes 25.8 seconds west 103.96 
                feet to a point N128,880.20, E1,566,952.94, thence 
                running north 38 degrees 50 minutes 43.8 seconds west 
                20.01 feet to the point of origin.
            (5) Block island harbor of refuge, rhode island.--The 
        portion of the project for navigation, Block Island Harbor of 
        Refuge, Rhode Island, adopted by the Rivers and Harbors Act of 
        July 11, 1870, consisting of the cut-stone breakwater lining 
        the west side of the Inner Basin, beginning at a point, 
        N32,179.55, E312,625.53, thence running northerly approximately 
        76.59 feet to a point with coordinates N326,655.92, 
        E312,631.32, thence running northerly approximately 206.81 feet 
        to a point with coordinates N32,858.33, E312,673.74, thence 
        running easterly approximately 109.00 feet to a point with 
        coordinates N32,832.15, E312,779.54.
    (b) Additional Deauthorizations.--The following projects are not 
authorized after the date of enactment of this Act, except with respect 
to any portion of such a project that has been completed before such 
date or is under construction on such date:
            (1) The project for flood protection and related purposes, 
        Cache River basin, Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by section 
        204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 172).
            (2) The Lower White River, Big Creek and tributaries, 
        Arkansas, element of the project for flood control and 
        improvement of the Lower Mississippi River, authorized by 
        section 1 of the Act of May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534), and 
        modified by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 
        Stat. 1076).
            (3) The project for navigation, Noyo River and Harbor, 
        California, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
        Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176) and modified by section 146 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2931).
            (4) The project for navigation, Red River Waterway, 
        Shreveport, Louisiana, to Dangerfield, Texas, authorized by the 
        River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731).
            (5) The project for flood control, Hocking River at Logan, 
        Ohio, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4122).
            (6) The Shipyard River Upper Channel and Upper Turning 
        basin elements of the project for navigation, Charleston 
        Harbor, South Carolina, authorized by section 202(a) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4096).
            (7) The environmental enhancements element of the project 
        for flood control, Nonconnah Creek and Johns Creek, Tennessee 
        and Mississippi, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124).
            (8) The recreation element of the project for flood 
        control, Nonconnah Creek and Johns Creek, Tennessee and 
        Mississippi, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124).
            (9) The project for flood protection, Santa Barbara County 
        Coastal Streams and tributaries in the area of Goleta, 
        California, authorized by section 201 of the Flood Control Act 
        of 1970 (84 Stat. 1826) and modified by section 102(b) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4804).
            (10) The project for flood control, Harris Fork Creek, 
        Tennessee and Kentucky, authorized by section 102 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921).
            (11) The project for flood control, Buena Vista, Virginia, 
        authorized by section 101(a)(24) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610) and modified by 
        section 118(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
        (106 Stat. 4824).

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 4001. HOLLIS, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigational improvements, Hollis, Alaska.

SEC. 4002. BULLARD WASH, GOODYEAR, ARIZONA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Bullard Wash, 
Goodyear, Arizona.

SEC. 4003. LOWER SANTA CRUZ RIVER, CASA GRANDE, ARIZONA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction and related water 
resource purposes for the Lower Santa Cruz River study area, Casa 
Grande, Arizona.

SEC. 4004. MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration, recreation, and related water resource purposes, including 
nonstructural solutions, for Maricopa County, Arizona.

SEC. 4005. OUACHITA RIVER, OUACHITA, UNION, AND ASHLEY COUNTIES, 
              ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, flood damage reduction, 
environmental restoration, bank stabilization, and related water 
resource purposes for the Ouachita River, Ouachita, Union, and Ashley 
Counties, Arkansas.

SEC. 4006. OIL TROUGH, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Oil Trough, 
Arkansas.

SEC. 4007. RANDOLPH COUNTY, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Randolph County, 
Arkansas.

SEC. 4008. BERKELEY MARINA, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigational improvements for Berkeley 
Marina, Berkeley, California.

SEC. 4009. CHELSEA WETLANDS, HERCULES, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration and flood damage 
reduction for Chelsea Wetlands, Hercules, California.

SEC. 4010. COLORADO LAGOON AND ALAMITOS BAY, LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration between Colorado 
Lagoon and Alamitos Bay, Long Beach, California.

SEC. 4011. LODI LAKE, LODI, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and streambank 
stabilization for Lodi Lake, Lodi, California.

SEC. 4012. OAKLAND-INNER HARBOR TIDAL CANAL, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation improvements for the Oakland-
Inner Harbor Tidal Canal, Oakland, California.

SEC. 4013. NOYO HARBOR DISTRICT, NOYO, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigational improvements and dredge 
material disposal for Noyo Harbor District, Noyo, California.

SEC. 4014. PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigational improvements, flood damage 
reduction, shoreline protection, environmental restoration, and related 
water resource purposes for Port of San Francisco, San Francisco, 
California.

SEC. 4015. REDWOOD CITY NAVIGATION CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigational improvements and dredge 
material disposal for Redwood City Navigation Channel, California.

SEC. 4016. RIALTO CHANNEL AND CACTUS CHANNEL, RIALTO, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for 
Rialto Channel and Cactus Channel, Rialto, California.

SEC. 4017. SACRAMENTO REGIONAL SANITATION DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction in the Sacramento 
Regional Sanitation District, Sacramento, California.

SEC. 4018. SAN PABLO BAY, HERCULES, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigational improvements for San Pablo Bay, 
Hercules, California.

SEC. 4019. STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for navigation channel deepening for Stockton, 
California.

