<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE bill PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/bill.dtd//EN" "bill.dtd">
<bill bill-stage="Introduced-in-House" bill-type="olc" dms-id="HE0A068F15EE74136B6DEF0B0D5232839" public-private="public">
	<form>
		<distribution-code display="yes">I</distribution-code>
		<congress>111th CONGRESS</congress>
		<session>1st Session</session>
		<legis-num>H. R. 1822</legis-num>
		<current-chamber>IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</current-chamber>
		<action>
			<action-date date="20090331">March 31, 2009</action-date>
			<action-desc><sponsor name-id="F000448">Mr. Franks of Arizona</sponsor>
			 (for himself, <cosponsor name-id="A000055">Mr. Aderholt</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="A000358">Mr. Akin</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="B001256">Mrs. Bachmann</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="B001239">Mr.
			 Barrett of South Carolina</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="B001236">Mr.
			 Boozman</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="B001262">Mr. Broun of
			 Georgia</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="B001149">Mr. Burton of
			 Indiana</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="C001053">Mr. Cole</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="C001062">Mr. Conaway</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="F000445">Mr. Forbes</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="F000449">Mr. Fortenberry</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="G000548">Mr. Garrett of New Jersey</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="H001048">Mr. Hunter</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="K000362">Mr. King of Iowa</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="L000564">Mr. Lamborn</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="L000566">Mr. Latta</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="L000321">Mr. Linder</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="L000563">Mr. Lipinski</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="M001147">Mr. McCotter</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="M001156">Mr. McHenry</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="P000587">Mr. Pence</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="S001176">Mr. Scalise</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="S001164">Mrs. Schmidt</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="S000522">Mr. Smith of New Jersey</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="S000583">Mr. Smith of Texas</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="S001143">Mr. Souder</cosponsor>,
			 <cosponsor name-id="T000074">Mr. Taylor</cosponsor>, and
			 <cosponsor name-id="W000795">Mr. Wilson of South Carolina</cosponsor>)
			 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
			 <committee-name committee-id="HJU00">Committee on the
			 Judiciary</committee-name></action-desc>
		</action>
		<legis-type>A BILL</legis-type>
		<official-title>To prohibit discrimination against the unborn on the
		  basis of sex or race, and for other purposes.</official-title>
	</form>
	<legis-body id="H79A052E2B88A46FEAE324229E5524E48" style="OLC">
		<section id="H4ED8E76626A6415F9200EC213EE0F42C" section-type="section-one"><enum>1.</enum><header>Short title</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">This Act may be cited as the
			 <quote><short-title>Susan B. Anthony and Frederick
			 Douglass Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act of 2009</short-title></quote>.</text>
		</section><section id="H1D3B96DF9E764A409669FF79DFFA2819"><enum>2.</enum><header>Findings and
			 Constitutional authority</header>
			<subsection id="H3F8205BA832E4C9D9326CE2FC273A0CC"><enum>(a)</enum><header>Findings</header><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The Congress makes the following
			 findings:</text>
				<paragraph id="H8D6BF169C95F492980AB1481312612BB"><enum>(1)</enum><header>Sex
			 discrimination findings</header>
					<subparagraph id="HE4DCCB176E834CE7A0CE3800F1AFB27F"><enum>(A)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Women are a vital part of American society
			 and culture and possess the same fundamental human rights and civil rights as
			 men.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="H506D6634D62E41118715C313E80ECDC"><enum>(B)</enum><text>United States law
			 prohibits the dissimilar treatment for males and females who are similarly
			 situated and prohibits sex discrimination in various contexts, including the
			 provision of employment, education, housing, health insurance coverage, and
			 athletics.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="HC78E24CB404F496AAE3678BFF4B3FEEE"><enum>(C)</enum><text>Sex is an
			 immutable characteristic, and is ascertainable at the earliest stages of human
			 development through existing medical technology and procedures commonly in use,
			 including maternal-fetal bloodstream DNA sampling, amniocentesis, chorionic
			 villus sampling or <quote>CVS</quote>, and medical sonography. In addition to
			 medically assisted sex-determination carried out by medical professionals, a
			 growing sex-determination niche industry has developed and is marketing
			 low-cost commercial products, widely advertised and available, that aid in the
			 sex determination of an unborn child without the aid of medical professionals.
