<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE resolution PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/res.dtd//EN" "res.dtd">
<resolution dms-id="HD8461633391C4F97003B92A53BAA520" key="H" public-private="public" resolution-stage="Introduced-in-House" resolution-type="house-concurrent" star-print="no-star-print">
<metadata xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<dublinCore>
<dc:title>109 HCON 501 IH: Expressing the sense of Congress that the
</dc:title>
<dc:publisher>U.S. House of Representatives</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2006-12-07</dc:date>
<dc:format>text/xml</dc:format>
<dc:language>EN</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.</dc:rights>
</dublinCore>
</metadata>
	<form>
		<distribution-code display="yes">IV</distribution-code>
		<congress display="yes">109th CONGRESS</congress>
		<session display="yes">2d Session</session>
		<legis-num>H. CON. RES. 501</legis-num>
		<current-chamber>IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</current-chamber>
		<action display="yes">
			<action-date date="20061207">December 7, 2006</action-date>
			<action-desc><sponsor name-id="I000057">Mr. Israel</sponsor> (for
			 himself, <cosponsor name-id="T000057">Mrs. Tauscher</cosponsor>, and
			 <cosponsor name-id="L000560">Mr. Larsen of Washington</cosponsor>) submitted
			 the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the
			 <committee-name committee-id="HFA00">Committee on International
			 Relations</committee-name></action-desc>
		</action>
		<legis-type>CONCURRENT RESOLUTION</legis-type>
		<official-title display="yes">Expressing the sense of Congress that the
		  Government of the United States should submit the Government of Iraq a draft
		  bilateral status-of-forces agreement by not later than June 1,
		  2007.</official-title>
	</form>
	<preamble>
		<whereas><text>Whereas the United States is currently maintaining a
			 significant military presence within the Republic of Iraq;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas the people of Iraq have expressed repeated concern
			 about the status of United States Armed Forces in their country;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas Iraq is a sovereign nation, having regained its
			 sovereignty on June 28, 2004, meaning that it is capable of being party to
			 bilateral and multilateral treaties;</text>
		</whereas><whereas commented="no"><text>Whereas the Interim Constitution of Iraq,
			 in recognizing Coalition Provisional Order Number 17 (relating to status of
			 forces), establishes a precedent that will not be incorporated into the
			 permanent constitutional law of Iraq;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas a status-of-forces agreement is a standard
			 bilateral agreement entered into between two countries when the military forces
			 of one country operate within the sovereign territory of the other
			 country;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas a status-of-forces agreement is an important
			 measure taken both to underline the sovereignty of the host country and to
			 protect the military justice system of the visiting country;</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas The New York Times reported on November 29, 2006,
			 that Stephen Hadley, the National Security Advisor, wrote a memorandum to
			 President George W. Bush stating that a status-of-forces agreement with the
			 Government of Iraq should be negotiated over the next year; and</text>
		</whereas><whereas><text>Whereas United States Armed Forces currently operate under
			 status-of-forces agreements within the territory of Japan, South Korea, and
			 many other countries: Now, therefore, be it</text>
		</whereas></preamble>
	<resolution-body id="H9E6D44AA499F4B62BA63F6BD80973027" style="traditional">
		<section display-inline="yes-display-inline" id="H3777517671C74C20B323D2D2B000DA5E" section-type="undesignated-section"><enum></enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">That it is the sense of Congress
			 that—</text>
			<paragraph id="H3B412E9BC350451FBC11D61C81DF57C5"><enum>(1)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">the Government of the United States should
			 submit the Government of Iraq a draft bilateral status-of-forces agreement by
			 not later than June 1, 2007; and</text>
			</paragraph><paragraph id="H9CF033C01BD54E499FCC00B65077BAFA"><enum>(2)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">the draft status-of-forces agreement
			 should—</text>
				<subparagraph id="H9F1AA1DCC7394CE0B660AE20E3CB00D1"><enum>(A)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">address the sovereign rights of Iraq,
			 underlining that the United States is not an occupying power;</text>
				</subparagraph><subparagraph id="HE7E5CA5C23C4475DA28F2679E9F045C7"><enum>(B)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">subject to negotiation with the Government
			 of Iraq, address the legal status of United States personnel in Iraq, including
			 the rights of United States personnel in civil and criminal matters that are
			 subject to the jurisdiction of the Government of Iraq; and</text>
				</subparagraph><subparagraph id="H64CADBA54F2148D0A8849BABD575BC19"><enum>(C)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">subject to negotiation with the Government
			 of Iraq, establish primacy and coordinative mechanisms with respect to
			 investigations and operations involving United States and Iraqi forces,
			 including civilian police forces.</text>
				</subparagraph></paragraph></section></resolution-body>
</resolution>


