[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 84 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
107th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 84
To increase the unified estate and gift tax credit to exempt small
businesses and farmers from estate taxes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
January 22, 2001
Mr. Lugar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and
referred to the Committee on Finance
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To increase the unified estate and gift tax credit to exempt small
businesses and farmers from estate taxes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Farmer and Entrepreneur Estate Tax
Relief Act of 2001''.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) The economy of the United States cannot achieve strong,
sustained growth without adequate levels of savings to fuel
productive activity. Inadequate savings have been shown to lead
to lower productivity, stagnating wages and reduced standards
of living.
(2) Savings levels in the United States have steadily
declined over the past 25 years, and have lagged behind the
industrialized trading partners of the United States.
(3) These anemic savings levels have contributed to the
country's long-term downward trend in real economic growth,
which averaged close to 3.5 percent over the last 100 years but
has slowed to 2.4 percent over the past quarter century.
(4) Congress should work toward reforming the entire
Federal tax code to end its bias against savings.
(5) Repealing the estate and gift tax would contribute to
the goals of expanding savings and investment, boosting
entrepreneurial activity, and expanding economic growth. The
estate tax is harmful to the economy because of its high
marginal rates and its multiple taxation of income.
(6) The repeal of the estate tax would increase the growth
of the small business sector, which creates a majority of new
jobs in our Nation. Estimates indicate that as many as 70
percent of small businesses do not make it to a second
generation and nearly 90 percent do not make it to a third.
(7) Eliminating the estate tax would lift the compliance
burden from farmers and family businesses. On average, family-
owned businesses spent over $33,000 on accountants, lawyers,
and financial experts in complying with the estate tax laws
over a 6.5-year period.
(8) Abolishing the estate tax would benefit the
preservation of family farms. Nearly 95 percent of farms and
ranches are owned by sole proprietors or family partnerships,
subjecting most of this property to estate taxes upon the death
of the owner. Due to the capital intensive nature of farming
and its low return on investment, farmers are 15 times more
likely to be subject to estate taxes than other Americans.
(9) As the average age of farmers approaches 60 years, it
is estimated that a quarter of all farmers could confront the
estate tax over the next 20 years. The auctioning of these
productive assets to finance tax liabilities destroys jobs and
harms the economy.
(10) Abolishing the estate taxes would restore a measure of
fairness to our Federal tax system. Families should be able to
pass on the fruits of the labor to the next generation without
realizing a taxable event.
(11) Despite this heavy burden on entrepreneurs, farmers,
and our entire economy, estate and gift taxes collect only
about 1 percent of our Federal tax revenues. In fact, the
estate tax may not raise any revenue at all, because more
income tax is lost from individuals attempting to avoid estate
taxes than is ultimately collected at death.
(12) Repealing estate and gift taxes is supported by the
White House Conference on Small Business, the Kemp Commission
on Tax Reform, and 60 small business advocacy organizations.
SEC. 3. INCREASE IN UNIFIED ESTATE AND GIFT TAX CREDIT.
(a) In General.--The table in section 2010(c) of the Internal
Revenue Code (relating to applicable credit amount) is amended--
(1) by striking ``2002 and 2003'' and inserting ``2002 or
thereafter'',
(2) by striking ``$700,000'' and inserting ``$5,000,000'',
and
(3) by striking all matter beginning with the item relating
to 2004 through the end of the table.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall
apply to the estates of decedents dying, and gifts made, after December
31, 2001.
<all>