SEC. 4020. TIJUANA RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, SAN DIEGO, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration, water supply, water quality, recreation, and other water-
related issues including the impacts of water flows from Mexico for the 
Tijuana River basin, San Diego, California.

SEC. 4021. TIJUANA RIVER WETLANDS RESTORATION, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration and wetland 
restoration along the Tijuana River, San Diego County, California.

SEC. 4022. VENTURA RIVER, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Ventura River, 
Ventura County, California.

SEC. 4023. WILLOWBROOK, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental restoration for 
Willowbrook, Los Angeles County, California.

SEC. 4024. FOUNTAIN SPRING WATERSHED, PUEBLO, COLORADO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a sediment impact analysis study to 
determine the sediment transport parameters for Fountain Spring 
watershed, Pueblo, Colorado.

SEC. 4025. RALSTON CREEK, ARVADA, COLORADO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for 
Ralston Creek, Arvada, Colorado.

SEC. 4026. HOLLY POND AND NOROTAN RIVER, STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for environmental restoration for Holly Pond and 
Norotan River, Stamford, Connecticut.

SEC. 4027. HOUSATONIC RIVER, NEW MILFORD, CONNECTICUT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction along the Housatonic 
River, New Milford, Connecticut.

SEC. 4028. LONG ISLAND SOUND AND MILL RIVER, STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigational improvements for Long Island 
Sound and Mill River, Stamford, Connecticut.

SEC. 4029. MERIDEN, CONNECTICUT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for 
Meriden, Connecticut.

SEC. 4030. SOUTH COVE, OLD SAYBROOK, CONNECTICUT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration for the South 
Cove, Old Saybrook, Connecticut.

SEC. 4031. WEST RIVER, NEW HAVEN HARBOR, WEST HAVEN, CONNECTICUT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for shoreline protection, storm damage 
reduction, including a review of bulkhead condition for West River, New 
Haven Harbor, West Haven, Connecticut.

SEC. 4032. CHESAPEAKE BAY, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, AND VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for enhanced public access and recreational 
opportunities on Army Corps of Engineers projects in the Chesapeake 
Bay, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia.

SEC. 4033. WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, including green 
technologies, for Washington, District of Columbia.

SEC. 4034. LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and environmental 
protection, Lake County, Florida.

SEC. 4035. MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Marion County, Florida.

SEC. 4036. MIAMI, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Miami, Florida.

SEC. 4037. OAKLAND PARK, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Oakland Park, 
Florida.

SEC. 4038. RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and 
shoreline protection for Riviera Beach, Florida.

SEC. 4039. SOUTH DAYTONA, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration, and related water resource purposes for South Daytona, 
Florida.

SEC. 4040. TAMPA, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and environmental 
restoration for Tampa, Florida.

SEC. 4041. PEAVINE CREEK, DECATUR, GEORGIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and environmental 
restoration, recreation, and related water resource purposes for 
Peavine Creek, Decatur, Georgia.

SEC. 4042. RICHLAND CREEK, LAWRENCEVILLE, GEORGIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration for Richland 
Creek, Lawrenceville, Georgia.

SEC. 4043. STUDY FOR WATER SUPPLY, GEORGIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of municipal 
and industrial water supply for the State of Georgia.
    (b) Study Components.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
review--
            (1) currently available water supplies;
            (2) expected future demand for potable water;
            (3) current water uses, including per capita use rates;
            (4) opportunities to augment existing supplies, including 
        through increased conservation and improved efficiencies;
            (5) the effect of water supply policies and uses on the 
        environment;
            (6) the effect of water supply policies on the economy;
            (7) the effect of water supply policies and uses on 
        upstream and downstream uses;
            (8) the impacts of water supply policies on threatened and 
        endangered species; and
            (9) the impacts of consumptive uses on instream uses.
    (c) Timing.--The Secretary shall complete the study not later than 
2 years following the first obligation of funds for the study.

SEC. 4044. SUWANNEE CREEK, LAWRENCEVILLE, GEORGIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration for Suwannee 
Creek, Lawrenceville, Georgia.

SEC. 4045. AGAT AND MERIZO, GUAM.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for storm damage reduction and shoreline 
protection for Agat and Merizo, Guam.

SEC. 4046. WAIAKEA STREAM AND PALAI STREAM, HILO, HAWAII.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction 
along Waiakea Stream and Palai Stream, Hilo, Hawaii.
    (b) Prior Work.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall 
utilize, to the extent practicable, any work undertaken in the 
formulation of a project for flood damage reduction, Waiakea Stream and 
Palai Stream, Hilo, Hawaii, initiated under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).

SEC. 4047. WAIALUA-KAIAKA WATERSHED, OAHU, HAWAII.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration, water supply, and related water resource purposes for the 
Waialua-Kaiaka watershed, Oahu, Hawaii.

SEC. 4048. ALBANY PARK, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Albany Park, 
Chicago, Illinois.

SEC. 4049. CARPENTER CREEK, CARPENTERSVILLE, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and stream bank 
stabilization for Carpenter Creek, Carpentersville, Illinois.

SEC. 4050. DES PLAINES RIVER, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and stream bank 
stabilization for the Des Plaines River, Cook County, Illinois.

SEC. 4051. FERSON-OTTER CREEK DAM, ST. CHARLES, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and stream bank 
stabilization for Ferson-Otter Creek Dam, St. Charles, Illinois.

SEC. 4052. MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVER, ILLINOIS AND MISSOURI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
developing a program for environmental restoration for the Middle 
Mississippi River, Illinois and Missouri.

