<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE bill PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/bill.dtd//EN" "bill.dtd">
<bill bill-stage="Introduced-in-House" dms-id="HAD2C2B98FB604563ACDF7CCF3952FDEE" public-private="public" bill-type="olc"> 
<metadata xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<dublinCore>
<dc:title>110 HR 6610 IH: To amend the Federal Rules of Evidence to address the waiver of the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine.</dc:title>
<dc:publisher>U.S. House of Representatives</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:format>text/xml</dc:format>
<dc:language>EN</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.</dc:rights>
</dublinCore>
</metadata>
<form> 
<distribution-code display="yes">I</distribution-code> 
<congress>110th CONGRESS</congress> <session>2d Session</session> 
<legis-num>H. R. 6610</legis-num> 
<current-chamber>IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</current-chamber> 
<action> 
<action-date date="20080724">July 24, 2008</action-date> 
<action-desc><sponsor name-id="J000032">Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas</sponsor> introduced the following bill; which was referred to the <committee-name committee-id="HJU00">Committee on the Judiciary</committee-name></action-desc> 
</action> 
<legis-type>A BILL</legis-type> 
<official-title>To amend the Federal Rules of Evidence to address the waiver of the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine.</official-title> 
</form> 
<legis-body id="HC515B34B88D341AA8F7437F0D900EDCF" style="OLC"> 
<section section-type="section-one" id="H5B01A9992D26498D913F1EB69C3F73F8" display-inline="no-display-inline"><enum>1.</enum><header>Attorney-Client privilege and work product; limitations on waiver</header> 
<subsection id="HAF074C387EC4451EA78FBDF00F9A86"><enum>(a)</enum><header>In General</header><text>Article V of the Federal Rules of Evidence is amended by adding at the end the following:</text> 
<quoted-block style="USC" id="HDE2487D144A4421980D26D00F000E2D5"> 
<section section-type="undesignated-section" id="H13058DC3DFFE47D70084F9998CEB5603"><header>Rule 502. Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product; Limitations on Waiver</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">The following provisions apply, in the circumstances set out, to disclosure of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work-product protection.</text> 
<subsection id="H17896A9A532C4092869C5641B82855C8"><enum>(a)</enum><header>Disclosure Made in a Federal Proceeding or to a Federal Office or Agency; Scope of a Waiver</header><text>When the disclosure is made in a Federal proceeding or to a Federal office or agency and waives the attorney-client privilege or work-product protection, the waiver extends to an undisclosed communication or information in a Federal or State proceeding only if:</text> 
<paragraph id="HBBEC10362E8A45CCA5215951006C3638"><enum>(1)</enum><text>the waiver is intentional;</text></paragraph> 
<paragraph id="H1EDA7D49B365446F8B43612684ADFBD"><enum>(2)</enum><text>the disclosed and undisclosed communications or information concern the same subject matter; and</text></paragraph> 
<paragraph id="HF9A679C47D204C70A78BB817E6523F91"><enum>(3)</enum><text>they ought in fairness to be considered together.</text></paragraph></subsection> 
<subsection id="H37A8D3AF5B8844F9872E73785F41EFD6"><enum>(b)</enum><header>Inadvertent Disclosure</header><text>When made in a Federal proceeding or to a Federal office or agency, the disclosure does not operate as a waiver in a Federal or State proceeding if:</text> 
<paragraph id="H1E305D686ED944D185B3005F78DC55CD"><enum>(1)</enum><text>the disclosure is inadvertent;</text></paragraph> 
<paragraph id="H51D9AFB07E62455182CBDC3D65396C81"><enum>(2)</enum><text>the holder of the privilege or protection took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure; and</text></paragraph> 
<paragraph id="H714D89A23C05481B9D5F3D5E5CED19A0"><enum>(3)</enum><text>the holder promptly took reasonable steps to rectify the error, including (if applicable) following Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B).</text></paragraph></subsection> 
<subsection id="H34414FD7E96E4C34A76DCE186DB5FF1F"><enum>(c)</enum><header>Disclosure Made in a State Proceeding</header><text>When the disclosure is made in a State proceeding and is not the subject of a State-court order concerning waiver, the disclosure does not operate as a waiver in a Federal proceeding if the disclosure:</text> 
<paragraph id="HA18737FB08504AE4A6E049C50CEDECA"><enum>(1)</enum><text>would not be a waiver under this rule if it had been made in a Federal proceeding; or</text></paragraph> 
<paragraph id="H4A5D9704A2A3440EB36945F259400DC"><enum>(2)</enum><text>is not a waiver under the law of the State where the disclosure occurred.</text></paragraph></subsection> 
<subsection id="HC8AA068A5433434692BDB89212E0F9E7"><enum>(d)</enum><header>Controlling Effect of a Court Order</header><text>A Federal court may order that the privilege or protection is not waived by disclosure connected with the litigation pending before the court—in which event the disclosure is also not a waiver in any other Federal or State proceeding.</text></subsection> 
<subsection id="H58B71BA0EE0142BE850405FCA422E716"><enum>(e)</enum><header>Controlling Effect of a Party Agreement</header><text>An agreement on the effect of disclosure in a Federal proceeding is binding only on the parties to the agreement, unless it is incorporated into a court order.</text></subsection> 
<subsection id="H9BEAF49BD9B14C06A6337265825BC6BA"><enum>(f)</enum><header>Controlling Effect of This Rule</header><text>Notwithstanding Rules 101 and 1101, this rule applies to State proceedings and to Federal court-annexed and Federal court-mandated arbitration proceedings, in the circumstances set out in the rule. And notwithstanding Rule 501, this rule applies even if State law provides the rule of decision.</text></subsection> 
<subsection id="H9F96C37993FD4FEC8656CBC543D433E"><enum>(g)</enum><header>Definitions</header><text>In this rule:</text> 
<paragraph id="H5C1CE4C943AF473BBA3147A43D0CAA"><enum>(1)</enum><text><quote>attorney-client privilege</quote> means the protection that applicable law provides for confidential attorney-client communications; and</text></paragraph> 
<paragraph id="H2B87A1D772DE4D9DB8EFB00AA05C3F7"><enum>(2)</enum><text><quote>work-product protection</quote> means the protection that applicable law provides for tangible material (or its intangible equivalent) prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial.</text></paragraph></subsection></section><after-quoted-block>.</after-quoted-block></quoted-block></subsection> 
<subsection id="HC10EF066BA524D37009150DF7E31EBEB"><enum>(b)</enum><header>Technical and Conforming Changes</header><text>The table of contents for the Federal Rules of Evidence is amended by inserting after the item relating to rule 501 the following:</text> 
<quoted-block style="OLC" id="H6C7B561B59B74C9A9DB30733CDA8C5C8"> 
<toc container-level="legis-body-container" quoted-block="no-quoted-block" lowest-level="section" regeneration="no-regeneration"> 
<toc-entry level="section">502. Attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine; limitations on waiver.</toc-entry></toc><after-quoted-block>.</after-quoted-block></quoted-block></subsection> 
<subsection id="H4CF0932B42084EF0B65097F4B77429C6"><enum>(c)</enum><header>Effective date</header><text>The amendments made by this Act shall apply in all proceedings commenced after the date of enactment of this Act and, insofar as is just and practicable, in all proceedings pending on such date of enactment.</text></subsection></section> 
</legis-body> 
</bill> 


