[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 13 Introduced in House (IH)]
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 13
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted
the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v.
Valeo.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 8, 2009
Ms. Kaptur (for herself and Mr. Higgins) submitted the following
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the
Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted
the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v.
Valeo.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
That it is the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted
the First Amendment to the Constitution in its decision in the 1976
case of Buckley v. Valeo because--
(1) the decision failed to recognize that the unlimited
spending of large amounts of money on elections has a corrosive
effect on the electoral process not simply because of direct
transactions between those who give large amounts of money and
candidates and elected officials but because the presence of
unlimited amounts of money corrupts the process on a more
fundamental level; and
(2) the decision failed to recognize other legitimate state
interests which justify limiting money in campaigns, including
the need to preserve the integrity of our republican form of
government, restore public confidence in government, and ensure
all citizens a more equal opportunity to participate in the
political process.
<all>