SEC. 4053. NORTH BRANCH OF THE CHICAGO RIVER, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration and related water 
resource purposes for the North Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, 
Illinois.

SEC. 4054. RIVER PARK AND RONAN PARK, NORTH BRANCH OF THE CHICAGO 
              RIVER, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration and shoreline 
protection for River Park and Ronan Park, North Branch of the Chicago 
River, Chicago, Illinois.

SEC. 4055. THILLENS PARK, NORTH BRANCH OF THE CHICAGO RIVER, CHICAGO, 
              ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration, and shoreline protection for Thillens Park, North Branch 
of the Chicago River, Chicago, Illinois.

SEC. 4056. VILLAGE OF SKOKIE, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for the Village of 
Skokie, Illinois.

SEC. 4057. BOWMAN CREEK, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration for Bowman Creek, 
South Bend, Indiana.

SEC. 4058. LAKE MICHIGAN WATERSHED, INDIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction, and related water 
resource purposes for the Lake Michigan watershed, Indiana.

SEC. 4059. BURLINGTON, IOWA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and stream bank 
stabilization for Burlington, Iowa.

SEC. 4060. BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL, LOUISIANA AND 
              MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
utilizing the Federal hopper dredge Wheeler, as part of routine testing 
and use under its ready reserve status pursuant to section 3 of the Act 
of August 11, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 622(c); 110 Stat. 3705), for support of 
projects for the beneficial reuse of material dredged from federally 
maintained waterways at the following locations:
            (1) Projects in connection with the comprehensive plan for 
        protecting, preserving, and restoring the coastal Louisiana 
        ecosystem, pursuant to section 7002 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1270).
            (2) Projects in connection with the project for hurricane 
        and storm damage reduction, Mississippi Coastal Improvements 
        Program, Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi, 
        authorized by section 1001 of this Act.

SEC. 4061. JESUIT BEND, PLAQUEMINES PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction 
for Jesuit Bend, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana.
    (b) Use of Local Report.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary 
may include elements of the report prepared by the non-Federal interest 
for Jesuit Bend, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, if the Secretary 
determines that such elements are feasible.

SEC. 4062. LABRANCHE WETLANDS, ST. CHARLES AND ST. JOHN COUNTIES, 
              LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of modifying the project for flood control and 
improvement of the Lower Mississippi River, Bonnet Carre Spillway, 
authorized by section 1 of the Act of May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534), to 
add environmental restoration as a project purpose.
    (b) Review.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall review 
operational and structural changes to the project to restore the 
LaBranche Wetlands, St. Charles and St. John Counties, Louisiana.

SEC. 4063. RUTH CANAL FRESHWATER DIVERSION, VERMILION, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for the 
improvement of Bayou Teche and the Vermilion River, Louisiana, 
authorized by section 3 of the Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941 (55 
Stat. 641), and the project for flood protection in the Teche-Vermilion 
basins, Louisiana, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1966 (80 Stat. 1420), to determine the feasibility of carrying out a 
project for environmental restoration and water supply, Ruth Canal, 
Vermilion, Louisiana.

SEC. 4064. ANACOSTIA RIVER WATERSHED, PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for the Anacostia 
River watershed, Prince George's County, Maryland.

SEC. 4065. CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE STUDY, MARYLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, AND 
              VIRGINIA.

    In carrying out the study for the Chesapeake Bay Shoreline, 
Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, being carried out under the 
Committee Resolution of the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
of the United States Senate, adopted May 23, 2001, the Secretary shall 
determine the feasibility of carrying out projects on federally owned 
property for shoreline protection, environmental restoration, and 
improvement of water quality of the Chesapeake Bay.

SEC. 4066. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL, BALTIMORE HARBOR, MARYLAND.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigational improvements and dredged 
material disposal at Cox Creek Dredged Material Disposal Site for 
Baltimore Harbor, Maryland.

SEC. 4067. MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND RECREATION AND PUBLIC ACCESS, 
              MARYLAND.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
modifying the Mid-Chesapeake Bay Island project for enhanced public 
access and recreational opportunities on Mid-Chesapeake Bay Island, 
Maryland, as authorized by section 1001 of this Act.

SEC. 4068. CAPISIC BROOK, PORTLAND, MAINE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for environmental restoration, flood damage 
reduction, and stormwater management for Capisic Brook, Portland, 
Maine.

SEC. 4069. FISHING AND GOOSEBERRY ISLANDS, KITTERY, MAINE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for storm damage reduction and shoreline 
protection for Fishing and Gooseberry Islands, Kittery, Maine.

SEC. 4070. SOUTHERN MAINE/NEW HAMPSHIRE DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL 
              STUDY, MAINE AND NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigational improvements and dredge 
material disposal for southern Maine and New Hampshire.

SEC. 4071. ASSABET, CHARLES, AND SUDBURY WATERSHEDS, MIDDLESEX AND 
              ESSEX COUNTIES, MASSACHUSETTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive watershed study to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
reduction, environmental restoration, and related water resource 
purposes, Assabet, Charles, and Sudbury watersheds, Middlesex and Essex 
Counties, Massachusetts.

SEC. 4072. HOOSIC RIVER WATERSHED, NORTH ADAMS, MASSACHUSETTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive watershed study to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage 
reduction, environmental restoration, and related water resource 
purposes for Hoosic River watershed, North Adams, Massachusetts.

SEC. 4073. MYSTIC RIVER WATERSHED, MASSACHUSETTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration for the Mystic 
River watershed, Massachusetts.

SEC. 4074. QUEQUECHAN RIVER, FALL RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, recreation, and 
related water resource purposes for the Quequechan River, Fall River, 
Massachusetts.

