<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE bill PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/bill.dtd//EN" "bill.dtd">
<bill bill-stage="Reported-in-House" bill-type="olc" dms-id="H55FC5FBC0F854BB1B3F89100EC85A025" public-private="public">
<metadata xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<dublinCore>
<dc:title>110 HR 5001 RH: Old Post Office Building Redevelopment
</dc:title>
<dc:publisher>U.S. House of Representatives</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2008-01-16</dc:date>
<dc:format>text/xml</dc:format>
<dc:language>EN</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.</dc:rights>
</dublinCore>
</metadata>
	<form>
		<distribution-code display="yes">IB</distribution-code>
		<calendar display="yes">Union Calendar No. 459</calendar>
		<congress display="yes">110th CONGRESS</congress>
		<session display="yes">2d Session</session>
		<legis-num>H. R. 5001</legis-num>
		<associated-doc display="yes" role="report">[Report No.
		  110–724]</associated-doc>
		<current-chamber display="yes">IN THE HOUSE OF
		  REPRESENTATIVES</current-chamber>
		<action>
			<action-date date="20080116">January 16, 2008</action-date>
			<action-desc><sponsor name-id="N000147">Ms. Norton</sponsor> introduced
			 the following bill; which was referred to the
			 <committee-name added-display-style="italic" committee-id="HPW00" deleted-display-style="strikethrough">Committee on Transportation and
			 Infrastructure</committee-name></action-desc>
		</action>
		<action>
			<action-date>June 19, 2008</action-date>
			<action-desc>Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of
			 the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be
			 printed</action-desc>
			<action-instruction>Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert
			 the part printed in italic</action-instruction>
			<action-instruction>For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as
			 introduced on January 16, 2008</action-instruction>
		</action>
		<legis-type>A BILL</legis-type>
		<official-title display="yes">To authorize the Administrator of General
		  Services to provide for the redevelopment of the Old Post Office Building
		  located in the District of Columbia.</official-title>
	</form>
	<legis-body changed="added" committee-id="HPW00" display-enacting-clause="yes-display-enacting-clause" id="HADC4716774D44F33A68F9DD86CDB33DA" reported-display-style="italic" style="OLC">
		<section id="H9D0C308E0AD7418D890937C1406F6D12" section-type="section-one"><enum>1.</enum><header>Short title</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">This Act may be cited as the
			 <quote><short-title>Old Post Office Building Redevelopment
			 Act of 2008</short-title></quote>.</text>
		</section><section id="HD5CC7BB963E546BB982C6018C6A347BE" section-type="subsequent-section"><enum>2.</enum><header>Old post office
			 building defined</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">In this Act,
			 the term <quote>Old Post Office Building</quote> means the land, including any
			 improvements thereon and specifically including the Pavilion Annex, that is
			 located at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., in the District of Columbia, and
			 under the jurisdiction, custody, and control of the General Services
			 Administration.</text>
		</section><section id="H788FD921969A433AB3063FDFB54C1400"><enum>3.</enum><header>Findings</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">Congress finds the following:</text>
			<paragraph id="H05919B297D4F4E7E8BAC23E849F13157"><enum>(1)</enum><text>For almost a decade the
			 Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency
			 Management of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House
			 of Representatives has expressed considerable concern about the waste and
			 neglect of the valuable, historic Old Post Office Building, centrally located
			 in the heart of the Nation’s Capital on Pennsylvania Avenue, and has pressed
			 the General Services Administration to develop and fully use this
			 building.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="HB52215232DFB477EBCE1999BF89D1ED7"><enum>(2)</enum><text>The policy of the
			 Government long has been to preserve and make usable historic properties rather
			 than sell them for revenue.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="HD2089ED59A6546169FF144663F4EE86"><enum>(3)</enum><text>Security concerns related
			 to this property’s proximity to the White House may hinder the sale of the Old
			 Post Office Building to a private party.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="HC20E9359E4A547D2B0009582E4132B23"><enum>(4)</enum><text>On December 28, 2000, the
