<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE resolution PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/res.dtd//EN" "res.dtd">
<resolution public-private="public" resolution-stage="Introduced-in-Senate" resolution-type="senate-resolution" star-print="no-star-print">

	<form>

		<distribution-code display="yes">III</distribution-code>

		<congress display="yes">109th CONGRESS</congress>

		<session display="yes">2d Session</session>

		<legis-num>S. RES. 355</legis-num>

		<current-chamber>IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES</current-chamber>

		<action display="yes">

			<action-date date="20060126">January 26, 2006</action-date>

			<action-desc><sponsor name-id="S283">Mr. Nelson of Nebraska</sponsor>

			 (for himself, <cosponsor name-id="S293">Mr. Graham</cosponsor>,

			 <cosponsor name-id="S274">Mr. Allen</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S286">Mr.

			 Talent</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S292">Mrs. Dole</cosponsor>,

			 <cosponsor name-id="S240">Mr. DeWine</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S288">Ms.

			 Murkowski</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S245">Ms. Snowe</cosponsor>,

			 <cosponsor name-id="S303">Mr. Thune</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S305">Mr.

			 Isakson</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S258">Ms. Landrieu</cosponsor>,

			 <cosponsor name-id="S282">Mr. Nelson of Florida</cosponsor>,

			 <cosponsor name-id="S172">Mr. Harkin</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S222">Mr.

			 Dorgan</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S166">Mr. Lautenberg</cosponsor>,

			 <cosponsor name-id="S167">Mr. Bingaman</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S213">Mr. Akaka</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S127">Mr.

			 Baucus</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S278">Mrs. Clinton</cosponsor>,

			 <cosponsor name-id="S209">Mr. Kohl</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S182">Ms.

			 Mikulski</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S264">Mr. Bayh</cosponsor>,

			 <cosponsor name-id="S275">Ms. Cantwell</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S295">Mr. Pryor</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S297">Mr.

			 Salazar</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S210">Mr. Lieberman</cosponsor>,

			 <cosponsor name-id="S010">Mr. Biden</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S201">Mr.

			 Conrad</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S055">Mr. Kennedy</cosponsor>,

			 <cosponsor name-id="S230">Mr. Feingold</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S306">Mr. Menendez</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S257">Mr.

			 Johnson</cosponsor>, and <cosponsor name-id="S253">Mr. Durbin</cosponsor>)

			 submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

			 <committee-name committee-id="SSAS00">Committee on Armed

			 Services</committee-name></action-desc>

		</action>

		<legis-type>RESOLUTION</legis-type>

		<official-title display="yes">Honoring the service of the National Guard

		  and requesting consultation by the Department of Defense with Congress and the

		  chief executive officers of the States prior to offering proposals to change

		  the National Guard force structure. </official-title>

	</form>

	<preamble>

		<whereas><text>Whereas the Army National Guard and Air National Guard of

			 the United States, representing all 50 States, Guam, Puerto Rico, the United

			 States Virgin Islands, and the District of Columbia, have played an

			 indispensable role in the defense of our country;</text>

		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas during one phase of the Global War on Terrorism,

			 Army National Guard soldiers comprised nearly half of the United States combat

			 forces in Iraq;</text>

		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas National Guard personnel are currently deployed in

			 Afghanistan, Bosnia, Kosovo, and more than 40 other countries around the

			 world;</text>

		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas 90 percent of the troops on the ground in

			 Louisiana and Mississippi responding to Hurricane Katrina were members of the

			 National Guard;</text>

		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas while performing these critical missions, the

			 National Guard continues to experience significant equipment shortages,

			 especially vehicle and radio shortages;</text>

		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas members of the National Guard are not

			 <quote>weekend warriors</quote>, but citizen-soldiers and airmen who serve

			 full-time when their country needs them to do so;</text>

		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the National Guard is a resource shared by the

			 chief executive officers of the States and the President;</text>

		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the National Guard is America’s militia;</text>

		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas deployment to fight terrorism on two fronts

			 overseas, while protecting our homeland, has stretched the National Guard

			 thin;</text>

		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the future of the National Guard could be

			 determined by the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) currently underway;</text>

		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the Army and Air Force could recommend changes in

			 the force structure of the National Guard;</text>

		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas reductions in force structure could impact

			 numerous Army National Guard armories and Air National Guard wings;</text>

		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas reductions in force structure combined with the

			 lack of adequate equipment for the National Guard threaten its capacity to

			 discharge its missions and its ability to respond in emergencies;</text>

		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas homeland defense is the most important mission of

			 the Department of Defense; and</text>

		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the National Guard is the force best suited to

			 defend the homeland and therefore the element from which resources should not

			 be cut: Now, therefore, be it</text>

		</whereas></preamble>

	<resolution-body>

		<section display-inline="yes-display-inline" id="S1" section-type="undesignated-section"><enum></enum><text>That the Senate—</text>

			<paragraph id="idC082FA58D8D348F5B00BD5C6EB09C82B"><enum>(1)</enum><text>supports the

			 vital Federal and State missions of the Army National Guard of the United

			 States and the Air National Guard of the United States, including support of

			 ongoing missions in Iraq and Afghanistan and homeland defense and disaster

			 assistance and relief efforts;</text>

			</paragraph><paragraph id="ID0ce23ed7544147b69a33e9ce0df3f651"><enum>(2)</enum><text>recommends that

			 the Department of Defense propose fully funding the equipment needs of the

			 National Guard;</text>

			</paragraph><paragraph id="IDbcea792d0c564608b2ff27d026dbf7f8"><enum>(3)</enum><text>believes that the

			 Department of Defense should, as soon as possible, consult with the chief

			 executive officers of the States, as well as Congress, on any proposed changes

			 to the National Guard force structure;</text>

			</paragraph><paragraph id="IDdc599c93deb949599667ccfa6d4858cd"><enum>(4)</enum><text>requests that any

			 plan of the Department of Defense regarding the National Guard force structure

			 take into account the role of the National Guard role in homeland defense and

			 other State missions as defined by the chief executive officers of the

			 States;</text>

			</paragraph><paragraph id="ID16b6a3a25ace45189bc81d60b7438920"><enum>(5)</enum><text>requests that the

			 Department of Defense prepare budget projections that detail cost savings from

			 any changes in National Guard force structure, as well as projected costs in

			 the event large personnel increases are necessary to respond to a national

			 emergency; and</text>

			</paragraph><paragraph id="ID590e7ff80ba94647978e866b9644baef"><enum>(6)</enum><text>requests that the

			 Department of Defense assure Congress and the chief executive officers of the

			 States that potential changes in the National Guard force structure will not

			 impact the safety and security of the United States people.</text>

			</paragraph></section></resolution-body>

</resolution>