SEC. 4075. CLINTON RIVER, CLINTON TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration, and related water resource purposes for Clinton River, 
Clinton Township, Michigan.

SEC. 4076. HAMILTON DAM, FLINT, MICHIGAN.

    In carrying out the review under the authority of section 216 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1830) of the project for flood 
control, Flint River, Michigan, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 311), the Secretary shall include a 
review of Hamilton Dam, Flint, Michigan.

SEC. 4077. UPPER PENINSULA FLOOD RECOVERY, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction and related water 
resource purposes for Upper Peninsula Flood Recovery, Michigan.

SEC. 4078. AMORY, MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Amory, 
Mississippi.

SEC. 4079. COASTAL MISSISSIPPI ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for environmental restoration and related water 
resource purposes for coastal Mississippi.

SEC. 4080. FULTON, MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Fulton, 
Mississippi.

SEC. 4081. GULFPORT, MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigational improvements, Gulfport, 
Mississippi.

SEC. 4082. LUCEDALE, MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, water supply, 
recreation, and related water resource purposes for Lucedale, 
Mississippi.

SEC. 4083. MAGBY CREEK AND VERNON BRANCH, LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Magby Creek and 
Vernon Branch in Lowndes County, Mississippi.

SEC. 4084. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
modifying the project for flood protection and other purposes in the 
Blue River basin, vicinity of Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas, 
authorized by section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (80 Stat. 
1409), to include additional flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration, and recreational measures, Kansas City, Missouri.

SEC. 4085. LITTLE BLUE RIVER, JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for stream bank stabilization for Little Blue 
River, Jackson County, Missouri.

SEC. 4086. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, especially examining 
the floodwall pump station, for St. Louis, Missouri.

SEC. 4087. LAS VEGAS WASH, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Las Vegas Wash, 
Las Vegas, Nevada.

SEC. 4088. NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    The Secretary, in collaboration with all relevant Federal and non-
Federal entities, including State and local governments, nonprofit 
organizations, academia, and the general public, shall conduct a 
comprehensive watershed study of all watersheds in New Hampshire for 
water quality, habitat degradation, environmental restoration, water 
supply, and potential impacts of climate change for New Hampshire.

SEC. 4089. PISCATAQUA RIVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to evaluate sediment and 
nutrient pollution in the Piscataqua River system to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental restoration and 
water quality for the Piscataqua River, New Hampshire.

SEC. 4090. BARNEGAT BAY WATERSHED, OCEAN AND MONMOUTH COUNTIES, NEW 
              JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive watershed study to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage 
reduction, shoreline protection, environmental restoration, and related 
water resource purposes for Barnegat Bay watershed, Ocean and Monmouth 
Counties, New Jersey.

SEC. 4091. BEVERLY, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for shoreline protection, including 
consideration of a gabion wall, for Beverly, New Jersey.

SEC. 4092. BOROUGH OF PINE BEACH, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for shoreline protection, including 
consideration of floating wave attenuators off shore, for Borough of 
Pine Beach, New Jersey.

SEC. 4093. HADDON TOWNSHIP, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Haddon Township, 
New Jersey.

SEC. 4094. RAHWAY RIVER WATERSHED, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive watershed study to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage 
reduction, environmental restoration, and related water resource 
purposes for Rahway River watershed, New Jersey.

SEC. 4095. THIRD RIVER, BELLEVILLE, BLOOMFIELD, AND NUTLEY, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction for Third River, 
Belleville, Bloomfield, and Nutley, New Jersey.

SEC. 4096. PASSAIC RIVER CHANNEL, NUTLEY, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, environmental restoration, and 
recreation for the Passaic River Channel, Nutley, New Jersey.

SEC. 4097. TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for storm damage reduction and shoreline 
protection for the Township of Ocean, New Jersey.

SEC. 4098. PREAKNESS BROOK, WAYNE, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Preakness Brook, 
Wayne, New Jersey.

SEC. 4099. DONA ANA, NEW MEXICO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
adding hydropower to existing irrigation canals for Dona Ana, New 
Mexico.

SEC. 4100. HIDALGO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Hidalgo County, 
New Mexico.

SEC. 4101. OTERO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Otero County, New 
Mexico.

SEC. 4102. VALENCIA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Valencia County, 
New Mexico.

SEC. 4103. GLEN COVE, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for storm damage reduction and environmental 
restoration for Glen Cove, New York.

SEC. 4104. HAWTREE BASIN, HAMILTON BEACH, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for storm damage reduction, shoreline protection, 
and environmental restoration for Hawtree basin, Hamilton Beach, New 
York.

SEC. 4105. KILL VAN KULL, PORT RICHMOND, STATEN ISLAND, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for storm damage reduction, shoreline protection, 
and environmental restoration for Kill Van Kull, Port Richmond, Staten 
Island, New York.

SEC. 4106. MARINERS MARSH AND ARLINGTON MARSH, STATEN ISLAND, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration for Mariners Marsh 
and Arlington Marsh, Staten Island, New York.

SEC. 4107. NEW YORK, NEW YORK.