			 General Services Administration, pursuant to <external-xref legal-doc="public-law" parsable-cite="pl/105/277">Public Law 105–277</external-xref>, submitted to
			 the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
			 Representatives and the Committees on Appropriations and Environment and Public
			 Works of the Senate a plan for the comprehensive redevelopment of the Old Post
			 Office.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="HDB73EC090EE949DCAD3D7D2BBFDC42BC"><enum>(5)</enum><text>The Committee on
			 Transportation and Infrastructure approved the redevelopment plan on May 16,
			 2001, and the Committees on Appropriations and Environment and Public Works
			 approved the plan on June 15, 2001.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="H011E0AA6BD86446E9FCA8858F7497CF"><enum>(6)</enum><text>The General Services
			 Administration issued a Request for Expression of Interest in 2004 for
			 developing the Old Post Office Building that generated a healthy, private
			 sector interest, but the General Services Administration has failed to proceed
			 with implementation of the approved redevelopment plan.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="H2FE94C4F43204062990288028F7B6D84"><enum>(7)</enum><text>Redevelopment of the Old
			 Post Office Building will preserve the historic integrity of this unique and
			 important asset, put it to its highest and best use, and provide a lucrative
			 financial return to the Government.</text>
			</paragraph></section><section id="HF09D5A3791B344ED8F07ADB757BE4DE9"><enum>4.</enum><header>Redevelopment of old
			 post office building</header>
			<subsection id="HF31530B244CE40828C00DCEBA4E03C5"><enum>(a)</enum><header>In
			 general</header><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The Administrator of
			 General Services is directed to proceed with redevelopment of the Old Post
			 Office Building, in accordance with existing authorities available to the
			 Administrator and consistent with the redevelopment plan previously approved by
			 the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
			 Representatives and the Committees on Appropriations and Environment and Public
			 Works of the Senate.</text>
			</subsection><subsection id="H56C9875CFA1746CBBAF2B9EC475FEB89"><enum>(b)</enum><header>Relocation of existing
			 building tenants</header><text>The Administrator is authorized, notwithstanding
			 <external-xref legal-doc="usc" parsable-cite="usc/40/3307">section 3307</external-xref> of title 40, United States Code, and otherwise in accordance with
			 existing authorities available to the Administrator, to provide replacement
			 space for Federal agency tenants housed in the Old Post Office Building whose
			 relocation is necessary for redevelopment of the Building.</text>
			</subsection></section><section id="H70BC469210F647D1BAE5DA667DB77E2F"><enum>5.</enum><header>Reporting
			 requirement</header>
			<subsection id="H5637ACE18AD54B478E71C4AE155450C1"><enum>(a)</enum><header>In
			 general</header><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The Administrator of
			 General Services shall transmit to the Committee on Transportation and
			 Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment
			 and Public Works of the Senate a report on any proposed redevelopment agreement
			 related to the Old Post Office Building.</text>
			</subsection><subsection id="H038037CDD47542EF8244E6BC8DACB028"><enum>(b)</enum><header>Contents</header><text>A
			 report transmitted under this section shall include a summary of a cost-benefit
			 analysis of the proposed development agreement and a description of the
			 material provisions of the proposed agreement.</text>
			</subsection><subsection id="HDC19E250DCE44DB9ADBFB656341334AF"><enum>(c)</enum><header>Review by
			 Congress</header><text>Any proposed development agreement related to the Old
			 Post Office Building may not become effective until the end of a 30-day period
			 of continuous session of Congress following the date of the transmittal of the
			 report required under this section. For purposes of the preceding sentence,
			 continuity of a session of Congress is broken only by an adjournment sine die,
			 and there shall be excluded from the computation of such 30-day period any day
			 during which either House of Congress is not in session during an adjournment
			 of more than 3 days to a day certain.</text>
			</subsection></section></legis-body>
	<endorsement display="yes">
		<action-date>June 19, 2008</action-date>
		<action-desc>Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of
		  the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be
		  printed</action-desc>
	</endorsement>
</bill>


