[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1013 Introduced in House (IH)]







110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1013

 Expressing the sense of Congress that providing breakfast in schools 
through the National School Breakfast Program has a positive impact on 
                         classroom performance.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2008

    Ms. Moore of Wisconsin (for herself, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Bishop of 
 Georgia, Ms. Bordallo, Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida, Mr. Butterfield, 
    Mrs. Capps, Mr. Clay, Mr. Clyburn, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Courtney, Mr. 
Crowley, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Farr, Mr. 
Fattah, Mr. Filner, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Hare, Mr. 
Hinchey, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Kagen, Ms. Kilpatrick, Mr. Kind, Ms. Lee, Mr. 
    Lewis of Georgia, Mrs. Maloney of New York, Mr. McDermott, Mr. 
McGovern, Mr. Meeks of New York, Mr. Michaud, Mr. Moore of Kansas, Mr. 
Obey, Mr. Ruppersberger, Mr. Salazar, Ms. Herseth Sandlin, Mr. Scott of 
 Virginia, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Sires, Ms. Sutton, Mr. Towns, and Mr. Wu) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                         on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
 Expressing the sense of Congress that providing breakfast in schools 
through the National School Breakfast Program has a positive impact on 
                         classroom performance.

Whereas breakfast program participants under the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 
        include public, private, elementary, middle, and high schools, as well 
        as rural, suburban, and urban schools;
Whereas almost 17,000 schools that participate in the National School Lunch 
        Program do not participate in the National School Breakfast Program;
Whereas in fiscal year 2006, 7,700,000 students in the United States consumed 
        free or reduced-price school breakfasts provided under the National 
        School Breakfast Program established by section 4 of the Child Nutrition 
        Act of 1966;
Whereas less than half of the low-income students who participate in the 
        National School Lunch Program also participate in the school breakfast 
        program;
Whereas implementing or improving classroom breakfast programs have been shown 
        to increase the participation of eligible students in breakfast 
        consumption dramatically, doubling, and in some cases tripling, numbers, 
        as evidenced by research in Minnesota, New York, and Wisconsin;
Whereas making breakfast widely available through different venues or a 
        combination thereof, such as in the classroom, obtained as students exit 
        their school bus, or outside the classroom, has been shown to lessen the 
        stigma of receiving free or reduced-price breakfast, which often 
        prevents eligible students from obtaining traditional breakfast in the 
        cafeteria;
Whereas providing free universal breakfast, especially in the classroom, has 
        been shown to significantly increase school breakfast participation 
        rates and increase absences and tardiness;
Whereas studies have shown that access to nutritious programs such as the 
        National School Lunch Program and National School Breakfast Program 
        helps to create a strong learning environment for children and helps to 
        improve children's concentration in the classroom;
Whereas providing breakfast in the classroom has been shown in several instances 
        to improve attentiveness and academic performance, while reducing 
        tardiness and disciplinary referrals;
Whereas students who eat a complete breakfast have been shown to make fewer 
        mistakes and work faster in math exercises than those who eat a partial 
        breakfast;
Whereas studies suggest that eating breakfast closer to classroom and test-
        taking time improves student performance on standardized tests relative 
        to students who skip breakfast or have breakfast at home;
Whereas studies show that students who skip breakfast are more likely to have 
        difficulty distinguishing among similar images, show increased errors, 
        and have slower memory recall;
Whereas children who live in families that experience hunger have been shown to 
        be more likely to have lower math scores, face an increased likelihood 
        of repeating a grade, and receive more special education services;
Whereas studies suggest that children who eat breakfast have more adequate 
        nutrition and intake of nutrients, such as calcium, fiber, protein, and 
        vitamins A, E, D, and B-6; and
Whereas children who fail to eat breakfast, whether in school or at home, are 
        more likely to be overweight than children who eat a daily healthy 
        breakfast: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the importance of the National School 
        Breakfast Program and its overall positive effect on the lives 
        of low-income children and families, as well as its effect on 
        helping to improve a child's overall classroom performance;
            (2) expresses support for States that have successfully 
        implemented school breakfast programs in order to improve the 
        test scores and grades of its participating students; and
            (3) encourages states to strengthen their school breakfast 
        programs by improving access for students, to promote 
        improvements in the nutritional quality of breakfasts served, 
        and to inform students and parents of healthy nutritional and 
        lifestyle choices.
                                 <all>