<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE bill PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/bill.dtd//EN" "bill.dtd">
<bill bill-stage="Introduced-in-Senate" bill-type="olc" public-print="no" public-private="public" stage-count="1" star-print="no-star-print">
	<form display="yes">
		<distribution-code display="yes">II</distribution-code>
		<congress display="yes">110th CONGRESS</congress>
		<session display="yes">1st Session</session>
		<legis-num display="yes">S. 650</legis-num>
		<current-chamber display="yes">IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED
		  STATES</current-chamber>
		<action display="yes">
			<action-date date="20070215">February 15, 2007</action-date>
			<action-desc><sponsor name-id="S198">Mr. Reid</sponsor> introduced the
			 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the
			 <committee-name committee-id="SSHR00">Committee on Health, Education, Labor,
			 and Pensions</committee-name></action-desc>
		</action>
		<legis-type display="yes">A BILL</legis-type>
		<official-title display="yes">To amend the Energy Employees Occupational
		  Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 to provide for certain nuclear weapons
		  program workers to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the
		  compensation program established by that Act.</official-title>
	</form>
	<legis-body display-enacting-clause="yes-display-enacting-clause" style="OLC">
		<section commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="S1" section-type="section-one"><enum>1.</enum><header display-inline="yes-display-inline">Short title</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">This Act may be cited as the
			 <quote><short-title>Nevada Test Site Veterans’
			 Compensation Act of 2007</short-title></quote>.</text>
		</section><section commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID55dd729251e3454a882b76f36232face" section-type="subsequent-section"><enum>2.</enum><header display-inline="yes-display-inline">Findings</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">Congress makes the following
			 findings:</text>
			<paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID604d719f5d7f4bea948519217b0753a1"><enum>(1)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The contribution of the State of Nevada to
			 the security of the United States throughout the Cold War and since has been
			 unparalleled.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="IDbaefc5b4fc8b4ad4a859a52b6331e4a1"><enum>(2)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">In 1950, President Harry S Truman
			 designated what would later be called the Nevada Test Site as the country’s
			 nuclear proving grounds and, a month later, the first atmospheric test at the
			 Nevada Test Site was detonated.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID68f214a317294e29978768c94afe23ac"><enum>(3)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The United States conducted 100
			 above-ground and 828 underground nuclear tests at the Nevada Test Site from
			 1951 to 1992.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="IDe835b2fe318f442d989348bd78f37708"><enum>(4)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Out of the 1,054 nuclear tests conducted in
			 the United States, 928, or 88 percent, were conducted at the Nevada Test
			 Site.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID601b2cf946174b7ebe7e061b30e13c9a"><enum>(5)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The Nevada Test Site has served, and
			 continues to serve, as the premier research, testing, and development site for
			 the nuclear defense capabilities of the United States.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="IDf53349cc92544ad7b45a163ea7d2b416"><enum>(6)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The Nevada Test Site and its workers are an
			 essential and irreplaceable part of the Nation’s defense capabilities.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID77edca0e39884ea2b9f8e540cb2949fc"><enum>(7)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Individuals working on Cold War-era nuclear
			 weapons programs were employed in facilities owned by the Federal Government
			 and the private sector producing and testing nuclear weapons and engaging in
			 related atomic energy defense activities for the national defense beginning in
			 the 1940s.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID7eecec57fec044fa9ea5e9036c976352"><enum>(8)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">These Cold War atomic energy veterans
			 helped to build and test the nuclear arsenal that served as a deterrent during
			 the Cold War, sacrificing their personal health and well-being in service to
			 the United States.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID59a3876d94184f7ebc23f9818ccca098"><enum>(9)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">During the Cold War, many of these workers
			 were exposed to radiation, beryllium, and silica, and were placed in harm's way
			 by the Department of Energy and contractors, subcontractors, and vendors of the
			 Department without the workers' knowledge or consent, without adequate
			 radiation monitoring, and without necessary protections from internal or
			 external occupational radiation exposure.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID7282fd9b97324a0285ef84039167f52d"><enum>(10)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The Energy Employees Occupational Illness
			 Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 7384 et seq.) (in this section
			 referred to as <quote>EEOICPA</quote>) was enacted to ensure fairness and
			 equity for the men and women who, during the past 60 years, performed duties
			 uniquely related to the nuclear weapons production and testing programs of the
			 Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and its contractors by
			 establishing a program that would provide timely, uniform, and adequate
			 compensation for beryllium- and radiation-related health conditions.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID5053b517319b44e18d14551b786bf9f4"><enum>(11)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Research by the Department of Energy, the
			 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), NIOSH
			 contractors, the President's Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health, and
			 congressional committees indicates that at certain nuclear weapons
			 facilities—</text>
