<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE bill PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/bill.dtd//EN" "bill.dtd">
<bill bill-stage="Introduced-in-House" dms-id="HBAC66E59294341A29BCC861AF1A8FB7B" public-private="public" bill-type="olc"> 
<form> 
<distribution-code display="yes">I</distribution-code> 
<congress>111th CONGRESS</congress>
<session>2d Session</session>
<legis-num>H. R. 4430</legis-num> 
<current-chamber>IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</current-chamber> 
<action> 
<action-date date="20100113">January 13, 2010</action-date> 
<action-desc><sponsor name-id="C001076">Mr. Chaffetz</sponsor> (for himself and <cosponsor name-id="J000289">Mr. Jordan of Ohio</cosponsor>) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the <committee-name committee-id="HGO00">Committee on Oversight and Government Reform</committee-name></action-desc>
</action> 
<legis-type>A BILL</legis-type> 
<official-title>To protect the democratic process and the right of the people of the District of Columbia to define marriage.</official-title> 
</form> 
<legis-body id="H11B41005E0534BE59BCDCC939260ED60" style="OLC"> 
<section id="H4D696963039C441D8A919921122AA27D" section-type="section-one"><enum>1.</enum><header>Short title</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">This Act may be cited as the <quote><short-title>District of Columbia Referendum on Marriage Act of 2010</short-title></quote>.</text></section> 
<section id="H8B5A2508CF894B4C9B2D4197B8C4062B" section-type="subsequent-section"><enum>2.</enum><header>Findings</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">Congress finds that—</text> 
<paragraph id="HE060546AEDF54405BDD8AF08AF233587"><enum>(1)</enum><text>a broad coalition of residents of the District of Columbia petitioned for an initiative in accordance with the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to establish that <quote>only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in the District of Columbia</quote>;</text></paragraph> 
<paragraph id="H6E6DC5E18AE84CF8B88000A6F3CDDE54"><enum>(2)</enum><text>this petition anticipated the Council of the District of Columbia’s passage of an Act legalizing same-sex marriage;</text></paragraph> 
<paragraph id="H2802AB870CB24D0F8BCA72575CD701C7"><enum>(3)</enum><text>the unelected District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics and the unelected District of Columbia Superior Court thwarted the residents’ initiative effort to define marriage democratically, holding that the initiative amounted to discrimination prohibited by the District of Columbia Human Rights Act; and</text></paragraph> 
<paragraph id="HB39087225FBD415BBA5D178D61BBCE21"><enum>(4)</enum><text>the definition of marriage affects every person and should be debated openly and democratically.</text></paragraph></section> 
<section id="H4CC31B54FDEB4406B601423BAF30A861"><enum>3.</enum><header>Referendum or initiative requirement</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, the government of the District of Columbia shall not issue a marriage license to any couple of the same sex until the people of the District of Columbia have the opportunity to hold a referendum or initiative on the question of whether the District of Columbia should issue same-sex marriage licenses.</text> </section> 
</legis-body> 
</bill> 