    (a) Inventory and Assessment of Bulkheads and Seawalls.--
            (1) Inventory.--The Secretary shall conduct an inventory of 
        bulkheads and seawalls constructed around the city of New York, 
        New York.
            (2) Assessment of rehabilitation needs.--In conducting the 
        inventory required under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall 
        assess the condition of the bulkheads and seawalls and the need 
        for rehabilitation or modification of the bulkheads and 
        seawalls.
    (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
report containing the inventory and assessment required by subsection 
(a).
    (c) Interim Actions.--If the Secretary determines that a bulkhead 
or seawall referred to in subsection (a) presents an imminent and 
substantial risk to public safety, the Secretary may carry out measures 
to prevent or mitigate that risk.
    (d) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of assistance 
provided under this section shall be 65 percent.
    (e) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall coordinate with the appropriate officials of the city of New York 
and the State of New York.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $7,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 4108. NORTON BASIN INLET, FAR ROCKAWAY, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for storm damage reduction and shoreline 
protection for Norton Basin Inlet, Far Rockaway, New York.

SEC. 4109. QUEENS, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for storm damage reduction and shoreline 
protection, Queens, New York, between 116th and 156th Streets.

SEC. 4110. ROCKAWAY BEACH SEAWALL, ROCKAWAY, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for storm damage reduction and shoreline 
protection for Rockaway Beach Seawall, Rockaway, New York.

SEC. 4111. ROOSEVELT ISLAND, EAST RIVER, NEW YORK, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction and shoreline 
protection for Roosevelt Island, East River, New York, New York.

SEC. 4112. CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for environmental restoration in support of the 
Surface Water Improvement and Management Initiative for Charlotte, 
North Carolina.

SEC. 4113. NANTAHALA RIVER, SWAIN, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, recreation, and 
related water resource purposes, Nantahala River, Swain, North 
Carolina.

SEC. 4114. MISSOURI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, SOUTH AND CENTRAL NORTH 
              DAKOTA, NORTH DAKOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for the Missouri 
River and tributaries, South and Central North Dakota, North Dakota.

SEC. 4115. BIG CREEK WATERSHED, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduction and 
environmental restoration for Big Creek watershed, Ohio.

SEC. 4116. BRANDYWINE CREEK WATERSHED, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive watershed study to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage 
reduction and environmental restoration for Brandywine Creek watershed, 
Ohio.

SEC. 4117. CARLISLE TOWNSHIP, LORAIN COUNTY, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Carlisle 
Township, Lorain County, Ohio.

SEC. 4118. CUYAHOGA RIVER WATERSHED AND TUSCARAWAS RIVER WATERSHED, 
              SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive watershed study to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
reduction, environmental restoration, and related water resource 
purposes, Cuyahoga River watershed and Tuscarawas River watershed, 
Summit County, Ohio.

SEC. 4119. EUCLID CREEK WATERSHED, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduction and 
environmental restoration for Euclid Creek watershed, Ohio.

SEC. 4120. HEALY CREEK, BRUNSWICK, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, streambank 
erosion, and sedimentation control for Healy Creek, Brunswick, Ohio.

SEC. 4121. LOWER MAUMEE RIVER, TOLEDO, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for the Lower Maumee 
River, Toledo, Ohio.

SEC. 4122. OHIO RIVER, OHIO.

    Section 4070 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 
Stat. 1183) is amended by striking ``Ohio River'' and inserting ``Ohio 
River and tributaries''.

SEC. 4123. SHAKER LAKES, SHAKER HEIGHTS AND CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration for Shaker Lakes, 
Shaker Heights and Cleveland Heights, Ohio.

SEC. 4124. STARK COUNTY, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and environmental 
restoration for Stark County, Ohio.

SEC. 4125. TINKERS CREEK WATERSHED, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduction and 
environmental restoration for Tinkers Creek watershed, Ohio.

SEC. 4126. UPPER TUSCARAWAS RIVER, CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for the Upper 
Tuscarawas River, Cuyahoga County, Ohio.

SEC. 4127. WEST CREEK WATERSHED, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduction and 
environmental restoration for West Creek watershed, Ohio.

SEC. 4128. YELLOW CREEK AND SHORT CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and environmental 
restoration for Yellow Creek and Short Creek, Jefferson County, Ohio.

SEC. 4129. FERRY CREEK RESERVOIR, BROOKINGS, OREGON.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration for Ferry Creek 
Reservoir, Brookings, Oregon.

SEC. 4130. OREGON NAVIGATION JETTIES AND BREAKWATERS, OREGON.

    (a) Inventory and Assessment of Navigation Jetties and 
Breakwaters.--
            (1) Inventory.--The Secretary shall conduct an inventory of 
        federally constructed navigation jetties and breakwaters in the 
        State of Oregon.
            (2) Assessment of rehabilitation needs.--In conducting the 
        inventory required under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall 
        assess the condition of the navigation jetties and breakwaters 
        and the need for rehabilitation or modification of the jetties 
        and breakwaters.
    (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
report containing the inventory and assessment required by subsection 
(a).
    (c) Interim Actions.--If the Secretary determines that a jetty or 
breakwater referred to in subsection (a) presents an imminent and 
substantial risk to public safety, the Secretary may carry out measures 
to prevent or mitigate that risk.
    (d) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of assistance 
provided under this section shall be 65 percent.
    (e) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall coordinate with the appropriate officials of the State of Oregon.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $7,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 4131. PORT ORFORD, OREGON.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigational improvements with examination 
of navigational breakwaters for Port Orford, Oregon.

SEC. 4132. BUHL LAKE, SHARON, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a multipurpose project for flood damage 
reduction and environmental restoration for Buhl Lake, Sharon, 
Pennsylvania.
    (b) Prior Work.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall 
utilize, to the extent practicable, any work undertaken in the 
formulation of a project for environmental restoration, Buhl Lake, 
Sharon, Pennsylvania, initiated under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330; 110 Stat. 3679).

