<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE bill PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/bill.dtd//EN" "bill.dtd">
<bill bill-stage="Introduced-in-House" bill-type="olc" dms-id="HB70EA241578A4EB8AE73BB6871EA4E97" public-private="public">
<metadata xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<dublinCore>
<dc:title>110 HR 1327 IH: Protective Equipment for America’s
</dc:title>
<dc:publisher>U.S. House of Representatives</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2007-03-06</dc:date>
<dc:format>text/xml</dc:format>
<dc:language>EN</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.</dc:rights>
</dublinCore>
</metadata>
	<form>
		<distribution-code display="yes">I</distribution-code>
		<congress>110th CONGRESS</congress>
		<session>1st Session</session>
		<legis-num>H. R. 1327</legis-num>
		<current-chamber>IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</current-chamber>
		<action>
			<action-date date="20070306">March 6, 2007</action-date>
			<action-desc><sponsor name-id="R000486">Ms. Roybal-Allard</sponsor>
			 (for herself and <cosponsor name-id="M000725">Mr. George Miller of
			 California</cosponsor>) introduced the following bill; which was referred to
			 the <committee-name committee-id="HED00">Committee on Education and
			 Labor</committee-name></action-desc>
		</action>
		<legis-type>A BILL</legis-type>
		<official-title>To direct the Occupational Safety and Health
		  Administration to complete its rulemaking on Employer Payment for Personal
		  Protective Equipment for workers.</official-title>
	</form>
	<legis-body id="HD9FB6055F9F34B480076A790398E956C" style="OLC">
		<section id="HD0C19468E8534AF382EFCD5CDD00D27F" section-type="section-one"><enum>1.</enum><header>Short title</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">This Act may be cited as the
			 <quote><short-title>Protective Equipment for America’s
			 Workers Act</short-title></quote>.</text>
		</section><section id="HB20ED951F5194C9FA3A127931C345F56"><enum>2.</enum><header>Findings</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">The Congress finds the following:</text>
			<paragraph id="H235282B927A14F27B54F91BDA317846D"><enum>(1)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The use of personal protective equipment
			 (PPE), such as respirators, chemical resistant clothing, metal mesh gloves,
			 lifelines and lanyards, safety glasses, and face shields substantially reduces
			 the fatalities and injuries among the Nation’s workers.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="HB0A26F9714514F01848B373FE1F7A32E"><enum>(2)</enum><text>An estimated 20
			 million workers use PPE on a regular basis to protect them from job
			 hazards.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="H5FC99D55CABD496CBDEADE00DD753171"><enum>(3)</enum><text>In some jobs,
			 including many low-wage jobs dominated by immigrant workers, personal
			 protective equipment is a worker’s principal protection from harm.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="H2449A2B0BE3F4DA0966C1812E1E86060"><enum>(4)</enum><text>Data from the
			 Bureau of Labor Statistics show that in 2005 there were over 4 million
			 non-fatal injuries in the private sector and over 5,700 fatalities.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="H00785916E8594692918F342FEF1FB47"><enum>(5)</enum><text>In
			 1999, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) proposed a rule
			 to require employers to pay for PPE needed to protect workers exposed to
			 hazards on the job.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="H9D6854B321594D2B8F8D6258681D16E"><enum>(6)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The proposed rule did not impose new
			 obligations on employers to provide PPE, but simply clarified their
			 responsibility to pay for it.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="H94D6C6FC7A9A4709ACE5F35F786899E4"><enum>(7)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">According to OSHA, the PPE rule would
			 prevent nearly 48,000 injuries and as many as 7 fatalities each year.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="H20F56CC1DE59471E87AA7F2CC369F9D"><enum>(8)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">OSHA first estimated that the final PPE
			 rule would be issued in 2000, but the agency missed that deadline and has
			 missed the subsequent deadlines announced in its semi-annual regulatory agenda
			 in 2004, 2005, and 2006.</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="H1D64164546FE47699B58112CCF3DC400"><enum>(9)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Since 1999, when OSHA first proposed the
			 PPE rule, workers have suffered almost 400,000 injuries and more than 50 deaths
			 that could have been prevented had the rule been issued, according to OSHA
			 estimates.</text>
			</paragraph></section><section id="H2484CE0A02794FF700ED8972573CA52C"><enum>3.</enum><header>OSHA rulemaking
			 on personal protective equipment</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">Notwithstanding any other provision of law,
			 not later than 30 days after the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Labor
			 shall issue a final rule under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970
			 (<external-xref legal-doc="usc" parsable-cite="usc/29/651">29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.</external-xref>) on Employer Payment for Personal Protective Equipment,
			 which shall provide no less protection to employees and shall have no further
			 exceptions from the employer payment requirement than the proposed rule
			 published in the Federal Register on March 31, 1999.</text>
		</section></legis-body>
</bill>