				<subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="IDb1114bce88c54977b3079f563d930ffc"><enum>(A)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">workers were not adequately monitored for
			 internal or external exposure to ionizing radiation; and</text>
				</subparagraph><subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID1159ecb0a50b490d8a86b9ffec367287"><enum>(B)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">records were not maintained, are not
			 reliable, are incomplete, or fail to indicate the radioactive isotopes to which
			 workers were exposed.</text>
				</subparagraph></paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="IDfed5fc8e3de74a26a86ab3c530e7ebbf"><enum>(12)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Due to the inequities posed by the factors
			 described above and the resulting harm to the workers, Congress designated
			 classes of atomic weapons employees at the Paducah, Kentucky, Portsmouth, Ohio,
			 Oak Ridge K–25, Tennessee, and the Amchitka Island, Alaska, sites as members of
			 the Special Exposure Cohort under EEOICPA.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID0162ff8c940a46acbf1e3573c0e57804"><enum>(13)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">It has become evident that it is not
			 feasible to estimate with sufficient accuracy in a timely manner the radiation
			 dose received by employees at the Department of Energy facility at the Nevada
			 Test Site for many reasons, including the following:</text>
				<subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID513e91e861f74033b1232aa2b792253f"><enum>(A)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The NIOSH Technical Basis Document, the
			 threshold document for radiation dose reconstruction under EEOICPA, has
			 incomplete radionuclide lists.</text>
				</subparagraph><subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="IDab9279a43e4d494486c37153e4b8efec"><enum>(B)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">NIOSH has not demonstrated that it can
			 estimate dose from exposure to large, nonrespirable hot particles.</text>
				</subparagraph><subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="IDee63049e80d94ef19a548efeb99a81d2"><enum>(C)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">There are significant gaps in environmental
			 measurement and exposure data.</text>
				</subparagraph><subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID0d37a6ff517f43cf9e86276d31913d1a"><enum>(D)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Resuspension doses have been seriously
			 underestimated.</text>
				</subparagraph><subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="IDb0b3ef207f04405ca909f341f9e6b141"><enum>(E)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">NIOSH has not been able to estimate
			 accurately exposures to bomb assembly workers and radon levels.</text>
				</subparagraph><subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="IDa6c79a3a370649c19c3ebd84ce88b6fb"><enum>(F)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">NIOSH has not demonstrated that it can
			 accurately sample tritiated water vapor.</text>
				</subparagraph><subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID4999dab5f34044f880fd57cb3b73b8b3"><enum>(G)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">External dose records lack
			 integrity.</text>
				</subparagraph><subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID4b247aa46477466088c6d1ec48fd43bd"><enum>(H)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">There are no beta dose data from before
			 1966.</text>
				</subparagraph><subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID5203d38ab12a4987b138de01aa40cce7"><enum>(I)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">There are no neutron dose data from before
			 1966 and only partial data after such date.</text>
				</subparagraph><subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID240ad4811051440da96c5f2355cf3619"><enum>(J)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">There are no internal dose data from before
			 late 1955 or 1956, and limited data until well into the 1960s.</text>
				</subparagraph><subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID94ab815d922b4fa3a1ae7329e5e19d25"><enum>(K)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">NIOSH has ignored exposure from more than a
			 dozen underground tests that vented, including Blanca, Des Moines, Baneberry,
			 Camphor, Diagonal Line, Riola, Agrini, Midas Myth, Misty Rain, and Mighty
			 Oak.</text>
				</subparagraph><subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID5adaf522516a4d26913167da599b0b4f"><enum>(L)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Instead of monitoring individuals, groups
			 were monitored, resulting in unreliable personnel monitoring.</text>
				</subparagraph></paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID3eaad4468b8b455db65a4c999f26bd5e"><enum>(14)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Some Nevada Test Site workers, despite
			 having worked with significant amounts of radioactive materials and having
			 known exposures leading to serious health effects, have been denied
			 compensation under EEOICPA as a result of flawed calculations based on records
			 that are incomplete or in error, or based on faulty assumptions and incorrect
			 models.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="id4E3F53CEB74A488690309775228951F7"><enum>(15)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Although basal cell carcinoma and chronic
			 lymphocytic leukemia are both radiogenic cancers that employees at the Nevada
			 Test Site may have contracted in the scope of their work, EEOICPA currently
			 will not include individuals with basal cell carcinoma as members of the
			 Special Exposure Cohort, nor does it provide for compensation for employees
			 with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.</text>
			</paragraph></section><section commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="IDee05b9a79d5d473fa0b0569e4f435c6f" section-type="subsequent-section"><enum>3.</enum><header display-inline="yes-display-inline">Inclusion of certain nuclear weapons
			 program workers in special exposure cohort under energy employees occupational
			 illness compensation program</header>
			<subsection commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="idE2A3EF7088724AA7AE7D2CD29F02242B"><enum>(a)</enum><header display-inline="yes-display-inline">In general</header><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Section 3621 of the Energy Employees
			 Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C.