SEC. 4133. DELAWARE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive watershed study to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage 
reduction and environmental restoration for the Delaware River and 
tributaries, Bucks County, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 4134. ELK CREEK, MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration and water quality 
for Elk Creek, Meadville, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 4135. MILL CREEK, ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, focusing on the Mill 
Creek Drift Catcher, for Mill Creek, Erie, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 4136. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration for the 
Susquehanna River, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 4137. WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    Section 4077 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 
Stat. 1184) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``Mahoning River basin, 
        Pennsylvania'' and inserting ``Mahoning River basin, 
        Pennsylvania, the Monongahela River basin, Pennsylvania,''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``Shaler Township'' and 
        inserting ``Shaler Township, Hampton Township, Harmar 
        Township,''.

SEC. 4138. GUAYAMA, PUERTO RICO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hurricane and storm damage reduction for 
Guayama, Puerto Rico.

SEC. 4139. RINCON, PUERTO RICO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and shoreline 
protection for the Municipality of Rincon, Puerto Rico.

SEC. 4140. PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction and related water 
resource purposes for the rivers in Providence, Rhode Island.

SEC. 4141. SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary, in collaboration with all relevant Federal and non-
Federal entities, including State and local governments, nonprofit 
organizations, academia, and the general public, shall conduct 
comprehensive watershed studies of all 8 watersheds in South Carolina 
for water quality, habitat condition, environmental restoration, water 
supply, and the potential impacts of climate change for South Carolina.

SEC. 4142. JAMES RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
modifying the project for channel restoration and improvements on the 
James River, South Dakota, authorized by section 401(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4128) to add ecosystem 
restoration and watershed improvements as project purposes.

SEC. 4143. STATION CAMP CREEK, GALLATIN, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration for Station Camp 
Creek, Gallatin, Tennessee.

SEC. 4144. BRAZOS RIVER, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study assessing the long-term impacts 
of water use, withdrawal, recirculation, and downstream impacts on the 
Whitney Lake Reservoir, Texas.

SEC. 4145. HICKORY CREEK, CITY OF BALCH SPRINGS, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Hickory Creek, 
City of Balch Springs, Texas.

SEC. 4146. HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS (BARBOURS CUT), TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of modifying 
the Barbours Cut element of the project for navigation and 
environmental restoration, Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, 
Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(30) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3666), to a depth of 45 feet.

SEC. 4147. PORT OF GALVESTON, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of carrying 
out a project for dredged material disposal in the vicinity of the 
project for navigation and environmental restoration, Houston-Galveston 
Navigation Channels, Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(30) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3666).

SEC. 4148. SIMSBORO AQUIFER, CITY OF BALSTROP, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
utilizing the Simsboro Aquifer for water supply for the City of 
Balstrop, Texas.

SEC. 4149. NAVASOTA RIVER WATERSHED, GRIMES COUNTY, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration, and related water resource purposes for the Navasota River 
watershed, Grimes County, Texas.

SEC. 4150. RIO GRANDE BASIN, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration, and water supply for the Rio Grande basin, Texas.

SEC. 4151. ROMA, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for Roma, Texas.

SEC. 4152. COTTONWOOD HEIGHTS, UTAH.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for streambank stabilization for Cottonwood 
Heights, Utah.

SEC. 4153. EMERY TOWN, UTAH.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study of existing water 
supply resources for Emery Town, Utah.

SEC. 4154. BIG SANDY RIVER REALLOCATION STUDY, VIRGINIA AND WEST 
              VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive watershed study to 
determine the feasibility of reallocating water storage at 6 reservoirs 
to optimize benefits for multiple-purpose use in the Big Sandy River 
watershed, Virginia and West Virginia.

SEC. 4155. BUCKROE AND GRANDVIEW BEACHES, HAMPTON, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for shoreline protection for Buckroe and 
Grandview Beaches, Hampton, Virginia.

SEC. 4156. FORT MONROE, HAMPTON, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
including offshore breakwaters, for Fort Monroe, Hampton, Virginia.

SEC. 4157. HAMPTON, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for hurricane and storm damage reduction and 
shoreline protection for Hampton, Virginia.

SEC. 4158. JAMES RIVER WATERSHED, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive watershed study to 
determine the water resource needs, including current and projected 
future needs, for the James River watershed, Virginia.

SEC. 4159. ELLIOTT BAY, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation channel deepening for Elliott 
Bay, Seattle, Washington.

SEC. 4160. GREEN RIVER, KENT, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction for the Green River, 
Kent, Washington.

SEC. 4161. VANCOUVER LAKE WATERSHED, VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive watershed study to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for environmental 
quality and environmental restoration, especially related to salmon and 
steelhead recovery issues, for the Vancouver Lake watershed, Vancouver, 
Washington.

SEC. 4162. LAKE MICHIGAN SHORELINE, CITY OF CUDAHY, WISCONSIN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for shoreline protection for the Lake Michigan 
shoreline, City of Cudahy, Wisconsin.