			 Experts have demonstrated that the sex-selection industry is on the rise and
			 predict that it will continue to be a growing trend in the United States. Sex
			 determination is always a necessary step to the procurement of a sex-selection
			 abortion.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="H6F62795E00D84D9FB9DC4F1650E13006"><enum>(D)</enum><text>A
			 <quote>sex-selection abortion</quote> is an abortion undertaken for purposes of
			 eliminating an unborn child of an undesired sex. Sex-selection abortion is
			 barbaric, and described by scholars and civil rights advocates as an act of
			 sex-based or gender-based violence, predicated on sex discrimination. By
			 definition, sex-selection abortions do not implicate the health of the mother
			 of the unborn, but instead are elective procedures motivated by sex or gender
			 bias.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="HCFDB3852B67E48D800FD525F6DF44D47"><enum>(E)</enum><text>The targeted
			 victims of sex-selection abortions performed in the United States and worldwide
			 are overwhelmingly female. The selective abortion of females is female
			 infanticide, the intentional killing of unborn females, due to the preference
			 for male offspring or <quote>son preference</quote>. Son preference is
			 reinforced by the low value associated, by some segments of the world
			 community, with female offspring. Those segments tend to regard female
			 offspring as financial burdens to a family over their lifetime due to their
			 perceived inability to earn or provide financially for the family unit as can a
			 male. In addition, due to social and legal convention, female offspring are
			 less likely to carry on the family name. <quote>Son preference</quote> is one
			 of the most evident manifestations of sex or gender discrimination in any
			 society, undermining female equality, and fueling the elimination of females’
			 right to exist in instances of sex-selection abortion.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="H24581B48EEC94CF9A8102B6BBB7CB15B"><enum>(F)</enum><text>Sex-selection
			 abortions are not expressly prohibited by United States law and the laws of 48
			 States. Sex-selection abortions are performed in the United States. In a March
			 2008 report published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
			 Columbia University economists Douglas Almond and Lena Edlund examined the sex
			 ratio of United States-born children and found <quote>evidence of sex
			 selection, most likely at the prenatal stage</quote>. The data revealed obvious
			 <quote>son preference</quote> in the form of unnatural sex-ratio imbalances
			 within certain segments of the United States population, primarily those
			 segments tracing their ethnic or cultural origins to countries where
			 sex-selection abortion is prevalent. The evidence strongly suggests that some
			 Americans are exercising sex-selection abortion practices within the United
			 States consistent with discriminatory practices common to their country of
			 origin, or the country to which they trace their ancestry. While sex-selection
			 abortions are more common outside the United States, the evidence reveals that
			 female feticide is also occurring in the United States.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="H86957803EB1A4FC9B717D7473CD1A527"><enum>(G)</enum><text>The American
			 public supports a prohibition of sex-selection abortion. In a March 2006 Zogby
			 International poll, 86 percent of Americans agreed that sex-selection abortion
			 should be illegal, yet only two States have proscribed sex-selection
			 abortion.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="H16A90A8A9946487897D670AD78BB4BBC"><enum>(H)</enum><text>Despite the
			 failure of the United States to proscribe sex-selection abortion, the United
			 States Congress has expressed repeatedly, through Congressional resolution,
			 strong condemnation of policies promoting sex-selection abortion in the
			 <quote>Communist Government of China</quote>. Likewise, at the 2007 United
			 Nation’s Annual Meeting of the Commission on the Status of Women, 51st Session,
			 the United States’ delegation spearheaded a resolution calling on countries to
			 eliminate sex-selective abortion, a policy directly contradictory to the
			 permissiveness of current United States’ law, which places no restriction on
			 the practice of sex-selection abortion. The United Nations Commission on the
			 Status of Women has urged governments of all nations <quote>to take necessary
			 measures to prevent … prenatal sex selection</quote>.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="H60C552200FC6410A87CB2DB93E4400E0"><enum>(I)</enum><text>A 1990 report by
			 Harvard University economist Amartya Sen, estimated that more than 100 million
			 women were <quote>demographically missing</quote> from the world as early as
			 1990 due to sexist practices, including sex-selection abortion. Many experts
			 believe sex-selection abortion is the primary cause. As of 2008, estimates of
			 women missing from the world range in the hundreds of millions.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="HCD450B4C1D804D06ACFEB5821D1713D"><enum>(J)</enum><text>Countries with
			 longstanding experience with sex-selection abortion—such as the Republic of
			 India, the United Kingdom, and the People’s Republic of China—have enacted
			 complete bans on sex-selection abortion, and have steadily continued to
			 strengthen prohibitions and penalties. The United States, by contrast, has no
			 law in place to restrict sex-selection abortion, establishing the United States
			 as affording less protection from sex-based feticide than the Republic of India
			 or the People’s Republic of China, whose recent practices of sex-selection
			 abortion were vehemently and repeatedly condemned by United States
			 congressional resolutions and by the United States’ Ambassador to the
			 Commission on the Status of Women. Public statements from within the medical
			 community reveal that citizens of other countries come to the United States for
			 sex-selection procedures that would be criminal in their country of origin.
