<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE resolution PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/res.dtd//EN" "res.dtd">
<resolution dms-id="H183A138804DD4A92AFDC196950023071" key="H" public-private="public" resolution-stage="Laid-on-Table-House" resolution-type="house-resolution" star-print="no-star-print">
<metadata xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<dublinCore>
<dc:title>110 HRES 1040 : Raising a question of the privileges of the
</dc:title>
<dc:publisher>U.S. House of Representatives</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2008-03-12</dc:date>
<dc:format>text/xml</dc:format>
<dc:language>EN</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.</dc:rights>
</dublinCore>
</metadata>
	<form>
		<distribution-code display="yes">IV</distribution-code>
		<congress display="yes">110th CONGRESS</congress>
		<session display="yes">2d Session</session>
		<legis-num>H. RES. 1040</legis-num>
		<current-chamber>IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</current-chamber>
		<action display="yes">
			<action-date date="20080312">March 12, 2008</action-date>
			<action-desc><sponsor name-id="B000589">Mr. Boehner</sponsor> submitted
			 the following resolution; which was laid on the table</action-desc>
		</action>
		<legis-type>RESOLUTION</legis-type>
		<official-title display="yes">Raising a question of the privileges of the
		  House.</official-title>
	</form>
	<preamble>
		<whereas><text>Whereas on June 13, 2007, the publication The Politico
			 reported, <quote>Democratic leaders gave in to Republican demands that
			 lawmakers be allowed to challenge individual member-requested projects from the
			 final version of each appropriations bill.</quote>;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas on November 15, 2007, Representatives Jack
			 Kingston and Frank Wolf introduced H. Con. Res. 263, to establish a Joint
			 Select Committee on Earmark Reform, and for other purposes;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas on March 6, 2008, The Hill reports in <quote>Obey
			 Criticizes Kingston on earmarks</quote> that <quote>Kingston said Obey has been
			 <quote>very irritated</quote> with his push for reform.</quote>;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas on March 5, 2008, House Appropriations Chairman
			 David Obey sent a Dear Colleague to Republican Members stating <quote>In light
			 of the continuing discussion on earmarks in the Republican Conference, the
			 Appropriations Committee needs to determine how it would
			 proceed.</quote>;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas on March 6, 2008, The Hill reports in <quote>Task
			 Force Looking Beyond Earmarks</quote> that <quote>Obey issued a memo to
			 Republicans in multiple-choice format asking them to check one of two boxes,
			 stating whether they believed in a one-year moratorium and therefore would not
			 be submitting earmark requests, or did not believe in a moratorium and would be
			 submitting requests. Obey spokeswoman Kristin Brost said Obey called the memo
			 his <quote>anti-hypocrisy memo, aimed at House Minority Leader John Boehner’s
			 (R–Ohio) repeated calls for a moratorium.</quote></quote>;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the Chairman of the Appropriations Committee Dave
			 Obey stated in said letter: <quote>Because it is important for the Committee to
			 move ahead with bills in a timely fashion, I will assume that any Member not
			 returning this form by March 19, 2008 wishes to see Congressional earmarks
			 discontinued and will therefore be submitting no request for fiscal year
			 2009.</quote>;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas House Rule XXIII Clause 16, states that a Member
			 may not condition the inclusion of language to provide funding for a
			 congressional earmark on any vote cast by another Member; and</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the Chairman of the Appropriations Committee, Dave
			 Obey, has conditioned the receipt of an earmark from the Committee on
			 Appropriations on a Member’s opposition to a moratorium on earmarks: Now,
			 therefore, be it</text>
		</whereas></preamble>
	<resolution-body id="H2F901688EF064E66975421FEA35593B" style="traditional">
		<section display-inline="yes-display-inline" id="H8B1E7EFEE2664CEB86535D2B656CEB6B" section-type="undesignated-section"><enum></enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">That the Committee on Standards of Official
			 Conduct is directed to investigate without further delay violations of House
			 rules by Representative Dave Obey and report its findings and recommendations
			 to the House, including a recommendation regarding the appropriate action for
			 Representative Obey’s violations.</text>
		</section></resolution-body>
</resolution>