			 7384<italic>l</italic>) is amended—</text>
				<paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="id40920C31FE224C3C8F209B2F8854EF1B"><enum>(1)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">in paragraph (9), by adding at the end the
			 following new subparagraph:</text>
					<quoted-block display-inline="no-display-inline" id="id37D3B600D1A94F778093EAB2F59D35CB" style="OLC">
						<subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="id3A5EA69C52124A11B772E38C977BC936"><enum>(C)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">An individual described in paragraph
				(14)(D).</text>
						</subparagraph><after-quoted-block>;
				and</after-quoted-block></quoted-block>
				</paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="idD349CC4335654F15899A9B028BF30B69"><enum>(2)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">in paragraph (14), by adding at the end the
			 following new subparagraph:</text>
					<quoted-block display-inline="no-display-inline" id="idC5AD9E949CB54C8FB2BF4FCB68C28BEE" style="OLC">
						<subparagraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID74b3047b7ee74f7ba0bf7b4c6d5d0866"><enum>(D)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The employee was so employed at the Nevada
				Test Site or other similar sites located in Nevada during the period beginning
				on January 1, 1950, and ending on December 31, 1993, and contracted an
				occupational illness, basal cell carcinoma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia,
				and, during such employment—</text>
							<clause commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="IDdb464d86d3a3410f8b29b5c904854688"><enum>(i)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">was present during an atmospheric or
				underground nuclear test or performed drillbacks, tunnel re-entry, or clean-up
				work following such a test (without regard to the duration of
				employment);</text>
							</clause><clause commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="id1303C8ED07024BFD964CCEC374B676A2"><enum>(ii)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">was present at an event involving the
				venting of an underground test or during a planned or unplanned radiation
				release (without regard to the duration of employment);</text>
							</clause><clause commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="id082FDF64C0334DC598A067EBB765B413"><enum>(iii)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">was present during testing or post-test
				activities related to nuclear rocket or ramjet engine testing at the Nevada
				Test Site (without regard to the duration of employment);</text>
							</clause><clause commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="id9B21549C93304220800E90A85C748460"><enum>(iv)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">was assigned to work at Area 51 or other
				classified program areas of the Nevada Test Site (without regard to the
				duration of employment); or</text>
							</clause><clause commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="IDc72e34c2199d44329af8e9975e0bd406"><enum>(v)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">was employed at the Nevada Test Site, and
				was employed in a job activity that—</text>
								<subclause commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="ID37751e1771c245a49df67ba7e404f1b5"><enum>(I)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">was monitored for exposure to ionizing
				radiation; or</text>
								</subclause><subclause commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="IDc8b0c118b62d400ab67d6fce472a8dda"><enum>(II)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">was comparable to a job that is, was, or
				should have been monitored for exposure to ionizing radiation at the Nevada
				Test
				Site.</text>
								</subclause></clause></subparagraph><after-quoted-block>.</after-quoted-block></quoted-block>
				</paragraph></subsection><subsection commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="id03CDF1B936DB4B67BD2FB8D745E539AE"><enum>(b)</enum><header display-inline="yes-display-inline">Deadline for claims
			 adjudication</header><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Claims for
			 compensation under section 3621(14)(D) of the Energy Employees Occupational
			 Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000, as added by subsection (a), shall be
			 adjudicated and a final decision issued—</text>
				<paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="idD20FE89198BB4906A341AD669939001B"><enum>(1)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">in the case of claims pending as of the
			 date of the enactment of this Act, not later than 30 days after such date;
			 and</text>
				</paragraph><paragraph commented="no" display-inline="no-display-inline" id="id25D44B723E2F4D329362D89F26B8B1F6"><enum>(2)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">in the case of claims filed after the date
			 of the enactment of this Act, not later than 30 days after the date of such
			 filing.</text>
				</paragraph></subsection></section></legis-body>
</bill>