			 Because the United States permits abortion on the basis of sex, the United
			 States may effectively function as a <quote>safe haven</quote> for those who
			 seek to have American physicians do what would otherwise be criminal in their
			 home countries—a sex-selection abortion, most likely late-term.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="HCA71DFB215DF42C68DA356FD0087D7AB"><enum>(K)</enum><text>The American
			 medical community opposes sex-selection abortion. The American College of
			 Obstetricians and Gynecologists, commonly known as <quote>ACOG</quote>, stated
			 in its February 2007 Ethics Committee Opinion, Number 360, that sex-selection
			 is inappropriate for family planning purposes because sex-selection
			 <quote>ultimately supports sexist practices</quote>. Likewise, the American
			 Society for Reproductive Medicine has opined that sex-selection for family
			 planning purposes is ethically problematic, inappropriate, and should be
			 discouraged.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="HC4A47B9585C54145B06C9DA47100FD1C"><enum>(L)</enum><text>Sex-selection
			 abortion results in an unnatural sex-ratio imbalance. An unnatural sex-ratio
			 imbalance is undesirable, due to the inability of the numerically predominant
			 sex to find mates. Experts worldwide document that a significant sex-ratio
			 imbalance in which males numerically predominate can be a cause of increased
			 violence and militancy within a society. Likewise, an unnatural sex-ratio
			 imbalance gives rise to the commoditization of humans in the form of human
			 trafficking, and a consequent increase in kidnapping and other violent
			 crime.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="H63B13A732A284DCA86F1A6989DAC7E5B"><enum>(M)</enum><text>Sex-selection
			 abortions have the effect of diminishing the representation of women in the
			 American population, and therefore, the American electorate.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="H500CF0D5E4DF42789C82BD869DA65876"><enum>(N)</enum><text>Sex-selection
			 abortion reinforces sex discrimination and has no place in a civilized
			 society.</text>
					</subparagraph></paragraph><paragraph id="HBF9059F2208340BCB019ABB4B8B648DC"><enum>(2)</enum><header>Racial
			 discrimination findings</header>
					<subparagraph id="HC76309DD35F644829D1255E6A5433EB0"><enum>(A)</enum><text>Minorities are a
			 vital part of American society and culture and possess the same fundamental
			 human rights and civil rights as the majority.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="H4EC5D3A059334766B4F629D5B88533A9"><enum>(B)</enum><text>United Sates law
			 prohibits the dissimilar treatment of persons of different races who are
			 similarly situated. United States law prohibits discrimination on the basis of
			 race in various contexts, including the provision of employment, education,
			 housing, health insurance coverage, and athletics.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="H11B6D1C2EF1140D3804B42B134564FF7"><enum>(C)</enum><text>A
			 <quote>race-selection abortion</quote> is an abortion performed for purposes of
			 eliminating an unborn child because the child or a parent of the child is of an
			 undesired race. Race-selection abortion is barbaric, and described by civil
			 rights advocates as an act of race-based violence, predicated on race
			 discrimination. By definition, race-selection abortions do not implicate the
			 health of mother of the unborn, but instead are elective procedures motivated
			 by race bias.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="H73342ADCE2B442909D082E7940D80017"><enum>(D)</enum><text>No State has
			 enacted law to proscribe the performance of race-selection abortions.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="HA9F3A96F1456452C962F2F54B3D6840"><enum>(E)</enum><text>Race-selection
			 abortions have the effect of diminishing the number of minorities in the
			 American population and therefore, the American electorate.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="H46D76F0F4C2A4C09B50024ED02A2CF99"><enum>(F)</enum><text>Race-selection
			 abortion reinforces racial discrimination and has no place in a civilized
			 society.</text>
					</subparagraph></paragraph><paragraph id="H2859183B9943463A8B22B48E5D5530D1"><enum>(3)</enum><header>General
			 findings</header>
					<subparagraph id="H51BBAE60AEDE44AD8C1C98BB9714FC81"><enum>(A)</enum><text>The history of the