                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS

SEC. 5001. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 510 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3759; 121 Stat. 1202) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1) by striking ``pilot'';
            (2) in subsection (d(2)) by adding at the end the 
        following:
                    ``(C) In-kind services.--In accordance with section 
                221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
                5b), the non-Federal interest may provide any portion 
                of the non-Federal share of the costs of the project 
                carried out under this section in the form of in-kind 
                services and materials.
                    ``(D) Treatment of certain funds.--In accordance 
                with section 2007 of the Water Resources Development 
                Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2222), funds provided by a 
                Federal department or agency other than the Corps of 
                Engineers for a project carried out under this section 
                shall be credited towards the non-Federal share of the 
                cost of project.''
            (3) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), (g), (h), and 
        (i) as subsections (f), (g), (h), (i), and (j), respectively;
            (4) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Cost Limitation.--Not more than $10,000,000 in Federal funds 
may be allotted under this section for a project at any single 
locality.'';
            (5) by striking subsection (g) (as redesignated by 
        paragraph (3) of this subsection) and inserting the following:
    ``(g) Projects.--The Secretary may carry out projects under this 
section in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, with the goal of carrying out 
projects in each of the States of Delaware, New York, Maryland, 
Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia and the District of 
Columbia.''; and
            (6) in subsection (j) (as redesignated by paragraph (3) of 
        this subsection) by striking ``$40,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$50,000,000''.
    (b) Restoration of Chesapeake Bay Ecosystem.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop at Federal 
        expense and submit to Congress a comprehensive plan to 
        prioritize projects within the Chesapeake Bay watershed, 
        including projects in the Anacostia, Elizabeth, James, 
        Patapsco, Patuxent, Potomac, Rappahannock, Susquehanna, and 
        York River basins.
            (2) Requirements.--The Secretary shall ensure that the plan 
        developed under paragraph (1)--
                    (A) focuses on integrating existing and potential 
                future work of the Corps of Engineers;
                    (B) is developed in consultation with the 
                Chesapeake Bay Program maintained under section 117 of 
                the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
                1267)); and
                    (C) encompasses all actions of the Corps of 
                Engineers that are necessary to assist in the 
                implementation of the goals of the Chesapeake Bay 
                Agreement, as defined in section 117 of the Federal 
                Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1267)).
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $1,000,000.

SEC. 5002. SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY.

    Section 5015(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 
Stat. 1196) is amended by striking ``$134,650,000'' and inserting 
``$185,638,028''.

SEC. 5003. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.

    Section 5002(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 
Stat. 1190) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (9) by striking ``Esopus, Plattekill, and 
        Rondout Creeks'' and inserting ``Esopus, Rondout, and Wallkill 
        watersheds''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(19) San Gabriel River watershed, California.
            ``(20) South Platte River watershed, Colorado.
            ``(21) Loxahatchee River watershed, Jupiter, Florida.
            ``(22) Hudson River watershed, Orange, Dutchess, and Ulster 
        Counties, New York.
            ``(23) Muskingum River basin, Ohio.''.

SEC. 5004. COMPREHENSIVE SHORELINE RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, navigation, flood damage reduction, and emergency 
streambank protection components of projects at the locations described 
in subsection (b) if the Secretary determines that such component is 
feasible.
    (b) Project Locations.--The locations referred to in subsection (a) 
are as follows:
            (1) Miller Knox Shoreline, Richmond, California.
            (2) Mississippi River, Davenport, Iowa.
            (3) Lake Michigan (in the vicinity of the former USX Site), 
        Chicago, Illinois.
            (4) Pond and Mill Creek, Louisville, Kentucky.
            (5) Massachusetts Bay (in the vicinity of Georges Island), 
        Boston, Massachusetts.
            (6) Mississippi River (in the vicinity of the lower St. 
        Anthony Falls), Minneapolis, Minnesota.
            (7) Brush Creek, Kansas City, Missouri.
            (8) Mississippi River, Kimmswick, Missouri.
            (9) Delaware River, Trenton, New Jersey.
            (10) East River, New York, New York.
            (11) Upper New York Bay, Staten Island, New York.
            (12) Abbott's Creek, Lexington, North Carolina.
            (13) Ohio River, Belpre, Ohio.
            (14) Schuylkill River, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
            (15) Ohio, Allegheny, and Monongahela Rivers, Pittsburgh, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (16) Ohio River, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
            (17) Fields Point, Narragansett Bay, Providence, Rhode 
        Island.
            (18) Congaree River, Columbia, South Carolina.
            (19) Wolf Creek Harbor, Mississippi River, Tennessee.
            (20) Ruston Way Seawall, Commencement Bay, Tacoma, 
        Washington.
            (21) Lower Yahara River, McFarland, Wisconsin.
    (c) Cost Limitation.--Not more than $5,000,000 in Federal funds may 
be allotted under this section for a project at any single locality.
    (d) Recreation.--The Secretary may include recreational components 
as part of a project carried out under this section.
    (e) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
this section $25,000,000 for each fiscal years 2011 through 2016.

SEC. 5005. NORTHEAST COASTAL REGION ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall plan, design, and construct 
projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration within the coastal waters of 
the Northeastern United States from Virginia to Maine, including 
associated bays, estuaries, and critical riverine areas.
    (b) General Coastal Management Plan.--
            (1) Assessment.--The Secretary, in coordination with the 
        Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the heads 
        of other appropriate Federal agencies, the Governors of the 
        coastal States from Virginia to Maine, nonprofit organizations, 
        and other interested parties, shall assess the needs regarding, 
        and opportunities for, aquatic ecosystem restoration within the 
        coastal waters of the Northeastern United States.
            (2) Plan.--The Secretary shall develop a general coastal 
        management plan based on the assessment carried out under 
        paragraph (1), maximizing the use of existing plans and 
        investigations. The Secretary shall include in the plan the 
        following:
                    (A) An inventory and evaluation of coastal 
                habitats.
                    (B) Identification of aquatic resources in need of 
                improvement.
                    (C) Identification and prioritization of potential 
                aquatic habitat restoration projects.
                    (D) Identification of geographical and ecological 
                areas of concern, including--
                            (i) finfish habitats;
                            (ii) diadromous fisheries migratory 
                        corridors;
                            (iii) shellfish habitats;
                            (iv) submerged aquatic vegetation;
                            (v) wetlands; and
                            (vi) beach dune complexes and other similar 
                        habitats.
    (c) Eligible Projects.--The Secretary may carry out an aquatic 
ecosystem restoration project under this section if the project--
            (1) is consistent with the management plan developed under 
        subsection (b); and
            (2) provides for--
                    (A) the restoration of degraded aquatic habitat 
                (including coastal, saltmarsh, benthic, and riverine 
                habitat);
                    (B) the restoration of geographical or ecological 
                areas of concern, including the restoration of natural 
                river and stream characteristics;
                    (C) the improvement of water quality; or
                    (D) other projects or activities determined to be 
                appropriate by the Secretary.
    (d) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Management plan.--The management plan developed under 
        subsection (b) shall be completed at Federal expense.
            (2) Restoration projects.--The non-Federal share of the 
        cost of a project carried out under this section shall be 35 
        percent.
    (e) Cost Limitation.--Not more than $10,000,000 in Federal funds 
may be allocated under this section for an eligible project.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2011 
and each fiscal year thereafter, including funds for the completion of 
the management plan.

