[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 570 Introduced in House (IH)]
107th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 570
To repeal the requirement relating to specific statutory authorization
for increases in judicial salaries, to provide for automatic annual
increases for judicial salaries, to provide for a 9.6 percent increase
in judicial salaries, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 13, 2001
Mrs. Biggert (for herself, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Thomas M. Davis of Virginia,
Mr. Frank, and Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut) introduced the following
bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To repeal the requirement relating to specific statutory authorization
for increases in judicial salaries, to provide for automatic annual
increases for judicial salaries, to provide for a 9.6 percent increase
in judicial salaries, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Judicial Fairness Act of
2001''.
SEC. 2. JUDICIAL COST-OF-LIVING INCREASES.
(a) Repeal of Statutory Requirement Relating to Judicial
Salaries.--Section 140 of the resolution entitled ``A Joint Resolution
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1982, and
for other purposes.'', approved December 15, 1981 (Public Law 97-92; 95
Stat. 1200; 28 U.S.C. 461 note), is repealed.
(b) Automatic Annual Increases.--Section 461(a) of title 28, United
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
``(a)(1) Subject to paragraph (2), effective on the first day of
the first applicable pay period beginning on or after January 1 of each
calendar year, each salary rate which is subject to adjustment under
this section shall be adjusted by an amount, rounded to the nearest
multiple of $100 (or if midway between multiples of $100, to the next
higher multiple of $100) equal to the percentage of such salary rate
which corresponds to the most recent percentage change in the ECI
(relative to the date described in the next sentence), as determined
under section 704(a)(1) of the Ethics Reform Act of 1989. The
appropriate date under this sentence is the first day of the fiscal
year that begins in the preceding calendar year.
``(2) In no event shall the percentage adjustment taking effect
under paragraph (1) in any calendar year (before rounding), in any
salary rate, exceed the percentage adjustment taking effect in such
calendar year under section 5303 of title 5 in the rates of pay under
the General Schedule.''.
(c) Judicial Salary Increases.--Effective on the first day of the
first applicable pay period that begins on or after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the rate of basic pay for the Chief Justice of
the United States, an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the
United States, a judge of a United States circuit court, a judge of a
district court of the United States, a judge of the United States Court
of International Trade, a bankruptcy judge, and a full-time magistrate
judge shall be increased in the amount of 9.6 percent of their
respective rates (as last in effect before the increase), rounded to
the nearest multiple of $100 (or, if midway between multiples of $100,
to the next higher multiple of $100).
SEC. 3. COORDINATION RULE.
If a pay adjustment under section 2 is to be made for an office or
position as of the same date as any other pay adjustment affecting such
office or position, the adjustment under section 2 shall be made first.
<all>