			 United States includes examples of both sex discrimination and race
			 discrimination. The people of the United States ultimately responded in the
			 strongest possible legal terms by enacting constitutional amendments correcting
			 elements of such discrimination. Women, once subjected to sex discrimination
			 that denied them the right to vote, now have suffrage guaranteed by the 19th
			 amendment. African-Americans, once subjected to race discrimination through
			 slavery that denied them equal protection of the laws, now have that right
			 guaranteed by the 14th amendment. The elimination of discriminatory practices
			 has been and is among the highest priorities and greatest achievements of
			 American history.</text>
					</subparagraph><subparagraph id="H6F68D6D6F30B4FA7AD6E00B5D8E49C79"><enum>(B)</enum><text>Implicitly
			 approving the discriminatory practices of sex-selection abortion and
			 race-selection abortion by choosing not to prohibit them will reinforce these
			 inherently discriminatory practices, and evidence a failure to protect a
			 segment of certain unborn Americans because those unborn are of a sex or racial
			 makeup that is disfavored. Sex-selection and race-selection abortions
			 trivialize the value of the unborn on the basis of sex or race, reinforcing sex
			 and race discrimination, and coarsening society to the humanity of all
			 vulnerable and innocent human life, making it increasingly difficult to protect
			 such life. Thus, Congress has a compelling interest in acting—indeed it must
			 act—to prohibit sex-selection abortion and race-selection abortion.</text>
					</subparagraph></paragraph></subsection><subsection id="H2BC9BB78E5FC404D89B58DE2F9DE17FD"><enum>(b)</enum><header>Constitutional
			 authority</header><text>In accordance with the above findings, Congress enacts
			 the following pursuant to Congress’ power under section 2 of the 13th amendment
			 and section 5 of the 14th amendment to enforce those amendments, including the
			 prohibition on government action denying equal protection of the laws, and the
			 power to pass all legislation necessary and proper for the carrying into
			 execution of these powers.</text>
			</subsection></section><section id="HC4CA7DAB8E9B433F8D6F509E7C659152"><enum>3.</enum><header>Discrimination
			 against the unborn on the basis of race or sex</header>
			<subsection id="H16A3ECF099824A4C9EE3E242E0552BBF"><enum>(a)</enum><header>In
			 general</header><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Chapter 13 of title
			 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:</text>
				<quoted-block display-inline="no-display-inline" id="H92F0BF64995F4DE0A2F78C11E7F58599" style="USC">
					<section id="HFCB00992D52E470ABB8B08E423AAB02D"><enum>249.</enum><header>Discrimination
				against the unborn on the basis of race or sex</header>
						<subsection id="H978B25AF6709470FB5632F9EAB282009"><enum>(a)</enum><header>In
				general</header><text>Whoever knowingly—</text>
							<paragraph id="HAC2E3CA26C76467EA9D3E111C5DCE05"><enum>(1)</enum><text>performs an
				abortion knowing that such abortion is sought based on the sex, gender, color
				or race of the child, or the race of a parent of that child;</text>
							</paragraph><paragraph id="H5D7EFFAE56584DBB9668B176E6331DF9"><enum>(2)</enum><text>uses force or the
				threat of force to intentionally injure or intimidate any person for the
				purpose of coercing a sex-selection or race-selection abortion; or</text>
							</paragraph><paragraph id="H62BD445B1CE14BAD9DD68EC3C2D42D3F"><enum>(3)</enum><text>solicits or
				accepts funds for the purpose of financing a sex-selection abortion or a
				race-selection abortion;</text>
							</paragraph><continuation-text continuation-text-level="subsection">or
				attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
				5 years, or both.</continuation-text></subsection><subsection id="HC134D029846946BB9202A7AE1EF34B00"><enum>(b)</enum><header>Civil
				remedies</header>
							<paragraph id="H72CD43262CA04204B541D0C4E284F5B"><enum>(1)</enum><header>Injunctive
				relief</header><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The Attorney General
				may in a civil action obtain appropriate prospective injunctive relief to
				enjoin a violation of subsection (a).</text>
							</paragraph><paragraph id="H7F7076FA6C9341AF8C7F1607B1EF7153"><enum>(2)</enum><header>Loss of Federal
				Funding</header><text>A violation of subsection (a) shall be deemed for the