SEC. 5006. ANACOSTIA WATERSHED, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, navigation, flood damage reduction, emergency streambank 
protection, and aquatic plant control components of the Anacostia River 
Watershed Restoration Plan, developed pursuant to section 5060 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1215), if the 
Secretary determines that such component is feasible.
    (b) Consultation.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall consult with the Anacostia Watershed Restoration Partnership.
    (c) Federal Lands.--In carrying out a project component under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall waive any cost share to be provided 
by non-Federal interests for any portion of the project component that 
benefits federally owned property.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 5007. EGMONT KEY, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall accept funds from the Director of the United 
States Fish and Wildlife Service to carry out those portions of the 
project for shoreline stabilization, Egmont Key, Florida, carried out 
under section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal 
participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly owned 
property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), that benefit 
federally owned property.

SEC. 5008. CAMBRIDGE, MARYLAND.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out projects for environmental 
protection and restoration at the Blackwater Wildlife Refuge, 
Cambridge, Maryland. In carrying out such projects, the Secretary shall 
accept funds from the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service.

SEC. 5009. HART-MILLER ISLAND, MARYLAND.

    After the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary may not 
consider the use or expansion of Hart-Miller Island, Maryland, in any 
dredged material management plan.

SEC. 5010. GALLOPS ISLAND, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project for the 
environmental remediation of Gallops Island, Boston, Massachusetts. In 
carrying out such project, the Secretary shall accept funds from the 
Director of the National Park Service.

SEC. 5011. SHARKEY COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

    Funding for the operation and maintenance of the multiagency 
wildlife and environmental interpretative and education center, 
authorized by section 145(f) of Division H of Public Law 108-199 (118 
Stat. 443), shall be provided by the Secretary of the Interior.

SEC. 5012. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE PROMOTION OF GENERAL MICHAEL J. 
              WALSH TO MAJOR GENERAL, UNITED STATES ARMY.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) Brigadier General Michael J. Walsh has had a 
        distinguished 30-year career with the United States Army Corps 
        of Engineers, including as--
                    (A) District Commander of the San Francisco 
                District, San Francisco, California, from 1994 to 1996;
                    (B) District Commander of the Sacramento District, 
                Sacramento, California, from 1998 to 2001;
                    (C) Executive Director of Civil Works, Corps 
                Headquarters, Washington, District of Columbia, from 
                2001 to 2003;
                    (D) Chief of Staff, Corps Headquarters, Washington, 
                District of Columbia, from 2003 to 2004;
                    (E) Commander of the South Atlantic Division, 
                Atlanta, Georgia, from 2004 to 2006;
                    (F) Commander for the Corps Gulf Region Division, 
                Baghdad, Iraq, from 2006 to 2008; and
                    (G) Commander of the Mississippi Valley Division, 
                Vicksburg, Mississippi, from 2008 to 2010.
            (2) General Walsh has held a wide variety of Army command 
        and staff assignments, including--
                    (A) project management officer for Engineer Branch, 
                Supreme Headquarters, Allied Powers, Europe (SHAPE);
                    (B) Environmental Task Force Leader, Fort Stewart, 
                Georgia;
                    (C) Executive Officer, 92nd Engineer Battalion, 
                Fort Stewart, Georgia, and Saudi Arabia;
                    (D) Project Engineer and Assistant Area Engineer, 
                Baltimore District;
                    (E) Construction Officer, 18th Engineer Brigade, 
                Darmstadt, Germany; and
                    (F) Commander, Company B, 94th Engineer Battalion, 
                Darmstadt, Germany.
            (3) General Walsh has received several awards of the United 
        States Army, including 2 Bronze Stars, 4 Legions of Merit, and 
        numerous lesser awards.
            (4) On October 27, 2009, the Committee on Armed Services of 
        the Senate unanimously approved the nomination of General Walsh 
        to the rank of Major General, United States Army.
            (5) General Walsh's nomination was unreasonably delayed on 
        the floor of the Senate for 7 months.
            (6) On May 19, 2010, the nomination of General Walsh to 
        Major General of the United States Army was confirmed by the 
        United States Senate by unanimous consent.
            (7) On June 2, 2010, Brigadier General Walsh was formally 
        promoted to the rank of Major General.
    (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the Sense of Congress that General 
Walsh should be congratulated for his promotion to the rank of Major 
General, United States Army, and should be commended for his duty and 
dedication to the United States, to the United States Army, and to the 
Corps of Engineers.
                                 <all>