				purposes of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to be discrimination
				prohibited by section 601 of that Act.</text>
							</paragraph><paragraph id="H48391D618C4A4692BEB80D60D5D50"><enum>(3)</enum><header>Private Cause of
				Action</header><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The father, if married
				to the mother at the time she receives a sex-selection abortion or a
				race-selection abortion, or, if the mother has not attained the age of 18 years
				at the time of the abortion, the maternal grandparents of the unborn, may on
				behalf of the unborn in a civil action obtain appropriate relief with respect
				to a violation of subsection (a). The court may award a reasonable attorney’s
				fee as part of the costs in an action under this paragraph. Appropriate relief
				includes money damages for all injuries (whether psychological, physical, or
				financial, including loss of companionship and support) occasioned by the
				violation.</text>
							</paragraph></subsection><subsection id="H151F5ABDC739458BBD16FE1218C6A490"><enum>(c)</enum><header>Reporting
				requirement</header><text>A physician, physician’s assistant, nurse, counselor,
				or other medical or mental health professional shall report known or suspected
				violations of any of this section to appropriate law enforcement authorities.
				Whoever violates this requirement shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
				not more than 1 year, or both.</text>
						</subsection><subsection id="HAB178DACA3E14A41A19DE7DFD1CD9D73"><enum>(d)</enum><header>Expedited
				consideration</header><text>It shall be the duty of the United States district
				courts, United States courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United
				States to advance on the docket and to expedite to the greatest possible extent
				the disposition of any matter brought under this section.</text>
						</subsection><subsection id="H9AC346AF388C41AEA92EB4E6D9640953"><enum>(e)</enum><header>Exception</header><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">A woman upon whom a sex-selection or
				race-selection abortion is performed may not be prosecuted or held civilly
				liable for any violation of this section, or for a conspiracy to violate this
				section.</text>
						</subsection><subsection id="HF3E05F47C72446E78F00CF0000BAD2F8"><enum>(f)</enum><header>Definition</header><text>The
				term <quote>abortion</quote> means the act of using or prescribing any
				instrument, medicine, drug, or any other substance, device, or means with the
				intent to terminate the clinically diagnosable pregnancy of a woman, with
				knowledge that the termination by those means will with reasonable likelihood
				cause the death of the unborn child, unless the act is done with the intent
				to—</text>
							<paragraph id="H548ACF7CAF22459990D4B393CD980C3"><enum>(1)</enum><text>save the life or
				preserve the health of the unborn child;</text>
							</paragraph><paragraph id="H4C6EAB1084734DDBBA66671ECC98DE76"><enum>(2)</enum><text>remove a dead
				unborn child caused by spontaneous abortion; or</text>
							</paragraph><paragraph id="HDBBF2339C11043118CDC92BC53319507"><enum>(3)</enum><text>remove an ectopic
				pregnancy.</text>
							</paragraph></subsection></section><after-quoted-block>.</after-quoted-block></quoted-block>
			</subsection><subsection commented="no" id="HBAA42E127E4D484B971FBB5FBB990745"><enum>(b)</enum><header>Clerical
			 amendment</header><text>The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 13 of
			 title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding after the item relating to
			 section 248 the following new item:</text>
				<quoted-block display-inline="no-display-inline" id="H6A1E9D5380D8422FB353B5C5E7DD8CFC" style="USC">
					<toc regeneration="no-regeneration">
						<toc-entry level="section">249. Discrimination against the unborn on
				the basis of race or
				sex.</toc-entry>
					</toc>
					<after-quoted-block>.</after-quoted-block></quoted-block>
			</subsection></section><section commented="no" id="H924ECA12152F46DFAFAF9F9CC9BECB38"><enum>4.</enum><header>Severability</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">If any portion of this Act or the
			 application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such
			 invalidity shall not affect the portions or applications of this Act which can
			 be given effect without the invalid portion or application.</text>
		</section></legis-body>
</bill>
